Automated clash detection and resolution system for 3-dimensional (3D) mechanical, electrical, plumbing and fire protection (MEPF) service models

Abstract

The present disclosure introduces an automated system designed for detecting and rectifying clashes in 3-dimensional (3D) mechanical, electrical, plumbing and fire protection (MEPF) service models. Comprising a computing device, the system receives a 3D model of a building project and various MEPF service models, including but not limited to HVAC, electrical, plumbing and fire protection services. An interconnected remote server, equipped with a non-transitory storage device, retains executable routines, a rule database with MEPF identifiers tied to specific rules and hierarchies, and a construction history database featuring 3D building templates depicting both clashed and resolved MEPF integrations. The central control unit retrieves the 3D models, constructs an AI model influenced by past construction data, and identifies clashes when overlaying the MEPF models on 3D depiction of the building. Post detection, the control unit employs AI-derived strategies to produce clash-free 3D models, which are subsequently displayed on the computing device.

Description

AUTOMATED CLASH DETECTION AND RESOLUTION SYSTEM FOR 3 -DIMENSIONAL (3D) MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING AND FIRE PROTECTION (MEPF) SERVICE MODELSTECHNICAL FIELD

[0001] The disclosure relates to architecture and construction, more specifically emphasizing the integration and conflict resolution of mechanical, electrical, plumbing and fire protection (MEPF) services in confined spaces like false ceilings.BACKGROUND

[0002] The construction of modern buildings involves a complex orchestration of various elements and systems, crucial among which are the mechanical, electrical, plumbing and fire protection (MEPF) systems. Each of the aforesaid systems serves essential roles: mechanical systems typically include heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC); electrical systems encompass wiring, outlets, and switches; plumbing systems involve piping, water supply, and waste removal; and fire protection system includes a fire sprinkler system, smoke detector, fire alarm control panel, flame detector, alarm and the like. In contemporary building projects, especially in commercial and high-rise residential buildings, the integration of the aforementioned systems is both a technical and spatial challenge, particularly within confined spaces such as the false ceilings.

[0003] False ceilings, used in various architectural designs, offer an aesthetic and functional purpose. They conceal infrastructure components, reduce room volume to aid heating or cooling efficiency, and can provide soundproofing benefits. However, the space above the ceilings becomes a densely packed maze of MEPF components. In the constrained spaces above false ceilings, there is a high chance for conflicts between the different systems, for instance, a ventilation duct might intersect with plumbing pipes, or electrical conduits might clash with HVAC components. Resolving such conflicts is essential to prevent system malfunctions and to facilitate easy maintenance.

[0004] In traditional building construction processes, MEPF systems were often planned to use two-dimensional (2D) drawings. While effective

[0005] for general planning, 2D drawings lack the spatial depth necessary for accurately identifying conflicts between systems, especially in the cramped and layered environment abovea false ceiling. The deficiency can lead to significant issues during the construction phase, such as the need for rework or redesign that can inflate costs, delay schedules, and lead to resource wastage.

[0006] The introduction of three-dimensional (3D) modeling in building construction, including techniques such as Building Information Modeling (BIM), has substantially improved the ability to plan and visualize the integration of MEPF services in buildings. Each specialist, be it a mechanical engineer, an electrical engineer, or a plumbing consultant, utilizes advanced modeling software to create a detailed digital representation of their part of the project. These models are crafted with precision, considering the unique specifications and requirements based on building requirement. However, the challenge arises when these individual models need to be integrated into a cohesive building plan. An architect or a dedicated BIM coordinator manually combines / aligns aforesaid models to create a comprehensive view of the entire project e.g., MEPF services model. The MEP services model allows a collaborative environment where different stakeholders can install different fittings pertinent to their specific needs, thereby enhancing coordination among them. During the alignment process, the combined model is scrutinized for "clashes," which are points where different systems intersect or interfere with each other, potentially causing functional conflicts or spatial issues. Identifying and resolving these clashes is a critical step to ensure seamless integration of all MEPF services, thereby enhancing the efficiency and safety of the building.

[0007] Upon the detection of clash within the integrated MEPF services model, the specialist responsible for the conflicting service revisits and modify 3D model accordingly. After the alteration, the altered model is then realigned with the other existing models to ensure congruence within the overall design framework. This realignment is part of an iterative process that is repeated as necessary. The cycle of detection, alteration, and realignment continues until a clash-free solution is achieved, ensuring that the mechanical, electrical, , plumbing and fire protection systems can coexist within the building's architecture without interference. However, even with advanced 3D modeling, identifying and resolving spatial conflicts in areas like false ceilings remains a significant challenge. Engineers must analyze the models to identify clashes, a process that can be both time-consuming and prone to human error. Each conflict identified needs to be evaluated, and a decision must be made whether to reroute plumbing, reshape ductwork, or relocateelectrical fixtures, all of which require careful consideration of the implications on system performance, safety, and accessibility.

[0008] The evolving complexity of buildings, driven by both architectural ambition and the need for sustainable, energy- efficient layouts, further compounds the aforesaid challenges. Modern buildings frequently incorporate advanced technology, and the integration of smart building systems or renewable energy technology can add additional layers of complexity to MEPF designing.

[0009] The challenges are not merely confined to the construction phase but extend into the operational life of the building. Poorly planned MEPF integrations can lead to increased maintenance costs, difficult access for repairs or upgrades, and safety hazards. Therefore, the planning and execution of MEPF integrations, particularly in constrained spaces like false ceilings, demand precision and an eye toward future maintenance and functionality.

[0010] The need for coordination and precise planning in MEPF systems integration highlights the significance of technological advancements in the related field. Effective integration of MEPF systems in confined spaces like false ceilings is crucial for the structural integrity, safety, and functional efficiency of modern buildings.SUMMARY

[0011] The aim of the present disclosure is to provide an automated clash detection and resolution system for the 3 -dimensional (3D) mechanical, electrical, plumbing and fire protection (MEPF) service models to minimize human intervention in clash detection. The aim of the disclosure is achieved by an automated clash detection and resolution system for the 3 -dimensional (3D) mechanical, electrical, plumbing and fire protection (MEPF) service models for resolving the clashes in 3D MEPF service models.

[0012] The present disclosure revolves around an automated system for detecting and resolving clashes in 3 -dimensional (3D) mechanical, electrical, plumbing and fire protection (MEPF) service models. The automated system integrates a computing device, receiving a 3D model of a building alongside multiple MEPF service models spanning from HVAC ductwork to building management system cabling. A connected remote server, featuring a non-transitory storage device, comprises executable routines, a rule database with MEPF service identifiers linked to rules and priority sequences, and a construction history database comprising varied 3D building templates. The 3D building templates exhibit both conflict-laden and conflict-resolvedversions of superimposed 3D model of building and 3D MEPF service models. The control unit of remote server retrieves the 3D models, crafts an artificial intelligence (Al) model influenced by the construction history database to discern clash resolution strategies, and pinpoints clashes when overlaying the MEPF models on 3D model of the building project. Following clash identification, the control unit harnesses the derived strategies to fashion clash-free 3D models, which are subsequently presented on the display of computing device. The disclosure promotes precision and efficiency in MEPF system integration within contemporary architectural layouts.

[0013] In an embodiment, the control unit refines the derived one or more strategies based on rule database to refine the one or more strategies to resolve the identified one or more clashes.

[0014] In an embodiment, the control unit receives, through the computing device, at least one alteration input against a selected clash free 3D model to generate one or more alternative clash free 3D models.

[0015] In an embodiment, the control unit sorts the generated clash free 3D models based on the predefined parameters.

[0016] In an embodiment, the control unit frames a summary report that comprises the details about the clashes and the corresponding resolutions.

[0017] In an embodiment, the control unit further enables automatic adjustments in the placement of MEPF services over the multiple planes within the generated clash free 3D model to optimize space utilization and avoid clashes.

[0018] In an embodiment, the control unit updates the at least one acquired 3D MEPF service model to provide an additional margin for the placement of MEPF services.

[0019] In an embodiment, the dimensions of the additional margin are customizable, allowing the users to specify the desired clearance based on project-specific requirements or local building standards.

[0020] In an embodiment, the control unit incorporates an augmented reality (AR) or a virtual reality (VR) capability, enhancing the visualization and understanding of MEPF service coordination in a 3D space.

[0021] In an embodiment, the control unit receives, through the computing device, an MEPF updation request to append the additional set of MEPF services to a preferred clash free 3D model.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0022] The summary above, as well as the following detailed description of illustrative embodiments, is better understood when read in conjunction with the appended drawings. For the purpose of illustrating the present disclosure, exemplary constructions of the disclosure are shown in the drawings. However, the present disclosure is not limited to specific methods and instrumentalities disclosed herein.

[0023] Embodiments of the present disclosure will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the following diagrams.

[0024] FIG. 1 illustrates an automated clash detection and resolution system for the 3- dimensional (3D) mechanical, electrical, plumbing and fire protection (MEPF) service models, in accordance with the embodiments of the present disclosure; and

[0025] FIG. 2 (FIG. 2Aand FIG. 2B) illustrates a clash laden scenario and a clash free scenario for the 3D MEPF service models, in accordance with the embodiments of the present disclosure.

[0026] FIG. 3 illustrates a step diagram for detecting and resolving clashes within 3D models of a building project and the multiple 3D MEPF service models, in accordance with the embodiments of the present disclosure.

[0027] FIG. 4 showcases a clash free 3D model, in accordance with the embodiments of the present disclosure.

[0028] FIG. 5 illustrates a user interface (UI) for a system that helps detect and resolve clashes in the 3D MEPF service models, in accordance with the embodiments of the present disclosure.

[0029] FIG. 6 presents a graphical user interface (GUI), to provide users with a detailed visual representation of the clashes that arise between the 3D MEPF service models, in accordance with the embodiments of the present disclosure.

[0030] FIG. 7 showcases a user-friendly interface to allow modifications on a selected clash- free 3D model, in accordance with the embodiments of present disclosure.

[0031] Fig. 8 illustrates a flow diagram of a method 800 for detecting and resolving clashes in 3-dimensional (3D) Mechanical, Electrical, plumbing and fire protection (MEPF) service models, in accordance with embodiment of present disclosure.DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS

[0032] Various objects, features, aspects and advantages of the inventive subject matter will become more apparent from the following detailed description of preferred embodiments, along with the accompanying drawing figures in which like numerals represent like components.

[0033] The following discussion provides many example embodiments of the inventive subject matter. Although each embodiment represents a single combination of inventive elements, the inventive subject matter is considered to include all possible combinations of the disclosed elements. Thus, if one embodiment comprises elements A, B, and C, and a second embodiment comprises elements B and D, then the inventive subject matter is also considered to include other remaining combinations of A, B, C, or D, even if not explicitly disclosed.

[0034] In some embodiments, the numbers expressing quantities of ingredients, properties such as concentration, reaction conditions, and so forth, used to describe and claim certain embodiments of the invention are to be understood as being modified in some instances by the term “about.” Accordingly, in some embodiments, the numerical parameters set forth in the written description and attached claims are approximations that can vary depending upon the desired properties sought to be obtained by a particular embodiment. In some embodiments, the numerical parameters should be construed in light of the number of reported significant digits and by applying ordinary rounding techniques. Notwithstanding that the numerical ranges and parameters setting forth the broad scope of some embodiments of the invention are approximations, the numerical values set forth in the specific examples are reported as precisely as practicable. The numerical values presented in some embodiments of the invention may contain certain errors necessarily resulting from the standard deviation found in their respective testing measurements.

[0035] As used in the description herein and throughout the claims that follow, the meaning of “a,” “an,” and “the” includes plural reference unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Also, as used in the description herein, the meaning of “in” includes “in” and “on” unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.

[0036] The recitation of ranges of values herein is merely intended to serve as a shorthand method of referring individually to each separate value falling within the range. Unless otherwise indicated herein, each individual value is incorporated into the specification as if it were individually recited herein. All methods described herein can be performed in any suitable order unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context. The use of any and all examples, or exemplary language (e.g. “such as”) provided with respect to certain embodiments herein is intended merely to better illuminate the invention and does not pose a limitation on thescope of the invention otherwise claimed. No language in the specification should be construed as indicating any non-claimed element essential to the practice of the invention.

[0037] Groupings of alternative elements or embodiments of the invention disclosed herein are not to be construed as limitations. Each group member can be referred to and claimed individually or in any combination with other members of the group or other elements found herein. One or more members of a group can be included in, or deleted from, a group for reasons of convenience and / or patentability. When any such inclusion or deletion occurs, the specification is herein deemed to contain the group as modified thus fulfilling the written description of all Markush groups used in the appended claims.

[0038] The following detailed description illustrates embodiments of the present disclosure and ways in which they can be implemented. Although some modes of carrying out the present disclosure have been disclosed, those skilled in the art would recognize that other embodiments for carrying out or practicing the present disclosure are also possible.

[0039] FIG. 1 illustrates an automated clash detection and resolution system 100 (interchangeably referred as system 100) for the 3 -dimensional (3D) mechanical, electrical, plumbing and fire protection (MEPF) service models, in accordance with the embodiments of the present disclosure. The system 100 comprises a computing device 102, a network interface 104, a remote server 106 and other known components of a service coordination unit. The system 100 functions as a BIM (Building Information Modelling) MEPF service auto coordinator. BIM, an advanced method employed to visualize and plan a building project in 3D, is revolutionized by capabilities of system 100. The system 100 streamlines the process of coordinating MEPF services within the architecture of the building project. By automating the aforesaid coordination, the system 100 ensures optimal placement of MEPF components, minimizing clashes and ensuring a smoother construction process.

[0040] In an embodiment, the computing device 102 receives a 3D model of the building project. The 3D model, offers a complete digital representation of the building project. The 3D model encompasses the architectural layout and the minute details of each component constituting the building project. Such details include, but are not limited to, the exact positioning and dimensions of walls, floors, ceilings, and other critical structural elements.

[0041] In an embodiment, the 3D model received by said computing device 102 typically includes representations of all fixtures, fittings, and finishes. The fixtures encompass the detailedmodeling of doors, windows, and fixed installations like cabinetry and bathroom fixtures. The 3D model also details the materials to be used, the textures, colors, and finishes, providing a nearly lifelike simulation of what the final building will embody.

[0042] In an embodiment, the computing device 102 receives two distinct 3D MEPF service models. The range of 3D MEPF service models compatible for receipt by said computing device 102 includes, but is not limited to, a heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) ductwork model, an electrical service model, a plumbing service model, a communication service model, an information technology (IT) service model, a fire suppression system model, an audio-visual system model, a security system model, and a building management system (BMS) cabling model.

[0043] In an embodiment, upon the receipt of any two models from the 3D MEPF service models, the computing device 102 is structured to manage and store the 3D MEPF service models. Each of the selected 3D MEPF service models is received in a format that is readily processed within the technical specifications of system 100. The 3D MEPF service models, once received by the computing device 102, accurately depict the spatial configuration and structural details pertinent to the corresponding MEPF services.

[0044] In an embodiment, the remote server 106 is operatively coupled to the computing device 102 through the network interface 104. The remote server 106 is equipped with a non- transitory storage device 108 configured to store a set of executable routines. The set of executable routines residing in the non-transitory storage device 108 are utilized for the automated clash detection and resolution pertaining to 3D MEPF service models within the building project. The executable routines are framed to process data received from the computing device 102, said data representing the 3D MEPF service models.

[0045] In another embodiment, upon receipt of the 3D MEPF service models from the computing device 102 through the network interface 104, the executable routines stored in the non-transitory storage device 108 are initiated. The routines are specifically configured to analyze the 3D MEPF service models to detect any clashes or conflicts within the 3D MEPF service models. Once clashes are detected, the executable routines are further responsible for providing solutions or recommendations to resolve the detected clashes.

[0046] In an embodiment, the non-transitory storage device 108 stores a rule database that includes multiple MEPF service identifiers, each of which corresponds to a set of rules and a priority order. The rule database facilitates the effective clash detection and resolution within the3D MEPF service models. Each MEPF service identifier within the rule database is associated with a distinct set of rules that provide specific guidelines for the proper and compliant placement and configuration of the corresponding MEPF service.

[0047] In an embodiment, the rule database also comprises the priority order, which establishes a sequence in which the MEPF services may be modified if clashes are detected within the 3D MEPF service models. The priority order serves as a guideline to determine the hierarchy of modifications when resolving conflicts, ensuring that modifications are executed in a manner that aligns with industry standards and government regulations. The priority order serves as a guideline to determine the hierarchy of modifications when resolving conflicts, ensuring that modifications are executed in a manner that aligns with industry standards and government regulations. The priority order might prioritize MEPF services that are critical for safety or are heavily regulated, such as fire suppression systems, over those that are less critical or less regulated. By following this hierarchy, system 100 can make informed decisions when modifying MEPF 3D models. An exemplary rule database is mentioned below in table. 1. As depicted, the HVAC system because of tedious design possesses least priority for being modified as compared to electrical systems that possesses the highest priority because of having ability to get modified easily.Table. 1

[0048] In an embodiment, the non-transitory storage device 108 stores a construction history database, comprising multiple 3D building templates, with each 3D building template being associated with specific characteristics. Specifically, a first template is stored, which incorporates a superimposed first 3D graphic model of a building along with multiple 3D MEPF service models, wherein at least two 3D MEPF service models within the first template are associated with at least one conflict. The conflict pertains to a defined location within the building (room, passage, etc.), wherein the said at least two 3D MEPF service models intersect and clash with each other.

[0049] In a preceding embodiment, the non-transitory storage device 108 retains a second template that is characterized by the superimposition of the same first 3D graphic model of the building, as observed in the first template, along with multiple updated 3D MEPF service models. Notably, the MEPF service models contained within the second template are free from the conflicts that were previously identified in the first template.

[0050] In an embodiment, the first template within the construction history database serves as a baseline reference, encapsulating a representation of initial MEPF system configuration of the building project. The aforesaid initial MEPF system configuration inherently comprises conflicts, as indicated by the intersection of at least two 3D MEPF service models within the first template.

[0051] In an embodiment, the system 100 resolves the conflicts by generating an updated configuration of the 3D MEPF service models. Said updated configuration is stored in the second template within the construction history database. The multiple updated 3D MEPF service modelscontained in the second template are adjusted and positioned to ensure they are devoid of any conflicts. The aforesaid adjustment, in effect, signifies that the MEPF service models present in the second template are arranged in a manner that eliminates any spatial overlap, thus mitigating clashes and discrepancies within the 3D MEPF service models. The transition from the first template to the second template represents all necessary changes made to solve design issues within a complex building project, thereby, ensuring that MEPF systems are integrated into the building design, without clash, in a way that is practical, efficient, and compliant with all necessary standards and regulations.

[0052] In an embodiment, the control unit 110 is operatively configured to acquire the 3D model of the building project and the at least two 3D MEPF service models from the computing device 102. The 3D model and 3D MEPF service models are retrieved for clash detection and resolution processes executed by the system 100. Upon acquisition, the control unit 110 ensures that the 3D model of the building project and the at least two 3D MEPF service models are made available for further processing. By being in possession of the requisite digital representations, the system 100 is configured for analysis, facilitating the detection and subsequent resolution of conflicts that may exist within the 3D MEPF service models and the 3D model of building project. The acquisition of 3D model and 3D MEPF service models is carried out in a run-time or near runtime manner through the network interface 104.

[0053] In a preceding embodiment, the control unit 110 superimposes each of the acquired 3D MEPF service models over the acquired 3D model of the building project. The superimposition ensures that the details of MEPF services are accurately mapped onto the broader framework of 3D model of the building project. For accurate superimposition, the control unit 110 aligns each of the 3D MEPF service models with the building's structural model in terms of scale, orientation, and reference points. This alignment ensures that when the MEPF 3D models are superimposed on the structural model, every component is in correct position as it would be in the physical world. The superimposition or integration process may follow a sequential approach, where the MEPF 3D models are added one by one, or a simultaneous approach, where all MEPF 3D models are imported and aligned at once. The chosen methodology may depend on the project's complexity and the preference of user. Each 3D MEPF service model can be treated as a separate layer within the combined superimposition. The layered approach allows for individual elements to be toggled on and off for better visibility and easier manipulation during the coordination process.Superimposition provides a comprehensive visualization of the project, giving stakeholders a clearer understanding of the scope and scale of the construction.

[0054] Upon successful superimposition, the control unit 110 identifies any possible clashes or inconsistencies among the 3D MEPF service models. The control unit analyze the superimposed models to identify points where different systems occupy the same space (hard clash), do not have required clearance (soft clash), or do not adhere to building codes (regulatory clash). By visualizing how different MEPF service 3D models interact in a shared space, potential clash can be identified and solved in the model before physical construction begins, saving time and resources. The identification process incorporates a rigorous comparison of spatial locations, orientations, and the specific geometries of each component contained within the 3D MEPF service models, which are compared against the corresponding features and design specifications of the acquired 3D model of the building project. The control unit 110 is passively overlaying images and is actively seeking anomalies that might disrupt the fluidity of the final construction layout. Instances arise where there are overlapping or intersecting components detected among the 3D MEPF service models. The aforesaid overlapping represents bottlenecks, areas where the MEPF services might interfere with one another or the overall building project. In such critical scenarios, said control unit 110 diligently registers the overlapping as clashes. The control unit 110 generates detailed reports listing each clash, along with its location and the systems involved. This reporting aids in tracking and resolving issues.

[0055] In an embodiment, the control unit 110 is devised to develop an artificial intelligence model. In the formation of such artificial intelligence model, the construction history database, stored in said non-transitory storage device 108, is utilized. By utilizing the historical construction data contained within the non-transitory storage device 108, patterns, trends, and correlations are discerned. The derived information is employed to derive one or more strategies adept at resolving clashes between the MEPF services.

[0056] In a preceding embodiment, the control unit 110 accesses and retrieves relevant data from said non-transitory storage device 108. Once the data is extracted, an analytical process is initiated wherein clashes between the MEPF service models are identified. By utilizing the artificial intelligence model, which is developed based on construction history database, one or more strategies for clash resolution are proposed. The proposed one or more strategies are thenstored in or retrieved from such non-transitory storage device 108 for future reference or immediate application.

[0057] In an embodiment, the control unit may utilize Al technique that utilizes information stored in construction history database to understand transformation processes / approaches used to resolved MEPF clashes. As construction history database comprises multiple 3D building templates, each consisting of a first template that includes conflicts between MEPF services and a second, conflict-free template. The Al technique analyzes changes made between these templates to understand and predict the necessary modifications for resolving clashes to develop one or more artificial intelligence models based to derive one or more strategies to resolve the clashes between the MEPF services. The Al technique can identify patterns in MEPF services, which led to clashes in past projects and recommend modifications like staggered layouts or service risers designed to avoid these repetitive issues. For instance, in a high-rise commercial complex project data of construction history database, the Al technique identifies a previously successful resolution strategy where the ductwork was re-routed above the electrical tray to resolve the conflict. In another example, based on data of hospital project the Al technique could develop strategy that requirement of uninterrupted access to critical services such as electricity and medical gases is paramount. In such cases, Al techniques can prioritize strategies that minimize disruptions to critical services. In contrast, for an indoor stadium Al technique may prioritize the efficient distribution of HVAC systems to ensure adequate air circulation throughout the seating area. Here, the Al would propose strategies that optimize ductwork layout for the unique spatial challenges of an open arena.

[0058] The Al models provide predictive insights by analyzing patterns and outcomes of clash resolutions from historical data. This predictive capability streamlines the resolution process and also aids in foreseeing potential conflicts before they materialize, thus enabling preemptive action. The derived one or more strategies to resolve the clashes may enable accurate and efficient planning of current project. Further, as the data of construction history database increases with integration of more 3D building templates, the Al's learning curve steepens, constantly improving ability to propose effective solutions. The dynamic learning process encapsulates the evolution of system 100 to provide one or more strategies to resolve the clashes between the MEPF services.

[0059] In an embodiment, the control unit 110 applies the derived one or more strategies to resolve the identified one or more clashes present in 3D MEPF service models. Upon receivinginformation pertaining to the detected clashes, the control unit 110 processes the received information in conjunction with the derived strategies. The control unit 110 applies AI- recommended strategies, such as rerouting or resizing, within the model to revise the 3D model while ensuring the new model remains functional and complies with relevant codes. Consider an instance where HVAC ducting and electrical conduits intersect in design. Al strategies might suggest rerouting the ducting or adjusting conduit placement, perhaps even altering their dimensions to avoid the clash. The complex nature clashes, the control unit 110 can prioritize clashes based on their impact on the project, complexity and any other parameters.

[0060] By utilizing Al technique, the control unit 110 ensures that the application of such strategies results in the resolution of the identified clashes. After the application of the aforesaid strategies, said control unit 110 generates one or more clash-free 3D models, which are devoid of any spatial or functional interferences that might compromise the integrity or functionality of the associated MEPF services. The generation of such clash-free 3D models by the control unit 110 aids in streamlining the design, planning, and construction processes, ensuring that the MEPF services can be efficiently integrated without conflicts.

[0061] In an embodiment, upon the generation of the clash free 3D models, the control unit 110 is further configured to render, onto the display of the computing device 102, the generated one or more clash free 3D models. In doing so, a visual representation of the 3D MEPF service models is provided in a manner that eliminates spatial conflicts among the individual MEPF services, ensuring that the MEPF services can be efficiently and correctly installed without physical interference. The display of the computing device 102 may be of various types, including but not limited to, light emitting diode (LED), liquid crystal display (LCD), organic light emitting diode (OLED), or other suitable display technologies, and may be of varying sizes and resolutions to accommodate different user needs. The rendering by said control unit 110 is performed using predefined set of routines and methods capable of effectively mapping the 3D space and visualizing the clash free configurations, thereby enabling stakeholders, such as engineers, architects, and contractors, to efficiently assess and finalize design decisions prior to the physical installation of the MEPF services. Each generated clash free 3D model facilitates easier collaboration among architects, engineers, and construction professionals, leading to a more integrated and holistic approach to building design and construction.

[0062] In an embodiment the control unit 110 may refine the derived one or more strategies for resolving identified clashes. Upon detection of the clashes, strategies for the resolution are initially derived. After the initial derivation, the control unit 110 accesses a rule database comprising guidelines provided by the government concerning the application and modification of 3D MEPF service models are stored. Additionally, the priority order for modification of the 3D MEPF service models is contained within such rule database. Based upon the guidelines and the priority order retrieved from the rule database, the control unit 110 refines the initially derived one or more strategies. Such refinement ensures that the derived one or more strategies for resolving the identified clashes are in compliance with the governmental guidelines and adhere to the specified priority order for modification. By incorporating governmental guidelines into the refinement process, the control unit 110 ensures that all resolved clashes meet legal and safety standards, which is critical for obtaining construction approvals and avoiding legal liabilities. Further, adherence to priority order for modifications, as defined in rule database, standardizes the resolution process across projects can be achieved. By implementing refined strategy, control unit 110 can enable alignment of modification with regulatory guideline to minimize requirement for future changes, which could arise from compliance issues detected at later project stages or during inspections. By prioritizing modifications through refined resolution strategies the control unit 110 facilitates an optimal sequence of actions, thereby minimizing wasted effort and resources. Simultaneously, the refined strategies reduces the risk of project delays and cost overruns by ensuring that the project progresses in full compliance with regulations from the outset. By ensuring that strategies are compliant from the initial stages of the project, the need for expensive retroactive alterations due to non-compliance is greatly reduced, leading to cost savings.

[0063] In an exemplary aspect, consider a scenario wherein the 3D MEPF service model of HVAC clashes with the 3D MEPF service models of electrical wiring, plumbing and fire protection. In accordance with the priority order, the control unit 110 refines the resolution strategies such that if a clash occurs between the 3D MEPF service model of HVAC, 3D MEPF service models of electrical wiring and 3D MEPF service models of plumbing, the electrical wiring may be modified first, given the easy modifiability. After the adjustment of the electrical wiring, modifications may be made to the plumbing. The HVAC system, despite clash, is preferably not immediately modified due to greater challenges associated with the modification.

[0064] In an embodiment, the control unit 110, through the interfacing with the computing device 102, may receive at least one alteration input pertaining to the selected clash free 3D model. Following the receipt of the at least one alteration input, the control unit 110, employing the inbuilt processing capabilities, modify the selected clash free 3D model in accordance with the provided alteration input. As a result of such manipulation, adjustment, or modification, one or more alternative clash free 3D models are generated by the control unit 110. The alternative clash free 3D models, once generated, can be stored, displayed, or further processed as deemed necessary by the system or user. The generation of the alternative clash free 3D models ensures that any modifications or adjustments made to the selected clash free 3D model not result in spatial clashes or conflicts, especially within the context of 3D MEPF service models, thereby ensuring the integrity and clash- free nature of the produced 3D models. In an embodiment, the system 100 can be designed to recognize and differentiate user inputs based on user profiles, which may contain specific information about the user's role, expertise, and historical alteration patterns, which can influence alteration nature and requirement. For instance, electrical engineer might suggest modifications to the routing of conduits, while a plumber might suggest changes to pipe sizes or routes. The control unit 110 can weigh these inputs based on the professional domain of the user profile, potentially applying different validation rules or priorities in response. As control unit 110 can adapt tailor modifications based on user profiles allows for more precise and relevant alterations to the models

[0065]

[0066] In an embodiment, the control unit 110 may execute a sorting operation on the generated clash-free 3D models of the MEPF services. Upon the successful identification and resolution of clashes within the said 3D MEPF service models, the control unit 110 proceeds to classify and arrange the resulting clash-free 3D models in an orderly manner. The aforesaid classification and arrangement are based on predefined parameters which may include, but are not limited to, spatial hierarchy, integration priority, or installation sequencing. The predefined parameters are set and embedded within the operational logic of said control unit 110 to ensure that the sorting process aligns with the specified requirements of the building project. The control unit 110 ensures that the clash-free 3D models are readily accessible and are presented in a sequence that facilitates efficient project execution and management. The sorting technique, which is an integral part of the operation of control unit 110, is coded to handle large datasets, therebyaccommodating the 3D MEPF service models that are commonplace in large-scale construction projects. Furthermore, the sorting process by such control unit 110 is executed in a manner that minimizes the time required for project stakeholders to locate and utilize the relevant 3D models, thereby significantly enhancing the workflow and reducing the time to project completion.

[0067] In an embodiment, the control unit 110 may frame a summary report, comprising detailed accounts of detected clashes within the 3D MEPF service models, as well as the corresponding resolutions thereto. Upon execution of the set of routines, each identified interference between elements within the 3D MEPF models is registered and categorized by the control unit 110. After the clash detection phase, resolution protocols are engaged, wherein optimal resolution strategies are determined and applied to each of the previously identified clashes. The aforesaid strategies are devised in accordance with a predetermined set of rules and parameters, which have been preinstalled into the non- transitory storage device 108. Upon successful resolution of clashes, the control unit 110 aggregates the clash data along with the resolution details into the summary report, ensuring that each clash, along with the resolved state, is documented in a clear, methodical format for ease of review and verification by the user. Additionally, the summary report generated by the control unit 110 is structured to facilitate a seamless integration into further project management and documentation. The summary report hence serves as a record of efficacy of the system 100 in resolving spatial interferences within the 3D MEPF models and acts as a vital communication tool that provides actionable insights, aiding in the decision-making process for future design adjustments and implementations.

[0068] In an embodiment, the control unit 110 may enable the automatic adjustments in the placement of MEPF services over multiple planes within the generated clash free 3D model. Upon detection of clashes or upon the identification of an opportunity to optimize space utilization within the 3D model, adjustments to the MEPF service placements are executed by such control unit 110. The adjustments are made with a primary objective to prevent any spatial conflicts between the MEPF services and other modelled entities, while also ensuring maximum efficient use of the available space within the 3D model. The automated adjustment process utilizes a predefined set of routines and criteria, based on which, the control unit 110 dictates the manner and extent of the adjustments to be executed on the MEPF placement of services over multiple planes within the 3D space. Further, optimization parameters can be input into the control unit 110, influencing the automatic adjustments, thereby tailoring the adjustments to specific project needs or objectives.

[0069] In an embodiment, upon receiving data indicative of the positions, dimensions, and orientations of various MEPF services within the 3D space, the control unit 110 may process such data and introduce modifications thereto, whereby an additional margin for the placement of the MEPF services is provisioned. The introduction of the additional margin by the control unit 110 ensures an enhanced buffer or clearance space surrounding the MEPF services, thereby preemptively reducing the probability for clashes or interferences between the services. By implementing the accommodation of additional margin, the resultant 3D MEPF service model, as modified by the control unit 110, exhibits augmented spatial allowances to facilitate the integration and placement of MEPF services in a manner that inherently mitigates the risk of spatial conflicts. The set of routines executed by the control unit 110, in the context of the update, are driven by predefined criteria or parameters that dictate the extent, shape, and orientation of the additional margins to be introduced. Furthermore, based on the complexity, density, and arrangement of the MEPF services in the acquired 3D model, the control unit 110 dynamically adjusts the magnitude of the additional margin, ensuring optimal space utilization and strategic positioning of the MEPF services.

[0070] In an embodiment, the control unit 110 provides provision for the customization of the dimensions of the additional margin integrated into the clash free 3D model. By the control unit 110, users are facilitated to adjust and specify the desired clearance dimensions, enabling a tailored fit to either the distinct stipulations of the building project or to adhere to predetermined regional or local building standards and codes. Through such configurability enabled by said control unit 110, the system 100 inherently enable enhanced flexibility to the users, allowing for adjustments in the clash detection process to accommodate varied spatial requirements and ensuring that the resulting 3D MEPF service models are both in compliance with the standards set forth by local authorities and are optimized for the specific spatial constraints of the individual project.

[0071] In an embodiment, an augmented reality (AR) capability or a virtual reality (VR) capability may be incorporated into said control unit 110. By virtue of AR or VR incorporation, the visualization and understanding of MEPF service coordination in a 3D space are enhanced. The AR or VR capability provides a more immersive and interactive experience for users, enabling them to visualize clashes and resolutions within the MEPF models with greater clarity and precision. Through the immersive visualization provided by said control unit 110, complex MEPF configurations are rendered in a manner that can be intuitively comprehended and navigated.Furthermore, the control unit 110 facilitates real-time interaction within the AR or VR environment, empowering users to inspect and analyze the 3D MEPF service models from various angles and perspectives in the 3D space. Such capability aids in detecting and resolving clashes, as well as in planning and coordinating the installation and maintenance of MEPF services. The integration of AR or VR capabilities into said control unit 110 ensures that users are provided with a more robust toolset for managing and optimizing MEPF service configurations in 3D models, thereby reducing errors, saving time, and improving overall efficiency in the execution of MEPF projects.

[0072] In an embodiment, the control unit 110 may receive, via the computing device 102, an MEPF updation request that appends an additional set of MEPF services to a specific clash free 3D model. Upon reception of the MEPF updation request, the control unit 110 is further configured to analyze the designated clash free 3D model to identify optimal locations for the integration of the additional set of MEPF services. In doing so, the integrity and clash-free nature of the existing 3D model are maintained, ensuring that no inadvertent clashes are introduced due to the addition of the new set of MEPF services. Further, the integration process performed by the control unit 110 takes into consideration various parameters and constraints, ensuring that the appended MEPF services seamlessly fit within the spatial confines of the existing 3D model while preserving the utility and functionality of both the existing and newly added services. Furthermore, the process managed by the control unit 110 enables users, through the computing device 102, to review the proposed locations for the appended MEPF services, thereby providing an avenue for manual adjustments or modifications, if desired. Once the additional set of MEPF services is successfully integrated into the clash free 3D model, confirmation notifications are generated by the control unit 110 and communicated to the user via the computing device 102, signifying the successful updation of the clash free 3D model.

[0073] FIG. 2 illustrates a clash laden scenario and a clash free scenario for the 3D MEPF service models, in accordance with the embodiments of the present disclosure. FIG. 2A illustrates a scenario depicting at least two clashes between the 3D MEPF service models when superimposed over 3D model of the building project, in accordance with the embodiments of the present disclosure. Such clashes, when present, pose significant challenges during construction, leading to increased costs, delays, and layout modifications. However, transitioning to FIG. 2B, a markedly contrasting scenario is illustrated. Here, following the utilization of clash detection and resolutioncapabilities of system 100, the previously identified clashes from FIG. 2A have been effectively addressed and resolved. Therefore, the resulting image in FIG. 2B showcases an integrated layout wherein the 3D MEPF service models seamlessly overlay the 3D model of building without any observable conflicts. The transition from FIG. 2A to FIG. 2B highlights the proficiency and effectiveness of system 100 in identifying and mitigating design discrepancies and highlights the capacity of system 100 in streamlining construction processes, minimizing project delays, and fostering a more efficient and error-free building design phase.

[0074] FIG. 3 illustrates a step diagram for detecting and resolving clashes within 3D models of a building project and the multiple 3D MEPF service models, in accordance with the embodiments of the present disclosure. Commencing with step SI, the system initiates by receiving the 3D model of the building project and multiple 3D MEPF service models. Progressing to step S2, as illustrated by an arrow, the control unit 110 acquires the 3D model of building project and at least two MEPF service models from the computing device 102, allowing for the further analysis of clashes. In step S3, the system develops an artificial intelligence model purposed to discern strategies apt for resolving detected MEPF clashes, a significant advancement in minimizing human errors. Subsequently, step S4 involves superimposing each MEPF service model over the 3D model of building, an action that identifies regions where MEPF systems clashes with each other. Once the clashes are pinpointed, step S5 demonstrates the capability of system to apply the previously derived Al-based strategies, aiming to produce updated, clash-free 3D models. The step S6 involves rendering and sending these clash-free 3D models onto a display of computing device 102, allowing users to visualize a seamless integration of MEPF services within the building project, ensuring efficient planning and subsequent construction phases.

[0075] FIG. 4 showcases a clash free 3D model, in accordance with the embodiments of the present disclosure. FIG. 4 introduces a unique "arm around" approach, a strategic modification implemented to counteract potential clashes in the MEPF services. As per the depiction, an initial pipe is dissected at two distinct points, termed as the first and second cut lines. The intervention paves the way for the introduction of a bypass mechanism. Originating from the first cut line, a perpendicular segment is extended, laying the groundwork for a subsequent parallel section. The parallel section, often denoted as the "moved pipe" segment, tactfully traces the trajectory of the original pipe, adeptly navigating past any clashing. Ultimately, the rerouted section intersects with a second perpendicular segment, which seamlessly merges back with the original pipe at thesecond cut line. The rerouting ensures that the original pipe, albeit modified, successfully reaches the predetermined endpoint without any clashing.

[0076] FIG. 5 illustrates a user interface (UI) for a system that helps detect and resolve clashes in the 3D MEPF service models, in accordance with the embodiments of the present disclosure. After receiving the 3D design of the building project, user can easily add various 3D MEPF design models using simple tabs on the UI. Once the 3D MEPF design models are added, the system 100 checks for any clashes. If found, the system 100 resolves the clashes and generates one or more clash free 3D models. The UI is made to be easy to use, so even those not expert in the field can navigate and make the most of the features. The system 100 ensures that before any physical construction of the building project starts, clashes are spotted and dealt with, saving time and money.

[0077] FIG. 6 presents a graphical user interface (GUI), to provide users with a detailed visual representation of the clashes that arise between the 3D MEPF service models, in accordance with the embodiments of the present disclosure. The GUI, can be an interactive dashboard designed to provide in-depth insights into the clashing parameters. As depicted, the GUI highlights several critical clashing metrics, giving users an unrivaled clarity into the details of 3D model. Among the clashing parameters, the precise location of each clash is spotlighted, allowing users to pinpoint exact problematic zones swiftly. The clashing metrics is further supplemented with detailed clashing values, quantitative measures that capture the magnitude of each interference, offering a granular breakdown of the clashes. Additionally, the GUI features a "clashing status" component, an indicator that keeps users apprised of the current state of each clash - be it resolved, pending, or escalated.

[0078] FIG. 7 showcases a user-friendly interface to allow modifications on a selected clash- free 3D model, in accordance with the embodiments of present disclosure. The system generates varied clash-free 3D designs that align with the requirements of the user. The interface, titled modify selected pipes, offers the multiple adjustment options. Users can categorize pipes, select materials, define diameters, and even choose specific end finishes. The interface serves as a safeguard, ensuring any alterations adhere to the foundational design parameters and avoid potential clashes. Visual adjustments like color and width are also available for an enhanced user experience. By providing such diverse modification tools, the system 100 ensures bothfunctionality and customization, letting users generate multiple 3D models without compromising on the clash-free guarantee.

[0079] Fig. 8 illustrates a flow diagram of a method 800 for detecting and resolving clashes in 3 -dimensional (3D) Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing and Fire protection (MEPF) service models, in accordance with embodiment of present disclosure. The method 800 comprises following steps:

[0080] Step 802 involves receiving a 3D model of a building project along with at least two 3D MEPF service (e.g., HVAC, electrical, plumbing and fire protection installation) models at a computing device (like a computer or server) from a user (e.g., architect, MEPF service engineer etc.) to enable the integration of comprehensive building data into a single computing platform, facilitating analysis and coordination. For construction projects require extensive computational resources to process complex models and simulations. A remote server, with superior processing capabilities, can handle these calculations more efficiently than local devices. The centralized server allows multiple stakeholders, such as architects, engineers, and construction managers, to access and work on the same set of data to foster better collaboration and coordination among different teams, which is essential for the timely and successful completion of complex projects.

[0081] Step 804 involves utilizing a remote server connected to the computing device via a network interface (e.g., WIFI, telecommunication network etc.). The server contains a non- transitory storage device for storing executable routines and a rule database with multiple MEPF service identifiers, each corresponding to a set of rules and a priority order. The storage device also includes a construction history database with multiple 3D building templates. The remote server (e.g., cloud-based server) provides centralized data storage and processing power, essential for handling complex calculations and storing extensive rule sets and templates.

[0082] Step 806 involves acquiring the 3D model of the building project and the MEPF service models from the computing device at a control unit. Step 808 involves superimposing each acquired 3D MEPF service model over the acquired 3D model of the building project to identify clashes. The superimposing involves overlaying the 3 -dimensional models of Mechanical, Electrical, plumbing and fire protection (MEPF) systems onto the 3D architectural model of building to determine where components of different systems might clash. For example, a duct from the HVAC system might be occupying the same space as a water pipe from the plumbing system or interfering with the electrical wiring routes. Superimposition allows for precisealignment of models, enabling accurate detection of spatial conflicts, which is crucial in complex structures where even small misalignments can cause significant issues. Determination of clashes enables engineers and architects to see exactly where conflicts occur and to brainstorm solutions effectively.

[0083] Step 810 encompasses developing an artificial intelligence model based on the construction history database to derive strategies for resolving the clashes. The Al technique utilizes pattern recognition and learning from historical data (includes previous project models, resolved clashes, and applied strategies), which can predict and solve complex clash scenarios. Over time, the Al model learns from new data and outcomes, continuously improving recommendations and problem solving capacity such that method 800 becomes more effective and efficient with each project. In an exemplary case, a tailored Al model can be developed for resolving clashes by considering the specific context and requirements of each project to meet demand of specific nature of project. For instance, in a large hospital construction project with intricate MEPF requirements, an Al system plays a crucial role in optimizing the design process. The Al analyzes historical data (e.g., historical data from previous hospital construction projects stored in its construction history database) to identify common issues such as the conflict between extensive HVAC systems and electrical wiring needed for medical equipment. Utilizing this analysis, Al model can understand specific adjustments like rerouting electrical conduits and modifying HVAC duct layouts in critical areas, particularly where imaging equipment will be installed. The recommendations, drawn from successful strategies in past projects, lead to a customized, clash-free MEPF design tailored to the hospital's unique needs.

[0084] Step 812 includes applying the derived strategies to resolve the identified clashes and generate clash-free 3D models. This step involves the Utilization of identified strategies, to provide optimum resolution for each of identified clashes. The strategies derived from Al analysis or other means are applied specifically to each identified clash point in the MEPF models to address each conflict is in efficient and effective manner, based on the unique characteristics of each clash. By applying tailored solutions, method 800 of present disclosure reduces the likelihood of errors that can arise from generic or one-size-fits-all solutions. For example, commercial building project where the initial MEPF models show clashes between the air conditioning ducts and the ceilingmounted lighting system. The derived strategies suggest two key changes: firstly, slightly reducing the size of the ducts in critical areas to avoid interference with the lighting system, and secondly,altering the path of some lighting wires to run alongside, rather than across, the ducts. These specific adjustments are then implemented in the 3D models. The reduced duct size is accounted for in the HVAC model, and the lighting system's layout is updated in the electrical model. As result, the final 3D model shows no clashes between the air conditioning and lighting systems. This clash-free model provides a clear and accurate guide for the construction team, reducing the risk of on-site issues and delays. The final step 814 involves rendering the generated clash-free 3D models onto the display of the computing device.

[0085] In an aspect, Al technique may be selected from any or a combination of machine learning mechanisms such as decision tree learning, Bayesian network, deep learning, random forest, supervised vector machines, reinforcement learning, prediction models, Statistical Algorithms, Classification, Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machines, Linear Discriminant Analysis, K-Nearest Neighbours, Decision Trees, Random Forests, Regression, Linear Regression, Support Vector Regression, Logistic Regression, Ridge Regression, Partial Least-Squares Regression, Non-Linear Regression, Clustering, Hierarchical Clustering - Agglomerative, Hierarchical Clustering - Divisive, K-Means Clustering, K-Nearest Neighbours Clustering, EM (Expectation Maximization) Clustering, Principal Components Analysis Clustering (PCA), Dimensionality Reduction, Non-Negative Matrix Factorization (NMF), Kernel PCA, Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), Generalized Discriminant Analysis (kernel trick again), Ensemble Algorithms, Deep Learning, Reinforcement Learning, AutoML (Bonus) and the like can be employed to learn sensor / hardware components.

[0086] The foregoing description of the specific embodiments will so fully reveal the general nature of the embodiments herein that others can, by applying current knowledge, readily modify and / or adapt for various applications such specific embodiments without departing from the generic concept, and, therefore, such adaptations and modifications should and are intended to be comprehended within the meaning and range of equivalents of the disclosed embodiments. It is to be understood that the phraseology or terminology employed herein is for the purpose of description and not of limitation. Therefore, while the embodiments herein have been described in terms of preferred embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that the embodiments herein can be practiced with modification within the spirit and scope of the embodiments as described herein.

[0087] It should be apparent to those skilled in the art that many more modifications besides those already described are possible without departing from the inventive concepts herein. The inventive subject matter, therefore, is not to be restricted except in the spirit of the appended claims. Moreover, in interpreting both the specification and the claims, all terms should be interpreted in the broadest possible manner consistent with the context. In particular, the terms “comprises” and “comprising” should be interpreted as referring to elements, components, or steps in a non-exclusive manner, indicating that the referenced elements, components, or steps may be present, or utilized, or combined with other elements, components, or steps that are not expressly referenced. Where the specification claims refer to at least one of something selected from the group consisting of A, B, C ... and N, the text should be interpreted as requiring only one element from the group, not A plus N, or B plus N, etc.CLAIMSWhat is claimed is:1. A clash detection and resolution system for the 3 -dimensional (3D) mechanical, electrical, plumbing and fire protection (MEPF) service models, the system comprising: a computing device receives: a 3-dimensional (3D) model of a building project; and at least two 3D MEPF service models of the MEPF services, wherein the at least two 3D MEPF service models are selected from a heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) ductwork, an electrical service, a plumbing service, a communication service, an information technology (IT) service, a fire suppression system, an audio-visual system, a security system, and a building management system (BMS) cabling; a remote server coupled to the computing device via a network interface, wherein the remote server comprises: a non-transitory storage device to store: a set of executable routines; a rule database comprising: the multiple MEPF service identifiers, wherein each of the MEPF service identifier corresponds to a set of rules and a priority order; and a construction history database comprising multiple 3D building templates, wherein each of the 3D building template is associated with: a first template comprising a superimposed first 3D graphic model of building and the multiple 3D MEPF service models, wherein the at least two 3D MEPF service models are associated with at least one conflict that defines a location at which the at least two 3D MEPF service models clash with each other; a second template comprising the superimposed first 3D graphic model of building and the multiple updated 3D MEPF service models, which are free from the conflicts; a control unit:acquires the 3D model of the building project and the at least two 3D MEPF service models from the computing device; superimpose each of the acquired 3D MEPF service model over the acquired 3D model of the building project to identify one or more clashes between the acquired multiple 3D MEPF service models; develop an artificial intelligence model based on the construction history database to derive one or more strategies to resolve the clashes between the MEPF services; apply the derived one or more strategies to resolve the identified one or more clashes to generate one or more clash free 3D models; and render onto a display of computing device, the generated one or more clash free 3D models. The system of claim 1 , wherein the control unit refines the derived one or more strategies based on rule database. The system of claim 1, wherein the control unit receives, through the computing device, at least one alteration input against a selected clash free 3D model to generate one or more alternative clash free 3D models. The system of claim 3, wherein the control unit sorts the generated clash free 3D models based on a predefined parameter. The system of claim 1, wherein the control unit frames a summary report that comprises the details about the clashes and the corresponding resolutions. The system of claim 1, wherein the control unit further enables automatic adjustments in the placement of MEPF services over the multiple planes within the generated clash free 3D model to optimize space utilization and avoid clashes. The system of claim 6, wherein the control unit update the at least one acquired 3D MEPF service model to provide an additional margin for the placement of MEPF services. The system of claim 7, wherein the dimensions of the additional margin are customizable, allowing the users to specify the desired clearance based on project-specific requirements or local building standards.The system of claim 1, wherein the control unit incorporates an augmented reality (AR) or a virtual reality (VR) capability, enhancing the visualization and understanding of MEPF service coordination in a 3D space. The system of claim 1, wherein the control unit receives, through the computing device, an MEPF updation request to append the additional set of MEPF services to a preferred clash free 3D model. A method for detecting clash and resolving the 3-dimensional (3D) mechanical, electrical, plumbing and fire protection (MEPF) service models, the method comprising: receiving, at a computing device: a 3 -dimensional (3D) model of a building project; and at least two 3D MEPF service models of the MEPF services, wherein the at least two 3D MEPF service models are selected from a heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) ductwork, an electrical service, a plumbing service, a communication service, an information technology (IT) service, a fire suppression system, an audio-visual system, a security system, and a building management system (BMS) cabling; utilizing, a remote server coupled to the computing device via a network interface, wherein the remote server comprises: a non-transitory storage device to store: a set of executable routines; a rule database comprising: the multiple MEPF service identifiers, wherein each of the MEPF service identifier corresponds to a set of rules and a priority order; and a construction history database comprising multiple 3D building templates, wherein each of the 3D building template is associated with: a first template comprising a superimposed first 3D graphic model of building and the multiple 3D MEPF service models, wherein the at least two 3D MEPF service models are associated with at least one conflict that defines a location at which the at least two 3D MEPF service models clash with each other;a second template comprising the superimposed first 3D graphic model of building and the multiple updated 3D MEPF service models, which are free from the conflicts; acquiring, at a control unit, the 3D model of the building project and the at least two 3D MEPF service models from the computing device; superimposing, each of the acquired 3D MEPF service model over the acquired 3D model of the building project to identify one or more clashes between the acquired multiple 3D MEPF service models; developing, an artificial intelligence model based on the construction history database to derive one or more strategies to resolve the clashes between the MEPF services; applying, the derived one or more strategies to resolve the identified one or more clashes to generate one or more clash free 3D models; and rendering, onto a display of computing device, the generated one or more clash free 3D models.AUTOMATED CLASH DETECTION AND RESOLUTION SYSTEM FOR 3 -DIMENSIONAL (3D) MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING AND FIRE PROTECTION (MEPF)SERVICE MODELSABSTRACTThe present disclosure introduces an automated system designed for detecting and rectifying clashes in 3 -dimensional (3D) mechanical, electrical, plumbing and fire protection (MEPF) service models. Comprising a computing device, the system receives a 3D model of a building project and various MEPF service models, including but not limited to HVAC, electrical, plumbing and fire protection services. An interconnected remote server, equipped with a non-transitory storage device, retains executable routines, a rule database with MEPF identifiers tied to specific rules and hierarchies, and a construction history database featuring 3D building templates depicting both clashed and resolved MEPF integrations. The central control unit retrieves the 3D models, constructs an Al model influenced by past construction data, and identifies clashes when overlaying the MEPF models on 3D depiction of the building. Post detection, the control unit employs Al-derived strategies to produce clash-free 3D models, which are subsequently displayed on the computing device.Fig. 1

Claims

CLAIMSWhat is claimed is:

1. A clash detection and resolution system for the 3 -dimensional (3D) mechanical, electrical, plumbing and fire protection (MEPF) service models, the system comprising: a computing device receives: a 3-dimensional (3D) model of a building project; and at least two 3D MEPF service models of the MEPF services, wherein the at least two 3D MEPF service models are selected from a heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) ductwork, an electrical service, a plumbing service, a communication service, an information technology (IT) service, a fire suppression system, an audio-visual system, a security system, and a building management system (BMS) cabling; a remote server coupled to the computing device via a network interface, wherein the remote server comprises: a non-transitory storage device to store: a set of executable routines; a rule database comprising: the multiple MEPF service identifiers, wherein each of the MEPF service identifier corresponds to a set of rules and a priority order; and a construction history database comprising multiple 3D building templates, wherein each of the 3D building template is associated with: a first template comprising a superimposed first 3D graphic model of building and the multiple 3D MEPF service models, wherein the at least two 3D MEPF service models are associated with at least one conflict that defines a location at which the at least two 3D MEPF service models clash with each other; a second template comprising the superimposed first 3D graphic model of building and the multiple updated 3D MEPF service models, which are free from the conflicts; a control unit:acquires the 3D model of the building project and the at least two 3D MEPF service models from the computing device; superimpose each of the acquired 3D MEPF service model over the acquired 3D model of the building project to identify one or more clashes between the acquired multiple 3D MEPF service models; develop an artificial intelligence model based on the construction history database to derive one or more strategies to resolve the clashes between the MEPF services; apply the derived one or more strategies to resolve the identified one or more clashes to generate one or more clash free 3D models; and render onto a display of computing device, the generated one or more clash free 3D models.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the control unit refines the derived one or more strategies based on rule database.

3. The system of claim 1, wherein the control unit receives, through the computing device, at least one alteration input against a selected clash free 3D model to generate one or more alternative clash free 3D models.

4. The system of claim 3, wherein the control unit sorts the generated clash free 3D models based on a predefined parameter.

5. The system of claim 1, wherein the control unit frames a summary report that comprises the details about the clashes and the corresponding resolutions.

6. The system of claim 1, wherein the control unit further enables automatic adjustments in the placement of MEPF services over the multiple planes within the generated clash free 3D model to optimize space utilization and avoid clashes.

7. The system of claim 6, wherein the control unit update the at least one acquired 3D MEPF service model to provide an additional margin for the placement of MEPF services.

8. The system of claim 7, wherein the dimensions of the additional margin are customizable, allowing the users to specify the desired clearance based on project-specific requirements or local building standards.

9. The system of claim 1, wherein the control unit incorporates an augmented reality (AR) or a virtual reality (VR) capability, enhancing the visualization and understanding of MEPF service coordination in a 3D space.

10. The system of claim 1, wherein the control unit receives, through the computing device, an MEPF updation request to append the additional set of MEPF services to a preferred clash free 3D model.

11. A method for detecting clash and resolving the 3-dimensional (3D) mechanical, electrical, plumbing and fire protection (MEPF) service models, the method comprising: receiving, at a computing device: a 3 -dimensional (3D) model of a building project; and at least two 3D MEPF service models of the MEPF services, wherein the at least two 3D MEPF service models are selected from a heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) ductwork, an electrical service, a plumbing service, a communication service, an information technology (IT) service, a fire suppression system, an audio-visual system, a security system, and a building management system (BMS) cabling; utilizing, a remote server coupled to the computing device via a network interface, wherein the remote server comprises: a non-transitory storage device to store: a set of executable routines; a rule database comprising: the multiple MEPF service identifiers, wherein each of the MEPF service identifier corresponds to a set of rules and a priority order; and a construction history database comprising multiple 3D building templates, wherein each of the 3D building template is associated with: a first template comprising a superimposed first 3D graphic model of building and the multiple 3D MEPF service models, wherein the at least two 3D MEPF service models are associated with at least one conflict that defines a location at which the at least two 3D MEPF service models clash with each other;a second template comprising the superimposed first 3D graphic model of building and the multiple updated 3D MEPF service models, which are free from the conflicts; acquiring, at a control unit, the 3D model of the building project and the at least two 3D MEPF service models from the computing device; superimposing, each of the acquired 3D MEPF service model over the acquired 3D model of the building project to identify one or more clashes between the acquired multiple 3D MEPF service models; developing, an artificial intelligence model based on the construction history database to derive one or more strategies to resolve the clashes between the MEPF services; applying, the derived one or more strategies to resolve the identified one or more clashes to generate one or more clash free 3D models; and rendering, onto a display of computing device, the generated one or more clash free 3D models.29

Images