An insecticidal composition and thereof

Abstract

The present disclosures presents a insecticidal composition comprising a combination of active ingredients, Spiromesifen, abamectin, and Fipronil and methods of preparing and using such compositions. The present disclosure aims to provide enhanced control of a variety of insect pests affecting crops, with a synergistic effect that improves efficacy compared to individual components.

Description

[0001] AN INSECTICIDAL COMPOSITION AND THEREOF FIELD OF THE INVENTION The present invention relates to the field of pesticides. The present invention, in particular, relates to a synergistic, broad-spectrum insecticidal composition comprising Spiromesifen, abamectin, and Fipronil. The present invention further relates to the process of preparation of said composition and its uses thereof. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION The background description includes information that may be useful in understanding the present invention. It is not an admission that any of the information provided herein is prior art or relevant to the presently claimed invention, or that any publication specifically or implicitly referenced is prior art. Enhancement of agricultural produce requires the protection of the crops and its produce from pest damage. Various chemicals and their formulations have been developed and are in use currently for the effective management of insects and pests. Due to non-judicious use of the hitherto known pesticides, the pests gain resistance and become hard to kill. Physically compatible pesticide mixtures exhibit a better pest management. These mixtures show multifaceted advantages than when applied individually, providing a synergistic effect. The need for more food has to be met through higher yields per unit of land, water, energy and time. Excessive use of mineral fertilizers and chemical pesticides has caused soil degradation, ground water pollution and the spread of the pest's resistant to pesticides in several areas. Hence their judicious use includes avoiding prophylactic sprays, adopting strip treatment, spot application to only those areas with heavy incidence of pests, application to the soil to avoid direct contact with the natural enemies and using selective or non-persistent pesticides. The systemic pesticides are sprayed at a concentration of 0.02 to 0.05 percent active ingredient. The contact pesticides are sprayed at 0.05 to 0.07 or even 0.1 percent active ingredient. The soil application of the granular systemic insecticides varies from 1 to 2 kg a.i. / ha. The insecticdes are applied up to 2 g / l depending upon the chemical used, pest species and season of the application. Processes for insecticidal agents and compositions have been developed to control insect pests and in practice have been used as a single or a mixed agent. However, processes for the economically efficient and ecologically safe insect control compositions are still being sought. A process for the preparation of insecticidal compositions which allows for reduced effective dosage rates, increased environmental safety and lower incidence of insect resistance are highly desirable. Although the rotational application of insect control agents having different modes of action may be adopted for good pest management practice, this approach does not necessarily give satisfactory insect control. Further, even though combinations of insect control agents have been studied, a high synergistic action has not always been found. Obtaining an insecticidal composition which demonstrates no cross-resistance to existing insecticidal agents, no toxicity problems and little negative impact on the environment is extremely difficult. Spiromesifen (Spiromesifen) molecular formula: c23H30O4. The spiromesifen has the action mechanism of influencing the development of whiteflies and mites and interfering the biosynthesis of liposome thereof, particularly has better activity to the larval stage, and can also generate the closing action of ovarian ducts, reduce the reproductive capacity of the mites and whiteflies adults and greatly reduce the egg laying amount. The abamectin is a pesticide, can simultaneously kill almost all nematodes, insects and mites, has the characteristics of wide insecticidal spectrum, high biological activity, high efficiency, safety and dual-purpose of agriculture and livestock, is completely prohibited from being used by high-toxicity organophosphorus pesticides in China in 2007, and is widely applied. The avermectin produced in the biological fermentation process mainly comprises avermectin B1 and avermectin B2, and the relative content is about B1: B2= (2.5-3): (2-2.5). Abamectin is a nerve toxicant, and the mechanism of the abamectin is that the abamectin acts on GABA receptors of insect neuron synapses or neuromuscular synapses to interfere the information transmission of nerve endings in insects, namely, the nerve endings are stimulated to release a nerve transmission inhibitor Y-aminobutyric acid (GABA), the GABA-gated chloride ion channel is promoted to be prolonged and opened, the chlorine ion channel is activated, a large number of chloride ions are injected to cause the super-activation of the nerve membrane potential, the nerve membrane is in a suppression state, the connection between the nerve endings and the muscles is blocked, and the insects are paralyzed, refused to eat and killed. Because of its unique action mechanism, it has no cross- resistance with the commonly used medicine. Fipronil is a broad-spectrum phenylpyrazole insecticide used to control ants, beetles, cockroaches, fleas, ticks, termites, mole crickets, thrips, rootworms, weevils and other insects. Fipronil blocks GABAA-gated chloride channels in the central nervous system. Disruption of the GABAAreceptors by fipronil prevents the uptake of chloride ions resulting in excess neuronal stimulation and death of the target insect. The existing problems and limitations in the current agricultural pest management techniques that the present disclosure seeks to address: 1. Development of Pest Resistance: a). Many pests have developed resistance to single active ingredient insecticides, making them less effective over time. b). Conventional insecticides often require increased dosages to achieve the same level of pest control, which is unsustainable and increases the risk of environmental contamination. c). The frequent use of single-action insecticides leads to the rapid evolution of resistant pest populations, reducing long-term pest management efficacy. 2. Limited Spectrum of Pest Control: a) Single active ingredient insecticides or basic tank mixtures may not be effective against a broad range of insect pests, leading to incomplete control. b) Farmers often need to use multiple products to target different pests, which increases costs and complicates pest management practices. c) Existing solutions may fail to control certain pests like Fruit borer & Thrips effectively in crops like chilli. 3. Suboptimal Synergy in Tank Mixes: a). Tank mixtures of individual insecticides do not always exhibit true synergistic effects. The combination may result in antagonistic or control. b). Inconsistent performance of tank mixes can be attributed to the instability of the combined components, leading to inadequate pest control and uneven application. 4. Stability Issues in Formulations: a) Existing insecticidal formulations often suffer from stability issues, especially under varying environmental conditions such as high or low temperatures. b) Instability can lead to the separation of active ingredients, reduced efficacy, and challenges in storage and transport. c) Unstable formulations are harder to apply uniformly, affecting the overall effectiveness of pest control measures. 5. Need for Higher Dosages: a) Due to the lack of synergistic action, traditional formulations or single active ingredient products may require higher dosages to achieve effective pest control. b) Increased dosages not only raise the cost of pest management but also heighten the risk of crop phytotoxicity and environmental damage, including potential harm to beneficial insects and non-target organisms. The present disclosure aims to overcome these limitations by providing a synergistic insecticidal composition of Spiromesifen, abamectin, and Fipronil, ensuring high efficacy at lower dosages, broad-spectrum pest control, formulation stability, and minimal environmental impact. OBJECT OF THE INVENTION The main objective of the disclosure is to provide a synergistic insecticidal composition combining Spiromesifen, abamectin, and Fipronil that enhances pest control efficacy beyond the sum of individual effects. Another important object of the present disclosure is to deliver broad-spectrum pest control that effectively targets a variety of insect pests, including Mites (Tetranychus urticae & Polyphagotarsonemus latus) across different crops like Chilli. Another object of the present disclosure is to reduce the likelihood of pest resistance by utilizing a multi-component approach, thereby decreasing the dependence on single- action insecticides. Yet another object of the present disclosure is to ensure stability of the formulation under various environmental conditions, minimizing separation or degradation of active ingredients for consistent performance. Yet another object of the present disclosure is to lower the required dosage levels while maintaining effective pest control to crops and minimizing environmental impact. Yet another object of the present disclosure is to provide an easy-to-mix and apply formulation that ensures uniform distribution on crops, improving application efficiency and overall pest control results. Yet another object of the present disclosure is to create an environmentally safer alternative by minimizing harmful residues, thus reducing health risks for farmers, consumers, and non-target organisms. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION Accordingly, in one aspect, the present invention provides an insecticide composition comprising Spiromesifen, abamectin, and Fipronil. In one aspect, the present invention provides a synergistic composition of Spiromesifen, abamectin, and Fipronil, and agrochemically acceptable additives. In yet another aspect, the present invention provides a synergistic composition comprising Spiromesifen, abamectin, and Fipronil the composition possesses Insecticidal activity. In a further aspect, the present invention provides a method for effective control of various pest in plants. In one aspect of the present invention, the Insecticidal composition of the present invention further comprises an agrochemically acceptable excipients selected from the group consisting of anti-freezing agent, dispersing agents, wetting agents, antifoaming agents, biocides, thickeners, surfactants, preservatives, colorants, pigments, buffers, solvents, and the like. Additional components may also be included, e.g., protective colloids, adhesives, thickeners, thixotropic agents, penetration agents, stabilisers, and sequestering agents. In another aspect of the present invention, the Insecticidal composition is formulated as capsule suspension (CS), Dispersible concentrate (DC), Dustable powder (DP), Powder for dry seed treatment (DS), Emulsifiable concentrate (EC), Emulsifiable granule (EG) Emulsifiable water-in-oil (EO), Emulsifiable powder (EP), Emulsifiable for seed treatment (ES), Emulsifiable oil-in-water (EW), flowable concentrate for seed treatment (FS), Suspension Concentrate (SC), Suspo-emulsion (SE), Oil Dispersion(OD).Water dispersible powder for slurry seed treatment (WS), Water dispersible granules (WDG) and Wettable powders (WP), a mixed formulation of CS 20 and SC (ZC), soluble liquid (SL). In another aspect, the insecticidal composition of the present invention is preferably formulated as an Emulsifiable concentrate (EC), Suspo-emulsion (SE), Wettable powders (WP), water-dispersible granules (WDG), Granular(GR), and Suspension Concentrate (SC). In yet another embodiment of the present invention, the invention further provides the process for preparation of the said formulation, wherein the said formulation is Emulsifiable concentrate (EC), Suspo-emulsion (SE), Wettable powders (WP), Water dispersible granules (WDG) , Granular(GR), and Suspension Concentrate (SC). DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION Discussed below are some representative embodiments of the present invention. The invention in its broader aspects is not limited to the specific details and representative methods. The illustrative examples are described in this section in connection with the embodiments and methods provided. The invention according to its various aspects is particularly pointed out and distinctly claimed in the appended claims read in view of this specification and appropriate equivalents. It is to be noted that, as used in the specification and the appended claims, the singular forms "a", "an" and "the" include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, reference to a composition containing “a compound” includes a mixture of two or more compounds. It should also be noted that the term “or” is generally employed in its sense including “and / or” unless the content clearly dictates otherwise. The expression of various quantities in terms of “% w / w” or “%” means the percentage by weight, relative to the weight of the total composition unless otherwise specified. The term “active ingredient” (a.i.) or “active agent” used herein refers to that component of the composition responsible for control of insects -pests or disease. As used herein, the terms "comprises", "comprising", "includes", "including", or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, subject to any limitation explicitly indicated. For example, a composition or a method that comprises a list of elements is not necessarily limited to only those elements but may include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such composition, or method. The term "synergistic", as used herein, refers the combined action of two or more active agents blended together and administered conjointly that is greater than the sum of their individual effects. As used herein, the term “composition” or "formulation" can be used interchangeably, unless stated otherwise, is meant to encompass, and is not limited to, compositions or formulations containing the combination of Spiromesifen, abamectin, and Fipronil. As used herein, the term “additive(s)” or "auxiliary agent(s)" or “agrochemically acceptable carrier(s)” can be used interchangeably and refers to inert substances which are commonly used as diluent, to provide stability or to increase the activity profile of the composition or formulation with or without having agrochemical activity or direct effect on the undesired phytopathogenic insects and / or microorganisms. As used herein, the term "agrochemically acceptable salts" are typically acid addition salts of inorganic or organic acids, preferably of hydrochloric acid, hydrobromic acid, sulfuric acid, nitric acid, perchloric acid, phosphoric acid, formic acid, acetic acid, trifluoroacetic acid, oxalic acid, malonic acid, toluenesulfonic acid, or benzoic acid. As used herein, the term "effective amount" means the amount of the active substances in the compositions to achieve an observable effect on growth, including the effects of necrosis, death, retardation, prevention, and removal, destruction, or otherwise diminishing the occurrence and activity of the target organism. The effective amount can vary for the various compositions used in the present invention. An effective amount of the compositions will also vary according to the prevailing conditions such as desired pesticidal effect and duration, weather, target species, locus, mode of application, and the like. In an embodiment, the Insecticidal composition wherein the Spiromesifen ranges from 5% to 15% by weight of the Insecticidal composition. In an embodiment, the Insecticidal composition wherein the Abamectin ranges from 1% to 5 % by weight of the Insecticidal composition. In an embodiment, the Insecticidal composition wherein the Fipronil ranges from 1% to 10% by weight of the Insecticidal composition. In another embodiment of the present invention, the invention further provides the process for preparation of the said formulation, wherein the said formulation is Emulsifiable concentrate (EC), Suspo-emulsion (SE), Wettable powders (WP), Water dispersible granules (WDG), Granular(GR), and Suspension Concentrate (SC). In yet another embodiment of the present invention, the agrochemically acceptable excipients of the formulation are selected from the group consisting of Dispersing agents, anti-freezing agents, wetting agents, defoamers, thickening agents, biocides, carrier / fillers, carriers, and solvents. Emulsifiers is selected from the group comprising of, but not limited to ethoxylatedpropoxylated alcohols, alkylphenolethoxylates, alkoxylatedtristyrylphenols, calcium dodecylbenzenesulfonate, mixture of fatty acid polyethylene glycol ester, ethoxylated propoxylatedpolyaryl phenol, ethoxylated fatty acids, fatty alcohol ethoxylates, ethoxylated ricinoleic acid triglycerides, sorbitan trioleate, tridecyl alcohol ethoxylate, castor oil ethoxylate, alkoxylated phosphate ester or mixtures thereof;The Emulsifiers is present in an amount of from 0.1% to 20.0% by weight based on a total weight of the composition. Solvent is selected from the group comprising of, but not limited to solvents are water, oils of vegetable, xylene, DMF, cyclohexanone, Heavy aromatic solvent, 2- butoxyethanol, or derivatives thereof. The solvent is present in an amount of from 0.1% to 30.0% by weight based on a total weight of the composition. Wetting agent is selected from the group comprising of, but not limited to non-ionic proprietary surfactant blend alkylphenol ethoxylates or polyoxyethylene sorbitan esters, lignosulfonates, sodium salt of naphthalene sulfonate condensates, tristyrylphenol ethoxylates. In a preferred embodiment, the wetting agent in an amount of from 1.0 – 5.0%by weight based on a total weight of the composition. Antifoaming agent is selected from the group comprising of, but not limited to polydimethyl siloxane, polydimethyl siloxane emulsion or mixtures thereof; The Antifoaming agent is present in an amount of from 0.1 - 5%by weight based on a total weight of the composition. Anti-freezing agents is selected from the group comprising of, but not limited to selected from the group comprising of ethylene glycol, propane-1,2-diol, propane-15 1,2,3-triol, urea or mixtures thereof. The anti-freezing agent is present in an amount of from 3.0 to 10.0% by weight, based on the total weight of the composition. Biocide is selected from the group comprising of 1,2-benzisothiazolin-3-one, formaldehyde, dipropyl glycol solution of 1,2-benzisothiazolin-3-one or mixtures thereof. The Biocide is present in an amount of from 0.10 – 3% by weight based on a total weight of the composition. Dispersing agent is selected from the group comprising of, but not limited to polymeric ester dispersant, ethoxylated polyarylphenol phosphate ester, sodium salt of naphthalene sulfonate condensate / naphthalene sulphonic acid condensate, acrylic copolymer, nonionic proprietary surfactant blend, polycarboxylates, calcium dodecylbenzene sulfonate, aryl sulphonate condensate, sodium lignosulphonate, dispertox BS SPL, polystyrenatedacrylated co-polymer, modified styrene acrylic copolymer, salts of phenol sulfonic acids, Terwet 2700,butyl polyalkylene oxide block co-polymer, mixture of tristyrylphenolethoxylates and polyalkylene oxide derivative of a synthetic alcohol, Kraft lignin sulphonate, random co-polymer of alcoxylated polyethylene glycol or mixtures thereof ;The Dispersing agent is present in an amount of from 2.0 – 6.0% by weight based on a total weight of the composition. Inert carriers is selected from the group comprising of, but not limited to kaolin, china clay, alumina, talc, chalk, quartz, attapulgite, montmorillonite, crushed and fractionated natural minerals such as calcite, marble, pumice, dextrin, precipitated silica, sepiolite, bentonite, river sand, white sand, zeolites, starch, sand, talc, quartz, dolomite, diatomaceous earth, aluminium oxide, silicates, calcium phosphates, calcium hydrogen phosphates, ammonium sulphate or mixtures thereof. The inert carriers is present in an amount of from 0% to 90% by weight based on a total weight of the composition. Thickening agents is selected from the group comprising of, but not limited to thickening agents by weight of the formulation selected from Hydrophobic fumed silica, Polysaccharides / carboxymethyl cellulose / Bentonite Clay or Organic derivative of hectorite clay. The thickening agents is present in an amount of from ranges from 0.10 – 2% by weight based on a total weight of the composition. The composition of the present invention is effective for management of insect or pests selected from one or more of Cotton (Gossypium spp.), Paddy (Oryza sativa), Wheat (Triticumaestavum), Barley (Hordeum vulgare), Maize (Zea mays), Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor), Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) , Sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris), Soybean (Glycin max), Peanut (Arachis hypogaea), Sunflower (Helianthus annuus) , Mustard (Brassica juncea), Rape seed (Brassica napus), Linseed (Linum usitatissimum), Sesame (Sesamum indicum), Castor (Ricinus communis), Green gram (Vigna radiate), Black gram (Vigna mungo), Chickpea (Ciceraritinum), Cowpea 20 (Vigna unguiculata), Redgram (Cajanus cajan), Frenchbean (Phaseolus vulgaris), Indian bean (Lablab purpureus), Horse gram (Macrotyloma uniflorum), Field pea (Pisum sativum), Cluster bean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba), Lentils (Lens culinaris), Brinjal (Solanum melongena), Cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata), Cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis), Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus), Onion 25 (Allium cepa L.), Tomato (Solanum lycopersicun) , Potato (Solanum tuberosum) , Sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas), Chilly (Capsicum annum), Garlic (Allium sativum), Cucumber (Cucumis sativus), Muskmelons (Cucumis melo), Watermelon (Citrullus lanatus), Bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria), Bitter gourd (Momordica charantia), Radish (Raphanus sativus), Carrot (Dacus carota subsp. sativus), Turnip (Brassica rapasubsprapa), Apple (Melus domestica), Banana (Musa 25 spp.), Citrus groups (Citrus spp.), Grape (Vitis vinifera), Guava (Psidium guajava), Litchi (Litchi chinensis), Mango (Mangifera indica), Papaya (Carica papaya), Pineapple (Ananas 5 comosus), Pomegranate (Punica granatum) , Sapota (Manilkara zapota), Tea (Camellia sinensis), Coffea (Coffea Arabica), Turmeric (Curcuma longa), Ginger (Zingiber officinale), Cumin (Cuminum cyminum), Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-30 graecum), Fennel (Foeniculum vulgare), Coriander (Coriandrum sativum), Ajwain (Trachyspermumammi), Psyllium (Plantago ovate), Black Pepper (Piper nigrum), 10 Stevia (Stevia rebaudiana), Safedmusli (Chlorophytum tuberosum), Drum stick (Moringa oleifera), Coconut (Coco nucifera), Mentha ( Mentha spp.), Rose (Rosa spp.), Jasmine (Jasminum spp.), Marigold (Tagetes spp.), Common daisy (Bellis perennis), Dahlia (Dahlia hortnesis), Gerbera (Gerbera jamesonii), Carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus) or GMO form thereof. In yet another preferred embodiment, the present invention provides an insecticidal combination or composition comprising Spiromesifen, abamectin, and Fipronil to control the pathogenic microorganism on economically important crops such as chilli. The invention is illustrated by the experiments as exemplified below. Examples: The examples below are given solely for the purpose of illustration and are not to be construed as limitations of the present invention, as many variations thereof are possible without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. SInE 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 x0 3 2 1.noan am D PepM o B P p lenroo SsluNcoBinFinAinSmlyiloron- legipgb gp be1w yzp xfa -ponreroreamreiroo:a satcer cisoy laht el nkyanctaionlyddnd dm moie il ie ec ie Ind im PrahridiazeGleennt ic fnperacac n ti nesg e rttitnt ifereen pa eolyeoo slinc-oxl3l iy y vdmlic e act nd iva i t, rcaten thtio-oe ergeiivts ncr eafn etecheomfiicnQ.0 0s6 1 2 3 5 1 15 w Easetco.20.10.0.0.0.0.50.0.50 / w% g 1lcotimcipda Q 0 0 1 w E ol.cs .20.16 0.01 .02 .03 .03 .02 .00 .0 / w% g 2siti oom n p Q o.0 0 5 5 w Eosto.20.16 0.01 .02 .03 .0.51 0.0.5% g 0 / w 3ftshitieopn Qras.0 0sto.20.16 0.01 .02 .03 .05 .01 .05 w E .0 / w% ge4 se Snu tispe Qn.sto.20 0.16 1 2 3 1 0.0.0.0.0.05 10 w % En0 gse sio0.0.0 / w 5cticn idcoQ.0 0 E a nsto.20.16 0.01 .02 .03 5 .0.52 0.05 w .0 / w% g 6l iscendter paQt.0 0 Esto.20.16 0.01 w . gi0 2 00 0 0 0c.3 . 3 . 1 . 5 . / w%7 teesd(SbC Qe.0 0 1 wl)Es .2.16 . go:0 1 .02 .03 .00 1 . 8 . / %8wto0 0.0 0 0 winTQ E a 0 0 6 1 2 3 2 w g b.sto.20.10.0.0.0.0.01 .05 .0 / w%9le1: Q 0 0 1 E.st.2.16 1 2 3 1 10 w % go0 0.0.0.0.0.00.0.0 / w 10 T 1 S ab0 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1.nloe2: D X B P D p A g A F A S Maw netnropeo folytlorafttloipb p roamiroahzy mx xtuermisolenameGthr4 cn m 8o 49il ec euia eGer ic s 9 - 4po13ac tt ismzoly u- lym -i nviafcenIng linc rfanoble-o i tivre 3lct-aneren ngedo n-iodiinored negnnte ic f acierets rn dyt il eic nt SU S T A A A P n n n D A A A E ht tWi c c cN ici-i- tifsptititiS Ck bfa ernainc reoeteezamttinerv v vF segin ineineiuIn nOc Nriergri inin Ag g g gti Caag lg g ea A AgArerereogd d dn O nge g geniei iN ne ent en nenenC ttntt t t t tE N T Q R.AstQ To0 .10 .16 .01 .02 .03 .03 .01 .05 .0AtyEm5 0 (ag(Sk)Ce )Q.stQo0m.10 5.16 1 2 3 5 0.0.0.0.0.51 5 0.0.5Bty0 (agk)eQ.stQo0 0 6 1 2m.15.10.0.0.03 .02 .01 .05 .0Cty(agk)e Process for preparing Suspension concentrates (SC) formulation: 1) A required quantity of water, biocide, and defoamer was taken in a mixing vessel. Gum powder was added to the mixture and homogenized with continuous stirring to obtain a gum solution. The gum solution was prepared 12–18 hours prior to its intended use. 2) In a separate vessel, the required quantity of demineralized (DM) water was charged. Wetting agents, dispersing agents, and suspending agents were added sequentially and homogenized using a high shear homogenizer for 45–60 minutes to obtain a uniform slurry. 3) The technical ingredient(s) along with other required adjuvants, excluding antifreeze and thickening agents, were added to the homogenized slurry and mixed thoroughly to achieve uniform dispersion. 4) Half of the total required quantity of antifoam agent was introduced into the slurry. The slurry was then passed through a particle size reduction equipment (Dyno-Mill) until the desired particle size of the grinded material was achieved. 5) The remaining half of the antifoam agent and the antifreeze agent were added to the pre-slurried material. The gum solution obtained in Step 1 was then added to the mixture, yielding the final suspension concentrate.

[0002] S Ta E 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1r.Nb xam ole- p .3p S p E B oT:l ilohothrFIlne2:ipsPXen ySalx a BspoxistyroA Spec rtepDanzisoP kynloh y ca l ryn i biroIica M wth othlveroplenekcteatelplhacinagming mngidraunyo A tr e r e re ati a miater G zot–uCl eeonx - men ivedctip iedsif dlC on d oino leiienieenieoomlin-3-IeXGe lyl mens gnrt acntivt anctts m pfin-o yer altedeivosnceol, oif ene st i eticoticim Q % ndaak.S0 .20 .210 6 .00 .22 . 3 5 . 1 1 . 5 Eolce t0o0 0.00 0 0.005000.50wg / w 1fth oe m S p m Qa0 0 0 1 u ok.S.2.210 6 2 3 0 1 8 w % Esieto0 0.0.00.20.00.00.0.0.0 / wg 2spt oioEn mam Qa0 0 1 6 0 2 3 %k.S.2.20.0.2.0.02 . E usS01 .05 .0 wglueto0 0.00 0 0 0 / w 3sionspo m Qa0 1 1(Semk.S.20 .210 6 .0.00 0.22 .03 0.0.01 .00 w .0 / w% E g E ) ueto0 0 0 0 04 Folsiom Qak.S0 t.20 0.210 6 0.0.00 0.22 0.03 5 1 1 %rmn 5 E 0.00.0.0.0 wg u (S5laEeo / wti)Fm %oo Q nrak. .mS0 2 0 1 6 0 2 3 5 2 5 E.0.20 0.0.00.20.0.0.5.0.0 wg ueto0 0 0 / w 6latiom Q % na0 0 1 6 0 2 3k.S.23 1 E:0.20 0.0.0.2.0.0.0.05 .0 wge to0 0 0 0 / w 7makQ % .S0 0 10 6 0 2 3 5 1 8 Ee1.20.20.0.00.20.00.00.0.0.0 wg0 to / 80wm Q %ak.S0 . 0 . 10 6 0 . 2 3 2 1 5e t2 2 wE g o 0 0.0.0020.00.00.0.0.0 / w 9makQe1.S0 .20 .210 6 . 0 . 2 3 1 . 1 1 % E 0wg 0 to0 0.0 0020.00.0000.0.0 / w 10 0 Process for preparing Suspo Emulsion (SE) Formulation. 1) A required quantity of water, biocide, and defoamer was taken in a mixing vessel. Gum powder was added to this mixture and homogenized with continuous stirring to obtain a gum solution. The gum solution was prepared 12–18 hours prior to further use. 2) The required quantity of demineralized (DM) water was charged into a separate vessel. Wetting agent, dispersing agent, and suspending agents were sequentially added and homogenized for 60–90 minutes using a high shear homogenizer to obtain a uniform slurry. 3) The technical ingredient(s), along with other adjuvants, excluding antifreeze and thickeners, were added to the homogenized slurry to form a uniform slurry mixture. 4) Half of the total required antifoam agent was incorporated into the slurry. The slurry was then subjected to particle size reduction using Dyno-Mill equipment until the desired particle size of the granule material was achieved. 5) The remaining half of the antifoam agent and the antifreeze agent were added to the granule material obtained. Finally, the gum solution prepared in Step 1 was added to the mixture to yield the suspo-emulsion formulation. 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 o S Ta E x 0 3 2 1r.nb l a e m p P A o lym n S apo S F A S4d odipb p i:Ile3C d m h otSiurmiumoanmro nmI s :Phimnho ine iS badLil ect niegec repat uhmt l leniua lig nsifretica C ySarcenmunedesryon diidralalySuhilolualphlsefk nati o ylS uulfotslC on x ananltea ltefatn o eamotepfinm oakQ 1 %s seS 0i1t.55 .05 .01 . 4 . 2 . 5 . 1 . 5 E teioctic0o0 0 00000005000.50wg 1 nid0 / w oa l mftah cokQ 0 5 5 1 4 2 3 1 1 %emeS1t.5.0.0.0.0.0.0.00 E0o0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 wgWp 2 o s0 / wettaitibon m Qa0 5 5 1 4 2 5 %leakSeto.50.00.00.00.00.00.51 0.05 EPs0.50wg / w 3oWw deme ttaakQ beS 01t.55 0.05 0.01 0.04 0.02 0.03 %r0.(01 0.05 0.0 wE gWlePP0o0 / w 4o0)Fw Q o d e Srmr10 to0 . 5 . 5 . 1 4 2 1 5 2 %(W0 E u0m 500000.00.00.0.0.0.0 wglaP a 0 0 0 k / w 5tio)Fe n o m. rmakQ % 0 1 E ueS1t.55 .05 .01 .04 .02 . 5 . 1 . 5wgla0o0 0 0 0 0005000.50 / w 6tio0 n m:akQ %eS 01t 0o.55 0.05 0.01 0.04 0.02 0.03 1 10 0.00.00.0 wE g / 0w 7m QakS 0 t.55 0.05 .01 .04 .02 .05 % .51 .05 .5 wE geo0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / w 8Q S 10 to0 0m.55 0.05 0.01 .04 .02 .03 .01 .05 % .0 wE g a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 k / w 9e Q S 1 0 5 5 1 4 2 1 5 2 % E 0to. . . . . . . .0wg 0m 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 1a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 k / w0 e Process for preparing Wettable Powder (WP) Formulation. 1) A required quantity of filler, wetting agent, dispersing agent, suspending agent, and technical active ingredient(s) were charged into a premixing blender. The contents were homogenized for a period of approximately 60 minutes to obtain a uniform pre-blended material. 2) The pre-blended material obtained from Step 1 was subjected to grinding using a jet mill or air classifier mill to achieve the desired fine particle size. 3) The micronized material was subsequently blended in a post-blender for a period of approximately 1.5 hours to ensure homogeneity of the formulation. 4) The homogeneous material obtained was unloaded from the blender and subjected to quality analysis as per specification requirements.

[0003] Ta E x S b a rlem 9 8 7 6 5 3 2 1.n 5p o .:Ilne4s:PC Po n S S P o oo SedlA pI ctireph S n ls apdyS Fn ca ii lyBuhiuSiucoibirogiaoddrCximlenlfonthmu lfmardpamm Lbroiuroedaaltiolaanye ethda aytelenalatk eauxym neil ctiensifien Cn ooley lryll aete nts m pfions m %siteaictikQceS 0 2 1wEonid1.5.04 .03 .05 .51 .05 0 to0 0 0 0 0 0.5 / wgoa l0 01fth coe m % mWp Q oakS 0eto.52 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.01 .05 .0 wE / wge2ttsaitibon leam %GsakQWeS 01t.52 .04 .03 .05 Er.1 . 8wganett0o0 0 0 00 0.0 / w 3ua0leb (l%WemGakQeS 0 2 4 3 2 1 5wE G1t) ran0o.50.00.00.00.0.0.0 / wg 4Fo u0rmle% u(mWakQ G 1ElaeS 01t.52 .04 .03 .0.01 1 .00wgt )F0o0 0 0 0 0.0 / w 5ion o0rm.makQ 1 % ueS 0 2 4 3 5 1 510 to.50.00.00.00.50.00.5 wE glati 0 / w 6 on0 m:akQ % 0 2 4 3 3 1 EeS1.50 to0.00.00.05 0.0.0.0 wg0 / w 7makQ % S 0 2 4 3 5 1 8wEe10 to.50.00.00.00.0.0.0g 80 / wmakQ %eS 01.52 0.04 3 2 1 5 0.00.00.0.0.0 wE g 0to / w 90 makQ %eS 01.52 . 4 . 3 . 1 . 1 1 E 0wg 0 to000000000.0.0 / w 10 0 Process for preparing Wettable Granule (WG) Formulation. 1) A required quantity of filler, wetting agent, dispersing agent, suspending agent, adjuvants, and technical active ingredient(s) were charged into a premixing blender and homogenized for about 30 minutes to obtain a pre- blended material. 2) The pre-blended material obtained from Step 1 was subjected to grinding using a jet mill or air classifier mill, followed by post-blending for approximately 1.5 hours to obtain a homogeneous fine mixture. 3) A required quantity of water was added to the homogeneous mixture obtained from Step 2 to prepare a dough of suitable consistency. 4) The dough was extruded using an extruder to obtain granules of the required size 5) The wet granules obtained from Step 4 were dried using a fluidized bed dryer. The dried granules were graded using vibrating screens to achieve uniform- sized wettable granules.

[0004] 3 2 1 no S Ta E 7 6 5 4 x .r.b l am DaHimElkeM6p t y lix:IleeavetMhoarytuA SpIn nyhyixA xylsreF birogs6e:cParlo fo xlycolhautoipamep mrehfCrodtire ne e ici pmrmlenodonilctisi en daa lticameFaa a lcn fents a lraidtteyteia u Cti n m ood mn Q.S1 % po.0 20 12 5 1 5 E ofinto.0.0.0.0.0.0 wg / w 1sitiosnecQti.S10 20 12 5 1 1 % 5wEo cgfid.to.0.0.0.50.00.50 / tw 2 ha elcQ %E omm.S1.0 20 12 10 2t.510wE g u poo.0.0.0.00.0 / w 3lsifsiQ %iati.S10 20 1 5 2 5 E bon.to.0.02 .0.0.50.0 wg / w 4leaCsQ oE.S1 2 1 % n m 5 1 2 Ecu.0to.00 .02 .0.0.00 .0 wg e / w 5 nltrsifQa iStae b. l.to10 20 1 % 2 3 1 10 E(EeCcom.0.0.0.0.0.0 wga / w 6)nk Fceo e rnmtr Q ua.St.%lae(to1m0 2 .00 1 .02 5 1 1 .0.0.00 0.0 wE gtio E7n Ca / wk. )Feorm Q.Su.o1 %m0 Elat2 1 3 1t.00 .02 .0.02 .00 .0 wg i / ow 8nak:eQ.S.%to1 2 1 1 2 Em0 .00 .02 .0.0.05 .0 wg / 9awkeQ.S.%tEo10 20 1 5 1 5 gm.0.02 .0.0.0.0 w 1a / w0ke Process for preparing Emulsifiable concentrate (EC) Formulation. 1) A required quantity of heavy aromatic solvent, dimethyl formamide, and mixed xylene were charged into a mixing vessel. 2) The required quantity of emulsifiers was added to the solvent mixture. The contents were homogenized for about 60 to 90 minutes using a high-shear homogenizer to obtain a uniform solvent–emulsifier mixture. 3) The technical active ingredient(s) were then added into the homogenized solvent–emulsifier mixture to form a uniform solution. 4) The obtained emulsion concentrate was tested in accordance with predetermined quality control specifications. Upon passing the quality tests, the product was filled into containers of desired pack sizes. Example 7: Evaluation of Bio-efficacy & Phytotoxicity of Insecticidal Composition and thereof (Spiromesifen and Abamectin and Fipronil) against Mites (Tetranychus urticae & Polyphagotarsonemus latus) on Chilli crop. Chilli is an important commercial crop and is prone to pest attack at various stages of crop growth. Many insect pests are of economic importance and cause considerable yield loss to an extent of 57-80 per cent. Among the sucking pests, mites and thrips are major problems affecting the plant growth and yield and among the Mites (Tetranychus urticae & Polyphagotarsonemus latus) pose a major threat. METHODOLOGY: The field trial was conducted at Guntur and the Chilli hybrid used was Bullet was sown in plots each measuring 25 sq m at 45 cm x 20 cm. Six treatments along with an Untreated Control were evaluated and each treatment was replicated three times. The first application was made when sucking pests, mainly Mites are present in sufficient numbers (i.e. ETL level) using a water volume of 500 liters per hectare. Second was imposed at an interval of 15 days. The observations on population of Mites per plant were recorded, from each plot 5 plants were randomly selected for the observation. The Mites population were recorded before as pretreatment count (PTC) for first spray as well as 3 (or) 7 and 15 days after each spray (DAS) The data on Tetranychus urticae & Polyphagotarsonemus latus (Mites) per plant on 5 randomly selected plants were also recorded before application of treatments and at 3, 7 DAS and 15 DAS. Treatments were imposed thrice. For the observation of yield data, chilli seed was separately harvested in two pickings from each treatment and finally expressed in quintal / ha. Experimental Detail: Design RBD Replications 3 Treatments 9 Hybrid Bullet Date of Sowing 05.12.2024 Plot size 25 sq m Soil type Heavy Black Spacing 75 x 20 cm Method of Application Foliar spraying Number and Date of 3 sprays 1st application – 10.01.25 Applications 2nd application-25.01.25 3rd application-10.02.25 Type of Sprayer Hand-operated Knapsack sprayer fitted with hollow cone nozzle. spray Volume / ha. 500 L Date of Harvest 20.03.25 and 25.04.25 T Ta D T T T T T T T T Trbet9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1.nolea7ilF C F S A 5 S 5 S 5 S:oUfnt irphipp b.5p.5p.5ptree raoloira%ir %ir %iratnr raonomm omomotmd n2eS S Smeil t iral5es ctiCesCesCes enco.5 n%ife nifeififtsn 0%ili S n 1.n en en :tro + pr C2 72 %151515lP orole .90S.5%.5%.5% p4e.3 %C F rg%S + + +o ArmiteACA Ab 3 bab mab mau mla5a.me t0cteicteioictn 0ecti n n in%n 1S%1%1% E1.7%+ + +FSiF FCpirpoipnroroi n Lin l lLilLInD 7 3 g o s 5 7 5 91 1 1 1 0 4 2 92 / hr e0.50.6.68 .53 .9.8a e )d (iaencttive 2 6 1(F0 2 0 4 5 0 0 6 0 25 67 5 4 o 00g0 gg g5 6 m 3 22 / hrmD mra l / mraramram ma u o hm ml / hl / hl / h) lase a / h / a / h h / a ahaa a a tion W 5 5 5 a D 00 00 0 5 5 5 5 5 0 00 00 00 00 00te iluL L L L L L Lr titreitreiL (tLioreitreitreitreitreitrein tei rn) T 9 T 8 T 7 T 6 T 5 T 4 T 3 T 2 T 1 Tr.no(TT R C SeabeE C C P F +A C F Sp A 5 A S 5 A S 5 A Strs Daleum h eo c nroipphirpb.5b p.5b p.5b p o bloroiroam%amir %a ir %a ir n8l(t5s%±kt) roelrgnaimra n mS omS mommomyc:lnil e ecCec eCecSCecTh E)it ee3ctit5nra 5n%sitf i tie n nstiesties reuf1ife n1ife nife asufec.021ilip S n 1 nC2.7% %n 1 n1%1tmrt(U0.5.72 % n %0% %rol.9 S +1+5+5entic oaftS Se0 CF5 .5 F.5i %F.5ti%s edrea E C4 %ip%p p + &ite.3roro +ro Pffd %Se+ C n n n il +ililorlen3 1 1yphtd-- -- -- -7 7 - 50.55 9 0 1 0 1 .6.64 2 9 2 8 3 2 a .8.8.i. ag o s 5.56 4go taes2 6 8rsof 0 2 0 4 6 F 0 5 0 00 25 67 56 42(go DonSp -- -- -- -- 0g m g g5 3 2rmo mram m m ousel / ml / hramramr / emirha lH o / hl / hl / h mlau m ta / h / ah / ahaa a a l)ioasnlaetusifeN 003 1 2 73 3 2 3 9 3 9 2 7 Ps)nS.2.0.40.9. .9.9.6. . . . . .2 . 6 To 11 73 -.846- 822 -.4 24 -.5 79 -.8 234 2 3 9 5 7- 71 - 72 - 77 -.7C n C5 .5S 003 1 h % .12.04.83 -23 1.8-25 . 2 8.52 5 2 3 1 2 1 6.8.4.0.1.7.9.8.822 . 5 4.13 Di-.5.25.61 1 - 55 - 1 7 - 27 - 84 -.47 - 3 alyli. +2 4 2 6 2 6 2 4 2 4 2 3 2 3 2sAS 003 Sab .1.0.6.4.8. . . . . . . . . . . . .3 . 7 pfa 451 1 - 21 - 6692- 6681 2 0 2 0 0 3 0 2 2 9- 95 - 64 - 28 - 56 - 62 - 3ratyerm F S 0 . 0ec1 6.3 0 6.1 7 2 2 2.5 2 7 2 7 2 5 2 5 2 3 2 4.1.8.2.8.2.4.0.4.1.1.7.32 . 4 . 1irs ti-.97 - 26 - 27 - 65 - 27 - 37 - 314 -.6 292- 6 5t n1S % 00 3 1 2 52 7 2 7 2 5 2 5 2 3 2 2 P .16.06.72 2.9.47.12.86.22.87.26.45.02.47.1.1.7.13 .6.24 .2T C+- - - - - - 37 - 34 - 9 - 6FS 0 . 0 1 3.0-312 -24 4.6.2.4.9-27 5.9.1-27 8.9.2-24 1.4.9-25 3.5.0-23 -23 -24ip3 2.1.29.1.2.4.93 S Dreocay n S 0onsOil.0 1 6.0-31 5.2 - 7.24 - 8.4.9 26 - 7.8.9 25.7 - 8.24 - 1.3.5 24 1.4.5-12 3.9.5-12 -24 7 da4.8.4.3.4spftb5es .50 1 2 52 7 2 7 2 2 5 1 2 1 2 5rrer% S 0 3a t.hv 11.04.30 9 -.6.59.6.8.3.9.4.55 - 58 - 1 1 - 51 -.3.53.3.8.4.8.3-2- 95 - 22 - 3.5.21 6 5 yea ti SoC n S 0 . 0 Psag 11.03 4.3102 9.55 .62 .87 .32 .97 .42 .552 .55 .31 .82 .41 .82 .3-25 .2T a -.69 - 58 - 1 1 - 51 -.33 - 95 - 22 - 3.56 Cins S 0 . 03 1 1.0.402 . 5 2t5.4.872 .872 . 4 2 4 1 2 1 2 2 4R3.6.3.6. . . . . .3 451 -.74 - 96 -.28 -.36 - 1 8 - 8792- 2761 3 5D - 35 - 3thaeydS 003 1 2 52 7ir s&.15.04.30 9 -.5.49.2.8.02 .872 - 43 - 1 4 -.1.24 8.2-24 - 2.3.21 9.71 3.91 .71 .92 .24 .17d a- 91 - 36 - 3spftYr S 0 .10aere4.0-31 - 4- - - -3- -1 - 3 ythllow 4.62 .23.4.6 26.86 .26.86 .28.23 .29.1.4 12.61 .17.7.7 26.2.71 3 5eM-- -- -- -- -5- 1 64-.92 2 4 .864-.31 4 .945-.75 6 .785-.28 7 . 26-.8 8 . 6 -.6856 D A @ Ri7 5 %te.6 . 9 . T1Os8.11 8 4 4 1 3 915191417.8 696267 S5C Results: The data presented in Table 8 showed that the pre-treatment mite populations (PTC) across all treatments were statistically at par, indicating no significant differences before the application of insecticides.Following treatment, all insecticidal applications resulted in a significant reduction in mite infestation compared to the untreated control, confirming their overall effectiveness. Among the evaluated treatments, the combination formulation of Spiromesifen 15.5% + Abamectin 1% + Fipronil 5.5% SC at 675 ml / ha (T3) was the most effective in suppressing mite populations, followed closely by the same formulation at 563 ml / ha (T2). Both T2 and T3 treatments exhibited superior efficacy and were statistically at par with each other, indicating that either dose can be effectively used for managing mite infestations.

[0005] T T a T T T7 T6 T5 4 3 2 1rb 9 8 T T T T.Nleo9.:ImR C S U F C F Ses D Eum niph lipp A 5 ir b.5Sp 5 %i .5Sp 5 %i .5Sp pa %i cl(ts 5tr ro oro oamrororot% ±eatnra n meSmSmSmo)edil2 nco.5t iral5e c%sif tiC nesCeCe fiSfsifsifp n 0n et %iS n 1 en en enirorlio + pr C2.27%151515 m lP orole .90S.5%.5%.5e%sip4 %Cfag.3%S +A + enA +AT1itC eAb a b a bre aa5 t.53bm m m m% 5a.0 mec ec ec en +0%ectt i ti tii n1 n1 n1tAb Sn% % % a E1 +m .7%+ +F F FectSiCproipip innronro 1% iin l lil+Fipron i 1 1 al35-- -- - 7 - 5 7 5 91 10 4 0.50.6.68 2 9 .53 2..9.8i..5g% DSC o se on 2 6 1 / t 2 0 4 6 FoH h00 5 0 0 2 6 5 4 0g0 0 5 7 6 2(graey- - -mlag g g5 3 2o m- - - r / mraramram m m mruiehl lmla ld / mh / h / / h / hl / hl tioaa / h haa a a a a)onfchilli5 .01 3.64 6 0 43 48 46 5 5 2 5 6 .22 6 1.71 5.25(qY Ccro4 / hi5 aeh p )ldilli.20 in24 c P -22c re5 7 3 38 56 53o ae-- -- --.520 15.07.02.87.135 n 2trosercelovnetr Results: Effect of Treatments on Chilli Fruit Yield The data on chilli fruit yield presented in Table 9 indicate that all insecticidal treatments significantly increased yield compared to the untreated control, which recorded the lowest yield of 40 q / ha. Among the treatments, the highest yield (62.75 q / ha) was obtained from the plot treated with Spiromesifen 15.5% + Abamectin 1% + Fipronil 5.5% SC at the higher dose of 675 ml / ha, followed closely by the lower dose of the same formulation (563 ml / ha) with 61.25 q / ha. Statistical analysis revealed that the yields from both doses were at par, indicating that the lower dose could serve as a more economical option for growers without compromising productivity. Phytotoxicity Observation: Phytotoxicity was assessed by visual observation. Ten plants in each treatment per replicate were observed critically at 1,3,7,10, and 14 days after spraying for chlorosis, leaf tip injury, necrosis, epinasty, hyponasty, vein clearing, and wilting, and were graded on a 0–10-point phytotoxicity scale. Crop response / crop injury Grade 0-00 0 1-10% 1 11-20% 2 21-30% 3 31-40% 4 41-50% 5 51-60% 6 61-70% 7 71-80% 8 81-90% 9 91-100% 10 Table 11: Phytotoxicity effect of Spiromesifen 15.5% + Abamectin 1% + Fipronil 5.5% SC on Chilli crop. Spiromesifen 15.5% + Abamectin 1% + Fipronil 5.5% SC for phytotoxicity on chilli crop (based on 20 leaves sample / replication) Leav es Dose injur yellow stunti Necro Epina Hypon Treatments (ml / y on ing ng sis sty asty ha) tips or surfa ce Spiromesifen15.5%+Abamectin 563 1%+Fipronil 5.5% SC ml / h 0 0 0 0 0 0 a Spiromesifen15.5%+Abamectin 675 1%+Fipronil 5.5% SC ml / h 0 0 0 0 0 0 a Untreated Control 0 0 0 0 0 0 * Observations were taken at 0, 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 & 15 Days after application Results: Table 11 shows that no phytotoxic symptoms were observed on the chilli crop following the application of the insecticidal combination Spiromesifen 15.5% + Abamectin 1% + Fipronil 5.5% SC at formulation doses of 563 ml / ha and 675 ml / ha. Treated plants exhibited normal growth and development, with no visible signs of leaf yellowing, stunting, necrosis, epinasty, hyponasty, or other adverse effects typically associated with phytotoxicity. These results indicate that the formulation is safe for use on chilli at the tested doses. Conclusion: • The test insecticide Spiromesifen15.5%+Abamectin1%+Fipronil 5.5% SC @ 563 ml / ha and 675 ml / ha was found to be effective in reducing chilli Mites with ROC of 85.69% and 86.17 % respectively • No phytotoxicity symptoms were observed on chilli when Spiromesifen15.5%+Abamectin1%+Fipronil 5.5% SC @ 563 ml / ha and 675 ml / ha were sprayed on chilli crop. • The increase in yield by 53.12 per cent and 56.87 per cent was observed due to Spiromesifen15.5%+Abamectin1%+Fipronil 5.5% SC @563 ml / ha and 675 ml / ha, respectively.

Claims

We claim:

1. An Insecticidal composition comprising a synergistic combination of- a. Spiromesifen is present in an amount of 5% to 15.5% by weight; b. Abamectin is present in an amount of 1% to 5% by weight; c. Fipronil is present in an amount of 1% to 10% by weight, and d. Agrochemical acceptable excipient.

2. The Insecticidal composition as claimed in claim 1, wherein Spiromesifen is present in an amount of 15.5% w / w, Abamectin is present in an amount of 1% w / w, and Fipronil is present in an amount of 5.5% w / w.

3. The Insecticidal composition as claimed in claim 1, wherein the agrochemically acceptable excipient is dispersant / dispersing agents, carriers, thickeners / binders, Biocides, wetting agents, antifreeze agents, antifoaming agents, carriers / fillers, and solvents.

4. The Insecticidal composition as claimed in claim 1, wherein the formulation is selected from Suspension concentrate (SC), suspo-emulsion (SE), Wettable granules (WG), Wettable powder (WP), and Emulsion Concentrate (EC).

5. The Insecticidal composition as claimed in claim 4, wherein the SE comprises at least a dispersing agent in an amount in the range of 2-6%w / w, at least a wetting agent in an amount in the range of 1-5%w / w, at least an anti-foaming agent in an amount in the range of 0.10-5%w / w, at least an anti-freezing agent in an amount up to 1-10%w / w, at least Biocide agent in an amount in the range of 0.10-5%w / w, at least a thickening agent in an amount in the range of 0.10-5%w / w, at least a solvent in an amount in the range of 10-50%w / w and a carrier upto 95%w / w.

6. The Insecticidal composition as claimed in claim 5, comprising Tristyrylphenol Ethoxylate Amine salt of phosphate of 3%, Block co-polymer,of 2%, SiloxanePolyalkyleneoxide of 0.20% Propylene Glycol of 6%, Solvent – C-IX of 0.10% Benzisothiazolin-3-one of 0.10%, Xanthum Gum of 0.20% and distilled water to make up to 100%w / w.

7. The Insecticidal composition as claimed in claim 4, wherein the SC comprises at least a dispersing agent in an amount in the range of 2-6%w / w, at least a wetting agent in an amount in the range of 1-5%w / w, at least an anti-foaming agent in an amount in the range of 0.10-5%w / w, at least an anti-freezing agent in an amount up to 1-10%w / w, at least Biocide agent in an amount in the range of 0.10-5%w / w, at least a thickening agent in an amount in the range of 0.10-5%w / w, at least a Solvent in an amount in the range of 10-50%w / w and a carrier upto 95%w / w.

8. The Insecticidal composition as claimed in claim 7, comprising Atlox 4913 - blend of acrylic graft co-polymer of 3%, Atlox 4894 - non-ionic polymeric surfactant of 2%, Siloxane Polyalkyleneoxide of 1% Propylene Glycol of 6%, Benzisothiazolin- 3-one of 0.10%, Xanthum Gum of 0.15% and distilled water to make up to 100%w / w.

9. The Insecticidal composition as claimed in claim 4, wherein the EC comprises at least an emulsifier agent in an amount in the range of 0.1-20%w / w, at least a Solvent in an amount in the range of 10-50%w / w, and a carrier up to 95%w / w.

10. The Insecticidal composition as claimed in claim 9, comprising Mixture of Calcium alkylarylsuphonate and Ethoxylated Fatty Alcohol of 12%, Mix xylene of 20%, Dimethyl formamide of 10% Heavy aromatic solvent to make up to 100%w / w.

11. The Insecticidal composition as claimed in claim 4, wherein the WG comprises comprises at least a dispersing agent in an amount in the range of 2-6%w / w, at least a wetting agent in an amount in the range of 1-5%w / w, at least an anti-foaming agent in an amount in the range of 0.10-5%w / w, and a carrier up to 95%w / w.

12. The Insecticidal composition as claimed in claim 11, comprising Sodium Polycarboxylate of 3%, Sodium Lauryl Sulphate of 4%, Sodium alkyl naphthalene sulfonate Blend of 2% Polydimethyl Siloxane of 0.50%, and China clay to make up to 100%w / w.

13. The Insecticidal composition as claimed in claim 4, wherein the WP comprises comprises at least a dispersing agent in an amount in the range of 2-6%w / w, at least a wetting agent in an amount in the range of 1-5%w / w, at least an anti-foaming agent in an amount in the range of 0.10-5%w / w, at least an anti-freezing agent in an amount up to 1-10%w / w, at least Biocide agent in an amount in the range of 0.10-5%w / w, at least a thickening agent in an amount in the range of 0.10-5%w / w, at least a Solvent in an amount in the range of 10-50%w / w and a carrier up to 95%w / w.

14. The Insecticidal composition as claimed in claim 13, comprising Sodium ligno sulfonate of 3%, Sodium Lauryl Sulfate of 2%, Sodium alkyl naphthalene sulfonate blend of 0.20% Starch of 6%, Ammonium Sulphate of 0.10% Polydimethyl Siloxan of 0.10%,and China clay to make up to 100%w / w.

Images