Computer-implemented method for optimizing injection-molding processes, and system for carrying out the method

Abstract

The invention relates to a computer-implemented method for optimizing injection-molding processes, and to a system for carrying out the method, the method comprising the following steps: a) performing a first simulation calculation for injection molding a component using an initial simulation molding model and an initial process parameter set, b) performing at least one further simulation calculation using at least one modified variant of the simulation molding model and / or at least one modified variant of the process parameters, c) transmitting the results of the simulation calculations to an evaluation unit, wherein an environment parameter set is present in the evaluation unit, or an environment parameter set is input into the evaluation unit, wherein the evaluation unit is configured to determine respective values of evaluation features of a set of evaluation features on the basis of the results of each of the transmitted simulation calculations, wherein at least one of the environment parameters is included in at least a partial number of the evaluation features for calculating the associated evaluation feature value, d) calculating a value of a multi-factor function for each simulation calculation on the basis of a specified multi-factor function algorithm including the evaluation feature values, e) automatedly processing the values of the multi-factor function of the various simulations by means of the evaluation unit, and f) automatedly determining a target process parameter set, a target molding model and / or a target environment parameter set for an optimized injection-molding process from the processing of the values of the multi-factor function.

Description

[0001] P 2753 WO / 2025014541 Representative: KÖNIG NAEVEN SCHMETZ Patent & Lawyers, 52072 Aachen

[0002] Applicant: SIMCON Kunststofftechnische Software GmbH

[0003] Computer-implemented method for optimizing injection molding processes and system for carrying out the process

[0004] The invention relates to a computer-implemented method for optimizing injection molding processes and a system for carrying out the method.

[0005] For plastic components, injection molding is a typical manufacturing process in which thermoplastic, thermoset, or elastomeric material is injected under pressure into cavities of a mold, where it solidifies and hardens. The molds are generally reusable, making this an efficient method for reliably producing a large number of identical parts. Finding the optimal mold design and suitable process parameters, such as those related to the plastic material, temperature, pressure, and injection point(s), can be costly and time-consuming, especially when trials are conducted with actual molds. To reduce this effort, simulation calculations can be used to vary the process parameters.

[0006] Injection-molded components are subject to complex quality requirements and objectives. In addition to functionality, increasing ecological demands are being placed on the production and life cycle of injection-molded components. Injection molding simulations offer the possibility of considering ecological aspects as early as the component design stage.

[0007] From US Patent 8,392,160 B2, a method and a system of the type mentioned above are known, in which energy indicator values ​​for a variety of thermoplastic materials are determined by means of simulation calculations for injection molding processes. An energy indicator value is intended to represent the expected energy requirement for carrying out an injection of the material into the injection mold. For this purpose, an injection process is simulated for each of the investigated thermoplastic materials in a first modeled mold. For the respective material, a corresponding value of a first energy parameter is determined based on the simulated injection process into the cavity of a first modeled injection mold. P 2753 EP Representative: KÖNIG NAEVEN SCHMETZ Patent & Trademark Attorneys, 52072 Aachen

[0008] Applicant: SIMCON Kunststofftechnische Software GmbH

[0009] 2

[0010] Based on the respective value of the first energy parameter, a corresponding energy indicator is determined for each of the thermoplastic materials. In one embodiment of the method according to this prior art, the injection of each of the thermoplastic materials into one or more other modeled injection molding cavities is simulated, each cavity having different geometric dimensions.

[0011] The aforementioned state of the art is limited to determining an energy indicator value that describes the expected energy consumption for various thermoplastic materials, based on a simulation of the injection molding process. This energy indicator value primarily considers energy consumption aspects such as heating the material, the required pressure, and cooling. However, these parameters alone do not provide a comprehensive environmental assessment and do not take into account other engineering objectives such as cost and quality optimization. Energy consumption is not, however, the only factor that is relevant from an environmental perspective.

[0012] The present invention is based on the technical problem of providing a method and a system of the type mentioned at the outset, which allow the consideration of further parameters for the optimization of the injection molding process.

[0013] With regard to the method, the technical problem is solved by the features of claim 1, and with regard to the system, by the features of claim 10. Advantageous embodiments of the method and the system according to the invention are set forth in the dependent claims.

[0014] Accordingly, a computer-implemented method for optimizing injection molding processes is proposed, comprising the following steps: a) Performing an initial simulation calculation for the injection molding of a component using an initial simulation mold model and an initial set of process parameters, P 2753 EP Representative: KÖNIG NAEVEN SCHMETZ Patent & Attorneys at Law, 52072 Aachen

[0015] Applicant: SIMCON Kunststofftechnische Software GmbH

[0016] 3 b) Performing at least one further simulation calculation using at least one modified variant of the simulation component model and / or at least one modified variant of the process parameters; c) Transmitting the results of the simulation calculations to an evaluation unit in which an environmental parameter set is available or to which an environmental parameter set is entered and which is configured to determine, based on the results of each of the transmitted simulation calculations, the respective values ​​of evaluation characteristics of a set of evaluation characteristics, whereby at least one of the environmental parameters is included for the calculation of the associated evaluation characteristic value for at least a subset of the evaluation characteristics; d) Calculating a value of a multifactor function for each simulation calculation using a predefined multifactor function algorithm, including the evaluation characteristic values.e) automated processing of the values ​​of the multifactor function from the various simulations using the evaluation unit, and f) automated determination of a target process parameter set, a target environment parameter set and / or a target molded part model for an optimized injection molding process from the processing of the values ​​of the multifactor function.

[0017] A key aspect of the invention is therefore to combine and consider various effects of an injection molding process, such as ecological and economic impacts, using automated means and simulation calculations that simulate the injection molding process, in such a way that a preferably ecologically optimized injection molding process can be achieved. For this purpose, the results of the simulation calculations are automatically evaluated with regard to predefined evaluation criteria. At least some of these criteria depend on at least one environmental parameter, such as ambient temperature or air pressure at the location of the actual injection molding process, energy price, energy consumption of the injection molding machine used, or the transport route for raw materials. The evaluation criteria can represent specific types of impacts, in particular ecological and / or economic impacts, of the injection molding process.For the P 2753 EP representatives: KÖNIG NAEVEN SCHMETZ Patent & Lawyers, 52072 Aachen.

[0018] Applicant: SIMCON Kunststofftechnische Software GmbH

[0019] For each of the four evaluation characteristics, an evaluation characteristic value can be automatically determined, which is then assigned, for example, to a considered effect. To obtain a measure of the totality of the effects of a specific simulated injection molding process, a multifactor function is used to calculate a multifactor value by calculating the evaluation characteristic values.

[0020] The respective multifactor values ​​from multiple simulation calculations are processed together in a predefined algorithm to determine which simulation mold model and which set of process parameters will lead to an optimized injection molding process under specific environmental parameters. Thus, for the actual injection molding process, given environmental parameters, the appropriate process parameters and the appropriate mold model can be selected based on the target process parameters and the target mold model determined by the algorithm. The environmental parameters expected in the actual process can also be influenced, such as ambient temperature or humidity at the production site. For environmental parameters that cannot be directly influenced, such as energy prices, waiting for suitable times for the actual injection molding process may be advisable.Therefore, target environmental parameters resulting from the inventive method can be useful for optimizing the injection molding process.

[0021] The automated processing of multifactor values ​​thus enables automated or semi-automated optimization of the injection molding process by determining target values ​​for the process parameter set, the optimized target mold model, and / or the environmental parameter set. This allows for optimization considering a multitude of factors, particularly general, engineering-focused objectives combined with life cycle assessment goals. From a technical perspective, this significantly minimizes the effort required to find an optimum in an injection molding process, especially with regard to environmental protection, but also including other aspects, such as economic considerations. In particular, the inclusion of diverse environmental parameters and P 2753 EP Representative: KÖNIG NAEVEN SCHMETZ Patent & Attorneys at Law, 52072 Aachen

[0022] Applicant: SIMCON Kunststofftechnische Software GmbH

[0023] 5 evaluation criteria result in a significant time saving and a significant saving of resources compared to other optimization attempts.

[0024] Optimization can focus on the injection molding process itself, the selection and / or manufacture of a tool and / or injection mold, and / or the component to be produced. The direction of the optimization can be determined by selecting the evaluation criteria. Optimization can encompass not only a single aspect, such as energy consumption, but also, particularly due to the inclusion of the environmental parameter set, other ecological impacts, such as the CO2 footprint of the injection molding process, the disposal of used injection molds, injection tools, or manufactured components. Costs of the injection molding process, including the costs of the production environment, quality characteristics of the manufactured components, or the stability of the production process can also be considered.For the first time, it is possible to automatically combine different evaluation characteristics from very different areas and to use them from a field of tension including, for example, functionality, quality, ecological influence and costs for multifactorial optimization in injection molding simulation.

[0025] The following explains the terms and steps used to describe the method according to the invention:

[0026] Each simulation molded part model defines, for example, a specific molded part geometry, in particular at least one molded part cavity and preferably wall thicknesses, as well as preferably material properties of the simulation molded part.

[0027] The process parameters include, for example, at least one, any subset, or all of the following exemplary quantities: position, orientation, and / or opening size of one or more injection points, an injection molding material, an injection temperature of the injection molding material, an initial temperature and / or initial temperature distribution of the simulated part, an injection pressure, an injection pressure distribution and / or an injection pressure profile, an injection speed, an injection speed distribution, and / or a P 2753 EP Representative: KÖNIG NAEVEN SCHMETZ Patent & Attorneys at Law, 52072 Aachen

[0028] Applicant: SIMCON Kunststofftechnische Software GmbH

[0029] 6. Injection speed profile, a switching point for switching between the filling phase and the holding pressure phase, a holding pressure, a holding pressure distribution and / or a holding pressure profile or a cooling time.

[0030] Environmental parameters are those that can be determined by the process environment in the broadest sense. The process environment in the broadest sense encompasses not only the immediate spatial surroundings of the actual injection molding process with measurable quantities such as temperature or humidity, and / or the type of injection molding machine used, the expected energy mix, and / or the machine's base energy consumption. Rather, the process environment also generally includes areas that influence the injection molding process and / or areas that are influenced by the injection molding process. These include, for example, transport routes or transport costs for the raw materials required for the process prior to the process, and, after the process, disposal costs or the environmental impact of the manufactured product.

[0031] The environmental parameters can form the basis for at least a subset of the evaluation features, which are explained in more detail below. The environmental parameters, or a subset thereof, can be defined by the user or are predefined when the method according to the invention is started. In the evaluation unit, the environmental parameters, together with the results of the simulation calculations, can be used to calculate at least a subset of the evaluation feature values.

[0032] The environmental parameters can be predefined in the simulation program and automatically selected by the program. It is also possible for the user to specify values ​​for environmental parameters to the simulation program, or to directly or indirectly adopt at least one value from at least one measuring device as an environmental parameter via at least one measuring device interface, e.g., an ambient temperature or an air pressure value. These can also be time-dependent environmental parameters that change during an injection molding process. The time dependency can result from different durations, e.g., the operating time of a machine. P 2753 EP Representative: KÖNIG NAEVEN SCHMETZ Patent & Attorneys at Law, 52072 Aachen

[0033] Applicant: SIMCON Kunststofftechnische Software GmbH

[0034] 7 or from fluctuations in relevant values ​​during the use of a machine or resource, e.g., a changing power requirement or energy price over the operating time.

[0035] An environmental parameter can also be specified depending on other parameters, such as the location, the selected material, or the properties of the component.

[0036] The environmental parameter, or at least a subset of the environmental parameters, can be entered or adjusted manually by a user before or during the simulation program, in addition to being specified in the simulation program or automatically supplied by another device, e.g., a measuring device.

[0037] Following the initial simulation, at least one further simulation is performed, with the simulation mold model and / or at least one process parameter being varied for each simulation. A variant of the simulation mold model is defined as a modified simulation mold model, with changes, for example, in the geometry of the mold cavity and preferably the wall thickness(es) and / or its material(s) and / or its functionalities. A variant of a process parameter is defined as a modified process parameter, whereby, optionally, a process parameter range can be specified for at least one of the process parameters, to which the variation of the process parameter is limited.

[0038] To automatically determine the variants and reduce the number of simulation runs, a statistical design of experiments can be used, preferably with the well-known D-optimal method (e.g., document "D-Optimal Design of Experiments", © 2020 CRGRAPH at https: / / crgraph.de / themen-index / ). Other designs besides D-optimal designs can also be used.

[0039] With a preferably automatically generated experimental design, for example a D-optimal experimental design, an uncorrelated experimental design can be, for example, automatically P 2753 EP Representative: KÖNIG NAEVEN SCHMETZ Patent & Lawyers, 52072 Aachen

[0040] Applicant: SIMCON Kunststofftechnische Software GmbH

[0041] The experimental design can be based on a predefined nth-order model. The underlying model can be linear, linear mixed, quadratic, mixed quadratic, or even of a higher order. Preferably, a linear or quadratic model is selected automatically. A suitable model can be defined, for example, by evaluating it using the coefficient of determination R².

[0042] The simulation results are analyzed in an evaluation unit with regard to the evaluation characteristics. The evaluation unit is formed by a data processing program, which can be independently equipped with its own interfaces or be part of a more comprehensive data processing program. The evaluation unit is therefore not necessarily a physically definable unit. The evaluation unit and other units used in the computer-implemented method according to the invention can also be formed by virtual machines.

[0043] The evaluation criteria relate to the actual injection molding process and a component produced by it, and are crucial for process optimization. Examples of evaluation criteria include the ecological and / or social impact of a real injection molding process and a component produced by it (as simulated), the total costs of the real injection molding process, the quality of the produced component, and the stability of the injection molding process. At least some of the evaluation criteria are influenced by environmental parameters, which are either initially defined by the user or are already stored in the system as fixed initial environmental parameters, e.g., in the evaluation unit. For example, if the ecological footprint of the injection molding process is used as an evaluation criterion, this criterion can depend directly on the environmental parameter "energy mix."

[0044] In the course of the inventive method, the evaluation unit determines the consequences of the results of at least a subset of the simulation calculations on the evaluation characteristics, taking into account any environmental parameters involved. For this purpose, the P 2753 EP Representative: KÖNIG NAEVEN SCHMETZ Patent & Attorneys at Law, 52072 Aachen

[0045] Applicant: SIMCON Kunststofftechnische Software GmbH

[0046] Each of the nine considered evaluation characteristics is assigned a dimensionless evaluation characteristic value, which can be determined, for example, using a predefined algorithm from a quantity value of a quantity assigned to the evaluation characteristic, which usually has one dimension. An example of how to determine an evaluation characteristic value is shown below.

[0047] The evaluation criteria can be divided into sub-criteria, which can also be considered. Regarding the ecological and / or social impact of an injection molding process and a component produced by it, the following environmental parameters, listed as examples, can be selected as sub-criteria for the evaluation criterion "ecological impact": transport routes, the use of recycled material and / or the proportion of recycled material in the manufacturing process, in the component and / or in the injection-molded part, and / or the electricity mix. The ecological impact can be determined, for example, through life cycle assessment (LCA), and the social impact through social life cycle analysis (S-LCA).The subordinate evaluation criteria to be considered for the evaluation criterion of life cycle assessment and / or social life cycle analysis are, for example, the CO2 equivalent, also called CO2 footprint, resource consumption, e.g. of water, waste management, preferably including end-of-life management, ecotoxicity, acidification potential, eutrophication potential, human toxicity and / or photochemical ozone formation potential.

[0048] Evaluation sub-characteristics of the evaluation characteristic "total costs" of the actual injection molding process can include, for example, energy costs, material costs, costs associated with the purchase and operation of the machines to be used and / or the cycle time.

[0049] Evaluation sub-characteristics of the evaluation characteristic "quality of the manufactured component" can include, for example, dimensional accuracy in length in a specific spatial direction, flatness, P 2753 EP Representative: KÖNIG NAEVEN SCHMETZ Patent & Lawyers, 52072 Aachen

[0050] Applicant: SIMCON Kunststofftechnische Software GmbH

[0051] 10. Roundness and / or wall thickness, the presence of surface defects, material degradation or mechanical properties.

[0052] Evaluation sub-characteristics of the evaluation characteristic "Stability of the injection molding process" can include, for example, the sensitivity of process parameters, environmental parameters and / or boundary conditions to the evaluation characteristics and / or the thermal stability of the injection molding process, e.g. in relation to the tool, the cooling system and / or the molded part.

[0053] The list of possible evaluation characteristics and sub-characteristics is not exhaustive. Each sub-characteristic can in turn be assigned subordinate sub-characteristics, thus creating a hierarchy.

[0054] Evaluation characteristic values ​​are preferably dimensionless values ​​assigned to the evaluation characteristics by the evaluation unit. The same applies to evaluation sub-characteristics, insofar as these are used in the process. Each evaluation characteristic or evaluation sub-characteristic is based on a measurable or determinable quantity. For example, the expected tolerance can be used as the quantity for the evaluation sub-characteristic of dimensional accuracy in length in a specific spatial direction.

[0055] To determine an evaluation (sub)characteristic value, it can be planned, for example, to first assign a target value of the corresponding quantity to a specific evaluation (sub)characteristic, e.g., for dimensional accuracy in length in a specific spatial direction, a tolerance of, for example, A = + / - 3 pm. A confidence interval is then set around this target value for the quantity, within which the result or the process of the injection molding process can still be expected to be acceptable, e.g., a confidence interval VB = |v²| - |vi| with a minimum tolerance of A. min = + / - 1 pm (=vi) up to a maximum tolerance of A max .= + / - 5 pm (= v2). P 2753 EP Representative: KÖNIG NAEVEN SCHMETZ Patent & Lawyers, 52072 Aachen

[0056] Applicant: SIMCON Kunststofftechnische Software GmbH

[0057] 11

[0058] To determine the evaluation characteristic value or evaluation sub-characteristic value, the following procedure can be used as an example: If the evaluation unit determines a specific value w for a particular evaluation characteristic or evaluation sub-characteristic in relation to a simulation calculation, the difference between the value wj and the target value Zj is calculated and divided by the confidence interval VBj. This yields a dimensionless number that serves as the evaluation characteristic value or evaluation sub-characteristic value aj. This relationship can be represented formulaically as follows:

[0059] An example of a simple evaluation characteristic dependent on an environmental parameter could be the CO2 footprint of the production of the raw material used in the injection molding process. For instance, the simulation might show that a certain mass m of raw material is required for the injection molding process. The environmental parameter could be the CO2 footprint f normalized to this mass, so that the evaluation characteristic is simply the product. = m*f is.

[0060] To address the possibility that the calculated value Wj for at least one of the evaluated characteristics lies outside the confidence interval VBj when evaluating the multifactor function, which is explained in the following paragraph, a penalty factor pj can be applied. This factor is linked to the value of the evaluated (sub)characteristic and is not equal to 1 if the value Wj lies outside the confidence interval. The linkage could, for example, be a multiplication. If the calculated value Wj lies outside the confidence interval, a corresponding notification can be automatically provided to the user.

[0061] The multifactor function is a function automatically determined via the predefined multifactor function algorithm based on the evaluation characteristic values ​​and / or evaluation sub-characteristic values, which serves as a measure for the optimization of the P 2753 EP Representative: KÖNIG NAEVEN SCHMETZ Patent & Lawyers, 52072 Aachen

[0062] Applicant: SIMCON Kunststofftechnische Software GmbH

[0063] 12. The algorithm can serve the injection molding process of the desired component. It is predefined for each automatically executed process, but preferably it can also be adapted to changing conditions, e.g., changing costs for raw materials and energy, changing environmental protection regulations, or changing requirements for the component to be produced by the injection molding process. The multifactor function can be a mathematical function, in particular an analytical function F(a0; ... .a). n ) be, with which the a0bis a n , which are the values ​​of the evaluation characteristics aj, are processed. In the simplest case, the multifactor function can be a sum of the absolute values ​​of the evaluation characteristic values, as shown below in a normalized form taking into account the penalty factor Pi:

[0064] With confidence interval VBi = \vi2\ - \vil\ zi = target value, e.g. centrally in the confidence interval VBI

[0065] For each simulation, a value of the associated multifactor function can be determined.

[0066] It is conceivable to use the lowest of the multifactor function values ​​and the process parameter set and / or the mold model of the associated simulation as the target process parameter set and / or as the target mold model for an optimized injection molding process. The environmental parameter set used in the evaluation unit with the result of the associated simulation can be used as the target environmental parameter set. It is also conceivable to map the determined discrete multifactor values ​​with a preferably continuous mathematical function, hereinafter referred to as the optimization function, and to determine an extreme value, e.g., a minimum, for the optimization function.The extreme value can be assigned process parameters, environmental parameters, and / or a molded part model that are modified compared to those used in the simulation calculations and in the evaluation unit and can serve as the target process parameter set, target environmental parameter set, and / or target molded part model for an optimized injection molding process. P 2753 EP Representative: KÖNIG NAEVEN SCHMETZ Patent & Attorneys at Law, 52072 Aachen.

[0067] Applicant: SIMCON Kunststofftechnische Software GmbH

[0068] 13

[0069] Using the target process parameter set and the target part model determined in this way, a simulation calculation can be performed again for verification. If the result is satisfactory, the target process parameter set and the target part model can be provided to the machine as input data for the actual injection molding process. This allows the environmental parameters present at the time of the actual injection molding process to be checked for at least a high degree of agreement with the target environmental parameters. The target process parameter set, target environmental parameter set, and / or target part model, which together are referred to as target values, can alternatively or additionally serve as the basis for further optimization steps. The decision regarding the use of the determined target values ​​for the actual injection molding process and / or for use in further optimization steps can be based on set limit values, e.g.,The multifactor function value determining the target values ​​can be determined automatically by the inventive method or by the user via a user interface.

[0070] The evaluation unit can be connected to a simulation unit via an interface for running the simulation. This interface can allow for a physical distance between the simulation units. The interface can be wireless. It can also be part of a network, particularly the internet. However, it is also possible to integrate the evaluation unit into the simulation unit. As already described, individual units or all units can be implemented as virtual machines, which can also be distributed, i.e., distributed within a network (LAN or WAN).

[0071] The optimization process can run completely automatically using the preset algorithms in the evaluation unit.

[0072] It can be advantageous to implement the method according to the invention in such a way that the multifactorial scoring algorithm is adapted by an artificial intelligence. Using an implemented artificial intelligence (hereinafter referred to as AI), the multifactorial scoring algorithm can be adapted by machine learning, preferably with the aid of P 2753 EP Representative: KÖNIG NAEVEN SCHMETZ Patent & Attorneys at Law, 52072 Aachen

[0073] Applicant: SIMCON Kunststofftechnische Software GmbH

[0074] The AI, comprised of at least 14 neural networks, can be continuously improved. This allows the AI ​​to analyze historical data from previous simulations and from real-world production runs encompassing the injection molding process, in order to identify patterns and predict future process optimizations. The application of AI offers exceptional adaptability to respond to dynamic changes. An example of AI application would be adapting the multi-factor value algorithm to dynamic fluctuations in raw material costs or legal environmental regulations. Using artificial intelligence and machine learning, a cause-and-effect model can be created, taking into account general engineering and life cycle assessment objectives.

[0075] The method according to the invention can also be implemented such that support information relating to evaluation features is exchanged via at least one support unit interface between the evaluation unit and / or the simulation unit on the one hand and an external support unit on the other. Such an external support unit can, for example, be configured to determine the composition of the current electricity mix and / or the CO2 footprint of the energy required for the injection molding process and / or the plastic material used, preferably taking into account its production, and / or the transport of the components involved in the injection molding process, and to automatically transmit the information thus obtained to the evaluation unit and / or the simulation unit, e.g., triggered by detected changes, such as in the electricity mix and / or energy or raw material prices. The support information can, for example,to adapt the environmental parameter data set for the following process steps or for another simulation round.

[0076] The support unit and / or the support unit interface can be located separately from the simulation unit and / or the evaluation unit. The support unit interface, and thus the support unit itself, can be connected to the simulation unit and / or the evaluation unit via a wired or wireless connection, possibly also via a network. The support unit can, for example, be located at the site of the actual injection molding process to be carried out after the simulation. The support unit can be a P 2753 EP representative: KÖNIG NAEVEN SCHMETZ Patent & Trademark Attorneys, 52072 Aachen

[0077] Applicant: SIMCON Kunststofftechnische Software GmbH

[0078] 15. The input interface allows for manual or automated input of support information. For example, current energy costs of individual energy resources, the current energy mix, current material costs, or other environmental parameters and / or parameters for a life cycle analysis of the component to be manufactured can be entered automatically, provided the input interface is connected to a suitable source. Additionally or alternatively, measuring devices for relevant quantities, such as temperature, air pressure, and / or humidity, can also be used as a source of support information.

[0079] The method according to the invention can also be implemented such that the external support unit is configured to perform a life cycle analysis or a life cycle assessment (LCA) for at least one of the evaluation characteristics or sub-characteristics as supporting information. For this purpose, the external support unit can determine, for example, a life cycle assessment value for the relevant evaluation (sub-)characteristic, e.g., energy and / or raw material consumption. This value is then used by the evaluation unit to determine the evaluation characteristic value or directly as an alternative evaluation characteristic value, e.g., a value for the CO2 footprint of the original evaluation characteristic. The evaluation unit can include the life cycle assessment value of the alternative evaluation characteristic in the calculation of the multi-factor value.

[0080] Data and information fed in via the support unit interface, e.g., from external data and / or information sources, can serve not only to determine the evaluation (partial) feature value. They can also serve, for example, in future inventive methods as a source of knowledge for creating a process parameter set and / or environmental parameter data set and / or a simulation component model for the first simulation calculation. They can also be considered for determining the variants of further simulation calculations of the same method. Artificial intelligence can use machine learning to determine the process parameter set and / or P 2753 EP Representative: KÖNIG NAEVEN SCHMETZ Patent & Attorneys at Law, 52072 Aachen

[0081] Applicant: SIMCON Kunststofftechnische Software GmbH

[0082] 16 To calculate the environmental parameter data set and / or a simulation part model and / or the variants thereof.

[0083] The method according to the invention can also be implemented such that the value of the multifactor function and / or the determined evaluation (partial) feature values ​​are displayed on a graphical user interface (GUI), preferably in real time, and an input option is provided for a user. The graphical user interface can be spatially separated from the simulation unit and / or the evaluation unit and independent of the support unit interface, or it can be provided as part of the support unit interface. The graphical user interface enables a real-time display of the results of at least the first, preferably every, simulation calculation of the method. Based on this, a user can assess whether further simulation calculations are necessary or useful. The input option allows the user to influence the process.

[0084] It can be advantageous to implement the method according to the invention in such a way that the evaluation characteristic values ​​are coupled with a weighting factor gj that can be adjusted automatically or manually. A weighting factor enables the influence of an evaluation characteristic value on the value of the multifactor function F(g1*p1*a1; ,...g ). n *p n *a n) The function (2) above could therefore, in the simplest case, be written as follows:

[0085] The weighting factor can thus be used to respond to developments, e.g., changes in energy and / or material costs and / or current economic, political, and / or regulatory requirements. Furthermore, different optimization goals can be flexibly prioritized, e.g., minimizing environmental impacts versus maximizing cost efficiency. It can be advantageous to make the weighting factor, or at least one of the weighting factors, available to artificial intelligence for the machine learning process. P 2753 EP Representative: KÖNIG NAEVEN SCHMETZ Patent & Attorneys at Law, 52072 Aachen

[0086] Applicant: SIMCON Kunststofftechnische Software GmbH

[0087] 17

[0088] Furthermore, a weighting factor can be linked to at least one of the environmental parameters when calculating one of the evaluation characteristic values, especially if more than one environmental parameter is used to calculate the evaluation characteristic value. The linkage can, for example, be a simple multiplication.

[0089] The method according to the invention can also be implemented such that the target process parameter set is fed into a real injection molding process, preferably automatically. Thus, the determined target process parameter set can be fed into a real injection molding process immediately or with a delay, particularly if the molded part already exists and does not need to be modified for optimization. It can therefore be advantageous to regularly perform an optimization run for real injection molding processes, whereby optimization can be ensured even with changing environmental parameters, as the target parameters can be automatically adjusted in the method according to the invention. For this purpose, the system according to the invention includes a real injection molding machine with an interface for data exchange with the simulation unit and / or the evaluation unit and / or the user interface.

[0090] An exemplary method and an exemplary system according to the invention of this side are presented below with reference to figures.

[0091] Figs. 1 and 2 show in two partial representations an exemplary flowchart for the method according to the invention, which is carried out using a computer.

[0092] To perform an initial simulation calculation for an injection molding process, the user defines a set of initial process parameters and an initial simulation part model at startup. Alternatively, the initial process parameters and the initial simulation part model, or a subset of these parameters, can already be stored in the system for the purpose of executing the procedure. P 2753 EP Representative: KÖNIG NAEVEN SCHMETZ Patent & Attorneys at Law, 52072 Aachen

[0093] Applicant: SIMCON Kunststofftechnische Software GmbH

[0094] 18

[0095] Using the initial process parameters and the initial simulation part model, a first simulation of an injection molding process is performed. To determine target process parameters and a target part model with which the real injection molding process can be optimized, further simulations are carried out, for which variants of the process parameters and / or the part model are created. It is possible to vary only a subset of the process parameters.

[0096] The variations of the process parameters and / or the molded part model are preferably generated automatically. Statistical experimental design can be used for this purpose. The user defines, for at least a subset of the process parameters, a process parameter range that specifies the limits within which the process parameters can be changed, and a molded part model range that specifies the limits within which the molded part model can be varied. Furthermore, the user defines evaluation criteria, which are characteristics used to determine whether an injection molding process can be considered optimized. In a later step, described below, evaluation criteria are assigned to the evaluation criteria for each simulation. These criteria are then used by an algorithm to determine the conditions for an optimized injection molding process.The user also defines evaluation characteristic value ranges, which specify the limits within which the evaluation characteristic values ​​may lie.

[0097] Following the initial simulation, variants of the process parameters and, optionally, of the molded part model are generated, preferably automatically, and further preferably using statistical design of experiments, taking into account the molded part model area, the process parameter areas, and the evaluation feature value areas. Several sets of varied process parameters and—if applicable—several molded part model variants are generated for a specific number of simulations. Alternatively, the variant generation step can be performed multiple times, each time between two simulations. This means, for example, that after the first simulation, at least one process parameter is varied again, and if applicable, P 2753 EP Representative: KÖNIG NAEVEN SCHMETZ Patent & Attorneys at Law, 52072 Aachen

[0098] Applicant: SIMCON Kunststofftechnische Software GmbH

[0099] 19 is intended to generate a molded part model variant for one or more further simulation calculations.

[0100] Using one set of varied process parameters and – if applicable – one of the molded part model variants, n - 1 further simulation calculations can be performed. The results of these n simulation calculations are then transferred to an evaluation unit. In addition to the simulation results, the evaluation unit also receives the evaluation characteristics and their value ranges, which are transmitted in a manner not shown in Fig. 1.

[0101] The evaluation criteria are based, at least in part, on environmental parameters, which are either defined by the user or stored in the software used. Environmental parameters are additional parameters that go beyond the usual process parameters known from the state of the art and include environmental conditions that must be considered for the actual injection molding process.

[0102] Furthermore, for at least one of the environmental parameters, a user-defined or software-defined environmental parameter range can be set, defining limits for the parameter in question. A warning signal can be triggered, for example, when the parameter exceeds this range. Such a range could be usefully defined, for instance, for ambient temperature or humidity at the injection molding process site.

[0103] For at least one of the evaluation characteristics, the user can define sub-characteristics, which can alternatively be predefined in the software. Like the evaluation characteristics themselves, the sub-characteristics represent the influence of the injection molding process on parameters relevant for optimizing the injection molding process and are taken into account during the evaluation of the simulation calculation(s). Furthermore, ranges can also be defined for the sub-characteristic values, specifying limits for acceptable values. The evaluation unit and the processes occurring within it are described below. P 2753 EP Representative: KÖNIG NAEVEN SCHMETZ Patent & Attorneys at Law, 52072 Aachen

[0104] Applicant: SIMCON Kunststofftechnische Software GmbH

[0105] 20

[0106] Furthermore, the user can optionally specify whether at least one evaluation (sub)characteristic, and if so, which one, should be converted into alternative life cycle assessment characteristics or quantities using a preferably external support unit. This option is explained further below.

[0107] According to the user's specifications, which can be entered via an interface for the computer-implemented process or are already specified in the associated software, an initial simulation calculation for the injection molding process is carried out in a simulation unit using the initial process parameters and the initial molded part model.

[0108] In the next step, variants of the process parameters and / or the initial molded part model are automatically generated, using statistical design of experiments (DOP), e.g., a D-optimal design of experiments. The number n of variants can be predetermined by the software used for the statistical design of experiments, defined by the user, or determined using artificial intelligence, depending on the method employed.

[0109] Depending on the number of variants, further simulations of the injection molding process are performed using varied process parameters and / or the modified part model. Simulations 1 to n are shown as examples in the flowchart. For each subsequent simulation, individual process parameters, a number of parts, or all process parameters can be varied.

[0110] The results of the simulation calculations are then transferred to an evaluation unit. The evaluation unit can be a physically separate unit connected to the simulation unit via at least one interface, or it can be software integrated into a computer unit that also performs the simulation calculations. As previously described, units and interfaces can be implemented virtually and distributed, for example, within a network (LAN or WAN), or even in a decentralized organization, such as in the cloud. P 2753 EP Representative: KÖNIG NAEVEN SCHMETZ Patent & Trademark Attorneys, 52072 Aachen

[0111] Applicant: SIMCON Kunststofftechnische Software GmbH

[0112] 21

[0113] The evaluation unit automatically calculates the effects of the simulated injection molding process on the evaluation (sub)characteristics using a predefined algorithm and taking environmental parameters into account. It then assigns a value to each of these (sub)characteristics. One of these values ​​could, for example, uniquely represent the material costs of the raw material used in a specific injection molding process. Another value could represent the total energy used during the injection process, comprised of the basic energy consumption of the injection molding machine and the energy calculated for the injection molding process during the simulation.

[0114] In a further step, it may be possible to introduce additional information, also referred to here as supporting information, into the process and to change or adjust environmental parameters, which may change a subset of the evaluation (sub)characteristics or the associated evaluation (sub)characteristic value. It may be advantageous to provide this measure as an option. Figure 1 shows the decision option regarding the necessity of converting to alternative life cycle assessment values. Other values ​​are also possible. In the flowchart in Figure 1, path A2 leads from the decision option to the continuation of the flowchart in Figure 2.

[0115] The input of support information can be automated, for example, via a separate support unit in the form of software, with information exchange occurring via an interface with the evaluation unit and / or the simulation unit. The support unit can, for example, have information about changed raw material or energy prices or a change in the composition of the energy mix. Environmental parameters can thus be modified by the support unit. The use of the support unit is particularly advantageous if the support unit can access more reliable or up-to-date sources or offers better computational capabilities. Figure 2 shows the transfer of at least a subset of the evaluation characteristic values ​​(AWWMWe) calculated by the evaluation unit to the P 2753 EP representative: KÖNIG NAEVEN SCHMETZ Patent & Attorneys at Law, 52072 Aachen

[0116] Applicant: SIMCON Kunststofftechnische Software GmbH

[0117] 22

[0118] The support unit is shown if the conversion option is to be used. This also includes the evaluation sub-characteristic values. For clarity, these are not shown in the flowchart, but are also used. The support unit can optionally be created by external software. Using the support information, the support unit calculates alternative evaluation (sub-)characteristic values.

[0119] Once all evaluation (sub)characteristic values ​​or the alternative evaluation (sub)characteristic values ​​calculated by the support unit are known, the evaluation unit then feeds these values ​​into a multifactor function for each simulation run. A specific algorithm is used to determine a multifactor function value for each simulation run. This algorithm can be adapted to dynamic changes using artificial intelligence and machine learning, as described above in the general section of this description.

[0120] The multifactor function values ​​can now be represented as a mathematical function depending on the varied process parameters, the environmental parameters, and / or the varied simulation part models. As shown, for example, in the general description above, a target process parameter set, a target environmental parameter set, and / or a target simulation part model can now be automatically calculated based on the dependency, which can be determined numerically, for example, enabling an optimized injection molding process.

[0121] The target process parameter set and / or the target simulation mold model can be automatically applied in a real injection molding process under conditions that correspond to or closely approximate the target environment parameter set (correct?). However, it is also possible to display the target process parameter set, the target environment parameter set, and / or the target simulation mold model, and / or the achieved multifactor function value as a preliminary final result, referred to as the preliminary optimum in Fig. 2, on a graphical user interface (see Fig. 2). A user can then decide whether the preliminary final result becomes the final result or whether an adjustment of output variables, e.g., the initial P 2753 EP Representative: KÖNIG NAEVEN SCHMETZ Patent & Attorneys at Law, 52072 Aachen

[0122] Applicant: SIMCON Kunststofftechnische Software GmbH

[0123] 23. The process parameter set, the initial environmental parameter set, and / or the initial simulation component model are replaced, and the process is restarted from the beginning. This is designated as path A4 across Fig. 2 and Fig. 1. Alternatively, the user can choose to restart the process in the evaluation unit with unchanged results from the simulation calculations already performed, in order to recalculate the evaluation (sub)feature values ​​with a changed weighting of the environmental parameters. This is designated as path A3 across Fig. 2 and Fig. 1.

[0124] Not shown in the figures is the user's option to change the weighting of the evaluation (sub)characteristic values ​​in the multifactor function, either as an alternative or in addition to changing the weighting of the environmental parameters.

Claims

P 2753 WO 72025014540 Representative: KÖNIG NAEVEN SCHMETZ Patent & Lawyers, 52072 Aachen Applicant: SIMCON Kunststofftechnische Software GmbH Computer-implemented method for optimizing injection molding processes and system for carrying out the process Patent claims 1. Computer-implemented method for optimizing injection molding processes, comprising the steps: a) Performing an initial simulation calculation for the injection molding of a component using an initial simulation mold model and an initial process parameter set; b) Performing at least one further simulation calculation using at least one modified variant of the simulation mold model and / or at least one modified variant of the process parameters; c) Transmitting the results of the simulation calculations to an evaluation unit, wherein an environment parameter set is available in the evaluation unit or an environment parameter set is entered into the evaluation unit, wherein the evaluation unit is configured to determine respective values ​​of evaluation characteristics of a set of evaluation characteristics based on the results of each of the transmitted simulation calculations.wherein at least one of the environmental parameters is included for the calculation of the corresponding evaluation characteristic value for at least a subset of the evaluation characteristics, d) calculation of a value of a multifactor function for each simulation calculation using a predefined multifactor function algorithm, including the evaluation characteristic values, e) automated processing of the values ​​of the multifactor function from the various simulations using the evaluation unit, and f) automated determination of a target process parameter set, a target molded part model and / or a target environmental parameter set for an optimized injection molding process from the processing of the values ​​of the multifactor function.

2. Method according to claim 1, characterized in that the multifactorial value algorithm is adapted by an artificial intelligence. P 2753 WO / 2025014540 Representative: KÖNIG NAEVEN SCHMETZ Patent & Lawyers, 52072 Aachen Applicant: SIMCON Kunststofftechnische Software GmbH 3. Method according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that support information relating to evaluation features is exchanged via at least one support unit interface between the evaluation unit and / or the simulation unit on the one hand and an external support unit.

4. Method according to one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the external support unit is set up to perform a life cycle assessment (LCA) for at least one of the evaluation characteristics as support information.

5. Method according to one of the preceding claims, characterized in that results of the multifactor score and / or the determined evaluation characteristic values ​​are displayed on a graphical user interface (GUI), preferably in real time, and an input option is provided for a user.

6. Method according to one of the preceding claims, characterized in that, for the calculation of the multifactor function value, at least one of the evaluation characteristic values ​​is coupled with an automatically or manually adjustable weighting factor and / or, for the calculation of at least one of the evaluation characteristic values, at least one of the environmental parameters is coupled with an automatically or manually adjustable weighting factor.

7. Method according to claims 5 and 6, characterized in that a value of the weighting factor or at least one of the weighting factors is entered via the graphical user interface.

8. Method according to one of the preceding claims, characterized in that at least one evaluation sub-characteristic is defined for at least one of the evaluation characteristics, and an evaluation sub-characteristic value is defined for at least one evaluation sub-characteristic in the evaluation unit. P 2753 WO 72025014540 Representative: KÖNIG NAEVEN SCHMETZ Patent & Lawyers, 52072 Aachen Applicant: SIMCON kunststofftechnische Software GmbH is determined and each evaluation sub-characteristic value is taken into account in the calculation of the respective multi-factor function value.

9. Method according to one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the target process parameter set is fed, preferably automatically, to a real injection molding process.

10. System comprising a simulation unit and an evaluation unit, characterized in that the system is set up to carry out the method according to one of claims 1 to 8.

11. System according to claim 10, further comprising a user interface, preferably graphical.

12. System according to claim 10 or 11, further comprising a support unit having a data storage device for environmental parameters or an interface for inputting environmental parameters.

13. System according to one of claims 10 to 12, characterized in that at least one of the following units, simulation unit and / or evaluation unit and / or, when claim 11 is included, the support unit, are formed as virtual machines.

14. System according to one of claims 10 to 13, characterized in that at least two of the following units, simulation unit and / or evaluation unit and / or, when claim 12 is included, the support unit, are connected to each other via a wide-area computer network (WAN).

15. System according to one of claims 10 to 14, further comprising an injection molding machine with an interface for data exchange with the simulation unit and / or the evaluation unit and / or, with reference to claim 11, the user interface.

Images