Supercharge Your Innovation With Domain-Expert AI Agents!

Research on Solid sorbents for CO2 capture in flue gas and industrial streams

SEP 24, 20259 MIN READ
Generate Your Research Report Instantly with AI Agent
Patsnap Eureka helps you evaluate technical feasibility & market potential.

CO2 Capture Technology Evolution and Objectives

Carbon dioxide capture technology has evolved significantly over the past several decades, driven by increasing concerns about climate change and greenhouse gas emissions. The journey began in the 1930s with the first commercial applications of amine-based absorption for natural gas sweetening. By the 1970s, these technologies were adapted for flue gas treatment, marking the first generation of CO2 capture solutions primarily focused on post-combustion capture using liquid solvents like monoethanolamine (MEA).

The 1990s witnessed a paradigm shift with the emergence of solid sorbents as potential alternatives to liquid-based systems. This second generation of capture technologies offered advantages including reduced energy penalties, lower corrosion risks, and greater operational flexibility. Materials such as activated carbons, zeolites, and metal oxides demonstrated promising CO2 adsorption capacities under laboratory conditions.

The early 2000s saw accelerated research into advanced materials, particularly metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), covalent organic frameworks (COFs), and functionalized porous silicas. These materials represented a third generation of capture technologies with unprecedented surface areas and tunable pore structures. Concurrently, temperature swing adsorption (TSA) and pressure swing adsorption (PSA) processes were refined to optimize the performance of these solid sorbents in real-world applications.

Current technological objectives focus on developing solid sorbents that combine high CO2 selectivity, substantial working capacity, rapid adsorption/desorption kinetics, and long-term stability under industrial conditions. Researchers aim to achieve capture costs below $40 per ton of CO2 by 2025 and under $30 per ton by 2035, compared to current costs of $50-100 per ton with conventional technologies.

The field is now moving toward fourth-generation materials that incorporate multiple functionalities, such as hierarchical pore structures and composite formulations that combine the advantages of different material classes. These advanced sorbents target specific industrial applications, including cement production, steel manufacturing, and power generation, each presenting unique challenges in terms of flue gas composition, temperature, and pressure conditions.

Looking forward, the technological roadmap emphasizes scalable manufacturing processes for novel sorbents, system integration with existing industrial infrastructure, and process intensification to minimize footprint and capital costs. The ultimate goal is to develop carbon-negative technologies that not only capture emissions from point sources but also enable direct air capture at economically viable costs, supporting global efforts to achieve net-zero emissions by mid-century.

Market Analysis for Industrial Carbon Capture Solutions

The global market for industrial carbon capture solutions is experiencing significant growth, driven by increasing environmental regulations and corporate sustainability commitments. Current market valuations indicate the carbon capture technology market reached approximately 7 billion USD in 2022, with projections suggesting growth to 12 billion USD by 2026. This represents a compound annual growth rate of around 15%, significantly outpacing many traditional industrial technology sectors.

Industrial sectors with the highest demand for carbon capture solutions include power generation, cement manufacturing, steel production, and chemical processing. These industries collectively account for over 60% of global industrial carbon emissions. The power generation sector remains the largest potential market, as coal and natural gas plants seek compliance with tightening emissions standards while extending operational lifespans.

Regional market analysis reveals varying adoption rates, with Europe leading implementation due to stringent regulatory frameworks including the EU Emissions Trading System. North America follows with growing momentum, particularly as tax incentives like the 45Q tax credit in the United States make carbon capture projects more economically viable. The Asia-Pacific region, while currently behind in adoption, represents the fastest-growing market segment with 20% annual growth as China and India balance industrial expansion with emissions reduction commitments.

Market segmentation by technology type shows that solid sorbent-based solutions are gaining market share against traditional liquid amine systems. This shift is driven by the lower energy penalties and reduced operational costs associated with advanced solid sorbents. Industry reports indicate that solid sorbent technologies could capture up to 30% of the total carbon capture market by 2025, up from approximately 15% in 2021.

Customer demand patterns reveal increasing preference for modular, scalable carbon capture systems that can be retrofitted to existing industrial facilities. This trend favors solid sorbent technologies, which typically offer greater flexibility in deployment compared to conventional liquid absorption systems. Additionally, industries are increasingly valuing solutions that address not only carbon capture but also utilization pathways, creating demand for integrated systems that connect capture technology with carbon utilization processes.

Market barriers include high capital expenditure requirements, uncertain regulatory environments in developing markets, and competition from alternative decarbonization strategies. However, declining costs of implementation, estimated at 5-8% annually for solid sorbent technologies, are gradually improving market penetration rates across industrial sectors.

Current Solid Sorbent Technologies and Barriers

Current solid sorbent technologies for CO2 capture have evolved significantly in recent years, with several material classes showing promising performance characteristics. Amine-functionalized sorbents represent one of the most mature technologies, where amines are grafted onto high surface area supports like mesoporous silica or activated carbon. These materials exhibit high CO2 selectivity and reasonable working capacities, typically 2-3 mmol/g under flue gas conditions. Their primary advantage lies in their ability to operate effectively at low CO2 partial pressures, making them suitable for post-combustion capture applications.

Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have emerged as another promising class of sorbents due to their exceptional porosity and tunable chemistry. Notable examples include Mg-MOF-74 and HKUST-1, which demonstrate CO2 capacities exceeding 5 mmol/g under ideal conditions. However, their performance often deteriorates in the presence of moisture and other flue gas contaminants, presenting a significant barrier to commercial deployment.

Zeolites and zeolitic imidazolate frameworks (ZIFs) offer another approach, with materials like 13X zeolite showing good CO2 selectivity. These crystalline aluminosilicates benefit from established manufacturing processes but suffer from severe performance degradation in humid conditions, requiring energy-intensive pre-drying of flue gas streams.

Despite these technological advances, several critical barriers impede widespread implementation. Thermal stability remains a major challenge, as many sorbents degrade after multiple temperature-swing adsorption-desorption cycles. Current materials typically maintain less than 80% of their initial capacity after 1000 cycles, falling short of the 5000+ cycles needed for economical operation.

Moisture sensitivity presents another significant hurdle, with water vapor in flue gas (typically 5-15%) competing with CO2 for adsorption sites. This competition substantially reduces working capacity and increases regeneration energy requirements. For instance, many MOFs lose 40-60% of their CO2 capacity in the presence of just 5% relative humidity.

Mechanical stability issues also plague current sorbent technologies. Pelletized or structured sorbents often experience attrition during cyclic operation, leading to pressure drop increases and material losses estimated at 1-2% per 100 cycles. This degradation significantly impacts process economics and operational reliability.

Scalability and manufacturing costs represent additional barriers. While laboratory-scale synthesis yields high-performance materials, transitioning to industrial-scale production often results in quality inconsistencies and substantially higher costs. Current production costs for advanced sorbents range from $20-100/kg, whereas commercial viability likely requires costs below $10/kg.

Existing Solid Sorbent Solutions for Flue Gas Applications

  • 01 Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) for CO2 capture

    Metal-organic frameworks are crystalline porous materials composed of metal ions or clusters coordinated with organic ligands, forming highly porous structures with large surface areas. These characteristics make MOFs excellent candidates for CO2 capture applications. Their tunable pore sizes and chemical functionalities allow for selective adsorption of CO2 from gas mixtures. MOFs can be designed with specific metal centers and organic linkers to enhance CO2 binding affinity and selectivity.
    • Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) for CO2 capture: Metal-organic frameworks are crystalline porous materials composed of metal ions or clusters coordinated with organic ligands. These materials have high surface areas and tunable pore sizes, making them effective for selective CO2 adsorption. MOFs can be designed with specific functional groups to enhance CO2 binding affinity and selectivity. Their modular nature allows for customization of properties to optimize capture performance under various conditions.
    • Amine-functionalized solid sorbents: Solid sorbents functionalized with amine groups demonstrate high CO2 capture capacity through chemical adsorption mechanisms. These materials typically consist of a porous support structure impregnated or grafted with various amine compounds. The amine groups react with CO2 to form carbamates or carbonates under ambient conditions, which can be regenerated through temperature or pressure swing processes. These sorbents offer advantages including lower regeneration energy requirements compared to liquid amine systems.
    • Zeolite and molecular sieve-based CO2 capture: Zeolites and molecular sieves are aluminosilicate materials with well-defined microporous structures that can selectively adsorb CO2 based on molecular size and polarity. These materials can be modified with cations to enhance CO2 selectivity and capacity. Their thermal stability allows for multiple adsorption-desorption cycles without significant degradation. Zeolite-based sorbents are particularly effective for pressure swing adsorption systems and can be tailored for specific operating conditions.
    • Carbon-based sorbents for CO2 capture: Carbon-based materials including activated carbon, carbon nanotubes, and graphene derivatives serve as effective CO2 sorbents due to their high surface area and pore volume. These materials can be functionalized or doped with nitrogen, oxygen, or metal particles to enhance CO2 binding affinity. Carbon-based sorbents offer advantages including low cost, high thermal stability, and hydrophobicity. Their production can utilize waste biomass, providing environmental benefits beyond carbon capture.
    • Regeneration methods for solid CO2 sorbents: Various regeneration techniques are employed to release captured CO2 from solid sorbents and restore their adsorption capacity. These include temperature swing adsorption (TSA), pressure swing adsorption (PSA), vacuum swing adsorption (VSA), and combinations thereof. Novel approaches utilize microwave, electrical, or steam heating to improve energy efficiency during regeneration. Advanced system designs incorporate heat integration and process optimization to minimize energy penalties associated with sorbent regeneration.
  • 02 Amine-functionalized solid sorbents

    Amine-functionalized materials represent a significant class of solid sorbents for CO2 capture. These materials incorporate amine groups that can chemically bind with CO2 through acid-base interactions. Common supports include silica, activated carbon, and polymeric materials that are modified with various amine compounds. The high selectivity for CO2 over other gases and the reversible nature of CO2 binding make these materials particularly effective for carbon capture applications. The amine loading, type of amine groups, and support characteristics can be optimized to enhance capture capacity and kinetics.
    Expand Specific Solutions
  • 03 Zeolite-based CO2 adsorbents

    Zeolites are crystalline aluminosilicate materials with well-defined pore structures that make them effective for CO2 capture. Their high thermal stability and mechanical strength allow for repeated adsorption-desorption cycles in industrial settings. The CO2 capture performance of zeolites can be enhanced by modifying their silicon-to-aluminum ratio, introducing metal cations, or creating hierarchical pore structures. These modifications can improve the CO2 adsorption capacity, selectivity, and kinetics under various operating conditions.
    Expand Specific Solutions
  • 04 Carbon-based sorbents for CO2 capture

    Carbon-based materials, including activated carbon, carbon nanotubes, and graphene derivatives, serve as effective CO2 adsorbents due to their high surface area and porous structure. These materials can be functionalized or doped with nitrogen, oxygen, or metal particles to enhance their CO2 capture performance. The advantages of carbon-based sorbents include low cost, high thermal stability, and resistance to moisture. Various activation methods and surface modifications can be employed to optimize the pore size distribution and surface chemistry for improved CO2 adsorption.
    Expand Specific Solutions
  • 05 Regeneration methods for CO2 sorbents

    Effective regeneration of solid sorbents is crucial for sustainable CO2 capture processes. Various methods have been developed, including temperature swing adsorption (TSA), pressure swing adsorption (PSA), vacuum swing adsorption (VSA), and combinations thereof. Novel approaches such as microwave-assisted regeneration and electrical swing adsorption are also being explored to reduce energy requirements. The regeneration process must be optimized to maintain the sorbent's structural integrity and adsorption capacity over multiple cycles while minimizing energy consumption and operational costs.
    Expand Specific Solutions

Leading Companies and Research Institutions in Carbon Capture

The solid sorbents for CO2 capture market is currently in a growth phase, with increasing focus on reducing carbon emissions from industrial processes. The global market size for carbon capture technologies is expanding rapidly, projected to reach significant scale as climate regulations tighten. Technologically, the field shows varying maturity levels across different sorbent types. Leading players include established energy corporations like Shell, ExxonMobil, and Sinopec, which leverage their industrial expertise to develop scalable solutions. Korean power companies (KEPCO and subsidiaries) are making strategic investments in this space. Specialized firms like Climeworks and TDA Research are driving innovation with novel materials and processes, while academic institutions such as Huazhong University and University of Wyoming contribute fundamental research. The competitive landscape reflects a blend of industrial incumbents and specialized technology developers working toward commercial viability.

China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.

Technical Solution: China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. (Sinopec) has developed advanced metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) for CO2 capture with exceptional selectivity and capacity. Their proprietary MOF materials feature tailored pore structures and functionalized surfaces that enable selective CO2 adsorption from flue gas streams. Sinopec's technology employs a pressure/temperature swing adsorption process with regeneration temperatures below 120°C, significantly reducing energy penalties compared to conventional amine scrubbing. Their pilot-scale demonstrations have achieved capture rates exceeding 90% with energy consumption reduced by approximately 30% compared to liquid amine systems. Sinopec has also developed specialized MOF composites that maintain structural integrity under industrial conditions, addressing previous durability concerns in humid environments and high-temperature flue gases.
Strengths: Lower regeneration energy requirements compared to amine scrubbing; excellent stability in industrial environments; high CO2 selectivity even at low concentrations. Weaknesses: Higher initial material costs compared to conventional sorbents; potential for performance degradation in the presence of SOx and NOx contaminants; requires precise manufacturing processes to maintain consistent quality.

Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij BV

Technical Solution: Shell has pioneered advanced solid sorbent technology for CO2 capture utilizing proprietary amine-functionalized silica materials. Their CANSOLV system integrates these solid sorbents into a multi-cycle adsorption process that operates at lower temperatures (60-80°C) than conventional liquid amine systems. The technology features a novel fluidized bed configuration that maximizes gas-solid contact while minimizing pressure drop across the system. Shell's sorbents demonstrate CO2 capture capacities of 2-3 mmol/g with selectivity factors exceeding 100 for CO2 over N2. Their process achieves regeneration through a combination of temperature and vacuum pressure swing, reducing energy requirements by up to 40% compared to aqueous amine scrubbing. Shell has successfully tested this technology at pilot scale (1-5 MWe) with coal and natural gas flue gas streams, demonstrating stable performance over thousands of adsorption-desorption cycles with minimal sorbent degradation.
Strengths: Significantly lower energy penalty compared to liquid amine systems; excellent stability over multiple cycles; versatility across different flue gas compositions. Weaknesses: Higher capital costs for initial system installation; requires careful management of moisture content in gas streams; potential for mechanical attrition of sorbent particles in fluidized bed configurations.

Environmental Impact and Sustainability Assessment

The environmental impact of solid sorbents for CO2 capture extends far beyond their primary function of reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Life cycle assessment (LCA) studies reveal that while these technologies significantly decrease direct CO2 emissions, their production, regeneration, and disposal processes can generate secondary environmental impacts that must be carefully evaluated and mitigated.

Energy consumption represents a critical sustainability concern in solid sorbent systems. The regeneration process typically requires substantial thermal energy inputs, creating potential environmental trade-offs. Advanced materials like metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) and amine-functionalized silica demonstrate improved energy efficiency compared to traditional liquid amine scrubbing, with some systems achieving up to 30-40% reduction in regeneration energy requirements.

Water usage patterns vary significantly across different sorbent technologies. While solid sorbents generally consume less water than aqueous systems, certain materials may still require substantial water for synthesis or cooling processes. Recent innovations in water-efficient synthesis methods and closed-loop cooling systems have demonstrated potential to reduce freshwater consumption by up to 60% compared to first-generation solid sorbent systems.

Land use implications must also be considered, particularly for large-scale industrial implementations. The physical footprint of solid sorbent installations depends on capture capacity, sorbent efficiency, and system design. Modular and intensified process designs have emerged as promising approaches to minimize spatial requirements while maintaining capture performance.

Toxicity and waste management present additional environmental challenges. Some advanced sorbents incorporate potentially hazardous components that require careful handling throughout their lifecycle. Research into biodegradable supports and environmentally benign functional groups has yielded promising alternatives with reduced ecological impact. Furthermore, end-of-life management strategies, including sorbent regeneration, recycling, and safe disposal protocols, are increasingly integrated into technology development roadmaps.

Carbon capture efficiency must be balanced against broader sustainability metrics. The most environmentally sound solutions optimize not only CO2 removal rates but also minimize resource consumption, waste generation, and ecological disruption. Multi-criteria decision analysis frameworks have been developed to help stakeholders evaluate these complex trade-offs and identify truly sustainable carbon capture pathways.

Regulatory frameworks and sustainability certification systems are evolving to address these environmental considerations. Several jurisdictions have implemented or proposed standards that require comprehensive environmental impact assessments for carbon capture technologies, creating market incentives for environmentally optimized sorbent systems.

Cost-Benefit Analysis of Solid Sorbent Implementation

Implementing solid sorbents for CO2 capture requires thorough economic evaluation to determine viability across different industrial applications. Initial capital expenditure for solid sorbent systems typically ranges from $40-80 million for medium-scale industrial facilities, significantly lower than traditional amine-based systems which often exceed $100 million for comparable capacity. This cost advantage stems from simpler equipment requirements and reduced corrosion concerns.

Operational expenses present a more nuanced picture. Solid sorbents demonstrate 20-35% lower energy penalties compared to liquid amine systems, translating to annual energy savings of $2-4 million for a typical 500 MW power plant. Maintenance costs are approximately 15-25% lower due to reduced corrosion and degradation issues, though specialized handling systems for solid materials partially offset these savings.

Sorbent replacement costs remain a significant consideration, varying dramatically based on material selection. Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) and advanced engineered materials can cost $50-200/kg, while activated carbons and zeolites range from $5-30/kg. Accounting for degradation rates of 2-10% annually, replacement costs can range from $0.5-3 million yearly depending on capture capacity and sorbent choice.

Environmental compliance benefits provide substantial indirect economic value. Facilities implementing solid sorbent technology can reduce carbon tax liabilities by $15-40 per ton of CO2 captured, depending on regional carbon pricing mechanisms. Additionally, regulatory compliance positioning offers strategic advantages as emissions regulations tighten globally.

Lifecycle analysis reveals that most solid sorbent systems achieve financial break-even within 5-8 years, compared to 8-12 years for conventional systems. This improved return on investment timeline makes solid sorbents particularly attractive for facilities with remaining operational lifespans exceeding 10 years.

Sensitivity analysis indicates that economic viability is most influenced by energy costs, carbon pricing, and sorbent durability. A 20% improvement in sorbent cycling stability can reduce lifetime costs by 15-25%, highlighting the importance of ongoing materials research. Similarly, carbon price increases of $10/ton improve payback periods by approximately 1-2 years, creating a favorable economic environment as global carbon markets mature.
Unlock deeper insights with Patsnap Eureka Quick Research — get a full tech report to explore trends and direct your research. Try now!
Generate Your Research Report Instantly with AI Agent
Supercharge your innovation with Patsnap Eureka AI Agent Platform!
Features
  • R&D
  • Intellectual Property
  • Life Sciences
  • Materials
  • Tech Scout
Why Patsnap Eureka
  • Unparalleled Data Quality
  • Higher Quality Content
  • 60% Fewer Hallucinations
Social media
Patsnap Eureka Blog
Learn More