Fabricated structure evaluation method and device based on toughness value and carbon emission

Abstract

The invention relates to the technical field of construction and the technical field of software, and discloses a fabricated structure evaluation method and device based on a toughness value and carbon emission, and the method comprises the steps: adding the damage volumes of all interfaces, and obtaining the damage amount of a fabricated structure; when the damage amount of the fabricated structure is within the damage range, a repair scheme of the fabricated structure is obtained, and the carbon emission amount of the repair scheme is generated; according to the length of each interface, the inertia moment of the complete part of each interface, the moving distance of the neutral axis of each interface and the contact surface rigidity model, the contact surface rigidity of the fabricated structure is generated, and according to the contact surface rigidity of the fabricated structure, the material elasticity modulus of the fabricated structure and the toughness model, the toughness value of the fabricated structure is generated. And performing specific value calculation on the carbon emission of the repair scheme and the toughness value of the fabricated structure to generate an evaluation value of the repair scheme. According to the invention, the evaluation efficiency of the repair scheme of the fabricated structure can be improved.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present application relates to the fields of construction technology and software technology, and in particular to a method and device for evaluating prefabricated structures based on toughness value and carbon emissions. Background Art

[0002] Prefabricated structures are highly susceptible to damage from earthquakes, uneven foundation settlement, or long-term water damage. Damage to prefabricated structures requires repair, a major challenge in urban emergency disaster management. This often requires extraordinary resource investment, leading to a dramatic increase in greenhouse gas emissions and significantly increasing environmental impacts.

[0003] However, the existing assessment methods for prefabricated structures are limited to the early design stage of prefabricated structures, while the repair plan for prefabricated structures occurs in the later repair stage after the prefabricated structure is damaged. Due to the large difference between the early design stage and the later repair stage, the existing assessment methods for prefabricated structures cannot determine the assessment value of the repair plan. Therefore, how to determine the assessment value of the repair plan is a technical problem that needs to be solved urgently. Summary of the Invention

[0004] The embodiments of the present application provide a method and device for evaluating prefabricated structures based on toughness value and carbon emissions to solve the above-mentioned technical problem of how to determine the evaluation value of the repair solution.

[0005] In a first aspect, an embodiment of the present application provides a method for evaluating an assembled structure, which is applied to an electronic device. The method comprises: Acquire monitoring data of the prefabricated structure, and obtain the failure length of each interface of the prefabricated structure from the monitoring data; Generate the failure volume of each interface based on the failure length, structural rotation angle, and volume model of each interface. The structural rotation angle is the angle formed by the splicing of different prefabricated components in the prefabricated structure. The failure volume of each interface is added together to obtain the failure volume of the prefabricated structure; When the damage amount of the prefabricated structure is within the damage range, a repair plan of the prefabricated structure is obtained, and the carbon emissions of the repair plan are generated through the carbon emission model; The contact surface stiffness of the prefabricated structure is generated based on the length of each interface, the moment of inertia of the complete part of each interface, the moving distance of the neutral axis of each interface, and the contact surface stiffness model. The start and end times are obtained from the repair plan. The toughness value of the prefabricated structure is generated based on the contact surface stiffness of the prefabricated structure, the material elastic modulus of the prefabricated structure, the start time, the end time, and the toughness model. Through the evaluation model, the carbon emissions of the repair plan are compared with the toughness value of the prefabricated structure to generate an evaluation value of the repair plan.

[0006] In a possible implementation of the first aspect, when the damage to the prefabricated structure is within the damage range, obtaining a repair plan for the prefabricated structure, and generating carbon emissions of the repair plan using a carbon emission model include: When the damage amount of the prefabricated structure is within the damage range, obtaining a repair plan for the prefabricated structure; Obtain from the repair plan the consumption of each material, the carbon emission factor corresponding to each material, the number of times each material is recycled, the number of shifts used for each machine, the energy consumption per shift used for each machine, and the carbon emission factor corresponding to each machine; The carbon emissions of the repair plan are generated based on the consumption of each material, the carbon emission factor corresponding to each material, the number of times each material is recycled, the number of shifts used by each machine, the energy consumption of each machine used per shift, the carbon emission factor corresponding to each machine, and the carbon emission model.

[0007] In a possible implementation of the first aspect, generating the contact surface stiffness of the prefabricated structure based on the length of each interface, the moment of inertia of the intact portion of each interface, the movement distance of the neutral axis of each interface, and the contact surface stiffness model; obtaining the start and end times from the repair plan; generating the toughness value of the prefabricated structure based on the contact surface stiffness of the prefabricated structure, the material elastic modulus of the prefabricated structure, the start and end times, and the toughness model; and calculating the ratio of the carbon emissions of the repair plan to the toughness value of the prefabricated structure using an evaluation model to generate an evaluation value of the repair plan, including: Obtain mechanical data of the assembled structure, and obtain the length of each interface, the moment of inertia of the complete part of each interface, and the movement distance of the neutral axis of each interface from the mechanical data; Generate the contact surface stiffness of the assembled structure according to the length of each interface, the moment of inertia of the complete part of each interface, the moving distance of the neutral axis of each interface and the contact surface stiffness model; The start and end times are obtained from the repair plan, and the toughness value of the prefabricated structure is generated based on the contact surface stiffness of the prefabricated structure, the material elastic modulus of the prefabricated structure, the start time, the end time and the toughness model. Through the evaluation model, the carbon emissions of the repair plan are compared with the toughness value of the prefabricated structure to generate an evaluation value of the repair plan.

[0008] In a possible implementation of the first aspect, the volume model is defined as follows: ; For the The failure volume of each interface; For the The failure length of the interface; is the structural corner, Indicates the tangent value of the structure's rotation angle.

[0009] In a possible implementation of the first aspect, the contact surface stiffness model is defined as follows: ; ; ; ; It is The length of the interface; It is The length of the Eth unit of the complete part of the interface; It is The moment of inertia of the complete part of the interface; It is The elastic modulus of the material of the Eth element in the complete part of the interface; It is The displacement of the neutral axis of the interface; It is The number of cells that form a complete part of the interface; It is The stiffness of the complete part of the interface; is the total number of interfaces; is the contact surface stiffness of the prefabricated structure.

[0010] In a possible implementation of the first aspect, the toughness value model is defined as follows: ; ; ; ; in, It is The length of the interface; For the The distance from the neutral axis of the interface to the upper edge; For the The moment of inertia of the integral part of an interface; is the thickness of the wall; is the initial moment; It is the moment of termination; is the relative stiffness of the prefabricated structure at the termination moment; is the contact surface stiffness of the prefabricated structure; is the elastic modulus of the material of the prefabricated structure; is the toughness value of the prefabricated structure; represents the relative stiffness of the prefabricated structure at the initial moment; express In the interval The cumulative value on .

[0011] In a possible implementation of the first aspect, the carbon emission model is defined as follows: ; in, The carbon emissions of the restoration solution; For the The consumption of materials, For the The carbon emission factor corresponding to the material, For the The number of times a material is recycled, is the total number of material types, is the total number of types of machinery; For the The use of this type of machinery is For the The energy consumption of each machine shift, For the The carbon emission factors corresponding to the types of machinery.

[0012] In a possible implementation of the first aspect, the evaluation model is defined as follows: ; represents the evaluation value of the repair solution, Indicates the toughness value of the prefabricated structure, Represents the carbon emissions of the remediation solution.

[0013] In a possible implementation of the first aspect, the contact surface stiffness of the prefabricated structure is generated based on the length of each interface, the moment of inertia of the complete portion of each interface, the movement distance of the neutral axis of each interface, and the contact surface stiffness model; the start time and the end time are obtained from the repair plan; the toughness value of the prefabricated structure is generated based on the contact surface stiffness of the prefabricated structure, the material elastic modulus of the prefabricated structure, the start time, the end time, and the toughness model; and after calculating the ratio of the carbon emissions of the repair plan to the toughness value of the prefabricated structure using the evaluation model to generate the evaluation value of the repair plan, the prefabricated structure evaluation method includes: Obtain evaluation values ​​of different repair solutions, sort the evaluation values ​​of different repair solutions, and select the repair solution with the smallest evaluation value as the optimal repair solution.

[0014] In a second aspect, an embodiment of the present application provides an assembled structure evaluation device, which is applied to electronic equipment, including: An acquisition module is used to acquire monitoring data of the prefabricated structure and obtain the failure length of each interface of the prefabricated structure from the monitoring data; A generation module is used to generate the failure volume of each interface based on the failure length, structural rotation angle, and volume model of each interface. The structural rotation angle is the angle formed by the splicing of different prefabricated components in the assembled structure. An addition module is used to add the damage volume of each interface to obtain the damage volume of the assembled structure; A selection module is used to obtain a repair plan for the prefabricated structure when the damage amount of the prefabricated structure is within the damage range, and generate the carbon emissions of the repair plan through a carbon emission model; The evaluation module is used to generate the contact surface stiffness of the prefabricated structure based on the length of each interface, the moment of inertia of the complete part of each interface, the movement distance of the neutral axis of each interface and the contact surface stiffness model, obtain the start time and the end time from the repair plan, and generate the toughness value of the prefabricated structure based on the contact surface stiffness of the prefabricated structure, the material elastic modulus of the prefabricated structure, the start time, the end time and the toughness model. Through the evaluation model, the carbon emissions of the repair plan are compared with the toughness value of the prefabricated structure to generate an evaluation value of the repair plan.

[0015] In a third aspect, an embodiment of the present application provides an electronic device comprising a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, wherein the processor implements the method for evaluating assembled structures in the first aspect when executing the computer program.

[0016] In a fourth aspect, an embodiment of the present application provides a computer-readable storage medium, wherein the computer-readable storage medium stores a computer program, and when the computer program is executed by a processor, the prefabricated structure evaluation method in the first aspect described above is implemented.

[0017] In a fifth aspect, an embodiment of the present application provides a computer program product. When the computer program product is run on an electronic device, the electronic device executes the prefabricated structure evaluation method in the first aspect.

[0018] The beneficial effects of the embodiments of the present application lie in two aspects. On the one hand, the contact surface stiffness of the prefabricated structure is generated based on the length of each interface, the moment of inertia of the complete part of each interface, the moving distance of the neutral axis of each interface, and the contact surface stiffness model. The start time and the end time are obtained from the repair plan. The toughness value of the prefabricated structure is generated based on the contact surface stiffness of the prefabricated structure, the material elastic modulus of the prefabricated structure, the start time, the end time, and the toughness model. Through the evaluation model, the carbon emissions of the repair plan and the toughness value of the prefabricated structure are ratio-calculated to generate the evaluation value of the repair plan, which solves the problem of how to determine the evaluation value of the repair plan. On the other hand, the smaller the evaluation value of the repair plan, the less carbon emissions the repair plan releases and the better the overall performance while achieving the same toughness value of the prefabricated structure. The larger the evaluation value of the repair plan, the more carbon emissions the repair plan releases and the worse the overall performance of the repair plan while achieving the same toughness value of the prefabricated structure. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0019] In order to more clearly illustrate the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present application, the following briefly introduces the drawings required for use in the description of the embodiments. Obviously, the drawings described below are only some embodiments of the present application. For those skilled in the art, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without creative work.

[0020] Figure 1 A diagram illustrating an application scenario of the prefabricated structure evaluation method provided in an embodiment of the present application; Figure 2 Schematic diagram of the process of the assembly structure evaluation method provided in the embodiment of the present application; Figure 3 This is a flowchart of S205 provided in an embodiment of the present application; Figure 4 A schematic block diagram of an assembly structure evaluation device provided in an embodiment of the present application; Figure 5 A schematic diagram of the structure of an electronic device provided in an embodiment of the present application; Figure 6This is a sample diagram of the assembled structure provided in the embodiment of the present application; Figure 7 This is an example interface diagram provided in the embodiment of the present application; Figure 8 This is a sample diagram of the structural corner provided in the embodiment of the present application. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0021] In order to make the purpose, technical solutions and advantages of this application more clear, the present application is further described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings and examples. It should be understood that the specific embodiments described herein are only used to explain this application and are not intended to limit this application. Based on the embodiments in this application, all other embodiments obtained by ordinary technicians in this field without making creative efforts are within the scope of protection of this application.

[0022] The prefabricated structure evaluation method provided in the embodiments of the present application can be applied to electronic devices such as mobile phones, tablet computers, wearable devices, vehicle-mounted devices, augmented reality (AR) / virtual reality (VR) devices, laptop computers, ultra-mobile personal computers (UMPCs), netbooks, and personal digital assistants (PDAs). The embodiments of the present application do not impose any restrictions on the specific types of electronic devices.

[0023] See also Figure 1 , Figure 1 The application scenario diagram of the prefabricated structure evaluation method provided in the embodiment of the present application is detailed as follows: The electronic device accesses the monitoring platform, obtains monitoring data of the prefabricated structure from the monitoring platform, and obtains the failure length of each interface of the prefabricated structure from the monitoring data.

[0024] In an embodiment of the present application, the electronic device can be connected to the monitoring platform to obtain monitoring data of the prefabricated structure from the monitoring platform, which reduces the time for obtaining the monitoring data and is conducive to improving the efficiency of obtaining the monitoring data.

[0025] See also Figure 2 , Figure 2 It is a flow chart of the assembled structure evaluation method provided in an embodiment of the present application, which can be applied to electronic equipment.

[0026] like Figure 2 As shown, the prefabricated structure evaluation method provided in the embodiment of the present application includes the following steps, which are detailed as follows: S201, obtaining monitoring data of the prefabricated structure, and obtaining the failure length of each interface of the prefabricated structure from the monitoring data; Among them, the prefabricated structure is a structure assembled by different prefabricated components.

[0027] Among them, prefabricated structures are applied to underground projects. Through prefabricated underground pipeline corridors, tunnel linings, integrated pipe trenches and other components, the rapid construction and precise installation of underground spaces can be achieved, effectively shortening the construction period and reducing the disturbance of construction to the surrounding environment.

[0028] S202, generating a failure volume of each interface based on the failure length of each interface, the structural rotation angle, and the volume model, where the structural rotation angle is the angle formed by the splicing of different prefabricated components in the prefabricated structure; The volume model is defined as follows: ; For the The failure volume of each interface; For the The failure length of the interface; is the structural corner, Indicates the tangent value of the structure's rotation angle.

[0029] Among them, after the prefabricated structure is damaged, the overall part of each interface of the prefabricated structure will also suffer varying degrees of damage.

[0030] The overall portion of each interface includes the damaged portion and the intact portion of each interface. The intact portion refers to the undamaged portion. The damaged length of each interface refers to the length of the damaged portion of each interface.

[0031] For ease of explanation, the following examples are given: For example, the prefabricated structure has the first interface, the second interface, the third interface, and the fourth interface; The integral portion of the first interface includes the damaged portion of the first interface and the intact portion of the first interface. The damaged length of the first interface refers to the length of the damaged portion of the first interface.

[0032] The entire portion of the second interface includes the damaged portion of the second interface and the intact portion of the second interface. The damaged length of the second interface refers to the length of the damaged portion of the second interface.

[0033] The entire portion of the third interface includes the damaged portion of the third interface and the intact portion of the third interface. The damaged length of the third interface refers to the length of the damaged portion of the third interface.

[0034] The overall portion of the fourth interface includes the damaged portion of the fourth interface and the intact portion of the fourth interface. The damaged length of the fourth interface refers to the length of the damaged portion of the fourth interface.

[0035] S203, adding the failure volume of each interface to obtain the failure volume of the prefabricated structure; The failure volume of the interface refers to the physical area where material failure or debonding occurs when the interface is subjected to a load exceeding its bearing capacity.

[0036] The damage volume of each interface is added together to obtain the damage volume of the assembled structure. Among them, the amount of damage to prefabricated structures is the core indicator of damage accumulation and failure degree of prefabricated structures under load. By monitoring the amount of damage to prefabricated structures, the weak parts of prefabricated structures can be accurately identified, which can provide data support for maintenance and reinforcement and avoid sudden collapse accidents.

[0037] S204, when the damage amount of the prefabricated structure is within the damage range, obtaining a repair plan for the prefabricated structure, and generating the carbon emissions of the repair plan through a carbon emission model; When the damage amount of the prefabricated structure is within the damage range, obtaining a repair plan for the prefabricated structure and generating the carbon emissions of the repair plan through a carbon emission model include: When the damage amount of the prefabricated structure is within the damage range, obtaining a repair plan for the prefabricated structure; Obtain from the repair plan the consumption of each material, the carbon emission factor corresponding to each material, the number of times each material is recycled, the number of shifts used for each machine, the energy consumption per shift used for each machine, and the carbon emission factor corresponding to each machine; The carbon emissions of the repair plan are generated based on the consumption of each material, the carbon emission factor corresponding to each material, the number of times each material is recycled, the number of shifts used by each machine, the energy consumption of each machine used per shift, the carbon emission factor corresponding to each machine, and the carbon emission model.

[0038] When the damage to the prefabricated structure is within the damage range, obtain the repair plan for the prefabricated structure, including: Obtaining the damage range, and dividing the damage range into a light damage range, a moderate damage range, and a high damage range; When the damage amount of the prefabricated structure is within the range of light damage, a repair plan for the prefabricated structure is obtained from a database corresponding to the range of light damage; When the damage amount of the prefabricated structure is in the moderate damage range, a repair plan for the prefabricated structure is obtained from a database corresponding to the moderate damage range; When the damage amount of the prefabricated structure is in the high damage range, the repair plan of the prefabricated structure is obtained from the database corresponding to the moderate damage range.

[0039] The carbon emission model is defined as follows: ; in, The carbon emissions of the restoration solution; For the The consumption of materials, For the The carbon emission factor corresponding to the material, For the The number of times a material is recycled, is the total number of material types, is the total number of types of machinery; For the The use of this type of machinery is For the The energy consumption of each machine shift, For the The carbon emission factors corresponding to the types of machinery.

[0040] The total number of material types refers to the total number of materials in different categories; The total number of types of machinery refers to the total number of machines of different categories.

[0041] S205, based on the length of each interface, the moment of inertia of the complete part of each interface, the moving distance of the neutral axis of each interface and the contact surface stiffness model, the contact surface stiffness of the prefabricated structure is generated, the start time and the end time are obtained from the repair plan, and the toughness value of the prefabricated structure is generated based on the contact surface stiffness of the prefabricated structure, the material elastic modulus of the prefabricated structure, the start time, the end time and the toughness model. Through the evaluation model, the carbon emissions of the repair plan are compared with the toughness value of the prefabricated structure to generate an evaluation value of the repair plan.

[0042] Among them, the contact surface stiffness model is a calculation model of the contact surface stiffness of the prefabricated structure.

[0043] Among them, the toughness value model is a calculation model for the toughness value of the prefabricated structure.

[0044] Among them, the contact surface stiffness model is defined as follows: ; ; ; ; It is The length of the interface; It is The length of the Eth unit of the complete part of the interface; It is The moment of inertia of the complete part of the interface; It is The elastic modulus of the material of the Eth element in the complete part of the interface; It is The displacement of the neutral axis of the interface; It is The number of cells that form a complete part of the interface; It is The stiffness of the complete part of the interface; is the total number of interfaces; is the contact surface stiffness of the prefabricated structure.

[0045] The contact surface stiffness of a prefabricated structure refers to a key parameter that determines how well the interface resists deformation when subjected to stress. The greater the stiffness, the greater the ability of the interface to resist relative deformation when subjected to stress. The smaller the stiffness, the weaker the ability to resist relative deformation when subjected to stress.

[0046] Among them, The overall part of the interface includes The intact and damaged parts of an interface.

[0047] Among them, the toughness value model is defined as follows: ; ; ; ; in, It is The length of the interface; For the The distance from the neutral axis of the interface to the upper edge; For the The moment of inertia of the integral part of an interface; is the thickness of the wall; is the initial moment; It is the moment of termination; is the relative stiffness of the prefabricated structure at the termination moment; is the contact surface stiffness of the prefabricated structure; is the elastic modulus of the material of the prefabricated structure; is the toughness value of the prefabricated structure; represents the relative stiffness of the prefabricated structure at the initial moment; express In the interval The cumulative value on .

[0048] The evaluation model is defined as follows: ; represents the evaluation value of the repair solution, Indicates the toughness value of the prefabricated structure, Represents the carbon emissions of the remediation solution.

[0049] For ease of explanation, refer to Figure 6 , Figure 6 This is a sample diagram of the assembled structure provided in the embodiment of the present application; Figure 6 Prefabricated component 1 and prefabricated component 2 are shown. The prefabricated structure consists of prefabricated component 1 and prefabricated component 2. There is a contact part between prefabricated component 1 and prefabricated component 2. The contact part includes T1, T2, T3, and T4. T1 represents the first interface, T2 represents the second interface, T3 represents the third interface, T4 represents the fourth interface, and b represents the thickness of the wall.

[0050] Further, to facilitate the explanation of the first interface, refer to Figure 7 , Figure 7 This is an example interface diagram provided in an embodiment of the present application.

[0051] Figure 7 T1, T2, T3, and T4 are shown; T1 represents the first interface, T2 represents the second interface, T3 represents the third interface, and T4 represents the fourth interface, and b represents the thickness of the wall.

[0052] Before destruction, the first interface is a whole, and there is no destroyed part and intact part in the first interface; is the length of the first interface; is the distance from the neutral axis to the upper edge of the first interface.

[0053] After the destruction, the first interface is no longer a whole, and the first interface has a destroyed part and an intact part. It is the failure length of the first interface. The failure length of the first interface is the length of the failed part of the first interface.

[0054] Among them, minus , the length of the complete section of the first interface is obtained. From the length of the complete section of the first interface, the number of elements in the complete section of the first interface can be determined, and the stiffness of the complete section of the first interface can be calculated. Since the processing procedures for the second, third, and fourth interfaces are the same as those for the first interface, they are not detailed here.

[0055] refer to Figure 8 , Figure 8 This is a sample diagram of the structural corner provided in the embodiment of the present application.

[0056] Figure 8 Prefabricated components 1 and 2 are shown. Prefabricated components 1 and 2 in the prefabricated structure are prone to bending failure under external loads, and the structural rotation angle can be obtained by measurement.

[0057] Among them, the smaller the evaluation value of the repair scheme, the less carbon emissions released and the better the overall performance of the repair scheme under the premise of achieving the same toughness value of the prefabricated structure; From a resilience perspective, a restoration solution that achieves the same resilience value for prefabricated structures means it meets the resilience standards for prefabricated structures. From an environmental perspective, the lower the carbon emissions released by the restoration solution, the less energy and resources it consumes during implementation, and the lighter the additional burden on environmental factors such as the atmosphere and soil. This effectively reduces the risk of secondary ecological damage caused by the restoration activities themselves, indicating that the restoration solution can reduce carbon emissions while ensuring safety. Therefore, the lower the restoration solution's assessment value, the better its overall performance in terms of both resilience and the environment.

[0058] Among them, the larger the evaluation value of the repair scheme, the more carbon emissions the repair scheme releases and the worse the overall performance is, under the premise of achieving the same toughness value of the prefabricated structure; From a resilience perspective, if a restoration solution achieves the same resilience value for prefabricated structures, it means it meets the resilience standards for prefabricated structures. From an environmental perspective, the greater the carbon emissions released by the restoration solution, the greater the energy and resource consumption during implementation, and the greater the additional burden on environmental factors such as the atmosphere and soil. This effectively increases the risk of secondary ecological damage caused by the restoration activities themselves, indicating that the restoration solution cannot reduce carbon emissions while ensuring safety. Therefore, the higher the restoration solution's assessment value, the worse its overall performance in terms of both resilience and the environment.

[0059] Wherein, after generating the contact surface stiffness of the prefabricated structure based on the length of each interface, the moment of inertia of the complete part of each interface, the moving distance of the neutral axis of each interface, and the contact surface stiffness model, obtaining the start time and the end time from the repair plan, generating the toughness value of the prefabricated structure based on the contact surface stiffness of the prefabricated structure, the material elastic modulus of the prefabricated structure, the start time, the end time, and the toughness model, and calculating the ratio of the carbon emissions of the repair plan to the toughness value of the prefabricated structure through the evaluation model to generate the evaluation value of the repair plan, the prefabricated structure evaluation method includes: Obtain evaluation values ​​of different repair solutions, sort the evaluation values ​​of different repair solutions, and select the repair solution with the smallest evaluation value as the optimal repair solution.

[0060] For ease of explanation, the following examples are given: For example, there are repair plan 1, repair plan 2, and repair plan 3; the evaluation value of repair plan 1 is evaluation value 1, the evaluation value of repair plan 2 is evaluation value 2, and the evaluation value of repair plan 3 is evaluation value 3. Sort evaluation value 1, evaluation value 2, and evaluation value 3; If the evaluation value 1 is the smallest, repair plan 1 is selected as the optimal repair plan.

[0061] If the evaluation value 2 is the smallest, repair plan 2 is selected as the optimal repair plan.

[0062] If the evaluation value 3 is the smallest, repair plan 3 is selected as the optimal repair plan.

[0063] The beneficial effects of the embodiments of the present application lie in two aspects. On the one hand, the contact surface stiffness of the prefabricated structure is generated based on the length of each interface, the moment of inertia of the complete part of each interface, the moving distance of the neutral axis of each interface, and the contact surface stiffness model. The start time and the end time are obtained from the repair plan. The toughness value of the prefabricated structure is generated based on the contact surface stiffness of the prefabricated structure, the material elastic modulus of the prefabricated structure, the start time, the end time, and the toughness model. Through the evaluation model, the carbon emissions of the repair plan and the toughness value of the prefabricated structure are ratio-calculated to generate the evaluation value of the repair plan, which solves the problem of how to determine the evaluation value of the repair plan. On the other hand, the smaller the evaluation value of the repair plan, the less carbon emissions the repair plan releases and the better the overall performance while achieving the same toughness value of the prefabricated structure. The larger the evaluation value of the repair plan, the more carbon emissions the repair plan releases and the worse the overall performance of the repair plan while achieving the same toughness value of the prefabricated structure.

[0064] See also Figure 3 , Figure 3 The flowchart of S205 provided in the embodiment of the present application is detailed as follows: S301, obtaining mechanical data of the assembled structure, and obtaining the length of each interface, the moment of inertia of the complete part of each interface, and the movement distance of the neutral axis of each interface from the mechanical data; S302, generating a contact surface stiffness of the assembled structure based on the length of each interface, the moment of inertia of the complete portion of each interface, the moving distance of the neutral axis of each interface, and the contact surface stiffness model; S303, obtaining the start time and end time from the repair plan, generating the toughness value of the prefabricated structure based on the contact surface stiffness of the prefabricated structure, the material elastic modulus of the prefabricated structure, the start time, the end time and the toughness model, and calculating the ratio of the carbon emissions of the repair plan to the toughness value of the prefabricated structure through the evaluation model to generate an evaluation value of the repair plan.

[0065] In an embodiment of the present application, the carbon emissions of the repair solution are compared with the toughness value of the prefabricated structure through an evaluation model to generate an evaluation value of the repair solution. This can automatically generate the evaluation value of the repair solution, reduce the time for obtaining the evaluation value of the repair solution, and help improve the efficiency of obtaining the evaluation value of the repair solution.

[0066] For the method of evaluating the assembled structure described in the above embodiment, please refer to Figure 4 , Figure 4 This is a schematic block diagram of an assembled structure evaluation device provided in an embodiment of the present application. Figure 4 The assembled structure evaluation device 400 shown can be applied to Figure 1The electronic device in the application scenario diagram shown below takes the electronic device as an example. Figure 4 The assembled structure evaluation device 400 shown is described in detail. The assembled structure evaluation device 400 may include an acquisition module 401 , a generation module 402 , an addition module 403 , a selection module 404 , and an evaluation module 405 .

[0067] An acquisition module 401 is used to acquire monitoring data of the prefabricated structure and obtain the failure length of each interface of the prefabricated structure from the monitoring data; A generation module 402 is configured to generate a failure volume of each interface based on the failure length of each interface, the structural rotation angle, and the volume model. The structural rotation angle is the angle formed by the splicing of different prefabricated components in the prefabricated structure. An adding module 403 is used to add the damage volume of each interface to obtain the damage volume of the prefabricated structure; The selection module 404 is used to obtain a repair plan for the prefabricated structure when the damage amount of the prefabricated structure is within the damage range, and generate the carbon emissions of the repair plan through the carbon emission model; Evaluation module 405 is used to generate the contact surface stiffness of the prefabricated structure based on the length of each interface, the moment of inertia of the complete part of each interface, the movement distance of the neutral axis of each interface, and the contact surface stiffness model, obtain the start time and the end time from the repair plan, and generate the toughness value of the prefabricated structure based on the contact surface stiffness of the prefabricated structure, the material elastic modulus of the prefabricated structure, the start time, the end time, and the toughness model. Through the evaluation model, the carbon emissions of the repair plan are compared with the toughness value of the prefabricated structure to generate an evaluation value of the repair plan.

[0068] It should be noted that the various embodiments in this specification are described in a progressive manner, and each embodiment focuses on the differences from other embodiments. The same and similar parts between the various embodiments can be referenced to each other.

[0069] The beneficial effects of the embodiments of the present application lie in two aspects. On the one hand, the contact surface stiffness of the prefabricated structure is generated based on the length of each interface, the moment of inertia of the complete part of each interface, the moving distance of the neutral axis of each interface, and the contact surface stiffness model. The start time and the end time are obtained from the repair plan. The toughness value of the prefabricated structure is generated based on the contact surface stiffness of the prefabricated structure, the material elastic modulus of the prefabricated structure, the start time, the end time, and the toughness model. Through the evaluation model, the carbon emissions of the repair plan and the toughness value of the prefabricated structure are ratio-calculated to generate the evaluation value of the repair plan, which solves the problem of how to determine the evaluation value of the repair plan. On the other hand, the smaller the evaluation value of the repair plan, the less carbon emissions the repair plan releases and the better the overall performance while achieving the same toughness value of the prefabricated structure. The larger the evaluation value of the repair plan, the more carbon emissions the repair plan releases and the worse the overall performance of the repair plan while achieving the same toughness value of the prefabricated structure.

[0070] See also Figure 5 , Figure 5 A schematic diagram of the structure of an electronic device provided in an embodiment of the present application.

[0071] like Figure 5 As shown, Figure 5 The electronic device 2 includes: at least one processor 20, a memory 21, and a computer program 22 stored in the memory 21 and executable on the at least one processor 20, wherein the processor 20 implements the steps of any of the above-mentioned method embodiments when executing the computer program 22.

[0072] The electronic device 2 may include, but is not limited to, a processor 20 and a memory 21. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that Figure 5 This is merely an example of the electronic device 2 and does not constitute a limitation on the electronic device 2 . The electronic device 2 may include more or fewer components than shown in the figure, or a combination of certain components, or different components. For example, the electronic device 2 may also include input and output devices, network access devices, etc.

[0073] The processor 20 is configured to run a computer program 22 stored in the memory 21 and implement the following steps when executing the computer program 22: Acquire monitoring data of the prefabricated structure, and obtain the failure length of each interface of the prefabricated structure from the monitoring data; Generate the failure volume of each interface based on the failure length, structural rotation angle, and volume model of each interface. The structural rotation angle is the angle formed by the splicing of different prefabricated components in the prefabricated structure. The failure volume of each interface is added together to obtain the failure volume of the prefabricated structure; When the damage amount of the prefabricated structure is within the damage range, a repair plan of the prefabricated structure is obtained, and the carbon emissions of the repair plan are generated through the carbon emission model; The contact surface stiffness of the prefabricated structure is generated based on the length of each interface, the moment of inertia of the complete part of each interface, the moving distance of the neutral axis of each interface, and the contact surface stiffness model. The start and end times are obtained from the repair plan. The toughness value of the prefabricated structure is generated based on the contact surface stiffness of the prefabricated structure, the material elastic modulus of the prefabricated structure, the start time, the end time, and the toughness model. Through the evaluation model, the carbon emissions of the repair plan are compared with the toughness value of the prefabricated structure to generate an evaluation value of the repair plan.

[0074] The processor 20 may be a central processing unit (CPU), or other general-purpose processors, digital signal processors, application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs), field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), or other programmable logic devices, discrete gate or transistor logic devices, or discrete hardware components. A general-purpose processor may be a microprocessor or any conventional processor.

[0075] In some embodiments, the memory 21 may be an internal storage unit of the electronic device 2, such as a hard disk or memory of the electronic device 2. In other embodiments, the memory 21 may also be an external storage device of the electronic device 2, such as a plug-in hard disk, a Smart Media Card (SMC), a Secure Digital (SD) card, a Flash Card, etc. equipped on the electronic device 2. Furthermore, the memory 21 may include both an internal storage unit of the electronic device 2 and an external storage device. The memory 21 is used to store an operating system, application programs, a boot loader, data, and other programs, such as the program code of the computer program. The memory 21 may also be used to temporarily store data that has been output or is about to be output.

[0076] It should be noted that the information interaction, execution process, etc. between the above-mentioned devices / units are based on the same concept as the method embodiment of this application. Their specific functions and technical effects can be found in the method embodiment section and will not be repeated here.

[0077] An embodiment of the present application provides a computer-readable storage medium, which stores a computer program. When the computer program is executed by a processor, the steps in the above-mentioned method embodiments can be implemented.

[0078] The computer-readable storage medium stores program codes, which can be called by a processor to execute the prefabricated structure evaluation method described in the above method embodiment.

[0079] The computer-readable storage medium has a storage space for program codes.

[0080] The program code includes the code of any step in the prefabricated structure evaluation method described in the above method embodiment.

[0081] For example, the program code is called by the processor and can execute the following steps: Acquire monitoring data of the prefabricated structure, and obtain the failure length of each interface of the prefabricated structure from the monitoring data; Generate the failure volume of each interface based on the failure length, structural rotation angle, and volume model of each interface. The structural rotation angle is the angle formed by the splicing of different prefabricated components in the prefabricated structure. The failure volume of each interface is added together to obtain the failure volume of the prefabricated structure; When the damage amount of the prefabricated structure is within the damage range, a repair plan of the prefabricated structure is obtained, and the carbon emissions of the repair plan are generated through the carbon emission model; The contact surface stiffness of the prefabricated structure is generated based on the length of each interface, the moment of inertia of the complete part of each interface, the moving distance of the neutral axis of each interface, and the contact surface stiffness model. The start and end times are obtained from the repair plan. The toughness value of the prefabricated structure is generated based on the contact surface stiffness of the prefabricated structure, the material elastic modulus of the prefabricated structure, the start time, the end time, and the toughness model. Through the evaluation model, the carbon emissions of the repair plan are compared with the toughness value of the prefabricated structure to generate an evaluation value of the repair plan.

[0082] The specific implementation of the above operations can be found in the previous embodiments and will not be repeated here.

[0083] The computer-readable storage medium may also be an external storage device of the assembled structure evaluation device or the electronic device, for example, a plug-in hard disk, a smart memory card (SmartMedia Card, SMC), a secure digital (Secure Digital, SD) card, a flash card (Flash Card), a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium, etc., equipped on the assembled structure evaluation device or the electronic device.

[0084] Since the computer program stored in the computer-readable storage medium can execute any of the prefabricated structure evaluation methods provided in the embodiments of the present application, the computer-readable storage medium can achieve the beneficial effects that can be achieved by any of the prefabricated structure evaluation methods provided in the embodiments of the present application. Please refer to the previous embodiments for details and will not be repeated here.

[0085] An embodiment of the present application provides a computer program product. When the computer program product is run on an electronic device, the electronic device executes the above-mentioned prefabricated structure evaluation method.

[0086] The above are only preferred embodiments of the present application and do not limit the patent scope of the present application. Any equivalent structure or equivalent process transformation made using the contents of the present application specification and drawings, or directly or indirectly applied in other related technical fields, are also included in the patent protection scope of the present application.

Claims

1. A method for evaluating an assembled structure, characterized in that: Applied to electronic equipment, the assembly structure evaluation method includes: Acquire monitoring data of the prefabricated structure, and obtain the failure length of each interface of the prefabricated structure from the monitoring data; Generate the failure volume of each interface based on the failure length, structural rotation angle, and volume model of each interface. The structural rotation angle is the angle formed by the splicing of different prefabricated components in the prefabricated structure. The failure volume of each interface is added together to obtain the failure volume of the prefabricated structure; When the damage amount of the prefabricated structure is within the damage range, a repair plan of the prefabricated structure is obtained, and the carbon emissions of the repair plan are generated through the carbon emission model; The contact surface stiffness of the prefabricated structure is generated based on the length of each interface, the moment of inertia of the complete part of each interface, the moving distance of the neutral axis of each interface, and the contact surface stiffness model. The start and end times are obtained from the repair plan. The toughness value of the prefabricated structure is generated based on the contact surface stiffness of the prefabricated structure, the material elastic modulus of the prefabricated structure, the start time, the end time, and the toughness model. Through the evaluation model, the carbon emissions of the repair plan are compared with the toughness value of the prefabricated structure to generate an evaluation value of the repair plan.

2. The method for evaluating an assembled structure according to claim 1, wherein: When the damage amount of the prefabricated structure is within the damage range, a repair plan for the prefabricated structure is obtained, and the carbon emissions of the repair plan are generated by using a carbon emission model, including: When the damage amount of the prefabricated structure is within the damage range, obtaining a repair plan for the prefabricated structure; Obtain from the repair plan the consumption of each material, the carbon emission factor corresponding to each material, the number of times each material is recycled, the number of shifts used for each machine, the energy consumption per shift used for each machine, and the carbon emission factor corresponding to each machine; The carbon emissions of the repair plan are generated based on the consumption of each material, the carbon emission factor corresponding to each material, the number of times each material is recycled, the number of shifts used by each machine, the energy consumption of each machine used per shift, the carbon emission factor corresponding to each machine, and the carbon emission model.

3. The method for evaluating an assembled structure according to claim 1, wherein: The method generates the contact surface stiffness of the prefabricated structure based on the length of each interface, the moment of inertia of the complete part of each interface, the movement distance of the neutral axis of each interface, and the contact surface stiffness model; obtains the start time and the end time from the repair plan; generates the toughness value of the prefabricated structure based on the contact surface stiffness of the prefabricated structure, the material elastic modulus of the prefabricated structure, the start time, the end time, and the toughness model; and calculates the ratio of the carbon emissions of the repair plan to the toughness value of the prefabricated structure through the evaluation model to generate an evaluation value of the repair plan, including: Obtain mechanical data of the assembled structure, and obtain the length of each interface, the moment of inertia of the complete part of each interface, and the movement distance of the neutral axis of each interface from the mechanical data; Generate the contact surface stiffness of the assembled structure according to the length of each interface, the moment of inertia of the complete part of each interface, the moving distance of the neutral axis of each interface and the contact surface stiffness model; The start and end times are obtained from the repair plan, and the toughness value of the prefabricated structure is generated based on the contact surface stiffness of the prefabricated structure, the material elastic modulus of the prefabricated structure, the start time, the end time and the toughness model. Through the evaluation model, the carbon emissions of the repair plan are compared with the toughness value of the prefabricated structure to generate an evaluation value of the repair plan.

4. The method for evaluating an assembled structure according to claim 1, wherein: The volume model is defined as follows: ； For the The failure volume of each interface; For the The failure length of the interface; is the structural corner, Indicates the tangent value of the structure's rotation angle.

5. The method for evaluating an assembled structure according to claim 1, wherein: The contact surface stiffness model is defined as follows: ； ； ； ； It is The length of the interface; It is The length of the Eth unit of the complete part of the interface; It is The moment of inertia of the complete part of the interface; It is The complete part of the interface The elastic modulus of the material of each element; It is The displacement of the neutral axis of the interface; It is The number of cells that form a complete part of the interface; It is The stiffness of the complete part of the interface; is the total number of interfaces; is the contact surface stiffness of the prefabricated structure.

6. The method for evaluating an assembled structure according to claim 1, wherein: The toughness value model is defined as follows: ； ； ； ； in, It is The length of the interface; For the The distance from the neutral axis of the interface to the upper edge; For the The moment of inertia of the integral part of an interface; is the thickness of the wall; is the initial moment; It is the moment of termination; is the relative stiffness of the prefabricated structure at the termination moment; is the contact surface stiffness of the prefabricated structure; is the elastic modulus of the material of the prefabricated structure; is the toughness value of the prefabricated structure; represents the relative stiffness of the prefabricated structure at the initial moment; express In the interval The cumulative value on .

7. The method for evaluating an assembled structure according to claim 1, wherein: The carbon emission model is defined as follows: ； in, The carbon emissions of the restoration solution; For the The consumption of materials, For the The carbon emission factor corresponding to the material, For the The number of times a material is recycled, is the total number of material types, is the total number of types of machinery; For the The use of this type of machinery is For the The energy consumption of each machine shift, For the The carbon emission factors corresponding to the types of machinery.

8. The method for evaluating an assembled structure according to claim 1, wherein: The evaluation model is defined as follows: ； represents the evaluation value of the repair solution, Indicates the toughness value of the prefabricated structure, Represents the carbon emissions of the remediation solution.

9. The method for evaluating an assembled structure according to any one of claims 1 to 8, wherein: After generating the contact surface stiffness of the prefabricated structure based on the length of each interface, the moment of inertia of the complete part of each interface, the movement distance of the neutral axis of each interface, and the contact surface stiffness model, obtaining the start time and the end time from the repair plan, generating the toughness value of the prefabricated structure based on the contact surface stiffness of the prefabricated structure, the material elastic modulus of the prefabricated structure, the start time, the end time, and the toughness model, and calculating the ratio of the carbon emissions of the repair plan to the toughness value of the prefabricated structure through the evaluation model to generate the evaluation value of the repair plan, the prefabricated structure evaluation method includes: Obtain evaluation values ​​of different repair solutions, sort the evaluation values ​​of different repair solutions, and select the repair solution with the smallest evaluation value as the optimal repair solution.

10. An assembly structure evaluation device, characterized in that: Used in electronic equipment, including: An acquisition module is used to acquire monitoring data of the prefabricated structure and obtain the failure length of each interface of the prefabricated structure from the monitoring data; A generation module is used to generate the failure volume of each interface based on the failure length, structural rotation angle, and volume model of each interface. The structural rotation angle is the angle formed by the splicing of different prefabricated components in the assembled structure. An addition module is used to add the damage volume of each interface to obtain the damage volume of the assembled structure; A selection module is used to obtain a repair plan for the prefabricated structure when the damage amount of the prefabricated structure is within the damage range, and generate the carbon emissions of the repair plan through a carbon emission model; The evaluation module is used to generate the contact surface stiffness of the prefabricated structure based on the length of each interface, the moment of inertia of the complete part of each interface, the movement distance of the neutral axis of each interface and the contact surface stiffness model, obtain the start time and the end time from the repair plan, and generate the toughness value of the prefabricated structure based on the contact surface stiffness of the prefabricated structure, the material elastic modulus of the prefabricated structure, the start time, the end time and the toughness model. Through the evaluation model, the carbon emissions of the repair plan are compared with the toughness value of the prefabricated structure to generate an evaluation value of the repair plan.

Images