Material arrival balance evaluation method, system, device and storage medium

Abstract

The application provides a material arrival balance evaluation method, system, device and storage medium, the method comprises the following steps: determining a target evaluation period in each evaluation period; determining a single-species material plan exchange rate of a target evaluation material according to a single-species plan arrival amount and a single-species actual arrival amount of each material in the target evaluation period; determining a single-species material execution rate according to the single-species material plan exchange rate and a preset processing rule; and determining a total plan arrival execution rate of all target evaluation materials in the target evaluation period according to the single-species material execution rate, the single-species plan arrival amount, a non-plan variety arrival amount and a total plan arrival amount of all materials in the target evaluation period. In the scheme, the single-species material execution rate of each evaluation period can be combined with viewing to know the stability of the single-species material in each evaluation period. Through the calculation of the plan arrival execution rate, the execution situation of all varieties of materials in the target evaluation period can be determined.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This invention relates to the field of metallurgy, and more particularly to a method, system, equipment, and storage medium for evaluating the uniformity of material arrival. Background Technology

[0002] In the steel industry, the balanced arrival of materials is crucial. Both excessive and delayed arrivals can impact production and increase costs. Excessive material arrivals can lead to unloading or even storage difficulties. In particular, excessive train arrivals resulting in delayed unloading not only incur delay fees, increasing transportation costs, but can also disrupt subsequent material shipments and arrivals due to loading restrictions. Conversely, insufficient material arrivals can disrupt the production balance of a single production unit and even affect the continuous production of the entire enterprise. Summary of the Invention

[0003] In view of the problems existing in the prior art, the present invention proposes a material arrival balance evaluation method, system, equipment and storage medium to evaluate the supplier's shipments and guide material procurement.

[0004] To achieve the above and other objectives, the present invention provides a method for evaluating material arrival balance, comprising:

[0005] Determine the target evaluation period within each evaluation cycle;

[0006] Based on the planned arrival quantity and actual arrival quantity of each material within the target evaluation period, determine the material plan exchange rate for each material under evaluation.

[0007] Determine the execution rate of a single material based on the planned exchange rate and preset processing rules.

[0008] Based on the single-item material execution rate, single-item planned arrival quantity, unplanned item arrival quantity, and the total planned arrival quantity of all materials within the target evaluation period, determine the total planned arrival execution rate of all target evaluation materials within the target evaluation period.

[0009] Optionally, the execution rate of a single-item material is determined based on the planned exchange rate and preset processing rules, including:

[0010] If the planned exchange rate of a single material is less than the first preset value, then the execution rate of the single material is equal to the planned exchange rate of the single material.

[0011] If the planned exchange rate of a single material is greater than or equal to the first preset value, and the planned exchange rate of a single material is less than or equal to the second preset value, then the execution rate of the single material is 100%; the second preset value is greater than the first preset value.

[0012] If the planned exchange rate of a single material is greater than the second preset value, then the execution rate of the single material is calculated based on the planned exchange rate of the single material.

[0013] Optionally, the process of determining the execution rate of a single-item material based on the planned exchange rate and preset processing rules also includes:

[0014] If the arrival status of a certain material during the target evaluation period leads to adjustments in the material allocation and production plan, the single-product material execution rate will be deducted based on the number of adjustments and the number of material shortages.

[0015] Optionally, if the arrival status of a certain material during the target evaluation period leads to adjustments in the material allocation production plan, the single-item material execution rate will be deducted based on the number of adjustments and the number of material shortages, including:

[0016] If the material arrives late and the allocation plan needs to be adjusted once, the execution rate of a single material will be deducted by 5%.

[0017] If a material shortage occurs once, the execution rate of that single material will be reduced by 10%.

[0018] Optionally, if the planned exchange rate of a single-product material is greater than the second preset value, then when calculating the execution rate of a single-product material based on the planned exchange rate, the calculation formula for the execution rate N of the single-product material is as follows:

[0019] N = 100% - (M - 100%)

[0020] in,

[0021] M represents the planned exchange rate for a single type of material.

[0022] Optionally, the formula for calculating the planned exchange rate M for a single material is as follows:

[0023]

[0024] in,

[0025] K represents the actual arrival volume of a single product;

[0026] V represents the planned arrival volume for a single product.

[0027] Optionally, the formula for calculating the plan arrival rate is as follows:

[0028]

[0029] in,

[0030] M represents the planned exchange rate for a single type of material;

[0031] V represents the planned arrival volume for a single product;

[0032] Z represents the planned total quantity of all types of materials within the target evaluation period;

[0033] R represents the amount of unplanned arrivals of materials within the target evaluation period for which no single product has a planned arrival quantity.

[0034] The material arrival balance evaluation system provided by this invention includes:

[0035] The evaluation cycle determination module is used to determine the target evaluation cycle in each evaluation cycle;

[0036] The first processing module is used to determine the material plan exchange rate of the target evaluation material based on the planned arrival quantity and actual arrival quantity of each material within the target evaluation period.

[0037] The second processing module is used to determine the execution rate of a single material based on the planned exchange rate of the single material and the preset processing rules.

[0038] The third processing module is used to determine the total planned arrival execution rate of all target evaluation materials in the target evaluation period based on the single-product material execution rate, single-product planned arrival quantity, unplanned product arrival quantity, and the total planned arrival quantity of all materials in the target evaluation period.

[0039] The electronic device provided by the present invention includes:

[0040] One or more processors;

[0041] A storage device for storing one or more programs, which, when executed by one or more processors, enable the electronic device to implement the material arrival balance evaluation method.

[0042] The present invention provides a computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, which, when executed by a computer processor, causes the computer to perform the material arrival balance evaluation method.

[0043] As described above, the material arrival balance evaluation method, system, equipment and storage medium of the present invention have the following beneficial effects.

[0044] In the plan, by combining the execution rates of individual materials in each evaluation period, the stability of individual materials in each evaluation period can be determined. By comparing the execution rates of individual materials in the same evaluation period, the execution efficiency of each individual material within the same period can be determined. By calculating the planned achievement execution rate, the execution status of all materials in the target evaluation period can be determined. Attached Figure Description

[0045] To more clearly illustrate the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present invention, the drawings used in the description of the embodiments of the present invention will be briefly introduced below. Obviously, the drawings described below are only some embodiments of the present invention. For those skilled in the art, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without creative effort.

[0046] Figure 1 This is a schematic flowchart of a material arrival balance evaluation method in one embodiment of the present invention.

[0047] Figure 2 This is a block diagram of a material arrival balance evaluation system in one embodiment of the present invention. Detailed Implementation

[0048] The following specific examples illustrate the implementation of the present invention. Those skilled in the art can easily understand other advantages and effects of the present invention from the content disclosed in this specification. The present invention can also be implemented or applied through other different specific embodiments, and various details in this specification can also be modified or changed based on different viewpoints and applications without departing from the spirit of the present invention. It should be noted that, unless otherwise specified, the following embodiments and features described therein can be combined with each other.

[0049] like Figure 1 As shown, this application provides a method for evaluating material arrival balance, which includes at least steps S110 to S140.

[0050] Step S110: Determine the target evaluation period in each evaluation period;

[0051] Step S120: Determine the material plan exchange rate for the target evaluation material based on the planned arrival quantity and actual arrival quantity of each material within the target evaluation period.

[0052] Step S130: Determine the execution rate of a single material based on the planned exchange rate of the single material and the preset processing rules;

[0053] Step S140: Based on the single-item material execution rate, single-item planned arrival quantity, unplanned item arrival quantity, and the total planned arrival quantity of all materials within the target evaluation period, determine the total planned arrival execution rate of all target evaluation materials within the target evaluation period.

[0054] In this embodiment, by combining the execution rates of individual materials in each evaluation period, the stability of individual materials in each evaluation period can be determined. By comparing the execution rates of individual materials in the same evaluation period, the execution efficiency of each individual material within the same period can be determined. By calculating the planned achievement execution rate, the execution status of all materials in the target evaluation period can be determined.

[0055] It should be noted that the actual arrival quantity is determined based on the quantity of wet substrate reported by the purchasing department at the designated location. The planned arrival quantity refers to the quantity of wet substrate to be delivered according to the monthly shipping plan formulated by the purchasing department.

[0056] In summary, this plan can effectively guide procurement.

[0057] In an exemplary embodiment, the process of determining the execution rate of a single material based on the planned exchange rate of the single material and preset processing rules includes at least steps S210 to S230.

[0058] Step S210: If the planned exchange rate of the single-product material is less than the first preset value, then the execution rate of the single-product material is equal to the planned exchange rate of the single-product material.

[0059] Step S220: If the planned exchange rate of the single-item material is greater than or equal to the first preset value, and the planned exchange rate of the single-item material is less than or equal to the second preset value, then the execution rate of the single-item material is equal to 100%; the second preset value is greater than the first preset value.

[0060] Step S230: If the single-product material plan exchange rate is greater than the second preset value, then calculate the single-product material execution rate based on the single-product material plan exchange rate.

[0061] For example, the first preset value is 90%, and the second preset value is 110%.

[0062] In an exemplary embodiment, the process of determining the execution rate of a single material based on the planned exchange rate of a single material and preset processing rules further includes: if the arrival of a certain material within the target evaluation period leads to an adjustment of the material allocation production plan, then the execution rate of the single material is deducted based on the number of adjustments and the number of material shortages.

[0063] In this embodiment, in cases of material shortages or untimely material supply, the evaluation results are affected by reducing the execution rate of a single material product.

[0064] In an exemplary embodiment, if the arrival of a certain material within the target evaluation period leads to an adjustment of the material allocation production plan, the process of deducting the single-product material execution rate based on the number of adjustments and the number of material shortages includes at least steps S310 and S320.

[0065] Step S310: If the material arrives late and the allocation plan is adjusted once, the single-item material execution rate will be deducted by 5%.

[0066] In step S320, if a material shortage occurs once, the single-product material execution rate will be reduced by 10%.

[0067] In this embodiment, the deduction score is determined based on the severity of the consequences caused by uneven material arrival.

[0068] In an exemplary embodiment, if the planned exchange rate of a single-product material is greater than the second preset value, then when calculating the execution rate of the single-product material based on the planned exchange rate, the calculation formula for the execution rate N of the single-product material is as follows:

[0069] N = 100% - (M - 100%)

[0070] in,

[0071] M represents the planned exchange rate for a single type of material.

[0072] In an exemplary embodiment, the formula for calculating the exchange rate M of a single-product material plan is as follows:

[0073]

[0074] in,

[0075] K represents the actual arrival volume of a single product;

[0076] V represents the planned arrival volume for a single product.

[0077] In one exemplary embodiment, the formula for calculating the plan completion rate is as follows:

[0078]

[0079] in,

[0080] M represents the planned exchange rate for a single type of material;

[0081] V represents the planned arrival volume for a single product;

[0082] Z represents the planned total quantity of all types of materials within the target evaluation period;

[0083] R represents the amount of unplanned arrivals of materials within the target evaluation period for which no single product has a planned arrival quantity.

[0084] For example, in January 2023, Material A is planned to reach 20,000 tons, Material B is planned to reach 40,000 tons, Material C is planned to reach 20,000 tons, and Material D is planned to reach 50,000 tons.

[0085] Material A actually reached 16,000 tons, Material B actually reached 38,000 tons, Material C actually reached 21,000 tons, Material D actually reached 58,000 tons, and Material E actually reached 10,000 tons.

[0086] During the target evaluation period, material B was affected by uneven arrival times, leading to one adjustment to the blending plan. Other materials did not experience any adjustments to their blending plans or material shortages.

[0087] Calculate the planned exchange rate M for a single material.

[0088] Based on the formula for calculating the planned exchange rate M of a single material, the calculation results are as follows:

[0089] Material A's single-item material planned exchange rate M A =[K / V]*100%=[1.6 / 2]*100%=80%;

[0090] Material B's single-item material planned exchange rate M B =[K / V]*100%=[3.8 / 4]*100%=95%;

[0091] Single-item material planned exchange rate M for material C C =[K / V]*100%=[2.1 / 2]*100%=105%;

[0092] The single-product material planned exchange rate M of material D D =[K / V]*100%=[5.8 / 5]*100%=116%.

[0093] Since material E is an unplanned arrival, no single-item material planned exchange rate evaluation will be performed.

[0094] Calculate the single-product material execution rate N

[0095] Calculate the single-item material execution rate N for materials A to D according to the calculation rules for single-item material execution rate.

[0096] The calculation rules are as follows:

[0097] If the fulfillment rate M of a single material plan is in the range of 90% to 110%, then the execution rate N of that material plan is 100%.

[0098] If the material plan fulfillment rate M < 90%, the execution rate N = M for that material.

[0099] If the material plan fulfillment rate M > 110%, the execution rate N = 100% - (M - 100%).

[0100] If a certain type of coking coal arrives without a planned shipment, the execution rate will not be evaluated.

[0101] If, during an evaluation period, there is a phased imbalance in the arrival of materials that necessitates an adjustment to the mixing plan, the execution rate will be deducted by 5%; if there is a material shortage, the execution rate will be deducted by 10%.

[0102] The calculation results are shown below:

[0103] Single-item material execution rate N for material A A It is 80%;

[0104] Single-item material execution rate N for material B B The target efficiency is 100%, but due to uneven arrival of material B during the target evaluation period, the allocation plan was adjusted once. Therefore, the single-item material execution rate N of material B is reduced. B Reduced to 95%;

[0105] Single-item material execution rate N for material C C It is 100%;

[0106] Single-item material execution rate N for material D D It is 84%;

[0107] Material E arrived unplanned, so no single-item material execution rate evaluation will be performed.

[0108] Calculate the plan achievement rate P

[0109] Based on the formula for calculating the planned arrival rate P, calculate the total planned arrival rate of all materials (including materials A to E) within the target period.

[0110] Planned arrival execution rate P = [Σ(Single-item material execution rate × Single-item planned arrival quantity) / (Planned arrival quantity + Unplanned item arrival quantity)] = (80% * 2 + 95% * 4 + 100% * 2 + 84% * 5)

[0111] / (2+4+2+5+1)=82.9%.

[0112] 4. Evaluation

[0113] 4.1 Evaluation of Single-Product Implementation Rate

[0114] The single-item material execution rates for materials A, B, C, and D are 80%, 95%, 100%, and 84%, respectively. The ranking shows that the single-item material execution rate is: Material C > Material B > Material D > Material A, indicating that Material C has a better single-item material execution rate. Assuming the target single-item material execution rate is 90%, then the single-item material execution rates for materials D and A are poor. To meet this requirement, the purchasing department can require the suppliers of materials D and A to increase their shipping capacity to ensure the single-item material execution rate meets the requirement. Furthermore, based on the fact that the single-item material execution rates for materials D and A do not meet the requirement, a reduction in the amount of materials purchased for materials D and A can be imposed as a penalty.

[0115] By establishing a trend chart of material execution rate over a continuous evaluation period, the delivery and arrival status of the material can be understood. Assuming that the execution rates of material A are 100%, 95%, 90%, and 86% over four consecutive evaluation periods, the trend evaluation can provide a clear picture of the execution rate trend of material A, effectively managing the planning and delivery of material A.

[0116] 4.2 Evaluation of Plan Achievement Rate

[0117] The planned arrival rate of materials (material A, material B, material C, material D, and material E) was 82.9% within an evaluation period. Assuming the target for planned arrival rate is set at 90%, the planned arrival rate of materials in this evaluation period did not meet the target requirement, indicating that the procurement department's ability to plan and control the arrival of materials is insufficient and needs further improvement.

[0118] In summary, this invention patent, starting from the perspectives of planned material shipment and actual arrival, comprehensively and scientifically evaluates the shipment and arrival of materials by tracking and comparing different angles such as plan fulfillment rate, single-item execution rate, and planned arrival execution rate. This is beneficial for purchasing and user departments to evaluate various material types and guide procurement.

[0119] It should be understood that the sequence number of each step in the above embodiments does not imply the order of execution. The execution order of each process should be determined by its function and internal logic, and should not constitute any limitation on the implementation process of the embodiments of the present invention.

[0120] like Figure 2 As shown, this application also provides a material equilibrium evaluation system, including:

[0121] Evaluation cycle determination module 210 is used to determine the target evaluation cycle in each evaluation cycle;

[0122] The first processing module 220 is used to determine the single-item material plan exchange rate of the target evaluation material based on the single-item planned arrival quantity and single-item actual arrival quantity of each material within the target evaluation period.

[0123] The second processing module 230 is used to determine the execution rate of a single material based on the planned exchange rate of the single material and the preset processing rules.

[0124] The third processing module 240 is used to determine the total planned arrival execution rate of all target evaluation materials in the target evaluation period based on the single-product material execution rate, single-product planned arrival quantity, unplanned product arrival quantity, and the total planned arrival quantity of all materials in the target evaluation period.

[0125] This solution uses the aforementioned system to automatically calculate the single-product material plan exchange rate, plan arrival execution rate, etc., after selecting the target evaluation period, so that users can view them more intuitively.

[0126] It should be noted that the material arrival balance evaluation system and the material arrival balance evaluation method provided in the above embodiments belong to the same concept. The specific operation methods of each module and unit have been described in detail in the method embodiments and will not be repeated here. In practical applications, the material arrival balance evaluation system provided in the above embodiments can be assigned to different functional modules as needed, that is, the internal structure of the system can be divided into different functional modules to complete all or part of the functions described above. This is not a limitation here.

[0127] In one embodiment, a computer device is provided, comprising:

[0128] One or more processors and memory.

[0129] The memory stores a computer program that, when executed by the one or more processors, causes the device to perform the above-described method.

[0130] In one embodiment, a computer-readable storage medium is provided having a computer program stored thereon, the computer program being executable by one or more processors to cause the processors to perform the methods described above.

[0131] The above-described embodiments are only used to illustrate the technical solutions of the present invention, and are not intended to limit it. Although the present invention has been described in detail with reference to the foregoing embodiments, those skilled in the art should understand that modifications can still be made to the technical solutions described in the foregoing embodiments, or equivalent substitutions can be made to some of the technical features. Such modifications or substitutions do not cause the essence of the corresponding technical solutions to deviate from the spirit and scope of the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present invention, and should all be included within the protection scope of the present invention.

Claims

1. A method for evaluating the uniformity of material arrival, characterized in that, include: Determine the target evaluation period within each evaluation cycle; Based on the planned arrival quantity and actual arrival quantity of each material within the target evaluation period, determine the material plan exchange rate for each material under evaluation. Determine the execution rate of a single material based on the planned exchange rate and preset processing rules. Based on the single-item material execution rate, single-item planned arrival quantity, unplanned item arrival quantity, and the total planned arrival quantity of all materials within the target evaluation period, determine the total planned arrival execution rate of all target evaluation materials within the target evaluation period; The execution rate of a single material is determined based on its planned exchange rate and pre-defined processing rules, including: If the planned exchange rate of a single material is less than the first preset value, then the execution rate of the single material is equal to the planned exchange rate of the single material. If the planned exchange rate of a single material is greater than or equal to the first preset value, and the planned exchange rate of a single material is less than or equal to the second preset value, then the execution rate of the single material is 100%; the second preset value is greater than the first preset value. If the planned exchange rate of the single-product material is greater than the second preset value, then the execution rate of the single-product material is calculated based on the planned exchange rate of the single-product material. If the planned exchange rate of a single-product material is greater than the second preset value, then when calculating the execution rate of a single-product material based on the planned exchange rate, the calculation formula for the execution rate N of the single-product material is as follows: in, M represents the planned exchange rate for a single type of material; The formula for calculating the plan completion rate is as follows: in, M represents the planned exchange rate for a single type of material; V represents the planned arrival volume for a single product; Z represents the planned total quantity of all types of materials within the target evaluation period; R represents the amount of unplanned arrivals of materials within the target evaluation period for which no single product has a planned arrival quantity.

2. The material arrival balance evaluation method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The process of determining the execution rate of a single material based on its planned exchange rate and preset processing rules also includes: If the arrival status of a certain material during the target evaluation period leads to adjustments in the material allocation and production plan, the single-product material execution rate will be deducted based on the number of adjustments and the number of material shortages.

3. The material arrival balance evaluation method according to claim 2, characterized in that, If the arrival status of a certain material during the target evaluation period leads to adjustments in the material allocation and production plan, then the single-item material execution rate will be deducted based on the number of adjustments and the number of material shortages, including: If a material arrives late and the allocation plan needs to be adjusted once, the execution rate of a single material will be deducted by 5%. If a material shortage occurs once, the execution rate of that single material will be reduced by 10%.

4. The material arrival balance evaluation method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The formula for calculating the planned exchange rate M for a single material is as follows: in, K represents the actual arrival volume of a single product; V represents the planned arrival volume for a single product.

5. A material arrival balance evaluation system, characterized in that, include: The evaluation cycle determination module is used to determine the target evaluation cycle in each evaluation cycle; The first processing module is used to determine the material plan exchange rate of the target evaluation material based on the planned arrival quantity and actual arrival quantity of each material within the target evaluation period. The second processing module is used to determine the execution rate of a single material based on the planned exchange rate of the single material and the preset processing rules. The third processing module is used to determine the total planned arrival execution rate of all target evaluation materials in the target evaluation period based on the single-product material execution rate, single-product planned arrival quantity, unplanned product arrival quantity, and the total planned arrival quantity of all materials in the target evaluation period. The execution rate of a single material is determined based on its planned exchange rate and pre-defined processing rules, including: If the planned exchange rate of a single material is less than the first preset value, then the execution rate of the single material is equal to the planned exchange rate of the single material. If the planned exchange rate of a single material is greater than or equal to the first preset value, and the planned exchange rate of a single material is less than or equal to the second preset value, then the execution rate of the single material is 100%; the second preset value is greater than the first preset value. If the planned exchange rate of the single-product material is greater than the second preset value, then the execution rate of the single-product material is calculated based on the planned exchange rate of the single-product material. If the planned exchange rate of a single-product material is greater than the second preset value, then when calculating the execution rate of a single-product material based on the planned exchange rate, the calculation formula for the execution rate N of the single-product material is as follows: in, M represents the planned exchange rate for a single type of material; The formula for calculating the plan completion rate is as follows: in, M represents the planned exchange rate for a single type of material; V represents the planned arrival volume for a single product; Z represents the planned total quantity of all types of materials within the target evaluation period; R represents the amount of unplanned arrivals of materials within the target evaluation period for which no single product has a planned arrival quantity.

6. A device, characterized in that, include: One or more processors and memory, The memory stores a computer program that, when executed by the one or more processors, causes the device to perform the method as described in any one of claims 1-4.

7. A computer-readable storage medium, characterized in that, It stores a computer program that, when executed by one or more processors, causes the device to perform the method as described in any one of claims 1-4.

Images