Group control master-slave ladder adaptive learning method, system, device and storage medium

Abstract

The application discloses a kind of group control main auxiliary ladder self-adapting learning method, system, device and storage medium, the method includes the following steps: detecting the communication quality of each elevator in group control elevator, determine the highest communication quality elevator;Respectively calculate the communication quality difference of other elevators in group control elevator and the highest communication quality elevator, obtain first comparison data;When all first comparison data are greater than first preset value, the highest communication quality elevator is used as the main ladder in the group control in board;When all first comparison data are less than first preset value, the running quality optimal elevator is used as the main ladder in the group control in board;When all first comparison data are less than the first preset value, and the running quality of each elevator is identical, the lowest loss situation elevator is used as the main ladder in the group control in board.The application can reduce the scheduling failure of group control elevator, and can reduce the situation that the whole group control elevator system in board fails due to the accident of single elevator.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This invention relates to the field of elevator technology, and in particular to a group-controlled main and auxiliary elevator adaptive learning method, system, device, and storage medium. Background Technology

[0002] Traditional elevator group control systems typically consist of a group controller and individual elevator controllers. If the group controller malfunctions, the individual elevator controllers will break out of the group control state, affecting the normal operation of the elevators. Intra-floor group control allows the main elevator with the highest elevator number to replace the group controller in controlling and scheduling the auxiliary elevators with subsequent elevator numbers. However, this method also has drawbacks; if the main elevator with the highest elevator number malfunctions, the group control system will still fail. Summary of the Invention

[0003] To address the aforementioned issues, this invention proposes an adaptive learning method for group-controlled main and auxiliary elevators, which can reduce the likelihood of a single elevator malfunctioning and causing the entire group-controlled elevator system within the slab to fail.

[0004] The first aspect of this invention discloses an adaptive learning method for group-controlled main and auxiliary elevators, the method comprising the following steps:

[0005] Detect the communication quality of each elevator in the group-controlled elevator system and determine the elevator with the highest communication quality;

[0006] The communication quality difference between the other elevators in the group-controlled elevator and the elevator with the highest communication quality is calculated to obtain the first comparison data; when all the first comparison data are greater than the first preset value, the elevator with the highest communication quality is selected as the main elevator in the group control within the board.

[0007] When all the first comparison data are less than the first preset value, the operating quality of each elevator in the group control elevator is detected, the elevator with the best operating quality is determined, and the elevator with the best operating quality is used as the main elevator in the group control within the board.

[0008] When all the first comparison data are less than the first preset value, and the operating quality of each elevator is the same, the usage of each elevator in the group-controlled elevator is statistically analyzed to determine the elevator with the lowest wear and tear; and the elevator with the lowest wear and tear is selected as the main elevator in the group control within the panel.

[0009] Furthermore, the process of detecting the communication quality of each elevator in the group-controlled elevator system and determining the elevator with the highest communication quality includes the following steps:

[0010] All elevators in the group control system are sorted in descending order based on the number of data packets lost for each elevator. The elevator with the lowest data packet loss in the sorted list is determined as the elevator with the highest communication quality. The number of data packets lost for each elevator is obtained through the following steps:

[0011] Get the number of the first data packets sent from the data sending elevator to the data receiving elevator in the group control system;

[0012] Record the number of second data packets actually received by the data receiving elevator from the data sending elevator;

[0013] The number of data packets lost by the data receiving elevator is calculated based on the number of the first data packets and the number of the second data packets.

[0014] Furthermore, the process of detecting the operating quality of each elevator in the group-controlled elevator system and determining the elevator with the optimal operating quality includes the following steps:

[0015] Statistically analyze the number of malfunctions and their severity for each elevator within a preset time period.

[0016] Each elevator's own health score is determined based on the number of faults and the fault level, and the elevator with the best operating quality is determined based on the own health score; wherein, the number of faults and the fault level are both inversely proportional to the own health score.

[0017] Furthermore, the process of detecting the operating quality of each elevator in the group-controlled elevator system and determining the elevator with the optimal operating quality includes the following steps:

[0018] Record the first data values ​​of several operating parameters for each elevator during commissioning;

[0019] The second data value of several operating parameters of each elevator is detected during operation;

[0020] The third data value of the operating parameters is determined based on the difference between the first and second data values ​​of several operating parameters for each elevator.

[0021] The third data value corresponding to multiple operating parameters of each elevator is summed to obtain the fourth data value;

[0022] Based on the fourth data value, all elevators in the group control are sorted in descending order, and the elevator at the bottom of the sort is determined as the elevator with the best operating quality.

[0023] Several operating parameters include elevator door opening and closing time parameters or voltage and current parameters.

[0024] Furthermore, the process of statistically analyzing the usage of each elevator in the group-controlled elevator system and determining the elevator with the lowest wear and tear includes the following steps:

[0025] Calculate the passenger load of each elevator within a preset time period;

[0026] The elevator with the lowest wear and tear is determined based on the stated carrying capacity.

[0027] Furthermore, the process of statistically analyzing the usage of each elevator in the group-controlled elevator system and determining the elevator with the lowest wear and tear includes the following steps:

[0028] Count the number of times each elevator is used within a preset time period;

[0029] The elevator with the lowest wear and tear is determined based on the number of times it is used.

[0030] Further, the step of calculating the communication quality difference between the other elevators in the group-controlled elevator and the elevator with the highest communication quality to obtain the first comparison data includes the following steps:

[0031] Obtain the first data packet loss count of the elevator with the highest communication quality and the second data packet loss count of other elevators in the group-controlled elevator;

[0032] The difference between the number of lost first data packets and the number of lost second data packets is calculated to obtain the first comparison data.

[0033] A second aspect of this invention discloses a group-controlled main and auxiliary elevator adaptive learning system, the system comprising the following steps:

[0034] The first module is used to detect the communication quality of each elevator in the group-controlled elevator system and determine the elevator with the highest communication quality.

[0035] The second module is used to calculate the communication quality difference between other elevators in the group-controlled elevator and the elevator with the highest communication quality, and obtain the first comparison data; when all the first comparison data are greater than the first preset value, the elevator with the highest communication quality is selected as the main elevator in the group control within the board.

[0036] The third module is used to detect the operating quality of each elevator in the group-controlled elevator when all the first comparison data are less than the first preset value, determine the elevator with the best operating quality, and use the elevator with the best operating quality as the main elevator in the group control within the board.

[0037] The fourth module is used to statistically analyze the usage of each elevator in the group-controlled elevator system when all the first comparison data are less than the first preset value and the operating quality of each elevator is the same, and to determine the elevator with the lowest wear and tear; and to designate the elevator with the lowest wear and tear as the main elevator in the group control system.

[0038] A third aspect of this invention discloses a group-controlled main and auxiliary elevator adaptive learning device, the device comprising:

[0039] At least one processor;

[0040] At least one memory for storing at least one program;

[0041] When the at least one program is executed by the at least one processor, the at least one processor implements the group control main and auxiliary ladder adaptive learning method as described in any of the first aspects.

[0042] A fourth aspect of the present invention discloses a computer storage medium storing a processor-executable program, which, when executed by the processor, is used to implement the adaptive learning method for group-controlled main and auxiliary elevators as described in any of the first aspects.

[0043] Compared with the prior art, the present invention has at least one of the following advantages / benefits:

[0044] This invention prioritizes elevator communication quality to the highest level and usage status to the lowest level. Then, it determines the main elevator in the group control system based on these priorities. Specifically, it first detects the communication quality of each elevator in the group control system and identifies the elevator with the highest communication quality. It then calculates the communication quality difference between the other elevators in the group control system and the elevator with the highest communication quality, obtaining first comparison data. When all first comparison data are greater than a first preset value, the elevator with the highest communication quality is designated as the main elevator in the group control system. Next, when all first comparison data are less than the first preset value, the elevator with the best operating quality is designated as the main elevator in the group control system. Finally, when all first comparison data are less than the first preset value, and the operating quality of each elevator is the same, the elevator with the lowest wear and tear is designated as the main elevator in the group control system. This invention can significantly reduce scheduling errors in the group control elevator system and can reduce the occurrence of system-wide failure due to a single elevator malfunction. Attached Figure Description

[0045] To more clearly illustrate the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention, the accompanying drawings used in the embodiments will be briefly introduced below. Obviously, the drawings described below are only some embodiments of the present invention. For those skilled in the art, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without creative effort.

[0046] Figure 1 A flowchart of the adaptive learning method for group-controlled main and auxiliary elevators provided in an embodiment of the present invention;

[0047] Figure 2 This is a diagram of the in-board group control elevator system architecture provided in an embodiment of the present invention;

[0048] Figure 3 Provided for embodiments of the present invention Figure 2 The flowchart for determining the main elevator based on priority level;

[0049] Figure 4Provided for embodiments of the present invention Figure 1 Flowchart of step S120;

[0050] Figure 5 Provided for embodiments of the present invention Figure 1 Flowchart of step S130;

[0051] Figure 6 Provided for embodiments of the present invention Figure 1 A flowchart of another embodiment of step S130;

[0052] Figure 7 Provided for embodiments of the present invention Figure 1 Flowchart of step S140;

[0053] Figure 8 Provided for embodiments of the present invention Figure 1 A flowchart of another embodiment of step S140. Detailed Implementation

[0054] The technical solutions of the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the accompanying drawings. Obviously, the described embodiments are only some embodiments of the present invention, and not all embodiments. Based on the embodiments of the present invention, all other embodiments obtained by those skilled in the art without creative effort are within the scope of protection of the present invention.

[0055] It should be noted that the terms "first," "second," "third," "fourth," etc., in the specification and claims of this invention are used to distinguish different objects, not to describe a specific order. The terms "comprising" and "having," and any variations thereof, in the embodiments of this invention are intended to cover non-exclusive inclusion. For example, a process, method, system, product, or device that includes a series of steps or units is not necessarily limited to those steps or units explicitly listed, but may include other steps or units not explicitly listed or inherent to these processes, methods, products, or devices.

[0056] The embodiments of the present invention propose an adaptive learning method for group-controlled main and auxiliary elevators, which can reduce the occurrence of the overall failure of the group-controlled elevator system within the slab due to an accident in a single elevator.

[0057] The following is a detailed description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.

[0058] Please see Figure 2 and Figure 3In this embodiment of the invention, the priority level of the elevator's communication quality is first set to the highest, and the priority level of the elevator's usage status is set to the lowest. Then, the main elevator in the group control within the panel is determined according to the priority levels of the elevator's communication quality, operation quality, and usage status. Finally, the other elevators in the group control elevator are designated as auxiliary elevators.

[0059] Specifically, the priority levels for elevator communication quality, operational quality, and usage status are determined as follows:

[0060] First, because each elevator in the machine room is in a different environment and faces different levels of communication interference, and the distance between each elevator and other elevators in the group control system also varies, these factors will affect the communication quality between the elevator and other elevators in the group control system. Since communication quality directly affects the success of the group control elevator system's scheduling and has the most direct impact on the passenger's elevator experience, the priority level for elevator communication quality is set to the highest.

[0061] Secondly, when an elevator's operational quality is abnormal, it poses a safety hazard and may suddenly malfunction, rendering it unable to function properly and thus preventing elevator scheduling. Therefore, elevator operational quality has a significant impact on elevator scheduling within an in-system group control system. Consequently, the priority level for elevator operational quality should be set to moderate.

[0062] Finally, in an in-system group-controlled elevator system, some elevators will always be used more frequently than others. When no malfunctions occur, these elevators will be in operation for a longer period, resulting in higher resource utilization at both the software and hardware levels. Consequently, their wear and tear will also be relatively higher. Therefore, these elevators should not be assigned the main elevator role; their priority should be set to the lowest possible level.

[0063] It should be noted that during the main and auxiliary elevator switching process, each elevator may still be in operation. Therefore, the elevator usage and scheduling in the in-slab group control elevator system will continue to maintain the status of the previous cycle, and there will be no situation where elevator calls are lost due to the change of control of the main elevator.

[0064] In addition, this invention proposes an adaptive learning method for group-controlled main and auxiliary elevators. Instead of simply using the elevator with the earlier elevator number as the criterion for determining the role of the main and auxiliary elevators, a new and complete set of evaluation criteria is established. This method can better select the main elevator in the group-controlled elevator system, which is more conducive to the stability of data transmission in the group-controlled elevator system and can reduce the occurrence of the entire group-controlled elevator system failing due to an accident in a single elevator.

[0065] Please see Figure 1The adaptive learning method for group control main and auxiliary ladders in this embodiment of the invention includes, but is not limited to, the following steps S110, S120, S130 and S140.

[0066] Step S110: Detect the communication quality of each elevator in the group-controlled elevator system and determine the elevator with the highest communication quality.

[0067] In some embodiments, step S110 involves detecting the communication quality of each elevator in the group-controlled elevator system and determining the elevator with the highest communication quality, including but not limited to the following steps:

[0068] All elevators in the group control system are sorted in descending order based on the number of data packets lost for each elevator. The elevator with the lowest data packet loss in the sorted list is determined as the elevator with the highest communication quality. The number of data packets lost for each elevator is obtained through the following steps:

[0069] Get the number of the first data packets sent from the data sending elevator to the data receiving elevator in the group control system;

[0070] Record the number of second data packets actually received by the data receiving elevator from the data sending elevator;

[0071] Calculate the number of data packets lost by the data receiving elevator based on the number of the first data packets and the number of the second data packets.

[0072] As an optional implementation, for example, the group control system can have four elevators, all directly connected via a CAN bus (Controller Area Network), with factory serial numbers 1#, 2#, 3#, and 4#. After the four elevators establish normal communication, each radio typically records the number of data packets actually received from the other three elevators in the group control system per unit time (i.e., the number of second data packets from the three elevators). Since the elevators communicate via the CAN bus, the theoretical number of data packets each elevator receives from the other three elevators in the group control system (i.e., the number of first data packets from the three elevators) is fixed. Therefore, by using the number of first and second data packets, the number of data packet losses for each elevator can be calculated, where the number of data packet losses is the criterion for judging the elevator communication quality. Specifically, the fewer data packet losses an elevator has, the higher its communication quality.

[0073] After calculating the number of data packets lost for each elevator, these data packet loss counts are then sorted in descending order among all elevators in the group control system. The elevator with the lowest data packet loss count in the sorted list is the one with the highest communication quality. For example, if elevator #3 loses far fewer data packets (less than 3 packets) than the other three elevators within one second, then #3 can be directly identified as the main elevator in the group control system, and the main elevator has the right to dispatch the other three elevators. Furthermore, the main elevator is also responsible for collecting internal and external calls, location information, and operating status information from the other three elevators, and assigning the calls to the appropriate elevators to respond, ensuring the stable operation of all elevators in the group control system.

[0074] Step S120: Calculate the communication quality difference between the other elevators in the group-controlled elevator and the elevator with the highest communication quality to obtain the first comparison data; when all the first comparison data are greater than the first preset value, the elevator with the highest communication quality is selected as the main elevator in the group control within the board.

[0075] As an optional implementation, the first preset value can be 3 packets. When all the first comparison data are greater than 3 packets (the first preset value), that is, the communication quality of the elevator with the highest communication quality is much higher than that of other elevators in the group control elevator, the elevator with the highest communication quality can be directly used as the main elevator in the group control within the board.

[0076] Please see Figure 4 In some embodiments, step S120 involves calculating the communication quality difference between the other elevators in the group-controlled elevator and the elevator with the highest communication quality to obtain first comparison data, including the following steps:

[0077] Step S210: Obtain the number of first data packets lost by the elevator with the highest communication quality and the number of second data packets lost by other elevators in the group-controlled elevators;

[0078] Step S220: Calculate the difference between the number of lost first data packets and the number of lost second data packets to obtain the first comparison data.

[0079] As an optional implementation, both the first data packet loss count and the second data packet loss count are obtained through the following steps: obtaining the number of first data packets sent by the data sending elevator to the data receiving elevator in the group control; recording the number of second data packets actually received by the data receiving elevator from the data sending elevator; and calculating the data packet loss count of the data receiving elevator based on the first data packet count and the second data packet count.

[0080] By calculating the difference between the number of lost first data packets and the number of lost second data packets, the communication quality difference between other elevators in the group-controlled elevator system and the elevator with the highest communication quality can be obtained. This communication quality difference can be used to determine whether to designate the elevator with the highest communication quality as the main elevator in the group control system, thus minimizing scheduling errors in the group-controlled elevator system.

[0081] Step S130: When all the first comparison data are less than the first preset value, the operating quality of each elevator in the group-controlled elevator is detected, the elevator with the best operating quality is determined, and the elevator with the best operating quality is used as the main elevator in the group control within the board.

[0082] As an optional implementation, when all the first comparison data are less than the first preset value, that is, when all the first comparison data are less than 3 packets, it indicates that the communication quality of the elevators in the group control elevator is comparable. At this time, it is necessary to further determine whether to use the elevator with the best operating quality as the main elevator in the group control by detecting the operating quality of each elevator in the group control. This can improve the stability of the group control elevator to the greatest extent when a single elevator has a problem.

[0083] Please see Figure 5 In some embodiments, step S130 involves detecting the operating quality of each elevator in the group-controlled elevator system and determining the elevator with the optimal operating quality, including but not limited to the following steps:

[0084] Step S310: Count the number of malfunctions and malfunction levels of each elevator within a preset time.

[0085] Step S320: Determine the health score of each elevator based on the number of faults and the fault level, and determine the elevator with the best operating quality based on the health score; wherein the number of faults and the fault level are inversely proportional to the health score.

[0086] As an optional implementation, embodiments of the present invention can determine the self-health score of each elevator by statistically analyzing the number of malfunctions and malfunction levels of each elevator within a month, and then identify the elevator with the best operating quality in the group-controlled elevator system based on its self-health score. The malfunction level can be level 1, level 2, or level 3, etc., with a higher malfunction level resulting in a lower self-health score. Similarly, the more malfunctions an elevator experiences, the lower its self-health score. Elevators with lower self-health scores may have more safety hazards; therefore, elevators with lower self-health scores cannot be used as main elevators and can only be used as auxiliary elevators for scheduling. Conversely, elevators with higher self-health scores indicate better operating quality, and only elevators with the best operating quality can subsequently be used as main elevators in the group control system.

[0087] Please see Figure 6 In another embodiment, step S130 involves detecting the operating quality of each elevator in the group-controlled elevator system and determining the elevator with the optimal operating quality, including but not limited to the following steps:

[0088] Step S410: Record the first data values ​​of several operating parameters for each elevator during commissioning;

[0089] Step S420: Detect the second data values ​​of several operating parameters for each elevator during operation;

[0090] Step S430: Determine the third data value of the operating parameters based on the difference between the first and second data values ​​of several operating parameters for each elevator;

[0091] Step S440: The third data values ​​corresponding to multiple operating parameters of each elevator are accumulated and added together to obtain the fourth data value;

[0092] Step S450: Sort all elevators in the group control system in descending order according to the fourth data value, and determine the elevator with the best operating quality as the last elevator in the sort.

[0093] Several operating parameters include elevator door opening and closing time parameters or voltage and current parameters.

[0094] As an optional implementation, this embodiment of the invention can calculate the deviation of the operating parameters (third data value) by performing a difference calculation between the door opening / closing time parameters or voltage / current parameters of each elevator during operation (i.e., the first data value) and the corresponding standard values ​​during debugging (i.e., the second data value). Then, the third data values ​​corresponding to multiple operating parameters for each elevator are summed to obtain a fourth data value. A higher fourth data value indicates a greater deviation in the elevator's operating parameters, and a relatively lower operating quality. Conversely, a higher fourth data value indicates better operating quality. Therefore, in this embodiment of the invention, the elevator with the lowest fourth data value is selected as the elevator with the best operating quality in the group-controlled elevator system.

[0095] Step S140: When all the first comparison data are less than the first preset value and the operating quality of each elevator is the same, the usage of each elevator in the group control elevator is statistically analyzed to determine the elevator with the lowest wear and tear; and the elevator with the lowest wear and tear is taken as the main elevator in the group control within the board.

[0096] As an optional implementation, when all the first comparison data are less than a first preset value, i.e., all the first comparison data are less than 3 packets, it indicates that the communication quality of the elevators in the group-controlled elevator is equivalent. Furthermore, if the operating quality of each elevator is the same, i.e., the fourth data value corresponding to each elevator is the same, then it is necessary to further identify the elevator with the lowest wear and tear by statistically analyzing the usage of each elevator in the group-controlled elevator, and designate the elevator with the lowest wear and tear as the main elevator in the group control system.

[0097] Please see Figure 7 In some embodiments, step S140 involves statistically analyzing the usage of each elevator in the group-controlled elevator system and determining the elevator with the lowest wear and tear, including the following steps:

[0098] Step S510: Calculate the load capacity of each elevator within a preset time.

[0099] Step S520: Determine the elevator with the lowest wear and tear based on the load capacity.

[0100] As an optional implementation, embodiments of the present invention can determine the usage status of each elevator in a group-controlled elevator system by statistically analyzing the load volume of each elevator over a month. Higher load volumes generally indicate higher elevator wear and tear; therefore, elevators with high load volumes are not suitable as the main elevators in the group control system. Consequently, the elevator with the lowest load volume, i.e., the one with the lowest wear and tear, needs to be selected as the main elevator in the group control system.

[0101] Please see Figure 8 In another embodiment, step S140 involves statistically analyzing the usage of each elevator in the group-controlled elevator system to determine the elevator with the lowest wear and tear, including the following steps:

[0102] Step S610: Count the number of times each elevator is used within a preset time period;

[0103] Step S620: Determine the elevator with the lowest wear and tear based on the number of times it is used.

[0104] As an optional implementation, embodiments of the present invention can determine the usage status of each elevator in a group-controlled elevator system by statistically analyzing the number of times each elevator is used within a month. The more times an elevator is used, the higher its wear and tear will be. In this case, an elevator with a high number of uses is not suitable as the main elevator in the group control system. Therefore, it is necessary to select the elevator with the fewest uses, i.e., the elevator with the lowest wear and tear, as the main elevator in the group control system.

[0105] The number of times a button can be used can be either the number of times the elevator's internal or external call buttons are used, or the number of times the elevator doors are opened and closed.

[0106] This invention sets the communication quality priority of elevators to the highest and the usage priority to the lowest. Then, the main elevator in the group control system is determined according to the priority levels of communication quality, operational quality, and usage. Specifically, firstly, the communication quality of each elevator in the group control system is detected, and the elevator with the highest communication quality is determined. The communication quality difference between the other elevators in the group control system and the elevator with the highest communication quality is calculated to obtain first comparison data. When all first comparison data are greater than a first preset value, the elevator with the highest communication quality is selected as the main elevator in the group control system. Then, when all first comparison data are less than the first preset value, the elevator with the best operational quality is selected as the main elevator in the group control system. Finally, when all first comparison data are less than the first preset value, and the operational quality of each elevator is the same, the elevator with the lowest wear and tear is selected as the main elevator in the group control system. This invention can significantly reduce scheduling errors in the group control elevator system and reduce the likelihood of a single elevator malfunction causing the entire group control elevator system to fail.

[0107] This invention also provides a group-controlled main and auxiliary elevator adaptive learning system, comprising the following steps:

[0108] The first module is used to detect the communication quality of each elevator in the group-controlled elevator system and determine the elevator with the highest communication quality.

[0109] The second module is used to calculate the communication quality difference between other elevators in the group-controlled elevator and the elevator with the highest communication quality, and obtain the first comparison data; when all the first comparison data are greater than the first preset value, the elevator with the highest communication quality is selected as the main elevator in the group control within the board.

[0110] The third module is used to detect the operating quality of each elevator in the group-controlled elevator when all the first comparison data are less than the first preset value, determine the elevator with the best operating quality, and use the elevator with the best operating quality as the main elevator in the group control within the board.

[0111] The fourth module is used to statistically analyze the usage of each elevator in the group-controlled elevator system when all the first comparison data are less than the first preset value and the operating quality of each elevator is the same, and to determine the elevator with the lowest wear and tear; and to designate the elevator with the lowest wear and tear as the main elevator in the group control system.

[0112] This invention also provides a group-controlled main and auxiliary elevator adaptive learning device, comprising:

[0113] At least one processor;

[0114] At least one memory for storing at least one program;

[0115] When the at least one program is executed by at least one processor, the at least one processor implements the adaptive learning method for group control of main and auxiliary ladders as described above.

[0116] This invention also provides a computer storage medium storing a processor-executable program, which, when executed by a processor, is used to implement the group control main and auxiliary ladder adaptive learning method described above.

[0117] Those skilled in the art will understand that all or some of the steps and systems disclosed above can be implemented as software, firmware, hardware, and suitable combinations thereof. Some or all of the physical components can be implemented as software executed by a processor, such as a central processing unit, digital signal processor, or microprocessor, or as integrated circuits, such as application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs). Such software can be distributed in computer storage media, including but not limited to read-only memory, random access memory, programmable read-only memory, erasable programmable read-only memory, programmable read-only memory, read-once programmable read-only memory, optical disc or other optical disc storage, disk storage, magnetic tape storage, or any other computer-readable medium capable of carrying or storing data.

[0118] The above is a detailed description of the preferred embodiments of the present invention. However, the present invention is not limited to the embodiments described. Those skilled in the art can make various equivalent modifications or substitutions without departing from the spirit of the present invention. All such equivalent modifications or substitutions are included within the scope defined by the claims of this application.

Claims

1. A group-controlled main and auxiliary ladder adaptive learning method, characterized in that, Includes the following steps: Detect the communication quality of each elevator in the group-controlled elevator system and determine the elevator with the highest communication quality; The communication quality difference between the other elevators in the group-controlled elevator and the elevator with the highest communication quality is calculated to obtain the first comparison data; when all the first comparison data are greater than the first preset value, the elevator with the highest communication quality is selected as the main elevator in the group control within the board. When all the first comparison data are less than the first preset value, the operating quality of each elevator in the group-controlled elevator is detected, and the elevator with the best operating quality is determined. The elevator with the best operating quality will be used as the main elevator in the group control system within the panel; When all the first comparison data are less than the first preset value, and the operating quality of each elevator is the same, the usage of each elevator in the group-controlled elevator is statistically analyzed to determine the elevator with the lowest wear and tear; and the elevator with the lowest wear and tear is selected as the main elevator in the group control within the panel.

2. The adaptive learning method for group-controlled main and auxiliary ladders according to claim 1, characterized in that, The method for detecting the communication quality of each elevator in a group-controlled elevator system and determining the elevator with the highest communication quality includes the following steps: All elevators in the group control system are sorted in descending order based on the number of data packets lost for each elevator. The elevator with the lowest data packet loss in the sorted list is determined as the elevator with the highest communication quality. The number of data packets lost for each elevator is obtained through the following steps: Get the number of the first data packets sent from the data sending elevator to the data receiving elevator in the group control system; Record the number of second data packets actually received by the data receiving elevator from the data sending elevator; The number of data packets lost by the data receiving elevator is calculated based on the number of the first data packets and the number of the second data packets.

3. The adaptive learning method for group-controlled main and auxiliary ladders according to claim 1, characterized in that, The process of detecting the operating quality of each elevator in a group-controlled elevator system and determining the elevator with the optimal operating quality includes the following steps: Statistically analyze the number of malfunctions and their severity for each elevator within a preset time period. Each elevator's own health score is determined based on the number of faults and the fault level, and the elevator with the best operating quality is determined based on the own health score; wherein, the number of faults and the fault level are both inversely proportional to the own health score.

4. The adaptive learning method for group-controlled main and auxiliary ladders according to claim 1, characterized in that, The process of detecting the operating quality of each elevator in a group-controlled elevator system and determining the elevator with the optimal operating quality includes the following steps: Record the first data values ​​of several operating parameters for each elevator during commissioning; The second data value of several operating parameters of each elevator is detected during operation; The third data value of the operating parameters is determined based on the difference between the first and second data values ​​of several operating parameters for each elevator. The third data value corresponding to multiple operating parameters of each elevator is summed to obtain the fourth data value; Based on the fourth data value, all elevators in the group control are sorted in descending order, and the elevator at the bottom of the sort is determined as the elevator with the best operating quality. Several operating parameters include elevator door opening and closing time parameters or voltage and current parameters.

5. The adaptive learning method for group-controlled main and auxiliary ladders according to claim 1, characterized in that, The process of statistically analyzing the usage of each elevator in a group-controlled elevator system and determining the elevator with the lowest wear and tear includes the following steps: Calculate the load capacity of each elevator within a preset time period; The elevator with the lowest wear and tear is determined based on the stated carrying capacity.

6. The adaptive learning method for group-controlled main and auxiliary ladders according to claim 1, characterized in that, The process of statistically analyzing the usage of each elevator in a group-controlled elevator system and determining the elevator with the lowest wear and tear includes the following steps: Count the number of times each elevator is used within a preset time period; The elevator with the lowest wear and tear is determined based on the number of times it is used.

7. The adaptive learning method for group-controlled main and auxiliary ladders according to claim 1, characterized in that, The process of calculating the communication quality difference between other elevators in the group-controlled elevator system and the elevator with the highest communication quality to obtain the first comparison data includes the following steps: Obtain the first data packet loss count of the elevator with the highest communication quality and the second data packet loss count of other elevators in the group-controlled elevator; The difference between the number of lost first data packets and the number of lost second data packets is calculated to obtain the first comparison data.

8. A group-controlled main and auxiliary elevator adaptive learning system, characterized in that, The system includes: The first module is used to detect the communication quality of each elevator in the group-controlled elevator system and determine the elevator with the highest communication quality. The second module is used to calculate the communication quality difference between other elevators in the group-controlled elevator and the elevator with the highest communication quality, and obtain the first comparison data; when all the first comparison data are greater than the first preset value, the elevator with the highest communication quality is selected as the main elevator in the group control within the board. The third module is used to detect the operating quality of each elevator in the group-controlled elevator when all the first comparison data are less than the first preset value, determine the elevator with the best operating quality, and use the elevator with the best operating quality as the main elevator in the group control within the board. The fourth module is used to statistically analyze the usage of each elevator in the group-controlled elevator system when all the first comparison data are less than the first preset value and the operating quality of each elevator is the same, and to determine the elevator with the lowest wear and tear; and to designate the elevator with the lowest wear and tear as the main elevator in the group control system.

9. A group-controlled main and auxiliary elevator adaptive learning device, characterized in that, include: At least one processor; At least one memory for storing at least one program; When the at least one program is executed by the at least one processor, the at least one processor implements the adaptive learning method for group control main and auxiliary ladders as described in any one of claims 1-7.

10. A computer storage medium storing a processor-executable program, characterized in that, The program executable by the processor, when executed by the processor, is used to implement the adaptive learning method for group-controlled main and auxiliary elevators as described in any one of claims 1-7.

Images