A method for obtaining a configuration plan for an iron core processing production line and related equipment

Abstract

The present application belongs to the technical field of iron core processing, and discloses a method for acquiring a configuration scheme of an iron core processing production line and related equipment, the method comprising: acquiring process information, site information and environmental information; the process information comprises process types of multiple processes, workpiece parameters of each process and target capacity of output products of each process; according to the target capacity of output products of each process, calculating the capacity index of output materials of each process; according to the environmental information, process type, workpiece parameters and capacity index, screening out the alternative processing equipment of each process from a processing equipment database; selecting a preferred processing equipment from the alternative processing equipment of each process according to the site information; according to the performance of the preferred processing equipment of each process, selecting the output logistics equipment of each process from a logistics equipment database to form a configuration scheme with the preferred processing equipment of each process; thereby being able to provide a reasonable configuration scheme of the transformer iron core processing production line based on existing constraints.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present application relates to the field of iron core processing technology, and in particular to a method for obtaining a configuration plan for an iron core processing production line and related equipment. Background Art

[0002] With the upgrading of the industry, many traditional transformer core manufacturers have the need to upgrade their production lines to digital ones.

[0003] The transformer core processing involves multiple steps, each of which requires different processing equipment. Some of the outputs of some steps can be used as transfer materials to the next step for further processing, or can be directly sold as products (for example, silicon steel sheets cut into a certain size by a cross-cutting device can be sold as products, or can be sent to a punching device for punching). There are many types of processing equipment to choose from in each step, and the processing capabilities of the equipment in each step vary greatly. There are many types of material transfer equipment to choose from between the process equipment, resulting in a variety of configuration options for the core processing production line, but not all configuration options are reasonable.

[0004] When transformer core manufacturers are upgrading their production lines to digitalization, they often select equipment under the premise that existing factory buildings, process methods, environmental conditions (mainly the temperature and humidity conditions of the factory buildings) and other factors remain unchanged. Once the selection is unreasonable, problems such as mismatch between site and equipment and excess or insufficient equipment performance are likely to occur. Therefore, how to reasonably configure the core processing production line under these existing constraints is a technical problem that needs to be solved urgently. Summary of the invention

[0005] The purpose of this application is to provide a method for obtaining a configuration plan for a core processing production line and related equipment, which can provide a reasonable configuration plan for a transformer core processing production line based on existing constraints.

[0006] In a first aspect, the present application provides a method for obtaining a configuration scheme of a core processing production line, which is used to obtain a configuration scheme of a transformer core processing production line, comprising the steps of:

[0007] A1. Obtaining the process information, site information and environment information of transformer core processing; the process information includes the process types of multiple processes, the workpiece parameters of each process and the target production capacity of the output product of each process;

[0008] A2. Calculate the capacity index of the output material of each process according to the target capacity of the output product of each process;

[0009] A3. Filtering out candidate processing equipment for each process from a processing equipment database according to the environmental information, the process type, the workpiece parameters, and the production capacity index;

[0010] A4. Select a preferred processing equipment from the alternative processing equipment for each process according to the site information;

[0011] A5. Based on the performance of the preferred processing equipment of each process, the output logistics equipment of each process is selected from the logistics equipment database to form a configuration plan with the preferred processing equipment of each process.

[0012] The method selects processing equipment and logistics equipment for each processing step based on existing constraints such as processing technology, site information and environmental information to form a configuration plan for the transformer core processing production line. The method realizes the automatic generation of the configuration plan for the transformer core processing production line, which can avoid the mismatch between the site and the equipment and is conducive to reducing the degree of excess or insufficient equipment performance, thereby improving the rationality of the configuration plan for the transformer core processing production line.

[0013] Preferably, step A2 comprises:

[0014] The capacity index of the output material of each process is calculated according to the following formula:

[0015] ;

[0016] in, is the capacity indicator of the output material of the i-th process, is the capacity indicator of the output material of the i+1th process, is the target capacity of the output product of the ith process, and n is the total number of processes.

[0017] Preferably, the processing equipment database records the equipment type, working environment requirements, processable workpiece parameter range and rated capacity data of various processing equipment;

[0018] Step A3 includes:

[0019] A301. Selecting a processing equipment whose equipment type matches the process type of each process from the processing equipment database as the first candidate equipment for each process;

[0020] A302. Selecting a processing device whose working environment requirement matches the environmental information from the first candidate equipment of each process as the second candidate equipment of each process;

[0021] A303. Selecting a processing device whose processable workpiece parameter range matches the workpiece parameter of the corresponding process from the second candidate equipment of each process as the third candidate equipment of each process;

[0022] A304. Select processing equipment whose rated capacity data is not less than the capacity index of the output material of the corresponding process from the third candidate equipment of each process as the alternative processing equipment for each process.

[0023] Screening the candidate processing equipment in the above-mentioned manner is conducive to ensuring that the screened candidate processing equipment meets the use requirements under the constraints of corresponding processes, sites and environments.

[0024] Preferably, the site information includes a plan view of the available space; the processing equipment database records the plane dimensions and prices of various processing equipment, and the plane dimensions are the dimensions of the projection of the processing equipment on the horizontal plane;

[0025] Step A4 includes:

[0026] A401. Arrange and combine the alternative processing equipment for each process to obtain multiple alternative processing equipment groups; each of the alternative processing equipment groups includes an alternative processing equipment corresponding to each process;

[0027] A402. According to the plan dimensions of each candidate processing equipment and the plan view of the available space, select the candidate processing equipment group that can be accommodated in the available space as the candidate equipment group;

[0028] A403. Select one of the candidate equipment groups as the preferred equipment group based on the prices of the alternative processing equipment in the candidate equipment group, and use the alternative processing equipment in the preferred equipment group as the preferred processing equipment for each process step.

[0029] By screening and selecting the preferred processing equipment from the candidate processing equipment in the above manner, it can be ensured that the available space can reliably accommodate the final iron core processing production line, and the equipment cost of the iron core processing production line can also be reduced.

[0030] Preferably, step A402 includes the following steps performed for each of the candidate processing equipment groups:

[0031] Taking each candidate processing equipment in the candidate processing equipment group as a target equipment, obtaining a characteristic rectangle of each target equipment according to the plane size of each target equipment; the characteristic rectangle is the minimum circumscribed rectangle of the projection of the target equipment on the horizontal plane;

[0032] The characteristic rectangle of each target device is offset outward by a preset safety distance to obtain an offset rectangle of each target device;

[0033] Taking the offset rectangle of each target device as the occupied space of the corresponding target device, searching for the placement area of ​​each target device in turn from the plan view of the available space, and judging whether the available space can accommodate the candidate processing equipment group according to the search results.

[0034] Preferably, the step of taking the offset rectangle of each target device as the occupied space of the corresponding target device, searching for the placement area of ​​each target device in sequence from the plan view of the available space, and judging whether the available space can accommodate the candidate processing equipment group according to the search results includes:

[0035] B1. Determine the characteristic corner points according to the relative positions of the corner points and the boundary lines of the available space in the plan view of the available space;

[0036] B2. Using the size of the offset rectangle of the target device corresponding to the first process as the target grid size, gridding the available space, and searching for the complete grid closest to the feature corner point as the placement area of ​​the target device corresponding to the first process;

[0037] B3. Re-gridding the remaining area of ​​the available space according to the size of the offset rectangle of the target device corresponding to the next process as the target grid size, and searching all complete grids to form a candidate grid set; the remaining area is the area in the available space other than the determined placement area;

[0038] B4. If the candidate grid set is an empty set, it is determined that the available space cannot accommodate the candidate processing equipment group, and the search is terminated;

[0039] B5. If the candidate grid set is not an empty set, the characteristic distances from each complete grid in the candidate grid set to the boundary of the remaining area of ​​the available space are calculated, and the complete grid with the largest characteristic distance is used as the placement area of ​​the target device corresponding to the next process; the characteristic distance is the distance from the center of the complete grid to the boundary of the remaining area of ​​the available space along the characteristic direction, and the characteristic direction is the direction from the center of the placement area of ​​the target device corresponding to the previous process to the center of the complete grid;

[0040] B6. If the search for the placement area of ​​the target equipment corresponding to all processes is completed, it is determined that the available space can accommodate the candidate processing equipment group and the search is terminated. Otherwise, steps B3 to B6 are repeated.

[0041] Preferably, step A5 comprises:

[0042] Determine the output logistics performance requirements of each process according to the rated capacity data of the preferred processing equipment of each process, the target capacity of the output product of each process and the capacity index of the output material of each process;

[0043] According to the output logistics performance requirements of each process, the output logistics equipment of each process is selected from the logistics equipment database to form a configuration plan with the preferred processing equipment of each process.

[0044] In a second aspect, the present application provides a device for acquiring a configuration scheme of a core processing production line, which is used to acquire a configuration scheme of a transformer core processing production line, including:

[0045] An acquisition module is used to acquire process information, site information and environmental information of transformer core processing; the process information includes process types of multiple processes, workpiece parameters of each process and target production capacity of output products of each process;

[0046] A calculation module, used to calculate the capacity index of the output material of each process according to the target capacity of the output product of each process;

[0047] A first screening module, used to screen candidate processing equipment for each process from a processing equipment database according to the environmental information, the process type, the workpiece parameter and the production capacity index;

[0048] A second screening module is used to select a preferred processing equipment from the candidate processing equipment of each process according to the site information;

[0049] The third screening module is used to select the output logistics equipment of each process from the logistics equipment database according to the performance of the preferred processing equipment of each process, so as to form a configuration plan with the preferred processing equipment of each process.

[0050] In a third aspect, the present application provides an electronic device comprising a processor and a memory, wherein the memory stores a computer program executable by the processor, and when the processor executes the computer program, it runs the steps in the method for acquiring a configuration plan for an iron core processing production line as described above.

[0051] In a fourth aspect, the present application provides a computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, and when the computer program is executed by a processor, the steps in the method for acquiring a configuration plan for an iron core processing production line as described above are executed.

[0052] Beneficial effect: The method for obtaining the configuration scheme of the core processing production line and the related equipment provided in the present application select the processing equipment and logistics equipment for each processing step based on existing constraints such as processing technology, site information and environmental information to form the configuration scheme of the transformer core processing production line, thereby realizing the automatic generation of the configuration scheme of the transformer core processing production line, avoiding the mismatch between the site and the equipment, and helping to reduce the degree of excess or insufficient equipment performance, thereby improving the rationality of the configuration scheme of the transformer core processing production line. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0053] Figure 1A flowchart of a method for obtaining a configuration plan for an iron core processing production line provided in an embodiment of the present application.

[0054] Figure 2 A schematic diagram of the structure of a device for acquiring a configuration scheme for an iron core processing production line provided in an embodiment of the present application.

[0055] Figure 3 A schematic diagram of the structure of an electronic device provided in an embodiment of the present application.

[0056] Figure 4 An exemplary floor plan of available space is shown below.

[0057] Explanation of reference numerals: 1. Acquisition module; 2. Calculation module; 3. First screening module; 4. Second screening module; 5. Third screening module; 301. Processor; 302. Memory; 303. Communication bus. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0058] The technical solutions in the embodiments of the present application will be clearly and completely described below in conjunction with the drawings in the embodiments of the present application. Obviously, the described embodiments are only a part of the embodiments of the present application, rather than all of the embodiments. The components of the embodiments of the present application described and shown in the drawings here can be arranged and designed in various different configurations. Therefore, the following detailed description of the embodiments of the present application provided in the drawings is not intended to limit the scope of the application claimed for protection, but merely represents the selected embodiments of the present application. Based on the embodiments of the present application, all other embodiments obtained by those skilled in the art without making creative work belong to the scope of protection of the present application.

[0059] It should be noted that similar reference numerals and letters represent similar items in the following drawings, so once an item is defined in one drawing, it does not need to be further defined and explained in subsequent drawings. At the same time, in the description of this application, the terms "first", "second", etc. are only used to distinguish the description and cannot be understood as indicating or implying relative importance.

[0060] Please refer to Figure 1 , Figure 1 A method for obtaining a configuration scheme of a core processing production line in some embodiments of the present application is used to obtain a configuration scheme of a transformer core processing production line, comprising the steps of:

[0061] A1. Obtain the process information, site information and environment information of transformer core processing; the process information includes the process types of multiple processes, the workpiece parameters of each process and the target production capacity of the output products of each process;

[0062] A2. Calculate the output material capacity index of each process based on the target output product capacity of each process;

[0063] A3. Select the candidate processing equipment for each process from the processing equipment database based on environmental information, process type, workpiece parameters and production capacity indicators;

[0064] A4. Select a preferred processing equipment from the alternative processing equipment for each process based on the site information;

[0065] A5. According to the performance of the preferred processing equipment of each process, the output logistics equipment of each process is selected from the logistics equipment database to form a configuration plan with the preferred processing equipment of each process.

[0066] The method selects processing equipment and logistics equipment for each processing step based on existing constraints such as processing technology, site information and environmental information to form a configuration plan for the transformer core processing production line. The method realizes the automatic generation of the configuration plan for the transformer core processing production line, which can avoid the mismatch between the site and the equipment and is conducive to reducing the degree of excess or insufficient equipment performance, thereby improving the rationality of the configuration plan for the transformer core processing production line.

[0067] Generally, the transformer core processing procedures include silicon steel sheet winding and unwinding, silicon steel sheet longitudinal cutting (cutting continuous silicon steel sheets to the required width along the longitudinal direction), silicon steel sheet cross cutting (cutting continuous silicon steel sheets into independent silicon steel sheets of required length along the transverse direction), silicon steel sheet punching (punching out process holes on independent silicon steel sheets), silicon steel sheet V-cutting (cutting out V-shaped incisions on independent silicon steel sheets), silicon steel sheet oblique cutting (cutting out oblique edges at both ends of independent silicon steel sheets) and stacking (stacking independent silicon steel sheets into cores), etc., but are not limited to these.

[0068] Among them, the capacity index of the output material of a process refers to the capacity of the total output material that the process needs to achieve, and the target capacity of the output product of a process refers to the capacity of the output product that the process needs to achieve; for the last process (such as stacking), its output materials are all products, so the target capacity of the output products is equal to the capacity index of its output materials; for processes whose output materials can be used as transit materials to flow to the next process for further processing or can be directly sold as products (for example, processes such as silicon steel sheet cross-cutting, silicon steel sheet punching, silicon steel sheet V-cutting and silicon steel sheet oblique cutting all belong to this type of process), when the output materials do not need to be used as products, the target capacity of its output products is zero; when part of the output materials need to be used as products, the target capacity of its output products is part of the capacity index of its own output materials.

[0069] Among them, since the forms of the materials output from each process are not all the same, for example, the materials output from the silicon steel sheet coiling and unwinding process and the silicon steel sheet longitudinal cutting process are continuous silicon steel sheets, the materials output from the silicon steel sheet cross-cutting, silicon steel sheet punching, silicon steel sheet V-cutting and silicon steel sheet oblique cutting processes are independent silicon steel sheets, and the material output from the stacking process is an iron core. If there are other processes after the stacking process, the materials output from other processes are also iron cores. In order to facilitate the unified calculation of production capacity, the target capacity and capacity indicators corresponding to each process can be uniformly converted into the silicon steel sheet output per unit time. Output quantity; for example, for the cores output by the stacking process (and other subsequent processes), the number of silicon steel sheets contained in a single core is known, and the number of cores required to be output per unit time is multiplied by the number of silicon steel sheets in a single core to obtain the output quantity of silicon steel sheets per unit time of the corresponding process; for the silicon steel sheet winding and unwinding process and the silicon steel sheet slitting process, since the length of a single independent silicon steel sheet is known, the length of the silicon steel sheet required to be output per unit time is divided by the length of a single independent silicon steel sheet to obtain the output quantity of silicon steel sheets per unit time of the corresponding process.

[0070] Among them, the workpiece parameters of the silicon steel sheet winding and unwinding process and the silicon steel sheet longitudinal cutting process may include but are not limited to the thickness and width of the silicon steel sheet. The workpiece parameters of the silicon steel sheet cross-cutting, silicon steel sheet punching, silicon steel sheet V-cutting and silicon steel sheet oblique cutting processes may include but are not limited to the thickness, width and length of the silicon steel sheet. The workpiece parameters of the stacking process may include but are not limited to the number of silicon steel sheets and the shape of the core of a single core.

[0071] Specifically, step A2 includes:

[0072] The capacity index of the output material of each process is calculated according to the following formula:

[0073] ;

[0074] in, is the capacity indicator of the output material of the i-th process, is the capacity indicator of the output material of the i+1th process, is the target capacity of the output product of the i-th process, and n is the total number of processes. For the last process, all its output materials are products, so the capacity index of its output materials is the same as the target capacity of the output products. For other processes, if part of the output materials are required to be products, the corresponding is a non-zero value as required. If all output materials are required to flow to the next process as transfer materials, the corresponding is zero.

[0075] When using the above method to generate a configuration plan for an iron core processing production line, the user only needs to input the output product capacity that the corresponding process needs to achieve (i.e., the target capacity of the output product) for the process that needs to output the product, and the program will automatically convert it into the capacity index of the output material of each process, so as to facilitate the subsequent selection of processing equipment with matching performance according to the capacity index of the output material of each process.

[0076] Preferably, the processing equipment database records the equipment types of various processing equipment (such as unwinding equipment, longitudinal cutting equipment, cross-cutting equipment, punching equipment, V-shearing equipment, diagonal shearing equipment, stacking equipment, etc.), working environment requirements (i.e., the environmental conditions required for the normal operation of the equipment), the processable workpiece parameter range and rated capacity data (which can be uniformly converted into the output quantity of silicon steel sheets per unit time in advance);

[0077] Step A3 includes:

[0078] A301. Select processing equipment whose equipment type matches the process type of each process from the processing equipment database as the first candidate equipment for each process;

[0079] A302. Select processing equipment whose working environment requirements match the environmental information from the first candidate equipment of each process as the second candidate equipment of each process;

[0080] A303. Selecting a processing device whose processable workpiece parameter range matches the workpiece parameter of the corresponding process from the second candidate equipment of each process as the third candidate equipment of each process;

[0081] A304. Select processing equipment whose rated capacity data is not less than the capacity index of the output material of the corresponding process from the third candidate equipment of each process as the alternative processing equipment for each process.

[0082] Screening the candidate processing equipment in the above-mentioned manner is conducive to ensuring that the screened candidate processing equipment meets the use requirements under the constraints of corresponding processes, sites and environments.

[0083] Among them, the working environment requirements may include the working temperature range and the working humidity range, so that the environmental information includes the temperature range and humidity range of the plant; the processing equipment whose working environment requirements match the environmental information refers to the processing equipment whose working temperature range covers the temperature range of the plant, and whose working humidity range covers the humidity range of the plant. Assuming that the working temperature range of a processing equipment is T1, the working humidity range of the processing equipment is S1, the temperature range of the plant is T2, and the humidity range of the plant is S2, if T2∈T1 and S2∈S1, then the working environment requirements of the processing equipment match the environmental information.

[0084] The processing equipment whose processable workpiece parameter range matches the workpiece parameters of the corresponding process refers to the processing equipment whose processable workpiece parameter range includes the workpiece parameters of the corresponding process.

[0085] Among them, in order to avoid excessive calculation amount of subsequent processing process caused by too many alternative processing equipment in each process, in step A304, for each process, if the number of processing equipment whose rated capacity data is not less than the capacity index of the output material of the corresponding process in the third candidate equipment exceeds a preset quantity threshold P (which can be set according to actual needs), the difference between the rated capacity data of each processing equipment that meets the conditions (that is, the processing equipment whose rated capacity data is not less than the capacity index of the output material of the corresponding process in the third candidate equipment) and the capacity index of the output material of the corresponding process can be calculated, and recorded as the capacity deviation, and then the processing equipment that meets the conditions is sorted in ascending order according to the capacity deviation, and finally the processing equipment that meets the conditions before P in the sorting is selected as the alternative processing equipment of the corresponding process.

[0086] In some embodiments, the site information includes a plan view of available space (i.e., space in a factory building that can be used to arrange an iron core processing production line); the processing equipment database records the plan dimensions and prices of various processing equipment, where the plan dimensions are the dimensions of the projection of the processing equipment on a horizontal plane;

[0087] Step A4 includes:

[0088] A401. Arrange and combine the alternative processing equipment of each process to obtain multiple alternative processing equipment groups; each alternative processing equipment group includes an alternative processing equipment corresponding to each process;

[0089] A402. According to the plan dimensions of each candidate processing equipment and the plan view of the available space, select a group of candidate processing equipment that can be accommodated in the available space as a candidate equipment group;

[0090] A403. Based on the prices of the alternative processing equipment in the candidate equipment group, select one candidate equipment group as the preferred equipment group, and use the alternative processing equipment in the preferred equipment group as the preferred processing equipment for each process.

[0091] By screening and selecting the preferred processing equipment from the candidate processing equipment in the above manner, it can be ensured that the available space can reliably accommodate the final iron core processing production line, and the equipment cost of the iron core processing production line can also be reduced.

[0092] The floor plan of the available space used in step A4 is a scaled floor plan (i.e., the scale is 1:1). If the floor plan of the available space in the site information obtained in step A1 is a scaled view, then before step A4, the floor plan of the available space needs to be adjusted to a scaled floor plan.

[0093] Among them, in step A401, one alternative processing equipment is selected from the alternative processing equipment of each process to form an alternative processing equipment group, and multiple alternative processing equipment groups can be obtained by performing permutations and combinations.

[0094] Wherein, step A402 includes the following steps performed for each candidate processing equipment group:

[0095] Taking each candidate processing equipment in the candidate processing equipment group as a target equipment, obtaining a characteristic rectangle of each target equipment according to the plane size of each target equipment; the characteristic rectangle is the minimum circumscribed rectangle of the projection of the target equipment on the horizontal plane;

[0096] The characteristic rectangle of each target device is offset outward by a preset safety distance to obtain an offset rectangle of each target device;

[0097] Taking the offset rectangle of each target device as the occupied space of the corresponding target device, the placement area of ​​each target device is searched in turn from the plan view of the available space, and judging whether the available space can accommodate the alternative processing equipment group according to the search results.

[0098] Among them, the preset safety distance can be set according to actual needs. When searching for the placement area, the safety distance between each processing equipment and between the processing equipment and buildings (such as walls, columns, etc.) or equipment outside the available space is fully considered. When the user configures the production line according to the final configuration plan, there is sufficient safety interval between the processing equipment of the production line and between the processing equipment and other buildings or equipment, which improves the rationality of the configuration plan.

[0099] The steps of taking the offset rectangle of each target device as the occupied space of the corresponding target device, searching for the placement area of ​​each target device in turn from the plan view of the available space, and judging whether the available space can accommodate the candidate processing equipment group according to the search results include:

[0100] B1. Determine the characteristic corner points according to the relative positions of the corner points and boundary lines of the available space in the plan view of the available space;

[0101] B2. Using the size of the offset rectangle of the target device corresponding to the first process as the target grid size, grid the available space, and search for the complete grid closest to the feature corner point as the placement area of ​​the target device corresponding to the first process;

[0102] B3. Re-grid the remaining area of ​​the available space based on the size of the offset rectangle of the target device corresponding to the next process as the target grid size, and search all complete grids to form a candidate grid set; the remaining area is the area in the available space other than the determined placement area;

[0103] B4. If the candidate grid set is an empty set, it is determined that the available space cannot accommodate the candidate processing equipment group, and the search ends;

[0104] B5. If the candidate grid set is not an empty set, calculate the characteristic distance from each complete grid in the candidate grid set to the boundary of the remaining area of ​​the available space, and use the complete grid with the largest characteristic distance as the placement area of ​​the target device corresponding to the next process; the characteristic distance is the distance from the center of the complete grid to the boundary of the remaining area of ​​the available space along the characteristic direction, and the characteristic direction is the direction from the center of the placement area of ​​the target device corresponding to the previous process to the center of the complete grid;

[0105] B6. If the search for the placement area of ​​the target equipment corresponding to all processes is completed, it is determined that the available space can accommodate the alternative processing equipment group and the search is ended. Otherwise, steps B3 to B6 are repeated.

[0106] In step B1, the feature corner points can be determined in the following manner:

[0107] Extracting the midpoint positions of each boundary line and the positions of each corner point of the available space in the plan view of the available space;

[0108] According to the midpoint position of each boundary line and the position of each corner point, the distance between each corner point and the midpoint of each boundary line is calculated;

[0109] Calculate the sum of the distances between each corner point and the midpoints of all non-adjacent boundary lines, and record it as the total corner margin; wherein, the adjacent boundary line of a corner point refers to the boundary line connected to the corner point;

[0110] A corner point corresponding to the maximum value of the total angular margin distance is selected as the feature corner point; if there are multiple corner points corresponding to the maximum value of the total angular margin distance, one is randomly selected as the feature corner point.

[0111] When the target equipment corresponding to the first process is placed near the feature corner point, the probability that the area near the target equipment corresponding to the first process is insufficient to accommodate other processing equipment after the target equipment corresponding to the first process is placed can be reduced, thereby reducing space waste and avoiding the situation where the actually accommodating group of alternative processing equipment is judged as not being able to be accommodated by the available space due to unreasonable setting of the placement area of ​​the target equipment corresponding to the first process.

[0112] In fact, in the plan view of the available space, the available space is mostly rectangular or L-shaped area, but not limited to this. For a rectangular area, placing the processing equipment of the first process close to one of the corner points can reduce space waste. For an L-shaped area, placing the processing equipment of the first process at the two corner points farthest apart (for example Figure 4When the feature corner point is near one of the corner points (point a and point b in the figure), space waste can also be reduced. Through the above-mentioned feature corner point determination method, any corner point of the rectangular area can be determined as a feature corner point, and one of the two farthest corner points in the L-shaped area can also be determined as a feature corner point.

[0113] Among them, after each grid division, the complete grid refers to a grid whose size is the same as the target grid size; for example, assuming that the target grid size is L*W, L is the length in the target grid size, and W is the width in the target grid size, when grid division is performed according to the target grid size, the distance between adjacent longitudinal grid lines is equal to L, and the distance between adjacent transverse grid lines is equal to W. Incomplete grids (i.e., grids whose size is smaller than the target grid size) may appear near the boundaries of the divided areas (when grid division is performed on the available space, the divided area is the available space; when grid division is performed on the remaining area of ​​the available space, the divided area is the remaining area of ​​the available space). These incomplete grids are not sufficient to accommodate the offset rectangles of the corresponding target devices. Therefore, only complete grids are used as placement areas.

[0114] In step B2, when the available space is gridded, it is preferred to make the feature corner point coincide with a grid point (i.e., a longitudinal grid line and a transverse grid line intersect at the feature corner point), so that the placement area of ​​the target device corresponding to the first process is as close to the feature corner point as possible to reduce space waste.

[0115] In step B3, when the remaining area of ​​the available space is gridded, the edges of the placement area of ​​the target device corresponding to the previous process that do not fit with other determined placement areas can be made to coincide with the grid lines, thereby increasing the probability that the grid adjacent to the placement area of ​​the target device corresponding to the previous process is a complete grid, thereby increasing the probability that the placement areas of the target devices corresponding to two adjacent processes are adjacent to each other, thereby reducing space waste.

[0116] In step B4, if the candidate grid set is an empty set, it means that no complete grid can be found, and thus the remaining area of ​​the available space is insufficient to accommodate the offset rectangle of the corresponding target device, thereby determining that the available space cannot accommodate the candidate processing equipment group.

[0117] In step B5, for example Figure 4In the figure, area s1, area s2, and area s3 are the target device placement areas corresponding to the first three processes respectively. When determining the target device placement area corresponding to the fourth process, the target device placement area corresponding to the previous process is area s3. The complete grid obtained by searching after grid division includes grid r1, grid r2, and grid r3 (also includes other grids, only grid r1, grid r2, and grid r3 are shown here); the direction from the center point of area s3 to the center point of grid r1 is the characteristic direction of grid r1, and the length of line segment L1 is the distance from the center of grid r1 along its characteristic direction to the boundary of the remaining area of ​​the available space, that is, the length of line segment L1 is the characteristic distance corresponding to grid r1. Similarly, the length of line segment L2 is the characteristic distance corresponding to grid r2, and the length of line segment L3 is the characteristic distance corresponding to grid r3. Among them, the complete grid with the largest characteristic distance is grid r3, so grid r3 is used as the placement area of ​​the target device corresponding to the fourth process. Among them, when calculating the characteristic distance from each complete grid in the candidate grid set to the boundary of the remaining area of ​​the available space, the direction vector of the corresponding characteristic direction can be calculated based on the center point position of the complete grid and the center point position of the placement area of ​​the target device corresponding to the previous process, and then the position of the projection point of the center point of the complete grid along the direction vector to the nearest boundary of the remaining area of ​​the available space is calculated (the method for calculating the position of the projection point on the line according to the direction vector of the projection direction is a prior art and is not described in detail here), and finally the distance from the center point of the complete grid to the projection point is calculated to obtain the characteristic distance.

[0118] Determining the placement area of ​​the target equipment corresponding to the next process by the above method is conducive to arranging each target equipment along the direction with more available space, reducing the probability of the center connection lines of the placement areas of adjacent processes crossing each other, thereby helping to avoid the intersection of material transportation routes between adjacent processes and improving the rationality of the placement area layout.

[0119] In some implementations, in step A403, the total price of processing equipment of each candidate equipment group can be calculated based on the price of the alternative processing equipment in each candidate equipment group, and then the candidate equipment group with the smallest total price of processing equipment is selected as the preferred equipment group.

[0120] In other embodiments, in step A403, the total price of the processing equipment of each candidate equipment group can be calculated according to the price of the candidate processing equipment in each candidate equipment group, and the sum of the center distances of the placement areas of the target equipment corresponding to the adjacent processes is calculated as the path length, and the cumulative rotation angle of the placement area center connection line is calculated (the placement area center connection line refers to the center point connection line of the placement areas of the target equipment corresponding to two adjacent processes, and the cumulative rotation angle of the placement area center connection line refers to the cumulative value of the relative rotation angle between the two adjacent placement area center connection lines. Assuming there are n processes, there are n-1 placement areas. Area center connection, where any i-th placement area center connection line has a rotation angle relative to the i-1-th placement area center connection line, where the rotation angle is an absolute value, and there are a total of n-2 rotation angles. The sum of these rotation angles is calculated to obtain the cumulative rotation angle), and then a negative evaluation value is calculated based on the total price of the processing equipment, the path length and the cumulative rotation angle (for example, the weighted sum of the three can be calculated as the negative evaluation value, where the higher the total price of the processing equipment, the longer the path length, and the larger the cumulative rotation angle, the higher the negative evaluation value), and the candidate equipment group with the lowest negative evaluation value is taken as the preferred equipment group.

[0121] Among them, the path length is related to the length of the material transportation route between the processing equipment. The longer the path length, the longer the material transportation route, and the higher the required logistics transportation cost. Therefore, the longer the path length, the higher the negative evaluation value. The cumulative turning angle is related to the direction of the material transportation route between the processing equipment. The larger the cumulative turning angle, the greater the possibility that the material transportation routes between adjacent processes intersect with each other, indicating that the equipment layout is more unreasonable. Therefore, the larger the cumulative turning angle, the higher the negative evaluation value. Comprehensively considering the equipment price, path length and cumulative turning angle to select the optimal equipment group can improve the rationality of the final configuration plan.

[0122] Specifically, step A5 includes:

[0123] A501. Determine the output logistics performance requirements of each process based on the rated capacity data of the preferred processing equipment of each process, the target capacity of the output products of each process, and the capacity index of the output materials of each process;

[0124] A502. According to the output logistics performance requirements of each process, the output logistics equipment of each process is selected from the logistics equipment database to form a configuration plan with the preferred processing equipment of each process.

[0125] In step A501, a preset redundancy coefficient (the redundancy coefficient is greater than 1 and can be set according to actual needs) can be multiplied by the capacity index of the output material of each process to obtain the redundant capacity index of each process. If the redundant capacity index exceeds the rated capacity data of the corresponding preferred processing equipment, the redundant capacity index is set to the rated capacity data of the corresponding preferred processing equipment.

[0126] For processes whose output materials are continuous silicon steel sheets (mainly including the unwinding and slitting processes of silicon steel sheets), there is no need to use additional logistics equipment for logistics transportation. Therefore, the output logistics performance requirements of this process are set to empty.

[0127] For the process with a target capacity of zero for the output product and the last process, determine that there is one corresponding output logistics route, and determine the output logistics performance requirement of this output logistics route as follows: the output logistics efficiency is not less than the redundant capacity index of the corresponding process;

[0128] For processes other than the last process whose target capacity of output products is not zero, it is determined that there are two corresponding output logistics routes, and the performance indicators of the two output logistics routes are calculated according to the following formula: x1=U*M / C, x2=U-x1, x1 is the performance indicator of the first output logistics route of the corresponding process, x2 is the performance indicator of the second output logistics route of the corresponding process (the first output logistics route is the logistics route for output products, and the second output logistics route is the logistics route for outputting transit materials to the next process), U is the redundant capacity indicator of the corresponding process, M is the target capacity of the output products of the corresponding process, and C is the capacity indicator of the output materials of the corresponding process; then the output logistics performance requirement of the first output logistics route is determined as: the output logistics efficiency of the first output logistics route is not less than x1; and the output logistics performance requirement of the second output logistics route is determined as: the output logistics efficiency of the second output logistics route is not less than x2.

[0129] Determining the output logistics performance requirements of each process in the above manner is conducive to ensuring that the output logistics equipment finally selected meets the material output transportation requirements of each production equipment when operating at full capacity, thereby avoiding insufficient transportation capacity.

[0130] Furthermore, in step A502, for a process with only one output logistics route, the logistics equipment whose output logistics efficiency is not less than the redundant capacity index of the corresponding process and is closest to the redundant capacity index of the corresponding process is selected from the logistics equipment database as the output logistics equipment of the corresponding process (the output logistics efficiencies of various logistics equipment are recorded in the logistics equipment database); for a process with two output logistics routes, the logistics equipment whose output logistics efficiency is not less than x1 of the corresponding process is selected from the logistics equipment database as the output logistics equipment of the first output logistics route of the corresponding process, and the logistics equipment whose output logistics efficiency is not less than x2 of the corresponding process is selected from the logistics equipment database as the output logistics equipment of the second output logistics route of the corresponding process.

[0131] The solution information of the final configuration solution includes the identification information (such as name, model, etc.) of the preferred processing equipment of each process and the identification information (such as name, model, etc.) of the output logistics equipment of each output logistics route of each process.

[0132] In some embodiments, the distribution position of the placement area of ​​the target equipment corresponding to each process in the preferred equipment group can also be output as one of the scheme information of the configuration scheme in step A502. Thus, the scheme information of the configuration scheme finally obtained also includes the distribution position of the placement area of ​​each preferred processing equipment.

[0133] From the above, it can be seen that the method for obtaining the configuration scheme of the core processing production line obtains the process information, site information and environmental information of the transformer core processing; the process information includes the process types of multiple processes, the workpiece parameters of each process and the target capacity of the output products of each process; according to the target capacity of the output products of each process, the capacity index of the output materials of each process is calculated; according to the environmental information, process type, workpiece parameters and capacity index, the alternative processing equipment of each process is screened out from the processing equipment database; according to the site information, a preferred processing equipment is selected from the alternative processing equipment of each process; according to the performance of the preferred processing equipment of each process, the output logistics equipment of each process is selected from the logistics equipment database to form a configuration scheme with the preferred processing equipment of each process; thereby, a reasonable configuration scheme of the transformer core processing production line can be provided based on the existing constraints.

[0134] refer to Figure 2 The present application provides a device for obtaining a configuration scheme of a core processing production line, which is used to obtain a configuration scheme of a transformer core processing production line, including:

[0135] Acquisition module 1 is used to acquire process information, site information and environmental information of transformer core processing; the process information includes process types of multiple processes, workpiece parameters of each process and target production capacity of output products of each process (refer to step A1 of the full text for details);

[0136] Calculation module 2, used to calculate the capacity index of the output material of each process according to the target capacity of the output product of each process (for details, refer to step A2 of the full text);

[0137] The first screening module 3 is used to screen candidate processing equipment for each process from the processing equipment database according to environmental information, process type, workpiece parameters and production capacity indicators (for details, refer to step A3 of the full text);

[0138] The second screening module 4 is used to select a preferred processing equipment from the candidate processing equipment for each process according to the site information (for details, refer to step A4 of the full text);

[0139] The third screening module 5 is used to select the output logistics equipment of each process from the logistics equipment database according to the performance of the preferred processing equipment of each process, so as to form a configuration plan with the preferred processing equipment of each process (for details, refer to step A5 of the full text).

[0140] Please refer to Figure 3 , Figure 3 The present invention provides a structural schematic diagram of an electronic device provided in an embodiment of the present application. The present application provides an electronic device, including: a processor 301 and a memory 302. The processor 301 and the memory 302 are interconnected and communicate with each other through a communication bus 303 and / or other forms of connection mechanisms (not shown). The memory 302 stores a computer program executable by the processor 301. When the electronic device is running, the processor 301 executes the computer program to execute the method for obtaining a configuration scheme for a core processing production line in any optional implementation of the above-mentioned embodiment to achieve the following functions: obtaining process information, site information and environmental information for transformer core processing; the process information includes process types of multiple processes, workpiece parameters of each process and target capacity of output products of each process; according to the target capacity of output products of each process, calculating the capacity index of output materials of each process; according to the environmental information, process type, workpiece parameters and capacity index, selecting alternative processing equipment for each process from a processing equipment database; selecting a preferred processing equipment from the alternative processing equipment of each process according to the site information; and selecting output logistics equipment of each process from a logistics equipment database according to the performance of the preferred processing equipment of each process to form a configuration scheme with the preferred processing equipment of each process.

[0141] An embodiment of the present application provides a computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon. When the computer program is executed by a processor, the method for obtaining a configuration scheme for a core processing production line in any optional implementation of the above-mentioned embodiment is executed to achieve the following functions: obtaining process information, site information and environmental information of transformer core processing; the process information includes process types of multiple processes, workpiece parameters of each process and target production capacity of output products of each process; calculating the production capacity index of the output material of each process according to the target production capacity of the output product of each process; screening out alternative processing equipment for each process from a processing equipment database according to the environmental information, process type, workpiece parameters and production capacity index; selecting a preferred processing equipment from the alternative processing equipment of each process according to the site information; selecting output logistics equipment for each process from a logistics equipment database according to the performance of the preferred processing equipment of each process to form a configuration scheme with the preferred processing equipment of each process. Among them, the computer-readable storage medium can be implemented by any type of volatile or non-volatile storage device or a combination thereof, such as static random access memory (SRAM), electrically erasable programmable read-only memory (EEPROM), erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM), programmable red-only memory (PROM), read-only memory (ROM), magnetic storage, flash memory, magnetic disk or optical disk.

[0142] In the embodiments provided in the present application, it should be understood that the disclosed devices and methods can be implemented in other ways. The device embodiments described above are merely schematic. For example, the division of the units is only a logical function division. There may be other division methods in actual implementation. For example, multiple units or components can be combined or integrated into another system, or some features can be ignored or not executed. Another point is that the mutual coupling or direct coupling or communication connection shown or discussed can be through some communication interfaces, and the indirect coupling or communication connection of the devices or units can be electrical, mechanical or other forms.

[0143] In addition, the units described as separate components may or may not be physically separated, and the components shown as units may or may not be physical units, and may be located in one place or distributed on multiple network units. Some or all of the units may be selected according to actual needs to achieve the purpose of the solution of this embodiment.

[0144] Furthermore, the functional modules in the various embodiments of the present application may be integrated together to form an independent part, or each module may exist separately, or two or more modules may be integrated to form an independent part.

[0145] In this document, relational terms such as first and second, etc. are used merely to distinguish one entity or operation from another entity or operation, but do not necessarily require or imply any such actual relationship or order between these entities or operations.

[0146] The above description is only an embodiment of the present application and is not intended to limit the protection scope of the present application. For those skilled in the art, the present application may have various modifications and variations. Any modification, equivalent replacement, improvement, etc. made within the spirit and principle of the present application shall be included in the protection scope of the present application.

Claims

1. A method for obtaining a configuration scheme of a core processing production line, used to obtain a configuration scheme of a transformer core processing production line, characterized in that: Includes steps: A1. Obtaining the process information, site information and environment information of transformer core processing; the process information includes the process types of multiple processes, the workpiece parameters of each process and the target production capacity of the output product of each process; A2. Calculate the capacity index of the output material of each process according to the target capacity of the output product of each process; A3. Filtering out candidate processing equipment for each process from a processing equipment database according to the environmental information, the process type, the workpiece parameters, and the production capacity index; A4. Select a preferred processing equipment from the alternative processing equipment for each process according to the site information; A5. According to the performance of the preferred processing equipment of each process, select the output logistics equipment of each process from the logistics equipment database to form a configuration plan with the preferred processing equipment of each process; Step A2 includes: The capacity index of the output material of each process is calculated according to the following formula: ； in, is the capacity indicator of the output material of the i-th process, is the capacity indicator of the output material of the i+1th process, is the target capacity of the output product of the i-th process, and n is the total number of processes; The site information includes a plan view of the available space; the processing equipment database records the plane dimensions and prices of various processing equipment, and the plane dimensions are the dimensions of the projection of the processing equipment on the horizontal plane; Step A4 includes: A401. Arrange and combine the alternative processing equipment for each process to obtain multiple alternative processing equipment groups; each of the alternative processing equipment groups includes an alternative processing equipment corresponding to each process; A402. According to the plan dimensions of each candidate processing equipment and the plan view of the available space, select the candidate processing equipment group that can be accommodated in the available space as the candidate equipment group; A403. According to the price of the candidate processing equipment in the candidate equipment group, select one of the candidate equipment groups as the preferred equipment group, and use the candidate processing equipment in the preferred equipment group as the preferred processing equipment for each process; Step A402 includes the following steps performed for each of the candidate processing equipment groups: Taking each candidate processing equipment in the candidate processing equipment group as a target equipment, obtaining a characteristic rectangle of each target equipment according to the plane size of each target equipment; the characteristic rectangle is the minimum circumscribed rectangle of the projection of the target equipment on the horizontal plane; The characteristic rectangle of each target device is offset outward by a preset safety distance to obtain an offset rectangle of each target device; Taking the offset rectangle of each target device as the occupied space of the corresponding target device, searching for the placement area of ​​each target device in turn from the plan view of the available space, and judging whether the available space can accommodate the candidate processing equipment group according to the search results; The steps of using the offset rectangle of each target device as the occupied space of the corresponding target device, searching for the placement area of ​​each target device in sequence from the plan view of the available space, and judging whether the available space can accommodate the candidate processing equipment group according to the search results include: B1. Determine the characteristic corner points according to the relative positions of the corner points and the boundary lines of the available space in the plan view of the available space; B2. Using the size of the offset rectangle of the target device corresponding to the first process as the target grid size, gridding the available space, and searching for the complete grid closest to the feature corner point as the placement area of ​​the target device corresponding to the first process; B3. Re-gridding the remaining area of ​​the available space according to the size of the offset rectangle of the target device corresponding to the next process as the target grid size, and searching all complete grids to form a candidate grid set; the remaining area is the area in the available space other than the determined placement area; B4. If the candidate grid set is an empty set, it is determined that the available space cannot accommodate the candidate processing equipment group, and the search is terminated; B5. If the candidate grid set is not an empty set, the characteristic distances from each complete grid in the candidate grid set to the boundary of the remaining area of ​​the available space are calculated, and the complete grid with the largest characteristic distance is used as the placement area of ​​the target device corresponding to the next process; the characteristic distance is the distance from the center of the complete grid to the boundary of the remaining area of ​​the available space along the characteristic direction, and the characteristic direction is the direction from the center of the placement area of ​​the target device corresponding to the previous process to the center of the complete grid; B6. If the search for the placement area of ​​the target equipment corresponding to all processes is completed, it is determined that the available space can accommodate the candidate processing equipment group and the search is terminated. Otherwise, steps B3 to B6 are repeated.

2. The method for obtaining a configuration plan for an iron core processing production line according to claim 1, characterized in that: The processing equipment database records the equipment types, working environment requirements, processable workpiece parameter ranges and rated capacity data of various processing equipment; Step A3 includes: A301. Selecting a processing equipment whose equipment type matches the process type of each process from the processing equipment database as the first candidate equipment for each process; A302. Selecting a processing device whose working environment requirement matches the environmental information from the first candidate equipment of each process as the second candidate equipment of each process; A303. Selecting a processing device whose processable workpiece parameter range matches the workpiece parameter of the corresponding process from the second candidate equipment of each process as the third candidate equipment of each process; A304. Select processing equipment whose rated capacity data is not less than the capacity index of the output material of the corresponding process from the third candidate equipment of each process as the alternative processing equipment for each process.

3. The method for obtaining a configuration plan for an iron core processing production line according to claim 1, characterized in that: Step A5 includes: Determine the output logistics performance requirements of each process according to the rated capacity data of the preferred processing equipment of each process, the target capacity of the output product of each process and the capacity index of the output material of each process; According to the output logistics performance requirements of each process, the output logistics equipment of each process is selected from the logistics equipment database to form a configuration plan with the preferred processing equipment of each process.

4. A device for acquiring a configuration scheme of a core processing production line, used to acquire a configuration scheme of a transformer core processing production line, characterized in that: include: An acquisition module is used to obtain process information, site information and environmental information of transformer core processing; The process information includes process types of multiple processes, workpiece parameters of each process, and target production capacity of output products of each process; A calculation module, used to calculate the capacity index of the output material of each process according to the target capacity of the output product of each process; A first screening module, configured to screen candidate processing equipment for each process from a processing equipment database according to the environmental information, the process type, the workpiece parameter, and the production capacity index; A second screening module is used to select a preferred processing equipment from the candidate processing equipment of each process according to the site information; A third screening module is used to select output logistics equipment of each process from the logistics equipment database according to the performance of the preferred processing equipment of each process, so as to form a configuration scheme with the preferred processing equipment of each process; When the calculation module calculates the capacity index of the output material of each process according to the target capacity of the output product of each process, it executes: The capacity index of the output material of each process is calculated according to the following formula: ； in, is the capacity indicator of the output material of the i-th process, is the capacity indicator of the output material of the i+1th process, is the target capacity of the output product of the i-th process, and n is the total number of processes The site information includes a plan view of the available space; the processing equipment database records the plane dimensions and prices of various processing equipment, and the plane dimensions are the dimensions of the projection of the processing equipment on the horizontal plane; When the second screening module selects a preferred processing equipment from the candidate processing equipment of each process according to the site information, the second screening module executes: A401. Arrange and combine the alternative processing equipment for each process to obtain multiple alternative processing equipment groups; each of the alternative processing equipment groups includes an alternative processing equipment corresponding to each process; A402. According to the plan dimensions of each candidate processing equipment and the plan view of the available space, select the candidate processing equipment group that can be accommodated in the available space as the candidate equipment group; A403. According to the price of the candidate processing equipment in the candidate equipment group, select one of the candidate equipment groups as the preferred equipment group, and use the candidate processing equipment in the preferred equipment group as the preferred processing equipment for each process; Step A402 includes the following steps performed for each of the candidate processing equipment groups: Taking each candidate processing equipment in the candidate processing equipment group as a target equipment, obtaining a characteristic rectangle of each target equipment according to the plane size of each target equipment; the characteristic rectangle is the minimum circumscribed rectangle of the projection of the target equipment on the horizontal plane; The characteristic rectangle of each target device is offset outward by a preset safety distance to obtain an offset rectangle of each target device; Taking the offset rectangle of each target device as the occupied space of the corresponding target device, searching for the placement area of ​​each target device in turn from the plan view of the available space, and judging whether the available space can accommodate the candidate processing equipment group according to the search results; The steps of using the offset rectangle of each target device as the occupied space of the corresponding target device, searching for the placement area of ​​each target device in sequence from the plan view of the available space, and judging whether the available space can accommodate the candidate processing equipment group according to the search results include: B1. Determine the characteristic corner points according to the relative positions of the corner points and the boundary lines of the available space in the plan view of the available space; B2. Using the size of the offset rectangle of the target device corresponding to the first process as the target grid size, gridding the available space, and searching for the complete grid closest to the feature corner point as the placement area of ​​the target device corresponding to the first process; B3. Re-gridding the remaining area of ​​the available space according to the size of the offset rectangle of the target device corresponding to the next process as the target grid size, and searching all complete grids to form a candidate grid set; the remaining area is the area in the available space other than the determined placement area; B4. If the candidate grid set is an empty set, it is determined that the available space cannot accommodate the candidate processing equipment group, and the search is terminated; B5. If the candidate grid set is not an empty set, the characteristic distances from each complete grid in the candidate grid set to the boundary of the remaining area of ​​the available space are calculated, and the complete grid with the largest characteristic distance is used as the placement area of ​​the target device corresponding to the next process; the characteristic distance is the distance from the center of the complete grid to the boundary of the remaining area of ​​the available space along the characteristic direction, and the characteristic direction is the direction from the center of the placement area of ​​the target device corresponding to the previous process to the center of the complete grid; B6. If the search for the placement area of ​​the target equipment corresponding to all processes is completed, it is determined that the available space can accommodate the candidate processing equipment group and the search is terminated. Otherwise, steps B3 to B6 are repeated.

5. An electronic device, characterized in that: It comprises a processor and a memory, wherein the memory stores a computer program executable by the processor, and when the processor executes the computer program, it runs the steps in the method for obtaining a configuration plan for an iron core processing production line as described in any one of claims 1 to 3.

6. A computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, characterized in that: When the computer program is executed by the processor, the steps in the method for acquiring the configuration plan of the core processing production line as described in any one of claims 1 to 3 are executed.

Images