An insecticidal composition containing a benzoylurea

Abstract

The present application belongs to the field of pesticide insecticide, and relates to an insecticidal composition containing benzoyl urea. The effective component of the insecticidal composition comprises active component A and active component B, the active component A is a compound of formula (I), the active component B is a benzoyl urea compound, and the mass ratio of the active component A to the active component B is 1:75-36:1. The insecticidal composition has the advantages of synergism and resistance delay, and is used for preventing and treating resistant pests.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This invention belongs to the field of pesticide and insecticide technology, specifically relating to an insecticidal composition containing benzoylurea. Background Technology

[0002] Benzoylurea insecticides (BPUs) are insecticides based on benzoylurea compounds. They work by inhibiting chitin in the target insects, not by directly killing them, but by hindering or interfering with the normal development of the insects during their individual development, thus reducing their ability to survive, causing them to die, and ultimately leading to the extinction of the population.

[0003] Benzoylurea insecticides have minimal contact action on insects, primarily killing pests through stomach poisoning. Furthermore, benzoylurea insecticides do not exhibit cross-resistance with organophosphates, carbamates, and pyrethroids, and are effective against Lepidoptera, Coleoptera, and Homoptera. They also have minimal impact on organisms lacking chitin. They decompose easily within plants and animals and in the natural environment, resulting in low environmental pollution, making them a widely used class of insecticides for pest control.

[0004] Benzoylurea insecticides have a limited spectrum of activity, limiting their application. While they are effective against specific pests, they are ineffective against some important pests. Furthermore, their insecticidal speed is slow; benzoylurea insecticides act as stomach poisons, not contact pesticides, requiring the pest to ingest the drug to be effective, resulting in poor rapid action. In addition, the excessive, frequent, and irrational use of pesticides in agricultural production leads to increasing resistance in harmful insects, causing more severe damage to crops and making control increasingly difficult. By mixing compounds of formula (I) with two or more benzoylurea insecticides, it is possible to achieve rapid and comprehensive control of different pests, broaden the control spectrum, improve pesticide efficacy, and reduce the development of insecticide resistance. Summary of the Invention

[0005] The purpose of this invention is to provide an insecticidal composition containing benzoylurea that has synergistic effects, reduces resistance, and has low usage costs.

[0006] To achieve the above objectives, the technical solution adopted by the present invention is as follows: an insecticidal composition containing benzoylurea, comprising active ingredient A and active ingredient B, wherein active ingredient A is a compound of formula (I). The active ingredient B is a benzoylurea compound;

[0007] Furthermore, the benzoylurea compounds include lufenuron, diflubenzuron, diflubenzuron, bis(triflubenzuron), flufenoxuron, flufenoxuron, flufenoxuron, flufenoxuron, flufenoxuron, flufenoxuron, chlorfenapyr, and polyfluorourea;

[0008] Further, the benzoylurea compound is chlorfluazuron, diflubenzuron, trifenofw, bistrifluron, flufenoxuron, flumorfuron, flucycloxuron, flufenoxuron, teflubenzuron;

[0009] Further, the mass ratio of the compound of formula (I) to chlorfluazuron is 1:40-20:1;

[0010] Further, the mass ratio of the compound of formula (I) to chlorfluazuron is 1:24-20:1;

[0011] Further, the mass ratio of the compound of formula (I) to chlorfluazuron is 1:24, 1:10, 1:9, 1:5, 1:4, 1:2, 2:5, 1:1, 4:1, 15:2, 8:1, 12:1, 20:1;

[0012] Further, the mass ratio of the compound of formula (I) to diflubenzuron is 1:60-25:1;

[0013] Further, the mass ratio of the compound of formula (I) to diflubenzuron is 1:30-25:1;

[0014] Further, the mass ratio of the compound of formula (I) to diflubenzuron is 1:30, 1:15, 1:7, 5:1, 12:1, 25:1;

[0015] Further, the mass ratio of the compound of formula (I) to triflumuron is 1:35-18:1;

[0016] Further, the mass ratio of the compound of formula (I) to triflumuron is 1:35, 1:20, 1:10, 1:5, 1:1, 5:1, 9:1, 18:1;

[0017] Further, the mass ratio of the compound of formula (I) to triflumuron is 1:20-18:1;

[0018] Further, the mass ratio of the compound of formula (I) to triflumuron is 1:20, 1:10, 1:5, 1:1, 5:1, 9:1, 18:1;

[0019] Further, the mass ratio of the compound of formula (I) to bistrifluron is 1:75-24:1;

[0020] Further, the mass ratio of the compound of formula (I) to bistrifluron is 1:50-24:1;

[0021] Further, the mass ratio of the compound of formula (I) to bistrifluron is 1:50, 1:20, 1:10, 1:5, 5:1, 16:1, 24:1;

[0022] Further, the mass ratio of the compound of formula (I) to chlorfluazuron is 1:45-20:1;

[0023] Further, the mass ratio of the compound of formula (I) to chlorfluazuron is 1:45-20:1;

[0024] Further, the mass ratio of the compound of formula (I) to chlorfluazuron is 1:45-20:1;

[0025] Further, the mass ratio of the compound of formula (I) to chlorfluazuron is 1:45-20:1;

[0026] Further, the mass ratio of the compound of formula (I) to flurotylurea is 1:36-28:1;

[0027] Further, the mass ratio of the compound of formula (I) to flurotylurea is 1:36-28:1;

[0028] Further, the mass ratio of the compound of formula (I) to flurotylurea is 1:36-28:1;

[0029] Further, the mass ratio of the compound of formula (I) to hexaflumuron is 1:60-30:1;

[0030] Further, the mass ratio of the compound of formula (I) to hexaflumuron is 1:60-30:1;

[0031] Further, the mass ratio of the compound of formula (I) to hexaflumuron is 1:60-30:1;

[0032] Further, the mass ratio of the compound of formula (I) to hexaflumuron is 1:60-30:1;

[0033] Further, the mass ratio of the compound of formula (I) to flufenprox is 1:40-36:1,

[0034] Further, the mass ratio of the compound of formula (I) to flufenprox is 1:40-36:1,

[0035] Further, the mass ratio of the compound of formula (I) to flufenprox is 1:40-36:1,

[0036] Further, the mass ratio of the compound of formula (I) to hexaflumuron is 1:30 to 24:1.

[0037] Further, the mass ratio of the compound of formula (I) to hexaflumuron is 1:20 to 15:1.

[0038] Further, the mass ratio of the compound of formula (I) to hexaflumuron is 1:30, 1:20, 2:15, 1:5, 4:1, 15:1, or 24:1.

[0039] Further, the total content of the active ingredient A and the active ingredient B in the insecticidal composition is 0.5% to 90% based on 100% by weight of the total mass of the insecticidal composition.

[0040] Further, the total content of the active ingredient A and the active ingredient B in the insecticidal composition is 1% to 85%.

[0041] Further, the insecticidal composition further comprises an agriculturally acceptable auxiliary ingredient in addition to the active ingredients, and the auxiliary ingredient is selected from one or more of wetting agents, dispersants, emulsifiers, thickeners, disintegrants, antifreezing agents, antifoaming agents, solvents, preservatives, stabilizers, synergists, or carriers.

[0042] Further, the acaricidal composition further comprises an auxiliary agent, and the auxiliary agent is selected from one or more of wetting agents, dispersants, emulsifiers, thickeners, disintegrants, antifreezing agents, antifoaming agents, solvents, preservatives, stabilizers, synergists, and carriers.

[0043] The wetting agent is selected from one or more of alkylbenzene sulfonate, alkylnaphthalene sulfonate, lignin sulfonate, sodium dodecyl sulfate, dioctyl sodium sulfosuccinate, alpha olefin sulfonate, alkylphenol polyoxyethylene ether, castor oil polyoxyethylene ether, alkylphenol ethoxylate, fatty alcohol ethoxylate, fatty alcohol polyoxyethylene ether sodium sulfate, silkworm excrement, soap nut powder, soapberry powder, SOPA, detergent, emulsifier 2000 series, and wetting penetrant F; and / or

[0044] The dispersant is selected from one or more of lignin sulfonate, alkylnaphthalene sulfonate formaldehyde condensate, naphthalene sulfonate, tristyrylphenol ethoxylate phosphate, fatty alcohol ethoxylate, alkylphenol polyoxyethylene ether, alkylphenol polyoxyethylene ether methyl ether condensate sulfate, fatty amine polyoxyethylene ether, glycerol fatty acid ester polyoxyethylene ether, polycarboxylate, polyacrylate, phosphate, EO-PO block copolymer, and EO-PO graft copolymer; and / or

[0045] The emulsifier is selected from one or more of calcium dodecylbenzenesulfonate, alkylphenol formaldehyde resin polyoxyethylene ether, phenylethylphenol polyoxyethylene polyoxypropylene ether, fatty alcohol-ethylene oxide-propylene oxide copolymer, styrylphenol polyoxyethylene ether, castor oil polyoxyethylene ether, and alkylphenol ether phosphate; and / or

[0046] The thickening agent is selected from one or more of xanthan gum, organobentonite, gum arabic, sodium alginate, magnesium aluminum silicate, carboxymethyl cellulose, and white carbon; and / or

[0047] The disintegrant is selected from one or more of sodium sulfate, ammonium sulfate, aluminum chloride, sodium chloride, ammonium chloride, bentonite, glucose, sucrose, starch, cellulose, urea, sodium carbonate, sodium bicarbonate, citric acid, and tartaric acid; and / or

[0048] The antifreezing agent is selected from one or more of alcohols, alcohol ethers, chlorinated hydrocarbons, and inorganic salts; and / or

[0049] The antifoaming agent is selected from one or more of C 10 -C 20 saturated fatty acid compound, silicone oil, silicone compound, one or more of C8-C 10 fatty alcohol; and / or

[0050] The solvent is selected from one or more of benzene, toluene, xylene, mesitylene, methanol, ethanol, isopropanol, n-butanol, dimethyl sulfoxide, dimethylformamide, cyclohexanone, alkylene carbonate, diesel oil, solvent naphtha, vegetable oil, vegetable oil derivative, and water; and / or

[0051] The preservative is selected from one or more of propionic acid, sodium propionate, sorbic acid, sodium sorbate, potassium sorbate, benzoic acid, sodium benzoate, sodium p-hydroxybenzoate, methyl p-hydroxybenzoate, carboxin, and 1,2-benzisothiazolin-3-one; and / or

[0052] The stabilizer is selected from one or more of disodium hydrogen phosphate, oxalic acid, succinic acid, adipic acid, borax, 2,6-di-tert-butyl-p-cresol, triethanolamine oleate, epoxidized vegetable oil, kaolin, bentonite, attapulgite, white carbon, talc, montmorillonite, and starch; and / or

[0053] The synergist is selected from one or more of phosphorus synergist, piperonyl butoxide; and / or

[0054] The carrier is selected from one or more of ammonium salt, ground natural mineral, ground artificial mineral, silicate, resin, wax, solid fertilizer, water, organic solvent, mineral oil, vegetable oil, and vegetable oil derivative.

[0055] Further, the pesticidal composition can be prepared into an agriculturally permissible formulation form selected from a solid formulation and / or a liquid formulation;

[0056] Further, the solid preparation includes powder, granule, pellet, tablet, strip, wettable powder, oil dispersible powder, emulsion powder, water dispersible granule, emulsion granule, water dispersible tablet, soluble powder, soluble tablet or soluble granule.

[0057] Further, the liquid preparation includes soluble liquid, soluble gel, oil, spreadable oil, emulsion, emulsion, dispersible liquid, paste, water emulsion, oil emulsion, microemulsion, fat, suspension, microcapsule suspension, oil suspension, dispersible oil suspension, suspoemulsion, microcapsule suspension-suspension, microcapsule suspension-water emulsion or microcapsule suspension-suspoemulsion.

[0058] Further, the solid preparation is selected from wettable powder, water dispersible granule; the liquid preparation is selected from emulsion, water emulsion, microemulsion, suspension, suspoemulsion, dispersible oil suspension.

[0059] Further, the solid preparation is selected from wettable powder, water dispersible granule; the liquid preparation is selected from emulsion, suspension.

[0060] The application of the insecticidal composition in the present application in preventing and controlling agricultural and forestry pests, sanitary pests;

[0061] The insecticidal composition in the present application can be used for preventing and controlling pests on fruit trees, vegetables, ornamental plants, tea, cotton, cereal crops;

[0062] Further, the agricultural and forestry pests, sanitary pests are Lepidoptera, Thysanoptera pests.

[0063] Further, the Lepidoptera pests include Adoxophyes spp., Adoxophyes orana, Agrotis spp. (cutworms), Agrotis ipsilon (black cutworm), Alabama argillacea (cotton leafworm), Amorbia cuneana, Amyelosis transitella (navel orangeworm), Anacamptodes defectaria, Anarsia lineatella (peach twig borer), Anomis sabulifera (jute looper), Anticarsia gemmatalis, Archips argyrospila (fruittree leafroller), Archips rosana (rose leaf roller), Argyrotaenia spp. (tortricid moths), Argyrotaenia citrana (orange tortrix), Autographa gamma, Bonagota cranaodes, Borbo cinnara (rice leaf folder), Bucculatrix thurberiella (cotton leaf perforator), Caloptilia spp. (leaf miners), Capua reticulana, Carposina niponensis (peach fruit moth), Chilo spp., Chlumetia transversa (mango shoot borer), Choristoneura rosaceana (obliquebanded leafroller), Chrysodeixis spp. (tobacco caterpillars), Chrysodeixis includens (velvetbean caterpillar), Cnaphalocerus medinalis (rice leaffolder), Cnephasia spp., Cochylis spp. (leafrollers), Cochylis nana (banded apple leafroller), Coleophora spp. (casebearers), Collix spp., Conogetonia spp., Conogetonia indica, Conopomorpha spp., Conogetorpha Further, the Lepidoptera pests include Adoxophyes spp., Adoxophyes orana, Agrotis spp. (cutworms), Agrotis ipsilon (black cutworm), Alabama argillacea (cotton leafworm), Amorbia cuneana, Amyelosis transitella (navel orangeworm), Anacamptodes defectaria, Anarsia lineatella (peach twig borer), Anomis sabulifera (jute looper), Anticarsia gemmatalis, Archips argyrospila (fruittree leafroller), Archips rosana (rose leaf roller), Argyrotaenia spp. (tortricid moths), Argyrotaenia citrana (orange tortrix), Autographa gamma, Bonagota cranaodes, Borbo cinnara (rice leaf folder), Bucculatrix thurberiella (cotton leaf perforator), Caloptilia spp. (leaf miners), Capua reticulana, Carposina niponensis (peach fruit moth), Chilo spp., Chlumetia transversa (mango shoot borer), Choristoneura rosaceana (obliquebanded leafroller), Chrysodeixis spp. (tobacco caterpillars), Chrysodeixis includens (velvetbean caterpillar), Cnaphalocerus medinalis (rice leaffolder), Cnaphalocerus), Cnaphalocerus medinalis (grass leafroller), Colias spp., Conpomorpha cramerella, Cossus cossus (carpenter moth), Crambus spp. (Sod webworms), Cydia funebrana (plum fruit moth), Cydia molesta (oriental fruit moth), Cydia nignicana (pea moth), Cydia pomonella (codling moth), Darna diducta, Diaphania spp. (stem borers), Diatraea spp. (stalk borers), Diatraea saccharalis (sugarcane borer), Diatraea graniosella (southwester corn borer), Earias spp. (cotton bollworms), Earias insulata (Egyptian cotton bollworm), Earias vitella (rough northern bollworm), Ecdytopopha aurantianum, Elasmopalpus lignosellus (lesser cornstalk borer), Epiphysias postruttana (light brown apple moth), Ephestia spp. (flour moths), Ephestia cautella (almond moth), Ephestia elutella (tobbac moth), Ephestia kuehniella (Mediterranean flour moth), Epimeces spp.), Epinotia aporema, Erionotathrax (banana skipper), Eupoecilia ambiguella (grapeberry moth), Euxoa auxiliaris (army cutworm), Feltia spp. (cutworms), Gortyna spp. (stemborers), Grapholita molesta (oriental fruit moth), Hedylepta indicate (bean leaf webber), Helicoverpa sp. p. (noctuid moths), Helicoverpa armigera, Helicoverpa zea, Heliothis spp., Heliothis virescens, Hellula undalis (cabbage webworm), Indarbela spp. (root borers), Keiferia lycopersicella, Leucinodes orbonalis, Leucoptera malifoliella, Lithocollectis spp., Lobesia botrana (grape fruit moth), Loxagrotis spp., Loxagrotis albicosta (western bean cutworm), Lymantria dispar (gypsy moth), Lyonetia clerkella (apple leaf miner), Mahasena corbetti (oil palm bagworm), Malacosoma spp. (tent caterpillars), Maruca testulalis (bean podworm), Melanchra persicariae (potato striped leafminer), Melanitidia spp. (rootworms), Melanophila acuminata (potato leafminer), Melanotus spp. (wireworms), Melia spp. (fruitworms), Melonis domestica (grape berry moth), Metisa prunifoliella (grape berry moth), Mocis spp. (paddy moths), Monopis obviella (flour moth), Mythimna spp. (cutworms), Nephalis spp. (rootworms), Nymphula spp. (leafrollers), Oiketicus spp. (rootworms), Oria spp. (cutworms), Ornisia spp. (cutworms), Ostrinia nubilalis (European corn borer), Ostrinia scapulalis (rice borer), Pammene spp. (leafrollers), Pandemis spp. (leafrollers), Pandemis cerasana (summer fruit tortrix moth), Pandemis heparica (summer fruit tortrix moth), Pandemis pyrusana (summer fruit tortrix moth), Pandemis sibirica (summer fruit tortrix moth), Pandemis spp. (leafrollers), Pandemis spp. (leafrollers), Pandemis spp. (leafrollers), Pandemis spp. (leafrollers), Pandemis spp. (leafrollers), Pandemis spp. (leafrollers), Pandemis spp. (leafrollers), Pandemis spp. (leafrollers), Pandemis spp. (leafrollers), Pandemis spp. (leafrollers), Pandemis spp. (leafrollers), Pandemis spp. (leafrollers), Pandemis spp. (leafrollers), Pandemis spp. (leafrollers), Pandemis spp. (leafrollers), Pandemis spp. (leafrollers), Pandemis spp. (leafrollers), Pandemis spp. (leafrollers), Pandemis spp. (leafrollers), Pandemis spp. (leafrollers), Pandemis spp. (leafrollers), Pandemis spp. (leafrollers), Pandemis spp. (leafrollers), Pandemis spp. (leafrollers), Pandemis spp. (leafrollers), Pandemis spp. (leafrollers), Pandemis spp. (leafrollers), Pandemis spp. (leafrollers), Pandemis spp. (leafrollers), Pandemis spp. (leafrollers), Pandemis spp. (leafrollers), Pandemis spp. (leafrollers), Pandemis spp. (leafrollers), Pandemis spp. (leafrollers), Pandemis spp. (leafrollers), Pandemis spp. (leafrollers), Pandemis spp. (leafrollers), Pandemis spp. (leafrollers), Pandemis spp. (leafrollers), Pandemis spp. (leafrollers), Pandemis spp. (leafrollers), Pandemis spp. (leafrollers), Pandemis spp. (leafrollers), Pandemis spp. (leafrollers), Pandemis spp. (leafrollers), Pandemis spp. (leafrollers), Pandemis spp. (leafrollers), Pandemis spp. (leafrollers), Pandemis)(tent caterpillars), Mamestra brassicae (cabbage armyworm), Maruca testulalis (bean pod borer), Metisa plana, Mythimna unipuncta (true armyworm), Neoleucinodes elegantalis, Nymphula depunctalis, Operophthera brumata, Ostrinia nubilalis (European corn borer), Oxydia vesulia, Pandemis cerasana (common currant tortrix), Pandemis heparana (brown apple tortrix), Papilio demodocus, Pectinophora gossypiella (pink bollworm), Peridroma spp. (cutworms), Peridroma saucia (variegated cutworm), Perileucoptera coffeella (white coffee leafminer), Phthorimaea operculella (potato tuber moth), Phyllocnisitis citrella, Phyllonorycter spp., Pieris rapae, Plathypena scabra, Plodia interpunctella, Plutella xylostella (diamondback moth), Polychrosis viteana (grapeberry moth), Prays endocarpa, Prays oleae (olive moth), Pseudaletia spp.) Spodoptera littoralis (beet armyworm), Spodoptera litura Fabricius, Pseudaletia unipunctata (armyworm), Pseudoplusia includes (, Rachiplusia nu, Chilo suppressalis (Walker), Scirpophaga incertulas, Sesamia spp. (stemborers), Sesamia inferens (pink rice stem borer), Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smmith), Sesamia nonagrioides, Setora nitens, Sitotroga cerealella (Angoumois grain moth), Sparganothis pilleriana, Spodoptera spp., Spodoptera exigua, Spodoptera fugiperda, Spodoptera oridania (southern armyworm), Synanthedon spp., Thecla basilides, Thermisia gemmatalis, Tineola bisselliella (webbing clothesmoth), Trichoplusia ni (cabbage looper), Pieris rapae Linne (cabbage looper), Tuta absoluta.

[0064] Further, the Thysanoptera pests include Thrips palmi Karny, Thrips tabaci, Frankliniella fusca (tobacco thrips), Frankliniella occidentalis (western flower thrips), Frankliniella shultzei, Frankliniella williamsi (corn thrips), Heliothrips haemorrhaidalis, greenhouse thrips, Riphiphorothrips cruentatus, Scirtothrips spp., Scirtothrips citri (citrus thrips), Scirtothrips dorsalis (yellow tea thrips), Taeniothrips rhopalantennalis, and Thrips spp.

[0065] Further, the Lepidoptera pests include Plutella xylostella, Spodoptera exigua, Spodoptera litura, Spodoptera frugiperda, Chilo suppressalis, Helicoverpa armigera, Pieris rapae;

[0066] Further, the Thysanoptera pests include Thrips tabaci, Thrips palmi, Frankliniella fusca, Frankliniella occidentalis, Scirtothrips dorsalis;

[0067] The present application also provides a method for using the benzoylurea-containing insecticidal composition as described above, specifically applying an effective dose to the pests to be controlled or the medium where the pests grow.

[0068] The insecticidal composition of the present application has the following advantages:

[0069] 1) The insecticidal composition of the present application shows synergistic effect within a certain ratio range, and has significant control effect and good speediness;

[0070] 2) The insecticidal composition of the present application can delay the pesticide resistance of pests, is friendly to the environment, and can reduce the use cost. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0071] The present application is further illustrated by the following examples, in which the percentages are all by weight, but the present application is not limited thereto.

[0072] The composition of the present application can be provided in the form of a preparation. The preparation is a suspension, an emulsion, a water dispersible granule, an aqueous emulsion, a granule, a wettable powder, a dispersible oil suspension, etc. according to the need. The content of the active ingredient in the composition of the present application depends on the application amount when used alone, and also depends on the mixing ratio and the degree of synergistic effect. The optimal range of the content of the active ingredient varies according to the type of the composition.

[0073] Preparation Example

[0074] Example 1:

[0075] 30% of the compound of formula (I) + chlorfluazuron suspension (6:24)

[0076] Formulation: 6% of the compound of formula (I), 24% of chlorfluazuron, 3% of fatty alcohol polyoxyethylene ether, 2% of alkyl aryl polyoxyethylene polyoxypropylene ether, 3.5% of styrene phenol polyoxyethylene ether phosphate, 1% of magnesium aluminum silicate, 0.2% of xanthan gum, 0.5% of sodium sorbate, 5% of ethylene glycol, 0.5% of silicone oil, deionized water to make up the balance;

[0077] Preparation method: the effective ingredient is added in wet dispersant and antifoaming agent, and wet grinding is performed using zirconium oxide beads with a sand mill to D 90 <5 μm to obtain a grinding slurry. The thickening agent, antifreezing agent, preservative, etc. are added to the grinding slurry and mixed uniformly, deionized water is added to make up to 100%, and the suspension product is prepared by high-speed shearing.

[0078] Example 2:

[0079] 24% of the compound of formula (I) + triflumuron suspension (4:20)

[0080] Formulation: 4% of the compound of formula (I), 20% of triflumuron, 2.5% of sodium polycarboxylate, 2.5% of alkyl aryl polyoxyethylene polyoxypropylene ether, 3.5% of sodium lignosulfonate, 1% of magnesium aluminum silicate, 0.2% of xanthan gum, 0.5% of sodium sorbate, 5% of ethylene glycol, 0.5% of silicone antifoaming agent, deionized water to make up the balance;

[0081] Preparation method: same as Example 1.

[0082] Example 3:

[0083] 28% of the compound of formula (I) + bistrifluron suspension (3:25)

[0084] Formula: 3% compound of formula (I), 25% bistrifluron, 3.5% sodium lignin sulfonate, 2.5% EO-PO block copolymer, 3.5% styryl phenol polyoxyethylene ether phosphate, 1% magnesium aluminum silicate, 0.2% xanthan gum, 0.5% sodium sorbate, 5% glycerol, 0.5% silicone oil, deionized water to make up the balance;

[0085] Preparation method: same as example 1.

[0086] Example 4:

[0087] 10% compound of formula (I)·flucycloxuron suspension (2:8)

[0088] Formula: 2% compound of formula (I), 8% flucycloxuron, 3% α-olefin sulfonate, 3% alkyl aryl polyoxyethylene polyoxypropylene ether, 2% styryl phenol polyoxyethylene ether phosphate, 1% magnesium aluminum silicate, 0.2% xanthan gum, 0.5% sodium benzoate, 5% ethylene glycol, 0.5% silicone oil, deionized water to make up the balance;

[0089] Preparation method: same as example 1.

[0090] Example 5:

[0091] 24% compound of formula (I)·flufenoxuron suspension (3:21)

[0092] Formula: 3% compound of formula (I), 21% flufenoxuron, 2% alkyl aryl polyoxyethylene polyoxypropylene ether, 3.5% styryl phenol polyoxyethylene ether phosphate, 2% sodium lignin sulfonate, 0.5% polyether, 1% magnesium aluminum silicate, 0.2% xanthan gum, 0.5% sodium sorbate, 5% ethylene glycol, 0.5% silicone antifoaming agent, deionized water to make up the balance;

[0093] Preparation method: same as example 1.

[0094] Example 6:

[0095] 30% compound of formula (I)·triflumuron suspension (5:25)

[0096] Formula: 5% compound of formula (I), 25% triflumuron, 3.5% sodium polycarboxylate, 1.5% alkyl aryl polyoxyethylene polyoxypropylene ether, 0.5 sodium lignin sulfonate, 1.5% styryl phenol polyoxyethylene ether phosphate, 1% magnesium aluminum silicate, 0.2% xanthan gum, 0.5% sodium sorbate, 5% ethylene glycol, 0.5% silicone oil, deionized water to make up the balance;

[0097] Preparation method: same as example 1.

[0098] Example 7:

[0099] 6% compound of formula (I)·triflumuron emulsion (1:5)

[0100] Formulation: 1% of the compound of formula (I), 5% of chlorobenzilate, 10% of propylene carbonate, 5.5% of calcium dodecylbenzenesulfonate, 10% of castor oil polyoxyethylene ether, 0.5% of N,N-dimethylformamide, 2% of soybean oil, 30% of cyclohexanone, methyl oleate to make up the balance;

[0101] Preparation method: the effective ingredient is first dissolved in the solvent, then the emulsifier is added and stirred to form a uniform transparent oily liquid, which is filled to prepare the emulsion formulation of the composition.

[0102] Example 8:

[0103] 6% of the compound of formula (I)·chlorobenzilate emulsion (1.2:4.8)

[0104] Formulation: 1.2% of the compound of formula (I), 4.8% of chlorobenzilate, 15% of propylene carbonate, 3% of sodium dodecylbenzenesulfonate, 10% of castor oil polyoxyethylene ether, 0.5% of N,N-dimethylformamide, 3% of soybean oil, 25% of cyclohexanone, methyl oleate to make up the balance;

[0105] Preparation method: the same as example 7.

[0106] Example 9:

[0107] 8% of the compound of formula (I)·chlorobenzilate emulsion (0.5:7.5)

[0108] Formulation: 0.5% of the compound of formula (I), 7.5% of chlorobenzilate, 10% of propylene carbonate, 4% of sodium lignosulfonate, 15% of castor oil polyoxyethylene ether, 1% of N,N-dimethylformamide, 4% of soybean oil, 25% of cyclohexanone, methyl oleate to make up the balance;

[0109] Preparation method: the same as example 7.

[0110] Example 10:

[0111] 32% of the compound of formula (I)·diflubenzuron wettable powder (4:28)

[0112] Formulation: 4% of the compound of formula (I), 28% of diflubenzuron, 8% of naphthalene sulfonate formaldehyde condensate, 10% of tea saponin, 1.5% of sodium carbonate, 5% of attapulgite, kaolin to make up the balance;

[0113] Preparation method: the effective ingredient, dispersant, wetting agent and filler are mixed according to the formulation ratio, uniformly stirred in a stirring kettle, and then uniformly mixed by a jet mill for multiple times to prepare the wettable powder of the composition.

[0114] Example 11:

[0115] 33% compound of formula (I) + bistrifluron water dispersible granules (3:30)

[0116] Formulation: 3% compound of formula (I), 30% bistrifluron, 6% sodium polycarboxylate, 2% sodium lignosulfonate, 6% naphthalene sulfonate formaldehyde condensate, 3.5% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 4% anhydrous sodium sulfate, 2% starch, kaolin to make up the balance;

[0117] Preparation method: according to the formulation ratio, the active ingredients are added to the carrier, and the surfactants and other functional adjuvants are added thereto, mixed, and then added with appropriate water after air flow crushing, followed by kneading, granulation, drying, and screening to obtain the water dispersible granule product.

[0118] Laboratory bioactivity determination

[0119] Reference to the agricultural industry standards:

[0120] NY / T 1154.6-2006, Guidelines on Laboratory Bioassay Test for Pesticides, Insecticides, Part 6: Immersion Method;

[0121] NY / T 1154.7-2006, Guidelines on Laboratory Bioassay Test for Pesticides, Insecticides, Part 7: Combined Action Test for Mixtures;

[0122] NY / T 1154.14-2008, Guidelines on Laboratory Bioassay Test for Pesticides, Insecticides, Part 14: Leaf Dip Method, etc.

[0123] Specific laboratory toxicity test:

[0124] 1) Test target: cabbage caterpillar, diamondback moth, and armyworm;

[0125] Test method: combination of leaf dip method and immersion method;

[0126] Pesticide preparation: the test pesticide is dissolved in acetone and prepared into 5 series of concentrations with 0.1% Tween 80 aqueous solution.

[0127] Test material: punch a leaf disc (1.5 cm in diameter) with a puncher, immerse it in the pesticide solution for 10 s, and then place the cabbage slice on a culture dish lined with a moist filter paper after the pesticide solution is naturally dried. Place 20 3rd instar larvae in the culture dish with the leaf dipped in the corresponding concentration of the pesticide solution, and then absorb the excess pesticide solution with a filter paper, and then place the test insects in the culture dish.

[0128] Test treatment: 4 replicates per treatment, with a blank treatment as a control. The treated test insects are placed in an artificial intelligent incubator at 25±1°C, with a light period of L:D=16h:8h and a relative humidity of 65%±5% for rearing.

[0129] Investigation method: Check the experimental results after 72h, touch the insect body with a brush pen, and the insect body is considered dead if it does not react. Count the number of live insects and dead insects in each treatment, and calculate the mortality rate.

[0130] Data statistics and analysis:

[0131] According to the investigation data, the corrected mortality rate of each treatment is calculated. According to formula (1) and (2), the calculation results are rounded to two decimal places:

[0132]

[0133] In the formula:

[0134] P - mortality rate, unit: percentage (%);

[0135] K - represents the number of dead insects, unit: head;

[0136] N - represents the total number of insects in the treatment, unit: head.

[0137]

[0138] In the formula:

[0139] P1 - corrected mortality rate, unit: percentage (%);

[0140] P t - treatment mortality rate, unit: percentage (%);

[0141] P0 - blank control mortality rate, unit: percentage (%).

[0142] If the control mortality rate is <5%, no correction is needed; if the control mortality rate is between 5% and 20%, it should be corrected according to formula (2); if the control mortality rate is >20%, the test needs to be redone.

[0143] The data is processed by the method of probability value analysis. It can be analyzed by DPS statistical analysis system to obtain the toxicity regression line, LC 50 value and its 95% confidence limit and correlation coefficient r, and to evaluate the activity of the test agent on biological test materials.

[0144] The co-toxicity coefficient (CTC value) of the mixed agent is calculated according to the following formula:

[0145]

[0146] In the formula:

[0147] ATI - measured toxicity index of mixed agent;

[0148] S - LC 50 of standard insecticide, unit: milligrams per liter (mg / L);

[0149] M - LC of the mixture 50 in milligrams per liter (mg / L).

[0150] TTI = TI A *P A + TI B *P B

[0151] wherein:

[0152] TTI - theoretical toxicity index of the mixture;

[0153] TI A - toxicity index of the A agent;

[0154] P A - percentage content of the A agent in the mixture, in percent (%);

[0155] TI B - toxicity index of the B agent;

[0156] P B - percentage content of the B agent in the mixture, in percent (%).

[0157]

[0158] wherein:

[0159] CTC - coefficient of joint toxicity;

[0160] ATI - actual toxicity index of the mixture;

[0161] TTI - theoretical toxicity index of the mixture.

[0162] A mixture with a coefficient of joint toxicity CTC≥ 120 exhibits synergistic action; CTC≤ 80 exhibits antagonistic action; 80 < CTC < 120 exhibits additive action.

[0163] Test results and analysis:

[0164] Joint toxicity of the mixture against Pieris rapae:

[0165] LC 50The compound of formula (I) and chlorfluazuron, diflubenzuron, triflumuron have good joint action on Pieris rapae, and show obvious synergistic effect under certain mass ratio. Table 1-Table 3 show that when the mass ratio of the compound of formula (I) and chlorfluazuron is 1:24-20:1, the co-toxicity coefficient is greater than 120, showing synergistic effect; when the mass ratio of the compound of formula (I) and diflubenzuron is 1:30-25:1, the co-toxicity coefficient is greater than 120, showing synergistic effect; when the mass ratio of the compound of formula (I) and triflumuron is 1:35-18:1, the co-toxicity coefficient is greater than 120, showing synergistic effect.

[0166] Table 1 Toxicity test results of different ratios of the compound of formula (I) and chlorfluazuron on Pieris rapae

[0167]

[0168] Table 2 Toxicity test results of different ratios of the compound of formula (I) and diflubenzuron on Pieris rapae

[0169]

[0170] Table 3 Toxicity test results of different ratios of the compound of formula (I) and triflumuron on Pieris rapae

[0171]

[0172] Joint toxicity of mixed preparation on Plutella xylostella:

[0173] LC of the compound of formula (I) on Plutella xylostella 50 The compound of formula (I) and bistrifluron, chlorofluazuron, flurenol, chlofluazuron have good joint action on Plutella xylostella, and show obvious synergistic effect under certain mass ratio.

[0174] Table 4-Table 7 show that when the mass ratio of the compound of formula (I) and bistrifluron is 1:50-24:1, the co-toxicity coefficient is greater than 120, showing synergistic effect; when the mass ratio of the compound of formula (I) and chlorofluazuron is 1:45-20:1, the co-toxicity coefficient is greater than 120, showing synergistic effect; when the mass ratio of the compound of formula (I) and flurenol is 1:30-28:1, the co-toxicity coefficient is greater than 120, showing synergistic effect; when the mass ratio of the compound of formula (I) and chlofluazuron is 1:60-30:1, the co-toxicity coefficient is greater than 120, showing synergistic effect.

[0175] Table 4 Toxicity test results of different ratios of the compound of formula (I) and bistrifluron on Plutella xylostella

[0176]

[0177]

[0178] Table 5 Toxicity of different mixtures of compound of formula (I) and chlorfluazuron against Plutella xylostella

[0179]

[0180] Table 6 Toxicity of different mixtures of compound of formula (I) and fluroxuron against Plutella xylostella

[0181]

[0182] Table 7 Toxicity of different mixtures of compound of formula (I) and hexaflumuron against Plutella xylostella

[0183]

[0184]

[0185] Joint toxicity of mixtures against Spodoptera exigua:

[0186] LC50 of compound of formula (I) against Spodoptera exigua is 0.432 mg / L. Compound of formula (I) has good joint action with lufenuron, flufenoxuron and hexaflumuron against Spodoptera exigua, and shows obvious synergistic effect at certain mass ratio. 50

[0187] Table 8-Table 10 show that when the mass ratio of compound of formula (I) to lufenuron is 1:24-20:1, the co-toxicity coefficient is greater than 120, showing synergistic effect; when the mass ratio of compound of formula (I) to flufenoxuron is 1:40-36:1, the co-toxicity coefficient is greater than 120, showing synergistic effect; when the mass ratio of compound of formula (I) to hexaflumuron is 1:30-24:1, the co-toxicity coefficient is greater than 120, showing synergistic effect.

[0188] Table 8 Toxicity of different mixtures of compound of formula (I) and lufenuron against Spodoptera exigua

[0189]

[0190] Table 9 Toxicity of different mixtures of compound of formula (I) and flufenoxuron against Spodoptera exigua

[0191]

[0192]

[0193] Table 10 Toxicity of different mixtures of compound of formula (I) and hexaflumuron against Spodoptera exigua

[0194]

[0195] ​2) Test target: Frankliniella occidentalis

[0196] Test method: medicine film rolling tube method

[0197] Preparation of medicine: the test medicine organic solvent (acetone) is prepared into mother liquor, and then 5 series of mass concentrations are prepared by using 0.1% Tween 80 aqueous solution.

[0198] Test treatment: immersion tube: a glass tube with a height of 7 cm and a diameter of 1.5 cm, a pipette is used to add 250ul of each concentration of medicine into the glass tube, then the glass tube is placed flat, and the palm is slowly rolled to accelerate the volatilization of the medicine, so that the medicine is evenly attached to the inner wall of the glass tube. Each tube is one repetition, 8 repetitions are set for each concentration, and the acetone immersion tube is used as a control;

[0199] Leaf immersion: fresh cabbage leaves are punched into small round pieces with a diameter of 1 cm by using a puncher, and then immersed in each concentration of medicine for 10s, and the leaf immersion with 0.1% Tween 80 is used as a control;

[0200] Insect introduction: the treated leaves are dried on filter paper, and then clamped into the glass tube corresponding to the concentration of the medicine by using tweezers; 20 adult thrips are transferred into the glass tube by using a thrips suction device, and the tube opening is covered with a 200-mesh gauze;

[0201] Feeding and observation: the treated test insects are placed in a rearing room with a temperature of 25±0.1℃, a humidity of 60%-80%, a light-dark ratio of 16h:8h, and are fed and observed;

[0202] Investigation time: after 72h, the western flower thrips is observed, the thrips is considered dead when it is touched with a brush tip, and the total number of insects and the number of dead insects are recorded respectively.

[0203] Data statistics and analysis:

[0204] According to the investigation data, the corrected mortality of each treatment is calculated. The calculation result is rounded to two decimal places according to the following formula:

[0205]

[0206] In the formula:

[0207] P - mortality, unit: percentage (%);

[0208] K - represents the number of dead insects, unit: head;

[0209] N - represents the total number of insects, unit: head.

[0210]

[0211] In the formula:

[0212] P1—Corrected mortality, in percent (%);

[0213] P t —Treated mortality, in percent (%);

[0214] P0—Blank control mortality, in percent (%).

[0215] If the control mortality is <5%, no correction is needed; if the control mortality is between 5% and 20%, the mortality should be corrected according to formula (2); if the control mortality is >20%, the test should be repeated.

[0216] The data are processed by the method of probit analysis. The DPS statistical analysis system can be used to analyze the data to obtain the toxicity regression line, LC 50 value and its 95% confidence limit and correlation coefficient r, and to evaluate the activity of the test agent on the biological test material.

[0217] The co-toxicity coefficient (CTC value) of the mixture is calculated according to the following formula:

[0218]

[0219] In the formula:

[0220] ATI—Measured toxicity index of the mixture;

[0221] S—LC 50 of the standard insecticide, in milligrams per liter (mg / L);

[0222] M—LC 50 of the mixture, in milligrams per liter (mg / L).

[0223] TTI = TI A * P A + TI B * P B

[0224] In the formula:

[0225] TTI—Theoretical toxicity index of the mixture;

[0226] TI A —Toxicity index of agent A;

[0227] P A —Percentage content of agent A in the mixture, in percent (%);

[0228] TI B —Toxicity index of agent B;

[0229] P B —Percentage content of agent B in the mixture, in percent (%).

[0230]

[0231] In the formula:

[0232] CTC - coefficient of joint toxicity;

[0233] ATI - observed mixture toxicity index;

[0234] TTI - theoretical mixture toxicity index.

[0235] The CTC of the complex is greater than or equal to 120, which shows a synergistic effect; the CTC is less than or equal to 80, which shows an antagonistic effect; and the CTC is greater than 80 and less than 120, which shows an additive effect.

[0236] Joint toxicity of the mixture to the western flower thrips:

[0237] Table 11 shows that the LC 50 The LC

[0238] Table 11 shows the results of toxicity determination of the compound of formula (I) and fluroxamide in different ratios to the western flower thrips

[0239]

[0240] Field efficacy examples

[0241] Field test 1

[0242] Test crop: cabbage (Brassica oleracea), the cabbage was in the rosette stage at the time of the test;

[0243] Test target: cabbage caterpillar;

[0244] Test site: cabbage test field in the vegetable planting base of Taishan District, Taian City, Shandong Province;

[0245] Spraying equipment: 3WBS-16 type backpack electric sprayer;

[0246] Test time: July 26, 2022;

[0247] Test environment: The cultivation conditions of all test plots were uniform and consistent, and the same level of fertilizer and water management was adopted. The water and fertilizer conditions were good, and the soil was sticky;

[0248] Test agent:

[0249] Table 12 shows the field test design and dosage

[0250]

[0251] Test method: at the peak of occurrence of cabbage moth (mostly 2-4 instar), apply once.

[0252] Plot area and repetition: random block arrangement, plot area 20 m 2 , 4 times for each treatment.

[0253] Investigation method: randomly sample five points in each plot, fix 4 plants per point, investigate the number of cabbage moths on all cabbage plants, investigate the initial population before application, investigate the residual population 3d and 7d after application.

[0254] Calculation formula and data analysis:

[0255]

[0256]

[0257] Field efficacy test results:

[0258] The field control effects of various agents on cabbage moths are shown in Table 13,

[0259] As can be seen from Table 13, 3d after application, 30% compound of formula (I) * bifenox suspension concentrate (6:24), 32% compound of formula (I) * diflubenzuron wettable powder (4:28), 24% compound of formula (I) * chlorfenprop-methyl suspension concentrate (4:20), 24% compound of formula (I) * flufenoxuron suspension concentrate (3:21), and 30% compound of formula (I) * triflumuron suspension concentrate (5:25) showed good quick-acting effect on cabbage moths, with control effects of 84.05%, 80.64%, 81.60%, 82.06% and 82.94% respectively, which were significantly higher than those of the single agent.

[0260] Table 13 Field control effects of different agents on cabbage moths (3d after application)

[0261]

[0262] Note: the initial population and control effect data above are the average values of 4 repetitions, the numerical value is kept to two decimal places, and different letters after the control effect data in the same column indicate significant difference (P<0.05).

[0263] From Table 14, it can be seen that 7 days after administration, 30% compound of formula (I) · bifenox suspension concentrate (6:24), 32% compound of formula (I) · diflubenzuron wettable powder (4:28), 24% compound of formula (I) · chlorfenprop-methyl suspension concentrate (4:20), 24% compound of formula (I) · flufenprox suspension concentrate (3:21), and 30% compound of formula (I) · triflumuron suspension concentrate (5:25) showed good persistence against cabbage caterpillars, with control effects of 93.76%, 91.15%, 93.11%, 90.25%, and 91.20%, respectively, which were significantly higher than those of the single agent controls.

[0264] Table 14 Field control effect of different agents on cabbage caterpillars (7 days after administration)

[0265]

[0266] Note: The above insect population base and control effect data are the average values of 4 repetitions, with two decimal places, and different letters after the control effect data in the same column indicate significant differences (P<0.05).

[0267] Safety: During the test period and the post-test observation, the cabbage grew normally and no obvious phytotoxicity was observed.

[0268] Field Test 2

[0269] Test crop: big onions;

[0270] Test target: Spodoptera litura;

[0271] Test site: Qingdao big onion planting base in Pingdu, Shandong Province;

[0272] Spraying equipment: 3WBS-16 type backpack electric sprayer;

[0273] Test time: September 15, 2022;

[0274] Test environment: The cultivation conditions of all test plots were uniform and consistent, and the same fertilizer and water management level was adopted;

[0275] Test agents:

[0276] Table 15 Field test design and dosage

[0277]

[0278]

[0279] Test method: At the peak of Spodoptera litura occurrence, spraying was performed once.

[0280] Plot area and repetition: Randomized block arrangement, 20 m 2 per plot, 4 repetitions per treatment.

[0281] Investigation method: Random five-point sampling per plot, 10 plants per point, investigation of the number of all leaves on the whole plant, investigation of the initial population before application, investigation of the residual population 3d and 10d after application.

[0282] Calculation formula and data analysis:

[0283]

[0284]

[0285] Field efficacy test results:

[0286] As shown in Table 16, 3d after application, 28% compound of formula (I)·bistrifluron suspension concentrate (3:25), 8% compound of formula (I)·chlorfluazuron emulsion (0.5:7.5), 10% compound of formula (I)·fluroxymester suspension concentrate (2:8), and 6% compound of formula (I)·hexaflumuron emulsion (1.2:4.8) showed good quick-acting property against C. punctiferalis in the onion field, with the control effects of 84.68%, 85.73%, 87.94%, and 87.49%, respectively, which were significantly higher than the control single agent.

[0287] Table 16 Field control effects of different agents against C. punctiferalis (3d after application)

[0288]

[0289]

[0290] Note: The initial population and control effect data above are the average of 4 repetitions, the values are kept to two decimal places, and different letters after the control effect data in the same column represent significant difference (P<0.05).

[0291] As shown in Table 17, 10d after application, 28% compound of formula (I)·bistrifluron suspension concentrate (3:25), 8% compound of formula (I)·chlorfluazuron emulsion (0.5:7.5), 10% compound of formula (I)·fluroxymester suspension concentrate (2:8), and 6% compound of formula (I)·hexaflumuron emulsion (1.2:4.8) showed good quick-acting property against C. punctiferalis in the onion field, with the control effects of 92.04%, 93.14%, 93.69%, and 92.34%, respectively, which were significantly higher than the control single agent.

[0292] Table 17 Field control effects of the same agents against C. punctiferalis (10d after application)

[0293]

[0294] Note: The insect population base and control effect data above are the average of 4 repetitions, the values are kept to two decimal places, and different letters after the control effect data in the same column indicate significant differences (P < 0.05).

[0295] Safety: During the trial period and post-observation, green onions grew normally without obvious phytotoxicity.

[0296] Field Test 3

[0297] Test crop: Cucumber;

[0298] Test target: Western flower thrips

[0299] Test site: Cucumber and vegetable land greenhouse in Gaoliu Town, Qingzhou City, Shandong Province;

[0300] Spraying equipment: 3WBS-16 type backpack electric sprayer, spraying liquid amount is 30 L / acre;

[0301] Test time: November 10, 2022;

[0302] Test environment: The cultivation conditions of all test plots are uniform and consistent, and the same level of fertilizer and water management is adopted;

[0303] Test agent:

[0304] Table 18 Field test design and dosage

[0305]

[0306] Test method: Thrips occur at the peak, spray once.

[0307] Plot area and repetition: Randomized block arrangement, 3 rows of cucumber in each plot, about 24 m 2 , 4 times for each treatment.

[0308] Investigation method: Random five-point sampling in each plot, 4 plants fixed per point, respectively investigate the number of adults and nymphs on all leaves (pounding method), investigate the insect population base before spraying, investigate the residual insect number 3d and 7d after spraying.

[0309] Calculation formula and data analysis:

[0310]

[0311]

[0312] Field trial results:

[0313] The field control effect of various agents on western flower thrips on cucumber is shown in Table 19, 3d after spraying, 10% compound (I) · fluroxamide suspension concentrate (2:8) dosage is 5, 7.5, 10 g a.i. / hm2 The control effects thereof are 80.17%, 85.63%, and 86.04% respectively, and the control effects of each treatment increase at 7 days after treatment, the dosages of 10% compound (I) · fluroxypyr suspension concentrate (2:8) are 5, 7.5, and 10 g a.i. / hm 2 The control effects thereof are 91.47%, 93.25%, and 94.05% respectively, and each mixed preparation also shows good persistence, the control effects are more than 90%, and are significantly higher than those of the control single agent.

[0314] Table 19 Field control effects of different pesticides on western flower thrips on cucumber

[0315]

[0316]

[0317] Note: The average number of pests is an integer; the above control effect data are the average values of 4 repetitions, the numerical values are kept to two decimal places, and different letters after the control effect data in the same column represent significant differences (P<0.05).

[0318] Safety: During the test period and the later observation, the cucumber grows normally, and no obvious phytotoxicity phenomenon occurs.

[0319] The control effect of the obtained insecticidal composition or preparation thereof by compounding is significant, is better than that of a single agent in delaying the generation of resistance and prolonging the persistence, and no phytotoxicity of the compounded pesticide to crops is found in the test, which indicates that in the case of synergistic enhancement of the insecticidal composition or preparation in killing insects, the production cost and use cost can be reduced, and the crops are safe.

[0320] Although the present application has been described in detail in the foregoing general description and specific embodiments, modifications and improvements thereto will occur to those skilled in the art. Therefore, it is the intent that all such modifications and improvements be included within the scope of the application which is to be limited only by the claims.

Claims

1. An insecticidal benzoylurea-containing composition characterized in that: comprising active ingredient A and active ingredient B, the active ingredient A is a compound of formula (I) , the active ingredient B is a benzoylurea compound, the benzoylurea compound is hydroprene, chlorfluazuron, triflumuron, teflubenzuron, flufenoxuron, fluroxymester, hexaflumuron, flufenprox. The mass ratio of the compound of formula (I) to chlorfluazuron is 1:24-20:1, the mass ratio of the compound of formula (I) to diflubenzuron is 1:30-25:1, the mass ratio of the compound of formula (I) to dimilin is 1:35-18:1, the mass ratio of the compound of formula (I) to flufenoxuron is 1:50-24:1, the mass ratio of the compound of formula (I) to fluazuron is 1:45-20:1, the mass ratio of the compound of formula (I) to flurotyluron is 1:30-28:1, the mass ratio of the compound of formula (I) to hexaflumuron is 1:60-30:1, the mass ratio of the compound of formula (I) to teflubenzuron is 1:30-25:1, and the mass ratio of the compound of formula (I) to triflumuron is 1:30-24:

1.

2. The insecticidal composition according to claim 1, characterized in that: The mass ratio of the compound of formula (I) to chlorfluazuron is 1:24, 1:10, 1:9, 1:5, 1:4, 1:2, 2:5, 1:1, 4:1, 15:2, 8:1, 12:1, 20:1, The mass ratio of the compound of formula (I) to diflubenzuron is 1:30, 1:15, 1:7, 5:1, 12:1, 25:1, The mass ratio of the compound of formula (I) to dimilin is 1:35, 1:20, 1:10, 1:5, 1:1, 5:1, 9:1, 18:1, The mass ratio of the compound of formula (I) to flufenoxuron is 1:50, 1:20, 1:10, 1:5, 5:1, 16:1, 24:1, The mass ratio of the compound of formula (I) to fluazuron is 1:45, 1:30, 1:15, 1:7, 1:3, 5:1, 20:1, The mass ratio of the compound of formula (I) to flurotyluron is 1:30, 1:25, 1:20, 2:35, 1:9, 1:5, 1:3, 1:1, 11:4, 10:1, 15:1, 20:1, 28:1, The mass ratio of the compound of formula (I) to hexaflumuron is 1:60, 1:45, 1:33, 1:16, 1:6, 5:1, 16:1, 30:1, The mass ratio of the compound of formula (I) to teflubenzuron is 1:30, 1:15, 1:7, 1:3, 3:1, 12:1, 25:1, The mass ratio of the compound of formula (I) to triflumuron is 1:30, 1:20, 2:15, 1:5, 4:1, 15:1, 24:

1.

3. The insecticidal composition according to claim 1, wherein: The total mass of the insecticidal composition is 100wt%, and the content of the active ingredient A and the active ingredient B in the insecticidal composition is 0.5%-90%.

4. The insecticidal composition according to claim 1, wherein: The total mass of the insecticidal composition is 100wt%, and the content of the active ingredient A and the active ingredient B in the insecticidal composition is 0.5%-90%.

5. The insecticidal composition according to claim 1, wherein: The insecticidal composition further comprises an agriculturally acceptable auxiliary ingredient in addition to the active ingredient, and the auxiliary ingredient is selected from one or more of wetting agents, dispersants, emulsifiers, thickening agents, disintegrating agents, antifreezing agents, antifoaming agents, solvents, preservatives, stabilizers, synergists or carriers.

6. The insecticidal composition according to claim 5, wherein: The insecticidal composition is prepared into an agriculturally allowable preparation dosage form selected from solid preparation and / or liquid preparation; the solid preparation is selected from wettable powder, water dispersible granule; the liquid preparation is selected from emulsifiable concentrate, water emulsion, microemulsion, suspension, suspoemulsion, dispersible oil suspension.

7. The use of the insecticidal composition according to any one of claims 1 to 6 for controlling agricultural and forestry pests, sanitary pests, characterized in that, The agricultural and forestry pests, sanitary pests are cabbage worm, diamondback moth, fall armyworm, western flower thrips.

Images