Intellectual property trading platform user management method and system

Abstract

The invention relates to the technical field of intellectual property, in particular to an intellectual property transaction platform user management method and system. The method comprises the following steps: acquiring an intellectual property transaction transfer protocol between a user and a transfer party; analyzing the transfer protocol, and determining whether the transfer protocol has a problem; if the problem exists, warning the user or stopping the intellectual property transaction; determining the transferor as a suspicious person, tracking the transaction behavior of the transferor in real time, obtaining the transaction scale of the transaction behavior and the transaction authority of the suspicious person, and limiting the transaction scale of the transferor according to the transaction authority and the transaction scale. And the transaction risk caused by the protocol problem is avoided. And the user is protected from potential economic loss and legal risk. And fraud and illegal transaction behaviors can be prevented, and the fairness and order of the intellectual property market can be maintained.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present application relates to the field of intellectual property technology, and in particular to a user management method and system for an intellectual property trading platform. Background Art

[0002] With the rapid development of the global economy and the improvement of innovation capabilities, the protection and management of intellectual property rights are becoming increasingly important. Intellectual property rights include trademarks, patents, copyrights, trade secrets and other forms, and are an important part of corporate competitiveness. In today's era, the integration of "Internet +" and intellectual property rights has made intellectual property transactions more inclusive and convenient, not only providing a wider range of participation opportunities, but also bringing more convenient transaction channels and service methods to ordinary people.

[0003] However, although the popularization and convenience of intellectual property transactions have brought many benefits to people, since the agreements involved in intellectual property transactions are confidential to other unrelated users and are opaque, some users may not understand the agreements between other users, so it is easy for them to participate in illegal operations without knowing it, leading to infringement. In addition, there is no good management measure for some transferors involved in infringement, which also increases the possibility of infringement. Summary of the invention

[0004] The present application provides a user management method and system for an intellectual property trading platform to reduce the illegal operations that users may face when trading intellectual property rights and reduce the possibility of infringement.

[0005] In a first aspect, the present application provides a method for managing users of an intellectual property trading platform, comprising: Obtain the intellectual property transaction transfer agreement between the user and the transferor; Analyze the transfer agreement to determine whether there are any problems with the transfer agreement; If there is a problem, the user will be warned or the intellectual property transaction will be stopped; The transferor is identified as a suspicious person, and the transaction behavior of the transferor is tracked in real time to obtain the transaction scale of the transaction behavior and the transaction authority of the suspicious person, and the transaction scale of the transferor is restricted based on the transaction authority and the transaction scale.

[0006] By analyzing the transfer agreement through this method, potential problems can be discovered in time, thus avoiding transaction risks caused by agreement problems. Warning users or stopping intellectual property transactions can protect users from potential economic losses and legal risks. Identifying the transferor as a suspicious person and tracking them in real time can help prevent fraud and illegal transactions. It also helps to maintain the fairness and order of the intellectual property market. Restricting the transaction rights and transaction scale of suspicious persons can prevent them from further engaging in high-risk or illegal transactions, thereby protecting the stability and security of the entire market.

[0007] Optionally, before obtaining the intellectual property transaction transfer agreement between the user and the transferor, the method includes: obtaining basic information of the user and the transferor respectively; obtaining communication records, and extracting key information involved in the communication records; generating a transfer agreement by combining the basic information, the key information and a preset transfer agreement template; sending the transfer agreement to the devices of the user and the transferor respectively, and receiving confirmation feedback from the user and the transferor; confirming whether the transfer agreement is correct based on the confirmation feedback; and submitting the transfer agreement if the transfer agreement is correct.

[0008] By using the solution provided in this embodiment, the basic information of the user and the transferor is obtained respectively, which can ensure that the identities and qualifications of both parties to the transaction are accurate, laying the foundation for the subsequent transfer agreement generation and transaction execution. Extract key information from communication records, reduce information redundancy, and improve the accuracy of selecting transfer agreement templates. Combining basic information, key information and preset transfer agreement templates, a transfer agreement can be automatically generated, which improves work efficiency. At the same time, using the preset transfer agreement template can ensure that the generated agreement content complies with laws, regulations and industry specifications, reducing the risks caused by non-compliance of the agreement content.

[0009] Optionally, analyzing the transfer agreement to determine whether there are any problems with the transfer agreement includes: analyzing the transfer agreement between the user and the transferor to obtain a first-level transfer agreement analysis result; the first-level transfer agreement analysis result includes but is not limited to first-level transfer conditions; based on the first-level transfer agreement analysis result, determining whether the transferor is the original right holder; if the transferor is not the original right holder, obtaining a second-level transfer agreement for the intellectual property rights in the transfer agreement corresponding to the transferor; analyzing the content of the second-level transfer agreement to obtain a second-level transfer agreement analysis result; the second-level transfer agreement analysis result includes but is not limited to second-level transfer conditions; based on the first-level transfer conditions and the second-level transfer conditions, determining whether there are any problems between the first-level transfer conditions and the second-level transfer conditions; if there are no problems between the first-level transfer conditions and the second-level transfer conditions, determining that there are no problems with the transfer agreement.

[0010] Through the solution of this embodiment, the primary transfer agreement and the possible secondary transfer agreement are analyzed, avoiding the possible problems of unclear ownership or inconsistent transfer conditions. The careful analysis of the transfer conditions at all levels can ensure that both parties to the transaction enjoy fair rights and interests during the transaction process, and avoid losses to one party due to insufficient information or misunderstanding. Timely discovery and resolution of problems can avoid additional costs caused by later disputes, help regulate the order of the intellectual property transaction market, improve the transparency and fairness of the market, and promote the healthy development of the market.

[0011] Optionally, determining whether there is a problem between the primary transfer condition and the secondary transfer condition based on the primary transfer condition and the secondary transfer condition includes: determining whether the secondary transferor in the secondary transfer condition is the original right holder based on the secondary transfer condition; if the secondary transferor in the secondary transfer condition is the original right holder, determining whether the transfer agreement involves the part of the consent of the original right holder; if it involves the part of the consent of the original right holder, analyzing the restrictive clauses in the secondary transfer agreement, and determining whether the secondary transfer agreement is an exclusive authorization based on the analysis results; if the secondary transfer agreement is an exclusive authorization, determining that there is a problem with the transfer agreement.

[0012] Through this solution, by checking whether the transfer agreement involves the consent of the original right holder, potential risks can be identified in advance to avoid the possibility that the agreement may be invalid due to the transfer without the consent of the original right holder. Further checking the restrictive clauses in the secondary transfer agreement can help determine whether there is an exclusive authorization, which helps prevent the abuse and over-concentration of intellectual property rights, and can prevent the abuse of intellectual property rights or deprive the original right holder of their legitimate rights and interests.

[0013] Optionally, if there is a problem, the user is warned or the intellectual property transaction is stopped, including: based on the fact that the transfer agreement involves the consent of the original right holder, the secondary transfer agreement is an exclusive authorization, and the restrictive clauses in the secondary transfer agreement do not explicitly prohibit or restrict sub-authorization, analyzing whether the transfer agreement in the transfer agreement contains unreasonable terms; if the transfer agreement in the transfer agreement contains unreasonable terms, a warning is issued and an agreement modification signal is sent to the user and the transferor respectively; modification feedback is received after the user and the transferor modify the transfer agreement; based on the modification feedback, analyzing whether the transfer agreement in the modification feedback contains unreasonable terms; if the modification result of the transfer agreement contains unreasonable terms, the intellectual property transaction is stopped.

[0014] Through this solution, we can analyze whether there are unreasonable clauses in the transfer agreement, enhance the user's understanding of the clauses that have not been noticed in the transfer agreement, ensure that the user has a clear understanding of each clause in the signed agreement, prevent the transferor from making profits through hidden means, ensure the fairness and legality of the transaction, reduce potential disputes and risks, and avoid huge losses. When unreasonable clauses are found, an agreement modification signal will be sent to the user and the transferor, which will help to reach an agreement clause that satisfies all parties.

[0015] Optionally, the transaction scale of the transferor is restricted based on the transaction authority and the transaction scale, including: determining a preset credit score to be deducted based on the market valuation of the intellectual property transaction; obtaining a new credit score of the transferor based on the deducted preset credit score; determining the tradable scale of the transferor based on the new credit score of the transferor; if the transferor conducts a new intellectual property transaction with other users, analyzing the market valuation of the new intellectual property transaction; determining the transaction scale of the new intellectual property transaction based on the market valuation result; analyzing whether the transaction scale is within the transaction scale of the transferor; if the transaction scale is not within the transaction scale of the transferor, restricting the transferor's new intellectual property transaction.

[0016] Through this solution, the preset credit score to be deducted is determined based on the market valuation of intellectual property transactions, providing an effective risk management mechanism for intellectual property transactions. It helps to reduce the potential risks caused by inaccurate market valuation or excessive transaction size. The adjustment of credit scores can motivate the transferor to conduct honest transactions, and also provide a reference standard for other traders to evaluate the security of transactions.

[0017] Optionally, the method also includes: determining the credibility score range of the transaction size according to a preset range division rule; obtaining the transaction results of the transferor, screening the transaction results, and determining whether there is a completed transaction; if there is a completed transaction, determining a recoverable credibility score according to the transaction size of the completed transaction and the number of transactions of the completed transaction; determining the reassessed credibility score of the transferor at the current moment according to the recoverable credibility score; judging whether the reassessed credibility score is within the credibility score range; if the reassessed credibility score is not within the credibility score range, determining the tradable scale of the reassessed credibility score according to the preset range division rule.

[0018] Through this solution, the recoverable credit score is determined based on the transaction scale and number of completed transactions. This encourages the transferor to conduct honest transactions. Dynamically adjusting the transferor's credit score and transaction scale based on the transferor's transaction results can more accurately reflect the transferor's transaction capabilities and market reputation. This dynamic adjustment helps ensure the fairness and rationality of transactions, while also providing the market with more accurate transaction information.

[0019] Optionally, after warning the user or stopping the intellectual property transaction, it also includes: obtaining and analyzing the user's operation requirements, and determining the operation content in the operation requirements based on the analysis results; determining the operation type of the operation content based on a preset operation type; if the operation type is a reporting type, determining the reported person information and reporting details based on the operation content; determining whether the operation content is the intellectual property transaction that has been stopped at the current moment based on the reported person information and the reporting details; if the operation content is the intellectual property transaction that has been stopped at the current moment, determining the original right holder of the intellectual property based on the analysis results of the secondary transfer agreement; sending the reported person information and the reporting details to the original right holder, and receiving operation feedback from the original right holder; and determining whether to terminate the agreement based on the operation feedback.

[0020] This solution can quickly respond to and handle reports from users who discover improper behavior in intellectual property transactions. When a report is received and confirmed to involve a stopped intellectual property transaction, the original right holder of the intellectual property can be accurately determined based on the analysis results of the secondary transfer agreement, thereby ensuring the correctness of the rights and interests notification, helping the original right holder to understand the situation in a timely manner and make corresponding arrangements, and effectively safeguarding the rights and interests of the original right holder. Allowing the original right holder to participate in the processing and decide whether to terminate the agreement based on his feedback increases the original right holder's participation and decision-making power, making the processing results more fair and reasonable.

[0021] Optionally, the method also includes: if the user is unable to find the intellectual property transaction information, sending a demand feedback signal to the user; analyzing and extracting key demand information in the demand feedback results based on the demand feedback results submitted by the user; obtaining relevant intellectual property based on the key demand information, and sending the relevant intellectual property to the user; obtaining the user's feedback results on the relevant intellectual property; determining the specific relevant intellectual property selected by the user based on the feedback results; analyzing the part of the specific relevant intellectual property that contains the key demand information based on the specific relevant intellectual property to obtain a key information analysis result; determining whether the part of the specific relevant intellectual property that contains the key demand information is allowed to be traded based on the key information analysis result; if the transaction is allowed, sending a selection signal to the user; obtaining the user's selection result; and determining whether the user conducts the transaction based on the selection result.

[0022] Through this solution, when users fail to find intellectual property transaction information, demand feedback signals can be sent to users in a timely manner, and personalized intellectual property recommendations can be provided based on the demand feedback results submitted by users, thereby improving the user experience. By analyzing and extracting key demand information from user demand feedback results, relevant intellectual property rights can be accurately matched to users, reducing the time for users to search and screen, and improving transaction efficiency.

[0023] In a second aspect, the present application provides a user management system for an intellectual property transaction platform, comprising: The agreement acquisition module acquires the intellectual property transaction transfer agreement between the user and the transferor; A protocol analysis module, analyzing the transfer agreement to determine whether there are any problems with the transfer agreement; A problem solving module, which warns the user or stops the intellectual property transaction if there is a problem; The transaction restriction module determines the transferor as a suspicious person, tracks the transaction behavior of the transferor in real time, obtains the transaction scale of the transaction behavior and the transaction authority of the suspicious person, and imposes transaction scale restrictions on the transferor based on the transaction authority and the transaction scale.

[0024] Optionally, the user management system of the intellectual property transaction platform further includes a protocol generation module, which is used to: Respectively obtain basic information of the user and the transferor; obtain communication records, and extract key information involved in the communication records; generate a transfer agreement by combining the basic information, the key information and a preset transfer agreement template; send the transfer agreement to the devices of the user and the transferor respectively, and receive confirmation feedback from the user and the transferor; confirm whether the transfer agreement is correct based on the confirmation feedback; if the transfer agreement is confirmed to be correct, submit the transfer agreement.

[0025] Optionally, the protocol analysis module is specifically used to: Analyze the transfer agreement between the user and the transferor to obtain a primary transfer agreement analysis result; the primary transfer agreement analysis result includes but is not limited to primary transfer conditions; determine whether the transferor is the original right holder based on the primary transfer agreement analysis result; if the transferor is not the original right holder, obtain a secondary transfer agreement for the intellectual property rights in the transfer agreement corresponding to the transferor; analyze the content of the secondary transfer agreement to obtain a secondary transfer agreement analysis result; the secondary transfer agreement analysis result includes but is not limited to secondary transfer conditions; determine whether there is a problem between the primary transfer conditions and the secondary transfer conditions based on the primary transfer conditions and the secondary transfer conditions; if there is no problem between the primary transfer conditions and the secondary transfer conditions, determine that there is no problem with the transfer agreement.

[0026] Optionally, the protocol analysis module is specifically used to: Based on the secondary transfer conditions, determine whether the secondary transferor in the secondary transfer conditions is the original right holder; if the secondary transferor in the secondary transfer conditions is the original right holder, determine whether the transfer agreement involves the consent of the original right holder; if it involves the consent of the original right holder, analyze the restrictive clauses in the secondary transfer agreement, and based on the analysis results, determine whether the secondary transfer agreement is an exclusive authorization; if the secondary transfer agreement is an exclusive authorization, determine that there is a problem with the transfer agreement.

[0027] Optionally, the problem solving module is specifically used to: Based on the fact that the transfer agreement involves the consent of the original right holder, the secondary transfer agreement is an exclusive authorization, and the restrictive clauses in the secondary transfer agreement do not explicitly prohibit or restrict sub-authorization, analyze whether there are unreasonable terms in the transfer agreement; if there are unreasonable terms in the transfer agreement, issue a warning and send an agreement modification signal to the user and the transferor respectively; receive modification feedback from the user and the transferor after modifying the transfer agreement; based on the modification feedback, analyze whether there are unreasonable terms in the transfer agreement in the modification feedback; if there are unreasonable terms in the modification result of the transfer agreement, stop the intellectual property transaction.

[0028] Optionally, the transaction restriction module is specifically used to: Determine the preset credit score to be deducted based on the market valuation of the intellectual property transaction; obtain the new credit score of the transferor based on the deducted preset credit score; determine the tradable scale of the transferor based on the new credit score of the transferor; if the transferor conducts new intellectual property transactions with other users, analyze the market valuation of the new intellectual property transaction; determine the transaction scale of the new intellectual property transaction based on the market valuation results; analyze whether the transaction scale is within the transaction scale of the transferor; if the transaction scale is not within the transaction scale of the transferor, restrict the transferor's new intellectual property transaction.

[0029] Optionally, the user management system of the intellectual property trading platform further includes a scale assessment module for: Determine the credit score range for the transaction size based on preset range division rules; obtain the transaction result of the transferor, filter the transaction result, and determine whether there is a completed transaction; if there is a completed transaction, determine the recoverable credit score based on the transaction size of the completed transaction and the number of transactions of the completed transaction; determine the re-evaluated credit score of the transferor at the current moment based on the recoverable credit score; determine whether the re-evaluated credit score is within the credit score range; if the re-evaluated credit score is not within the credit score range, determine the tradable scale of the re-evaluated credit score based on the preset range division rules.

[0030] Optionally, the user management system of the intellectual property trading platform further includes a reporting analysis module, which is used to: Obtain and analyze the user's operation requirements, and determine the operation content in the operation requirements based on the analysis results; determine the operation type of the operation content based on the preset operation type; if the operation type is a reporting type, determine the reported person information and reporting details based on the operation content; determine whether the operation content is the intellectual property transaction that has been stopped at the current moment based on the reported person information and the reporting details; if the operation content is the intellectual property transaction that has been stopped at the current moment, determine the original right holder of the intellectual property based on the analysis results of the secondary transfer agreement; send the reported person information and the reporting details to the original right holder, and receive the operation feedback from the original right holder; determine whether to terminate the agreement based on the operation feedback.

[0031] Optionally, the intellectual property rights trading platform user management system further includes a transaction analysis module, which is used to: If the user is unable to find the intellectual property transaction information, a demand feedback signal is sent to the user; based on the demand feedback results submitted by the user, key demand information in the demand feedback results is analyzed and extracted; based on the key demand information, relevant intellectual property is obtained, and the relevant intellectual property is sent to the user; feedback results from the user on the relevant intellectual property are obtained; based on the feedback results, the specific relevant intellectual property selected by the user is determined; based on the specific relevant intellectual property, the part of the specific relevant intellectual property containing the key demand information is analyzed to obtain key information analysis results; based on the key information analysis results, it is determined whether the part of the specific relevant intellectual property containing the key demand information is allowed to be traded; if the transaction is allowed, a selection signal is sent to the user; the selection result of the user is obtained; based on the selection result, it is determined whether the user conducts the transaction. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0032] In order to more clearly illustrate the embodiments of the present application or the technical solutions in the prior art, a brief introduction will be given below to the drawings required for use in the embodiments or the description of the prior art. Obviously, the drawings described below are some embodiments of the present application. For ordinary technicians in this field, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without paying any creative labor.

[0033] Figure 1 A schematic diagram of an application scenario provided for an embodiment of the present application; Figure 2 A flowchart of a method for managing users of intellectual property transactions provided in one embodiment of the present application; Figure 3 A schematic diagram of the structure of an intellectual property transaction user management system provided in one embodiment of the present application. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0034] In order to make the purpose, technical scheme and advantages of the embodiments of the present application clearer, the technical scheme in the embodiments of the present application will be clearly and completely described below in conjunction with the drawings in the embodiments of the present application. Obviously, the described embodiments are part of the embodiments of the present application, not all of the embodiments. Based on the embodiments in the present application, all other embodiments obtained by ordinary technicians in this field without creative work are within the scope of protection of this application.

[0035] In addition, the term "and / or" in this article is only a description of the association relationship of associated objects, indicating that there can be three relationships. For example, A and / or B can represent: A exists alone, A and B exist at the same time, and B exists alone. In addition, the character " / " in this article, unless otherwise specified, generally means that the associated objects before and after are in an "or" relationship.

[0036] The embodiments of the present application are further described in detail below in conjunction with the drawings in the specification.

[0037] The popularization and convenience of intellectual property transactions have brought many benefits to people. However, since the agreements involved in intellectual property transactions are confidential to other unrelated users and are opaque, some users may not understand the agreements between other users. Therefore, it is easy for them to participate in illegal operations without knowing it, leading to infringement. In addition, there is no good management measure for some transferors involved in infringement, which also increases the possibility of infringement.

[0038] Based on this, the present application provides a user management method and system for an intellectual property trading platform. By analyzing the transfer agreement, potential problems can be discovered in a timely manner, such as unclear rights content, unreasonable transfer conditions, etc., thereby avoiding transaction risks caused by agreement problems. Warning users or stopping intellectual property transactions can protect users from potential economic losses and legal risks. Identifying the transferor as a suspicious person and tracking them in real time can help prevent fraud and illegal transactions. It also helps to maintain the fairness and order of the intellectual property market. Restrictions on the trading rights and transaction scale of suspicious persons can prevent them from further engaging in high-risk or illegal transactions, thereby protecting the stability and security of the entire market.

[0039] Figure 1A schematic diagram of an application scenario provided for the present application. When user management of the intellectual property trading platform is required, the solution provided by the present application can be adopted. The method of the present application can be mounted on any server. The user initiates an intellectual property transaction through a mobile terminal and generates an intellectual property transfer agreement. At this time, the transfer agreement is analyzed to determine whether there are any problems with the transfer agreement. And when there are problems, a warning or stop the transaction, and at the same time, the transferor is restricted from trading, user management is implemented, and transaction risks caused by agreement problems are avoided, which helps prevent fraud and illegal transactions, and also helps maintain the fairness and order of the intellectual property market. The specific implementation method can refer to the following embodiments.

[0040] Figure 2 This is a flow chart of a method for managing users of intellectual property transactions provided in one embodiment of the present application. The method of this embodiment can be applied to the server in the above scenario. Figure 2 As shown, the method includes: S201. Obtain the intellectual property transaction transfer agreement between the user and the transferor.

[0041] The user can be considered as the person who needs the intellectual property and can be the buyer of the intellectual property transaction; the transferor can be considered as the current owner of the intellectual property and can be the seller of the intellectual property transaction.

[0042] The intellectual property transaction transfer agreement can be considered as a contract made according to the wishes of the user and the transferor to achieve the user's purpose and protect the rights of the transferor. Since each user has different purposes and the requirements for the required rights are not fixed, the content of each transfer agreement is also different, requiring the user and the transferor to adjust the transfer agreement based on their own actual situation.

[0043] Specifically, when a user needs certain intellectual property rights, the intellectual property rights that the user wants to trade can be determined based on the user's operations, and the intellectual property rights transaction transfer agreement between the user and the transferor can be obtained.

[0044] S202: Analyze the transfer agreement to determine whether there are any problems with the transfer agreement.

[0045] Specifically, there are several contents in the transfer agreement that need to be filled in by the user and the transferor. These contents must comply with legal provisions while meeting the needs of both parties. First, ensure that all information is correctly filled in the appropriate location in the transfer agreement and that the necessary parts of the agreement are filled in completely. If they are not filled in completely or not filled in the appropriate location, it can be considered that there is a problem with the transfer agreement. For example, if some numbers need to be filled in, but the location is blank or text, it can be considered that there is a problem. Secondly, some transferors may add some risky content and induce users to agree because the user does not have a comprehensive understanding of intellectual property transactions. In order to avoid possible risk losses to users, after a simple check of the content filled in the transfer agreement, the content of the transfer agreement can be analyzed to determine whether there are risks in the content.

[0046] In a specific implementation, a deep learning model can be set up, and a number of text contents and the losses incurred by both parties to the intellectual property transaction can be used as training samples and input into the deep learning model for training, so that the trained deep learning model can identify the text content, determine whether the text content has possible risk losses, and if there is a risk loss, it can display the specific risk loss content. After the above-mentioned user and the transferor generate the corresponding transfer agreement, the content of the transfer agreement can be input into the above-mentioned trained deep learning model, so as to use the trained deep learning model to determine whether there is a possible risk loss in the above-mentioned transfer agreement. If so, it can also be considered that there is a problem with the transfer agreement.

[0047] S203. If there is a problem, the user is warned or the intellectual property transaction is stopped.

[0048] Specifically, for some minor problems in the agreement, such as incorrect filling in location, missing or forgotten necessary parts, a modification or filling reminder will be sent to the user and / or transferor to remind the user and / or transferor to modify or fill in the parts.

[0049] If it is determined through the above step S202 that there is a possible risk of loss in the transfer agreement, then the loss that may be caused to the user is determined based on the specific risk loss content output by the trained deep learning model. Based on this loss, the probability of occurrence is determined. If the probability is small, such as when the user performs certain operations incorrectly, a loss may occur. At this time, the user can be warned to remind the user not to do so. For example, the transfer agreement stipulates that sub-authorization is not allowed, and the user transfers it to others again for his own benefit after the transfer is successful. At this time, a loss will occur, and if he does not perform additional transfer operations, no loss will occur. In this case, the user can be warned.

[0050] S204: Identify the transferor as a suspicious person, track the transferor's transaction behavior in real time, obtain the transaction scale of the transaction behavior and the transaction authority of the suspicious person, and restrict the transaction scale of the transferor based on the transaction authority and transaction scale.

[0051] Suspicious persons can be considered as those who may want to achieve their own profit goals through infringement and illegal operations, but have not yet achieved it.

[0052] The transaction scale can be considered as a scale judgment made after analyzing the market valuation and business potential of the rights involved in the transaction. In the specific implementation method, the transaction scale can be divided into the following types: large-scale transactions, medium-scale transactions, small-scale transactions, and personal transactions.

[0053] The transaction authority can be considered as the transaction restriction imposed on the suspicious person after the transferor is determined to be a suspicious person. In the specific implementation, the transaction authority of the suspicious person can be confirmed according to the risk loss that may be brought to the user in the above steps. In the specific implementation, several transaction authority limitation specifications can be set in advance. When a specification is triggered, the transaction authority can be limited according to the corresponding content.

[0054] Specifically, when it is determined through the above steps that the transferor may be in a situation that is unfavorable to the user, the transferor is identified as a suspicious person, and its subsequent transaction behavior is tracked in real time to determine the transaction scale of the transaction behavior. At the same time, the transaction authority of the suspicious person is obtained when the transferor is identified as a suspicious person, and the transaction scale and corresponding transaction authority are used to limit the transaction scale of the transferor's transaction behavior.

[0055] By analyzing the transfer agreement through the method provided by this application, potential problems can be discovered in a timely manner, thereby avoiding transaction risks caused by agreement problems. Warning users or stopping intellectual property transactions can protect users from potential economic losses and legal risks. Identifying the transferor as a suspicious person and tracking it in real time can help prevent fraud and illegal transactions. It also helps to maintain the fairness and order of the intellectual property market. Restricting the trading rights and transaction scale of suspicious persons can prevent them from further engaging in high-risk or illegal transactions, thereby protecting the stability and security of the entire market.

[0056] In some embodiments, basic information of the user and the transferor are obtained respectively; communication records are obtained, and key information involved in the communication records are extracted; a transfer agreement is generated by combining the basic information, key information and a preset transfer agreement template; the transfer agreement is sent to the devices of the user and the transferor respectively, and confirmation feedback from the user and the transferor is received; based on the confirmation feedback, it is confirmed whether the transfer agreement is correct; if the transfer agreement is confirmed to be correct, the transfer agreement is submitted.

[0057] Basic information can be considered as the information provided by the user and the transferor when registering and logging in to the platform, such as age, name, company name, etc. It can be obtained by obtaining the background data of the user and the transferor.

[0058] The communication record can be considered as the communication content before the user and the transferor conduct a transaction and generate a transfer agreement. The system provided by this application can have a dialogue module, through which the user and the transferor can communicate. At the same time, the module can also monitor sensitive words involved in intellectual property transactions during the communication process, such as money, rights content, etc. When these types of words appear, reminders can be given to enable the user and the transferor to communicate cautiously.

[0059] Key information can be considered as some details about the intellectual property transaction negotiated and discussed between the user and the transferor during communication, such as the type of intellectual property transaction, transaction price, usage time range, and breach of contract handling method.

[0060] The preset transfer agreement template can be considered as a transfer agreement template constructed by the above-mentioned embodiment, and these transfer agreement templates are stored in the template database. They contain necessary agreement content and non-essential agreement content. In a specific implementation, the user and the transferor cannot adjust the necessary agreement content, but can add, delete, modify and check the non-essential agreement content.

[0061] The confirmation feedback can be considered as the decision made by the user and the transferor based on the content of the transfer agreement. This confirmation feedback can indicate whether the two parties need to adjust the content in the above template.

[0062] Specifically, obtain the basic information of the user and the transferor, obtain the communication records, and extract the key information related to the intellectual property transaction. Through the key information, determine the transaction content of the intellectual property transaction. According to these transaction contents, determine the corresponding preset transfer agreement template, and then combine the basic information to generate the transfer agreement. After the agreement is generated, it is sent to the user and the transferor respectively. The user and the transferor confirm whether the transfer agreement needs to be adjusted. After making a decision, generate confirmation feedback, and determine whether the transfer agreement is wrong based on this confirmation feedback. If the user and / or the transferor want to adjust the content, it can be considered that the above transfer agreement is wrong, and the content can be adjusted according to the confirmation feedback of the transferor and / or the user. If no adjustment is required, it means that there is no problem with the transfer agreement, and it can be submitted directly at this time.

[0063] In other implementations, both the user and the transferor can obtain some basic information about the other party. For example, the user can obtain the intellectual property rights owned by the transferor, the transaction scale and the transferor's profile; the transferor can obtain the user's profile and current transaction needs.

[0064] By using the solution provided in this embodiment, the basic information of the user and the transferor is obtained respectively, which can ensure that the identities and qualifications of both parties to the transaction are accurate, laying the foundation for the subsequent transfer agreement generation and transaction execution. Extract key information from communication records, reduce information redundancy, and improve the accuracy of selecting transfer agreement templates. Combining basic information, key information and preset transfer agreement templates, a transfer agreement can be automatically generated, which improves work efficiency. At the same time, using the preset transfer agreement template can ensure that the generated agreement content complies with laws, regulations and industry specifications, reducing the risks caused by non-compliance of the agreement content.

[0065] In some embodiments, the transfer agreement between the user and the transferor is analyzed to obtain the primary transfer agreement analysis results; the primary transfer agreement analysis results include but are not limited to primary transfer conditions; based on the primary transfer agreement analysis results, determine whether the transferor is the original right holder; if the transferor is not the original right holder, obtain the secondary transfer agreement of the intellectual property rights in the transfer agreement corresponding to the transferor; analyze the content of the secondary transfer agreement to obtain the secondary transfer agreement analysis results; the secondary transfer agreement analysis results include but are not limited to secondary transfer conditions; based on the primary transfer conditions and the secondary transfer conditions, determine whether there is a problem between the primary transfer conditions and the secondary transfer conditions; if there is no problem between the primary transfer conditions and the secondary transfer conditions, determine that there is no problem with the transfer agreement.

[0066] The first-level transfer agreement analysis result can be considered as the transfer agreement between the current user and the transferor, and the result obtained after analysis. Among them, the first-level transfer conditions can be considered as the transaction conditions corresponding to this transfer agreement.

[0067] The secondary transfer agreement can be considered as an agreement between the transferor and the previous-level transferor when the transferor is not the original right holder, among which the secondary transfer conditions can be considered as the transaction conditions when conducting a transaction between the current transferor and the previous-level transferor.

[0068] Specifically, this embodiment considers the situation where the original right holder transfers the right again after the transfer, wherein the transfer agreement generated by the original right holder has been stored in the database as a result, and the second transfer is a transaction behavior performed by the current user. Because the transaction has not been completed, the generated transfer agreement has not been stored in the database, and it is necessary to analyze and determine whether there is a problem.

[0069] If the transferor in the transaction conducted by the current user is the original right holder, it is directly analyzed whether there are legal issues involved, and according to the above embodiment, the possible risk losses in the contract are analyzed, and according to the analysis results, a warning is issued or the transaction is terminated.

[0070] If the transferor of the current transaction is not the original right holder, in order to determine the risk of this transfer, it is necessary to analyze multiple transfer transactions and obtain multiple agreement analysis results, such as the first-level transfer agreement analysis results and the second-level transfer agreement analysis results. It is necessary to combine the first-level transfer agreement analysis results and the second-level transfer agreement analysis results to determine whether there is a conflict of rights. If there is no problem, it can be considered that there is no problem with the transfer agreement and the transaction can be carried out. If a conflict is found during the retrospective analysis, stop restricting the transaction between the current user and the transferor. At the same time, the original right holder and the victim involved can be notified to find the transferor who caused the conflict and reduce the transaction authority and transaction scale.

[0071] In the specific implementation, if there are multiple transactions, the above analysis can be performed in sequence. It should be noted that in order to ensure the correctness of the analysis, it is necessary to analyze step by step starting from the transaction of the original right holder to determine whether there are any problems in the transaction between the user who finally conducts the transaction and the transferor.

[0072] Through the solution of this embodiment, the primary transfer agreement and the possible secondary transfer agreement are analyzed, avoiding the possible problems of unclear ownership or inconsistent transfer conditions. The careful analysis of the transfer conditions at all levels can ensure that both parties to the transaction enjoy fair rights and interests during the transaction process, and avoid losses to one party due to insufficient information or misunderstanding. Timely discovery and resolution of problems can avoid additional costs caused by later disputes, help regulate the order of the intellectual property transaction market, improve the transparency and fairness of the market, and promote the healthy development of the market.

[0073] In some embodiments, based on the secondary transfer conditions, it is determined whether the secondary transferor in the secondary transfer conditions is the original right holder; if the secondary transferor in the secondary transfer conditions is the original right holder, it is determined whether the transfer agreement involves the consent of the original right holder; if it involves the consent of the original right holder, the restrictive clauses in the secondary transfer agreement are analyzed, and based on the analysis results, it is determined whether the secondary transfer agreement is an exclusive authorization; if the secondary transfer agreement is an exclusive authorization, it is determined that there is a problem with the transfer agreement.

[0074] The original right holder can be considered as the ultimate right holder of the intellectual property rights being traded. The consent portion of the original right holder can be considered as the content and scope of the transaction allowed by the original right holder.

[0075] Exclusive authorization can be considered as the act of the original right holder granting a specific individual the exclusive right to use or exercise the intellectual property rights within a specific scope.

[0076] Specifically, if the secondary transferor is the original right holder, then it is possible to determine whether the secondary transferor is allowed to trade, that is, whether the secondary transfer conditions clearly allow trading and the scope of trading. If the secondary transfer conditions do not involve the above content, it can be considered that the transfer agreement does not involve the consent of the original right holder, and at this time, it can be considered that there is a problem with the transfer agreement. If there is a consent of the original right holder in the above transfer agreement, the restrictive clauses in the secondary transfer agreement can be analyzed to determine whether the secondary transfer agreement is an exclusive authorization. If so, the current transferor has no right to trade, that is, there is a problem with the transfer agreement.

[0077] In the specific implementation method, if it is not an exclusive authorization, the scope of permitted transfer in the secondary transfer agreement can also be determined based on the restrictive clauses, so as to determine whether the transfer content in the current transfer agreement conflicts with the permitted transfer scope based on the analyzed permitted transfer scope. If there is a conflict, it means that there is a problem with the current transfer agreement. If there is no conflict, it can be considered that there is no problem.

[0078] Through the solution of this embodiment, by checking whether the transfer agreement involves the consent of the original right holder, potential risks can be identified in advance to avoid the possibility that the agreement will be invalid due to the transfer without the consent of the original right holder. Further checking the restrictive clauses in the secondary transfer agreement can help determine whether there is an exclusive authorization, which helps prevent the abuse and over-concentration of intellectual property rights, and can prevent the abuse of intellectual property rights or deprivation of the legitimate rights and interests of the original right holder.

[0079] In some embodiments, based on the fact that the transfer agreement involves the consent of the original right holder, the secondary transfer agreement is an exclusive authorization, and the restrictive clauses in the secondary transfer agreement do not explicitly prohibit or restrict sub-licensing, the transfer agreement in the transfer agreement is analyzed to see whether there are unreasonable terms; if the transfer agreement in the transfer agreement contains unreasonable terms, a warning is issued and an agreement modification signal is sent to the user and the transferor respectively; modification feedback is received from the user and the transferor after the modification of the transfer agreement; based on the modification feedback, the transfer agreement in the modification feedback is analyzed to see whether there are unreasonable terms; if the modification result of the transfer agreement contains unreasonable terms, the intellectual property transaction is stopped.

[0080] Specifically, after analyzing the multi-level transfer agreements, it can be determined that the current transaction does not conflict with the previous transfer agreement, but for the current agreement, there may still be some unreasonable terms for users.

[0081] For unreasonable terms in the above transfer agreement, firstly, a warning reminder is given, such as marking the unreasonable terms in red. At the same time, an agreement modification signal is sent to the user and the transferor, so that both parties can adjust the unreasonable terms. After the adjustment is completed, the modification feedback of the transfer agreement made by the user and the transferor is received. The previously marked red part can be analyzed to determine its rationality. If the analysis shows that the red part still contains unreasonable terms, the current transaction is stopped.

[0082] Through the solution provided by this embodiment, the transfer agreement is analyzed to see if there are unreasonable clauses, which can enhance the user's understanding of the clauses that have not been noticed in the transfer agreement, ensure that the user has a clear understanding of each clause in the signed agreement, prevent the transferor from making profits through hidden means, ensure the fairness and legality of the transaction, reduce potential disputes and risks, and avoid huge losses. When unreasonable clauses are found, an agreement modification signal will be sent to the user and the transferor, which helps to reach an agreement clause that satisfies all parties.

[0083] In some embodiments, based on the market valuation of the intellectual property transaction, a preset credit score to be deducted is determined; based on the deducted preset credit score, a new credit score of the transferor is obtained; based on the new credit score of the transferor, the tradable scale of the transferor is determined; if the transferor conducts new intellectual property transactions with other users, the market valuation results of the new intellectual property transactions are analyzed; based on the market valuation results, the transaction scale of the new intellectual property transactions is determined; it is analyzed whether the transaction scale is within the transaction scale of the transferor; if the transaction scale is not within the transaction scale of the transferor, the transferor's new intellectual property transactions are restricted.

[0084] Market valuation can be considered as a value assessment of the rights of intellectual property transactions based on market demand and supply, commercial potential value, and degree of technological innovation.

[0085] The preset credit score can be considered as a credit score to be deducted in advance based on market valuation, degree of violation and infringement, impact, etc. After the credit score of the transferor is deducted according to the preset credit score, the credit score obtained is the new credit score.

[0086] According to the description of the above embodiment, after the transferor is marked as a suspicious person, the transaction authority of the transferor will change to a certain extent, which will cause a change in the size of the transaction. Since the credit score can indicate the credit behavior problem of the transferor, the transaction scale can also be restricted. In a specific implementation method, the tradable scale can be set according to the credit score. When the transferor reaches a certain credit score, the corresponding tradable scale also changes accordingly.

[0087] Specifically, when restricting the transferor's transactions, the market valuation of the intellectual property transaction between the current user and the transferor can be prioritized to determine the impact that may be caused if the intellectual property transaction is illegally transferred by the transferor, and then the preset credit score to be deducted is determined based on the market valuation and the impact, and the credit score of the transferor is deducted accordingly to obtain a new credit score. Based on the new credit score, the current transferor's transaction scale is determined.

[0088] When the transferor generates a new intellectual property transaction with other users, a market valuation is conducted on the new intellectual property transaction, and the transaction scale of the new intellectual property transaction is determined based on the above market valuation results. At this time, the transaction scale of the new intellectual property transaction is matched with the current transferor's tradable scale. If they can be matched, the transaction is allowed; if they cannot be matched, it can be considered that the transaction scale is not within the transferor's transaction scale, and the transferor's new intellectual property transaction is restricted to prevent other users from passively performing illegal operations.

[0089] Through the solution provided by this embodiment, the preset credit score to be deducted is determined based on the market valuation of the intellectual property transaction, which provides an effective risk management mechanism for intellectual property transactions and helps reduce the potential risks caused by inaccurate market valuation or excessive transaction size. The adjustment of the credit score can motivate the transferor to conduct honest transactions, and also provide a reference standard for other traders to evaluate the security of transactions.

[0090] In some embodiments, the reputation score range of the transaction size is determined according to a preset range division rule; the transaction result of the transferor is obtained, the transaction results are screened, and it is determined whether there is a completed transaction; if there is a completed transaction, the recoverable reputation score is determined according to the transaction size of the completed transaction and the number of completed transactions; based on the recoverable reputation score, the revalued reputation score of the transferor at the current moment is determined; it is determined whether the revalued reputation score is within the reputation score range; if the revalued reputation score is not within the reputation score range, the tradable scale of the revalued reputation score is determined according to the preset range division rule.

[0091] The preset range division rule can be considered as a division rule for dividing the tradable scale according to the size of the credit score.

[0092] A completed transaction can be considered as an intellectual property transaction that has been completed by the transferor, which may be a transaction with the current user or a transaction with other users.

[0093] The recoverable credit score can be considered as when the transferor completes the transaction, it means that the transaction party recognizes it. At this time, the transferor's credit score can be adjusted. The adjustable score is called the recoverable credit score. In the specific implementation method, the recoverable credit score can be determined according to the size of the transaction.

[0094] The re-evaluated credit score can be considered as the total credit score after adding the above new credit score to the recoverable credit score.

[0095] Specifically, first determine which credit score range the transaction size of the new intellectual property transaction falls into based on the preset range division rules. Then obtain and filter the transaction results of the transferor to determine whether there are completed transactions after the transaction with the user. If so, obtain the transaction size and transaction number of these completed transactions. Determine the recoverable credit score based on the transaction size and transaction number.

[0096] At this time, the final credit score of the transferor at the current moment, i.e., the re-evaluated credit score, is determined based on the recoverable credit score, and it is determined whether the re-evaluated credit score still belongs to the credit score range determined above. If it does, the current tradable scale of the transferor will not be adjusted. If it does not, the tradable scale to which the re-evaluated credit score belongs can be determined based on the preset range division rules.

[0097] Through the solution provided in this embodiment, the recoverable credit score is determined based on the transaction scale and transaction number of completed transactions. This encourages the transferor to conduct honest transactions. Dynamically adjusting the credit score and transaction scale of the transferor based on the transaction results of the transferor can more accurately reflect the transaction ability and market reputation of the transferor. This dynamic adjustment helps to ensure the fairness and rationality of the transaction, and also provides the market with more accurate transaction information.

[0098] In some embodiments, the user's operation requirements are obtained and analyzed, and the operation content in the operation requirements is determined based on the analysis results; the operation type of the operation content is determined based on the preset operation type; if the operation type is a reporting type, the reported person information and reporting details are determined based on the operation content; based on the reported person information and reporting details, it is determined whether the operation content is an intellectual property transaction that has been stopped at the current moment; if the operation content is an intellectual property transaction that has been stopped at the current moment, the original right holder of the intellectual property is determined based on the secondary transfer agreement analysis results; the reported person information and reporting details are sent to the original right holder, and the original right holder's operation feedback is received; based on the operation feedback, it is determined whether to terminate the agreement.

[0099] Operational requirements can be considered as the needs that users want to express after performing certain operations and analyzing these operations.

[0100] The preset operation type can be considered as the type of operation that the user can perform, such as reporting, exiting, clicking on other pages to jump, etc.

[0101] Operation feedback can be considered as certain specific operations performed by the original right holder.

[0102] Specifically, the user's operation requirements are obtained and analyzed to determine the user's operation content. The operation type of the operation content is determined according to the preset operation type. At this time, if the operation type is a reporting type, the information of the person to be reported by the user, that is, the information of the person to be reported, and the detailed content of the report, that is, the reporting details, can be determined according to the operation content obtained by the above analysis.

[0103] At this time, based on the information of the reported person and the details of the report obtained above, determine whether the operation content is related to the transaction between the current user and the transferor. If relevant, the original right holder of the intellectual property rights can be determined based on the analysis results of the secondary transfer agreement, and the information of the reported person and the details of the report can be sent to the original right holder.

[0104] After receiving the above content, the original right holder can understand that his intellectual property rights may be harmed by some operations of the current transferor, and at this time, he can choose to terminate the agreement with the above transferor, or perform other operations to restrict the transfer of the above transferor. When the original right holder performs the operation, the operation feedback will be generated. At this time, the operation feedback can be analyzed to determine whether to terminate the agreement. If the original right holder requests to terminate the agreement, the above transferor can be directly informed and the agreement can be terminated.

[0105] The solution provided by this embodiment can quickly respond to and handle reports made by users who discover improper behavior in intellectual property transactions. When a report is received and confirmed to involve a stopped intellectual property transaction, the original right holder of the intellectual property is accurately determined based on the analysis results of the secondary transfer agreement, thereby ensuring the correctness of the rights and interests notification, helping the original right holder to understand the situation in a timely manner and make corresponding handling, and effectively safeguarding the rights and interests of the original right holder. Allowing the original right holder to participate in the processing process and decide whether to terminate the agreement based on his feedback increases the participation and decision-making power of the original right holder, making the processing results more fair and reasonable.

[0106] In some embodiments, if the user is unable to find intellectual property transaction information, a demand feedback signal is sent to the user; based on the demand feedback results submitted by the user, key demand information in the demand feedback results is analyzed and extracted; based on the key demand information, relevant intellectual property is obtained, and the relevant intellectual property is sent to the user; the user's feedback results on the relevant intellectual property are obtained; based on the feedback results, the specific relevant intellectual property selected by the user is determined; based on the specific relevant intellectual property, the part of the specific relevant intellectual property containing the key demand information is analyzed to obtain the key information analysis results; based on the key information analysis results, it is determined whether the part of the specific relevant intellectual property containing the key demand information is allowed to be traded; if the transaction is allowed, a selection signal is sent to the user; the user's selection result is obtained; based on the selection result, it is determined whether the user conducts the transaction.

[0107] The demand feedback signal can be considered as a signal that requires the user to provide feedback on the demand for intellectual property rights. If the user provides feedback on the demand for intellectual property rights, a corresponding demand feedback result will be generated.

[0108] Key requirement information can be considered as information related to the intellectual property that the user wants.

[0109] Relevant intellectual property rights can be considered as intellectual property rights that are consistent with or partially consistent with key demand information.

[0110] Specifically, if the user does not conduct a transaction after searching or the system recommends according to the user's needs, it can be considered that the user has not found the intellectual property transaction information that meets his needs. At this time, a demand feedback signal can be sent to the user, and the user actively fills in his needs, thereby obtaining a demand feedback result.

[0111] Then, the demand feedback result is analyzed to extract the key demand information, thereby obtaining the relevant intellectual property rights and sending them to the user for selection. At this time, the user may select from the relevant intellectual property rights. If the user selects some relevant intellectual property rights, the corresponding feedback result will be generated. At this time, the specific relevant intellectual property rights are determined based on the corresponding feedback results. This specific relevant intellectual property right can be considered as the intellectual property rights that meet the user's needs and the user is relatively satisfied with.

[0112] Subsequently, the specific relevant intellectual property is analyzed to determine which parts of the design contain key demand information, and the corresponding parts are analyzed again to obtain key information analysis results, thereby determining whether the part of the specific relevant intellectual property that contains key demand information is allowed to be traded.

[0113] If the transaction is allowed, a selection signal can be sent to the user to remind the user that the intellectual property transaction can be carried out. At the same time, the selection result of the user is obtained, so as to determine whether the user conducts the transaction according to the selection result.

[0114] Through the solution provided by this embodiment, when the user fails to find intellectual property transaction information, the demand feedback signal can be sent to the user in a timely manner, and personalized intellectual property recommendations can be provided based on the demand feedback results submitted by the user, thereby improving the user experience. By analyzing and extracting key demand information in the user demand feedback results, the relevant intellectual property rights are accurately matched to the user, reducing the user's search and screening time and improving transaction efficiency.

[0115] Figure 3 A schematic diagram of a user management system for an intellectual property transaction platform provided in one embodiment of the present application is shown in FIG. Figure 3 As shown, the intellectual property rights transaction platform user management system 300 of this embodiment includes: a protocol acquisition module 301 , a protocol analysis module 302 , a problem solving module 303 , and a transaction restriction module 304 .

[0116] The agreement acquisition module 301 acquires the intellectual property transaction transfer agreement between the user and the transferor; The protocol analysis module 302 analyzes the transfer protocol to determine whether there are any problems with the transfer protocol; The problem solving module 303 warns the user or stops the intellectual property transaction if there is a problem; The transaction restriction module 304 determines the transferor as a suspicious person, tracks the transaction behavior of the transferor in real time, obtains the transaction scale of the transaction behavior and the transaction authority of the suspicious person, and imposes transaction scale restrictions on the transferor based on the transaction authority and the transaction scale.

[0117] Optionally, the intellectual property transaction platform user management system 300 further includes a protocol generation module 305, which is used to: Respectively obtain basic information of the user and the transferor; obtain communication records, and extract key information involved in the communication records; generate a transfer agreement by combining the basic information, the key information and a preset transfer agreement template; send the transfer agreement to the devices of the user and the transferor respectively, and receive confirmation feedback from the user and the transferor; confirm whether the transfer agreement is correct based on the confirmation feedback; if the transfer agreement is confirmed to be correct, submit the transfer agreement.

[0118] Optionally, the protocol analysis module 302 is specifically used to: Analyze the transfer agreement between the user and the transferor to obtain a primary transfer agreement analysis result; the primary transfer agreement analysis result includes but is not limited to primary transfer conditions; determine whether the transferor is the original right holder based on the primary transfer agreement analysis result; if the transferor is not the original right holder, obtain a secondary transfer agreement for the intellectual property rights in the transfer agreement corresponding to the transferor; analyze the content of the secondary transfer agreement to obtain a secondary transfer agreement analysis result; the secondary transfer agreement analysis result includes but is not limited to secondary transfer conditions; determine whether there is a problem between the primary transfer conditions and the secondary transfer conditions based on the primary transfer conditions and the secondary transfer conditions; if there is no problem between the primary transfer conditions and the secondary transfer conditions, determine that there is no problem with the transfer agreement.

[0119] Optionally, the protocol analysis module 302 is specifically used to: Based on the secondary transfer conditions, determine whether the secondary transferor in the secondary transfer conditions is the original right holder; if the secondary transferor in the secondary transfer conditions is the original right holder, determine whether the transfer agreement involves the consent of the original right holder; if it involves the consent of the original right holder, analyze the restrictive clauses in the secondary transfer agreement, and based on the analysis results, determine whether the secondary transfer agreement is an exclusive authorization; if the secondary transfer agreement is an exclusive authorization, determine that there is a problem with the transfer agreement.

[0120] Optionally, the problem solving module 303 is specifically used to: Based on the fact that the transfer agreement involves the consent of the original right holder, the secondary transfer agreement is an exclusive authorization, and the restrictive clauses in the secondary transfer agreement do not explicitly prohibit or restrict sub-authorization, analyze whether there are unreasonable terms in the transfer agreement; if there are unreasonable terms in the transfer agreement, issue a warning and send an agreement modification signal to the user and the transferor respectively; receive modification feedback from the user and the transferor after modifying the transfer agreement; based on the modification feedback, analyze whether there are unreasonable terms in the transfer agreement in the modification feedback; if there are unreasonable terms in the modification result of the transfer agreement, stop the intellectual property transaction.

[0121] Optionally, the transaction restriction module 304 is specifically configured to: Determine the preset credit score to be deducted based on the market valuation of the intellectual property transaction; obtain the new credit score of the transferor based on the deducted preset credit score; determine the tradable scale of the transferor based on the new credit score of the transferor; if the transferor conducts new intellectual property transactions with other users, analyze the market valuation of the new intellectual property transaction; determine the transaction scale of the new intellectual property transaction based on the market valuation results; analyze whether the transaction scale is within the transaction scale of the transferor; if the transaction scale is not within the transaction scale of the transferor, restrict the transferor's new intellectual property transaction.

[0122] Optionally, the intellectual property transaction platform user management system 300 further includes a scale assessment module 306 for: Determine the credit score range for the transaction size based on preset range division rules; obtain the transaction result of the transferor, filter the transaction result, and determine whether there is a completed transaction; if there is a completed transaction, determine the recoverable credit score based on the transaction size of the completed transaction and the number of transactions of the completed transaction; determine the re-evaluated credit score of the transferor at the current moment based on the recoverable credit score; determine whether the re-evaluated credit score is within the credit score range; if the re-evaluated credit score is not within the credit score range, determine the tradable scale of the re-evaluated credit score based on the preset range division rules.

[0123] Optionally, the intellectual property rights trading platform user management system 300 further includes a report analysis module 307, which is used to: Obtain and analyze the user's operation requirements, and determine the operation content in the operation requirements based on the analysis results; determine the operation type of the operation content based on the preset operation type; if the operation type is a reporting type, determine the reported person information and reporting details based on the operation content; determine whether the operation content is the intellectual property transaction that has been stopped at the current moment based on the reported person information and the reporting details; if the operation content is the intellectual property transaction that has been stopped at the current moment, determine the original right holder of the intellectual property based on the analysis results of the secondary transfer agreement; send the reported person information and the reporting details to the original right holder, and receive the operation feedback from the original right holder; determine whether to terminate the agreement based on the operation feedback.

[0124] Optionally, the intellectual property transaction platform user management system 300 further includes a transaction analysis module 308, which is used to: If the user is unable to find the intellectual property transaction information, a demand feedback signal is sent to the user; based on the demand feedback results submitted by the user, key demand information in the demand feedback results is analyzed and extracted; based on the key demand information, relevant intellectual property is obtained, and the relevant intellectual property is sent to the user; feedback results from the user on the relevant intellectual property are obtained; based on the feedback results, the specific relevant intellectual property selected by the user is determined; based on the specific relevant intellectual property, the part of the specific relevant intellectual property containing the key demand information is analyzed to obtain key information analysis results; based on the key information analysis results, it is determined whether the part of the specific relevant intellectual property containing the key demand information is allowed to be traded; if the transaction is allowed, a selection signal is sent to the user; the selection result of the user is obtained; based on the selection result, it is determined whether the user conducts the transaction.

[0125] The system of this embodiment can be used to execute the method of any of the above embodiments. The implementation principles and technical effects are similar and will not be described in detail here.

Claims

1. A method for managing users of an intellectual property trading platform, characterized in that: include: Obtain the intellectual property transaction transfer agreement between the user and the transferor; Analyze the transfer agreement to determine whether there are any problems with the transfer agreement; If there is a problem, the user will be warned or the intellectual property transaction will be stopped; The transferor is identified as a suspicious person, and the transaction behavior of the transferor is tracked in real time to obtain the transaction scale of the transaction behavior and the transaction authority of the suspicious person. According to the transaction authority and the transaction scale, the transaction scale of the transferor is restricted.

2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that Before obtaining the intellectual property transaction transfer agreement between the user and the transferor, it includes: Obtaining basic information of the user and the transferor respectively; Obtaining communication records, and extracting key information involved in the communication records; Generate a transfer agreement by combining the basic information, the key information and a preset transfer agreement template; Sending the transfer agreement to the devices of the user and the transferor respectively, and receiving confirmation feedback from the user and the transferor; According to the confirmation feedback, confirm whether the transfer agreement is correct; If the transfer agreement is confirmed to be correct, submit the transfer agreement.

3. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that: The analyzing the transfer agreement to determine whether there are any problems with the transfer agreement includes: Analyze the transfer agreement between the user and the transferor to obtain a first-level transfer agreement analysis result; the first-level transfer agreement analysis result includes but is not limited to first-level transfer conditions; Determine whether the transferor is the original right holder based on the analysis results of the primary transfer agreement; If the transferor is not the original right holder, obtain the secondary transfer agreement of the intellectual property rights in the transfer agreement corresponding to the transferor; Analyze the content of the secondary transfer agreement to obtain the secondary transfer agreement analysis result; the secondary transfer agreement analysis result includes but is not limited to the secondary transfer conditions; Determine whether there is a problem between the first-level transfer condition and the second-level transfer condition according to the first-level transfer condition and the second-level transfer condition; If there is no problem between the primary transfer conditions and the secondary transfer conditions, it is determined that there is no problem with the transfer agreement.

4. The method according to claim 3, characterized in that Determining whether there is a problem between the primary transfer condition and the secondary transfer condition according to the primary transfer condition and the secondary transfer condition includes: According to the secondary transfer conditions, determining whether the secondary transferor in the secondary transfer conditions is the original right holder; If the secondary transferor in the secondary transfer conditions is the original right holder, determine whether the transfer agreement involves the consent of the original right holder; If the consent of the original right holder is involved, the restrictive clauses in the secondary transfer agreement are analyzed, and based on the analysis results, whether the secondary transfer agreement is an exclusive authorization is determined; If the secondary transfer agreement is an exclusive authorization, it is determined that there is a problem with the transfer agreement.

5. The method according to claim 4, characterized in that If there is a problem, the user will be warned or the intellectual property transaction will be stopped, including: Based on the fact that the transfer agreement involves the consent of the original right holder, the secondary transfer agreement is an exclusive authorization, and the restriction clauses in the secondary transfer agreement do not clearly prohibit or restrict sub-authorization, analyze whether there are unreasonable clauses in the transfer agreement; If there are unreasonable terms in the transfer agreement, a warning is issued and a signal is sent to the user and the transferor to modify the transfer agreement; receiving modification feedback from the user and the transferor after the transfer agreement has been modified; Based on the modification feedback, analyzing whether there are unreasonable terms in the transfer agreement in the modification feedback; If the modification of the transfer agreement contains unreasonable terms, the intellectual property transaction will be terminated.

6. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that The limiting of the transaction scale of the transferor according to the transaction authority and the transaction scale includes: Determining a preset reputation score to be deducted based on the market valuation of the intellectual property transaction; Obtaining a new credit score of the transferor according to the deducted preset credit score; Determine the transaction size of the transferor according to the new credit score of the transferor; If the transferor conducts a new intellectual property transaction with other users, analyzing the market valuation of the new intellectual property transaction; Determine the transaction size of the new intellectual property transaction based on the market valuation results; Analyze whether the transaction size is within the transferor's transaction size; If the transaction scale is not within the transaction scale of the transferor, restrict the transferor's transaction of the new intellectual property rights.

7. The method according to claim 5, characterized in that Also includes: Determine the credit score range for the transaction size according to the preset range division rules; Obtaining the transaction results of the transferor, screening the transaction results, and determining whether there is a completed transaction; If there is a completed transaction, the recoverable credit score is determined based on the transaction size of the completed transaction and the number of transactions of the completed transaction; Determining the re-evaluated credit score of the transferor at the current moment according to the recoverable credit score; Determining whether the re-evaluated credit score is within the credit score range; If the re-evaluated credit score is not within the credit score range, the tradable scale of the re-evaluated credit score is determined according to a preset range division rule.

8. The method according to claim 3, characterized in that After the user is warned or the intellectual property transaction is stopped, the method further includes: Obtaining and analyzing the operation requirements of the user, and determining the operation content in the operation requirements according to the analysis results; Determine the operation type of the operation content according to the preset operation type; If the operation type is a reporting type, then the reported person information and reporting details are determined according to the operation content; Determine, based on the reported person information and the reporting details, whether the operation content is the intellectual property transaction that has been stopped at the current moment; If the operation content is the intellectual property transaction that has been stopped at the current moment, the original right holder of the intellectual property is determined according to the analysis result of the secondary transfer agreement; Send the reported person information and the reporting details to the original right holder, and receive the operation feedback from the original right holder; Determine whether to terminate the agreement based on the operation feedback.

9. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that: The method further comprises: If the user is unable to find the intellectual property transaction information, sending a demand feedback signal to the user; Analyze and extract key demand information from the demand feedback results submitted by the user; Acquire relevant intellectual property rights according to the key demand information, and send the relevant intellectual property rights to the user; Obtaining feedback from the user regarding the relevant intellectual property rights; Determine the specific relevant intellectual property rights selected by the user according to the feedback result; According to the specific relevant intellectual property rights, analyzing the part of the specific relevant intellectual property rights that contains the key demand information to obtain key information analysis results; Determine, based on the key information analysis results, whether the portion of the specific relevant intellectual property rights containing the key demand information is allowed to be traded; If the transaction is allowed, sending a selection signal to the user; Obtaining the selection result of the user; According to the selection result, it is determined whether the user conducts the transaction.

10. A user management system for an intellectual property trading platform, characterized in that: include: The agreement acquisition module acquires the intellectual property transaction transfer agreement between the user and the transferor; A protocol analysis module, analyzing the transfer agreement to determine whether there are any problems with the transfer agreement; A problem solving module, which warns the user or stops the intellectual property transaction if there is a problem; The transaction restriction module determines the transferor as a suspicious person, tracks the transaction behavior of the transferor in real time, obtains the transaction scale of the transaction behavior and the transaction authority of the suspicious person, and imposes transaction scale restrictions on the transferor based on the transaction authority and the transaction scale.

Images