A method and device for evaluating interior decoration of medical departments

Abstract

The present disclosure provides a method and device for evaluating interior decoration of a medical department, the method comprising: obtaining a project rendering and a completed construction drawing of the medical department to be evaluated; inputting the project rendering and the completed construction drawing into an evaluation model for evaluation, respectively, to obtain a first evaluation result corresponding to the project rendering and a second evaluation result corresponding to the completed construction drawing; based on the first evaluation result and the second evaluation result, obtaining a final evaluation result corresponding to the medical department to be evaluated, the final evaluation result at least including whether the decoration of the medical department to be evaluated meets the decoration standards. The present disclosure formulates specific evaluation criteria with the help of an evaluation model, adopts an intelligent evaluation method for the interior decoration renderings or as-built drawings of the medical department, obtains objective and accurate evaluation results, and provides useful suggestions for the optimization and reconstruction of the interior decoration of the medical department, so as to improve the service satisfaction of the medical department.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present disclosure relates to the field of interior decoration, and more particularly, to a method and device for evaluating interior decoration of medical departments. Background Art

[0002] The interior decoration of specialized medical purification engineering departments, including intensive care units (ICUs), neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), emergency intensive care units (EICUs), anesthesia recovery rooms, operating rooms, and other treatment rooms, as well as supporting functional rooms, must comply with specific regulations and industry standards. The existing evaluation method for medical department interior decoration relies on manual evaluation based on set rules. This evaluation method is not only inefficient but also subject to human factors, resulting in less objective and accurate evaluation results. Summary of the Invention

[0003] The present disclosure addresses the technical problems existing in the prior art and provides a method and device for evaluating interior decoration of medical departments, thereby realizing a scientific evaluation method for interior decoration.

[0004] According to a first aspect of the present disclosure, a method for evaluating interior decoration of a medical department is provided, comprising: S1, obtaining a project rendering and a constructed scene drawing of the medical department to be evaluated; S2, inputting the project rendering into an evaluation model for evaluation to obtain a first evaluation result corresponding to the project rendering, and inputting the constructed scene drawing into the evaluation model to obtain a second evaluation result corresponding to the constructed scene drawing, wherein the first evaluation result at least includes whether the decoration design of the medical department to be evaluated meets the design standards, and the second evaluation result at least includes whether the decoration construction of the medical department to be evaluated meets the construction process standards; and S3, obtaining a final evaluation result corresponding to the medical department to be evaluated based on the first evaluation result and the second evaluation result, wherein the final evaluation result at least includes whether the decoration of the medical department to be evaluated meets the decoration standards.

[0005] According to a second aspect of the present disclosure, there is provided an interior decoration evaluation device for a medical department, comprising: a data acquisition module for acquiring a project rendering and a constructed real-life picture of a medical department to be evaluated; an evaluation module for inputting the project rendering into an evaluation model for evaluation to obtain a first evaluation result corresponding to the project rendering, and inputting the constructed real-life picture into the evaluation model to obtain a second evaluation result corresponding to the constructed real-life picture, wherein the first evaluation result at least includes whether the decoration design of the medical department to be evaluated meets the design standards, and the second evaluation result at least includes whether the decoration construction of the medical department to be evaluated meets the construction process standards; and an evaluation result confirmation module for obtaining a final evaluation result corresponding to the medical department to be evaluated based on the first evaluation result and the second evaluation result, wherein the final evaluation result at least includes whether the decoration of the medical department to be evaluated meets the decoration standards.

[0006] According to a third aspect of the present disclosure, an electronic device is provided, including a memory and a processor, wherein the processor is configured to implement the steps of an interior decoration evaluation method for a medical department when executing a computer management program stored in the memory.

[0007] According to a fourth aspect of the present disclosure, a computer-readable storage medium is provided, on which a computer management program is stored. When the computer management program is executed by a processor, the steps of the interior decoration evaluation method for a medical department are implemented.

[0008] The present disclosure provides a method and device for evaluating interior decoration of medical departments. The method evaluates project renderings and actual construction drawings during the interior decoration process based on an evaluation model, obtains a first evaluation result and a second evaluation result, respectively, and jointly determines the final evaluation result corresponding to the medical department to be evaluated based on the first evaluation result and the second evaluation result. This method can realize a scientific evaluation of the decoration of the medical department, and the evaluation result is more accurate. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0009] The accompanying drawings are provided to facilitate a better understanding of the present invention and do not constitute a limitation of the present disclosure.

[0010] Figure 1 is a flow chart of a method for evaluating interior decoration of a medical department according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;

[0011] Figure 2 A schematic diagram of a process for evaluating a project rendering according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;

[0012] Figure 3 A schematic diagram of a process for evaluating a constructed real scene image according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;

[0013] Figure 4Schematic diagram of a block diagram of an interior decoration evaluation device for a medical department according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;

[0014] Figure 5 is a schematic diagram of the hardware structure of an electronic device according to an embodiment of the present disclosure; and

[0015] Figure 6 Schematic diagram of the hardware structure of a computer-readable storage medium according to an embodiment of the present disclosure. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0016] In order to make the purpose, technical solutions and advantages of the embodiments of the present disclosure clearer, the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present disclosure will be clearly and completely described below in conjunction with the drawings in the embodiments of the present disclosure. Obviously, the described embodiments are part of the embodiments of the present disclosure, not all of the embodiments. Based on the embodiments in the present disclosure, all other embodiments obtained by ordinary technicians in this field without making creative work are within the scope of protection of the present disclosure. In addition, the technical features in the various embodiments or single embodiments provided by the present disclosure can be arbitrarily combined with each other to form a feasible technical solution. This combination is not restricted by the sequence of steps and / or structural composition mode, but must be based on the ability of ordinary technicians in this field to implement it. When the combination of technical solutions is mutually contradictory or cannot be implemented, it should be deemed that such a combination of technical solutions does not exist and is not within the scope of protection required by the present disclosure.

[0017] Figure 1 This is a flow chart of a method for evaluating interior decoration of medical departments provided by the present disclosure. Figure 1 As shown, the method includes: steps S1 to S3.

[0018] In operation S1, the project renderings and the actual construction pictures of the medical department to be evaluated are obtained.

[0019] In operation S2, the project renderings are input into the evaluation model for evaluation, resulting in a first evaluation result corresponding to the project renderings. The completed construction images are also input into the evaluation model, resulting in a second evaluation result corresponding to the completed construction images. The first evaluation result includes at least whether the decoration design of the evaluated medical department meets the design standards, and the second evaluation result includes at least whether the decoration construction of the evaluated medical department meets the construction process standards.

[0020] In operation S3, a final evaluation result corresponding to the medical department to be evaluated is obtained based on the first evaluation result and the second evaluation result, wherein the final evaluation result at least includes whether the decoration of the medical department to be evaluated meets the decoration standards.

[0021] It is understood that the process of decorating a medical department includes both the design and renovation phases. First, design drawings are drawn, and then construction and renovation are carried out based on these drawings. The design drawings from the design phase are called project renderings, and the actual pictures of the decoration after renovation are called completed pictures. After the renovation is completed, the project renderings of the medical department to be evaluated, both during the design phase and after the renovation and construction, can be obtained.

[0022] In the disclosed embodiment, the project renderings and the actual scenes that have been constructed are respectively input into the evaluation model. Based on the evaluation model, the project renderings are evaluated to see whether they meet the design standards, including whether the design rules of the project renderings are reasonable and whether the decorative effects meet the design standards. In addition, based on the evaluation model, it is evaluated whether the actual scenes that have been constructed meet the construction process standards.

[0023] If the project renderings meet the design standards and the completed images also meet the construction process standards, the final evaluation result for the medical department to be evaluated is "Meet the Decoration Standards." If the project renderings do not meet the design standards, or the completed images do not meet the construction process standards, the final evaluation result for the medical department to be evaluated is "Not Meet the Decoration Standards."

[0024] Project renderings include multiple design drawings from the design phase, such as cover art, catalogs, design concepts, color palettes, CAD plans, and renderings. Construction site images include images of various finishing materials and products during the construction process, such as tiles, stone, carpets, floor coverings, automatic doors, and handwash sinks.

[0025] See also Figure 2 In step S2, the project rendering is input into the evaluation model for evaluation to obtain a first evaluation result corresponding to the project rendering, including steps S21 to S23.

[0026] In operation S21 , a plurality of design drawings are input into an evaluation model, and a plurality of features to be evaluated corresponding to each design drawing are obtained based on the evaluation model.

[0027] In operation S22 , the multiple features to be evaluated of each design drawing are evaluated one by one, and an evaluation result corresponding to each design drawing is obtained according to the evaluation results of the multiple features to be evaluated.

[0028] In operation S23 , a first evaluation result corresponding to the project rendering is obtained according to the evaluation result corresponding to each design drawing.

[0029] In an embodiment of the present disclosure, a project rendering includes multiple design drawings from the design phase. The evaluation process for the project rendering can include inputting each design drawing into an evaluation model, extracting multiple features from each design drawing, evaluating each feature, and determining an evaluation result for each design drawing based on the evaluation results of the multiple features. Furthermore, based on the evaluation results for each design drawing, an evaluation result for the project rendering is determined, recorded as a first evaluation result, indicating whether the project rendering meets the design standards.

[0030] According to an embodiment of the present disclosure, in step S21, multiple design drawings are input into the evaluation model, and multiple features to be evaluated corresponding to each design drawing are obtained based on the evaluation model, specifically including: inputting each design drawing into the evaluation model, and the evaluation model identifies the product information of each product in each design drawing based on image recognition technology or big data comparison methods.

[0031] According to an embodiment of the present disclosure, in step S22, multiple features to be evaluated of each design drawing are evaluated one by one, and an evaluation result corresponding to each design drawing is obtained based on the evaluation results of the multiple features to be evaluated, specifically including: comparing the product information of each product with the preset product recommendation information, and determining the evaluation result of each product based on the comparison result of each product, the evaluation result of each product including whether the design of the product meets the design standards; and determining the evaluation result of each design drawing based on the evaluation result of each product.

[0032] It is understood that each design drawing is input into the evaluation model, which then uses image recognition to identify product information for each product in each design drawing. The products mentioned in this disclosure may include various medical devices and medical physical environment facilities. Medical devices may include, for example, medical displays and diagnostic equipment; medical physical environment facilities may include office products such as sofas, desks, chairs, hand wash basins, lighting fixtures, and other appliances.

[0033] In the disclosed embodiment, each product's product information is compared with pre-set product recommendation information. By comparing the deviation between each product's product information and the recommended product information, an evaluation result for each product is determined. The evaluation result for each product primarily includes whether the product's design meets the design standards. Based on the evaluation results for each product, the evaluation results for each design drawing are determined.

[0034] For example, the product information of each product includes at least product name, product color, and product style.

[0035] According to an embodiment of the present disclosure, the product information of each product is compared with the preset product recommendation information, and the evaluation result of each product is determined based on the comparison result of each product, including: according to the product name, finding the corresponding product and product recommendation information from the preset library, the product recommendation information includes the product recommended color, product recommended style and product recommended size; comparing the extracted product color, product style and product size with the product recommended color, product recommended style and product recommended size; determining the design grade of each product based on the comparison result; and determining whether the design of each product meets the design standards based on the design grade of each product.

[0036] It is understood that each product's product information includes at least multiple product information items, such as product name, product color, and product style. Based on the product name, the corresponding product and corresponding product recommendation information are found in the preset library. The preset library stores each product and product recommendation information, including recommended product color, recommended product style, and recommended product size.

[0037] Compare each product information item to the corresponding recommended product information item. For example, compare the product color, product style, and product size to the recommended color, product style, and product size. Based on the comparison results for each product information item, determine the design grade for each product information item. Then, calculate the design grade for each product based on the design grade of each product information item.

[0038] According to the design level of each product, determine whether the design of each product meets the design standards.

[0039] According to an embodiment of the present disclosure, the design level of each product is determined based on the comparison results, including: respectively calculating the deviation values ​​between the product color and the product recommended color, the product style and the product recommended style, and the product size and the product recommended size to obtain multiple deviation values; and determining the design level based on the multiple deviation values.

[0040] According to an embodiment of the present disclosure, whether the design of each product meets the design standards is determined based on the design level of each product, including: if the design level of the product is greater than or equal to the preset level, the evaluation result of the product meets the design standards; otherwise, the evaluation result of the product does not meet the design standards.

[0041] It is understandable that when determining the design grade of each product, the deviation value between the product color and the product recommended color is calculated, the deviation value between the product style and the product recommended style is calculated, and the deviation value between the product size and the product recommended size is calculated.

[0042] When calculating the deviation value between the product color and the recommended product color, and calculating the deviation value between the product style and the recommended product style, the color of the designed product and the recommended product color, and the style of the designed product and the recommended product style can be digitized respectively. After digitization, the deviation value between the product color and the recommended product color, and the deviation value between the product style and the recommended product style are calculated.

[0043] According to the size of the deviation value, the corresponding level can be determined. Specifically, the correspondence between the deviation interval and the level can be set. For example, the design level can be set as high, ultimate and low, or it can be designed as more levels. Different levels can be assigned numerical values. The closer the deviation value between the designed product information and the recommended product information is, the higher the design level of the product; conversely, the farther the deviation value between the designed product information and the recommended product information is, the lower the design level of the product. The design level of the product color can be determined based on the deviation interval into which the deviation value between the product color and the recommended product color falls. Similarly, the design level of the product style can be determined based on the interval range into which the deviation value between the product style and the recommended product style falls. For product size, if the size itself is a numerical value, the deviation value between the designed product size and the recommended product size is directly calculated, and the design level of the product size is determined based on the deviation interval into which the size deviation value falls.

[0044] Of course, the above only describes the method for determining the design level of product color, product style and product size. Product information items are not limited to color, style and size. Based on the same method, the design level of each information item of each product is determined.

[0045] According to the grades of multiple information items of each product, the design grade of the corresponding product is calculated by weighted summation.

[0046] If the design level of the product is greater than or equal to the preset level, the evaluation result of the product meets the design standards; otherwise, the evaluation result of the product does not meet the design standards.

[0047] Among them, the evaluation results of each design drawing are determined based on the evaluation results of each product, including: if the designs of all products in the design drawing meet the design standards, the evaluation results of the design drawing are in compliance with the design standards; otherwise, the design drawing does not meet the design standards, and the product information that does not meet the design standards is recorded.

[0048] It is understood that the above steps obtain the evaluation results of each product in the design drawing. When all products in the design drawing meet the design standards, the design drawing meets the design standards. If one or more products do not meet the design standards, the corresponding design drawing does not meet the design standards. When the design drawing does not meet the design standards, the information of the product that does not meet the design standards is recorded to facilitate subsequent improvement of the products that do not meet the design standards.

[0049] The evaluation results of the project renderings are determined based on the evaluation results of each design drawing. If all design drawings in the project renderings meet the design standards, the design of the project renderings is determined to meet the design standards; otherwise, the design of the project renderings does not meet the design standards. If the design of the project renderings does not meet the design standards, the design drawings that do not meet the design standards are recorded, along with the product information in the design drawings that do not meet the design standards, thus completing the evaluation of the project renderings.

[0050] For evaluation of the constructed scenes, see Figure 3 In S2, the constructed real scene picture is input into the evaluation model to obtain a second evaluation result corresponding to the constructed real scene picture, including steps S21' to S24'.

[0051] In operation S21 ′, the constructed real scene image is input into the evaluation model, and multiple construction parameters and product information of each product after construction in the constructed real scene image are extracted based on image recognition.

[0052] In operation S22 ′, each construction parameter is compared with a corresponding preset parameter threshold, and the product information of each product after construction is compared with the corresponding product recommendation information of each product.

[0053] In operation S23', the construction level of each construction parameter and the construction level of each product are obtained according to the comparison result.

[0054] In operation S24', based on the construction level of each construction parameter and the construction level of each product, an evaluation result for each construction parameter and each product is determined. The evaluation result for each construction parameter includes whether each construction parameter meets the construction process standards, and the evaluation result for each product includes whether the decoration of each product meets the construction process standards. If each construction parameter and the decoration of each product meet the construction process standards, then the constructed real scene image meets the construction process standards. Otherwise, the constructed real scene image does not meet the construction process standards.

[0055] It is understandable that when evaluating the actual construction scene pictures, the actual construction scene pictures can be input into the evaluation model. The evaluation model identifies multiple construction parameters and product information of each product after construction from the actual construction scene pictures based on image recognition technology.

[0056] Each construction parameter is then compared with a preset parameter threshold to obtain a comparison result for each construction parameter. The product information for each product after construction is then compared with the corresponding product recommendation information to obtain a comparison result for each product information. Based on the comparison results for each construction parameter, a construction grade for each construction parameter is determined. Based on the comparison results for each product, a construction grade for each product is determined.

[0057] Based on the construction grade of each construction parameter and each product, the evaluation results for each construction parameter and each product are determined. Specifically, when the construction grade of a construction parameter is greater than or equal to the set grade, the construction parameter meets the construction process standards; otherwise, the construction parameter does not meet the construction process standards. Similarly, when the construction grade of a product is greater than the set grade, the product's decoration meets the construction process standards; otherwise, the product's decoration does not meet the construction process standards.

[0058] Then, if every construction parameter and every product decoration meets the construction process standards, then the actual scene pictures after construction meet the construction process standards; otherwise, the actual scene pictures after construction do not meet the construction process standards.

[0059] Among them, multiple construction parameters include the verticality, neatness, equality of construction and product information of each product after construction. The construction level of each construction parameter and the construction level of each product are obtained according to the comparison results, including: respectively calculating the distance between the verticality, neatness and equality of construction and the corresponding preset parameter thresholds, and determining the construction level of each construction parameter according to the distance; and calculating the deviation value between the product information of each product and the corresponding product recommendation information of each product, and determining the construction level of each product according to the deviation value.

[0060] In the embodiment of the present disclosure, the evaluation results of each construction parameter and each product are determined based on the construction level of each construction parameter and the construction level of each product, including: if the construction level of the construction parameter is greater than or equal to the preset level, the construction parameter meets the construction process standards; otherwise, the construction parameter does not meet the construction process standards; if the construction level of the product is greater than or equal to the preset level, the decoration of the product meets the construction process standards; otherwise, the decoration of the product does not meet the construction process standards.

[0061] It can be understood that multiple construction parameters include the verticality, neatness, and equality of the construction. The deviation values ​​between the verticality, neatness, and equality of the construction and the corresponding preset parameter thresholds are calculated respectively, and the construction grade of each construction parameter is determined according to the deviation interval in which the deviation value falls. The correspondence between the deviation interval between each construction parameter and the preset parameter threshold and the construction grade is pre-set.

[0062] And calculate the deviation value between the product information of each product after construction and the product recommended information, and determine the construction level of each product according to the deviation range in which the deviation value falls. Among them, the specific determination of the construction level of each product after construction can refer to the design level of each product in the design stage.

[0063] For example, the specific evaluation process for tiles after construction is: compare the size, thickness, and texture of the tiles after actual construction with the size, thickness, and texture of the tiles in the preset library to obtain the construction grade of the tiles. Based on the construction grade of the tiles, it can be determined whether the construction of the tiles meets the construction requirements.

[0064] For example, the specific evaluation process for a carpet after construction is as follows: the actual pile height, weight, and adhesive backing of the carpet after construction are compared with the pile height, weight, and adhesive backing of the carpet in the preset library in the model to obtain the quality grade corresponding to the carpet. Based on the carpet's quality grade, project classification, overall design style, and technique, it can be determined whether the carpet's construction meets the construction requirements.

[0065] For example, the specific evaluation process for floor glue after construction is: compare the size, pattern and color of the actual floor glue after construction with the size, pattern and color of the floor glue in the preset library in the model to obtain the construction grade corresponding to the floor glue. According to the construction grade of the floor glue, it can be judged whether the construction of the floor glue meets the construction requirements.

[0066] When the construction level of the construction parameter is greater than or equal to the set level, the construction parameter meets the construction process standard. Otherwise, the construction parameter does not meet the construction process standard.

[0067] If all construction parameters extracted from the completed image meet the construction process standards and the decoration of each product after construction also meets the construction parameters, the evaluation result of the completed image is considered to meet the decoration standards. Otherwise, the evaluation result of the completed image is considered to not meet the decoration standards. The evaluation result of the completed image is called the second evaluation result.

[0068] Among them, in step S3, the final evaluation result corresponding to the medical department to be evaluated is obtained based on the first evaluation result and the second evaluation result, including: if the first evaluation result is in compliance with the design standards and the second evaluation result is in compliance with the construction process standards, the final evaluation result corresponding to the medical department to be evaluated is determined to be in compliance with the decoration standards; otherwise, the final evaluation result corresponding to the medical department to be evaluated is not in compliance with the decoration standards.

[0069] It is understandable that the above S2 obtains a first evaluation result of the project rendering and a second evaluation result of the constructed scene based on the evaluation model, and determines the final evaluation result of the decoration of the hospital department to be evaluated based on the two evaluation results.

[0070] Specifically, the decoration of the hospital department to be evaluated will meet the decoration standards only when the design of the project renderings meets the design standards and the construction corresponding to the actual construction drawings also meets the construction process standards.

[0071] Among them, if the final evaluation result corresponding to the medical department to be evaluated is that it does not meet the decoration standards, corresponding improvements will be made based on the product information that does not meet the design standards in the project renderings, and / or the construction parameters and / or product information that do not meet the construction process standards in the actual construction scenes.

[0072] It is understandable that if the decoration of the hospital department to be evaluated does not meet the decoration standards, then find out where it does not meet the decoration standards, for example, whether the project renderings do not meet the design standards, or whether the actual construction drawings do not meet the construction process standards, or whether the project renderings do not meet the design standards and the actual construction drawings do not meet the construction process standards. If the project renderings do not meet the design standards, then find out which design drawings do not meet the design standards and which product does not meet the design standards, and improve the design of that product. Similarly, if the actual construction drawings do not meet the construction process standards, then find out which construction parameters do not meet the construction process standards or find out which products do not meet the construction process standards, and improve those construction parameters and products that do not meet the construction process standards.

[0073] The evaluation method further includes matching the project renderings of the medical department to be evaluated with reference project renderings in a historical database, wherein the historical database stores a correspondence between reference project renderings and cost quotations. If a reference project rendering exists in the historical database that matches the project renderings of the medical department to be evaluated, the cost quotation corresponding to the reference project rendering is used as the cost quotation for the project renderings of the medical department to be evaluated.

[0074] It is understandable that after designing the project rendering, you can know the cost quotation of the design rendering. You can match the project rendering with the reference project renderings in the history library, find the reference project rendering that matches the designed project rendering in the history library, and use the cost quotation of the reference project rendering as the cost quotation of the designed project rendering.

[0075] See also Figure 4 , which is a structural diagram of an interior decoration evaluation device for a medical department provided by an embodiment of the present disclosure. The device includes: a data acquisition module 401, an evaluation module 402, and an evaluation result confirmation module 403.

[0076] The data acquisition module 401 is used to obtain the project renderings and the actual construction pictures of the medical department to be evaluated.

[0077] Evaluation module 402 is used to input the project renderings into the evaluation model for evaluation to obtain a first evaluation result corresponding to the project renderings, and to input the actual scene pictures of the construction into the evaluation model to obtain a second evaluation result corresponding to the actual scene pictures of the construction, wherein the first evaluation result at least includes whether the decoration design of the medical department to be evaluated meets the design standards, and the second evaluation result at least includes whether the decoration construction of the medical department to be evaluated meets the construction process standards.

[0078] The evaluation result confirmation module 403 is used to obtain a final evaluation result corresponding to the medical department to be evaluated based on the first evaluation result and the second evaluation result, wherein the final evaluation result at least includes whether the decoration of the medical department to be evaluated meets the decoration standards.

[0079] It can be understood that the interior decoration evaluation device for medical departments provided by the present disclosure corresponds to the interior decoration evaluation method for medical departments provided in the aforementioned embodiments. The relevant technical features of the interior decoration evaluation device for medical departments can refer to the relevant technical features of the interior decoration evaluation method for medical departments, and will not be repeated here.

[0080] See also Figure 5 , Figure 5 Schematic diagram of an electronic device provided by an embodiment of the present disclosure. Figure 5 As shown, an embodiment of the present disclosure provides an electronic device 500, including a memory 510, a processor 520, and a computer program 511 stored in the memory 510 and executable on the processor 520. When the processor 520 executes the computer program 511, the steps of the interior decoration evaluation method for a medical department are implemented.

[0081] See also Figure 6 , Figure 6 Schematic diagram of an embodiment of a computer-readable storage medium provided by the present disclosure. Figure 6 As shown, this embodiment provides a computer-readable storage medium 600 on which a computer program 611 is stored. When the computer program 611 is executed by a processor, the steps of the interior decoration evaluation method for a medical department are implemented.

[0082] The interior decoration evaluation method and device for medical departments provided in the embodiments of the present disclosure respectively evaluate the project renderings and the actual construction drawings during the interior decoration process based on the evaluation model, and obtain a first evaluation result and a second evaluation result respectively. The final evaluation result corresponding to the medical department to be evaluated is jointly determined based on the first evaluation result and the second evaluation result with different weights.

[0083] The evaluation of the renderings of the department to be constructed and the actual construction scene is quantified. According to the evaluation results, it can be clearly known whether the construction of the department to be constructed meets the requirements, which is convenient for project management, improves evaluation efficiency and improves service quality.

[0084] It should be noted that, in the above embodiments, the description of each embodiment has its own focus. For parts that are not described in detail in a certain embodiment, reference can be made to the relevant descriptions of other embodiments.

[0085] Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the embodiments of the present disclosure may be provided as methods, devices, systems, or computer program products. Therefore, the present disclosure may take the form of a complete hardware embodiment, a complete software embodiment, or an embodiment combining software and hardware. Furthermore, the present disclosure may take the form of a computer program product implemented on one or more computer-usable storage media (including but not limited to databases, disk storage, CD-ROMs, optical storage, etc.) containing computer-usable program code.

[0086] The present disclosure is described with reference to the flowcharts and / or block diagrams of the methods, devices (systems), and computer program products according to the embodiments of the present disclosure. It should be understood that each process and / or box in the flowchart and / or block diagram, as well as the combination of the processes and / or boxes in the flowchart and / or block diagram, can be implemented by computer program instructions. These computer program instructions can be provided to a processor of a general-purpose computer, a special-purpose computer, an embedded computer, or other programmable data processing device to produce a machine, so that the instructions executed by the processor of the computer or other programmable data processing device generate instructions for implementing the processes in the flowchart and / or block diagram. Figure 1 a process or multiple processes and / or boxes Figure 1 A device that provides the functions specified in a block or multiple blocks.

[0087] These computer program instructions may also be stored in a computer readable memory that can direct a computer or other programmable data processing device to work in a specific manner, so that the instructions stored in the computer readable memory produce an article of manufacture comprising an instruction device, which implements the process Figure 1 a process or multiple processes and / or boxes Figure 1 The function specified in one or more boxes.

[0088] These computer program instructions can also be loaded onto a computer or other programmable data processing device so that a series of operational steps are executed on the computer or other programmable device to produce a computer-implemented process, thereby providing the instructions executed on the computer or other programmable device for implementing the process. Figure 1 a process or multiple processes and / or boxes Figure 1 The steps for the function specified in one or more boxes.

[0089] Although the preferred embodiments of the present disclosure have been described, those skilled in the art may make additional changes and modifications to these embodiments once they have learned the basic creative concepts. Therefore, the appended claims are intended to be interpreted as including the preferred embodiments and all changes and modifications that fall within the scope of the present disclosure.

[0090] Obviously, those skilled in the art may make various changes and modifications to the present disclosure without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure. Thus, if these modifications and variations of the present disclosure fall within the scope of the claims of the present disclosure and their equivalents, the present disclosure is intended to include these modifications and variations.

Claims

1. A method for evaluating interior decoration of medical departments, characterized in that: include: S1, obtain the project renderings and construction site pictures of the medical department to be evaluated; S2, inputting the project rendering into the evaluation model for evaluation to obtain a first evaluation result corresponding to the project rendering, and inputting the constructed scene image into the evaluation model to obtain a second evaluation result corresponding to the constructed scene image, wherein the first evaluation result at least includes whether the decoration design of the to-be-evaluated medical department meets the design standards, and the second evaluation result at least includes whether the decoration construction of the to-be-evaluated medical department meets the construction process standards; and S3, obtaining a final evaluation result corresponding to the medical department to be evaluated based on the first evaluation result and the second evaluation result; wherein the final evaluation result at least includes whether the decoration of the medical department to be evaluated meets the decoration standards; In S2, the constructed scene image is input into the evaluation model to obtain a second evaluation result corresponding to the constructed scene image, including: Inputting the constructed real scene image into the evaluation model, and extracting multiple construction parameters and product information of each product after construction from the constructed real scene image based on image recognition; Comparing each construction parameter with a corresponding preset parameter threshold, and comparing the product information of each product after construction with the corresponding product recommendation information of each product; Obtaining the construction grade of each construction parameter and the construction grade of each product according to the comparison results; and Determine, based on the construction level of each construction parameter and the construction level of each product, an evaluation result of each construction parameter and an evaluation result of each product, wherein the evaluation result of each construction parameter includes whether each construction parameter meets the construction process standard, and the evaluation result of each product includes whether the decoration of each product meets the construction process standard; If all construction parameters and the decoration of all products meet the construction process standards, the second evaluation result corresponding to the actual construction scene is that it meets the construction process standards; otherwise, the second evaluation result corresponding to the actual construction scene is that it does not meet the construction process standards.

2. The interior decoration evaluation method according to claim 1, characterized in that: The project renderings include a plurality of design drawings; in S2, the project renderings are input into an evaluation model for evaluation to obtain a first evaluation result corresponding to the project renderings, including: Inputting a plurality of design drawings into the evaluation model, and obtaining a plurality of features to be evaluated corresponding to each design drawing based on the evaluation model; Evaluate the multiple features to be evaluated of each design drawing one by one, and obtain an evaluation result corresponding to each design drawing according to the evaluation results of the multiple features to be evaluated; and According to the evaluation results corresponding to each design drawing, a first evaluation result corresponding to the project rendering is obtained.

3. The interior decoration evaluation method according to claim 2, characterized in that: The step of inputting a plurality of design drawings into the evaluation model and obtaining a plurality of features to be evaluated corresponding to each design drawing based on the evaluation model includes: Each design drawing is input into the evaluation model, and the evaluation model identifies product information of each product in each design drawing based on image recognition; wherein the product information of each product includes at least product name, product color and product style.

4. The interior decoration evaluation method according to claim 3, characterized in that: The step of evaluating the multiple features to be evaluated of each design drawing one by one and obtaining the evaluation result corresponding to each design drawing according to the evaluation results of the multiple features to be evaluated includes: Comparing the product information of each product with the preset product recommendation information, and determining an evaluation result of each product based on the comparison result of each product, wherein the evaluation result of each product includes whether the design of the product meets the design standards; and Based on the evaluation results of each product, determine the evaluation results of each design drawing.

5. The interior decoration evaluation method according to claim 4, characterized in that: The process of comparing the product information of each product with the existing product recommendation information and determining the evaluation result of each product based on the comparison result of each product includes: According to the product name, find the corresponding product and product recommendation information from the preset library, the product recommendation information including the product recommended color, product recommended style and product recommended size; Compare the product color, product style, and product size to the product recommended color, product recommended style, and product recommended size; Determine the design level of each product based on the comparison results; and According to the design level of each product, determine whether the design of each product meets the design standards.

6. The interior decoration evaluation method according to claim 5, characterized in that: Determining the design grade of each product based on the comparison results, and determining whether the design of each product meets the design standards based on the design grade of each product, includes: Calculate the deviation values ​​between the product color and the recommended product color, the product style and the recommended product style, and the product size and the recommended product size respectively to obtain multiple deviation values; Determine the design level of the product based on multiple deviation values; When the design level of the product is greater than or equal to the preset level, the evaluation result of the product meets the design standards; otherwise, the evaluation result of the product does not meet the design standards.

7. The interior decoration evaluation method according to claim 3, characterized in that: Determining the evaluation results of each design drawing based on the evaluation results of each product includes: If the designs of all products in the design drawings meet the design standards, the evaluation result of the design drawings is that they meet the design standards; otherwise, the design drawings do not meet the design standards, and the product information that does not meet the design standards is recorded.

8. The interior decoration evaluation method according to claim 1, characterized in that: The plurality of construction parameters include verticality, neatness, and equality of the construction, as well as product information of each product after construction; the construction grade of each construction parameter and the construction grade of each product obtained based on the comparison results include: Calculating the distances between the verticality, neatness, and equality of the construction and the corresponding preset parameter thresholds, and determining the construction grade of each construction parameter based on the distances; and Calculate the deviation between the product information of each product and the corresponding product recommendation information of each product, and determine the construction level of each product based on the deviation value; Determining the evaluation result of each construction parameter and each product according to the construction level of each construction parameter and the construction level of each product includes: If the construction level of the construction parameter is greater than or equal to the preset level, the construction parameter meets the construction process standard; otherwise, the construction parameter does not meet the construction process standard; If the construction grade of the product is greater than or equal to the preset grade, the decoration of the product meets the construction process standards; otherwise, the decoration of the product does not meet the construction process standards.

9. The interior decoration evaluation method according to claim 1, characterized in that: In S3, a final evaluation result corresponding to the medical department to be evaluated is obtained based on the first evaluation result and the second evaluation result, including: If the first evaluation result is in compliance with the design standards and the second evaluation result is in compliance with the construction process standards, the final evaluation result corresponding to the medical department to be evaluated is determined to be in compliance with the decoration standards; otherwise, the final evaluation result corresponding to the medical department to be evaluated is not in compliance with the decoration standards.

10. The interior decoration evaluation method according to claim 9, characterized in that: If the final evaluation result corresponding to the medical department to be evaluated is that it does not meet the decoration standards, the interior decoration of the medical department to be evaluated shall be improved based on the product information that does not meet the design standards in the project renderings, the construction parameters that do not meet the construction process standards in the actual construction pictures, or the product information that does not meet the construction process standards.

11. The interior decoration evaluation method according to claim 1, characterized in that: The method further includes: Matching the project renderings of the medical department to be evaluated with reference project renderings in a historical database; wherein the historical database stores a correspondence between reference project renderings and cost quotations; When there is a reference project rendering that matches the project rendering of the medical department to be evaluated in the historical database, the cost quotation corresponding to the reference project rendering is used as the cost quotation of the project rendering of the medical department to be evaluated.

12. An interior decoration evaluation device for a medical department, characterized in that: include: Data acquisition module, used to obtain project renderings and actual construction pictures of the medical departments to be evaluated; an evaluation module, configured to input the project rendering into an evaluation model for evaluation to obtain a first evaluation result corresponding to the project rendering, and input the constructed scene image into the evaluation model to obtain a second evaluation result corresponding to the constructed scene image, wherein the first evaluation result includes at least whether the decoration design of the medical department to be evaluated meets the design standards, and the second evaluation result includes at least whether the decoration construction of the medical department to be evaluated meets the construction process standards; as well as an evaluation result confirmation module, configured to obtain a final evaluation result corresponding to the medical department to be evaluated based on the first evaluation result and the second evaluation result, wherein the final evaluation result at least includes whether the decoration of the medical department to be evaluated meets the decoration standards; Inputting the constructed scene image into the evaluation model to obtain a second evaluation result corresponding to the constructed scene image includes: Inputting the constructed real scene image into the evaluation model, and extracting multiple construction parameters and product information of each product after construction from the constructed real scene image based on image recognition; Comparing each construction parameter with a corresponding preset parameter threshold, and comparing the product information of each product after construction with the corresponding product recommendation information of each product; Obtaining the construction grade of each construction parameter and the construction grade of each product according to the comparison results; and Determine, based on the construction level of each construction parameter and the construction level of each product, an evaluation result of each construction parameter and an evaluation result of each product, wherein the evaluation result of each construction parameter includes whether each construction parameter meets the construction process standard, and the evaluation result of each product includes whether the decoration of each product meets the construction process standard; If all construction parameters and the decoration of all products meet the construction process standards, the second evaluation result corresponding to the actual construction scene is that it meets the construction process standards; otherwise, the second evaluation result corresponding to the actual construction scene is that it does not meet the construction process standards.

Images