Project management maturity evaluation method and device, equipment and storage medium

Abstract

The invention relates to the technical field of computers, in particular to a project management maturity evaluation method and device, equipment and a storage medium, and the method comprises the steps: obtaining project data of a target project and a project management maturity system to which the target project belongs; based on a project management maturity system, obtaining an index score of each work achievement under each target assessment index from the project data; inputting the index score of each work achievement into an assessment index influence degree model, and outputting an achievement score of each work achievement; starting from the practice process, taking the sum of the scores of the lower-layer management elements as the score of the upper-layer management elements until the domain score of the target management domain is obtained; inputting the field score of each target management field into a management field influence degree model, and outputting a project score of the target project; evaluating the project management maturity of the target project according to the project score of the target project; therefore, the dependence of the evaluation process on manpower is avoided, and the accuracy of the evaluation result is improved.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present disclosure relates to the field of computer technology, and in particular to a project management maturity assessment method, device, equipment and storage medium. Background Art

[0002] Project management maturity directly affects the success rate, cost-effectiveness, time control and overall quality of a project. Therefore, accurate assessment of project management maturity is particularly important.

[0003] Usually, the maturity of project management is evaluated mainly by project managers based on their experience, but this evaluation method is highly dependent on people and is too subjective, resulting in inaccurate evaluation results. Summary of the invention

[0004] In order to solve the above technical problems, the present disclosure provides a project management maturity assessment method, device, equipment and storage medium.

[0005] In a first aspect, the present invention provides a method for evaluating project management maturity, comprising:

[0006] Obtain the project information of the target project and the project management maturity system to which the target project belongs. The management elements in the project management maturity system are arranged in a top-down hierarchical relationship as target management fields, management modules, practice processes, work results and target assessment indicators. The correspondence between upper-level management elements and lower-level management elements is one-to-one or one-to-many. The target assessment indicators are updated based on the pre-built assessment indicator impact model, and the target management fields are updated based on the management field impact model. Based on the project management maturity system, obtain the indicator score corresponding to each work result under each target assessment indicator from the project information; input the indicator score corresponding to each work result into the assessment indicator impact model, and output the result score of each work result; starting from the practice process, take the sum of the scores of the lower-level management elements as the score of the upper-level management elements until the field score of the target management field is obtained; input the field scores of each target management field into the management field impact model, and output the project score of the target project; evaluate the project management maturity of the target project according to the project score of the target project.

[0007] In a second aspect, the present invention provides a project management maturity assessment device, comprising:

[0008] The first acquisition module is used to acquire the project data of the target project and the project management maturity system to which the target project belongs. The management elements in the project management maturity system are arranged in a top-down hierarchical relationship as target management fields, management modules, practice processes, work results and target assessment indicators. The correspondence between upper-level management elements and lower-level management elements is one-to-one or one-to-many. The target assessment indicators are updated based on the pre-built assessment indicator impact model, and the target management fields are updated based on the management field impact model. The second acquisition module is used to acquire the indicator score corresponding to each work result under each target assessment indicator from the project data based on the project management maturity system. The first calculation module is used to input the indicator score corresponding to each work result into the assessment indicator impact model and output the result score of each work result. The second calculation module is used to take the sum of the scores of the lower-level management elements as the score of the upper-level management elements starting from the practice process until the field score of the target management field is obtained. The third calculation module is used to input the field score of each target management field into the management field impact model and output the project score of the target project. The evaluation module is used to evaluate the project management maturity of the target project according to the project score of the target project.

[0009] In a third aspect, the present invention provides a computer device, comprising:

[0010] The memory and the processor are connected to each other for communication. The memory stores computer instructions. The processor executes the project management maturity assessment method corresponding to the first aspect by executing the computer instructions.

[0011] In a fourth aspect, the present invention provides a computer-readable storage medium having computer instructions stored thereon, the computer instructions being used to enable a computer to execute the project management maturity assessment method corresponding to the first aspect.

[0012] Compared with the prior art, the technical solution provided by the embodiments of the present disclosure has the following advantages:

[0013] The project management maturity evaluation method provided in this embodiment obtains the project information of the target project and the project management maturity system to which the target project belongs; based on the project management maturity system, obtains the indicator score corresponding to each work result under each target evaluation indicator from the project information; inputs the indicator score corresponding to each work result into the evaluation indicator influence model, and outputs the result score of each work result; starting from the practice process, the sum of the scores of the lower-level management elements is used as the score of the upper-level management elements until the field score of the target management field is obtained; the field scores of each target management field are input into the management field influence model, and the project score of the target project is output; the project management maturity of the target project is evaluated according to the project score of the target project; the above process avoids the dependence of the evaluation process on manual work, and because the target evaluation indicators and target management fields in the project management maturity system are elements updated according to the evaluation indicator influence model and the management field influence model, the evaluation indicator influence model and the management field influence model will also be regularly updated according to the actual situation of project management, therefore, the project score obtained by the pre-constructed evaluation indicator influence model and the management field influence model is more objective and more accurate. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0014] The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments consistent with the present disclosure and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the present disclosure.

[0015] In order to more clearly illustrate the embodiments of the present invention or the technical solutions in the prior art, the drawings required for use in the embodiments or the description of the prior art will be briefly introduced below. Obviously, for ordinary technicians in this field, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without paying any creative labor.

[0016] Figure 1 A schematic diagram of a process flow of a project management maturity assessment method provided by an embodiment of the present invention;

[0017] Figure 2 A schematic diagram of a process for constructing an assessment indicator influence model provided by an embodiment of the present invention;

[0018] Figure 3 A schematic diagram of a process for constructing a management domain influence model provided by an embodiment of the present invention;

[0019] Figure 4 A schematic diagram of the structural connection of a device for evaluating project management maturity provided by an embodiment of the present invention;

[0020] Figure 5 A schematic diagram of the structural connection of a computer device provided in an embodiment of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0021] In order to more clearly understand the above-mentioned objectives, features and advantages of the present disclosure, the scheme of the present disclosure will be further described below. It should be noted that the embodiments of the present disclosure and the features in the embodiments can be combined with each other without conflict.

[0022] In the following description, many specific details are set forth to facilitate a full understanding of the present disclosure, but the present disclosure may also be implemented in other ways different from those described herein; it is obvious that the embodiments in the specification are only part of the embodiments of the present disclosure, rather than all of the embodiments. Based on the embodiments of the present invention, all other embodiments obtained by those skilled in the art without creative work are within the scope of protection of the present invention.

[0023] According to an embodiment of the present invention, an embodiment of a project management maturity assessment method is provided. It should be noted that the steps shown in the flowchart of the accompanying drawings can be executed in a computer system such as a set of computer executable instructions, and although a logical order is shown in the flowchart, in some cases, the steps shown or described can be executed in an order different from that shown here.

[0024] In this embodiment, a project management maturity evaluation method is provided, which can be used on a PC, an evaluation device, a mobile terminal, etc. Figure 1 is a flow chart of a method for evaluating project management maturity according to an embodiment of the present invention. Figure 1 As shown, the process includes the following steps:

[0025] S101, obtaining project information of the target project and the project management maturity system to which the target project belongs.

[0026] Among them, the target project is the project to be evaluated. The project information is all the information during the implementation of the target project. The project management maturity system is obtained by updating the initial management system based on the pre-built assessment indicator impact model and the management field impact model. The project management maturity system can be understood as the management structure of the project, and the project management maturity system is constructed according to the management elements and the hierarchical relationship between each management element. In this embodiment, the management elements are arranged as target management fields, management modules, practice processes, work results and target assessment indicators according to the top-down hierarchical relationship. It should also be noted that the correspondence between the upper management elements and the lower management elements is one-to-one or one-to-many, that is, the target project includes one or more target management fields, each target management field includes one or more management modules, each management module includes one or more practice processes, each practice process includes one or more work results, and each work result includes one or more target assessment indicators. It should also be noted that the update of the project management maturity system is reflected in the update of the initial management areas and initial assessment indicators in the initial management system. That is, the target assessment indicators in the management elements are obtained after updating the pre-built assessment indicator impact model, and the target management areas are obtained after updating the management area impact model.

[0027] Specifically, the project information of the project to be evaluated is obtained from the project database, and the updated project management maturity system to which the target project belongs is obtained.

[0028] S102, based on the project management maturity system, obtain the corresponding indicator scores of each work result under each target assessment indicator from the project data.

[0029] Specifically, an index path for each achievement document is generated according to the project management maturity system; according to the index path, the achievement document corresponding to the index path is searched from the project document, and the indicator score corresponding to each target assessment indicator is obtained from the achievement document; wherein the achievement document is the document corresponding to the work achievement. Taking the search for achievement document corresponding to a certain index path as an example, the process of searching for achievement document corresponding to the index path from the project document is exemplified. First, the historical project document is identified using a semantic-based statistical language model, specifically, the directory structure, file content, file name and other information in the historical project document is identified, so as to find all the management elements involved in the index path. Then, according to the hierarchical relationship between the management elements in the index path, the achievement document corresponding to the index path is found from the project document in a top-down manner.

[0030] Exemplarily, the project management maturity system can be understood as a tree structure, and the lowest level target assessment indicators are stored in the achievement data under the project data. Therefore, in this embodiment, each branch in the project management maturity system is determined as an index path of an achievement data, such as target management field A1-> management module B1-> practice process C1-> work achievement D1. First, according to the above index path, the achievement data corresponding to the path is searched from the project data, and then the achievement data is traversed, and the score data corresponding to each target assessment indicator is obtained from the achievement material. The target assessment indicator E1 is "whether there are relevant criteria / standards / guidelines". By traversing the achievement data, it is determined whether there are relevant criteria / standards / guidelines in the achievement data. If there are, the indicator score of the work achievement "target management field A1-> management module B1-> practice process C1-> work achievement D1" corresponding to the achievement data under the target assessment indicator E1 is set to 1, and if not, it is set to 0. In the same way, the assessment data corresponding to each assessment indicator of each work achievement contained in the target management field-> management module-> practice process can be obtained.

[0031] S103, input the indicator score corresponding to each work result into the assessment indicator influence model, and output the result score of each work result.

[0032] The assessment indicator impact model can be understood as a data processing mechanism for determining the achievement score of the work achievement to which the indicator belongs based on the input indicator score. The assessment indicator impact model can be updated regularly or in real time according to the project management situation.

[0033] Specifically, the assessment index influence model is P = ω 1 p 1 +ω 2 p 2 ……+ω n p n ,ω i The predetermined target assessment indicator p i The corresponding indicator weight, 1≤i≤n, n is the number of target assessment indicators. After obtaining the indicator score corresponding to each work achievement in the target project under each target assessment indicator according to S102, the indicator score corresponding to each work achievement (i.e., the indicator score corresponding to each target assessment indicator) is input into the assessment indicator influence model, and the input indicator score is weighted and summed according to the predetermined indicator weight to obtain the achievement score of the work achievement. The work achievement in this embodiment refers to all work achievements included in the project management maturity system.

[0034] For example, a certain work result is used as an example to explain the process of determining the result score. The indicator scores of this work result under the three target assessment indicators are p1 、p 2 、p 3 , p 1 、p 2 、p 3 After inputting into the assessment index influence model, the output is the achievement score P of the work achievement, P = ω 1 p 1 +ω 2 p 2 +ω 3 p 3 .

[0035] S104, starting from the practice process, the sum of the scores of the lower-level management elements is used as the score of the upper-level management elements until the field score of the target management field is obtained.

[0036] Specifically, the sum of the results scores of all work results corresponding to the practice process is determined as the score of the practice process; the sum of the scores of all practice processes corresponding to the management module is determined as the score of the management module; the sum of the scores of all management modules corresponding to the target management field is determined as the field score of the target management field.

[0037] S105, inputting the domain score of each target management domain into the management domain influence model, and outputting the project score of the target project.

[0038] The management domain impact model can be understood as a data processing mechanism for determining project scores based on domain scores. Similar to the assessment indicator impact model, the management domain impact model is also updated regularly or in real time based on the project management situation.

[0039] Specifically, the management domain influence model is: Manage areas for pre-determined goals j The domain weight is 1≤j≤m, where m is the number of target management domains. After obtaining the domain scores corresponding to each target management domain in the target project, the domain scores of each target management domain are input into the management domain influence model. According to the predetermined domain weights, the input domain scores are weighted and summed to obtain the project scores of the target project.

[0040] S106, evaluating the project management maturity of the target project according to the project score of the target project.

[0041] Specifically, after obtaining the project score, the maturity level corresponding to the project score of the target project can be matched from the pre-built mapping relationship between the score and the maturity level. The mapping relationship between the score and the maturity level can be formulated by those skilled in the art after multiple maturity assessments.

[0042] In this embodiment, the maturity levels are from low to high, namely, initial chaos level, standard system level, effective control level, comprehensive integration level and continuous improvement level. The initial chaos level generally exists in the management of small engineering projects without a standardized engineering project management system. There are some common terms and scattered process management methods, which rely heavily on the experience of managers or teams, and the template formatting is limited to the basic requirements of the government industry. The standard system level is reflected in the establishment of relatively independent basic norms and systems, and the corresponding management activities are carried out accordingly. The effective control level is reflected in the structuring of management modules, the formation of a unified structured process method, the implementation of standardization, and the management process is operable, measurable, repeatable, and feedback-able. The management process can be effectively controlled and measured, and the problems found in various fields can be controlled and improved. The project management system has basically matured. The comprehensive integration level is reflected in the coordinated integration of management modules to achieve systematization, the use of benchmark comparison methods, and the standardization and institutionalization of the organization level to constrain a single management process. At this time, project management can comprehensively consider the coordination relationship between various fields and the coordination relationship between various subjects, and the company's support for a single project focuses on the efficiency of organizational process assets. At this time, the management capability is already at a very high level. The rapid development of information technology has provided support for the formation of comprehensive integration capabilities. The continuous improvement level is reflected in the ability to conduct effective management self-evaluation regularly, the pursuit of experience feedback in each process, the organization's focus on continuous improvement and the formation of a project management capability assessment and improvement mechanism, and the organizational process assets at the improvement level company level can play a good role. This stage is a continuous cycle of continuous improvement from the effective control level and the comprehensive integration level.

[0043] In one example, after evaluating the project management maturity of the target project according to the project score of the target project, it also includes: generating an evaluation report corresponding to the maturity level according to the maturity level, the evaluation report including the project score of the target project, the maturity level, the total score of the target project under each target assessment indicator and improvement suggestions corresponding to the maturity level.

[0044] Exemplarily, the improvement suggestions corresponding to the maturity level can be predetermined improvement suggestions given by technical personnel in this field for common problems existing in the maturity level project. The maturity level in the assessment report refers to the maturity level and the level description corresponding to the maturity level. Generating an assessment report provides decision makers with more timely and comprehensive data support, which helps users to clarify the actual management status of the target project and the subsequent improvement direction, thereby helping users make more correct management decisions.

[0045] The project management maturity evaluation method provided in this embodiment obtains the project information of the target project and the project management maturity system to which the target project belongs; based on the project management maturity system, obtains the indicator score corresponding to each work result under each target evaluation indicator from the project information; inputs the indicator score corresponding to each work result into the evaluation indicator influence model, and outputs the result score of each work result; starting from the practice process, the sum of the scores of the lower-level management elements is used as the score of the upper-level management elements until the field score of the target management field is obtained; the field scores of each target management field are input into the management field influence model, and the project score of the target project is output; the project management maturity of the target project is evaluated according to the project score of the target project; the above process avoids the dependence of the evaluation process on manual work, and because the target evaluation indicators and target management fields in the project management maturity system are elements updated according to the evaluation indicator influence model and the management field influence model, the evaluation indicator influence model and the management field influence model will also be regularly updated according to the actual situation of project management, therefore, the project score obtained by the pre-constructed evaluation indicator influence model and the management field influence model is more objective and accurate.

[0046] In this embodiment, a project management maturity evaluation method is provided to optimize the construction process of the evaluation index impact model. Figure 2 As shown, the optimization process includes the following steps:

[0047] S201, obtaining historical project data of multiple historical projects.

[0048] Among them, historical projects correspond to the initial management system, which is the system before the project management maturity system is updated. The difference between the initial management system and the project management maturity system is that the lowest level of management elements in the initial management system are initial assessment indicators, while the lowest level of management elements in the project management maturity system are target assessment indicators, which are part of the initial assessment indicators. Correspondingly, the highest level of management elements in the initial management system are initial management areas, while the highest level of management elements in the project management maturity system are target management areas, which are part of the initial management areas.

[0049] The initial management system is constructed based on historical project data. The construction process can be: using a semantic-based statistical language model to identify management elements and hierarchical relationships between management elements in historical project data. The recognition process of the semantic-based statistical language model is, first, to identify information such as directory structure, file content and file name in historical project data, and to perform word segmentation on the identified information, and to remove unimportant words in the word segmentation. Secondly, a forward filtering method is used to select words of specific parts of speech, and a candidate list is formed based on the selected words. Thirdly, after obtaining the candidate list, Gibbs sampling is performed on the corpus to obtain management elements. The project data is traversed, and the hierarchical relationships between management elements are extracted from them. Finally, the hierarchical relationships between management elements identified by the semantic-based statistical language model are obtained.

[0050] Specifically, historical project data corresponding to multiple historical projects are obtained from the project database. It should be noted that the historical project data have been evaluated manually or by other evaluation methods. Therefore, each piece of historical project data contains the project score of the corresponding historical project, the field score of each initial management field included in each historical project, and the indicator score of each work achievement included in each initial management field under each initial assessment indicator.

[0051] S202, obtaining the project score of each historical project and the total index score of each historical project under each initial assessment index from the historical project data.

[0052] The total score of the historical project under each initial assessment indicator can be understood as the sum of the indicator scores of each work result of the historical project under the initial assessment indicator. The method for obtaining the indicator score of the work result under the initial assessment indicator is the same as that recorded in the embodiment of step S102, and will not be repeated here.

[0053] For example, as shown in Table 1, each historical project corresponds to a record, which includes the project score of the historical project and the total score of the historical project under each initial assessment indicator. Table 1 shows m initial assessment indicators and n historical projects.

[0054] Table 1

[0055]

[0056] S203, determining the correlation index corresponding to each initial assessment indicator according to the project score of each historical project and the total score of each historical project under each initial assessment indicator.

[0057] For example, the project score is used as the parent sequence, the total score of the indicator is used as the child sequence, and the grey correlation algorithm is used to calculate the grey correlation of each initial assessment indicator, and the grey correlation is determined as the correlation index. The correlation index is used to characterize the degree of influence of the initial assessment indicator on the evaluation result. The larger the correlation index, the higher the degree of influence and the more important the initial assessment indicator.

[0058] Exemplarily, the process of determining the grey correlation degree of each assessment indicator using the grey correlation degree algorithm is as follows:

[0059] According to Table 1, the assessment matrix is ​​constructed. The size of the assessment matrix is ​​n×m. The assessment matrix is ​​as follows:

[0060]

[0061] a1, with the item score as the parent sequence (i.e., reference sequence), denoted by x 0 , taking the total score of the index as the subsequence (i.e., comparison sequence), denoted as x 1 、x 2 , …, x m .

[0062] a2, normalize the assessment matrix and project scores to eliminate the dimension effect and reduce the range of assessment data and initial scores, thereby standardizing the assessment matrix to obtain the standardized matrix Z. The elements in Z are recorded as Z ij .

[0063]

[0064] The processed standardized matrix is ​​as follows:

[0065]

[0066] a3, according to the standardized matrix, calculate the correlation coefficient of each initial assessment indicator (subsequence) and project score (parent sequence), and construct the correlation coefficient matrix R according to the correlation coefficient. The correlation coefficient is determined as follows:

[0067]

[0068] The correlation matrix R is as follows:

[0069]

[0070] a4. According to the correlation coefficient matrix R, calculate the grey correlation degree corresponding to each assessment indicator.

[0071] Exemplarily, the grey relational degree is determined as follows:

[0072]

[0073] S204, selecting a target assessment indicator from the initial assessment indicators according to the correlation index, and calculating the indicator weight of the target assessment indicator.

[0074] Specifically, the above S204 includes the following steps:

[0075] S2041, determining a mean value of the correlation index according to all the correlation indexes.

[0076] Specifically, according to the correlation index corresponding to each initial assessment indicator, the mean value of the correlation index is calculated.

[0077] S2042, determining the initial assessment indicator whose correlation index is greater than or equal to the average correlation index as the target assessment indicator.

[0078] Specifically, the correlation index of each initial assessment indicator is compared with the correlation index mean, and the initial assessment indicator with a correlation index greater than or equal to the correlation index mean is determined as the target assessment indicator. In this embodiment, the assessment indicator with a grey correlation greater than the grey correlation mean is determined as the target assessment indicator, which helps to evaluate the accuracy of the result.

[0079] S2043, determining the indicator weight of the target assessment indicator as the ratio of the correlation index of each target assessment indicator to the sum of the correlation indexes of all target assessment indicators.

[0080] For example, the indicator weights of the target assessment indicators are determined as follows:

[0081]

[0082] Among them, r t is the selected target assessment indicator, x is the number of target assessment indicators, W t The target assessment indicator is j The corresponding indicator weight.

[0083] S205, constructing an assessment indicator influence model based on the target assessment indicators and indicator weights.

[0084] Specifically, after determining the target assessment indicators and the indicator weights corresponding to the target assessment indicators, an assessment indicator influence model for characterizing the mapping relationship between indicator scores and achievement scores is constructed in a weighted summation manner. The assessment indicator influence model is not described here in detail, please refer to the corresponding description of S103.

[0085] Exemplarily, after the construction of the assessment indicator influence model is completed, the initial assessment indicators in the initial management system are updated to target assessment indicators.

[0086] In this embodiment, a project management maturity evaluation method is provided to optimize the construction process of the management field impact model. Figure 3 As shown in the figure, the creation of the management domain impact model includes the following steps:

[0087] S301, obtaining, from the historical project data, the field scores of each initial management field included in each historical project.

[0088] Specifically, taking the historical project as a unit, the field score of each initial management field is obtained from the historical project data corresponding to the historical project.

[0089] S302: Determine a correlation index corresponding to each initial management field according to the project scores of each historical project and the field scores of each initial management field included in each historical project.

[0090] Specifically, the method for determining the correlation index of the initial management field is the same as the method for determining the correlation of the initial assessment indicators. Taking the project score as the parent sequence and the field score of each initial management field as the child sequence, the gray correlation algorithm is used to calculate the gray correlation of each initial management field, and the gray correlation is determined as the correlation index. For the specific solution process, please refer to the content recorded in the embodiment of S203, which will not be repeated here.

[0091] S303, selecting a target management field from the initial management fields according to the correlation indexes of all the initial management fields, and calculating the field weight of the target management field.

[0092] Specifically, the mean value of the correlation index is calculated based on the correlation index of all the initial management fields. The correlation index of each initial management field is compared with the mean value of the correlation index, and the initial management field whose correlation index is greater than or equal to the mean value of the correlation index is determined as the target management field. After the target management field is determined, the ratio of the correlation index of each target management field to the sum of the correlation indexes of all target management fields is determined as the field weight of each target management field.

[0093] S304, constructing a management domain influence model according to the domain weight and the domain score of the target management domain.

[0094] Exemplarily, after the management domain influence model is constructed, the initial management domain in the initial management system is updated to the target management domain, and the updated initial management system is determined as the project management maturity system.

[0095] The specific implementation method of the above process can refer to the corresponding description in the indicator weight determination process, which will not be repeated here.

[0096] In this embodiment, a project management maturity assessment device is also provided, which is used to implement the above-mentioned embodiments and preferred implementation modes, and the descriptions that have been made will not be repeated. As used below, the term "module" can implement a combination of software and / or hardware of a predetermined function. Although the devices described in the following embodiments are preferably implemented in software, the implementation of hardware, or a combination of software and hardware, is also possible and conceivable.

[0097] This embodiment provides a project management maturity assessment device, such as Figure 4 As shown, including:

[0098] The first acquisition module 401 is used to obtain the project information of the target project and the project management maturity system to which the target project belongs. The management elements in the project management maturity system are arranged in a top-down hierarchical relationship as target management areas, management modules, practice processes, work results and target assessment indicators. The correspondence between upper-level management elements and lower-level management elements is one-to-one or one-to-many. The target assessment indicators are updated based on a pre-built assessment indicator influence model, and the target management areas are updated based on the management area influence model.

[0099] The second acquisition module 402 is used to acquire the indicator score corresponding to each work achievement under each target assessment indicator from the project data based on the project management maturity system.

[0100] The first calculation module 403 is used to input the indicator score corresponding to each work achievement into the assessment indicator influence model, and output the achievement score of each work achievement.

[0101] The second calculation module 404 is used to take the sum of the scores of the lower-level management elements as the score of the upper-level management elements from the beginning of the practice process until the field score of the target management field is obtained.

[0102] The third calculation module 405 is used to input the field score of each target management field into the management field influence model, and output the project score of the target project.

[0103] The evaluation module 406 is used to evaluate the project management maturity of the target project according to the project score of the target project.

[0104] In some optional implementations, the construction of the assessment indicator influence model is implemented through the following modules:

[0105] The third acquisition module is used to obtain historical project data of multiple historical projects, where the historical projects correspond to the initial management system, and the lowest-level management elements in the initial management system are the initial assessment indicators; the fourth acquisition module is used to obtain the project scores of various historical projects and the total score of each historical project under each initial assessment indicator from the historical project data; the fourth calculation module is used to determine the correlation index corresponding to each initial assessment indicator based on the project scores of various historical projects and the total score of each historical project under each initial assessment indicator; the fifth calculation module is used to select the target assessment indicator from the initial assessment indicators based on the correlation index, and calculate the indicator weight of the target assessment indicator; the first construction module is used to construct an assessment indicator influence model based on the target assessment indicator and the indicator weight.

[0106] In some optional implementations, the fifth computing module includes:

[0107] The first determination submodule is used to determine the mean value of the correlation index based on all the correlation indexes; the second determination submodule is used to determine the initial assessment indicator whose correlation index is greater than or equal to the mean value of the correlation index as the target assessment indicator; the third determination submodule is used to determine the ratio of the correlation index of each target assessment indicator to the sum of the correlation indexes of all target assessment indicators as the indicator weight of the target assessment indicator.

[0108] In some optional implementations, the initial management system also includes an initial management field, and the construction of the management field influence model is implemented through the following modules:

[0109] The fifth acquisition module is used to obtain the field scores of each initial management field included in each historical project from the historical project data; the sixth calculation module is used to determine the correlation index corresponding to each initial management field based on the project scores of each historical project and the field scores of each initial management field included in each historical project; the seventh calculation module is used to select the target management field from the initial management fields based on the correlation indexes of all initial management fields, and calculate the field weight of the target management field; the second construction module is used to construct a management field influence model based on the field weight and the field score of the target management field.

[0110] In some optional implementations, the second acquisition module 402 includes:

[0111] The generation submodule is used to generate an index path for each achievement document according to the project management maturity system. The achievement document is the document corresponding to the work achievement. The search submodule is used to search for the achievement document corresponding to the index path from the project document according to the index path, and obtain the indicator score corresponding to each target assessment indicator from the achievement document.

[0112] In some optional implementations, the second calculation module 404 includes:

[0113] The fourth determination submodule is used to determine the sum of the results scores of all work results corresponding to the practice process as the score of the practice process; the fifth determination submodule is used to determine the sum of the scores of all practice processes corresponding to the management module as the score of the management module; the sixth determination submodule is used to determine the sum of the scores of all management modules corresponding to the target management field as the field score of the target management field.

[0114] In some optional implementations, the evaluation module 406 includes:

[0115] The selection submodule is used to match the maturity level corresponding to the project score from the pre-built mapping relationship between the score and the maturity level according to the project score.

[0116] The device also includes: a generation module, which is used to generate an evaluation report corresponding to the maturity level according to the maturity level, the evaluation report including the project score of the target project, the maturity level, the total score of the target project under each target assessment indicator and improvement suggestions corresponding to the maturity level.

[0117] The further functional description of each of the above modules and units is the same as that of the above corresponding embodiments and will not be repeated here.

[0118] The project management maturity assessment device in this embodiment is presented in the form of a functional unit, where the unit refers to an ASIC (Application Specific Integrated Circuit) circuit, a processor and memory that executes one or more software or fixed programs, and / or other devices that can provide the above functions.

[0119] The embodiment of the present invention also provides a computer device having the above Figure 4 The assessment means of project management maturity are shown.

[0120] See also Figure 5 , Figure 5 is a schematic diagram of the structure of a computer device provided by an optional embodiment of the present invention, such as Figure 5As shown, the computer device includes: one or more processors 10, a memory 20, and interfaces for connecting various components, including high-speed interfaces and low-speed interfaces. Various components are connected to each other using different buses for communication, and can be installed on a common mainboard or installed in other ways as needed. The processor can process the instructions executed in the computer device, including instructions stored in or on the memory to display the graphical information of the GUI on an external input / output device (such as, a display device coupled to the interface). In some optional embodiments, if necessary, multiple processors and / or multiple buses can be used together with multiple memories and multiple memories. Similarly, multiple computer devices can be connected, and each device provides some necessary operations (for example, as a server array, a group of blade servers, or a multi-processor system). Figure 5 A processor 10 is taken as an example.

[0121] The processor 10 may be a central processing unit, a network processor or a combination thereof. The processor 10 may further include a hardware chip. The hardware chip may be a dedicated integrated circuit, a programmable logic device or a combination thereof. The programmable logic device may be a complex programmable logic device, a field programmable gate array, a general purpose array logic or any combination thereof.

[0122] The memory 20 stores instructions executable by at least one processor 10, so that at least one processor 10 executes the method shown in the above embodiment.

[0123] The memory 20 may include a program storage area and a data storage area, wherein the program storage area may store an operating system, an application required for at least one function; the data storage area may store data created according to the use of the computer device, etc. In addition, the memory 20 may include a high-speed random access memory, and may also include a non-transient memory, such as at least one disk storage device, a flash memory device, or other non-transient solid-state storage device. In some optional embodiments, the memory 20 may optionally include a memory remotely arranged relative to the processor 10, and these remote memories may be connected to the computer device via a network. Examples of the above-mentioned network include, but are not limited to, the Internet, an intranet, a local area network, a mobile communication network, and combinations thereof.

[0124] The memory 20 may include a volatile memory, such as a random access memory; the memory may also include a non-volatile memory, such as a flash memory, a hard disk or a solid state drive; the memory 20 may also include a combination of the above types of memory.

[0125] The computer device further comprises a communication interface 30 for the computer device to communicate with other devices or a communication network.

[0126] The embodiment of the present invention also provides a computer-readable storage medium. The method according to the embodiment of the present invention can be implemented in hardware, firmware, or can be implemented as a computer code that can be recorded in a storage medium, or can be implemented as a computer code that is originally stored in a remote storage medium or a non-temporary machine-readable storage medium and will be stored in a local storage medium through a network download, so that the method described herein can be stored in such software processing on a storage medium using a general-purpose computer, a dedicated processor, or programmable or dedicated hardware. Among them, the storage medium can be a magnetic disk, an optical disk, a read-only storage memory, a random access memory, a flash memory, a hard disk or a solid-state hard disk, etc.; further, the storage medium can also include a combination of the above types of memories. It can be understood that a computer, a processor, a microprocessor controller, or programmable hardware includes a storage component that can store or receive software or computer code. When the software or computer code is accessed and executed by a computer, a processor, or hardware, the method shown in the above embodiment is implemented.

[0127] It should be noted that, in this article, relational terms such as "first" and "second" are only used to distinguish one entity or operation from another entity or operation, and do not necessarily require or imply any such actual relationship or order between these entities or operations. Moreover, the terms "include", "comprise" or any other variants thereof are intended to cover non-exclusive inclusion, so that a process, method, article or device including a series of elements includes not only those elements, but also other elements not explicitly listed, or also includes elements inherent to such process, method, article or device. In the absence of further restrictions, the elements defined by the sentence "comprise a ..." do not exclude the existence of other identical elements in the process, method, article or device including the elements.

[0128] The above are only specific embodiments of the present disclosure, so that those skilled in the art can understand or implement the present disclosure. Various modifications to these embodiments will be apparent to those skilled in the art, and the general principles defined herein can be implemented in other embodiments without departing from the spirit or scope of the present disclosure. Therefore, the present disclosure will not be limited to these embodiments herein, but will conform to the widest scope consistent with the principles and novel features disclosed herein.

Claims

1. A method for evaluating project management maturity, characterized in that: include: Acquire project information of a target project and a project management maturity system to which the target project belongs, wherein the management elements in the project management maturity system are arranged in a top-down hierarchical relationship into target management fields, management modules, practice processes, work results, and target assessment indicators, and the correspondence between upper-level management elements and lower-level management elements is one-to-one or one-to-many, the target assessment indicators are updated based on a pre-built assessment indicator influence model, and the target management fields are updated based on a management field influence model; Based on the project management maturity system, obtaining the corresponding indicator score of each work achievement under each target assessment indicator from the project data; Input the indicator score corresponding to each work result into the assessment indicator influence model, and output the result score of each work result; Starting from the practice process, the sum of the scores of the lower management elements is used as the score of the upper management element until the field score of the target management field is obtained; Input the domain score of each target management domain into the management domain influence model, and output the project score of the target project; The project management maturity of the target project is evaluated according to the project score of the target project.

2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that: The assessment indicator influence model is constructed in the following way: Obtaining historical project data of a plurality of historical projects, wherein the historical projects correspond to an initial management system, and the lowest-level management elements in the initial management system are initial assessment indicators; Obtaining from the historical project data the project scores of each of the historical projects and the total index scores of each of the historical projects under each of the initial assessment indicators; Determine the correlation index corresponding to each of the initial assessment indicators according to the project scores of each of the historical projects and the total score of each of the historical projects under each of the initial assessment indicators; According to the correlation index, a target assessment indicator is selected from the initial assessment indicators, and an indicator weight of the target assessment indicator is calculated; The assessment indicator influence model is constructed according to the target assessment indicator and the indicator weight.

3. The method according to claim 2, characterized in that The step of selecting a target assessment indicator from the initial assessment indicators according to the correlation index and calculating the indicator weight of the target assessment indicator comprises: Determine a correlation index mean value based on all the correlation indexes; Determine the initial assessment indicator whose relevance index is greater than or equal to the mean of the relevance index as the target assessment indicator; The ratio of the relevance index of each target assessment indicator to the sum of the relevance indexes of all target assessment indicators is determined as the indicator weight of the target assessment indicator.

4. The method according to claim 2, characterized in that: The initial management system also includes an initial management field, and the management field influence model is constructed in the following way: Obtaining, from the historical project data, field scores of each of the initial management fields included in each of the historical projects; Determine a correlation index corresponding to each of the initial management fields according to the project scores of each of the historical projects and the field scores of each of the initial management fields included in each of the historical projects; According to the correlation indexes of all the initial management fields, selecting the target management field from the initial management fields, and calculating the field weight of the target management field; The management domain influence model is constructed according to the domain weight and the domain score of the target management domain.

5. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that The step of obtaining the corresponding indicator score of each work achievement under each target assessment indicator from the project data based on the project management maturity system includes: Generate an index path for each achievement document according to the project management maturity system, wherein the achievement document is the document corresponding to the work achievement; According to the index path, the achievement data corresponding to the index path is searched from the project data, and the indicator score corresponding to each of the target assessment indicators is obtained from the achievement data.

6. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that Starting from the practice process, the sum of the scores of the lower management elements is used as the score of the upper management element until the field score of the target management field is obtained, including: Determine the sum of the achievement scores of all the work achievements corresponding to the practice process as the score of the practice process; Determine the sum of the scores of all the practice processes corresponding to the management module as the score of the management module; The sum of the scores of all the management modules corresponding to the target management field is determined as the field score of the target management field.

7. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that The evaluating the project management maturity of the target project according to the project score of the target project includes: According to the project score, matching the maturity level corresponding to the project score from a pre-constructed mapping relationship between the score and the maturity level; After evaluating the project management maturity of the target project according to the project score of the target project, the method further includes: An evaluation report corresponding to the maturity level is generated according to the maturity level, wherein the evaluation report includes the project score of the target project, the maturity level, the total score of the target project under each target assessment indicator, and improvement suggestions corresponding to the maturity level.

8. A project management maturity assessment device, characterized in that: include: A first acquisition module is used to acquire project information of a target project and a project management maturity system to which the target project belongs. The management elements in the project management maturity system are arranged in a top-down hierarchical relationship as target management fields, management modules, practice processes, work results, and target assessment indicators. The correspondence between upper-level management elements and lower-level management elements is one-to-one or one-to-many. The target assessment indicators are updated based on a pre-built assessment indicator influence model, and the target management fields are updated based on a management field influence model. A second acquisition module is used to acquire, from the project data, the indicator score corresponding to each of the work results under each of the target assessment indicators based on the project management maturity system; A first calculation module is used to input the indicator score corresponding to each work achievement into the assessment indicator influence model, and output the achievement score of each work achievement; A second calculation module is used to use the sum of the scores of the lower-level management elements as the score of the upper-level management elements from the beginning of the practice process until the field score of the target management field is obtained; A third calculation module is used to input the field score of each target management field into the management field influence model, and output the project score of the target project; An evaluation module is used to evaluate the project management maturity of the target project according to the project score of the target project.

9. A computer device, characterized in that: include: A memory and a processor, wherein the memory and the processor are communicatively connected to each other, the memory stores computer instructions, and the processor executes the project management maturity assessment method according to any one of claims 1 to 7 by executing the computer instructions.

10. A computer-readable storage medium, characterized in that: The computer-readable storage medium stores computer instructions, and the computer instructions are used to enable a computer to execute the project management maturity assessment method according to any one of claims 1 to 7.

Images