Multi-dimensional evaluation method of target object, system terminal and medium

Abstract

The invention discloses a multi-dimensional evaluation method of a target object, and discloses a system, a terminal and a medium with the multi-dimensional evaluation method of the target object, and the multi-dimensional evaluation method of the target object provides a relatively objective evaluation mode to assist an enterprise in understanding policy affirmation. And whether the enterprise is suitable for applying for the corresponding policy is known. And meanwhile, the problem of data distortion provided by the user can be compensated to a certain extent.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the field of data analysis technology, and in particular to a multi-dimensional evaluation method, system terminal and medium for a target object. Background Art

[0002] When enterprises declare the type of enterprise that is inclined by national policies, they often need to make judgments based on the requirements of national policy and regulatory publicity.

[0003] For most policy evaluations, hard and soft indicators are often combined. Hard indicators are easy to understand, and are clearly marked in the policy as the threshold standards that must be met before an application can be made. However, soft standard evaluations often cause certain difficulties for companies to understand. For example, policy documents may contain the following descriptions: outstanding contributions in a certain field, good scientific and technological achievements, etc. These descriptions can easily lead to deviations in the company's understanding of the policy, and thus misunderstand the scope of policy recognition. Summary of the invention

[0004] The present invention aims to solve at least one of the technical problems existing in the prior art. To this end, the present invention proposes a multi-dimensional evaluation method for a target object, which can make a relatively objective evaluation method for the qualification assessment of an enterprise, assist the enterprise in understanding the policy recognition, and understand whether the enterprise is suitable for applying for the corresponding policy.

[0005] The present invention also provides a system terminal and a storage medium having a multi-dimensional evaluation method for a target object.

[0006] The multi-dimensional evaluation method of a target object according to the first aspect of the present invention is characterized by comprising:

[0007] Obtain information about the target object; classify the target object's information according to basic conditions, degree of specialization, degree of refinement, characteristics, and innovation capabilities; set different weights and evaluation criteria for the sub-items in each category, and score them, and obtain the final evaluation results by combining the scores; among them,

[0008] The sub-items of the basic situation include holding relationship and identification of similar products within the group;

[0009] The sub-items of the degree of specialization include market segmentation time, proportion of main business income and main business income growth rate;

[0010] The sub-items of the degree of refinement include product or management system certification, information system support and debt-to-asset ratio;

[0011] The sub-items of the degree of specialization include market share and independent brands;

[0012] The sub-items of innovation capability include the proportion of R&D expenses, the number of Class I intellectual property rights, and the number of standards formulated.

[0013] The multi-dimensional evaluation method of the target object according to the embodiment of the present invention has at least the following beneficial effects: the method makes an objective evaluation of the specific situation of the target object, thereby comprehensively and objectively evaluating the comprehensive strength of the enterprise. It avoids the customer's understanding deviation of the policy standards, thereby reducing invalid applications.

[0014] According to some embodiments of the present invention, the information of the enterprise also includes industrial chain supporting facilities, and the sub-projects of the industrial chain supporting facilities include the industrial chain to which it belongs, the status of filling in the gaps, the supporting conditions, and the six industrial bases.

[0015] According to some embodiments of the present invention, the scoring process of the basic situation includes:

[0016] Obtain basic information provided by the user;

[0017] Obtain data corresponding to the user's basic information through public channels, and compare the corresponding data with the basic information provided by the user to determine the reliability of the information provided by the user;

[0018] The weights and / or evaluation criteria of different sub-items in the enterprise information are adjusted based on the reliability.

[0019] According to some embodiments of the present invention, the target is an enterprise, and the basic conditions include:

[0020] Controlling relationship check: confirm whether the current enterprise has a controlling stake in the assessed enterprise;

[0021] Similar product certification inspection within the group: Determine whether there are other companies in the group that produce similar leading products that have been certified or declared.

[0022] According to some embodiments of the present invention, the sub-items may be divided into confidential items and public items, wherein the public items refer to items whose information can be obtained from other public channels; the scoring process of the basic situation includes:

[0023] Obtain the data provided by the user and determine the confidential and public items;

[0024] Obtaining data corresponding to public items in the user-provided data through public channels, and comparing the corresponding data with the public items provided by the user to determine the reliability of the information provided by the user;

[0025] The weights and / or evaluation criteria of different sub-items in the enterprise information are adjusted based on the reliability.

[0026] The multi-dimensional evaluation system for a target object according to the second aspect of the present invention is characterized by comprising:

[0027] Data collection module, which can obtain information of target objects;

[0028] The information classification module can classify the target object's information according to basic conditions, degree of specialization, degree of refinement, characteristics, and innovation capabilities;

[0029] The data evaluation module can set different weights and evaluation criteria for each sub-item in each category, and score them, and obtain the final evaluation result by combining the scores.

[0030] The sub-items of the basic situation include holding relationship and identification of similar products within the group;

[0031] The sub-items of the degree of specialization include market segmentation time, proportion of main business income and main business income growth rate;

[0032] The sub-items of the degree of refinement include product or management system certification, information system support and debt-to-asset ratio;

[0033] The sub-items of the degree of specialization include market share and independent brands;

[0034] The sub-items of innovation capability include the proportion of R&D expenses, the number of Class I intellectual property rights, and the number of standards formulated.

[0035] According to some embodiments of the present invention, the information of the enterprise also includes industrial chain supporting facilities, and the sub-projects of the industrial chain supporting facilities include the industrial chain to which it belongs, the status of filling in the gaps, the supporting conditions, and the six industrial bases.

[0036] According to some embodiments of the present invention, in the data evaluation module, the scoring process of the basic situation includes:

[0037] Obtain basic information provided by the user;

[0038] Obtain data corresponding to the user's basic information through public channels, and compare the corresponding data with the basic information provided by the user to determine the reliability of the information provided by the user;

[0039] The weights and / or evaluation criteria of different sub-items in the enterprise information are adjusted based on the reliability.

[0040] According to some embodiments of the present invention, the target is an enterprise, and the basic conditions include:

[0041] Controlling relationship check: confirm whether the current enterprise has a controlling stake in the assessed enterprise;

[0042] Similar product certification inspection within the group: Determine whether there are other companies in the group that produce similar leading products that have been certified or declared.

[0043] According to some embodiments of the present invention, the sub-items may be divided into confidential items and public items, wherein the public items refer to items whose information can be obtained from other public channels; the scoring process of the basic situation includes:

[0044] Obtain the data provided by the user and determine the confidential and public items;

[0045] Obtaining data corresponding to public items in the user-provided data through public channels, and comparing the corresponding data with the public items provided by the user to determine the reliability of the information provided by the user;

[0046] The weights and / or evaluation criteria of different sub-items in the enterprise information are adjusted based on the reliability.

[0047] According to the terminal of the embodiment of the third aspect of the present invention, the terminal includes a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, and when the processor executes the computer program, the multi-dimensional evaluation method of the target object is implemented.

[0048] According to a computer-readable storage medium of an embodiment of the fourth aspect of the present invention, the medium stores computer-executable instructions, and the computer-executable instructions are used to execute the multi-dimensional evaluation method of the target object.

[0049] Additional aspects and advantages of the present invention will be given in part in the following description and in part will be obvious from the following description, or will be learned through practice of the present invention. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0050] The above and / or additional aspects and advantages of the present invention will become apparent and easily understood from the description of the embodiments in conjunction with the following drawings, in which:

[0051] Figure 1 A schematic diagram of the steps of a multi-dimensional evaluation method for a target object provided in the first embodiment of the present invention;

[0052] Figure 2 A schematic diagram of the steps of a multi-dimensional evaluation method for a target object provided in the second embodiment of the present invention;

[0053] Figure 3 This is a structural block diagram of a multi-dimensional evaluation system for a target object provided by an embodiment of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0054] Embodiments of the present invention are described in detail below, examples of which are shown in the accompanying drawings, wherein the same or similar reference numerals throughout represent the same or similar elements or elements having the same or similar functions. The embodiments described below with reference to the accompanying drawings are exemplary and are only used to explain the present invention, and cannot be understood as limiting the present invention.

[0055] In the description of the present invention, it should be understood that descriptions involving orientations, such as up, down, front, back, left, right, etc., and orientations or positional relationships indicated are based on the orientations or positional relationships shown in the accompanying drawings, and are only for the convenience of describing the present invention and simplifying the description, and do not indicate or imply that the device or element referred to must have a specific orientation, be constructed and operated in a specific orientation, and therefore should not be understood as a limitation on the present invention.

[0056] In the description of the present invention, "several" means one or more, "more" means more than two, "greater than", "less than", "exceed" etc. are understood as not including the number itself, and "above", "below", "within" etc. are understood as including the number itself. If there is a description of "first" or "second", it is only used for the purpose of distinguishing the technical features, and cannot be understood as indicating or implying the relative importance or implicitly indicating the number of the indicated technical features or implicitly indicating the order of the indicated technical features.

[0057] In the description of the present invention, unless otherwise clearly defined, terms such as setting, installing, connecting, etc. should be understood in a broad sense, and technicians in the relevant technical field can reasonably determine the specific meanings of the above terms in the present invention based on the specific content of the technical solution.

[0058] Embodiment 1

[0059] In order to enhance the user's understanding of a policy application standard, the present invention provides a multi-dimensional evaluation method for a target object, such as Figure 1 As shown, the method comprises the following steps:

[0060] Step S100: Obtain information of the target object.

[0061] In order to comprehensively evaluate the comprehensive strength of an enterprise, users are required to provide a variety of data for analysis, some of which are difficult to collect and require the enterprise to provide the data itself.

[0062] It is understandable that when obtaining some items that need to be kept confidential, the data needs to be encrypted for transmission to enhance security.

[0063] Step S200: classify the target object's information according to basic situation, degree of specialization, degree of refinement, characteristics, and innovation capability.

[0064] Sub-items of the basic situation include holding relationships and identification of similar products within the group;

[0065] The sub-items of specialization degree include time in the market segment, proportion of main business income and growth rate of main business income;

[0066] Sub-items of refinement include product or management system certification, information system support, and debt-to-asset ratio;

[0067] Sub-items of degree of specialization include market share and proprietary brands;

[0068] The sub-items of innovation capability include the proportion of R&D expenditure, the number of Class I intellectual property rights, and the number of standards formulated.

[0069] Preferably, for some enterprises, there is also industrial chain supporting facilities, and the sub-projects of the industrial chain supporting facilities include the industrial chain to which they belong, the status of making up for shortcomings, the supporting conditions, and the six industrial bases.

[0070] Step S300: Different weights and evaluation criteria are set for the sub-items in each category, and scores are given, and the final evaluation result is obtained by combining the scores.

[0071] For the above sub-items, this embodiment provides a teaching evaluation standard and weight for each category, with a percentage system as a reference, as follows:

[0072] 1. Basic information:

[0073] Check on controlling relationship (5 points): If there is no controlling relationship with an existing enterprise that has passed the assessment, 5 points will be awarded if the standard is met; otherwise, 0 points will be awarded if the standard is not met.

[0074] Similar product recognition check within the group (5 points): If no other enterprise producing similar leading products within the same group has been recognized or declared, 5 points will be awarded if the standard is met; otherwise, 0 points will be awarded if the standard is not met.

[0075] 2. Specialization:

[0076] Time in market segmentation (5 points): If the time of engagement is ≥ 3 years, 5 points will be awarded; otherwise, 0 points will be awarded if the standard is not met.

[0077] Proportion of main business income (5 points): If the proportion is ≥70%, 5 points will be awarded; otherwise, 0 points will be awarded if the standard is not met.

[0078] Growth rate of main business income (10 points): If the average growth rate in the past two years is ≥5%, 10 points will be awarded if it meets the standard; otherwise, 0 points will be awarded if it does not meet the standard.

[0079] 3. Refinement:

[0080] Product or management system certification (5 points): If at least one of the certifications is met, 5 points will be awarded; if neither is met, 0 points will be awarded.

[0081] Information system support (5 points): If at least one core business uses an information system and meets the requirements, 5 points will be awarded; otherwise, 0 points will be awarded if the requirements are not met.

[0082] Debt-to-asset ratio (10 points): ≤70%, if it meets the standard, 10 points will be awarded; otherwise, 0 points will be awarded if it does not meet the standard.

[0083] 4. Characteristic:

[0084] Market share (10 points): ≥10%, if the standard is met, 10 points will be awarded; otherwise, 0 points will be awarded if the standard is not met.

[0085] Independent brand (5 points): 5 points if the company has an independent brand, 0 points if the company does not have an independent brand (not mandatory but recommended).

[0086] 5. Innovation ability:

[0087] Number of research institutions (optional, maximum 3 points): 3 points if there is a research institution, 0 points if there is none.

[0088] R&D expense ratio (10 points): Set different ratio requirements based on 2023 operating income, and meet the requirements if met.

[0089] Number of Category I intellectual property rights (10 points): 10 points if ≥ 2 items are related to the dominant product, otherwise 0 points.

[0090] Number of standards formulated (non-mandatory, maximum 2 points): 2 points will be awarded if the main drafting unit formulates ≥ 3 standards, otherwise 0 points.

[0091] 6. Industrial chain supporting:

[0092] Industry chain (maximum score: 3 points): score by field, with a maximum of 100 points and a weight of 40%.

[0093] Make up for shortcomings (maximum score: 3 points): score based on technical level, with a maximum of 100 points and a weighting of 40%.

[0094] Supporting conditions (maximum score: 2 points): score based on the scale of supporting enterprises, with a maximum score of 100 points and a weight of 20%.

[0095] Six basic elements of industry (non-mandatory, maximum 2 points): If yes, get 2 points; No, get 0 points.

[0096] The scores of each sub-item are added together to get the total score, and the grades are divided according to the total score: 96 points and above are S grade, 80 points and above are A grade, 70 points and above are B grade, and 60 points and above are C grade.

[0097] Embodiment 2

[0098] Embodiment 1 provides a basic evaluation system, but this evaluation system relies on data provided by users. In some cases, users may tend to beautify their own data, which may cause data distortion and further affect the evaluation results.

[0099] Based on the above reasons, the method provided in the first embodiment is improved so that the authenticity of the data provided by the user can be judged, thereby improving the accuracy of the judgment.

[0100] In the multi-dimensional evaluation method of the target object provided in the second embodiment, Figure 2 As shown, including:

[0101] Step A100: Obtain the data provided by the user and determine the confidential items and public items therein.

[0102] When obtaining data provided by users, items that can only be known to the users themselves are kept confidential, while items that can be obtained from public websites are kept public.

[0103] Step A200: Acquire data corresponding to the public items in the user-provided data through public channels, and compare the corresponding data with the public items provided by the user to determine the reliability of the information provided by the user.

[0104] Obtain the user's corresponding information from information disclosure websites or other sources, and compare the data provided by the user with the public items. For example:

[0105] Among the data provided by the user, there are a total of 5 public items that can be obtained from public sources; and among these 5 public items, 4 public items are consistent with the data provided by the public source and the user, so the user's reliability can be determined to be 0.8.

[0106] Step A300: adjusting the weights and / or evaluation criteria of different sub-items in the enterprise information based on the reliability.

[0107] If the user's reliability is 100%, the information provided by the user is considered accurate and the default evaluation criteria and weights can be used.

[0108] If the user reliability is between 60% and 100%, it is considered that the user has beautified the data, and the weight and evaluation criteria need to be modified. The specific modification strategy is as follows:

[0109] (1) Modification of weights

[0110] Increase the weight of the public item, and use the data obtained from the public source as the basis for subsequent judgment. The increased weight needs to be deducted from the weight of the confidential item by an equal amount. The details are as follows:

[0111] Taking the category of specialization as an example, the weight is usually changed by changing the proportion of different sub-items in one category. Specialization has three sub-items:

[0112] Time in market segmentation (5 points): If the time of engagement is ≥ 3 years, 5 points will be awarded; otherwise, 0 points will be awarded if the standard is not met.

[0113] Proportion of main business income (5 points): If the proportion is ≥70%, 5 points will be awarded; otherwise, 0 points will be awarded if the standard is not met.

[0114] Growth rate of main business income (10 points): If the average growth rate in the past two years is ≥5%, 10 points will be awarded if it meets the standard; otherwise, 0 points will be awarded if it does not meet the standard.

[0115] If the time of the market segment is considered public, and the proportion of main business income and the growth rate of main business income are confidential, then when changing the weight, you can increase the score of the time of the market segment and reduce the proportion of the proportion of main business income and the growth rate of main business income:

[0116] Time in market segmentation (10 points): If the time of engagement is ≥ 3 years, 10 points will be awarded; otherwise, 0 points will be awarded if the standard is not met.

[0117] Proportion of main business income (3 points): If the proportion is ≥70%, 3 points will be awarded; otherwise, 0 points will be awarded if the standard is not met.

[0118] Growth rate of main business income (7 points): If the average growth rate in the past two years is ≥5%, 7 points will be awarded if it meets the standard; otherwise, 0 points will be awarded if it does not meet the standard.

[0119] (2) Modification of evaluation criteria

[0120] Taking specialization as an example, specialization has three sub-items:

[0121] Time in market segmentation (5 points): If the time of engagement is ≥ 3 years, 5 points will be awarded; otherwise, 0 points will be awarded if the standard is not met.

[0122] Proportion of main business income (5 points): If the proportion is ≥70%, 5 points will be awarded; otherwise, 0 points will be awarded if the standard is not met.

[0123] Growth rate of main business income (10 points): If the average growth rate in the past two years is ≥5%, 10 points will be awarded if it meets the standard; otherwise, 0 points will be awarded if it does not meet the standard.

[0124] If the time of market segmentation is determined to be a public item, and the proportion of main business income and the growth rate of main business income are confidential items, then when changing the evaluation criteria, the evaluation criteria of the confidential items can be made stricter. For example:

[0125] Time in market segmentation (5 points): If the time of engagement is ≥ 3 years, 5 points will be awarded; otherwise, 0 points will be awarded if the standard is not met.

[0126] Proportion of main business income (5 points): If the proportion is ≥75%, 5 points will be awarded; otherwise, 0 points will be awarded if the standard is not met.

[0127] Growth rate of main business income (10 points): If the average growth rate in the past two years is ≥ 7%, 10 points will be awarded if it meets the standard; 5 points will be awarded if the growth rate is between 5% and 7%; 0 points will be awarded if the growth rate is less than 5%.

[0128] The above modifications to weights and evaluation criteria are only for illustration purposes. Their purpose is to compensate for the distortion caused by data beautification by users to a certain extent. The results obtained for different users are also different, and targeted analysis is required based on user characteristics.

[0129] If the user reliability is less than 60%, it is generally believed that the user data is unreliable or there are serious problems with the sampling data. At this time, modifying the evaluation criteria can no longer make up for the user's beautification of the data, so it is necessary to contact the customer to communicate and find out where the problem lies.

[0130] Embodiment 3

[0131] Another embodiment of the present application provides a multi-dimensional evaluation system for a target object, such as Figure 3 As shown, the system 30 includes:

[0132] Data collection module 301, capable of acquiring information of a target object;

[0133] The information classification module 302 can classify the information of the target object according to basic conditions, degree of specialization, degree of refinement, characteristics, and innovation ability;

[0134] The data evaluation module 303 can set different weights and evaluation criteria for each sub-item in each category, and score them, and obtain the final evaluation result by combining the scores of various items;

[0135] The sub-items of the basic situation include holding relationship and identification of similar products within the group;

[0136] The sub-items of the degree of specialization include market segmentation time, proportion of main business income and main business income growth rate;

[0137] The sub-items of the degree of refinement include product or management system certification, information system support and debt-to-asset ratio;

[0138] The sub-items of the degree of specialization include market share and independent brands;

[0139] The sub-items of innovation capability include the proportion of R&D expenses, the number of Class I intellectual property rights, and the number of standards formulated.

[0140] Furthermore, the information of the enterprise also includes industrial chain supporting facilities, and the sub-projects of the industrial chain supporting facilities include the industrial chain to which it belongs, the status of filling in the gaps, the supporting conditions, and the six industrial bases.

[0141] According to some embodiments of the present invention, in the data evaluation module, the scoring process of the basic situation includes:

[0142] Obtain basic information provided by the user;

[0143] Obtain data corresponding to the user's basic information through public channels, and compare the corresponding data with the basic information provided by the user to determine the reliability of the information provided by the user;

[0144] The weights and / or evaluation criteria of different sub-items in the enterprise information are adjusted based on the reliability.

[0145] Furthermore, the target is an enterprise, where the basic situation includes:

[0146] Controlling relationship check: confirm whether the current enterprise has a controlling stake in the assessed enterprise;

[0147] Similar product certification inspection within the group: Determine whether there are other companies in the group that produce similar leading products that have been certified or declared.

[0148] Furthermore, sub-items can be divided into confidential items and public items, where public items refer to items whose information can be obtained from other public channels; the scoring process of the basic situation includes:

[0149] Obtain the data provided by the user and determine the confidential and public items;

[0150] Obtaining data corresponding to public items in the user-provided data through public channels, and comparing the corresponding data with the public items provided by the user to determine the reliability of the information provided by the user;

[0151] The weights and / or evaluation criteria of different sub-items in the enterprise information are adjusted based on the reliability.

[0152] Embodiment 4:

[0153] Yet another embodiment of the present application provides a terminal, including: a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, wherein the processor executes the computer program to implement the multi-dimensional evaluation method for the target object.

[0154] Specifically, the processor may be a CPU, a general-purpose processor, a DSP, an ASIC, an FPGA or other programmable logic device, a transistor logic device, a hardware component or any combination thereof. It may implement or execute various exemplary logic blocks, modules and circuits described in conjunction with the disclosure of this application. The processor may also be a combination that implements computing functions, such as a combination of one or more microprocessors, a combination of a DSP and a microprocessor, etc.

[0155] Specifically, the processor is connected to the memory via a bus, and the bus may include a path for transmitting information. The bus may be a PCI bus or an EISA bus, etc. The bus may be divided into an address bus, a data bus, a control bus, etc.

[0156] The memory can be a ROM or other type of static storage device that can store static information and instructions, a RAM or other type of dynamic storage device that can store information and instructions, or an EEPROM, CD-ROM or other optical disk storage, optical disk storage (including compressed optical disk, laser disk, optical disk, digital versatile disk, Blu-ray disk, etc.), magnetic disk storage medium or other magnetic storage device, or any other medium that can be used to carry or store the desired program code in the form of instructions or data structures and can be accessed by a computer, but is not limited to this.

[0157] Optionally, the memory is used to store the code of the computer program for executing the solution of the present application, and the execution is controlled by the processor. The processor is used to execute the application program code stored in the memory to implement Figure 3 The illustrated embodiment provides the functions of a multi-dimensional evaluation system for a target object.

[0158] Another embodiment of the present application provides a computer-readable storage medium storing computer-executable instructions for executing the above-mentioned Figure 1 Multi-dimensional evaluation method for the target object shown.

[0159] The device embodiments described above are only illustrative, and the units described as separate components may or may not be physically separated, that is, they may be located in one place, or they may be distributed on multiple network units. Some or all of the modules may be selected according to actual needs to achieve the purpose of the solution of this embodiment.

[0160] It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that all or some of the steps and systems in the disclosed method above may be implemented as software, firmware, hardware and appropriate combinations thereof. Some physical components or all physical components may be implemented as software executed by a processor, such as a central processing unit, a digital signal processor or a microprocessor, or may be implemented as hardware, or may be implemented as an integrated circuit, such as an application specific integrated circuit. Such software may be distributed on a computer-readable medium, which may include a computer storage medium (or a non-transitory medium) and a communication medium (or a temporary medium). As known to those skilled in the art, the term computer storage medium includes volatile and non-volatile, removable and non-removable media implemented in any method or technology for storing information (such as computer-readable instructions, data structures, program modules or other data). Computer storage media include, but are not limited to, RAM, ROM, EEPROM, flash memory or other memory technologies, CD-ROM, digital versatile disks (DVD) or other optical disk storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tapes, disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium that may be used to store desired information and may be accessed by a computer. Furthermore, it is well known to those skilled in the art that communication media typically embodies computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules, or other data in a modulated data signal such as a carrier wave or other transport mechanism, and may include any information delivery media.

[0161] The above is a specific description of the preferred implementation of the present application, but the present application is not limited to the above-mentioned implementation mode. Technical personnel familiar with the field can also make various equivalent deformations or substitutions without violating the spirit of the present application. These equivalent deformations or substitutions are all included in the scope defined by the claims of the present application.

Claims

1. A multi-dimensional evaluation method for a target object, characterized in that: include: Get information about the target object; Classify the target object's information according to basic situation, degree of specialization, degree of refinement, characteristics, and innovation ability; Different weights and evaluation criteria are set for each sub-item in each category, and scores are given. The final evaluation result is obtained by combining the scores. The sub-items of the basic situation include holding relationship and identification of similar products within the group; The sub-items of the degree of specialization include market segmentation time, proportion of main business income and main business income growth rate; The sub-items of the degree of refinement include product or management system certification, information system support and debt-to-asset ratio; The sub-items of the degree of specialization include market share and independent brands; The sub-items of innovation capability include the proportion of R&D expenses, the number of Class I intellectual property rights, and the number of standards formulated.

2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that The information of the enterprise also includes industrial chain supporting facilities, and the sub-projects of the industrial chain supporting facilities include the industrial chain to which it belongs, the status of filling in the gaps, the supporting conditions, and the six industrial bases.

3. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that The scoring process of the basic situation includes: Obtain basic information provided by the user; Obtain data corresponding to the user's basic information through public channels, and compare the corresponding data with the basic information provided by the user to determine the reliability of the information provided by the user; The weights and / or evaluation criteria of different sub-items in the enterprise information are adjusted based on the reliability.

4. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that The target is an enterprise, where the basic situation includes: Controlling relationship check: confirm whether the current enterprise has a controlling stake in the identified enterprise; Similar product certification inspection within the group: Determine whether there are other companies in the group that produce similar leading products that have been certified or declared.

5. The method according to claims 3 and 4, characterized in that The sub-items can be divided into confidential items and public items, where public items refer to items whose information can be obtained from other public channels; the scoring process of the basic situation includes: Obtain the data provided by the user and determine the confidential and public items; Obtaining data corresponding to public items in the user-provided data through public channels, and comparing the corresponding data with the public items provided by the user to determine the reliability of the information provided by the user; The weights and / or evaluation criteria of different sub-items in the enterprise information are adjusted based on the reliability.

6. A multi-dimensional evaluation system for a target object, characterized in that: include: Data collection module, which can obtain information of target objects; The information classification module can classify the target object's information according to basic conditions, degree of specialization, degree of refinement, characteristics, and innovation capabilities; The data evaluation module can set different weights and evaluation criteria for each sub-item in each category, and score them, and obtain the final evaluation result by combining the scores. The sub-items of the basic situation include holding relationship and identification of similar products within the group; The sub-items of the degree of specialization include market segmentation time, proportion of main business income and main business income growth rate; The sub-items of the degree of refinement include product or management system certification, information system support and debt-to-asset ratio; The sub-items of the degree of specialization include market share and independent brands; The sub-items of innovation capability include the proportion of R&D expenses, the number of Class I intellectual property rights, and the number of standards formulated.

7. The system according to claim 6, characterized in that The information of the enterprise also includes industrial chain supporting facilities, and the sub-projects of the industrial chain supporting facilities include the industrial chain to which it belongs, the status of filling in the gaps, the supporting conditions, and the six industrial bases.

8. The system according to claim 6, characterized in that In the data evaluation module, the scoring process for the basic situation includes: Obtain basic information provided by the user; Obtain data corresponding to the user's basic information through public channels, and compare the corresponding data with the basic information provided by the user to determine the reliability of the information provided by the user; The weights and / or evaluation criteria of different sub-items in the enterprise information are adjusted based on the reliability.

9. The system according to claim 6, characterized in that The target is an enterprise, where the basic situation includes: Controlling relationship check: confirm whether the current enterprise has a controlling stake in the identified enterprise; Similar product certification inspection within the group: Determine whether there are other companies in the group that produce similar leading products that have been certified or declared.

10. The system according to claims 8 and 9, characterized in that The sub-items can be divided into confidential items and public items, where public items refer to items whose information can be obtained from other public channels; the scoring process of the basic situation includes: Obtain the data provided by the user and determine the confidential and public items; Obtaining data corresponding to public items in the user-provided data through public channels, and comparing the corresponding data with the public items provided by the user to determine the reliability of the information provided by the user; The weights and / or evaluation criteria of different sub-items in the enterprise information are adjusted based on the reliability.

11. A terminal, comprising: A memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, wherein the processor executes the computer program to implement the method according to any one of claims 1 to 5. 12 . A computer-readable storage medium storing computer-executable instructions, wherein the computer-executable instructions are used to execute the method according to claim 1 .

Images