Method and system for testing energy efficiency of multifunctional food processor

Abstract

The invention discloses an energy efficiency testing method and system for a multifunctional food processor, and relates to the technical field of energy efficiency testing. The method comprises the following steps: firstly, evaluating preset data of the multifunctional food processer in each test environment by presetting data of different test environments to generate stirring data, matching the stirring data and testing, then monitoring work and loss data of the food processer in a monitoring time period, and determining the loss of the food processer on the basis of the work data. Analyzing to obtain a working test coincidence value of the multifunctional food processor, adjusting the rotating speed of the motor, extracting loss data, analyzing in combination with a test evaluation value of the multifunctional food processor and the working test coincidence value, adjusting a heat dissipation system, and performing early warning prompt; therefore, the working efficiency and performance of the food processor are improved, and the energy utilization efficiency of the food processor is improved.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the technical field of energy efficiency testing, and in particular to a method and system for testing the energy efficiency of a multifunctional food processor. Background Art

[0002] A multi-function food processor is a kitchen appliance that integrates multiple functions such as mixing, grinding, stirring, and cutting. It is widely used in homes and commercial places. At present, the energy efficiency test of multi-function food processors mainly relies on international and domestic standard methods, such as testing based on indicators such as power consumption, working time and processing efficiency, so as to provide consumers with more valuable reference energy efficiency data and promote the application and development of energy-saving technologies.

[0003] For example, the invention patent with announcement number CN116718860B announces a household appliance energy efficiency laboratory testing system, including: a data acquisition module: used to collect energy efficiency parameter data of household appliances involving water consumption; a data processing module: used to pre-process the collected energy efficiency parameter data and pre-prepare curve graphs; a test analysis module: used to perform energy efficiency testing and result analysis based on the pre-processed energy efficiency parameter data.

[0004] For example, the invention patent with announcement number CN107228993B announces a method and device for testing the energy efficiency of a pressure cooking appliance, the method comprising the following steps: obtaining an initial water temperature in the pressure cooking appliance, and calculating a baseline power consumption of the pressure cooking appliance based on the initial water temperature; controlling the pressure cooking appliance to operate so as to heat a preset volume of water in the pressure cooking appliance so that the pressure cooking appliance successively enters a temperature rise and pressure start-up stage and a pressure maintenance stage; obtaining the cumulative heating time of the pressure cooking appliance under preset conditions, and obtaining the power consumption of the pressure cooking appliance when the cumulative heating time reaches the preset time; and calculating the energy efficiency index of the pressure cooking appliance based on the power consumption of the pressure cooking appliance and the baseline power consumption of the pressure cooking appliance.

[0005] Based on the above findings, the existing technical solutions may have the problem of a single testing environment, which makes it impossible to comprehensively evaluate the performance of the product and obtain the best use environment for the product, thus affecting the energy efficiency of the equipment and causing unclear optimization direction of the product. Summary of the invention

[0006] In view of the deficiencies in the prior art, the present invention provides a method and system for testing the energy efficiency of a multi-functional food processor, which solves the problems in the above-mentioned background technology.

[0007] To achieve the above objectives, the present invention is implemented through the following technical solutions: a method for testing the energy efficiency of a multi-function food processor, comprising presetting data of each test environment, analyzing the data of each test environment to obtain a test evaluation value of the multi-function food processor under each test environment, and matching the test evaluation value of the multi-function food processor under each test environment to obtain stirring data of the multi-function food processor under each test environment.

[0008] The multi-function food processor is tested according to the stirring data of the multi-function food processor in each test environment, and each monitoring time period is preset. The working data and loss data of the multi-function food processor are monitored within each monitoring time period to obtain the working data and loss data of the multi-function food processor in each test environment within each monitoring time period.

[0009] The working data of the multi-function food processor in each test environment within each monitoring time period is analyzed to obtain the working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor in each monitoring time period under each test environment, and the motor speed of the multi-function food processor is adjusted according to the working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor in each monitoring time period under each test environment.

[0010] The loss data of the multi-function food processor in each test environment within each monitoring time period is extracted, and the test evaluation values ​​of the multi-function food processor under each test environment and the working test compliance values ​​of the multi-function food processor under each test environment within each monitoring time period are analyzed to obtain the energy efficiency evaluation value of the multi-function food processor under each test environment, adjust the heat dissipation equipment of the multi-function food processor, and issue an early warning prompt.

[0011] Furthermore, the data of each test environment includes the temperature of each test environment, the volume of food placed in each test under each test environment, and the hardness of food placed in each test under each test environment.

[0012] The temperature of each test environment, the volume and hardness of each test food under each test environment are extracted, and the data of each test environment are processed to obtain the test evaluation value of the multi-function food processor under each test environment. The test evaluation value of the multi-function food processor under each test environment obtained from the data of each test environment is used to evaluate the safety level of each test environment.

[0013] Furthermore, the test evaluation values ​​of the multi-function food processor under each test environment are extracted and matched with the stirring data corresponding to each interval of the test evaluation values ​​of each multi-function food processor in the database to obtain the stirring data of the multi-function food processor under each test environment. The stirring data of the multi-function food processor under each test environment includes blade speed, working power and stirring time.

[0014] Furthermore, the multi-function food processor is tested according to its blade speed, working power and stirring time under each test environment, and each monitoring time point is set within each monitoring time period to monitor the working data and loss data of the multi-function food processor to obtain the working data and loss data of the multi-function food processor in each test environment within each monitoring time period. The working data of the multi-function food processor in each test environment within each monitoring time period includes: the motor speed, amplitude and vibration acceleration of the multi-function food processor at each monitoring time point.

[0015] The loss data of the multi-function food processor in each test environment during each monitoring time period includes: the number of equipment restarts, the cumulative number of motor overheating, and the number of work interruptions.

[0016] Furthermore, the resistance of each blade in each monitoring time period is extracted, and the motor speed, amplitude and vibration acceleration of the multi-function food processor at each monitoring time point are averaged respectively to obtain the average motor speed, average amplitude and average vibration acceleration of the multi-function food processor in each monitoring time period, and the resistance of each blade in each monitoring time period is averaged to obtain the average resistance of the blade, and the working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor in each monitoring time period under each test environment is obtained through processing. The working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor in each monitoring time period under each test environment is used to evaluate the operation of the multi-function food processor.

[0017] Furthermore, the working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor in each monitoring time period under each test environment is extracted and compared with the working test compliance value threshold of the multi-function food processor stored in the database; if the working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor in a certain monitoring time period under a certain test environment is lower than the working test compliance value threshold of the multi-function food processor, the motor speed of the multi-function food processor in the test environment during the monitoring time period is adjusted.

[0018] If the working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor in a certain monitoring time period under a certain test environment is higher than or equal to the working test compliance value threshold of the multi-function food processor, the working data of the multi-function food processor in the test environment in the monitoring time period is continuously monitored.

[0019] Furthermore, the number of device restarts of the multi-function food processor in each monitoring time period, the cumulative number of motor overheating, the number of work interruptions, the test evaluation value of the multi-function food processor under each test environment, and the working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor in each monitoring time period under each test environment are extracted, and the energy efficiency evaluation value of the multi-function food processor under each test environment is processed to obtain the energy efficiency evaluation value of the multi-function food processor under each test environment. The energy efficiency evaluation value of the multi-function food processor under each test environment is used to evaluate the energy efficiency level of the multi-function food processor.

[0020] Furthermore, the energy efficiency evaluation value of the multi-function food processor under each test environment is extracted and matched with the energy efficiency levels corresponding to each interval of the energy efficiency evaluation value of the multi-function food processor stored in the database to obtain the energy efficiency level of the multi-function food processor under each test environment, wherein the energy efficiency level includes a high energy efficiency level, a medium energy efficiency level and a low energy efficiency level.

[0021] When the energy efficiency level of the multi-function food processor under a test environment is a high energy efficiency level, the energy consumption data of the multi-function food processor under the test environment is continuously monitored; when the energy efficiency level of the multi-function food processor under a test environment is a medium energy efficiency level, the heat dissipation device of the multi-function food processor under the test environment is adjusted, and the heat dissipation device includes a cooling fan and a water-cooled heat dissipation device; when the energy efficiency level of the multi-function food processor under a test environment is a low energy efficiency level, the heat dissipation device of the multi-function food processor under the test environment is adjusted while reducing the workload of the multi-function food processor, and an early warning is issued.

[0022] Furthermore, the energy efficiency evaluation values ​​of the multi-function food processor under each test environment are specifically analyzed as follows:

[0023]

[0024] In the formula, τ i represents the energy efficiency evaluation value of the multi-function food processor under the i-th test environment, ρ i represents the test evaluation value of the multi-function food processor under the i-th test environment, σ i→j It represents the working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor in the jth monitoring period under the i-th test environment, RT j Indicates the number of restarts of the multi-function food processor during the jth monitoring period, OT j Indicates the cumulative number of motor overheating of the multi-function food processor in the jth monitoring period, INT j represents the number of interruptions of the multi-function food processor during the jth monitoring period, ΔRT represents the allowed value of the number of restarts of the multi-function food processor, ΔOT represents the allowed value of the cumulative number of overheating of the motor of the multi-function food processor, ΔINT represents the allowed value of the number of interruptions of the multi-function food processor, and a 1 Indicates the weight factor corresponding to the test evaluation value of the multi-function food processor, a 2 Indicates the weight factor corresponding to the set working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor, a 3 Indicates the weight factor corresponding to the number of device restarts of the multi-function food processor, a 4 Indicates the weight factor corresponding to the cumulative number of overheating times of the motor of the multi-function food processor, a 5Represents the weight factor corresponding to the set number of work interruptions of the multi-function food processor, i represents the number of each test environment, i=1,2,3,...,m, m represents the total number of test environments, j represents the number of each monitoring time period, j=1,2,3,...,n, n represents the total number of monitoring time periods.

[0025] Furthermore, the second aspect of the present invention provides a multifunctional food processor energy efficiency testing system, comprising:

[0026] The test environment management module is used to preset the data of each test environment, analyze the data of each test environment to obtain the test evaluation value of the multi-function food processor under each test environment, and match the test evaluation value of the multi-function food processor under each test environment to obtain the stirring data of the multi-function food processor under each test environment.

[0027] The data monitoring module is used to test the multi-function food processor according to the stirring data of the multi-function food processor under each test environment, preset each monitoring time period, monitor the working data and loss data of the multi-function food processor within each monitoring time period, and obtain the working data and loss data of the multi-function food processor in each test environment within each monitoring time period.

[0028] The data analysis and adjustment module is used to analyze the working data of the multi-function food processor in each test environment within each monitoring time period, obtain the working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor in each monitoring time period under each test environment, and adjust the motor speed of the multi-function food processor according to the working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor in each monitoring time period under each test environment.

[0029] The function evaluation module is used to extract the loss data of the multi-function food processor in each test environment within each monitoring time period, analyze the test evaluation value of the multi-function food processor under each test environment and the working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor under each test environment within each monitoring time period, obtain the energy efficiency evaluation value of the multi-function food processor under each test environment, adjust the heat dissipation equipment of the multi-function food processor, and issue an early warning prompt.

[0030] The present invention has the following beneficial effects:

[0031] (1) The present invention provides a method and system for testing the energy efficiency of a multifunctional food processor. First, by presetting the data of each test environment, the test evaluation value of the multifunctional food processor in each environment is analyzed and calculated, thereby providing a basis for matching the stirring data. Next, based on these data, a working test of the food processor is performed. During a preset monitoring period, its working state and loss are continuously monitored, and working data and loss data are collected. Subsequently, by analyzing these monitoring data, the performance compliance of the food processor in each environment is evaluated, which helps to avoid excessive loss and improve energy efficiency. The motor speed is adjusted according to the working test compliance value to optimize the working efficiency. Finally, the energy efficiency evaluation is performed in combination with the loss data, the test evaluation value and the working test compliance value, and the heat dissipation system of the food processor is adjusted based on the analysis results to ensure the thermal efficiency of the equipment.

[0032] (2) The present invention extracts data such as temperature, food volume and hardness of each test environment, processes it to obtain a test evaluation value of the multi-function food processor, which is used to evaluate the safety level of each test environment and matches the corresponding stirring data in the database as the energy efficiency test working parameter of the multi-function food processor, which helps to accurately evaluate the energy efficiency performance of the multi-function food processor in different environments and improve the accuracy and reliability of the test.

[0033] (3) The present invention processes the motor speed, amplitude, vibration acceleration and blade resistance of the multi-function food processor to obtain the working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor in each monitoring time period under each test environment, so as to evaluate the operating status and working efficiency of the multi-function food processor under different environments, which is helpful to comprehensively evaluate the working performance and stability of the food processor and timely discover potential problems of the equipment.

[0034] (4) The present invention extracts the number of device restarts, the cumulative number of motor overheating, the number of work interruptions, the test evaluation value and the work test compliance value of the multi-function food processor in each monitoring time period, and processes them to obtain the energy efficiency evaluation value under each test environment, which is used to evaluate the energy efficiency performance of the multi-function food processor and adjust the heat dissipation device of the multi-function food processor, which helps to timely discover and solve energy efficiency problems, prevent potential failures, and ensure the stable operation of the equipment.

[0035] Of course, any product implementing the present invention does not necessarily need to achieve all of the advantages described above at the same time. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0036] Figure 1 It is a schematic diagram of the process of the present invention.

[0037] Figure 2 It is a variation curve of the average amplitude of the multifunctional food processor of the present invention and the working test compliance value of the multifunctional food processor.

[0038] Figure 3 It is a schematic diagram of the system flow of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0039] The following will be combined with the drawings in the embodiments of the present invention to clearly and completely describe the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention. Obviously, the described embodiments are only part of the embodiments of the present invention, not all of the embodiments. Based on the embodiments of the present invention, all other embodiments obtained by ordinary technicians in this field without creative work are within the scope of protection of the present invention.

[0040] In the description of the present invention, it should be understood that the terms "opening", "upper", "lower", "thickness", "top", "middle", "length", "inside", "all around" and the like indicating orientation or positional relationship are only for the convenience of describing the present invention and simplifying the description, rather than indicating or implying that the components or elements referred to must have a specific orientation, be constructed and operated in a specific orientation, and therefore should not be understood as limiting the present invention.

[0041] See also Figure 1 The embodiment of the present invention provides a technical solution: a method and system for testing the energy efficiency of a multi-function food processor, including presetting data of each test environment, analyzing the data of each test environment to obtain a test evaluation value of the multi-function food processor under each test environment, and matching the test evaluation value of the multi-function food processor under each test environment to obtain stirring data of the multi-function food processor under each test environment.

[0042] The multi-function food processor is tested according to the stirring data of the multi-function food processor in each test environment, and each monitoring time period is preset. The working data and loss data of the multi-function food processor are monitored within each monitoring time period to obtain the working data and loss data of the multi-function food processor in each test environment within each monitoring time period.

[0043] The working data of the multi-function food processor in each test environment within each monitoring time period is analyzed to obtain the working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor in each monitoring time period under each test environment, and the motor speed of the multi-function food processor is adjusted according to the working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor in each monitoring time period under each test environment.

[0044] The loss data of the multi-function food processor in each test environment within each monitoring time period is extracted, and the test evaluation values ​​of the multi-function food processor under each test environment and the working test compliance values ​​of the multi-function food processor under each test environment within each monitoring time period are analyzed to obtain the energy efficiency evaluation value of the multi-function food processor under each test environment, adjust the heat dissipation equipment of the multi-function food processor, and issue an early warning prompt.

[0045] It should be noted that data for different test environments are preset, and the test environment data includes analyzing and processing the preset data of the multi-function food processor under each test environment to generate stirring data, extracting the stirring data and testing it, and then monitoring the working and loss data of the food processor during the monitoring period. Based on the working data, the working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor is analyzed and obtained, the motor speed is adjusted, the loss data is extracted, and the test evaluation value and the working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor are combined for analysis, the heat dissipation system is adjusted, and early warning prompts are issued. By adjusting the motor speed and other operating parameters, the working efficiency and performance of the food processor are improved, and the energy utilization efficiency of the food processor is improved.

[0046] It should be noted that each test environment includes the power supply voltage, power supply frequency, and working time of the multi-function food processor for each test.

[0047] Specifically, the data of each test environment includes the temperature of each test environment, the volume of food placed in each test under each test environment, and the hardness of food placed in each test under each test environment.

[0048] The temperature of each test environment, the volume and hardness of each test food under each test environment are extracted, and the data of each test environment are processed to obtain the test evaluation value of the multi-function food processor under each test environment. The test evaluation value of the multi-function food processor under each test environment obtained from the data of each test environment is used to evaluate the safety level of each test environment.

[0049] It should be noted that a temperature sensor is used to measure the temperature of the test environment; a food volume meter is used to accurately measure the volume of the food; and a texture analyzer is used to measure the hardness of the food.

[0050] It should be noted that the test evaluation value of the multi-function food processor under each test environment is analyzed in the following specific process:

[0051]

[0052] In the formula, ρ i represents the test evaluation value of the multi-function food processor under the i-th test environment, T i The temperature of the i-th test environment, V i→q represents the food delivery volume for the qth test under the ith test environment, H i→q represents the hardness of the food put in the qth test under the i-th test environment, ΔT represents the reference value of the set temperature of the test environment, ΔV represents the reference value of the set food volume, ΔH represents the reference value of the set hardness of the food, and b 1 Indicates the correction factor corresponding to the set test environment temperature, b 2 Indicates the correction factor corresponding to the set food delivery volume, b 3It represents the correction factor corresponding to the set hardness of the food, i represents the number of each test environment, i=1,2,3,...,m, m represents the total number of test environments, q represents the number of each test number, q=1,2,3,...,r, r represents the total number of tests.

[0053] It should be noted that there is a correlation between the temperature of each test environment, the volume of food put in each test under each test environment, and the hardness. The temperature of the test environment directly affects the operating efficiency of the multi-function food processor and the stability of the test results. Higher or lower ambient temperatures may change the motor performance of the food processor, thereby affecting the consistency and efficiency of food processing. The difference in the test evaluation values ​​of the multi-function food processor under different environmental conditions reflects the adaptability and stability of the equipment performance. For example, if the evaluation value under high temperature conditions is significantly lower than that under normal temperature conditions, it may indicate that the heat dissipation performance of the food processor is insufficient. The temperature of each test environment, the volume of food put in each test under each test environment, and the hardness are analyzed to obtain the test evaluation value of the multi-function food processor under each test environment.

[0054] b 1 The correction factor corresponding to the temperature of the test environment set in the database is used to quantify the influence of the temperature of the test environment on the test evaluation value of the multi-function food processor. It can be directly obtained from the database when used, and its corresponding relationship is a pre-set mapping relationship. For example, the temperature of the test environment and the correction factor corresponding to the temperature of the test environment preset in the database form a mapping set. The real-time temperature of the test environment is input into this mapping set to obtain the corresponding correction factor. The mapping relationship is a one-to-one correspondence or a many-to-one relationship. In this example, the value range of the correction factor is [0,1].

[0055] b 2 The correction factor corresponding to the food delivery volume set in the database is used to quantify the influence of the food delivery volume on the test evaluation value of the multi-function food processor. It can be directly obtained from the database when used, and its corresponding relationship is a pre-set mapping relationship. For example, the food delivery volume and the correction factor corresponding to the food delivery volume preset in the database form a mapping set. The real-time food delivery volume is input into this mapping set to obtain the corresponding correction factor. The mapping relationship is a one-to-one correspondence or a many-to-one relationship. In this example, the value range of the correction factor is [0,1].

[0056] b 3The correction factor corresponding to the hardness of the food set in the database is used to quantify the influence of the hardness of the food on the test evaluation value of the multi-function food processor. It can be directly obtained from the database when used, and its corresponding relationship is a pre-set mapping relationship. For example, the hardness of the food and the correction factor corresponding to the hardness of the food preset in the database form a mapping set. The real-time hardness of the food is input into this mapping set to obtain the corresponding correction factor. The mapping relationship is a one-to-one correspondence or a many-to-one relationship. In this example, the value range of the correction factor is [0,1].

[0057] It should be noted that evaluating the security level of each test environment includes: extracting the test evaluation value of the multi-function food processor under each test environment, matching it with the security level of the test environment corresponding to each interval of the test evaluation value of the multi-function food processor stored in the database. The security level of each test environment is preset in the database. When in use, the security level of each test environment can be directly obtained from the database. The corresponding relationship can be a pre-set mapping relationship. For example, the test evaluation value of the multi-function food processor under each test environment and the security level of the test environment in the database form a mapping set, and the real-time test evaluation value of the multi-function food processor under each test environment is input into the mapping set to obtain the security level of each test environment. The mapping relationship can be a one-to-one relationship. The test environment security level includes low security level, medium security level, and high security level. Evaluating the test environment security level helps to timely discover potential safety hazards and provide an important basis for the safe use and optimized design of products.

[0058] Specifically, the test evaluation values ​​of the multi-function food processor under each test environment are extracted and matched with the stirring data corresponding to each interval of the test evaluation values ​​of each multi-function food processor in the database to obtain the stirring data of the multi-function food processor under each test environment. The stirring data of the multi-function food processor under each test environment includes blade speed, working power and stirring time.

[0059] It should be noted that the test evaluation value of the multi-function food processor under each test environment is extracted and matched with the stirring data corresponding to each interval of the test evaluation value of the multi-function food processor stored in the database. The stirring data is preset in the database. When in use, the stirring data can be directly obtained from the database. The corresponding relationship can be a preset mapping relationship. For example, the test evaluation value of the multi-function food processor under each test environment and the stirring data in the database form a mapping set, and the real-time test evaluation value of the multi-function food processor under each test environment is input into the mapping set to obtain each stirring data. The mapping relationship can be a one-to-one corresponding relationship. When the test evaluation value of the multi-function food processor under each test environment is larger, the stirring data corresponding to the multi-function food processor will also be larger. For example, as the volume of food increases or the hardness of food increases, the test evaluation value of the multi-function food processor under each test environment may be larger. Therefore, in order to maintain the stirring efficiency, the blade speed needs to be increased. When the blade speed increases, the working power also increases accordingly to provide sufficient power to drive the increase in the blade speed; when the volume or hardness of the food increases, the stirring time of the multi-function food processor obtained by matching will increase, which helps to ensure that the food can be fully mixed.

[0060] It should be noted that the multi-function food processor has preset power and temperature control modes. When the corresponding mixing data is matched, it can automatically switch to the corresponding power, match the mixing data in the database according to the evaluation value under the test environment, and extract relevant parameters as the energy efficiency test working parameters of the multi-function food processor. It can accurately match the appropriate mixing data according to the evaluation value under the test environment, provide a scientific basis for the energy efficiency optimization of the multi-function food processor, and help improve the product's energy efficiency performance and user experience.

[0061] Specifically, the multi-function food processor is tested according to its blade speed, working power and stirring time under each test environment, and each monitoring time point is set within each monitoring time period to monitor the working data and loss data of the multi-function food processor to obtain the working data and loss data of the multi-function food processor in each test environment within each monitoring time period. The working data of the multi-function food processor in each test environment within each monitoring time period includes: the motor speed, amplitude and vibration acceleration of the multi-function food processor at each monitoring time point.

[0062] The loss data of the multi-function food processor in each test environment during each monitoring time period includes: the number of equipment restarts, the cumulative number of motor overheating, and the number of work interruptions.

[0063] It should be noted that the speed sensor measures the motor speed of the multi-function food processor; the amplitude measuring instrument senses the vibration of the object and outputs the corresponding amplitude; the vibration acceleration sensor measures the vibration of the multi-function food processor; the torque sensor installed on the blade shaft measures and outputs the torque value to obtain the resistance of each blade.

[0064] It should be noted that the multi-function food processor has a built-in counter to record the number of times the device is restarted; the motor of the multi-function food processor is usually equipped with a temperature sensor. When the motor temperature reaches the preset overheating threshold, the device will automatically record and prompt the number of overheating events that occur; the work interruptions of the multi-function food processor will be recorded in the work log, and the number of work interruptions can be obtained through the log analysis software.

[0065] Specifically, the resistance of each blade in each monitoring time period is extracted, and the motor speed, amplitude and vibration acceleration of the multi-function food processor at each monitoring time point are averaged respectively to obtain the average motor speed, average amplitude and average vibration acceleration of the multi-function food processor in each monitoring time period, and the resistance of each blade in each monitoring time period is averaged to obtain the average resistance of the blade, and the working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor in each monitoring time period under each test environment is obtained through processing. The working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor in each monitoring time period under each test environment is used to evaluate the operation of the multi-function food processor.

[0066] It should be noted that the working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor in each monitoring time period under each test environment is as follows:

[0067]

[0068] In the formula, σ i→j It represents the working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor in the jth monitoring period under the i-th test environment, n i→j represents the average motor speed of the multi-function food processor in the jth monitoring period under the i-th test environment, D i→j represents the average amplitude of the multi-function food processor in the jth monitoring period under the i-th test environment, A i→j represents the average vibration acceleration of the multi-function food processor in the jth monitoring period under the i-th test environment, F i→j represents the average resistance of the blade of the multi-function food processor in the jth monitoring period under the i-th test environment, Δn represents the set average speed reference value of the motor of the multi-function food processor, ΔD represents the set average amplitude reference value of the multi-function food processor, ΔA represents the set average vibration acceleration reference value of the multi-function food processor, ΔF represents the set average resistance reference value of the blade of the multi-function food processor, e is a natural constant, c 1 Indicates the correction factor corresponding to the set average motor speed of the multi-function food processor, c 2 Indicates the correction factor corresponding to the average amplitude of the multi-function food processor, c 3 Indicates the correction factor corresponding to the average vibration acceleration of the multi-function food processor, c 4It represents the correction factor corresponding to the average resistance of the blade of the set multi-function food processor, i represents the number of each test environment, i=1,2,3,...,m, m represents the total number of test environments, j represents the number of each monitoring time period, j=1,2,3,...,n, n represents the total number of monitoring time periods.

[0069] It should be noted that when the average amplitude of the multi-function food processor is too small, the movement amplitude of the blade will also be correspondingly small, which may result in poor cutting effect. When the average amplitude of the multi-function food processor is too large, it may bring greater vibration, noise and mechanical burden, affecting the life of the multi-function food processor. If the average resistance of the blade of the multi-function food processor is too small, it may cause insufficient contact force between the blade and the food, affecting the cutting efficiency. If the average resistance of the blade of the multi-function food processor is too large, it may affect the rotation speed of the blade, resulting in reduced working efficiency of the food processor.

[0070] It should be noted that there is a correlation between the average motor speed, average amplitude, average vibration acceleration and average blade resistance of the multi-function food processor. With the increase of the average motor speed, the vibration of the motor will also increase accordingly; with the increase of the average speed, the vibration of the motor will be more intense, and the vibration acceleration will also increase accordingly; the increase of the motor speed will increase the blade speed, and the increase of the blade speed may lead to an increase in the blade resistance. Therefore, the working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor in each monitoring time period under each test environment is obtained by the average motor speed, average amplitude, average vibration acceleration and average blade resistance of the multi-function food processor in each monitoring time period.

[0071] c 1 The correction factor corresponding to the average motor speed set in the database is used to quantify the influence of the average motor speed on the working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor. It can be directly obtained from the database when used, and its corresponding relationship is a pre-set mapping relationship. For example, the average motor speed and the correction factor corresponding to the preset average motor speed in the database form a mapping set. The real-time average motor speed is input into this mapping set to obtain the corresponding correction factor. The mapping relationship is a one-to-one correspondence or a many-to-one relationship. In this example, the value range of the correction factor is [0,1].

[0072] c 2The correction factor corresponding to the average amplitude set in the database is used to quantify the influence of the average amplitude on the working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor. It can be directly obtained from the database when used, and its corresponding relationship is a pre-set mapping relationship. For example, the average amplitude and the correction factor corresponding to the average amplitude preset in the database form a mapping set. The real-time average amplitude is input into this mapping set to obtain the corresponding correction factor. The mapping relationship is a one-to-one correspondence or a many-to-one relationship. In this example, the value range of the correction factor is [0,1].

[0073] c 3 The correction factor corresponding to the average vibration acceleration set in the database is used to quantify the influence of the average vibration acceleration on the working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor. It can be directly obtained from the database when used, and its corresponding relationship is a pre-set mapping relationship. For example, the average vibration acceleration and the correction factor corresponding to the average vibration acceleration preset in the database form a mapping set. The real-time average vibration acceleration is input into this mapping set to obtain the corresponding correction factor. The mapping relationship is a one-to-one correspondence or a many-to-one relationship. In this example, the value range of the correction factor is [0,1].

[0074] c 4 The correction factor corresponding to the average resistance of the blade set in the database is used to quantify the influence of the average resistance of the blade on the working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor. It can be directly obtained from the database when used, and its corresponding relationship is a pre-set mapping relationship. For example, the average resistance of the blade and the correction factor corresponding to the average resistance of the blade preset in the database form a mapping set. The real-time average resistance of the blade is input into this mapping set to obtain the corresponding correction factor, and its mapping relationship is a one-to-one correspondence or a many-to-one relationship. In this example, the value range of the correction factor is [0,1].

[0075] like Figure 2 As shown, Figure 2 The figure represents the variation curve of the average amplitude of the multi-function food processor - the working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor, where the x-axis represents the average amplitude of the multi-function food processor in the j-th monitoring period under the ith test environment, and the y-axis represents the working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor in the j-th monitoring period under the ith test environment. Three different groups of example parameters are defined in the figure, corresponding to different situations of the three curves, represented by solid lines, dashed lines and dotted lines, respectively, and the corresponding curve labels are a, b, and c, respectively. Assuming that the average motor speed of the multi-function food processor is i→j =15000 (rpm), A i→j=0.05 (meters per second squared), the average speed reference value of the motor of the multi-function food processor Δn = 20000 (r / min), the average amplitude reference value of the multi-function food processor ΔD = 1 (mm), the average vibration acceleration reference value of the multi-function food processor ΔA = 0.1 (meters per second squared), the average resistance reference value of the blade of the multi-function food processor ΔF = 0.3 (Nm), the correction factor c corresponding to the average speed of the motor of the multi-function food processor 1 =0.3, the correction factor c corresponding to the average amplitude of the multi-function food processor 2 =0.55, the correction factor c corresponding to the average vibration acceleration of the multi-function food processor 3 =0.4, the correction factor c corresponding to the average resistance of the blade of the multi-function food processor 4 =0.6, when the average resistance of the blade of the multi-function food processor in the j-th monitoring time period under the ith test environment is 0.2, the schematic diagram of the working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor in the j-th monitoring time period under the ith test environment is shown as curve a, when the average resistance of the blade of the multi-function food processor in the j-th monitoring time period under the ith test environment is 0.5, the schematic diagram of the working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor in the j-th monitoring time period under the ith test environment is shown as curve b, when the average resistance of the blade of the multi-function food processor in the j-th monitoring time period under the ith test environment is 0.6, the working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor in the j-th monitoring time period under the ith test environment is shown as curve c.

[0076] As shown in Table 1, Table 1 is example data of a variation curve of the average amplitude of a multi-function food processor and the working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor, which lists the average amplitude of the multi-function food processor and the working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor.

[0077] Table 1 Example data of working test compliance values ​​of multi-function food processor

[0078]

[0079] As shown in Table 1, in a specific embodiment, assuming that the average motor speed of the multi-function food processor is n, the average vibration acceleration of the multi-function food processor is n. i→j =15000 (rpm), A i→j =0.05 (meters per second squared), the average speed reference value of the motor of the multi-function food processor Δn = 20000 (r / min), the average amplitude reference value of the multi-function food processor ΔD = 1 (mm), the average vibration acceleration reference value of the multi-function food processor ΔA = 0.1 (meters per second squared), the average resistance reference value of the blade of the multi-function food processor ΔF = 0.3 (Nm), the correction factor c corresponding to the average speed of the motor of the multi-function food processor 1=0.3, the correction factor c corresponding to the average amplitude of the multi-function food processor 2 =0.55, the correction factor c corresponding to the average vibration acceleration of the multi-function food processor 3 =0.4, the correction factor c corresponding to the average resistance of the blade of the multi-function food processor 4 =0.6.

[0080] It should be noted that by extracting and calculating the average resistance of each monitoring time point and each blade, and further obtaining the average of the motor speed, amplitude, vibration acceleration and blade resistance of the multi-function food processor in each monitoring time period, the working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor under each test environment is obtained, and the operation of the multi-function food processor is evaluated, which helps to understand the working status of the food processor, discover potential problems and issue early warnings.

[0081] Specifically, the working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor in each monitoring time period under each test environment is extracted and compared with the working test compliance value threshold of the multi-function food processor stored in the database; if the working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor in a monitoring time period under a certain test environment is lower than the working test compliance value threshold of the multi-function food processor, the motor speed of the multi-function food processor in the test environment during the monitoring time period is adjusted.

[0082] If the working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor in a certain monitoring time period under a certain test environment is higher than or equal to the working test compliance value threshold of the multi-function food processor, the working data of the multi-function food processor in the test environment in the monitoring time period is continuously monitored.

[0083] It should be noted that in each test environment and monitoring time period, the working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor is compared with the preset threshold, and the motor speed is dynamically adjusted or the working data is continuously monitored according to the comparison result to ensure the stable operation of the food processor. The problem of insufficient performance of the food processor can be discovered and resolved in time, and the food processor can be prevented from running in an inefficient or unstable state, which helps to extend the service life of the food processor and reduce maintenance costs.

[0084] It should be noted that the adjustment of the motor speed of the multi-function food processor in the test environment during the monitoring time period includes: extracting the motor speed of the multi-function food processor, comparing it with the motor speed threshold stored in the database, if the motor speed is less than or equal to the motor speed threshold, increasing the motor speed according to the amplitude, if the motor speed is greater than the motor speed threshold, increasing the motor speed according to the amplitude, each time the adjustment is made, the motor speed, amplitude, vibration acceleration and blade resistance of the multi-function food processor are re-collected, and the working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor is processed until the working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor is higher than or equal to the working test compliance value threshold of the multi-function food processor. For example: when the working test compliance value of a multi-function food processor in a test environment during a certain monitoring time period is lower than the working test compliance value threshold of the multi-function food processor, the motor speed is extracted, and when the motor speed is less than or equal to the motor speed threshold, the motor speed is increased by 5%, and the working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor is recalculated until the working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor is higher than or equal to the working test compliance value threshold of the multi-function food processor.

[0085] Specifically, the number of device restarts, the cumulative number of motor overheating, the number of work interruptions, the test evaluation value of the multi-function food processor under each test environment, and the working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor under each test environment in each monitoring time period are extracted, and the energy efficiency evaluation value of the multi-function food processor under each test environment is obtained. The energy efficiency evaluation value of the multi-function food processor under each test environment is used to evaluate the energy efficiency level of the multi-function food processor.

[0086] Specifically, the energy efficiency evaluation value of the multi-function food processor under each test environment is extracted and matched with the energy efficiency levels corresponding to each interval of the energy efficiency evaluation value of the multi-function food processor stored in the database to obtain the energy efficiency level of the multi-function food processor under each test environment, wherein the energy efficiency level includes a high energy efficiency level, a medium energy efficiency level and a low energy efficiency level.

[0087] When the energy efficiency level of the multi-function food processor under a test environment is a high energy efficiency level, the energy consumption data of the multi-function food processor under the test environment is continuously monitored; when the energy efficiency level of the multi-function food processor under a test environment is a medium energy efficiency level, the heat dissipation device of the multi-function food processor under the test environment is adjusted, and the heat dissipation device includes a cooling fan and a water-cooled heat dissipation device; when the energy efficiency level of the multi-function food processor under a test environment is a low energy efficiency level, the heat dissipation device of the multi-function food processor under the test environment is adjusted while reducing the workload of the multi-function food processor, and an early warning is issued.

[0088] It should be noted that the energy efficiency evaluation value of the multi-function food processor under each test environment is extracted and matched with the energy efficiency level of the multi-function food processor corresponding to each interval of the energy efficiency evaluation value of the multi-function food processor stored in the database. The energy efficiency level of each multi-function food processor is preset in the database. When in use, the energy efficiency level of each multi-function food processor can be directly obtained from the database. The corresponding relationship may be a preset mapping relationship. For example, the energy efficiency evaluation value of the multi-function food processor under each test environment and the energy efficiency level of the multi-function food processor in the database form a mapping set, and the real-time energy efficiency evaluation value of the multi-function food processor under each test environment is input into the mapping set to obtain the energy efficiency level of each multi-function food processor. The mapping relationship may be a one-to-one corresponding relationship.

[0089] It should be noted that when the energy efficiency level of the multi-function food processor is a high energy efficiency level, the energy consumption data of the multi-function food processor is continuously monitored to provide data support for subsequent energy efficiency optimization; when the energy efficiency level of the multi-function food processor is a medium energy efficiency level, the speed of the cooling fan and the flow rate of the circulating water in the water-cooling device are increased by an amount to take away the heat faster. For example, when the energy efficiency level of the multi-function food processor is a medium energy efficiency level, the speed of the cooling fan is increased by 15%, and the flow rate of the circulating water in the water-cooling device is increased by 3%; when the energy efficiency level of the multi-function food processor is When the energy efficiency level is low, the device sends a signal to remind that the energy efficiency of the multi-function food processor is low. While increasing the speed of the cooling fan and the flow rate of the circulating water in the water-cooling device, the speed of the motor of the multi-function food processor is reduced to reduce the workload and issue an early warning. For example, when the energy efficiency level of the multi-function food processor is a low energy efficiency level, the speed of the cooling fan is increased by 15%, the flow rate of the circulating water in the water-cooling device is increased by 3%, and the motor speed is reduced by 5%. An early warning is issued through an alarm to indicate that the energy efficiency performance of the multi-function food processor is poor.

[0090] Specifically, the energy efficiency evaluation values ​​of the multi-function food processor under each test environment are analyzed as follows:

[0091]

[0092] In the formula, τ i represents the energy efficiency evaluation value of the multi-function food processor under the i-th test environment, ρ i represents the test evaluation value of the multi-function food processor under the i-th test environment, σ i→j It represents the working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor in the jth monitoring period under the i-th test environment, RT j Indicates the number of restarts of the multi-function food processor during the jth monitoring period, OT j Indicates the cumulative number of motor overheating of the multi-function food processor in the jth monitoring period, INT jrepresents the number of interruptions of the multi-function food processor during the jth monitoring period, ΔRT represents the allowed value of the number of restarts of the multi-function food processor, ΔOT represents the allowed value of the cumulative number of overheating of the motor of the multi-function food processor, ΔINT represents the allowed value of the number of interruptions of the multi-function food processor, and a 1 Indicates the weight factor corresponding to the test evaluation value of the multi-function food processor, a 2 Indicates the weight factor corresponding to the set working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor, a 3 Indicates the weight factor corresponding to the number of device restarts of the multi-function food processor, a 4 Indicates the weight factor corresponding to the cumulative number of overheating times of the motor of the multi-function food processor, a 5 Represents the weight factor corresponding to the set number of work interruptions of the multi-function food processor, i represents the number of each test environment, i=1,2,3,...,m, m represents the total number of test environments, j represents the number of each monitoring time period, j=1,2,3,...,n, n represents the total number of monitoring time periods.

[0093] It should be noted that there is a correlation between the number of device restarts, the cumulative number of motor overheating, and the number of work interruptions of the multi-function food processor. Frequent device restarts may generate a large heat load, resulting in an increase in the number of motor overheating times. When the motor overheats to a certain extent, the food processor will automatically stop working to protect the motor from damage, resulting in work interruption. The energy efficiency evaluation value of the multi-function food processor under each test environment is determined by the number of device restarts, the cumulative number of motor overheating, the number of work interruptions, the test evaluation value of the multi-function food processor under each test environment, and the work test compliance value of the multi-function food processor in each monitoring time period under each test environment.

[0094] a 1 The weight factor corresponding to the test evaluation value of the multi-function food processor set in the database is used to quantify the influence of the test evaluation value of the multi-function food processor on the energy efficiency evaluation value of the multi-function food processor. It can be directly obtained from the database when used, and its corresponding relationship is a pre-set mapping relationship. For example, the test evaluation value of the multi-function food processor and the weight factor corresponding to the test evaluation value of the multi-function food processor preset in the database form a mapping set. The real-time test evaluation value of the multi-function food processor is input into this mapping set to obtain the corresponding weight factor. The mapping relationship is a one-to-one correspondence or a many-to-one relationship. In this example, the value range of the weight factor is [0,1].

[0095] a 2The weight factor corresponding to the working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor set in the database is used to quantify the influence of the working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor on the energy efficiency evaluation value of the multi-function food processor. It can be directly obtained from the database when used, and its corresponding relationship is a pre-set mapping relationship. For example, the working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor and the weight factor corresponding to the working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor preset in the database form a mapping set. The real-time working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor is input into this mapping set to obtain the corresponding weight factor, and its mapping relationship is a one-to-one correspondence or a many-to-one relationship. In this example, the value range of the weight factor is [0,1].

[0096] a 3 The weight factor corresponding to the number of device restarts of the multi-function food processor set in the database is used to quantify the degree of influence of the number of device restarts of the multi-function food processor on the energy efficiency evaluation value of the multi-function food processor. It can be directly obtained from the database when used, and its corresponding relationship is a pre-set mapping relationship. For example, the number of device restarts of the multi-function food processor and the weight factor corresponding to the number of device restarts of the multi-function food processor preset in the database form a mapping set. The real-time number of device restarts of the multi-function food processor is input into this mapping set to obtain the corresponding weight factor, and its mapping relationship is a one-to-one correspondence or a many-to-one relationship. In this example, the value range of the weight factor is [0,1].

[0097] a 4 The weight factor corresponding to the cumulative number of motor overheating of the multi-function food processor set in the database is used to quantify the influence of the cumulative number of motor overheating of the multi-function food processor on the energy efficiency evaluation value of the multi-function food processor. It can be directly obtained from the database when used, and its corresponding relationship is a pre-set mapping relationship. For example, the cumulative number of motor overheating of the multi-function food processor and the weight factor corresponding to the cumulative number of motor overheating of the multi-function food processor preset in the database form a mapping set. The real-time cumulative number of motor overheating of the multi-function food processor is input into this mapping set to obtain the corresponding weight factor, and its mapping relationship is a one-to-one correspondence or a many-to-one relationship. In this example, the value range of the weight factor is [0,1].

[0098] a 5The weight factor corresponding to the number of work interruptions of the multi-function food processor set in the database is used to quantify the influence of the number of work interruptions of the multi-function food processor on the energy efficiency evaluation value of the multi-function food processor. It can be directly obtained from the database when used, and its corresponding relationship is a pre-set mapping relationship. For example, the number of work interruptions of the multi-function food processor and the weight factor corresponding to the number of work interruptions of the multi-function food processor preset in the database form a mapping set. The real-time number of work interruptions of the multi-function food processor is input into this mapping set to obtain the corresponding weight factor, and its mapping relationship is a one-to-one correspondence or a many-to-one relationship. In this example, the value range of the weight factor is [0,1].

[0099] Specifically, the test environment management module is used to preset data for each test environment, analyze the data for each test environment to obtain the test evaluation value of the multi-function food processor under each test environment, and match the test evaluation value of the multi-function food processor under each test environment to obtain the stirring data of the multi-function food processor under each test environment.

[0100] The data monitoring module is used to test the multi-function food processor according to the stirring data of the multi-function food processor under each test environment, preset each monitoring time period, monitor the working data and loss data of the multi-function food processor within each monitoring time period, and obtain the working data and loss data of the multi-function food processor in each test environment within each monitoring time period.

[0101] The data analysis and adjustment module is used to analyze the working data of the multi-function food processor in each test environment within each monitoring time period, obtain the working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor in each monitoring time period under each test environment, and adjust the motor speed of the multi-function food processor according to the working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor in each monitoring time period under each test environment.

[0102] The function evaluation module is used to extract the loss data of the multi-function food processor in each test environment within each monitoring time period, analyze the test evaluation value of the multi-function food processor under each test environment and the working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor under each test environment within each monitoring time period, obtain the energy efficiency evaluation value of the multi-function food processor under each test environment, adjust the heat dissipation equipment of the multi-function food processor, and issue an early warning prompt.

[0103] It should be noted that data for different test environments are preset, and the preset data of the multi-function food processor under each test environment is analyzed and processed to generate stirring data, the stirring data is extracted and tested, and then the working and loss data of the food processor are monitored during the monitoring period. Based on the working data, the working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor is analyzed and obtained, the motor speed is adjusted, the loss data is extracted, and the test evaluation value and the working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor are analyzed. The heat dissipation system is adjusted, and early warning prompts are issued. By adjusting the motor speed and other operating parameters, the working efficiency and performance of the food processor are improved, and the energy utilization efficiency of the food processor is improved.

[0104] It should be noted that a method for testing the energy efficiency of a multi-function food processor also includes storing and managing the working data and loss data of the multi-function food processor in a database. In this embodiment, the database is used to store the safety level of the test environment, the reference value of the set temperature of the test environment, the reference value of the set food input volume, the reference value of the set hardness of the food, the correction factor corresponding to the set temperature of the test environment, the correction factor corresponding to the set food input volume, the correction factor corresponding to the set hardness of the food, the stirring data of the multi-function food processor, the reference value of the set average motor speed of the multi-function food processor, the reference value of the set average amplitude of the multi-function food processor, the reference value of the set average vibration acceleration of the multi-function food processor, the reference value of the set average resistance of the blade of the multi-function food processor, and the correction factor corresponding to the set average motor speed of the multi-function food processor. factor, a correction factor corresponding to the set average amplitude of the multi-function food processor, a correction factor corresponding to the set average vibration acceleration of the multi-function food processor, a correction factor corresponding to the set average resistance of the blade of the multi-function food processor, a motor speed threshold, a working test compliance value threshold of the multi-function food processor, the energy efficiency grade of the multi-function food processor, a set allowable value of the cumulative number of overheating times of the motor of the multi-function food processor, a set allowable value of the number of work interruptions of the multi-function food processor, a weight factor corresponding to the set test evaluation value of the multi-function food processor, a weight factor corresponding to the set working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor, a weight factor corresponding to the set number of equipment restarts of the multi-function food processor, a weight factor corresponding to the set cumulative number of overheating times of the motor of the multi-function food processor, and a weight factor corresponding to the set number of work interruptions of the multi-function food processor.

[0105] It should be noted that, in this article, relational terms such as first and second, etc. are only used to distinguish one entity or operation from another entity or operation, and do not necessarily require or imply any such actual relationship or order between these entities or operations. Moreover, the terms "include", "comprise" or any other variants thereof are intended to cover non-exclusive inclusion, so that a process, method, article or device including a series of elements includes not only those elements, but also other elements not explicitly listed, or also includes elements inherent to such process, method, article or device.

[0106] The preferred embodiments of the present invention disclosed above are only used to help illustrate the present invention. The preferred embodiments do not describe all the details in detail, nor do they limit the invention to the specific implementation methods described. Obviously, many modifications and changes can be made according to the content of this specification. This specification selects and specifically describes these embodiments in order to better explain the principles and practical applications of the present invention, so that those skilled in the art can understand and use the present invention well. The present invention is limited only by the claims and their full scope and equivalents.

Claims

1. A method for testing the energy efficiency of a multifunctional food processor, characterized in that: include: Preset data of each test environment, analyze the data of each test environment to obtain test evaluation values ​​of the multi-function food processor under each test environment, and obtain stirring data of the multi-function food processor under each test environment according to the test evaluation values ​​of the multi-function food processor under each test environment; The multifunctional food processor is tested according to the mixing data of the multifunctional food processor in each test environment, each monitoring time period is preset, and the working data and loss data of the multifunctional food processor are monitored in each monitoring time period to obtain the working data and loss data of the multifunctional food processor in each test environment in each monitoring time period; Analyze the working data of the multi-function food processor in each test environment in each monitoring time period to obtain the working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor in each monitoring time period under each test environment, and adjust the motor speed of the multi-function food processor according to the working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor in each monitoring time period under each test environment; The loss data of the multi-function food processor in each test environment within each monitoring time period is extracted, and the test evaluation values ​​of the multi-function food processor under each test environment and the working test compliance values ​​of the multi-function food processor under each test environment within each monitoring time period are analyzed to obtain the energy efficiency evaluation value of the multi-function food processor under each test environment, adjust the heat dissipation equipment of the multi-function food processor, and issue an early warning prompt.

2. A method for testing the energy efficiency of a multifunctional food processor according to claim 1, characterized in that: The data of each test environment are analyzed to obtain the test evaluation value of the multi-function food processor under each test environment. The specific analysis is as follows: The data of each test environment includes the temperature of each test environment, the volume of food placed in each test under each test environment, and the hardness of food placed in each test under each test environment; The temperature of each test environment, the volume and hardness of each test food under each test environment are extracted, and the data of each test environment are processed to obtain the test evaluation value of the multi-function food processor under each test environment. The test evaluation value of the multi-function food processor under each test environment obtained from the data of each test environment is used to evaluate the safety level of each test environment.

3. A method for testing energy efficiency of a multifunctional food processor according to claim 1, characterized in that: The mixing data of the multi-function food processor under each test environment is obtained by matching the test evaluation values ​​of the multi-function food processor under each test environment. The specific analysis is as follows: The test evaluation value of the multi-function food processor under each test environment is extracted, and matched with the stirring data corresponding to each interval of the test evaluation value of each multi-function food processor in the database to obtain the stirring data of the multi-function food processor under each test environment, wherein the stirring data of the multi-function food processor under each test environment includes blade speed, working power and stirring time.

4. A method for testing energy efficiency of a multifunctional food processor according to claim 1, characterized in that: The working data and loss data of the multi-function food processor in each test environment in each monitoring time period are obtained, and the specific analysis is as follows: The multifunctional food processor is tested according to the blade speed, working power and stirring time of the multifunctional food processor under each test environment, each monitoring time point is set in each monitoring time period, and the working data and loss data of the multifunctional food processor are monitored to obtain the working data and loss data of the multifunctional food processor in each test environment in each monitoring time period, wherein the working data of the multifunctional food processor in each test environment in each monitoring time period includes: the motor speed, amplitude and vibration acceleration of the multifunctional food processor at each monitoring time point; The loss data of the multi-function food processor in each test environment during each monitoring time period includes: the number of equipment restarts, the cumulative number of motor overheating, and the number of work interruptions.

5. A method for testing the energy efficiency of a multifunctional food processor according to claim 4, characterized in that: The working data of the multi-function food processor in each test environment in each monitoring time period is analyzed to obtain the working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor in each monitoring time period in each test environment. The specific analysis is as follows: The resistance of each blade in each monitoring time period is extracted, and the motor speed, amplitude and vibration acceleration of the multi-function food processor at each monitoring time point are averaged respectively to obtain the average motor speed, average amplitude and average vibration acceleration of the multi-function food processor in each monitoring time period. The resistance of each blade in each monitoring time period is averaged to obtain the average resistance of the blade, and the working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor in each monitoring time period under each test environment is obtained through processing. The working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor in each monitoring time period under each test environment is used to evaluate the operation of the multi-function food processor.

6. The method for testing the energy efficiency of a multifunctional food processor according to claim 1, characterized in that: The motor speed of the multi-function food processor is adjusted according to the working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor in each monitoring time period under each test environment. The specific analysis is as follows: Extract the working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor in each monitoring time period under each test environment and compare it with the working test compliance value threshold of the multi-function food processor stored in the database; if the working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor in a monitoring time period under a certain test environment is lower than the working test compliance value threshold of the multi-function food processor, adjust the motor speed of the multi-function food processor in the test environment in the monitoring time period; If the working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor in a certain monitoring time period under a certain test environment is higher than or equal to the working test compliance value threshold of the multi-function food processor, the working data of the multi-function food processor in the test environment in the monitoring time period is continuously monitored.

7. A method for testing energy efficiency of a multifunctional food processor according to claim 4, characterized in that: The energy efficiency evaluation values ​​of the multi-function food processor under each test environment are specifically analyzed as follows: The number of device restarts, the cumulative number of motor overheating, the number of work interruptions, the test evaluation value of the multi-function food processor under each test environment, and the working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor under each test environment in each monitoring time period are extracted within each monitoring time period, and the energy efficiency evaluation value of the multi-function food processor under each test environment is processed to obtain the energy efficiency evaluation value of the multi-function food processor under each test environment. The energy efficiency evaluation value of the multi-function food processor under each test environment is used to evaluate the energy efficiency level of the multi-function food processor.

8. The method for testing the energy efficiency of a multifunctional food processor according to claim 1, characterized in that: The heat dissipation device of the multifunctional food processor is adjusted and an early warning prompt is issued. The specific analysis is as follows: Extract the energy efficiency evaluation value of the multi-function food processor under each test environment, match it with the energy efficiency level corresponding to each interval of the energy efficiency evaluation value of the multi-function food processor stored in the database, and obtain the energy efficiency level of the multi-function food processor under each test environment, wherein the energy efficiency level includes a high energy efficiency level, a medium energy efficiency level and a low energy efficiency level; When the energy efficiency level of the multi-function food processor under a test environment is a high energy efficiency level, the energy consumption data of the multi-function food processor under the test environment is continuously monitored; when the energy efficiency level of the multi-function food processor under a test environment is a medium energy efficiency level, the heat dissipation device of the multi-function food processor under the test environment is adjusted, and the heat dissipation device includes a cooling fan and a water-cooled heat dissipation device; when the energy efficiency level of the multi-function food processor under a test environment is a low energy efficiency level, the heat dissipation device of the multi-function food processor under the test environment is adjusted while reducing the workload of the multi-function food processor, and an early warning is issued.

9. A method for testing energy efficiency of a multifunctional food processor according to claim 7, characterized in that: The energy efficiency evaluation values ​​of the multi-function food processor under each test environment are specifically analyzed as follows: In the formula, τ i represents the energy efficiency evaluation value of the multi-function food processor under the i-th test environment, ρ i represents the test evaluation value of the multi-function food processor under the i-th test environment, σ i→j It represents the working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor in the jth monitoring period under the i-th test environment, RT j Indicates the number of restarts of the multi-function food processor during the jth monitoring period, OT j Indicates the cumulative number of motor overheating of the multi-function food processor in the jth monitoring period, INT j represents the number of work interruptions of the multi-function food processor in the jth monitoring time period, ΔRT represents the allowed value of the set number of device restarts of the multi-function food processor, ΔOT represents the allowed value of the set number of cumulative overheating times of the motor of the multi-function food processor, ΔINT represents the allowed value of the set number of work interruptions of the multi-function food processor, a1 represents the weight factor corresponding to the set test evaluation value of the multi-function food processor, a2 represents the weight factor corresponding to the set work test compliance value of the multi-function food processor, a3 represents the weight factor corresponding to the set number of device restarts of the multi-function food processor, a4 represents the weight factor corresponding to the set number of cumulative overheating times of the motor of the multi-function food processor, a5 represents the weight factor corresponding to the set number of work interruptions of the multi-function food processor, i represents the number of each test environment, i=1,2,3,...,m, m represents the total number of test environments, j represents the number of each monitoring time period, j=1,2,3,...,n, n represents the total number of monitoring time periods.

10. A multifunctional food processor energy efficiency testing system, characterized in that: include: A test environment management module, used to preset data of each test environment, analyze the data of each test environment to obtain the test evaluation value of the multi-function food processor under each test environment, and obtain the stirring data of the multi-function food processor under each test environment according to the test evaluation value of the multi-function food processor under each test environment; A data monitoring module is used to test the multifunctional food processor according to the mixing data of the multifunctional food processor in each test environment, preset each monitoring time period, monitor the working data and loss data of the multifunctional food processor in each monitoring time period, and obtain the working data and loss data of the multifunctional food processor in each test environment in each monitoring time period; The data analysis and adjustment module is used to analyze the working data of the multi-function food processor in each test environment in each monitoring time period, obtain the working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor in each monitoring time period under each test environment, and adjust the motor speed of the multi-function food processor according to the working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor in each monitoring time period under each test environment; The function evaluation module is used to extract the loss data of the multi-function food processor in each test environment within each monitoring time period, analyze the test evaluation value of the multi-function food processor under each test environment and the working test compliance value of the multi-function food processor under each test environment within each monitoring time period, obtain the energy efficiency evaluation value of the multi-function food processor under each test environment, adjust the heat dissipation equipment of the multi-function food processor, and issue an early warning prompt.

Images