Software interface construction method and system for heat supply system

Abstract

The invention provides a software interface construction method and system for a heat supply system, and belongs to the technical field of software interfaces, and the method specifically comprises the steps that the pipe network length and the heat supply area of a heat supply pipe network are determined on the basis of distribution data of the heat supply pipe network of the heat supply system, and the distribution data of heat supply adjusting facilities of the heat supply pipe network are combined; when it is determined that the display reliability of the heat supply pipe network does not meet the requirement, the heat supply pipe network is divided into a plurality of areas, and the analysis results of the historical fault data in different areas are utilized to determine the display area of the software interface of the heat supply system; and according to the analysis result of the monitoring data of the heat supply network in the display area and the analysis result of the historical fault data, the display modes of different areas in the heat supply network in the display area are determined, so that the reliability of operation and maintenance management is improved.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention belongs to the technical field of software interfaces, and in particular relates to a method and system for constructing a software interface for a heating system. Background Art

[0002] In order to improve the efficiency and accuracy of the heating analysis and processing of the heating system, the efficiency and accuracy of the heating regulation processing can be greatly improved by constructing a unified software interface of the heating system. In the specific existing technical solutions, different colors are often used in the display interface to mark the corresponding cell color blocks, so as to provide a more intuitive heating effect display for the operation and maintenance personnel, and improve the convenience of heating effect observation. However, the above technical solutions have the following technical problems:

[0003] When constructing the software interface of a heating system, the range and area of ​​the heating pipe network in the heating system are relatively large. Therefore, if the display mode of the heating pipe network in different positions in the software interface cannot be determined according to the deviation of the operating data of the heating pipe network in the heating system, the intuitiveness of the software interface of the heating system cannot be guaranteed.

[0004] In view of the above technical problems, the present invention provides a method and system for constructing a software interface for a heating system. Summary of the invention

[0005] A method for constructing a software interface for a heating system, specifically comprising:

[0006] S1 obtains historical fault data of the heating pipe network of the heating system, and when the distribution discreteness of the fault positions of the heating pipe network of the heating system meets the requirements based on the analysis results of the historical fault data, proceeds to the next step;

[0007] S2 determines the pipe length and heating area of ​​the heating pipe network based on the distribution data of the heating pipe network of the heating system, and when it is determined that the display reliability of the heating pipe network does not meet the requirements in combination with the distribution data of the heating regulation facilities of the heating pipe network, proceeds to the next step;

[0008] S3: dividing the heating pipe network into multiple areas, and using the analysis results of historical fault data in different areas to determine the display area of ​​the software interface of the heating system;

[0009] S4 determines the display mode of different areas in the heating network in the display area based on the analysis results of the monitoring data of the heating network in the display area and the analysis results of the historical fault data.

[0010] A further technical solution is that the historical fault data of the heating network includes the fault location of the heating network and the historical fault times of different fault locations.

[0011] A further technical solution is that the fault location is a location where a heating failure occurs or a heating parameter does not meet a standard.

[0012] A further technical solution is that the historical fault data of the heating network is determined based on the analysis results of the historical monitoring data of the heating network.

[0013] A further technical solution is that the method for displaying the heating network is:

[0014] Dividing the heating pipe network in the display area into a plurality of areas, determining the monitoring data in different areas based on the analysis results of the monitoring data of the heating pipe network in the display area, determining the data abnormality probability in different areas based on the monitoring data in different areas, and when the data abnormality probability in the area does not meet the requirements, determining the rendering processing mode of the area according to the first display mode;

[0015] When the data anomaly probability in the area meets the requirement, the fault location in the different areas is determined by using the historical fault data of the heating pipe network in the different areas;

[0016] The historical fault risk coefficients of different regions are determined according to the number of fault locations in different regions, and the rendering processing methods of the fault locations in different regions are determined using the historical fault risk coefficients, and the display methods of different regions are determined according to the rendering processing methods.

[0017] A further technical solution is to use the historical fault risk coefficient to determine the rendering processing method of the fault location in different areas, specifically including:

[0018] When the historical failure risk coefficient of the area does not meet the requirement, the rendering processing mode of the area is determined by using the second display mode;

[0019] When the historical failure risk coefficient of the area meets the requirement, the rendering processing mode of the area is determined by using the third display mode.

[0020] On the other hand, the present application provides a software interface construction system for a heating system, which adopts the above-mentioned software interface construction method for a heating system, specifically comprising:

[0021] Distribution discrete evaluation module, display reliability evaluation module, display area screening module, display mode determination module;

[0022] The distribution discreteness evaluation module is responsible for obtaining the historical fault data of the heating pipe network of the heating system, and determining whether the distribution discreteness of the fault location of the heating pipe network of the heating system meets the requirements based on the analysis results of the historical fault data;

[0023] The display reliability evaluation module is responsible for determining the pipe network length and heating area of ​​the heating pipe network based on the distribution data of the heating pipe network of the heating system, and determining whether the display reliability of the heating pipe network meets the requirements in combination with the distribution data of the heating regulation facilities of the heating pipe network;

[0024] The display area screening module is responsible for dividing the heating network into multiple areas, and using the analysis results of historical fault data in different areas to determine the display area of ​​the software interface of the heating system;

[0025] The display mode determination module is responsible for determining the display modes of different areas in the heating network in the display area based on the analysis results of the monitoring data of the heating network in the display area and the analysis results of the historical fault data.

[0026] On the other hand, a computer-readable storage medium is provided in an embodiment of the present application, on which a computer program is stored. When the computer program is executed in a computer, the computer is caused to execute the above-mentioned method for constructing a software interface for a heating system.

[0027] On the other hand, a computer program product is provided in an embodiment of the present application, characterized in that the computer program product stores instructions, and when the instructions are executed by a computer, the computer implements the above-mentioned method for constructing a software interface for a heating system.

[0028] The beneficial effects of the present invention are:

[0029] Based on the length and heating area of ​​the heating network and the distribution data of the heating regulation facilities of the heating network, it is determined whether the display reliability of the heating network meets the requirements. Not only the difference in the display reliability of the heating network due to differences in the length and heating area of ​​the heating network is taken into account, but also the difference in the distribution of the heating regulation facilities of the heating network, which leads to differences in the display processing reliability of the heating network. This realizes the screening of heating networks with greater display processing difficulties, and also further carries out regional display processing for heating networks with greater display processing difficulties, laying a foundation for the management reliability of operation and maintenance management personnel.

[0030] The display method of different areas in the regional heating network is determined based on the analysis results of the monitoring data of the heating network in the display area and the analysis results of the historical fault data. Differentiated display processing is achieved for areas with serious historical faults and abnormal monitoring data, which reduces the difficulty of operation and maintenance management. At the same time, it also lays a foundation for operation and maintenance managers to carry out differentiated operation and maintenance management. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0031] The above and other features and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent by describing in detail exemplary embodiments thereof with reference to the attached drawings.

[0032] Figure 1 is a flow chart of a method for constructing a software interface for a heating system;

[0033] Figure 2 It is a flow chart for determining whether the distribution of the fault location of the heating pipe network of the heating system meets the requirements;

[0034] Figure 3 The present invention is a flow chart of a method for determining a display area of ​​a software interface of a heating system. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0035] Example embodiments will now be described more fully with reference to the accompanying drawings. However, example embodiments can be implemented in a variety of ways and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein; rather, these embodiments are provided so that the present invention will be comprehensive and complete and fully convey the concepts of the example embodiments to those skilled in the art. The same reference numerals in the figures represent the same or similar structures, and thus their detailed description will be omitted.

[0036] The terms "a", "an", "the", and "said" are used to indicate the presence of one or more elements / components / etc.; the terms "comprising" and "having" are used to express an open-ended inclusive meaning and mean that additional elements / components / etc. may be present in addition to the listed elements / components / etc.

[0037] Example 1

[0038] To solve the above problems, according to one aspect of the present invention, Figure 1 As shown, a method for constructing a software interface for a heating system is provided, which specifically includes:

[0039] S1 obtains historical fault data of the heating pipe network of the heating system, and when the distribution discreteness of the fault positions of the heating pipe network of the heating system meets the requirements based on the analysis results of the historical fault data, proceeds to the next step;

[0040] S2 determines the pipe length and heating area of ​​the heating pipe network based on the distribution data of the heating pipe network of the heating system, and when it is determined that the display reliability of the heating pipe network does not meet the requirements in combination with the distribution data of the heating regulation facilities of the heating pipe network, proceeds to the next step;

[0041] S3: dividing the heating pipe network into multiple areas, and using the analysis results of historical fault data in different areas to determine the display area of ​​the software interface of the heating system;

[0042] S4 determines the display mode of different areas in the heating network in the display area based on the analysis results of the monitoring data of the heating network in the display area and the analysis results of the historical fault data.

[0043] Furthermore, the historical fault data of the heating network includes the fault location of the heating network and the historical fault times of different fault locations.

[0044] A further technical solution is that the fault location is a location where a heating failure occurs or a heating parameter does not meet a standard.

[0045] A further technical solution is that the historical number of failures includes the number of heating failures and the number of heating parameters that do not meet standards.

[0046] Specifically, the historical fault data of the heating pipe network is determined according to the analysis results of the historical monitoring data of the heating pipe network.

[0047] It should be noted that if Figure 2 As shown, determining that the distribution discreteness of the fault location of the heating pipe network of the heating system meets the requirements specifically includes:

[0048] Determining the fault location of the heating pipe network of the heating system based on historical fault data of the heating pipe network of the heating system;

[0049] Determine the interval distances between different fault locations based on the fault locations of the heating pipe network, and determine discrete fault locations among the fault locations using the interval distances;

[0050] It is determined according to the number of discrete fault locations whether the distribution discreteness of the fault locations of the heating pipe network of the heating system meets the requirements.

[0051] Further, when the number of discrete fault locations is greater than the preset number of locations, it is determined that the discrete distribution of the fault locations of the heating pipe network of the heating system does not meet the requirements.

[0052] Optionally, the discrete fault location is a fault location whose average value of interval distances with other faults is not within a preset distance interval.

[0053] In another embodiment, determining whether the distribution discreteness of the fault location of the heating pipe network of the heating system meets the requirements specifically includes:

[0054] Determine the fault location of the heating pipe network of the heating system based on the historical fault data of the heating pipe network of the heating system. When the number of the fault locations of the heating pipe network is less than a preset number:

[0055] It is determined that the distribution discreteness of the fault positions of the heating pipe network of the heating system meets the requirements;

[0056] When the number of fault locations of the heating network is not less than a preset number:

[0057] When it is determined that there is no screening fault location in the fault location based on the historical fault times of the fault location of the heating pipe network: it is determined that the distribution discreteness of the fault location of the heating pipe network of the heating system meets the requirements;

[0058] When a screening fault location exists in the fault location:

[0059] Determine the interval distances between different fault locations based on the fault location of the heating pipe network, and determine the discrete fault locations in the fault locations using the interval distances, and when the number of discrete fault locations does not meet the requirement, determine that the distribution discreteness of the fault locations of the heating pipe network of the heating system meets the requirement;

[0060] When the number of discrete fault locations meets the requirement:

[0061] Determine the fault discrete coefficients of different discrete fault positions according to the interval distances between different discrete fault positions and the number of historical faults of the discrete fault positions; when the sum of the fault discrete coefficients of the discrete fault positions does not meet the requirements, determine that the distribution discreteness of the fault positions of the heating pipe network of the heating system meets the requirements;

[0062] When the sum of the fault discrete coefficients of the discrete fault positions meets the requirement:

[0063] A comprehensive discrete coefficient is determined according to the number of discrete fault locations and the fault discrete coefficients of different discrete fault locations, and the comprehensive discrete coefficient is used to determine whether the distribution discreteness of the fault locations of the heating pipe network of the heating system meets the requirements.

[0064] Specifically, the method for determining the display reliability of the heating network is:

[0065] Determine the distribution number of the heat supply regulating facilities of the heat supply network based on the distribution data of the heat supply regulating facilities of the heat supply network, and determine the facility distribution dispersion coefficient of the heat supply network based on the distribution number of the heat supply regulating facilities and the interval distances between different heat supply regulating facilities;

[0066] The display reliability of the heating network is determined based on the facility distribution dispersion coefficient, the network length and the heating area of ​​the heating network.

[0067] Further, the display reliability of the heating network is determined according to the facility distribution dispersion coefficient, the network length and the heating area of ​​the heating network, specifically including:

[0068] Determining preset reliability corresponding to the facility distribution dispersion coefficient, the network length of the heating network, and the heating area based on the facility distribution dispersion coefficient, the network length of the heating network, and the heating area;

[0069] The displayed reliability of the heating network is determined based on the sum of the preset reliabilities corresponding to the facility distribution dispersion coefficient, the network length of the heating network and the heating area.

[0070] Optionally, when the display reliability of the heating pipe network meets the requirements, the heating pipe network is used as the display area of ​​the software interface of the heating system.

[0071] Specifically, Figure 3 As shown, the method for determining the display area of ​​the software interface of the heating system is:

[0072] Determine the fault location in the area based on the analysis result of the historical fault data in the area;

[0073] Determining failure coefficients of different failure locations according to the number of historical failures of different failure locations in the area;

[0074] The screening fault locations among the fault locations are determined based on the fault coefficients of different fault locations, and the display area of ​​the software interface of the heating system is determined by using the number of the screening fault locations.

[0075] Furthermore, the display area of ​​the software interface of the heating system is the area with the largest number of fault locations to be screened.

[0076] It should also be noted that the screened fault locations are fault locations whose fault coefficients are greater than a preset coefficient threshold.

[0077] Optionally, the method for determining the display area of ​​the software interface of the heating system is:

[0078] S21 determines the fault location in the area based on the analysis result of the historical fault data in the area, determines the total number of historical faults in the area according to the number of historical faults at different fault locations in the area, and determines the fault anomaly coefficient of the area based on the total number of historical faults;

[0079] S22 determines the display distribution dispersion coefficient of the fault positions in the area according to the historical fault counts of different fault positions in the area and in combination with the interval distance between the fault position and the fault positions in the area;

[0080] S23 determines a display processing requirement coefficient based on the display distribution dispersion coefficient and the fault abnormality coefficient, and uses the display processing requirement coefficient to determine a display area of ​​the software interface of the heating system.

[0081] Optionally, the above step S21 includes the following contents:

[0082] S211 determines the fault locations in the area based on the analysis results of the historical fault data in the area. When the number of fault locations in the area is less than the preset number of locations, the process proceeds to step S212. When the number of fault locations in the area is not less than the preset number of locations, the process proceeds to step S213.

[0083] S212: when it is determined that the historical fault times of different fault locations in the area are all less than the preset fault times, it is determined that the area does not belong to the display area of ​​the software interface of the heating system; when there is a fault location with a historical fault time not less than the preset fault time, the process proceeds to step S213;

[0084] S213 determines the fault anomaly coefficient of the area based on the total number of historical faults. When the fault anomaly coefficient of the area meets the requirements, it is determined that the area does not belong to the display area of ​​the software interface of the heating system. When the fault anomaly coefficient of the area does not meet the requirements, proceed to step S22.

[0085] Optionally, the above step S22 includes the following contents:

[0086] S221 determines the position distribution dispersion coefficient of the fault positions in the area according to the interval distances between different fault positions in the area and the fault positions in the area, and when the position distribution dispersion coefficient is within the preset dispersion coefficient interval, proceeds to step S222; when the position distribution dispersion coefficient is not within the preset dispersion coefficient interval, proceeds to step S223;

[0087] S222: determining the total number of historical faults of different fault locations in the region based on the number of historical faults of different fault locations; when the total number of historical faults is within a preset number interval, determining that the region does not belong to the display area of ​​the software interface of the heating system; and when the total number of historical faults is not within the preset number interval, proceeding to step S223;

[0088] S223: obtaining the number of fault locations in the area. When the number of fault locations is within a preset location number interval, determining that the area does not belong to the display area of ​​the software interface of the heating system. When the number of fault locations is not within the preset location number interval, proceeding to step S224.

[0089] S224 determines the display distribution dispersion coefficient of the fault location in the area according to the historical fault times of different fault locations in the area and in combination with the interval distance between the fault location and the fault location in the area; when the display distribution dispersion coefficient does not meet the requirements, it is determined that the area does not belong to the display area of ​​the software interface of the heating system; when the display distribution dispersion coefficient meets the requirements, proceed to step S23.

[0090] Specifically, the method for displaying the heating network is as follows:

[0091] Dividing the heating pipe network in the display area into a plurality of areas, determining the monitoring data in different areas based on the analysis results of the monitoring data of the heating pipe network in the display area, determining the data abnormality probability in different areas based on the monitoring data in different areas, and when the data abnormality probability in the area does not meet the requirements, determining the rendering processing mode of the area according to the first display mode;

[0092] When the data anomaly probability in the area meets the requirement, the fault location in the different areas is determined by using the historical fault data of the heating pipe network in the different areas;

[0093] The historical fault risk coefficients of different regions are determined according to the number of fault locations in different regions, and the rendering processing methods of the fault locations in different regions are determined using the historical fault risk coefficients, and the display methods of different regions are determined according to the rendering processing methods.

[0094] Furthermore, the rendering processing method of the fault location in different areas is determined by using the historical fault risk coefficient, specifically including:

[0095] When the historical failure risk coefficient of the area does not meet the requirement, the rendering processing mode of the area is determined by using the second display mode;

[0096] When the historical failure risk coefficient of the area meets the requirement, the rendering processing mode of the area is determined by using the third display mode.

[0097] Example 2

[0098] On the other hand, the present application provides a software interface construction system for a heating system, which adopts the above-mentioned software interface construction method for a heating system, specifically comprising:

[0099] Distribution discrete evaluation module, display reliability evaluation module, display area screening module, display mode determination module;

[0100] The distribution discreteness evaluation module is responsible for obtaining the historical fault data of the heating pipe network of the heating system, and determining whether the distribution discreteness of the fault location of the heating pipe network of the heating system meets the requirements based on the analysis results of the historical fault data;

[0101] The display reliability evaluation module is responsible for determining the pipe network length and heating area of ​​the heating pipe network based on the distribution data of the heating pipe network of the heating system, and determining whether the display reliability of the heating pipe network meets the requirements in combination with the distribution data of the heating regulation facilities of the heating pipe network;

[0102] The display area screening module is responsible for dividing the heating network into multiple areas, and using the analysis results of historical fault data in different areas to determine the display area of ​​the software interface of the heating system;

[0103] The display mode determination module is responsible for determining the display modes of different areas in the heating network in the display area based on the analysis results of the monitoring data of the heating network in the display area and the analysis results of the historical fault data.

[0104] Example 3

[0105] On the other hand, a computer-readable storage medium is provided in an embodiment of the present application, on which a computer program is stored. When the computer program is executed in a computer, the computer is caused to execute the above-mentioned method for constructing a software interface for a heating system.

[0106] Example 4

[0107] On the other hand, a computer program product is provided in an embodiment of the present application, characterized in that the computer program product stores instructions, and when the instructions are executed by a computer, the computer implements the above-mentioned method for constructing a software interface for a heating system.

[0108] In the embodiments of the present invention, the term "plurality" refers to two or more than two, unless otherwise clearly defined. The terms "installation", "connection", "fixation" and the like should be understood in a broad sense. For example, "connection" can be a fixed connection, a detachable connection, or an integral connection. For those skilled in the art, the specific meanings of the above terms in the embodiments of the present invention can be understood according to the specific circumstances.

[0109] In the description of the embodiments of the present invention, it needs to be understood that the directions or positional relationships indicated by the terms "upper" and "lower" are based on the directions or positional relationships shown in the accompanying drawings, and are only for the convenience of describing the embodiments of the present invention and simplifying the description, rather than indicating or implying that the device or unit referred to must have a specific direction, be constructed and operated in a specific orientation. Therefore, it cannot be understood as a limitation on the embodiments of the present invention.

[0110] In the description of this specification, the description of the terms "one embodiment", "a preferred embodiment", etc. means that the specific features, structures, materials or characteristics described in conjunction with the embodiment or example are included in at least one embodiment or example of the embodiment of the present invention. In this specification, the schematic representation of the above terms does not necessarily refer to the same embodiment or example. Moreover, the specific features, structures, materials or characteristics described can be combined in any one or more embodiments or examples in a suitable manner.

[0111] The above are only preferred embodiments of the present invention and are not intended to limit the present invention. For those skilled in the art, the present invention may have various modifications and changes. Any modification, equivalent replacement, improvement, etc. made within the spirit and principle of the present invention should be included in the protection scope of the present invention.

Claims

1. A method for constructing a software interface for a heating system, characterized in that: Specifically include: Acquire historical fault data of the heating pipe network of the heating system, and when the distribution discreteness of the fault positions of the heating pipe network of the heating system meets the requirements based on the analysis results of the historical fault data, proceed to the next step; Based on the distribution data of the heating network of the heating system, the network length and heating area of ​​the heating network are determined, and when it is determined that the display reliability of the heating network does not meet the requirements in combination with the distribution data of the heating regulation facilities of the heating network, the next step is entered; Dividing the heating pipe network into a plurality of areas, and using the analysis results of the historical fault data in different areas to determine the display area of ​​the software interface of the heating system; The display mode of different areas in the heating network in the display area is determined based on the analysis results of the monitoring data of the heating network in the display area and the analysis results of the historical fault data.

2. The method for constructing a software interface for a heating system according to claim 1, characterized in that: The historical fault data of the heating pipe network includes the fault location of the heating pipe network and the historical fault times of different fault locations.

3. The method for constructing a software interface for a heating system according to claim 2, characterized in that: The historical fault data of the heating pipe network is determined according to the analysis results of the historical monitoring data of the heating pipe network.

4. The method for constructing a software interface for a heating system according to claim 1, characterized in that: Determining whether the distribution discreteness of the fault location of the heating pipe network of the heating system meets the requirements specifically includes: Determining the fault location of the heating pipe network of the heating system based on historical fault data of the heating pipe network of the heating system; Determine the interval distances between different fault locations based on the fault locations of the heating pipe network, and determine discrete fault locations among the fault locations using the interval distances; It is determined according to the number of discrete fault locations whether the distribution discreteness of the fault locations of the heating pipe network of the heating system meets the requirements.

5. The method for constructing a software interface for a heating system according to claim 4, characterized in that: When the number of discrete fault locations is greater than the preset number of locations, it is determined that the distribution discreteness of the fault locations of the heating pipe network of the heating system does not meet the requirements.

6. The method for constructing a software interface for a heating system according to claim 4, characterized in that: The discrete fault position is a fault position whose average value of the interval distance between the faults and other faults is not within a preset distance interval.

7. The method for constructing a software interface for a heating system according to claim 1, characterized in that: Determining whether the distribution discreteness of the fault location of the heating pipe network of the heating system meets the requirements specifically includes: Determine the fault location of the heating pipe network of the heating system based on the historical fault data of the heating pipe network of the heating system. When the number of the fault locations of the heating pipe network is less than a preset number: It is determined that the distribution discreteness of the fault positions of the heating pipe network of the heating system meets the requirements; When the number of fault locations of the heating network is not less than a preset number: When it is determined that there is no screening fault location in the fault location based on the historical fault times of the fault location of the heating pipe network: it is determined that the distribution discreteness of the fault location of the heating pipe network of the heating system meets the requirements; When a screening fault location exists in the fault location: Determine the interval distances between different fault locations based on the fault location of the heating pipe network, and determine the discrete fault locations in the fault locations using the interval distances, and when the number of discrete fault locations does not meet the requirement, determine that the distribution discreteness of the fault locations of the heating pipe network of the heating system meets the requirement; When the number of discrete fault locations meets the requirement: Determine the fault discrete coefficients of different discrete fault positions according to the interval distances between different discrete fault positions and the number of historical faults of the discrete fault positions; when the sum of the fault discrete coefficients of the discrete fault positions does not meet the requirements, determine that the distribution discreteness of the fault positions of the heating pipe network of the heating system meets the requirements; When the sum of the fault discrete coefficients of the discrete fault positions meets the requirement: A comprehensive discrete coefficient is determined according to the number of discrete fault locations and the fault discrete coefficients of different discrete fault locations, and the comprehensive discrete coefficient is used to determine whether the distribution discreteness of the fault locations of the heating pipe network of the heating system meets the requirements.

8. The method for constructing a software interface for a heating system according to claim 1, characterized in that: The method for determining the display reliability of the heating network is: Determine the distribution number of the heat supply regulating facilities of the heat supply network based on the distribution data of the heat supply regulating facilities of the heat supply network, and determine the facility distribution dispersion coefficient of the heat supply network based on the distribution number of the heat supply regulating facilities and the interval distances between different heat supply regulating facilities; The display reliability of the heating network is determined based on the facility distribution dispersion coefficient, the network length and the heating area of ​​the heating network.

9. The method for constructing a software interface for a heating system according to claim 8, characterized in that: Determining the display reliability of the heating network according to the facility distribution dispersion coefficient, the network length and the heating area of ​​the heating network, specifically includes: Determining preset reliability corresponding to the facility distribution dispersion coefficient, the network length of the heating network, and the heating area based on the facility distribution dispersion coefficient, the network length of the heating network, and the heating area; The displayed reliability of the heating network is determined based on the sum of the preset reliabilities corresponding to the facility distribution dispersion coefficient, the network length of the heating network and the heating area.

10. A software interface construction system for a heating system, using a software interface construction method for a heating system according to any one of claims 1 to 9, characterized in that: Specifically include: Distribution discrete evaluation module, display reliability evaluation module, display area screening module, display mode determination module; The distribution discreteness evaluation module is responsible for obtaining the historical fault data of the heating pipe network of the heating system, and determining whether the distribution discreteness of the fault location of the heating pipe network of the heating system meets the requirements based on the analysis results of the historical fault data; The display reliability evaluation module is responsible for determining the pipe network length and heating area of ​​the heating pipe network based on the distribution data of the heating pipe network of the heating system, and determining whether the display reliability of the heating pipe network meets the requirements in combination with the distribution data of the heating regulation facilities of the heating pipe network; The display area screening module is responsible for dividing the heating network into multiple areas, and using the analysis results of historical fault data in different areas to determine the display area of ​​the software interface of the heating system; The display mode determination module is responsible for determining the display modes of different areas in the heating network in the display area based on the analysis results of the monitoring data of the heating network in the display area and the analysis results of the historical fault data.

Images