Cigarette digital sensory smoke panel test system and method

Abstract

The invention provides a cigarette digital sensory smoke panel test system and method, and the system comprises a basic configuration module which is deployed at a server side and is used for maintaining the data of an evaluation group and an evaluation scheme; the task issuing module is deployed at the server side and used for adding a list of cigarette samples needing to be evaluated, determining evaluation personnel and specific evaluation content based on an existing evaluation group and an evaluation scheme, configuring a task list corresponding to cigarette sample smoking evaluation, issuing the task list to a user side of the corresponding evaluation personnel, and receiving and displaying a feedback evaluation result; and the sensory smoking evaluation module is deployed at the user side and is used for receiving the task list, filling in an evaluation result of the to-be-detected cigarette sample and feeding back the evaluation result to the task issuing module. According to the method, the data of the evaluation group personnel and the data of the evaluation scheme are maintained in a digital form, and the smoking evaluation efficiency is improved.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the technical field of tobacco evaluation, and in particular to a digital cigarette sensory smoking evaluation system and method. Background Art

[0002] Tobacco leaf smoking is an activity to test the sensory quality of tobacco products in order to evaluate the intrinsic quality of cigarette products.

[0003] In related technologies, a series of evaluation indicators are often defined manually, and the evaluators feed back the inspection results in various forms after completing the inspection. However, the traditional methods have the following defects: there is a lack of a unified data management model, which leads to low evaluation efficiency; the evaluation indicators between different tasks are inconsistent, and it takes a lot of effort to change the evaluation indicators; the form of evaluation is relatively simple; there is no effective rule for the time node and feedback form of the evaluators' feedback of the inspection results.

[0004] Based on the above analysis of the development status of this technical field, the existing technical solutions lack a digital system for cigarette sensory evaluation to solve the above problems. Summary of the invention

[0005] The purpose of the present invention is to provide a digital cigarette sensory evaluation system and method, aiming to solve the above-mentioned problems in the prior art.

[0006] According to a first aspect of an embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a digital cigarette sensory evaluation system, comprising:

[0007] The basic configuration module is deployed on the server side and is used to maintain the data of the evaluation group and evaluation plan;

[0008] The task issuing module is deployed on the server side and is used to add the list of cigarette samples that need to be evaluated, determine the evaluators and specific evaluation contents based on the existing evaluation group and evaluation plan, configure the task sheet corresponding to the cigarette sample evaluation, issue the task sheet to the user side of the corresponding evaluator, receive the feedback of the evaluation results and display them;

[0009] The sensory smoking evaluation module is deployed on the user side to receive task orders, fill in the evaluation results of the cigarette samples to be tested, and feed back the evaluation results to the task issuing module.

[0010] According to a second aspect of an embodiment of the present invention, a method for digital sensory smoking evaluation of cigarettes is provided, comprising:

[0011] Maintain the data of evaluation groups and evaluation plans through the basic configuration module;

[0012] Add a list of cigarette samples to be evaluated through the task distribution module, determine the evaluators and specific evaluation content based on the existing evaluation group and evaluation plan, configure the task sheet corresponding to the cigarette sample evaluation, distribute the task sheet to the user end of the corresponding evaluator, receive the feedback of the evaluation results and display them;

[0013] The sensory evaluation module receives the task order, fills in the evaluation results of the cigarette samples to be tested, and feeds the evaluation results back to the task issuing module.

[0014] According to a third aspect of an embodiment of the present invention, there is provided an electronic device, comprising: a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, wherein when the computer program is executed by the processor, the steps of the method for digital sensory smoking evaluation of cigarettes as provided in the second aspect of the present disclosure are implemented.

[0015] According to a fourth aspect of an embodiment of the present invention, a computer-readable storage medium is provided, on which a program for implementing information transmission is stored, and when the program is executed by a processor, the steps of the digital sensory evaluation method for cigarettes provided in the second aspect of the present disclosure are implemented.

[0016] The technical solution provided by the embodiment of the present invention includes the following beneficial effects: deploying a basic configuration module and a task issuing module on the server side to facilitate researchers to configure a comprehensive and complete tobacco evaluation smoking plan, maintaining the data of the evaluation team members and the data of the evaluation plan in a digital form, and being able to quickly generate corresponding task orders according to actual conditions, deploying a sensory evaluation smoking module on the user side to facilitate employees to receive task orders and perform tobacco evaluation smoking tasks, and centrally feeding back the results to the server side.

[0017] It is to be understood that the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory only and are not restrictive of the present disclosure. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0018] In order to more clearly illustrate one or more embodiments of this specification or the technical solutions in the prior art, the drawings required for use in the embodiments or the description of the prior art will be briefly introduced below. Obviously, the drawings described below are only some embodiments recorded in this specification. For ordinary technicians in this field, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without paying creative labor.

[0019] Figure 1 is a schematic diagram of a digital cigarette sensory evaluation system according to an embodiment of the present invention;

[0020] Figure 2 is a schematic diagram of a newly created evaluation group according to an embodiment of the present invention;

[0021] Figure 3is a schematic diagram of a newly created evaluator in an embodiment of the present invention;

[0022] Figure 4 is a schematic diagram of a deactivation evaluation group according to an embodiment of the present invention;

[0023] Figure 5 is a schematic diagram of an evaluation group editor according to an embodiment of the present invention;

[0024] Figure 6 is a schematic diagram of resetting an evaluation group query according to an embodiment of the present invention;

[0025] Figure 7 is a schematic diagram of maintaining an evaluation scheme according to an embodiment of the present invention;

[0026] Figure 8 is a schematic diagram of a reference indicator button according to an embodiment of the present invention;

[0027] Fig. 9 is a schematic diagram of adding indicator items in an embodiment of the present invention;

[0028] Fig.10 is a schematic diagram of a deactivation evaluation scheme according to an embodiment of the present invention;

[0029] Fig.11 is a schematic diagram of evaluation phrase maintenance according to an embodiment of the present invention;

[0030] Fig.12 is a schematic diagram of editing an evaluation phrase according to an embodiment of the present invention;

[0031] Fig.13 is a schematic diagram of a cigarette task list according to an embodiment of the present invention;

[0032] Fig.14 is a schematic diagram of form creation according to an embodiment of the present invention;

[0033] Fig.15 is a schematic diagram of sample addition in an embodiment of the present invention;

[0034] Fig.16 is a schematic diagram added by an evaluator of an embodiment of the present invention;

[0035] Fig.17 is a schematic diagram added by a single evaluator in an embodiment of the present invention;

[0036] Fig.18 is a schematic diagram of adding evaluation indicators in an embodiment of the present invention;

[0037] Fig.19 is a schematic diagram of adding a single indicator item in an embodiment of the present invention;

[0038] Fig. 20 is a schematic diagram of task distribution in an embodiment of the present invention;

[0039] Fig.21 is a schematic diagram of cancelling the sending of an embodiment of the present invention;

[0040] Fig. 22 Schematic diagram showing evaluation results of an embodiment of the present invention

[0041] Fig.23 is a schematic diagram of a printing interface of an embodiment of the present invention;

[0042] Fig.24 is a schematic diagram of automatic statistics of results in an embodiment of the present invention;

[0043] Fig.25 is a schematic diagram of a user terminal interface of an embodiment of the present invention;

[0044] Fig.26 is a schematic diagram of sliding scoring according to an embodiment of the present invention;

[0045] Fig. 27 It is a schematic diagram of setting value multiple scoring in an embodiment of the present invention;

[0046] Fig.28 is a schematic diagram of a difference evaluation of an embodiment of the present invention;

[0047] Fig.29 is a schematic diagram of evaluation phrase selection according to an embodiment of the present invention;

[0048] Fig.30 is a schematic diagram of a historical evaluation of an embodiment of the present invention;

[0049] Fig.31 Schematic diagram of the digital sensory evaluation method for cigarette smoking of the present invention;

[0050] Fig.32 is a schematic diagram of an electronic device according to an embodiment of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0051] In order to enable those skilled in the art to better understand the technical solutions in one or more embodiments of this specification, the following will be combined with the drawings in one or more embodiments of this specification to clearly and completely describe the technical solutions in one or more embodiments of this specification. Obviously, the described embodiments are only part of the embodiments of this specification, not all of the embodiments. Based on one or more embodiments of this specification, all other embodiments obtained by ordinary technicians in this field without creative work should fall within the scope of protection of this document.

[0052] System Example

[0053] According to an embodiment of the present invention, a digital cigarette sensory evaluation system is provided. Figure 1 Schematic diagram of a digital cigarette sensory evaluation system according to an embodiment of the present invention. Figure 1 As shown, the digital sensory evaluation system for cigarettes according to an embodiment of the present invention specifically includes:

[0054] The basic configuration module 10 is deployed on the server side and is used to maintain the data of the evaluation group and the evaluation plan, and is specifically used for:

[0055] The server-side system operation role is the administrator;

[0056] The basic configuration module 10 specifically includes: an evaluation group maintenance module, an evaluation scheme maintenance module and an evaluation phrase maintenance module, wherein:

[0057] The evaluation group maintenance module is used to create, delete or modify the information of an evaluation group, or control the deactivation or activation of an existing evaluation group, wherein an evaluation group includes the information of one or more evaluators. The activation in the embodiment of the present invention is to send the selected data to the back-end release method through the foreground, and the deactivation is to send the selected data to the back-end through the foreground and call the back-end unRelease method.

[0058] Figure 2 is a schematic diagram of a newly created evaluation group in an embodiment of the present invention, such as Figure 2 As shown in the figure, the basic information required for creating a new evaluation group is displayed. You need to manually enter the evaluation group code and name. You can add the evaluator's information in the data form below the basic information. Figure 3 is a schematic diagram of a newly created evaluator in an embodiment of the present invention, such as Figure 3 As shown, the interface information for adding evaluators is displayed, that is, an evaluation group includes information of one or more employees, and the evaluation group maintenance module maintains different evaluation groups.

[0059] Figure 4 is a schematic diagram of a deactivation evaluation group according to an embodiment of the present invention. Figure 4 As shown, select a data with enabled status and click the Disable button. After clicking, the system pops up a confirmation window of "Do you want to disable". After confirmation, the deactivation of this evaluation group is completed. That is to say, the evaluation group in the disabled status cannot be used when the task is issued. Similarly, the disabled data can also be set to enabled.

[0060] In the embodiment of the present invention, the information in the evaluation group can be modified by the edit button, or the information can be deleted by the delete button. It should be noted that all modifications or deletions in the embodiment of the present invention need to be performed in the state where the data is deactivated. Modification without deactivating the data may destroy the consistency and integrity of the data, thereby affecting the normal operation of the business; Figure 5 Schematic diagram of the evaluation group editing of the embodiment of the present invention, such as Figure 5As shown, the editing interface of the evaluation group after the evaluation group is deactivated is displayed.

[0061] Furthermore, the content maintained by the embodiment of the present invention can realize the query function. The query is to call the background query method to retrieve data. The query condition can be reset. Figure 6 is a schematic diagram of resetting the evaluation group query according to an embodiment of the present invention, such as Figure 6 As shown in the figure, the query filter is displayed. To reset, first clear the input items, then set the drop-down selection box to clear all status and date items.

[0062] The evaluation scheme maintenance module is used to create, delete or modify the information of the evaluation scheme, or control the deactivation or activation of an existing evaluation scheme. An evaluation scheme includes basic scheme information and indicator items; the basic scheme information specifically includes:

[0063] Scheme code, scheme name, document source, evaluation type and elimination rules, where the document source indicates the source of the cigarette sample type, and the elimination rules indicate the rules for eliminating abnormal sample values ​​in the evaluation results after receiving the evaluation results. For example, if most evaluation results of a certain indicator item are stable in the range of 0.8-0.9, and the evaluation result of a certain evaluator is 0.6, with a large deviation, it is considered that the evaluation result is greatly affected by the subjective influence of the evaluator and needs to be eliminated. The elimination rules include the rules for excluding maximum and minimum values ​​and eliminating outliers, and the evaluation type indicates the specific evaluation type under the source of the cigarette sample type;

[0064] The document sources include: ordinary cigarettes, single-ingredient cigarettes and flavors and fragrances; evaluation types include flavors and fragrances-olfactory evaluation, single-ingredient cigarettes-daily monitoring evaluation, etc. The document source of the data can be seen from the evaluation type; the settings of other basic information facilitate the storage of maintenance plans;

[0065] Figure 7 is a schematic diagram of the evaluation scheme maintenance of an embodiment of the present invention, such as Figure 7 As shown, an example of an existing evaluation scheme that is maintained is presented; Figure 8 is a schematic diagram of a reference indicator button according to an embodiment of the present invention, such as Figure 8 As shown in the figure, in the editing interface of evaluation scheme maintenance, click the reference indicator button to enter the interface of adding indicator items; Fig. 9 is a schematic diagram of adding indicator items in an embodiment of the present invention, such as Fig. 9 As shown, the interface for adding indicator items in the editing interface of evaluation plan maintenance is displayed.

[0066] Evaluation plan maintenance also supports related functions of "addition, deletion, modification and query". Fig.10 is a schematic diagram of a deactivation evaluation scheme according to an embodiment of the present invention. Fig.10 As shown, the interface for deactivating a certain evaluation scheme is displayed.

[0067] In the embodiment of the present invention, it is further preferred that the evaluation scheme maintenance module can realize the copy function, that is, copy an evaluation scheme, form a copy based on the evaluation scheme, and modify some data in the copy to form a new evaluation scheme, thereby reducing the consumption of manual addition. In the process of implementing the copy, if no selection is made, a prompt "Please select a piece of data for operation" is displayed; preferably, the evaluation schemes that are used more frequently can be abstracted into standardized templates, including key settings, which can be completed by writing scripts;

[0068] The evaluation phrase maintenance module is used to maintain the optional evaluation phrases corresponding to the non-quantitative indicator items of the evaluation scheme, and is used to create, delete or modify the information of the evaluation phrases, or control the deactivation or activation of the existing evaluation phrases;

[0069] When designing smoking evaluation questions, digital quantitative evaluation and textual non-quantification are two common types of settings. For non-quantitative indicators, such as the evaluation of the odor characteristics of cigarettes, the conclusion cannot be expressed in numbers, but the evaluators' writing skills vary and may not reflect their professionalism. Therefore, accurate evaluation phrases describing the odor characteristics are provided. One indicator item matches multiple optional evaluation phrases, such as: good aroma texture, high concentration, local odor, strong permeability, etc., for evaluators to choose.

[0070] Fig.11 Schematic diagram of evaluation phrase maintenance in an embodiment of the present invention. Fig.11 As shown, the phrase classification name corresponds to the scheme name in the evaluation scheme, and the document source also corresponds to the document source in the evaluation scheme, so the correspondence with the indicator items in the evaluation scheme can be achieved. Fig.12 Schematic diagram of editing evaluation phrases according to an embodiment of the present invention. Fig.12 As shown, the phrase classification sorting is sorted from large to small according to the historical selection volume, so that the most commonly used evaluation phrases are sorted at the front, thereby improving the user's evaluation efficiency.

[0071] The task issuing module 12 is deployed on the server side and supports both manual and interface methods. It is used to add a list of cigarette samples that need to be evaluated, determine the evaluators and specific evaluation contents based on the existing evaluation group and evaluation plan, configure the task sheet corresponding to the cigarette sample evaluation, issue the task sheet to the user side of the corresponding evaluator, receive the feedback evaluation results and display them, and is specifically used for:

[0072] Manual refers to the operation of the evaluator through the user interface provided by the system, and the interface refers to the interaction between the evaluator and the server through the API programming interface, which can take into account both small-scale evaluation and absorption tasks and large-scale evaluation and absorption tasks at the same time; in order to achieve this integration, a lightweight RESTful API communication protocol is used for data exchange between the client and the server;

[0073] The task issuing module 12 specifically includes: a form creation module, a sample adding module, an evaluator adding module, an evaluation index adding module and an assignment issuing module, wherein:

[0074] The form creation module is used to obtain the evaluation type and elimination rules, and add the evaluation method for comparison between samples to form an initial table corresponding to the cigarette evaluation task. The evaluation type and elimination rules are consistent with the meanings in the basic configuration module 10;

[0075] The evaluation methods include: one-to-one evaluation method, two-to-one evaluation method and differential evaluation method, among which:

[0076] The one-to-one evaluation method is to compare and evaluate a cigarette sample with a standard sample;

[0077] The two-to-one evaluation method is to compare and evaluate the two cigarette samples with the standard sample;

[0078] The difference evaluation method is to select the cigarette sample with the greatest difference among three cigarette samples, two of which are identical. In other words, the evaluators are required to find one of the different samples.

[0079] In the difference evaluation, preferably, the embodiment of the present invention uses a three-point test method, which is a blind test method. At the user end of the smoking stimulant, the order of the three samples should be randomly arranged to avoid position bias and avoid reference conclusions between different smoking stimulants;

[0080] In an embodiment of the present invention, for a difference evaluation group of one A sample and two B samples, the existing arrangement orders are: ABB, BBA and BAB. Excel VBA is used to design a three-point inspection method and generate a custom plug-in. The custom plug-in randomly generates sample codes based on an automated language to ensure that the probability of occurrence of each order is the same. The custom plug-in is installed in the task delivery module on the server side to optimize the overall delivery efficiency.

[0081] Preferably, the front desk needs to verify whether all indicator items have been scored, and if not, it prompts that the indicator item has no score.

[0082] Fig.13 Schematic diagram of a cigarette task list according to an embodiment of the present invention, Fig.13 As shown, the data forms of the task order are displayed. After the task order is issued, you can click "Force Completion" to force the evaluator to perform the task within the specified time. The sequence, task number, task status, etc. are used to maintain the information and status of each task order.

[0083] Fig.14 Schematic diagram of form creation in an embodiment of the present invention. Fig.14As shown, the basic information of form creation is displayed, corresponding to the data maintained in the basic configuration module 10, and the task date is an automatically generated date; there are sample addition buttons, evaluation group addition buttons, and indicator item addition buttons at the bottom of the interface.

[0084] The sample adding module is used to add a list of cigarette samples that need to be evaluated, add the list of cigarette samples to the initial table, and form a first task table. The sample adding module is specifically used to: obtain the list of samples that need to be evaluated in batches or manually selected, Fig.15 Schematic diagram of sample addition in an embodiment of the present invention, such as Fig.15 As shown in the figure, the sample adding interface is displayed. If the top selection box before the serial number is selected, it means batch selection. If the selection box before the serial number is selected individually, it means manual selection of individual samples.

[0085] The evaluator adding module is used to obtain the evaluation list of the evaluators including the evaluators of this evaluation based on the maintained evaluation group, and add the evaluation list to the first task list to form the second task list; Fig.16 is a schematic diagram added by an evaluator of an embodiment of the present invention, such as Fig.16 As shown in the lower right corner, you can directly search for the entire group to add, or add a single reviewer using the Add button; Fig.17 is a schematic diagram added by a single evaluator in an embodiment of the present invention, such as Fig.17 As shown, you can identify the specific evaluator by searching for the evaluator code, evaluator name or work number.

[0086] Preferably, when adding an evaluation group, a neural network model is used to predict the matching degree between each evaluation group and the evaluation task. In an embodiment of the present invention, the characteristics of the task to be issued may include difficulty level, required skills, etc., and the characteristics of the evaluation group may include number of people, average remaining workload, work preference, etc.;

[0087] Use a neural network model to calculate the matching degree between the task to be issued and the evaluation group. The matching degree can be a similarity score. The evaluation groups are sorted from high to low according to the similarity, so that managers can directly select the evaluation group with the highest score.

[0088] The evaluation index adding module is used to obtain specific index items of this evaluation based on the maintained evaluation scheme, that is, the index items matched by the evaluation scheme, and add each specific index item to the second task table to form a task list; Fig.18 is a schematic diagram of adding evaluation indicators in an embodiment of the present invention, such as Fig.18 As shown, the task list after adding indicator items is displayed.

[0089] In the process of adding indicator items, the indicator items corresponding to the evaluation scheme maintained in the basic configuration module 10 can be directly added in batches, or a single indicator item can be added manually to achieve personalized customization. Fig.19 is a schematic diagram of adding a single indicator item in an embodiment of the present invention, such as Fig.19 As shown, the interface for manually adding indicator items according to the indicator item name or indicator category name is displayed.

[0090] At this point, the task list is set up and the maintained task list supports the functions of adding, deleting, modifying and checking. The distribution module is used to automatically distribute the task list to the mobile device of the corresponding evaluator user end. Fig. 20 Schematic diagram of task distribution in an embodiment of the present invention, such as Fig. 20 As shown in the figure, the status of the unissued task order is shown as unissued. Click the "Issue" button, and a pop-up window will pop up asking "Do you want to issue it?". After confirmation, it can be issued.

[0091] The preferred embodiment of the present invention can cancel the tasks that have been issued. Fig.21 Schematic diagram of canceling the sending of an embodiment of the present invention, such as Fig.21 As shown, the interface for canceling the task order is displayed.

[0092] Fig. 22 is a schematic diagram showing the evaluation results of an embodiment of the present invention, such as Fig. 22 As shown in the figure, the scoring of the evaluation results is displayed; when the evaluation results are received, the results can be viewed. The result viewing interface only supports viewing, and cannot be modified or saved, but the results can be printed. Fig.23 Schematic diagram of the printing interface of an embodiment of the present invention. Fig.23 As shown, the printing interface is displayed.

[0093] Preferably, the embodiment of the present invention can realize automatic statistics of evaluation results. Fig.24 Schematic diagram of automatic statistics of results in an embodiment of the present invention. Fig.24 As shown, on the left is the statistical filter, which is used to filter the time period that the manager wants to count, and on the right is the statistical data form.

[0094] The sensory smoking evaluation module 14 is deployed at the user end, and is used to receive the task list, fill in the evaluation results of the cigarette samples to be tested, and feed back the evaluation results to the task issuing module 12.

[0095] Fig.25 is a schematic diagram of a user terminal interface of an embodiment of the present invention, such as Fig.25 As shown, the interface of the task to be evaluated is displayed, the received task sheet is displayed in the interface, the evaluation results of the cigarette samples to be tested are filled in, and the evaluation results are fed back to the task issuing module.

[0096] The sensory evaluation module 14 is specifically used for:

[0097] The quantitative index items of the tested cigarette samples are evaluated by using a sliding progress bar or a set value multiple scoring method; a specific evaluation phrase is selected from the optional evaluation phrases, or the non-quantitative index items are evaluated by manual input. When the number of optional evaluation phrases exceeds a preset threshold, the historical selection quantity of each evaluation phrase is obtained, and the optional evaluation phrases are sorted from large to small according to the historical selection quantity;

[0098] Sorting the evaluation phrases that are clicked more by users to the front can greatly improve the user experience. From a technical point of view, it is necessary to add a counter module in the background to record the number of evaluation phrases selected by evaluators, use SQL query statements to query or sort, and use the ORDER BY clause to sort by click volume. Preferably, the data can be cached in a key-value storage system such as Redis to cache the most recently accessed content.

[0099] Fig.26 is a schematic diagram of sliding scoring according to an embodiment of the present invention. Fig.26 As shown, the sliding scoring interface is displayed; Fig. 27 Schematic diagram of setting value multiple scoring in an embodiment of the present invention, such as Fig. 27 As shown, the setting value multiple scoring interface is displayed. The setting value multiple of this embodiment is 0.5, so it can be represented by a star; Fig.28 is a schematic diagram of the difference evaluation of the embodiment of the present invention, such as Fig.28 As shown, the interface of difference evaluation is displayed.

[0100] Fig.29 Schematic diagram of the evaluation phrase selection of the embodiment of the present invention. Fig.29 , showing the result of selecting "higher concentration" as the main feature from the three optional evaluation phrases.

[0101] Fig.30 is a schematic diagram of the historical evaluation of an embodiment of the present invention, such as Fig.30 As shown, all completed evaluation tasks are displayed.

[0102] To sum up, in response to the existing problems, this paper invents a digital sensory evaluation system for cigarettes, deploys basic configuration modules and task issuing modules on the server side, which is convenient for managers to configure a comprehensive and complete tobacco evaluation plan, maintains the data of evaluation team members and evaluation plan data in a digital form, and can quickly generate corresponding task orders according to actual conditions; in the process of setting up task orders, it supports automatic import of maintained data, and supports customized separate setting import, which enhances the user experience; deploys a sensory evaluation module on the user side, which is convenient for employees to receive task orders and perform tobacco evaluation tasks, and centrally feed back the results to the server side.

[0103] Method Embodiment

[0104] According to an embodiment of the present invention, a digital sensory evaluation method for cigarettes is provided. Fig.31 Schematic diagram of the digital sensory evaluation method for cigarette smoking of the present invention, such as Fig.31 As shown, the digital sensory evaluation method for cigarettes according to an embodiment of the present invention specifically includes:

[0105] In step S3110, the data of the evaluation group and the evaluation scheme are maintained through the basic configuration module;

[0106] In step S3120, the list of cigarette samples to be evaluated is added through the task issuing module, and the evaluators and specific evaluation contents are determined based on the existing evaluation group and evaluation plan, and the task sheet corresponding to the cigarette sample evaluation is configured, and the task sheet is issued to the user end of the corresponding evaluator, and the feedback evaluation results are received and displayed;

[0107] In step S3130, the task list is received through the sensory evaluation module, the evaluation results of the cigarette samples to be tested are filled in, and the evaluation results are fed back to the task issuing module.

[0108] To sum up, in response to the existing problems, this paper invented a digital sensory evaluation method for cigarettes, deploying basic configuration modules and task issuing modules on the server side, so that managers can configure a comprehensive and complete tobacco evaluation plan, maintain the data of evaluation team members and evaluation plan data in digital form, and quickly generate corresponding task orders according to actual conditions; in the process of setting up task orders, it supports automatic import of maintained data, and supports customized separate setting import, which enhances the user experience; deploys a sensory evaluation module on the user side, so that employees can receive task orders and perform tobacco evaluation tasks, and feed back the results to the server side in a centralized manner.

[0109] Electronic device embodiment

[0110] Fig.32 3200 is a schematic diagram of an electronic device according to an embodiment of the present invention. The electronic device 3200 may include at least one processor 3210 and a memory 3220. The processor 3210 may execute instructions stored in the memory 3220. The processor 3210 is connected to the memory 3220 through a data bus. In addition to the memory 3220, the processor 3210 may also be connected to an input device 3230, an output device 3240, and a communication device 3250 through a data bus.

[0111] The processor 3210 may be any conventional processor, such as a commercially available CPU. The processor may also include a graphics processor (Graphic Process Unit, GPU), a field programmable gate array (Field Programmable Gate Array, FPGA), a system on chip (System on Chip, SOC), an application specific integrated circuit (Application Specific Integrated Circuit, ASIC) or a combination thereof.

[0112] Memory 3220 can be implemented by any type of volatile or non-volatile storage device or a combination thereof, such as static random access memory (SRAM), electrically erasable programmable read-only memory (EEPROM), erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM), programmable read-only memory (PROM), read-only memory (ROM), magnetic memory, flash memory, magnetic disk or optical disk.

[0113] In the disclosed embodiment, executable instructions are stored in the memory 3220, and the processor 3210 can read the executable instructions from the memory 3220 and execute the instructions to implement all or part of the steps of any of the digital sensory evaluation methods for cigarettes in the above exemplary embodiments.

[0114] Computer Readable Storage Medium Embodiments

[0115] In addition to the above-mentioned methods and devices, the exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure may also be a computer program product or a computer-readable storage medium storing the computer program product. The computer product includes computer program instructions, which can be executed by a processor to implement all or part of the steps described in any of the digital sensory evaluation methods of cigarettes in the above-mentioned exemplary embodiments.

[0116] The computer program product may be written in any combination of one or more programming languages ​​to write program codes for performing the operations of the embodiments of the present application, including object-oriented programming languages ​​such as Java, C++, etc., and also conventional procedural programming languages ​​such as "C" language or similar programming languages ​​and scripting languages ​​(e.g., Python). The program code may be executed entirely on the user computing device, partially on the user computing device, as an independent software package, partially on the user computing device and partially on a remote computing device, or entirely on a remote computing device or server.

[0117] Computer readable storage media can adopt any combination of one or more readable media. The readable medium can be a readable signal medium or a readable storage medium. The readable storage medium can include, for example, but is not limited to, a system, device or device of electricity, magnetism, light, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor, or any combination of the above. More specific examples of readable storage media include: a static random access memory (SRAM) with one or more wires electrically connected, an electrically erasable programmable read-only memory (EEPROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM), a programmable read-only memory (PROM), a read-only memory (ROM), a magnetic memory, a flash memory, a magnetic disk or an optical disk, or any suitable combination of the above.

[0118] Finally, it should be noted that the above embodiments are only used to illustrate the technical solutions of the present invention, rather than to limit it. Although the present invention has been described in detail with reference to the aforementioned embodiments, those skilled in the art should understand that they can still modify the technical solutions described in the aforementioned embodiments, or replace some or all of the technical features therein with equivalents. However, these modifications or replacements do not cause the essence of the corresponding technical solutions to deviate from the scope of the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present invention.

Claims

1. A digital cigarette sensory evaluation system, characterized in that: include: The basic configuration module is deployed on the server side and is used to maintain the data of the evaluation group and evaluation plan; The task issuing module is deployed on the server side, and is used to add a list of cigarette samples to be evaluated, determine the evaluators and specific evaluation contents based on the existing evaluation group and the evaluation plan, configure the task sheet corresponding to the cigarette sample evaluation, issue the task sheet to the user end of the corresponding evaluator, receive the feedback evaluation results and display them; The sensory smoking evaluation module is deployed on the user side, and is used to receive the task list, fill in the evaluation results of the cigarette samples to be tested, and feed back the evaluation results to the task issuing module.

2. The system according to claim 1, characterized in that The basic configuration module specifically includes: an evaluation group maintenance module, an evaluation scheme maintenance module and an evaluation phrase maintenance module, wherein: The evaluation group maintenance module is used to create, delete or modify the information of an evaluation group, or control the deactivation or activation of an existing evaluation group, wherein an evaluation group includes the information of one or more evaluators; The evaluation scheme maintenance module is used to create, delete or modify the information of the evaluation scheme, or control the deactivation or activation of an existing evaluation scheme, wherein an evaluation scheme includes basic scheme information and indicator items; The evaluation phrase maintenance module is used to maintain the optional evaluation phrases corresponding to the non-quantitative indicator items of the evaluation scheme, and is used to create, delete or modify the information of the evaluation phrases, or control the deactivation or activation of existing evaluation phrases.

3. The system according to claim 2, characterized in that The basic information of the scheme specifically includes: Scheme code, scheme name, document source, evaluation type and elimination rules, wherein the document source indicates the source of the cigarette sample type, the elimination rules indicate the rules for eliminating abnormal sample values ​​in the evaluation results after receiving the evaluation results, the elimination rules include rules for excluding maximum and minimum values ​​and eliminating outliers, and the evaluation type indicates the specific evaluation type under the source of the cigarette sample type.

4. The system according to claim 3, characterized in that The task distribution module specifically includes: a form creation module, a sample addition module, an evaluator addition module, an evaluation index addition module and a distribution distribution module, wherein: The form creation module is used to obtain the evaluation type and the elimination rule, and add the evaluation method for comparison between samples to form an initial table corresponding to the cigarette evaluation task; The sample adding module is used to add a list of cigarette samples that need to be evaluated, and add the list of cigarette samples to the initial table to form a first task table; The evaluator adding module is used to obtain an evaluation list including the evaluators for this evaluation based on the maintained evaluation group, and add the evaluation list to the first task list to form a second task list; The evaluation index adding module is used to obtain specific index items of this evaluation based on the maintained evaluation scheme, and add each specific index item to the second task table to form the task list; The distribution and issuing module is used to automatically distribute the task list to the mobile device of the corresponding evaluator user terminal.

5. The system according to claim 3, characterized in that The sources of the documents specifically include: ordinary cigarettes, single-ingredient cigarettes and flavors and fragrances.

6. The system according to claim 4, characterized in that The evaluation methods specifically include: one-to-one evaluation method, two-to-one evaluation method and differential evaluation method, among which: The one-to-one evaluation method is to compare and evaluate a cigarette sample with a standard sample; The two-to-one evaluation method is to compare and evaluate the two cigarette samples with the standard sample; The difference evaluation method is to select a cigarette sample with the greatest difference among three cigarette samples.

7. The system according to claim 1, characterized in that The sensory evaluation module is specifically used for: The quantitative index items of the tested cigarette samples are evaluated by using a sliding progress bar or a set value multiple scoring method; A specific evaluation phrase is selected from the optional evaluation phrases, or a non-quantitative indicator item is evaluated by manual input. When the number of the optional evaluation phrases exceeds a preset threshold, the historical selection quantity of each evaluation phrase is obtained, and the optional evaluation phrases are sorted from large to small according to the historical selection quantity.

8. A digital cigarette sensory evaluation method, used in the digital cigarette sensory evaluation system according to any one of claims 1 to 7, the method specifically comprising: Maintain the data of evaluation groups and evaluation plans through the basic configuration module; Add a list of cigarette samples to be evaluated through the task issuing module, determine the evaluators and specific evaluation contents based on the existing evaluation group and the evaluation plan, configure the task sheet corresponding to the cigarette sample evaluation, issue the task sheet to the user end of the corresponding evaluator, receive the feedback of the evaluation results and display them; The task list is received through the sensory evaluation module, the evaluation result of the cigarette sample to be tested is filled in, and the evaluation result is fed back to the task issuing module.

9. An electronic device, characterized in that: include: A memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, wherein the computer program, when executed by the processor, implements the steps of the digital sensory evaluation method for cigarettes as described in claim 8.

10. A computer-readable storage medium, characterized in that: The computer-readable storage medium stores an implementation program for information transmission, and when the program is executed by the processor, the steps of the digital sensory evaluation method for cigarettes as described in claim 8 are implemented.

Images