Scaled blade design method and scaled blade

By calculating the waving stiffness and array stiffness distribution of the original blade, the cross-sectional size of the support beam of the shrink blade is determined, and combined with skin processing, the problem of low design efficiency of the shrink blade is solved, achieving a more efficient and accurate design process.

CN119885647APending Publication Date: 2025-04-25HUANENG CLEAN ENERGY RES INST +2
View PDF 0 Cites 0 Cited by

Patent Information

Application Number
CN202411996127.3
Authority / Receiving Office
CN · China
Patent Type
Applications(China)
Current Assignee / Owner
Filing Date
2024-12-31
Publication Date
2025-04-25

AI Technical Summary

Technical Problem

The existing shrink blade design efficiency is low, resulting in complex design process, high cost and long manufacturing cycle.

Method used

By obtaining the waving stiffness and array stiffness distribution of the original blade, the number of similar criteria is calculated, the cross-sectional dimension of the support beam is calculated based on the aerodynamic shape and material elastic modulus, and the shrinkage blade is processed in combination with the skin to ensure that its aerodynamic shape and stiffness distribution is similar to the original blade.

Benefits of technology

Significantly improve the design efficiency and accuracy of shrinking blades, reduce performance losses and cost waste caused by design problems, and shorten the manufacturing cycle.

✦ Generated by Eureka AI based on patent content.

Smart Images

  • Figure CN119885647A_ABST
    Figure CN119885647A_ABST
Patent Text Reader

Abstract

The invention provides a scaled blade design method and a scaled blade, and the scaled blade design method comprises the steps: obtaining the flapping rigidity distribution of an original blade, calculating a required similarity criterion number, and calculating the flapping rigidity distribution of the scaled blade according to the flapping rigidity distribution of the original blade and the similarity criterion number; the swing array rigidity distribution of the original blade is obtained, the needed similarity criterion number is calculated, and the swing array rigidity distribution of the scaled blade is calculated according to the swing array rigidity distribution of the original blade and the similarity criterion number; obtaining the aerodynamic shape of the scaled blade based on the geometric scale ratio; on the basis of the aerodynamic configuration of the scaled blade, the elastic modulus of a supporting beam material, the distribution of the flapping rigidity and the distribution of the swing rigidity, the required cross section size of the supporting beam is obtained through calculation; the scaled blade is machined through the supporting beam and the skin on the outer side of the supporting beam, and the appearance of the skin is the same as the aerodynamic appearance of the scaled blade. The problem that in the prior art, the design efficiency of scaling blades is low is solved.
Need to check novelty before this filing date? Find Prior Art

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the field of wind power generation, and in particular to a scaled-down blade design method and a scaled-down blade. Background Art

[0002] A scaled blade refers to a model blade used in wind tunnel tests and model experiments in fields such as energy engineering and aeronautical engineering. It is made by reducing the shape, size and other information of the original-size blade (usually a large blade actually used, such as the wind blade of a wind turbine, the propeller blade of an aircraft, etc.) according to a certain geometric reduction coefficient. The purpose of designing and manufacturing scaled blades is to simulate and study the fluid dynamics, structural dynamics and overall performance of the original-size blade in an actual working environment at a smaller scale in a laboratory or in facilities such as a wind tunnel. Through scaled blades, researchers can obtain data on blades under various working conditions, such as aerodynamic characteristics, vibration characteristics, fatigue characteristics, etc., under controllable experimental conditions, and then analyze and optimize the performance of the blades, reducing the testing cost and time of full-size blades. The key to the design of scaled blades is to ensure that their physical properties are similar to those of the original-size blades, including but not limited to aerodynamic shape, structural stiffness, etc., to ensure that the experimental results can accurately reflect the behavior of the original-size blades.

[0003] At present, there are mainly the following calculation methods in the design of scaled blades: 1. Scale the blades according to the similarity criterion number, use the geometric shape, parameters, materials and processing and manufacturing methods of the original blades, and scale them to obtain scaled blades. This method is simple and convenient, but the weight and size of the blades vary greatly, and the change in blade thickness affects the rigidity of the blades, which in turn affects the blades' flapping stiffness and swing array stiffness, and the blades' flapping stiffness and swing array stiffness directly affect the blades' stability during high overload operation. 2. Obtain the aerodynamic shape of the scaled blades and the cross-sectional dimensions of the support beams through computer simulation, but there is no quantitative method to determine the cross-sectional dimensions of the support beams. It is usually achieved through a repeated process of model trial production, testing, measurement, adjustment, retesting, remeasurement, and readjustment. This method is costly and has a long manufacturing cycle. Summary of the invention

[0004] The main purpose of the present invention is to provide a scaled-down blade design method and a scaled-down blade, so as to solve the problem of low design efficiency of scaled-down blades in the prior art.

[0005] In order to achieve the above-mentioned purpose, according to one aspect of the present invention, a scaled-down blade design method is provided, comprising: obtaining the flapping stiffness distribution of the original blade, calculating the required similarity criterion number, and calculating the flapping stiffness distribution of the scaled blade according to the flapping stiffness distribution and the similarity criterion number of the original blade; obtaining the swing array stiffness distribution of the original blade, calculating the required similarity criterion number, and calculating the swing array stiffness distribution of the scaled blade according to the swing array stiffness distribution and the similarity criterion number of the original blade; obtaining the aerodynamic shape of the scaled-down blade based on the geometric scale ratio; calculating the required cross-sectional size of the support beam based on the aerodynamic shape of the scaled-down blade, the elastic modulus of the support beam material, the distribution of the flapping stiffness and the distribution of the swing array stiffness; processing the scaled-down blade using the support beam and the skin on the outside of the support beam, and the shape of the skin is the same as the aerodynamic shape of the scaled-down blade.

[0006] Furthermore, the similarity criterion number N is 1 / (nl^4), and the flapping stiffness EI of the scaled blade is F = flapping stiffness of original blade*N, flapping stiffness of scaled blade EI E =The swing array stiffness of the original blade*N, where nl is the geometric scaling coefficient; and / or the geometric scaling ratio is 1 / nl, and the aerodynamic shape of the scaled blade is 1 / nl of the aerodynamic shape of the original blade, where nl is the geometric scaling coefficient.

[0007] Furthermore, calculating the required cross-sectional dimensions of the support beam includes: calculating the required cross-sectional dimensions of the main beam of the support beam based on the aerodynamic shape of the scaled blade, the elastic modulus of the support beam material, and the distribution of flapping stiffness; calculating the required cross-sectional dimensions of the side beam of the support beam based on the aerodynamic shape of the scaled blade, the elastic modulus of the support beam material, and the distribution of swing stiffness.

[0008] Furthermore, the cross-sectional dimensions of the main beam of the required support beam are calculated by: obtaining the elastic modulus E1 of the main beam according to the material of the main beam; calculating the cross-sectional moment of inertia of the main beam: the swing stiffness is EIF, and the cross-sectional moment of inertia of the main beam I1 = EI F / E1; calculate the cross-sectional area S1 of the main beam, the calculation formula is S1*h1 2 *2=I1, where h1 is the maximum thickness of the cross section of the scaled blade; the width L1 of the main beam is obtained according to the aerodynamic shape of the scaled blade; the thickness t1 of the main beam is obtained according to the cross-sectional area S1 of the main beam and the width L1 of the main beam, and the calculation formula of the thickness t1 of the main beam is t1=S1 / L1.

[0009] Further, the cross-sectional dimensions of the required side beams of the support beams are calculated by: obtaining the elastic modulus E2 of the side beams according to the materials of the side beams; calculating the cross-sectional moment of inertia of the side beams: the array stiffness is EI E , the section moment of inertia of the edge beam is I2=EIE / E2; calculate the cross-sectional area S2 of the edge beam, the calculation formula is (M / 2) 2 *S2*2=I2, where M is the chord length of the cross section of the scaled blade; the width L2 of the side beam is obtained according to the aerodynamic shape of the scaled blade; the thickness t2 of the side beam is obtained according to the cross-sectional area S2 of the side beam and the width L2 of the side beam, and the calculation formula for the thickness t2 of the side beam is t2=S2 / L2.

[0010] Furthermore, calculating the required cross-sectional dimensions of the support beam also includes: along the length direction of the scaled blade, the support beam has multiple cross-sectional dimensions, and at least some of the cross-sectional dimensions are different, and the dimensions of each cross-sectional dimension are calculated respectively.

[0011] Furthermore, after the calculation of the scaled blade is completed, the software is used to simulate the flapping stiffness of each cross section of the scaled blade. When the simulated flapping stiffness exceeds the calculated flapping stiffness of the scaled blade, the thickness and / or width of the main beam is adjusted, wherein the thickness of the main beam is first adjusted so that the simulated flapping stiffness is equal to the calculated flapping stiffness of the scaled blade. If the adjustment of the thickness of the main beam cannot meet the requirement, the width of the main beam is adjusted.

[0012] Furthermore, after the calculation of the scaled blade is completed, software is used to simulate the swing array stiffness of each cross section of the scaled blade. When the simulated swing array stiffness exceeds the calculated swing array stiffness of the scaled blade, the thickness and / or width of the side beam is adjusted. The thickness of the side beam is first adjusted so that the simulated swing array stiffness is equal to the calculated swing array stiffness of the scaled blade. If the adjusted thickness of the side beam cannot meet the requirement, the width of the side beam is adjusted.

[0013] Furthermore, the material of the support beam is high modulus fiber, and the support beam includes multiple layers of high modulus fiber.

[0014] According to another aspect of the present invention, a scaled-down blade is provided. The scaled-down blade adopts the above-mentioned scaled-down blade design method. The scaled-down blade comprises: a support beam and a skin. The skin is sleeved on the outside of the support beam, and the shape of the skin is the shape of the scaled-down blade.

[0015] By applying the technical solution of the present invention, a support beam is set as a support for the scaled blade, and the cross-sectional size of the support beam is calculated by utilizing the aerodynamic shape of the scaled blade, the elastic modulus of the support beam material, the flapping stiffness distribution and the swing array stiffness distribution of the scaled blade, thereby significantly improving the design efficiency and accuracy of the scaled blade, allowing designers to quickly obtain a more accurate scaled blade through information such as the parameters of the original blade, while reducing performance losses and cost waste caused by design problems, and shortening the cycle of subsequent testing and adjustments of the scaled blade, thereby shortening the manufacturing cycle of the scaled blade, and further improving the design efficiency of the scaled blade. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0016] The drawings constituting a part of the present application are used to provide a further understanding of the present invention. The exemplary embodiments of the present invention and their descriptions are used to explain the present invention and do not constitute an improper limitation of the present invention. In the drawings:

[0017] Figure 1 A flow chart of the scaled blade design method of the present invention is shown. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0018] It should be noted that, in the absence of conflict, the embodiments and features in the embodiments of the present application can be combined with each other. The present invention will be described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings and in combination with the embodiments.

[0019] It should be noted that, unless otherwise specified, all technical and scientific terms used in this application have the same meanings as commonly understood by ordinary technicians in the technical field to which this application belongs.

[0020] In the present invention, unless otherwise specified, the directional words used, such as "up, down, top, bottom", usually refer to the directions shown in the drawings, or to the components themselves in the vertical, perpendicular or gravity directions; similarly, for ease of understanding and description, "inside and outside" refer to the inside and outside relative to the outline of each component itself, but the above-mentioned directional words are not used to limit the present invention.

[0021] In order to solve the problem of low design efficiency of scaled-down blades in the prior art, the present invention provides a scaled-down blade design method and a scaled-down blade.

[0022] like Figure 1 A scaled-down blade design method is shown, comprising: obtaining the flapping stiffness distribution of the original blade, calculating the required similarity criterion number, and calculating the flapping stiffness distribution of the scaled blade according to the flapping stiffness distribution and the similarity criterion number of the original blade; obtaining the swing array stiffness distribution of the original blade, calculating the required similarity criterion number, and calculating the swing array stiffness distribution of the scaled blade according to the swing array stiffness distribution and the similarity criterion number of the original blade; obtaining the aerodynamic shape of the scaled-down blade based on the geometric scale ratio; calculating the required cross-sectional size of the support beam based on the aerodynamic shape of the scaled-down blade, the elastic modulus of the support beam material, the distribution of the flapping stiffness and the distribution of the swing array stiffness; and processing the scaled-down blade using the support beam and the skin on the outside of the support beam, wherein the shape of the skin is the same as the aerodynamic shape of the scaled-down blade.

[0023] In this embodiment, a support beam is set as the support of the scaled blade, and the cross-sectional size of the support beam is calculated by utilizing the aerodynamic shape of the scaled blade, the elastic modulus of the support beam material, the flapping stiffness distribution and the swing array stiffness distribution of the scaled blade, thereby significantly improving the design efficiency and accuracy of the scaled blade, allowing designers to quickly obtain a more accurate scaled blade through information such as the parameters of the original blade, while reducing performance loss and cost waste caused by design problems, and shortening the cycle of subsequent testing and adjustment of the scaled blade, thereby shortening the manufacturing cycle of the scaled blade, and further improving the design efficiency of the scaled blade.

[0024] It should be noted that, in this embodiment, Figure 1 The scaled blade design steps in the embodiment are used as an example to illustrate, but in the design process of the scaled blade, the order of the steps is not unique. For example, the aerodynamic shape of the scaled blade can be obtained based on the geometric scale ratio first, and then the flapping stiffness distribution and the swing array stiffness distribution of the scaled blade can be calculated, as long as the cross-sectional size of the support beam can be finally obtained. The cross-section in this embodiment refers to the cross-section perpendicular to the length direction of the blade, and the length direction of the blade refers to the extension direction from the root of the blade to the tip of the blade.

[0025] In this embodiment, the similarity criterion number N is 1 / (nl^4), and the flapping stiffness EI of the scaled blade is F = flapping stiffness of original blade*N, flapping stiffness of scaled blade EI E = the swing array stiffness of the original blade * N, where nl is the geometric scaling coefficient; thus, the similarity criterion number can be used to accurately calculate the flapping stiffness distribution and the swing array stiffness distribution of the scaled blade. Specifically, the product of the flapping stiffness value at a certain position of the original blade and the similarity criterion number can be used to obtain the flapping stiffness value at the corresponding position of the scaled blade. By obtaining the flapping stiffness values ​​at multiple different positions of the scaled blade, the flapping stiffness distribution of the scaled blade can be obtained. The process of obtaining the swing array stiffness distribution is similar to the process of obtaining the flapping stiffness distribution, and will not be repeated here. In this way, through the similarity criterion number, the consistency of the flapping stiffness and the swing array stiffness between the scaled blade and the original blade can be ensured, which is particularly important for studying the dynamic response of the blade under different wind speed conditions, allowing researchers and developers to more accurately predict and control the behavior of the blade under various conditions, thereby designing more stable and efficient wind turbine blades. It should be noted that the geometric scaling factor nl is the ratio of the size of the original blade to the size of the scaled blade. Taking the length dimension as an example, nl is the ratio of the length of the original blade to the length of the scaled blade.

[0026] In this embodiment, the geometric scale ratio is 1 / nl, and the aerodynamic shape of the scaled blade is 1 / nl of the aerodynamic shape of the original blade, where nl is the geometric scale factor. In this way, the aerodynamic shape of the scaled blade is obtained through the aerodynamic shape of the original blade, which ensures the similarity of the aerodynamic shape between the scaled blade and the original blade, so as to ensure the similarity of the physical properties between the scaled blade and the original blade, which is conducive to the scaled blade representing the original blade in the laboratory for testing, verification and optimization, so that the scaled blade can reflect the real situation of the original blade, thereby improving the reliability of the test data and avoiding expensive and high-risk experiments directly on the original blade, which has important engineering value.

[0027] In this embodiment, calculating the required cross-sectional dimensions of the support beam includes: calculating the required cross-sectional dimensions of the main beam of the support beam based on the aerodynamic shape of the scaled blade, the elastic modulus of the support beam material, and the distribution of flapping stiffness; calculating the required cross-sectional dimensions of the side beam of the support beam based on the aerodynamic shape of the scaled blade, the elastic modulus of the support beam material, and the distribution of swing stiffness.

[0028] In this embodiment, the support beam includes a main beam and a side beam, wherein two main beams and two side beams are provided. The two main beams are arranged along the thickness direction of the cross section of the scaled blade, respectively arranged at the two ends of the thickness direction, and arranged at the maximum thickness of the cross section. The two side beams are arranged along the chord direction of the scaled blade, respectively arranged at the two ends of the chord direction, that is, respectively arranged at the leading edge and the trailing edge of the scaled blade. It should be noted that the chord direction mentioned in this embodiment refers to the direction from the leading edge to the trailing edge of the scaled blade, that is, the width direction of the scaled blade, and is also the width direction of the cross section of the main beam.

[0029] In this embodiment, the cross-sectional dimensions of the main beam of the required support beam are calculated by: obtaining the elastic modulus E1 of the main beam according to the material of the main beam; calculating the cross-sectional moment of inertia of the main beam: the swing stiffness is EIF, and the cross-sectional moment of inertia of the main beam I1=EI F / E1; calculate the cross-sectional area S1 of the main beam, the calculation formula is S1*h1 2*2=I1, where h1 is the maximum thickness of the cross section of the scaled blade; the width L1 of the main beam is obtained according to the aerodynamic shape of the scaled blade; the thickness t1 of the main beam is obtained according to the cross-sectional area S1 of the main beam and the width L1 of the main beam, and the calculation formula of the thickness t1 of the main beam is t1=S1 / L1. Specifically, the material of the main beam is first determined. Considering the stiffness requirements of the scaled blade, a material with a higher shear modulus is generally selected. After the material is determined, the elastic modulus of the material can be obtained; then the cross-sectional inertia moment of the main beam can be calculated, and then the maximum thickness of the cross section of the scaled blade is obtained in combination with the aerodynamic shape, and the cross-sectional area of ​​the main beam is calculated; then the width of the main beam is obtained through the width dimension of the corresponding cross section of the original blade (or the width dimension of the beam at the corresponding position of the original blade) and the geometric scale ratio, or directly through the aerodynamic shape of the scaled blade, and then the thickness is obtained, thereby obtaining the specific size of the main beam. In this way, this quantitative calculation form simplifies the design process of the scaled blade, while ensuring the structural strength and rigidity of the scaled blade, thereby improving the accuracy of the scaled blade and ensuring the accuracy and reliability of the scaled blade test data. It should be noted that the maximum thickness h1 of the cross section of the scaled blade is the maximum thickness of the cross section where the aerodynamic shape of the scaled blade is located, and the width L1 of the main beam refers to the length of the main beam along the chord direction of the scaled blade. According to the structure of the aerodynamic shape, the main beam is not a regular rectangle, but has a certain curvature along the chord direction of the scaled blade, and the width L1 is the arc length of the main beam; the thickness direction of the main beam is perpendicular to the length direction of the scaled blade and the width direction of the main beam.

[0030] In this embodiment, the cross-sectional dimensions of the required side beams of the support beams are calculated by: obtaining the elastic modulus E2 of the side beams according to the materials of the side beams; calculating the cross-sectional moment of inertia of the side beams: the array stiffness is EI E , the section moment of inertia of the edge beam is I2=EI E / E2; calculate the cross-sectional area S2 of the edge beam, the calculation formula is (M / 2) 2 *S2*2=I2, where M is the chord length of the cross section of the scaled blade; the width L2 of the side beam is obtained according to the aerodynamic shape of the scaled blade; the thickness t2 of the side beam is obtained according to the cross-sectional area S2 of the side beam and the width L2 of the side beam, and the calculation formula for the thickness t2 of the side beam is t2=S2 / L2.

[0031] Specifically, first determine the material of the side beam. Considering the stiffness requirements of the scaled blade, a material with a higher shear modulus is generally selected. After the material is determined, the elastic modulus of the material can be obtained; then the moment of inertia of the cross section of the side beam can be calculated, and then the maximum thickness of the cross section of the scaled blade can be obtained in combination with the aerodynamic shape, and the cross-sectional area of ​​the side beam can be calculated; then the width of the side beam is obtained through the width dimension of the corresponding cross section of the original blade (or the width dimension of the beam at the corresponding position of the original blade) and the geometric scale ratio, or directly through the aerodynamic shape of the scaled blade, and then the thickness is obtained, thereby obtaining the specific size of the side beam. In this way, this quantitative calculation form simplifies the design process of the scaled blade, while ensuring the structural strength and stiffness of the scaled blade, thereby improving the accuracy of the scaled blade and ensuring the accuracy and reliability of the scaled blade test data. It should be noted that the chord length of the cross section of the scaled blade is the distance from the leading edge to the trailing edge of the cross section corresponding to the aerodynamic shape of the scaled blade. Similar to the main beam, the side beam is not a regular rectangle, but also has a certain curvature. The width L2 of the side beam refers to the length of the side beam extending along the aerodynamic shape of the scaled blade, and L2 is the arc length; the thickness direction of the side beam is the direction in which the cross-sectional edge of the scaled blade approaches the center. Of course, the order of calculating the cross-sectional dimensions of the main beam of the required support beam and the cross-sectional dimensions of the side beam of the required support beam can be exchanged without affecting the calculation results.

[0032] In this embodiment, calculating the required cross-sectional dimensions of the support beam also includes: along the length direction of the scaled blade, there are multiple cross-sections of the support beam, and at least some of the cross-sections are of different sizes, and the dimensions of each cross-section are calculated separately. Considering that the blades of this embodiment, whether they are scaled blades or original blades, have a certain length, the flapping stiffness and swing array stiffness of each cross section in the direction from the root to the tip of the blade are different, and the size of the cross section is also different, it is necessary to calculate the cross-sectional dimensions of each cross section in the length direction of the scaled blade. In this way, by comprehensively considering the stiffness changes of the scaled blade along the length direction, the mechanical properties of the original blade can be simulated more realistically, so that the mechanical response of the original blade at different positions can be better simulated, thereby improving the accuracy of the scaled blade design, thereby reducing the cycle of subsequent testing and adjustment of the scaled blade, and further improving the design efficiency of the scaled blade.

[0033] In this embodiment, after the calculation of the scaled blade is completed, the software is used to simulate the flapping stiffness of each cross section of the scaled blade. When the simulated flapping stiffness exceeds the calculated flapping stiffness of the scaled blade, the thickness and / or width of the main beam is adjusted, wherein the thickness of the main beam is first adjusted so that the simulated flapping stiffness is equal to the calculated flapping stiffness of the scaled blade. If the adjustment of the thickness of the main beam cannot meet the requirement, the width of the main beam is adjusted. That is, after the specific size of the main beam is obtained by calculation, the software simulation is used to verify whether the obtained scaled blade can approach the performance of the original blade. If the flapping stiffness obtained by the software simulation exceeds the calculated flapping stiffness of the scaled blade, the thickness of the main beam is adjusted first, but the thickness needs to meet the minimum thickness of the main beam material, otherwise the width of the main beam should be adjusted.

[0034] In this embodiment, after the calculation of the scaled blade is completed, the software is used to simulate the swing array stiffness of each cross section of the scaled blade. When the simulated swing array stiffness exceeds the calculated swing array stiffness of the scaled blade, the thickness and / or width of the side beam is adjusted, wherein the thickness of the side beam is first adjusted so that the simulated swing array stiffness is equal to the calculated swing array stiffness of the scaled blade. If the thickness of the side beam cannot meet the requirement, the width of the side beam is adjusted. The adjustment method of the side beam is similar to the adjustment method of the main beam and will not be repeated.

[0035] In the present embodiment, the material of the support beam is high modulus fiber, and the support beam includes multiple layers of high modulus fiber. High modulus fiber not only has excellent mechanical properties, but also can significantly reduce the weight of the blade, which has a significant effect on improving the safety and efficiency of scaled-down blades and reducing experimental costs. High modulus fiber includes carbon fiber, polyimide fiber, glass fiber, etc. The main beam of the present embodiment adopts carbon fiber, and the side beam adopts glass fiber. Of course, other materials can also be used according to actual conditions. The support beam of the present embodiment includes two main beams and two side beams, so at least four layers of high modulus fiber are provided. Under the condition that the flapping stiffness and the swing array stiffness are not too large, each main beam and each side beam can be respectively provided with multiple layers of high modulus fiber, so that the performance of the scaled-down blade is closer to the original blade.

[0036] The present invention also provides a scaled-down blade, which adopts the scaled-down blade design method, and the scaled-down blade includes: a support beam and a skin, the skin is sleeved on the outside of the support beam, and the shape of the skin is the shape of the scaled-down blade. In this way, the scaled-down blade can accurately simulate the mechanical and aerodynamic characteristics of the original blade, thereby improving the design efficiency of the scaled-down blade, and also has the advantages of simple structure and low manufacturing cost.

[0037] It should be noted that, the multiple in the above embodiments refers to at least two.

[0038] From the above description, it can be seen that the above embodiments of the present invention achieve the following technical effects:

[0039] 1. Solve the problem of low design efficiency of scaled-down blades in the prior art;

[0040] 2. By setting a support beam as the support of the scaled blade, the cross-sectional size of the support beam is calculated by using the aerodynamic shape of the scaled blade, the elastic modulus of the support beam material, the flapping stiffness distribution and the swing array stiffness distribution of the scaled blade, thereby significantly improving the design efficiency and accuracy of the scaled blade, allowing designers to quickly obtain a more accurate scaled blade through information such as the parameters of the original blade, while reducing performance loss and cost waste caused by design problems;

[0041] 3. It can shorten the cycle of subsequent testing and adjustment of scaled blades, thereby shortening the manufacturing cycle of scaled blades to further improve the design efficiency of scaled blades.

[0042] Obviously, the above-described embodiments are only a part of the embodiments of the present invention, rather than all the embodiments. Based on the embodiments of the present invention, all other embodiments obtained by ordinary technicians in this field without creative work should fall within the scope of protection of the present invention.

[0043] It should be noted that the terms used herein are only for describing specific embodiments and are not intended to limit the exemplary embodiments according to the present application. As used herein, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, the singular form is also intended to include the plural form. In addition, it should be understood that when the terms "comprise" and / or "include" are used in this specification, it indicates the presence of features, steps, operations, devices, components and / or combinations thereof.

[0044] It should be noted that the terms "first", "second", etc. in the specification and claims of the present application and the above-mentioned drawings are used to distinguish similar objects, and are not necessarily used to describe a specific order or sequence. It should be understood that the numbers used in this way can be interchanged where appropriate, so that the embodiments of the present application described herein can be implemented in an order other than those illustrated or described herein.

[0045] The above description is only a preferred embodiment of the present invention and is not intended to limit the present invention. For those skilled in the art, the present invention may have various modifications and variations. Any modification, equivalent replacement, improvement, etc. made within the spirit and principle of the present invention shall be included in the protection scope of the present invention.

Claims

1. A scaled blade design method, characterized in that: include: Obtaining the flapping stiffness distribution of the original blade, calculating the required similarity criterion number, and calculating the flapping stiffness distribution of the scaled-down blade according to the flapping stiffness distribution of the original blade and the similarity criterion number; Obtaining the swing array stiffness distribution of the original blade, calculating the required similarity criterion number, and calculating the swing array stiffness distribution of the scaled-down blade according to the swing array stiffness distribution of the original blade and the similarity criterion number; Obtaining an aerodynamic shape of the scaled blade based on a geometric scale ratio; Based on the aerodynamic shape of the scaled blade, the elastic modulus of the support beam material, the distribution of the flapping stiffness and the distribution of the swing array stiffness, the required cross-sectional dimensions of the support beam are calculated; The scaled-down blade is processed by utilizing the support beam and the outer skin of the support beam, and the outer shape of the skin is the same as the aerodynamic shape of the scaled-down blade.

2. The scaled blade design method according to claim 1, characterized in that: The similarity criterion number N is 1 / (nl^4), and the flapping stiffness EI of the scaled blade is F = flapping stiffness of the original blade*N, flapping stiffness of the scaled blade EI E = the swing array stiffness of the original blade * N, where nl is the geometric scaling factor; and / or The geometric scaling ratio is 1 / nl, and the aerodynamic shape of the scaled-down blade is 1 / nl of the aerodynamic shape of the original blade, wherein nl is the geometric scaling coefficient.

3. The scaled blade design method according to claim 1, characterized in that: The calculation to obtain the required cross-sectional dimensions of the support beam includes: Based on the aerodynamic shape of the scaled blade, the elastic modulus of the support beam material and the distribution of the flapping stiffness, the required cross-sectional dimensions of the main beam of the support beam are calculated; Based on the aerodynamic shape of the scaled-down blade, the elastic modulus of the support beam material and the distribution of the swing array stiffness, the required cross-sectional dimensions of the side beams of the support beam are calculated.

4. The scaled blade design method according to claim 3, characterized in that: The cross-sectional dimensions of the main beam of the required support beam obtained by calculation include: According to the material of the main beam, obtaining the elastic modulus E1 of the main beam; The cross-sectional moment of inertia of the main beam is calculated as follows: The swing stiffness is EI F , the section moment of inertia of the main beam I1=NO F / E1; The cross-sectional area S1 of the main beam is calculated using the formula S1*h1 2 *2=I1, where h1 is the maximum thickness of the cross section of the scaled blade; Obtaining the width L1 of the main beam according to the aerodynamic shape of the scaled-down blade; The thickness t1 of the main beam is obtained according to the cross-sectional area S1 of the main beam and the width L1 of the main beam. The thickness t1 of the main beam is calculated by the formula t1=S1 / L1.

5. The scaled blade design method according to claim 3, characterized in that: The cross-sectional dimensions of the side beams of the required support beams obtained by calculation include: According to the material of the side beam, obtaining the elastic modulus E2 of the side beam; The cross-sectional moment of inertia of the edge beam is calculated: the pendulum array stiffness is EI E , the section moment of inertia of the edge beam <h2 style=";text-align:left;direction:ltr">I2=EI<h2 style=";text-align:left;direction:ltr"> E <h2 style=";text-align:left;direction:ltr"> / E2; The cross-sectional area S2 of the side beam is calculated using the formula (M / 2) 2 *S2*2=I2, where M is the chord length of the cross section of the scaled blade; Obtaining the width L2 of the side beam according to the aerodynamic shape of the scaled-down blade; According to the cross-sectional area S2 of the side beam and the width L2 of the side beam, the thickness t2 of the side beam is obtained, and the calculation formula of the thickness t2 of the side beam is t2=S2 / L2.

6. The scaled blade design method according to claim 3, characterized in that: The method of calculating the required cross-sectional dimensions of the support beam further includes: along the length direction of the scaled blade, the support beam has multiple cross-sectional dimensions, and at least some of the cross-sectional dimensions are different, and the dimensions of each cross-sectional dimension are calculated separately.

7. The scaled blade design method according to claim 4, characterized in that: After the calculation of the scaled blade is completed, the software is used to simulate the flapping stiffness of each cross section of the scaled blade. When the simulated flapping stiffness exceeds the calculated flapping stiffness of the scaled blade, the thickness and / or width of the main beam is adjusted. The thickness of the main beam is first adjusted so that the simulated flapping stiffness is equal to the calculated flapping stiffness of the scaled blade. If the thickness of the main beam cannot meet the requirement, the width of the main beam is adjusted.

8. The scaled blade design method according to claim 5, characterized in that: After the calculation of the scaled blade is completed, the software is used to simulate the swing array stiffness of each cross section of the scaled blade. When the simulated swing array stiffness exceeds the calculated swing array stiffness of the scaled blade, the thickness and / or width of the side beam is adjusted. The thickness of the side beam is first adjusted so that the simulated swing array stiffness is equal to the calculated swing array stiffness of the scaled blade. If adjusting the thickness of the side beam cannot meet the requirement, the width of the side beam is adjusted.

9. The scaled blade design method according to claim 1, characterized in that: The support beam is made of high modulus fiber, and the support beam includes multiple layers of high modulus fiber.

10. A scaled-down blade, characterized in that: The scaled-down blade design method according to any one of claims 1 to 9 is adopted, wherein the scaled-down blade comprises: Support beams; The skin is sleeved on the outer side of the support beam, and the outer shape of the skin is the outer shape of the scaled blade.