A method and system for apron bridge conversion scheduling based on flight information

Abstract

The present invention provides a method and system for apron bridge conversion scheduling based on flight information, belonging to the technical field of optimization scheduling. Specifically, it includes: determining the deviation switching times in the apron bridge type switching times based on the deviation of the apron bridge usage duration of the associated flights and the interval duration during the type conversion process in the alternative scheduling plans; determining the preferred scheduling plan in the alternative plans according to the deviation of the deviation switching times corresponding to each apron bridge in the alternative scheduling plans; determining the change situation of the historical passenger-carrying data of the associated flights in different apron bridge type switching times in the preferred scheduling plan, and combining the interval duration during the type conversion process in different apron bridge type switching times to determine the optimal plan in the preferred scheduling plan; and using the optimal plan to perform automatic switching processing on the access control devices of different apron bridges, thereby improving the reliability of the apron bridge type switching control.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention belongs to the technical field of optimization scheduling, and particularly relates to a method and system for apron bridge conversion scheduling based on flight information. Background Art

[0002] Domestic / international convertible apron bridges can achieve general management of domestic and international flights. During use, flight support personnel can manually open the corresponding access control according to the current flight and convert the apron bridge into the required support type.

[0003] However, with the growth of flight volume, this traditional management method mainly relying on manual labor has exposed some problems: first, there is a lack of an effective "foolproof error correction" judgment mechanism, and the judgment of whether the current conversion is correct simply depends on manual labor, which is prone to port events such as "it should be an international apron bridge but is actually a domestic apron bridge"; second, the efficiency of apron bridge conversion support is not high. On-site personnel need to repeatedly check flight information before they can implement the conversion of the apron bridge type, and once an error occurs, they need to rework.

[0004] Existing technical solutions, such as the invention patent CN202311619772.9 "Method, device, equipment and storage medium for allocating airport parking positions", have achieved optimized scheduling and allocation of parking positions. However, in the above technical solutions, the domestic and international attributes of different parking positions are fixed, so the above technical problems do not exist, and at the same time, these technical problems have not been solved.

[0005] In view of the above technical problems, specifically, the present application provides a method and system for apron bridge conversion scheduling based on flight information. Summary of the Invention

[0006] To achieve the object of the present invention, the present invention adopts the following technical solutions:

[0007] In the first aspect, the present application provides a method for apron bridge conversion scheduling based on flight information, specifically including:

[0008] S1 Determine the available scheduling plan for the apron bridge using the time of different types of flights, and determine the alternative scheduling plans in the available scheduling plan based on the type conversion data of different apron bridges and the interval duration of different type conversion processes;

[0009] S2 Determine the deviation switching times in the apron bridge type switching times based on the deviation of the apron bridge usage duration and the interval duration of the type conversion process of the associated flights of the apron bridge type switching times of the alternative scheduling plan;

[0010] S3 Determine the optimal scheduling plan in the alternative plan based on the deviation of the deviation switching times corresponding to each apron bridge in the alternative scheduling plan;

[0011] S4 determines the variation of the historical passenger data of associated flights among different numbers of apron bridge type switches in the preferred scheduling plan, and determines the optimal plan in the preferred scheduling plan by combining the interval duration during the type conversion process for different numbers of apron bridge type switches, and uses the optimal plan to perform automatic switching processing of the access control devices for different apron bridges.

[0012] The beneficial effects of the present invention are as follows:

[0013] Based on the type conversion data of different apron bridges and the interval duration of different type conversion processes in the available scheduling plans, alternative scheduling plans in the available scheduling plans are determined, thereby firstly realizing the screening of available scheduling plans with fewer apron bridge type switches and longer interval durations during the apron bridge type switching process, avoiding the technical problem of low reliability of apron bridge switching control caused by more switching times or shorter interval durations, and ensuring that the apron bridge can meet the disembarking requirements of different flights.

[0014] Based on the variation of the historical passenger data of associated flights and the interval duration during the type conversion process for different numbers of apron bridge type switches in the preferred scheduling plan, the optimal plan in the preferred scheduling plan is determined, avoiding the technical problem that the preferred scheduling plan cannot meet the disembarking requirements of flights due to frequent changes in the historical passenger data of associated flights during the apron bridge type switching process, and ensuring that the fluctuation of the historical passenger data of associated flights for different numbers of apron bridge type switches in the optimal plan is within the preset range, improving the reliability of apron bridge scheduling processing.

[0015] A further technical solution is that the types of the flights include international flights and domestic flights.

[0016] A further technical solution is that the method for determining the available scheduling plan of the apron bridge is as follows:

[0017] Taking the condition that different flights have corresponding apron bridges as a constraint, according to the types and distribution time periods of different flights, and combining the distribution data of the apron bridges, determine the available allocated apron bridges for different flights;

[0018] Combine the available allocated apron bridges for different flights to generate the available scheduling plan of the apron bridge.

[0019] A further technical solution is that the type conversion data includes the number of type conversions of different apron bridges between international types and domestic types.

[0020] A further technical solution is that the method for determining the alternative scheduling plan in the available scheduling plan is as follows:

[0021] Determine the type conversion times of different jet bridges based on the type conversion data of different jet bridges in the available scheduling plan;

[0022] Based on the interval duration during the type conversion process of different type conversion times, determine the type conversion times with an interval duration less than the preset interval duration;

[0023] Based on the number of jet bridges with type conversion times having an interval duration less than the preset interval duration, determine whether the available scheduling plan is an alternative scheduling plan.

[0024] A further technical solution is that when the number of jet bridges with type conversion times having an interval duration less than the preset interval duration is greater than the preset number of jet bridges, it is determined that the available scheduling plan does not belong to the alternative scheduling plan.

[0025] A further technical solution is that the change situation of the historical passenger-carrying data of the associated flight is determined according to the deviation situation of the historical passenger-carrying capacity of the associated flight on different dates.

[0026] A further technical solution is that the method for determining the optimal plan in the preferred scheduling plan is as follows:

[0027] Based on the change situation of the historical passenger-carrying data of the associated flight in different jet bridge type switching times, determine the historical passenger-carrying capacity of the associated flight on different dates, and use the proportion of the number of dates whose deviation amount from the average value of the historical passenger-carrying capacity on different dates does not meet the requirements to determine the passenger-carrying fluctuating flights in the associated flight;

[0028] Take the jet bridge type switching times when the associated flight is a passenger-carrying fluctuating flight as the fluctuating switching times, and use the interval duration of the fluctuating switching times during the type conversion process to determine the fluctuating switching times with an interval duration within the preset duration range;

[0029] Determine the optimal plan in the preferred scheduling plan based on the fluctuating switching times with an interval duration within the preset duration range.

[0030] A further technical solution is that the optimal plan is the preferred scheduling plan with the smallest number of fluctuating switching times having an interval duration within the preset duration range.

[0031] A further technical solution is that using the optimal plan to perform automatic switching processing on the access control devices of different jet bridges specifically includes:

[0032] Based on the optimal plan, determine the jet bridges corresponding to different flights;

[0033] Perform automatic switching processing on the access control devices of the jet bridges corresponding to the flights according to the type of the flights.

[0034] Second aspect, the present application provides a jet bridge conversion scheduling system based on flight information, adopting the above-mentioned jet bridge conversion scheduling method based on flight information, specifically including:

[0035] An alternative plan screening module, a deviation switching analysis module, an optimal plan determination module, and an access control device control module;

[0036] Among them, the alternative plan screening module is responsible for determining the alternative scheduling plans in the available scheduling plans;

[0037] The deviation switching analysis module is responsible for determining the deviation switching times among the jet bridge type switching times;

[0038] The optimal plan determination module is responsible for determining the optimal scheduling plan among the alternative plans;

[0039] The access control device control module is responsible for determining the optimal plan among the optimal scheduling plans, and using the optimal plan to perform automatic switching processing of the access control devices of different jet bridges.

[0040] Other features and advantages will be described in the subsequent specification. The objectives and other advantages of the present invention are achieved and obtained by the structures specifically pointed out in the specification and the drawings.

[0041] To make the above objectives, features, and advantages of the present invention more obvious and understandable, the following specifically gives preferred embodiments and, in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, makes the following detailed description. Description of the Drawings

[0042] By referring to the drawings and describing its exemplary embodiments in detail, the above and other features and advantages of the present invention will become more obvious;

[0043] Figure 1 is a flowchart of a jet bridge conversion scheduling method based on flight information;

[0044] Figure 2 is a flowchart of a method for determining alternative scheduling plans in available scheduling plans;

[0045] Figure 3 is a flowchart of a method for determining the deviation switching times;

[0046] Figure 4 is a flowchart of a method for determining the optimal scheduling plan among alternative plans;

[0047] Figure 5 is a flowchart of a method for determining the optimal plan among the optimal scheduling plans;

[0048] Figure 6 is a framework diagram of a jet bridge conversion scheduling system based on flight information. Detailed implementation manners

[0049] In order to enable those skilled in the art to better understand the technical solutions in this specification, the technical solutions in the embodiments of this specification will be clearly and completely described below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in the embodiments of this specification. Obviously, the described embodiments are only a part of the embodiments of this specification, rather than all the embodiments. Based on the embodiments of this specification, all other embodiments obtained by those of ordinary skill in the art without creative efforts shall fall within the scope of protection of this specification.

[0050] The object of the present invention is to realize the scheduling process of domestic / international convertible jet bridges, fully consider the number of type switches of different domestic / international convertible jet bridges during the scheduling process, realize the screening of the optimal solution with fewer type switches and lower fluctuations in the number of passengers carried by the associated flights during the type switch, and use the optimal solution to realize the automatic switching process of the access control devices of different jet bridges.

[0051] Taking the condition that different flights have corresponding jet bridges as a constraint, according to the types and distribution time periods of different flights, and combining the distribution data of the jet bridges, determine the available allocated jet bridges for different flights, and combine the available allocated jet bridges for different flights to generate an available scheduling plan for the jet bridges.

[0052] The alternative scheduling plan is an available scheduling plan in which the number of type switches of the jet bridge is within a preset switching number range, and the interval duration of different type conversion processes is greater than the preset duration threshold.

[0053] Based on the jet bridge usage duration of the associated flights with the number of type switches of the alternative scheduling plan on different dates, determine the dates when the jet bridge usage duration is greater than the interval duration, and use them as the duration deviation dates. When the proportion of the number of duration deviation dates is less than 0.2, it is determined that the number of type switches of the jet bridge does not belong to the deviation switching number.

[0054] The preferred scheduling plan is an alternative plan in which the proportion of the number of jet bridges with deviation switching numbers is less than 0.1.

[0055] Based on the change situation of the historical passenger data of the associated flights in different numbers of type switches of the jet bridge, determine the historical passenger volume of the associated flights on different dates, and use the associated flights with the proportion of the number of dates whose deviation from the average value of the historical passenger volume on different dates does not meet the requirements as the passenger fluctuation flights. Use the number of type switches of the jet bridge with the associated flights being the passenger fluctuation flights as the fluctuation switching number, and use the interval duration during the type conversion process of the fluctuation switching number to determine the fluctuation switching number with the interval duration within the preset duration range. The preferred scheduling plan with the smallest fluctuation switching number with the interval duration within the preset duration range is the optimal plan.

[0056] Embodiment 1 is as follows Figure 1 As shown, the present application provides a method for converting and scheduling an airbridge based on flight information, specifically including:

[0057] S1: Using the time of different types of flights to determine the available scheduling plan of the airbridge, and determining the alternative scheduling plan in the available scheduling plan based on the type conversion data of different airbridges and the interval duration of different type conversion processes;

[0058] Furthermore, the types of flights include international flights and domestic flights.

[0059] Specifically, the method for determining the available scheduling plan of the airbridge is as follows:

[0060] Taking the condition that different flights have corresponding airbridges as a constraint, and determining the available allocated airbridges for different flights according to the types and distribution time periods of different flights, and combining with the distribution data of the airbridges;

[0061] Combining the available allocated airbridges of different flights to generate the available scheduling plan of the airbridge.

[0062] Optionally, the type conversion data includes the number of type conversions of different airbridges between international type and domestic type.

[0063] It should be noted that, as Figure 2 shown, the method for determining the alternative scheduling plan in the available scheduling plan is as follows:

[0064] Based on the type conversion data of different airbridges in the available scheduling plan, determining the number of type conversions of different airbridges;

[0065] Based on the interval duration of different type conversion times during the type conversion process, determining the type conversion times with an interval duration less than the preset interval duration;

[0066] Based on the number of airbridges with type conversion times having an interval duration less than the preset interval duration, determining whether the available scheduling plan is an alternative scheduling plan.

[0067] Furthermore, when the number of airbridges with type conversion times having an interval duration less than the preset interval duration is greater than the preset number of airbridges, it is determined that the available scheduling plan does not belong to the alternative scheduling plan.

[0068] In another embodiment, the method for determining the alternative scheduling plan in the available scheduling plan is as follows:

[0069] Based on the type conversion data of different airbridges in the available scheduling plan, determining the number of type conversions of different airbridges;

[0070] Determine the number of type conversions with an interval duration less than a preset interval duration based on the interval duration between different type conversions during the type conversion process;

[0071] Based on the number of type conversions with an interval duration less than the preset interval duration, determine whether the available scheduling plan is an alternative scheduling plan.

[0072] It should be noted that when the number of type conversions with an interval duration less than the preset interval duration does not meet the requirements, it is determined that the available scheduling plan does not belong to the alternative scheduling plan.

[0073] S2 determines the deviation switching times among the bridge type switching times based on the deviation situation of the bridge usage duration of the associated flights of the bridge type switching times of the alternative scheduling plan and the interval duration of the type conversion process;

[0074] Furthermore, the associated flight of the type conversion times is the nearest flight before the conversion period corresponding to the type conversion times.

[0075] It should be noted that as Figure 3 shown, the method for determining the deviation switching times is as follows:

[0076] Determine the dates with a bridge usage duration greater than the interval duration based on the bridge usage duration of the associated flights of the bridge type switching times of the alternative scheduling plan on different dates, and use them as the duration deviation dates;

[0077] Determine the deviation amount between the bridge usage duration and the interval duration on different dates based on the bridge usage duration of the associated flights of the bridge type switching times of the alternative scheduling plan on different dates, and use the average value of the deviation amounts between the bridge usage duration and the interval duration on different dates as the average duration deviation value;

[0078] Determine the switching duration deviation coefficient of the bridge type switching times according to the average duration deviation value and the duration deviation dates, and use the switching duration deviation coefficient to determine whether the bridge type switching times are deviation switching times.

[0079] It should be noted that determining the switching duration deviation coefficient of the bridge type switching times according to the average duration deviation value and the duration deviation dates specifically includes:

[0080] Determine the duration deviation coefficient based on the preset deviation coefficient corresponding to the average duration deviation value;

[0081] Determine the switching duration deviation coefficient of the bridge type switching times by multiplying the proportion of the number of duration deviation dates by the duration deviation coefficient.

[0082] Specifically, determining whether the number of switching times of the jet bridge type is the deviation switching times by using the switching duration deviation coefficient specifically includes:

[0083] When the switching duration deviation coefficient is greater than the preset deviation coefficient threshold, it is determined that the number of switching times of the jet bridge type is the deviation switching times.

[0084] Optionally, the method for determining the deviation switching times is:

[0085] Based on the jet bridge usage durations of the associated flights with the number of switching times of the jet bridge type in the alternative scheduling plan on different dates, determine the dates when the jet bridge usage duration is greater than the interval duration, and use them as the duration deviation dates;

[0086] Determine whether the number of switching times of the jet bridge type is the deviation switching times according to the proportion of the number of duration deviation dates and the deviation amount between the jet bridge usage duration and the interval duration on the duration deviation dates.

[0087] It can be understood that determining whether the number of switching times of the jet bridge type is the deviation switching times according to the proportion of the number of duration deviation dates and the deviation amount between the jet bridge usage duration and the interval duration on the duration deviation dates specifically includes:

[0088] When the proportion of the number of duration deviation dates is greater than the preset proportion of the number of deviation dates, it is determined that the number of switching times of the jet bridge type is the deviation switching times;

[0089] When the proportion of the number of duration deviation dates is not greater than the preset proportion of the number of deviation dates:

[0090] When the proportion of the number of duration deviation dates is within the preset proportion range of the number of dates and the deviation amount between the jet bridge usage duration and the interval duration on the duration deviation dates is greater than the preset duration deviation amount, it is determined that the number of switching times of the jet bridge type is the deviation switching times.

[0091] S3 Determine the optimal scheduling plan in the alternative plan according to the deviation situations of the deviation switching times corresponding to each jet bridge in the alternative scheduling plan;

[0092] Specifically, as Figure 4 shown, the method for determining the optimal scheduling plan in the alternative plan is:

[0093] Based on the deviation situations of the deviation switching times corresponding to each jet bridge in the alternative scheduling plan, determine the jet bridges with deviation switching times, and use them as the deviation switching jet bridges;

[0094] According to the product of the deviation switching times of different deviation switching jet bridges and the preset proportional factor, determine the deviation switching weight values of different deviation switching jet bridges;

[0095] Determine the deviation weight sum according to the sum of the deviation switching weight values for switching the jet bridges, and use the deviation weight sum to determine whether the alternative solution is an optimal scheduling solution.

[0096] Furthermore, using the deviation weight sum to determine whether the alternative solution is an optimal scheduling solution specifically includes:

[0097] When the deviation weight sum of the alternative solution is greater than a preset deviation weight threshold, it is determined that the alternative solution does not belong to the optimal scheduling solution.

[0098] In another possible embodiment, the method for determining the optimal scheduling solution in the alternative solution is:

[0099] Based on the deviation situation of the deviation switching times corresponding to each jet bridge in the alternative scheduling solution, determine the jet bridges with deviation switching times and use them as the deviation switching jet bridges;

[0100] According to the deviation switching times of different deviation switching jet bridges, determine the total sum of the deviation switching times of the alternative scheduling solution;

[0101] According to the total sum of the deviation switching times of the alternative scheduling solution, determine whether the alternative solution is an optimal scheduling solution.

[0102] Specifically, when the total sum of the deviation switching times of the alternative scheduling solution does not meet the requirements, it is determined that the alternative solution does not belong to the optimal scheduling solution.

[0103] Optionally, the method for determining the optimal scheduling solution in the alternative solution is:

[0104] Based on the deviation situation of the deviation switching times corresponding to each jet bridge in the alternative scheduling solution, when it is determined that there are no jet bridges with deviation switching times, it is determined that the alternative solution belongs to the optimal scheduling solution;

[0105] When there are no jet bridges with deviation switching times:

[0106] Obtain the number of jet bridges with deviation switching times. When the number of jet bridges with deviation switching times does not meet the requirements, it is determined that the alternative solution does not belong to the optimal scheduling solution;

[0107] When the number of jet bridges with deviation switching times meets the requirements:

[0108] Take the jet bridges with deviation switching times as the deviation switching jet bridges, determine the total sum of the deviation switching times of the alternative scheduling plans according to the deviation switching times of different deviation switching jet bridges. When the total sum of the deviation switching times of the alternative scheduling plan does not meet the requirements, determine that the alternative plan does not belong to the preferred scheduling plan;

[0109] When the total sum of the deviation switching times of the alternative scheduling plan meets the requirements:

[0110] Obtain the deviation switching times of different deviation switching jet bridges. When there are deviation switching jet bridges with deviation switching times that do not meet the requirements, determine that the alternative plan does not belong to the preferred scheduling plan;

[0111] When there are no deviation switching jet bridges with deviation switching times that do not meet the requirements:

[0112] Based on the deviation switching times of the deviation switching jet bridges, when it is determined that there are no deviation switching jet bridges with deviation switching times within the preset deviation switching time interval, determine that the alternative plan belongs to the preferred debugging plan;

[0113] When there are deviation switching jet bridges with deviation switching times within the preset deviation switching time interval:

[0114] Obtain the number of deviation switching jet bridges with deviation switching times within the preset deviation switching time interval. When the number of deviation switching jet bridges with deviation switching times within the preset deviation switching time interval does not meet the requirements, determine that the alternative plan does not belong to the preferred debugging plan;

[0115] When the number of deviation switching jet bridges with deviation switching times within the preset deviation switching time interval meets the requirements:

[0116] Obtain the number of deviation switching jet bridges, and combine the switching deviation times of different deviation switching jet bridges to determine the type switching deviation coefficient of the alternative plan, and use the type switching deviation coefficient to determine whether the alternative plan belongs to the preferred debugging plan.

[0117] S4 Determine the change situation of the historical passenger data of the associated flights in different jet bridge type switching times of the preferred scheduling plan, and combine the interval duration during the type conversion of different jet bridge type switching times to determine the optimal plan in the preferred scheduling plan, and use the optimal plan to perform automatic switching processing of the access control devices of different jet bridges.

[0118] Furthermore, when the type switching deviation coefficient is greater than the preset switching deviation coefficient threshold, determine that the alternative plan belongs to the preferred debugging plan.

[0119] It is understandable that the change situation of the historical passenger-carrying data of the associated flight is determined according to the deviation situation of the historical passenger-carrying capacity of the associated flight on different dates.

[0120] Specifically, as Figure 5 shown, the method for determining the optimal plan in the preferred scheduling plan is as follows:

[0121] Based on the change situation of the historical passenger-carrying data of the associated flight in different numbers of switching times of the apron bridge types, determine the historical passenger-carrying capacity of the associated flight on different dates, and use the proportion of the number of dates whose deviation amount from the average value of the historical passenger-carrying capacity on different dates does not meet the requirements to determine the passenger-carrying fluctuating flights among the associated flights;

[0122] Take the number of switching times of the apron bridge type where the associated flight is a passenger-carrying fluctuating flight as the fluctuating switching times, and use the interval duration during the type conversion of the fluctuating switching times to determine the number of fluctuating switching times whose interval duration is within the preset duration interval;

[0123] Determine the optimal plan in the preferred scheduling plan based on the number of fluctuating switching times whose interval duration is within the preset duration interval.

[0124] Furthermore, the optimal plan is the preferred scheduling plan with the smallest number of fluctuating switching times whose interval duration is within the preset duration interval.

[0125] Optionally, the method for determining the optimal plan in the preferred scheduling plan is as follows:

[0126] S41 Based on the change situation of the historical passenger-carrying data of the associated flight in different numbers of switching times of the apron bridge types, determine the historical passenger-carrying capacity of the associated flight on different dates, and use the ratio of the interval duration during the type conversion of the number of switching times of the apron bridge type and the average value of the historical passenger-carrying capacity of the associated flight on different dates to determine the passenger-carrying capacity matching coefficient of different numbers of switching times of the apron bridge type;

[0127] S42 Use the deviation amount from the average value of the historical passenger-carrying capacity on different dates to determine the passenger-carrying capacity fluctuation coefficient corresponding to different numbers of switching times of the apron bridge type, and based on the ratio of the passenger-carrying capacity matching coefficient and the passenger-carrying capacity fluctuation coefficient of the number of switching times of the apron bridge type, determine the switching reliability coefficient of the number of switching times of the apron bridge type;

[0128] S43 Determine the adaptation coefficient of the preferred scheduling plan based on the switching reliability coefficient of different numbers of switching times of the apron bridge type in the preferred scheduling plan, and use the adaptation coefficient to determine the optimal plan in the preferred scheduling plan.

[0129] Furthermore, using the optimal plan to perform automatic switching processing on the access control devices of different apron bridges specifically includes:

[0130] Based on the optimal solution, determine the jet bridges corresponding to different flights;

[0131] Perform automatic switching processing on the access control devices of the jet bridges corresponding to the flights according to the types of the flights.

[0132] In the second aspect of Embodiment 2, as Figure 6 shown, the present application provides a jet bridge conversion scheduling system based on flight information, which adopts the above-mentioned jet bridge conversion scheduling method based on flight information, and specifically includes:

[0133] An alternative solution screening module, a deviation switching analysis module, an optimal solution determination module, and an access control device control module;

[0134] Among them, the alternative solution screening module is responsible for determining the alternative scheduling solutions in the available scheduling solutions;

[0135] The deviation switching analysis module is responsible for determining the deviation switching times in the switching times of the jet bridge types;

[0136] The optimal solution determination module is responsible for determining the optimal scheduling solution in the alternative solutions;

[0137] The access control device control module is responsible for determining the optimal solution in the optimal scheduling solution, and performing automatic switching processing on the access control devices of different jet bridges by using the optimal solution.

[0138] Optionally, the method for determining the alternative scheduling solutions in the available scheduling solutions is:

[0139] Based on the type conversion data of different jet bridges in the available scheduling solutions, determine the type conversion times of different jet bridges. Based on the interval duration of the type conversion times in the type conversion process, when it is determined that there are type conversion times with the interval duration within the preset interval duration range, it is determined that the available scheduling solution does not belong to the alternative scheduling solution;

[0140] When there are no type conversion times with the interval duration within the preset interval duration range:

[0141] When it is determined that there are no type conversion times with the interval duration less than the preset interval duration in the available scheduling solution, determine whether the available scheduling solution is an alternative scheduling solution based on the type conversion times of the available scheduling solution and the number of jet bridges with type conversions;

[0142] When the available scheduling solution has type conversion times with the interval duration less than the preset interval duration:

[0143] When the type conversion times with the interval duration less than the preset interval duration in the available scheduling solution do not meet the requirements, it is determined that the available scheduling solution does not belong to the alternative scheduling solution;

[0144] When the number of type conversions with an interval duration less than the preset interval duration among the available scheduling schemes meets the requirements:

[0145] Obtain the number of jet bridges with a number of type conversions having an interval duration less than the preset interval duration. When the number of jet bridges with a number of type conversions having an interval duration less than the preset interval duration does not meet the requirements, it is determined that the available scheduling scheme does not belong to the alternative scheduling schemes;

[0146] When the number of jet bridges with a number of type conversions having an interval duration less than the preset interval duration meets the requirements:

[0147] Obtain the number of type conversions with an interval duration less than the preset interval duration in different jet bridges. When there is a jet bridge with a number of type conversions having an interval duration less than the preset interval duration greater than the preset type conversion number threshold, it is determined that the available scheduling scheme does not belong to the alternative scheduling schemes;

[0148] When there is no jet bridge with a number of type conversions having an interval duration less than the preset interval duration greater than the preset type conversion number threshold:

[0149] Obtain the number of type conversions of different jet bridges, and determine the type switching frequency coefficient of the available scheduling scheme by combining the interval durations corresponding to different numbers of type conversions, and use the type switching frequency coefficient to determine whether the available scheduling scheme is an alternative scheduling scheme.

[0150] It should be noted that when the type switching frequency coefficient of the available scheduling scheme is less than the preset switching frequency coefficient threshold, it is determined that the available scheduling scheme is an alternative scheduling scheme.

[0151] Optionally, the above step S41 includes the following content:

[0152] S411 Determine the historical passenger load of the associated flights on different dates based on the changes in the historical passenger load data of the associated flights in different numbers of jet bridge type conversions. Determine the passenger load matching coefficient of different numbers of jet bridge type conversions using the ratio of the interval duration during the type conversion of the number of jet bridge type conversions to the average value of the historical passenger load of the associated flights on different dates. When the average value of the passenger load matching coefficients of different numbers of jet bridge type conversions does not meet the requirements, it is determined that the preferred scheduling scheme does not belong to the optimal scheme. When the average value of the passenger load matching coefficients of different numbers of jet bridge type conversions meets the requirements, proceed to step S412;

[0153] S412 When there is no number of times of switching between jet bridge types where the passenger capacity matching coefficient does not meet the requirements in the preferred scheduling plan, proceed to step S42; when there is a number of times of switching between jet bridge types where the passenger capacity matching coefficient does not meet the requirements in the preferred scheduling plan, proceed to step S413;

[0154] S413 When the number of times of switching between jet bridge types where the passenger capacity matching coefficient does not meet the requirements is greater than the preset number limit value, it is determined that the preferred scheduling plan does not belong to the optimal plan; when the number of times of switching between jet bridge types where the passenger capacity matching coefficient does not meet the requirements is not greater than the preset number limit value, proceed to step S42.

[0155] Optionally, the following content is included in the above step S42:

[0156] S421 Determine the passenger capacity fluctuation coefficient corresponding to different numbers of times of switching between jet bridge types by using the deviation amount from the average value of the historical passenger capacity on different dates. When there is a number of times of switching between jet bridge types where the passenger capacity fluctuation coefficient is greater than the preset fluctuation coefficient threshold, proceed to step S422; when there is no number of times of switching between jet bridge types where the passenger capacity fluctuation coefficient is greater than the preset fluctuation coefficient threshold, proceed to step S423;

[0157] S422 Take the number of times of switching between jet bridge types where the passenger capacity fluctuation coefficient is greater than the preset fluctuation coefficient threshold as the fluctuation switching times. When there is a number of times of switching between jet bridge types where the passenger capacity matching coefficient does not meet the requirements among the fluctuation switching times, it is determined that the preferred scheduling plan does not belong to the optimal plan; when there is a number of times of switching between jet bridge types where the passenger capacity matching coefficient does not meet the requirements among the fluctuation switching times, proceed to step S423;

[0158] S423 Based on the ratio of the passenger capacity matching coefficient to the passenger capacity fluctuation coefficient of the number of times of switching between jet bridge types, determine the switching reliability coefficient of the number of times of switching between jet bridge types. When the average value of the switching reliability coefficients of different numbers of times of switching between jet bridge types does not meet the requirements, it is determined that the preferred scheduling plan does not belong to the optimal plan; when the average value of the switching reliability coefficients of different numbers of times of switching between jet bridge types meets the requirements, proceed to step S43.

[0159] Specifically, the adaptation coefficient of the preferred scheduling plan is determined according to the average value of the switching reliability coefficients of different numbers of times of switching between jet bridge types and the average value of the proportion of the number of times of switching between jet bridge types where the switching reliability coefficient is greater than the preset reliability coefficient threshold.

[0160] It should be noted that the optimal plan is the preferred scheduling plan with the largest adaptation coefficient.

[0161] Each embodiment in this specification is described in a progressive manner. For the identical or similar parts among the embodiments, reference can be made to each other, and the differences between each embodiment and other embodiments are emphasized. In particular, for the embodiments of apparatuses, devices, and non-volatile computer storage media, since they are basically similar to the method embodiments, the description is relatively simple, and the relevant parts can refer to the partial description of the method embodiments.

[0162] The above describes specific embodiments of this specification. Other embodiments are within the scope of the appended claims. In some cases, the actions or steps recited in the claims can be performed in a different order than in the embodiments and still achieve the desired result. Additionally, the processes depicted in the figures do not necessarily require the particular order or sequential order shown to achieve the desired result. In certain embodiments, multitasking and parallel processing are also possible or may be advantageous.

[0163] The foregoing is only one or more embodiments of this specification and is not intended to limit this specification. For those skilled in the art, various modifications and variations can be made to one or more embodiments of this specification. Any modification, equivalent replacement, improvement, etc. made within the spirit and principle of one or more embodiments of this specification shall be included within the scope of the claims of this specification.

Claims

1. A bridge transfer scheduling method based on flight information, characterized in that: Specifically include: Determine available scheduling schemes for the jet bridges using the time of different types of flights, and determine alternative scheduling schemes in the available scheduling schemes based on type conversion data of different jet bridges in the available scheduling schemes and the interval duration of different type conversion processes; Determine the deviation switching number in the number of bridge type switching according to the deviation of the bridge use time of the flight associated with the number of bridge type switching of the alternative scheduling solution and the interval time of the type conversion process; Determine a preferred scheduling scheme among the alternative scheduling schemes according to the deviation of the deviation switching times corresponding to each corridor bridge in the alternative scheduling schemes; Determine the change of historical passenger data of the associated flights in the preferred scheduling scheme at different times of bridge type switching, and determine the optimal scheme in the preferred scheduling scheme in combination with the interval length of different bridge type switching times during the type conversion process, and use the optimal scheme to automatically switch the access control devices of different bridges; The method for determining the alternative scheduling scheme among the available scheduling schemes is: Determine the number of type conversions of different corridor bridges based on the type conversion data of different corridor bridges in the available scheduling scheme; Based on the intervals of different type conversion times during the type conversion process, determine the type conversion times whose intervals are shorter than a preset interval; Determining whether the available scheduling solution is an alternative scheduling solution based on the number of corridor bridges with a type conversion number of times having an interval time shorter than a preset interval time; The method for determining the preferred scheduling solution among the alternative solutions is: According to the deviation of the deviation switching times corresponding to each corridor bridge in the alternative scheduling scheme, a corridor bridge with a deviation switching time is determined and used as a deviation switching corridor bridge; Determine the deviation switching weight values ​​of different deviation switching bridges according to the product of the deviation switching times of different deviation switching bridges and the preset proportional factor; Determine a deviation weight sum according to the sum of the deviation switching weight values ​​of the deviation switching corridor bridge, and use the deviation weight sum to determine whether the alternative solution is a preferred scheduling solution; The method for determining the optimal solution in the preferred scheduling solution is: Determine the historical passenger volume of the associated flights on different dates based on the changes in the historical passenger volume data of the associated flights in different times of bridge type switching, and determine the passenger volume fluctuation flights among the associated flights based on the proportion of the number of dates whose deviation from the average value of the historical passenger volume on different dates does not meet the requirements; The number of bridge type switching times when the associated flight is a passenger-carrying fluctuation flight is used as the fluctuation switching times, and the interval time of the fluctuation switching times during the type conversion process is used to determine the number of fluctuation switching times within a preset time interval; The optimal solution in the preferred scheduling solution is determined according to the number of fluctuation switches within a preset time interval.

2. The method for jet bridge transfer and scheduling based on flight information as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that: The types of flights mentioned include international flights and domestic flights.

3. The method for jet bridge transfer and scheduling based on flight information as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that: The method for determining the available scheduling scheme of the corridor bridge is: With the constraint that different flights have corresponding jet bridges, the available jet bridges for different flights are determined based on the types and distribution periods of different flights and the distribution data of jet bridges; The available allocated bridges of different flights are combined to generate an available scheduling plan for the bridges.

4. The method for jet bridge transfer and scheduling based on flight information as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that: The type conversion data includes the number of type conversions of different corridor bridges between international types and domestic types.

5. The method for jet bridge transfer and scheduling based on flight information as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that: When the number of corridors with type conversion times whose interval duration is less than the preset interval duration is greater than the preset number of corridors, it is determined that the available scheduling scheme does not belong to the alternative scheduling scheme.

6. The method for jet bridge transfer and scheduling based on flight information as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that: The optimal solution is a preferred scheduling solution with the smallest number of fluctuation switches within a preset time interval.

7. The method for jet bridge transfer and scheduling based on flight information as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that: The optimal solution is used to automatically switch the access control devices of different corridors, specifically including: Based on the optimal solution, determine the corresponding jet bridges for different flights; Automatic switching processing of the access control device of the jet bridge corresponding to the flight is performed according to the type of the flight.

8. A flight information-based jet bridge switching scheduling system, using a flight information-based jet bridge switching scheduling method according to any one of claims 1 to 7, characterized in that: Specifically include: Alternative solution screening module, deviation switching analysis module, preferred solution determination module, access control device control module; The alternative scheme screening module is responsible for determining the alternative scheduling schemes among the available scheduling schemes; The deviation switching analysis module is responsible for determining the deviation switching times in the corridor bridge type switching times; The preferred solution determination module is responsible for determining the preferred scheduling solution among the alternative solutions; The access control device control module is responsible for determining the optimal solution among the preferred scheduling solutions, and using the optimal solution to automatically switch the access control devices of different corridors.

Images