Ship performance evaluation method and system

Abstract

The invention provides a ship performance evaluation method and system, and the method comprises the steps: carrying out the initial evaluation of the basic information and safety measure list information of a ship, determining the integrity of the basic performance of the ship, carrying out the corresponding prompt, and when the basic performance of the ship is qualified, carrying out the corresponding prompt. Extracting a corresponding model structure according to the basic information and the safety measure list information to establish a performance evaluation model of the ship, performing depth evaluation on the ship according to the performance evaluation model to obtain a plurality of corresponding use performances of the ship under different navigation conditions, establishing a performance comprehensive list of the ship, and performing performance evaluation on the ship according to the performance comprehensive list. Obtaining an updating structure of the performance evaluation model, establishing an updating structure model in combination with the ship model of the ship, inputting the updating structure model into a preset model structure library, and analyzing and evaluating the performance of the ship in a model construction mode, so that one ship model and one model can be realized, the defects of a traditional evaluation mode are eliminated, and the evaluation efficiency is improved. And high-quality evaluation can be completed in a simple manner.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the technical field of performance evaluation, and in particular to a ship performance evaluation method and system. Background Art

[0002] Since entering the international ship market, China's shipbuilding industry has always regarded the advanced ship products of Japanese and Korean shipyards as its own catch-up goal, but how to evaluate the main performance level of ship products from an objective perspective has always been a topic of concern to the Chinese shipbuilding industry. At present, there are two methods for evaluating ship performance: direct parameter comparison method and relative coefficient comparison method. The direct parameter comparison method is to directly compare the main performance data of the evaluated ship with the data of the benchmark ship type / sample ship type, list the difference and the percentage of the difference, and the corresponding chart. The relative coefficient comparison method uses the relative coefficient calculated by the relative comparison coefficient calculation formula for the evaluation of ships with different characteristics of different ship types, as well as the ratio of the International Maritime Organization (IMO) energy efficiency design index to the baseline value, and outputs a "multi-axis radar type" comparison chart. Although these two evaluation methods can complete the evaluation, the evaluation results are accidental and one-sided, and require a lot of calculations to obtain the results, and the process is too complicated.

[0003] Therefore, the present invention provides a ship performance evaluation method and system. Summary of the invention

[0004] The present invention provides a ship performance evaluation method and system, which analyzes and evaluates the performance of a ship by constructing a model, and can implement one model for each ship type, thereby eliminating the drawbacks of traditional evaluation methods and completing high-quality evaluation in a simple manner.

[0005] The present invention provides a ship performance evaluation method, comprising:

[0006] Step 1: Conduct a preliminary assessment of the basic information of the ship and the safety measures list information, determine the basic performance integrity of the ship, and make corresponding prompts;

[0007] Step 2: When the basic performance of the ship is qualified, extract the corresponding model structure according to the basic information and the safety measures list information to establish the performance evaluation model of the ship;

[0008] Step 3: Performing an in-depth evaluation of the ship according to the performance evaluation model, obtaining a number of corresponding usage performances of the ship under different navigation conditions, and establishing a comprehensive performance list of the ship;

[0009] Step 4: Obtain the updated structure of the performance evaluation model, establish an updated structure model in combination with the ship model of the ship, and input it into the preset model structure library.

[0010] In one practicable manner,

[0011] The step 1 comprises:

[0012] Step 11: retrieve the basic information and safety measures list information of the ship, construct several safety measures of the ship based on the basic information and the safety measures list information, and respectively determine the prevention dimension corresponding to each safety measure;

[0013] Step 12: constructing a basic model of the ship based on the basic information, and using the basic model to simulate each of the safety measures to obtain the prevention effectiveness corresponding to each prevention dimension;

[0014] Step 13: Run the basic model to obtain the basic functional effectiveness of the ship, and determine the basic performance integrity of the ship in combination with the prevention effectiveness corresponding to each of the prevention dimensions;

[0015] Step 14: When the basic performance integrity is lower than the standard integrity, locate the unqualified functions of the ship and provide a function compensation prompt, otherwise, provide a qualified reminder for the ship.

[0016] In one practicable manner,

[0017] The step 14 comprises:

[0018] Step 141: when the basic performance integrity is lower than the standard integrity, constructing the hull structure of the ship according to the basic information, performing structural decomposition on the hull structure using the finite element method, and obtaining a plurality of geometric structures of the ship;

[0019] Step 142: mapping each of the security measures to the hull structure, obtaining a plurality of action geometric structures corresponding to each of the security measures, establishing a plurality of structure sets, obtaining a structure layout generated by each of the structure sets, running the basic model, obtaining a layout effect corresponding to each of the structure layouts and a security effect of the corresponding security measures;

[0020] Step 143: Finding the layout defects contained in each of the layout functions, and finding the safety measures defects contained in each of the safety measures functions, locating each of the layout defects and safety measures defects in the basic model, and determining the unqualified functions of the cabin;

[0021] Step 144: When the ship contains unqualified functions, a function compensation voice is constructed according to the cabin position corresponding to the unqualified function and a preset prompt slogan to provide a function compensation prompt to the cabin; when the cabin does not contain unqualified functions, a qualified reminder is given to the cabin.

[0022] In one practicable manner,

[0023] Also includes:

[0024] When the ship contains unqualified functions, the defect compensation plan of the ship is retrieved according to the function compensation voice, and the defect compensation plan is used to supervise workers to perform functional maintenance on the ship.

[0025] In one practicable manner,

[0026] The step 2 comprises:

[0027] Step 21: When the basic performance of the ship is qualified, the prescribed navigation mode of the ship is determined according to the basic information, the safety measures list information is constructed to determine the achievable safety measures of the ship, the corresponding environmental characteristics are retrieved according to the prescribed navigation mode, and the corresponding model characteristics are retrieved according to the achievable safety measures;

[0028] Step 22: constructing a plurality of environmental model structures of the ship using the environmental features and the model features, inputting the basic information and the safety measures list information into each of the environmental model structures, and obtaining a plurality of environmental sub-models of the ship;

[0029] Step 23: determining the main safety measures corresponding to the ship under different environmental characteristics according to the corresponding environmental safety measures information in each of the environmental sub-models, and strengthening the corresponding main safety measures in each of the environmental sub-models;

[0030] Step 24: Integrate the enhanced environmental sub-models respectively and add corresponding evaluation conditions to generate a performance evaluation model of the ship.

[0031] In one practicable manner,

[0032] The step 3 comprises:

[0033] Step 31: running the performance evaluation model to obtain a plurality of working performances of the ship, dividing the working performance into a plurality of performance sets according to the navigation conditions corresponding to each of the working performances, and matching a corresponding navigation tag for each of the working performances according to the performance sets corresponding to each of the working performances;

[0034] Step 32: Performing logical analysis on each of the performance sets to obtain the logical relationship between different working performances in the same performance set, constructing a working structure tree of the ship under the corresponding navigation conditions, performing deep training on each of the working structure trees to obtain the dependency relationship between different working performances of the ship under the corresponding navigation conditions, and matching corresponding relationship labels for working performances with dependency relationships;

[0035] Step 33: each of the navigation conditions is divided into regions and reorganized to generate a plurality of fluctuating navigation conditions, and a plurality of fluctuating working performances corresponding to the cabin under the different fluctuating navigation conditions are constructed based on the navigation label and the relationship label corresponding to each working performance, so as to construct a fluctuating performance set;

[0036] Step 34: construct a comprehensive performance list of the ship according to the performance presentation data corresponding to each of the fluctuation performance sets.

[0037] In one practicable manner,

[0038] The step 4 comprises:

[0039] Step 41: Counting a number of model structures corresponding to each ship model, and establishing a preset model structure library for each of the ship models;

[0040] Step 42: Compare the performance evaluation model with each of the model structures to obtain a plurality of updated structures included in the performance evaluation model;

[0041] Step 43: Estimate the ship model corresponding to the ship, and input the updated structure into the corresponding preset model structure library to complete the update.

[0042] In one practicable manner,

[0043] Also includes:

[0044] According to the ship model corresponding to each of the ships, a corresponding route is matched for each of the ships and displayed.

[0045] The present invention provides a ship performance evaluation system, comprising:

[0046] The initial assessment module is used to conduct an initial assessment of the basic information of the ship and the safety measures list information, determine the basic performance integrity of the ship, and make corresponding prompts;

[0047] A performance evaluation module, used for extracting a corresponding model structure according to the basic information and the safety measures list information to establish a performance evaluation model of the ship when the basic performance of the ship is qualified;

[0048] A comprehensive analysis module, used to perform an in-depth evaluation of the ship according to the performance evaluation model, obtain a number of corresponding usage performances of the ship under different navigation conditions, and establish a comprehensive performance list of the ship;

[0049] The structure updating module is used to obtain the updated structure of the performance evaluation model, establish an updated structure model in combination with the ship model of the ship, and input it into a preset model structure library.

[0050] In one practicable manner,

[0051] The initial assessment module includes:

[0052] A first evaluation unit is used to retrieve basic information and safety measures list information of the ship, construct a plurality of safety measures of the ship based on the basic information and the safety measures list information, and respectively determine a prevention dimension corresponding to each safety measure;

[0053] A second evaluation unit is used to construct a basic model of the ship based on the basic information, and use the basic model to simulate each of the safety measures to obtain the prevention effectiveness corresponding to each prevention dimension;

[0054] A third evaluation unit is used to run the basic model to obtain the basic functional effectiveness of the ship, and determine the basic performance integrity of the ship in combination with the prevention effectiveness corresponding to each of the prevention dimensions;

[0055] The fourth evaluation unit is used to locate the unqualified functions of the ship and provide function compensation prompts when the basic performance integrity is lower than the standard integrity, otherwise, it will give a qualified reminder of the ship.

[0056] The achievable beneficial effects of the above technical solution are: first, a preliminary assessment is made on the basic information and safety checklist information of the ship to determine whether the furnishings in the ship are complete, and corresponding prompts are made for reference by the staff. When the ship performance is qualified, a performance evaluation model of the ship is constructed based on the basic information and safety checklist information, and then the performance evaluation model is used to conduct an in-depth evaluation of the ship, thereby determining the ship's performance under different navigation conditions and constructing a comprehensive performance list. In order to facilitate subsequent evaluation work, the updated structure in the performance evaluation model is classified into the corresponding preset model structure library, which effectively improves the efficiency of the next evaluation. Through the above technical means, ships with high safety factors can be put into use to avoid accidents.

[0057] Other features and advantages of the present invention will be described in the following description, and partly become apparent from the description, or understood by practicing the present invention. The purpose and other advantages of the present invention can be realized and obtained by the structures particularly pointed out in the written description and the accompanying drawings.

[0058] The technical solution of the present invention is further described in detail below through the accompanying drawings and embodiments. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0059] The accompanying drawings are used to provide a further understanding of the present invention and constitute a part of the specification. Together with the embodiments of the present invention, they are used to explain the present invention and do not constitute a limitation of the present invention. In the accompanying drawings:

[0060] Figure 1 A schematic diagram of a work flow of a ship performance evaluation method according to an embodiment of the present invention;

[0061] Figure 2 The figure is a schematic diagram of the composition of a ship performance evaluation system in an embodiment of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0062] The preferred embodiments of the present invention are described below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. It should be understood that the preferred embodiments described herein are only used to illustrate and explain the present invention, and are not used to limit the present invention.

[0063] Example 1

[0064] This embodiment provides a ship performance evaluation method and system. Figure 1 As shown, including:

[0065] Step 1: Conduct a preliminary assessment of the basic information of the ship and the safety measures list information, determine the basic performance integrity of the ship, and make corresponding prompts;

[0066] Step 2: When the basic performance of the ship is qualified, extract the corresponding model structure according to the basic information and the safety measures list information to establish the performance evaluation model of the ship;

[0067] Step 3: Performing an in-depth evaluation of the ship according to the performance evaluation model, obtaining a number of corresponding usage performances of the ship under different navigation conditions, and establishing a comprehensive performance list of the ship;

[0068] Step 4: Obtain the updated structure of the performance evaluation model, establish an updated structure model in combination with the ship model of the ship, and input it into the preset model structure library.

[0069] In this example, one ship model corresponds to one preset model structure library;

[0070] In this example, the safety measures list information represents a list of all safety measures in a ship;

[0071] In this example, basic performance includes: the functions that can be achieved by each device in the ship, such as the diesel engine that can provide power for the ship.

[0072] The working principle and beneficial effects of the above technical solution are as follows: first, a preliminary assessment is made on the basic information and safety checklist information of the ship to determine whether the furnishings in the ship are complete, and corresponding prompts are made for the staff's reference. When the ship's performance is qualified, a performance evaluation model of the ship is constructed based on the basic information and safety checklist information, and then the performance evaluation model is used to conduct an in-depth evaluation of the ship, thereby determining the ship's performance under different navigation conditions and constructing a comprehensive performance list. In order to facilitate subsequent evaluation work, the updated structure in the performance evaluation model is classified into the corresponding preset model structure library, which effectively improves the efficiency of the next evaluation. Through the above technical means, ships with high safety factors can be put into use to avoid accidents.

[0073] Example 2

[0074] Based on Example 1, the ship performance evaluation method, step 1, comprises:

[0075] Step 11: retrieve the basic information and safety measures list information of the ship, construct several safety measures of the ship based on the basic information and the safety measures list information, and respectively determine the prevention dimension corresponding to each safety measure;

[0076] Step 12: constructing a basic model of the ship based on the basic information, and using the basic model to simulate each of the safety measures to obtain the prevention effectiveness corresponding to each prevention dimension;

[0077] Step 13: Run the basic model to obtain the basic functional effectiveness of the ship, and determine the basic performance integrity of the ship in combination with the prevention effectiveness corresponding to each of the prevention dimensions;

[0078] Step 14: When the basic performance integrity is lower than the standard integrity, locate the unqualified functions of the ship and provide a function compensation prompt, otherwise, provide a qualified reminder for the ship.

[0079] In this example, the safety measures refer to the means to ensure the safety of the ship during its operation;

[0080] In this example, the prevention dimensions include: hull dimension, equipment safety dimension, ship operation dimension, personnel safety dimension, and energy consumption dimension;

[0081] In this example, the standard integrity is 85%.

[0082] The working principle and beneficial effects of the above technical solution are as follows: first, safety measures are constructed according to the basic information of the ship and the safety measures information list information, and the prevention dimension corresponding to each safety measure is analyzed. The effectiveness of different prevention dimensions is determined by running the basic model, and the basic performance integrity of the ship can be further determined. Then, corresponding reminders are made according to different integrity conditions. This not only completes the preliminary assessment of the ship, but also makes different reminders for different situations, which is convenient for the staff to carry out the next step.

[0083] Example 3

[0084] Based on Example 2, in the ship performance evaluation method, step 14 includes:

[0085] Step 141: when the basic performance integrity is lower than the standard integrity, constructing the hull structure of the ship according to the basic information, performing structural decomposition on the hull structure using the finite element method, and obtaining a plurality of geometric structures of the ship;

[0086] Step 142: mapping each of the security measures to the hull structure, obtaining a plurality of action geometric structures corresponding to each of the security measures, establishing a plurality of structure sets, obtaining a structure layout generated by each of the structure sets, running the basic model, obtaining a layout effect corresponding to each of the structure layouts and a security effect of the corresponding security measures;

[0087] Step 143: Finding the layout defects contained in each of the layout functions, and finding the safety measures defects contained in each of the safety measures functions, locating each of the layout defects and safety measures defects in the basic model, and determining the unqualified functions of the cabin;

[0088] Step 144: When the ship contains unqualified functions, a function compensation voice is constructed according to the cabin position corresponding to the unqualified function and a preset prompt slogan to provide a function compensation prompt to the cabin; when the cabin does not contain unqualified functions, a qualified reminder is given to the cabin.

[0089] The working principle and beneficial effects of the above technical solution are as follows: when the basic performance integrity of a ship is too low, the hull structure of the ship is first constructed, and then the hull structure is decomposed to obtain multiple geometric structures. The corresponding structural layout is obtained by laying out the structural set obtained by classifying each geometric structure, and then the basic model is used to analyze the structural layout to determine its corresponding layout function and the use of safety measures. By analyzing different safety measure defects and layout defects, the unqualified functions of the cabin are determined, and corresponding reminders are made in time to allow the staff to respond quickly to the reminders and make compensations. At the same time, qualified reminders are made when the ship is qualified, which is convenient for the staff to distinguish between ships of different safety levels.

[0090] Example 4

[0091] Based on Example 2, the ship performance evaluation method further includes:

[0092] When the ship contains unqualified functions, the defect compensation plan of the ship is retrieved according to the function compensation voice, and the defect compensation plan is used to supervise workers to perform functional maintenance on the ship.

[0093] The working principle and beneficial effects of the above technical solution: supervise the workers' compensation work process to ensure the effectiveness of functional compensation.

[0094] Example 5

[0095] Based on Example 1, the ship performance evaluation method, step 2, comprises:

[0096] Step 21: When the basic performance of the ship is qualified, the prescribed navigation mode of the ship is determined according to the basic information, the safety measures list information is constructed to determine the achievable safety measures of the ship, the corresponding environmental characteristics are retrieved according to the prescribed navigation mode, and the corresponding model characteristics are retrieved according to the achievable safety measures;

[0097] Step 22: constructing a plurality of environmental model structures of the ship using the environmental features and the model features, inputting the basic information and the safety measures list information into each of the environmental model structures, and obtaining a plurality of environmental sub-models of the ship;

[0098] Step 23: determining the main safety measures corresponding to the ship under different environmental characteristics according to the corresponding environmental safety measures information in each of the environmental sub-models, and strengthening the corresponding main safety measures in each of the environmental sub-models;

[0099] Step 24: Integrate the enhanced environmental sub-models respectively and add corresponding evaluation conditions to generate a performance evaluation model of the ship.

[0100] The working principle and beneficial effects of the above technical solution are as follows: the safety measures list is estimated to determine the feasible safety measures of the ship, and the environmental model structure of the ship is constructed according to the environmental characteristics corresponding to different navigation modes. Then, the basic information and the safety measures list information are input into each environmental model structure to obtain several environmental sub-models of the ship. Then, the main safety measures in different environmental sub-models are strengthened, and then the performance evaluation model of the ship is constructed in combination with the evaluation conditions. In this way, the established performance evaluation model takes into account multiple environmental models and realizes multiple functions of one model.

[0101] Example 6

[0102] Based on Example 1, the ship performance evaluation method, step 3, comprises:

[0103] Step 31: running the performance evaluation model to obtain a plurality of working performances of the ship, dividing the working performance into a plurality of performance sets according to the navigation conditions corresponding to each of the working performances, and matching a corresponding navigation tag for each of the working performances according to the performance sets corresponding to each of the working performances;

[0104] Step 32: Performing logical analysis on each of the performance sets to obtain the logical relationship between different working performances in the same performance set, constructing a working structure tree of the ship under the corresponding navigation conditions, performing deep training on each of the working structure trees to obtain the dependency relationship between different working performances of the ship under the corresponding navigation conditions, and matching corresponding relationship labels for working performances with dependency relationships;

[0105] Step 33: performing regional segmentation and reorganization on each of the navigation conditions to generate a plurality of fluctuating navigation conditions, constructing a plurality of fluctuating working performances corresponding to the cabin under the different fluctuating navigation conditions based on the navigation label and the relationship label corresponding to each working performance, and constructing a fluctuating performance set;

[0106] Step 34: construct a comprehensive performance list of the ship according to the performance presentation data corresponding to each of the fluctuation performance sets.

[0107] The working principle and beneficial effects of the above technical solution are as follows: the working performance of the ship is determined by running a performance evaluation model, and then the same performance is aggregated and corresponding navigation labels are added to it. Then, the logical relationship between different working performances is determined through logical analysis to construct a working structure tree. The dependency between different working performances is further analyzed through deep training to add relationship labels. A fluctuating navigation situation is constructed by combining different navigation conditions, and then a performance analysis is performed to construct a comprehensive list of the ship's performance. In this way, the performance of the ship can be analyzed as a whole, including various situations that may occur during the navigation process of the ship, thereby improving the effectiveness of the model.

[0108] Example 7

[0109] Based on Example 1, in the ship performance evaluation method, step 4 comprises:

[0110] Step 41: Counting a number of model structures corresponding to each ship model, and establishing a preset model structure library for each of the ship models;

[0111] Step 42: Compare the performance evaluation model with each of the model structures to obtain a plurality of updated structures included in the performance evaluation model;

[0112] Step 43: Estimate the ship model corresponding to the ship, and input the updated structure into the corresponding preset model structure library to complete the update.

[0113] The working principle and beneficial effects of the above technical solution are as follows: by continuously updating the updated structure into the model structure library, the structure library is improved, thereby improving the efficiency of building the evaluation model next time.

[0114] Example 8

[0115] Based on Example 1, the ship performance evaluation method further includes:

[0116] According to the ship model corresponding to each of the ships, a corresponding route is matched for each of the ships and displayed.

[0117] Example 9

[0118] This example provides a ship performance evaluation system. Figure 2 As shown, including:

[0119] The initial assessment module is used to conduct an initial assessment of the basic information of the ship and the safety measures list information, determine the basic performance integrity of the ship, and make corresponding prompts;

[0120] A performance evaluation module, used for extracting a corresponding model structure according to the basic information and the safety measures list information to establish a performance evaluation model of the ship when the basic performance of the ship is qualified;

[0121] A comprehensive analysis module, used to perform an in-depth evaluation of the ship according to the performance evaluation model, obtain a number of corresponding usage performances of the ship under different navigation conditions, and establish a comprehensive performance list of the ship;

[0122] The structure updating module is used to obtain the updated structure of the performance evaluation model, establish an updated structure model in combination with the ship model of the ship, and input it into a preset model structure library.

[0123] In this example, one ship model corresponds to one preset model structure library;

[0124] In this example, the safety measures list information represents a list of all safety measures in a ship;

[0125] In this example, basic performance includes: the functions that can be achieved by each device in the ship, such as the diesel engine that can provide power for the ship.

[0126] The working principle and beneficial effects of the above technical solution are as follows: first, a preliminary assessment is made on the basic information and safety checklist information of the ship to determine whether the furnishings in the ship are complete, and corresponding prompts are made for the staff's reference. When the ship's performance is qualified, a performance evaluation model of the ship is constructed based on the basic information and safety checklist information, and then the performance evaluation model is used to conduct an in-depth evaluation of the ship, thereby determining the ship's performance under different navigation conditions and constructing a comprehensive performance list. In order to facilitate subsequent evaluation work, the updated structure in the performance evaluation model is classified into the corresponding preset model structure library, which effectively improves the efficiency of the next evaluation. Through the above technical means, ships with high safety factors can be put into use to avoid accidents.

[0127] Example 10

[0128] Based on Example 9, the ship performance evaluation system, the initial evaluation module, includes:

[0129] A first evaluation unit is used to retrieve basic information and safety measures list information of the ship, construct a plurality of safety measures of the ship based on the basic information and the safety measures list information, and respectively determine a prevention dimension corresponding to each safety measure;

[0130] A second evaluation unit is used to construct a basic model of the ship based on the basic information, and use the basic model to simulate each of the safety measures to obtain the prevention effectiveness corresponding to each prevention dimension;

[0131] A third evaluation unit is used to run the basic model to obtain the basic functional effectiveness of the ship, and determine the basic performance integrity of the ship in combination with the prevention effectiveness corresponding to each of the prevention dimensions;

[0132] The fourth evaluation unit is used to locate the unqualified functions of the ship and provide function compensation prompts when the basic performance integrity is lower than the standard integrity, otherwise, it will give a qualified reminder of the ship.

[0133] In this example, the safety measures refer to the means to ensure the safety of the ship during its operation;

[0134] In this example, the prevention dimensions include: hull dimension, equipment safety dimension, ship operation dimension, personnel safety dimension, and energy consumption dimension;

[0135] In this example, the standard integrity is 85%.

[0136] The working principle and beneficial effects of the above technical solution are as follows: first, safety measures are constructed according to the basic information of the ship and the safety measures information list information, and the prevention dimension corresponding to each safety measure is analyzed. The effectiveness of different prevention dimensions is determined by running the basic model, and the basic performance integrity of the ship can be further determined. Then, corresponding reminders are made according to different integrity conditions. This not only completes the preliminary assessment of the ship, but also makes different reminders for different situations, which is convenient for the staff to carry out the next step.

[0137] Obviously, those skilled in the art can make various changes and modifications to the present invention without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. Thus, if these modifications and variations of the present invention fall within the scope of the claims of the present invention and their equivalents, the present invention is also intended to include these modifications and variations.

Claims

1. A ship performance evaluation method, characterized in that: include: Step 1: Conduct a preliminary assessment of the basic information of the ship and the safety measures list information, determine the basic performance integrity of the ship, and make corresponding prompts; Step 2: When the basic performance of the ship is qualified, extract the corresponding model structure according to the basic information and the safety measures list information to establish the performance evaluation model of the ship; Step 3: Performing an in-depth evaluation of the ship according to the performance evaluation model, obtaining a number of corresponding usage performances of the ship under different navigation conditions, and establishing a comprehensive performance list of the ship; Step 4: Obtain the updated structure of the performance evaluation model, establish an updated structure model in combination with the ship model of the ship, and input it into the preset model structure library.

2. A ship performance evaluation method according to claim 1, characterized in that: The step 1 comprises: Step 11: retrieve the basic information and safety measures list information of the ship, construct several safety measures of the ship based on the basic information and the safety measures list information, and respectively determine the prevention dimension corresponding to each safety measure; Step 12: constructing a basic model of the ship based on the basic information, and using the basic model to simulate each of the safety measures to obtain the prevention effectiveness corresponding to each prevention dimension; Step 13: Run the basic model to obtain the basic functional effectiveness of the ship, and determine the basic performance integrity of the ship in combination with the prevention effectiveness corresponding to each of the prevention dimensions; Step 14: When the basic performance integrity is lower than the standard integrity, locate the unqualified functions of the ship and provide a function compensation prompt, otherwise, provide a qualified reminder for the ship.

3. A ship performance evaluation method according to claim 2, characterized in that: The step 14 comprises: Step 141: when the basic performance integrity is lower than the standard integrity, constructing the hull structure of the ship according to the basic information, performing structural decomposition on the hull structure using the finite element method, and obtaining a plurality of geometric structures of the ship; Step 142: mapping each of the security measures to the hull structure, obtaining a plurality of action geometric structures corresponding to each of the security measures, establishing a plurality of structure sets, obtaining a structure layout generated by each of the structure sets, running the basic model, obtaining a layout effect corresponding to each of the structure layouts and a security effect of the corresponding security measures; Step 143: Finding the layout defects contained in each of the layout functions, and finding the safety measures defects contained in each of the safety measures functions, locating each of the layout defects and safety measures defects in the basic model, and determining the unqualified functions of the cabin; Step 144: When the ship contains unqualified functions, a function compensation voice is constructed according to the cabin position corresponding to the unqualified function and a preset prompt slogan to provide a function compensation prompt to the cabin; when the cabin does not contain unqualified functions, a qualified reminder is given to the cabin.

4. A ship performance evaluation method according to claim 2, characterized in that: Also includes: When the ship contains unqualified functions, the defect compensation plan of the ship is retrieved according to the function compensation voice, and the defect compensation plan is used to supervise workers to perform functional maintenance on the ship.

5. A ship performance evaluation method according to claim 1, characterized in that: The step 2 comprises: Step 21: When the basic performance of the ship is qualified, the prescribed navigation mode of the ship is determined according to the basic information, the safety measures list information is constructed to determine the achievable safety measures of the ship, the corresponding environmental characteristics are retrieved according to the prescribed navigation mode, and the corresponding model characteristics are retrieved according to the achievable safety measures; Step 22: constructing a plurality of environmental model structures of the ship using the environmental features and the model features, inputting the basic information and the safety measures list information into each of the environmental model structures, and obtaining a plurality of environmental sub-models of the ship; Step 23: determining the main safety measures corresponding to the ship under different environmental characteristics according to the corresponding environmental safety measures information in each of the environmental sub-models, and strengthening the corresponding main safety measures in each of the environmental sub-models; Step 24: Integrate the enhanced environmental sub-models respectively and add corresponding evaluation conditions to generate a performance evaluation model of the ship.

6. A ship performance evaluation method according to claim 1, characterized in that: The step 3 comprises: Step 31: running the performance evaluation model to obtain a plurality of working performances of the ship, dividing the working performance into a plurality of performance sets according to the navigation conditions corresponding to each of the working performances, and matching a corresponding navigation tag for each of the working performances according to the performance sets corresponding to each of the working performances; Step 32: Performing logical analysis on each of the performance sets to obtain the logical relationship between different working performances in the same performance set, constructing a working structure tree of the ship under the corresponding navigation conditions, performing deep training on each of the working structure trees to obtain the dependency relationship between different working performances of the ship under the corresponding navigation conditions, and matching corresponding relationship labels for working performances with dependency relationships; Step 33: each of the navigation conditions is divided into regions and reorganized to generate a plurality of fluctuating navigation conditions, and a plurality of fluctuating working performances corresponding to the cabin under the different fluctuating navigation conditions are constructed based on the navigation label and the relationship label corresponding to each working performance, so as to construct a fluctuating performance set; Step 34: construct a comprehensive performance list of the ship according to the performance presentation data corresponding to each of the fluctuation performance sets.

7. A ship performance evaluation method according to claim 1, characterized in that: The step 4 comprises: Step 41: Counting a number of model structures corresponding to each ship model, and establishing a preset model structure library for each of the ship models; Step 42: Compare the performance evaluation model with each of the model structures to obtain a plurality of updated structures included in the performance evaluation model; Step 43: Estimate the ship model corresponding to the ship, and input the updated structure into the corresponding preset model structure library to complete the update.

8. A ship performance evaluation method according to claim 1, characterized in that: Also includes: According to the ship model corresponding to each of the ships, a corresponding route is matched for each of the ships and displayed.

9. A ship performance evaluation system, characterized in that: include: The initial assessment module is used to conduct an initial assessment of the basic information of the ship and the safety measures list information, determine the basic performance integrity of the ship, and make corresponding prompts; A performance evaluation module, used for extracting a corresponding model structure according to the basic information and the safety measures list information to establish a performance evaluation model of the ship when the basic performance of the ship is qualified; A comprehensive analysis module, used to perform an in-depth evaluation of the ship according to the performance evaluation model, obtain a number of corresponding usage performances of the ship under different navigation conditions, and establish a comprehensive performance list of the ship; The structure updating module is used to obtain the updated structure of the performance evaluation model, establish an updated structure model in combination with the ship model of the ship, and input it into a preset model structure library.

10. A ship performance evaluation system according to claim 9, characterized in that: The initial assessment module includes: A first evaluation unit is used to retrieve basic information and safety measures list information of the ship, construct a plurality of safety measures of the ship based on the basic information and the safety measures list information, and respectively determine a prevention dimension corresponding to each safety measure; A second evaluation unit is used to construct a basic model of the ship based on the basic information, and use the basic model to simulate each of the safety measures to obtain the prevention effectiveness corresponding to each prevention dimension; A third evaluation unit is used to run the basic model to obtain the basic functional effectiveness of the ship, and determine the basic performance integrity of the ship in combination with the prevention effectiveness corresponding to each of the prevention dimensions; The fourth evaluation unit is used to locate the unqualified functions of the ship and provide function compensation prompts when the basic performance integrity is lower than the standard integrity, otherwise, it will give a qualified reminder of the ship.

Images