Construction drawing multi-specialty collaborative joint review method, device and equipment and storage medium

Abstract

The invention discloses a construction drawing multi-specialty collaborative joint review method, device and equipment and a storage medium. The method comprises the steps of receiving construction drawing data; recognizing drawing data of the construction drawing, acquiring content and professional information related to the construction drawing, and generating a plurality of professional auditing tasks according to the acquired content and professional information related to the construction drawing; evaluating the plurality of professional auditing tasks based on a preset evaluation rule, and adjusting the professional auditing tasks which do not meet the preset evaluation rule to obtain a plurality of target professional auditing tasks; matching and outputting the plurality of target professional auditing tasks to corresponding professional auditing terminals based on a preset task allocation rule, and collecting professional auditing opinion data corresponding to the professional auditing terminals; and summarizing the professional auditing opinion data to a corresponding construction drawing file, generating an auditing document and outputting the auditing document. The construction drawing is subjected to multi-specialty auditing through multiple specialty auditing tasks, auditing opinions are automatically summarized and then sent, and careless mistakes caused by manual summarization are avoided.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This application relates to the technical field of construction drawing review, and more specifically, to a multi-disciplinary collaborative joint review method, device, equipment and storage medium for construction drawings. Background Art

[0002] Construction drawing review refers to the activity of organizing personnel from various specialties to check and verify the construction drawings after the construction unit receives the construction drawings completed by the survey and design unit and before delivering them for construction. After being reviewed by multiple parties and found error-free, they are summarized according to the bill of quantities to form a project list, which serves as the basic basis for measurement and payment to ensure the accuracy, compliance and constructability of the drawings.

[0003] The traditional construction drawing review operation process is generally an offline operation. After the construction unit receives the construction drawings completed by the survey and design unit, it sends them to the construction drawing review unit. Then, according to the design content of the construction drawings and the participating specialties, it picks up the construction drawing files participated by this specialty, and after the director confirms again that "this specialty needs to participate in the review", assigns the reviewer to participate in the review or joint review of the construction drawing files. After summarizing the signed paper version and electronic version of the qualified professional construction drawing review opinion contact form and the submission form of the consultation document, after going through the internal audit and standardization process, the signed paper version and electronic version of the qualified summary construction drawing review opinion contact form, the submission form of the consultation document, etc. are submitted to the production scheduling. The production scheduling issues the electronic version of the review opinion contact form and retains the signed paper version of the review opinion and the submission form of the consultation document for archiving.

[0004] However, in the traditional construction drawing review operation process, there are problems such as a large number of personnel involved in the professional distribution link, high consumption of human resources, manual reception and summary of professional opinions, large workload and easy to make mistakes, inability to accurately locate the reviewer and process information, the need for adjudication by the production department and the company's chief engineer when adding joint review specialties, serious situations of mutual shirking and wrangling between specialties, high consumption of human resources, the electronic version of the review opinion contact form is stored in the disk in the form of local files, which is not convenient for retrieval, query and reuse of results, the review opinion contact form is manually sent by the area dispatcher to each corresponding unit by email, and it is necessary to submit the paper review opinion and submission form, wasting a large amount of paper and printing toner, which is uneconomical and not environmentally friendly. Summary of the Invention

[0005] In view of at least one defect or improvement requirement of the prior art, the present invention provides a multi-disciplinary collaborative joint review method, device, equipment and storage medium for construction drawings, which is used to solve the problems in the prior art that there are a large number of personnel involved in the professional distribution link of the construction drawing review operation process, high consumption of human resources, the need for manual reception and summary of professional opinions, large workload and easy to make mistakes, and inability to accurately locate the reviewer and process information.

[0006] To achieve the above object, according to the first aspect of the present invention, a multi - professional collaborative joint review method for construction drawings is provided, including:

[0007] Receiving construction drawing data;

[0008] Identifying the construction drawing data, obtaining the content and professional information involved in the construction drawings, and generating a number of professional review tasks according to the obtained content and professional information involved in the construction drawings;

[0009] Evaluating a number of professional review tasks respectively based on a preset evaluation rule, adjusting the professional review tasks that do not meet the preset evaluation rule, and obtaining a number of target professional review tasks;

[0010] Based on a preset task allocation rule, matching and outputting a number of target professional review tasks to the corresponding professional review terminals, and collecting the professional review opinion data corresponding to the professional review terminals;

[0011] Summarizing the professional review opinion data into the corresponding construction drawing file, generating a review document and outputting it.

[0012] In a possible implementation manner, evaluating a number of professional review tasks respectively based on a preset evaluation rule, adjusting the professional review tasks that do not meet the preset evaluation rule, and obtaining a number of target professional review tasks, including:

[0013] Respectively obtaining the characteristic values / attribute values of a number of professional review tasks, matching them with the first evaluation index threshold, and determining the professional review tasks that do not meet the threshold relationship as the professional review tasks that do not meet the first evaluation index;

[0014] Respectively obtaining the characteristic values / attribute values of a number of transitional professional review tasks, matching them with the second evaluation index threshold, and determining the transitional professional review tasks that do not meet the threshold relationship as the transitional professional review tasks that do not meet the second evaluation index;

[0015] Among them, the professional review tasks that do not meet the first evaluation index threshold relationship and the transitional professional review tasks that do not meet the second evaluation index threshold relationship are the professional review tasks that do not meet the preset evaluation rule; the transitional professional review tasks are the professional review tasks that meet the first evaluation index through the first - layer evaluation.

[0016] In a possible implementation manner, respectively obtaining the characteristic values / attribute values of a number of professional review tasks, matching them with the first evaluation index threshold, and determining the professional review tasks that do not meet the threshold relationship as the professional review tasks that do not meet the first evaluation index, including:

[0017] Obtaining the professional data and compliance data in the construction drawing data;

[0018] Obtaining the professional attribute values and compliance attribute values in the characteristic values of a number of professional review tasks;

[0019] Match and compare the professional data and compliance data in the construction drawing data with the professional attribute values and compliance attribute values in the characteristic values of several professional review tasks respectively;

[0020] For those that do not meet the professional attribute value threshold relationship or do not meet the compliance attribute value threshold relationship, determine them as professional review tasks that do not meet the first evaluation index.

[0021] In a possible implementation, obtain the characteristic values / attribute values of several transitional professional review tasks respectively, match them with the second evaluation index threshold, and determine those that do not meet the threshold relationship as transitional professional review tasks that do not meet the second evaluation index, including:

[0022] Obtain the review purpose data and potential risk data in the construction drawing data;

[0023] Obtain the review purpose attribute values and potential risk attribute values in the characteristic values of several transitional professional review tasks;

[0024] Match and compare the review purpose data and potential risk data in the construction drawing data with the review purpose attribute values and potential risk attribute values in the characteristic values of several professional review tasks respectively;

[0025] For those that do not meet the review purpose attribute value threshold relationship or do not meet the potential risk attribute value threshold relationship, determine them as transitional professional review tasks that do not meet the second evaluation index.

[0026] In a possible implementation, match and output several target professional review tasks to the corresponding professional review terminals based on a preset task assignment rule, and collect the professional review opinion data corresponding to the professional review terminals, including:

[0027] Obtain the professional labels of the professional review terminals;

[0028] Calculate the professional matching degree between the target professional review tasks and the professional labels of the review terminals based on the preset task assignment rule;

[0029] Assign the target professional review tasks to the corresponding professional review terminals according to the professional matching degree;

[0030] Store the review opinion data obtained from the review of the professional review terminals of the same construction drawing in a preset database.

[0031] In a possible implementation, store the review opinion data obtained from the review of the professional review terminals of the same construction drawing in a preset database, including:

[0032] When collecting the professional review opinion data, record several review opinion parameter information corresponding to the professional review opinion data;

[0033] Associate a number of review opinion parameter information with the corresponding professional review opinion data and store them in a preset database.

[0034] In a possible implementation, summarize the professional review opinion data into the corresponding construction drawing file, generate a review document and output it, including:

[0035] Summarize the professional review opinion data of several professional reviews of the same construction drawing and the corresponding review opinion parameter information into the same construction drawing file to obtain a review report;

[0036] Edit the review document based on the review report in a preset text format and output it.

[0037] According to the second aspect of the present invention, there is also provided a multi-professional collaborative joint review device for construction drawings, including:

[0038] An acquisition module, which is configured to receive construction drawing data;

[0039] A task generation module, which is configured to identify the construction drawing data, obtain the content and professional information involved in the construction drawing, and generate a number of professional review tasks according to the obtained content and professional information involved in the construction drawing;

[0040] A task evaluation module, which is configured to evaluate a number of professional review tasks respectively based on a preset evaluation rule, adjust the professional review tasks that do not meet the preset evaluation rule, and obtain a number of target professional review tasks;

[0041] A review opinion module, which is configured to match and output a number of target professional review tasks to the corresponding professional review terminals based on a preset task allocation rule, and collect the professional review opinion data corresponding to the professional review terminals;

[0042] A document generation module, which is configured to summarize the professional review opinion data into the corresponding construction drawing file, generate a review document and output it.

[0043] According to the third aspect of the present invention, there is also provided a multi-professional collaborative joint review device for construction drawings, which includes at least one processing unit and at least one storage unit. Among them, the storage unit stores a computer program. When the computer program is executed by the processing unit, the processing unit executes the steps of the multi-professional collaborative joint review method for construction drawings described in any one of the above.

[0044] According to the fourth aspect of the present invention, there is also provided a storage medium, which stores a computer program executable by an access authentication device. When the computer program runs on the access authentication device, the access authentication device executes the steps of the multi-professional collaborative joint review method for construction drawings described in any one of the above.

[0045] Generally speaking, compared with the prior art, the above technical solution conceived by the present invention can achieve the following beneficial effects:

[0046] A multi-disciplinary collaborative joint review method for construction drawings provided by the present invention receives construction drawing data, identifies the construction drawing data, obtains the content and professional information involved in the construction drawings, generates a number of professional review tasks according to the obtained content and professional information involved in the construction drawings, preliminarily determines the types of professionals required to review the current construction drawings, evaluates each of the number of professional review tasks based on a preset evaluation rule, adjusts the professional review tasks that do not meet the preset evaluation rule, obtains a number of target professional review tasks, and matches and outputs the number of target professional review tasks to the corresponding professional review terminals based on a preset task allocation rule, so as to be distributed to the review terminals of the corresponding professionals for drawing review, reducing the human resources required in the distribution link. Based on the number of target professional review tasks, the construction drawings are respectively reviewed to collect the professional review opinion data corresponding to the professional review terminals, and the different professionals in the drawings are respectively reviewed, which is beneficial to accurately locate the reviewer and process information in a timely manner. After the review is completed, the number of professional review opinions can be automatically summarized to the corresponding construction drawing file, generating a review document and outputting it, without manual summarization, avoiding the problem of drawing leakage caused by possible mistakes in manual summarization and sending emails. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0047] In order to more clearly illustrate the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present application, the drawings required for the embodiments will be briefly introduced below. Obviously, the drawings in the following description are only some embodiments of the present application. For those of ordinary skill in the art, without creative efforts, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings.

[0048] Figure 1 It is a schematic flowchart of an embodiment of a multi-disciplinary collaborative joint review method for construction drawings provided by the present invention;

[0049] Figure 2 It is a schematic flowchart of an embodiment of determining a professional review task that does not meet the first evaluation index provided by the present invention;

[0050] Figure 3 It is a schematic flowchart of an embodiment of determining a professional review task that does not meet the second evaluation index provided by the present invention;

[0051] Figure 4 For the Figure 1 schematic flowchart of an embodiment of step S104 provided by the present invention;

[0052] Figure 5Schematic structural diagram of an embodiment of the multi - professional collaborative joint review device for construction drawings provided by the present invention;

[0053] Figure 6 Schematic structural diagram of the multi - professional collaborative joint review equipment for construction drawings provided by the embodiment of the present invention. Detailed implementation manners

[0054] In order to make the objectives, technical solutions and advantages of the present invention clearer, the present invention will be further described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings and embodiments. It should be understood that the specific embodiments described herein are only used to explain the present invention and are not used to limit the present invention. In addition, the technical features involved in the various embodiments of the present invention described below can be combined with each other as long as they do not conflict with each other.

[0055] The terms "first", "second", "third", etc. in the specification, claims and drawings of this application are used to distinguish different objects, rather than to describe a specific order. In addition, the terms "comprising" and "having" and any variations thereof are intended to cover non - exclusive inclusion. For example, a process, method, system, product or device that includes a series of steps or units is not limited to the listed steps or units, but optionally further includes steps or units not listed, or optionally further includes other steps or units inherent to these processes, methods, products or devices.

[0056] Before elaborating on the embodiments of the present invention, the following explanations are given for relevant terms:

[0057] Construction drawings: They are important technical documents used to guide construction in building engineering, also known as construction drawings or construction blueprints. They are finally formed based on design drawings (including schematic design, preliminary design and construction drawing design), and detail specific information such as the detailed structure, dimensions, materials, construction requirements, etc. of the building, and are the direct basis for construction workers to carry out construction operations.

[0058] The present invention provides a multi - professional collaborative joint review method, device, equipment and storage medium for construction drawings, which will be described separately below.

[0059] Please refer to Figure 1 , Figure 1 Flow chart of an embodiment of a multi - professional collaborative joint review method for construction drawings provided by the present invention. In a specific embodiment of the present invention, a multi - professional collaborative joint review method for construction drawings is disclosed, including:

[0060] S101. Receive construction drawing data;

[0061] S102. Identify the construction drawing data, obtain the content and professional information involved in the construction drawing, and generate several professional review tasks according to the obtained content and professional information involved in the construction drawing;

[0062] S103. Evaluate several professional review tasks respectively based on a preset evaluation rule, adjust the professional review tasks that do not meet the preset evaluation rule, and obtain several target professional review tasks;

[0063] S104. Match and output several target professional review tasks to the corresponding professional review terminals based on a preset task allocation rule, and collect the professional review opinion data corresponding to the professional review terminals;

[0064] S105. Summarize the professional review opinion data into the corresponding construction drawing file, generate a review document and output it.

[0065] In the above embodiment, a multi - professional collaborative joint review method for construction drawings proposed by this application is implemented through a construction drawing review system. First, the construction drawing needs to be uploaded to the construction drawing review system. After receiving the construction drawing, the production department area identifies the key elements in the construction drawing and automatically divides them into different professional fields according to these elements. A standardized review task template is set for each professional field, covering multi - dimensional review points such as compliance with laws and regulations, design rationality, and construction feasibility. It should be noted that the production department area does not fully understand each professional in the construction drawing and can only make a preliminary division of each professional in the construction drawing and formulate several professional review tasks.

[0066] The construction drawing review system evaluates several professional review tasks respectively based on a preset evaluation rule. After evaluation and adjustment, several target professional review tasks are obtained. According to the evaluation results and the project progress, the priorities, scopes of the target professional review tasks are flexibly adjusted or additional review points are added. It should be noted that if several transitional professional review tasks do not need to be adjusted after evaluation, then these several transitional professional review tasks at this time are the target professional review tasks.

[0067] After the professional review terminal completes the review of the content of its own professional and obtains the professional review opinion data, the system will automatically collect and integrate all the professional review opinion data, generate a detailed review report document, and can automatically send the review report and modification suggestions to the corresponding design unit, construction unit and supervision unit through encrypted emails according to the preset email template to ensure information security and timely communication.

[0068] Compared with the prior art, a multi - professional collaborative joint review method for construction drawings provided in this embodiment receives construction drawing data, identifies the construction drawing data, obtains the content and professional information involved in the construction drawings, generates several professional review tasks according to the obtained content and professional information involved in the construction drawings, preliminarily determines the types of professionals required to review the current construction drawings, evaluates each of the several professional review tasks based on a preset evaluation rule, adjusts the professional review tasks that do not meet the preset evaluation rule, obtains several target professional review tasks, and matches and outputs the several target professional review tasks to the corresponding professional review terminals based on a preset task assignment rule, so as to be distributed to the review terminals of the corresponding professionals for drawing review, reducing the human resources required in the distribution link. Based on the several target professional review tasks, the construction drawings are respectively reviewed to collect the professional review opinion data corresponding to the professional review terminals, and different professionals in the drawings are respectively reviewed, which is conducive to accurately positioning the reviewer and process information in a timely manner. After the review is completed, the several professional review opinions can be automatically summarized into the corresponding construction drawing file, generating a review document and outputting it, without manual summarization, avoiding the problem of drawing leakage caused by possible mistakes in manual summarization and sending emails.

[0069] In some embodiments of the present invention, evaluating each of the several professional review tasks based on a preset evaluation rule and adjusting the professional review tasks that do not meet the preset evaluation rule to obtain several target professional review tasks includes:

[0070] Respectively obtain the characteristic values / attribute values of the several professional review tasks, match them with the first evaluation index threshold, and determine the professional review tasks that do not meet the first evaluation index if they do not meet the threshold relationship;

[0071] Respectively obtain the characteristic values / attribute values of the several transitional professional review tasks, match them with the second evaluation index threshold, and determine the transitional professional review tasks that do not meet the second evaluation index if they do not meet the threshold relationship;

[0072] Among them, the professional review tasks that do not meet the first evaluation index threshold relationship and the transitional professional review tasks that do not meet the second evaluation index threshold relationship are the professional review tasks that do not meet the preset evaluation rule; the transitional professional review tasks are the professional review tasks that meet the first evaluation index through the first - layer evaluation.

[0073] In the above - mentioned embodiment, the system has a first evaluation terminal and a second evaluation terminal. Among them, the first evaluation terminal and the second evaluation terminal respectively evaluate the professional review tasks with the first evaluation index and the second evaluation index.

[0074] Using automated tools or manual methods, key feature values / attribute values ​​are extracted from each professional audit task, such as task type, involved fields, expected results, historical processing time, etc. The extracted feature values / attribute values ​​are compared with the preset first evaluation indicator threshold, and tasks that do not meet the threshold relationship are marked as professional audit tasks that do not meet the first evaluation indicator.

[0075] Professional audit tasks sent to the second evaluation end after evaluation by the first evaluation end are collectively referred to as transitional professional audit tasks. After the first round of adjustments, a batch of transitional professional audit tasks are formed, which have met the basic requirements in terms of professionalism and accuracy. For transitional tasks, their feature values / attribute values ​​are re-extracted or updated, and the updated feature values / attribute values ​​are compared with the threshold of the second evaluation index. Tasks that do not meet the threshold relationship are marked as transitional professional audit tasks that do not meet the second evaluation index. If adjustments are required, the first evaluation end must agree before they can be executed.

[0076] It should be noted that the first assessment end can choose to add professional review tasks or delete professional review tasks when making adjustments, while the second assessment end can only choose to add professional review tasks when making adjustments, thus avoiding mutual shirking of responsibility between professions.

[0077] See also Figure 2 , Figure 2 A flow chart of an embodiment of determining a professional audit task that does not meet a first evaluation indicator provided by the present invention. In some embodiments of the present invention, characteristic values / attribute values ​​of several professional audit tasks are obtained respectively, and matched with the first evaluation indicator threshold. If the threshold relationship is not met, it is determined that the professional audit task does not meet the first evaluation indicator, including:

[0078] S201. Obtain professional data and compliance data from construction drawing data;

[0079] S202, obtaining professional attribute values ​​and compliance attribute values ​​in characteristic values ​​of several professional audit tasks;

[0080] S203, matching and comparing the professional data and compliance data in the construction drawing data with the professional attribute values ​​and compliance attribute values ​​in the characteristic values ​​of several professional review tasks respectively;

[0081] S204: If the professional attribute value threshold relationship or the compliance attribute value threshold relationship is not met, it is determined as a professional review task that does not meet the first evaluation indicator.

[0082] In the above embodiments, first, using professional CAD software or drawing parsing tools, key professional data such as structural dimensions, material specifications, construction techniques, etc. are extracted from the construction drawings. At the same time, according to the markings, descriptions, and relevant standards cited on the drawings, compliance data is collected, including whether it complies with building codes, industry standards, design specifications, etc. It should be noted that the extracted data is initially verified to ensure its accuracy, integrity, and consistency. For data points with doubts or ambiguities, further confirmation or correction is required.

[0083] For each professional review task, clarify the professional attribute values and compliance attribute values to be evaluated. These attribute values may include but are not limited to task type, professional field, review key points, expected outcomes, compliance with laws and regulations, etc. Through methods such as task management systems, database queries, or manual collation, characteristic value data corresponding to each task is collected. Ensure the accuracy and timeliness of the data.

[0084] According to the preset matching rules and logics, the construction drawing data is compared with the task characteristic values one by one. For professional attribute values, compare whether the actual drawing data is consistent with the professional standards and specifications required by the task; for compliance attribute values, check whether the drawing data meets the requirements of all relevant laws, regulations, and industry standards. Automated tools or algorithms can be used to assist the matching process to improve efficiency and accuracy. For example, use AI image recognition technology to quickly identify key information in the drawings, or use natural language processing technology to analyze the compliance requirements in the task description.

[0085] The threshold relationships of professional attribute values may be formulated based on industry standards, organizational regulations, historical experience, or expert opinions. According to the results of the matching comparison, judge whether each task meets the set threshold relationships. For any task that does not meet the professional attribute value threshold or compliance attribute value threshold, it is regarded as not meeting the first evaluation index, and corresponding markings or records are made.

[0086] It should be noted that for professional review tasks that do not require adjustment, after being evaluated by the first evaluation end, they are also called transitional professional review tasks.

[0087] Please refer to Figure 3 , Figure 3 which is a schematic flowchart of an embodiment for determining professional review tasks that do not meet the second evaluation index provided by the present invention. In some embodiments of the present invention, the characteristic values / attribute values of several transitional professional review tasks are respectively obtained and matched with the second evaluation index threshold. Those that do not meet the threshold relationship are determined as transitional professional review tasks that do not meet the second evaluation index, including:

[0088] S301. Obtain the review purpose data and potential risk data in the construction drawing data;

[0089] S302. Obtain the audit purpose attribute value and potential risk attribute value among the characteristic values of several transitional professional audit tasks;

[0090] S303. Match and compare the audit purpose data and potential risk data in the construction drawing data with the audit purpose attribute value and potential risk attribute value among the characteristic values of several professional audit tasks respectively;

[0091] S304. For those that do not meet the threshold relationship of the audit purpose attribute value or do not meet the threshold relationship of the potential risk attribute value, determine them as transitional professional audit tasks that do not meet the second evaluation index.

[0092] In the above embodiments, clarify the specific audit purposes of each professional audit task, such as ensuring structural safety, complying with fire protection codes, optimizing cost - effectiveness, etc. Then, extract information directly related to these audit purposes from the construction drawing data, such as structural force analysis, fire protection facility layout, material cost estimation, etc. Utilize professional knowledge, historical data, and risk assessment tools to identify potential risk points that may exist in the construction drawings, such as design defects, material incompatibility, high construction difficulty, etc. These risk data are crucial for evaluating the comprehensiveness and importance of the audit tasks.

[0093] For each transitional professional audit task, record in detail its audit purpose attribute value and potential risk attribute value. The audit purpose attribute value should clarify the core objective and expected outcomes of the task; the potential risk attribute value includes the identified risk types, risk levels, possible impact scopes, and recommended countermeasures, etc. Collect the above - mentioned characteristic value data of each transitional task through task management systems, project documents, or expert consultations, etc. Ensure the accuracy and integrity of the data for subsequent matching and comparison.

[0094] Establish a clear matching logic and scoring criteria, and compare the audit purpose data and potential risk data in the construction drawings with the audit purpose attribute value and potential risk attribute value of the transitional tasks one by one. Evaluate the matching degree, consistency, or difference degree between the two. For data points with low matching degrees, conduct in - depth analysis to explore the reasons. It may be that the drawing data is inaccurate, the task characteristic value description is vague, or there is a misunderstanding between the two. Solve these problems through communication, clarification, or supplementary information.

[0095] Before the evaluation, set the threshold criteria for the audit purpose attribute value and potential risk attribute value according to organizational standards, industry norms, or project requirements. According to the results of the matching comparison, judge whether the transitional task meets the set threshold relationship. If the audit purpose attribute value or potential risk attribute value of the task is lower than the threshold standard, it is regarded as not meeting the second evaluation index. For such tasks, special treatment or re - evaluation is required to ensure that they meet the overall project requirements and risk management strategies.

[0096] See also Figure 4 , Figure 4 The present invention provides Figure 1 The flowchart of an embodiment of step S104 in some embodiments of the present invention is as follows: Based on the preset task allocation rules, a plurality of target professional audit tasks are matched and output to the corresponding professional audit end, and the professional audit opinion data corresponding to the professional audit end is collected, including:

[0097] S401, obtain professional labels of professional review terminals;

[0098] S402, calculating the professional matching degree between the target professional audit task and the professional label of the audit end based on the preset task allocation rule;

[0099] S403, assigning the target professional audit task to the corresponding professional audit end according to the professional matching degree;

[0100] S404. The audit opinion data obtained by the professional audit end of the same construction drawing is stored in a preset database.

[0101] In the above embodiment, a series of professional labels are defined for the professional review end based on factors such as the professional background, skills, and work experience of the professional review end, such as "building structure expert", "electrical engineer", "water supply and drainage expert", etc.

[0102] According to the direct correspondence between the task type and the audit end's profession, the matching principle between the task difficulty and the audit end's ability, and the consideration of the audit end's current workload, the characteristic values ​​of the target professional audit task (such as task type, professional field, complexity, etc.) and the professional label of the audit end are matched and calculated. Methods such as weighted scoring, similarity algorithm or machine learning model can be used to comprehensively evaluate the professional matching between the task and the audit end.

[0103] Based on the calculation results of the matching degree, a task allocation strategy is formulated to prioritize the allocation of tasks to the audit end with the highest matching degree to ensure that the tasks can receive the most professional review. At the same time, the workload and availability of the audit end are taken into consideration to avoid excessive allocation that may lead to a decrease in audit efficiency.

[0104] During the review process, collect and organize in a timely manner the review opinion data from different professional review terminals. This data may include various forms such as text descriptions, pictures, videos, etc., comprehensively reflecting the compliance and optimization suggestions of the construction drawings in each professional field. Store the collected review opinion data in a preset database or data warehouse, and adopt a reasonable data structure and indexing strategy to ensure the efficient query and update of the data. At the same time, pay attention to data security and privacy protection to avoid information leakage or abuse. Integrate and summarize the different professional review opinions of the same construction drawing, and through data analysis and mining techniques, discover potential problems and common suggestions to provide strong support for subsequent construction drawing modification and optimization.

[0105] In some embodiments of the present invention, storing the review opinion data obtained from the professional review terminals of the same construction drawing in a preset database includes:

[0106] When collecting the professional review opinion data, record several review opinion parameter information corresponding to the professional review opinion data;

[0107] Associate and store several review opinion parameter information with the corresponding professional review opinion data in a preset database.

[0108] In the above embodiments, when recording the review opinions, it is necessary to clarify and record the parameter information corresponding to each review opinion. These parameter information may include but are not limited to review document work point information, review opinion type information, review opinion status information, process information, review quality information, quota information, time information, etc. Among them, the work point information is generated when the production department area of the review document sends the professional review task file to the first evaluation terminal; the review opinion type information is generated when the reviewer fills in the review opinion; the review opinion includes status information such as adoption, disagreement, non-adoption, etc., and the status information is generated during the review stage; the process information includes all information such as time, version, review stage, process location generated during the process; the review quality information is the information for evaluating the review quality of the reviewer generated during the professional reviewer's approval process; the quota information is the information input by the professional person in charge when assigning professional reviewers, used to reflect the average time required for the task file. It should be noted that for the convenience of subsequent data processing and analysis, the review opinion parameter information needs to be recorded and stored in a unified data format, such as using structured data tables, JSON, or XML, etc.

[0109] Before the review work starts, it is necessary to design and configure a preset database according to the actual requirements of the project and the specifications of data management. This database should have efficient data storage, retrieval, update, and backup functions to ensure the security and accessibility of review opinions and their parameter information. After obtaining the complete professional review opinions and their corresponding parameter information, these information should be stored in the database according to the preset association relationships (such as through unique identifiers, foreign keys, etc.). At the same time, it is also necessary to ensure the integrity and consistency of the data to avoid data loss or redundancy. As the project progresses and the review work deepens, it may be necessary to supplement, modify, or delete the existing review opinions and their parameter information. Therefore, an effective data maintenance mechanism needs to be established to ensure that the information in the database always remains consistent with the actual situation of the project. Subsequently, data statistics, reprocessing, application, and data empowerment can be carried out according to certain dimensions as needed. Common data statistics include, for example, counting the number of review opinions by review opinion type, calculating the adoption rate by review opinion status information, screening out dissenting opinions when preparing reports, etc.; arranging professional manpower according to the daily load intensity, etc.

[0110] In some embodiments of the present invention, the professional review opinion data is summarized into the corresponding construction drawing file to generate and output a review document, including:

[0111] Summarize the professional review opinion data of several parts of the same construction drawing and the corresponding several review opinion parameter information into the same construction drawing file to obtain a review report;

[0112] Based on the review report, edit it in a preset text format to obtain a review document and output it.

[0113] In the above embodiments, the collected professional review opinions are classified and sorted according to the specific parts or chapters of the construction drawing to ensure that the review opinions of each part are presented clearly and orderly. At the same time, the corresponding review opinion parameter information (such as problem type, impact degree, specific location, etc.) is corresponding to the review opinions one by one, so as to facilitate the recipient to quickly understand and process, and directly mark or attach a note on the construction drawing file to indicate the specific location of the review opinion and the proposed modification plan.

[0114] The template should include unified regulations on elements such as font, font size, paragraph format, title style, header and footer, etc., to ensure the visual consistency and professionalism of the review document. After the editing is completed, strict review and proofreading work are carried out to ensure that the information in the document is accurate, logical, and in standard format. For any problems or omissions found, they are corrected and supplemented in a timely manner. Finally, the edited review document is output in an appropriate format (such as PDF, Word, etc.) and saved to the specified location. At the same time, distribute the document to the relevant parties (such as the construction unit, design unit, construction unit, etc.) as needed, so that they can understand the review results and take corresponding measures.

[0115] To better implement the multi - professional collaborative joint review method for construction drawings in the embodiments of the present invention, based on the multi - professional collaborative joint review method for construction drawings, correspondingly, please refer to Figure 5 , Figure 5 FIG. is a schematic structural diagram of an embodiment of a multi - professional collaborative joint review device for construction drawings provided by the present invention. The embodiments of the present invention provide a multi - professional collaborative joint review device 500 for construction drawings, including:

[0116] An acquisition module 510, which is configured to receive construction drawing data;

[0117] A task generation module 520, which is configured to identify the construction drawing data, obtain the content and professional information involved in the construction drawings, and generate several professional review tasks according to the obtained content and professional information involved in the construction drawings;

[0118] A task evaluation module 530, which is configured to evaluate several professional review tasks respectively based on a preset evaluation rule, adjust the professional review tasks that do not meet the preset evaluation rule, and obtain several target professional review tasks;

[0119] A review opinion module 540, which is configured to match and output several target professional review tasks to the corresponding professional review terminals based on a preset task assignment rule, and collect the professional review opinion data corresponding to the professional review terminals;

[0120] A document generation module 550, which is configured to summarize the professional review opinion data into the corresponding construction drawing file, generate a review document and output it.

[0121] It should be noted here that: The device 500 provided in the above - mentioned embodiment can implement the technical solutions described in the above - mentioned method embodiments. The specific implementation principles of the above - mentioned modules or units can be referred to the corresponding content in the above - mentioned method embodiments, and will not be elaborated here.

[0122] Please refer to Figure 6 , Figure 6 FIG. is a schematic structural diagram of a multi - professional collaborative joint review device for construction drawings provided by an embodiment of the present invention. Based on the above - mentioned multi - professional collaborative joint review method for construction drawings, the present invention also correspondingly provides a multi - professional collaborative joint review device for construction drawings. The multi - professional collaborative joint review device for construction drawings can be a computing device such as a mobile terminal, a desktop computer, a notebook, a handheld computer, and a server. The multi - professional collaborative joint review device 600 for construction drawings includes a processor 610, a memory 620, and a display 630. Figure 6 Only some components of the synchronous tracking flight welding device for real - time measurement of battery height are shown. However, it should be understood that it is not required to implement all the shown components, and more or fewer components can be alternatively implemented.

[0123] The memory 620 can be an internal storage unit of the multi - professional collaborative review device 600 for construction drawings in some embodiments, such as the hard disk or memory of the multi - professional collaborative review device 600 for construction drawings. In some other embodiments, the memory 620 can also be an external storage device of the multi - professional collaborative review device 600 for construction drawings, such as a plug - in hard disk, a Smart Media Card (SMC), a Secure Digital (SD) card, a Flash Card, etc., equipped on the multi - professional collaborative review device 600 for construction drawings. Further, the memory 620 can also include both the internal storage unit and the external storage device of the multi - professional collaborative review device 600 for construction drawings. The memory 620 is used to store application software installed on the multi - professional collaborative review device 600 for construction drawings and various types of data, such as program codes installed on the multi - professional collaborative review device 600 for construction drawings. The memory 620 can also be used to temporarily store data that has been output or will be output. In one embodiment, a multi - professional collaborative review program 640 for construction drawings is stored on the memory 620, and the multi - professional collaborative review program 640 can be executed by the processor 610, thereby implementing the multi - professional collaborative review method for construction drawings in various embodiments of the present application.

[0124] The processor 610 can be a Central Processing Unit (CPU), a microprocessor, or other data - processing chips in some embodiments, and is used to run the program codes stored in the memory 620 or process data, such as executing the multi - professional collaborative review method for construction drawings, etc.

[0125] The display 630 can be an LED display, a liquid - crystal display, a touch - type liquid - crystal display, and an OLED (Organic Light - Emitting Diode) toucher, etc. in some embodiments. The display 630 is used to display information on the multi - professional collaborative review device 600 for construction drawings and to display a visual user interface. The components 610 - 630 of the multi - professional collaborative review device 600 for construction drawings communicate with each other through a system bus.

[0126] In one embodiment, when the processor 610 executes the multi - professional collaborative review program 640 in the memory 620, the steps in the above - mentioned multi - professional collaborative review method for construction drawings are implemented.

[0127] This embodiment also provides a computer - readable storage medium, on which a multi - professional collaborative review program for construction drawings is stored. When the multi - professional collaborative review program for construction drawings is executed by a processor, the following steps are implemented:

[0128] Receive construction drawing data;

[0129] Identify the construction drawing data, obtain the content and professional information involved in the construction drawing, and generate a number of professional review tasks based on the obtained content and professional information of the construction drawing;

[0130] Evaluate a number of professional review tasks respectively based on a preset evaluation rule, adjust the professional review tasks that do not meet the preset evaluation rule, and obtain a number of target professional review tasks;

[0131] Match and output a number of target professional review tasks to the corresponding professional review terminals based on a preset task allocation rule, and collect the professional review opinion data corresponding to the professional review terminals;

[0132] Summarize the professional review opinion data to the corresponding construction drawing file, generate a review document and output it.

[0133] In summary, a multi-professional collaborative joint review method for construction drawings provided in this embodiment receives construction drawing data, identifies the construction drawing data, obtains the content and professional information involved in the construction drawing, generates a number of professional review tasks based on the obtained content and professional information of the construction drawing, initially determines the types of professionals required to review the current construction drawing, evaluates a number of professional review tasks respectively based on a preset evaluation rule, adjusts the professional review tasks that do not meet the preset evaluation rule, obtains a number of target professional review tasks, matches and outputs the number of target professional review tasks to the corresponding professional review terminals based on a preset task allocation rule, so as to be distributed to the review terminals of the corresponding professionals for drawing review, reducing the human resources required in the distribution link, respectively reviewing the construction drawings based on a number of target professional review tasks, collecting the professional review opinion data corresponding to the professional review terminals, and respectively reviewing different professionals in the drawing, which is conducive to accurately positioning the reviewer and process information in a timely manner. After the review is completed, the professional review opinions of a number of professionals can be automatically summarized to the corresponding construction drawing file, generating a review document and outputting it, without manual summarization, avoiding the problem of drawing leakage caused by possible mistakes in manual summarization and sending emails.

[0134] This application also provides a computer-readable storage medium, on which a computer program is stored. When the program is executed by a processor, the steps of the above method are implemented. Among them, the computer-readable storage medium may include, but is not limited to, any type of disk, including floppy disks, optical disks, DVDs, CD-ROMs, microdrives, and magneto-optical disks, ROMs, RAMs, EPROMs, EEPROMs, DRAMs, VRAMs, flash memory devices, magnetic cards or optical cards, nano-systems (including molecular memory ICs), or any type of medium or device suitable for storing instructions and / or data.

[0135] It should be noted that, for the foregoing method embodiments, for the sake of simple description, they are all expressed as a series of action combinations. However, those skilled in the art should understand that this application is not limited by the described action sequence, because according to this application, certain steps can be performed in other sequences or simultaneously. Secondly, those skilled in the art should also understand that the embodiments described in the specification are all preferred embodiments, and the actions and modules involved are not necessarily essential to this application.

[0136] In the above embodiments, the descriptions of the respective embodiments have their own focuses. For the parts not detailed in a certain embodiment, reference can be made to the relevant descriptions of other embodiments.

[0137] In the several embodiments provided by this application, it should be understood that the disclosed device can be implemented in other ways. For example, the device embodiments described above are merely illustrative. For example, the division of the units is only a logical function division. In actual implementation, there can be other division methods. For example, multiple units or components can be combined or integrated into another system, or some features can be ignored or not executed. Another point is that the displayed or discussed coupling or direct coupling or communication connection to each other can be through some service interfaces. The indirect coupling or communication connection of the device or unit can be in an electrical or other form.

[0138] The units described as separate components may or may not be physically separated, and the components displayed as units may or may not be physical units, that is, they can be located in one place, or can be distributed to multiple network units. Some or all of the units can be selected according to actual needs to achieve the purpose of the solution of this embodiment.

[0139] In addition, in each embodiment of this application, the functional units can be integrated in a processing unit, or each unit can exist physically alone, or two or more units can be integrated in one unit. The above integrated units can be implemented in the form of hardware or in the form of software functional units.

[0140] When the integrated unit is implemented in the form of a software functional unit and sold or used as an independent product, it can be stored in a computer-readable memory. Based on this understanding, the technical solution of this application, in essence, or the part that contributes to the prior art, or all or part of this technical solution, can be embodied in the form of a software product. This computer software product is stored in a memory and includes several instructions for causing a computer device (which can be a personal computer, a server, or a network device, etc.) to execute all or part of the steps of the methods described in various embodiments of this application. The aforementioned memory includes various media that can store program codes, such as USB flash drives, read-only memories (ROM), random access memories (RAM), mobile hard disks, magnetic disks, or optical discs.

[0141] Those of ordinary skill in the art can understand that all or part of the steps in the various methods of the above embodiments can be completed by instructing relevant hardware through a program. This program can be stored in a computer-readable memory, and the memory can include: flash drives, read-only memories (ROM), random access memories (RAM), magnetic disks, or optical discs, etc.

[0142] The above are only exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure and should not be used to limit the scope of the present disclosure. That is, all equivalent changes and modifications made in accordance with the teachings of the present disclosure still fall within the scope covered by the present disclosure. Those skilled in the art will readily think of other embodiments of the present disclosure after considering the specification and practicing the present disclosure here. This application aims to cover any variations, uses, or adaptive changes of the present disclosure, and these variations, uses, or adaptive changes follow the general principles of the present disclosure and include common general knowledge or conventional technical means in the technical field not recorded in the present disclosure. The specification and embodiments are only regarded as exemplary, and the scope and spirit of the present disclosure are defined by the claims.

[0143] The technical features of the above embodiments can be combined arbitrarily. For the sake of brevity of description, not all possible combinations of the technical features in the above embodiments are described. However, as long as there is no contradiction in the combination of these technical features, it should be considered as the scope recorded in this specification.

[0144] Those skilled in the art can easily understand that the above are only the preferred embodiments of the present invention and are not used to limit the present invention. Any modifications, equivalent replacements, and improvements made within the spirit and principle of the present invention should be included in the protection scope of the present invention.

Claims

1. A multi-disciplinary collaborative review method for construction drawings, characterized in that: include: Receive construction drawing data; Identify the construction drawing data, obtain the content and professional information involved in the construction drawing, and generate a number of professional review tasks based on the obtained content and professional information involved in the construction drawing; Evaluate the plurality of professional audit tasks respectively based on preset evaluation rules, adjust the professional audit tasks that do not meet the preset evaluation rules, and obtain a plurality of target professional audit tasks; Based on the preset task allocation rules, the plurality of target professional audit tasks are matched and output to the corresponding professional audit end, and the professional audit opinion data corresponding to the professional audit end is collected; The professional review opinion data is aggregated into the corresponding construction drawing files, and the review document is generated and output.

2. The multi-disciplinary collaborative review method for construction drawings as claimed in claim 1 is characterized in that: The step of evaluating the plurality of professional audit tasks based on the preset evaluation rules, adjusting the professional audit tasks that do not meet the preset evaluation rules, and obtaining a plurality of target professional audit tasks includes: Acquire the characteristic values / attribute values ​​of the plurality of professional audit tasks respectively, match them with the first evaluation index threshold, and determine the professional audit tasks that do not meet the threshold relationship as professional audit tasks that do not meet the first evaluation index; Acquire characteristic values / attribute values ​​of several transitional professional audit tasks respectively, match them with the second evaluation index threshold, and if the threshold relationship is not satisfied, it is determined as a transitional professional audit task that does not satisfy the second evaluation index; Among them, the professional audit tasks that do not meet the threshold relationship of the first evaluation indicator and the transitional professional audit tasks that do not meet the threshold relationship of the second evaluation indicator are professional audit tasks that do not meet the preset evaluation rules; the transitional professional audit tasks are professional audit tasks that meet the first evaluation indicator.

3. The multi-disciplinary collaborative review method for construction drawings as claimed in claim 2 is characterized in that: The obtaining of the characteristic values / attribute values ​​of the plurality of professional audit tasks respectively and matching them with the first evaluation index threshold value, and determining that the professional audit tasks that do not meet the threshold relationship are professional audit tasks that do not meet the first evaluation index, includes: Obtaining professional data and compliance data from the construction drawing data; Obtaining professional attribute values ​​and compliance attribute values ​​in the characteristic values ​​of the plurality of professional audit tasks; Matching and comparing the professional data and compliance data in the construction drawing data with the professional attribute values ​​and compliance attribute values ​​in the characteristic values ​​of the plurality of professional review tasks respectively; If the professional attribute value threshold relationship or the compliance attribute value threshold relationship is not met, it is determined to be a professional review task that does not meet the first evaluation indicator.

4. The multi-disciplinary collaborative review method for construction drawings as claimed in claim 2 is characterized in that: The characteristic values / attribute values ​​of a plurality of transitional professional audit tasks are obtained respectively, and matched with the second evaluation index threshold value, and if the threshold relationship is not satisfied, it is determined as a transitional professional audit task that does not satisfy the second evaluation index, including: Obtaining audit purpose data and potential risk data in the construction drawing data; Obtaining audit purpose attribute values ​​and potential risk attribute values ​​in the characteristic values ​​of the plurality of transitional professional audit tasks; Matching and comparing the audit purpose data and potential risk data in the construction drawing data with the audit purpose attribute values ​​and potential risk attribute values ​​in the characteristic values ​​of the plurality of professional audit tasks respectively; If the audit purpose attribute value threshold relationship or the potential risk attribute value threshold relationship is not met, it will be determined as a transitional professional audit task that does not meet the second evaluation indicator.

5. The multi-disciplinary collaborative review method for construction drawings according to claim 1 is characterized in that: The matching and outputting of the plurality of target professional audit tasks to corresponding professional audit terminals based on the preset task allocation rules, and collecting professional audit opinion data corresponding to the professional audit terminals, include: Get professional labels from professional reviewers; Calculate the professional matching degree between the target professional audit task and the professional label of the audit end based on the preset task allocation rule; Allocate the target professional audit task to the corresponding professional audit end according to the professional matching degree; The audit opinion data obtained by the professional audit end of the same construction drawing is stored in the preset database.

6. The multi-disciplinary collaborative review method for construction drawings as claimed in claim 5 is characterized in that: The storing of the audit opinion data obtained by the professional audit end of the same construction drawing into the preset database includes: When collecting the professional audit opinion data, recording a number of audit opinion parameter information corresponding to the professional audit opinion data; The plurality of audit opinion parameter information and the corresponding professional audit opinion data are associated and stored in the preset database.

7. The multi-disciplinary collaborative review method for construction drawings as claimed in claim 6 is characterized in that: The professional review opinion data is aggregated into the corresponding construction drawing file, and the review document is generated and output, including: Aggregate several professional review opinion data and corresponding review opinion parameter information of the same construction drawing into the same construction drawing file to obtain a review report; Based on the audit report, an audit document is edited in a preset text format and output.

8. A multi-professional collaborative review device for construction drawings, characterized in that: include: An acquisition module configured to receive construction drawing data; A task generation module is configured to identify the construction drawing data, obtain the content and professional information involved in the construction drawing, and generate a number of professional review tasks according to the obtained content and professional information involved in the construction drawing; A task evaluation module, which is configured to evaluate the plurality of professional audit tasks respectively based on preset evaluation rules, adjust the professional audit tasks that do not meet the preset evaluation rules, and obtain a plurality of target professional audit tasks; An audit opinion module is configured to match and output the plurality of target professional audit tasks to corresponding professional audit terminals based on preset task allocation rules, and collect professional audit opinion data corresponding to the professional audit terminals; The document generation module is configured to aggregate the professional review opinion data into the corresponding construction drawing file, generate the review document and output it.

9. A multi-professional collaborative review device for construction drawings, characterized in that: It includes at least one processing unit and at least one storage unit, wherein the storage unit stores a computer program. When the computer program is executed by the processing unit, the processing unit executes the steps of the multi-professional collaborative review method for construction drawings as described in any one of claims 1 to 7.

10. A storage medium, characterized in that: It stores a computer program that can be executed by an access authentication device. When the computer program runs on the access authentication device, the access authentication device executes the steps of the multi-professional collaborative review method for construction drawings as described in any one of claims 1 to 7.

Images