Information management method and device for production safety, server and computer readable storage medium

Abstract

The invention relates to the technical field of household appliance manufacturing, and discloses an information management method for production safety, and the method comprises the steps: determining an accumulated safety credit point according to a potential safety hazard level, the rectification condition of a safety responsible person, and the associated condition and / or improvement opinion declaration level of a subordinate on-duty safety responsible person; according to the accumulated safety credit points, point early warning information or retraining information is sent to the safety responsible person, or on-duty level information of the safety responsible person is adjusted; wherein the potential safety hazard level is determined according to the production violation behavior of the safety responsible person, and the improvement opinion declaration level is determined according to the improvement opinion declaration type of the safety responsible person. According to the method, the safety awareness and initiative of production personnel are improved, and potential safety hazards are reduced, so that the production and manufacturing quality of household appliances is improved. The invention further discloses an information management device for production safety, a server and a computer readable storage medium.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This application relates to the technical field of home appliance manufacturing, for example, to an information management method and device for production safety, a server, and a computer-readable storage medium. Background Art

[0002] Currently, in the process of home appliance manufacturing, high-quality products are needed to win the market share. However, it is difficult to ensure the quality of home appliances during the manufacturing process.

[0003] The related technology discloses a management method for personnel quality information in a production workshop, including the steps of: configuring defects; collecting quality defects; determining responsibilities; displaying quality defects; calculating scores; and monitoring quality information. It can determine the safety responsible person for quality problems, improve the quality awareness and attitude of production personnel, help production personnel timely discover the quality problems they generate, and reduce the quality losses caused by personnel problems; implementing this management method in the form of software enables the sharing of quality information, improves efficiency, and achieves quality visualization.

[0004] In the process of implementing the embodiments of the present disclosure, it is found that there are at least the following problems in the related technology:

[0005] During the home appliance manufacturing process, relying solely on the determination of the quality problem responsibilities of safety responsible persons and using fines as a substitute for management, the safety awareness and initiative of production personnel are still relatively low, and the potential safety hazards are still relatively high, resulting in poor quality of home appliance manufacturing.

[0006] It should be noted that the information disclosed in the above background art section is only used to enhance the understanding of the background of this application, and thus may include information that does not constitute the prior art known to those of ordinary skill in the art. Summary of the Invention

[0007] To have a basic understanding of some aspects of the disclosed embodiments, a simple summary is given below. This summary is not a general review, nor is it intended to identify key / important constituent elements or delineate the protection scope of these embodiments, but rather serves as a preface to the subsequent detailed description.

[0008] The embodiments of the present disclosure provide an information management method and device for production safety, a server, and a computer-readable storage medium to improve the safety awareness and initiative of production personnel, reduce potential safety hazards, and thereby improve the quality of home appliance manufacturing.

[0009] In some embodiments, the method includes: determining an accumulated safety credit score according to the level of potential safety hazards, the rectification situation of the safety responsible person, the liability situation of the safety responsible persons at the subordinate on-duty levels, and / or the level of improvement suggestion declarations; sending a score warning message or a retraining message to the safety responsible person according to the accumulated safety credit score, or adjusting the on-duty level information of the safety responsible person; wherein, the level of potential safety hazards is determined according to the production violation behaviors of the safety responsible person, and the level of improvement suggestion declarations is determined according to the types of improvement suggestion declarations of the safety responsible person.

[0010] In some embodiments, the apparatus includes: a determination module configured to determine an accumulated safety credit score according to the level of potential safety hazards, the rectification situation of the safety responsible person, the liability situation of the safety responsible persons at the subordinate on-duty levels, and / or the level of improvement suggestion declarations; an information sending module configured to send a score warning message or a retraining message to the safety responsible person according to the accumulated safety credit score, or adjust the on-duty level information of the safety responsible person; wherein, the level of potential safety hazards is determined according to the production violation behaviors of the safety responsible person, and the level of improvement suggestion declarations is determined according to the types of improvement suggestion declarations of the safety responsible person.

[0011] In some embodiments, the apparatus includes a processor and a memory storing program instructions, and the processor is configured to execute the information management method for production safety when running the program instructions.

[0012] In some embodiments, the server includes: a server body; and the information management apparatus for production safety as described above is installed on the server body.

[0013] In some embodiments, the computer-readable storage medium stores program instructions, and when the program instructions are running, they are used to cause a computer to execute the information management method for production safety as described above.

[0014] The information management method, apparatus, server, and computer-readable storage medium for production safety provided by the embodiments of the present disclosure can achieve the following technical effects:

[0015] According to the accumulated safety credit score determined according to the level of potential safety hazards, the rectification situation of the safety responsible person, the liability situation of the safety responsible persons at the subordinate on-duty levels, and / or the level of improvement suggestion declarations, a score warning message or a retraining message is sent to the safety responsible person, or the on-duty level information of the safety responsible person is adjusted. This avoids the management mode of only relying on penalties, is conducive to improving the safety awareness and initiative of production personnel, reducing potential safety hazards, and thus improving the quality of home appliance production and manufacturing.

[0016] The above general description and the following description are only exemplary and explanatory, and are not used to limit the present application. Description of the Drawings

[0017] One or more embodiments are exemplarily illustrated by corresponding drawings. These exemplary illustrations and the drawings do not constitute a limitation on the embodiments. Elements with the same reference numerals in the drawings are shown as similar elements. The drawings do not constitute a scale limitation, and wherein:

[0018] Figure 1 is a schematic diagram of an information management method for production safety provided by an embodiment of the present disclosure;

[0019] Figure 2 is a schematic diagram of another information management method for production safety provided by an embodiment of the present disclosure;

[0020] Figure 3 is a schematic diagram of another information management method for production safety provided by an embodiment of the present disclosure;

[0021] Figure 4 is a schematic diagram of another information management method for production safety provided by an embodiment of the present disclosure;

[0022] Figure 5 is a schematic diagram of an information management device for production safety provided by an embodiment of the present disclosure;

[0023] Figure 6 is a schematic diagram of another information management device for production safety provided by an embodiment of the present disclosure;

[0024] Figure 7 is a schematic diagram of a server provided by an embodiment of the present disclosure. Detailed Description of the Embodiments

[0025] In order to be able to understand the features and technical content of the embodiments of the present disclosure in more detail, the implementation of the embodiments of the present disclosure will be described in detail below with reference to the drawings. The attached drawings are for reference and illustration purposes only and are not used to limit the embodiments of the present disclosure. In the following technical description, for the sake of explanation, multiple details are provided to provide a full understanding of the disclosed embodiments. However, one or more embodiments can still be implemented without these details. In other cases, well-known structures and devices can be shown in a simplified manner.

[0026] The terms "first", "second", etc. in the specification, claims and above-mentioned drawings of the embodiments of the present disclosure are used to distinguish similar objects and do not necessarily need to be used to describe a specific order or sequence. It should be understood that such data can be interchanged under appropriate circumstances so as to implement the embodiments of the present disclosure described herein. In addition, the terms "comprising" and "having" and any variations thereof are intended to cover non-exclusive inclusion.

[0027] Unless otherwise specified, the term "plural" means two or more.

[0028] In the embodiments of the present disclosure, the character " / " indicates that the objects before and after are in an "or" relationship. For example, A / B means: A or B.

[0029] The term "and / or" is an associative relationship describing an object, indicating that three relationships can exist. For example, A and / or B means: A or B, or, the three relationships of A and B.

[0030] The term "corresponding" may refer to an associative relationship or a binding relationship. A corresponding to B means that there is an associative relationship or a binding relationship between A and B.

[0031] Combined Figure 1 As shown, the embodiments of the present disclosure provide an information management method for production safety, including:

[0032] S101, the server determines the cumulative safety credit score according to the safety hazard level, the rectification situation of the safety responsible person, the associated situation of the safety responsible persons at the subordinate on-the-job level, and / or the improvement opinion declaration level.

[0033] S102, the server sends an integral warning message or a retraining message to the safety responsible person according to the cumulative safety credit score, or adjusts the on-the-job level information of the safety responsible person.

[0034] Among them, the safety hazard level is determined according to the production violation behavior of the safety responsible person, and the improvement opinion declaration level is determined according to the improvement opinion declaration type of the safety responsible person.

[0035] By using the information management method for production safety provided by the embodiments of the present disclosure, according to the cumulative safety credit score determined by the safety hazard level, the rectification situation of the safety responsible person, the associated situation of the safety responsible persons at the subordinate on-the-job level, and / or the improvement opinion declaration level, an integral warning message or a retraining message is sent to the safety responsible person, or the on-the-job level information of the safety responsible person is adjusted. In this way, it avoids substituting punishment for management, is conducive to improving the safety awareness and initiative of production personnel, reducing safety hazards, and thus improving the quality of home appliance production and manufacturing.

[0036] Optionally, the server determines the level of potential safety hazards based on the production violation behaviors of the safety responsible persons, including: when the production violation behavior of the safety responsible person belongs to the first type of violation, the server determines the potential safety hazard level as the first hazard level. Or, when the production violation behavior of the safety responsible person belongs to the second type of violation, the server determines the potential safety hazard level as the second hazard level. Or, when the production violation behavior of the safety responsible person belongs to the third type of violation, the server determines the potential safety hazard level as the third hazard level. Among them, the degree of danger of the first type of violation is higher than that of the second type of violation, and the degree of danger of the second type of violation is higher than that of the third type of violation. The first hazard level is higher than the second hazard level, and the second hazard level is higher than the third hazard level.

[0037] In this way, determining the corresponding potential safety hazard level according to the degree of danger of production violation behaviors is conducive to better determining the cumulative safety credit score, thereby helping to improve the safety awareness and initiative of production personnel, reduce potential safety hazards, and thus enhance the quality of home appliance production and manufacturing.

[0038] Optionally, the way to obtain production violation behaviors is as follows:

[0039] The monitoring device captures the behaviors of production personnel to obtain monitoring images and uploads them to the server. The server compares the monitoring images with sample images. The server identifies the same violation behaviors and the corresponding safety responsible persons from the monitoring images. Or,

[0040] The server receives the text, images or videos including production violation behaviors uploaded by other safety responsible persons.

[0041] In this way, it is conducive to more accurately identifying production violation behaviors, thus more accurately identifying production violation types, and further more accurately determining the cumulative safety credit score, improving the safety awareness and initiative of production personnel, reducing potential safety hazards, and thus enhancing the quality of home appliance production and manufacturing.

[0042] Optionally, the way to obtain the rectification situation of the safety responsible person is as follows: The monitoring device captures the behaviors of production personnel to obtain monitoring images and uploads them to the server. The server compares the monitoring images with sample images. The server identifies the same rectification behaviors and the corresponding safety responsible persons from the monitoring images.

[0043] In this way, it is conducive to more accurately identifying the rectification situation of the safety responsible person, thus more accurately determining the cumulative safety credit score, improving the safety awareness and initiative of production personnel, reducing potential safety hazards, and thus enhancing the quality of home appliance production and manufacturing.

[0044] Optionally, the method for obtaining the type of improvement opinion declaration of the safety responsible person is as follows: The server receives the text of the improvement opinion declaration sent by the safety responsible person. The server identifies the type of improvement opinion declaration from the semantics of the improvement opinion declaration text.

[0045] In this way, it is beneficial to obtain the type of improvement opinion declaration of the safety responsible person more accurately, thereby determining the improvement opinion declaration level more accurately, and then determining the cumulative safety credit points more accurately, improving the safety awareness and initiative of production personnel, reducing potential safety hazards, and thus improving the quality of home appliance production and manufacturing.

[0046] Optionally, the server determines the improvement opinion declaration level according to the type of improvement opinion declaration of the safety responsible person, including: When the type of improvement opinion declaration of the safety responsible person is the first opinion type, the server determines that the improvement opinion declaration level is the first opinion level. Or, when the type of improvement opinion declaration of the safety responsible person is the second opinion type, the server determines that the improvement opinion declaration level is the second opinion level. Or, when the type of improvement opinion declaration of the safety responsible person is the third opinion type, the server determines that the improvement opinion declaration level is the third opinion level. Among them, the first opinion level is higher than the second opinion level, and the second opinion level is higher than the third opinion level.

[0047] In this way, determining the improvement opinion declaration level according to the type of improvement opinion declaration is beneficial to determining the cumulative safety credit points more accurately, thereby helping to improve the safety awareness and initiative of production personnel, reducing potential safety hazards, and thus improving the quality of home appliance production and manufacturing.

[0048] Optionally, the server determines the cumulative safety credit points according to the safety hazard level, the rectification situation of the safety responsible person, the liability situation of the safety responsible persons at the subordinate on-the-job level, and / or the improvement opinion declaration level, including:

[0049] The server determines the first deduction points according to the safety hazard level and the rectification situation of the safety responsible person. And / or, the server determines the second deduction points and / or the first additional points according to the liability situation of the safety responsible persons at the subordinate on-the-job level. And / or, the server determines the second additional points according to the improvement opinion declaration level.

[0050] The server deducts the first deduction points from the original cumulative safety credit points, and / or deducts the second deduction points, adds the first additional points, and / or adds the second additional points to obtain the updated cumulative safety credit points.

[0051] In this way, the first deduction points are deducted according to the safety hazard level and the rectification situation of the safety responsible person, which is conducive to improving the safety awareness and initiative of production personnel and reducing safety hazards. And according to the associated situation of the safety responsible person at the subordinate on-the-job level, the first additional points are superimposed or the second deduction points are deducted, which is conducive to improving the awareness of production safety supervision, so as to better reduce safety hazards and improve the quality of home appliance production and manufacturing.

[0052] Optionally, the server determines the first deduction points according to the safety hazard level and the rectification situation of the safety responsible person, including: when the rectification situation of the safety responsible person is rectified within the first set rectification period, the server determines that the first deduction points are zero. When the rectification situation of the safety responsible person is not rectified within the second set rectification period, the server determines the first deduction points according to the safety hazard level. Specifically, the value of the first set rectification period can be 2h (hour). The value of the second set rectification period can be 24h or 48h.

[0053] In this way, it is conducive to urging the safety responsible person to better rectify production violations, thereby reducing safety hazards and improving the quality of home appliance production and manufacturing.

[0054] Optionally, the server determines the first deduction points according to the safety hazard level, including: when the safety hazard level is the first hazard level, the server determines that the first deduction points are the first integral value. Or, when the safety hazard level is the second hazard level, the server determines that the first deduction points are the second integral value. Or, when the safety hazard level is the third hazard level, the server determines that the first deduction points are the third integral value. Among them, the level of the safety hazard is positively correlated with the first deduction points. The first integral value is greater than the second integral value, and the second integral value is greater than the third integral value. Specifically, the value of the first integral value can be 6 points, the value of the second integral value can be 3 points, and the value of the third integral value can be 1 point.

[0055] In this way, the higher the safety hazard level, the higher the first deduction points deducted, which is conducive to urging the safety responsible person to better rectify production violations, thereby reducing safety hazards and improving the quality of home appliance production and manufacturing.

[0056] Optionally, the server determines the second deduction score and / or the first additional score according to the liability connection of the safety responsible persons at the subordinate on-the-job levels, including: when the liability connection of the safety responsible persons at the subordinate on-the-job levels is that the safety responsible person of the subordinate node has a production violation, the server determines the second deduction score according to the safety hazard level corresponding to the safety responsible person of the subordinate node and the management level of the safety responsible person belonging to the subordinate node. And / or, when the liability connection of the safety responsible persons at the subordinate on-the-job levels is that the safety responsible person of the subordinate node has a reported improvement opinion, the server determines the first additional score according to the improvement opinion reporting level of the safety responsible person of the subordinate node at the first-level management.

[0057] In this way, if the safety responsible person of the subordinate node has a production violation, the safety responsible person of this node will be jointly deducted the second deduction score. If the safety responsible person of the subordinate node has a reported improvement opinion, the safety responsible person of this node will be jointly added the first additional score. This is conducive to improving the awareness of production safety supervision, thereby better reducing potential safety hazards and enhancing the quality of home appliance manufacturing.

[0058] Optionally, the server determines the second deduction score according to the safety hazard level corresponding to the safety responsible person of the subordinate node and the management level of the safety responsible person belonging to the subordinate node, including: when the safety hazard level corresponding to the safety responsible person of the subordinate node is the first hazard level, the server determines that the second deduction score is the fourth score value or the fifth score value according to the management level of the safety responsible person belonging to the subordinate node. Or, when the safety hazard level corresponding to the safety responsible person of the subordinate node is the second hazard level, the server determines that the second deduction score is the sixth score value or the seventh score value according to the management level of the safety responsible person belonging to the subordinate node. Among them, the fourth score value is greater than the fifth score value, the fifth score value is greater than or equal to the sixth score value, and the sixth score value is greater than the seventh score value.

[0059] In this way, if the safety responsible person of the subordinate node has a production violation, the higher the corresponding safety hazard level, the higher the second deduction score deducted from the safety responsible person of this node. This is conducive to improving the awareness of production safety supervision, thereby better reducing potential safety hazards and enhancing the quality of home appliance manufacturing.

[0060] Optionally, the server determines that the second deduction score is the fourth score value or the fifth score value according to the management level of the safety responsible person belonging to the subordinate node, including: when the management level of the safety responsible person belonging to the subordinate node is the first level, the server determines that the second deduction score is the fourth score value. Or, when the management level of the safety responsible person belonging to the subordinate node is the second level, the server determines that the second deduction score is the fifth score value. Specifically, the value of the fourth score value can be 3, and the value of the fifth score value can be 2.

[0061] In this way, if the safety responsible person of a subordinate node has production violations, when this node is the first-level manager of the subordinate node, the second deduction score is high; when this node is the second-level manager of the subordinate node, the second deduction score is low. Such a hierarchical joint liability mechanism is conducive to enhancing the awareness of production safety supervision, thereby better reducing potential safety hazards and improving the quality of home appliance manufacturing.

[0062] Optionally, the server determines the second deduction score as the sixth score value or the seventh score value according to the management level of the safety responsible person belonging to the subordinate node, including: when the management level of the safety responsible person belonging to the subordinate node is at the first level, the server determines the second deduction score as the sixth score value; or when the management level of the safety responsible person belonging to the subordinate node is at the second level, the server determines the second deduction score as the seventh score value. Specifically, the value of the sixth score value can be 2, and the value of the seventh score value can be 1.

[0063] In this way, if the safety responsible person of a subordinate node has production violations, when this node is the first-level manager of the subordinate node, the second deduction score is high; when this node is the second-level manager of the subordinate node, the second deduction score is low. Such a hierarchical joint liability mechanism is conducive to enhancing the awareness of production safety supervision, thereby better reducing potential safety hazards and improving the quality of home appliance manufacturing.

[0064] Optionally, the server determines the first additional score according to the declared level of the improvement opinions of the safety responsible person of the subordinate nodes under first-level management, including: when the declared level of the improvement opinions of the safety responsible person of the subordinate nodes under first-level management is the first opinion level, the server determines the first additional score as the eighth score value; or when the declared level of the improvement opinions of the safety responsible person of the subordinate nodes under first-level management is the second opinion level, the server determines the first additional score as the ninth score value. Among them, the first opinion level is higher than the second opinion level, and the eighth score value is greater than the ninth score value. Specifically, the value of the eighth score value can be 2, and the value of the ninth score value can be 1.

[0065] In this way, if the safety responsible person of a subordinate node has a declared improvement opinion, the higher the corresponding declared level of the improvement opinion, the higher the additional first score of the safety responsible person of this node. This is conducive to enhancing the awareness of production safety supervision, thereby better reducing potential safety hazards and improving the quality of home appliance manufacturing.

[0066] Optionally, the server determines the second additional score according to the declared level of improvement suggestions, including: when the declared level of improvement suggestions by the server is the first opinion level, the server determines the second additional score as the tenth score value. Or, when the declared level of improvement suggestions by the server is the second opinion level, the server determines the second additional score as the eleventh score value. Or, when the declared level of improvement suggestions by the server is the third opinion level, the server determines the second additional score as the twelfth score value. Among them, the declared level of improvement suggestions by the safety responsible person is positively correlated with the first additional score. The tenth score value is greater than the eleventh score value, and the eleventh score value is greater than the twelfth score value. Specifically, the value of the tenth score value can be 3, the value of the eleventh score value can be 2, and the value of the twelfth score value can be 1.

[0067] In this way, the higher the declared level of improvement suggestions by the safety responsible person, the higher the superimposed first additional score, which is conducive to improving the enthusiasm and initiative of the safety responsible person, avoiding substituting management for punishment, and thus better reducing potential safety hazards and improving the quality of home appliance production and manufacturing.

[0068] Optionally, the server sends score warning information or retraining information to the safety responsible person according to the accumulated safety credit score, or adjusts the on-the-job level information of the safety responsible person, including: when the accumulated safety credit score is less than the thirteenth score value and greater than zero, the server sends score warning information to the safety responsible person. When the accumulated safety credit score is less than or equal to zero, according to the frequency of clearing the accumulated safety credit score, the server sends retraining information to the safety responsible person, or sends information to adjust the on-the-job level to the safety responsible person.

[0069] In this way, if the accumulated safety credit score is less than the thirteenth score value but not cleared, only a warning is sent to the safety responsible person. If the accumulated safety credit score is cleared, the safety responsible person is retrained or the on-the-job level is adjusted according to the frequency of clearing the accumulated safety credit score. This is conducive to urging the safety responsible person to better rectify production violations, thereby reducing potential safety hazards and improving the quality of home appliance production and manufacturing.

[0070] Optionally, the server sends retraining information to the safety responsible person, or sends information to adjust the on-the-job level to the safety responsible person according to the frequency of clearing the accumulated safety credit score, including: when the frequency of clearing the accumulated safety credit score is the first frequency, the server sends retraining information to the safety responsible person and restores the accumulated safety credit score to the default original score value. Or, when the frequency of clearing the accumulated safety credit score is the second frequency, the server sends information to lower the on-the-job level by one level to the safety responsible person. Among them, the first frequency is lower than the second frequency. Specifically, the value of the first frequency is once a year. The value of the second frequency is twice a year or more than twice a year. The value of the default original score value can be 12.

[0071] In this way, if the frequency of the cumulative safety credit points being cleared is low, the safety responsible person will be retrained. If the frequency of the cumulative safety credit points being cleared is high, the on-the-job level of the safety responsible person will be adjusted. This is conducive to urging the safety responsible person to better rectify production violations, thereby reducing potential safety hazards and improving the quality of home appliance manufacturing.

[0072] Optionally, when the cumulative safety credit points are less than or equal to zero, it further includes: when the frequency of the cumulative safety credit points being cleared is the third frequency, the server sends information canceling the year-end excellent evaluation qualification to the safety responsible person. Among them, the third frequency is higher than the second frequency. Specifically, the value of the third frequency can be 3 times a year or more.

[0073] In this way, when the frequency of the cumulative safety credit points being cleared is high, the year-end excellent evaluation qualification of the safety responsible person will be canceled. This is conducive to urging the safety responsible person to better rectify production violations, thereby reducing potential safety hazards and improving the quality of home appliance manufacturing.

[0074] Optionally, it further includes: the server sends information for adjusting the on-the-job level to the safety responsible person according to the downgrading frequency of the on-the-job level of the safety responsible person of the subordinate node.

[0075] In this way, the on-the-job level of the safety responsible person is adjusted according to the downgrading frequency of the on-the-job level of the safety responsible person of the subordinate node. Such a joint liability mechanism is conducive to enhancing the awareness of production safety supervision, thereby better reducing potential safety hazards and improving the quality of home appliance manufacturing.

[0076] Specifically, the server sends information for adjusting the on-the-job level to the safety responsible person according to the downgrading frequency of the on-the-job level of the safety responsible person of the subordinate node, including: when the downgrading frequency of the on-the-job level of the safety responsible person of the subordinate node is the third frequency, the server sends information for downgrading the on-the-job level to the safety responsible person.

[0077] In this way, if the downgrading frequency of the on-the-job level of the safety responsible person of the subordinate node is the third frequency, the on-the-job level of the safety responsible person of this node will be downgraded. Such a joint liability mechanism is conducive to enhancing the awareness of production safety supervision, thereby better reducing potential safety hazards and improving the quality of home appliance manufacturing.

[0078] Optionally, before the server sends integral warning information, retraining information, or information for adjusting the on-the-job level of the safety responsible person according to the cumulative safety credit points, it further includes: the server determines the cumulative safety credit points according to the text, image, or video of the production violations of other safety responsible persons uploaded by the safety responsible person to the server.

[0079] In this way, determining the cumulative safety credit points based on the reported production violations of other safety responsible persons is conducive to enhancing the awareness of supervision, as well as the enthusiasm and initiative for safe production of safety responsible persons. This is conducive to urging safety responsible persons to better rectify production violations, thereby reducing potential safety hazards and improving the quality of home appliance production and manufacturing.

[0080] Optionally, the server determines the cumulative safety credit points based on the text, image, or video of the production violations of other safety responsible persons uploaded by the safety responsible person to the server, including: The server determines the level of award-based reporting according to the text, image, or video of the production violations of other safety responsible persons uploaded by the safety responsible person to the server. The server determines the third additional points based on the level of award-based reporting. The server superimposes the third additional points on the original cumulative safety credit points to obtain the updated cumulative safety credit points.

[0081] In this way, rewards and punishments are clearly defined, which is conducive to urging safety responsible persons to better rectify production violations, thereby reducing potential safety hazards and improving the quality of home appliance production and manufacturing.

[0082] Optionally, the server determines the cumulative safety credit points based on the level of award-based reporting, including: When the level of award-based reporting is the first reporting level, the server determines the third additional points as the fourteenth point value. Or, when the level of award-based reporting is the second reporting level, the server determines the third additional points as the fifteenth point value. Or, when the level of award-based reporting is the third reporting level, the server determines the third additional points as the sixteenth point value. Among them, the level of award-based reporting is positively correlated with the third additional points. The fourteenth point value is greater than the fifteenth point value, and the fifteenth point value is greater than the sixteenth point value. Specifically, the value of the fourteenth point can be 3, the value of the fifteenth point can be 2, and the value of the sixteenth point can be 1.

[0083] In this way, the higher the level of award-based reporting, the higher the third additional points. This is conducive to enhancing the awareness of supervision, as well as the enthusiasm and initiative for safe production of safety responsible persons. It is conducive to urging safety responsible persons to better rectify production violations, thereby reducing potential safety hazards and improving the quality of home appliance production and manufacturing.

[0084] Optionally, the server determines the cumulative safety credit points based on the level of potential safety hazards, the rectification situation of the safety responsible person, the liability connection situation of the safety responsible persons at the subordinate on-the-job level, and / or the level of improvement opinion reporting, and also includes: The server determines the fourth additional points according to the liability connection situation of the safety responsible persons at the subordinate on-the-job level. The server superimposes the fourth additional points on the original cumulative safety credit points to obtain the updated cumulative safety credit points.

[0085] In this way, the third additional score is superimposed according to the liability connection situation of the safety responsible persons at the subordinate on-the-job levels. Such a liability connection mechanism is conducive to enhancing the awareness of production safety supervision, thereby better reducing potential safety hazards and improving the quality of home appliance production and manufacturing.

[0086] Optionally, the server determines the fourth additional score according to the liability connection situation of the safety responsible persons at the subordinate on-the-job levels, including: when the liability connection situation of the safety responsible persons at the subordinate on-the-job levels is that the safety responsible person of the subordinate node has uploaded written, image or video of other production violations of safety responsible persons to the server, the server determines the fourth additional score according to the award reporting level corresponding to the safety responsible persons at the subordinate on-the-job levels.

[0087] In this way, the third additional score is superimposed according to the award reporting level of the safety responsible persons at the subordinate on-the-job levels. Such a liability connection mechanism is conducive to enhancing the awareness of production safety supervision, thereby better reducing potential safety hazards and improving the quality of home appliance production and manufacturing.

[0088] Optionally, the fourth additional score is determined according to the award reporting level corresponding to the safety responsible persons at the subordinate on-the-job levels, including: when the award reporting level corresponding to the safety responsible persons at the subordinate on-the-job levels is the first reporting level, the fourth additional score is determined to be the seventeenth score value. Or, when the award reporting level corresponding to the safety responsible persons at the subordinate on-the-job levels is the second reporting level, the fourth additional score is determined to be the eighteenth score value. Specifically, the value of the seventeenth score value can be 2, and the value of the eighteenth score value can be 1.

[0089] In this way, the higher the award reporting level of the safety responsible persons at the subordinate on-the-job levels, the higher the fourth additional score of this node. The lower the award reporting level of the safety responsible persons at the subordinate on-the-job levels, the lower the fourth additional score of this node. Such a liability connection mechanism is conducive to enhancing the awareness of production safety supervision, thereby better reducing potential safety hazards and improving the quality of home appliance production and manufacturing.

[0090] Combined Figure 2 As shown, another information management method for production safety provided by an embodiment of the present disclosure includes:

[0091] S201, the server determines the first deduction score according to the safety hazard level and the rectification situation of the safety responsible person. And / or, the server determines the second deduction score and / or the first additional score according to the liability connection situation of the safety responsible persons at the subordinate on-the-job levels. And / or, the server determines the second additional score according to the improvement opinion reporting level.

[0092] S202, the server deducts the first deduction points and / or the second deduction points from the original cumulative safety credit points, and / or adds the first additional points and / or the second additional points to obtain the updated cumulative safety credit points.

[0093] S203, the server sends a points warning message or a retraining message to the safety responsible person according to the cumulative safety credit points, or adjusts the on-the-job level information of the safety responsible person.

[0094] Among them, the safety hazard level is determined according to the production violation behaviors of the safety responsible person, and the improvement opinion declaration level is determined according to the improvement opinion declaration type of the safety responsible person.

[0095] Adopting the information management method for production safety provided by the embodiments of the present disclosure, the first deduction points are deducted according to the safety hazard level and the rectification situation of the safety responsible person, which is beneficial to improving the safety awareness and initiative of production personnel and reducing safety hazards. And adding the first additional points or deducting the second deduction points according to the liability situation of the safety responsible persons at the subordinate on-the-job levels is beneficial to improving the production safety supervision awareness, thereby better reducing safety hazards and improving the quality of home appliance production and manufacturing. Sending a points warning message or a retraining message to the safety responsible person, or adjusting the on-the-job level information of the safety responsible person, thus avoiding simply relying on penalties, is beneficial to improving the safety awareness and initiative of production personnel, reducing safety hazards, and thus improving the quality of home appliance production and manufacturing.

[0096] Combined Figure 3 As shown, the embodiments of the present disclosure provide another information management method for production safety, including:

[0097] S301, the server determines the first deduction points according to the safety hazard level and the rectification situation of the safety responsible person. And / or, the server determines the second deduction points and / or the first additional points according to the liability situation of the safety responsible persons at the subordinate on-the-job levels. And / or, the server determines the second additional points according to the improvement opinion declaration level.

[0098] S302, the server deducts the first deduction points and / or the second deduction points from the original cumulative safety credit points, and / or adds the first additional points and / or the second additional points to obtain the updated cumulative safety credit points.

[0099] S303, the server sends a points warning message or a retraining message to the safety responsible person according to the cumulative safety credit points, or adjusts the on-the-job level information of the safety responsible person.

[0100] S304, the server sends information for adjusting the on-the-job level to the safety responsible person according to the downward adjustment frequency of the on-the-job levels of the safety responsible persons at the subordinate nodes.

[0101] Among them, the level of potential safety hazard is determined according to the production violation behaviors of the safety responsible person, and the level of improvement opinion declaration is determined according to the type of improvement opinion declaration of the safety responsible person.

[0102] By using the information management method for production safety provided by the embodiments of the present disclosure, the first deduction score is deducted according to the level of potential safety hazard and the rectification situation of the safety responsible person, which is beneficial to improving the safety awareness and initiative of production personnel and reducing potential safety hazards. And the first additional score is superimposed or the second deduction score is deducted according to the joint liability situation of the safety responsible persons at the subordinate on-the-job levels, which is beneficial to improving the production safety supervision awareness. Sending score warning information or retraining information to the safety responsible person, or adjusting the on-the-job level information of the safety responsible person, thus avoiding substituting punishment for management, which is beneficial to improving the safety awareness and initiative of production personnel. According to the downgrading frequency of the on-the-job levels of the safety responsible persons at the subordinate nodes, the on-the-job level of the safety responsible person is adjusted. Such a joint liability mechanism is beneficial to improving the production safety supervision awareness, so as to better reduce potential safety hazards and improve the quality of home appliance production and manufacturing.

[0103] Combined with Figure 4 As shown, the embodiments of the present disclosure provide another information management method for production safety, including:

[0104] S401, the server determines the first deduction score according to the level of potential safety hazard and the rectification situation of the safety responsible person. And / or, the server determines the second deduction score and / or the first additional score according to the joint liability situation of the safety responsible persons at the subordinate on-the-job levels. And / or, the server determines the second additional score according to the level of improvement opinion declaration. And / or, the server determines the fourth additional score according to the joint liability situation of the safety responsible persons at the subordinate on-the-job levels

[0105] S402, the server determines the level of reward for reporting violations according to the text, image or video of the production violation behaviors of other safety responsible persons uploaded by the safety responsible person to the server.

[0106] S403, the server determines the third additional score according to the level of reward for reporting violations.

[0107] S404, the server deducts the first deduction score and / or the second deduction score from the original cumulative safety credit score, superimposes the first additional score, and / or superimposes the second additional score, and / or superimposes the third additional score, and / or superimposes the fourth additional score, to obtain the updated cumulative safety credit score.

[0108] S405, the server sends score warning information or retraining information to the safety responsible person according to the cumulative safety credit score, or adjusts the on-the-job level information of the safety responsible person.

[0109] Among them, the safety hazard level is determined according to the production violation behaviors of the safety responsible persons, and the improvement opinion declaration level is determined according to the improvement opinion declaration types of the safety responsible persons.

[0110] By using the information management method for production safety provided by the embodiments of the present disclosure, the first deduction points are deducted according to the safety hazard level and the rectification situation of the safety responsible persons. This is beneficial to improving the safety awareness and initiative of production personnel and reducing safety hazards. And the first additional points are superimposed or the second deduction points are deducted according to the associated situation of the safety responsible persons at the subordinate on-the-job level, which is beneficial to enhancing the production safety supervision awareness, thereby better reducing safety hazards and improving the quality of home appliance production and manufacturing. The third additional points are determined according to reporting the production violation behaviors of other safety responsible persons, and the fourth additional points are superimposed according to the associated situation of the safety responsible persons at the subordinate on-the-job level. Integral warning information or retraining information is sent to the safety responsible persons, or the on-the-job level information of the safety responsible persons is adjusted. In this way, it avoids replacing management with punishment, is beneficial to improving the safety awareness and initiative of production personnel, reducing safety hazards, and thus improving the quality of home appliance production and manufacturing.

[0111] Combined with Figure 5 As shown, the embodiments of the present disclosure provide an information management device 200 for production safety, including a determination module 501 and an information sending module 502. The determination module 501 is configured to determine the cumulative safety credit points according to the safety hazard level, the rectification situation of the safety responsible persons, the associated situation of the safety responsible persons at the subordinate on-the-job level, and / or the improvement opinion declaration level. The information sending module 502 is configured to send integral warning information or retraining information to the safety responsible persons according to the cumulative safety credit points, or adjust the on-the-job level information of the safety responsible persons; among them, the safety hazard level is determined according to the production violation behaviors of the safety responsible persons, and the improvement opinion declaration level is determined according to the improvement opinion declaration types of the safety responsible persons.

[0112] By using the information management device 200 for production safety provided by the embodiments of the present disclosure, integral warning information or retraining information is sent to the safety responsible persons, or the on-the-job level information of the safety responsible persons is adjusted according to the cumulative safety credit points determined according to the safety hazard level, the rectification situation of the safety responsible persons, the associated situation of the safety responsible persons at the subordinate on-the-job level, and / or the improvement opinion declaration level. In this way, it avoids replacing management with punishment, is beneficial to improving the safety awareness and initiative of production personnel, reducing safety hazards, and thus improving the quality of home appliance production and manufacturing.

[0113] Combined with Figure 6As shown in the figure, an information management device 300 for production safety provided by an embodiment of the present disclosure includes a processor 700 and a memory 701. Optionally, the device 300 may further include a communication interface 702 and a bus 703. Among them, the processor 700, the communication interface 702, and the memory 701 can complete communication with each other through the bus 703. The communication interface 702 can be used for information transmission. The processor 700 can call the logical instructions in the memory 701 to execute the information management method for production safety in the above embodiment.

[0114] In addition, when the logical instructions in the above-mentioned memory 701 are implemented in the form of software functional units and sold or used as an independent product, they can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium.

[0115] The memory 701, as a computer-readable storage medium, can be used to store software programs and computer-executable programs, such as the program instructions / modules corresponding to the methods in the embodiments of the present disclosure. The processor 700 executes functional applications and data processing by running the program instructions / modules stored in the memory 701, that is, implements the information management method for production safety in the above embodiment.

[0116] The memory 701 may include a program storage area and a data storage area. Among them, the program storage area can store an operating system and application programs required for at least one function; the data storage area can store data created according to the use of the terminal device, etc. In addition, the memory 701 may include a high-speed random access memory and may also include a non-volatile memory.

[0117] Combined with Figure 7 As shown in the figure, an embodiment of the present disclosure provides a server 100, including: a server body, and the above-mentioned information management device 200(300) for production safety. The information management device 200(300) for production safety is installed on the server body. The installation relationship described here is not limited to being placed inside the server body, but also includes installation connections with other components of the server 100, including but not limited to physical connections, electrical connections, or signal transmission connections, etc. Those skilled in the art can understand that the information management device 200(300) for production safety can be adapted to a feasible server main body, and then implement other feasible embodiments.

[0118] An embodiment of the present disclosure provides a computer-readable storage medium storing computer-executable instructions, and the computer-executable instructions are set to execute the above-mentioned information management method for production safety.

[0119] The technical solution of the embodiments of the present disclosure can be embodied in the form of a software product, which is stored in a storage medium and includes one or more instructions for causing a computer device (which may be a personal computer, a server, or a network device, etc.) to execute all or part of the steps of the method described in the embodiments of the present disclosure. The foregoing storage medium may be a non-transitory storage medium, such as: a USB flash drive, a mobile hard disk, a read-only memory (ROM, Read-Only Memory), a random access memory (RAM, Random Access Memory), a magnetic disk, or an optical disc, etc., which are various media that can store program codes.

[0120] The above description and drawings fully illustrate the embodiments of the present disclosure, enabling those skilled in the art to practice them. Other embodiments may include structural, logical, electrical, process, and other changes. Embodiments merely represent possible variations. Unless explicitly required, separate components and functions are optional, and the order of operations may vary. Parts and features of some embodiments may be included in or substituted for parts and features of other embodiments. Moreover, the terms used in this application are only for describing embodiments and do not limit the claims. As used in the description of the embodiments and the claims, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, the singular forms "a", "an", and "the" are intended to also include the plural forms. Similarly, as used in this application, the term "and / or" refers to any and all possible combinations including one or more of the associated listed items. Additionally, when used in this application, the term "comprise" and its variants "comprises" and / or "comprising", etc., mean the presence of the stated features, wholes, steps, operations, elements, and / or components, but do not exclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, wholes, steps, operations, elements, components, and / or groupings of these. Without further limitation, an element defined by the statement "comprising one..." does not exclude the presence of additional identical elements in the process, method, or device including the element. In this document, each embodiment may focus on the differences from other embodiments, and the same or similar parts between the embodiments may be referred to each other. For the methods, products, etc. disclosed in the embodiments, if they correspond to the method part disclosed in the embodiments, the relevant parts may refer to the description of the method part.

[0121] Those skilled in the art can realize that the units and algorithm steps of each example described in combination with the embodiments disclosed herein can be implemented by electronic hardware, or a combination of computer software and electronic hardware. Whether these functions are executed in a hardware or software manner may depend on the specific application and design constraints of the technical solution. The technician can use different methods for each specific application to implement the described functions, but such implementation should not be considered to exceed the scope of the embodiments of the present disclosure. Those skilled in the art can clearly understand that for the convenience and conciseness of description, the specific working processes of the systems, devices, and units described above can refer to the corresponding processes in the foregoing method embodiments and will not be elaborated herein.

[0122] In the embodiments disclosed herein, the disclosed methods, products (including but not limited to devices, equipment, etc.) can be implemented in other ways. For example, the device embodiments described above are merely illustrative. For example, the division of the units can be only a logical function division, and there can be other division methods in actual implementation. For example, multiple units or components can be combined or integrated into another system, or some features can be ignored or not executed. In addition, the displayed or discussed couplings or direct couplings or communication connections to each other can be through some interfaces. The indirect couplings or communication connections of devices or units can be electrical, mechanical, or other forms. The units described as separate components may or may not be physically separated. The components displayed as units may or may not be physical units, that is, they can be located in one place, or they can be distributed to multiple network units. Some or all of the units can be selected according to actual needs to implement this embodiment. In addition, in the embodiments of the present disclosure, the functional units can be integrated into a processing unit, or each unit can exist physically alone, or two or more units can be integrated into one unit.

[0123] The flowcharts and block diagrams in the accompanying drawings illustrate the architecture, functionality, and operation of possible implementations of systems, methods, and computer program products according to embodiments of the present disclosure. In this regard, each block in the flowchart or block diagram may represent a module, a segment of a program, or a portion of code, which contains one or more executable instructions for implementing a specified logical function. In some alternative implementations, the functions noted in the block may occur in an order different from that noted in the drawings. For example, two consecutive blocks may in fact be executed substantially in parallel, or they may sometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending on the functions involved. In the description corresponding to the flowcharts and block diagrams in the accompanying drawings, the operations or steps corresponding to different blocks may also occur in an order different from that disclosed in the description, and sometimes there is no specific order between different operations or steps. For example, two consecutive operations or steps may in fact be executed substantially in parallel, or they may sometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending on the functions involved. Each block in the block diagram and / or flowchart, and combinations of blocks in the block diagram and / or flowchart, may be implemented by a dedicated hardware-based system that performs the specified functions or actions, or may be implemented by a combination of dedicated hardware and computer instructions.

Claims

1. An information management method for production safety, characterized in that, Including: Determine the cumulative safety credit score based on the level of safety hazards, the rectification situation of the safety responsible person, the associated situation of the safety responsible persons at the subordinate on-the-job levels, and / or the declared level of improvement suggestions; Send score warning information or retraining information to the safety responsible person according to the cumulative safety credit score, or adjust the on-the-job level information of the safety responsible person; Among them, the level of safety hazards is determined based on the production violation behaviors of the safety responsible person, and the declared level of improvement suggestions is determined according to the declared type of improvement suggestions of the safety responsible person.

2. The information management method according to claim 1, wherein Determine the cumulative safety credit score based on the level of safety hazards, the rectification situation of the safety responsible person, the associated situation of the safety responsible persons at the subordinate on-the-job levels, and / or the declared level of improvement suggestions, including: Determine the first deduction score according to the level of safety hazards and the rectification situation of the safety responsible person; and / or determine the second deduction score and / or the first additional score according to the associated situation of the safety responsible persons at the subordinate on-the-job levels; and / or determine the second additional score according to the declared level of improvement suggestions; Deduct the first deduction score and / or the second deduction score from the original cumulative safety credit score, add the first additional score, and / or add the second additional score to obtain the updated cumulative safety credit score.

3. The information management method according to claim 2, characterized in that Determine the first deduction score according to the level of safety hazards and the rectification situation of the safety responsible person, including: When the rectification situation of the safety responsible person is that the rectification is completed within the first set rectification period, determine that the first deduction score is zero; When the rectification situation of the safety responsible person is that the rectification is not completed within the second set rectification period, determine the first deduction score according to the level of safety hazards.

4. The information management method according to claim 2, wherein Determine the second deduction score and / or the first additional score according to the associated situation of the safety responsible persons at the subordinate on-the-job levels, including: When the associated situation of the safety responsible persons at the subordinate on-the-job levels is that the safety responsible person at the subordinate node has production violation behaviors, determine the second deduction score according to the level of safety hazards corresponding to the safety responsible person at the subordinate node and the management level of the safety responsible person belonging to the subordinate node; and / or When the associated situation of the safety responsible persons at the subordinate on-the-job levels is that the safety responsible person at the subordinate node has declared improvement suggestions, determine the first additional score according to the declared level of improvement suggestions of the safety responsible person at the first-level managed subordinate node.

5. The information management method according to any one of claims 1 to 4, characterized in that, Send score warning information or retraining information to the safety responsible person according to the cumulative safety credit score, or adjust the on-the-job level information of the safety responsible person, including: When the cumulative safety credit score is less than the thirteenth score value and greater than zero, send score warning information to the safety responsible person; When the cumulative safety credit score is less than or equal to zero, send retraining information to the safety responsible person according to the frequency of clearing the cumulative safety credit score, or send information to adjust the on-the-job level to the safety responsible person.

6. The information management method according to any one of claims 1 to 4, characterized in that Also including: Send information to adjust the on-the-job level to the safety responsible person according to the downward adjustment frequency of the on-the-job level of the safety responsible person at the subordinate node.

7. An information management device for production safety, characterized in that, Including: A determination module, configured to determine an accumulated safety credit score according to the level of potential safety hazards, the rectification situation of the safety responsible person, the liability situation of the safety responsible persons at the subordinate on-the-job levels, and / or the declared level of improvement opinions; An information sending module, configured to send an integral warning message or a retraining message to the safety responsible person according to the accumulated safety credit score, or to adjust the on-the-job level information of the safety responsible person; Wherein, the level of potential safety hazards is determined according to the production violation behaviors of the safety responsible person, and the declared level of improvement opinions is determined according to the declared type of improvement opinions of the safety responsible person.

8. An information management device for production safety, comprising a processor and a memory storing program instructions, characterized in that, The processor is configured to execute the information management method for production safety according to any one of claims 1 to 6 when running the program instructions.

9. A server, characterized in that, Comprising: A server body; The information management device for production safety according to claim 7 or 8, installed on the server body.

10. A computer-readable storage medium storing program instructions, characterized in that, When running, the program instructions are used to cause the computer to execute the information management method for production safety according to any one of claims 1 to 6.

Images