Intelligent processing method for administrative examination and approval affair handling items

Abstract

The invention relates to the technical field of intelligent processing of administrative examination and approval affairs, and discloses an intelligent processing method of administrative examination and approval affairs. By acquiring and classifying historical administrative examination and approval items, the system establishes a data set and mines rules, and the examination and approval efficiency and accuracy are improved. Classification management facilitates data retrieval, application materials are summarized to form a list, and errors are reduced. A classification set is set to improve data storage and calling efficiency, and an approval strategy is dynamically updated. Acquisition of the applicant item content is helpful for rapid matching of historical cases and improvement of approval accuracy. Application items and materials are distributed to approvers, so that the responsibility is ensured to be clear, the materials are confirmed in time, and lagging is avoided. The initial application material is judged, compliance is ensured, the material meeting the requirement is quickly confirmed, the approval process is accelerated, and the overall efficiency and the user satisfaction degree are improved.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the technical field of intelligent processing of administrative approval matters, and specifically provides an intelligent processing method for administrative approval matters. Background Art

[0002] With the rapid development of society and the increasing number of administrative approval matters, traditional administrative approval processes face many problems such as low efficiency, untimely information processing, and frequent manual intervention. These problems not only lead to an extended approval cycle but also affect the applicant's experience and satisfaction. Therefore, how to improve the intelligence and automation of administrative approval has become an urgent issue to be solved.

[0003] The existing technologies mainly focus on the manual processing of administrative approvals. Traditional approval processes usually rely on manual review, and approval personnel need to check the integrity and compliance of application materials one by one. This process is not only time-consuming and laborious but also prone to errors due to human negligence, thus affecting the quality and efficiency of approvals. In addition, due to the variety and complexity of application material requirements, applicants often cannot accurately grasp the requirements when submitting materials, resulting in non-compliant submissions and increasing the cost of repeated revisions. In recent years, with the progress of artificial intelligence and big data technologies, some institutions have begun to explore intelligent approval systems. These systems attempt to conduct preliminary reviews of application materials through technologies such as automatic classification and intelligent matching, reducing manual intervention. However, existing intelligent approval systems still have some deficiencies. For example, many systems lack the ability to deeply analyze application materials and cannot accurately judge the effectiveness and compliance of materials. In addition, when processing materials submitted by applicants, existing technologies often cannot provide real-time feedback and guidance, resulting in applicants still relying on manual customer service for consultation, causing additional communication costs.

[0004] To address the above problems of existing technologies, an intelligent processing method for administrative approval matters is proposed. By obtaining and analyzing historical administrative approval matters, intelligent classification and material matching are performed to achieve a more efficient approval process. This method can not only improve the approval efficiency but also enhance the applicant's experience and reduce the possibility of repeated material submissions, thus fundamentally solving many pain points in existing technologies. Summary of the Invention

[0005] The present invention provides an intelligent processing method for administrative approval matters, which helps to solve the problems mentioned in the above background art.

[0006] The present invention provides the following technical solution: An intelligent processing method for administrative approval matters, comprising:

[0007] Obtaining a list of historical administrative approval matters;

[0008] Classify the matters in the historical administrative approval service matter list, and obtain the classification names. Create an administrative approval service matter classification set with the classification names as the names, and add the administrative approval service matters of the same type to the corresponding administrative approval service matter classification set;

[0009] Obtain and summarize the service materials submitted during the application of the administrative approval service matters of the same category, and form a list of application materials for the administrative approval service matters of the same category. Add the list to the corresponding administrative approval service matter classification set;

[0010] Set the historical administrative approval service matter classification set;

[0011] Add all the administrative approval service matter classification sets to the historical administrative approval service matter classification set;

[0012] Obtain the content of the administrative approval service matter applied by the applicant, and record it as the matter to be approved;

[0013] Obtain the category of the administrative approval service matter applied by the applicant, and record it as the category of the matter to be approved;

[0014] Match the elements with the same category as the category of the matter to be approved from the historical administrative approval service matter classification set, and obtain the list of application materials for the administrative approval service matters of the same category in the element, and record it as the initial list of application materials for the administrative approval service matter to be handled;

[0015] Assign the matter to be approved, the category of the matter to be approved, and the initial list of application materials for the administrative approval service matter to be handled to the material list approver for confirmation, and judge whether the content in the initial list of application materials for the administrative approval service matter to be handled meets the requirements of the application materials for the matter to be approved;

[0016] If the requirements are met, use the initial list of application materials for the administrative approval service matter to be handled as the list of application materials for the administrative approval service matter to be handled, and collect materials using the material distribution strategy;

[0017] If the requirements are not met, the material list approver adds, deletes, or modifies the content in the initial list of application materials for the administrative approval service matter to be handled according to the requirements of the application materials for the matter to be approved, and records the initial list of application materials for the administrative approval service matter to be handled after the operation as the list of application materials for the administrative approval service matter, and collects materials using the material distribution strategy.

[0018] Optionally, the collection of materials using the material distribution strategy specifically includes:

[0019] Match the application materials required by the applicant from the data platform according to the content of the list of application materials for the administrative approval service matter;

[0020] Traverse the application materials matched in the data platform to determine whether all the contents in the application material list for administrative approval matters are matched;

[0021] If all are matched, use the approver assignment strategy to assign the matters to be approved;

[0022] If not all are matched, establish a list of application materials submitted by the applicant, add the unmatched materials to the list of application materials submitted by the applicant, use the application material content prompt strategy to prompt the applicant to submit application materials, and use the applicant-submitted material content review strategy to review the materials submitted by the applicant;

[0023] When the materials submitted by the applicant pass the review, use the approver assignment strategy to assign the matters to be approved;

[0024] When the materials submitted by the applicant do not pass the review, use the application material modification prompt strategy to prompt the applicant until the materials submitted by the applicant pass the review, and use the approver assignment strategy to assign the matters to be approved.

[0025] Optionally, the use of the application material content prompt strategy to prompt the applicant to submit application materials specifically includes:

[0026] Obtain the content in the list of application materials submitted by the applicant, denoted as the materials to be submitted;

[0027] Obtain the type of the materials to be submitted;

[0028] When the materials to be submitted are files that need to be filled in, denote the files that need to be filled in as the files to be submitted;

[0029] Divide the content level of the files to be submitted;

[0030] Obtain the image of the files to be submitted;

[0031] Delimit the fixed content area of the image of the files to be submitted and make prompts for the delimited area;

[0032] Add the list of application materials submitted by the applicant and the image with the delimited area to a folder and send it to the applicant.

[0033] Optionally, the use of the applicant-submitted material content review strategy to review the materials submitted by the applicant specifically includes:

[0034] Obtain the application materials submitted by the applicant;

[0035] Conduct a first-level review of the application materials submitted by the applicant. The first-level review is specifically:

[0036] Obtain the name, category, and quantity of the application materials, denoted as the name of the submitted materials, the category of the submitted materials, and the quantity of the submitted materials;

[0037] Obtain the names, categories, and quantities of the materials that need to be submitted in the applicant's application material list, and record them as the names of materials to be submitted, the categories of materials to be submitted, and the quantities of materials to be submitted;

[0038] Compare whether the quantity of submitted materials is equal to the quantity of materials to be submitted;

[0039] If the quantity of submitted materials ≠ the quantity of materials to be submitted, obtain the missing materials and send them to the applicant to remind the applicant to complete them;

[0040] If the quantity of submitted materials = the quantity of materials to be submitted, compare whether the types of submitted materials are the same as the types of materials to be submitted;

[0041] If the types of submitted materials are not the same as the types of materials to be submitted, traverse and compare the types of submitted materials with the types of materials to be submitted, obtain the types of materials not submitted, and send them to the applicant to remind the applicant to complete them;

[0042] If the types of submitted materials are the same as the types of materials to be submitted, compare whether the names of submitted materials are the same as the names of materials to be submitted;

[0043] If the names of submitted materials are not the same as the names of materials to be submitted, traverse and compare the names of submitted materials with the names of materials to be submitted, obtain the files whose names do not conform to the names of materials to be submitted, form a combination of the file names that need to be modified and the corresponding correct names, and generate a file name modification file. Send the file name modification file and the files that need to be modified to the applicant to remind the applicant to modify them;

[0044] If the names of submitted materials are the same as the names of materials to be submitted, review the content of the materials submitted by the applicant.

[0045] Optionally, the review of the content of the materials submitted by the applicant specifically includes:

[0046] Scan the materials submitted by the applicant into images, and record them as images to be reviewed;

[0047] Obtain the fixed content areas in the images;

[0048] For each fixed content area, obtain the text in the fixed area, count the number of characters in the text, and detect whether the number of characters in the text meets the requirements for the number of characters in the fixed area;

[0049] If the number of characters in the fixed area does not meet the requirements for the number of characters in the fixed area, mark this material as a material that does not meet the requirements;

[0050] If the number of characters in the fixed area meets the requirements for the number of characters in the fixed area, detect whether the text in the fixed area meets the requirements for the text in the fixed area;

[0051] If the text within the fixed area does not meet the requirements for the text within the fixed area, then mark this material as non - compliant material;

[0052] If the number of characters of the text within the fixed area meets the requirements for the number of characters of the text within the fixed area, then perform document stamping detection.

[0053] Optionally, detecting whether the text within the fixed area meets the requirements for the text within the fixed area specifically includes:

[0054] Match the elements with the same category as the to - be - approved item from the classification set of historical administrative approval matters, and obtain all the sub - elements in the elements, and mark the sub - elements as historical comparison materials;

[0055] Obtain all the fixed areas in the historical comparison materials;

[0056] Compare the fixed areas at the same positions in all historical comparison materials respectively;

[0057] For any fixed area at the same position, extract the same characters in the fixed area at the same position;

[0058] If the same characters are extracted, form the characters into the character set of the text requirements for the corresponding position of the fixed area;

[0059] If no same characters are extracted, then mark the text requirements for the corresponding fixed area as an empty set, and the empty set indicates that there are no text requirements for this fixed area.

[0060] Optionally, performing document stamping detection specifically includes:

[0061] Obtain the number of stamps required in the material to be submitted;

[0062] Obtain the number of stamps that have been stamped in the image to be reviewed;

[0063] If the number of stamps that have been stamped in the image to be reviewed ≠ the number of stamps required in the material to be submitted, then obtain the number of missing stamps, and send the number of missing stamps to the applicant to remind the applicant to complete the number of stamps;

[0064] If the number of stamps that have been stamped in the image to be reviewed = the number of stamps required in the material to be submitted;

[0065] Obtain all the stamped areas in the image to be reviewed and number them;

[0066] For any stamped area;

[0067] Obtain the outermost edge of the stamp, and mark the area enclosed by the outermost edge as the target area;

[0068] Obtain the center points of all seal characters within the target area, and connect the center points of the seal characters in sequence. Denote the connecting line as the seal character connecting line;

[0069] Obtain the center points of all the characters filled in by the applicant within the target area, and connect the center points of the characters filled in by the applicant in sequence. Denote it as the filled character connecting line;

[0070] Obtain the number of intersection points between the seal character connecting line and the filled character connecting line, and denote it as the effective intersection point number;

[0071] Set the threshold for the number of intersection points of the connecting line;

[0072] If the effective intersection point number ≥ the threshold for the number of intersection points of the connecting line, then this sealed area is a valid area;

[0073] If the effective intersection point number < the threshold for the number of intersection points of the connecting line, then this sealed area is an invalid area.

[0074] Optionally, using the application material modification prompt strategy to prompt the applicant specifically includes:

[0075] Obtain the application materials that fail the seal detection, and denote them as the failed application materials;

[0076] Obtain all the invalid areas and take screenshots;

[0077] Obtain the number of the sealed area in the image to be reviewed for the screenshot of the invalid area;

[0078] Name the screenshot of the invalid area with the corresponding number obtained;

[0079] Obtain any historical approved matter that is the same as the matter to be approved;

[0080] Obtain the materials in the application materials of the historical approved matter that are the same as the failed application materials, and denote them as the comparison materials;

[0081] Obtain the same positions as the invalid areas in the failed application materials in the comparison materials and take screenshots, which are denoted as the comparison screenshots;

[0082] Save the comparison screenshots with the name of the screenshot of the invalid area + comparison character;

[0083] Form a seal modification group with the invalid screenshots and the corresponding comparison screenshots;

[0084] Add the seal modification group and the failed application materials to the modification folder and send them to the applicant.

[0085] Optionally, using the approver assignment strategy to assign the matter to be approved specifically includes:

[0086] Obtain the level of the administrative approval matters applied by the applicant, denoted as the level to be approved;

[0087] Obtain the approver(s) matching the level to be approved;

[0088] Obtain the current working status and the number of matters to be approved of all the matching approvers;

[0089] If there is an approver with an idle working status among the matched approvers, randomly assign an idle approver to approve the administrative application;

[0090] If the working status of all the matched approvers is busy, compare the number of matters to be approved of the approvers, and assign an approver with the least number of matters to be approved to approve the administrative application.

[0091] The present invention has the following beneficial effects:

[0092] 1. By summarizing and analyzing past approval matters, the system can establish a comprehensive database, providing important data support for subsequent classification and matching. This process helps to uncover the patterns and trends in historical data, providing reference for the approval of new applications, thereby improving the approval efficiency and accuracy. The process of classifying historical administrative approval matters helps to manage information systematically. Through clear classification, data retrieval and material matching can be carried out more conveniently. Summarizing the materials submitted for administrative approval matters of the same category to form a list can effectively reduce information errors. Setting up a classification set of historical administrative approval matters is an important step in establishing an information system. The construction of this set enables the system to store and call relevant data more efficiently, forming a good information management system. Through the maintenance of the classification set, the system can dynamically update and optimize the approval strategy to meet the needs of different application situations. The step of obtaining the content of the administrative approval matters applied for by the applicant enables the system to accurately understand the current application requirements and clarify the category of the application matters, helping the system to quickly screen and match in the vast amount of data. By matching the categories of historical administrative approval matters, the system can effectively utilize the existing data resources, improving the accuracy and efficiency of approval. This process can help the approval personnel quickly find similar historical cases and refer to their processing results, reducing incorrect decisions caused by insufficient information. Assigning the application matters and the relevant material list to the approval personnel can ensure clear responsibilities at each link and improve work efficiency. This process enables the approval personnel to confirm and review the materials in a timely manner, avoiding the problem of information lag. Judging the initial application materials can ensure the compliance and integrity of each application. Determining the list of application materials that meet the requirements as the official to-do matters can speed up the approval process. The approval personnel modifying the material list according to the requirements can ensure the accuracy and compliance of the application. Through this dynamic adjustment, the system can correct problems in a timely manner, avoiding subsequent troubles caused by non-compliant materials. This process not only improves the quality of the materials but also reduces the time delay caused by the applicant modifying the materials, thereby enhancing the overall approval efficiency and user satisfaction.

[0093] 2. By matching the application materials required by the applicant from the data platform, the system can quickly and accurately obtain the necessary information. This process ensures that the approval personnel can retrieve relevant materials from the standardized database, reducing approval delays caused by incomplete or incorrect information. Through effective matching, the system can also reduce manual intervention, improve work efficiency, and at the same time reduce the number of materials submitted by the applicant; traversing and judging whether the matched application materials are complete is an important step to ensure the compliance of the application materials. Through this check, the system can promptly identify missing or non-compliant parts of the materials, avoiding problems in the subsequent approval stage; once all application materials are successfully matched, the use of the approver assignment strategy for the allocation of matters to be approved can quickly advance the approval process; in the case where not all materials are matched, establishing a list of materials submitted by the applicant and recording the missing parts ensures the integrity and accuracy of the information. By clearly listing the materials that need to be supplemented, the system can effectively guide the applicant to make corrections. This measure not only helps improve the compliance of the application materials but also reduces subsequent problems caused by incomplete information; by implementing the application material content prompt strategy, the system can clearly convey to the applicant the specific materials required; adopting the material review strategy to review the materials submitted by the applicant can effectively ensure the accuracy and compliance of the materials. Through the systematic review process, the approval personnel can quickly identify errors or non-compliant parts in the materials, thus reducing the subsequent review burden; after the materials submitted by the applicant pass the review, immediately using the approver assignment strategy for the allocation of matters to be approved can significantly speed up the approval process. This mechanism ensures that the materials passing the review can be processed in a timely manner, avoiding unnecessary delays; in the case where the materials do not pass the review, using the application material modification prompt strategy can effectively guide the applicant to make necessary modifications.

[0094] 3. By obtaining the list of materials submitted by the applicant and recording it as the materials to be submitted, the system can establish clear requirements for application documents. This process ensures that all required materials are clearly listed, thus reducing the risk of the applicant omitting documents. Identifying the types of materials to be submitted can help the system classify and process different types of documents. This classification not only makes the management of materials more orderly but also provides basic data for subsequent review and approval. Classifying the levels of the content to be filled in the documents to be submitted enables the applicant to more clearly understand the importance and filling requirements of each part. Obtaining the images of the documents to be submitted can ensure that the system has visual material records, providing a direct basis for subsequent review. Designating fixed content areas for the images of the documents to be submitted can ensure that the applicant accurately focuses on the key parts during the filling process. This process provides clear visual guidance, reducing application problems caused by filling errors or omissions. By prompting specific areas, the system can guide the applicant to ensure the integrity of all necessary information, helping to improve the compliance and quality of materials. Organizing and sending the list of materials submitted by the applicant and the images with designated areas to the applicant can effectively improve the efficiency and transparency of communication. This process ensures that the applicant timely obtains the specific guidance they need, enabling them to more accurately prepare and modify application materials.

[0095] 4. Obtaining the application materials submitted by the applicant is the first step in the approval process, laying the foundation for the entire review process. Conducting a primary review of the application materials is an important step to ensure the quality of the materials. This link can promptly detect and correct potential problems, thereby improving the efficiency and accuracy of subsequent reviews. The primary review can not only help the reviewers screen out non-compliant materials, avoid waste of resources, but also reduce the burden on subsequent review links, ensuring a smoother approval process. Through this process, the system can enhance the compliance and integrity of application materials at the earliest stage, thus reducing the risk of review delays caused by document problems. By obtaining the names, categories, and quantities of the application materials, the system can provide clear criteria and basis for subsequent reviews. Obtaining the detailed information of the materials to be submitted enables the system to clearly understand the specific materials required for the application.

[0096] 5. The process of comparing the quantity of submitted materials with the quantity of materials to be submitted helps to quickly identify the completeness of the materials. This step ensures that all necessary documents have been submitted, thus reducing the risk of approval delays due to missing materials. If the quantities do not match, the system can promptly send a reminder to the applicant to guide them in completing the materials; If a mismatch in the quantity of materials is found, promptly obtaining the missing materials and sending a reminder helps to quickly resolve potential issues. This step, through proactive communication, ensures that the applicant understands the specific content that is missing, avoiding repeated revisions and time waste due to ambiguity; In the case where the quantity of materials is in line, the process of further comparing the types of materials is an important step in ensuring the compliance of the application materials. This step helps the reviewers confirm that the submitted materials meet the requirements and reduces review issues caused by type mismatches; By traversing and comparing the types of submitted materials, the system can accurately identify the missing material types and promptly remind the applicant to complete them. This process provides clear feedback to the applicant, helping them understand the specific materials that need to be supplemented, thus accelerating the improvement and submission of the materials; After confirming that the material types match, the step of further comparing the material names ensures the accuracy of the application materials. This process can promptly detect potential naming errors or inconsistencies, thus avoiding approval delays caused by non-compliant material names; By traversing and comparing the inconsistent material names and sending modification suggestions to the applicant, the system can effectively improve the compliance of the application materials; In the case where the material names are consistent, the review of the content of the materials submitted by the applicant begins. This step is a key part of the entire approval process. By carefully reviewing the material content, it is ensured that it meets the application requirements and standards. This process not only improves the compliance of the materials but also provides a reliable basis for subsequent approval decisions. In this way, the reviewers can ensure that each submitted material has been strictly reviewed, reducing the risk of errors and omissions, thus improving the overall approval efficiency and applicant satisfaction.

[0097] 6. Scanning the materials submitted by the applicant into images is an important step in the digital approval process. This process ensures that all paper materials are converted into electronic format, facilitating subsequent storage, processing, and review. Digitalization not only improves the accessibility of the materials but also provides a convenient and fast query method for the system; Counting the number of words in the text within the fixed content area is a key step in ensuring the compliance of the application materials. Through this process, the system can quickly determine whether the materials meet the specified word count requirements, thus avoiding the disqualification of materials due to insufficient word count; If the number of words in the text within the fixed area does not meet the requirements, marking the materials as non-compliant helps to promptly address potential issues; After ensuring that the word count meets the requirements, further detecting the compliance of the text content is an important link in ensuring the quality of the materials. This process ensures its compliance with relevant standards and requirements through the review of the text content, thereby further improving the effectiveness of the materials; If the text within the fixed area does not meet the requirements, marking the materials as non-compliant can promptly identify and handle potential problems; After confirming that the word count of the text meets the requirements, performing document stamping detection is an important step in ensuring the legality of the application materials. This link can verify the authenticity and effectiveness of the materials, preventing compliance issues caused by the lack of stamping. Through this inspection, the reviewers can ensure that all submitted documents have been formally approved, thereby enhancing the credibility of the materials.

[0098] 7. By matching elements with the same category as the matter to be approved from the historical classification set of administrative approval matters and extracting their sub-elements, historical comparison materials are formed. This process provides an important reference basis for approval. The historical comparison materials can provide the system with the handling experience of past similar cases and information on the required materials, thus helping it formulate reasonable review criteria; obtaining all the fixed areas in the historical comparison materials helps to focus the key points of the review work. By identifying and extracting the key content areas, the system can quickly focus on the most important information in the approval process. This method not only improves the review efficiency but also reduces the time cost of information search; comparing the fixed areas at the same positions in all the historical comparison materials can effectively identify the consistency and differences between the materials; extracting the same characters in the fixed areas at the same positions provides an effective tool for ensuring the consistency of the material content. This process can help the reviewers verify the accuracy and legality of the materials, thus reducing the review problems caused by inappropriate content. By extracting the same characters, the system can establish a set of standardized text requirements, which not only improves the transparency of the approval but also provides clear guidance for the applicants. In addition, this method can enhance the control of the content of the application materials, ensure that all the submitted information complies with the specifications, and thus improve the overall efficiency of the approval process; if the same characters are successfully extracted, they are formed into a character set of the text requirements for the fixed areas, providing a clear standard for the review. This character set can be used as an important basis for subsequent material review to ensure that the content of all application materials complies with the set specifications; if the same characters cannot be extracted, the text requirements for the corresponding fixed areas are recorded as an empty set. This measure can timely identify the content that does not require specific requirements. In this way, the system can more flexibly process the materials with low text requirements, thus simplifying the review process.

[0099] 8. By understanding the number of stamps required for each piece of material, the system can effectively determine whether the applicant's materials comply with the regulations, reducing delays caused by incomplete materials during the review process; obtaining the number of stamps already affixed in the image to be reviewed can intuitively reflect the integrity and compliance of the application materials; when the number of stamps already affixed in the image to be reviewed does not match the stamp requirements in the materials to be submitted, promptly identify the missing number of stamps and send a reminder to ensure that the applicant can quickly complete the materials; when the number of stamps already affixed in the image to be reviewed matches the required number, obtain all the stamped areas and number them, providing a clear structure for subsequent review work. This process ensures that each stamped area can be reviewed one by one, reducing review errors caused by omission or oversight; obtaining the outermost edge of the stamp and defining the target area lays the foundation for subsequent image analysis. This process can help the system accurately locate the scope of each stamp, avoiding misjudgment caused by improper stamp position; extracting the center points of the stamp text within the target area and connecting them to form connecting lines provides specific data support for subsequent image analysis; obtaining the center points of the applicant's filled-in text within the target area and forming connecting lines can help the system compare the applicant's filled-in content with the stamp information; setting the intersection line can prevent the filled-in text from being tampered with; calculating the number of intersections between the connecting lines of the stamp text and the connecting lines of the filled-in text helps to evaluate the effectiveness and compliance of the materials. This data can intuitively reflect the matching degree between the applicant's filled-in information and the stamp content, thus providing a clear judgment basis for the system. Through the analysis of the number of valid intersections, the review personnel can quickly identify whether the materials meet the requirements, reducing approval problems caused by inconsistent information; setting the threshold for the number of intersections of the connecting lines provides a clear standard for subsequent material review. This threshold can help the system quickly determine whether a stamped area is valid; when the number of valid intersections reaches or exceeds the threshold, the stamped area is determined to be a valid area, which helps to improve the scientificity and efficiency of the review. This judgment standard ensures that only the stamped areas that meet the requirements are recognized, thus reducing approval problems caused by non-compliant materials; determining the stamped areas with the number of valid intersections below the threshold as invalid areas helps to strictly control the quality of material review. This measure can prevent approval errors caused by improper stamping and ensure that all reviewed materials meet the specified requirements.

[0100] 9. By obtaining the application materials that fail the seal inspection and marking them as "failed application materials", the system can clearly identify the materials that need to be corrected; obtaining all the invalid areas and taking screenshots provides clear visual evidence for subsequent material feedback and correction. This process helps the system intuitively display the specific areas with problems, making it clearer for applicants to understand the material issues; associating the screenshots of the invalid areas with the seal area numbers in the image to be reviewed provides systematic information for subsequent material review and feedback; naming the screenshots of the invalid areas with the corresponding numbers makes subsequent document management and retrieval more convenient; obtaining the historical approved service items that are the same as the service item to be approved provides successful cases for the system to refer to; by taking screenshots of the same positions in the materials as the invalid areas of the failed application materials, the system can effectively show specific problems to the applicants, reducing the understanding deviation caused by written descriptions; naming the comparison screenshots with the screenshot name of the invalid area plus the comparison character enhances the systematic management of the documents. This naming method is not only convenient for subsequent searching and review, but also helps the system clearly distinguish different materials and review criteria. At the same time, this method also provides clear reference for the applicants, enabling them to accurately grasp the parts that need to be adjusted when modifying the materials, promoting the improvement of material compliance; through this structured modification, the system can manage and track the material modification process more systematically, reducing repeated submissions due to non-compliant materials. At the same time, this method also improves the communication efficiency between the applicants and the system, making the material review process smoother; adding the seal modification group and the failed application materials to the modification folder and sending them to the applicants can effectively convey the review feedback information to the applicants.

[0101] 10. By obtaining the level of the administrative approval matters applied for by the applicant and marking it as the "pending approval level", the review process can be better classified and managed. Approval matters of different levels may have different complexities and processing requirements, and this information is crucial for allocating suitable approvers; obtaining the approvers matching the pending approval level helps achieve accurate matching during the review process; obtaining the current working status and the number of pending approval matters of all matching approvers provides an important basis for reasonably allocating approval tasks. This information can help managers understand the workload of each approver in real time, thereby achieving efficient human resource management. By analyzing the working status and the number of pending matters of each approver, it is possible to effectively prevent the reduction in efficiency caused by some approvers due to excessive work; if there is an approver with an idle working status among the matching approvers, randomly allocating an idle approver helps achieve efficient resource utilization. The random allocation method can avoid subjective biases among approval personnel and at the same time quickly respond to the applicant's need for administrative approval; when all matching approvers are busy, by comparing the number of pending approval matters and allocating to the approver with the least number of pending approval matters, the resource allocation can be effectively optimized. This approach ensures that the approval work will not be affected by the excessive workload of the approver, thus maintaining the efficiency of the approval. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0102] Figure 1 It is a schematic diagram of the process of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS

[0103] Next, the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in the embodiments of the present invention. Obviously, the described embodiments are only a part of the embodiments of the present invention, rather than all of the embodiments. Based on the embodiments of the present invention, all other embodiments obtained by those of ordinary skill in the art without creative efforts shall fall within the protection scope of the present invention.

[0104] Embodiment, referring to Figure 1 , an intelligent processing method for administrative approval matters, including:

[0105] Obtain a list of historical administrative approval matters;

[0106] Classify the matters in the list of historical administrative approval matters and obtain the classification names. Create an administrative approval matter classification set with the classification names as the names, and add the administrative approval matters of the same type to the corresponding administrative approval matter classification set;

[0107] Obtain the materials submitted during the application of administrative approval matters of the same category, summarize them, and form a list of application materials for administrative approval matters of the same category. Add the list to the corresponding classification set of administrative approval matters.

[0108] Set up a classification set of historical administrative approval matters.

[0109] Add all the classification sets of administrative approval matters to the classification set of historical administrative approval matters.

[0110] Obtain the content of the administrative approval matter applied by the applicant, which is recorded as the matter to be approved.

[0111] Obtain the category of the administrative approval matter applied by the applicant, which is recorded as the category of the matter to be approved.

[0112] Match the elements with the same category as the category of the matter to be approved from the classification set of historical administrative approval matters, and obtain the list of application materials for administrative approval matters of the same category in the element, which is recorded as the initial list of application materials for the administrative approval matter to be handled.

[0113] Assign the matter to be approved, the category of the matter to be approved, and the initial list of application materials for the administrative approval matter to be handled to the personnel responsible for approving the material list to confirm whether the content in the initial list of application materials for the administrative approval matter to be handled meets the requirements of the application materials for the matter to be approved.

[0114] If the requirements are met, use the initial list of application materials for the administrative approval matter to be handled as the list of application materials for the administrative approval matter to be handled, and use the material distribution strategy to collect materials.

[0115] If the requirements are not met, the personnel responsible for approving the material list add, delete, or modify the content in the initial list of application materials for the administrative approval matter to be handled according to the requirements of the application materials for the matter to be approved. Record the initial list of application materials for the administrative approval matter to be handled after the operation as the list of application materials for the administrative approval matter, and use the material distribution strategy to collect materials.

[0116] By summarizing and analyzing past approval matters, the system can establish a comprehensive database, providing important data support for subsequent classification and matching. This process helps to uncover the patterns and trends in historical data, providing reference for the approval of new applications, thereby improving the approval efficiency and accuracy. The process of classifying historical administrative approval matters helps to systematically manage information. Through clear classification, data retrieval and material matching can be more convenient. Summarizing the materials submitted for administrative approval matters of the same category to form a list can effectively reduce information errors. Setting up a classification set of historical administrative approval matters is an important step in establishing an information system. The construction of this set enables the system to store and call relevant data more efficiently, forming a good information management system. Through the maintenance of the classification set, the system can dynamically update and optimize the approval strategy to meet the needs of different application situations. The step of obtaining the content of the administrative approval matter applied for by the applicant enables the system to accurately understand the current application requirements and clarify the category of the application matter, helping the system to quickly screen and match in the vast amount of data. By matching the categories of historical administrative approval matters, the system can effectively utilize the existing data resources, improving the accuracy and efficiency of approval. This process can help the approval personnel quickly find similar historical cases and refer to their handling results, reducing wrong decisions caused by insufficient information. Assigning the application matter and the relevant material list to the approval personnel can ensure clear responsibilities for each link and improve work efficiency. This process enables the approval personnel to promptly confirm and review the materials, avoiding the problem of information lag. Judging the initial application materials can ensure the compliance and integrity of each application. Determining the list of application materials that meet the requirements as the official to-do matters can speed up the approval process. The approval personnel modifying the material list according to the requirements can ensure the accuracy and compliance of the application. Through this dynamic adjustment, the system can promptly correct problems, avoiding subsequent troubles caused by non-conforming materials. This process not only improves the quality of the materials but also reduces the time delay caused by the applicant modifying the materials, thereby enhancing the overall approval efficiency and user satisfaction.

[0117] The use of the material distribution strategy for material collection specifically includes:

[0118] Matching the application materials required by the applicant from the data platform according to the content of the application material list for the administrative approval matter;

[0119] Traversing the application materials matched from the data platform and judging whether all the content in the application material list for the administrative approval matter is matched;

[0120] If all are matched, then use the approver assignment strategy to assign the to-be-approved matter;

[0121] If not all are matched, create a list of application materials submitted by the applicant and add the unmatched materials to the list. Use the application material content prompting strategy to prompt the applicant to submit application materials, and use the applicant-submitted material content review strategy to review the materials submitted by the applicant;

[0122] When the materials submitted by the applicant pass the review, use the approver assignment strategy to assign the matters to be approved;

[0123] When the materials submitted by the applicant do not pass the review, use the application material modification prompting strategy to prompt the applicant until the materials submitted by the applicant pass the review, and use the approver assignment strategy to assign the matters to be approved.

[0124] By matching the applicant's required application materials from the data platform, the system can quickly and accurately obtain the necessary information. This process ensures that the approval personnel can retrieve relevant materials from the standardized database, reducing approval delays caused by incomplete or incorrect information. Through effective matching, the system can also reduce manual intervention, improve work efficiency, and at the same time reduce the number of materials submitted by the applicant; traversing the matched application materials and judging whether they are complete is an important step to ensure the compliance of the application materials. Through this inspection, the system can timely identify the missing or non-compliant parts of the materials, avoiding problems in the subsequent approval stage; once all application materials are successfully matched, use the approver assignment strategy to assign the matters to be approved, which can quickly promote the approval process; in the case of not matching all materials, create a list of materials submitted by the applicant and record the missing parts, ensuring the integrity and accuracy of the information. By clearly listing the materials that need to be supplemented, the system can effectively guide the applicant to make corrections. This measure not only helps to improve the compliance of the application materials but also reduces subsequent problems caused by incomplete information; by implementing the application material content prompting strategy, the system can clearly convey to the applicant the specific materials required; adopting the material review strategy to review the materials submitted by the applicant can effectively ensure the accuracy and compliance of the materials. Through the systematic review process, the approval personnel can quickly identify the errors or non-compliant places in the materials, thus reducing the subsequent review burden; when the materials submitted by the applicant pass the review, immediately use the approver assignment strategy to assign the matters to be approved, which can significantly speed up the approval process. This mechanism ensures that the materials passing the review can be processed in a timely manner, avoiding unnecessary delays; in the case of the materials not passing the review, using the application material modification prompting strategy can effectively guide the applicant to make necessary modifications.

[0125] The use of the application material content prompting strategy to prompt the applicant to submit application materials specifically includes:

[0126] Obtain the content in the applicant's submitted application material list, and record it as the materials to be submitted;

[0127] Obtain the types of the materials to be submitted;

[0128] When the materials to be submitted are documents that need to be filled out, record the documents that need to be filled out as the documents to be submitted;

[0129] Classify the content levels of the documents to be submitted;

[0130] Obtain the images of the documents to be submitted;

[0131] Define the fixed content areas for the images of the documents to be submitted, and give prompts for the defined areas;

[0132] Add the applicant's submitted application material list and the image with defined areas to a folder and send it to the applicant.

[0133] By obtaining the applicant's submitted material list and recording it as the materials to be submitted, the system can establish clear requirements for application documents. This process ensures that all required materials are clearly listed, thus reducing the risk of applicants omitting documents. Identifying the types of the materials to be submitted can help the system classify and process different types of documents. This classification not only makes the management of materials more orderly but also provides basic data for subsequent review and approval. Classifying the content levels of the documents to be submitted enables applicants to more clearly understand the importance and filling requirements of each part. Obtaining the images of the documents to be submitted can ensure that the system has visual material records, providing a direct basis for subsequent review. Defining the fixed content areas for the images of the documents to be submitted can ensure that applicants accurately focus on the key parts during the filling process. This process provides clear visual guidance, reducing application problems caused by filling errors or omissions. By prompting specific areas, the system can guide applicants to ensure the completeness of all necessary information, helping to improve the compliance and quality of materials. Organizing and sending the applicant's submitted material list and the image with defined areas to the applicant can effectively improve the efficiency and transparency of communication. This process ensures that applicants can obtain the specific guidance they need in a timely manner, enabling them to more accurately prepare and modify application materials.

[0134] The strategy for reviewing the applicant's submitted materials using the applicant's submitted material content review strategy specifically includes:

[0135] Obtain the applicant's submitted application materials;

[0136] Conduct a first-level review of the applicant's submitted application materials. The first-level review is specifically as follows:

[0137] Obtain the name, category, and quantity of the application materials, and record them as the submitted material name, submitted material category, and submitted material quantity;

[0138] Obtain the names, categories, and quantities of the materials to be submitted in the applicant's application material list, denoted as the names of materials to be submitted, the categories of materials to be submitted, and the quantities of materials to be submitted;

[0139] Compare whether the quantity of submitted materials is equal to the quantity of materials to be submitted;

[0140] If the quantity of submitted materials ≠ the quantity of materials to be submitted, obtain the missing materials and send them to the applicant to remind the applicant to complete them;

[0141] If the quantity of submitted materials = the quantity of materials to be submitted, compare whether the types of submitted materials are the same as the types of materials to be submitted;

[0142] If the types of submitted materials are not the same as the types of materials to be submitted, traverse and compare the types of submitted materials with the types of materials to be submitted, obtain the types of materials not submitted, and send them to the applicant to remind the applicant to complete them;

[0143] If the types of submitted materials are the same as the types of materials to be submitted, compare whether the names of submitted materials are the same as the names of materials to be submitted;

[0144] If the names of submitted materials are not the same as the names of materials to be submitted, traverse and compare the names of submitted materials with the names of materials to be submitted, obtain the files whose names do not conform to the names of materials to be submitted, form a combination of the file names to be modified and the corresponding correct names, and generate a file name modification file. Send the file name modification file and the files to be modified to the applicant to remind the applicant to modify them;

[0145] If the names of submitted materials are the same as the names of materials to be submitted, review the content of the materials submitted by the applicant.

[0146] Obtaining the application materials submitted by the applicant is the first step in the approval process, laying the foundation for the entire review process. Conducting a primary review of the application materials is an important step in ensuring the quality of the materials. This step can promptly identify and correct potential problems, thereby improving the efficiency and accuracy of subsequent reviews. The primary review not only helps reviewers screen out non-compliant materials, avoiding resource waste, but also reduces the burden on subsequent review links, ensuring a smoother approval process. Through this process, the system can enhance the compliance and integrity of the application materials at the earliest stage, thereby reducing the risk of review delays caused by document problems. By obtaining the names, categories, and quantities of the application materials, the system can provide clear criteria and a basis for subsequent reviews. Obtaining the detailed information of the materials to be submitted enables the system to clearly understand the specific materials required for the application. The process of comparing the quantity of the submitted materials with the quantity of the materials to be submitted helps quickly identify the completeness of the materials. This step ensures that all necessary documents have been submitted, thereby reducing the risk of approval delays due to missing materials. If the quantities do not match, the system can promptly send a reminder to the applicant to guide them to complete the materials. If it is found that the quantity of the materials does not match, promptly obtaining the missing materials and sending a reminder helps quickly resolve potential problems. This step, through proactive communication, ensures that the applicant understands the specific content that is missing, avoiding repeated revisions and time waste caused by ambiguity. In the case where the quantity of the materials is consistent, the further process of comparing the types of the materials is an important step in ensuring the compliance of the application materials. This step helps reviewers confirm that the submitted materials meet the requirements, reducing review problems caused by type mismatches. By traversing and comparing the types of the submitted materials, the system can accurately identify the missing material types and promptly remind the applicant to complete them. This process provides clear feedback to the applicant, helping them understand the specific materials that need to be supplemented, thereby accelerating the improvement and submission of the materials. After confirming that the types of the materials match, the further process of comparing the names of the materials ensures the accuracy of the application materials. This process can promptly identify potential naming errors or inconsistencies, thereby avoiding review delays caused by non-compliant material names. By traversing and comparing the inconsistent material names and sending modification suggestions to the applicant, the system can effectively enhance the compliance of the application materials. In the case where the names of the materials are consistent, the review of the content of the materials submitted by the applicant begins. This step is a key part of the entire approval process. By carefully reviewing the content of the materials, it is ensured that they meet the application requirements and standards. This process not only improves the compliance of the materials but also provides a reliable basis for subsequent approval decisions. In this way, reviewers can ensure that each submitted material has been strictly examined, reducing the risk of errors and omissions, thereby enhancing the overall approval efficiency and the applicant's satisfaction.

[0147] The review of the content of the materials submitted by the applicant specifically includes:

[0148] Scan the materials submitted by the applicant into images, which are denoted as the images to be reviewed;

[0149] Obtain the fixed content areas in the images;

[0150] For each fixed content area, obtain the text within the fixed area, count the number of characters in the text, and detect whether the number of characters in the text meets the requirements for the number of characters in the fixed area;

[0151] If the number of characters in the fixed area does not meet the requirements for the number of characters in the fixed area, mark the material as a non - compliant material;

[0152] If the number of characters in the fixed area meets the requirements for the number of characters in the fixed area, detect whether the text in the fixed area meets the requirements for the text in the fixed area;

[0153] If the text in the fixed area does not meet the requirements for the text in the fixed area, mark the material as a non - compliant material;

[0154] If the number of characters in the fixed area meets the requirements for the number of characters in the fixed area, perform file stamp detection.

[0155] Scanning the materials submitted by the applicant into images is an important step in the digital approval process. This process ensures that all paper materials are converted into electronic format, facilitating subsequent storage, processing, and review. Digitalization not only improves the accessibility of materials but also provides a convenient and fast query method for the system; Counting the number of characters in the text within the fixed content area is a key step in ensuring the compliance of application materials. Through this process, the system can quickly determine whether the materials meet the specified character count requirements, thus avoiding material non - compliance caused by insufficient character count; If the number of characters in the fixed area does not meet the requirements, marking the material as non - compliant helps to promptly address potential issues; After ensuring that the character count meets the requirements, further detecting the compliance of the text content is an important link in ensuring the quality of materials. This process ensures that the text content meets relevant standards and requirements through text content review, thereby further improving the effectiveness of materials; If the text in the fixed area does not meet the requirements, marking it as a non - compliant material can promptly identify and handle potential problems; After confirming that the character count meets the requirements, performing file stamp detection is an important step in ensuring the legality of application materials. This link can verify the authenticity and effectiveness of materials, preventing compliance issues caused by the lack of a stamp. Through this inspection, reviewers can ensure that all submitted documents have been formally approved, thus enhancing the credibility of the materials.

[0156] The detection of whether the text in the fixed area meets the requirements for the text in the fixed area specifically includes:

[0157] Match the elements with the same category as the matter to be approved from the historical administrative approval matter classification set, and obtain all the sub-elements in the elements, and record the sub-elements as historical comparison materials;

[0158] Obtain all the fixed areas in the historical comparison materials;

[0159] Compare the fixed areas at the same positions in all the historical comparison materials respectively;

[0160] For any fixed area at the same position, extract the same characters of the fixed areas at the same position. The same characters are when "xxxxx Company" appears in all the fixed areas at the same position, then "Company" is the same character of this fixed area. At the same time, multiple same characters of the fixed areas at the same position are allowed. For example, when "xxx Province" also appears in this fixed area, the same characters of this fixed area are "Company, Province";

[0161] If the same characters are extracted, form the same character set of the fixed area text at the corresponding position;

[0162] If no same characters are extracted, record the fixed area text requirements at the corresponding position as an empty set, and the empty set indicates that there are no text requirements for this fixed area.

[0163] By matching elements with the same category as the matter to be approved from the historical classification set of administrative approval matters and extracting their sub-elements, a historical comparison material is formed. This process provides an important reference basis for approval. The historical comparison material can provide the system with the processing experience of past similar cases and information on the required materials, thus helping it to formulate reasonable review criteria; obtaining all fixed areas in the historical comparison material helps to focus the key points of the review work. By identifying and extracting key content areas, the system can quickly focus on the most important information in the approval process. This method not only improves the review efficiency but also reduces the time cost of information search; comparing the fixed areas at the same positions in all historical comparison materials can effectively identify the consistency and differences between the materials; extracting the same characters in the fixed areas at the same positions provides an effective tool to ensure the consistency of the material content. This process can help the reviewers verify the accuracy and legality of the materials, thus reducing review problems caused by inappropriate content. By extracting the same characters, the system can establish a set of standardized text requirements, which not only improves the transparency of the approval but also provides clear guidance for the applicants. In addition, this method can enhance the control of the content of the application materials, ensure that all submitted information meets the specifications, and thus improve the overall efficiency of the approval process; if the same characters are successfully extracted, they are formed into a character set of fixed area text requirements, providing a clear standard for the review. This character set can be used as an important basis for subsequent material review to ensure that the content of all application materials meets the set specifications; if the same characters are not extracted, the fixed area text requirements for the corresponding positions are recorded as an empty set. This measure can timely identify the content that does not require specific requirements. In this way, the system can more flexibly process materials with low text requirements, thus simplifying the review process.

[0164] The said file seal detection specifically includes:

[0165] Obtain the number of seals required in the material to be submitted;

[0166] Obtain the number of seals already stamped in the image to be reviewed;

[0167] If the number of seals already stamped in the image to be reviewed ≠ the number of seals required in the material to be submitted, obtain the number of missing seals and send the number of missing seals to the applicant to remind the applicant to complete the number of seals;

[0168] If the number of seals already stamped in the image to be reviewed = the number of seals required in the material to be submitted;

[0169] Obtain all the stamped areas in the image to be reviewed and number them;

[0170] For any one stamped area;

[0171] Obtain the outermost edge of the seal, and record the area enclosed by the outermost edge as the target area;

[0172] Obtain the center points of all seal characters within the target area, and connect the center points of the seal characters in sequence. Denote the connecting lines as the seal character connecting lines;

[0173] Obtain the center points of all the characters filled in by the applicant within the target area, and connect the center points of the characters filled in by the applicant in sequence. Denote it as the filled character connecting line;

[0174] Obtain the number of intersection points between the seal character connecting line and the filled character connecting line, and denote it as the effective intersection point number;

[0175] Set a threshold for the number of intersection points of the connecting lines. The threshold for the number of intersection points of the connecting lines is used to define the intersection situation between the characters filled in the sealing area and the characters on the seal. The more the number of intersection points, the more standard the sealing is, and vice versa;

[0176] If the effective intersection point number ≥ the threshold for the number of intersection points of the connecting lines, then this sealing area is a valid area;

[0177] If the effective intersection point number < the threshold for the number of intersection points of the connecting lines, then this sealing area is an invalid area.

[0178] By understanding the number of stamps required for each piece of material, the system can effectively determine whether the applicant's materials comply with the regulations, reducing delays caused by incomplete materials during the review process; obtaining the number of stamps already affixed in the image to be reviewed can intuitively reflect the integrity and compliance of the application materials; when the number of stamps already affixed in the image to be reviewed does not match the stamp requirements in the materials to be submitted, promptly identify the missing number of stamps and send a reminder to ensure that the applicant can quickly complete the materials; when the number of stamps already affixed in the image to be reviewed matches the required number, obtain all the stamped areas and number them, providing a clear structure for subsequent review work. This process ensures that each stamped area can be reviewed one by one, reducing review errors caused by omission or negligence; obtaining the outermost edge of the stamp and defining the target area lays the foundation for subsequent image analysis. This process can help the system accurately locate the scope of each stamp, avoiding misjudgment caused by improper stamp placement; extracting the center points of the stamp text within the target area and connecting them to form connection lines provides specific data support for subsequent image analysis; obtaining the center points of the applicant's filled-in text within the target area and forming connection lines can help the system compare the applicant's filled-in content with the stamp information; calculating the number of intersection points between the connection lines of the stamp text and the connection lines of the filled-in text helps to evaluate the effectiveness and compliance of the materials. This data can intuitively reflect the matching degree between the applicant's filled-in information and the stamp content, thus providing a clear judgment basis for the system. Through the analysis of the number of valid intersection points, the reviewers can quickly identify whether the materials meet the requirements, reducing approval problems caused by inconsistent information; setting a threshold for the number of intersection points of the connection lines provides a clear standard for subsequent material review. This threshold can help the system quickly determine whether a stamped area is valid; when the number of valid intersection points reaches or exceeds the threshold, determine the stamped area as a valid area, which helps to improve the scientific nature and efficiency of the review. This judgment standard ensures that only the stamped areas that meet the requirements are recognized, thus reducing approval problems caused by non-compliant materials; determining the stamped areas with the number of valid intersection points lower than the threshold as invalid areas helps to strictly control the quality of material review. This measure can prevent approval errors caused by improper stamping and ensure that all reviewed materials meet the specified requirements.

[0179] The prompting of the applicant using the application material modification prompt strategy specifically includes:

[0180] Obtain the application materials that fail the stamp detection and record them as the application materials that fail;

[0181] Obtain all the invalid areas and take screenshots;

[0182] Obtain the numbers of the stamped areas in the screenshot of the invalid area in the image to be reviewed;

[0183] Name the screenshot of the invalid area with the corresponding number obtained;

[0184] Obtain any historical approved business item that is the same as the business item to be approved;

[0185] Obtain the materials in the application materials of the historical approved business item that are the same as the unapproved application materials, and record them as comparison materials;

[0186] Obtain the positions in the comparison materials that are the same as the invalid areas in the unapproved application materials and take screenshots, which are recorded as comparison screenshots;

[0187] Name the comparison screenshots as the screenshot name of the invalid area + comparison characters and save them;

[0188] Form a seal modification group with the invalid screenshots and the corresponding comparison screenshots;

[0189] Add the seal modification group and the unapproved application materials to the modification folder and send them to the applicant.

[0190] By obtaining the application materials that fail the seal detection and marking them as "unapproved application materials", the system can clearly identify the materials that need to be corrected; obtaining all the invalid areas and taking screenshots provides clear visual evidence for subsequent material feedback and correction. This process can help the system intuitively display the specific areas with problems, making it clearer for the applicant to understand the material problems; associating the screenshots of the invalid areas with the seal area numbers in the image to be reviewed can provide systematic information for subsequent material review and feedback; naming the screenshots of the invalid areas with the corresponding numbers makes subsequent document management and retrieval more convenient; obtaining the historical approved business items that are the same as the business items to be approved provides successful cases for the system to refer to; by taking screenshots of the positions in the comparison materials that are the same as the invalid areas of the unapproved application materials, the system can effectively show the specific problems to the applicant, reducing the understanding deviation caused by text description; naming the comparison screenshots as the screenshot name of the invalid area plus comparison characters enhances the systematic management of the documents. This naming method is not only convenient for subsequent search and review, but also helps the system clearly distinguish different materials and review criteria. At the same time, this method also provides clear reference for the applicant, enabling them to accurately grasp the parts that need to be adjusted when modifying the materials, promoting the improvement of material compliance; through this structured modification, the system can more systematically manage and track the material modification process, reducing repeated submissions due to non-compliant materials. At the same time, this method also improves the communication efficiency between the applicant and the system, making the material review process smoother; adding the seal modification group and the unapproved application materials to the modification folder and sending them to the applicant can effectively convey the review feedback information to the applicant.

[0191] The use of the approval personnel allocation strategy to allocate the business items to be approved specifically includes:

[0192] Obtain the level of the administrative approval matters applied for by the applicant, and record it as the level to be approved;

[0193] Obtain the approver(s) matching the level to be approved;

[0194] Obtain the current working status and the number of matters to be approved of all the matching approvers;

[0195] If there is an approver with an idle working status among the matched approvers, randomly assign an idle approver to approve the administrative application;

[0196] If the working status of all the matched approvers is busy, compare the number of matters to be approved of the approvers, and assign an approver with the least number of matters to be approved to approve the administrative application.

[0197] By obtaining the level of the administrative approval matters applied for by the applicant and marking it as the "level to be approved", the review process can be better classified and managed. Approval matters of different levels may have different complexities and processing requirements, and this information is crucial for allocating appropriate approvers; obtaining the approver(s) matching the level to be approved helps achieve precise matching during the review process; obtaining the current working status and the number of matters to be approved of all the matching approvers provides an important basis for reasonably allocating approval tasks. This information can help managers understand the workload of each approver in real time, thus achieving efficient human resource management. By analyzing the working status and the number of matters to be processed of each approver, it is possible to effectively prevent the reduction in efficiency caused by some approvers due to excessive work; if there is an approver with an idle working status among the matched approvers, randomly assigning an idle approver helps achieve efficient resource utilization. The random assignment method can avoid subjective biases among approval personnel and at the same time quickly respond to the applicant's need for administrative approval; when all the matched approvers are busy, by comparing the number of matters to be approved and assigning to the approver with the least number of matters to be approved, the resource allocation can be effectively optimized. This approach ensures that the approval work will not be affected by the excessive workload of the approvers, thus maintaining the efficiency of the approval.

[0198] It should be noted that in this article, relational terms such as first and second are only used to distinguish one entity or operation from another entity or operation, and do not necessarily require or imply any actual relationship or order between these entities or operations. Moreover, the term "including", "comprising" or any other variant thereof is intended to cover non-exclusive inclusion, so that a process, method, article or device including a series of elements not only includes those elements, but also includes other elements not explicitly listed, or also includes elements inherent in such a process, method, article or device.

[0199] The above are only the preferred embodiments of the present invention. It should be noted that for those of ordinary skill in the art, without departing from the technical principle of the present invention, several improvements and refinements can be made, and these improvements and refinements should also be regarded as the protection scope of the present invention.

Claims

1. An intelligent processing method for administrative approval matters, characterized in that, Including: Obtain a list of historical administrative approval matters; Classify the matters in the list of historical administrative approval matters, obtain the classification names, create a classification set of administrative approval matters with the classification names as the names, and add the administrative approval matters of the same type to the corresponding classification set of administrative approval matters; Obtain and summarize the materials submitted during the application of administrative approval matters of the same category, form a list of application materials for administrative approval matters of the same category, and add the list to the corresponding classification set of administrative approval matters; Set the classification set of historical administrative approval matters; Add all the classification sets of administrative approval matters to the classification set of historical administrative approval matters; Obtain the content of the administrative approval matter applied for by the applicant, which is recorded as the matter to be approved; Obtain the category of the administrative approval matter applied for by the applicant, which is recorded as the category of the matter to be approved; Match the elements with the same category as the category of the matter to be approved from the classification set of historical administrative approval matters, and obtain the list of application materials for administrative approval matters of the same category in the elements, which is recorded as the initial list of application materials for administrative approval matters to be handled; Assign the matter to be approved, the category of the matter to be approved, and the initial list of application materials for administrative approval matters to be handled to the material list approver for confirmation, and judge whether the content in the initial list of application materials for administrative approval matters to be handled meets the requirements of the application materials for the matter to be approved; If the requirements are met, use the initial list of application materials for administrative approval matters to be handled as the list of application materials for administrative approval matters to be handled, and use the material distribution strategy to collect materials; If the requirements are not met, the material list approver adds, deletes, or modifies the content in the initial list of application materials for administrative approval matters to be handled according to the requirements of the application materials for the matter to be approved, records the initial list of application materials for administrative approval matters to be handled after the operation as the list of application materials for administrative approval matters, and uses the material distribution strategy to collect materials.

2. The intelligent processing method for administrative approval matters according to claim 1, characterized in that, The use of the material distribution strategy to collect materials specifically includes: Match the application materials required by the applicant from the data platform according to the content of the list of application materials for administrative approval matters; Traverse the application materials matched from the data platform, and judge whether all the content in the list of application materials for administrative approval matters is matched; If all are matched, use the approver distribution strategy to assign the matter to be approved; If not all are matched, establish a list of application materials submitted by the applicant, add the unmatched materials to the list of application materials submitted by the applicant, use the application material content prompt strategy to prompt the applicant to submit application materials, and use the applicant submitted material content review strategy to review the materials submitted by the applicant; When the materials submitted by the applicant pass the review, use the approver distribution strategy to assign the matter to be approved; When the materials submitted by the applicant do not pass the review, use the application material modification prompt strategy to prompt the applicant until the materials submitted by the applicant pass the review, and use the approver distribution strategy to assign the matter to be approved.

3. The intelligent processing method for administrative approval matters according to claim 2, characterized in that, The applicant is prompted to submit application materials using the application material content prompt strategy, which specifically includes: Obtain the content in the applicant's submitted application material list, denoted as the materials to be submitted; Obtain the types of the materials to be submitted; When the material to be submitted is a document that needs to be filled out, denote the document that needs to be filled out as the document to be submitted; Classify the content levels of the document to be submitted; Obtain the image of the document to be submitted; Define the fixed content areas of the image of the document to be submitted, and give prompts for the defined areas; Add the applicant's submitted application material list and the image with defined areas to a folder and send it to the applicant.

4. The intelligent processing method for administrative approval matters according to claim 2, wherein, The applicant's submitted materials are reviewed using the applicant-submitted material content review strategy, which specifically includes: Obtain the application materials submitted by the applicant; Conduct a primary review of the application materials submitted by the applicant. The primary review is specifically as follows: Obtain the name, category, and quantity of the application materials, denoted as the submitted material name, submitted material category, and submitted material quantity; Obtain the name, category, and quantity of the materials that need to be submitted in the applicant's submitted application material list, denoted as the to-be-submitted material name, to-be-submitted material category, and to-be-submitted material quantity; Compare whether the quantity of the submitted materials is equal to the quantity of the materials to be submitted; If the quantity of the submitted materials ≠ the quantity of the materials to be submitted, obtain the missing materials and send them to the applicant to remind the applicant to complete them; If the quantity of the submitted materials = the quantity of the materials to be submitted, compare whether the types of the submitted materials are the same as the types of the materials to be submitted; If the types of the submitted materials are not the same as the types of the materials to be submitted, traverse and compare the types of the submitted materials with the types of the materials to be submitted, obtain the types of the materials not submitted, and send them to the applicant to remind the applicant to complete them; If the types of the submitted materials are the same as the types of the materials to be submitted, compare whether the names of the submitted materials are the same as the names of the materials to be submitted; If the names of the submitted materials are not the same as the names of the materials to be submitted, traverse and compare the names of the submitted materials with the names of the materials to be submitted, obtain the files whose names do not conform to the names of the materials to be submitted, form a combination of the file names that need to be modified and the corresponding correct names, generate a file name modification file, and send the file name modification file and the files that need to be modified to the applicant to remind the applicant to modify them; If the names of the submitted materials are the same as the names of the materials to be submitted, review the content of the materials submitted by the applicant.

5. The intelligent processing method for administrative approval matters according to claim 4, wherein The review of the content of the materials submitted by the applicant specifically includes: Scan the materials submitted by the applicant into an image, denoted as the image to be reviewed; Obtain the fixed content areas in the image; For each fixed content area, obtain the text within the fixed area, count the number of characters in the text, and detect whether the number of characters in the text meets the requirements for the number of characters in the fixed area; If the number of characters in the text within the fixed area does not meet the requirements for the number of characters in the fixed area, denote the material as a non-conforming material; If the number of characters in the text within the fixed area meets the requirements for the number of characters in the fixed area, detect whether the text within the fixed area meets the requirements for the text in the fixed area; If the text within the fixed area does not meet the requirements for the text in the fixed area, denote the material as a non-conforming material; If the number of characters in the text within the fixed area meets the requirements for the number of characters in the fixed area, conduct a document stamping detection.

6. The intelligent processing method for administrative approval matters according to claim 5, wherein Checking whether the text within the fixed detection area meets the requirements of the text within the fixed area specifically includes: Matching elements with the same category as the to-be-approved matter from the historical administrative approval matter classification set, and obtaining all sub-elements in the element, and denoting the sub-elements as historical comparison materials; Obtaining all fixed areas in the historical comparison materials; Comparing the fixed areas at the same positions in all historical comparison materials respectively; For any fixed area at the same position, extracting the same characters of the fixed area at the same position; If the same characters are extracted, forming a character set of the text requirements for the fixed area at the corresponding position; If no same characters are extracted, then denoting the text requirements for the corresponding fixed area as an empty set, and the empty set indicates that there are no text requirements for this fixed area.

7. An intelligent processing method for administrative approval matters according to claim 5, characterized in that, Performing document stamping detection specifically includes: Obtaining the number of stamps required in the to-be-submitted materials; Obtaining the number of stamps already stamped in the to-be-reviewed image; If the number of stamps already stamped in the to-be-reviewed image ≠ the number of stamps required in the to-be-submitted materials, then obtaining the number of missing stamps, and sending the number of missing stamps to the applicant to remind the applicant to complete the number of stamps; If the number of stamps already stamped in the to-be-reviewed image = the number of stamps required in the to-be-submitted materials; Obtaining all stamped areas in the to-be-reviewed image and numbering them; For any stamped area; Obtaining the outermost edge of the stamp, and denoting the area enclosed by the outermost edge as the target area; Obtaining the center points of all the stamp characters within the target area, and connecting the center points of the stamp characters in sequence, and denoting the connecting line as the stamp character connecting line; Obtaining the center points of all the text filled in by the applicant within the target area, and connecting the center points of the text filled in by the applicant in sequence, and denoting it as the filled text connecting line; Obtaining the number of intersection points between the stamp character connecting line and the filled text connecting line, and denoting it as the effective intersection point number; Setting a threshold for the number of intersection points of the connecting lines; If the effective intersection point number ≥ the threshold for the number of intersection points of the connecting lines, then this stamped area is a valid area; If the effective intersection point number < the threshold for the number of intersection points of the connecting lines, then this stamped area is an invalid area.

8. The intelligent processing method for administrative approval matters according to claim 7, wherein Prompting the applicant using the application material modification prompt strategy specifically includes: Obtaining the application materials that fail the stamping detection, and denoting them as the unpassed application materials; Obtaining all invalid areas and taking screenshots; Obtaining the numbers of the stamped areas in the to-be-reviewed image where the screenshots of the invalid areas are located; Naming the screenshots of the invalid areas with the obtained corresponding numbers; Obtaining any historical approved matter that is the same as the to-be-approved matter; Obtaining the materials in the application materials of the historical approved matter that are the same as the unpassed application materials, and denoting them as the comparison materials; Obtaining the positions in the comparison materials that are the same as the invalid areas in the unpassed application materials and taking screenshots, and denoting them as the comparison screenshots; Saving the comparison screenshots with the name of the screenshot name of the invalid area + comparison characters; Forming a stamping modification group with the invalid screenshots and the corresponding comparison screenshots; Adding the stamping modification group and the unpassed application materials to the modification folder and sending them to the applicant.

9. The intelligent processing method for administrative approval matters according to claim 2, wherein Assigning the to-be-approved matters using the approver assignment strategy specifically includes: Obtaining the level of the administrative approval matter applied by the applicant, and denoting it as the to-be-approved level; Obtain an approver that matches the level to be approved; Obtain the current working status and the number of matters pending approval of all matching approvers; If there is an approver with an idle working status among the matched approvers, randomly assign an idle approver to approve the administrative application; If the working status of all matched approvers is busy, compare the number of matters pending approval of the approvers, and assign an approver with the least number of matters pending approval to approve the administrative application.

Images