Female athlete competitive ability evaluation system

Abstract

The invention provides a female athlete competitive ability evaluation system which comprises an athlete terminal, a coach terminal and an evaluation device, menstrual data and physiological data of a female athlete are collected through the athlete terminal and sent to the evaluation device, and historical test data of the female athlete are stored in the evaluation device. The evaluation device judges the menstrual cycle according to the common state and judges the common state according to the menstrual cycle; the current day state is judged according to the historical test data, then the personalized state is calculated by combining the historical test data, and the evaluation result is generated by combining the common state, the personalized state and the current day state and is sent to the coach terminal, so that the physiological characteristics of the female athlete are fully considered; and the physical state of each female athlete in the day and the previous training condition are also considered, so that the evaluation result can provide multi-azimuth and personalized information for the coach, and the coach is assisted to perform daily training planning of each female athlete more scientifically and reasonably.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the technical field of athlete ability evaluation, and in particular to a female athlete competitive ability evaluation system. Background Art

[0002] In multiplayer competitive sports, to achieve optimal training outcomes and protect athletes from injury due to excessively intense training, it's essential to test and assess their competitive abilities and physical condition. Based on these assessments, appropriate training programs and their intensity can be rationally and scientifically arranged. After years of development and refinement, a systematic approach has emerged for assessing athletes' competitive abilities and arranging training programs in multiplayer competitive sports.

[0003] However, existing methods of this type are primarily targeted at male athletes and fail to fully consider the unique characteristics of female athletes, lacking specific methods specifically tailored to them. Female athletes have different physiological characteristics than male athletes, particularly monthly menstruation, which leads to changes in physiological indicators such as hormone levels in female athletes. This, in turn, results in changes in physical fitness, strength, and other aspects of female athletes. For example, during menstruation, female athletes are often more prone to fatigue. If existing methods for evaluating competitive ability and scheduling training programs are adopted, simply applying the same methods for male athletes to female athletes, it is easy to schedule overly high-intensity training for female athletes during menstruation, leading to overuse injuries and even amenorrhea and menstrual disorders.

[0004] On the other hand, existing methods of this type mainly focus on athletes' past training results, but pay relatively little attention to each athlete's current condition. In addition, the training program arrangements carried out through existing methods of this type are usually for the entire team, and there is also insufficient consideration of the individual condition of each athlete.

[0005] Therefore, in order to better evaluate the competitive ability of female athletes and arrange training for them more scientifically and reasonably, a competitive ability evaluation system is needed that is targeted at female athletes and takes into account the individual situation of each female athlete. Summary of the Invention

[0006] The present invention is designed to solve the above-mentioned problems and aims to provide a female athlete competitive ability evaluation system that fully considers the physiological characteristics of female athletes and the individual conditions of each person. The present invention adopts the following technical solutions:

[0007] The present invention provides a female athlete's competitive ability evaluation system, which has the following technical features: the system includes: an athlete terminal, which is held by a corresponding female athlete and has a corresponding identification number; a coach terminal, which is held by the coach of the female athlete; and an evaluation device, which is respectively connected to the athlete terminal and the coach terminal in communication, and is used to generate the competitive ability evaluation result of the female athlete based on the data collected by the athlete terminal, wherein the collection terminal includes: a menstrual data collection unit, which is used to collect the menstrual data of the corresponding female athlete; a physiological data collection unit, which is used to collect the physiological data of the female athlete; and a collection side communication unit, which is used to send the identification number and the corresponding menstrual data and the physiological data to the evaluation device, and the evaluation device includes: an evaluation side communication unit, which is used to receive the identification number and the corresponding The menstrual data and the physiological data, and the device for sending the evaluation result to at least one of the corresponding acquisition terminal and the coaching terminal according to the identification number; an evaluation side storage unit, which at least stores the identification number of the female athlete and the corresponding historical data; a common state determination unit, which is used to determine the current menstrual cycle of the female athlete on that day according to the menstrual data, and determine the common state of the female athlete according to the corresponding current menstrual cycle; an individual state determination unit, which is used to determine the individual state of the female athlete according to the corresponding historical data; a current state determination unit, which is used to determine the current state of the female athlete according to the physiological data including the current physiological data; and an evaluation result generation unit, which is used to generate the evaluation result according to the corresponding common state, the individual state, the current state and a predetermined evaluation algorithm.

[0008] The female athlete competitive ability evaluation system provided by the present invention may also have such technical features, wherein the menstrual data collection unit is used to allow the female athlete to input her menstrual start date and menstrual end date, and the common state determination unit determines the current physiological cycle according to the menstrual start date and / or the menstrual end date, including the menstrual period, follicular phase, early luteal phase, and late luteal phase, and determines the corresponding exercise intensity as the common state according to the current physiological cycle, the physiological data of the day includes one or more of the female athlete's blood pressure, heart rate, blood oxygen, and deep sleep time of the previous night, the historical data includes historical physiological data, the state determination unit of the day determines the corresponding exercise intensity as the state of the day according to the corresponding historical physiological data and the physiological data of the day, and the evaluation result includes the recommended exercise intensity of the day, which is the lower exercise intensity between the common state and the state of the day.

[0009] The female athlete competitive ability evaluation system provided by the present invention may also have such technical features, wherein the common state determination unit determines that the common state is a low-intensity exercise state during the menstrual period, determines that the common state is a high-intensity exercise state during the follicular phase, determines that the common state is a high-intensity exercise state during the early luteal phase, and determines that the common state is a medium-to-low intensity exercise state during the late luteal phase.

[0010] The female athlete competitive ability evaluation system provided by the present invention may also have such technical features, wherein the physiological data of the day includes one or more of the morning pulse of the female athlete of the day, the deep sleep time of the previous day, and the perceived exercise intensity evaluation value input by the female athlete; the state determination unit of the day preliminarily determines that it is a high-intensity exercise state when the morning pulse is basically consistent with the usual resting heart rate in the historical physiological data; preliminarily determines that it is a medium-to-high-intensity exercise state when the morning pulse is 5-10 beats / minute higher than the usual resting heart rate; preliminarily determines that it is a medium-to-low-intensity exercise state when the morning pulse is 10-15 beats / minute higher than the usual resting heart rate; preliminarily determines that it is a medium-to-low-intensity exercise state when the morning pulse is 10-15 beats / minute higher than the usual resting heart rate; When the self-perceived exercise intensity evaluation value is lower than 4, it is determined as a low-intensity exercise state; when the self-perceived exercise intensity evaluation value is between 4 and 6, it is determined as a medium-intensity exercise state; when the self-perceived exercise intensity evaluation value is greater than 7, it is determined as a high-intensity exercise state. When there are more than two preliminarily determined exercise states, the state determination unit for the day takes the one with the lowest intensity among the multiple preliminarily determined exercise states as the state for the day.

[0011] The female athlete competitive ability assessment system provided by the present invention may also have such technical features, wherein the historical data includes historical test data, which includes historical scores of multiple test items, and the personality status determination unit calculates the average value of each of the test items based on the historical scores, and determines the assessment levels of multiple competitive abilities based on the average value of each of the test items, the corresponding competitive ability and the predetermined multi-level standards, and the competitive ability assessment result also includes the assessment levels of multiple competitive abilities.

[0012] The female athlete competitive ability assessment system provided by the present invention may also have such technical features, wherein the competitive ability includes speed, endurance, strength, and agility, and the corresponding test items are 30-meter running test, YOYO interval running test, vertical jump test, and T-type running test.

[0013] The female athlete competitive ability evaluation system provided by the present invention may also have such technical features, wherein the coach terminal includes: a coach side input and display unit, for the coach to specify the female athlete and select the function of generating training program recommendations for the female athlete; and a coach side communication unit, for after the coach selects to generate the training program recommendation for the day and specifies the female athlete through the coach side input unit, the corresponding program recommendation generation instruction and the identification number of the female athlete are sent to the evaluation device, the evaluation side communication unit is also used to receive the training program recommendation generation instruction and the identification number from the coach terminal, the evaluation device also includes: a training program recommendation generation unit, for generating the corresponding training program recommendation result for the female athlete based on the identification number in the received training program recommendation generation instruction and the corresponding competitive ability evaluation result, the evaluation side communication unit is also used to send the training program recommendation result to the coach terminal, after the coach side communication unit receives the training program recommendation result, the coach side input and display unit generates and displays the corresponding training program recommendation interface based on the training program recommendation result.

[0014] The female athlete competitive ability evaluation system provided by the present invention may also have such technical features, wherein the evaluation side storage unit also stores training project related data, including project identification numbers of multiple predetermined training projects, corresponding training intensities, basic training volumes, and corresponding competitive abilities, and the training project recommendation generation unit includes: an athlete data extraction unit, used to obtain the corresponding athlete related data and the competitive ability evaluation results from the evaluation side storage unit according to the identification numbers; a training project acquisition unit, used to obtain the training project related data from the evaluation side storage unit; a training project screening unit, used to screen out the training projects that meet the requirements from the training project related data according to the recommended exercise intensity of the day in the competitive ability evaluation results; a training project parameter generation unit, used to generate a training volume recommendation for the training project based on the screened training projects, the competitive ability evaluation results and the corresponding basic training volume; and a recommendation information generation unit, used to generate the training project recommendation results based on the competitive ability evaluation results, the screened training projects, and the generated training volume recommendations.

[0015] The female athlete competitive ability evaluation system provided by the present invention may also have such technical features, wherein the coach terminal includes: a coach side input unit for the coach to select the function of generating a competition lineup recommendation and set competition parameters; and a coach side communication unit for sending the corresponding generation lineup recommendation instruction and the parameters to the evaluation device after the coach selects to generate the competition lineup recommendation for the day and sets the parameters through the coach side input unit. The evaluation side communication unit is also used to receive the generation lineup recommendation instruction and the parameters from the coach terminal. The evaluation device also includes: a competition lineup recommendation generation unit for generating a corresponding competition lineup recommendation result based on the competition parameters in the received competition lineup recommendation generation instruction and the competitive ability evaluation result. The evaluation side communication unit is also used to send the competition lineup recommendation result to the coach terminal. After the coach side communication unit receives the competition lineup recommendation result, the coach side input display unit generates and displays a corresponding competition lineup recommendation interface based on the competition lineup recommendation result.

[0016] The female athlete competitive ability evaluation system provided by the present invention may also have such technical features, wherein the competition lineup recommendation generation unit includes: a competition parameter acquisition unit, used to obtain the competition parameters from the competition lineup recommendation generation instruction; an athlete data acquisition unit, used to obtain the athlete-related data from the evaluation side storage unit; an athlete screening unit, used to screen out multiple recommended female athletes from multiple female athletes based on the competition parameters and the athlete-related data; and a recommendation information generation unit, which generates the competition lineup recommendation result based on the athlete-related data of the screened female athletes and the competitive ability evaluation result.

[0017] Functions and effects of the invention

[0018] The female athlete competitive ability evaluation system provided by the present invention includes an athlete terminal, a coach terminal, and an evaluation device communicatively connected thereto. The athlete terminal collects menstrual data and physiological data of the female athlete and sends it to the evaluation device. The evaluation device stores historical test data of the female athlete. The evaluation device determines the menstrual cycle based on common status and common status based on the menstrual cycle; determines the status of the day based on the historical test data, and then calculates the individual status based on the historical test data. The evaluation result is generated by combining the common status, individual status, and the status of the day, and then sent to the coach terminal. Therefore, the generated evaluation result fully considers the physiological characteristics of the female athletes, especially the impact of the menstrual cycle, and also considers the physical condition of each female athlete on the day and the previous training situation. Therefore, the evaluation result can provide coaches with comprehensive and personalized information, assisting coaches in more scientific and reasonable daily training planning for each female athlete, achieving better training results. At the same time, it can avoid arranging high-intensity training or inappropriate training programs during fatigue conditions such as menstruation or lack of rest, thereby ensuring the physical health and safety of female athletes. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0019] Figure 1 is a structural block diagram of the female athlete competitive ability evaluation system in this embodiment;

[0020] Figure 2 is a structural block diagram of the athlete terminal in this embodiment;

[0021] Figure 3 is a schematic diagram of the menstrual period data collection interface in this embodiment;

[0022] Figure 4 is a structural block diagram of the evaluation device in this embodiment;

[0023] Figure 5 This is a structural block diagram of the coach terminal in this embodiment;

[0024] Figure 6 Schematic diagram of the function selection interface in this embodiment;

[0025] Figure 7 is a schematic diagram of the evaluation result interface in this embodiment;

[0026] Figure 8 Schematic diagram of the training item recommendation result interface in this embodiment;

[0027] Figure 9 Schematic diagram of the competition lineup recommendation result interface in this embodiment;

[0028] Figure 10 is a flow chart for generating competitive ability evaluation results in this embodiment;

[0029] Figure 11 is a flow chart of generating training item recommendation results in this embodiment;

[0030] Figure 12 4 is a flowchart of generating competition lineup recommendation results in this embodiment.

[0031] Reference numerals:

[0032] Women's Athlete Competitive Ability Evaluation System 100; Athlete Terminal 10; Athlete-side Communication Unit 11; Athlete-side Storage Unit 12; Menstrual Period Data Collection Unit 13; Menstrual Period Data Collection Interface 131; Menstrual Start Date Input Area 1311; Menstrual End Date Input Area 1312; Confirmation Button 1313; Physiological Data Collection Unit 14; Subjective Data Collection Unit 15; Athlete-side Display Unit 16; Athlete-side Control Unit 17; Evaluation Device 20; Evaluation-side Communication Unit 21; Evaluation-side Storage Unit 22; Competitive Ability Evaluation Unit 23; Athlete Data Extraction Unit 231; Required Data Determination Unit 232; Common Status Determination Unit 233; Individual Status Determination Unit 234; Current Status Determination Unit 235; Evaluation Result Generation Unit 236; Training Program Recommendation Generation Unit 24; Athlete Data Extraction Unit 241; Training Program Acquisition Unit 24 2; training item screening unit 243; training item parameter generating unit 244; recommendation information generating unit 245; competition parameter acquiring unit 251; athlete data acquiring unit 252; athlete screening unit 253; recommendation information generating unit 254; competition lineup recommendation generating unit 25; evaluation side control unit 26; coach terminal 30; coach side communication unit 31; coach side storage unit 32; coach side input display unit 33; function selection interface 331; competitive ability evaluation button 3311; training item recommendation button 3312; competition lineup recommendation button 3312; evaluation result interface 332; evaluation result area 3321; training item recommendation result interface 333; training item information display area 3331; today's competition lineup recommendation result 334; competition lineup information display area 3341; coach side control unit 34; communication network 40. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0033] In order to make the technical means, creative features, objectives and effects of the present invention easier to understand, the following is a detailed description of the female athlete competitive ability evaluation system of the present invention in conjunction with embodiments and drawings.

[0034] <Example>

[0035] This embodiment provides a female athlete competitive ability assessment system for evaluating the competitive abilities of female athletes. The system generates training program recommendations and / or inferences about the day's competition lineup based on the evaluation, allowing coaches to tailor the training program and / or the day's competition lineup. This embodiment uses female soccer players as an example for detailed explanation.

[0036] Figure 1 2 is a structural block diagram of the female athlete competitive ability evaluation system in this embodiment.

[0037] like Figure 1 As shown, the female athlete competitive ability evaluation system 100 includes multiple athlete terminals 10, an evaluation device 20 and one or more coach terminals 30. The evaluation device 20 is communicatively connected to the athlete terminal 10 and the coach terminal 30 through a communication network 40.

[0038] The athlete terminal 10 is held by the corresponding female athlete and is used to collect data of the female athlete and send it to the evaluation device 20 for competitive ability evaluation, and can be used to receive evaluation results from the evaluation device 30 and display them to the female athlete.

[0039] Figure 2 It is a structural block diagram of the athlete terminal in this embodiment.

[0040] like Figure 2 As shown, the athlete terminal 10 includes an athlete-side communication unit 11 , an athlete-side storage unit 12 , a menstrual period data collection unit 13 , a physiological data collection unit 14 , a subjective data collection unit 15 , an athlete-side display unit 16 , and an athlete-side control unit 17 .

[0041] The athlete-side communication unit 11 is used to communicate with the evaluation device 20. Optionally, the athlete-side communication unit 11 can also be used to communicate with the coach terminal 30.

[0042] The athlete-side storage unit 12 is used to store the corresponding information collected by each collection unit so that the collected information can be subsequently sent to the evaluation device 20 via the athlete-side communication unit 11. In addition, the athlete-side storage unit 12 also stores the unique identification number of the athlete terminal 10 (referred to as the athlete terminal identification number).

[0043] The menstrual period data collecting unit 13 is used to collect the menstrual period data of female athletes.

[0044] Figure 3 Schematic diagram of the menstrual period data collection interface in this embodiment.

[0045] like Figure 3As shown, for example, the menstrual data collection unit 13 may provide a menstrual data collection interface 131, which includes prompt text, a date selection area 1311, and an OK button 1312. The date selection area 1311 displays an electronic calendar of selectable dates. The female athlete can click on a date as the menstrual start date based on the prompt text, then click OK button 1312 to confirm the date. The corresponding information is then stored in the athlete-side storage unit 12. The menstrual end date can also be collected in a similar manner. Alternatively, other date input methods may be employed, such as providing an input box for the female athlete to enter a date.

[0046] The physiological data collection unit 14 is used to collect physiological data of female athletes according to predetermined conditions, such as heart rate, blood pressure, blood oxygen, deep sleep time, etc.; in this embodiment, at least the morning pulse and deep sleep time of female athletes are collected.

[0047] The subjective data collection unit 15 is used to collect subjective data related to the female athletes' competitive state. In this embodiment, it is used for the female athletes to input their Rating of Perceived Exertion Scale (RPE) values. Female athletes can fill out a corresponding subjective fatigue scale based on their daily feelings to obtain an RPE value, which they then enter into the athlete terminal 10. The subjective fatigue scale is an existing, efficient and convenient psychological measurement scale that has the advantages of being simple, direct, economical, and highly operational when collecting athlete training load data.

[0048] The athlete-side display unit 16 is used to display information to the female athlete, including displaying the above-mentioned operational interface, and displaying information from the evaluation device 20 or the coach terminal 30, etc.

[0049] The athlete-side control unit 17 is used to control the operation of the above-mentioned functional units, for example, after each acquisition unit acquires corresponding information, it controls the acquisition unit to store the acquired information in the storage unit, and controls the communication unit to send the acquired information to the evaluation device 20, or it can periodically control the communication unit to send the acquired information currently stored in the storage unit to the evaluation device 20.

[0050] For example, the athlete terminal 10 may include a smartphone and a smart watch held by a female athlete. The smart watch is bound to the smartphone, the physiological data acquisition unit 14 is integrated into the smart watch, and other functional units are integrated into the smartphone.

[0051] The evaluation device 20 is used to receive the collected data from the athlete terminal 10, perform competitive ability evaluation and related recommendations based on the received data, and send the generated evaluation results and recommendation results to at least one of the athlete terminal 10 and the coach terminal 30.

[0052] Figure 4 It is a structural block diagram of the evaluation device in this embodiment.

[0053] like Figure 4 As shown, the evaluation device 20 includes an evaluation-side communication unit 21 , an evaluation-side storage unit 22 , a competitive ability evaluation unit 23 , a training item recommendation generation unit 24 , a competition lineup recommendation generation unit 25 , and an evaluation-side control unit 26 .

[0054] The evaluation-side communication unit 21 is used to communicate with the athlete terminal 10 and the coach terminal 30, including receiving the athlete terminal identification number and collected data from the athlete terminal 10, and receiving evaluation generation requests, training program recommendation generation requests, and competition lineup recommendation generation requests from the coach terminal 30. The evaluation generation request includes the unique identification number of the female athlete for whom the competitive ability evaluation is to be generated (referred to as the athlete identification number).

[0055] The evaluation-side storage unit 22 stores athlete-related data and training program-related data, and is also used to store generated competitive ability evaluation results, training program recommendation results, and competition lineup recommendation results.

[0056] Among them, athlete-related data includes the unique identification numbers, personal basic information, competition-related information, historical test data, menstrual data, and physiological data of multiple female athletes. Personal basic information includes name, age, height, weight, etc. Competition-related information includes the competition event, position in the competition event, etc. For example, if the competition event is women's football, the positions in the competition event include goalkeeper, defender, midfielder, forward, etc. Historical test data includes the scores of each test event of the female athlete over a period of time, and in this embodiment, at least includes the scores of the past month. Menstrual data includes the start and end time of menstruation for each of the past few months of the female athlete, and may or may not include data for the current month. Physiological data includes the female athlete's daily heart rate, blood pressure, blood oxygen, deep sleep time, etc., and in this embodiment, at least includes heart rate and deep sleep time.

[0057] The training program related data includes the unique identification number of multiple training programs, the name of the training program, the intensity, the basic training volume, and the corresponding competitive ability. For example, the name of the training program is aerobic jogging, the intensity is low intensity, the basic training volume is 30 minutes, and the corresponding competitive ability is endurance. In the present embodiment, high-intensity training programs may include, for example, antagonistic sports (boxing, taekwondo, fencing, etc.), high-intensity large ball sports (basketball, football, volleyball), and high-intensity small ball sports (badminton, table tennis, tennis, etc.). Medium-intensity training programs may include, for example, medium-intensity large ball sports and medium-intensity small ball sports. Low-intensity training programs may include, for example, yoga, Pilates, aerobic jogging, Tai Chi, and golf.

[0058] Upon receiving an evaluation request, the competitive state evaluation unit 23 retrieves the corresponding female athlete's menstrual data, physiological data, and historical test data from the evaluation-side storage unit 22 based on the athlete identification number in the evaluation request. Based on this data and a predetermined evaluation algorithm, the competitive state evaluation unit 23 generates a competitive state evaluation result for the female athlete for the day. The competitive state evaluation unit 23 includes an athlete data extraction unit 231, a required data determination unit 232, a common state determination unit 233, an individual state determination unit 234, a current state determination unit 235, and an evaluation result generation unit 236.

[0059] The athlete data extraction unit 231 is used to extract the menstrual data, physiological data and historical test data of the corresponding female athlete from the evaluation side storage unit 22 according to the athlete identification number in the evaluation generation request.

[0060] The required data judgment unit 232 is used to determine whether the extracted data already contains all the data required to generate the assessment. In this embodiment, it specifically includes: determining whether at least one month of menstrual data has been extracted; determining whether the extracted physiological data includes the heart rate of the day, the heart rate of the previous period (for example, the heart rate of the previous week), and the deep sleep time of the previous night; and determining whether the extracted historical test data contains the performance records of each predetermined training item. If the judgment is no, a corresponding reminder can be sent to the coach terminal 30 and the athlete terminal 10 to remind the female athlete to supplement the missing data in a timely manner, and to inform the coach that some data is missing and the assessment result cannot be generated temporarily, and the assessment result generation process is stopped. The coach can restart the assessment generation after the female athlete supplements the data.

[0061] When the required data determination unit 231 determines that the answer is yes, the common state determination unit 233 determines the menstrual cycle of the female athlete on that day based on the extracted menstrual data, and further determines the appropriate exercise intensity as the common state based on the menstrual cycle.

[0062] In this embodiment, the menstrual cycle includes the menstrual phase, follicular phase, early luteal phase, and late luteal phase. The menstrual phase is calculated based on the menstrual start date of the current month as day 1. The menstrual phase is days 1-7, the follicular phase is days 8-13, the early luteal phase is days 15-21, and the late luteal phase is days 21-28. The menstrual cycle for the current month can be calculated based on the menstrual start and end dates of each of the previous months. If the menstrual start date or the menstrual start and end dates for the current month are also entered, the calculated menstrual cycle can be further corrected based on the dates entered for the current month. The specific calculation method is prior art and will not be described in detail.

[0063] After researching the literature and analyzing blood samples from several female soccer players, the inventors concluded that various physiological indicators related to athletic performance vary across the menstrual cycle, influenced by hormones. Key physiological indicators related to athletic performance include hemoglobin (HGB), creatine kinase (CK), and testosterone (T). The data for these indicators across the menstrual cycle are summarized in Table 1.

[0064] Table 1 Summary of various physiological index data

[0065]

[0066]

[0067] In Table 1, I, II, III, and IV represent the menstrual phase, follicular phase, pre-luteal phase, and late luteal phase, respectively. Each value is the average of regular blood tests for multiple female athletes, so the physiological indicators described above are generally applicable.

[0068] As shown in Table 1, hemoglobin is the most important protein in the blood, responsible for oxygen transport and carbon dioxide removal. Maintaining normal hemoglobin levels is crucial for athletic performance. Hemoglobin levels are lowest during the menstrual period. Subsequently, during the follicular phase, hemoglobin levels gradually rise, reaching a peak in the early luteal phase. Hemoglobin levels then begin to decline gradually in the late luteal phase. Creatine kinase, an enzyme present in muscle, brain, and other tissues, plays a key role in energy metabolism. Creatine kinase levels exhibit two peaks during the menstrual period and the late luteal phase, but remain relatively low during both the follicular and early luteal phases. Testosterone levels are a key hormonal indicator for athletes and play a crucial role in athletic performance. Testosterone levels are lowest during the menstrual period, gradually rise during the follicular phase, and show little difference between the early and follicular phases. However, they fluctuate slightly during the luteal phase before gradually declining in the late luteal phase.

[0069] Based on the above data, the inventors further analyzed and concluded that the exercise intensity design for each menstrual cycle described above is as follows: During the menstrual period, low hemoglobin levels may lead to decreased oxygen transport capacity, affecting endurance performance; creatine kinase levels reach their peak, making muscles more susceptible to fatigue and less able to recover; low blood testosterone levels may lead to decreased strength and recovery, affecting high-intensity exercise performance, thus setting the exercise intensity for low intensity. During the follicular phase, hemoglobin levels gradually rise, enhancing the body's recovery capacity; low creatine kinase levels indicate strong muscle recovery capacity; blood testosterone levels gradually rise, and the body enters its optimal state, thus setting the exercise intensity for high intensity. During the pre-luteal phase, hemoglobin levels reach their peak, optimizing oxygen transport capacity; low creatine kinase levels indicate strong muscle recovery capacity; blood testosterone levels remain at a high level, similar to that of the follicular phase, thus setting the exercise intensity for high intensity. In the late luteal phase, the hemoglobin content gradually decreases and the body gradually enters a recovery period, but it is still higher than the menstrual period; the creatine kinase level reaches a peak; the blood testosterone level gradually decreases, but it is still higher than the menstrual period, so it is set to a medium to low intensity exercise state.

[0070] When the required data determination unit 231 determines "yes," the personality status determination unit 234 calculates the average of the corresponding female athlete's performance records for each training event based on the historical test data. Based on the average of each training event, the competitive ability corresponding to each training event, and the multi-level standards for each training event, the personality status determination unit 234 determines the assessment level of the female athlete's multiple competitive abilities as her personality status. In this embodiment, taking female soccer players as an example, the four main competitive abilities include: speed, (aerobic) endurance, strength, and agility. The test item corresponding to speed is the 30-meter run test; the test item corresponding to endurance is the YOYO interval run test; the test item corresponding to strength is the vertical jump test; and the test item corresponding to agility is the T-shaped run test. Therefore, for each competitive ability, a multi-level standard range can be pre-set. When the calculated average of the corresponding test item's performance falls within a certain standard range, the female athlete's competitive ability for that event is determined to be at the corresponding assessment level. Taking speed as an example, the average value is calculated based on the timing of multiple 30-meter running tests. Three timing standard ranges are pre-set, corresponding to the three speed evaluation levels of slow, medium and fast. By judging which predetermined standard range the timing average value falls within, the speed evaluation level of the female athlete can be obtained.

[0071] If the required data determination unit 231 determines "yes," the daily state determination unit 235 determines an appropriate exercise intensity based on the physiological data as the daily state. In this embodiment, the appropriate exercise intensity is determined based on the morning pulse, the duration of deep sleep the previous night, the RPE value for the day, and a predetermined daily state determination algorithm.

[0072] Specifically, for the morning pulse, when the morning pulse is consistent with the usual resting heart rate (which can be derived from historical physiological data), it is preliminarily judged as high intensity; when the morning pulse is 5-10 beats / minute higher than the usual resting heart rate, it is preliminarily judged as medium-high intensity; when the morning pulse is 10-15 beats / minute higher than the usual resting heart rate, it is preliminarily judged as medium-low intensity; when the morning pulse is more than 15 beats / minute higher than the usual resting heart rate, it is preliminarily judged as low intensity.

[0073] As for deep sleep time, deep sleep time usually accounts for 15-25% of the total sleep time, about 1-2 hours. When the deep sleep time is greater than 1 hour, it is preliminarily judged as high intensity; when the deep sleep time is less than or equal to 1 hour, it is preliminarily judged as medium-low intensity.

[0074] For PRE values, when the RPE value is below 4 points, it is preliminarily judged as high intensity; when the RPE value is between 4 and 6 points, it is preliminarily judged as medium to low intensity; when the RPE value is above 7 points, it is preliminarily judged as low intensity.

[0075] Then, the lowest of the three intensities initially determined based on the three indicators is used as the status for the day.

[0076] In an alternative solution, for example, when some data is missing, the status of the day can be judged based on only one or two of the morning pulse, deep sleep time, and RPE value.

[0077] The evaluation result generation unit 236 generates a competitive ability evaluation result for the female athlete based on the common status, individual status, and current status, along with a predetermined evaluation algorithm. The evaluation result is stored in the evaluation-side storage unit 122, along with the athlete's identification number. The evaluation result includes an evaluation level for the current day's exercise intensity and evaluation levels for various competitive abilities. The lower of the common status and current day's status is used as the current day's exercise intensity evaluation level.

[0078] The training program recommendation generating unit 24 is used to generate training program recommendations for a female athlete for the day based on a given athlete identification number and the corresponding evaluation results. The training program recommendation generating unit 24 includes an athlete data extraction unit 241, a training program acquisition unit 242, a training program screening unit 243, a training program parameter generation unit 244, and a recommendation information generation unit 245.

[0079] Among them, the athlete data extraction unit 241 is used to obtain the athlete identification number of the female athlete specified by the coach from the training program recommendation generated from the coach terminal 30, and extract the corresponding female athlete's evaluation result from the evaluation side storage unit 22 according to the given athlete identification number.

[0080] The training item acquisition unit 242 is used to acquire training item related data from the evaluation-side storage unit 22 .

[0081] The training item screening unit 243 is used to screen out one or more training items from the acquired training item related data (including multiple training items) as recommended training items based on the exercise intensity assessment level of the day in the extracted assessment results. In this embodiment, training items with an intensity equal to the exercise intensity assessment level of the day are first preliminarily screened out. When there are multiple training items screened out, one or more competitive abilities with the lowest assessment level can be further selected based on the assessment levels of each competitive ability in the assessment results. Then, the training items corresponding to the competitive ability with the lowest assessment level in the assessment results can be further selected from the preliminarily screened out training items. In an alternative embodiment, all training items with an intensity equal to or less than the exercise intensity assessment level of the day can be preliminarily screened out. When there are multiple training items screened out, further screening can be performed.

[0082] The training program parameter generation unit 244 is used to generate training volume recommendations for the selected training programs based on the selected training programs and the evaluation results. Specifically, the recommended parameters for the training program are generated based on the average performance value of the training program in the evaluation results, the assessment level of the exercise intensity for that day, the basic training volume for that training program, and a predetermined parameter generation algorithm. For example, if a training volume adjustment range is predetermined, and for a female athlete, the average performance value of one training program is at the highest level and the exercise intensity assessment level for that day is high intensity, the basic training volume or the basic training volume plus the minimum value within the training volume adjustment range can be used as the recommended parameter. If the average performance value of another training program is at the lowest level and requires more training to improve performance, the basic training volume plus the maximum value within the training volume adjustment range can be used as the recommended parameter.

[0083] The recommendation information generating unit 245 is configured to generate a training program recommendation for the day based on the assessment results, the selected training programs, and the generated training volume recommendations. For example, the training program recommendation for a female athlete might include: Assessment Results: Recommended Low-Intensity Exercise; Recommended Training Program: Aerobic Jogging; Recommended Training Program Parameters: 40 Minutes. Optionally, the generated training program recommendation for the day may also include information such as the female athlete's menstrual cycle and historical performance in the program, providing a more comprehensive reference for coaches.

[0084] After the recommendation information generation unit 245 generates the training program recommendation results for the day, the evaluation-side communication unit 21 transmits the training program recommendation results to the coach terminal 30. Optionally, the training program recommendation results can also be simultaneously transmitted to the corresponding athlete terminal 10 based on the athlete's identification number. Optionally, the training program recommendation results can also be stored in the athlete-side storage unit 12.

[0085] The competition lineup recommendation generation unit 25 is used to generate a competition lineup recommendation result for the corresponding competition based on given competition parameters and the evaluation results of multiple female athletes. The competition lineup recommendation generation unit 25 includes a competition parameter acquisition unit 251, an athlete data acquisition unit 252, an athlete screening unit 253, and a recommendation information generation unit 254.

[0086] The competition parameter acquisition unit 251 is used to acquire specified competition parameters from the competition lineup recommendation generation instruction from the coach terminal 30. For example, for a football game, the competition parameters may include the total number of players and the number of players in each position.

[0087] The athlete data acquisition unit 252 is used to acquire the athlete-related data of all female athletes from the evaluation-side storage unit 22 .

[0088] The athlete screening unit 253 is used to select multiple recommended female athletes from a group of female athletes based on the competition parameters and the acquired athlete-related data. Specifically, the athlete-related data of the multiple female athletes is sorted according to predetermined rules, for example, by the assessed level of exercise intensity for the day. Multiple female athletes with the same assessed level of exercise intensity for the day are then sorted according to their respective competitive abilities. Then, based on the number of players in each position specified in the competition parameters, the corresponding number of female athletes who are qualified for the corresponding position and have the highest ranking are selected as recommended athletes for each position. If a sufficient number of players are not selected for a particular position, a corresponding prompt message can be sent to the coaching terminal 30, terminating the competition lineup recommendation generation process.

[0089] In an alternative solution, the competition parameters may further include other parameters, such as the minimum requirements for a certain competitive ability of each position, and the athlete screening unit 253 further selects female athletes who meet the competitive ability requirements based on the minimum requirements.

[0090] The recommendation information generating unit 254 generates a recommended lineup for the day based on the player-related data and evaluation results of the screened female athletes in each position. For example, the recommended lineup for the day includes: Athlete A, position of goalkeeper, and the athlete's four evaluation levels of competitive ability; Athlete B, position of forward, and the athlete's four evaluation levels of competitive ability; and so on.

[0091] After the recommendation information generating unit 254 generates the recommended lineup for the day, the evaluation-side communication unit 21 sends the recommended lineup for the day to the coach terminal 30. Alternatively, the recommended lineup for the day may be stored in the athlete-side storage unit 12.

[0092] The evaluation-side control unit 26 is used to control the operations of the above-mentioned functional units.

[0093] The evaluation device 20 may be, for example, a local server or a cloud server, or may be a coach's computer, etc.

[0094] The coach terminal 30 is held by the coach of the female athlete and is used for the coach to set competitive ability evaluation and related parameters for recommendation, etc., and to receive competitive ability evaluation results from the evaluation device 20.

[0095] Figure 5 It is a structural block diagram of the coach terminal in this embodiment.

[0096] like Figure 5 As shown, the coach terminal 30 includes a coach-side communication unit 31 , a coach-side storage unit 32 , a coach-side input and display unit 33 , and a coach-side control unit 34 .

[0097] The coach-side communication unit 31 is used to communicate with the evaluation device 20. Optionally, the coach-side communication unit 31 can also be used to communicate with the athlete terminal 10.

[0098] The coach-side storage unit 32 is used to store various interface templates.

[0099] The coach-side input and display unit 33 is used for the coach to set parameters related to competitive ability assessment and recommendation, and is used to display assessment results and recommendation results to the coach. In this embodiment, the coach-side input and display unit 33 provides a function selection interface, an athlete selection interface, an assessment result interface, a training program recommendation result interface, a competition parameter setting interface, and a competition lineup recommendation result interface.

[0100] Figure 6 Schematic diagram of the function selection interface in this embodiment.

[0101] like Figure 6 As shown, the function selection interface 331 is used for the coach to select functions, and the interface includes a competitive ability evaluation button 3311, a training item recommendation button 3312, and a competition lineup recommendation button 3312.

[0102] After pressing the Competitive Ability Evaluation button 3311, the athlete selection interface will be switched to display. This interface displays buttons or menus corresponding to multiple female athletes, allowing the coach to select the female athlete for whom the competitive ability evaluation result is desired. After further selecting a female athlete and confirming the selection, the coach terminal 30 sends an evaluation generation request containing the female athlete's athlete identification number to the evaluation device 20. After receiving the evaluation generation request, the evaluation device 20 generates the evaluation result for the female athlete as described above and sends the evaluation result to the coach terminal 30. After receiving the evaluation result, the coach-side input display unit 33 of the coach terminal 30 generates and switches to display the evaluation result interface for the female athlete based on the evaluation result and the corresponding interface template.

[0103] Figure 7 Schematic diagram of the evaluation result interface in this embodiment.

[0104] like Figure 7 As shown, the evaluation result interface 332 includes an evaluation result area 3321, which displays the above-mentioned competitive ability evaluation results of the specified female athlete in a table format, and wherein the factors affecting the evaluation results (menstrual cycle, physiological conditions) are highlighted.

[0105] After pressing the training program recommendation button 3312, the athlete selection interface will be switched to display, allowing the coach to select which female athlete he would like to see the training program recommendation results for that day. After selecting a female athlete, the coach terminal 30 will send a training program recommendation generation request containing the athlete identification number of the female athlete to the evaluation device 20. After receiving the training program recommendation generation request, the evaluation device 20 generates the training program recommendation results for the female athlete on that day as described above and sends them to the coach terminal 30. After receiving the training program recommendation results on that day, the coach-side input display unit 33 of the coach terminal 30 generates and switches to display the training program recommendation results interface based on the training program recommendation results and the corresponding interface template.

[0106] Figure 8 Schematic diagram of the training item recommendation result interface in this embodiment.

[0107] like Figure 8 As shown, the training program recommendation result interface 333 includes a training program information display area 3331. This area displays recommended training program information in a tabular format, including the female athlete's name, the recommended training program name, the female athlete's historical average performance in the training program, and the recommended training volume. The coach can arrange a training program for the female athlete for the day based on the information displayed on this interface.

[0108] Pressing the competition lineup recommendation button 3312 will switch to the competition parameter setting interface, allowing the coach to enter competition-related parameters, such as the total number of players and the number of players in each position. After the coach completes the input and confirms it, the coach terminal 30 sends a competition lineup recommendation generation request containing the competition parameters to the evaluation device 20. After receiving the competition lineup recommendation generation request, the evaluation device 20 generates the competition lineup recommendation results for the day as described above and sends them to the coach terminal 30. After the coach terminal 30 receives the competition lineup recommendation results for the day, the coach-side input and display unit 33 generates and switches to display the competition lineup recommendation results interface based on the competition lineup recommendation results and the corresponding interface template.

[0109] Figure 92 is a schematic diagram of the competition lineup recommendation result interface in this embodiment.

[0110] like Figure 9 As shown, the recommended lineup results 334 for the day include a lineup information display area 3341. This area displays the recommended lineup information in a tabular format, including the position in the game, the name of the corresponding female athlete, and the female athlete's multiple competitive ability evaluation levels. The coach can arrange the lineup for the day based on the information displayed on this interface.

[0111] The trainer-side control unit 34 is used to control the operation of the above-mentioned functional units of the trainer terminal 30 .

[0112] Optionally, each of the above interfaces may further include some conventional function buttons, such as a return button, a save to local button, etc. When the save to local button is pressed, the information in the information display area on the corresponding interface is saved to the coach-side storage unit 32 .

[0113] In addition, optionally, the coach terminal 30 may further include the function of modifying relevant preset parameters. For example, the coach terminal 30 may provide a corresponding interface for the coach to add new training items or change existing training items. After the coach completes the input and confirms through the interface, the coach terminal 30 will send a preset parameter update request containing the newly added training item information or the changed training item information to the evaluation device 20. After receiving the preset parameter update request, the evaluation device 20 will update the training item related data stored in the evaluation side storage unit 22 accordingly.

[0114] The coach terminal 30 may be, for example, a smart phone, a smart tablet, or other device held by the coach.

[0115] For ease of understanding, the following outlines the process of evaluation and two recommendation generation steps.

[0116] Figure 10 This is a flow chart of generating competitive ability evaluation results in this embodiment.

[0117] like Figure 10 As shown in the figure, the process of generating the competitive ability evaluation results includes the following steps:

[0118] In step S1 - 1 , the coach clicks the competitive ability evaluation button 3311 on the function selection interface 331 displayed on the coach terminal 30 , and the coach terminal 30 switches to display the athlete selection interface.

[0119] In step S1 - 2 , the coach selects the female athlete for whom he wishes to generate an evaluation result on the athlete selection interface, and the coach terminal 30 sends an evaluation generation request including the athlete identification number of the female athlete to the evaluation device 20 .

[0120] In step S1-3, the evaluation device 20 receives the evaluation generation request, and the player data extraction unit 231 extracts the player-related data from the evaluation-side storage unit 22 according to the player identification number.

[0121] In step S1-4, the required data determination unit 232 determines whether the extracted athlete-related data contains all the data required for generating the evaluation. If the determination is no, a corresponding prompt message is sent to the coach terminal 30 and the process enters the end state. If the determination is yes, the process proceeds to the subsequent steps.

[0122] In step S1-5, the common state determination unit 233 determines the corresponding exercise intensity as the common state based on the menstrual data.

[0123] In step S1-6, the personality status determination unit 234 determines the evaluation levels of the corresponding multiple competitive abilities as personality statuses based on the average scores of the various test items in the historical test data.

[0124] In step S1-7, the current state determination unit 235 determines the corresponding exercise intensity as the current state based on the physiological data.

[0125] In step S1-8, the evaluation result generating unit 236 generates the competitive ability evaluation result of the female athlete based on the common status, individual status, status of the day and the evaluation algorithm.

[0126] In step S1 - 9 , the evaluation device 20 sends the generated competitive ability evaluation result to the coach terminal 30 . The coach terminal 30 receives the evaluation result and switches to display the evaluation result interface 332 .

[0127] Figure 11 This is a flowchart of generating training item recommendation results in this embodiment.

[0128] like Figure 11 As shown in Figure 2, the process of generating training item recommendation results includes the following steps:

[0129] In step S2-1, the coach clicks the training item recommendation button 3312 on the function selection interface 331 displayed on the coach terminal 30, and the coach terminal 30 switches to display the athlete selection interface.

[0130] In step S2 - 2 , the coach selects a female athlete for whom he wishes to generate training program recommendations on the athlete selection interface, and the coach terminal 30 sends a training program recommendation generation request including the athlete identification number of the female athlete to the evaluation device 20 .

[0131] In step S2-3, the evaluation device 20 receives a training program recommendation generation request, and the athlete data extraction unit 241 extracts athlete-related data and evaluation results from the evaluation-side storage unit 22 according to the athlete identification number.

[0132] In step S2 - 4 , the training item acquisition unit 242 acquires training item related data from the evaluation-side storage unit 22 .

[0133] In step S2-5, the training item screening unit 243 preliminarily screens out a plurality of training items with appropriate exercise intensity from the acquired training item-related data according to the exercise intensity assessment level of the day in the assessment results, and then further selects the training items that need to be improved most according to the competitive ability assessment level in the assessment results.

[0134] In step S2-6, the training item parameter generating unit 244 generates a recommended training amount for the selected training item based on the basic training amount of the training item, the exercise intensity evaluation level of the day, the corresponding competitive ability evaluation level, and a predetermined algorithm.

[0135] In step S2-7, the recommendation information generating unit 245 generates a training program recommendation result for the day based on the selected training program and its recommended training amount.

[0136] In step S2 - 8 , the evaluation device 20 sends the generated training item recommendation result for the day to the coach terminal 30 . The coach terminal 30 receives the training item recommendation result for the day and switches to display the training item recommendation result interface 333 .

[0137] Figure 12 4 is a flowchart of generating competition lineup recommendation results in this embodiment.

[0138] like Figure 12 As shown in FIG, the process of generating the competition lineup recommendation results includes the following steps:

[0139] In step S3 - 1 , the coach clicks the competition lineup recommendation button 12312 on the function selection interface 331 displayed on the coach terminal 30 , and the coach terminal 30 switches to display the competition parameter setting interface.

[0140] In step S3 - 2 , after the coach sets and confirms the competition parameters through the competition parameter setting interface, the coach terminal 30 sends a competition lineup recommendation generation request including the competition parameters to the evaluation device 20 .

[0141] In step S3-3, after the evaluation device 20 receives the request for generating a recommended competition lineup, the competition parameter acquisition unit 251 acquires competition parameters from the request.

[0142] In step S3 - 4 , the player data acquisition unit 252 acquires the player-related data of all female players from the evaluation-side storage unit 22 .

[0143] In step S3-5, the athlete screening unit 253 sorts the athlete-related data of multiple female athletes according to the exercise intensity assessment level of the day, and sorts those with the same exercise intensity according to the various competitive ability assessment levels, and then selects several female athletes with the highest ranking for each position based on the number of people in each position in the competition parameters.

[0144] In step S3-6, the recommendation information generating unit 254 generates a recommended lineup for the day's competition based on the athlete-related data and positions of the selected multiple female athletes.

[0145] In step S3 - 7 , the evaluation device 20 sends the generated competition lineup recommendation result for the day to the coach terminal 30 . The coach terminal 30 receives the competition lineup recommendation result for the day and switches to display the competition lineup recommendation result interface 334 .

[0146] Functions and Effects of the Embodiments

[0147] The competitive ability evaluation system for female athletes provided in this embodiment includes an athlete terminal, a coach terminal, and an evaluation device communicatively connected thereto. The athlete terminal collects menstrual and physiological data of the female athletes and transmits it to the evaluation device. The evaluation device stores historical test data of the female athletes. The evaluation device determines the menstrual cycle based on common states and common states based on the menstrual cycle; determines the current day's state based on the historical test data, and then calculates the individual state based on the historical test data. The evaluation result is generated by combining the common state, individual state, and current day's state, and then transmitted to the coach terminal. Therefore, the generated evaluation result fully considers the physiological characteristics of the female athletes, especially the impact of the menstrual cycle, and also considers the physical condition of each female athlete on the day and the previous training situation. Therefore, the evaluation result can provide coaches with comprehensive and personalized information, assisting coaches in more scientific and reasonable daily training planning for each female athlete, achieving better training results. At the same time, it can avoid arranging high-intensity training or inappropriate training programs during fatigue conditions such as menstruation or lack of rest, thereby ensuring the physical health and safety of the female athletes.

[0148] In an embodiment, the athlete terminal includes a smartphone and a smart watch for female athletes. Female athletes only need to input menstrual data every month and RPE values when needed. Other physiological data can be automatically collected by the smart watch during normal daily life and training. Therefore, it is easy to operate and will not bring additional burden to female athletes.

[0149] Furthermore, the menstrual period, follicular period, early luteal period, and late luteal period are calculated based on historical and / or current month's menstrual data, and the corresponding common states are further determined to be low-intensity, high-intensity, high-intensity, and medium-low intensity exercise states based on a predetermined algorithm. In this way, female athletes can avoid high-intensity exercise during the menstrual period and late luteal period when they are prone to fatigue, so that they can get sufficient rest and recovery, avoiding injuries or even amenorrhea caused by high-intensity exercise; and they can make full use of the follicular period and early luteal period when the body's exercise capacity is better, arrange high-intensity exercise, and ensure training results.

[0150] Furthermore, the estimated exercise state is lowered when the morning pulse is higher than the usual resting heart rate. High-intensity exercise is determined to be unsuitable when deep sleep was insufficient the previous night. Furthermore, the estimated exercise state is lowered when the individual's subjective RPE value is low. The lower of the common state and the current state is used as the estimated appropriate exercise intensity for the day. This method combines information from each female athlete's physiological cycle, physiological data, and personal subjective experience to assess the appropriate exercise intensity for the day, further ensuring that excessively high-intensity training is avoided. Furthermore, this method is highly interpretable.

[0151] Furthermore, the evaluation results displayed on the coach terminal include not only the assessed appropriate exercise intensity for the day, but also the menstrual cycle, physiological data, etc. on which the evaluation results are based, and the items that affect the evaluation results are highlighted. Therefore, it not only provides the coach with scientific evaluation results, but also allows the coach to understand the reasons for making the evaluation conveniently and intuitively.

[0152] Furthermore, the coach terminal and the evaluation device not only provide the coach with the function option of generating evaluation results for each female athlete, but also provide the coach with the function of further generating training program recommendations for the day based on the evaluation results. The generated training program recommendation information includes training programs with intensity suitable for the personal situation of the female athlete on that day, the recommended training volume, and the corresponding competitive ability evaluation level, that is, it provides intelligent and personalized recommendations, which can assist the coach in planning the training programs for each female athlete more scientifically and reasonably.

[0153] Furthermore, the coach terminal and the evaluation device also provide the coach with a function to generate a recommendation for the day's competition lineup based on the evaluation results of multiple female athletes. The coach only needs to input the competition parameters (such as the number of people in each position and other screening conditions). The evaluation device will automatically select the most suitable candidates for each position on the day based on the competition parameters, athlete data and evaluation results to form a recommended competition lineup. The coach can quickly obtain the best competition lineup for the day after checking or making simple adjustments, which can save the coach a lot of time.

[0154] Furthermore, the coach terminal provides a variety of interactive interfaces. The coach only needs to click and select and enter the competition parameters through the coach terminal, and then obtain the generated evaluation results and recommendation results through the coach terminal. Therefore, the operation is very convenient and intuitive for the coach, and there is almost no additional learning cost.

[0155] In addition, there is no black box process in the system of the embodiment, and the generation process of the evaluation results and the generation process of the recommendation results have corresponding research and analysis basis, so the method also has good interpretability.

[0156] The above embodiments are merely illustrative of specific implementations of the present invention, and the present invention is not limited to the scope of the description of the above embodiments. Those skilled in the art should understand that the present invention is not limited to the above embodiments. The above embodiments and descriptions are merely illustrative of the principles of the present invention. Various changes and improvements may be made to the present invention without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. Such changes and improvements fall within the scope of the present invention as claimed. The scope of protection claimed in the present invention is defined by the appended claims and their equivalents.

[0157] For example, in the above embodiment, the women's athlete competitive ability assessment system is used to assess the competitive ability of women football players, and on this basis, recommend training programs and competition lineups. In fact, the assessment system can also be used to assess the competitive ability of women athletes in other sports and make corresponding recommendations. The above system can be fine-tuned according to the competitive ability involved in the corresponding sports.

[0158] In the above embodiment, the women's athlete competitive ability assessment system is used to evaluate the competitive abilities of women soccer players and generate relevant recommendations for coaches. A simplified system based on the above assessment system can also be developed to help women understand their athletic ability and plan their own exercise plans. For example, the simplified system simply includes multiple user terminals and the assessment system. The user terminals are similar to the athlete terminals described above. The assessment system communicates with the user terminals and, similar to the embodiment, generates assessment results and exercise program recommendations based on user operations and sends them to the user terminals.

[0159] In the above embodiment, the female athlete competitive ability evaluation system can further generate training program recommendations and competition lineup recommendations for the day based on the evaluation results of each female athlete. In an alternative solution, recommendations for other given dates are generated based only on menstrual data and historical test data, or recommendations are generated for each day in a period of time, so that coaches can plan training programs for a period of time (such as a week) at one time, which is more convenient to operate.

[0160] For example, in the above embodiment, for the convenience of description, the female athlete competitive ability evaluation system is specifically described as being used by a coach and multiple female athletes coached by him. In an alternative solution, the system can also be used by multiple coaches and multiple female athletes. The coach terminal also has a corresponding unique identification number. The generated evaluation results and recommendation results can be sent to the corresponding correct coach terminal according to the identification number of the coach terminal.

Claims

1. A female athlete's competitive ability evaluation system, characterized by: include: an athlete terminal, held by the respective female athlete and bearing the corresponding identification number; a coach terminal, held by the coach of the female athlete; as well as An evaluation device is connected to the athlete terminal and the coach terminal for generating an evaluation result of the competitive ability of the female athlete based on the data collected by the athlete terminal. Wherein, the acquisition terminal includes: a menstrual period data collection unit, configured to collect the menstrual period data of the corresponding female athlete; a physiological data collection unit, used to collect physiological data of the female athlete; and The collection side communication unit is used to send the identification number and the corresponding menstrual period data and physiological data to the evaluation device, The evaluation device comprises: an evaluation-side communication unit, configured to receive the identification number and the corresponding menstrual period data and physiological data from the acquisition terminal, and to send the evaluation result to at least one of the corresponding acquisition terminal and the coaching terminal according to the identification number; an evaluation-side storage unit storing at least the identification number of the female athlete and corresponding historical data; a common status determination unit, configured to determine the current menstrual cycle of the female athlete on that day based on the menstrual period data, and determine the common status of the female athlete based on the corresponding current menstrual cycle; a personality status determination unit, configured to determine the personality status of the female athlete based on the corresponding historical data; a current day condition determination unit configured to determine the current day condition of the female athlete based on the physiological data including the current day physiological data; and The evaluation result generating unit is used to generate the evaluation result according to the corresponding common status, the individual status, the status of the day and a predetermined evaluation algorithm.

2. The female athlete competitive ability evaluation system according to claim 1, characterized in that: in, The menstrual period data collection unit is used to allow the female athlete to input her menstrual start date and menstrual end date. The common state determination unit determines the current physiological cycle according to the menstrual start date and / or the menstrual end date, including the menstrual period, follicular phase, early luteal phase, and late luteal phase, and determines the corresponding exercise intensity according to the current physiological cycle as the common state. The physiological data of the day includes one or more of the female athlete's blood pressure, heart rate, blood oxygen, and deep sleep time the night before. The historical data includes historical physiological data, The current day state determination unit determines the corresponding exercise intensity as the current day state based on the corresponding historical physiological data and the current day physiological data. The evaluation result includes a recommended exercise intensity for the day, which is the lower exercise intensity between the common state and the state for the day.

3. The female athlete competitive ability evaluation system according to claim 2, characterized in that: in, The common state determination unit determines that the common state is a low-intensity exercise state during the menstrual period, determines that the common state is a high-intensity exercise state during the follicular phase, determines that the common state is a high-intensity exercise state during the early luteal phase, and determines that the common state is a medium-to-low-intensity exercise state during the late luteal phase.

4. The female athlete competitive ability evaluation system according to claim 3, characterized in that: in, The physiological data of the day includes one or more of the morning pulse of the female athlete, the deep sleep time of the previous day, and the perceived exertion intensity assessment value input by the female athlete. The day state determination unit preliminarily determines that the exercise state is high-intensity when the morning pulse is substantially consistent with the usual resting heart rate in the historical physiological data; preliminarily determines that the exercise state is medium-high intensity when the morning pulse is 5-10 beats / minute higher than the usual resting heart rate; preliminarily determines that the exercise state is medium-low intensity when the morning pulse is 10-15 beats / minute higher than the usual resting heart rate; and preliminarily determines that the exercise state is low-intensity when the morning pulse is more than 15 beats / minute higher than the usual resting heart rate. The current state determination unit preliminarily determines that the state is a low-to-medium intensity exercise state when the deep sleep time is equal to or less than 1 hour, and preliminarily determines that the state is a high-intensity exercise state when the deep sleep time is more than 1 hour. The current day state determination unit determines that the exercise state is low-intensity when the perceived exercise intensity evaluation value is less than 4, determines that the exercise state is medium-intensity when the perceived exercise intensity evaluation value is between 4 and 6, and determines that the exercise state is high-intensity when the perceived exercise intensity evaluation value is greater than 7. When there are two or more preliminarily determined exercise states, the current day state determination unit selects the one with the lowest intensity among the plurality of preliminarily determined exercise states as the current day state.

5. The female athlete competitive ability evaluation system according to claim 2, characterized in that: in, The historical data includes historical test data, which includes historical scores of multiple test items. The personality status determination unit calculates the average value of each of the test items based on the historical scores, and determines the evaluation levels of multiple competitive abilities based on the average value of each of the test items, the corresponding competitive abilities, and predetermined multi-level standards. The competitive ability evaluation result also includes multiple evaluation levels of the competitive ability.

6. The female athlete competitive ability evaluation system according to claim 5, characterized in that: in, The competitive ability includes speed, endurance, strength, and agility, and the corresponding test items are 30-meter running test, YOYO interval running test, vertical jump test, and T-type running test.

7. The female athlete's competitive ability evaluation system according to claim 5, Its characteristics are: in, The coach terminal includes: a coach-side input display unit, configured for the coach to designate the female athlete and select a function for generating a training program recommendation for the female athlete; and The coach-side communication unit is configured to send a corresponding instruction to generate a training program recommendation for the day and the identification number of the female athlete to the evaluation device after the coach selects to generate the training program recommendation for the day and designates the female athlete through the coach-side input unit. The evaluation side communication unit is further configured to receive the training item recommendation generation instruction and the identification number from the coach terminal. The evaluation device further comprises: a training item recommendation generating unit, configured to generate a corresponding training item recommendation result for the female athlete according to the identification number in the received training item recommendation generating instruction and the corresponding competitive ability evaluation result; The evaluation side communication unit is further configured to send the training item recommendation result to the coach terminal. After the coach-side communication unit receives the training item recommendation result, the coach-side input and display unit generates and displays a corresponding training item recommendation interface based on the training item recommendation result.

8. The female athlete's competitive ability evaluation system according to claim 7, Its characteristics are: in, The evaluation side storage unit also stores training item related data, including item identification numbers of a plurality of predetermined training items, corresponding training intensities, basic training volumes, and corresponding competitive abilities. The training item recommendation generation unit includes: an athlete data extraction unit, configured to obtain the corresponding athlete-related data and the competitive ability evaluation result from the evaluation-side storage unit according to the identification number; A training item acquisition unit, configured to acquire the training item related data from the evaluation side storage unit; a training program screening unit, configured to screen out the training programs that meet the requirements from the training program-related data according to the recommended exercise intensity for the day in the competitive ability assessment result; a training item parameter generating unit, configured to generate a training volume recommendation for the training item based on the screened training items, the competitive ability assessment results, and the corresponding basic training volume; and The recommendation information generating unit is configured to generate the training item recommendation result based on the competitive ability evaluation result, the screened training items, and the generated training volume recommendation.

9. The female athlete's competitive ability evaluation system according to claim 3, Its characteristics are: in, The coach terminal includes: A coach-side input unit, configured to allow the coach to select a function for generating a competition lineup recommendation and to set competition parameters; and The coach-side communication unit is configured to send a corresponding instruction to generate a lineup recommendation and the parameters to the evaluation device after the coach selects to generate the lineup recommendation for the day and sets the parameters through the coach-side input unit. The evaluation side communication unit is further configured to receive the lineup recommendation generation instruction and the parameters from the coach terminal, The evaluation device further comprises: a competition lineup recommendation generating unit, configured to generate a competition lineup recommendation result for the corresponding competition based on the competition parameters and the competitive ability evaluation result in the received competition lineup recommendation generating instruction; The evaluation side communication unit is further configured to send the competition lineup recommendation result to the coach terminal, After the coach-side communication unit receives the competition lineup recommendation result, the coach-side input and display unit generates and displays a corresponding competition lineup recommendation interface based on the competition lineup recommendation result.

10. The female athlete's competitive ability evaluation system according to claim 9, Its characteristics are: in, The competition lineup recommendation generating unit includes: A competition parameter acquisition unit, configured to acquire the competition parameters from the competition lineup recommendation generation instruction; An athlete data acquisition unit, configured to acquire the athlete-related data from the evaluation-side storage unit; an athlete screening unit, configured to screen out a plurality of recommended female athletes from the plurality of female athletes based on the competition parameters and the athlete-related data; and The recommendation information generating unit generates the competition lineup recommendation result based on the athlete-related data of the screened female athletes and the competitive ability evaluation result.

Images