Method for evaluating applicability of tipping paper and cigarette making machine

Abstract

The invention discloses a method for evaluating the applicability of tipping paper and a cigarette making machine, and the method comprises the steps: determining the evaluation indexes of the applicability of the tipping paper and the cigarette making machine, the evaluation indexes comprising at least one of an interruption frequency index, a quality index and a splicing failure frequency index; calculating a quantitative score of each evaluation index; determining the function relationship between the applicability between the tipping paper and the cigarette making machine and each evaluation index; according to the function relation and the quantitative score of each evaluation index, the applicability of the tipping paper and the cigarette making machine is evaluated, and an evaluation result is obtained. According to the method for evaluating the applicability of the tipping paper and the cigarette making machine, a scientific evaluation method is provided for evaluating the applicability of the tipping paper and the cigarette making machine, and a cigarette enterprise is guided to select proper tipping paper for production in the production and manufacturing process, so that the product quality is improved, defective cigarettes are reduced, the production efficiency is improved, and the consumption of raw and auxiliary materials is reduced; and factors restricting the improvement of the production and manufacturing level are found in time, and targeted improvement is carried out.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the technical field of cigarette raw and auxiliary material evaluation, and more particularly to a method for evaluating the applicability of tipping paper to a cigarette making machine. Background Art

[0002] At present, there is no relevant evaluation method for the applicability of tipping paper to cigarette making machines, and there are no relevant control measures for the applicability of tipping paper to cigarette making machines. The applicability of tipping paper to cigarette making machines cannot be evaluated, resulting in the inability to effectively control the quality of tipping paper on the machine, causing the problem of tipping paper being unsuitable for cigarette making machines. During the production process, due to the tipping paper being unsuitable for cigarette making machines, it will cause the interruption of tipping paper supply during the production process, cause cigarette tipping paper to curl up, cigarette quality problems such as tipping paper length, and splicing failure when changing tipping paper. This situation will greatly affect the equipment operation efficiency, reduce the equipment's hourly output, and affect the output, quality, consumption and other indicators of the production workshop products. At the same time, there are no relevant evaluation indicators for the applicability of tipping paper to cigarette making machines, no relevant scientific evaluation methods, and no relevant research in this regard.

[0003] Therefore, there is an urgent need for a method to evaluate the applicability of tipping paper to cigarette making machines. Summary of the Invention

[0004] The purpose of the present invention is to provide a method for evaluating the applicability of tipping paper to a cigarette making machine, so as to solve the above-mentioned problems in the prior art and provide a scientific evaluation method for the applicability of tipping paper to a cigarette making machine.

[0005] The present invention provides a method for evaluating the applicability of tipping paper to a cigarette making machine, comprising:

[0006] Determining an evaluation index for the applicability of the tipping paper to the cigarette making machine, the evaluation index comprising at least one of an interruption number index, a quality index, and a splicing failure number index;

[0007] Calculating the quantitative score of each evaluation indicator;

[0008] Determining the functional relationship between the applicability of the tipping paper to the cigarette making machine and each of the evaluation indicators;

[0009] The applicability of the tipping paper to the cigarette making machine is evaluated based on the functional relationship between the applicability of the tipping paper to the cigarette making machine and each evaluation index and the quantitative score of each evaluation index to obtain an evaluation result.

[0010] In the method for evaluating the applicability of tipping paper to a cigarette making machine as described above, preferably, the cigarette making machine includes: a cigarette making machine of model ZJ118;

[0011] The interruption index includes: the number of interruptions of the tipping paper during a shift from the start of production to the end of an 8-hour production shift;

[0012] The quality indicators include the number of cigarettes with curled edges rejected by the cigarette making machine and the number of cigarettes with short tipping paper rejected within a production shift;

[0013] The splicing failure number indicator includes the number of splicing failures when automatically splicing and replacing used tipping paper with new tipping paper within a production shift.

[0014] In the above method for evaluating the suitability of tipping paper and a cigarette making machine, preferably, the step of calculating the quantitative score of each evaluation indicator includes:

[0015] Determine the quantitative calculation formula for each evaluation indicator;

[0016] According to the quantitative calculation formula, the quantitative score of each evaluation indicator is calculated.

[0017] In the above method for evaluating the applicability of tipping paper to a cigarette making machine, preferably, the quantitative calculation formula for the interruption number index includes:

[0018] The maximum score for the interruption index is 100 points. If the number of interruptions of the cigarette making machine tipping paper does not exceed 2 times in a production shift, no points will be deducted. If the number of interruptions exceeds 2 times, 10 points will be deducted for each additional interruption. The score of the interruption index is expressed by the following formula:

[0019] Interruption count indicator score = 100-(interruption count-2)*10.

[0020] In the above method for evaluating the suitability of tipping paper for a cigarette making machine, preferably, the quantitative calculation formula for the quality index includes:

[0021] The full score of the quality index is 100 points. If the number of cigarettes rejected due to curled edges does not exceed 150 in a production shift, no points will be deducted. If the number exceeds 150, 0.5 points will be deducted for each additional cigarette. If the number of cigarettes rejected due to short tipping paper does not exceed 200, no points will be deducted. If the number exceeds 200, 0.2 points will be deducted for each additional cigarette. The quality index score is expressed by the following formula:

[0022] Quality index score = 100-(number of cigarettes with curled edges removed-150)*0.5-(number of cigarettes with short or long tipping paper removed-200)*0.2.

[0023] In the above method for evaluating the suitability of tipping paper and cigarette making machine, preferably, the quantitative calculation formula of the splicing failure index includes:

[0024] The full score of the splicing failure number indicator is 100 points. When the used tipping paper is automatically spliced ​​and replaced with new tipping paper within a production shift, no points will be deducted if the number of splicing failures does not exceed 2 times. If the number of splicing failures exceeds 2 times, 15 points will be deducted for each additional splicing failure. The score of the splicing failure number indicator is expressed by the following formula:

[0025] The score of the number of splicing failures indicator = 100-(number of splicing failures-2)*15.

[0026] In the above method for evaluating the applicability of tipping paper to a cigarette making machine, preferably, the step of calculating the quantitative score of each evaluation indicator according to the quantitative calculation formula includes:

[0027] After the tipping paper is installed, a production shift is carried out, and a quantitative score of each evaluation indicator is calculated according to the quantitative calculation formula corresponding to each evaluation indicator.

[0028] In the above method for evaluating the applicability of tipping paper to a cigarette making machine, preferably, determining the functional relationship between the applicability of tipping paper to a cigarette making machine and each of the evaluation indicators includes:

[0029] Based on the quantitative scores of the evaluation indicators, the total applicability score between the tipping paper and the cigarette making machine is determined by the following formula:

[0030] Total applicability score = interruption number index score * 30% + quality index score * 40% + splicing failure number index score * 30%.

[0031] In the above method for evaluating the applicability of tipping paper to a cigarette-making machine, preferably, the applicability of the tipping paper to the cigarette-making machine is evaluated based on the functional relationship between the applicability of the tipping paper to the cigarette-making machine and each evaluation index and the quantitative score of each evaluation index to obtain the evaluation result, including:

[0032] Substituting the quantitative scores of the evaluation indicators into the functional relationship between the applicability of the tipping paper and the cigarette making machine and the evaluation indicators to obtain a total applicability score, wherein the total applicability score is used to reflect the applicability of the tipping paper and the cigarette making machine;

[0033] The applicability of the tipping paper to the cigarette making machine is evaluated according to the total applicability score to obtain an evaluation result, which includes whether the tipping paper is not suitable for the cigarette making machine or whether the tipping paper is suitable for the cigarette making machine.

[0034] In the above method for evaluating the applicability of tipping paper to a cigarette making machine, preferably, the applicability of the tipping paper to the cigarette making machine is evaluated based on the total applicability score to obtain an evaluation result, including:

[0035] If the total applicability score is less than 85 points, the evaluation result is that the tipping paper is not suitable for cigarette making machines; if the total applicability score is greater than or equal to 85 points, the evaluation result is that the tipping paper is suitable for cigarette making machines.

[0036] The present invention provides a method for evaluating the applicability of tipping paper to a cigarette-making machine. According to the functional relationship between the applicability between the tipping paper and the cigarette-making machine and each evaluation index and the quantitative score of each evaluation index, the applicability of the tipping paper to the cigarette-making machine is evaluated to obtain an evaluation result. A scientific evaluation method is provided for evaluating the applicability of the tipping paper to the cigarette-making machine, and cigarette companies are guided to select suitable tipping paper for production during the production process, thereby improving product quality, reducing defective cigarettes, improving production efficiency, and reducing the consumption of raw and auxiliary materials. Factors that restrict the improvement of production and manufacturing levels are discovered in a timely manner, and targeted upgrades and improvements are carried out, so that cigarette companies can continuously improve their production and manufacturing capabilities and reduce the consumption of raw and auxiliary materials, thereby promoting high-quality development of cigarette companies. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0037] In order to make the purpose, technical solutions and advantages of the present invention more clear, the present invention will be further described below with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:

[0038] Figure 1 This is a flow chart of an embodiment of the method for evaluating the applicability of tipping paper to a cigarette making machine provided by the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0039] Various exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure will now be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings. The description of the exemplary embodiments is merely illustrative and is in no way intended to limit the present disclosure, its application, or use. The present disclosure can be implemented in many different forms and is not limited to the embodiments described herein. These embodiments are provided to make the present disclosure thorough and complete and to fully convey the scope of the present disclosure to those skilled in the art. It should be noted that unless otherwise specifically stated, the relative arrangement of parts and steps, the composition of materials, numerical expressions, and numerical values ​​set forth in these embodiments should be interpreted as being merely exemplary and not as limiting.

[0040] The terms "first," "second," and similar terms used in this disclosure do not indicate any order, quantity, or importance, but are simply used to distinguish different parts. Terms such as "include" or "comprising" mean that the elements preceding the term include the elements listed after the term, and do not exclude the possibility of also including other elements. Terms such as "upper," "lower," and the like are only used to indicate relative positional relationships. When the absolute position of the described object changes, the relative positional relationship may also change accordingly.

[0041] In the present disclosure, when a specific component is described as being located between a first component and a second component, there may or may not be an intervening component between the specific component and the first component or the second component. When a specific component is described as being connected to another component, the specific component may be directly connected to the other component without an intervening component, or may not be directly connected to the other component but have an intervening component.

[0042] All terms (including technical or scientific terms) used in this disclosure have the same meaning as those understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this disclosure belongs, unless otherwise specifically defined. It should also be understood that terms defined in, for example, general dictionaries should be interpreted as having a meaning consistent with their meaning in the context of the relevant technology, and should not be interpreted in an idealized or highly formal sense, unless explicitly defined herein.

[0043] Technologies, methods, and equipment known to ordinary technicians in the relevant art may not be discussed in detail, but where appropriate, the technologies, methods, and equipment should be considered part of the specification.

[0044] like Figure 1 As shown, the method for evaluating the applicability of tipping paper to a cigarette making machine provided in this embodiment includes the following steps during actual implementation:

[0045] Step S1: Determine an evaluation index for the applicability of the tipping paper to the cigarette making machine, wherein the evaluation index includes at least one of an interruption number index, a quality index, and a splicing failure number index.

[0046] The cigarette making machine includes the ZJ118 model. The interruption indicator includes the number of tipping paper interruptions during a shift, from the start of production to the end of an 8-hour shift. The quality indicator includes the number of cigarettes with warped edges and cigarettes with short tipping paper rejected by the cigarette making machine within an 8-hour shift. The splicing failure indicator includes the number of splicing failures during the automatic splicing replacement of used tipping paper with new one within an 8-hour shift.

[0047] Step S2: Calculate the quantitative score of each evaluation indicator.

[0048] In one embodiment of the method for evaluating the applicability of tipping paper to a cigarette making machine of the present invention, step S2 may specifically include:

[0049] Step S21: Determine the quantitative calculation formula for each evaluation index.

[0050] Specifically, the quantitative calculation formula of the interruption number indicator includes:

[0051] The maximum score for the interruption index is 100 points. If the cigarette machine tipping paper is interrupted no more than twice within a production shift (8 hours), no points will be deducted. If the interruption exceeds 2 times, 10 points will be deducted for each additional interruption. The score for the interruption index is expressed by the following formula:

[0052] Interruption count indicator score = 100-(interruption count-2)*10.

[0053] Furthermore, the quantitative calculation formula of the quality index includes:

[0054] The full score of the quality index is 100 points. If the number of cigarettes rejected due to curled edges does not exceed 150 in one production shift (8 hours), no points will be deducted. If the number exceeds 150, 0.5 points will be deducted for each additional cigarette. If the number of cigarettes rejected due to short tipping paper does not exceed 200, no points will be deducted. If the number exceeds 200, 0.2 points will be deducted for each additional cigarette. The quality index score is expressed by the following formula:

[0055] Quality index score = 100-(number of cigarettes with curled edges removed-150)*0.5-(number of cigarettes with short or long tipping paper removed-200)*0.2.

[0056] Furthermore, the quantitative calculation formula of the splicing failure number indicator includes:

[0057] The maximum score for the splicing failure number indicator is 100 points. When the used tipping paper is automatically spliced ​​and replaced with new tipping paper within one production shift (8 hours), no points will be deducted if the number of splicing failures does not exceed 2 times. If the number of splicing failures exceeds 2 times, 15 points will be deducted for each additional splicing failure. The score for the splicing failure number indicator is expressed by the following formula:

[0058] The score of the number of splicing failures indicator = 100-(number of splicing failures-2)*15.

[0059] Step S22: Calculate the quantitative score of each evaluation indicator according to the quantitative calculation formula.

[0060] Specifically, after the tipping paper is installed, a production shift is carried out, and a quantitative score of each evaluation indicator is calculated according to the quantitative calculation formula corresponding to each evaluation indicator.

[0061] In one embodiment of the present invention, an experiment was conducted on a cigarette making machine. After installing tipping paper, production began, and after the shift ended, quantitative scores for each evaluation indicator were calculated. Specifically, the number of tipping paper interruptions recorded by operators on a given cigarette making machine during that shift was used to determine the interruption score. If the number of tipping paper interruptions was three, the interruption score was calculated as 100 - (3 - 2) * 10 = 90 points.

[0062] The quality indicator's number of "lifted edge" rejects is calculated by looking up the rejection records of the cigarette making machine's visual inspection system, which show the number of cigarettes rejected due to curled edges within an eight-hour production shift. The quality indicator's number of "tip paper overshort" rejects is calculated by looking up the rejection records of the cigarette making machine's visual inspection system, which show the number of cigarettes rejected due to curled edges within an eight-hour production shift. The visual inspection system's rejection records show 164 cigarettes rejected due to curled edges and 211 cigarettes rejected due to overshort tip paper. Therefore, the quality indicator score is calculated as 100 - (164 - 150) * 0.5 - (211 - 200) * 0.2, which equals 90.8 points.

[0063] The splicing failure index is obtained by checking the number of tipping paper splicing failures in the cigarette making machine shutdown records. For example, if the number of tipping paper splicing failures in the cigarette making machine shutdown records is 3, the splicing failure index score = 100 - (3 - 2) * 15 = 75 points.

[0064] Step S3: determining the functional relationship between the applicability of the tipping paper to the cigarette making machine and each of the evaluation indicators.

[0065] Specifically, based on the quantitative scores of the evaluation indicators, the total applicability score between the tipping paper and the cigarette making machine is determined by the following formula:

[0066] Total applicability score = interruption number index score * 30% + quality index score * 40% + splicing failure number index score * 30%.

[0067] Step S4: Evaluate the applicability of the tipping paper to the cigarette making machine based on the functional relationship between the applicability of the tipping paper to the cigarette making machine and each evaluation index and the quantitative score of each evaluation index to obtain an evaluation result.

[0068] In one embodiment of the method for evaluating the applicability of tipping paper to a cigarette making machine of the present invention, step S4 may specifically include:

[0069] Step S41: Substitute the quantitative scores of the evaluation indicators into the functional relationship between the applicability between the tipping paper and the cigarette making machine and the evaluation indicators to obtain a total applicability score, which is used to reflect the applicability of the tipping paper and the cigarette making machine.

[0070] In one embodiment of the present invention, the quantitative scores of the evaluation indicators calculated in step S2 are substituted into the functional relationship determined in step S3 to obtain a total suitability score. For example, the interruption index score = 90 points, the quality index score = 90.8 points, and the splicing failure index score = 75 points. The total suitability score = interruption index (90) * 30% + quality index score (90.8) * 40% + splicing failure index score (75) * 30% = 85.82 points.

[0071] Step S42: Evaluate the applicability of the butt-binding paper and the cigarette-making machine according to the total applicability score to obtain an evaluation result.

[0072] The evaluation results include whether the tipping paper is not suitable for the cigarette making machine or whether the tipping paper is suitable for the cigarette making machine.

[0073] Specifically, if the total applicability score is less than 85 points, the evaluation result is that the tipping paper is not suitable for cigarette making machines;

[0074] If the total applicability score is greater than or equal to 85 points, the evaluation result is that the tipping paper is suitable for cigarette making machines.

[0075] In one embodiment of the present invention, the total applicability score (85.82) calculated in step S41 is greater than 85 points, which means that the tipping paper is determined to be applicable to the cigarette making machine.

[0076] The method for evaluating the applicability of tipping paper to cigarette-making machines provided in an embodiment of the present invention evaluates the applicability of tipping paper to cigarette-making machines based on the functional relationship between the applicability between the tipping paper and the cigarette-making machine and each evaluation index and the quantitative score of each evaluation index, and obtains an evaluation result, thereby providing a scientific evaluation method for evaluating the applicability of tipping paper to cigarette-making machines, guiding cigarette companies to select suitable tipping paper for production during the production process, improve product quality, reduce defective cigarettes, improve production efficiency, and reduce the consumption of raw and auxiliary materials, and timely discover factors that restrict the improvement of production and manufacturing levels, and carry out targeted upgrades and improvements, so that cigarette companies can continuously improve their production and manufacturing capabilities and reduce the consumption of raw and auxiliary materials, thereby promoting the high-quality development of cigarette companies.

[0077] Thus far, various embodiments of the present disclosure have been described in detail. To avoid obscuring the concept of the present disclosure, some details known in the art have not been described. Based on the above description, those skilled in the art can fully understand how to implement the technical solutions disclosed herein.

[0078] Although some specific embodiments of the present disclosure have been described in detail through examples, those skilled in the art will understand that the above examples are for illustration only and are not intended to limit the scope of the present disclosure. Those skilled in the art will understand that the above embodiments may be modified or some technical features may be replaced with equivalents without departing from the scope and spirit of the present disclosure. The scope of the present disclosure is defined by the appended claims.

Claims

1. A method for evaluating the suitability of tipping paper and a cigarette making machine, characterized in that: include: Determining an evaluation index for the applicability of the tipping paper to the cigarette making machine, the evaluation index comprising at least one of an interruption number index, a quality index, and a splicing failure number index; Calculating the quantitative score of each evaluation indicator; Determining the functional relationship between the applicability of the tipping paper to the cigarette making machine and each of the evaluation indicators; The applicability of the tipping paper to the cigarette making machine is evaluated based on the functional relationship between the applicability of the tipping paper to the cigarette making machine and each evaluation index and the quantitative score of each evaluation index to obtain an evaluation result.

2. The method for evaluating the suitability of tipping paper and cigarette making machine according to claim 1, characterized in that: The cigarette making machine includes: a cigarette making machine of model ZJ118; The interruption index includes: the number of interruptions of the tipping paper during a shift from the start of production to the end of an 8-hour production shift; The quality indicators include the number of cigarettes with curled edges rejected by the cigarette making machine and the number of cigarettes with short tipping paper rejected within a production shift; The splicing failure number indicator includes the number of splicing failures when automatically splicing and replacing used tipping paper with new tipping paper within a production shift.

3. The method for evaluating the suitability of tipping paper and cigarette making machine according to claim 1, characterized in that: Calculating the quantitative score of each evaluation indicator includes: Determine the quantitative calculation formula for each evaluation indicator; According to the quantitative calculation formula, the quantitative score of each evaluation indicator is calculated.

4. The method for evaluating the suitability of tipping paper and cigarette making machine according to claim 3, characterized in that: The quantitative calculation formula of the interruption number index includes: The maximum score for the interruption index is 100 points. If the number of interruptions of the cigarette making machine tipping paper does not exceed 2 times in a production shift, no points will be deducted. If the number of interruptions exceeds 2 times, 10 points will be deducted for each additional interruption. The score of the interruption index is expressed by the following formula: Interruption count indicator score = 100-(interruption count-2)*10.

5. The method for evaluating the suitability of tipping paper and cigarette making machine according to claim 3, characterized in that: The quantitative calculation formula of the quality index includes: The full score of the quality index is 100 points. If the number of cigarettes rejected due to curled edges does not exceed 150 in a production shift, no points will be deducted. If the number exceeds 150, 0.5 points will be deducted for each additional cigarette. If the number of cigarettes rejected due to short tipping paper does not exceed 200, no points will be deducted. If the number exceeds 200, 0.2 points will be deducted for each additional cigarette. The quality index score is expressed by the following formula: Quality index score = 100-(number of cigarettes with curled edges removed-150)*0.5-(number of cigarettes with short or long tipping paper removed-200)*0.

2.

6. The method for evaluating the suitability of tipping paper and cigarette making machine according to claim 3, characterized in that: The quantitative calculation formula of the splicing failure number index includes: The full score of the splicing failure number indicator is 100 points. When the used tipping paper is automatically spliced ​​and replaced with new tipping paper within a production shift, no points will be deducted if the number of splicing failures does not exceed 2 times. If the number of splicing failures exceeds 2 times, 15 points will be deducted for each additional splicing failure. The score of the splicing failure number indicator is expressed by the following formula: The score of the number of splicing failures indicator = 100-(number of splicing failures-2)*15.

7. The method for evaluating the suitability of tipping paper and cigarette making machine according to claim 3, characterized in that: Calculating the quantitative score of each evaluation indicator according to the quantitative calculation formula includes: After the tipping paper is installed, a production shift is carried out, and a quantitative score of each evaluation indicator is calculated according to the quantitative calculation formula corresponding to each evaluation indicator.

8. The method for evaluating the suitability of tipping paper and cigarette making machine according to claim 1, characterized in that: The determining of the functional relationship between the applicability of the tipping paper to the cigarette making machine and each of the evaluation indicators includes: Based on the quantitative scores of the evaluation indicators, the total applicability score between the tipping paper and the cigarette making machine is determined by the following formula: Total applicability score = interruption number index score * 30% + quality index score * 40% + splicing failure number index score * 30%.

9. The method for evaluating the suitability of tipping paper and cigarette making machine according to claim 1, characterized in that: The applicability of the tipping paper to the cigarette making machine is evaluated based on the functional relationship between the applicability of the tipping paper to the cigarette making machine and each of the evaluation indicators and the quantitative score of each of the evaluation indicators to obtain an evaluation result, including: Substituting the quantitative scores of the evaluation indicators into the functional relationship between the applicability of the tipping paper and the cigarette making machine and the evaluation indicators to obtain a total applicability score, wherein the total applicability score is used to reflect the applicability of the tipping paper and the cigarette making machine; The applicability of the tipping paper to the cigarette making machine is evaluated according to the total applicability score to obtain an evaluation result, which includes whether the tipping paper is not suitable for the cigarette making machine or whether the tipping paper is suitable for the cigarette making machine.

10. The method for evaluating the suitability of tipping paper and cigarette making machine according to claim 9, characterized in that: The applicability of the butt-binding paper to the cigarette making machine is evaluated based on the total applicability score to obtain an evaluation result, including: If the total applicability score is less than 85 points, the evaluation result is that the tipping paper is not suitable for cigarette making machines; if the total applicability score is greater than or equal to 85 points, the evaluation result is that the tipping paper is suitable for cigarette making machines.

Images