Evaluation method for online matching of filter tip cigarette cutter

Abstract

The invention discloses a filter tip cigarette cutter on-machine matching evaluation method, which comprises the following steps: determining evaluation indexes of filter tip cigarette cutter on-machine matching, the evaluation indexes comprising at least one of a life cycle index, a quality index, a shutdown index and a cleaning index; calculating a quantitative score of each evaluation index; determining a function relationship between the on-machine matching performance of the filter tip cigarette cutter and each evaluation index; and according to the function relationship and the quantitative score of each evaluation index, evaluating the online matching of the filter tip cigarette cutter to obtain an evaluation result. According to the method for evaluating the on-machine matching performance of the filter tip cigarette cutter, a scientific evaluation method is provided for the on-machine matching performance of the filter tip cigarette cutter, a cigarette enterprise is guided to select a proper filter tip cigarette cutter for production in the production and manufacturing process, and the production efficiency is improved. The product quality is improved, the production efficiency is improved, the shutdown frequency of equipment is reduced, the consumption of raw and auxiliary materials is reduced, and the labor intensity of operators is reduced.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the technical field of cigarette consumables evaluation, and more particularly to a method for evaluating the matching performance of a filter cigarette cutter on a machine. Background Art

[0002] Currently, there is no relevant evaluation method for the compatibility of filter cutters on machines, nor are there relevant control measures for the compatibility of filter cutters on machines. This makes it impossible to evaluate the compatibility of filter cutters on machines, resulting in an inability to effectively control the quality of filter cutters on machines and poor compatibility of filter cutters on machines. During the production process, poor compatibility of filter cutters on machines results in the production of a large number of defective cigarettes with dented filter tips. This also significantly impacts equipment operating efficiency, reduces equipment hourly output, increases the number of times filter cutters need to be cleaned during a shift, and increases operator labor intensity, significantly affecting the output, quality, and consumption of products in the production workshop. Furthermore, there are no corresponding evaluation indicators for the effects of filter cutters on cigarette product quality, cigarette machine operating conditions, or operator labor intensity, nor are there relevant scientific evaluation methods, and there is no relevant research in this area.

[0003] Therefore, there is an urgent need for an evaluation method for the matching performance of filter cigarette cutters on machines. Summary of the Invention

[0004] The purpose of the present invention is to provide a method for evaluating the compatibility of a filter cigarette cutter on a machine, so as to solve the problems in the above-mentioned prior art and to provide a scientific evaluation method for the compatibility of a filter cigarette cutter on a machine.

[0005] The present invention provides a method for evaluating the compatibility of a filter cigarette cutter on a machine, which includes:

[0006] Determining an evaluation index for the compatibility of the filter cigarette cutter with the machine, the evaluation index comprising at least one of a life cycle index, a quality index, a downtime index, and a cleaning index;

[0007] Calculating the quantitative score of each evaluation indicator;

[0008] Determine the functional relationship between the filter cigarette cutter machine matching and each of the evaluation indicators;

[0009] The matching performance of the filter cigarette cutter on the machine is evaluated according to the functional relationship between the matching performance of the filter cigarette cutter on the machine and each of the evaluation indicators and the quantitative scores of each of the evaluation indicators to obtain an evaluation result.

[0010] In the above-mentioned method for evaluating the compatibility of a filter cigarette cutter on a machine, preferably, the cigarette making machine for which the filter cigarette cutter is compatible includes: a cigarette making machine of model ZJ118;

[0011] The life cycle indicators include: the length of time from the installation and production of the filter cigarette cutter to the end of its service life;

[0012] The quality indicators include the number of cigarettes with dented filter tips rejected by the cigarette making machine within a production shift;

[0013] The shutdown index includes the number of shutdowns of the cigarette making machine caused by the filter cigarette cutter in a production shift;

[0014] The cleaning index includes the number of times an operator cleans the filter cigarette cutter within a production shift.

[0015] In the above-mentioned method for evaluating the compatibility of filter cigarette cutters with machine tools, preferably, the step of calculating the quantitative scores of the evaluation indicators includes:

[0016] Determine the quantitative calculation formula for each evaluation indicator;

[0017] According to the quantitative calculation formula, the quantitative score of each evaluation indicator is calculated.

[0018] In the above-mentioned method for evaluating the compatibility of filter cigarette cutters on machines, preferably, the quantitative calculation formula of the quality index includes:

[0019] The full score of the quality index is 100 points. If the number of cigarettes with dented filter tips does not exceed 400 in a production shift, no points will be deducted. If the number exceeds 400, 0.2 points will be deducted for each additional cigarette. The quality index score is expressed by the following formula:

[0020] Quality index score = 100-(number of cigarette filter end dents removed-400)*0.2.

[0021] In the above-mentioned method for evaluating the compatibility of filter cigarette cutters on machines, preferably, the quantitative calculation formula of the shutdown index includes:

[0022] The full score of the downtime index is 100 points. If the number of downtimes caused by the filter cigarette cutter does not exceed 2 times in a production shift, no points will be deducted. If the number of downtimes exceeds 2 times, 10 points will be deducted for each additional time. The downtime index score is expressed by the following formula:

[0023] The downtime index score = 100-(number of downtimes caused by the filter cigarette cutter-2)*10.

[0024] In the above-mentioned method for evaluating the compatibility of a filter cigarette cutter on a machine, preferably, the quantitative calculation formula of the cleaning index includes:

[0025] The full score of the cleaning index is 100 points. If the operator cleans the filter cigarette cutter no more than 3 times within a production shift, no points will be deducted. If the operator cleans the filter cigarette cutter more than 3 times, 5 points will be deducted for each additional time. The cleaning index score is expressed by the following formula:

[0026] Cleanliness index score = 100-(number of cleanings-3)*5.

[0027] In the above-mentioned method for evaluating the compatibility of filter cigarette cutters on a machine, preferably, the step of calculating the quantitative score of each evaluation indicator according to the quantitative calculation formula includes:

[0028] After the filter cigarette cutter is installed, a production shift is carried out, and the quantitative score of each evaluation index is calculated according to the quantitative calculation formula corresponding to each evaluation index.

[0029] In the above-mentioned method for evaluating the compatibility of a filter cigarette cutter on a machine, preferably, determining the functional relationship between the compatibility of the filter cigarette cutter on a machine and each of the evaluation indicators includes:

[0030] Based on the quantitative scores of the evaluation indicators, the total score of the filter cigarette cutter on the machine is determined by the following formula:

[0031] The total matching score = (life cycle is a veto item) + quality index score * 40% + downtime index score * 40% + cleaning index score * 20%. Among them, the life cycle index is a veto item, requiring the filter cigarette cutter to be able to be used for at least one production shift. If the usage cycle is less than one production shift, the total matching score is 0.

[0032] In the above-mentioned method for evaluating the compatibility of a filter cigarette cutter on a machine, preferably, the compatibility of the filter cigarette cutter on a machine is evaluated based on the functional relationship between the compatibility of the filter cigarette cutter on a machine and each of the evaluation indicators and the quantitative score of each of the evaluation indicators, to obtain an evaluation result, including:

[0033] Substituting the quantitative scores of the evaluation indicators into the functional relationship between the filter cigarette cutter machine matching and the evaluation indicators, to obtain a total matching score reflecting the filter cigarette cutter machine matching;

[0034] The matching of the filter cigarette cutter on the machine is evaluated according to the total matching score to obtain an evaluation result, which includes whether the filter cigarette cutter is mismatched or whether the filter cigarette cutter is matched.

[0035] In the above-mentioned method for evaluating the compatibility of a filter cigarette cutter on a machine, preferably, the compatibility of the filter cigarette cutter on a machine is evaluated based on the total compatibility score to obtain an evaluation result, including:

[0036] If the total matching score is less than 85 points, the evaluation result is that the filter cigarette cutter does not match; if the total matching score is greater than or equal to 85 points, the evaluation result is that the filter cigarette cutter matches.

[0037] The present invention provides an evaluation method for the machine matching of filter cigarette cutters. According to the functional relationship between the machine matching of filter cigarette cutters and various evaluation indicators and the quantitative scores of various evaluation indicators, the machine matching of filter cigarette cutters is evaluated to obtain an evaluation result. The method provides a scientific evaluation method for the machine matching of filter cigarette cutters, guides cigarette companies to select suitable filter cigarette cutters for production during the production process, improves product quality, improves production efficiency, reduces equipment downtime, reduces the consumption of raw and auxiliary materials, reduces the labor intensity of operators, and promptly discovers factors that restrict the improvement of production and manufacturing levels, and conducts targeted upgrades and improvements, so that cigarette companies can continuously improve their production and manufacturing capabilities and reduce the consumption of raw and auxiliary materials, thereby promoting the high-quality development of cigarette companies. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0038] In order to make the purpose, technical solutions and advantages of the present invention more clear, the present invention will be further described below with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:

[0039] Figure 1 This is a flow chart of an embodiment of a method for evaluating the matching performance of a filter cigarette cutter on a machine provided by the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0040] Various exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure will now be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings. The description of the exemplary embodiments is merely illustrative and is in no way intended to limit the present disclosure, its application, or use. The present disclosure can be implemented in many different forms and is not limited to the embodiments described herein. These embodiments are provided to make the present disclosure thorough and complete and to fully convey the scope of the present disclosure to those skilled in the art. It should be noted that unless otherwise specifically stated, the relative arrangement of parts and steps, the composition of materials, numerical expressions, and numerical values ​​set forth in these embodiments should be interpreted as being merely exemplary and not as limiting.

[0041] The terms "first," "second," and similar terms used in this disclosure do not indicate any order, quantity, or importance, but are simply used to distinguish different parts. Terms such as "include" or "comprising" mean that the elements preceding the term include the elements listed after the term, and do not exclude the possibility of also including other elements. Terms such as "upper," "lower," and the like are only used to indicate relative positional relationships. When the absolute position of the described object changes, the relative positional relationship may also change accordingly.

[0042] In the present disclosure, when a specific component is described as being located between a first component and a second component, there may or may not be an intervening component between the specific component and the first component or the second component. When a specific component is described as being connected to another component, the specific component may be directly connected to the other component without an intervening component, or may not be directly connected to the other component but have an intervening component.

[0043] All terms (including technical or scientific terms) used in this disclosure have the same meaning as those understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this disclosure belongs, unless otherwise specifically defined. It should also be understood that terms defined in, for example, general dictionaries should be interpreted as having a meaning consistent with their meaning in the context of the relevant technology, and should not be interpreted in an idealized or highly formal sense, unless explicitly defined herein.

[0044] Technologies, methods, and equipment known to ordinary technicians in the relevant art may not be discussed in detail, but where appropriate, the technologies, methods, and equipment should be considered part of the specification.

[0045] like Figure 1 As shown, the method for evaluating the compatibility of a filter cigarette cutter on a machine provided in this embodiment specifically includes the following steps during actual implementation:

[0046] Step S1: Determine evaluation indicators for the compatibility of a filter cigarette cutter with a machine, wherein the evaluation indicators include at least one of a life cycle indicator, a quality indicator, a shutdown indicator, and a cleaning indicator.

[0047] The filter cutter's compatibility with the cigarette making machine is targeted at the ZJ118 model. Lifecycle indicators include the duration from the installation of the filter cutter to the end of its service life. Quality indicators include the number of cigarettes with dented filter tips rejected by the cigarette making machine within an 8-hour production shift. Downtime indicators include the number of cigarette machine downtimes caused by the filter cutter within an 8-hour production shift. Cleaning indicators include the number of times an operator cleans the filter cutter within an 8-hour production shift.

[0048] Step S2: Calculate the quantitative score of each evaluation indicator.

[0049] In one embodiment of the method for evaluating the compatibility of a filter cigarette cutter on a machine according to the present invention, step S2 may specifically include:

[0050] Step S21: Determine the quantitative calculation formula for each evaluation index.

[0051] Specifically, the quantitative calculation formula of the quality index includes:

[0052] The full score of the quality index is 100 points. If the number of cigarettes with dented filter tips does not exceed 400 in one production shift (8 hours), no points will be deducted. If the number exceeds 400, 0.2 points will be deducted for each additional cigarette. The quality index score is expressed by the following formula:

[0053] Quality index score = 100-(number of cigarette filter end dents removed-400)*0.2.

[0054] Furthermore, the quantitative calculation formula of the downtime index includes:

[0055] The full score of the downtime index is 100 points. If the number of downtimes caused by the filter cigarette cutter does not exceed 2 times within a production shift (8 hours), no points will be deducted. If the number of downtimes exceeds 2 times, 10 points will be deducted for each additional time. The downtime index score is expressed by the following formula:

[0056] The downtime index score = 100-(number of downtimes caused by the filter cigarette cutter-2)*10.

[0057] Furthermore, the quantitative calculation formula of the cleaning index includes:

[0058] The full score of the cleaning index is 100 points. If the operator cleans the filter cigarette cutter no more than 3 times within a production shift (8 hours), no points will be deducted. If the operator cleans the filter cigarette cutter more than 3 times, 5 points will be deducted for each additional time. The cleaning index score is expressed by the following formula:

[0059] Cleanliness index score = 100-(number of cleanings-3)*5.

[0060] Step S22: Calculate the quantitative score of each evaluation indicator according to the quantitative calculation formula.

[0061] Specifically, after the filter cigarette cutter is installed, a production shift is carried out, and the quantitative score of each evaluation indicator is calculated according to the quantitative calculation formula corresponding to each evaluation indicator.

[0062] In one embodiment of the present invention, an experiment was conducted on a cigarette making machine. After installing a filter tip cutter, one production shift (8 hours) was carried out. The life cycle of the filter tip cutter was observed, and the quantitative scores of each evaluation index were calculated after the end of the production shift. In one embodiment of the present invention, the life cycle of the filter tip cutter exceeded one production shift (8 hours). In a specific implementation, the number of cigarettes with dented filter tips rejected in the quality index was obtained by consulting the rejection record of the cigarette making machine's visual inspection system, which records the number of cigarettes with dented filter tips rejected within one production shift (8 hours). In one embodiment of the present invention, if the number of cigarettes with dented filter tips rejected in the rejection record of the cigarette making machine's visual inspection system is 458, then the quality index score = 100 - (458 - 400) * 0.2 = 88.4 points.

[0063] The number of downtimes in the downtime index is determined by reviewing the number of downtimes caused by the filter cigarette cutter within an eight-hour production shift. In one embodiment of the present invention, if the number of downtimes caused by the filter cigarette cutter in the cigarette making machine downtime record is three, the downtime index score is calculated as 100 - (3 - 2) * 10 = 90 points.

[0064] The cleaning frequency index is obtained by viewing the number of times an operator cleans the filter tip cutter during an eight-hour production shift, as collected by the data acquisition system. In one embodiment of the present invention, if the data acquisition system indicates that an operator cleaned the filter tip cutter of a cigarette making machine six times during a production shift, the cleaning frequency index score is calculated as 100 - (6 - 3) * 5 = 85 points.

[0065] Step S3: determining the functional relationship between the filter cigarette cutter machine matching and each of the evaluation indicators.

[0066] Specifically, based on the quantitative scores of the evaluation indicators, the total score of the filter cigarette cutter on the machine is determined by the following formula:

[0067] The total matching score = (life cycle is a veto item) + quality index score * 40% + downtime index score * 40% + cleaning index score * 20%. Among them, the life cycle index is a veto item, requiring the filter cigarette cutter to be able to be used for at least one production shift (8 hours). If the usage cycle is less than one production shift, the total matching score is 0.

[0068] Step S4: Evaluate the matching performance of the filter cigarette cutter on the machine based on the functional relationship between the matching performance of the filter cigarette cutter on the machine and each of the evaluation indicators and the quantitative score of each of the evaluation indicators to obtain an evaluation result.

[0069] In one embodiment of the method for evaluating the compatibility of a filter cigarette cutter on a machine according to the present invention, step S4 may specifically include:

[0070] Step S41 , substituting the quantitative scores of the evaluation indicators into the functional relationship between the filter cigarette cutter machine matching and the evaluation indicators, to obtain a total matching score reflecting the filter cigarette cutter machine matching.

[0071] In one embodiment of the present invention, the quantitative scores of the evaluation indicators calculated in step S2 are substituted into the functional relationship determined in step S3 to obtain a total matching score. For example, if the life cycle of the filter cigarette cutter exceeds one production shift (8 hours), the rejection condition is not met, and the total matching score is not 0. Then, the total matching score is calculated using the functional relationship determined in step S3. According to the above analysis, the quality index score = 88.4 points, the downtime index score = 90 points, and the cleaning frequency index score = 85 points. Then, the total matching score = quality index score (88.4) * 40% + downtime index score (90) * 40% + cleaning index score (85) * 20% = 88.36 points.

[0072] Step S42: Evaluate the compatibility of the filter cigarette cutter on the machine based on the total compatibility score to obtain an evaluation result.

[0073] The evaluation result includes whether the filter cigarette cutter does not match or the filter cigarette cutter matches.

[0074] Specifically, if the total matching score is less than 85 points, the evaluation result is that the filter cigarette cutter does not match;

[0075] If the total matching score is greater than or equal to 85 points, the evaluation result is filter cigarette cutter matching.

[0076] In one embodiment of the present invention, the total matching score (88.36) calculated in step S41 is greater than 85 points, which means that the filter cigarette cutter is determined to be suitable for the cigarette making machine.

[0077] The embodiment of the present invention provides an evaluation method for the machine matching of filter cigarette cutters. According to the functional relationship between the machine matching of filter cigarette cutters and various evaluation indicators and the quantitative scores of various evaluation indicators, the machine matching of filter cigarette cutters is evaluated to obtain evaluation results, thereby providing a scientific evaluation method for the machine matching of filter cigarette cutters. The method guides cigarette companies to select suitable filter cigarette cutters for production during the production process, improve product quality, improve production efficiency, reduce equipment downtime, reduce the consumption of raw and auxiliary materials, reduce the labor intensity of operators, and promptly discover factors that restrict the improvement of production and manufacturing levels, and carry out targeted upgrades and improvements, so that cigarette companies can continuously improve their production and manufacturing capabilities and reduce the consumption of raw and auxiliary materials, thereby promoting the high-quality development of cigarette companies.

[0078] Thus far, various embodiments of the present disclosure have been described in detail. To avoid obscuring the concept of the present disclosure, some details known in the art have not been described. Based on the above description, those skilled in the art can fully understand how to implement the technical solutions disclosed herein.

[0079] Although some specific embodiments of the present disclosure have been described in detail through examples, those skilled in the art will understand that the above examples are for illustration only and are not intended to limit the scope of the present disclosure. Those skilled in the art will understand that the above embodiments may be modified or some technical features may be replaced with equivalents without departing from the scope and spirit of the present disclosure. The scope of the present disclosure is defined by the appended claims.

Claims

1. A method for evaluating the compatibility of a filter cigarette cutter on a machine, characterized in that: include: Determining an evaluation index for the compatibility of the filter cigarette cutter with the machine, the evaluation index comprising at least one of a life cycle index, a quality index, a downtime index, and a cleaning index; Calculating the quantitative score of each evaluation indicator; Determine the functional relationship between the filter cigarette cutter machine matching and each of the evaluation indicators; The matching performance of the filter cigarette cutter on the machine is evaluated according to the functional relationship between the matching performance of the filter cigarette cutter on the machine and each of the evaluation indicators and the quantitative scores of each of the evaluation indicators to obtain an evaluation result.

2. The method for evaluating the compatibility of a filter cigarette cutter on a machine according to claim 1, characterized in that: The cigarette making machines for which the filter cigarette cutter is compatible include: cigarette making machines of model ZJ118; The life cycle indicators include: the length of time from the installation and production of the filter cigarette cutter to the end of its service life; The quality indicators include the number of cigarettes with dented filter tips rejected by the cigarette making machine within a production shift; The shutdown index includes the number of shutdowns of the cigarette making machine caused by the filter cigarette cutter in a production shift; The cleaning index includes the number of times an operator cleans the filter cigarette cutter within a production shift.

3. The method for evaluating the compatibility of a filter cigarette cutter on a machine according to claim 1, characterized in that: Calculating the quantitative score of each evaluation indicator includes: Determine the quantitative calculation formula for each evaluation indicator; According to the quantitative calculation formula, the quantitative score of each evaluation indicator is calculated.

4. The method for evaluating the compatibility of a filter cigarette cutter on a machine according to claim 3, characterized in that: The quantitative calculation formula of the quality index includes: The full score of the quality index is 100 points. If the number of cigarettes with dented filter tips does not exceed 400 in a production shift, no points will be deducted. If the number exceeds 400, 0.2 points will be deducted for each additional cigarette. The quality index score is expressed by the following formula: Quality index score = 100-(number of cigarette filter end dents removed-400)*0.

2.

5. The method for evaluating the compatibility of a filter cigarette cutter on a machine according to claim 3, characterized in that: The quantitative calculation formula of the shutdown index includes: The full score of the downtime index is 100 points. If the number of downtimes caused by the filter cigarette cutter does not exceed 2 times in a production shift, no points will be deducted. If the number of downtimes exceeds 2 times, 10 points will be deducted for each additional time. The downtime index score is expressed by the following formula: The downtime index score = 100-(number of downtimes caused by the filter cigarette cutter-2)*10.

6. The method for evaluating the compatibility of a filter cigarette cutter on a machine according to claim 3, wherein: The quantitative calculation formula of the cleaning index includes: The full score of the cleaning index is 100 points. If the operator cleans the filter cigarette cutter no more than 3 times within a production shift, no points will be deducted. If the operator cleans the filter cigarette cutter more than 3 times, 5 points will be deducted for each additional time. The cleaning index score is expressed by the following formula: Cleanliness index score = 100-(number of cleanings-3)*5.

7. The method for evaluating the compatibility of a filter cigarette cutter on a machine according to claim 3, wherein: Calculating the quantitative score of each evaluation indicator according to the quantitative calculation formula includes: After the filter cigarette cutter is installed, a production shift is carried out, and the quantitative score of each evaluation index is calculated according to the quantitative calculation formula corresponding to each evaluation index.

8. The method for evaluating the compatibility of a filter cigarette cutter on a machine according to claim 1, characterized in that: The determination of the functional relationship between the filter cigarette cutter machine compatibility and each of the evaluation indicators includes: Based on the quantitative scores of the evaluation indicators, the total score of the filter cigarette cutter on the machine is determined by the following formula: The total matching score = (life cycle is a veto item) + quality index score * 40% + downtime index score * 40% + cleaning index score * 20%. Among them, the life cycle index is a veto item, requiring the filter cigarette cutter to be able to be used for at least one production shift. If the usage cycle is less than one production shift, the total matching score is 0.

9. The method for evaluating the compatibility of a filter cigarette cutter on a machine according to claim 1, wherein: The matching performance of the filter cigarette cutter on the machine is evaluated based on the functional relationship between the matching performance of the filter cigarette cutter on the machine and each of the evaluation indicators and the quantitative score of each of the evaluation indicators to obtain an evaluation result, including: Substituting the quantitative scores of the evaluation indicators into the functional relationship between the filter cigarette cutter machine matching and the evaluation indicators, to obtain a total matching score reflecting the filter cigarette cutter machine matching; The matching of the filter cigarette cutter on the machine is evaluated according to the total matching score to obtain an evaluation result, which includes whether the filter cigarette cutter is mismatched or whether the filter cigarette cutter is matched.

10. The method for evaluating the compatibility of a filter cigarette cutter on a machine according to claim 9, characterized in that: The compatibility of the filter cigarette cutter on the machine is evaluated based on the total compatibility score, and the evaluation result is obtained, including: If the total matching score is less than 85 points, the evaluation result is that the filter cigarette cutter does not match; if the total matching score is greater than or equal to 85 points, the evaluation result is that the filter cigarette cutter matches.

Images