Charging pile fault safety test method, system, medium and equipment

Abstract

The invention provides a charging pile fault safety test method and system, a medium and equipment, and the method comprises the steps: obtaining a vehicle charging parameter of a charging vehicle, and determining a charging pile operation parameter of the charging pile in a charging process; injecting a test fault signal into the charging pile; collecting a feedback signal after the charging pile receives the test fault signal; determining the fault safety level of the charging pile based on the feedback signal and the test fault signal; charging pile operation parameters are determined by acquiring vehicle charging parameters of a charging vehicle, a charging handshake is established based on the vehicle charging parameters and the charging pile operation parameters, and the fault safety level of the charging pile is determined by injecting a test fault signal, collecting a feedback signal of the charging pile and according to the feedback signal and the test fault signal. Therefore, the response measure of the fault of the charging pile in the charging process is tested to determine the response measure of the charging pile to the fault signal, so that the safety level of the charging pile is determined, and the safety test result of the charging pile is accurately tested and obtained.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This application relates to the field of charging pile testing technology, specifically to a charging pile fault safety testing method, system, medium, and equipment. Background Technology

[0002] With the continuous development of electric vehicles, the usage of charging stations is also increasing. Providing fast, efficient, and safe charging services for electric vehicles, the charging performance and safety of charging stations are primary concerns. Especially when there are abnormalities or malfunctions in the charging system, the safe handling of charging stations is a necessary means to ensure the safety of both the charging station and the electric vehicle. Currently, there is no good method for testing the performance under charging failure scenarios. Therefore, there is an urgent need for a method to test the performance of charging stations when malfunctions occur during the charging process. Summary of the Invention

[0003] To address the aforementioned technical problems, this application is proposed. Embodiments of this application provide a method, system, medium, and equipment for fault safety testing of charging piles.

[0004] According to one aspect of this application, a method for testing the fault safety of a charging pile is provided, comprising: acquiring vehicle charging parameters of a charging vehicle; wherein the vehicle charging parameters include vehicle model, battery parameters, and communication protocol; determining charging pile operating parameters during the charging process based on the vehicle charging parameters; injecting a test fault signal into the charging pile; wherein the test fault signal characterizes a fault signal of the charging vehicle; collecting a feedback signal from the charging pile after receiving the test fault signal; wherein the feedback signal includes a notification signal or a response measure signal; and determining the fault safety level of the charging pile based on the feedback signal and the test fault signal.

[0005] In one embodiment, determining the charging pile operating parameters during the charging process based on the vehicle charging parameters includes: selecting a charging strategy suitable for the vehicle being charged based on the vehicle charging parameters; and determining the charging pile operating parameters during the charging process based on the charging strategy.

[0006] In one embodiment, the charging pile fault safety testing method further includes: collecting the output information of the charging pile; injecting a test fault signal into the charging pile includes: if the output information matches the operating parameters of the charging pile, then injecting a test fault signal into the charging pile.

[0007] In one embodiment, the step of collecting the feedback signal after the charging pile receives the test fault signal includes: periodically collecting the output information of the charging pile after injecting the test fault signal; calculating the difference between the current output information collected in the current period and the historical output information collected in the previous period; and collecting the feedback signal if the difference is greater than a preset difference threshold.

[0008] In one embodiment, determining the fault safety level of the charging pile based on the feedback signal and the test fault signal includes: determining the fault safety level of the charging pile based on the safety handling measures corresponding to the feedback signal and the test fault signal.

[0009] In one embodiment, determining the fault safety level of the charging pile based on the safety handling measures corresponding to the feedback signal and the test fault signal includes: if the feedback signal is the safety handling measure corresponding to the test fault signal, then the fault safety level of the charging pile is determined to be high.

[0010] In one embodiment, the safety handling measures corresponding to the test fault signal include multiple measures; wherein, determining the fault safety level of the charging pile based on the feedback signal and the safety handling measures corresponding to the test fault signal includes: if the feedback signal is the optimal handling measure among the multiple safety handling measures, then the fault safety level of the charging pile is determined to be high.

[0011] According to another aspect of this application, a charging pile fault safety testing system is provided, comprising: a charging parameter acquisition module for acquiring vehicle charging parameters of a charging vehicle; wherein the vehicle charging parameters include vehicle model, battery parameters, and communication protocol; an operating parameter determination module for determining charging pile operating parameters during the charging process based on the vehicle charging parameters; a test fault injection module for injecting a test fault signal into the charging pile; wherein the test fault signal characterizes a fault in the charging vehicle; a feedback signal acquisition module for acquiring a feedback signal from the charging pile after receiving the test fault signal; wherein the feedback signal includes a notification signal or a response measure signal; and a safety level determination module for determining the fault safety level of the charging pile based on the feedback signal and the test fault signal.

[0012] According to another aspect of this application, a computer-readable storage medium is provided, the storage medium storing a computer program for performing any of the methods described above.

[0013] According to another aspect of this application, an electronic device is provided, comprising: a processor; a memory for storing processor-executable instructions; the processor being configured to perform any of the methods described above.

[0014] This application provides a charging pile fault safety testing method, system, medium, and equipment. The method involves acquiring vehicle charging parameters, including vehicle model, battery parameters, and communication protocols; determining charging pile operating parameters during the charging process based on these parameters; injecting a test fault signal into the charging pile, where the test fault signal represents a fault in the charging vehicle; collecting feedback signals from the charging pile after receiving the test fault signal, including notification signals or response measure signals; and determining the charging pile's fault safety level based on the feedback signals and the test fault signal. By acquiring the vehicle charging parameters and determining the charging pile's operating parameters, establishing a charging handshake based on these parameters, and injecting the test fault signal and collecting the charging pile's feedback signal, the method determines the charging pile's fault safety level. This allows for testing the response measures of the charging pile to faults during charging, determining the charging pile's response to fault signals, and thus determining its safety level, thereby accurately obtaining the charging pile's safety test results. Attached Figure Description

[0015] The above and other objects, features, and advantages of this application will become more apparent from the more detailed description of the embodiments of this application in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. The drawings are provided to further illustrate the embodiments of this application and form part of the specification. They are used together with the embodiments of this application to explain this application and do not constitute a limitation thereof. In the drawings, the same reference numerals generally represent the same components or steps.

[0016] Figure 1 This is a flowchart illustrating a charging pile fault safety testing method provided in an exemplary embodiment of this application.

[0017] Figure 2 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of a charging pile fault safety testing system provided in an exemplary embodiment of this application.

[0018] Figure 3 This is a structural diagram of an electronic device provided in an exemplary embodiment of this application. Detailed Implementation

[0019] Hereinafter, exemplary embodiments according to this application will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings. Obviously, the described embodiments are merely some embodiments of this application, and not all embodiments of this application. It should be understood that this application is not limited to the exemplary embodiments described herein.

[0020] Figure 1 This is a flowchart illustrating a fault safety testing method for charging piles provided in an exemplary embodiment of this application. Figure 1As shown, the fault safety testing method for this charging pile includes the following steps: Step 110: Obtain the vehicle charging parameters of the charging vehicle.

[0021] The charging pile fault safety testing method of this application is applied to a charging system, which includes a charging pile, a virtual charging system model, and a virtual vehicle model, wherein the charging pile, virtual charging system model, and virtual vehicle model are connected sequentially. The charging pile is used to output electrical energy, the virtual charging system model is used to simulate the charging strategy control of vehicle charging, and the virtual vehicle model is used to store vehicle charging parameters. The vehicle charging parameters include vehicle model, battery parameters, and communication protocol. This application connects the charging plug of the charging pile to the corresponding charging socket of the virtual simulation test platform to complete the physical connection of the equipment. By acquiring vehicle messages from various electric vehicles and interpreting the messages to convert them into vehicle charging parameter tables, these tables are stored in the database module of the virtual vehicle model to form a charging parameter library for the charging vehicles. During the test, by retrieving the corresponding vehicle charging parameter tables from the database module of the virtual vehicle model, a model is built using digital twin technology to reproduce the actual vehicle charging environment.

[0022] Step 120: Based on the vehicle charging parameters, determine the charging pile operating parameters during the charging process.

[0023] This application determines the charging needs of a vehicle based on its charging parameters, and then determines the charging pile's operating parameters based on those charging needs, in order to simulate charging the vehicle.

[0024] Step 130: Inject a test fault signal into the charging station.

[0025] The test fault signal represents a fault in the charging vehicle. This application achieves fault testing of the charging pile by injecting a test fault signal into the charging system. Specifically, the test fault signal can be injected into the charging vehicle or directly into the charging pile.

[0026] Step 140: Collect the feedback signal after the charging pile receives the test fault signal.

[0027] The feedback signal includes a notification signal or a response measure signal. This application, after injecting a test fault signal, collects the response signal or response measure of the charging pile to determine the charging pile's response information after receiving the test fault signal.

[0028] Step 150: Determine the fault safety level of the charging pile based on the feedback signal and the test fault signal.

[0029] Based on the feedback signal and the test fault signal, a comprehensive judgment is made on whether the feedback signal of the charging pile in response to the test fault signal can eliminate the test fault or reduce the impact of the test fault signal, thereby determining the fault safety level of the charging pile.

[0030] This application provides a charging pile fault safety testing method, which involves acquiring vehicle charging parameters, including vehicle model, battery parameters, and communication protocol; determining charging pile operating parameters during the charging process based on the vehicle charging parameters; injecting a test fault signal into the charging pile, wherein the test fault signal represents a fault in the charging vehicle; collecting feedback signals from the charging pile after receiving the test fault signal, wherein the feedback signals include notification signals or response measure signals; and determining the fault safety level of the charging pile based on the feedback signals and the test fault signal. By acquiring the vehicle charging parameters to determine the charging pile operating parameters, establishing a charging handshake based on the vehicle charging parameters and the charging pile operating parameters, and determining the fault safety level of the charging pile by injecting the test fault signal and collecting the feedback signals from the charging pile, this method tests the response measures of the charging pile to faults during the charging process, determines the charging pile's response measures to fault signals, and thus determines its safety level, thereby accurately obtaining the safety test results of the charging pile.

[0031] In one embodiment, step 120 can be implemented as follows: based on vehicle charging parameters, select a charging strategy suitable for the charging vehicle; based on the charging strategy, determine the charging pile operating parameters during the charging process.

[0032] The charging strategy includes charging handshake timing, charging power, and charging interface parameters. The charging parameters have a virtual adjustment function and can generate waveform strategies. Specifically, the AC-to-DC rectification process can use diodes and a single-phase path to convert the two positive and negative half-waves into two positive half-waves. This application selects a corresponding charging strategy based on the vehicle's charging parameters to perform the charging operation. Furthermore, based on this charging strategy, it determines the charging pile's operating parameters during the charging process, thereby determining the charging pile operating parameters that meet the vehicle's charging needs, thus achieving simulated charging matching between the charging pile and the virtual vehicle.

[0033] Optionally, after obtaining the charging pile's operating parameters, this application evaluates the charging strategy of the charging pile. If the evaluation result is qualified, the charging operation is performed based on the charging strategy and the corresponding charging pile operating parameters; otherwise, the charging strategy is switched until the evaluation result is qualified.

[0034] In one embodiment, the above-mentioned charging pile fault safety test method may further include: collecting the output information of the charging pile; correspondingly, the specific implementation of the above-mentioned step 130 may be: if the output information matches the charging pile operating parameters, then inject a test fault signal into the charging pile.

[0035] The test fault signals include, but are not limited to, power battery voltage fault signals, power battery current fault signals, power battery temperature fault signals, power battery insulation status signals, power battery output connector over-temperature fault signals, and BMS component / battery pack output connector over-temperature signals. This application collects the output information of the charging pile. If the output information matches the charging pile's operating parameters, i.e., if the output information matches the charging strategy, it indicates that the charging pile and vehicle are in a normal charging state. At this time, a test fault signal is injected into the charging pile to test its response performance.

[0036] In one embodiment, the specific implementation of step 140 above may be as follows: after injecting a test fault signal, periodically collect the output information of the charging pile; calculate the difference between the current output information collected in the current cycle and the historical output information collected in the previous cycle; if the difference is greater than a preset difference threshold, then collect a feedback signal.

[0037] After injecting a test fault signal, this application periodically collects the output information of the charging pile, and determines the feedback signal of the charging pile after receiving the test fault signal by calculating the difference between the current output information collected in the current cycle and the historical output information collected in the previous cycle. That is, if the difference between the current output information and the historical output information is greater than a preset difference threshold, it indicates that the charging pile has taken countermeasures under the action of the test fault signal, and its feedback signal is collected at this time.

[0038] In one embodiment, step 150 can be implemented by determining the fault safety level of the charging pile based on the safety handling measures corresponding to the feedback signal and the test fault signal.

[0039] For each test fault signal, there is a corresponding safety handling measure (i.e., standard safety handling measure). After collecting the feedback signal from the charging pile, this application determines the fault safety level of the charging pile based on the feedback signal and the safety handling measure.

[0040] In one embodiment, step 150 can be implemented as follows: if the feedback signal is a safety handling measure corresponding to a test fault signal, then the fault safety level of the charging pile is determined to be high.

[0041] If the feedback signal corresponds to a safety handling measure for a test fault signal, meaning the charging pile responds to the test fault signal using standard safety procedures, then the charging pile is safe in dealing with the test fault signal, and therefore its fault safety level can be determined to be high. Conversely, if the feedback signal does not correspond to a safety handling measure for a test fault signal, meaning the charging pile's response is not a standard safety procedure, then the charging pile is unsafe in dealing with the test fault signal, and therefore its fault safety level can be determined to be low.

[0042] In one embodiment, the safety handling measures corresponding to the test fault signal include multiple measures; wherein, the specific implementation of the above step 150 may be: if the feedback signal is the optimal handling measure among multiple safety handling measures, then the fault safety level of the charging pile is determined to be high.

[0043] There may be multiple safety measures for the same test fault. For example, when the power battery temperature fault occurs, the output current of the charging pile can be reduced, charging of the vehicle can be suspended until the temperature fault of the power battery disappears and then charging can be resumed, or charging of the vehicle can be stopped directly. This application can divide the safety measures into multiple levels according to the degree of impact. For example, the above-mentioned safety measures for handling power battery temperature faults can be divided into first-level measures (reducing the output current of the charging pile), second-level measures (suspending charging of the vehicle), and third-level measures (stopping charging of the vehicle directly) from low to high. If the feedback signal given during charging is the lowest level of measures (i.e., the optimal measures), then the fault safety level of the charging pile is determined to be high. If the charging pile adopts the highest level of measures, that is, stopping charging when a fault occurs, although it is safe, its charging effect is poor.

[0044] Optionally, if the feedback signal from the charging pile obtained during testing is not the optimal handling measure, this application can input the test fault signal and the corresponding optimal handling measure into the charging pile to optimize the fault response measures of the charging pile.

[0045] Optionally, when injecting a test fault signal, this application can dynamically adjust the intensity, frequency, and other information of the test fault signal to test the vehicle's dynamic response capability. Preferably, this application can input a dynamically changing test fault signal (i.e., a test fault signal curve) and collect the charging pile's response curve (i.e., a feedback signal curve). The safety performance of the charging pile is determined based on the changing trend between the test fault signal curve and the response curve. For example, the trend of the overall curves of the test fault signal curve and the response curve can be aligned. Specifically, multiple vertices of the overall curves of the test fault signal curve and the response curve are determined, and the alignment of the test fault signal curve and the overall curve of the response curve is achieved by using vertex alignment. After alignment, the response mutation value of the charging pile is determined by calculating the difference ratio between adjacent vertices (the ratio between the difference between adjacent vertices in the response curve and the difference between corresponding adjacent vertices in the test fault signal curve), thereby determining the response boundary value of the charging pile.

[0046] Figure 2 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of a charging pile fault safety testing system provided in an exemplary embodiment of this application. Figure 2 As shown, the charging pile fault safety testing system 20 includes: a charging parameter acquisition module 21, used to acquire the vehicle charging parameters of the charging vehicle; wherein, the vehicle charging parameters include vehicle model, battery parameters, and communication protocol; an operating parameter determination module 22, used to determine the charging pile operating parameters during the charging process based on the vehicle charging parameters; a test fault injection module 23, used to inject a test fault signal into the charging pile; wherein, the test fault signal is a signal representing a fault in the charging vehicle; a feedback signal acquisition module 24, used to acquire the feedback signal after the charging pile receives the test fault signal; wherein, the feedback signal includes a notification signal or a response measure signal; and a safety level determination module 25, used to determine the fault safety level of the charging pile based on the feedback signal and the test fault signal.

[0047] This application provides a charging pile fault safety testing system. The system acquires vehicle charging parameters (including vehicle model, battery parameters, and communication protocol) through a charging parameter acquisition module 21. An operating parameter determination module 22 determines the charging pile's operating parameters during the charging process based on these parameters. A test fault injection module 23 injects a test fault signal into the charging pile, where the test fault signal represents a fault in the charging vehicle. A feedback signal acquisition module 24 acquires the feedback signal received by the charging pile after receiving the test fault signal, where the feedback signal includes a notification signal or a response measure signal. A safety level determination module 25 determines the charging pile's fault safety level based on the feedback signal and the test fault signal. By acquiring the vehicle charging parameters, the system determines the charging pile's operating parameters, establishes a charging handshake based on these parameters, and determines the charging pile's fault safety level by injecting the test fault signal and acquiring the charging pile's feedback signal. This allows for testing the charging pile's response measures to faults during charging, determining the charging pile's response to fault signals, and thus determining its safety level, thereby accurately obtaining the charging pile's safety test results.

[0048] In one embodiment, the above-mentioned operating parameter determination module 22 can be further configured to: select a charging strategy suitable for the charging vehicle based on the vehicle charging parameters; and determine the charging pile operating parameters during the charging process based on the charging strategy.

[0049] In one embodiment, the above-mentioned charging pile fault safety test system 20 can be further configured to: collect the output information of the charging pile; correspondingly, the above-mentioned test fault injection module 23 can be further configured to: inject a test fault signal into the charging pile if the output information matches the charging pile operating parameters.

[0050] In one embodiment, the feedback signal acquisition module 24 can be further configured to: periodically acquire the output information of the charging pile after injecting a test fault signal; calculate the difference between the current output information acquired in the current cycle and the historical output information acquired in the previous cycle; and acquire a feedback signal if the difference is greater than a preset difference threshold.

[0051] In one embodiment, the safety level determination module 25 can be further configured to determine the fault safety level of the charging pile based on the safety handling measures corresponding to the feedback signal and the test fault signal.

[0052] In one embodiment, the safety level determination module 25 can be further configured to: if the feedback signal is a safety handling measure corresponding to a test fault signal, then determine that the fault safety level of the charging pile is high.

[0053] In one embodiment, the safety handling measures corresponding to the test fault signal include multiple measures; wherein, the safety level determination module 25 can be further configured to: if the feedback signal is the optimal handling measure among multiple safety handling measures, then determine the fault safety level of the charging pile as high.

[0054] Below, for reference Figure 3 This application describes an electronic device according to embodiments thereof. The electronic device may be either or both of a first device and a second device, or a standalone device independent of them, which may communicate with the first device and the second device to receive acquired input signals from them.

[0055] Figure 3 A block diagram of an electronic device according to an embodiment of this application is illustrated.

[0056] like Figure 3 As shown, the electronic device 10 includes one or more processors 11 and memory 12.

[0057] The processor 11 may be a central processing unit (CPU) or other form of processing unit with data processing capabilities and / or instruction execution capabilities, and may control other components in the electronic device 10 to perform desired functions.

[0058] The memory 12 may include one or more computer program products, which may include various forms of computer-readable storage media, such as volatile memory and / or non-volatile memory. The volatile memory may include, for example, random access memory (RAM) and / or cache memory. The non-volatile memory may include, for example, read-only memory (ROM), hard disk, flash memory, etc. One or more computer program instructions may be stored on the computer-readable storage medium, and the processor 11 may execute the program instructions to implement the methods of the various embodiments of this application described above and / or other desired functions. Various contents such as input signals, signal components, and noise components may also be stored in the computer-readable storage medium.

[0059] In one example, the electronic device 10 may also include an input device 13 and an output device 14, which are interconnected via a bus system and / or other forms of connection mechanism (not shown).

[0060] When the electronic device is a standalone device, the input device 13 can be a communication network connector for receiving the collected input signals from the first device and the second device.

[0061] In addition, the input device 13 may also include, for example, a keyboard, a mouse, etc.

[0062] The output device 14 can output various information to the outside, including determined distance information, direction information, etc. The output device 14 may include, for example, a display, a speaker, a printer, and a communication network and its connected remote output devices, etc.

[0063] Of course, for the sake of simplicity, Figure 3 Only some of the components of the electronic device 10 relevant to this application are shown in this illustration; components such as buses, input / output interfaces, etc., are omitted. In addition, the electronic device 10 may include any other suitable components depending on the specific application.

[0064] In addition to the methods and apparatus described above, embodiments of this application may also be computer program products, which include computer program instructions that, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to perform the steps in the methods according to various embodiments of this application described in the "Exemplary Methods" section above.

[0065] The computer program product can be written in any combination of one or more programming languages ​​to perform the operations of the embodiments of this application. The programming languages ​​include object-oriented programming languages ​​such as Java and C++, as well as conventional procedural programming languages ​​such as C or similar languages. The program code can be executed entirely on the user's computing device, partially on the user's computing device, as a standalone software package, partially on the user's computing device and partially on a remote computing device, or entirely on a remote computing device or server.

[0066] Furthermore, embodiments of this application may also be computer-readable storage media storing computer program instructions thereon, which, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to perform the steps in the methods according to various embodiments of this application described in the "Exemplary Methods" section above.

[0067] The computer-readable storage medium may be any combination of one or more readable media. A readable medium may be a readable signal medium or a readable storage medium. A readable storage medium may be, for example, an electrical, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system, apparatus, or device, or any combination thereof. More specific examples of readable storage media (a non-exhaustive list) include: an electrical connection having one or more wires, a portable disk, a hard disk, random access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or flash memory), optical fiber, portable compact disk read-only memory (CD-ROM), optical storage device, magnetic storage device, or any suitable combination thereof.

[0068] The basic principles of this application have been described above with reference to specific embodiments. However, it should be noted that the advantages, benefits, and effects mentioned in this application are merely examples and not limitations, and should not be considered as essential features of each embodiment of this application. Furthermore, the specific details disclosed above are for illustrative and facilitative purposes only, and are not limitations. These details do not limit the application to the necessity of employing the aforementioned specific details for implementation.

[0069] The block diagrams of devices, apparatuses, devices, and systems involved in this application are merely illustrative examples and are not intended to require or imply that they must be connected, arranged, or configured in the manner shown in the block diagrams. As those skilled in the art will recognize, these devices, apparatuses, devices, and systems can be connected, arranged, and configured in any manner. Words such as “comprising,” “including,” “having,” etc., are open-ended terms meaning “including but not limited to,” and are used interchangeably with them. The terms “or” and “and” as used herein refer to the terms “and / or,” and are used interchangeably with them unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. The term “such as” as used herein refers to the phrase “such as but not limited to,” and is used interchangeably with it.

[0070] It should also be noted that in the apparatus, equipment, and methods of this application, the components or steps can be disassembled and / or recombined. These disassemblies and / or recombinations should be considered as equivalent solutions of this application.

[0071] The above description of the disclosed aspects is provided to enable any person skilled in the art to make or use this application. Various modifications to these aspects will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the general principles defined herein can be applied to other aspects without departing from the scope of this application. Therefore, this application is not intended to be limited to the aspects shown herein, but rather to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and novel features disclosed herein.

[0072] The above description has been given for purposes of illustration and description. Furthermore, this description is not intended to limit the embodiments of this application to the forms disclosed herein. Although numerous exemplary aspects and embodiments have been discussed above, those skilled in the art will recognize certain variations, modifications, alterations, additions, and sub-combinations thereof.

Claims

1. A method for fault safety testing of charging piles, characterized in that, include: Obtain the vehicle charging parameters of the charging vehicle; wherein, the vehicle charging parameters include vehicle model, battery parameters and communication protocol; Based on the vehicle charging parameters, the charging pile operating parameters during the charging process are determined. A test fault signal is injected into the charging pile; wherein the test fault signal is a signal that represents a fault in the charging vehicle; Collect feedback signals after the charging pile receives the test fault signal; wherein, the feedback signals include notification signals or response measure signals; Based on the feedback signal and the test fault signal, the fault safety level of the charging pile is determined.

2. The charging pile fault safety testing method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The process of determining the charging pile's operating parameters during the charging process based on the vehicle charging parameters includes: Based on the vehicle charging parameters, a charging strategy suitable for the vehicle being charged is selected; Based on the charging strategy, the charging pile's operating parameters during the charging process are determined.

3. The charging pile fault safety testing method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The fault safety testing method for charging piles also includes: Collect the output information of the charging pile; The injection of a test fault signal into the charging pile includes: If the output information matches the operating parameters of the charging pile, a test fault signal is injected into the charging pile.

4. The charging pile fault safety testing method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The feedback signal collected after the charging pile receives the test fault signal includes: After the test fault signal is injected, the output information of the charging pile is periodically collected; Calculate the difference between the current output information collected in the current cycle and the historical output information collected in the previous cycle; If the difference is greater than a preset difference threshold, then the feedback signal is collected.

5. The charging pile fault safety testing method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The process of determining the fault safety level of the charging pile based on the feedback signal and the test fault signal includes: Based on the safety handling measures corresponding to the feedback signal and the test fault signal, the fault safety level of the charging pile is determined.

6. The charging pile fault safety test method according to claim 5, characterized in that, The safety handling measures based on the feedback signal and the test fault signal, used to determine the fault safety level of the charging pile, include: If the feedback signal is a safety handling measure corresponding to the test fault signal, then the fault safety level of the charging pile is determined to be high.

7. The charging pile fault safety test method according to claim 5, characterized in that, The safety handling measures corresponding to the test fault signal include multiple measures; wherein, determining the fault safety level of the charging pile based on the feedback signal and the safety handling measures corresponding to the test fault signal includes: If the feedback signal is the optimal processing measure among the multiple safety processing measures, then the fault safety level of the charging pile is determined to be high.

8. A charging pile fault safety testing system, characterized in that, include: A charging parameter acquisition module is used to acquire the vehicle charging parameters of the charging vehicle; wherein, the vehicle charging parameters include vehicle model, battery parameters and communication protocol; The operating parameter determination module is used to determine the charging pile operating parameters during the charging process based on the vehicle charging parameters. A test fault injection module is used to inject a test fault signal into the charging pile; wherein the test fault signal represents a fault in the charging vehicle. The feedback signal acquisition module is used to acquire the feedback signal after the charging pile receives the test fault signal; wherein, the feedback signal includes a notification signal or a response measure signal; The safety level determination module is used to determine the fault safety level of the charging pile based on the feedback signal and the test fault signal.

9. A computer-readable storage medium, characterized in that, The storage medium stores a computer program for performing the method described in any one of claims 1-7.

10. An electronic device, characterized in that, include: processor; Memory used to store the processor's executable instructions; The processor is used to execute the method described in any one of claims 1-7.

Images