Automatic drawing auditing method and system for nuclear power instrument control display picture

Abstract

The invention belongs to the technical field of nuclear power plant instrument control picture auditing, and particularly relates to an automatic picture auditing method and system for a nuclear power instrument control display picture, and the method comprises the steps: obtaining the entry information data of the nuclear power instrument control display picture; and traversing the picture elements and the graphic elements in the obtained entry information data, and automatically checking the obtained picture elements and graphic elements based on a preset picture checking rule base to obtain a picture checking result, thereby completing automatic picture checking of the nuclear power instrument control display picture.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This invention belongs to the field of nuclear power plant instrumentation and control screen review technology, specifically relating to an automatic review method and system for nuclear power plant instrumentation and control display screens. Background Technology

[0002] The statements in this section are merely background information related to the present invention and do not necessarily constitute prior art.

[0003] Nuclear power plant instrumentation and control displays are the core human-machine interface for operators to monitor the plant's status, diagnose abnormal conditions, and execute control operations. The correctness, compliance, and consistency of their design directly affect the safe and stable operation of the nuclear power plant. High-quality nuclear power plant instrumentation and control displays help operators quickly and accurately obtain information and make decisions; while defective displays may lead to misjudgments or even serious nuclear safety accidents.

[0004] Currently, the nuclear power industry, and even the entire power industry, relies primarily on traditional manual methods for reviewing display screens (referred to as "drawing review"). Senior designers or independent verification personnel meticulously check and verify every element, layout, and logical relationship of the display screen according to written engineering design specifications, human factors engineering guidelines (such as NUREG 0700), and project-specific design requirements. However, traditional manual drawing review involves processing a large amount of data, and the manual traversal and comparison are time-consuming and extremely inefficient. Furthermore, human subjectivity can lead to misunderstandings by operators, directly impacting the accuracy of the review. Simultaneously, manual checks easily overlook deep logical connections between different screens and elements, creating blind spots and potential safety hazards. The repetitive and mechanical data verification work consumes a significant amount of the operator's energy, making it difficult for staff to dedicate more time and energy to optimizing the screen's functional logic and human-computer interaction processes, thus weakening their focus on core design and reducing the accuracy of the drawing review. Summary of the Invention

[0005] To address the aforementioned issues, this invention proposes an automatic review method and system for nuclear power plant instrumentation and control display screens. The method transforms engineering specifications described in natural language into review rules, constructs a review rule base, identifies entry information of the nuclear power plant instrumentation and control display screens based on the constructed review rule base, identifies entry objects that violate the review rules, obtains the review results, and completes the automatic review of nuclear power plant instrumentation and control display screens.

[0006] According to some embodiments, the first aspect of the present invention provides an automatic drawing review method for nuclear power plant instrumentation and control display screens, employing the following technical solution: An automatic drawing review method for nuclear power plant instrumentation and control display screens includes: Acquire item information data from the nuclear power plant instrumentation and control display screen; The system iterates through the screen elements and graphic elements in the acquired item information data, automatically reviews the obtained screen elements and graphic elements based on the preset review rule library, obtains the review results, and completes the automatic review of the nuclear power instrumentation and control display screen.

[0007] As a further technical limitation, the preset drawing review rule library is obtained through engineering specification structuring and rule translation, that is, the display screen engineering specifications described in natural language are decomposed and structured, and the resulting decomposed and structured descriptions are translated into machine-executable drawing review rules to obtain the preset drawing review rule library.

[0008] Furthermore, in the process of structuring and translating engineering specifications and rules, the full text of the engineering specifications is decomposed into independent rule entries; each rule entry is given a structured description, the attributes of which include at least rule number, rule description, rule type, applicable elements, and constraints; the constraints of the structured description are translated into specific program code logic or database query statements.

[0009] Furthermore, the rule type includes at least one of layout rules, color rules, navigation rules, signal association rules, and text rules; the translation into specific program code logic includes translating the requirements for navigation consistency between screens in the specification into code that checks whether there is a correspondence between the outbound navigation of the starting screen and the inbound navigation of the target screen.

[0010] As a further technical limitation, during the automatic review process, target graphic elements are selected from the entry information data according to the applicable elements of the rules; for each target graphic element, the corresponding program code logic in the review rule base is executed to determine whether its attributes meet the constraints; if not, a violation record containing a rule number, a violation image identifier, a violation element identifier, and a violation details description is generated.

[0011] As a further technical limitation, during the process of obtaining the review results, the violation records are displayed in a list in the graphical user interface; in response to the user's selection of a violation record in the list, the graphic element corresponding to the violation record is highlighted in the associated preview view; and the function of exporting the review results as a standardized report file is provided.

[0012] According to some embodiments, the second aspect of the present invention provides an automatic drawing review system for nuclear power plant instrumentation and control display screens, employing the following technical solution: An automatic drawing review system for nuclear power plant instrumentation and control display screens includes: The acquisition module is configured to acquire item information data from the nuclear power plant instrumentation and control display screen; The drawing review module is configured to traverse the screen elements and graphic elements in the acquired item information data, automatically review the obtained screen elements and graphic elements based on the preset drawing review rule base, obtain the drawing review results, and complete the automatic drawing review of the nuclear power instrumentation and control display screen.

[0013] According to some embodiments, a third aspect of the present invention provides a computer-readable storage medium, employing the following technical solution: A computer-readable storage medium having a program stored thereon, which, when executed by a processor, implements the steps in an automatic drawing review method for a nuclear power plant instrumentation and control display screen as described in the first aspect of the present invention.

[0014] According to some embodiments, the fourth aspect of the present invention provides an electronic device, which adopts the following technical solution: An electronic device includes a memory, a processor, and a program stored in the memory and running on the processor. When the processor executes the program, it implements the steps in the automatic drawing review method for a nuclear power plant instrumentation and control display screen as described in the first aspect of the present invention.

[0015] According to some embodiments, the fifth aspect of the present invention provides a computer program product, which adopts the following technical solution: A computer program product includes software code, wherein the program in the software code performs the steps of an automatic drawing review method for a nuclear power plant instrumentation and control display screen as described in the first aspect of the present invention.

[0016] Compared with the prior art, the beneficial effects of the present invention are as follows: This invention transforms traditional manual visual comparison and logical reasoning into intelligent recognition, fundamentally eliminating the problem of low efficiency in manual drawing review. It avoids the problems of inconsistent review standards and fluctuating review results caused by the subjective bias of reviewers. It can quickly and efficiently verify massive amounts of data, effectively checking for hidden rules that are difficult to find or easily overlooked by manual review (such as the consistency of navigation logic across screens and the correctness of deep signal associations). This frees operators from tedious and repetitive mechanical verification work, allowing them to focus more on design activities such as screen functional logic and human interaction experience optimization, significantly reducing time costs while improving the quality of drawing review. Attached Figure Description

[0017] The accompanying drawings, which form part of this embodiment, are used to provide a further understanding of this embodiment. The illustrative embodiments and their descriptions are used to explain this embodiment and do not constitute an improper limitation of this embodiment.

[0018] Figure 1 This is a flowchart of the automatic drawing review method for the nuclear power plant instrumentation and control display screen in Embodiment 1 of the present invention; Figure 2 This is an architecture diagram of the automatic drawing review method for the nuclear power plant instrumentation and control display screen in Embodiment 1 of the present invention; Figure 3 This is a structural block diagram of the automatic drawing review system for the nuclear power plant instrumentation and control display screen in Embodiment 2 of the present invention. Detailed Implementation

[0019] The present invention will be further described below with reference to the accompanying drawings and embodiments.

[0020] It should be noted that the following detailed descriptions are exemplary and intended to provide further illustration of the invention. Unless otherwise specified, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention pertains.

[0021] It should be noted that the terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to limit the scope of exemplary embodiments according to the invention. As used herein, the singular form is intended to include the plural form as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. Furthermore, it should be understood that when the terms "comprising" and / or "including" are used in this specification, they indicate the presence of features, steps, operations, devices, components, and / or combinations thereof.

[0022] In this invention, terms such as "upper," "lower," "left," "right," "front," "back," "vertical," "horizontal," "side," and "bottom" indicate the orientation or positional relationship based on the orientation or positional relationship shown in the accompanying drawings. These terms are used only to facilitate the description of the structural relationships of the various components or elements of this invention and do not specifically refer to any component or element in this invention. They should not be construed as limiting the invention.

[0023] In this invention, terms such as "fixed connection," "connected," and "linked" should be interpreted broadly, indicating a fixed connection, an integral connection, or a detachable connection; a direct connection or an indirect connection through an intermediate medium. Those skilled in the art can determine the specific meaning of these terms in this invention based on the specific circumstances, and they should not be construed as limitations on the invention.

[0024] Where there is no conflict, the embodiments and features in the embodiments of the present invention can be combined with each other.

[0025] Example 1 Embodiment 1 of the present invention introduces an automatic drawing review method for nuclear power plant instrumentation and control display screens.

[0026] EB, a digital design platform, is a digital design tool tailored for engineering design and complex workflows. It is object-oriented, database-driven, and can create standard graphic libraries, component libraries, and template libraries, associating them with attributes to generate necessary drawings. EB is based on Visio and enhances Visio's functionality while retaining its original features. Display designers use the EB platform to complete display designs, generating design deliverables. An automated review program retrieves data from objects in the display screen from EB, such as coordinates, dimensions, and attributes, calculates against preset rules, and outputs review results.

[0027] This embodiment uses, as follows: Figure 1 An automatic drawing review method for a nuclear power plant instrumentation and control display screen, as shown, includes: Acquire item information data from the nuclear power plant instrumentation and control display screen; The system iterates through the screen elements and graphic elements in the acquired item information data, automatically reviews the obtained screen elements and graphic elements based on the preset review rule library, obtains the review results, and completes the automatic review of the nuclear power instrumentation and control display screen.

[0028] like Figure 2 As shown, this embodiment decomposes and structures the display screen engineering specifications described in natural language, and translates them into machine-executable review rules to construct a review rule library; it obtains the display screen design results data to be reviewed from the digital design platform, the data including the attribute information of the screen and its contained graphic elements; it traverses the screens and graphic elements in the design results data, applies the rules in the review rule library to perform calculations, identifies objects that violate the rules, and generates violation records; it aggregates and displays the violation records, and provides location and export functions.

[0029] As one or more implementation methods, this embodiment translates engineering specifications into rules, transforming engineering design specifications, which exist in the form of natural language and documents, into a drawing review rule base that can be directly called and executed by computer programs; specifically: (1) Standardize the full text breakdown and itemization The original engineering specifications (PDF, Word, etc.) documents are parsed and their contents are broken down into independent, minimum-granularity constraints. For example, "The English part of the screen title text should be capitalized" and "The screen title should be centered in the top area" are split into two independent rule entries.

[0030] (2) Structured description Each rule entry is structured and its key attributes are defined. These key attributes include rule number (unique identifier), rule description (a natural language summary of the rule content), rule type (e.g., "layout rule", "color rule", "navigation rule", "signal association rule", "text rule", etc.), applicable elements (i.e., the type of screen element it targets, such as "all graphics", "rectangle", "text box", "navigation hotspot", etc.), constraints (i.e., the core logic of the rule, described using logical expressions or pseudocode; for example, for a color rule, the constraint might be element.border color == RGB(255, 0, 0)), priority (indicating the severity of the rule violation (e.g., error, warning, prompt)), and referenced specification source (indicating which section of the specification document the rule originates from).

[0031] (3) Rule computability translation The structured rule descriptions are further transformed into specific code logic or database query statements that can be embedded in the review process. This translation process requires a deep understanding of the specification's intent and the data model of the digital design platform (such as EB).

[0032] In this embodiment, the display screen engineering specifications serve as guiding principles, carrying a wealth of engineering practices and knowledge. They contain numerous constraints and rules. First, the entire specification is broken down, itemized, and structured. Then, these structured rules are translated into drawing review rules. For example, Example 1: The specification requires that "each unidirectional hotspot on the starting screen should have a corresponding unidirectional hotspot on the target display screen," which is interpreted as Rule 1 and the ratio of each navigation element in each display screen to the target screen. Rule 2: The target screen should have navigation elements associated with the starting screen.

[0033] In this embodiment, each unidirectional hotspot on the starting screen should have a corresponding unidirectional hotspot on the target display screen; Rule 1 (i.e., forward navigation existence): for any unidirectional navigation hotspot H_out on any display screen S, the target screen T it points to must exist; Rule 2 (i.e., reverse navigation existence): on the target screen T, there must exist an incoming navigation hotspot H_in, which points to the source screen S; assuming that in the EB platform, a navigation hotspot is an object type, its attributes include Hotspot ID, SourcePage ID, TargetPage ID, and Direction (such as "unidirectional" or "bidirectional"); through a large number of similar translation works, a "review rule base" covering layout, color, navigation, signals, text, and other aspects is finally built; the built review rule base can exist in the form of database tables, XML configuration files, or directly compiled into the assembly.

[0034] As one or more implementation methods, automated drawing review needs to be integrated with a digital design platform to obtain the display design data to be reviewed. Specifically, the integration methods in this embodiment include at least direct database access (the design data of the EB platform is usually stored in a background SQL database. The drawing review program connects directly to this database through technologies such as ADO.NET and EntityFramework to execute SQL queries to obtain the screen, graphic elements and their attributes), file parsing (if the EB platform exports the design results as files in a specific format (such as XML or JSON), the drawing review program obtains the data by parsing these files), and API calls (if the EB platform provides an application programming interface (API), the structured data is obtained by calling its API).

[0035] The data acquired in this embodiment is typically a collection of all displayed screens under a project. For each screen (Page), its metadata (such as screen ID, screen name, designer, creation date) is acquired. For each graphic element (Shape) in the screen, its detailed information is acquired, including but not limited to: element ID, element type (such as Rectangle, TextBox, Line, Hotspot), layer; geometric attributes (X coordinate, Y coordinate, width, height, rotation angle); style attributes (fill color, line color, line thickness, font name, font size, font color); data attributes (associated signal tags, range, unit); logical attributes (for navigation hotspots, including target screen ID, navigation direction; for combined elements, including its list of child elements). This data is loaded into the memory of the drawing review program to form an object model for subsequent review calculations.

[0036] This embodiment uses C# language and SQL database to complete the code development of the review rules, thereby filtering out objects that violate the review rules, and writing the relevant location information such as the rule violated by the object, its location, and the person in charge into the review results so that users can quickly locate it.

[0037] As one or more implementation methods, this embodiment performs automatic review of design results, generating automatic review results, including information such as violation rule descriptions, rule numbers, screen numbers, screen element serial numbers, and modification suggestions, accurately locating screen problems. The automatic review program interface has functions such as online review of results and one-click export of review reports.

[0038] During the automatic image review process, this embodiment iterates through all the images and elements obtained in the previous steps and applies the rules in the established image review rule base to perform calculations and judgments one by one.

[0039] This embodiment uses a rules engine to execute the drawing review process. The workflow of the engine used is as follows: Select a rule from the drawing review rule library in sequence or according to priority; Based on the "Applicable Elements" attribute of the rule, all graphic elements for which the rule needs to be applied are selected from all design data. For example, a "color rule" may apply to all elements of the "device symbol" type; for each target element, the computable logic corresponding to the rule is executed to check whether the element's attributes satisfy the constraints. If an element attribute does not meet the constraints, a "Violation Record" is generated. The generated violation record includes at least the associated rule number, rule description, violating screen ID, violating element ID, violating element name, detailed violation description (e.g., "expected color is red, actual color is blue"), modification suggestions, and rule priority.

[0040] This embodiment aggregates all generated violation records and can sort and group them according to screen ID, rule priority (error > warning > prompt), rule type, etc., for easy viewing by users.

[0041] This embodiment displays the review results to the user in a graphical user interface (GUI), which has at least the following functions: (1) List display, that is, all violations are clearly listed in tabular form; (2) Precise positioning, that is, when a user clicks on a violation record in the list, the interface can automatically highlight the corresponding screen and violation element in the EB platform or a previewer, realizing "what you click is what you see", which greatly facilitates the troubleshooting of problems; (3) Filtering and searching, which allows users to filter results based on conditions such as screen, rules, and priority; (4) Online review, which means that users can confirm each violation record on the interface and mark it as "modified", "false alarm" or "pending processing".

[0042] It should be noted that this embodiment also has a one-click export function, which generates a report in a standard format, such as a Word document, PDF file or Excel spreadsheet, from the review results. The report includes a review overview (total number of screens, total number of violations, statistics for each category) and a detailed list of violations, which is convenient for archiving and distribution.

[0043] This embodiment transforms traditional manual visual comparison and logical reasoning into intelligent recognition, fundamentally eliminating the problem of low efficiency in manual drawing review. It avoids the problems of inconsistent review standards and fluctuating review results caused by the subjective bias of the reviewers. It can quickly and efficiently verify massive amounts of data, effectively checking for hidden rules that are difficult to find or easily overlooked by manual review (such as the consistency of navigation logic across screens, the correctness of deep signal associations, etc.). It frees operators from tedious and repetitive mechanical verification work, allowing them to focus more on design activities such as screen functional logic and human interaction experience optimization, thereby significantly reducing time costs while improving the quality of drawing review.

[0044] Example 2 Embodiment 2 of the present invention introduces an automatic drawing review system for nuclear power plant instrumentation and control display screens.

[0045] like Figure 3 An automatic drawing review system for nuclear power plant instrumentation and control display screens, as shown, includes: The acquisition module is configured to acquire item information data from the nuclear power plant instrumentation and control display screen; The drawing review module is configured to traverse the screen elements and graphic elements in the acquired item information data, automatically review the obtained screen elements and graphic elements based on the preset drawing review rule base, obtain the drawing review results, and complete the automatic drawing review of the nuclear power instrumentation and control display screen.

[0046] The detailed steps are the same as those of the automatic drawing review method for nuclear power plant instrumentation and control display screen provided in Embodiment 1, and will not be repeated here.

[0047] Example 3 Embodiment 3 of the present invention provides a computer-readable storage medium.

[0048] A computer-readable storage medium having a program stored thereon, which, when executed by a processor, implements the steps in an automatic drawing review method for a nuclear power plant instrumentation and control display screen as described in Embodiment 1 of the present invention.

[0049] The detailed steps are the same as those of the automatic drawing review method for nuclear power plant instrumentation and control display screen provided in Embodiment 1, and will not be repeated here.

[0050] Example 4 Embodiment 4 of the present invention provides an electronic device.

[0051] An electronic device includes a memory, a processor, and a program stored in the memory and running on the processor. When the processor executes the program, it implements the steps in the automatic drawing review method for a nuclear power plant instrumentation and control display screen as described in Embodiment 1 of the present invention.

[0052] The detailed steps are the same as those of the automatic drawing review method for nuclear power plant instrumentation and control display screen provided in Embodiment 1, and will not be repeated here.

[0053] Example 5 Embodiment 5 of the present invention provides a computer program product.

[0054] A computer program product includes software code, wherein the program in the software code performs the steps of an automatic drawing review method for a nuclear power plant instrumentation and control display screen as described in Embodiment 1 of the present invention.

[0055] The detailed steps are the same as those of the automatic drawing review method for nuclear power plant instrumentation and control display screen provided in Embodiment 1, and will not be repeated here.

[0056] Those skilled in the art will understand that embodiments of the present invention can be provided as methods, systems, or computer program products. Therefore, the present invention can take the form of a completely hardware embodiment, a completely software embodiment, or an embodiment combining software and hardware aspects. Furthermore, the present invention can take the form of a computer program product implemented on one or more computer-usable storage media (including but not limited to disk storage, CD-ROM, optical storage, etc.) containing computer-usable program code. The solutions in the embodiments of the present invention can be implemented using various computer languages, such as the object-oriented programming language Java and the interpreted scripting language JavaScript.

[0057] This invention is described with reference to flowchart illustrations and / or block diagrams of methods, apparatus (systems), and computer program products according to embodiments of the invention. It will be understood that each block of the flowchart illustrations and / or block diagrams, and combinations of blocks in the flowchart illustrations and / or block diagrams, can be implemented by computer program instructions. These computer program instructions can be provided to a processor of a general-purpose computer, special-purpose computer, embedded processor, or other programmable data processing apparatus to produce a machine, such that the instructions, which execute via the processor of the computer or other programmable data processing apparatus, generate instructions for implementing the flowchart illustrations and / or block diagrams. Figure 1 One or more processes and / or boxes Figure 1 A device that provides the functions specified in one or more boxes.

[0058] These computer program instructions may also be stored in a computer-readable storage medium that can direct a computer or other programmable data processing device to function in a particular manner, such that the instructions stored in the computer-readable storage medium produce an article of manufacture including instruction means, which are implemented in a process Figure 1 One or more processes and / or boxes Figure 1 The function specified in one or more boxes.

[0059] These computer program instructions may also be loaded onto a computer or other programmable data processing equipment to cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer or other programmable equipment to produce a computer-implemented process, thereby providing instructions that execute on the computer or other programmable equipment for implementing the process. Figure 1 One or more processes and / or boxes Figure 1 The steps of the function specified in one or more boxes.

[0060] Although preferred embodiments of the invention have been described, those skilled in the art, upon learning the basic inventive concept, can make other changes and modifications to these embodiments. Therefore, the appended claims are intended to be interpreted as including both the preferred embodiments and all changes and modifications falling within the scope of the invention.

[0061] Obviously, those skilled in the art can make various modifications and variations to this invention without departing from its spirit and scope. Therefore, if these modifications and variations fall within the scope of the claims of this invention and their equivalents, this invention also intends to include these modifications and variations.

[0062] The above description is merely a preferred embodiment of this practice and is not intended to limit the scope of this practice. Various modifications and variations can be made to this practice by those skilled in the art. Any modifications, equivalent substitutions, or improvements made within the spirit and principles of this practice should be included within the protection scope of this practice.

Claims

1. An automatic drawing review method for nuclear power plant instrumentation and control display screens, characterized in that, include: Acquire item information data from the nuclear power plant instrumentation and control display screen; The system iterates through the screen elements and graphic elements in the acquired item information data, automatically reviews the obtained screen elements and graphic elements based on the preset review rule library, obtains the review results, and completes the automatic review of the nuclear power instrumentation and control display screen.

2. The automatic drawing review method for nuclear power plant instrumentation and control display screens as described in claim 1, characterized in that, The preset drawing review rule library is obtained through engineering specification structuring and rule translation. That is, the engineering specifications of the display screen described in natural language are decomposed and structured, and the resulting decomposed and structured descriptions are translated into machine-executable drawing review rules to obtain the preset drawing review rule library.

3. The automatic drawing review method for nuclear power plant instrumentation and control display screens as described in claim 2, characterized in that, In the process of structuring and translating engineering specifications and rules, the full text of the engineering specifications is decomposed into independent rule entries; each rule entry is given a structured description, the attributes of which include at least rule number, rule description, rule type, applicable elements, and constraints; the constraints of the structured description are translated into specific program code logic or database query statements.

4. The automatic drawing review method for nuclear power plant instrumentation and control display screens as described in claim 3, characterized in that, The rule types include at least one of layout rules, color rules, navigation rules, signal association rules, and text rules; the translation into specific program code logic includes translating the requirements for navigation consistency between screens in the specification into code that checks whether there is a correspondence between the outbound navigation of the starting screen and the inbound navigation of the target screen.

5. The automatic drawing review method for nuclear power plant instrumentation and control display screen as described in claim 1, characterized in that, During the automatic review process, target graphic elements are selected from the entry information data based on the applicable elements of the rules. For each target graphic element, execute the corresponding program code logic in the drawing review rule base to determine whether its attributes meet the constraints; if not, generate a violation record containing the rule number, violation image identifier, violation element identifier, and violation details description.

6. The automatic drawing review method for nuclear power plant instrumentation and control display screen as described in claim 1, characterized in that, During the process of obtaining the drawing review results, the violation records are displayed in a list in the graphical user interface; in response to the user's selection of a violation record in the list, the graphic element corresponding to the violation record is highlighted in the associated display preview view; Provides the ability to export review results as standardized report files.

7. An automatic drawing review system for nuclear power plant instrumentation and control display screens, characterized in that, include: The acquisition module is configured to acquire item information data from the nuclear power plant instrumentation and control display screen; The drawing review module is configured to traverse the screen elements and graphic elements in the acquired item information data, automatically review the obtained screen elements and graphic elements based on the preset drawing review rule base, obtain the drawing review results, and complete the automatic drawing review of the nuclear power instrumentation and control display screen.

8. A computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, characterized in that, When the program is executed by the processor, it implements the steps of an automatic drawing review method for a nuclear power plant instrumentation and control display screen as described in any one of claims 1-6.

9. An electronic device comprising a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and running on the processor, characterized in that, When the processor executes the program, it implements the steps of the automatic drawing review method for the nuclear power instrumentation and control display screen as described in any one of claims 1-6.

10. A computer program product, comprising software code, characterized in that, The program in the software code executes the steps of an automatic drawing review method for a nuclear power plant instrumentation and control display screen as described in any one of claims 1-6.

Images