Zero voltage switching control method for power converters, and dc-dc multi-port converter
Patent Information
- Application Number
- EP2023790260
- Authority / Receiving Office
- EP · EP
- Patent Type
- Applications
- Current Assignee / Owner
- Priority Date
- 2022-10-20
- Filing Date
- 2023-10-12
- Publication Date
- 2025-07-02
AI Technical Summary
Existing Zero Voltage Switching (ZVS) control methods for power converters, particularly Dual Active Bridge (DAB) converters, face challenges in maintaining ZVS conditions across a broad power range and are complex to implement, especially for multi-port topologies, leading to increased switching losses and operational inefficiencies.
A control method that modifies the switching frequency and phase shift to maintain ZVS conditions, utilizing two control loops - a fast loop for power delivery and a slower loop for ensuring ZVS, allowing for iterative adjustment of these variables to optimize operation and minimize losses.
This approach ensures reliable ZVS operation across a wide range of power levels, simplifies implementation, and reduces switching losses, making it suitable for industrial applications and multi-port converters.
Smart Images

Figure 1.1
Abstract
Description
[0001]202203709 subsequent filing PCT 1 Description Zero Voltage Switching control method for power converters, and DC-DC multi-port converter TECHNICAL FIELD The present invention relates to a control method to operate a power converter under Zero Voltage Switching (ZVS) condition. The invention also refers to a DC-DC multi-port converter, operating in accordance with the previously mentioned control method. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION This invention proposes a control method for a well-known power electronics topology called Dual Active Bridge (DAB). The invention may be applicable to some of its variants as well (such as multi-ports DABs). Figure 1 shows a schematic of this DAB topology. A DAB is a bidirectional DC-DC converter with primary and secondary side full-bridges (1,1´´) or half-bridge, a high frequency transformer (2), an energy transfer inductor (Ls) and DC-link capacitors (Cf1,Cf2). The two legs of both full-bridges (1,1´´) are driven with complimentary square-wave pulses. Power flow is controlled by phase-shifting the pulses of one bridge with respect to the other. The control directs power between the two DC buses such that the leading bridge delivers power to the lagging bridge. Dual Active Bridge (DAB) converters, typically operate under Zero Voltage Switching (ZVS) conditions at semiconductors turn-off or Zero Current Switching conditions (ZCS) at 202203709 subsequent filing PCT 2 semiconductors turn-off. These two conditions imply no switching losses at turn-on or turn-off, respectively. Each semiconductor of the topology can operate under ZVS or ZCS condition during one switching cycle. Due to easiness of implementation, it is preferred to work under ZVS rather than ZCS. The most commonly used control strategy is called “phase shift control” and is shown in Figure 2. With this method, the phase displacement is introduced among the square voltages, (Vp and Vs), created by each bridge of the topology (left-side bridge and right-side bridge in Figure 2). The higher the phase shift (φ), the higher the amplitude of the inductor current (il), and thus the power transferred from one bridge to the other. However, if the phase shift control is used, the converter may lose the ZVS condition at turn-on depending on the operating point (power, input and output voltages). Moreover, large currents through the semiconductors at the switching instant may occur. If previously mentioned situations arise, significant increase in the switching loses will appear. To avoid losing ZVS and / or ZCS, there are several control solutions for the DAB topology. These solutions imply modifying the duty cycle of each semiconductor bridge. Although they are able to maintain ZVS and / or ZCS along multiple voltage and power ranges, its implementation is cumbersome and time consuming. This implementation complexity is even larger when these techniques are used for multiport topologies, resulting in a non-solid solution for industrial application and large durability products. Therefore, there is a need for Zero Voltage Switching (ZVS) control methods, that solve the above-described drawbacks of the prior art. 202203709 subsequent filing PCT 3 SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION An object of the invention is the provision of a control method for a power converter, that assures operation under Zero Voltage Switching (ZVS) condition in a broad power range and in a reliable manner, and which is easy to implement. The invention is especially applicable to multi-port converters for battery balancing, that is, to converters having three or more converters coupled to a common multi- winding transformer. The invention is a method to maintain ZVS condition of a DC- DC converter by modifying the switching frequency (fsw) and the phase shift (φ) of the converter. Therefore, an aspect of the invention refers to a control method for operating a DAB-based power converter under Zero Voltage Switching, ZVS, conditions, wherein the converter is a DC-DC isolated converter, and the method comprises operating the converter by modifying the switching frequency (^^^) or the phase shift (^) to operate the converter under Zero Voltage Switching condition. This dual control to maintain ZVS, is reliable in a wide range of power and easy to implement, especially for multiport converters, so that, the converter can be optimized and designed neglecting the turn-off losses. Preferably, the converter is operated such that the output power (P) of the converter is represented by the expression: ^ (φ) P = K · · phase shift angle, (^^^) is the switching frequency and (Ls) is the equivalent 202203709 subsequent filing PCT 4 inductance value of an inductor or inductors connected in series between the two bridges of the converter. The proposed control contains two control loops. A fast control loop in charge of ensuring that power is delivered to the load, and a second control loop, slower that the first one, with the aim of ensuring ZVS in all devices. As shown in equation above, either the phase shift (^) or the switching frequency (^^^) can modify the power delivered, such that, one of these two variables is chosen to ensure ZVS and the other one to guarantee the power delivery. Given a status of the converter with a certain voltage, current, switching frequency and or power, it is possible to obtain the value of the variable (^, ^^^) that regulates the ZVS. Once this value is adjusted, the other variable that regulates the power will vary to reach the desired reference. Along this process, since both variables affect the output power, an iterative process is carried out until steady state is fully reached. To have the ZVS variable value it is necessary to obtain the required value for each semiconductor and then retain the most restrictive value. This value can be computed during operation or have it precalculated and stored in the system memory. In a preferred example, the minimum phase shift (^) value, may be calculated analytically by computing the minimum phase shift of each semiconductor switch of the converter, and selecting the maximum phase shift obtained. Alternatively, the minimum phase shift (^) value, may be obtained by measuring current through an inductor (Ls) connected in series between two bridges of the converter and during the switching process. 202203709 subsequent filing PCT 5 In a preferred example of implementing the invention, the control method comprises setting a switching frequency (^^^) to assure ZVS operation of the converter, and controlling power transfer by controlling phase shift (^) in the converter. Increasing both the phase shift (^) and the switching frequency (^^^), makes easier to guarantee ZVS, but it rises the reactive current and the switching losses at turn-off (ZVS implies no loses at turn-on). If desired, it is possible to evaluate between reducing reactive power by decreasing (^) and increasing (^^^), or reduce the switching loses by increasing (^) and reducing switching frequency (^^^). In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the DC-DC converter may be a two-port Dual Active Bridge (DAB) converter, such as a non-resonant converter, that comprises a transformer having two windings, and a first bridge converter coupled to a winding of the transformer, and a second bridge converter connected to the other winding of the transformer, and an inductor connected in series between the output port of one of the bridge converters and the winding connected to it. When a two-port Dual Active Bridge (DAB) converter is used, it is preferred to set a minimum phase shift (^) that ensures ZVS (depending on the cell voltages; for instance, by using a look up table, or analytically) and to use a controller to achieve the desired power transfer by varying switching frequency (^^^). For a given pair of constant input and output voltages, increasing the switching frequency (^^^) will reduce the power, and vice versa. The lower the voltage, the lower the switching frequency (^^^), thus, there will be fewer switching losses but more conduction losses due to excess of reactive current. Conversely, at higher cell voltages, the switching frequency (^^^) will rise, increasing switching 202203709 subsequent filing PCT 6 losses but reducing conduction losses. The maximum field density of the transformer is given at maximum cell voltage with high frequencies. While at lower cell voltages the field density peak is similar to the obtained with maximum voltages but with lower frequency. In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the DC-DC converter may be a multi-port converter comprising: - a transformer having a plurality of windings and a single core in common for all the windings, - a set of DC-AC converters individually connected with the windings of the transformer, and adapted to be connected individually to DC sources and / or DC loads, - a control unit adapted for controlling the operation of the converters, for converting a DC voltage into an AC signal, and wherein the control unit is further adapted for operating the converters of the set of converters, such that power from at least one DC source / load can be transferred to one or more DC source / load through a selection of converters, when the converters are connected individually to the DC sources / loads. All the converters may have the same topology or not, either full-bridge DC-AC converters, or half-bridge DC-AC converters, or any suitable combination thereof. Preferably, when a multi-port converter is used with at least three modules operating simultaneously, in the control method a switching frequency (^^^) is selected in common to all connected cells that ensures ZVS. The phase shift (^) is different among different cells blocks, as it will be used to control power transfer between 202203709 subsequent filing PCT 7 them. To deliver relatively low power with respect to the nominal power, the power can be pulsed. Another solution is to stop switching the secondary transistors or to switch them synchronously. In this way it is achieved that they work as a rectification with conventional diodes. Another aspect of the invention refers to a DC-DC multi-port converter, comprising: a transformer having a plurality of windings and a single core in common for all the windings, a set of DC-AC converters individually connected with the windings of the transformer, and adapted to be connected individually with a DC source or load, a control unit adapted for controlling the operation of the converters, for converting a DC voltage into an AC signal, and wherein the control unit is further adapted for operating the converters of the set of converters, such that power from at least one DC source / load can be transferred to one or more DC source / load through a selection of converters, when the converters are connected individually to the DC sources / loads, and wherein the control unit is further adapted to operate the converter in accordance with the control method previously defined. Preferably, the control unit is adapted such that a switching frequency (^^^) is selected in common for all the converters connected to a DC source / load, and power transfer between the converters, is controlled by varying the phase shift (^). BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 202203709 subsequent filing PCT 8 Figure 1 shows an electric diagram of a Dual Active Bridge, DAB, converter topology according to the prior art. Figure 2 shows a graph of voltages illustrating a phase shift control according to the prior art. Figure 3 shows a graph of voltages illustrating a dual control to maintain ZVS according to the invention. Figure 4 shows an electric diagram of a multi-port isolated converter topology according to the invention. Figure 5 shows a diagram illustrating the fast and slow control loops for controlling power transfer and ZVS operation. In the diagram the expressions: ^^^ | ^ , ^ | ^^^ mean that one of these two variables is used for controlling power or ZVS, and the other variable used for the other control. DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION Figure 3 shows a graph of voltages (Vp,Vs) and current (il) illustrating the dual control method according of the invention, wherein the method comprises operating the converter by modifying the switching frequency (^^^) and the phase shift (^) of the conversion process, to operate the converter under Zero Voltage Switching condition, ZVS. In a preferred implementation of the invention, the converter is a Dual Active Bridge (DAB) converter, for example as the one shown in Figure 1. As explained earlier, the DAB is a bidirectional DC-DC converter with primary and secondary side full-bridges (1,1´´), a high frequency transformer (2), an energy transfer inductor (Ls) and two DC-link capacitors (Cf1,Cf2). 202203709 subsequent filing PCT 9 The inductor (Ls) is connected in series between the output of the first full-bridge converter (1) and a terminal of the primary winding (2a) of the transformer (2). A first DC-link capacitor (Cf1) is connected in parallel with the two input terminals (1a,1b) of the first full-bridge converter (1), and the second DC-link capacitor (Cf2) is connected in parallel with the two output terminals (1a´,1b´) of the second full- bridge converter (1´). The input of the second full-bridge converter (1´), is connected in parallel with the secondary winding (2b) of the transformer (2). Therefore, the voltage (Vp) is the output voltage of the first full-bridge converter (1), that is applied to the series connection formed by the inductor (Ls) and to the primary winding (2a) of the transformer (2), whereas, current (il) is the current through the inductor (Ls), and voltage (Vs) is the voltage at the secondary (2b) of the transformer. Therefore, as shown in Figure 3 the control method of the invention, involve modifying the phase shift (^) between voltages (Vp,Vs), and also modifying the switching frequency (^^^) to operate the converter under Zero Voltage Switching condition. In the alternative embodiment of Figure 4, the DC-DC converter is a multi-port converter (3) comprising a transformer (4) having a plurality of windings (N1,N2,…,Nn) and a single core (5) in common for all the windings. In addition, the converter (3) has a set of full-bridge DC-AC converters (6) individually connected with the windings (N1,N2,…,Nn) of the transformer (4), and adapted to be connected individually with DC sources or loads (7). A control unit (8) is provided for controlling the operation of the converters (6), for converting a DC voltage into an AC signal in a known manner. 202203709 subsequent filing PCT 10 Furthermore, the control unit (8) is further adapted for operating the converters (6) of the set of converters, such that power from at least one DC source / load can be transferred to one or more DC source / loads through any selection of converters (6), when the converters are connected individually to the DC sources / loads. Each converter (6) may be connected with the respective winding (N1,N2,…,Nn) by means of an inductor (Ls1, Ls2,…, Lsn) connected in series between the converter output and the respective winding of the transformer (4). In addition, each converter (6) of the set of converters may be connected to a DC source / load (7) by means of a filter, which in the example of Figure 4, includes a capacitor (Cf1, Cf2,…, Cfn) in parallel with the input port of each converter (6), and an inductor (Lf1, Lf2,…, Lfn) in series at the input port of each converter (6). According to the invention, the conversion process between the two selected converters (6), is carried out as represented in Figure 3, that is, by modifying the phase shift (^) between voltages (Vp,Vs), and by modifying the switching frequency (^^^) to operate the converter under Zero Voltage Switching condition. Figure 5 shows a diagram illustrating the two control loops for controlling power transfer and ZVS operation, and the possibility according to the invention, of choosing which control variable, either phase shift (^) or switching frequency (^^^), is used for controlling power or ZVS operation. Additionally, the figure shows that the output voltage (Vo) or the output current (io) of a power converter (6) can be controlled. In Figure 5 a power controller (9) controls operation of a power converter (6) for power transfer, and both configure a fast control loop (10), such that the output of the power converter (6), either the output voltage (Vo) or the output 202203709 subsequent filing PCT 11 current (io) is fed back to be compared with reference voltage or current desired values (Vref| Iref). Either the phase shift (^) or the switching frequency (^^^), is used for controlling power transfer of the power converter (6). A ZVS controller (11) and the power converter (6) configure a slow control loop (12). The ZVS controller (11) receives the input voltage (vi) of the converter (6) as well as the output voltage (Vo) or the output current (io) of the converter. Since both variables (^^^ | ^) affect the ZVS and the output power at same time, the time response of both controls must be different. Both controls need to have different time response / bandwidth, one faster than the other, otherwise, the system would become instable. In Figure 5, the slow control (12) to ensure ZVS varies the parameter linearly or discretely according to previously calculated values or by measuring the current through the inductor (Ls) (or transformer´s winding) continuously. By measuring the current, the slow control varies the phase shift (^) until it reaches a minimum value that guarantees ZVS. If ZVS condition is not met, the phase shift (^) increases. If the current to guarantee ZVS is excessive, the phase shift (^) decreases until it reaches a minimum. If switching frequency (^^^) is the variable chosen to guarantee ZVS, it varies inversely to the previous case. In Figure 5, the slow control (12) is used to ensure ZVS, and the fast control for power transfer, but it could be the other way around. For a multiport topology as the one shown in Figure 4, it is preferred for simplicity to use switching frequency (^^^) in the slow control to ensure ZVS operation, and phase shift (^) is used for controlling power transfer. 202203709 subsequent filing PCT 12 Although the present invention has been described in detail with reference to the preferred embodiment, it is to be understood that the present invention is not limited by the disclosed examples, and that numerous additional modifications and variations could be made there to by a person skilled in the art without departing from the scope of the invention.
Claims
202203709 subsequent filing PCT 13 CLAIMS 1. Control method for operating a power converter under Zero Voltage Switching (ZVS) conditions, wherein the power converter is a DC-DC isolated converter, and the method comprises operating the power converter by modifying the switching frequency (^^^) or the phase shift (^) of the power converter, to operate the power converter under Zero Voltage Switching condition, such that one of these variables, either the switching frequency (^^^) or the phase shift (^) is used to ensure Zero Voltage Switching of a first and second bridge converters, whilst the other variable is used for controlling power transfer.
2. Control method according to claim 1, wherein power transfer is controlled by means of a first control loop, and wherein Zero Voltage Switching operation is controlled by means of a second control loop, and wherein the second control loop is slower than the first control loop.
3. Control method according to claim 1 or 2, further comprising setting for a given input and output voltage of the converter and / or for a given switching frequency (^^^), a minimum phase shift (^) value at which the converter operates under ZVS condition, and controlling power transfer in the converter by controlling the switching frequency (^^^) of the same.
4. Control method according to claim 3, wherein the minimum phase shift (^) value, is calculated analytically by computing the minimum phase shift of each semiconductor switch of the converter and selecting the maximum phase shift obtained.
5. Control method according to claim 3, wherein the minimum phase shift (^) value, is obtained by measuring current through an inductor (Ls) connected in series between two bridges of the converter and during the switching process.202203709 subsequent filing PCT 14 6. Control method according to claim 1, further comprising setting a switching frequency (^^^) to assure ZVS operation of the converter, and controlling power transfer by controlling phase shift (^) in the converter.
7. Control method according to claim 1, further comprising setting a phase shift (^) to assure ZVS operation of the converter, and controlling power transfer by controlling switching frequency (^^^) in the converter.
8. Control method according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the DC-DC converter is a non-resonant two-port Dual Active Bridge (DAB) converter that comprises a transformer having two windings, and a first bridge converter coupled to a winding of the transformer, and a second bridge converter connected to the other winding of the transformer, and an inductor connected in series between the output port of one of the bridge converter and the winding connected to it.
9. Control method according to any of the claims 1 to 7, wherein the DC-DC converter is a multi-port converter comprising: a transformer (4) having a plurality of windings (N1,N2…,Nn) and a single core (5) in common for all the windings, a set of DC-AC converters (6) individually connected with the windings (N1,N2…,Nn) of the transformer (4), and adapted to be connected individually with a DC source or load, a control unit (8) adapted for controlling the operation of the converters (6), for converting a DC voltage into an AC signal, and202203709 subsequent filing PCT 15 wherein the control unit (8) is further adapted for operating the converters (6) of the set of converters, such that power from at least one DC source / load can be transferred to one or more DC source / load through a selection of converters (6), when the converters are connected individually to the DC sources / loads.
10. Control method according to any of the preceding claims, wherein all the converters are full-bridge DC-AC converters, or wherein all the converters half-bridge DC-AC converters.
11. A DC-DC multi-port converter, comprising: a transformer (4) having a plurality of windings (N1,N2…,Nn) and a single core (5) in common for all the windings, a set of DC-AC converters (6) individually connected with the windings (N1,N2…,Nn) of the transformer (4), and adapted to be connected individually with a DC source or load, a control unit (8) adapted for controlling the operation of the converters (6), for converting a DC voltage into an AC signal, and wherein the control unit (8) is further adapted for operating the converters (6) of the set of converters, such that power from at least one DC source / load can be transferred to one or more DC source / load through a selection of converters (6), when the converters are connected individually to the DC sources / loads, and wherein the control unit (8) is further adapted to operate the converter in accordance with the control method defined in any of the claims 1 to 7.202203709 subsequent filing PCT 16 12. A DC-DC multi-port converter according to claim 11, wherein the control unit (8) is adapted such that a switching frequency (^^^) is selected in common for all the converters connected to a DC source / load, and wherein power transfer between the converters, is controlled by varying the phase shift (^).