Method for evaluating feasibility of commercialization of corporate commercialization plan or academic paper using generative ai and commercialization evaluation score, and cloud-based commercialization determination support system using the method

Abstract

To provide a method for evaluating feasibility of commercialization of corporate commercialization plans or academic papers using generative AI, and a cloud-based commercialization determination support system for implementing the method.SOLUTION: A method for evaluating feasibility of corporate commercialization plans using generative AI and commercialization evaluation scores, includes the steps of: preparing a commercialization evaluation score in which evaluation points are assigned for every piece of evaluation criteria information prepared in advance with respect to a commercialization plan of a target company; inputting the evaluation points assigned to the evaluation criteria information of the commercialization evaluation score and necessary questions or instructions / commands to a generative AI to learn; and causing the generative AI to create a commercialization evaluation relating to the commercialization plan and output it in text or voice. In addition, a cloud-type commercialization determination support system capable of determining commercialization evaluation from a communication terminal has been proposed at the same time.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 1

Description

[Technical Field]

[0001] The present invention relates to a method for evaluating corporate commercialization and academic papers using a generation AI and a commercialization evaluation score, and a cloud-based commercialization evaluation support system using this method. [Background technology]

[0002] The following patent document discloses and proposes a technique for using a generation AI to make a judgment. [Prior art documents] [Patent documents]

[0003] [Patent Document 1] Patent No. 7097945 [Patent Document 2] JP 2018-24340 A [Patent Document 3] Japanese Patent Publication No. 2023-166041 [Patent Document 4] Japanese Patent Application Publication No. 2024-16211 Summary of the Invention [Problem to be solved by the invention]

[0004] However, Patent Document 1 relates to a method for supporting nursing care certification, Patent Document 2 relates to determining driving tendencies, Patent Document 3 relates to analyzing human skin, and Patent Document 4 relates to evaluating the content of surgeons' surgeries. Therefore, there is no technology that allows generative AI to evaluate commercialization based on business plans or academic papers written by scholars. In contrast, the present invention aims to provide a method for utilizing cutting-edge generative AI technology to evaluate business plans and academic papers, as well as a cloud-based commercialization evaluation system that can easily execute such a method using a communication terminal connected to a communication network such as the Internet. [Means for solving the problem] [Effects of the Invention]

[0005] According to the present invention, by using the commercialization evaluation score, the evaluation score, questions, and necessary instructions and commands can be input into the generation AI, which can then quickly perform a commercialization evaluation in writing or by voice, and advice can be obtained. Furthermore, a commercialization assessment report can be generated and output based on the commercialization assessment and advice made by the generation AI, allowing for a rapid response using the information gathering and analytical capabilities of the generation AI. This allows for a rapid evaluation without oversight. According to the cloud-based commercialization decision support system, the evaluator logs in to the server device via a communication terminal, By assigning a business feasibility evaluation score and asking questions or giving necessary instructions, the AI ​​can output a business evaluation on the spot in written or audio format, and if necessary, a business feasibility assessment report can be generated and output in written format. [Brief explanation of the drawings]

[0006] [Figure 1] 1 is a functional block diagram showing an overview of a cloud-enabled commercialization decision support system of the present invention. [Figure 2] FIG. 1 is an explanatory diagram showing the basic structure of a commercialization evaluation score. [Figure 3] An explanatory diagram showing an example of using the business evaluation score. [Figure 4] 1 is a flowchart showing the basic steps of a method for determining whether a commercialization plan can be commercialized according to the present invention. [Figure 5] 1 is a flowchart showing the basic steps of a method for determining commercial viability of an academic paper according to the present invention. [Figure 6] FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of a business feasibility evaluation report.

[0007] Examples of the present invention will be described below. Figure 1 shows an overview of a cloud-connected business feasibility decision support system, configured as a combination of functional blocks. The server device A is connected to the Internet INT, which is connected to external information sites SA··· and to communication terminal devices C··· of users. The external information site SA has a database that holds information that can be made public, and each database stores all the information necessary for business evaluation, including news, current affairs, statistics, economics, academics, literature, music, and entertainment. The server device A includes a communication control unit 1 connected to the Internet INT, a program processing unit 2, a generation AI processing unit 3, a business evaluation report generation unit 4, an extended function processing unit 5, an information management database 6, and extended storage 7. Here, the communication control unit 1 performs the necessary communication control via the communication terminal device C..., external site SA..., and the Internet INT. The program processing unit 2 performs the information processing necessary to operate the communication control unit 1, generation AI processing unit 3, business evaluation report generation unit 4, extended function processing unit 5, information management database 6, and extended storage 7. The generation AI processing unit 3 uses the commercialization evaluation score B to decode and learn the commands and messages sent from the evaluator's communication terminal C..., and performs a commercialization evaluation using the generation AI, outputting the results in text or audio. The commercialization evaluation report generation unit 4 compiles the commercialization evaluation determined and created by the generation AI processing unit 3 into a predetermined format, and edits and creates a commercialization evaluation report, which will be described later. In addition, the extended function processing unit 5, the management database 6 which stores the URLs of external sites, etc., and the extended storage 7 perform the information processing necessary to quickly decode and learn the commands and messages sent from the user's communication terminal C...

[0008] FIG. 2 shows the basic structure of the business feasibility evaluation score used in the present invention. This score has six main categories I to VI as the main columns, and each of the main categories I to VI has sub-categories shown as (1) to (4). In addition, on the right side of the main column, there is a major item score column where the average score of the six major items I to VI is written. Here, this commercialization evaluation score B was created by the inventor as a result of careful consideration in order to have the generating AI make a commercialization evaluation judgment. However, in order to ensure that the generating AI can correctly understand the meaning of the terms without any misunderstanding, the terms used for the major and minor items are those that are generally used in commercialization analysis in fields such as economics. Six major items in the business evaluation score I. Product and Technology Evaluation II Market analysis III. Patent and Intellectual Property Strength IV. Business Plan V. Legal and Regulatory Review VI. Strategy Formulation Sub-items for the six major items of the business evaluation score I. Product and Technology Evaluation ▲1▼ Uniqueness ▲2▼ Innovation ▲3▼ Technical maturity ▲4▼ Technology transfer success rate II Market analysis ▲1▼ Market size ▲2▼ Market growth rate ▲3▼ Market saturation 4. Difficulty of new entrants III. Patent and Intellectual Property Strength ▲1▼ Number of patent citations ▲2▼ Patent renewal ▲3▼ Number of independent claims in a patent ▲4▼ Litigation history IV. Business Plan ▲1▼ Cost (all costs of product development, manufacturing, marketing, distribution, etc.) ▲2▼ Initial investment and working capital ▲3▼ Profitability forecast (revenue model, sales, profit margin, break-even point) ▲4▼ Technology transfer success rate V. Legal and Regulatory Review ▲1▼ Patent validity 2. Scope of intellectual property rights 3. Related legal and regulatory issues 4. Risk of patent infringement and possibility of licensing agreements VI. Strategy Formulation ▲1▼ Product positioning 2. Differentiation strategy ▲3▼ Market entry strategy

[0009] In this invention, by combining the use of generation AI and scores, the generation AI can quickly evaluate commercialization and provide advice by learning from the information necessary for commercialization assessment that has been acquired from external sites.

[0010] About the business evaluation score The evaluator first reads the business plans and academic papers of the target companies and prepares a table of business evaluation scores B. Then, for the business plans they have read, they enter their own evaluation scores in the score columns for each sub-item of the major items, with 100 being the maximum score. For example, in the example in Figure 3, the business evaluation score B for the business plan read by the evaluator is 70 points for the average of the following: product and manufacturing technology: ▲1▼ uniqueness: 60 points, ▲2▼ innovativeness: 70 points, ▲3▼ technological maturity: 70 points, ▲4▼ technology transfer success rate: 80 points; market analysis: ▲1▼ market size: 70 points, ▲2▼ market growth rate: 80 points, ▲3▼ market saturation: 60 points, ▲4▼ difficulty of market entry: 70 points; and patent and intellectual property strength: ▲1▼ number of patent citations: 60 points, ▲2▼ patent renewal: 70 points, ▲3▼ number of independent patent claims: 70 points, ▲4▼ litigation history: 80 points. In addition, the business plan received a total of 70 points, with ▲1▼ costs scored at 60 points, ▲2▼ initial investment and working capital scored at 70 points, and ▲3▼ profitability forecasts scored at 70 points.The legal and regulatory considerations received a total of 70 points, with ▲1▼ patent validity scored at 60 points, ▲2▼ scope of intellectual property scored at 80 points, ▲3▼ related legal and regulatory issues scored at 70 points, and the risk of patent infringement and the possibility of licensing agreements scored at 60 points.The strategy formulation received a total of 70 points, with ▲1▼ product positioning scored at 70 points, ▲2▼ differentiation strategy scored at 60 points, and ▲3▼ market entry strategy scored at 80 points. In this way, the evaluator assigns a score to each sub-item, and the score for each major item is assigned the average score for the sub-items. In the example of Figure 3, the major items I, product and technology evaluation, are assigned 70 points, II, market analysis, 70 points, III, patent and intellectual property strength, 70 points, IV, business plan, 70 points, V, legal and regulatory review, 70 points, and VI, strategy formulation, are assigned 70 points.

[0011] How to determine whether a company is viable for business FIG. 4 shows the basic steps of the method for determining whether a company can be commercialized using the generation AI of the present invention. In the method for assessing the commercialization of a company according to the present invention, as a preliminary step, the evaluator reads the commercialization plan and assigns points to the score column of the evaluation criteria information of the commercialization evaluation score B prepared in advance. Next, the evaluator inputs the evaluation points assigned to each evaluation criterion information of Score B, as well as any necessary questions or instructions, in writing or by voice, into the generated AI to allow it to learn. The evaluator then instructs the generation AI to generate an evaluation judgment of the business plan and output it in text or voice. In addition, if the evaluator requires a commercialization evaluation report, a step is added to instruct the generation of a commercialization evaluation report, and the generating AI is given an instruction to compile the evaluation results and output them as a commercialization evaluation report. The business plan to be evaluated can be read by the evaluator or by the generating AI. In the present invention, based on the above-mentioned procedure, it is desirable to allow the generation AI to learn sufficiently by interactively inputting the necessary information as needed, and then to conduct a commercialization evaluation. Therefore, in order to ensure accurate judgments by the generating AI, it is essential for the evaluator to devise various questions and instructions for the generating AI.

[0012] Methods for evaluating the commercial viability of academic papers Figure 5 shows the basic steps for conducting a business feasibility evaluation of an academic paper. In this method, the evaluator reads the academic paper, grasps the necessary information, and then assigns a score B, which is the same as the business feasibility evaluation of a company shown in Figure 4, but there is an additional step in which the academic paper is read into the generation AI. Academic papers can be read not only in their entirety as text information, but also by identifying the specialist books and magazines in which the academic papers are published. When conducting a commercialization assessment of an academic paper, the generation AI can be made to read the academic paper, while also reading the major and minor items of the commercialization score, and then have the generation AI assign scores before conducting the commercialization assessment. In addition, the generation AI may be used to perform an academic evaluation of an academic paper before making a commercialization evaluation judgment of the academic paper. One example of an academic paper being evaluated is to conduct an academic evaluation of something like "multilayered turbostratic graphene" and use the score B mentioned above to determine whether it will be commercially viable.

[0013] Questions and commands for the generated AI Next, we will explain the scoring system used to allow the generating AI to make a commercialization decision, as well as the questions and instructions given to the generating AI. 1. Example of determining the points allocated to major items on the score sheet and requesting a comprehensive evaluation 1) Case 1 ▲1▼ When the score sheet is all 70 points In Case 1, questions are posed to the generating AI based on the points on the score sheet, but only the points for the major items are assigned, and the minor items are not specifically stated. <Questions and commands to the generating AI> In the score sheet, product and technology evaluation is 70 points out of 100, market analysis is 70 points out of 100, patent and intellectual property strength is 70 points out of 100, business plan is 70 points out of 100, and legal and regulatory review is 70 points out of 100. If your strategy formulation scores 70 out of 100, should you go ahead and commercialize it? 2) Case 2 ▲2▼The score sheet is all 70 points Questions are posed to the generating AI based on the score sheet, but the scores for major items and minor items are specified. <Questions and commands to the generating AI> In the score sheet, the total score for the product and technology (▲1▼Uniqueness, ▲2▼Innovativeness, ▲3▼Technological maturity, ▲4▼Technology transfer success rate) is 70 points out of 100, overall evaluation of market analysis (▲1▼market size, ▲2▼market growth rate, ▲3▼market saturation, ▲4▼difficulty of new entry) The overall rating of the strength of the patents and intellectual property (▲1▼Number of patent citations, ▲2▼Patent renewals, ▲3▼Number of independent patent claims, ▲4▼Litigation history) was 70 out of 100 points; the overall rating of the business plan (▲1▼Costs (total costs of product development, manufacturing, marketing, distribution, etc.), ▲2▼Initial investment and working capital, ▲3▼Profitability forecast (revenue model, sales, profit margin, break-even point), ▲4▼Technology transfer success rate) was 70 out of 100 points; the overall rating of the legal and regulatory considerations (▲1▼Patent validity, ▲2▼Scope of intellectual property rights, ▲3▼Related legal and regulatory issues, ▲4▼Risk of patent infringement and possibility of licensing agreements) was 70 out of 100 points; and the overall rating of the strategy formulation (▲1▼Product positioning, ▲2▼Differentiation strategy, ▲3▼Market entry strategy) was 70 out of 100 points. In this case, should we make a comprehensive judgment on the whole and commercialize it? 2. Cases where commercialization decisions are made by focusing on one major item 1) Case 1 In the case of product and manufacturing technology, should the project be commercialized if the following points are allocated? Originality: 60 out of 100 points Innovation score: 70 out of 100 Technical maturity score: 70 out of 100 The success rate of technology transfer is 80 out of 100 2) Case 2 In the market analysis, should the business be commercialized if the following points are allocated? Market size is 70 out of 100 Market growth rate is 80 out of 100 Market saturation score is 60 out of 100 Difficulty of market entry is 70 out of 100 3) Case 3 Should a business be commercialized if the strength of patents and intellectual property rights is as follows? Patent citations score 60 out of 100 Patent renewal is 70 out of 100 points The number of independent claims in the patent is 70 out of 100 Litigation history is 80 out of 100 4) Case 4 In the business plan, should the business be commercialized if the following points are allocated? Cost is 60 points out of 100 Initial investment and working capital are 70 out of 100 points Profitability forecast score of 70 out of 100 5) Case 5 When considering laws and regulations, should a business be launched in the following cases? Patent validity is 60 out of 100 The scope of intellectual property is 80 out of 100 points Related legal and regulatory issues scored 70 out of 100 The risk of patent infringement and the possibility of licensing agreements are 60 out of 100. 6) Case 6 In formulating a strategy, should the project be commercialized in the following cases? Product positioning is 60 out of 100 Differentiation strategy: 60 out of 100 Market entry strategy scored 80 out of 100

[0014] Preferred embodiments of the commercialization assessment method of the present invention The commercialization assessment method of the present invention allows for a variety of patterns by selecting various major items, minor items, questions, and instructions to be posed to the generation AI, but in order to provide accurate information to the generation AI, it is considered most desirable to carry out the following procedure. First, the AI ​​generator will be asked questions individually and consecutively about each of the subcategory evaluation items of the major item I. "Evaluation of Products and Technology": ▲1▼Uniqueness ▲2▼Innovativeness ▲3▼Technological Maturity ▲4▼Technology Transfer Success Rate, and will make a judgment. Then, they will be asked to make a comprehensive decision on whether or not to commercialize the project, taking into account the above four points. Secondly, the AI ​​is asked questions about each of the sub-categories of Major Item II. "Market Analysis Evaluation": ▲1▼Market size ▲2▼Market growth rate ▲3▼Market saturation ▲4▼Difficulty of new entry. The AI ​​is then asked to make a comprehensive judgment on whether or not to commercialize the business, taking into account the above four items. Third, the AI ​​is asked questions about each of the sub-categories of the major category III, "Strength of Patents and Intellectual Property," including: ▲1▼Number of patent citations, ▲2▼Current patent renewals, ▲3▼Number of independent patent claims, and ▲4▼Litigation history. It then makes a comprehensive judgment on whether or not the product should be commercialized, taking into account the above four factors. Fourth, the AI ​​is asked questions about each of the following sub-categories of major item IV. "Commercialization Plan": ▲1▼Total costs of product development, manufacturing, marketing, distribution, etc. ▲2▼Initial investment and working capital ▲3▼Profitability forecast (revenue model, sales, profit margin, break-even point) ▲4▼Technology transfer success rate. It then makes a comprehensive decision on whether or not to commercialize the idea, taking into account the above four items. Fifth, the AI ​​is asked questions about each of the following sub-categories of Major Item V. "Legal and Regulatory Considerations": ▲1▼Patent validity ▲2▼Scope of intellectual property ▲3▼Relevant legal and regulatory issues ▲4▼Risk of patent infringement and possibility of licensing agreements. It is then asked to make a comprehensive judgment on whether or not to commercialize the idea, taking into account the above four items. Sixth, the AI ​​will be asked questions about each of the sub-categories of Major Item VI. "Strategy Formulation" - ▲1▼Product Positioning ▲2▼Differentiation Strategy ▲3▼Market Entry Strategy - and judged individually. It will then make a comprehensive judgment on whether or not to commercialize the idea, taking into account the above four items. Seventh, and finally, integrate the overall business assessment from I to VI to reach a conclusion and output a final business feasibility assessment report.

[0015] Business Evaluation Report Finally, the evaluator will explain the evaluation score given to the generated AI, as well as the business evaluation report obtained by asking questions and giving instructions. 1) Process example 1 for deriving a comprehensive business feasibility assessment report <Questions and commands to the generating AI> The business evaluation scores are as follows: In other words, the evaluation of the major category I. Product and technology is 70 points out of 100 points. II. Market analysis: 70 out of 100 points III. Patent and intellectual property strength is 70 out of 100 IV. Business plan: 70 points out of 100 V. Legal and regulatory review: 70 out of 100 marks VI. If your strategy formulation scores 70 out of 100, should you go ahead and commercialize it? Please make a comprehensive assessment after taking into consideration the major categories and items I to VI, and prepare a business feasibility assessment report. Please document as much as possible and provide a rational explanation of why you came to that conclusion. <Reply from the Generative AI> We will prepare a comprehensive business feasibility assessment report and provide a response. Comprehensive business evaluation report 1. Summary We comprehensively evaluate each item, including product and technology evaluation, market analysis, patent and intellectual property strength, commercialization plan, legal and regulatory review, and strategy formulation, to determine whether or not a business can be commercialized. 2. Evaluation and analysis of each item I. Product and Technology Evaluation With above-average scores in uniqueness, innovation, technological maturity and technology transfer success, the country has a good foundation for market success. II. Market analysis The market has high growth rates and manageable entry difficulty. The market size and saturation level are average, and there is a need to focus on specific market needs. III. Patent and Intellectual Property Strength The right level of patent validity, citations, subsistence renewals, and independent claims provides a competitive advantage in the marketplace. IV. Business Plan The business plan is financially viable, with reasonable projections of costs, initial investment, working capital, and profitability. V. Legal and Regulatory Review There are risks of patent infringement and legal and regulatory challenges, but these can be overcome with the right management strategies. VI. Strategy Formulation It has a strong market entry strategy and an effective product positioning and differentiation strategy. 3. Overall Judgment Recommendation: Commercialization is recommended. The company's key evaluation criteria show above-average performance, and its market entry strategy and patent strength are particularly favorable for successful commercialization. The innovativeness and technological maturity of its products and technologies are also factors that will enhance its market competitiveness. 1) Reason: Product Competitiveness: The uniqueness and innovation of the product gives it market differentiation and competitive advantage. Market Opportunities: The rate of market growth and the feasibility of new entrants contribute to business expansion. Intellectual Property Protection: Strong patent and intellectual property rights provide competitive protection. Financial viability: A reasonable business plan and financial projections demonstrate the sustainability of the business. Legal and regulatory management: Legal and regulatory risks exist but can be overcome with appropriate management. Strategic Preparation: Effective market entry strategies and product positioning form the foundation for business success. 2) Conclusion Overall, we believe that commercialization has clear advantages and that the planned business has a high probability of success in the market. However, continuous monitoring of market trends, addressing legal and regulatory risks, and flexible adjustments to the strategy are necessary to further ensure the business's success. By addressing these factors appropriately, commercialization is likely to produce promising results.

[0016] 2) Process example 2 for deriving a business feasibility report <Questions and commands to the generating AI> The points allocated in the score are as follows: I. Product and technology evaluation: uniqueness (60 / 100), innovativeness (70 / 100), technological maturity (70 / 100), and technology transfer success rate (80 / 100). II. Market analysis: Market size (60 / 100), market growth rate (80 / 100), market saturation (60 / 100), difficulty of new entry (70 / 100) III. Patent and Intellectual Property Strength: Patent citation count (60 / 100), patent renewals (70 / 100), patent independent claims (70 / 100), and litigation history (80 / 100). IV. Business Plan: Cost (70 / 100), initial investment and working capital (70 / 100), profitability forecast (70 / 100) V. Legal and Regulatory Review: Patent validity (70 / 100), scope of intellectual property rights (80 / 100), related legal and regulatory issues (70 / 100), risk of patent infringement and potential licensing agreements (60 / 100) VI. Strategy Formulation: Product positioning (70 / 100), differentiation strategy (60 / 100), market entry strategy (80 / 100) Please use not only the six major items in the score, but also the minor items as necessary, and use the points allocated to determine whether or not the project is suitable for commercialization from a financial perspective and from the perspective of whether it is feasible. Please provide a full A4 answer with sufficient explanation. <Reply from the Generative AI> We will prepare a business feasibility report and answer your questions. Business feasibility report background We comprehensively evaluate the feasibility of commercialization from the perspectives of financial and feasibility, based on product and technology evaluation, market analysis, patent and intellectual property strength, commercialization plan, legal and regulatory review, and strategy formulation. Evaluation Summary I. Product and Technology Evaluation: Innovativeness (70 / 100) and technological maturity (70 / 100) suggest that the product has a high chance of market acceptance. Uniqueness (0 / 100) and technology transfer success rate (80 / 100) support competitive advantage within the market. II. Market analysis: Market growth (80 / 100) indicates high revenue potential in an expanding market. The size of the market (60 / 100) and the degree of saturation (60 / 100) require careful market segmentation and targeting. III. Patent and Intellectual Property Strength: Patent validity (70 / 100) indicates that legal protection is established for the product. The number of citations (60 / 100) and survival renewals (0 / 100) suggest that intellectual property provides a basis for competitive advantage in the market. IV. Business Plan: The cost (70 / 100) and profitability projections (70 / 100) indicate a financially viable plan. V. Legal and Regulatory Review: Patent infringement risk (60 / 100) represents a certain risk, but it can be managed with appropriate management. VI. Strategy Formulation: Market entry strategy (80 / 100) indicates effective market penetration and growth strategies. Financial evaluation From an overall financial perspective, the commercialization plan is financially viable. Projected costs are manageable, and market growth potential and product technological maturity are key drivers of profitability. However, given the size of the market and the competitive landscape, careful capital allocation and risk management are required. Feasibility evaluation From a viability perspective, product innovation, successful technology transfer, and an effective market entry strategy support a viable business venture. Legal and regulatory challenges and patent infringement risks require attention, but these can be managed with proper planning and strategy. Overall Judgment 1) Conclusion: We recommend commercialization. 2) Reasons: Product and technology evaluation and market analysis indicate high market acceptance and growth potential. Strong patents and intellectual property provide additional protection and competitive advantage, while the financial viability of the commercialization plan and an effective market entry strategy form the foundation for success. Points to note Risk Management: Patent infringement risks and legal and regulatory challenges require constant attention and countermeasures. Monitor market trends: Continuous market analysis and flexible adjustments to strategies are required to respond to market changes. 3) Final opinion Taking all the factors into consideration, the drivers for commercialization are strong and the risks can be overcome with proper management and strategy, making commercialization the preferred option from both a financial and viability perspective.

Claims

1. A method for evaluating the commercial feasibility of a company using a generation AI and a commercial feasibility evaluation score, A step of preparing a commercialization evaluation score in which evaluation points are assigned to each piece of evaluation criteria information prepared in advance with respect to the commercialization plan of the target company; A step of inputting the evaluation score assigned to the evaluation criteria information of the commercialization evaluation score and necessary questions and instructions to the generating AI to learn; A method for assessing the commercialization of a company using a generative AI, comprising a step of having the generative AI create a commercialization evaluation of the commercialization plan and output it in text or voice.

2. A method for evaluating the commercial viability of academic papers using a generation AI and a commercial viability evaluation score, A step of preparing a commercialization evaluation score for the academic paper, in which evaluation points are assigned to each piece of evaluation criteria information prepared in advance; inputting the academic paper to the generating AI; A step of inputting the evaluation points allocated to the evaluation criteria information of the commercialization evaluation score and necessary questions and instructions to the generated AI to learn; and causing the generating AI to generate a commercialization evaluation of the academic paper and output it in text or voice.

3. In claim 1, The commercialization evaluation score includes, as the evaluation criteria information, A method for assessing a company's business feasibility using generative AI, including major items such as product and technology evaluation, market analysis, differentiation through intellectual property, business planning, compliance preparation, and strategy formulation.

4. In claim 2, The commercialization evaluation score includes, as the evaluation criteria information, A method for determining the commercial viability of academic papers using generative AI, which includes major items such as product and technology evaluation, market analysis, differentiation through intellectual property, business planning, compliance preparation, and strategy formulation.

5. In claim 1, A method for assessing the commercial viability of a company, further comprising a step of editing and creating a commercial viability evaluation report based on the commercial viability evaluation of the company created by the generation AI.

6. In claim 2, A method for determining the commercial viability of an academic paper, further comprising a step of editing and creating a commercial viability evaluation report based on the commercial viability evaluation of the academic paper created by the generation AI.

7. A cloud-connected business feasibility assessment support system, It is composed of a combination of a commercialization evaluation score and a server device, The commercialization evaluation score is an evaluation score assigned to each piece of evaluation criteria information prepared in advance, the server device is installed on the web and can be logged in from a communication terminal; It is equipped with a communication control unit, a program processing unit, and a generation AI processing unit, The generation AI processing unit is a cloud-connected commercialization support search system that is configured to receive and decode the commercialization evaluation scores for the companies' commercialization plans and academic papers sent from the communication terminal, as well as questions and necessary instructions and commands, learn from them, and output a commercialization evaluation of the companies' commercialization plans and academic papers in text or voice.

8. In claim 1, The server device further includes a business evaluation report generation unit, The commercialization evaluation report generation unit is a cloud-connected commercialization support search system that has the function of outputting a commercialization evaluation report regarding a company's commercialization plan or an academic paper based on the commercialization evaluation results determined by the generation AI processing unit.

Images