Shoes with soles that provide dynamic arch support

Abstract

The present invention provides a shoe (1) having a sole that provides dynamic plantar arch support. The shoe includes a rubber outsole (9), an upper (10), and a midsole (2). The midsole includes a hard elastic material (4) and a soft elastic material (5). The hard elastic material has an elastic hardness ranging from 1.3 to 3 times that of the soft elastic material. The hard elastic material is arranged as a band (3) on the medial side of the periphery of the midsole. The soft elastic material (5) is arranged within the midsole medial to the band of hard elastic material. The shoe further includes a support structure (8) arranged below the soft elastic material in a medial-lateral direction. The support structure is positioned 4 cm forward and vertically below the center of the navicular bone for a typical user whose foot fits the shoe size. The support structure has a higher elastic hardness than the hard elastic material, and has a larger longitudinal dimension on the medial side than on the lateral side when the shoe is standing on a horizontal surface. This allows for more support below the medial side of the plantar arch than below the lateral side of the plantar arch.

Description

[Technical field]

[0001] The present invention relates to a shoe, and more particularly to a shoe having a sole that provides dynamic and comfortable plantar arch support. [Background technology]

[0002] Various kinds of shoes have been used for thousands of years. In modern society, where walking is often done on hard flat ground, various foot problems are prevalent. Good shoes can alleviate many of these problems. Conventional walking shoes for healthy feet and healthy transfer of forces from the underside to bones, joints, muscles and connective tissues usually have a hard sole. More than 50% of the sole thickness is often made of hard inelastic materials. Another shoe design, perhaps the most cutting-edge design, for alleviating common walking-related biomechanical problems is described and illustrated in European Patent Specification No. 2747592B1. US Patent Application No. 2018 / 0199665A1 describes and illustrates footwear that includes a lightweight sole structure with a multi-layer structure for enhanced comfort, flexibility and performance characteristics.

[0003] WO 2009 / 010078 A1 describes and illustrates a molded sole with an anatomical foot support bed. The molded sole includes a longitudinal arch support along the medial longitudinal portion that is more effective than in conventional soles. This effect is exerted under the navicular bone (accessory navicular bone), resulting in better anatomical support of the foot.

[0004] The navicular bone is a boat-shaped bone located on the medial upper or medial side of the longitudinal arch of the foot, adjacent to the talus and the three cuneiform bones, and medially to the cuboid bone. The rounded navicular part of the navicular bone is on the side of the talus. The rounded shape of this joint allows the navicular bone to rotate freely both medially and downward in relation to the longitudinal axis of the talus and foot. The navicular bone is considered the most important bone in composing the longitudinal arch of the human foot. When measured from the heel of the footprint or along a last of a size that fits the footprint, the navicular bone is located on the medial side of the plantar arch and extends in the range of about 30% to 50% of the length across the footprint or last, more specifically in the range of about 35% to 45% and center in the range of about 38% to 40%. Summary of the Invention [Problem to be solved by the invention]

[0005] Despite the numerous shoe designs and insole designs, a need remains for alternative or improved shoe designs that provide dynamic and comfortable plantar arch support. [Means for solving the problem]

[0006] The present invention provides a shoe having a sole that provides dynamic plantar arch support. The shoe comprises a rubber outsole and an upper. The rubber outsole is alternatively referred to as an undersole or sole rubber. The shoe further comprises a midsole. The midsole comprises: a hard elastic material; A soft elastic material; Here, the hard elastic material has an elastic hardness in the range of 1.3 to 3 times, preferably 1.5 to 2.5 times, that of the soft elastic material.

[0007] The shoe is characterized in that the hard elastic material is arranged as a band on the inside of the periphery of the midsole. Preferably, the band extends from the periphery along the sides and heel of the midsole inwardly by 0.1 to 1 times the thickness of the midsole. Preferably, the band is wider on the inside than on the outside at the heel of the midsole. Preferably, the band is 1.5 to 4 times, 1.5 to 3 times, 2 to 3 times, or 2.5 to 3 times wider on the inside than on the outside at the heel of the midsole.

[0008] A soft elastic material is disposed within the midsole inside the band of hard elastic material.

[0009] The shoe further comprises a support structure disposed below the soft elastic material in a medial to lateral direction, the support structure being located 4 cm vertically below or 3 cm forward of the center of the navicular accessory bone for a typical user whose foot fits the shoe size. Preferably, the support structure has a higher elastic hardness than the hard elastic material and / or has a larger vertical dimension on the medial side than on the lateral side when the shoe is standing on a horizontal surface, thereby providing more support below the medial side of the plantar arch than on the lateral side of the plantar arch.

[0010] The sole has a harder resilience beneath the user's plantar arch, medial cuneiform bone and navicular accessory bone than a standard walking shoe sole, but the initial compression resilience is softer due to the softer resilient material facing the foot beneath the plantar arch, providing comfort.

[0011] As mentioned above, the prior art US Patent Application No. 2018 / 0199665A1 describes and illustrates footwear including a lightweight sole structure with a multi-layer structure. As shown in FIG. 1 and FIG. 12A-FIG. 12H and described in paragraphs

[0031] and

[0036] , the hard elastic material 160 is disposed below the soft elastic material 130, and the curved plate 150 and the strobel member 140 are disposed therebetween. The strobel member 140 fixes the upper to the sole structure and is closed for direct contact between the layers 130 and 160. As shown in FIG. 12A-FIG. 12H of US Patent Application No. 2018 / 0199665A1, the soft material 130 is above the layers of materials 160, 150 and 140 and extends to a position much higher than the hard material 160 when the shoe is standing on a horizontal underlay. As shown in FIG. 12E, a user wearing the shoe described in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2018 / 0199665A1 does not have an effective support structure located from medial to lateral underneath the navicular bone.

[0012] In contrast, an essential feature of the shoe of the present invention is a support structure located below the soft elastic material in a medial-lateral direction. The support structure is located 4 cm vertically below or 3 cm forward of the center of the navicular accessory bone of a typical user whose foot fits the shoe size. Also, the hard elastic material is located like a band on the inside of the periphery of the midsole, and the soft elastic material is located in the midsole inside the band of hard elastic material. There is no other material between the soft elastic material and the hard elastic material. These materials are directly adjacent and in direct contact without any intervening material. In the shoe of the present invention, the hard elastic material extends to a higher position than the soft elastic material when the shoe is standing on a horizontal underlay. In the shoe of the present invention, the side support is increased by providing a hard elastic material just inside the heel and side periphery of the midsole. In the shoe of U.S. Patent Application No. 2018 / 0199665A1, the side support is increased by thickening the soft elastic material on the side of the user's foot.

[0013] Elastic hardness is measured according to ASTM D2240.

[0014] Type A is used for hard and soft elastic materials, resulting in a Shore A value for elastic hardness. Type A or Type D is used for support structures, resulting in a Shore A or Shore D value for elastic hardness, respectively. Shore hardness is related to Young's Modulus of Elasticity (Young's Modulus) by a relationship known to those skilled in the art. This relationship is non-linear and is most easily determined using a chart, table, or formula. Young's Modulus of Elasticity, as is common knowledge, relates to resistance to bending.

[0015] This characteristic of hard elastic materials having elastic strength in the range of 1.3 to 3 times that of soft elastic materials relates to the Shore A value. For example, if the Shore A hardness of the soft elastic material is 30, the Shore A hardness of the hard elastic material is in the range of 39 to 90.

[0016] Preferably, when the support structure is an inlay or shank, the Shore D hardness of the support structure is between 70 and 90, preferably about 80. Preferably, the inlay or shank is integrated into or molded into the soft elastic material. When the support structure is integrated into the rubber outsole or located between the rubber outsole and the midsole, preferably in the form of an arch roller integrated into the rubber outsole, it preferably has a Shore A hardness of ≧70, for example a Shore A hardness of about 75, or a Shore D hardness of ≧30, for example a Shore D hardness of about 35.

[0017] Preferably, the shoe comprises an inlay sole disposed on the midsole. However, the shoe does not have to have an inlay sole. The shoe may be a sandal.

[0018] The term midsole means the sole above the rubber outsole, which may or may not have an inlay or insole thereon.

[0019] When measured from the heel of the shoe, midsole, sole, or last, the centerline of the support structure has a distance in a medial-lateral direction that is in the range of about 30%-50%, more specifically in the range of about 35%-45%, such as in the range of about 38%-40%, of the length from the heel to the forefoot.

[0020] Typically, the shoe of the present invention comprises a sole or midsole having greater than 50%, greater than 60%, or greater than 75% of the relatively soft elastic material across its thickness in the heel region in the form of hard elastic material and soft elastic material.

[0021] However, in the portion of the sole below the medial cuneiform and navicular bones, the sole may have about 50% or less of a soft elastic material in the thickness direction. This allows the dynamic elastic stiffness to be more effective and to increase progressively below the medial plantar arch. Also, the heel and preferably the forefoot have a softer elastic stiffness than the midfoot. The heel may sink further down and the forefoot may have a lower and / or softer elastic stiffness than the lower portion of the medial plantar arch.

[0022] As described above and as claimed, by combining materials with low elastic hardness, materials with high elastic hardness and more or less hard materials, with the material with low elastic hardness on top, advanced yet comfortable navicular and plantar arch support can be obtained.

[0023] Preferably, the support structure is disposed within the rubber outsole as an integral part of the rubber outsole. In many preferred embodiments, a further support structure is disposed within the midsole, preferably within the soft elastic material, and optionally also within the hard elastic material. Preferably, the support structure is disposed within the midsole and the rubber outsole.

[0024] Preferably, the support structure has a conical structure arranged from medial to lateral when viewed from the heel of the shoe with the shoe standing on a horizontal surface, with the largest vertical dimension on the medial side. Its cross-sectional shape can be circular, elliptical, semicircular, semi-elliptical or polygonal, and preferably, in any embodiment, has a conical or cone-like structure with the largest vertical dimension on the medial side. The support structure can be arranged in the rubber outsole, in the midsole, or both. Preferably, the support structure has a substantially cylindrical structure with substantially parallel sides toward the toe and heel with the shoe standing on a horizontal surface, with a larger vertical cross-sectional dimension on the medial side than on the lateral side.

[0025] In a preferred embodiment of the shoe, the support structure comprises an inlay covering the plantar arch of the sole. Preferably, the inlay is trapezoidal, with its longest side on the medial side. Preferably, the medial side of the inlay is curved, with the convex side facing upwards. Preferably, the inlay is straight / flat in the medial-lateral direction and twisted clockwise for the right shoe as seen from behind. This allows the natural shape of the plantar arch to match the inlay. The inlay can be said to be a shorter version of a shank. Preferably, the inlay is twisted clockwise and / or curved for the right midsole as seen from behind, with an angle α2 of its upper surface in the range of 1°-10°, more preferably in the range of 2°-10° or in the range of 3°-7° from the horizontal. Preferably, the inlay comprises a longitudinal rib along the underside. The rib is higher on the medial side than on the lateral side. At maximum extension, the ribs extend outwardly from the underside of the inlay a distance at least equal to the thickness of the inlay without the ribs. Preferably, the inlay is formed from a polymeric material, preferably polyamide, preferably PA6 or PA66. Preferably, the thickness of the inlay without the ribs is 0.5mm to 5mm, more preferably 1mm to 4mm, or 2mm to 3mm. Other polymers such as PE or PET, carbon fiber, carbon composites, or metals may also be used. However, the dimensions must be adapted to provide a similar bending stiffness to a size 39 shoe as a 3mm thick PA6 inlay.

[0026] Preferably, the shoe comprises a shank. Preferably, the shank is embedded in the midsole, preferably in a soft elastic material, from the heel to the forefoot of the midsole. Alternatively, the shank is disposed between layers of soft elastic material. Preferably, the shank extends over 60% to 95% of the last length and over 60% to 95% of the last width.

[0027] Preferably, the shank is twisted clockwise in the case of a right foot midsole viewed from behind at a mid-section from the heel to a position forward of the user's navicular bone. Preferably, the twist angle α2 is in the range of 1°-10° from horizontal, more preferably in the range of 2°-10°, or in the range of 3°-7°. Preferably, the shank comprises a longitudinal rib along the underside of the shank. The rib extends from the heel and mid-section to a position forward of the user's navicular bone. Preferably, the rib, if present, is located higher on the inside of the shank than on the outside of the shank. Preferably, at maximum extension, the rib extends outwardly from the underside of the shank a distance at least equal to the thickness of the shank without the rib. Preferably, the shank is formed from a polymeric material, preferably a polyamide, preferably PA6 or PA66. Preferably, the thickness of the shank without the rib is 0.5mm-3mm. Other polymers, such as PE or PET, preferably with a bending stiffness similar to polyamide, carbon fiber, carbon composites, or metals may also be used. Preferably, the shank has a Shore D hardness of 70-90, preferably about 80. However, the dimensions, measured at the midpoint of the shank in the midfoot region in the medial-lateral direction, must be adapted to give a size 39 shoe a bending stiffness similar to a 3 mm thick PA6 shank. Preferably, the dimensions are adjusted proportionally, for example, a shoe with two-thirds the dimensions of a size 39 shoe would preferably have a 2 mm thick PA6 shank. Alternatively or additionally, the elastic bending stiffness can be adjusted alone or in combination with thickness / dimensions / ribs, or no ribs, and / or slot adjustments. This can provide a shank with a bending stiffness similar to a PA6 or PA66 shank as described above. The thickness of the soft elastic material in the midfoot above and below the shank is at least one time the thickness of the shank. This allows the shank to bend properly above the arch roller. Such a shank, with carefully tailored bending stiffness embedded in soft elastic material, combined with an arch roller that provides support below the midfoot, giving more support below the medial side than the lateral side, is the best embodiment of the shoe of the present invention.

[0028] Preferably, the midsole comprises, as the hard elastic material, polyurethane (PU) having a Shore A hardness in the range of 40 to 80, more preferably a Shore A hardness of about 60, and, as the soft elastic material, polyurethane (PU) having a Shore A hardness in the range of 20 to 60, more preferably a Shore A hardness of about 30.

[0029] Preferably, at least a portion of the upper surface of the midsole is inclined. The midsole is higher on the medial side than on the lateral side from the heel and midsection to a position forward of the user's navicular bone. Preferably, the angle of inclination α1 in the medial-lateral direction is in the range of 1°-7°, more preferably 3°-5°, from the horizontal. Preferably, the upper surface is substantially horizontal in the forefoot region.

[0030] Regarding the rotation angle α2 of the fitting portion or the shank, and the inclination angle α1 of the upper surface of the midsole, it is preferable that α2≧α1, and more preferably α2>α1.

[0031] Preferably, the thickness of the soft elastic material above the support structure / shank in the midfoot region of the midsole is less than the thickness of the soft elastic material above the support structure in the heel region of the midsole, which provides a soft elasticity upon initial compression by the user's foot, but upon further compression provides progressively harder elastic support in the midfoot region than in the heel region of the shoe, where the harder elasticity begins with less compression in the midfoot region than in the heel region of the midsole, and is more pronounced on the medial side than on the lateral side.

[0032] Preferably, the hard elastic material is arranged in a band laterally around the soft elastic material, but also in a layer below the soft elastic material, whereby the hard elastic material is preferably arranged as a sole-shaped "cup" into which the soft elastic material and preferably the inlay and preferably the shank are arranged, for example by moulding.

[0033] This shoe construction provides a combination of comfort and dynamic support, yet is tunable for specific purposes. How the shoe, and particularly its midsole, needs to be designed and constructed, and why, will become apparent from the further description below.

[0034] The precision involved in designing and constructing the shoe to provide its specific effect while still maintaining its comfort is one of the reasons why the shoe is described as having dynamic plantar arch support. More specifically, the elasticity of the sole when initially compressed is soft, guided by the elasticity of the soft elastic material. With further compression, the sole area below the medial cuneiform and navicular accessory bones becomes relatively stiffer, like a progressive spring. As a result, the heel and forefoot areas sink more than the plantar arch area below the medial cuneiform and navicular accessory bones. This effect varies depending on the amount of compression of the sole. This makes the support dynamic.

[0035] Below a bone structure such as the calcaneus or navicular bone means vertically below the center of the particular bone in a typical user's foot that fits the shoe size, unless otherwise specified.

[0036] As will be apparent to one skilled in the art, the definitions for twisting the left shoe are reversed.

[0037] The shoes of the present invention also include specialized embodiments such as shoes for diabetics, shoes for children, and running shoes.

[0038] Of particular relevance to diabetics, the shoe of the present invention can enhance the dynamic distribution of weight on the foot by several features. One feature is the effect of a hard elastic material arranged like a band on the sides of the midsole and on the inside of the heel periphery, rather than a larger soft elastic material. A further feature is the inherent directing of the resultant forces of the user, by the outwardly twisted heel side sole and shank / insert, and the midfoot arch support, to direct the center of gravity of the user's foot during walking along a vertical line below the center of mass or volume of the skeleton along the foot. Another feature is the inherent dynamic elasticity as specified elsewhere in this specification. A further feature is the combination of a longitudinal convex sole and a lateral concave or flat sole against a flat underlay. It is assumed that the result is a partially unstable shoe, which avoids the concentration of extreme partial pressures and allows the brain to receive enhanced continuous signals from the sensory system. It is also assumed that blood circulation is improved. As a specific example, when standing in balance, neither the center of gravity nor the foot is stationary, because the sensory system (nerves) detects small deviations in load and stress in the tissues of the foot and provides signals to adjust the position of the foot and body to remain in a balanced position through very rapid, precise, and often unconscious adjustments, also called postural pendulum. This results in dynamic pressure fluctuations on the foot, a process that stimulates circulation, including the soft tissues of the midfoot. This process is enhanced by the structural design of the shoe, rather than providing a large amount of soft material to support the foot. For early stage diabetes patients with feet without significant deep tissue damage, the basic shoe embodiment defined in the attached independent claims and including the arch roller and shank may be the optimal shoe.

[0039] For diabetic patients with significant inflammation and / or damage to the deep tissues of the foot, the shoe preferably has the following features, in any combination: - Increase the lateral dimension of the shoe by at least 2%, 3%, 5%, 8%, 10% or 15% in the direction from the inside to the outside of the shoe; · Increase the vertical dimension between the sole and upper of the shoe by 2%, 3%, 5%, 8%, 10% or 15% or more; Preferably, in the area under the ball of the first toe of a user having a foot that fits the shoe size, and in an area of ​​at least 0.5 cm, e.g. 0.5 cm, 1 cm, 1.5 cm, 2 cm, or 3 cm around the center point of the ball of the first toe or the center point of the affected tissue, and optionally also under further metatarsal heads / balls, by reducing the elastic hardness of the sole compared to the surrounding areas, and / or by reducing the altitude or height or thickness, and / or by adding perotettes below the metatarsals, in which the contact pressure under the ball of the first toe of the user is reduced by transferring some of the load to other parts of the forefoot, and including structural modifications to reduce contact pressure against tissue below the heel bone for an optimal, wide pressure distribution below the entire plantar area of ​​the heel bone of a user having a foot that fits the shoe size, by reducing the elastic hardness of the sole and / or reducing the altitude or height or thickness below the medial area of ​​the calcaneus (in the case of calcaneal valgus) compared to the surrounding areas; The present invention has one or more of the following:

[0040] In a preferred embodiment, the sole is adjusted below and around the center point of the user's heel bone or affected tissue by at least 1 cm, 1.5 cm, 2 cm, 2.5 cm, 3 cm, or 4 cm. In addition to reducing pressure below the calcaneus, dynamic loading of the midfoot region contributes to a further reduction in elastic stiffness below the calcaneus.

[0041] The increased size features include adjustments for various degrees of inflammation. For example, the size is adjusted for size 39 of the European shoe size standard (ISO / TS19407:2015, EU or EUR). For other sizes or standards, the size can be adjusted proportionately.

[0042] Structural modifications to reduce contact pressure are for adjusting the shoe to reduce contact pressure at typical injury sites that afflict diabetics, such as under the calcaneus and first metatarsal head. Using soft elastic materials in specific areas under the ball of the first toe and / or under the heel bone, and / or modifying the shank to provide an opening under the ball of the first toe and / or under the heel bone, reducing the midsole height by at least 0.5 mm, 1 mm, or 2 mm, and / or reducing the elastic stiffness by at least 5, 10, or 15 Shore A units, may help. Similarly, adjustments of the sole under the center point of the affected deep tissue area in the user's foot are also included in further embodiments of the shoe of the present invention.

[0043] While the physical effects of shoe adjustments are in principle known or predictable by logical reasoning, and / or calculations / simulations, and / or measurements, the clinical effects on diabetic patients cannot be verified until comprehensive scientific trials are performed. Even if the shoe can help many people, individual follow-up and treatment should always be performed for those who are severely affected by deep tissue damage caused directly or indirectly by diabetes.

[0044] Shoes for children in very small sizes, such as European sizes 20 and 21, do not necessarily have to include all the specific features of claim 1 of the appended claims, but an arch roller must be present and the sole must be moderately thicker or higher medially than laterally, at least in the heel and midfoot regions of the sole.

[0045] Further embodiments of the shoe of the present invention include a running shoe. The running shoe is preferably lighter, preferably by using a lighter material than standard PU in the midsole. For example, PU reinforced with carbon fibers, such as nano carbon fibers, is highly practical, since the elastic stiffness of the lightweight PU grade can be increased with a moderate weight increase. Other examples include block copolymers such as polyether and polyamide. For a running shoe, the midsole is preferably 5% to 50% thicker, more preferably 10% to 30% thicker, than a standard shoe for walking. Preferably, the thickness of the sole is mainly due to an increase in the thickness of the soft elastic material and the hard elastic material. Also preferably, the heel region of the sole of the running shoe is relatively higher, preferably 5% to 30% higher, than the mid and forefoot regions of the sole, compared to a standard shoe for walking. Here, the sole is at least higher in the heel region. Preferably, both the heel and forefoot regions of the sole are thicker than those of a standard walking shoe, and preferably the "forefoot drop", i.e. the difference between the thickness of the heel and the thickness of the forefoot of the sole, is increased. This means that both the heel and forefoot regions of the sole, and preferably the midfoot region, are thicker, and preferably the increase in thickness in the heel region of the sole is greater. For example, in the case of a typical running shoe of the present invention, the heel part of the sole is thicker than the forefoot part of the sole, and for example, for a size 39 shoe, the difference between the thickness measured below the center of the heel bone and the thickness measured below the center of the ball of the first toe of a typical user whose foot fits the shoe size may be increased from 7 mm or 9 mm to 10 mm or 11 mm. Such adjustments fall within the scope of protection of the independent claims as set forth in the appended claims. [Brief description of the drawings]

[0046] [Figure 1] FIG. 2 shows a medial-lateral cross section through the heel region of the midsole of the shoe of the present invention. [Diagram 2] FIG. 2 shows a shoe midsole insert of the present invention having a shank configuration. [Diagram 3] FIG. 2 shows a medial-lateral cross section through the midfoot region of the shoe of the present invention. [Figure 4] FIG. 2 shows a medial-lateral cross section through the forefoot region of the shoe of the present invention. [Diagram 5] FIG. 1 shows a shoe of the present invention. [Figure 6] FIG. 2 is a longitudinal cross-section of the lateral side of the midsole of the shoe of the present invention. [Figure 7] FIG. 2 is a longitudinal cross-section of the medial side of the midsole of the shoe of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

[0047] The essential support structure in the shoe of the present invention is preferably an arch roller. Preferably, the further support structure is a shank embedded in the soft elastic material in the midsole. The shank extends at least from the heel to the front so as to cover the entire plantar arch. Preferably, the arch roller is arranged so as to be integrated into the rubber outsole. Alternatively, the arch roller is arranged between the rubber outsole and the midsole, in which case the shank is necessarily above it.

[0048] More specifically, the shoe 1 of the present invention preferably includes an arch roller 8 and a shank 6. The arch roller is integrated into the rubber outsole or is located between the rubber outsole and the shank. The arch roller is located in a medial-to-lateral direction directly below or slightly forward of the navicular bone of a typical user whose foot fits the shoe size. Here, directly below or slightly forward means 4 cm, 0-3 cm, 1 cm-3 cm, or about 2 cm forward of the center of the navicular bone, projecting vertically downward. Another way to express the location and orientation of the arch roller is that the arch roller is below the center of the medial cuneiform bone and extends in a medial-to-lateral direction across the sole, projecting vertically downward about 2.3 cm forward of the center of the navicular bone for a size 39 shoe.

[0049] With reference to FIG. 1, a cross section from medial to lateral through the heel region of a midsole 2 with a rubber outsole 9 of a right shoe 1 of the invention is shown, seen from behind. A band 3 of hard elastic material 4 extends on the medial side of the periphery of the midsole. As clearly shown in the figure, the band is wider on the medial side M than on the lateral side L. The hard elastic material is also located on the lower part of the midsole, which is attached to the rubber outsole. In the midsole, a soft elastic material 5 is filled over and below the band on the medial side. In the cross section, a shank 6 within the soft elastic material is clearly shown.

[0050] As clearly shown in the figure, when the rubber outsole 9 is placed on a horizontal surface, the shank twists clockwise and the upper surface of the heel portion of the midsole and its substantially even or flat portions, excluding the rim and edges, slope clockwise. In the embodiment shown in the figure, at the location selected for the cross section, the thickness of the soft elastic material above the inside of the insert is 3 mm, and the thickness of the soft elastic material above the outside of the insert is approximately 5 mm to 6 mm. The location of the cross section is vertically downward from the center of the cuboid bone of a typical user. When measured at the center or centerline of the shank, the thickness of the soft elastic material above the shank is 4.5 mm. As clearly shown in the figure, the shank twists clockwise to a greater extent than the upper surface of the midsole slopes clockwise relative to a horizontal line parallel to the underside of the midsole. The shank is thicker on the inside than on the outside, approximately 3 mm versus 1.5 mm, respectively. On the underside of the shank, a rib 7 extends downward. Preferably, the shank is asymmetrically positioned about the center of the soft elastic material relative to the medial side of the soft elastic material, at least in the heel region of the midsole.

[0051] The specific dimensions, angles and locations described herein are exemplary for a size 39 shoe. For other shoe sizes, the dimensions are adjusted linearly. For other embodiments or other foot problems, the twist of the insert and slope of the upper surface of the midsole, as well as the dimensions and amounts of material, may be different, e.g., in the opposite direction, larger, or smaller.

[0052] With further reference to FIG. 2, a shank 6 is shown to be embedded in the midsole of the shoe of the present invention. The shank is twisted clockwise in the heel and midfoot regions and is horizontal in the forefoot region of the shoe. This is more clearly shown in the cross-sectional views of FIG. 1, FIG. 3 and FIG. 4 along dashed lines 1-1, 3-3 and 4-4 in FIG. 2, respectively. Ribs 7 are only visible in the cross-sectional views. Preferably, the support structure in the form of a shank has holes (not shown) as anchor points for molding and longitudinal slots 11 at least in the forefoot region for anchoring and reducing bending stiffness.

[0053] FIG. 3 shows a medial-lateral cross section through the midfoot region of the shoe of the invention. The shank and the upper surface of the midsole are twisted clockwise for the right shoe as seen from behind. The rubber outsole 9 has an arch roller 8 integrated therein. At the medial side M, the arch roller will contact the ground before the rest of the rubber outsole. Preferably, the hardness of the rubber outsole and the integrated arch roller is Shore A ≥ 70, for example about 75, or Shore D ≥ 30, for example about 35. The thickness of the soft elastic material 5 above the shank 6 is 0.6 to 2 times, or 0.8 to 1.5 times, for example about 1 time, the thickness of the shank without ribs. The thickness of the soft elastic material 5 below the shank 6 is 0.6 to 2 times, or 0.8 to 1.8 times, for example about 1.3 times, the thickness of the shank without ribs. The medial part of the shank is vertically above the medial part of the arch roller. The soft elastic material and the hard elastic material make up about 30% to 60%, or about 50% of the thickness of the sole. Thus, the elastic stiffness of the midsole in the midfoot region is relatively higher than in the heel and forefoot regions of the sole, especially on the medial side, since most of the thickness is formed by the rubber outsole / arch roller and shank, which are relatively stiffer materials.

[0054] Figure 4 shows a medial-lateral cross section through the forefoot region of the shoe of the invention. The thickness of the soft elastic material 5 above the shank 6 is 0.6-2 times, or 0.7-1 times, for example about 0.8 times, the thickness of the shank without ribs. The thickness of the soft elastic material 5 below the shank 6 is 0.2-1.5 times, or 0.3-1.2 times, for example about 0.5 times, the thickness of the shank without ribs. The sole in the forefoot is thinner, softer and has a lower upper surface than the midfoot part of the sole.

[0055] FIG. 5 shows an embodiment of a complete shoe 1 of the invention, with a rubber outsole 9, an upper 10, and an insole (not shown), seen from the outside. With the shoe standing unloaded on a flat, hard underlay, the arch roller 8 does not reach the underlay on the outside as shown, but does reach it on the inside. A person skilled in the art will recognize that this is shown in FIG. 3. FIGS. 6 and 7 clearly show this feature. Typically, depending on the shoe size, 2 cm to 6 cm, or preferably 3 cm to 5 cm, of the medial portion of the arch roller contacts the flat underlay during walking. Thus, in some embodiments of the shoe of the invention, the arch roller does not extend the entire length from the medial to the lateral side of the sole, below the plantar arch of the user.

[0056] Preferably, the shoe 1 of the present invention comprises an arch roller 8 and a shank 6. Preferably, the arch roller is integrated into the rubber outsole or is located between the rubber outsole and the midsole or shank. The arch roller is located, in a medial-lateral direction, directly below or slightly forward of the navicular bone of a typical user whose foot fits the shoe size. Here, directly below or slightly forward means vertically below the center of the navicular bone to 4 cm forward. Measured from heel to fore along the sole, this corresponds to 30% to 50%, or 35% to 45%, more specifically 38% to 40% of the length from heel to fore.

[0057] The arch roller 8 has a conical structure with respect to its vertical cross-sectional dimension when the shoe is standing on a horizontal surface. The horizontal cross-sectional dimension is substantially the same or decreases along the length of the arch roller from the medial side to the lateral side. Alternatively, the cross-sectional dimension of the arch roller in the vertical and / or lateral direction changes in a stepped manner.

[0058] The arch rollers may be made of heavy rubber, at least on the inside. The inside of the shank, if present, is located above the inside of the arch rollers.

[0059] Preferably, the arch roller is integrated into the rubber outsole. Viewed from below or from the side, the arch roller integrated into the rubber outsole extends further down on the medial side than on the lateral side, as shown in FIG. 3, which includes the arch roller 8 in its longitudinal section. As shown in FIG. 7, the longitudinal generally convex curvature 12 of the surface of the rubber outsole of the shoe intersects with the arch roller 8 on the medial side by 1 mm to 5 mm. As shown in FIG. 6, the longitudinal generally convex curvature 12 of the surface of the rubber outsole of the shoe is reduced from the longitudinal generally convex curvature 12 on the lateral side by 1 mm to 5 mm. FIGS. 6 and 7 are simplified views to show only the features described herein, showing a cross section slightly medial to the periphery, and a cross section of the lateral and medial periphery, respectively.

[0060] The cross dimension of the arch roller in the longitudinal direction of the shoe is substantially the same or smaller on the lateral side than on the medial side. The arch roller in combination with the shank can provide the user with dynamic and progressive support, which increases the support with more pronation and allows the arch roller to "lift" the shank, actually inhibiting it from sinking above the arch roller, and allows the shank to curve downwards around the arch roller to comfortably support the entire length of the plantar arch, the plantar fascia. The shank must have an appropriate bending stiffness, which can be ensured by the selection of the shank and sole as described above. This reduces or prevents the so-called "naviculare drop". Also, plantar fasciitis, heel spurs and similar problems are reduced or prevented for most users.

[0061] "Navicular drop" is a biomechanical term that refers to the extension and downward pressure of the plantar arch due to the weight of the user. The present invention can reduce or prevent excessive navicular drop. Navicular lift or lifter is another term that describes the effect and refers to the lift of the navicular in the shoe of the present invention versus the navicular drop in a conventional walking shoe.

[0062] On the medial side, when the arch roller contacts the floor, it reaches the floor before the curvature of the generally convex surface of the undersole. The arch roller 8 has a larger longitudinal dimension and is higher on the medial side of the shoe than on the lateral side, so that it reaches the flat floor before the generally convex curvature of the surface of the undersole.

[0063] The sole of the shoe of the present invention has a soft elasticity similar to the initial softness of a sports shoe with a wide range of damping, softer than a conventional walking shoe. With increasing compression, the elasticity becomes progressively harder, especially in the medial heel and midfoot, and also in the midfoot region than in the heel region. Therefore, when the weight on the calcaneus increases, the resistance to further compression is higher on the medial side than on the lateral side. This results in a dynamic and progressive resistance to excessive medial rotation of the heel bone (biomechanically defined as "calcaneal transposition"). This torque rotates the right foot clockwise as viewed from behind. This affects the vertical movement of the calcaneus and the vertical alignment of the Achilles tendon compared to the use of a conventional walking shoe or a sports shoe. This can reduce or prevent excessive calcaneus transposition. Similarly, when stepping from heel strike to midfoot stance, the plantar arch is supported by a stiffer elastic that is firmer earlier (less compressive) in the midfoot region, below and especially on the medial side of the plantar arch, with a gradually stiffer elastic to achieve "navicular accessory lift". Preferably, the shoe includes an arch roller and shank combination, whereby the arch roller exerts a force from the underlay to the shank in the area of ​​greatest compression on the medial side of the midfoot, and the shank bends to distribute the force along the plantar arch. With such detailed design, the shank bends substantially to conform to the shape of the plantar arch.

Claims

1. A shoe (1) having a sole that provides dynamic plantar arch support, The shoe comprises a rubber outsole (9), an upper (10), and a midsole (2); The midsole (2) is a hard elastic material (4), a soft elastic material (5), Equipped with The hard elastic material (4) has an elastic hardness in the range of 1.3 to 3 times that of the soft elastic material (5); said hard elastic material (4) forming a wall-like structure strip (3) along the length of said shoe (1) inside the periphery of said midsole (2); The band (3) is wider on the medial side (M) than on the lateral side (L) at the heel portion of the midsole (2); The soft elastic material (5) is arranged in the midsole (2) inside the band (3) of hard elastic material (4), The shoe (1) further comprises a support structure (8) arranged below the soft elastic material (5) in the medial-lateral direction, The support structure (8) is located vertically below and 4 cm forward of the center of the navicular accessory bone of a typical user whose foot fits the size of the shoe (1); The support structure (8) has a higher elastic hardness than the hard elastic material (4); The support structure (8) has a vertical dimension larger in the inner portion than in the outer portion when the shoe (1) is standing on a horizontal surface, As a result, the inner part of the support structure (8) is higher than the outer part, the generally convex curved part (12) of the surface of the undersole intersects with the support structure (8) at the inner part, not at the outer part of the shoe (1), the inner part of the support structure (8) protrudes below the curved surface of the convex curved part (12), and when walking on a flat floor surface with the shoe (1), the inner part of the support structure (8) reaches the flat floor surface before the curved surface of the convex curved part (12), This provides more support below the medial portion of the plantar arch than the lateral portion of the plantar arch. shoes.

2. The support structure (8) is either integrally disposed within the rubber outsole (9), or disposed between the rubber outsole (9) and the midsole (2), or disposed within the midsole (2). The shoe according to claim 1.

3. The shoe (1) comprises a further support structure in the form of a shank (6), the shank (6) being embedded in the soft elastic material (5) from the heel to the forefoot of the midsole (2). The shoe according to any one of claims 1 to 2.

4. The shank (6) is rotated clockwise in the midsection from the heel to a position in front of the user's navicular bone in the case of the midsole (2) of the right foot as viewed from behind, the angle α2 of the clockwise rotation is in the range of 1° to 10° from the horizontal line when the shoe (1) is placed on a horizontal floor surface; The thickness of the shank (6) without ribs is between 0.5 mm and 3 mm; The shoe according to claim 3.

5. The hard elastic material (4) includes polyurethane (PU) having a Shore A hardness in the range of 40 to 80, and the soft elastic material (5) includes polyurethane (PU) having a Shore A hardness in the range of 20 to 60. The shoe according to any one of claims 1 to 4.

6. At least a portion of the upper surface of the midsole (2) is inclined, The midsole (2) is located at a position from the heel and midfoot to the front of the user's navicular bone, with the medial side being higher than the lateral side, and the inclination angle α1 is in the range of 1° to 7° from the horizontal line when the shoe (1) is placed on a horizontal floor surface. The shoe according to any one of claims 1 to 5.

7. The α2 is equal to or greater than the α1. The shoe according to claim 6 when claim 4 is recited.

8. a thickness of the soft elastic material (5) above the support structure (8) in the midfoot region of the midsole (2) is less than a thickness of the soft elastic material (5) above the support structure (8) in the heel region of the midsole (2); The shoe according to any one of claims 1 to 7.

9. The shoe (1) is highly practical for diabetics and has the following characteristics, in any combination: - an increase in the lateral dimension of the shoe (1) in the direction from the medial side to the lateral side of the shoe (1) of 2%, 5%, 10% or 15% or more compared to a standard shoe size; - the vertical dimension between the sole and the upper of said shoe (1) is increased by 2%, 5%, 10% or 15% or more compared to a standard shoe size; - comprising a structural modification to reduce contact pressure on tissues below the ball of the first toe of a user having a foot that fits the size of the shoe (1), by reducing the elastic hardness of the sole and / or by reducing the hardness or height or thickness in the area below the ball of the first toe of the user and below the center point of the ball of the first toe of the user and in an area of ​​at least 0.5 cm around said center point, compared to the surrounding areas; and - comprising a structural modification that reduces the contact pressure on tissue below the heel bone in an area below the midpoint of the heel bone of the user and in an area of ​​at least 1 cm around the midpoint by reducing the elastic hardness of the sole and / or reducing the height or thickness in the area below the heel bone of the user having a foot that fits the size of the shoe (1) compared to the surrounding areas; having one or more of: The shoe according to any one of claims 1 to 8.

10. The shoe (1) is a running shoe, At least the heel part of the sole of the running shoe is thicker than that of the walking shoe. The shoe according to any one of claims 1 to 8.

11. The band (3) extends inwardly from the periphery along the sides and heel of the midsole (2) in a range of 0.1 to 1 times the thickness of the midsole (2); The shoe according to any one of claims 1 to 10.

Images