Method for pulling cylindrical crystals from the melt

Abstract

A method for controlling the diameter of the crystal (5) provides for maintaining a constant crystal lifting speed (13) and varying the height of the annular gap (12) between the heat shield (10) surrounding the crystal (5) and the melt surface to control the diameter, thereby influencing the heat incidence on the lower lateral region of the crystal (5). This not only affects the crystal diameter, but also ensures that the vertical temperature gradient is consistent across the crystal diameter, thereby enhancing the homogeneity of the crystal (5).

Description

[Technical field]

[0001] The present invention relates to a method for pulling a cylindrical crystal from a melt using a crystal pulling apparatus including a crucible containing a melt, a crucible heater annularly surrounding the crucible, a crucible lifting unit for lifting the crucible, a crystal lifting unit for pulling the crystal from the melt, and a heat shield annularly surrounding the crystal, the lower end of which terminates above the melt to form an annular gap.

[0002] In the Czochralski method, a crystal is grown by pulling it out of a hot melt, whose atoms are arranged on the lower edge of the crystal in a lattice structure specific to the material of the melt, so that when the crystal is slowly pulled out of the melt and cooled, a hard crystal lattice forms. In the crystal layer near the melt, there are initially still inherent point defects, i.e. unoccupied lattice sites (vacancies) and interstitial atoms (atoms between lattice sites), but when pulled with the right parameters, these pair up and disappear, forming a homogeneous and almost defect-free crystal lattice. This form of crystal growth is used, for example, to produce silicon crystals required for the semiconductor industry. For this purpose, thin slices called wafers are cut out of the crystal, from which integrated circuits are manufactured.

[0003] In general, the pulling process must be designed so that the diameter of the pulled crystal is as constant as possible and so that intrinsic point defects are as completely eliminated as possible to provide high homogeneity.

[0004] DE 102013210687 A1 describes a method for controlling the crystal diameter. In this method, the crystal diameter on the melt surface is directly or indirectly determined and compared with the desired target diameter. This leads to a suitable crystal pulling speed as a control variable of the crystal lifting unit, which sets the desired crystal diameter. Further examples of conventional diameter control are described in WO 01 / 57294 A1 and US 2011 / 0126757 A1.

[0005] The crystal pulling speed is the relative speed at which the crystal moves relative to the melt surface, and is usually set so that the absolute level of the melt surface relative to the crystal pulling device is at a constant height, so the crystal pulling speed corresponds to the absolute crystal lifting speed, i.e., the speed of the crystal relative to the stationary part of the crystal pulling device.

[0006] The crystal pulling speed also affects the homogeneity of the crystal. The repair of the above-mentioned intrinsic point defects is due to the fact that the intrinsic point defects still present at the crystal end faces are compensated for by interstitial atoms migrating into the vacancies in the lower layers of the crystal near the melt. Since the diffusion rates of interstitial atoms and vacancies are different, a near perfect compensation can only be achieved if the crystal pulling speed has a constant ratio to the vertical temperature gradient in the crystal. For diameter control using the crystal pulling speed as a control variable, the ratio of the crystal pulling speed to the vertical temperature gradient varies to the same extent as the crystal pulling speed, since the temperature gradient is material and equipment dependent. This ratio therefore does not always have the value required to obtain the most homogeneous crystal possible. However, such homogeneity is necessary for integrated circuit manufacturers to keep production waste low.

[0007] There are two distinct time axes for silicon Czochralski control: (A) Time scale of melt convection fluctuations over minutes to tens of minutes. Thermally unstable stratification of the melt in the Czochralski assembly leads to typical unsteady and often turbulent melt convection currents that strongly affect the heat and mass transfer through the melt, resulting in temperature fluctuations at the crystal growth front and, in fact, arbitrary diameter fluctuations on millimeter length scales.

[0008] (B) The continuous removal of silicon by the growing crystal changes the melt level over a time scale of several to tens of hours, from a nearly full crucible at the beginning of the process to a nearly empty crucible at the end of the process. This continuous change in melt level changes the macroscopic geometry of the growth assembly, in particular the position of the crucible relative to the main and bottom heaters, and also the ratio of free melt surface to wetted crucible wall surface.

[0009] In order to be able to adjust the crystal diameter on the one hand and the crystal quality, here in particular the oxygen concentration and point defect concentration, in a targeted manner on the other hand, at least two control loops are always used in the prior art, where one control loop is operated by a first control device on the time axis (A) and mainly compensates for the effects of melt convection, and a second control loop is operated by a second control device on the time axis (B) and mainly compensates for the effects of changes in the melt level in the crucible.

[0010] The first controller regulates the crystal pulling speed, and the second controller regulates the power of the crucible heater.

[0011] This causes the crystal pulling speed to constantly change, and because the control of the crystal diameter in the prior art is achieved by adjusting the crystal pulling speed, the homogeneity of the pulled crystal can never be optimal.

[0012] The invention is therefore based on the task of providing a control algorithm for a crystal pulling process which produces homogeneous crystals with a diameter as constant as possible and as free from defects as possible.

[0013] To solve this problem, the present invention provides a method for measuring the actual value of the crystal diameter above the melt surface and comparing it with a target value of the crystal diameter, and adjusting the annular gap height according to the difference between the actual value and the target value by a first control device having a first reset time, thereby keeping the crystal pulling speed constant.

[0014] Although the prior art (EP 2 659 031 or U.S. Pat. No. 6,458,203) does indeed generally point out the importance of the annular gap, it does not explicitly mention influencing the annular gap height so as to control the crystal diameter to a constant value while maintaining the crystal pulling speed.

[0015] The crystal homogeneity and resulting diameter are largely determined by the crystal temperature at the side of the crystal just above the melt surface. If appropriate measures can be taken to prevent thermal radiation in the lower region of this side, the vertical temperature gradient will be constant across the crystal diameter, and an appropriate crystal pulling speed across the entire crystal diameter will result in an optimum ratio of crystal pulling speed to temperature gradient, allowing nearly complete recombination of vacancies and interstitials.

[0016] Furthermore, it was found that increased lateral thermal radiation cools and expands the edge region of the crystal, and that this edge region shrinks when heat is injected into the crystal. With a larger annular gap, more heat reaches the lower side of the crystal by radiation, increasing the surface temperature of the side of the crystal and reducing the vertical temperature gradient from the phase boundary / heat flux within the crystal. Therefore, less latent heat can flow from the phase boundary. This results in a smaller crystal diameter for the same pulling speed.

[0017] The influence of heat input or radiation on the homogeneity of such crystals has already been addressed in DE 10 2013210687 A1. In order to be able to influence this, in addition to the crucible heater, a ring heater is provided directly on the crystal. This can also be used to control the crystal diameter by directing the control variable of the control to the influence of the power of this ring heater. However, this method has the disadvantage that an additional ring heater is required, which is particularly prone to failures since it is located at a point exposed to heat.

[0018] In the present invention, the melt can be kept at a predetermined temperature by utilizing the thermal radiation of the existing crucible heater without using an additional ring heater. In other words, the thermal radiation of the crucible heater hits the lower side of the crystal through the annular gap, so that the heat incidence or radiation to the crystal can be adjusted by changing the height of the annular gap. Therefore, there is no need to prepare a separate ring heater.

[0019] Preferably, the first reset time is selected so that the effects of melt convection at the melt and at the end faces of the crystal in contact with the melt are compensated for, thus adjusting the annular gap height in time (A).

[0020] The control provides for decreasing the annular gap height if the actual value of the diameter is less than the target value, and for increasing the annular gap height if the actual value is greater than the target value.

[0021] An additional advantage of this control is that the crystal pulling speed, i.e., the speed at which the crystal is moved relative to the melt surface, remains constant, so that by varying the crucible lifting speed and the crystal hoisting speed to the same extent for the apparatus to account for melt volume loss, the crystal pulling speed does not change, but the distance from the melt surface to the bottom end of the heat shield, and therefore the annular gap height, does.

[0022] In this control, a control value for the annular gap height is generated. For this purpose, an offset speed is determined. To this is added a reference value for the crucible lifting speed required to compensate for the melt volume consumption and a reference value for the crystal lifting speed corresponding to the desired crystal pulling speed at a constant level of the melt surface. By increasing or decreasing the annular gap height, the offset value can be positive or negative.

[0023] The crystal pull rate remains unaffected since both rates are changed by the same amount, but the annular gap height is altered such that the change in crucible lift rate moves the melt level closer to or further from the lower edge of the heat shield.

[0024] An external control aimed at the heating power of the crucible heater is also superimposed on this internal control.The invention therefore provides that by means of a second control device with a second reset time, the control value of the annular gap height is input as an actual value for controlling the heating power of the crucible heater, with the average annular gap height being set as a setpoint value.

[0025] Here, the second reset time is selected so as to compensate for the effect of the change in the position of the melt surface in the crucible that occurs during the pulling process. Thus, control is performed on the time axis (B).

[0026] This means that the first reset time is smaller than the second reset time.

[0027] In the external control, the time-averaged control value of the annular gap height is input to the heating power actuator as an actual value, which is preferably achieved by inputting this control value to the heating power actuator as a control value modified by a PT1 filter.

[0028] The present invention will be described in more detail below with reference to exemplary embodiments. [Brief description of the drawings]

[0029] [Figure 1] Schematic diagram of a crystal pulling apparatus using the Czochralski method. [Diagram 2] FIG. 1 shows a control scheme according to the prior art. [Diagram 3] FIG. 2 illustrates a control scheme according to the present invention. [Figure 4] FIG. 1 illustrates in graphical form the protocol for the crystal pulling process.

[0030] First, reference is made to Fig. 1. According to Fig. 1, the crystal pulling apparatus is composed of an apparatus housing 1, in which there is a crucible 3 filled with a melt 2. Surrounding the crucible is a crucible heater 4, which melts the material in the crucible 3 and then maintains the temperature.

[0031] A cylindrical crystal 5 is slowly pulled up from the melt 2 by a crystal lifting unit 6, during which atoms from the melt 2 adhere to the lower end face of the crystal 5, forming a crystal lattice as the crystal is pulled up from the melt 2. Since the material in the crucible 3 is consumed during this process, the crystal pulling apparatus is usually equipped with a crucible lifting unit 7 that moves the crucible 3 so that the melt level is always at a constant level relative to the apparatus housing 1.

[0032] The crystal diameter is measured by a camera 8 directed at the edge of the crystal in transition with the melt. From the images taken by the camera 8, the crystal diameter can be derived. The image evaluation methods used for this are known to the person skilled in the art and therefore do not need to be described in detail here.

[0033] The crystal pulling process is controlled by a control unit 9, which receives information from the camera 8 and sends control variables to the crystal lifting unit 6 and the crucible lifting unit 7.

[0034] A heat shield 10 is required surrounding the crystal to allow it to cool gradually as it is pulled from the melt, thereby keeping radiation from the crucible heater 4 and the hot melt away from the upper regions of the sides of the crystal 5.

[0035] The lower end of the heat shield 10 terminates above the surface of the melt 2 so that there is an annular gap 12 between the end of the heat shield 10 and the melt. Heat radiates through this annular gap 12 to the lower region of the side of the crystal 5.

[0036] To control the pulling process, the following variables should be taken into account: The one that is ultimately crucial is the crystal pulling speed, i.e. the speed of the crystal relative to the melt surface. This is determined by the absolute crystal lifting speed 13, i.e. the speed at which the crystal is moved relative to the apparatus, and the speed of the melt surface relative to the apparatus. If the latter is set to zero, the melt surface is kept at a constant level relative to the apparatus, so that the crystal pulling speed corresponds to the absolute crystal lifting speed 13.

[0037] The speed of the melt level relative to the apparatus is determined by the absolute crucible lifting speed 14, taking into account the lowering of the melt level in the crucible due to material consumption. The crucible lifting speed can be determined, for example, by examining the material capacity of the crystal 5 based on the crystal pulling speed, so that the lowering of the melt level relative to the crucible 3 is compensated for by a corresponding lifting of the crucible 3, so that the melt level remains at a constant level relative to the apparatus.

[0038] 2 shows a control scheme for controlling the crystal pulling process in accordance with the prior art so that the crystal diameter is as constant as possible. This process consists of a diameter controller 20, which receives the actual value of the diameter at a first input 21 and the setpoint value of the diameter at a second input 22. At an output 23 of the diameter controller 20, the control value of the crystal lifting unit 6 is output.

[0039] This control value is also input to a PT1 filter 24 to prevent the crystal pulling speed from changing too much, and its output 25 is input as an actual value to a control device 26 for the average crystal pulling speed. For this reason, a target value for the average crystal pulling speed is present at an input 27. By comparing the actual value with the target value, a control value for the heating output of the crucible heater 4 is generated, and this is input to a heating output actuator 28.

[0040] 3, the control scheme according to the invention consists of a diameter control device 30, into which the actual value of the crystal diameter is input at a first input 31 and the setpoint value of the crystal diameter is input at a second input 32. The diameter control device 30 generates a control value for the annular gap height at an output 33, which is used by an annular gap height actuator 34.

[0041] The annular gap height actuator 34 generates an offset value at its output 35, which is input to both the crystal lifting actuator 36 and the crucible lifting actuator 37. The actuators 36, 37 add this offset value to the reference value of the crucible lifting speed 14 or the reference value of the crystal lifting speed 13, so that the crystal lifting speed 13 and the crucible lifting speed 14 change at the same level without changing the crystal pulling speed. The reference value of the crucible lifting is a value for keeping the melt level at a constant level, taking into account the consumption. The reference value of the crystal lifting is the value of the desired crystal pulling speed.

[0042] Thus, although the crystal lifting speed 13 changes, it is important to the present invention that the crystal pulling speed at which the crystal 5 rises from the melt 2 does not change. Here, the crucible 3 is moved so that the melt surface moves relative to the lower end of the heat shield 10, thereby changing the height of the annular gap 12. In this way, the heat radiation from the crucible heater 4 to the lower side of the crystal can be suppressed to a value that does not cause heat radiation at least in the lower region of the crystal, so that if the crystal pulling speed is constant, the diameter of the crystal 5 will be constant and the ratio of the temperature gradient to the crystal pulling speed will be optimized.

[0043] Here too, a slower outer control loop is superimposed on the inner control loop: the control value of the gap height actuator is input via a PT1 filter 40 to a control device 41 for the average annular gap height. This value is compared with a setpoint value for the average annular gap height at input 42 so that a corresponding control value is made available for the heating power actuator 28. The PT1 filter 40 changes the actual value associated with the heating power actuator 28 in proportion to the time change in the control value of the annular gap height actuator 34, which slows down the control process of the outer control loop.

[0044] The graphs show the time course of the actual crystal diameter measured by the camera (curve 50), the crystal pulling speed (curve 51), the annular gap height (curve 52), and the crucible heater temperature (curve 53) over several hours.

[0045] The first stage of the growth test is shown by the first time line 54, in which a conventional cascade controller is used to control the crystal diameter by the pull rate in the inner control loop and the main heater temperature in the outer control loop. On the time axis (A), the fluctuation of the pull rate (indicator arrow 55) is clearly visible, as is the corresponding change in the crystal diameter (indicator arrow 56).

[0046] Afterwards (after the first timeline 54), the control of the crystal puller is switched to control according to the invention, with the annular gap height being used as the controlled variable in the inner control loop, and the main heater temperature continuing to be used as the controlled variable in the outer control loop. After the switchover, it can be seen that the pulling speed remains quite constant (pointer arrow 57), while the annular gap height now varies over the time axis (A) (pointer arrow 58). This control results in a substantially constant crystal diameter (pointer arrow 59). At the second timeline 60, the test is stopped. [Explanation of symbols]

[0047] 1. Equipment case 2. Melt 3 Crucible 4 Crucible heater 5 crystals 6 Crystal lifting unit 7 Crucible lifting unit 8. Camera 9. Control Unit 10 Heat Shield 12 Annular gap 13 Crystal lifting speed 14 Crucible lifting speed 20 Diameter control device 21 Input section 22 Input section 23 Output section 24 PT1 Filter 25 Output section 26 Control device 27 Input section 28 Heating Output Actuator 30 Diameter control device 31 Input section 32 Input section 33 Output section 34 Annular Gap Height Actuator 35 Output section 36 Crystal lifting actuator 37 Crucible lifting actuator 40 PT1 Filter 41 Control device 42 Input section 50 curves 51 Curve 52 curve 53 Curve 54 Timeline 55 Directional Arrow 56 Directional Arrow 57 Directional Arrow 58 Directional Arrow 59 Directional Arrow 60 Time Line

Claims

1. A method for pulling a cylindrical crystal (5) from a melt (2) using a crystal pulling device, the crystal pulling device comprising a crucible (3) containing the melt (2), a crucible heater (4) surrounding the crucible (3) in an annular shape, a crucible lifting unit (7) for lifting the crucible (3), a crystal lifting unit (6) for pulling the crystal (5) from the melt (2), and a heat shield (10) surrounding the crystal (5) in an annular shape, the lower end of which terminates above the melt (2) to form an annular gap (12), the method comprising the steps of: measuring an actual value of the crystal diameter above the melt surface and comparing it with a target value of the crystal diameter; and adjusting the height of the annular gap (12) according to the difference between the actual value and the target value by a first control device having a first reset time; 4. A method for varying said annular gap height, characterized in that the crystal pulling speed is kept constant by varying the crucible (3) lifting speed and the crystal (5) hoisting speed to the same extent.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first reset time is selected to compensate for melt convection effects at the end of the crystal in contact with the melt and at the melt.

3. 3. The method of claim 1, further comprising decreasing the annular gap height if the actual value is less than the target value and increasing the annular gap height if the actual value is greater than the target value.

4. 4. The method according to claim 1, further comprising the steps of: setting the crucible lifting speed (14) to a reference value which compensates for the volumetric consumption of the melt (2); setting the crystal lifting speed (13) to a reference value; and adding the same offset value to the two reference values ​​in order to control the annular gap height.

5. 5. The method according to claim 1, further comprising the step of inputting the control value of the annular gap height as an actual value for controlling the heating power of the crucible heater (4) by means of a second control device having a second reset time, the average annular gap height being set as a setpoint value.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein the second reset time is selected to compensate for effects of changes in the position of the melt level within the crucible that occur during a pulling process.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein the first reset time is less than the second reset time.

8. 8. The method according to claim 6 or 7, wherein the control value of the annular gap height is input as an actual value to the heating power actuator (28) via a PT1 filter (40).

Images