Filter for water treatment

Abstract

To provide: water good for health for the purpose of promotion of cell activation without any scientific approaches involving chemicals present in nature such as ionized minerals, for example, calcium, artificial chemicals such as surfactants, antioxidants, antibiotics, and antifungal agents, or the like; a cartridge or a water purifier in such a fashion as to be able to bring tap water into contact with a meteorite, meteorite-containing ceramics (including clay firing for ceramics), or meteorite-containing fiber to apply meteorite characteristic vibration thereto, different from simple hazardous substance removal; and water having undergone the meteorite characteristic vibration.SOLUTION: A filter for water treatment includes: a container provided with a water introducing port and a water discharge port; a flowing water passageway running from the water introducing port to the water discharge port; and a meteorite of 0.0001 g or more provided in the flowing water passageway. Wave water (of a cluster size of hexamolecular structured water) obtained by applying meteorite characteristic vibration to water can be provided by a cartridge or a water purifier capable of bringing tap water into contact with the meteorite to apply the meteorite characteristic vibration thereto.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 1

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to a water treatment filter, a cartridge, a water purifier having a record of the natural vibration of a meteorite by bringing water into contact with the meteorite, and water imparted with the natural vibration of the meteorite.

Background Art

[0002] There has been an increasing concern about the safety and hygiene of tap water quality, and water has been sold in PET bottles for a long time. Therefore, in water purifiers, it is desired to remove various harmful substances contained in tap water, such as bacteria (Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2021-169072, Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2021-159894), trihalomethane (Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2020-124714) (Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2020-121288) (Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2020-110801) (Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2019-167258), heavy metals (Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2021-176609), boron, arsenic, phosphorus (Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2021-171729), chloroform (Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2022-017611), organic substances, impurities, harmful ions, etc. (Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 08-164380), trihalomethane, chlorine, sodium hypochlorite, magnesium hydroxide, sodium hydroxide, algae, miscellaneous bacteria (Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2020-163370), fluorosurfactant (Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2022-093398), etc. are the mainstream of removal. In addition, there are many patents for water purifiers that focus on the cluster of water (Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2022-099208) (Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2022-102744) (Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2011-025217) (Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 07-204635) (Japanese Utility Model Application Laid-Open No. 04-131483) (Japanese Utility Model Application Laid-Open No. 04-131482) (Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2022-099208), etc.

[0003] In addition, patents for water purifiers have been devised that relate to a water conditioner capable of electrode cleaning using forced vibrations such as ultrasonic vibrations and electromagnetic vibrations (Japanese Utility Model Application Laid-Open No. 06-048886), and that enable regeneration of an adsorbent by ultrasonic irradiation (Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2008-136894). Water purifiers have also been invented that activate water by vibrating a ceramic body that emits far-infrared rays (Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2008-012506, Patent No. 2918535). There are water purifiers that provide a device capable of reducing water molecules other than an electrolysis system (Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2022-099208), a faucet-connected water purifier that can notify the user of the replacement time of the filter cartridge (Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2022-097852), and a magnetic treatment device that can modify a fluid by applying a magnetic field while spontaneously inducing a turbulent flow, fine vibration, sound wave, etc. in the fluid (Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2010-253415). As for those using magnets, there are water purifiers that provide a magnetically activated water purifier that combines the purification action of a filter and the activation action of magnetism by incorporating a magnet or a magnetic circuit into the water purifier (Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2003-126865), and water purifiers such as those in which the magnetic energy of a magnet acts on tap water, improving the penetration power, dissolving power, and water purification power, and further improving the beneficial effect on the human body (Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2004-261799).

[0004] It has become normal that drinking water such as tap water does not taste good, but this is not just a matter of taste. Tap water that comes through a water purification plant, etc. contains harmful substances such as trihalomethane, residual chlorine, heavy metal ions, dioxin, sodium hypochlorite, magnesium hydroxide, sodium hydroxide, boron, arsenic, phosphorus, chloroform, various environmental hormones, fine metal particles, rust, turbidity, miscellaneous bacteria, mold, and algae, and their odors. These are the culprit substances in tap water, and thus water purifiers such as activated carbon and hollow fiber membrane filters that attempt to remove the culprit substances are on the market. However, the water that passes through such water purifiers is not always beneficial to the body. Therefore, a combination of things that can improve the properties of water itself was verified, and a water purifier using that combination was invented. However, water purifiers that involve the idea of imparting fluctuations (natural vibrations) have provided special wave materials made of natural materials. 1. A water quality improvement device (Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2008-012503) that uses special wave stones made of natural materials and appropriate far-infrared rays, 2. A ship (Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2008-012506) that uses special wave stones made of natural materials, 3. A container 1 (Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2008-012509) that uses special wave stones made of natural materials have been invented. Regarding meteorites, although it is not a water purifier, there is a tub stimulation device (Utility Model Registration No. 3184863) that provides a spherical molded article by mixing fine pieces of meteorites into glass or the like in order to utilize the electromagnetic waves with therapeutic effects emitted from meteorites.

[0005] There are also water purifiers (Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2004-195443) and their cartridges that can bring tap water into contact with wave-generating substances, and water purifiers and their cartridges that can bring tap water into contact with wave-generating substances, particularly ivory, crystal, pyrophyllite, kaolinite, wollastonite, rock crystal, lapis lazuli, pink calcite, sunstone, selenite, aquamarine, new jade, rose quartz, sodalite, banded carnelian, and amazonite. Therefore, by using one or a mixture of several of these, the high-wave action associated with this substance can be applied to drinking water. Furthermore, it has been invented that a mixture of three types, new jade, sodalite, and rose quartz, has good results (Utility Model Registration No. 3097013). Meteorites appear in a far-infrared radioactive inorganic building material and a method for manufacturing the far-infrared radioactive inorganic building material (Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2005-097859). Also provided is a hydrosol (aromatic distilled water with the property that essential oils are dissolved to the saturation limit) imparted with functionalities such as effects on negative ions, far-infrared rays, deodorization, antibacterial, antifungal properties, freshness retention, and also the activation, enhancement of cells, and antioxidant action of free radicals such as active oxygen. The hydrosol is an ion aqueous solution extracted and purified from one or a plurality of natural ores such as tourmaline (schorl), silica, obsidian, quartz, zeolite, magnetite, loess, lava, meteorites, particles, powders, and fine powders of titanium oxide, coral, shellfish, crustacean shells, binchotan, bamboo charcoal, charcoal, seaweed charcoal, ceramics, etc., or a hydrosol (stable suspension in which solid particles are dispersed) obtained by mixing, stirring, and dispersing an ion aqueous solution extracted and purified from deep seawater and natural ores such as titanium oxide, coral, shellfish, crustacean shells, binchotan, bamboo charcoal, charcoal, seaweed charcoal, ceramics, etc., and a method for producing the same (Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 2004-018850). Unlike simply filtering to achieve the umami of tap water, there is a water purifier and its cartridge (Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 2004-195443) that can bring tap water into contact with wave-generating substances (ivory, quartz, calcite, kaolinite, wollastonite, rock crystal, lapis lazuli, pink calcite, selenite, aquamarine, nephrite, rose quartz, sodalite, sunstone, banded carnelian, amazonite), and there is a high-wave water purifier (Utility Model Registration No. 3097013) that passes tap water through wave-generating substances (sodalite, nephrite, rose quartz) in a high-wave water purifier and its cartridge, but nothing else was found.

[0006] Other examples of inventions relating to waves include JP 2006-314899, which describes a method for improving athletic ability using wave information water and for inducing self-healing improvement in areas with weakened abilities, and JP 07-198429, which provides a wave information converter that uses wave information of weak potential differences measured on the surface of living or non-living objects to convert various types of basic information into multiple information, such as automatically turning on and off alarm devices, fountain water supply devices, air conditioners, lighting devices, and plane synchronizers. There are many different documents and products available on types of purified water, including the above-mentioned vibrational water, magnetic water, tourmaline water, alkaline ionized water, acidic water, dissociated water (free water), water with small clusters (π water), active hydrogen water, negative ion water, deep ocean water, reduced water, electrolyzed water, oxygenated water, carbonated water, sparkling water, non-sparkling water, and raw water (mineral water, mineral water, deep well water, shallow well water, underground water, vanadium water, spring water, hot spring water, etc.). However, no documents could be found on filters, cartridges, or water purifiers that use meteorites, or on water that has passed through them.

[0007] Here, we will explain about clusters. A cluster is a group of two or more molecules or atoms that are gathered together through relatively weak interactions such as van der Waals forces and hydrogen bonds. Water is a typical substance that forms clusters through hydrogen bonds. Clusters are sometimes used to indicate the density of water molecules, but so far only two experiments have been found that accurately measured the clusters of liquid water. One was published in NATURE magazine (Vol 381 6 JUNE 1996) by K. Liu (Henan Polytechnic University) et al. in the United States. According to the study, water with a cluster size of six molecules has the highest specific heat and is the most stable, and the structure is cage-like, and it is concluded that a group of six H2O molecules is the most stable. In other words, the force is different even for the same water depending on the cluster structure. K. Liu et al. also stated that the experimental results are as shown in Figure 1. In another study, Saykally Richard J. (University of California at Berkeley, CA, USA) and others stated that hexamolecular water, that is, "a collection of six water molecules, is particularly important as the smallest representative of a multi-three-dimensional hydrogen bond structure." Richard J. and others also stated their experimental results as shown in the middle and upper right figures above (SCIENCE magazine). In addition, Masato Yasui et al. of the Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Keio University, have stated that water (H2O) is one of the most important molecules for living organisms, and that in fact, MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) reflects the dynamics of water molecules in the body and diagnoses cancer from differences in water structure. MRI is also used to analyze the morphology and function of the brain. However, the biological significance of water behavior in cancer cells and brain tissues remains largely unknown, and research on water structure in living organisms is lagging behind. One of the reasons for this is thought to be that water is difficult to study and there has been no observation technology. Analysis of cell membrane water diffusion as water molecule dynamics and free water and structured water inside and outside the cells as cell functions are necessary, and that water structure is considered essential for maintaining life, and further research is awaited. In other words, K. Liu et al. and Richard J et al. have stated that the structure of six water molecules in water is stable, and Masato Yasui et al. have stated that the structure of water molecules in water is necessary for maintaining life.

[0008] The group led by the late Satoru Mashimo (Professor at the Faculty of Science, Tokai University) has determined that for water to have the properties of water, at least six water molecules must exist together. Also, it was Matsushita Kazuhiro (formerly of JEOL) who claimed that the smaller the clusters, the tastier the water. Matsushita wrote a paper entitled "Looking at Foods with NMR - Differences in 'Taste' Captured at the Molecular Level" (Modern Chemistry, January 1989, 62-67). However, leaving aside the question of taste, K. Liu et al. and SAYKALLY Richard J. et al. say that five-membered ring water is not good. In other words, smaller clusters are not necessarily better water. So how do we create a cluster of six water molecules? Even if we could, it would be difficult to prove it. 17Even when examined by ¹⁷O-NMR and the line width changes only slightly, since the protons are also affected by proton exchange simultaneously with the rotational motion of the molecule, there is no direct relationship with the speed of molecular motion. What serves as an indicator of molecular motion is the NMR T1 relaxation time (the time required for the longitudinal magnetization displaced from the thermal equilibrium state to return to the thermal equilibrium state), but even if the T1 relaxation time is observed, the size of the molecular population is unknown. All that can be measured is the characteristic time related to molecular motion. The idea is to consider a "model" of "molecular population" to explain the measurement results, and it is by no means the case that the T1 relaxation time or 17 the change in the line width of ¹⁷O-NMR serves as evidence for the existence and change in size of the molecular population. That is, 17 it has not been confirmed that the line width of ¹⁷O-NMR reflects the size of the water molecule population, and currently 17 detection by ¹⁷O-NMR (NMR is relatively inexpensive at around 160,000 yen) is considered impossible. Thus, it is difficult to obtain a precise molecular-scale explanation of the structure of water. To identify the structure of water, computer simulations using terahertz laser vibration-rotation tunneling spectroscopy have been devised, but they require an expensive machine costing around 16 million yen and software that must be separately constructed, so they are not common. Moreover, what is more accurate is that there is a possibility of examining the precise structure by a high-precision experiment using the Compton scattering method (a method of analyzing the energy difference before and after X-ray particles (photons) collide with electrons and scatter to investigate the motion state of the electrons possessed by the molecules and atoms under study) at the high-energy inelastic scattering beamline (BL08W) of SPring-8 (located at 1-1 Kouto 1-chome, Sayo-machi, Sayo-gun, Hyogo Prefecture, within the Harima Science Garden City), but it is extremely costly. Therefore, 17 a method for easily examining water beneficial to the body that anyone can perform without relying on ¹⁷O-NMR has been devised. That method is the above-mentioned trunk gravity axis test. It is an alternative medical diagnostic method called Applied Kinesiology (claiming that diseases can be diagnosed and treatment methods can be selected by palpating muscle strength, invented by George Goodheart in 1964). There is also the Bi-Digital O-Ring Test (an alternative medical diagnostic method using the strength of the fingers of the hand, invented by Teruaki Omura, a professor at New York Medical College and a visiting professor at the School of Medicine, Showa University, around 1977). However, it highly depends on sensation. Although it is not necessarily negatively evaluated by medical researchers and clinicians, as it can be confirmed that there are multiple hospitals, dental clinics, and acupuncture and osteopathy clinics using this test as an examination method, it still has the insurmountable drawback of not being quantifiable. A method invented to visualize a concept almost the same as these will be described later.

Prior Art Documents

Patent Documents

[0009]

Patent Document 1

Patent Document 2

Patent Document 3

Patent Document 4

Patent Document 5

Patent Document 6

Patent Document 7

Patent Document 8

Patent Document 9

Patent Document 10

Patent Document 11

Patent Document 12

Patent Document 13

Patent Document 14

Patent Document 15

Patent Document 16

Patent Document 17

Patent Document 18

Patent Document 19

Patent Document 20

Patent Document 21

Patent Document 22

Patent Document 23

Patent Document 24

Patent Document 25

Patent Document 26

Patent Document 27

Patent Document 28

Patent Document 29

Patent Document 30

Patent Document 31

Patent Document 32

[0010] [Non-Patent Document 1] A method for easily conducting experiments on moving and floating objects with ultrasonic waves - YouTube <https: / / www.youtube.com / watch?v=l7BwWhFqqpU> [Non-Patent Document 2] Home Page Moving Objects with Ultrasonic Waves | Treasure Chest of Electronic Workmanship (ele-lab.com) <https: / / www.ele-lab.com / usonic7.php>

Disclosure of the Invention

Problems to be Solved by the Invention

[0011] The amazing fact that "water records the effect of a drug and has the same effect" was published in the journal NATURE (issue 333, June 1988). The research was conducted by Jacques Benveniste et al. and is a paper titled "Degranulation of Human Basophils Induced by Highly Diluted Anti-IgE Antiserum". The content is that usually, when an anti-IgE molecule that specifically reacts with IgE (a causative factor of allergic rhinitis and atopic dermatitis) on the surface of basophils in white blood cells encounters it, a phenomenon called degranulation of basophils occurs, and histamine is released from the inside. Naturally, such a phenomenon does not occur with just distilled water. However, IgE is dissolved in distilled water to make IgE water, and it is diluted 10 to the 60th power with distilled water. This is equivalent to diluting 1 mL of water on a cosmic scale, and finally, theoretically and realistically, the distilled water should contain not a single molecule of IgE and should have no effect of IgE. However, the paper is amazing in that the water has the effect of the initially dissolved IgE and causes basophils to degranulate. Although it has been verified by many institutions, from a business perspective, this would make the drug unsellable and no medical professional would want to know about it. On the contrary, they would probably find it completely annoying. Although many proponents of homeopathy agreed, it is non-scientific, and the most powerful factor is probably the pressure from pharmaceutical companies. This paper later became involved in a retraction controversy. It is thought to be the first paper to spread the word "wave" in the world. After that, things that act on something and affect water in this way will be called "wave water". It is considered that waves may be related to the cluster structure of water depending on the substance.

[0012] In quantum mechanics, it has been found that two seemingly contradictory properties, namely particles and waves, hold simultaneously. Quantum mechanics, together with the general theory of relativity, forms the backbone of modern physics. It mainly deals with the mechanics of microscopic physical phenomena such as molecules, atoms, or the electrons that constitute them. There is a concept of wave-particle duality, which means that an object can be a particle and a wave depending on the situation. This is not only observed in elementary particles but also in composite particles such as atoms and molecules, and is particularly thought to occur in water molecules. Therefore, quantum mechanical concepts cannot be ignored when considering water. It is a well-known fact that all substances, including electrons, atoms, and molecules existing on Earth, are vibrating invisibly. It is not an exaggeration to say that this world is a world of vibrations. Also, although vibration patterns are affected by the environment such as substances, temperature, and humidity, the general vibration pattern is determined by the substance. Gemstones are beautiful because they select the reflection of light. It is thought that there are vibration patterns emitted by beautiful things. There is a stone called a power stone, and it is thought to be derived from the unique vibration pattern of that stone. Although it is currently impossible to scientifically elucidate power stones, in quantum mechanics, it seems that wave information is similar to particle information in some cases. Needless to say, it is a developing field of study, and we expect that unexpected things will be elucidated in the future.

[0013] A group studying certain waves claims that there are substances that activate the body's vitality and natural healing power. According to them, they have applied for Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 2001-321124, which is characterized by activating the natural healing power and promoting a healthy body by continuously consuming a medium transcribed with wave information using a wave measuring device. There are many others who say similar things. For example, Masaru Emoto, the director of the I.H.M. Comprehensive Research Institute, who first introduced a wave measuring device (Magnetic Resonance Analyzer, MRA) to Japan. The wave measuring device recommended by Emoto is a machine that measures the "waves" of the human body, food, etc. and discriminates between "good" and "bad", but it is regarded as pseudoscience without scientific evidence. This wave measuring instrument was developed as a "diagnostic device" by Ronald J. Weinstock at MRDC in California in 1989. It was named "Bio-Sellar Analyzer" during development, but was changed to a wave measuring instrument at Emoto's request. In 1994, a patent was applied for in Japan as a computerized magnetic resonance analyzer, and Patent 2647786 was granted in 1997. When measuring, if the object is an item, place it on top of the device. If it is a human body, hold the "detection rod" in hand, press the "probe" held by the operator against the operator's other hand, and use the operator's body as an amplifier to send "vibrations" into the object. Then one of two types of electronic sounds will ring. Repeat the operation and measure the number of times until the sound changes, and make a judgment on a scale of plus or minus 21 levels for each measurement item. When the object is a human body, the method of the operator applying the probe to the subject holding the detection rod is also used.

[0014] As similar products, five types of similar devices, including the device named "Life Field Tester" (LFT) in Japan, have emerged. When the wave measuring instruments introduced by Emoto were brought to the Satoru Energy Society for investigation, it was found that all of them are the same, using the measurer as a sensor, without a sensor installed in the measuring instrument itself. Also, the cord of the wave measuring instrument is nonsense, and the change in the electronic sound is due to electrical resistance and can be changed at the will of the operator, which is a sloppy thing. Hori Yasunori also participated in the society at that time. It is something like a so-called lie detector. If the wave measuring instrument had a built-in sensor and its cord was accurate, perhaps the wave measuring instrument would not have been regarded as pseudoscience. I think it should have been questioned whether the machine was right or wrong before it was released. It is very difficult to cover up something that has once been labeled badly. Emoto seems to have been running after business and seemed to be regarded suspiciously. It is recorded that the wave measuring instrument sold by Emoto in December 1988, 34 years ago, was about 8.5 million yen. However, curiously enough, although the wave measuring device is rather crude, this result coincides with the results of upright kinesiology and the Oring test. In that sense, upright kinesiology and the Oring test may also be rather crude, but these often coincide with the results of blood tests, X-rays, CT scans, and MRIs. If a person refuses blood transfusions, blood sampling, and new drugs for religious reasons, has extreme needle phobia, or faints after blood sampling and thus cannot undergo examinations, it is written on the Internet that the medical treatment is declined, etc., and this is the current clinical situation that cannot be ignored.

[0015] That is to say, regardless of whether wave measuring devices can "transcribe" waves or not, it is an obvious fact that there are vibrations inherent in substances. I asked a pear farmer who practices pesticide-free cultivation, and he said that when music (Mozart) is played for the pears, the way the fruits grow becomes better and the sugar content increases. It is said that there is a clear sugar content difference of up to about 8% between the group that listens to music and the group that does not, even for the same variety. It was said that perhaps the vibration of sound was transmitted to the pear fruits through the water, increasing the sugar content. As for the reason, at first, the sound was emitted unevenly and it was found that as the volume of the audible sound decreased, the sugar content gradually decreased. In this pear orchard, Mozart is played evenly throughout the orchard from when the pear blossoms bloom until harvest, and it is said that sweet pears are produced. It was also said that all of them are always sold out every year because fans come to buy them every year, saying "sweet and delicious," and there are no pears left to be put on the market. Also, a method for easily conducting experiments on moving and levitating objects with ultrasonic waves is explained - it is published on YouTube, on the homepage of "Moving Objects with Ultrasonic Waves," and in the "Wisdom Bag of Electronics Work (ele-lab.com)" (Non-Patent Document 1). Although ultrasonic waves cannot be heard by the ear, their energy is strong. The fact that the flow of running water changes due to the vibration of sound means that at the molecular level, the structure of water clusters can be changed. If there is no change in the clusters, the flow of running water should not change. Given that the frequency of sound affects the flow of water, we conducted an experiment based on the idea that the natural vibration of a substance might also be able to change the structure of water clusters. Moreover, no relevant literature on water purifiers was found. The present invention has been made in view of the above problems, and its object is to provide a water treatment filter, a cartridge, a water purifier having a record of the natural vibration of a meteorite by bringing water into contact with a meteorite, and water imparted with the natural vibration of a meteorite.

Means for Solving the Problems

[0016] The inventor of the present invention completed the present invention through intensive studies. Thus, the water treatment filter according to the present invention includes a container provided with a water inlet and a drain outlet, a running water passage passing from the water inlet to the drain outlet, and a meteorite provided in the running water passage, and the meteorite is 0.0001 g or more. In the water treatment filter of the present invention, it is preferable that the above meteorite is pulverized into a size of 20 μm to 300 μm and then kneaded into a ceramic material having an infrared emissivity of 90% or more, or mixed into a glaze and then fired to be a ceramic. Also, it is preferable that the above meteorite is pulverized into a size of 20 μm to 300 μm and then kneaded into a fiber or adsorbed. Also, it is preferable that the above meteorite is pulverized into a size of 20 μm to 300 μm and then kneaded into an adhesive such as cement. In addition, in the water treatment filter of the present invention, in addition to the above meteorite, (b) arcade, aquamarine, apatite, amazonite, alexandrite, andesine, amber, king stone, ichio, incarose, wollastonite, emerald, loess, onyx, opal, garnet, carnelian, kaolinite, hornblende, granite, volcanic glass, volcanic rock (sekiyakuyakuishi) Itoigawa, volcanic rock (lava), talc, limonite, calcite, kiyoseishi, otolite, otolith of fish, squid, octopus, gold, silver, kingkaseki (mineral name unknown), chrysocolla (malachite), crystal quartz, chrysoprase, kunzite, keserastone, basalt, bezoar, obsidian, amber, sapphire, samarskite, yttrium oxide, copper oxide, coral, sunstone, native copper (pyrite), red stone fat, autumn stone, stalactite, silica, siliceous cyst, zirconia (artificial), zircon (natural), super seven, sugilite, turtle shell, spinel, hematite, lime (quicklime), coal, shijuumei ichibou (abalone shell), xenotime, selenite, diorite, zoisite, ivory, sodalite, turquoise, tiger eye, diamond, marble, tanzanite (skarn), chart, terahertz ore, celestial eye stone, topaz, tourmaline, herkimer diamond, pearl, shungite, platinum, palladium, banded carnelian, jadeite, bismuth, himekawa yakushi, fluorite (fluorite), black star, black stone, clam shell (two-piece shell), hematite, peridot, sodalite, horn health, malachite, pine tree, moonstone, unnamed burnt, beryl, mengshi, actinolite, lazurite, labradorite, limonite, ruby, ruby in zoisite, antelope horn, epidolite, roseite, roadnite, furnace eye stone, deer antler and at least one raw material selected from the group consisting of 115 types of wild horse (hereinafter referred to as "group (b)") is preferably contained in an amount of 0.001 g (1 mg).

[0017] The water purifier according to another invention is characterized in that it incorporates an infrared radiation substance having a wavelength range of 2 μm to 14 μm and a radiation rate of 90% or more when treated with the above water treatment filter. The water purifier according to another invention is characterized by including the above water treatment filter. Also, a water treatment method according to another invention is characterized in that water is passed in contact with a meteorite having a mass of 0.1 mg or more at a flow rate of 10 mL / sec or less per unit mass (100 L / sec or less per 1 g of the meteorite unit mass). At this time, it is preferable to pass water in contact with (a) a meteorite having a mass of 0.1 mg or more and (b) at least 1 mg or more of a mineral of at least one raw material selected from the group at a flow rate of 10 mL / sec or less per unit mass (1 L / sec or less per 1 g of the mineral unit mass). Also, it is preferable that water passes non-contact in the vicinity of the above mineral at a flow rate of 10 mL / sec or less per unit mass (1 L / sec or less per 1 g of the mineral unit mass) with (a) a meteorite having a mass of 0.1 mg or more and (b) at least 1 mg or more of a mineral of at least one raw material selected from the group. Also, a water purifier according to another invention is characterized by comprising the water treatment filter described above and a sound wave irradiation device that applies sound waves of 20 Hz to 10,000 Hz to the water passing through the filter. For sound wave irradiation, only sound having a certain frequency can be used, or sound having sound waves of 20 Hz to 10,000 Hz (for example, music emitted from a CD (classical music such as Mozart and Beethoven)) can also be used. Also, a water purifier according to another invention is characterized by comprising the water treatment filter described above and a fluctuation device that applies 1 / f fluctuation to the water passing through the filter. 1 / f fluctuation is considered to be included in, for example, the sounds of the sea, waterfalls, rivers, and undulations. Therefore, the fluctuation device means a device that emits such sounds. Also, water according to another invention is treated with the above water treatment filter and is characterized by having an effect of strengthening the body trunk gravity axis (the load weight when the lumbar vertebrae collapse) to 5 kg or more. Also, a body trunk weight test device according to another invention is a device capable of measuring the pressing force between the left and right hands in the vertical direction on the back of a subject, and includes a first pressing operation part that can be pressed with one of the palms, a second pressing operation part that can be pressed with the other palm and can be pressed in a direction opposite to the pressing force of the first pressing operation part, and a pressing force measurement part that can measure the force applied to the two pressing operation parts.

Advantages of the Invention

[0018] According to the present invention, it is possible to provide a water treatment filter, a cartridge, a water purifier having a record of the natural vibration of a meteorite by bringing water into contact with the meteorite, water having the natural vibration of the meteorite, and the like. The water purifier of the present invention is a wave water purifier in which wave generating substances (meteorite + mineral) are disposed in a flowing water passage. Since wave generating substances containing meteorites exist in the flowing water passage in the container, the flowing water passing through here can be brought into contact with the wave generating substances to experience waves. Further, according to the filter of the present invention, tap water or the like enters from the water inlet of the filter and exits from the drain port to another port in the water purifier, and during this time, the tap water can be subjected to the wave action of meteorites and minerals. As a result, unlike simply filtering tap water, it has been successful in providing water having a mild effect on the body by bringing wave generating substances containing meteorites into contact with tap water or passing them in the vicinity, for example, water having a high oxygen content in blood, so that the filter can be provided.

Brief Description of the Drawings

[0019]

Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 3

Figure 4

Figure 5

Figure 6

Figure 7

Figure 8

Figure 9

Figure 10

Figure 11

Figure 12

Figure 13

Figure 14

Figure 15

Figure 16

Figure 17

Figure 18

Figure 19

Figure 20

Figure 21

Figure 22

Figure 23

Figure 24

Figure 25

Figure 26

Figure 27

Figure 28

Figure 29

Figure 30

Figure 31

Figure 32

Figure 33

Figure 34

Figure 35

Figure 36

Figure 37

Figure 38

Modes for Carrying Out the Invention

[0020] Next, embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the charts. However, the technical scope of the present invention is not limited by these embodiments and can be implemented in various forms without changing the gist of the invention. There are five types of meteorites used in the present invention. (A) Stony meteorites are meteorites mainly composed of silicate minerals. There are meteorites with a chondritic structure and those without. (B) Iron meteorites are meteorites mainly containing metallic iron (Fe-Ni alloy) and trace amounts of cobalt, gold, platinum, iridium, phosphorus, carbon, etc. (C) Stony-iron meteorites are meteorites composed of approximately equal amounts of Fe-Ni alloy and silicate minerals. These three types and (D) tektites, moldavites, Libyan glass, etc., which have been ejected into space once and then fallen back to Earth, and unclassified meteorites that have not yet been classified are included. Note that Libyan glass is included in the category of tektites assuming the theory that it is caused by a meteorite impact. Meteorites do not have a weak current flowing between the positive and negative poles at both ends of the crystal like tourmaline crystals, nor do they have piezoelectric, pyroelectric properties, or permanent electrodes. In other words, (A) stony meteorites are rocks, (B) iron meteorites are mainly alloys of iron and nickel, (C) stony-iron meteorites are rocks mainly composed of silicate minerals and iron-nickel alloy, and (D) contains impurities such as AI, Fe, Ca, Na, K, Ba, mg, Ti, Mn, Cu, Sr, etc., and approximately 75% is glass (SiO2). However, this study has proven that meteorites that have traveled through space have the power to activate water. Although modern science cannot explain it, it should be noted in advance that the phenomenon actually occurs.

[0021] For convenience, the following method is referred to as the trunk gravity axis test. The method of the trunk gravity axis test is as follows: (1) The subject crosses their fingers with their back hand. (2) Prepare a dynamometer modified for a maximum value of 100 kg. (3) The operator holds the dynamometer and places (B) on the palm where the subject 1 has crossed their fingers with their back hand. (4) The operator slowly and straightly presses downwards as it is. (5) Record the weight at which subject 1 collapses. (6) This time, do the same thing with only 5 mL of commercially available mineral water and record the weight at which it collapses. (7) This time, drink 5 mL of the water used in various experiments and do the same thing. Note that the details of the test will be described later. This result has spread among wave enthusiasts. Magnetic Resonance Analyzers (MRA) that perform masking, magnetic resonance analyzers, "Life Field Testers" (LFT), and other portable and compact wave measuring devices have been devised (Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 2004-016769), and a simpler monochrome wave measuring device has also been devised (Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 2009-103298). However, although these are greatly affected by subjective factors, it is interesting that the results almost match despite the masking. Here, the effects and efficacy of water will be described. It is a well-known fact that the efficacy of water varies depending on the stratum. In the report of "Mineral Balance Index of Delicious and Healthy Water" by Hashimoto, Shou of the Faculty of Engineering, Osaka University (awarded in 1988), Biology and Science, Vol. 26, No. 1 (Issue 290), the Kako River system and the Yumae River system, whose source is Mount Amano in the deep Tamba region with many clouds, have a good mineral balance and are less likely to suffer from stroke. It has been announced that the people living in this river system are less likely to have cerebral infarction. It has been considered that this is largely due to the mineral balance, but according to my research, there are many places across the country where the mineral balance is even better. Also, it is now possible to produce water with a good mineral balance. Then, what is the influencing factor? This is a point that remains doubtful. Naturally, it is thought that the most important reason is long-term drinking, but I also think that there may be something else. These days, there has been an increasing demand for delicious and healthy water. As one method, by using a biofilter and selecting filter media minerals according to the water quality, for example, if the water is deficient in Ca, a limestone filter can be used; if the water is deficient in SiO2, a filter made of igneous rock can be used. By making such arrangements, it is possible to turn any water in the country into delicious and healthy water. Hashimoto et al. state that regarding water and health and the taste of water, in addition to the major inorganic components discussed here, there may be some components among the trace components that also have an impact.

[0022] At around 6:35 am on April 7, 1904 (Meiji 37), a meteorite fell in Imafuku, Tamba Sasayama City (at that time, Imafuku, Okano Village, Taki County). It was discovered by Katsuzo Hata (deceased). It is a famous meteorite. It was handed over to Tadashi Hiki (deceased), a current professor at Kyoto University. As a result of subsequent analysis, it contains a large amount of 94.85% iron component, while the nickel, which is usually contained at about 7%, is as little as 4.44%. Therefore, it was found to be a very rare meteorite in which the beautiful pattern unique to meteorites called Widmanstätten structure cannot be seen. It is a famous meteorite named "Okano Meteorite" (about 18 cm in diameter and 4.74 kg in weight) by Professor Hiki. Although not because of this meteorite, it is said that in the past, before humans existed, meteorites rained down much more than they do now. It wouldn't be strange if meteorites were hidden deep underground. These days, I think that meteorites are more or less related to places called famous waters. Incidentally, it is not clear whether it is due to fog or groundwater, but since ancient times, Tamba Sasayama has been rich in natural products such as black soybeans, black edamame, matsutake mushrooms, chestnuts, yams, tea, cuckoos (large groups), peacocks, long-tailed tits, and bluebuzzards, as well as wild boars, beef, and Tamba pottery. Also, there is a person with the name "Inune" in this area. Although they are in Kyoto and Wakayama, tracing their origin leads to Tamba Sasayama. It is said that it is a name given because it means the root of a well, that is, "a person who protects the well." There are only about 20 people with this surname nationwide, which is quite rare. Its water vein also flows into the Kako River system, and it is possible that it helps prevent cerebral infarction and the like. Therefore, in the comparison of the change in the population aged 100 and over in Tamba Sasayama City (Hyogo Prefecture) with other municipalities, the latest (2020) population aged 100 and over in Tamba Sasayama City (Hyogo Prefecture) is 47 people. The population aged 100 and over in Tamba Sasayama City (Hyogo Prefecture), Ina Town (Mie Prefecture), and Oizumi Town (Gunma Prefecture) in 2020 was compared. First, the town closest to Tamba Sasayama City in terms of population nationwide is Ina Town (Mie Prefecture), the town next door where I live. Second is Oizumi Town (Gunma Prefecture), third is Chikatsu-Asano County Nagayo Town (Nagasaki Prefecture), and fourth is Nakagami County Yomitan Village (Okinawa Prefecture). There is data comparing the above populations aged 100 and over.

[0023]

Table 1

[0024] The number of people aged 100 and over in Tamba Sasayama City is approximately 24 more than that in Ina Town (Mie Prefecture), and 2.043 times higher. In particular, although Tamba Sasayama City and Oizumi Town (Gunma Prefecture) are the second closest in population in Japan as a whole, there is a huge difference in the population aged 100 and over. The number of people is approximately 27 more, and 2.35 times higher. Third is Chikatsu-Asano County Nagayo Town (Nagasaki Prefecture), 1.567 times higher with 30 people, and fourth is Nakagami County Yomitan Village (Okinawa Prefecture), 1.741 times higher with 27 people. What's the difference? On August 5, 1997, in the "About Water" section of the Chubu Keizai Shinbun Medical News, Yasunori Hori said, "Hexagonal structured water is a living thing," and there is a legend that "immortals eat the mist and are immortal and long-lived." Of course, this is an impossible story, but without any basis, would such a legend be passed down to this day? What if, when various conditions are met, the water becomes structured, and the mist that the immortals drank or took into their bodies through inhalation was hexagonal structured water? This theory was described. In Tamba Sasayama, there are many days with thick fog characteristic of the basin from autumn to winter. The sea of clouds that can be seen even from low mountains (such as Kaiga-take) is also called "Tamba fog" and has become a local specialty. So, it may be that fog is also related to long life.

[0025] 17 O-NMR Next, 17 Using O-NMR, water samples collected and prepared under the conditions of the following <Example 1> to <Example 4> were examined. <Example 1> Tap water in Yokkaichi, collected on August 28, 2001, from 7-6, Tomari-cho, Yokkaichi City, Mie Prefecture (hereinafter referred to as "Sampling Location 1"). <Example 2> Well water in Yokkaichi, collected on August 28, 2001, from 1-3013-1, Oiwake 3-chome, Yokkaichi City, Mie Prefecture, the water of the Oiwake Torii. <Example 3> Tap water in Yokkaichi (collected from Sampling Location 1 on August 28, 2001) with meteorites and the above minerals immersed in it. <Example 4> Tap water in Yokkaichi (collected from Sampling Location 1 on August 28, 2001) with 0.1 mg of divalent and trivalent iron salts dissolved in 1 L (commonly known as "Pi water"). The results are shown in Figures 2 to 5. Due to the above reasons, the correlation with clusters lacks credibility. However, at present, there is no method to evaluate clusters other than terahertz laser vibration-rotation tunneling spectroscopy. Also, Pi water is said to have a small water cluster size 17 and it was consistent with the results of O-NMR. However, Professor Shoichi Okochi of the Faculty of Engineering, Hosei University, and others state that the cluster measurement value has nothing to do with the size of water molecules.

[0026] Next, the change in the number of Collembola individuals according to conditions was examined. <Example 5> The number of Collembola fissions in tap water and well water On January 17, 2021, an experiment was conducted to determine whether the various tap waters and well waters collected above affect the reproduction of the single-celled organism Collembola. Generally, single-celled organisms do not have the concept of lifespan, but in Collembola, a phenomenon occurs where cell division cannot occur unless self-reproduction and conjugation are carried out by repeating isolation after division. This time and number are used as one indicator to judge the quality of water. Figure 6 shows a microscopic photograph of Collembola (A) and an enlarged sketch (B). The rotifers were cultured in a plastic bottle. The optimal temperature for rotifer growth is 26°C. Therefore, the room temperature was maintained at 26°C. Also, the plastic bottle was capped to prevent evaporation and contamination of the solution. Each water sample was passed through two filters: a sterilizing filter (Dismic AS type syringe filter) and a sterilizing Millipore filter unit (33 mm). Although it is said that light does not affect rotifer growth, the light was adjusted to 2250 lux. For each of the various culture media, 500 mL (measured using a 500 mL graduated cylinder, and the same method was used hereinafter) was placed in a 1000 mL plastic bottle, and 150 rotifers were added to each bottle. The number of rotifers was examined every two days. Since rotifers feed on bacteria such as bacteria and yeast, 250 mg of dried baker's yeast was given as food and thoroughly stirred for culturing. For weighing, an electronic balance BM capable of weighing 0.01 mg manufactured by Shimadzu Corporation was used. In addition, the life and death of rotifers were observed using a stereomicroscope. It was confirmed by whether they were swimming or not. If alive, each cell swims in a random direction, but if dead, it either settles or floats, so it was confirmed. Hereinafter, OLYMPUS SZX7 was used for the stereomicroscope. Regarding the life and death of non-swimming cells, a water droplet containing the cells was placed on a slide glass, covered with a cover glass, and observed under a microscope. If two contractile vacuoles opened and closed alternately, it was judged to be alive; if it remained open, it was judged to be dead, and the change in the number of individuals was recorded. Initially, the number of individuals in 1 mL was 0.5. As an initial measurement method for a small number of individuals, 1 mL was dispensed using a micropipette and counted using a stereomicroscope. To prevent sampling errors, the same procedure was repeated 5 times to obtain an average value. When the number of individuals increased, 2 mL of the sample was taken, saturated picric acid was added, and after fixation, it was counted using OLYMPUS SZX7 under a stereomicroscope. At this time, a ruled slide glass was used for easy measurement. The measured results were calculated based on the diluted fraction, and the number of individuals in 500 mL was determined. The results are shown below.

[0027] <Example 6> Changes in the Number of Paramecia under Different Conditions The following experiment was conducted to determine whether it affects the reproduction of the single-celled organism Paramecium. Generally, single-celled organisms do not have the concept of lifespan. However, in Paramecium, if self-reproduction and conjugation are not allowed by repeating isolation after division, a phenomenon occurs where cell division becomes impossible. This time and number are used as one indicator to judge the quality of water. Paramecia were cultured in plastic bottles. The optimal temperature for Paramecium growth is 26°C. Therefore, the room temperature was maintained at 26°C. Also, the plastic bottles were capped to prevent evaporation and contamination of the solution. Each water sample was passed through two filters: a sterilizing filter (syringe filter DISMIC AS type) and a sterilizing Millipore filter unit (33 mm). Although it is said that light does not affect the growth of Paramecium, the light was adjusted to 2250 lux. 500 Paramecia were placed in each 1000 mL plastic bottle with 500 mL of various culture media (the measurement was carried out using a 500 mL graduated cylinder, and the same method was used hereinafter). The number was examined every two days. Since Paramecia feed on bacteria such as bacteria and yeast, 300 mg of dried baker's yeast was given as food and stirred well for culturing. For weighing, an electronic balance BM capable of weighing 0.01 mg for high-precision analysis manufactured by Shimadzu Corporation was used. In order to ensure accuracy in subsequent examples, all meteorite weighings were carried out at the Department of Histology and Anatomy, Showa University using an electronic balance BM capable of weighing 0.01 mg for high-precision analysis manufactured by Shimadzu Corporation. In addition, the life and death of Paramecia were observed using a stereomicroscope. It was confirmed by whether they were swimming or not. If alive, each cell swims in a random direction, but if dead, it settles or floats, so it was confirmed. In the future, OLYMPUS SZX7 was also used for the stereomicroscope. The life and death of non-swimming cells were observed under a microscope by placing a water droplet containing the cells on a slide glass and covering it with a cover glass. If two contractile vacuoles opened and closed alternately, it was judged to be alive, and if it remained open, it was judged to be dead, and the change in the number of individuals was recorded. At first, the number of individuals per 1 mL was 0.5. As an initial measurement method with a small number of individuals, 1 mL was dispensed using a micropipette and counted using a stereomicroscope. To prevent sampling errors, the same procedure was repeated five times and the average value was calculated. When the number of individuals increased, 2 mL of the sample was taken, saturated picric acid was added, fixed, and then counted using an optical microscope (OLYMPUS CX21). At this time, an eyepiece micrometer was used for measurement to make it easier to measure. The result was calculated based on the diluted fraction to determine the number of individuals in 500 mL. After that, the same method was used in all experiments with the flea beetle.

[0028] <Example 7> Flea Beetle Experiment Various tap waters and various well waters (waters collected on January 17, 2021) Next, experiments on the number of divisions of the flea beetle in the tap water of Yokkaichi City, the tap water of Kako River, the tap water of Shino-yama, the well water of Yokkaichi City, the well water of Kako River, and the well water of Shino-yama were conducted in the same manner. After that, the method was the same in the experiments with the flea beetle. An experiment was conducted on whether the various tap waters and well waters collected on January 17, 2021, the same as above, would affect the reproduction of the single-celled organism, the flea beetle. The growth results of the flea beetle in the tap water of Yokkaichi City "×", the tap water of Kako River "★", the tap water of Shino-yama "●", the well water of Yokkaichi City "▲", the well water of Kako River "■", and the well water of Shino-yama "○ with × in it" are shown in Table 2. The explanations for each mark are consistent with the explanations of the graph (the same applies hereinafter). It reached a peak from the 8th to the 12th and began to decrease on the 16th. The difference between the tap water group and the well water group was distinct. It may also be due to the fact that tap water contains calcium. When the individual number changes in the above results are made into a graph, it is shown in Figure 7. Well water seems to act more favorably on the flea beetle, but the growth rate was much lower than that of physiological saline.

[0029]

Table 2

[0030] <Example 8> Table 3 shows the change in the number of Paramecium in the tap water of Yokkaichi City and the water obtained by making the tap water of Yokkaichi City into 0.8% physiological saline. Figure 8 shows a graph of the scoring of the change in the number of Paramecium using the tap water of Yokkaichi City in which 0.8% salt was dissolved. The growth of Paramecium in the prepared saline was as described above. Due to the relationship of osmotic pressure, the Paramecium divided vigorously.

[0031] [Table 3]

[0032] <Example 9> After applying sounds of 23 Hz, 24 Hz, and 25 Hz to the tap water of Yokkaichi City, Paramecium was cultured. The results are shown in Table 4. Figure 9 shows a graph of the scoring of the change in the number of Paramecium using the tap water of Yokkaichi City to which sounds of 23 Hz, 24 Hz, and 25 Hz were applied.

[0033] [Table 4]

[0034] <Example 10> Paramecium was cultured in water obtained by applying "1 / f fluctuation" to the tap water of Yokkaichi City. The results are shown in Table 5. Figure 10 shows a graph of the scoring of the change in the number of Paramecium using the tap water of Yokkaichi City that was in contact with "1 / f fluctuation". "1 / f fluctuation" was also considered to be effective.

[0035] [Table 5]

[0036] <Example 11> Paramecium was cultured in the tap water of Yokkaichi City to which sounds of 23 Hz, 24 Hz, and 25 Hz + "undulation" were applied. Next, an experiment on whether the wave water of different meteorites affects the reproduction of the single-celled organism Paramecium was conducted in the same manner as above. For the fluctuating water passed through meteorites used for cultivation, except that a total of 40 g (1.0 g for each of various meteorites ((A) stony meteorite, (B) iron meteorite, (C) stony-iron meteorite, (D-1) tektite, (D-2) moldavite, (D-3) Libyan glass)) was immersed in 1000 mL of Shizuoka tap water for 100 seconds and stirred, the procedure was carried out in the same manner as above. For the fluctuating water used for cultivation, 1000 mL of Shizuoka tap water was stirred, and sounds of 23 Hz, 24 Hz, and 25 Hz were applied thereto for 100 seconds. Then, the sounds of 23 Hz and 24 Hz were made to generate a "ripple" simultaneously and applied to the Shizuoka tap water. Next, after making the sounds of 23 Hz and 25 Hz generate a "ripple" simultaneously and applying them to the Shizuoka tap water for 100 seconds each, the resulting water was used to culture the pill bugs. Table 6 shows the change in the number of pill bugs.

[0037]

Table 6

[0038] Fig. 11 shows a graph of the scoring of the change in the number of pill bugs using the Shizuoka tap water that was in contact with the sounds of 23 Hz, 24 Hz, and 25 Hz + "1 / f fluctuation". The inventor was surprised that water that could affect the growth of pill bugs was produced simply by applying sound and ripple. Here, the 1 / f fluctuation is described. Although the mechanism by which the 1 / f fluctuation occurs has not been clearly elucidated yet, it is a phenomenon frequently observed in nature and is said to be something like a fundamental law of the movement of a group of things. Specific examples include the interval between human heartbeats, the way a candle flame flickers, the swaying of a train, the sound of a small stream, the movement of eyes, sunlight filtering through leaves, the way fireflies glow, the setting of a fan, the swaying of a skirt, the swaying of hair, etc. Physically, the resistance of metals and the flow of network information are cited as examples, but the actual situation is not clear. The ripple caused by the difference in frequencies used here is also considered to be a 1 / f fluctuation. It is said that there is 1 / f fluctuation in the human heartbeat rhythm, and that the normally functioning heart is not simply beating regularly, but rather conducting human life with 1 / f fluctuation. Also, the biological rhythm represented by the frequency fluctuation of the alpha waves of the electroencephalogram is said to be such that the electrical pulse intervals of the biological signals emitted by human nerve cells are 1 / f fluctuations. Similar to the golden ratio, 1 / f fluctuation is considered to be not only the cause difference that humans feel comfortable, but also something similar to the fundamental law of the movement of all things in the universe, but its origin remains a mystery. That is, if the undulation also feels comfortable, it is called 1 / f fluctuation. When I asked a pear farmer about this, it might lead to the story that when pears are made to listen to music (Mozart), the way the fruits grow becomes better and the sugar content increases. That is, sound, or 1 / f fluctuation, is having a positive effect at the cell level. Later experiments were conducted, but it seems that high-frequency sounds do not have much of a positive effect on cells. That is, water treated with sound frequencies in the audible range that are not extremely unpleasant is good. Therefore, it is considered good to have a water purifier with a sound wave wavelength of 20 Hz to 10,000 Hz that can be applied with 1 / f fluctuation. The wavelength of the sound wave will be described later using the eggs of the African clawed frog.

[0039] <Example 12> Water Passed Through Various Meteorites Next, in order to investigate whether there are differences depending on the type of meteorite, the following waters (D-1) to (D-4) were used. (D-1) Tap water in Yokkaichi that has come into contact with tektite, (D-2) Tap water in Yokkaichi that has come into contact with moldavite, (D-3) Tap water in Yokkaichi that has come into contact with Libyan glass, were each investigated. The same conditions as above were used except that 1.0 g of each was immersed in 1000 mL of tap water in Yokkaichi for 100 seconds and the water was stirred. Table 7 shows the change in the number of pill bugs due to differences in meteorites. In Fig. 12, the change in the number of individuals of the above results is shown as a graph. Thus, it was found that by passing through at least tektite, moldavite, and Libyan glass respectively, the same effect as well water was obtained. Moldavite, tektite, and Libyan glass had almost the same effect, probably because they are similar in formation. Although it did not reach physiological saline, the growth rate increased.

[0040]

Table 7

[0041] <Example 13> Next, the results of a breeding experiment on various meteorites of Paramecium, (A) tap water in Yokkaichi that had contacted a stony meteorite, (B) tap water in Yokkaichi that had contacted an iron meteorite, and (C) tap water in Yokkaichi that had contacted a stony-iron meteorite were shown in Table 8 by the same method. In order of the strength of the effect, they were stony-iron meteorite, iron meteorite, and stony meteorite. In Fig. 13, the data is shown as a graph. The meteorites had a good effect on the single-celled organism Paramecium. Since the human body is also an aggregate of single cells, these meteorites should have a good effect on human somatic cells. It is obvious that there is a big difference from when there was only the tap water in Yokkaichi. That is, it was suggested that it also has a good effect on the human body.

[0042]

Table 8

[0043] <Example 14> Water Passed Through Various Meteorites + Total Minerals Next, minerals were added to the oscillating water for each type of meteorite and stirred to obtain oscillating water. An experiment on whether the water affects the reproduction of the single-celled organism Paramecium was conducted in the same method as above. Table 9 shows the change in the number of Paramecium individuals in tap water in Yokkaichi that had contacted tektite and total minerals, tap water in Yokkaichi that had contacted moldavite and total minerals, and tap water in Yokkaichi that had contacted Libyan glass and total minerals, in order from the top. Also, in Fig. 14, the data is shown as a graph. It reached its peak from the 8th and continued until the 16th, and then died out, reaching its minimum on the 26th. The difference was clear when plotted on a graph. The water composition did not change. It is a mysterious phenomenon. The wave water of meteorite + gemstone seems to be useful for single-celled organisms. The method for selecting the minerals used will be described later.

[0044]

Table 9

[0045] <Example 15> Next, Table 10 shows the change in the number of pill bugs in the tap water of Yokkaichi in contact with stony meteorites and total minerals, the water of Yokkaichi in contact with iron meteorites and total minerals, and the tap water of Yokkaichi in contact with stony-iron meteorites and total meteorites. Figure 15 shows the data presented as a graph. As shown in the figure, a clear difference was observed in the water in contact with the minerals compared to the tap water.

[0046]

Table 10

[0047] <Example 16> Next, an experiment on whether the wave water of different meteorites affects the reproduction of the single-celled organism pill bug was conducted in the same manner as above. The wave water passed through the meteorites used for culturing was the same test as above, except that water obtained by immersing 1.0 g of each of various meteorites ((A) stony meteorite, (B) iron meteorite, (C) stony-iron meteorite, (D-1) tektite, (D-2) moldavite, (D-3) Libyan glass), a total of 40 g, in 1000 mL of tap water from Yokkaichi for 100 seconds and stirring was used. The total meteorites used here include, in addition to tektites, moldavites, and Libyan glass, (A) stony meteorites, namely, 1. Acondrite meteorite, 2. LL3 chondrite meteorite, 3. H3-5 chondrite meteorite, 4. CV3 chondrite meteorite, 5. R chondrite meteorite, 6. carbonaceous chondrite meteorite, 7. MC chondrite meteorite, 8. Becker 001, 9. NWA532 meteorite, 10. Ahnighito meteorite, 11. Murchison meteorite, 12. Bashkirian stone meteorite, 13. Chelyabinsk meteorite, 14. Tarda meteorite, 15. Orgueil meteorite, 16. Gao meteorite, 17. Zag meteorite, 18. Bensour meteorite, 19. Vega A meteorite, 20. Tamdut meteorite, 21. Porter Ranch Palaeometeorite, 22. Becker 001, 23. Chelger meteorite, 24. Rumuruti chondrite meteorite, 25. enstatite chondrite meteorite, 26. Al Hagounia meteorite, 27. NWA1180 meteorite, 28. NWA1232 meteorite, 29. NWA11900 meteorite, 30. NWA11304 meteorite, 31. Oum Dreyga meteorite, 32. Maricopa meteorite, 33. Mount Yirtkuq Bulak 006 meteorite, 34. NWA869 meteorite, 35. North West Africa 869 meteorite, 36. Acapulcoite-Lodranite meteorite, 37. ureilite, 38. 2008TC3 meteorite, 39. Almahata Sitta meteorite, 40. Muonionalusta meteorite, 41. angrite meteorite, 42. howardite meteorite, 43. diogenite meteorite, 44. Mirbiliri meteorite, 45. eucrite meteorite, 46. meteorong meteorite, 47. NWA7831 meteorite, 48. shergottite meteorite, 49. shashinite meteorite, 50. 50 types of NWA1180 meteorite, and (B) iron meteorites, namely, 1. Nandan meteorite, 2. Gibeon meteorite, 3. Campo del Cielo meteorite, 4. Uralsk meteorite, 5. Canyon Diablo meteorite, 6. Gebel Kamel meteorite, 7. Mundrabilla meteorite, 8. Agdal meteorite, 9. Altai meteorite, 10. Dronino meteorite, 11. Sikhote-Alin meteorite, 12. Swedish Muonionalusta meteorite, 13. Chinga meteorite, 14. Santovale meteorite, 15. Xinjiang meteorite, 16. Madagascar meteorite, 17. Taza (NWA859) meteorite, 18. Toluca meteorite, 19. Mundrabilla meteorite, 20. Odessa meteorite, 21. Turgut meteorite, 22. ataxite meteorite, 23. Imilchil meteorite, 24.Twenty-four types of droimite meteorites, and, as (C) stony-iron meteorites: 1. Brahin meteorite, 2. Imilac meteorite, 3. Esquel meteorite, 4. NWA4747 meteorite, 5. Cerico meteorite, 6. Seymchan meteorite, 7. Sublimation iron meteorite, 8. Hakkitta meteorite, 9. Mesosiderite meteorite, 10. Brenham meteorite, 11. Quijin meteorite, 12. Jinder meteorite, 13. Springwater meteorite, 14. Mount Yirtkuq Bulak 006 meteorite, 15. Vaca Muerta meteorite, 16. Krasnoyarsk meteorite, 17. Fukang meteorite, 18. NWA4747 meteorite, 19. Fukan meteorite, 20. Twenty types of Esquel meteorite, and three unclassified types, for a total of 100 meteorites, were pulverized to diameters of 20 - 40 μm and approximately 300 μm to obtain meteorite powder. From this, exactly 1.00 g was taken out from each, and 100 g of meteorite powder was obtained for 100 types. In the following, those described as "total meteorites" indicate that the above 100 types of meteorites were used.

[0048] In addition, except for using water obtained by immersing a total of 114 g, each 1.0 g, of a water treatment filter (corresponding to Claim 1) containing at least one raw material selected from 115 types (arcade, aquamarine, apatite, amazonite, alexandrite, andesine, amber, lapis lazuli, ichthyo, inca rose, wollastonite, emerald, loess, onyx, opal, garnet, carnelian, kaolinite, hornblende, granite, volcanic glass, volcanic rock (seishiyakuishi) Itoigawa, volcanic rock (lava), talc, limonite, calcite, gui yang stone, otolith of fish, squid, octopus, gold, silver, king flower stone (no mineral name), chrysocolla (malachite), crystal quartz, chrysoprase, kunzite, keser stone, basalt, bezoar, obsidian, amber, sapphire, samarskite, yttrium oxide, copper oxide, coral, sunstone, native copper (pyrite), red stone fat, autumn stone, stalactite, silica, siliceous cyst, zirconia (artificial), zircon (natural), super seven, sugilite, turtle shell, spinel, hematite, lime (quicklime), coal, abalone shell, xenotime, selenite, diorite, zoisite, ivory, sodalite, turquoise, tiger eye, diamond, marble, tanzanite (skarn), chart, terahertz ore, celestial eye stone, topaz, tourmaline, herkimer diamond, pearl, shungite, platinum, palladium, banded carnelian, jadeite, bismuth, himekawa medicine stone, fluorite, black star, black stone, clam shell (two-piece shell), magnetite, peridot, sodalite, horn health, malachite, pine, moonstone, unnamed different burning, beryl, meng stone, actinolite, lazurite, labradorite, limonite, ruby, ruby in zoisite, antelope horn, lepidolite, roseite, road night, furnace eye stone, deer horn, wild horse) in 1000 mL of Yokkaichi tap water for 100 seconds and stirring, the same conditions as above were used. Hereafter, "total minerals" refers to the above 115 types of minerals.

[0049] <Example 17> Change in the number of pill bugs due to tap water in Yokkaichi that has come into contact with total minerals Table 11 shows the change in the number of Daphnia magna caused by the tap water in Yokkaichi that has come into contact with the total minerals. Figure 16 shows the scoring of the change in the number of Daphnia magna caused by the tap water in Yokkaichi that has come into contact with the total minerals.

[0050]

Table 11

[0051] <Example 18> Change in the number of Daphnia magna caused by the tap water in Yokkaichi that has come into contact with total meteorites + total minerals + sound waves Table 12 shows the results of examining the change in the number of Daphnia magna caused by the tap water in Yokkaichi that has come into contact with total meteorites + total minerals + sound waves. Figure 17 shows the scoring of the change in the number of Daphnia magna cultured in the tap water in Yokkaichi that has come into contact with the above-mentioned total meteorites, total minerals, and sound waves.

[0052]

Table 12

[0053] <Example 19> Change in the number of Daphnia magna in the tap water in Yokkaichi caused by infrared radiation ceramics For infrared radiation, the following infrared radiation material from Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 08-104609, for which Yasunori Hori obtained a patent, "ash that emits far-infrared rays and ash of a composition that emits far-infrared rays" was used. A graph of this infrared radiation rate is shown in Figure 18. The ash was mixed into the material of the pottery and then fired into ceramics. As shown in the figure, it was ceramics with an infrared radiation rate of about 95%.

[0054] <Example 20> Tap water in Yokkaichi that has come into contact with infrared radiation ceramics Table 13 and Figure 19 show the change in the number of Daphnia magna cultured in the tap water in Yokkaichi that has come into contact with the above-mentioned infrared radiation ceramics. Although the effect is small, an effect of infrared rays was recognized.

[0055]

Table 13

[0056] <Example 21> Table 14 shows the results of examining the change in the number of pill bugs due to the tap water in Yokkaichi that was contacted with total meteorites + total minerals + infrared rays + sound waves + 1 / f. The water used for culturing was 1000 mL of tap water in Yokkaichi, which was stirred, and 100 g of the above total meteorites (1.0 g of each various meteorite) was put into it, and the ceramic was fired. After stirring it for 100 seconds, the meteorite ceramic was taken out. Next, a total of 114 g, with 1.0 g of each of the above various minerals, was added to the water. Then, sounds of 23 Hz, 24 Hz, and 25 Hz were applied for 100 seconds. After that, the sounds of 23 Hz and 24 Hz were made to resonate simultaneously to generate a "ripple" and applied to the tap water in Yokkaichi. Next, the sounds of 23 Hz and 25 Hz were made to resonate simultaneously to generate a "ripple" and applied to the tap water in Yokkaichi for 100 seconds each, and then far-infrared rays were radiated to the water for 100 seconds, and the water was used to culture pill bugs. Here, the 1 / f fluctuation will be explained. The mechanism by which the 1 / f fluctuation occurs has not yet been clearly elucidated, but it is a phenomenon frequently seen in nature, and it is known that it seems to be something like a fundamental law of the way a group of things moves. The ripple caused by this difference in frequency also seems to correspond to the 1 / f fluctuation.

[0057] <Example 22> The results of examining the change in the number of pill bugs due to the tap water in Yokkaichi that was contacted with total meteorites and total minerals are shown. A distinct difference was found compared to culturing with only the tap water in Yokkaichi. It should be noted here that the number of individuals starts to decrease from the 16th day, but for the tap water in Yokkaichi + total meteorites + total minerals + sound waves applied, it recovered a little after 28 days. It was considered possible that the dead individuals among the group began to decompose and nutrients were taken from there. Naturally, the same phenomenon should occur with the tap water in Yokkaichi as well, but in tap water and well water, the power remained in the pill bugs, and they were considered dead. What I found amazing here was that the effect of water still persisted even after 30 days. Tap water that had merely been in contact with a meteorite, minerals, sound, and 1 / f fluctuations for a few minutes seemed transformed. It exceeded the superiority difference. It was a phenomenon that was difficult to conceive of based on common sense. The count of the number of cultured pill bugs is shown in Figure 20. This is a phenomenon where I wonder if what Benveniste said about water having memory could be occurring. I hesitated greatly in writing this article. This is because it is unscientific and because Benveniste's paper later became involved in a retraction controversy. However, although it may seem "ridiculous," it is the result of facts. If such results had not been obtained, I would not have considered writing a patent.

[0058]

Table 14

[0059] Next, it was verified whether there was a difference in water before and after the meteorite was thrown in. <Example 23> Next, it was verified whether the components of the meteorite would dissolve in water. Therefore, on January 17, 2011, a water quality inspection of tap water collected at 7-6, Tomari-cho, Yokkaichi City, Mie Prefecture was conducted, as well as a water quality inspection after soaking and filtering various meteorites. Incidentally, 100 g of various meteorites were used per 1 L of tap water. The various meteorites were placed in running water for 72 hours. The method involved preparing seven magnetic stirrers and 2L beakers, and all operations were carried out within a drive chamber manufactured by Soda Industry Co., Ltd. to prevent contamination. (A) For cutting out various meteorites, a dental magnifying glass was used, and the minerals were cut out with a dental diamond disc or shaved with a dental diamond bar, and 10g were combined and 10 pieces were put in to make 100g. (B) The weighing instrument used at that time was an electronic balance BM capable of weighing 0.01mg for high-precision analysis manufactured by Shimadzu Corporation. (C) The water used was tap water from Yokkaichi City, Mie Prefecture. The various meteorites were thoroughly washed with water, and moreover, 1,000 mL of tap water was used. (D) Stirring was carried out using a magnetic stirrer REXIM for 72 hours at a rotation speed of 100 rpm, and 10g of various meteorites ((A) stone meteorite, (B) iron meteorite, (C) stony-iron meteorite, (D-1) tektite, (D-2) moldavite, (D-3) Libyan glass) were immersed in 10 portions of 100g for 72 hours. (E) For taking out the minerals, filtration was carried out using one coffee filter, and the components of the water were inspected. The results are shown in Table 15. In the table, "cis-1,2-dichloroethylene, etc." indicates cis-1,2-dichloroethylene, trans-1,2-dichloroethylene, dichloromethane, tetrachloroethylene, trichloroethylene, benzene, chloroform, dibromochloromethane, bromic acid, total trihalomethane, bromodichloromethane, and bromoform. No scientific changes were found in the tap water that had been in contact with various meteorites ((A) stone meteorite, (B) iron meteorite, (C) stony-iron meteorite, (D-1) tektite, (D-2) moldavite, (D-3) Libyan glass) for 72 hours. That is, no scientific changes such as the release of ions and the removal of harmful substances could be found through the inspection.

Table 15

[0060] <Example 24> A magnetic stirrer and a 2L beaker were prepared, and all operations were carried out inside the drive chamber manufactured by Soda Industry Co., Ltd. to prevent contamination. For various cuttings of meteorites, (a) a magnifying glass for dental technicians was used, and the minerals were cut out with a dental diamond disk or shaved with a dental diamond bar, and 100 g was combined. (b) The weighing instrument used at that time was Shimadzu Corporation, and an electronic balance BM for high-precision analysis capable of weighing 0.01 mg was used. (c) The water used was tap water from Yokkaichi City, Mie Prefecture, and various meteorites were thoroughly washed with tap water, and 1,000 mL of tap water was used. (d) Stirring was carried out for 72 hours using a magnetic stirrer REXIM at a rotation speed of 500 rpm, and 100 g of various meteorites ((A) stony meteorite, (B) iron meteorite, (C) stony-iron meteorite, (D-1) tektite, (D-2) moldavite, (D-3) Libyan glass) were immersed for 72 hours. (e) Tweezers were used to take out the minerals. The results of the electrical resistivity (Ω·cm) and electrical conductivity (μs / cm) in tap water (water temperature 25°C) and the meteorites were immersed. In addition, as a measuring instrument, Toa DKK, a portable electrical conductivity meter CM-31P-W (for pure water) was used. Table 16 shows the analysis results. Originally, although it was immersed for 72 hours instead of 100 seconds, no change was observed. That is, it was not considered that anything had eluted. Substances can have good and bad effects. Drugs can be considered as those that emphasize their good aspects. There are also cases where a certain substance induces or conversely inhibits the activity of an enzyme, and toxicity appears due to a combination with other substances. These phenomena are important issues in toxicology, but a large difference in the composition of isotopes of He, Ne, Ar, Kr, and Xe has been reported as a major difference between meteorites and terrestrial rocks. The most prominent is helium, and the 3 He / 4 He isotope ratio is about 10 -4 whereas that of terrestrial rocks is about 10 -6 or lower. Terrestrial rocks are subjected to a large amount of 4 He generated by the nuclear decay of uranium and thorium, so in meteorites 3 He / 4There are many isotopes of He. However, it is unlikely that this would chemically affect water and have an impact on the body.

[0061]

Table 16

[0062] <Example 25> Regarding whether the components of meteorites dissolve in distilled water, the same experiment was conducted using distilled water. Pure water refers to water with a high purity from which impurities have been removed. Also, water with an even higher purity than pure water is called ultrapure water. There are no quantitatively determined values or rules for the distinction between pure water and ultrapure water, and it varies among academic societies and industries, so there is no clear distinction. However, (18 MΩcm) is sometimes considered ultrapure water (with a water temperature of 25°C as the standard). The distilled water used had an electrical resistivity (Ω·cm) of 1.001 MΩcm and an electrical conductivity (μs / cm) of 0.99 μs / cm. The results are shown in Table 17. No difference was found in the electrical resistivity (Ω·cm) and electrical conductivity (μs / cm) at 1.001 M for the distilled water either. That is, it is considered that there is no dissolution of anything. As described above, as Masato Yasui, K. Liu, Richard J., etc. have said, it is possible that something has affected the properties of water itself and structured water has been formed, but this is inexplicable to us.

[0063]

Table 17

[0064] <Example 26> Measurement of the oxidation-reduction potential of water Next, a test was conducted on the change in the oxidation-reduction potential. The measuring instrument used was a digital oxidation-reduction potential meter (ORP) meter YK-23RP MotherTool manufactured by Matsuzawa Tools Co., Ltd. The measurement results for each water are shown in Table 18 (water temperature is 25°C). It was found that the oxidation-reduction potential of well water is smaller.

[0065]

Table 18

[0066] <Example 27> Measurement of Redox Potential When Using Meteorites, etc. Weighing was performed using an electronic balance BM capable of weighing 0.01 mg for high-precision analysis manufactured by Shimadzu Corporation for each meteorite. 500 mL was taken out using a 500 mL graduated cylinder. Tap water in Yokkaichi (7-6, Tomari-cho, Yokkaichi City, Mie Prefecture, collected on January 17, 2012), (A) tap water in Yokkaichi + stony meteorite, (B) tap water in Yokkaichi + iron meteorite, (C) tap water in Yokkaichi + stony-iron meteorite, (D-1) tap water in Yokkaichi + tektite, (D-2) tap water in Yokkaichi + moldavite, (D-3) tap water in Yokkaichi + Libyan glass, 100 g each were cut out with a dental diamond disc or shaved with a dental diamond bar using a jeweler's magnifying glass to make the weights equal. The tap water in Mie Prefecture, Yokkaichi City was dispensed into a 1000 mL beaker and slowly stirred (using a magnetic stirrer REXIM, rotation speed 500 rpm) so as not to generate bubbles. After immersing the meteorite in it for 100 seconds, the meteorite was removed. The removal was performed with tweezers. The same experiment was conducted 5 times and the average value was obtained. The results are shown in Table 19. The change in the reduction potential of the tap water in Yokkaichi immersed with various meteorites was within the error range, and the redox potential was almost the same as that of the original tap water. That is, it was not considered that the reduction potential was related. Figure 21 shows a part of the shape of the stones used in the experiment, and Figure 22 shows the meteorite (A) crushed to a diameter of 300 μm and the meteorite (B) crushed to a diameter of 22 μm to 40 μm, respectively. The meteorites used in this experiment were made and used in various shapes such as the original pyramid shape, spherical shape, hexagonal prism, tama shape, cube, oval shape, ring shape, disc shape, triangular shape, oval shape, diamond cut shape, etc. The difference due to the above-mentioned shape differences seems to increase the efficacy in the order of hexagonal prism, spherical shape, pyramid shape, and natural state. However, since the natural state has sufficient effect, it was considered that the shape does not need to be specified.

[0067]

Table 19

[0068] <Example 28> Trunk Gravity Axis Test Regardless of the gender of the subjects, they were divided into 10 groups by weight: Group 1: 60.0 kg - 62.5 kg, Group 2: 62.5 kg - 65.0 kg, Group 3: 65.0 kg - 67.5 kg, Group 4: 67.5 kg - 70.0 kg, Group 5: 70.0 kg - 72.5 kg, Group 6: 72.5 kg - 75.0 kg, Group 7: 75.0 kg - 77.5 kg, Group 8: 77.5 kg - 80.0 kg, Group 9: 80.0 kg - 82.5 kg, Group 10: 82.5 kg - 85.0 kg. There were 7 people in each group, for a total of 70 people. In addition to weight, the trunk gravity axis test was conducted. Those who were extremely weak or extremely strong were excluded, and the results of 5 people in each group, for a total of 50 people, were shown. For the trunk gravity axis test of subjects by weight in subsequent examples, data were obtained from these 50 people in this group. Note that the control was also performed 3 times for each person, and also 3 times after the test diet, and the average value was taken. The method was to dispense various waters into 100 mL beakers. Using a magnetic stirrer REXIM, it was stirred at a rotation speed of 500 rpm. Then minerals were added and filtered using 3 coffee filters. The time from addition to filtration was divided into 100 - second intervals, and the filtered water was obtained. Regardless of the presence or absence of minerals, the same operation was performed to obtain the control. For the experiment, data were used in which the trunk gravity axis test was conducted immediately after having 5 mL of the filtered water drunk by each person. (The large intestine has a strong water absorption ability to absorb bound water as well. However, most of the water is absorbed in the small intestine, which takes about 30 minutes, so it was considered that there was no time for absorption.) The subjects were not informed of anything and received the control once a day and the trunk gravity axis test only once after the test diet. The trunk gravity axis test was performed 3 times for each water, and the average value of 5 people was calculated. Note that the control was taken every day, and the difference from the control was described in 100 - g units based on this. Photographs were taken and enlarged for determination. A series of operations (dispensing, stirring, filtering) were performed under the same conditions as when minerals were added. Since the memory is in 1 kg units, the center of the memory was set to 0.5 kg. To achieve as much accuracy as possible, a photo was taken, enlarged, and the numerical values were read.

[0069] <Example 29> Creation and Usage Method of Trunk Gravity Axis Testing Device In the trunk gravity axis test, it is difficult to recognize whether the subject's strength has increased or not when the weight is from 0.0↑ kg to 1.5 kg. Therefore, the following device was devised to increase objectivity. Fig. 23 shows the device used for the trunk gravity axis test, and Fig. 24 shows the test procedure. The trunk gravity axis testing device 1 (hereinafter simply referred to as "device 1") is an improved version of a 100 kg grip strength meter. This device 1 can measure the pressing force applied between the left and right hands on the back of the subject. The device 1 includes a first pressing operation part 2 that can be pressed by one of the left or right palms of the subject, a second pressing operation part 3 that can be pressed by the other palm and can be pressed in a direction opposite to the pressing force of the first pressing operation part 2, and a measuring part 4 that can measure the force applied to both pressing operation parts 2 and 3. Note that the device 1 can be operated by one person or, as described below, by two people. To measure more accurately, it is preferable to operate it with two people. First, the handle part was enlarged so that it could be pressed directly below, and the grip of the part that would be caught when pressed was cut off. Also, a handle was attached to eliminate the deviation when pressing straight, so that it could be held at two points. This handle is appropriately equipped with weights such as 5 kg and 10 kg in advance for the subject who requires force, so as to minimize the force of the operator. The reason is that if force is required for the operator, the results will vary and lack accuracy. In this way, the good and bad were visualized in kg. The results were recorded as kg, kg↑ by taking a photo, enlarging it. In photo judgment, it is possible to judge up to kg, kg↑, kg↓, but since those below 0.5 are within the error range, they were unified to kg, kg↑. At this time, both the operator and the subject practiced how to release the force. This is because at first, everyone will apply force and resist. This is not to show off strength but to observe how it affects the trunk gravity axis, and it is required to perform it in a relaxed manner. The conditions at that time were as follows: regardless of the season (spring, summer, autumn, or winter), the temperature of the drinking water was 25°C, the humidity was 65%, the brightness was Mitsubishi Electric Osram Co., Ltd.'s NHT270·L, 100V, and the wind force was 0 m. The tap water in Yokkaichi, which served as the base, was set at 0.0 kg as the control. Simply put, instead of using the test machine, one can determine whether force is exerted or not by pressing with the fist of an operator. However, when the weight is 1.5 kg or less, not much change is felt. In many cases, at least 1.5 kg or more seems to be required. After that, this trunk gravity axis test was conducted sequentially. As shown in Figure 25, the determination of the memory was made by taking a photo and judging the weight in kg. It was subtle within 1 kg, but it was clearly different from 1.5 kg and above.

[0070] As shown in Figure 24, (1) The subject looked straight ahead, aligned the tips of the toes and heels of the feet, stood upright, and crossed the hands behind with the back hands. (2) The subject stood with the tips of the toes and heels aligned. (3) Both hands were firmly crossed behind so that they would not separate even if someone else applied force easily. (4) The first pressing operation part 2 of device 1 was placed on the palm of the crossed back hand, and the operator applied force to the second pressing operation part 3 directly downward. Since a force comparison was not being made at this time, the device 1 was aimed directly downward (so as not to cause displacement in the front-back, left-right directions) so as not to cause any obstruction to the subject's shoulders. The force applied was gradually increased, and the weight at which the subject would collapse was photographed. Regarding precautions for the subject, during the test, the subject stood in a natural posture without forcing or straining, crossed the hands with the back hands, and practiced how to relax the force several times before proceeding. Also, in all trunk gravity axis tests, those who complained of pain such as low back pain, shoulder pain, or tenosynovitis were excluded from the subjects. The photo when the subject collapsed was enlarged to read the weight memory. Figure 25 shows a photo diagram explaining how to read the memory. Next, the subject drank the test substance (water) and immediately repeated the same operation. For the water consumed by the subject, that which passed through two filters of a sterilization filter (syringe filter DISMIC AS type and sterilization Mylex filter unit 33 mm) was used. Table 20 shows the criteria for evaluating the difference in weight tolerance (weight tolerance before drinking - weight tolerance after drinking) (g) before and after the subject drinks. In the notation example, in the case of 0.0, it represents the same as the control. "↑" means exactly ~ +500 g, that is, "0.0↑" means 0 g to 500 g, and "1.0↑" means 1000 g to 1500 g or less.

[0071]

Table 20

[0072] <Example 30> Tap water, various well waters, and trunk gravity axis test (1) As the specimen, tap water collected from the tap at 7-6, Urago-cho, Yokkaichi City, Mie Prefecture on January 17, 2002 was used. The results are shown in Table 21.

[0073]

Table 21

[0074] <Example 31> Tap water, various well waters, and trunk gravity axis test (2) As the specimen, tap water collected from the tap adjacent to the well of Kobo Daishi in Nishi-Shin-kichi-cho, Kakogawa City on August 28, 2001 was used. The results are shown in Table 22.

[0075]

Table 22

[0076] <Example 32> Tap water, various well waters, and trunk gravity axis test (3) As the specimen, tap water collected from the tap at 148, Inaba Shin-machi, Tamba Sasayama City on August 28, 2001 was used. The results are shown in Table 23.

[0077]

Table 23

[0078] <Example 33> Tap water, various well waters, and trunk gravity axis test (4) As the specimen, well water collected on August 28, 2001 from the well at 1-3013-1, Oiwake Torii, 3-chome, Oiwake, Yokkaichi City, Mie Prefecture was used. The results are shown in Table 24.

[0079]

Table 24

[0080] <Example 34> Tap water, various well waters, and trunk gravity axis test (5) As the specimen, well water collected on August 28, 2001 from the well of Kobo Daishi in Nishi-Kanki-machi, Kakogawa City was used. The results are shown in Table 25.

[0081]

Table 25

[0082] <Example 35> Tap water, various well waters, and trunk gravity axis test (6) As the specimen, well water collected on August 28, 2001 from the well at 148 Bancho, Inaba Shinmachi, Tamba Sasayama City was used. The results are shown in Table 26. Strangely enough, there was a difference of more than 3.5 kg between the tap water in Yokkaichi and the well water in Tamba. There is no explanation for this, but it is the result of the facts. Incidentally, strangely enough, the negative effect of water was greater in the order of lighter body weight, and the positive effect was greater in the order of heavier body weight.

[0083]

Table 26

[0084] <Example 36> Various tap waters, various well waters, and trunk gravity axis test (7) As a sample, a water sample collected on January 17, 2021 was used for the trunk gravity axis test. The collection location was the same as that in Examples 29 to 34 above. Compared with the experiment conducted in 1993, although the subjects were different, similar results were obtained. The water collection location and test method were the same as above. The results are shown in Table 27. In the results of the trunk gravity axis test using the well water in Tanba and the well water in Kagogawa in 1993 and 2021, there was no significant difference. Considering the Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake that occurred on January 17, 1995, it was thought that the water veins in Kagogawa and Tanba might have changed, but there was no significant difference in the results. Overall, 28 years have passed, and it was imagined that water pollution would have more serious results in the trunk gravity axis test, but the changes between 1993 and 2021 were only within the error range. That is, it was considered that one of the reasons why there are many people over 100 years old might be that many people drink well water as mineral water.

[0085]

Table 27

[0086] <Example 37> The components of the meteorite were examined, and in the analysis, except for oxidation due to high temperature in the atmosphere, there was no difference in the components worthy of special mention compared to the substances on Earth. There may be differences in a very small amount, but no significant difference was found compared to the substances on Earth. Therefore, the trunk gravity axis test was conducted using water obtained by passing water with all the same substances, but surprisingly, meteorite-like results were not obtained in six types. This will be described below. The component analysis table and the results of the trunk gravity axis test for various meteorites are shown. Originally, it was submitted for inspection on August 28, 1993, but due to data loss, new data was taken on November 25, 2022. The samples were tested with the same lot No. samples as those submitted for inspection on August 28, 1993. The component analysis results of stony meteorites are shown in Fig. 26. (A) As the breakdown of stony meteorites, 1. Eucrite meteorite, 2. LL3 chondrite meteorite, 3. H3-5 chondrite meteorite, 4. CV3 chondrite meteorite, 5. R chondrite meteorite, 6. carbonaceous chondrite meteorite, 7. MC chondrite meteorite, 8. Bekaer 001, 9. NWA532 meteorite, 10. Ahnighito meteorite, 11. Murchison meteorite, 12. Bashkirian meteorite, 13. Chelyabinsk meteorite, 14. Tarda meteorite, 15. Orgueil meteorite, 16. Gao meteorite, 17. Zag meteorite, 18. Benguela meteorite, 19. Vega A meteorite, 20. Tamdakht meteorite, 21. Portales Valley meteorite, 22. Bekaer 001, 23. Chelger meteorite, 24. Rumuruti chondrite meteorite, 25. enstatite chondrite meteorite, 26. Al-Hagounia meteorite, 27. NWA1180 meteorite, 28. NWA1232 meteorite, 29. NWA11900 meteorite, 30. NWA11304 meteorite, 31. Oum Dreyga meteorite, 32. Maricopa meteorite, 33. Mount Yirtkuq Bulak 006 meteorite, 34. NWA869 meteorite, 35. North West Africa 869 meteorite, 36. Acapulcoite-Lodranite meteorite, 37. ureilite, 38. 2008TC3 meteorite, 39. Almahata Sitta meteorite, 40. Muonionalusta meteorite, 41. angrite meteorite, 42. howardite meteorite, 43. diogenite meteorite, 44. Mirbiliri meteorite, 45. eucrite meteorite, 46. meteorong meteorite, 47. NWA7831 meteorite, 48. shergottite meteorite, 49. shashinite meteorite, 50. NWA1180 meteorite was ground into powder. The grinder was the FV-250 type of Central Chemical Machinery Co., Ltd. and was ground to an average particle size of 20 μm to 40 μm for the meteorite, and then equal amounts were combined and mixed well for component analysis. Since something may stand out in one meteorite, the average of the above 50 types of stony meteorites was taken. All subsequent stony meteorites used these same 50 types.

[0087] <Example 38> The trunk gravity axis test was conducted after August 28, 2011. The following components, which are almost the same as those of a stony meteorite, were collected: silicon oxide (39.0128 g), magnesium oxide (24.7793 g), iron oxide (22.8868 g), sulfur oxide (3.82277 g), aluminum oxide (3.7147 g), calcium oxide (2.1645 g), sodium oxide (1.4244 g), chromium oxide (0.5858 g), nickel oxide (0.4593 g), manganese oxide (0.3847 g), phosphorus oxide (0.3207 g), potassium oxide (0.1572 g), titanium oxide (0.1607 g), cobalt oxide (0.0325 g), vanadium oxide (0.0176 g), chlorine (0.0157 g), zinc oxide (0.0086 g), copper oxide (0.0069 g), strontium oxide (0.0041 g), a total of 100 g. After putting them into running water, the trunk gravity axis test was carried out with the water. The method followed the above method. The weighing instrument used at that time was an electronic balance BM capable of weighing 0.01 mg manufactured by Shimadzu Corporation. Although the above-mentioned amounts are slightly different from the amounts obtained by quantitative analysis, since there is no significant difference, the above-mentioned numerical values were used. The results are shown in Table 28. As described above, the trunk gravity axis test hardly changed. That is, even with almost the same components as a stony meteorite, when it is less than 1.0 kg, the difference from the stony meteorite is clear and the same effect was not recognized. This is truly the mystery of the universe.

[0088]

Table 28

[0089] <Example 39> (B) The component analysis of iron meteorites is shown in Fig. 27. (B) As the breakdown of iron meteorites, 1. Nandan meteorite, 2. Gibeon meteorite, 3. Campo del Cielo meteorite, 4. Urals meteorite, 5. Canyon Diablo meteorite, 6. Gebel Kamil meteorite, 7. Mundrabilla meteorite, 8. Agdal meteorite, 9. Altai meteorite, 10. Dronino meteorite, 11. Sikhote Alin meteorite, 12. Swedish Mönsterås meteorite, 13. Chinga meteorite, 14. Santo Ban meteorite, 15. Xinjiang meteorite, 16. Madagascar meteorite, 17. Taza (NWA859) meteorite, 18. Toluca meteorite, 19. Mandrabilla meteorite, 20. Odessa meteorite, 21. Turgut meteorite, 22. Ataxite meteorite, 23. Imilchil meteorite, 24. Dronimo meteorite, a total of 24 types were used. They were crushed to 20 - 40 μm, and these were combined in equal amounts and mixed well for component analysis. Since something might stand out in one meteorite, the average of 24 types was taken for stony meteorites. After that, all the iron meteorites that came out were made into powder from the same 24 types. The crusher was the FV - 250 type of Central Chemical Machinery Co., Ltd. They were crushed to an average particle size of 20 μm - 40 μm for meteorites, combined in equal amounts and mixed well for component analysis. Since something might stand out in one meteorite, the average of the above 24 types was taken for iron meteorites. After that, all the stony meteorites that came out used the same 24 types. Iron meteorites were sticky during crushing and took the most time for crushing.

[0090] <Example 40> Collect the following components that are almost the same as iron meteorites: iron oxide (88.7363 g), nickel oxide (7.5788 g), phosphorus oxide (2.2354 g), cobalt oxide (0.5044 g), sodium oxide (0.4105 g), chromium oxide (0.2068 g), magnesium oxide (0.1312 g), sulfur oxide (0.0911 g), silicon oxide (0.0586 g), manganese oxide (0.0296 g), chlorine (0.0174 g). A body trunk gravity axis test was conducted through water. The method is as described above. The measuring instrument used at that time was the high-precision analytical electronic balance BM capable of measuring 0.01 mg manufactured by Shimadzu Corporation. The above quantities are slightly different from the quantities obtained by quantitative analysis, but there is no significant difference, so the above numerical values were used. The results are shown in Table 29. As described above, the trunk gravity axis test remained almost unchanged. That is, even with almost the same composition as the iron meteorite, but with a weight of less than 1.0 kg, the difference from the stony meteorite was clear and the same effect was not recognized. This is truly the mystery of the universe.

[0091]

Table 29

[0092] <Example 41> The component analysis results of the stony-iron meteorites are shown in Fig. 28. (C) As stony-iron meteorites, 1. Brahin meteorite, 2. Imilac meteorite, 3. Esquel meteorite, 4. NWA4747 meteorite, 5. Cerico meteorite, 6. Seymchan meteorite, 7. Sublimation iron meteorite, 8. Hakkitta meteorite, 9. Mesosiderite meteorite, 10. Brenham meteorite, 11. Quijin meteorite, 12. Jinder meteorite, 13. Springwater meteorite, 14. Mount Yirtkuq Bulak 006 meteorite, 15. Vaca Muerta meteorite, 16. Krasnoyarsk meteorite, 17. Fukang meteorite, 18. NWA4747 meteorite, 19. Fukan meteorite, 20. Esquel meteorite, 20 types in total were used. They were crushed to 20 - 40 μm, and these were combined in equal amounts and mixed well for component analysis. Since something may stand out in one meteorite, the average of 20 types of stony-iron meteorites was taken. All the iron meteorites to be presented hereafter will use the same 20 types. All stony-iron meteorites will be made into powder of the same 20 types. The crusher was the FV-250 type of Central Chemical Engineering Co., Ltd. Those crushed to an average particle size of 20 μm - 40 μm of the meteorites were combined in equal amounts and mixed well for component analysis.

[0093] <Example 42> Stony-iron meteorite Collected components almost the same as those of a stony-iron meteorite: iron oxide (94.7157 g), silicon oxide (2.3166 g), aluminum oxide (1.9675 g), manganese oxide (0.3191 g), magnesium oxide (0.1925 g), calcium oxide (0.1262 g), chromium oxide (0.0833 g), tin oxide (0.0732 g), titanium oxide (0.0583 g), zinc oxide (0.0381 g), nickel oxide (0.0354 g), potassium oxide (0.0245 g), sulfur oxide (0.0192 g), chlorine (0.0147), zirconium oxide (0.0137 g). A body trunk gravity axis test was conducted through water. The method was the same as above. The measuring instrument used at that time was an electronic balance BM capable of weighing 0.01 mg for high-precision analysis manufactured by Shimadzu Corporation. The above amounts are slightly different from the amounts obtained by quantitative analysis, but since there is no significant difference, the above numerical values were used. The results are shown in Table 30. As described above, the body trunk gravity axis test hardly changed. That is, even with components almost the same as those of a stony-iron meteorite, when it was less than 1.0 kg, the difference from a stony meteorite was clear and the same effect was not recognized. This is truly the mystery of the universe.

[0094]

Table 30

[0095] <Example 43> The component analysis results of tektite are shown in Figure 29. <Example 44> Tektite The following components, which are almost the same as tektite, were collected. That is, silicon oxide (70.8096 g), aluminum oxide (13.2208 g), iron oxide (6.1699), potassium oxide (2.6849 g), calcium oxide (2.1806 g), magnesium oxide (0.1337 g), sodium oxide (1.2537 g), titanium oxide (0.9113 g), chromium oxide (0.4996 g), manganese oxide (0.1337 g), sulfur oxide (0.0539 g), nickel oxide (0.0425 g), zirconium oxide (0.0415), strontium oxide (0.0239), rubidium oxide (0.0141), and yttrium oxide (0.0040 g) were combined and a trunk gravity axis test was conducted through water. The method was the same as described above. The measuring instrument used at that time was an electronic balance BM capable of measuring 0.01 mg manufactured by Shimadzu Corporation for high-precision analysis. The above weights are slightly different from the weights obtained by quantitative analysis, but since there is no significant difference, the above numerical values were used. The results are shown in Table 31. As described above, the trunk gravity axis test was almost unchanged. That is, even with components almost the same as tektite, the same effect as tektite was not recognized at 0.5 kg or less. This is truly the mystery of the universe.

[0096]

Table 31

[0097] <Example 45> The component analysis results of moldavite are shown in Figure 30. <Example 46> Moldavite The following components, which are almost the same as those of moldavite, were collected. That is, silicon oxide (74.5027 g), aluminum oxide (11.0192 g), potassium oxide (4.9036 g), calcium oxide (3.5360 g), iron oxide (2.9962), magnesium oxide (2.1168 g), titanium oxide (0.4394 g), chromium oxide (0.1562 g), barium oxide (0.1236 g), manganese oxide (0.1204 g), zirconium oxide (0.0176 g), nickel oxide (0.0138 g), phosphorus oxide (0.0127 g). Together, a body trunk gravity axis test was conducted through water. The method was the same as described above. The measuring instrument used at that time was an electronic balance BM capable of measuring 0.01 mg from Shimadzu Corporation for high-precision analysis. The above amounts are slightly different from the amounts obtained by quantitative analysis, but since there is no significant difference, the above numerical values were used. The results are shown in Table 32. As described above, the body trunk gravity axis test was almost unchanged. That is, even with components almost the same as those of moldavite, the same effect as that of moldavite was not recognized within an error range of 0.5 kg or less. Truly, it is the mystery of the universe.

[0098]

Table 32

[0099] <Example 47> The component analysis results of Libyan glass are shown in Figure 31. <Example 48> The following components, which are almost the same as those of Libyan glass, were collected. That is, silicon oxide (97.8135), aluminum oxide (1.6069 g), iron oxide (0.2332), titanium oxide (0.1441 g), chromium oxide (0.1090 g), calcium oxide (0.0308 g), potassium oxide (0.0240 g), zirconium oxide (0.0142 g), nickel oxide (0.0126 g), manganese oxide (0.0090 g), strontium oxide (0.0017). Together, a body trunk gravity axis test was conducted through water. The method was the same as described above. The measuring instrument used at that time was an electronic balance BM capable of measuring 0.01 mg from Shimadzu Corporation for high-precision analysis. Although the above amounts are slightly different from the amounts obtained by quantitative analysis, there is no significant difference, so the above numerical values were used. The results are shown in Table 33. As described above, the trunk gravity axis test remained almost unchanged. That is, even with almost the same components as Libyan glass but less than 0.5 kg, the same effect as Libyan glass was not observed. Such is the mystery of the universe. Although there are differences in the components of tektite, moldavite, and Libyan glass, there was almost no difference in the trunk gravity axis test. From this, it was considered that there is a high possibility that the formation process of each rock has an effect rather than the difference in components.

[0100]

Table 33

[0101] <Example 49> Next, it was verified whether the components of meteorites dissolve in water. Therefore, a water quality test of tap water collected on January 17, 2011, at 7-6, Tomari-cho, Yokkaichi City, Mie Prefecture, and a water quality test after immersing and filtering various meteorites were conducted. Note that 100 g of various meteorites were used per 1 L of tap water. The various meteorites were placed in running water for 72 hours. The method was as follows: Seven magnetic stirrers and 2-L beakers were prepared, and all operations were carried out inside a drive chamber manufactured by Soda Industry Co., Ltd. to prevent contamination. For cutting out various meteorites, (a) a magnifying glass for dental technicians was used, and the minerals were cut out or shaved with a dental diamond disk and a dental diamond bar to make a total of 100 g. (b) The weighing instrument used at that time was an electronic balance BM capable of weighing 0.01 mg for high-precision analysis manufactured by Shimadzu Corporation. (c) The water used was tap water from Yokkaichi City, Mie Prefecture. The various meteorites were thoroughly washed with water, and 1,000 mL of tap water was used. (d) Stirring was carried out for 72 hours at a rotation speed of 100 rpm using a magnetic stirrer REXIM, and 500 g of various meteorites ((A) stony meteorite, (B) iron meteorite, (C) stony-iron meteorite, (D-1) tektite, (D-2) moldavite, (D-3) Libyan glass) were immersed for 72 hours. (e) For taking out the minerals, filtration was carried out using three coffee filters, and the component test of the water was conducted. The results are shown in Table 34. No scientific changes were found in the tap water that had been in contact with various meteorites ((A) stony meteorites, (B) iron meteorites, (C) stony-iron meteorites, (D-1) tektites, (D-2) moldavites, (D-3) Libyan glass) for 72 hours. That is, no scientific changes such as ion elution and harmful substance removal could be found through inspection.

[0102]

Table 34

[0103] <Example 50> A magnetic stirrer and a 2L beaker were prepared, and all operations were carried out inside a drive chamber manufactured by Soda Industry Co., Ltd. to prevent contamination. For cutting out various meteorites, (a) a magnifying glass for dental technicians was used, and the minerals were cut out with a dental diamond disk or shaved with a dental diamond bar to obtain a total of 500g. (b) The weighing instrument used at that time was an electronic balance BM capable of weighing 0.01mg for high-precision analysis manufactured by Shimadzu Corporation. (c) The water used was tap water from Yokkaichi City, Mie Prefecture. The various meteorites were thoroughly washed with water, and 1,000 mL of tap water was used. (d) Stirring was carried out using a magnetic stirrer REXIM at a rotation speed of 500 rpm for 72 hours to immerse 500g of various meteorites ((A) stony meteorites, (B) iron meteorites, (C) stony-iron meteorites, (D-1) tektites, (D-2) moldavites, (D-3) Libyan glass) for 72 hours. (e) Tweezers were used to take out the minerals. The results of the electrical resistivity (Ω·cm) and electrical conductivity (μs / cm) in tap water were measured with the meteorites immersed. Incidentally, a portable electrical conductivity meter CM-31P-W (for pure water) manufactured by Toa DKK was used (the water temperature was 25°C). The results are shown in Table 35. Originally, despite immersing for 72 hours instead of 100 seconds, no changes were observed. That is, it was difficult to consider that anything had eluted. Substances can have both beneficial and harmful effects. Drugs can be considered as those that emphasize their beneficial aspects. There are cases where a certain substance induces or conversely inhibits the activity of an enzyme, and toxicity may appear when combined with other substances. These phenomena are important issues in toxicology. However, a large difference in the isotope composition of He, Ne, Ar, Kr, and Xe has been reported between meteorites and terrestrial rocks. The most prominent is helium, and the 3 He / 4 He isotope ratio in meteorites is on the order of 10 -4 whereas that in terrestrial rocks is a low value on the order of 10 -6 or less. Terrestrial rocks are subject to a large amount of 4 He generated by the nuclear decay of uranium and thorium, so meteorites have more 3 He / 4 He isotopes. However, it is unlikely that this chemically affects water and the body.

[0104]

Table 35

[0105] <Example 51> Therefore, the same experiment was conducted using distilled water. Pure water refers to water with a high purity from which impurities have been removed. Water with an even higher purity than pure water is called ultrapure water. There is no quantitatively determined value or rule for the distinction between pure water and ultrapure water, and it varies among academic societies and industries, so there is no clear distinction. However, (18 MΩcm) is sometimes considered ultrapure water (in this case, the water temperature is 25 °C). The distilled water used had an electrical resistivity (Ω·cm) of 1.001 MΩcm and an electrical conductivity (μs / cm) of 0.99 μs / cm. The results are shown in Table 36. No difference was found in the electrical resistivity (Ω·cm) and 1.001 M in electrical conductivity (μs / cm) even with distilled water. That is, it was considered that there was no elution of anything. As Yasuhito Yasui, K. Liu, Richard J., etc. mentioned as above, it is possible that something affected the properties of water itself and structured water was formed, but I couldn't understand the explanation.

[0106]

Table 36

[0107] <Example 52> Next, the change in redox potential was measured. The instrument used was a digital redox potential meter (ORP) YK-23RP MotherTool manufactured by Masato Tools Co., Ltd. (the water temperature was 25°C). The measurement results for each water are shown in Table 37.

[0108]

Table 37

[0109] <Example 53> For weighing, an electronic balance BM capable of weighing 0.01 mg for high-precision analysis manufactured by Shimadzu Corporation was used to weigh each meteorite. 500 mL was taken out using a 500 mL volumetric cylinder. Tap water in Yokkaichi (No. 7-6, Tomari-cho, Yokkaichi City, Mie Prefecture, collected on January 17, 2012), (A) tap water in Yokkaichi + stony meteorite, (B) tap water in Yokkaichi + iron meteorite, (C) tap water in Yokkaichi + stony-iron meteorite, (D-1) tap water in Yokkaichi + tektite, (D-2) tap water in Yokkaichi + moldavite, (D-3) tap water in Yokkaichi + Libyan glass, 100 g each were cut or shaved with a dental diamond disk using a jeweler's magnifying glass to make the weights equal. The tap water in Yokkaichi City, Mie Prefecture was dispensed into a 1000 mL beaker and slowly stirred (using a magnetic stirrer REXIM at a rotation speed of 500 rpm) to avoid generating bubbles. The meteorite was immersed in it for 100 seconds and then removed. The removal was done with tweezers. The same experiment was conducted 5 times and the average value was obtained. The results are shown in Table 38. The change in the reduction potential of tap water in Yokkaichi with various meteorites immersed was within the error range, and the redox potential was almost the same as that of the original tap water. That is, it was not possible to think that the reduction potential was related. Incidentally, the following photo is an example of some of the shapes used in the experiment. The meteorites used in this experiment were used as they were, and various shapes such as pyramid type, spherical, hexagonal prism, tama shape, cube, oval, ring type, disc shape, triangle, oval, diamond cut type were created and used. The shapes were as shown in FIGS. 21 and 22. The difference due to the difference in shape seems to increase the efficacy in the order of hexagonal prism, spherical, pyramid type, and natural, but it was found that the natural shape was sufficiently effective.

Table 38

[0110] <Example 54> Trunk gravity axis test and water temperature The specific gravity increases the most when the water temperature is about 4°C, but it was found that the trunk gravity axis test of water also follows a similar arc. The results are shown in FIG. 32. There is a slight error between the highest value and the lowest value, but it is the result of the trunk gravity axis test. In the graph, "★" indicates the results of male high school seniors, "× in ○" indicates male high school freshmen, "◆" indicates male junior high school seniors, "●" indicates male junior high school freshmen, "▲" indicates male sixth graders in elementary school, and "hexagonal star" indicates the results of male first graders in elementary school. The mineral water used was Evian. In 1 liter of Evian, total meteorites (in addition to tektite, moldavite, Libyan glass, and 100 types of meteorites described in <Example 16>) were ground to 20 μm to 40 μm to obtain meteorite powder. From this, exactly 1.00 g was taken out from each to obtain 100 g of meteorite powder of 100 types. For the total minerals, 115 types from group (b) above were used. First, 1,000 mL of tap water from Yokkaichi was taken out and stirred. Then, the total meteorites (100 g in total, 1 g of each meteorite) were immersed for 100 seconds, after which the meteorites were taken out. The same water was stirred, and then 115 types of various minerals, 1 g of each (115 g in total), were immersed for 100 seconds and then taken out. Sound waves of 23 Hz, 24 Hz, and 25 Hz were applied to the water for 100 seconds each. Then, 13 Hz and 24 Hz were applied simultaneously to give a wave for 100 seconds. Similarly, 24 Hz and 25 Hz were applied simultaneously to give a wave for 100 seconds. Verification was carried out with water to which 23 Hz and 25 Hz were applied simultaneously to give a wave for 100 seconds. First graders who had just entered elementary school from kindergarten were not as strong as sixth graders. It seemed to grow about four times in six years. The figure shows the results of the trunk gravity axis test immediately after drinking 5 mL of that water. From the results of the above six people, it was common that the force was almost the same at 24°C to 30°C. When the temperature exceeded 70°C, the force suddenly disappeared. At 80°C, there was almost no efficacy, and it became almost the same as the tap water in Yokkaichi. That is, it was considered that the results suggested the possibility that the structured clusters were broken at 70°C or higher. From this result, it was considered that it was not wrong that there was a lot of hexamolecular water in the snowmelt water. Especially from 24°C to 30°C, almost the same numerical values were obtained. Therefore, in all subsequent trunk gravity axis tests, experiments were conducted using water with the water temperature set at 24°C to 30°C. Although not shown in the figure, the results of experiments on rugby players showed that the highest value of the water with sound waves + 1 / f fluctuation added to the water stirred by total meteorites + total minerals + infrared radiation at 4°C was surprisingly 32.5 kg↑ excluding the amount of Evian as a basis.

[0111] <Example 55> Example of trunk gravity axis test by type, weight, and second of meteorites For the weighing of each meteorite, a Shimadzu high-precision analytical electronic balance BM capable of weighing 0.01 mg was used in the Toxicology Laboratory of the Faculty of Pharmacy, Showa University for all measurements. 100 mL was taken out with a 500 mL graduated cylinder. (A) Stony meteorite, (B) Iron meteorite, (C) Stony-iron meteorite, (D-1) Tektite, (D-2) Moldavite, (D-3) Libyan glass, and the above 100 types of unclassified meteorites were ground using the FV-250 model of Chuo Kako Co., Ltd. to obtain meteorite powder with an average particle size of 20 μm to 40 μm. From this, exactly 1.00 g was taken out from each to obtain 100 g of meteorite powder of 100 types. A total of 100 g of meteorites was used. For meteorites smaller than that, the tap water in Yokkaichi City, Mie Prefecture was dispensed into a 1000 mL beaker and stirred (magnetic stirrer REXIM, rotation speed 500 rpm). After immersing the meteorites therein, the meteorites were taken out. Three coffee filters were used for removing the meteorites. The filtration time was rounded up to a total of 100 seconds and 10 seconds of the time when water remained even though the water was in contact with the sample. Immediately after having 5 mL of that water drunk by each person, a trunk gravity axis test was conducted. The test was immediately after drinking, and there was no time for absorption from the gastrointestinal tract. The reason for using three filters even though it is possible to take out with tweezers is to make all conditions the same including when it is 0.000001 g (0.001 mg). Also, immediately after drinking, the subjects were not informed of anything and conducted only one type of trunk gravity axis test per day. Each person conducted the trunk gravity axis test three times for each mineral, and the extremely weak and extremely strong people were excluded to obtain the average value.

[0112] In all subsequent experiments, unless otherwise stated, (a) for weighing minerals, an electronic balance BM0.01mg capable of high-precision analysis manufactured by Shimadzu Corporation was used. (b) A magnifying glass for craftsmen was used to cut out minerals with a dental diamond disk or shave them with a dental diamond bar to adjust each mineral to the target weight. (c) 100 mL of tap water from Yokkaichi City, Mie Prefecture was used for the experiment. (d) A magnetic stirrer REXIM was used to stir the water at a rotation speed of 500 rpm. (e) The minerals were immersed in the stirred water. (f) To take out the minerals from the stirred water, three coffee filters were used for filtration and received in a beaker under the filter paper. (g) The filtration time was set to two types: a total of 100 seconds and 10 seconds for the time when the water remained but the minerals were still in contact. (h) The subject drank 5 mL of the water in which the minerals were immersed and filtered. (i) Immediately after drinking, the subject underwent a trunk gravity axis test only once a day without being informed of anything. (j) For each mineral, one person performed the trunk gravity axis test three times, excluding those who were extremely weak or extremely strong, and the average value was obtained and described. For various meteorites ((A) stony meteorite, (B) iron meteorite, (C) stony-iron meteorite, (D-1) tektite, (D-2) moldavite, (D-3) Libyan glass), the weights were changed to 100 g, 10 g, 1 g, 100 mg, 10 mg, 1 mg, 0.1 mg, 0.01 mg, and 0.001 mg respectively, and the experiment was conducted according to the above procedures (a) to (j). Subsequently, for various meteorites of 100 mg or less, those pulverized into powder form were used. The pulverizer was the FV-250 type of Chuo Kako Kikai Co., Ltd., and those pulverized to an average particle size of 20 μm to 40 μm of the meteorite were used. Also, for those with a small quantity, those pulverized to an average particle size of 20 μm to 40 μm of the meteorite by the crusher (hammer type) NH-34S of Sanjo Industry Co., Ltd. were used. Up to 0.1 mg, it was directly measured using the Shimadzu Corporation's high-precision analytical electronic balance BM capable of weighing 0.01 mg. Since the amount below that was too small to be directly measured, 1 mg was stirred with 100 mL of distilled water using a magnetic stirrer REXIM at a rotation speed of 500 rpm. While stirring, 1 mL was dispensed from it, and the coffee filter was stacked three times for filtration to obtain the crushed mineral. It was naturally dried to obtain 0.01 mg. Since measurement was impossible, it was used as the theoretical value. For weighing minerals below that, it was determined as shown in Table 39.

[0113]

Table 39

[0114] For all minerals, weighing below 0.1 mg was performed using the same method as above. From here on, in the experiment, there was a difference of 100 seconds and 10 seconds in the time when the meteorite's weight and the meteorite contacted the tap water in Yokkaichi, but basically the same operations were carried out. Experiments were conducted with 100 mL of stirred tap water in Yokkaichi and meteorites of 100 g, 10 g, 1 g (1,000 mg), 0.1 g (100 mg), 0.01 g (10 mg), 0.001 g (1 mg), 0.0001 g (0.1 mg), 0.00001 g (0.01 mg), 0.000001 g (0.001 mg) for 100 seconds and 10 seconds each. The total meteorites used here were the same as the above total meteorites (100 types of meteorites). First, the results of the weight of each type of meteorite being 100 g and the contact time with the tap water in Yokkaichi being 100 seconds are shown in Table 40.

[0115]

Table 40

[0116] <Example 56> The experimental procedure was as described above, and the experiment was conducted with the time for immersing the meteorite in the tap water of Yokkaichi changed from 100 seconds to 10 seconds. The results for 10 seconds with the weight of each type of meteorite being 100 g are shown in Table 41.

[0117]

Table 41

[0118] <Example 57> The results for 100 seconds with the weight of each type of meteorite being 10 g and in contact with the tap water of Yokkaichi are shown in Table 42.

[0119]

Table 42

[0120] <Example 58> The experiment was conducted with the time for immersing the meteorite in the tap water of Yokkaichi changed from 100 seconds to 10 seconds. The results for 10 seconds with the weight of each type of meteorite being 10.00 g are shown in Table 43. The results were almost the same even when changed from 100 seconds to 10 seconds.

[0121]

Table 43

[0122] <Example 59> The results for 100 seconds with the weight of each type of meteorite being 1 g and in contact with the tap water of Yokkaichi are shown in Table 44.

[0123]

Table 44

[0124] <Example 60> The experiment was conducted with the time for immersing the meteorite in the tap water of Yokkaichi changed from 100 seconds to 10 seconds. The results are shown in Table 45. The results were almost the same even when changed from 100 seconds to 10 seconds.

[0125]

Table 45

[0126] <Example 61> The results of the weight of 0.1 g (100 mg) of each type of meteorite and the contact time of 100 seconds with the tap water in Yokkaichi are shown in Table 46.

[0127] [Table 46]

[0128] <Example 62> An experiment was conducted with the immersion time of the meteorite in the tap water of Yokkaichi changed from 100 seconds to 10 seconds. The weights of 0.100 g (100 mg) of each type of meteorite and the results for 10 seconds are shown in Table 47. The results were almost the same even when the time was changed from 100 seconds to 10 seconds.

[0129] [Table 47]

[0130] <Example 63> The results of the weight of 0.01 g (10 mg) of each type of meteorite and the contact time of 100 seconds with the tap water in Yokkaichi are shown in Table 48.

[0131] [Table 48]

[0132] <Example 64> An experiment was conducted with the immersion time of the meteorite in the tap water of Yokkaichi changed from 100 seconds to 10 seconds. The weights of 0.010 g (10 mg) of each type of meteorite and the results for 10 seconds are shown in Table 49. The results were almost the same even when the time was changed from 100 seconds to 10 seconds.

[0133] [Table 49]

[0134] <Example 65> Table 50 shows the results of exposing various types of meteorites with a weight of 0.001 g (1 mg) to the tap water in Yokkaichi for 100 seconds. It was found that there was almost no difference due to the size of the meteorites from 100 g to 0.001 g (1 mg), and all were effective.

[0135]

Table 50

[0136] <Example 66> An experiment was conducted with the immersion time of the meteorites in the tap water of Yokkaichi changed from 100 seconds to 10 seconds. Table 51 shows the results of exposing various types of meteorites with a weight of 0.001 g (1 mg) for 10 seconds. The results were almost the same even when the time was changed from 100 seconds to 10 seconds. That is, it was found that there was almost no difference due to the size of the meteorites from 100 g to 0.001 g (1 mg) and the time, and all were effective.

[0137]

Table 51

[0138] <Example 67> Table 52 shows the results of exposing various types of meteorites with a weight of 0.0001 g (0.1 mg) to the tap water in Yokkaichi for 100 seconds. It was found that when the weight of the meteorite was 0.0001 g (0.1 mg), the efficacy was halved.

[0139]

Table 52

[0140] <Example 68> An experiment was conducted with the immersion time of the meteorites in the tap water of Yokkaichi changed from 100 seconds to 10 seconds. Table 53 shows the results of exposing various types of meteorites with a weight of 0.0001 g (0.1 mg) for 10 seconds. It was found that when the weight of the meteorite was 0.0001 g (0.1 mg), although the efficacy was halved, it had the ability to eliminate the adverse effects of the tap water.

[0141]

Table 53

[0142] <Example 69> The results of the weight of 0.00001 g (0.01 mg) for each type of meteorite and 100 seconds of contact with the tap water in Yokkaichi are shown in Table 54. It was found that when the weight of the meteorite is 0.00001 g (0.01 mg), it has the power to cancel out the negative effects of the tap water.

Table 54

[0143] <Example 70> An experiment was conducted with the immersion time of the meteorite in the tap water of Yokkaichi changed from 100 seconds to 10 seconds. The results of the weight of 0.00001 g (0.01 mg) for each type of meteorite and 10 seconds are shown in Table 55. When the weight of the meteorite is 0.00001 g (0.01 mg), it has the power to cancel out the negative effects of the tap water. The results were almost the same even when the time was changed from 100 seconds to 10 seconds.

[0144]

Table 55

[0145] <Example 71> The results of the weight of 0.000001 g (0.001 mg) for each type of meteorite and 100 seconds of contact with the tap water in Yokkaichi are shown in Table 56. Even when the weight of the meteorite is 0.000001 g (0.001 mg), stony meteorites, iron meteorites, and stony-iron meteorites barely have the power to cancel out the negative effects of the tap water, but this was not observed for tektites, moldavites, and Libyan glass. It was found that the action of the meteorite is affected when the weight of the meteorite is 0.00001 g (0.01 mg) or more and for 100 seconds with respect to 100 mL.

[0146]

Table 56

[0147] <Example 72> An experiment was conducted by changing the time for immersing the meteorite in the tap water of Yokkaichi from 100 seconds to 10 seconds. The weight of each type of meteorite was 0.000001 g (0.001 mg), and the results for 10 seconds are shown in Table 57. Even when the weight of the meteorite was 0.000001 g (0.001 mg), stony meteorites, iron meteorites, and stony-iron meteorites had a barely detectable ability to cancel out the negative effects of tap water, but this was not observed for tektites, moldavites, or Libyan glass. The results were almost the same even when the time was changed from 100 seconds to 10 seconds. It was proven that there was little difference between a weight of 1 mg for 10 seconds and a weight of 100 g for 100 seconds. That is, even if a meteorite that has become +10 kg is immersed in water for more than an hour, it will not become +15 kg. Also, even when the size of the meteorite was increased by a factor of 10, the force did not increase by a factor of 10. However, it is also a fact that if it is too small, the effect will disappear.

[0148]

Table 57

[0149] As a result, due to the presence of the meteorite in the flowing water passage in the container, it is unclear whether the vibration of the meteorite can be imparted to the flowing water passing through here and change the properties (cluster size) of the water itself, but all the subjects wondered why the same water had increased power. It is a true fact that seems like a lie. The Earth was formed by the accumulation of meteorites 4.56 billion years ago. All the stones, wood, air, water, and even our bodies that are lying around here are directly related to meteorites at the atomic and molecular levels, even though their appearance and form may change. It is reasonable to think that meteorites continue to hold all the information about the evolutionary history of the solar system, the origin and evolutionary history of our humanity, and even the information before the formation of our solar system. Therefore, in order to clarify the mechanism, we had a conversation with the Department of Histology and Anatomy, School of Medicine, Showa University. One of the inventors, Yasunori Hori, was appointed visiting professor of tissue anatomy at Showa University School of Medicine on July 1, 2009. At the time, it was the most prolific research lab in Japan, with over 70 papers published per year, and was accepted by Nature and Science. The professor was Seiji Shiota, who was doing 10 years' worth of research at other schools in one year. Shiota is a world authority on peptides. The lab had 65 excellent staff members, including overdoctors, and three technicians. The lab had received about 600 million yen in grants for three consecutive years. In October 2015, 81 people, including the tissue anatomy staff, biochemistry staff, toxicology staff from the School of Pharmacy, and other interested professors, discussed the project, but they looked at the data, experienced it, and were all puzzled, and no conclusion was reached. It was thought that the meteorite's vibrations (waves in quantum mechanics) were affecting the water clusters, but it was concluded that further progress in quantum mechanics was needed to explain this phenomenon. Therefore, this patent was written with a predetermined conclusion in mind. Water is essential for living cells, and it is well known that drinking water has a significant impact on human health. For example, it has been scientifically proven that certain types of mineral water boost human immunity and natural killer cell activity, promoting anti-cancer immunity in mice. Natural mineral water contains various dissolved substances, which is probably why it is said to be good for human health. In addition, 13 types of aquaporins (AQPs) are known in humans. AQP2 and AQP3 are involved in water reabsorption and are abundant in the kidneys, while AQP7 and AQP9 are involved in glycerol metabolism and are abundant in fat cells and the liver. There are various aquaporins in the intestines that are involved in water absorption.

[0150] <Example 73> Heavy Water On the other hand, it is conceivable that water treated with special meteorites, stones, and ceramics could have a beneficial effect on human health and the growth of animals and plants, even if no minerals are leached from it. If the above phenomenon occurs, it is considered that either the water molecules themselves have changed or the clusters have changed. When water itself has changed, the water molecules that make up water consist of two hydrogen atoms and one oxygen atom. In addition to the atoms that make up the majority of hydrogen and oxygen, a small amount of atoms with different weights are mixed in. As a result, even though it is just called water, in addition to ordinary water H2O, a small amount of water heavier than this is contained. A typical example of heavy water is D2O, which contains hydrogen D (deuterium), which is twice as heavy as ordinary hydrogen H, instead of ordinary hydrogen. However, in the case of humans, there is no report that heavy water has had an impact. It is said that even in mice, no abnormalities were shown when 15% of ordinary water was replaced with heavy water. However, if it exceeds 30%, it will lead to death, and in 100% heavy water, the muscles of frogs do not contract, and bacteria also grow extremely slowly. However, the main component of meteorites does not contain palladium, nor are they being discharged while immersed in meteorites, nor are they being irradiated with ultrasonic waves. That is, it seems that no extra heavy water is being generated, but just in case, a test was conducted to see if heavy water was produced. The method was as follows: Samples were taken, and the heavy water concentration at 25°C was measured at the School of Medicine, Showa University by the zinc decomposition method and a mass spectrometer. The results are shown in Table 58. In all cases, it was the same as the naturally occurring 0.0149% with no change from the tap water in Yokkaichi. Although there was an error of ±0.0001, heavy water did not seem to be related.

[0151]

Table 58

[0152] <Example 74> Changes in water due to the frequency of sound It was confirmed that water to which sound waves of 23 Hz, 24 Hz, 25 Hz, 10,000 Hz, 20,000 Hz, 28,000 Hz, and 40,000 Hz were applied showed visible changes. That is, the structural change of water due to the frequency of sound is clear. Fig. 33 shows the photographic illustration. Tap water in Yokkaichi without sound waves applied was used as a control. As a result, waves could be drawn at 23 Hz, 24 Hz, and 25 Hz, but the wavelength became longer from 10,000 Hz, and at 20,000 Hz, the water only broke into water droplets and did not draw waves. It was considered that 10,000 Hz is the maximum frequency for generating waves. Aquaporin is located on the plasma membrane of cells and was discovered in 1992. It exists in all organisms from bacteria to mammals and plays an important role in connecting water and life. The function for water molecules to pass through the biological membrane is aquaporin, a membrane protein. In the examples, we measured whether a meteorite can change the structure (cluster) of water and whether the water cluster increases the water permeability of aquaporin. First of all, we conducted an experiment to see whether a meteorite can change the tap water in Yokkaichi into tap water with high aquaporin permeability. Fig. 34 shows a schematic diagram of aquaporin. Aquaporin is a protein that has the special property of allowing water to pass through a narrow pore with a diameter of about 3 angstroms for water molecules to pass directly through, and water passes through one molecule at a time. During passage, the hydrogen bonds between water molecules are broken by the interaction with surrounding amino acids and temporarily become single-molecule water, so amino acids are considered to be very important elements. When water permeates through aquaporin, it is thought that water is decomposed into individual molecules and about 10 million molecules pass through per second. It is strange that the water clusters inside and outside the cell are related in such a situation, but it was suggested that the speed of water passing through the pore of aquaporin may change due to the difference in the structure of water. This report considered that when measuring the permeability of aquaporin of water treated with a meteorite, a nearly accurate value can be obtained by measuring the structural change of water as a solvent when passing through aquaporin. As factors affecting the opening of aquaporin, phosphorylation, pH, Ca 2+, pressure, osmotic pressure, temperature, and nutrient components are known. If these factors are completely excluded, the difference in aquaporin water permeability would depend on the properties of the water molecules themselves. It was confirmed that the change in water permeability due to meteorites also occurred when using distilled water, and the water permeability of the distilled water was almost the same as that of the tap water from which it was derived.

[0153] Water molecules are adsorbed and aggregated on the surfaces and interfaces of various substances on Earth, significantly affecting physical properties such as electrical and heat conduction characteristics, chemical properties such as corrosiveness and catalytic activity, mechanical properties such as friction, and even life functions. The properties and functions of such surface and interface water molecule aggregation systems are largely governed by not only the translational structure (oxygen arrangement) of water molecules in the hydrogen bond network but also their anisotropic up / down orientation structure (hydrogen arrangement). In particular, since water molecules are polar molecules, their orientation structure influences the potential distribution at the surface and interface. Also, when forming hydrogen bonds, the hydrogen of a water molecule is donated to other water molecules, and the oxygen of a water molecule has the property of accepting hydrogen from other water molecules. Therefore, it is considered that the orientation structure of water molecules also determines the acid-base characteristics and the direction of proton transfer flow at the surface and interface. Thus, the orientation of water molecules is essentially important structural information related to the properties and functions of the hydrogen bond network at the surface and interface. So far, studies on water molecules on solid surfaces have been actively conducted by various surface science experimental methods such as electron beams, X-rays, and scanning probe microscopes. These studies have revealed that water molecules on the surfaces of metals and oxides, unlike the hydrogen bond network of the six-membered ring structure in the bulk of crystalline ice, may form specific hydrogen bonds consisting of rings of 4, 5, 7, 8 molecules, etc., and complex long-period structures. Therefore, experiments on aquaporin were then carried out using metals and oxides.

[0154] <Example 75> Measurement of Aquaporin Water Permeability 1. Materials and Treatments, Methods This was carried out using the tap water in Yokkaichi City. 1 g of meteorite was placed in 500 mL of tap water or distilled water and treated at room temperature for 3 hours. When treating the water sample with a microwave oven, a Panasonic microwave oven NE-1802 1100 was used and treated at 700 W for 5 minutes. Also, 32 - 160 L of distilled water (manufactured by Coolfurniture) was used for the preparation of distilled water. Also, it was treated at room temperature for 3 minutes at the normal power with an ultrasonic device (Branson 2510) at an oscillation frequency of 40 kHz. The meteorites used were total meteorites, and for weighing, in order to ensure accuracy, all were weighed at the Toxicology Laboratory of the Faculty of Pharmacy, Showa University using an electronic balance BM capable of weighing 0.01 mg manufactured by Shimadzu Corporation.

[0155] 2. Measurement of the water permeability of aquaporin using Xenopus laevis oocytes Figure 35 shows the state of the experiment using Xenopus laevis. The water permeability of aquaporin was measured using Xenopus laevis oocytes. RNA made from the aquaporin gene was injected into the oocytes. Then, aquaporin was synthesized inside the cells and located on the egg membrane. The oocytes expressing aquaporin were placed in various kinds of water. Specifically, egg masses (oocytes at stage V - VI (1 - 1.2 mm)) were removed from Xenopus laevis and treated with 1 mg / mL of collagenase (Sigma type II, solution: 100 mM NaCl, 2 mM KCl, 1 mM mg Cl2, and 5 mM Hepes - Tris pH 7.5) at 20°C for 2 hours to obtain oocytes. In addition, the oocytes from which the outer membrane had been removed were washed with modified Barth's medium (MBS, 88 mM NaCl, 1 mM KCl, 2.4 mM NaHCO3, 0.4 mM Ca(NO3)2, 0.4 mM CaCl2, 0.8 mM mg SO4, 100 μg / mL Na - penicillin, and 100 μg / mL Streptomycin, 15 mM Tris - HCl pH 7.4). cRNA was injected at 50 ng / 50 nl using a nanoliter injection device (manufactured by Narishige). The injected oocytes were cultured in MBS (200 mOsmin) for 2 days. To measure water permeability, the injected and cultured oocytes were placed in the test water (0 mOsmout), the expansion of the oocytes was measured with a digital camera (manufactured by Shimadzu Corporation), and the expansion rate was calculated with Motik Image Plus 21S (manufactured by Shimadzu Corporation). The water permeability (Pf) was calculated by the following (Equation 1) from the magnitude of the expansion rate (V / V0 (d(V / Vo) / dt), the initial magnitude (V0 = 9 × 10 -4 cm 3 ), the surface area of the initial oocyte (S = 0.045 cm 2 ), and the molecular weight of water 4 (Vw = 18 cm 3 / mol). Pf = V0[d(V / V0) / dt] / [S × Vw(Osmin - Osmout)] (Equation 1) Xenopus laevis can be egg-collected almost throughout the year by hormone injection. Since adults also live in water and feed by smell, artificial feed can be used (reared with mass feed). As long as the water quality can be maintained, rearing is easy.

[0156] In addition, the range that can usually be heard by the ear is a frequency of 20 Hz to 20,000 Hz. Those with a low frequency of 1 Hz to 1,200 Hz are called low frequencies, and those with a high frequency of 10,000 Hz or more are called high frequencies. The experimental systems conducted were 18 types shown in Table 59.

[0157]

Table 59

[0158] The expanding size of the eggs was measured to calculate the water permeability. The measurement of the glycerol permeability was performed by putting the oocytes expressing aquaporin into a glycerol solution and, after a certain time, colorimetrically quantifying the amount of glycerol taken up by the oocytes. Since there are large individual differences in the oocytes of Xenopus laevis, the experiment was conducted with at least 10 oocytes in one experiment and the average was obtained. The results are shown in Table 60 together with the results of Example 76. In the sound experiment, the water aquaporin permeability was such that the absorption of water irradiated with sound waves of 8.23 Hz, 9.24 Hz, and 10.25 Hz improved, while the absorption deteriorated in water irradiated with high sound waves of 11. Also, the absorption rate decreased even in water heated in a microwave oven. It was thought that the absorption rate would increase because water molecules are subdivided when heated in a microwave oven, but the opposite was true. It seemed difficult to explain this phenomenon. In FIGS. 36 and 37, the results are shown as bar graphs. From this, it was understood that sound waves and 1 / f fluctuations are effective. Also, it was found that significant effects are shown when water passes non - contact near the minerals of the present embodiment (14, 15, 16). Aquaporin 3 (AQP3) is abundantly distributed in the skin and plays an important role in the supply of water and glycerol to the skin. Thirteen types of aquaporins have been found in humans. Among them, AQP3 is a unique aquaporin that has the property of permeating not only water but also glycerol and is also called an aquaglyceroporin.

[0159] In humans, in addition to AQP3, there are two aquaporins called aquaglyceroporins, which are abundantly distributed in adipocytes and the liver and are deeply involved in glycerol metabolism. Aquaglyceroporin is an aquaporin commonly found in primitive microorganisms. Aquaporin is a relatively small membrane protein of about 30 kD, but a pore in the shape of an hourglass is open in the center. The narrowest part of the hourglass - shaped pore is only about 3 angstroms in size, and a water molecule of 2.8 angstroms can barely pass through one by one. Therefore, it is considered that water with high aquaporin permeability has a structure that can pass through this narrow part faster. Since glycerol is larger than a water molecule, the pore of AQP3 is larger than other aquaporins. However, the water passing through AQP3 passes one molecule at a time, just like other aquaporins. It has been found that where water passes depends not only on the size of the hole but also on the electrical property characteristics of the amino acids near the hole.

[0160] <Example 76> Measurement of Glycerol Permeability CRNA of aquaporin 3 (AQP3) with glycerol permeability was injected into Xenopus laevis oocytes. As test water, glycerol and ×10 Birth Medium salt solution were added to meteorite water (distilled water) or control distilled water to prepare a final concentration of 200 mM glycerol and ×1 Birth Medium. For the measurement of glycerol permeability, a 24-well plastic culture plate was used. Oocytes were transferred to the plate wells, 1 ml of glycerol-containing Birth Medium was added, and the plate was left standing at 20 °C for 30 minutes. After washing three times with Birth Medium, the oocytes were transferred to a microtube, 50 μL of Assay Buffer of the glycerol measurement kit (BioVision Free Glycerol Assay kit) was added, and the oocytes were ruptured and lysed with a pipette and centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 5 minutes. After centrifugation, 5 μL of the enzyme mixture of the kit was added to 5 μL of the supernatant, and after reacting for 30 minutes, the absorbance was measured at OD562nm. The glycerol concentration was calculated based on the absorbance of the standard. The results are shown in Table 60. In this example, it was suggested that distilled water and tap water treated with meteorites are water that easily permeates aquaporin, and further promotes glycerol permeability. In addition, even only ceramics (including pottery clay) with an infrared emissivity of 90% or more at a wavelength of 2 μm to 14 μm had a significant effect. Although we would like to conduct experiments with each meteorite, the experiment on aquaporin using Xenopus laevis eggs is over. As described above, in the experiment using Xenopus laevis eggs, high-frequency (ultrasonic waves) were not well absorbed. Therefore, it was found that the effective sound wave frequency is 20 Hz to 10,000 Hz.

[0161]

Table 60

[0162] <Example 77> Examples of trunk gravity axis tests by meteorite type, weight, second, and total meteorites Experiments were conducted using the method described in Example 55. (A) Stony meteorite, (B) Iron meteorite, (C) Stony-iron meteorite, (D-1) Tektite, (D-2) Moldavite, (D-3) Libyan glass were each used with weights varying as 100 g, 10 g, 1 g, 100 mg, 10 mg, 1 mg, 0.1 mg, 0.01 mg, 0.001 mg, and experiments were carried out following the procedures (a) to (c) of Example 55 above. For various meteorites of 100 mg or less hereafter, those pulverized into powder form were used. Speaking from the conclusions, there were no significant differences among the meteorites experimented on. The pulverizer used was the FV-250 type of Chuo Kako Kikai Co., Ltd., and those pulverized to an average particle size of 20 μm to 40 μm of meteorites were used. For those in small quantities, those pulverized to an average particle size of 20 μm to 40 μm of meteorites by the crusher (hammer type) NH-34S of Sanjo Industries Co., Ltd. were used. Up to 0.1 mg, it was directly measured using the Shimadzu Corporation's high-precision analytical electronic balance BM capable of weighing 0.01 mg. For those below that, since they were too little to be directly measured, 1 mg was stirred with 500 mL of distilled water using a magnetic stirrer REXIM at a rotation speed of 500 rpm, and 1 mL was dispensed from it, and the crushed minerals were obtained by filtering through three stacked coffee filters. It was naturally dried to obtain 0.01 mg, but it was impossible to measure and was a theoretical value. For the weighing of minerals below that, it was determined by the method shown in Table 39. For the total meteorites used here, 100 types of meteorites described in <Example 16> were used. Specifically, for each of the 100 types of meteorites, 1 g was taken out each time, and after thoroughly mixing them each time, 100 g was obtained. In the case of 10 g, 10 g was taken out after mixing 100 g of the well-mixed meteorite powder. In the case of 1 g, 1 g was taken out in the same way. The trunk gravity axis test was carried out according to <Example 28>. The same was done in the following. The results of the trunk gravity axis test for 100 g of each type of meteorite and 100 seconds are shown in Table 61.

[0163]

Table 61

[0164] <Example 78> The results of the trunk gravity axis test for 100 g of various types of meteorites for 10 seconds are shown in Table 62.

[0165]

Table 62

[0166] <Example 79> The results of the trunk gravity axis test for 10 g of various types of meteorites for 100 seconds are shown in Table 63.

[0167]

Table 63

[0168] <Example 80> An experiment was conducted with the time for immersing the meteorite in water changed from 100 seconds to 10 seconds. The results of the trunk gravity axis test for 10.00 g of various types of meteorites for 10 seconds are shown in Table 64. The results were almost the same even when it was changed from 100 seconds to 10 seconds.

[0169]

Table 64

[0170] <Example 81> The results of the trunk gravity axis test for 1 g of various types of meteorites for 100 seconds are shown in Table 65.

[0171]

Table 65

[0172] <Example 82> An experiment was conducted with the time for immersing the meteorite in water changed from 100 seconds to 10 seconds. The results of the trunk gravity axis test for 1.00 g of various types of meteorites for 10 seconds are shown in Table 66. The results were almost the same even when it was changed from 100 seconds to 10 seconds.

[0173]

Table 66

[0174] <Example 83> The results of the body trunk gravity axis test for 100 seconds with a weight of 0.1 g (100 mg) for each type of meteorite are shown in Table 67.

[0175]

Table 67

[0176] <Example 84> An experiment was conducted with the time of immersing the meteorite in water changed from 100 seconds to 10 seconds. The results of the body trunk gravity axis test for 10 seconds with a weight of 0.100 g (100 mg) for each type of meteorite are shown in Table 68. The results were almost the same even when the time was changed from 100 seconds to 10 seconds.

[0177]

Table 68

[0178] <Example 85> The results of the body trunk gravity axis test for 100 seconds with a weight of 0.01 g (10 mg) for each type of meteorite are shown in Table 69.

[0179]

Table 69

[0180] <Example 86> An experiment was conducted with the time of immersing the meteorite in water changed from 100 seconds to 10 seconds. The results of the body trunk gravity axis test for 10 seconds with a weight of 0.010 g (10 mg) for each type of meteorite are shown in Table 70. The results were almost the same even when the time was changed from 100 seconds to 10 seconds.

[0181]

Table 70

[0182] <Example 87> The results of the trunk gravity axis test for 100 seconds with the weight of each type of meteorite being 0.001 g (1 mg) are shown in Table 71. There is no doubt that the meteorites are large from 100 g to 0.001 g (1 mg), but it was found that there is almost no difference due to size and they have almost the same efficacy.

[0183]

Table 71

[0184] <Example 88> An experiment was conducted with the time of immersing the meteorite in water changed from 100 seconds to 10 seconds. The results of the trunk gravity axis test for 10 seconds with the weight of each type of meteorite being 0.001 g (1 mg) are shown in Table 72. The difference due to the size of the meteorite was not very large from 100 g to 0.001 g. Also, the results were almost the same even when the time was changed from 100 seconds to 10 seconds.

[0185]

Table 72

[0186] <Example 89> The results of the trunk gravity axis test for 100 seconds with the weight of each type of meteorite being 0.0001 g (0.1 mg) are shown in Table 73. The efficacy was halved when the weight of the meteorite was 0.0001 g (0.1 mg).

[0187]

Table 73

[0188] <Example 90> An experiment was conducted with the time of immersing the meteorite in water changed from 100 seconds to 10 seconds. The results of the trunk gravity axis test for 10 seconds with the weight of each type of meteorite being 0.0001 g (0.1 mg) are shown in Table 74. It was found that although the efficacy is halved from the weight of the meteorite being 0.0001 g (0.1 mg), the adverse effects of tap water can be completely eliminated.

[0189]

Table 74

[0190] <Example 91> The results of the trunk gravity axis test for 100 seconds with the weight of each type of meteorite being 0.00001 g (0.01 mg) are shown in Table 75. It was found that with the weight of the meteorite being 0.00001 g (0.01 mg), it has the ability to cancel out the negative effects of tap water.

[0191]

Table 75

[0192] <Example 92> An experiment was conducted with the time of immersing the meteorite in water changed from 100 seconds to 10 seconds. The results of the trunk gravity axis test for 10 seconds with the weight of each type of meteorite being 0.00001 g (0.01 mg) are shown in Table 76. It was found that with the weight of the meteorite being 0.00001 g (0.01 mg), it has the ability to cancel out the negative effects of tap water. The results were almost the same even when changing from 100 seconds to 10 seconds.

[0193]

Table 76

[0194] <Example 93> The results of the trunk gravity axis test for 100 seconds with the weight of each type of meteorite being 0.000001 g (0.001 mg) are shown in Table 77. Even meteorites with a weight as small as 0.000001 g (0.001 mg), such as stony meteorites, iron meteorites, and stony-iron meteorites, have a barely detectable ability to counteract the negative effects of tap water, while this effect was not observed in tektites, moldavites, or Libyan glass. It was found that the effect of meteorites becomes noticeable when the weight of the meteorite is 0.00001 g (0.01 mg) or more, and the exposure time is 100 seconds for 500 mL of water.

[0195]

Table 77

[0196] <Example 94> The results of the 10-second body trunk gravity axis tests for various types of meteorites with weights of 0.000001 g (0.001 mg) are shown in Table 78. Even meteorites with a weight as small as 0.000001 g (0.001 mg), such as stony meteorites, iron meteorites, and stony-iron meteorites, have a barely detectable ability to counteract the negative effects of tap water, while this effect was not observed in tektites, moldavites, or Libyan glass. Even when the exposure time was changed from 100 seconds to 10 seconds, the results were almost the same. It was proven that there is not much difference between a 10-second exposure with a 1 mg meteorite and a 100-second exposure with a 100 g meteorite. That is, even if a meteorite weighing more than 10 kg is immersed in water for more than an hour, it will not reach a positive value of 15 kg. As a result, when a meteorite is present in the flowing water passage in the container, it is unclear whether the vibration of the meteorite can be imparted to the flowing water passing through here and change the properties (cluster size) of the water itself. However, all the subjects wonder why the same water seems to gain strength. This is a true fact that seems like a lie.

[0197]

Table 78

[0198] <Example 95> Example of determining the effective value based on the mixing ratio of meteorites in ceramics and the particle size of meteorites For various types of meteorites, the ones pulverized into a powder with an average particle size of 20 μm to 40 μm by the FV-250 type pulverizer of Central Chemical Engineering Co., Ltd. were mixed into the ceramic material silicon nitride (Si3N4), fired at 1,500 °C for 3 hours, and then naturally cooled were used. Also, 10 g of ceramic containing meteorite was prepared with 9 g of ceramic material (aluminum oxide (Al2O3)) and 1 g of meteorite, and the same experiment was conducted. Taking those who drank 5 mL of tap water in Yokkaichi City, Mie Prefecture and conducted the trunk gravity axis test as the control with 0.0 kg. The data are shown in Table 79.

[0199]

Table 79

[0200] Subsequently, 10 g of 100% silicon nitride ceramic was fired, and the same experiment was conducted. As the firing kiln, the ultra-high speed temperature rising electric furnace NE-4060H (maximum temperature 1,800 °C) manufactured by Motoyama was used. First, only the ceramic material was prepared, and the results of the trunk gravity axis test immediately after obtaining water and drinking 5 mL after immersing it in water for 100 seconds and 10 seconds are shown in Table 80. Therefore, 10 g of 100% alumina ceramics, which are other ceramic materials, were fired and the trunk gravity axis test was conducted. There seems to be a little influence of infrared radiation, but there were changes in a small range in the trunk gravity axis test both for 100 seconds and 10 seconds with only the ceramic. Therefore, experiments were conducted to see if there were differences with other fine ceramic materials, and they were almost the same.

[0201]

Table 80

[0202] <Example 96> The results of the trunk gravity axis test immediately after obtaining water and drinking 5 mL after immersing 10 g of zirconia in the tap water of Yokkaichi for 100 seconds and 10 seconds are shown in Table 81.

[0203]

Table 81

[0204] <Example 97> The results of the trunk gravity axis test immediately after drinking 5 mL of water obtained by immersing 10 g of silicon carbide in the tap water of Yokkaichi for 100 seconds and then for 10 seconds are shown in Table 82.

[0205]

Table 82

[0206] <Example 98> The results of the trunk gravity axis test immediately after drinking 5 mL of water obtained by immersing 10 g of cordierite in the tap water of Yokkaichi for 100 seconds and then for 10 seconds are shown in Table 83.

[0207]

Table 83

[0208] <Example 99> The results of the trunk gravity axis test immediately after drinking 5 mL of water obtained by immersing 10 g of barium titanate in the tap water of Yokkaichi for 100 seconds and then for 10 seconds are shown in Table 84.

[0209]

Table 84

[0210] <Example 100> The results of the trunk gravity axis test immediately after drinking 5 mL of water obtained by immersing 10 g of zircon in the tap water of Yokkaichi for 100 seconds and then for 10 seconds are shown in Table 85.

[0211]

Table 85

[0212] <Example 101> The results of the trunk gravity axis test immediately after drinking 5 mL of water obtained by immersing 10 g of mullite in the tap water of Yokkaichi for 100 seconds and then for 10 seconds are shown in Table 86.

[0213]

Table 86

[0214] <Example 102> The results of the trunk gravity axis test immediately after drinking 5 mL of water obtained by immersing 10 g of aluminum nitride in the tap water of Yokkaichi for 100 seconds and then for 10 seconds are shown in Table 87.

[0215]

Table 87

[0216] <Example 103> The results of the trunk gravity axis test immediately after drinking 5 mL of water obtained by immersing 10 g of silicon nitride in the tap water of Yokkaichi for 100 seconds and then for 10 seconds are shown in Table 88.

[0217]

Table 88

[0218] <Example 104> The results of the trunk gravity axis test immediately after drinking 5 mL of water obtained by immersing 10 g of lead zirconate titanate in the tap water of Yokkaichi for 100 seconds and then for 10 seconds are shown in Table 89. The results were not good for lead zirconate titanate, but the results of the trunk gravity axis test were almost the same otherwise. The low value of lead zirconate titanate may be related to something other than infrared radiation. Since the main axis is set to infrared in this study, experiments were conducted here using a general-purpose ceramic material (alumina).

[0219]

Table 89

[0220] <Example 105> Preparation of Meteorite-Containing Ceramics They were made slightly larger to be 1.0 g after firing (1.3981 g), and the excess was trimmed off with an evans to make the weights uniform. Eight types of ceramics with meteorite contents of 10% (1 g = 1,000 mg), 1% (0.1 g = 100 mg), 0.1% (0.01 g = 10 mg), 0.01% (0.001 g = 1 mg), 0.001% (0.0001 g = 0.1 mg), 0.0001% (0.00001 g = 0.01 mg), 0.00001% (0.000001 g = 0.001 mg) were fired. Judging from the conclusions, it was considered that the greater the variety of meteorites, the more efficient.

[0221] <Example 106> Measurement under the conditions of 1 g (1,000 mg) of meteorite, 20 μm to 40 μm, and 100 seconds with 9 g of ceramic material As a result of conducting the same experiment with 10 g of ceramic, there was no change in the tap water in Yokkaichi City, Mie Prefecture. Therefore, the tap water in Yokkaichi was used as a control, and the data at that time was set to 0.0 kg. In subsequent experiments, the alumina content was corrected and the results were published. That is, for groups 1 to 10, the numbers obtained by subtracting 0.5 to 1.5 were published. Various types of meteorites were pulverized into a powder with an average particle size of 20 μm to 40 μm using a FV-250 type pulverizer of Chuo Kako Co., Ltd. and mixed with the ceramic material, and then fired at 1500 °C for 3 hours and naturally cooled. Silicon nitride was used as the ceramic material and fired at 1,500 °C for 3 hours. Meteorites pulverized to an average particle size of 20 μm to 40 μm and silicon nitride were used as the ceramic material to prepare 10 g of meteorite-containing ceramic, which was immersed in stirred water for 100 seconds. That is, 10 g of meteorite-containing ceramic was prepared with 9 g of ceramic material and 1 g (1,000 mg) of meteorite. After immersing 10 g of meteorite-containing ceramic in stirred tap water for 100 seconds, 5 mL of the water was drunk and a trunk gravity axis test was conducted. According to the study by the present inventor, there was no significant difference between the cases of using silicon nitride and using alumina as the ceramic material, and almost the same results were obtained. Therefore, unless otherwise specified, the results when using alumina as the ceramic material are shown in a table. In subsequent experiments, as shown in <Example 95>, the numbers obtained by subtracting 100 seconds or 10 seconds are listed, where Group 1 and Group 2 are 0.5, Group 3 to Group 5 are 0.5↑, Group 6 and Group 7 are 1.0, Group 8 and Group 9 are 1.0↑, and Group 10 is 1.5. Table 90 shows the results of experiments conducted using alumina instead of silicon nitride as the ceramic material.

[0222]

Table 90

[0223] <Example 107> Measurement under the conditions of 9 g of ceramic material, 1 g (1,000 mg) of meteorite, 20 μm to 40 μm, and 10 seconds Next, the same material as above, which was pulverized to an average particle size of 20 μm to 40 μm of the meteorite, was used to drink 5 mL of water with a contact time with tap water of 10 seconds in the same method, and a body trunk gravity axis test was conducted. The results are shown in Table 91. There was no change between 100 seconds and 10 seconds. In addition, the results were almost the same whether it was firing of clay for open firing or firing of clay for pottery.

[0224]

Table 91

[0225] <Example 108> Measurement under the conditions of 9 g of ceramic material, 1 g (1,000 mg) of meteorite, 300 μm, and 100 seconds Meteorite-containing ceramics were created in the same manner as described above. Using alumina, 10 g of meteorite-containing ceramics were created from meteorites crushed to an average particle size of 300 μm and a ceramic material, and immersed in stirred water for 100 seconds. That is, 10 g of meteorite-containing ceramics were created with 9 g (90%) of the ceramic material and 1 g (10%) of the meteorite, and after immersing 10 g of the meteorite-containing ceramics in stirred tap water for 100 seconds, 5 mL of the water was ingested and a trunk gravity axis test was conducted. The results are shown in Table 92. Compared with the results of Examples 106 and 107, there was no change. Incidentally, the results were almost the same whether it was firing of clay for open firing or firing of clay for pottery.

[0226]

Table 92

[0227] <Example 109> Measurement under the conditions of 9 g of ceramic material, 1 g (1,000 mg) of meteorite, 300 μm, and 10 seconds Next, using the same material as above crushed to an average meteorite particle size of 300 μm, a trunk gravity axis test was conducted by ingesting 5 mL of water that had been in contact with tap water for 10 seconds in the same manner. The results are shown in Table 93. Compared with the results of Example 108, there was no change. Incidentally, the results were almost the same whether it was firing of clay for open firing or firing of clay for pottery.

[0228]

Table 93

[0229] <Example 110> Measurement under the conditions of 9.9 g of ceramic material, 0.1 g (100 mg) of meteorite, 20 μm to 40 μm, and 100 seconds Meteorite-containing ceramics were created in the same manner as described above. Using alumina, 10 g of meteorite-containing ceramics were created from meteorites crushed to an average particle size of 20 μm to 40 μm and a ceramic material, and immersed in stirred water for 100 seconds. That is, 10 g of meteorite-containing ceramic was prepared with 9.9 g (99%) of ceramic material and 0.1 g of meteorite. After immersing the 10 g of meteorite-containing ceramic in stirred tap water for 100 seconds, 5 mL of the water was drunk, and a trunk gravity axis test was conducted. The results are shown in Table 94. Compared with the results of Example 109 etc., there was almost no change. Incidentally, the results were almost the same whether it was firing of clay for open firing or firing of clay for pottery.

[0230]

Table 94

[0231] <Example 111> Measurement under the conditions of 9.9 g of ceramic material, 0.1 g (100 mg) of meteorite, 20 μm to 40 μm, and 10 seconds Next, the same material as above, which was pulverized so that the average particle size of the meteorite was 20 μm to 40 μm, was used. After 10 seconds of contact time with tap water in the same manner as above, 5 mL of the water was drunk, and a trunk gravity axis test was conducted. The results are shown in Table 95. Compared with the results of Example 110 etc., there was almost no change. Incidentally, the results were almost the same whether it was firing of clay for open firing or firing of clay for pottery.

[0232]

Table 95

[0233] <Example 112> Measurement under the conditions of 9.9 g of ceramic material, 0.1 g (100 mg) of meteorite, 300 μm, and 100 seconds The meteorite-containing ceramic was prepared in the same manner as above. Using alumina for the meteorite pulverized to an average particle size of 300 μm and the ceramic material, 10 g of meteorite-containing ceramic was prepared with 9.9 g of ceramic material and 0.1 g (100 mg) of meteorite. After immersing it in stirred tap water for 100 seconds, 5 mL of the water was drunk, and a trunk gravity axis test was conducted. The results are shown in Table 96. Compared with the results of Example 111 etc., there was almost no change. Incidentally, the results were almost the same whether it was firing of clay for wild burning or firing of clay for pottery.

[0234]

Table 96

[0235] <Example 113> Measurement under the conditions of 9.9 g of ceramic material, 0.1 g of meteorite (100 mg), 300 μm, 10 seconds Next, 5 mL of water that was the same as the above-mentioned material pulverized to an average particle size of 300 μm of meteorite and had been in contact with tap water for 10 seconds was drunk, and a trunk gravity axis test was conducted. The results are shown in Table 97. Compared with the results of Example 112 etc., there was almost no change. Incidentally, the results were almost the same whether it was firing of clay for wild burning or firing of clay for pottery.

[0236]

Table 97

[0237] <Example 114> Measurement under the conditions of 9.99 g of ceramic material, 0.01 g of meteorite (10 mg), 20 μm - 40 μm, 100 seconds A meteorite-containing ceramic was prepared in the same manner as above. Using alumina for the meteorite pulverized to an average particle size of 20 μm - 40 μm and the ceramic material, 10 g of meteorite-containing ceramic was prepared with 9.99 g of ceramic material and 0.01 g of meteorite (10 mg), and 5 mL of the water after immersing it in stirred tap water for 100 seconds was drunk, and a trunk gravity axis test was conducted. The results are shown in Table 98. Compared with the results of Example 113 etc., there was almost no change. Incidentally, the results were almost the same whether it was firing of clay for wild burning or firing of clay for pottery.

[0238]

Table 98

[0239] <Example 115> Measurement under the conditions of 9.99 g of ceramic material, 0.01 g (10 mg) of meteorite, 20 μm to 40 μm, and 10 seconds Next, water with a contact time of 10 seconds with tap water was prepared in the same manner as above, with the meteorite ground to an average particle size of 20 μm to 40 μm. Then, 5 mL of this water was drunk, and a trunk gravity axis test was conducted. The results are shown in Table 99. Compared with the results of Example 114 etc., there was almost no change. Also, the results were almost the same whether it was firing of clay for open firing or firing of clay for pottery.

[0240]

Table 99

[0241] <Example 116> Measurement under the conditions of 9.99 g of ceramic material, 0.01 g (10 mg) of meteorite, 300 μm, and 100 seconds The meteorite-containing ceramic was prepared in the same manner as above. Using alumina, 10 g of meteorite-containing ceramic was prepared with 9.99 g (99.9%) of ceramic material and 0.01 g (10 mg) of meteorite, with the meteorite ground to an average particle size of 300 μm. Then, the water after immersing it in stirred tap water for 100 seconds was drunk in an amount of 5 mL, and a trunk gravity axis test was conducted. The results are shown in Table 100. Compared with the results of Example 115 etc., there was almost no change. Also, the results were almost the same whether it was firing of clay for open firing or firing of clay for pottery.

[0242]

Table 100

[0243] <Example 117> Measurement under the conditions of 9.99 g of ceramic material, 0.01 g (10 mg) of meteorite, 300 μm, and 10 seconds Next, water with a contact time of 10 seconds with tap water was prepared in the same manner as above, with the meteorite ground to an average particle size of 300 μm. Then, 5 mL of this water was drunk, and a trunk gravity axis test was conducted. The results are shown in Table 101. Compared with the results of Example 116 etc., there was almost no change. Incidentally, the results were almost the same whether it was firing of clay for wild burning or firing of clay for pottery.

[0244]

Table 101

[0245] <Example 118> Measurement under the conditions of 9.999 g of ceramic material, 0.001 g (1 mg) of meteorite, 20 μm to 40 μm, and 100 seconds Meteorite-containing ceramic was created in the same manner as above. Using alumina for the meteorite pulverized to an average particle size of 20 μm to 40 μm and the ceramic material, 10 g of meteorite-containing ceramic was created with 9.999 g (99.99%) of ceramic material and 0.001 g (1 mg) of meteorite, and after immersing it in stirred tap water for 100 seconds, 5 mL of the water was drunk and a body trunk gravity axis test was conducted. The results are shown in Table 102. Compared with the results of Example 117 etc., there was almost no change. Incidentally, the results were almost the same whether it was firing of clay for wild burning or firing of clay for pottery.

[0246]

Table 102

[0247] <Example 119> Measurement under the conditions of 9.999 g of ceramic material, 0.001 g (1 mg) of meteorite, 20 μm to 40 μm, and 10 seconds Next, using the same material pulverized to an average particle size of 20 μm to 40 μm of the meteorite, a body trunk gravity axis test was conducted by drinking 5 mL of water with the contact time with tap water being 10 seconds in the same method. The results are shown in Table 103. Compared with the results of Example 118 etc., there was almost no change. Incidentally, the results were almost the same whether it was firing of clay for wild burning or firing of clay for pottery.

[0248]

Table 103

[0249] <Example 120> Measurement under the conditions of 9.999 g of ceramic material, 0.001 g (1 mg) of meteorite, 300 μm, and 100 seconds The meteorite-containing ceramic was prepared in the same manner as above. Using alumina for the meteorite pulverized to an average particle size of 300 μm and the ceramic material, 10 g of meteorite-containing ceramic was prepared with 9.999 g (99.99%) of ceramic material and 0.001 g (1 mg) of meteorite. After immersing it in stirred tap water for 100 seconds, 5 mL of the water was drunk and a trunk gravity axis test was conducted. The results are shown in Table 104. Compared with the results of Example 119 etc., there was almost no change. Incidentally, the results were almost the same for firing of clay for open firing and firing of clay for pottery.

[0250]

Table 104

[0251] <Example 121> Measurement under the conditions of 9.999 g of ceramic material, 0.001 g (1 mg) of meteorite, 300 μm, and 10 seconds Next, using the same material pulverized to an average particle size of 300 μm of the meteorite and in the same method, a trunk gravity axis test was conducted by drinking 5 mL of water with a contact time with tap water of 10 seconds. The results are shown in Table 105. Compared with the results of Example 120 etc., there was almost no change. Incidentally, the results were almost the same for firing of clay for open firing and firing of clay for pottery.

[0252]

Table 105

[0253] <Example 122> Measurement under the conditions of 9.9999 g of ceramic material, 0.0001 g (0.1 mg) of meteorite, average particle size of 20 μm - 40 μm, and 100 seconds Meteorite-containing ceramics were produced in the same manner as described above. Using alumina for the meteorite crushed to an average particle size of 20 μm to 40 μm and the ceramic material, 10 g of meteorite-containing ceramics were produced with 9.9999 g of the ceramic material and 0.0001 g (0.1 mg) of the meteorite. After immersing it in stirred tap water for 100 seconds, 5 mL of the water was drunk and a trunk gravity axis test was conducted. The results are shown in Table 106. With 0.0001 g (0.1 mg), the negative aspects of the tap water could be eliminated. Incidentally, the results were almost the same whether it was firing with clay for open firing or firing with clay for pottery.

[0254]

Table 106

[0255] <Example 123> Ceramic material 9.9999 g, meteorite 0.0001 g (0.1 mg), average particle size 20 μm to 40 μm, measurement under the condition of 10 seconds Next, using the same material crushed to an average particle size of 20 μm to 40 μm as the meteorite above, 5 mL of water with a contact time with tap water of 10 seconds was drunk in the same manner and a trunk gravity axis test was conducted. The results are shown in Table 107. Compared with Example 122, there was almost no change. Incidentally, the results were almost the same whether it was firing with clay for open firing or firing with clay for pottery.

[0256]

Table 107

[0257] <Example 124> Ceramic material 9.9999 g, meteorite 0.0001 g (0.1 mg), average particle size 300 μm, measurement under the condition of 100 seconds Meteorite-containing ceramics were produced in the same manner as described above. Using alumina for the meteorite crushed to an average particle size of 300 μm and the ceramic material, 10 g of meteorite-containing ceramics were produced with 9.9999 g of the ceramic material and 0.0001 g (0.1 mg) of the meteorite. After immersing it in stirred tap water for 100 seconds, 5 mL of the water was drunk and a trunk gravity axis test was conducted. The results are shown in Table 108. At 0.0001 g (0.1 mg), the negative effects of tap water could be eliminated. Incidentally, the results were almost the same whether it was firing with wild-burning clay or firing with pottery clay.

[0258]

Table 108

[0259] <Example 125> Ceramic material: 9.9999 g, meteorite: 0.0001% (0.1 mg), average particle size: 300 μm, measurement under the condition of 10 seconds Next, 5 mL of water that had been in contact with tap water for 10 seconds was drunk to conduct a trunk gravity axis test in the same way as above, using the same material with the meteorite crushed to an average particle size of 300 μm. The results are shown in Table 109. Incidentally, the results were almost the same whether it was firing with wild-burning clay or firing with pottery clay.

[0260]

Table 109

[0261] <Example 126> Ceramic material: 9.99999 g, meteorite: 0.00001 g (0.01 mg), average particle size: 20 μm - 40 μm, measurement under the condition of 100 seconds A meteorite-containing ceramic was prepared in the same manner as above. Using alumina, 10 g of meteorite-containing ceramic was prepared with 9.99999 g of ceramic material and 0.00001 g (0.01 mg) of meteorite, with the meteorite crushed to an average particle size of 20 μm - 40 μm. After immersing it in stirred tap water for 100 seconds, 5 mL of the water was drunk to conduct a trunk gravity axis test. The results are shown in Table 110. Even at 0.00001 g (0.01 mg), the negative effects of tap water could be eliminated, but since the memory was not accurate, the credibility of the data in this area was considered to be somewhat lacking. Incidentally, the results were almost the same whether it was firing with wild-burning clay or firing with pottery clay.

[0262]

Table 110

[0263] <Example 127> 9.99999 g of ceramic material, 0.00001 g (0.01 mg) of meteorite, average particle size 20 μm to 40 μm, measurement under the condition of 10 seconds Next, the same material as above with the meteorite crushed to an average particle size of 20 μm to 40 μm was used. Water with a contact time of 10 seconds with tap water was drunk in an amount of 5 mL in the same way, and a trunk gravity axis test was conducted. The results are shown in Table 111. Even 0.00001 g (0.01 mg) can eliminate the minus of tap water, but since the memory is not accurate, the credibility of the data in this area seems to be a bit poor. In addition, the results were almost the same whether it was fired with wild-burning clay or pottery clay.

[0264]

Table 111

[0265] <Example 128> 9.99999 g of ceramic material, 0.00001 g (0.01 mg) of meteorite, average particle size 300 μm, measurement under the condition of 100 seconds The meteorite-containing ceramic was prepared in the same manner as above. Using alumina for the meteorite crushed to an average particle size of 300 μm and the ceramic material, 10 g of meteorite-containing ceramic was prepared with 9.99999 g of ceramic material and 0.00001 g (0.01 mg) of meteorite, and the water after immersing it in stirred tap water for 100 seconds was drunk in an amount of 5 mL, and a trunk gravity axis test was conducted. The results are shown in Table 112. Even 0.0001 g (0.1 mg) could eliminate the minus of tap water. In addition, the results were almost the same whether it was fired with wild-burning clay or pottery clay.

[0266]

Table 112

[0267] <Example 129> 9.99999 g of ceramic material, 0.00001 g (0.01 mg) of meteorite, average particle size 300 μm, measurement under the condition of 10 seconds Next, the same material as above, which was crushed to an average particle size of 300 μm for the meteorite, was used to conduct a body trunk gravity axis test by drinking 5 mL of water that had been in contact with tap water for 10 seconds in the same manner. The results are shown in Table 113. Even with 0.00001 g (0.01 mg) of meteorite and 9.99999 g of ceramic material (alumina) at the drying point, the negative aspects of tap water can be eliminated, but the memory is not accurate, so the credibility of the data in this regard seems to be somewhat lacking. Note that the results were almost the same whether it was firing with wild firing clay or firing with pottery clay.

[0268]

Table 113

[0269] <Example 130> 9.999999 g of ceramic material, 0.000001 g (0.001 mg) of meteorite, average particle size 20 μm - 40 μm, measurement under the condition of 100 seconds In the same way as above, a meteorite-containing ceramic was prepared. Using alumina for the ceramic material and meteorite crushed to an average particle size of 20 μm - 40 μm, 10 g of meteorite-containing ceramic was prepared with 9.999999 g of ceramic material and 0.000001 g (0.001 mg) of meteorite. After immersing it in stirred tap water for 100 seconds, 5 mL of the water was drunk to conduct a body trunk gravity axis test. The results are shown in Table 114. Even with 0.000001 g (0.001 mg), the negative aspects of tap water can be eliminated, but the memory is not accurate, so the credibility of the data in this regard seems to be somewhat lacking. Note that the results were almost the same whether it was firing with wild firing clay or firing with pottery clay.

[0270]

Table 114

[0271] <Example 131> 9.999999 g of ceramic material, 0.000001 g (0.001 mg) of meteorite, average particle size 20 μm to 40 μm, measurement under the condition of 10 seconds Next, 5 mL of water with a contact time of 10 seconds with tap water was drunk in the same way as above, which was the same material as above but the meteorite was crushed to an average particle size of 20 μm to 40 μm, and a trunk gravity axis test was conducted. The results are shown in Table 115. Even 0.000001 g (0.001 mg) can eliminate the minus of tap water, but since the memory is not accurate, the credibility of the data in this area seems to be a bit poor. In addition, the results were almost the same whether it was firing wild-burning clay or firing pottery clay.

[0272]

Table 115

[0273] <Example 132> 9.999999 g of ceramic material, 0.000001 g (0.001 mg) of meteorite, average particle size 300 μm, measurement under the condition of 100 seconds The meteorite-containing ceramic was prepared in the same manner as above. Using alumina for the meteorite crushed to an average particle size of 300 μm and the ceramic material, 10 g of meteorite-containing ceramic was prepared with 9.999999 g of ceramic material and 0.000001 g (0.001 mg) of meteorite, and after immersing it in stirred tap water for 100 seconds, 5 mL of the water was drunk and a trunk gravity axis test was conducted. The results are shown in Table 116. Even 0.0001 g (0.1 mg) could eliminate the minus of tap water.

[0274]

Table 116

[0275] <Example 133> 9.999999 g of ceramic material, 0.000001 g (0.001 mg) of meteorite, average particle size 300 μm, measurement under the condition of 10 seconds Next, 5 mL of water with a contact time of 10 seconds with tap water was drunk in the same way as the above-mentioned material crushed to an average meteorite particle size of 300 μm, and a trunk gravity axis test was conducted. The results are shown in Table 117. Even 0.000001 g (0.001 mg) can eliminate the negative of tap water, but since the memory is not accurate, the credibility of the data in this area seems to be somewhat lacking.

[0276]

Table 117

[0277] Mixing ratio of meteorite in dental resin (particle size of meteorite) For fibers, there are Tencel, a fiber not specified, rayon, a regenerated fiber, cupra, polynosic, acetate, a semi-synthetic fiber, triacetate, promix, acrylic, nylon, polyurethane, polyester, vinylon, exlan, cashmilon, teviron, envilon, pyren, polyethylene, polystyrene, Examples of natural resins include rosin, lacquer, amber, natural rubber, shellac, gelatin, and casein. Examples of thermosetting resins include phenol resin, epoxy resin, melamine resin, urea resin, unsaturated polyester resin, alkyd resin, silicone resin, polyurethane, and thermosetting polyamide. Examples of thermoplastic resins include polyethylene, polypropylene, polystyrene, polyethylene terephthalate, polyvinyl chloride, AS resin, ABS resin, polyamide, polycarbonate, polyacetal, polybutylene terephthalate, polyphenylene sulfide, polyether ether ketone, polyamideimide, polyetherimide, and polysulfone. In Japanese, resin is used as a general term for natural resins and synthetic resins. Resins include natural resins, which are substances secreted from plants, and synthetic resins, which are artificially synthesized. Representing the fibers of the present invention, seven types of resins with meteorite contents of 10%, 1%, 0.1%, 0.01%, 0.001%, 0.0001%, and 0.00001% were prepared using dental resin, and a trunk gravity axis test was conducted. Dental resin was used because it is put into the oral cavity for use, has received medical product approval, and is guaranteed to be safe with no reported harmful effects. Various types of meteorites were formed by mixing powders of meteorites with an average particle size of 20 μm to 40 μm, pulverized by the FV-250 type pulverizer of Central Chemical Machinery Co., Ltd., into the resin material powder, and left in a Japanese heater CW36T-R2 electric can warmer at 50 °C for 1.5 hours, and the resulting product was used as the "resin". The tap water in Yokkaichi City, Mie Prefecture was used as the control, with a value of 0.0 kg.

[0278] <Example 134> As a control, the results of using only the resin material are shown in Table 118. There was no change in the tap water in Yokkaichi. At the drying point, a 10 g block of dental resin, which is 100% dental resin, was made. The tap water in Yokkaichi was used as the control. There was no significant change in the trunk gravity axis test with only the resin. Since the dental resin is approved by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, it is not very harmful to the body, and it was thought that the result was 0.0↑ where it would originally be negative. Regarding the determination of effective values, particle sizes, and amounts of meteorites according to the mixing ratio of meteorites in dental resin Seven types of 10 g dental resins with meteorite contents of 10% (1 g = 1,000 mg), 1% (0.1 g = 100 mg), 0.01% (0.01 g = 10 mg), 0.001% (0.001 g = 1 mg), 0.0001% (0.0001 g = 0.1 mg), 0.00001% (0.00001 g = 0.01 mg), and 0.000001% (0.000001 g = 0.001 mg) were prepared. The same experiment was conducted with 100 g of ceramic containing 10% (10 g) (10,000 mg) of meteorites with a meteorite particle size of 20 - 40 μm and a meteorite particle size of 300 μm.

[0279]

Table 118

[0280] <Example 135> Subsequently, a resin plate was made with 10 g of dental resin, and the same experiment was conducted. It was made slightly larger, and when dried, the excess part was scraped off with an evans before drying so that it would weigh 10 g. When it was less, resin was added to make the weight even. Various types of meteorites were pulverized into a powdery form with an average particle size of 20 μm to 40 μm by a FV-250 type pulverizer of Central Chemical Machinery Co., Ltd. 10 g of meteorite-containing dental resin was prepared with 9 g (10%) of dental resin material and 1 g (1,000 mg) of meteorite, and the same experiment was conducted. Those who drank 5 mL of tap water in Yokkaichi City, Mie Prefecture and underwent a trunk gravity axis test were set as the control and set to 0.0 kg. First, only the dental resin material was prepared, immersed in water for 100 seconds, and then after obtaining water and drinking 5 mL, the trunk gravity axis test was conducted immediately. The results are shown in Table 119.

[0281]

Table 119

[0282]

Table 120

[0283] <Example 136> That is, although there seems to be a little influence of infrared radiation, 10 g of meteorite-containing ceramic with a meteorite content of 3 g was prepared with 0.5 g of various meteorites, and the same experiment was conducted. The results are shown in Table 121. Compared with the above meteorites, the 0.5↑ of only dental resin was within the error range.

[0284]

Table 121

[0285] <Example 137> Measurement under the conditions of 9 g (90%) of dental resin material and 1 g (10%) of meteorite, 20 μm to 40 μm, and 100 seconds As a result of conducting the same experiment with 10 g of dental resin, there was no change compared to the tap water in Yokkaichi City, Mie Prefecture. Therefore, the tap water in Yokkaichi City was used as the control and set to 0.0 kg. Various types of meteorites were used to prepare 10 g of meteorite-containing dental resin by pulverizing meteorites into a powdery form with an average particle size of 20 μm to 40 μm using a FV-250 type pulverizer from Central Chemical Machinery Co., Ltd. and mixing them with dental resin, and then immersing it in stirred water for 100 seconds. That is, 10 g of meteorite-containing dental resin was prepared with 9 g (9,000 mg) of dental resin material and 1 g (1,000 mg) of meteorite, and after immersing it in stirred tap water for 100 seconds, 5 mL of the water was drunk for the trunk gravity axis test. The results are shown in Table 122.

[0286]

Table 122

[0287] <Example 138> Measurement under the conditions of 9 g (90%) of dental resin material and 1 g (10%) of meteorite, 20 μm to 40 μm, and 10 seconds Next, 5 mL of water with a contact time of 10 seconds with tap water was drunk for the trunk gravity axis test in the same manner as above using the same material pulverized to an average particle size of 20 μm to 40 μm for the meteorite. The results are shown in Table 123. There was no change compared to Example 137.

[0288]

Table 123

[0289] <Example 139> Measurement under the conditions of 9 g (90%) of dental resin material and 1 g (10%) of meteorite, 300 μm, and 100 seconds A meteorite-containing dental resin was prepared in the same manner as above. Using the meteorite pulverized to an average particle size of 300 μm and the dental resin, 10 g of the meteorite-containing dental resin was prepared and immersed in the stirred water for 100 seconds. That is, 10 g of a meteorite-containing dental resin was prepared with 9 g (90%) of dental resin material and 1 g (10%) of meteorite, and after immersing it in the stirred tap water for 100 seconds, 5 mL of the water was ingested to conduct a trunk gravity axis test. The results are shown in Table 124.

[0290]

Table 124

[0291] <Example 140> Measurement under the conditions of 9 g (90%) of dental resin material and 1 g (10%) of meteorite, 300 μm, and 10 seconds Next, using the same material pulverized to an average particle size of 300 μm of the meteorite, a trunk gravity axis test was conducted by ingesting 5 mL of water with a contact time with tap water of 10 seconds in the same manner. The results are shown in Table 125. Compared with Example 139, there was no change.

[0292]

Table 125

[0293] <Example 141> Measurement under the conditions of 9.9 g of dental resin material, 0.1 g (100 mg) of meteorite, 20 μm to 40 μm, and 100 seconds A meteorite-containing dental resin was prepared in the same manner as above. Using the meteorite pulverized to an average particle size of 20 μm to 40 μm and the dental resin, 10 g of the meteorite-containing dental resin was prepared and immersed in the stirred water for 100 seconds. That is, 10 g of a dental resin containing 0.1 g of meteorite was prepared with 9.9 g of a dental resin material, and after immersing the stirred water in tap water for 100 seconds, 5 mL of the water was drunk to conduct a trunk gravity axis test. The results are shown in Table 126.

[0294]

Table 126

[0295] <Example 142> Measurement under the conditions of 9.9 g of dental resin material, 0.1 g (10 mg) of meteorite, 20 μm to 40 μm, and 10 seconds Next, the same material as above, which was crushed to an average particle size of the meteorite of 20 μm to 40 μm, was used to conduct a trunk gravity axis test by drinking 5 mL of water with a contact time with tap water of 10 seconds in the same method. The results are shown in Table 127.

[0296]

Table 127

[0297] <Example 143> Measurement under the conditions of 9.9 g of dental resin material, 0.1 g (100 mg) of meteorite, 300 μm, and 100 seconds A dental resin containing meteorite was prepared in the same manner as above. Using the meteorite crushed to an average particle size of 300 μm and the dental resin, 10 g of a dental resin containing meteorite was prepared, and it was immersed in the stirred water for 100 seconds. That is, 10 g of a dental resin containing 0.1 g (100 mg) of meteorite was prepared with 9.9 g of a dental resin material, and after immersing the stirred water in tap water for 100 seconds, 5 mL of the water was drunk to conduct a trunk gravity axis test. The results are shown in Table 128.

[0298]

Table 128

[0299] <Example 144> 9.9 g of dental resin material, 0.1 g (100 mg) of meteorite, measurement under the conditions of 300 μm and 10 seconds Next, 5 mL of water with a contact time of 10 seconds with tap water was drunk in the same manner as above using the same material obtained by pulverizing the meteorite to an average particle size of 300 μm, and a trunk gravity axis test was conducted. The results are shown in Table 129.

[0300]

Table 129

[0301] <Example 145> 9.99 g of dental resin material, 0.01 g (10 mg) of meteorite, measurement under the conditions of 20 μm to 40 μm and 100 seconds A dental resin containing meteorite was prepared in the same manner as above. Using a meteorite pulverized to an average particle size of 20 μm to 40 μm and a dental resin, 10 g of a dental resin containing meteorite was prepared and immersed in stirred water for 100 seconds. That is, 10 g of a dental resin containing meteorite was prepared with 9.99 g of dental resin material and 0.01 g (10 mg) of meteorite, and after immersing it in stirred tap water for 100 seconds, 5 mL of the water was drunk and a trunk gravity axis test was conducted. The results are shown in Table 130.

[0302]

Table 130

[0303] <Example 146> 9.99 g of dental resin material, 0.01 g (10 mg) of meteorite, measurement under the conditions of 20 μm to 40 μm and 10 seconds Next, 5 mL of water with a contact time of 10 seconds with tap water was drunk in the same manner as above using the same material obtained by pulverizing the meteorite to an average particle size of 20 μm to 40 μm, and a trunk gravity axis test was conducted. The results are shown in Table 131.

[0304]

Table 131

[0305] <Example 147> Measurement under the conditions of 9.99 g of dental resin material, 0.01 g (10 mg) of meteorite, 300 μm, and 100 seconds A dental resin containing meteorite was prepared in the same manner as above. Using a meteorite crushed to an average particle size of 300 μm and a dental resin, 10 g of a dental resin containing meteorite was prepared and immersed in stirred water for 100 seconds. That is, 10 g of a dental resin containing meteorite was prepared with 9.99 g of dental resin material and 0.01 g (10 mg) of meteorite, and after immersing it in stirred tap water for 100 seconds, 5 mL of the water was drunk and a trunk gravity axis test was conducted. The results are shown in Table 132.

[0306]

Table 132

[0307] <Example 148> Measurement under the conditions of 9.99 g of dental resin material, 0.01 g (10 mg) of meteorite, 300 μm, and 10 seconds Next, using the same material crushed to an average particle size of 300 μm of the meteorite, in the same manner as above, 5 mL of water with a contact time with tap water of 10 seconds was drunk and a trunk gravity axis test was conducted. The results are shown in Table 133.

[0308]

Table 133

[0309] <Example 149> Measurement under the conditions of 9.999 g of dental resin material, 0.001 g (1 mg) of meteorite, 20 μm - 40 μm, and 100 seconds A dental resin containing meteorite was prepared in the same manner as above. Using a meteorite crushed to an average particle size of 20 μm - 40 μm and a dental resin, 10 g of a dental resin containing meteorite was prepared and immersed in stirred water for 100 seconds. That is, 9.999 g of dental resin material and 0.001 g (1 mg) of meteorite were used to prepare 10 g of meteorite-containing dental resin. After immersing it in stirred tap water for 100 seconds, 5 mL of the water was drunk and a trunk gravity axis test was conducted. The results are shown in Table 134.

[0310]

Table 134

[0311] <Example 150> Measurement under the conditions of 9.999 g of dental resin material, 0.001 g (1 mg) of meteorite, 20 μm to 40 μm, and 10 seconds Next, the same material as above, with the meteorite crushed to an average particle size of 20 μm to 40 μm, was used. In the same way, water with a contact time of 10 seconds with tap water was drunk in an amount of 5 mL, and a trunk gravity axis test was conducted. The results are shown in Table 135.

[0312]

Table 135

[0313] <Example 151> Measurement under the conditions of 9.999 g of dental resin material, 0.001 g (1 mg) of meteorite, 300 μm, and 100 seconds The meteorite-containing dental resin was prepared in the same manner as above. 10 g of meteorite-containing dental resin was prepared using the meteorite crushed to an average particle size of 300 μm and the dental resin, and it was immersed in stirred water for 100 seconds. That is, 9.999 g of dental resin material and 0.001 g (1 mg) of meteorite were used to prepare 10 g of meteorite-containing dental resin. After immersing it in stirred tap water for 100 seconds, 5 mL of the water was drunk and a trunk gravity axis test was conducted. The results are shown in Table 136.

[0314]

Table 136

[0315] <Example 152> 9.999 g of dental resin material, 0.001 g (1 mg) of meteorite, measurement under the conditions of 300 μm and 10 seconds Next, the same material as above, which was crushed to an average particle size of 300 μm for the meteorite, was used to conduct a body trunk gravity axis test by drinking 5 mL of water with a contact time with tap water of 10 seconds in the same manner. The results are shown in Table 137. It was considered that by mixing 1 mg or more in the range of 20 μm to 300 μm into full denture, partial denture, resin restoration, or cement, it could be converted into good waves in the oral cavity.

[0316]

Table 137

[0317] <Example 153> 9.9999 g of dental resin material, 0.0001 g (0.1 mg) of meteorite, measurement under the conditions of an average particle size of 20 μm to 40 μm and 100 seconds A dental resin containing meteorite was prepared in the same manner as above. Using the meteorite crushed to an average particle size of 20 μm to 40 μm and dental resin, 10 g of dental resin containing meteorite was prepared and immersed in stirred water for 100 seconds. That is, 10 g of dental resin containing meteorite was prepared with 9.9999 g of dental resin material and 0.0001 g (0.1 mg) of meteorite, and after immersing it in stirred tap water for 100 seconds, 5 mL of the water was drunk to conduct a body trunk gravity axis test. The results are shown in Table 138. With 0.0001 g (0.1 mg), the minus of the tap water could be eliminated.

[0318]

Table 138

[0319] <Example 154> 9.9999 g of dental resin material, 0.0001 g (0.1 mg) of meteorite, measurement under the conditions of an average particle size of 20 μm to 40 μm and 10 seconds Next, 5 mL of water with a contact time of 10 seconds with tap water was drunk in the same manner as above with the meteorite crushed to an average particle size of 20 μm to 40 μm, and a trunk gravity axis test was conducted. The results are shown in Table 139.

[0320]

Table 139

[0321] <Example 155> Measurement under the conditions of 9.999 g of dental resin material and 0.001 g (1 mg) of meteorite with an average particle size of 300 μm for 100 seconds A meteorite-containing dental resin was prepared in the same manner as above. 10 g of meteorite-containing dental resin was prepared using a meteorite crushed to an average particle size of 300 μm and dental resin, and after immersing it in stirred water for 100 seconds, 5 mL of the water was drunk and a trunk gravity axis test was conducted. The results are shown in Table 140. At 0.0001 g (0.1 mg), the minus of tap water could be eliminated.

[0322]

Table 140

[0323] <Example 156> Measurement under the conditions of 0.0001 g (0.1 mg) of dental resin material, an average particle size of 300 μm, and 10 seconds Next, 5 mL of water with a contact time of 10 seconds with tap water was drunk in the same manner as above with the meteorite crushed to an average particle size of 300 μm, and a trunk gravity axis test was conducted. The results are shown in Table 141.

[0324]

Table 141

[0325] <Example 157> Measurement under the conditions of 9.99999 g of dental resin material, 0.00001 g (0.01 mg) of meteorite, an average particle size of 20 μm to 40 μm, and 100 seconds A meteorite-containing dental resin was prepared in the same manner as described above. Using meteorites pulverized to an average particle size of 20 μm to 40 μm and dental resin, 10 g of the meteorite-containing dental resin was prepared and immersed in stirred water for 100 seconds. That is, 10 g of a meteorite-containing dental resin was prepared with 9.99999 g of dental resin material and 0.00001 g (0.01 mg) of meteorite. After immersing it in stirred tap water for 100 seconds, 5 mL of the water was drunk and a trunk gravity axis test was conducted. The results are shown in Table 142. Even 0.00001 g (0.01 mg) can eliminate the negative effects of tap water, but the memory is not accurate, so the credibility of the data in this area seems to be somewhat lacking.

[0326]

Table 142

[0327] <Example 158> Dental resin material 9.99999 g, meteorite 0.00001 g (0.01 mg), average particle size 20 μm to 40 μm, measurement under the condition of 10 seconds Next, 5 mL of water with a contact time with tap water of 10 seconds was drunk using the same material pulverized to an average particle size of 20 μm to 40 μm as above in the same manner, and a trunk gravity axis test was conducted. The results are shown in Table 143. Even 0.00001 g (0.01 mg) can eliminate the negative effects of tap water, but the memory is not accurate, so the credibility of the data in this area seems to be somewhat lacking.

[0328]

Table 143

[0329] <Example 159> Dental resin material 9.99999 g, meteorite 0.00001 g (0.01 mg), average particle size 300 μm, measurement under the condition of 100 seconds A meteorite-containing dental resin was prepared in the same manner as above. Using meteorites pulverized to an average particle size of 300 μm and dental resin, 10 g of the meteorite-containing dental resin was prepared, and the water after immersing it in stirred water for 100 seconds was drunk in an amount of 5 mL to conduct a trunk gravity axis test. The results are shown in Table 144. When the meteorite content was 0.00001 g (0.01 mg), there was a positive change in the trunk gravity axis test. Even at 0.0001 g (0.1 mg), the negative effect of tap water was eliminated. It was found that the minimum amount to be mixed into the resin is 0.00001 g (0.01 mg).

[0330]

Table 144

[0331] <Example 160> Dental resin material 9.99999 g, meteorite 0.00001 g (0.01 mg), average particle size 300 μm, measurement under the condition of 10 seconds Next, using the same material pulverized to an average particle size of 300 μm as the meteorite, water with a contact time of 10 seconds with tap water was drunk in an amount of 5 mL in the same manner to conduct a trunk gravity axis test. The results are shown in Table 145. Even at 0.00001 g (0.01 mg), the negative effect of tap water can be eliminated, but since the memory is not accurate, the credibility of the data in this area seems to be somewhat poor.

[0332]

Table 145

[0333] <Example 161> Dental resin material 9.999999 g, meteorite 0.000001 g (0.001 mg), average particle size 20 μm - 40 μm, measurement under the condition of 100 seconds A meteorite-containing dental resin was prepared in the same manner as above. Using meteorites pulverized to an average particle size of 20 μm - 40 μm and dental resin, 10 g of the meteorite-containing dental resin was prepared and immersed in stirred water for 100 seconds. That is, 9.999999 g of dental resin material and 0.000001 g (0.001 mg) of meteorite were used to prepare 10 g of meteorite-containing dental resin, and after immersing it in stirred tap water for 100 seconds, 5 mL of the water was drunk to conduct a trunk gravity axis test. The results are shown in Table 146. Even 0.000001 g (0.001 mg) can eliminate the negative effects of tap water, but the memory is not accurate, so the credibility of the data in this regard seems to be a bit poor.

[0334]

Table 146

[0335] <Example 162> 99.999999 g of dental resin material, 0.000001 g (0.001 mg) of meteorite, average particle size 20 μm - 40 μm, measurement under the condition of 10 seconds Next, the same material as above, which was crushed into meteorites with an average particle size of 20 μm - 40 μm, was used to conduct a trunk gravity axis test by drinking 5 mL of water with a contact time with tap water of 10 seconds in the same way. The results are shown in Table 147. Even 0.000001 g (0.001 mg) could eliminate the negative effects of tap water in the case of stony meteorites, iron meteorites, and stony-iron meteorites, but the effect was not observed in tektites, moldavites, and Libyan glass.

[0336]

Table 147

[0337] <Example 163> 99.999999 g of dental resin material, 0.000001 g (0.001 mg) of meteorite, average particle size 300 μm, measurement under the condition of 100 seconds The meteorite-containing dental resin was prepared in the same manner as above. 10 g of meteorite-containing dental resin was prepared using meteorites crushed to an average particle size of 300 μm and dental resin, and after immersing it in stirred water for 100 seconds, 5 mL of the water was drunk to conduct a trunk gravity axis test. The results are shown in Table 148. Even 0.000001 g (0.001 mg) was able to eliminate the negative effects of tap water.

[0338]

Table 148

[0339] <Example 164> Dental resin material 99.999999 g, meteorite 0.000001 g (0.001 mg), average particle size 300 μm, measurement under the condition of 10 seconds Next, the same material as above, which was crushed to an average particle size of 300 μm for the meteorite, was used to drink 5 mL of water with a contact time of 10 seconds with tap water in the same method, and a trunk gravity axis test was conducted. The results are shown in Table 149. It was found that there was almost no force. Therefore, data with a weight of 0.000001 g (0.001 mg) or less for various meteorites are omitted for both 100 seconds and 10 seconds.

[0340]

Table 149

[0341] <Example 165> Cement types are roughly classified into (1) Portland cement, (2) blended cement (blast furnace cement, silica cement, fly ash cement), (3) eco-cement, and (4) special cement (alumina cement, white Portland cement, super-fast hard cement, expansive cement, colloidal cement, oil well cement, geothermal cement), and as dental cements, for example, glass ionomer cement, resin cement, zinc phosphate cement, zinc oxide eugenol cement, non-eugenol cement, polycarboxylate cement, zinc oxide eugenol cement, EBA cement, CR-based resin cement, PMMA-based resin cement, zinc polycarbonate oxalate cement, carbocement, ceramic cement, polycarboxylate cement, super bond, etc. are included. Since the experimental results were almost the same for ceramics and resins, the details will be omitted. Although there was sufficient adhesive strength for meteorite particle sizes of 20 μm to 40 μm, the adhesive strength decreased at 300 μm, but there was no problem in manufacturing the filter. Taking zinc phosphate cement as an example, representative cases will be described for meteorite weights of 10 mg, 1 mg, 0.1 mg, and 0.01 mg, meteorite particle sizes of 20 μm to 40 μm and approximately 300 μm, and water contact times of 100 seconds and 10 seconds.

[0342] <Example 166> Measurement under the conditions of 9.99 g of zinc phosphate cement material, 0.01 g (10 mg) of meteorite, particle size of 20 μm to 40 μm, and 100 seconds A meteorite-containing zinc phosphate cement plate was prepared in the same manner as above. Using meteorite pulverized to an average particle size of 20 μm to 40 μm and zinc phosphate cement, 10 g of a meteorite-containing zinc phosphate cement plate was prepared and immersed in stirred water for 100 seconds. That is, 10 g of a meteorite-containing zinc phosphate cement plate was prepared with 9.99 g of zinc phosphate cement material and 0.01 g (10 mg) of meteorite, and after immersing it in stirred tap water for 100 seconds, 5 mL of the water was drunk and a trunk gravity axis test was conducted. The results are shown in Table 150.

[0343]

Table 150

[0344] <Example 167> Measurement under the conditions of 9.99 g of zinc phosphate cement material, 0.01 g (10 mg) of meteorite, particle size of 20 μm to 40 μm, and 10 seconds Next, using the same material pulverized to an average meteorite particle size of 20 μm to 40 μm, a trunk gravity axis test was conducted by drinking 5 mL of water with a contact time with tap water of 10 seconds in the same manner. The results are shown in Table 151.

[0345]

Table 151

[0346] <Example 162> 9.99 g of zinc phosphate cement material, 0.01 g (10 mg) of meteorite, measurement under the conditions of 300 μm and 100 seconds A meteorite-containing zinc phosphate cement plate was prepared in the same manner as above. Using a meteorite pulverized to an average particle size of 300 μm and zinc phosphate cement, 10 g of a meteorite-containing zinc phosphate cement plate was prepared and immersed in stirred water for 100 seconds. That is, 10 g of a meteorite-containing zinc phosphate cement plate was prepared with 9.99 g of zinc phosphate cement material and 0.01 g (10 mg) of meteorite, and after immersing it in stirred tap water for 100 seconds, 5 mL of the water was drunk and a trunk gravity axis test was conducted. The results are shown in Table 152.

[0347]

Table 152

[0348] <Example 163> 9.99 g of zinc phosphate cement material, 0.01 g (10 mg) of meteorite, measurement under the conditions of 300 μm and 10 seconds Next, using the same material pulverized to an average meteorite particle size of 300 μm, a trunk gravity axis test was conducted by drinking 5 mL of water with a contact time with tap water of 10 seconds in the same manner. The results are shown in Table 153.

[0349]

Table 153

[0350] <Example 164> 9.999 g of zinc phosphate cement, 0.001 g (1 mg) of meteorite, measurement under the conditions of 20 μm to 40 μm and 100 seconds A meteorite-containing zinc phosphate cement plate was prepared in the same manner as above. Using a meteorite pulverized to an average particle size of 20 μm to 40 μm and zinc phosphate cement, 10 g of a meteorite-containing zinc phosphate cement plate was prepared and immersed in stirred water for 100 seconds. That is, 9.999 g of zinc phosphate cement and 0.001 g (1 mg) of meteorite were used to prepare 10 g of a meteorite-containing zinc phosphate cement plate, and the water after immersing it in stirred tap water for 100 seconds was drunk in an amount of 5 mL, and a trunk gravity axis test was conducted. The results are shown in Table 154.

[0351]

Table 154

[0352] <Example 165> Measurement under the conditions of 9.999 g of zinc phosphate cement, 0.001 g (1 mg) of meteorite, 20 μm to 40 μm, and 10 seconds Next, the same material as above, which was crushed to an average particle size of the meteorite of 20 μm to 40 μm, was used to conduct a trunk gravity axis test by drinking 5 mL of water with a contact time with tap water of 10 seconds in the same method. The results are shown in Table 155.

[0353]

Table 155

[0354] <Example 166> Measurement under the conditions of 9.999 g of zinc phosphate cement, 0.001 g (1 mg) of meteorite, 300 μm, and 100 seconds A meteorite-containing zinc phosphate cement plate was prepared in the same manner as above. 10 g of a meteorite-containing zinc phosphate cement plate was prepared using a meteorite crushed to an average particle size of 300 μm and zinc phosphate cement, and it was immersed in stirred water for 100 seconds. That is, 9.999 g of zinc phosphate cement and 0.001 g (1 mg) of meteorite were used to prepare 10 g of a meteorite-containing zinc phosphate cement plate, and the water after immersing it in stirred tap water for 100 seconds was drunk in an amount of 5 mL, and a trunk gravity axis test was conducted. The results are shown in Table 156.

[0355]

Table 156

[0356] <Example 167> 9.999 g of zinc phosphate cement, 0.001 g (1 mg) of meteorite, measurement under the conditions of 300 μm and 10 seconds Next, the same material as above, which was crushed to an average particle size of 300 μm for the meteorite, was used to drink 5 mL of water with a contact time of 10 seconds with tap water in the same method, and a trunk gravity axis test was conducted. The results are shown in Table 157. It is conceivable that by mixing 1 mg or more in the range of 20 μm to 300 μm into full denture, partial denture, resin restoration, or cement, it can be converted into good waves in the oral cavity.

[0357]

Table 157

[0358] <Example 168> 9.9999 g of zinc phosphate cement, 0.0001 g (0.1 mg) of meteorite, measurement under the conditions of an average particle size of 20 μm to 40 μm and 100 seconds A zinc phosphate cement plate containing a meteorite was prepared in the same manner as above. Using a meteorite crushed to an average particle size of 20 μm to 40 μm and zinc phosphate cement, 10 g of a zinc phosphate cement plate containing a meteorite was prepared, and it was immersed in stirred water for 100 seconds. That is, 10 g of a zinc phosphate cement plate containing a meteorite was prepared with 9.9999 g of zinc phosphate cement and 0.0001 g (0.1 mg) of meteorite, and after immersing it in stirred tap water for 100 seconds, 5 mL of the water was drunk and a trunk gravity axis test was conducted. The results are shown in Table 158. With 0.0001 g (0.1 mg), the minus of the tap water could be eliminated.

[0359]

Table 158

[0360] <Example 169> 9.9999 g of zinc phosphate cement, 0.0001 g (0.1 mg) of meteorite, measurement under the conditions of an average particle size of 20 μm to 40 μm and 10 seconds Next, 5 mL of water with a contact time of 10 seconds with tap water was drunk in the same manner as above, but with the meteorite pulverized to an average particle size of 20 μm to 40 μm, and a trunk gravity axis test was conducted. The results are shown in Table 159.

[0361]

Table 159

[0362] <Example 170> Zinc phosphate cement 9.9999 g, meteorite 0.0001 g (0.1 mg), average particle size 300 μm, measurement under the condition of 100 seconds A zinc phosphate cement plate containing a meteorite was prepared in the same manner as above. Using a meteorite pulverized to an average particle size of 300 μm and zinc phosphate cement, 10 g of a zinc phosphate cement plate containing a meteorite was prepared, and after immersing it in stirred water for 100 seconds, 5 mL of the water was drunk and a trunk gravity axis test was conducted. The results are shown in Table 160.

[0363]

Table 160

[0364] <Example 171> Zinc phosphate cement 9.9999 g, meteorite 0.0001 g (0.1 mg), average particle size 300 μm, measurement under the condition of 10 seconds Next, 5 mL of water with a contact time of 10 seconds with tap water was drunk in the same manner as above, but with the meteorite pulverized to an average particle size of 300 μm, and a trunk gravity axis test was conducted. The results are shown in Table 161.

[0365]

Table 161

[0366] <Example 172> Zinc phosphate cement 9.99999 g, meteorite 0.00001 g (0.01 mg), average particle size 20 μm to 40 μm, measurement under the condition of 100 seconds A zinc phosphate cement plate containing meteorite was prepared in the same manner as described above. Using meteorite pulverized to an average particle size of 20 μm to 40 μm and zinc phosphate cement, 10 g of a zinc phosphate cement plate containing meteorite was prepared and immersed in stirred water for 100 seconds. That is, 10 g of a zinc phosphate cement plate containing meteorite was prepared with 9.99999 g of zinc phosphate cement and 0.00001 g (0.01 mg) of meteorite, and after immersing it in stirred tap water for 100 seconds, 5 mL of the water was ingested to conduct a trunk gravity axis test. The results are shown in Table 162. Even 0.00001 g (0.01 mg) can eliminate the negative effects of tap water, but since the memory is not accurate, the credibility of this data seems to be somewhat lacking.

[0367]

Table 162

[0368] <Example 173> 9.99999 g of zinc phosphate cement, 0.00001 g (0.01 mg) of meteorite, average particle size 20 μm to 40 μm, measurement under the condition of 10 seconds Next, using the same material pulverized to an average particle size of 20 μm to 40 μm as above and in the same manner, 5 mL of water with a contact time with tap water of 10 seconds was ingested to conduct a trunk gravity axis test. The results are shown in Table 163. Even 0.000001 g (0.01 mg) can eliminate the negative effects of tap water, but since the memory is not accurate, the credibility in this regard seems to be somewhat lacking.

[0369]

Table 163

[0370] <Example 174> 9.99999 g of zinc phosphate cement, 0.00001 g (0.01 mg) of meteorite, average particle size 300 μm, measurement under the condition of 100 seconds A zinc phosphate cement plate containing meteorite was prepared in the same manner as described above. Using meteorite pulverized to an average particle size of 300 μm and zinc phosphate cement, 10 g of a zinc phosphate cement plate containing meteorite was prepared, and after immersing it in stirred water for 100 seconds, 5 mL of the water was drunk and a trunk gravity axis test was conducted. The results are shown in Table 164. When the meteorite content was 0.00001 g (0.01 mg), there was a positive change in the trunk gravity axis test. Even 0.00001 g (0.01 mg) could eliminate the negative value of tap water. It was found that the minimum amount to be mixed into the resin was 0.00001 g (0.01 mg).

[0371]

Table 164

[0372] <Example 175> Zinc phosphate cement 9.99999 g, meteorite 0.00001 g (0.01 mg), average particle size 300 μm, measurement under the condition of 10 seconds Next, using the same material pulverized to an average particle size of 300 μm of meteorite, water with a contact time with tap water of 10 seconds was drunk in the same manner, and a trunk gravity axis test was conducted. The results are shown in Table 165. Even 0.000001 g (0.01 mg) could eliminate the negative value of tap water. This means that at 0.01 mg, it is almost the same as tap water and has no effect for ceramics (including firing of pottery clay), resin, and cement. Therefore, weights of various meteorites of 0.000001 g, (0.001 mg) or less are omitted.

[0373]

Table 165

[0374] Experiment on the amount and time of effectiveness of various minerals Therefore, tap water in Yokkaichi City, Mie Prefecture was examined for minerals that could produce effects of 0.5 kg to 2 kg or more on the body trunk gravity axis test, other than meteorites, similar to the well water in Tamba. Kinsekiwa is a metamorphic rock that can be picked up in the Himekawa River basin and has no official mineral name. What is considered to be sulfide agate and has undergone metamorphism into pyrite, agate, etc. in a mudstone matrix and is called "Kinsekiwa" in the Itoigawa area was used. Iyoseki refers to natural ore mined from Iyoyama, located on the border between Toyama Prefecture and Ishikawa Prefecture. In the case of red, the scientific name is orthopyroxene hornblende andesite; for blue, it is quartz biotite hornblende augite andesite. Antelope horn refers to the horn of a serow, deer horn includes antler, Mongolian stone refers to glauconite, including glauconite, Muyoisho refers to a traditional handicraft from Sado Island, Niigata Prefecture, clam shell refers to the shell of a bivalve, abalone shell refers to abalone, and regular joint, conch shell refers to the shell of a conch.

[0375] It took three years to obtain each mineral and conduct the same body trunk gravity axis test to determine the type and amount of minerals. First, different types of minerals were determined at 1 g. The method is as follows. <Example 176> For the experiment, (a) an electronic balance BM0.01mg capable of weighing minerals manufactured by Shimadzu Corporation was used. (b) A magnifying glass for artisans was used to cut out minerals with a dental diamond disc or shave them with a dental diamond bar to adjust the weight of each mineral to 10.00 g. (c) For those with a weight of 100 mg or less, the pulverized material was weighed and used. For meteorites, a powder with an average particle size of 20 μm to 30 μm of meteorites pulverized by an FV-250 type pulverizer of Chuo Kako Kikai Co., Ltd. was used. For various minerals with a small quantity, a high-speed mill of Labo Net Co., Ltd. was used to make the average particle size of meteorites 50 μm to 100 μm. (d) 100 mL of tap water from Yokkaichi City, Mie Prefecture was used for the experiment. (e) Using a magnetic stirrer REXIM, the water was stirred for 100 seconds at a rotation speed of 500 rpm, and (f) the mineral was immersed in the stirred water for 1 second. (g) To take out the mineral from the stirred water, three coffee filters were used for filtration and received in a beaker below. (h) The filtration time was set to a total of 100 seconds for the time when the water remained in contact with the mineral. (i) The subject drank 5 mL of the water in which the mineral was immersed and filtered, and (j) immediately after drinking, the subject underwent a trunk gravity axis test only once a day without being informed of anything. (k) For each mineral, one person performed the trunk gravity axis test three times, and those who were extremely weak or extremely strong were excluded, and the average value was obtained. For those various minerals with a small quantity obtained later, a material pulverized to an average particle size of 20 μm to 40 μm of meteorites using a crusher (hammer type) NH-33S manufactured by Sanjo Industries Co., Ltd. was used. Tables 166 to 170 show the results of the trunk gravity axis test by water after 100 seconds of contact time between 100 g (100,000 mg) of various minerals obtained by the above method and 100 mL of tap water in Yokkaichi.

[0376]

Table 166

[0377]

Table 167

[0378]

Table 168

[0379]

Table 169

[0380]

Table 170

[0381] As a result of the contact time of 100 seconds between 1,000 mL of water and 100 g of the weight of various minerals, 115 types in group (b) were used as minerals having an effect of 1.0 kg to 2 kg↑ similar to Tamba well water in the trunk gravity axis test when used alone. In addition, since 100 g of diamond could not be prepared, the experiment was conducted with 10 g. Next, since 100 g of each of the above-mentioned various minerals was used, using a dental diamond disk and a dental diamond bar with a jeweler's magnifying glass, they were cut out or shaved so as to have weights of 10 g, 1 g, 0.1 g (100 mg), 0.01 g (10 mg), 0.001 g (1 mg), 0.1 mg, 0.01 mg, and 0.001 mg to adjust the weights. The weights of diamonds were adjusted with melee diamonds or the like. Also, as a trial, since a diamond of 0.000000000000011 mg (the minimum value is the theoretical value of a diamond with a diameter of 0.0025 mm of a melee diamond of Granburger Co., Ltd. because the measurement is impossible) was obtained, it was also tested. The result for all was 0.0 kg.

[0382] <Example 177> Regarding the change in the weight of 80 types of minerals for which an effect was recognized in the above-mentioned trunk gravity axis test, the change in the trunk gravity axis test was confirmed. The weights used in the experiment were 10 g, 1 g, 100 mg, 10 mg, 1 mg, 0.1 mg, 0.01 mg, and 0.001 mg. In addition, the following experiment was conducted by adding diamond to the above-mentioned minerals. The results of the body trunk gravity axis test using water after 100 seconds of contact between 10 g (10,000 mg) of various minerals and 100 mL of tap water in Yokkaichi are shown in Tables 171 to 174. All the minerals in the tables showed a body trunk gravity axis test of 1.0 g or more.

[0383]

Table 171

[0384]

Table 172

[0385]

Table 173

[0386]

Table 174

[0387] <Example 178> The results of the body trunk gravity axis test using water after 100 seconds of contact between 1 g (1,000 mg) of various minerals and 100 mL of tap water in Yokkaichi are shown in Tables 175 and 176.

[0388]

Table 175

[0389]

Table 176

[0390] <Example 179> The results of the body trunk gravity axis test using water after 100 seconds of contact between 0.1 g (100 mg) of various minerals and 100 mL of tap water in Yokkaichi are shown in Tables 177 and 178. All the minerals in the table showed a body trunk gravity axis test of 1.0 g or more.

[0391]

Table 177

[0392]

Table 178

[0393] <Example 180> The results of the trunk gravity axis test with water after 100 seconds of contact between 0.01 g (10 mg) of various minerals and 100 mL of tap water in Yokkaichi are shown in Tables 179 and 180. All the minerals in the table showed a trunk gravity axis test of 1.0 g or more. It was shown to be effective at a weight of 0.001 g (1 mg).

[0394]

Table 179

[0395]

Table 180

[0396] <Example 181> The results of the trunk gravity axis test with water after 100 seconds of contact between 0.001 g (1 mg) of various minerals and 100 mL of tap water in Yokkaichi are shown in Tables 181 and 182. All the minerals in the table had a trunk gravity axis test of 1.0 g or more. It turned positive at a weight of 0.0001 g (0.1 mg).

[0397]

Table 181

[0398]

Table 182

[0399] <Example 182> Table 183 and Table 184 show the results of the body trunk gravity axis test using water after 100 seconds of contact between 0.0001 g (0.1 mg) of various minerals and 100 mL of tap water in Yokkaichi. As a result, there was an effect of about half of 1 mg.

[0400]

Table 183

[0401]

Table 184

[0402] <Example 183> Table 185 and Table 186 show the results of the body trunk gravity axis test using water after 100 seconds of contact between 0.00001 g (0.01 mg) of various minerals and 100 mL of tap water in Yokkaichi. As a result, although it was better than tap water, there was no significant difference, so it was considered to have no effect.

[0403]

Table 185

[0404]

Table 186

[0405] <Example 184> Table 187 and Table 188 show the results of the body trunk gravity axis test using water after 100 seconds of contact between 0.000001 g (0.001 mg) of various minerals and 100 mL of tap water in Yokkaichi. As a result, it was found that there was no ability to eliminate the negative effects of tap water. However, regarding diamond, at 0.000000000000011 mg, it was found that the result of the body trunk gravity axis test showed no ability to eliminate the negative effects of tap water.

[0406]

Table 187

[0407]

Table 188

[0408] <Example 185> Next, the influence on the body trunk gravity axis due to the length of the contact time was investigated. The results of the body trunk gravity axis test using water after 10 seconds of contact time between 10 g (10,000 mg) of various minerals and 100 mL of tap water in Yokkaichi are shown in Tables 189 and 190.

[0409]

Table 189

[0410]

Table 190

[0411] <Example 186> The results of the body trunk gravity axis test using water after 10 seconds of contact time between 1 g (1,000 mg) of various minerals and 100 mL of tap water in Yokkaichi are shown in Tables 191 and 192.

[0412]

Table 191

[0413]

Table 192

[0414] <Example 187> The results of the body trunk gravity axis test using water after 10 seconds of contact time between 0.1 g (100 mg) of various minerals and 100 mL of tap water in Yokkaichi are shown in Tables 193 and 194.

[0415]

Table 193

[0416]

Table 194

[0417] <Example 188> The results of the body trunk gravity axis test with water 10 seconds after the contact time between 0.01 g (10 mg) of various minerals and 100 mL of tap water in Yokkaichi are shown in Tables 195 and 196. As a result, it was effective at a weight of 0.001 g (1 mg).

[0418]

Table 195

[0419]

Table 196

[0420] <Example 189> The results of the trunk gravity axis test were carried out with a contact time of 10 seconds between 0.001 g (1 mg) of various minerals and 100 mL of tap water in Yokkaichi, and the results are shown in Tables 197 and 198. At a weight of 0.001 g (1 mg), contacting for 10 seconds and contacting for 100 seconds were almost the same and were turned positive.

[0421]

Table 197

[0422]

Table 198

[0423] <Example 190> The results of the body trunk gravity axis test of water with the contact time between 0.0001 g (0.1 mg) of various minerals and 100 mL of Yokkaichi tap water changed from 100 to 10 seconds are shown in Tables 199 and 200.

[0424] [Table 199]

[0425] [Table 200]

[0426] <Example 191> The results of the body trunk gravity axis test of water after 10 seconds of contact between 0.00001 g (0.01 mg) of various minerals and 100 mL of Yokkaichi tap water are shown in Tables 201 and 202. The results of the body trunk gravity axis test of water after 100 seconds of contact between 0.00001 g (0.01 mg) of various minerals and 100 mL of Yokkaichi tap water were almost the same as those after 10 seconds, and no efficacy as a tourmaline was observed.

[0427] [Table 201]

[0428] [Table 202]

[0429] <Example 192> The test was conducted with 100 mL of water mixed with all types except meteorites, and the contact time with minerals was 10 seconds. The 115 types of the above minerals with a weight of 0.001 g (1 mg) were used as the various minerals. The results are shown in Table 203. The gravity axis test increased, but it became stronger when meteorites were added. That is, it was found that meteorites definitely played a major role.

[0430] [Table 203]

[0431] <Example 193> Results of the Trunk Gravity Axis Test by Frequency Also, since it is known that low frequencies also have a great force, the following trunk gravity axis tests were conducted according to the difference in frequency. Since not all experiments could be carried out, representative ones were conducted. The results are shown in Table 204. The finding was obtained that low frequencies are effective, but high frequencies are not effective.

[0432]

Table 204

[0433] <Example 194> Experiments with Combinations of Meteorite Types and the Following Minerals Experimenting with all combinations would result in an extremely large number of combinations and be too harsh on the inventor. Therefore, experiments were conducted with combinations of meteorite types and the following minerals in the same operation as <Example 54>. A total of 115 types of various minerals were used, all adjusted to 0.001 g (1 mg). 1 mg of merel diamond was inexpensive and easily available. The results are shown in Table 205. Regardless of the type of meteorite, the trunk gravity axis test generally yielded amazing results of +13 kg. With 100 types of meteorites, amazing results of +20 kg to 23.5 kg were obtained.

[0434]

Table 205

[0435] <Example 195> Next, an experiment on clams was conducted. As conditions, it was carried out directly below a 100 W FED bulb at a distance of 250 cm with a humidity of 65% and a room temperature of 25°C. 30 clams were arranged on a black plate, and the changes every 5 minutes were observed. The number of times the clams extended their toes and moved around was counted. The same experiment was conducted three times with different individuals and the average value was obtained. For each water sample, 1 g of meteorite was cut out. 1000 mL of tap water collected on January 17, 2010, at 7-6 Urahori, Yokkaichi City, Mie Prefecture, was dispensed into a 3000 mL beaker, and gently stirred (using a magnetic stirrer REXIM at a rotation speed of 100 rpm) so as not to generate bubbles. After immersing 1 g of meteorite in it for 100 seconds, the water from which the meteorite was removed was used. A total of 100 types of meteorites were powdered, stirred, and 1 g was taken out. The results are shown in Table 206. All 30 Dijimi began to be active in 25 minutes when immersed in the total meteorite + mineral + low-frequency fluctuating water. All 30 Dijimi began to be active at 45 minutes, 50 minutes, and 55 minutes when immersed in the stony meteorite + mineral fluctuating water, iron meteorite + mineral fluctuating water, and stony-iron meteorite + mineral fluctuating water, respectively. All 30 Shijimi began to be active 60 minutes after being immersed in the tektite + mineral fluctuating water, moldavite + mineral fluctuating water, and Libyan glass + mineral fluctuating water. However, none of the Shijimi immersed in the tap water of Yokkaichi became active in 60 minutes. The difference is obvious. It has been previously proven that the water composition has not changed. That is, the meteorite + gemstone fluctuating water, and the meteorite + gemstone fluctuating + low-frequency fluctuating water seem to be useful for organisms belonging to the phylum Mollusca such as shellfish.

[0436]

Table 206

[0437] <Example 196> Experiment on the lifespan of mice Next, an experiment on the lifespan of mice was conducted. Three mice were used for each water sample. Among the mice used, BB6D2F1 showed an average lifespan of 870 days for males and 783 days for females. Males had a longer lifespan than females. The difference in the maximum lifespan between males and females was small, both being around 1100 days. The feed used was the standard products of CLEA Japan (CE-2, CR-3M), and no drugs were mixed. The water was freely inoculated for (1) - (14) using an automatic water feeder. The lifespan was measured with 3 male and 3 female mice for each type of water, and the average value was obtained. None of the mice died suddenly or prematurely among all the mice. The results are shown in Table 207. As shown in the table, the fluctuating water of all meteorites + gems significantly extended the lifespan. The original lifespan cannot extend the sequence called telomere on chromosomes, which shortens during cell division. When the telomere becomes shorter than a certain extent, cells can no longer divide. This is called the Hayflick limit in animals, and it is thought to be the cause of physiological lifespan. It is considered that animals set their physiological lifespan by losing telomerase. Therefore, if an environment that produces telomerase can be created, the lifespan will be extended, but it is difficult to think that the telomere is extended. In the case of humans, it is said that the SpO2 value (blood oxygen concentration) of healthy people at rest is in the range of 96% - 98%, and when it drops below 90%, it is defined as respiratory failure. When respiratory failure occurs, the respiratory rate increases, and accordingly, the heart rate increases, and the lifespan becomes shorter. According to "The Time of Elephants, the Time of Mice, the Biology of Size" by Tatsuo Honkawa (Chuko Shinsho), it is said that the lifespan of any organism ends when the heart beats 1.5 billion times. It was considered that as the blood oxygen concentration increases, the respiratory rate decreases, and in conjunction with that, the heart rate decreases, and the lifespan is extended.

[0438]

Table 207

[0439] <Example 197> Relationship among Respiratory Rate, Heart Rate, and Oxygen Concentration Therefore, next, the respiratory rate, heart rate, and transcutaneous arterial oxygen saturation were examined in humans. (A) Respiratory rate (RR), (B) Heart rate (HR), and (C) Transcutaneous arterial oxygen saturation SpO2 (Oxygen, Saturation, Percutaneous) were measured in humans because it is impossible to measure them in mice. (A) The respiratory rate per minute was counted. Breathing was counted as one cycle of natural "exhale and inhale" without awareness, and if it ended midway, the respiratory rate was counted as 0.0. (B) The heart rate was measured using an OMRON HCR-7800T (upper arm blood pressure monitor with electrocardiogram). (C) The blood oxygen concentration was measured using an OMRON pulse oximeter HPO-300T. The subjects were divided into 10 groups by age: Group A: 10 - 15 years old, Group B: 16 - 20 years old, Group C: 21 - 25 years old, Group D: 26 - 30 years old, Group E: 31 - 35 years old, Group F: 36 - 40 years old, Group G: 41 - 45 years old, Group H: 46 - 50 years old, Group I: 51 - 60 years old, Group J: 61 - 65 years old. People with extremely low or high numbers were excluded, and the average of 5 people was calculated. These were taken once a day for each sample. As for the beverage conditions, on the first day, 2.5 liters of tap water was consumed in small portions starting at 21:00, and the respiratory rate, heart rate, and oxygen concentration were measured at 20:00 the next day. On the second day, 2.5 liters of tap water + water with the fluctuation of whole meteorites + minerals was consumed in small portions starting at 21:00, and the respiratory rate, heart rate, and oxygen concentration were measured for each sample at 20:00 the next day. Since the oxygen partial pressure changes due to heating (37°C) and humidification (100%) associated with air pressure and breathing, the experiment was conducted in a room maintained at a room temperature of 25°C and a humidity of 65%. Cloudy and rainy days were avoided, and sunny days were selected for the experiment. Table 208 shows the results of measuring the respiratory rate, heart rate, and SpO2 value after 15 minutes of rest.

[0440]

Table 208

[0441] There was no significant difference between well water and tap water. However, in the case of water with whole meteorites + 80 types of the above minerals using the tap water in Yokkaichi, a distinct significant difference occurred. This phenomenon was thought to be explained as follows. The difference in SpO2 was only 1% to 2% at most. In general, the total blood volume is said to be 1 / 13 of the body weight in men. For example, for a person weighing 60 kg, 60÷13≒3.6 kg. Since the specific gravity of blood is about 1.00, the volume is about 3.6 liters. Furthermore, gases can be dissolved in blood in two ways: physically dissolved (in a molecular state) and chemically dissolved (chemically bound to substances in the blood). The physical dissolution of oxygen is 0.29 mL / dL. In chemical dissolution, O2 exists bound to hemoglobin. When reduced hemoglobin binds with O2, it becomes oxyhemoglobin (HBO2). The ratio of oxyhemoglobin to total hemoglobin is called oxygen saturation (HBO2 / (HB+HBO2)). An increase in oxygen partial pressure increases oxygen saturation, and normally, at an oxygen partial pressure of 100 mmHg, the saturation is approximately 98%. 1g of HB binds with 1.33mL of oxygen, so if HB in 100mL is 15g, 1.33mL x 15g = about 20mL can be transported. If the cardiac output per minute is about 5L, then 1L of oxygen can be transported per minute. In other words, the difference between the amount of oxygen transported per minute between 99% and 98% is 10mL per minute, and 10mL x 60 minutes x 24 hours = 14,400mL per day, so even a 1% difference can have a significant impact on lifespan. The number of breaths and the heart rate are linked, and it is said that a person's lifespan ends when their heart beats 1.5 billion times. If the number of breaths decreases and the heart rate decreases accordingly, lifespan will be extended. If a heart rate drops from 80 beats per minute to 65 beats per minute, it would not be surprising if life expectancy increased by 18%. In humans, this would increase life expectancy by more than 18%. In other words, it is highly likely that the increase in life expectancy in mice is due to an effect on heart rate. It was thought that the vibrational water, which was made from tap water in Yokkaichi and had been passed through the meteorite and the above minerals, would increase the amount of oxygen supplied. However, since there was no machine to accurately measure the partial pressure of oxygen in the blood, no data could be obtained from blood tests.

[0442] In addition, as the effects when using the water of the present invention, there have been reports that: (1) dying goldfish became lively, (2) the cataracts of a pet dog improved, (3) a cat that could no longer walk could walk again, (4) a dying cat revived, (5) a dog gave birth to 11 puppies, (6) the coat condition of dogs and cats improved, (7) the germination of plants was two days earlier, (8) cut flowers lasted longer, and (9) foliage plants grew lushly. Furthermore, as the effects on humans, there have been reports that: (1) constipation improved, (2) it became less likely to catch a cold, (3) compared to before drinking, urination became more frequent, (4) it became less likely to have a hangover, (5) the liver values improved, (6) asthma was alleviated, (7) it became less likely to get drunk on alcohol, (8) diabetes was alleviated, (9) the physical condition improved, (10) cystitis was improved, (11) kidney function (creatinine level) improved, and (12) the skin condition improved.

[0443] <Water treatment filter and water purifier> Figure 38 shows the configuration of a water purifier 12 equipped with a water treatment filter 11. The water treatment filter 11 is provided with a container 15 having a water inlet 13 and a drain outlet 14, and a flowing water passage 16 for supplying water from the water inlet 13 to the drain outlet 14. Inside the container 15, a meteorite 17 is provided in the flowing water passage 16 so that the water passing through the flowing water passage 16 comes into contact with the meteorite 17. This water purifier 12 is provided with a sound wave irradiation device 18 for applying sound waves to the water passing through the flowing water passage 16 and a fluctuation device 19 for applying 1 / f fluctuations. In this way, when water is flowed from the water inlet 13 using the configured water purifier 12, water that has come into contact with the meteorite 17 and has been subjected to sound waves and / or 1 / f fluctuations by the sound wave irradiation device 18 and / or the fluctuation device 19 can be obtained. In addition, in the above-described embodiment, any of the following structures is included in the technical scope of the present invention: (A) a structure without the sound wave irradiation device 18 and the vibration device 19 (only the water treatment filter 11), (B) a structure provided with only the sound wave irradiation device 18 (the water treatment filter 11 and the sound wave irradiation device 18), (C) a structure provided with only the vibration device 19 (the water treatment filter 11 and the vibration device 19), or (D) a structure provided with the sound wave irradiation device 18 and the vibration device 19 (the water treatment filter 11, the sound wave irradiation device 18, and the vibration device 19).

[0444] As described above, according to this embodiment, it is possible to provide a water treatment filter, a cartridge, a water purifier having a record of the natural vibration of a meteorite by bringing water into contact with the meteorite, and water having the natural vibration of the meteorite. In addition, according to the water purifier, it is a wave water purifier in which a wave generating substance (meteorite + mineral) is disposed in a flowing water passage. Since the wave generating substance containing the meteorite exists in the flowing water passage in the container, the flowing water passing through here can be brought into contact with the wave generating substance to experience waves. In addition, according to the filter, tap water or the like enters from the water inlet of the filter and exits from the drain port to another port in the water purifier, and during this time, the wave action of the meteorite or the mineral can be exerted on the tap water. As a result, different from simply filtering tap water, it has been successful in providing water having a mild effect on the body by bringing the wave generating substance containing the meteorite into contact with the tap water or passing it in the vicinity, for example, water having a high oxygen content in the blood, so that the filter can be provided.

Claims

1. A filter for water treatment, comprising: a container provided with a water inlet and a drain outlet; a flowing water passage extending from the water inlet to the drain outlet; and a meteorite provided in the flowing water passage, wherein the meteorite weighs 0.0001 g or more, and the meteorite is composed of a stone meteorite, an iron meteorite, a stony-iron meteorite, tektite, moldavite, and Libyan glass.

2. The filter for water treatment according to claim 1, wherein the meteorite is pulverized into a size of 20 μm to 300 μm and then kneaded into a ceramic material having an infrared emissivity of 90% or more, or mixed into a glaze, and then fired to form a ceramic.

3. The filter for water treatment according to claim 1, wherein the meteorite is pulverized into a size of 20 μm to 300 μm and then kneaded into a fiber or adsorbed onto the fiber.

4. The filter for water treatment according to claim 1, wherein the meteorite is pulverized into a size of 20 μm to 300 μm and then kneaded into an adhesive such as cement.

5. A water purifier incorporating an infrared radiator having a wavelength range of 2 μm to 14 μm and an emissivity of 90% or more when treated with the filter for water treatment according to any one of claims 1 to 4.

6. A water purifier comprising the filter for water treatment according to claim 1.

7. A water purifier, comprising: the filter for water treatment according to any one of claims 1 to 4; and a sound wave irradiation device configured to apply a sound wave of 20 Hz to 10,000 Hz to water passing through the filter.

Images