Design proposal review support system

Abstract

To provide a highly convenient design proposal review support system. [Solution] A design proposal review system A is accessed from a user's terminal and supports the review of design proposals for temporary structures in construction work, and includes at least a design proposal extraction unit 10 that extracts one or more design proposals based on design conditions entered by user B from terminal C, a result display unit 20 that displays the extraction results by the design proposal extraction unit 10 on a screen, and a comparison table generation unit 30 that generates a comparison table of a design proposal selected by user B from the one or more design proposals extracted by the design proposal extraction unit 10. The comparison table generated by the comparison table generation unit 30 can be downloaded as a template for documents that the user needs to prepare when, for example, presenting multiple design proposals to a client, thereby contributing to improving the convenience of document creation work performed by the user.

Description

[Technical Field]

[0001] The present invention relates to a design proposal review support system for supporting the review of design proposals to be adopted in construction work by extracting design proposals that meet design conditions input by a user. [Background technology]

[0002] The following prior art documents are known as systems for automatically selecting a construction method that suits the conditions of a construction site. For example, the system disclosed in Patent Document 1 selects one or more civil engineering methods that are compatible with the input data by inputting data regarding the type of construction work, the planned cross section of the construction site, and the planning conditions. The applicant has also established a website described in the following Non-Patent Document 1 as a service to support the simplified design of temporary bridges. [Prior art documents] [Patent documents]

[0003] [Patent Document 1] Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2002-146825 [Non-patent literature]

[0004] [Patent Document 2] https: / / www.kyoryo-net.jp / top.aspx Summary of the Invention [Problem to be solved by the invention]

[0005] An object of the present invention is to provide a design proposal review support system that is more convenient for users than the systems or services related to the prior art documents mentioned above. [Means for solving the problem]

[0006] The present invention, which has been made to solve the above-mentioned problems, is a system that is accessed from a user's terminal and supports the consideration of design proposals for temporary structures in construction work, and is characterized by comprising at least a design proposal extraction unit that extracts one or more design proposals based on design conditions entered by the user from the terminal, a result display unit that displays the extraction results by the design proposal extraction unit on a screen, and a comparison table generation unit that generates a comparison table of a design proposal selected by the user from the one or more design proposals extracted by the design proposal extraction unit. Furthermore, the present invention may be configured such that, in the above invention, the comparison table generation unit has a function of highlighting differences in design conditions and / or detailed information between all design proposals or between the design proposals being compared on a selection screen for design proposals for generating the comparison table. The present invention may also be configured such that the comparison table generating unit has a function of inserting sample text that requires addition or correction by the user into at least some of the items in the comparison table. Furthermore, the present invention may be configured such that, in the above invention, the design proposal extraction unit has a function that allows a user to select which process to proceed: a multiple extraction process that extracts multiple design proposals, or a single extraction process that extracts one design proposal, and the comparison table generation unit has a function that generates a comparison table of the design proposal selected by the user across the design proposals extracted in each of the multiple extraction process and / or the single extraction process. Furthermore, the present invention may be configured such that, in the multiple extraction process and / or the single extraction process, when the design proposal extraction unit requests the user to interactively input design conditions, the design proposal extraction unit has a function of changing the input order of subsequent design conditions in accordance with the design conditions input by the user. In the present invention, the comparison table generating unit may have a function that allows a user to download the comparison table in tabular format data. [Effects of the Invention]

[0007] According to the present invention, it is possible to provide a design proposal review support system that is more convenient for proceeding with the review of design proposals that are compatible with the conditions of a construction site. [Brief explanation of the drawings]

[0008] [Figure 1] 1 is a schematic diagram showing the overall configuration of a design proposal review support system according to the present invention; [Figure 2] Image of the condition input screen for multiple extraction processing (1). [Figure 3] Image of the condition input screen for multiple extraction processing (2). [Figure 4] An image of the condition input screen for multiple extraction processing (3). [Figure 5] An image of the condition input screen for multiple extraction processing (4). [Figure 6] An image of the condition input screen for multiple extraction processing (5). [Figure 7] Image of the multiple extraction results screen. [Figure 8] Image of the design proposal selection screen (1). [Figure 9] An image of the comparison table screen. [Figure 10] An image of the comparison table list screen. [Figure 11] An image of the condition input screen for single extraction processing (1). [Figure 12] An image of the condition input screen for single extraction processing (2). [Figure 13] An image of the condition input screen for single extraction processing (3). [Figure 14] An image of the condition input screen for single extraction processing (4). [Figure 15] Image of the single extraction results screen. [Figure 16] Image of the design proposal selection screen (2). DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0009] Hereinafter, an embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings. [Example]

[0010] <1> Overview (Figure 1) The design proposal review support system A (hereinafter sometimes simply referred to as "support system A") according to the present invention can be used to review design proposals suitable for construction work. Examples of the design proposals to be reviewed include temporary structures such as temporary bridges, temporary bridges, temporary piers, and earth retaining structures. As an example, an embodiment in which the support system A according to the present invention is applied to the study of design proposals for temporary structures will be described with reference to the drawings.

[0011] <1.1>Prerequisites The support system A according to the present invention is used by being accessed from a terminal (used terminal C) used by a user B via various networks such as the Internet, LAN, and WAN. In this embodiment, the support system according to the present invention is applied as a SaaS (Software as a Service) type system that is used by logging in from a web browser on a terminal that User B can use (Terminal C).

[0012] <1.2> User attributes User B who uses the support system A of the present invention is not limited to design consultants and clients who review design proposals for construction work, but also includes sales representatives and engineers belonging to the company that provides this support system. Furthermore, the terminal C used by user B may be a PC, a smartphone, a tablet, or any other information processing device.

[0013] <1.3> Overall structure The support system A according to the present invention comprises at least a design proposal extraction unit 10, a result display unit 20, and a comparison table generation unit 30. Each part can be realized by any combination of hardware and software, and can also be configured as a separate device, or as an integrated device incorporating multiple parts. Each part will be described in detail below.

[0014] <2> Design proposal extraction section (Fig. 1) The design proposal extraction unit 10 is a processing unit having at least a function of extracting at least one or more design proposals based on design conditions input by user B from terminal C used by user B. More specifically, the design proposal extraction unit 10 has at least the function of displaying a design condition input screen on the display of the terminal C used by user B, and the function of extracting at least one candidate design proposal based on the design conditions input by user B from this input screen. In the present invention, "input" by the user also includes the selection of conditions using check boxes or pull-down menus displayed on the condition input screen. The details of the screen displayed on the terminal C used by the user B by the design proposal extraction unit 10 will be described later. <5> The items in the screen image will be explained.

[0015] <2.1>Design conditions Design conditions are the conditions under which design proposals for construction work are considered. For example, when the subject of User B's study is a temporary structure, examples of items that may be listed as design conditions that require input by the user are shown in Table 1 below.

[0016] [Table 1] TIFF0007776605000002.tif201151

[0017] Depending on whether User B selects the multiple extraction process or the single extraction process described below, and the design conditions entered by User B during each extraction process, it is possible to omit inputting conditions for some of these items, have the design proposal extraction unit 10 automatically input the conditions, or omit displaying the item altogether.

[0018] <2.2>Selection of design condition input method In the present invention, the design proposal extraction unit 10 may be configured so that when user B inputs design conditions, user B can select which extraction process to proceed with from the multiple extraction process or the single extraction process described below. Each extraction process will be described in detail below.

[0019] <2.2.1> Multiple extraction processing The multiple extraction process is a process in which the design conditions that need to be input by user B are displayed on the display of user terminal C, and after user B inputs the design conditions for each item, multiple design proposals that satisfy the design conditions are extracted. In this process, the input fields for user B to input design conditions on the screen may be configured to be displayed as a list on the screen of terminal C from the beginning, or the design conditions to be input may be displayed in order in an interactive format. This process is suitable for selection when user B wants to compare multiple design proposals (such as different construction methods).

[0020] <2.2.2> Single extraction processing The single extraction process is a process in which the design conditions that need to be input by user B are displayed on the screen, and after user B inputs the design conditions for each item, only one design plan that satisfies the design conditions is extracted. In this process, the input fields on the screen for user B to input design conditions may be configured to be displayed as a list on the screen of terminal C from the beginning, as in the multiple extraction process described above, or may be configured to display the design conditions to be input in an interactive format in order. This process is suitable for selection when User B, who has extensive design experience, uses the system after he or she has already decided on the construction method to be adopted.

[0021] <2.2.3> Contents and display order of design conditions for each extraction process In the present invention, the contents and input order of the design conditions input in each extraction process do not need to be the same. For example, in a single extraction process, design conditions that do not exist in a multiple extraction process may be added to narrow down the design proposals to one, or when a user is asked to interactively input design conditions in each extraction process, the input order of subsequent design conditions may be changed depending on the design conditions input by the user.

[0022] <2.3> Integration process (Fig. 1) The design plan extraction unit 10 may be configured to perform an accumulation process of the construction period and construction costs of each design plan in conjunction with the design plan extraction process. As shown in FIG. 1, the support system according to this embodiment is provided with a database (hereinafter also referred to as "DB") of various information required for estimating construction periods and construction costs. An example of the DB will be described below.

[0023] <2.3.1>Quantity summary table DB The quantity summary table DB 40 is a database that records the unit quantities of each member used in the construction method adopted in the design proposal. The design plan extraction unit 10 reads out the quantity of each member used in the construction method selected in the extracted design plan from the quantity summary table DB 40 and uses it for estimation.

[0024] <2.3.2> Price unit price DB The unit price DB50 is a database that records the unit prices of each component used in the design proposal. The design plan extraction unit 10 reads out the unit price of each member used in the construction method selected in the extracted design plan and uses it for estimation. In addition, since the unit price of each component may differ depending on the construction area and construction time, the price unit price DB 50 may be configured to incorporate publicly available price information and be updated as appropriate.

[0025] <3> Result display section (Figure 1) The result display unit 20 is a processing unit having a function of displaying the extraction results by the design plan extraction unit 10 on the screen of the terminal C used by the user B. Details of the screen displayed on the terminal C used by the result display unit 20 of the user B will be described later. <5> The items in the screen image will be explained.

[0026] <3.1> Display items of design proposals The display items of the design proposal extracted by the design proposal extraction unit 10 can include some or all of the design conditions entered by user B in Table 1 above, as well as detailed information shown in Table 2 below.

[0027] [Table 2] TIFF0007776605000003.tif72151

[0028] The result display unit 20 may be configured to display a column displaying a list of extracted design proposals and a column displaying detailed information about the design proposal selected by user B separately. In addition, in the column displaying the list of design proposals, only some of the items listed in Table 2 above may be extracted and displayed. Furthermore, the field displaying detailed information about the design proposal may be configured to also display the design conditions entered by user B (information included in Table 1 above).

[0029] <4> Comparison table generator (Figure 1) The comparison table generating unit 30 is a processing unit having a function of generating a comparison table of the design plan selected by the user B from at least one or more design plans extracted by the design plan extracting unit 10. More specifically, the comparison table generation unit 30 selects multiple design proposals from the multiple design proposals displayed on user B's terminal C, and selects execution of comparison table generation, thereby displaying a comparison table on user B's terminal C that displays the contents of each design proposal, construction period, construction costs, and other information in tabular format. The details of the screen displayed on the display of the terminal C used by the user B by the comparison table generating unit 30 will be described later. <5> The items in the screen image will be explained.

[0030] <4.1> What to generate a comparison table for In the comparison table generation unit 30, the design proposals for which the comparison table is generated are not limited to those displayed on the screen via the result display unit 20 immediately after the extraction process by the design proposal extraction unit 10, but may also be design proposals that have been extracted and saved in the past, or may be configured to allow cross-sectional selection of these design proposals. For example, for design proposals that have the same property name or area name that must be input as design conditions, design proposals extracted by multiple extraction processing and design proposals extracted by single extraction processing can be classified into the same group, and each design proposal can be included in the list of targets for generating a comparison table regardless of whether it is multiple extraction processing or single extraction processing.

[0031] <4.2> Item highlighting function In the present invention, the comparison table generation unit 30 may have a function to highlight differences in the design conditions (Table 1) and / or detailed information (Table 2) entered by user B between all design proposals or between design proposals selected for comparison on a design proposal selection screen for generating a comparison table.

[0032] <4.3> Sample text insertion function In the present invention, the comparison table generating unit 30 may have a function of inserting sample text (template text) that requires additions or corrections by user B into at least some of the items in the comparison table to be generated. With this function, User B can create a new comparison table using sample text that is inserted in advance into one of the items in the comparison table generated by this system. More specifically, by including both optional descriptions as sample text, User B can prepare a new comparison table simply by deleting one of the optional descriptions.

[0033] <4.4> Comparison table download function In the present invention, the comparison table generating unit 30 may have a function that enables the generated comparison table to be downloaded as tabular data. The comparison table to be downloaded is not limited to the comparison table generated immediately after the extraction process by the design proposal extraction unit 10, but may be a comparison table that has been generated and saved in the past. With this function, User B can directly modify the tabular comparison table downloaded from this system using spreadsheet software when generating a comparison table for a client, thereby enabling the preparation of documents to be submitted to business partners with less work.

[0034] <5> Screen image (1) [Multiple extraction process] (Figures 2 to 10) The following describes the transition of screens displayed on the terminal C of user B when user B accesses the support system according to the present invention and extracts design proposals using multiple extraction processes. In the present invention, the layout of each screen displayed on the terminal C used by user B is not particularly limited, and a layout that can be changed to an appropriate layout depending on the display size and resolution of the terminal C used (such as so-called "responsive design") may be adopted.

[0035] (1) Condition input screen (Figures 2 to 6) 2 to 6 show a condition input screen 100 that is displayed on the terminal C of user B by the design plan extraction unit 10 after user B logs in to the support system according to the present invention.

[0036] 2 shows a condition input screen 100 in which a menu field 110 is arranged on the left side of the screen, and in which user B has selected new design button 111 in menu field 110, and further in which a first selection button 121 ("standard mode") for proceeding to multiple extraction processing, which is displayed as a tab in the upper area of ​​the area extending from the center to the right side of the screen, has been selected, and in the remaining area, a first input field 131 is arranged in which user B can input various design conditions, and in which basic information such as the property name and area is entered. After the design conditions in this first input field 131 are entered, new input fields are displayed below as needed, prompting user B to enter design conditions.

[0037] 3, a second input field 132 for inputting the temporary construction method is arranged. In the standard mode (multiple extraction processing), no selection item for the construction method is made, and only vertical or horizontal temporary construction is selected.

[0038] In FIG. 4, in addition to the third input field 133 mentioned above, there is also a third input field 133 for inputting the substructure type and a fourth input field 134 for inputting the loading conditions, etc. In this embodiment, based on the input contents in the first input field 131 and the second input field 132, the third input field 133 and the fourth input field 134 have limited options, so the design conditions are automatically input by the design proposal extraction unit 10, and each field is grayed out and cannot be input by user B.

[0039] In FIG. 5, in addition to the fourth input field 134, a fifth input field 135 for inputting pile specifications is arranged.

[0040] In addition to the fifth input field 135 mentioned above, Figure 6 also includes a sixth input field 136 for inputting the effective width, a seventh input field 137 for inputting the bridge length, and an extraction execution button 140 for instructing the execution of the design proposal extraction process. When the user B selects the extraction execution button 140 arranged on the condition input screen 100 shown in FIG. 6, the design plan extraction unit 10 executes the design plan extraction process.

[0041] (2) Multiple extraction results screen (Figure 7) FIG. 7 shows a multiple extraction result screen 200 that displays the extraction results of the multiple extraction process by the result display unit 20. The multiple extraction result screen 200 shown in Figure 7 has an extraction result column 210 on the left side of the screen that displays a list of extracted design proposals, and a design proposal details column 220 on the right side of the screen that displays detailed content of the design proposal selected by user B from the extraction result column 210. The extraction results are saved on the system side and can be referenced later by selecting the design history button 112 in the menu column 110 shown in FIG.

[0042] (3) Design proposal selection screen (Fig. 8) FIG. 8 shows a design plan selection screen 300 for selecting a design plan for which a comparison table is to be generated from the design plan extraction results by the comparison table generating unit 30. On the design proposal selection screen 300 shown in FIG. 8, after selecting the design history button 112 in the menu column 110 on the left side of the screen, the design proposal list button in tab format located at the top center of the screen is selected, and a list of the design proposals saved on the system side is displayed below that button.

[0043] When the check box attached to each design proposal is selected, items that differ between the selected design proposals in terms of the design conditions entered by the user or detailed design proposal information (construction method adopted, cost estimation results, etc.) are highlighted by changing the color of the item column or by changing the text in the item to bold (transition to highlighted item 311).

[0044] In Figure 8, three design proposals are selected, and after entering any name in the comparison table name input field located at the bottom of the comparison table screen 400, the user selects the comparison table generation execution button 313, which causes the comparison table generation unit 30 to perform the comparison table generation process, save the generated comparison table on the system side, and display the comparison table screen 400 shown in Figure 9.

[0045] (4) Comparison table screen (Figure 9) FIG. 9 shows a comparison table screen 400 that displays the comparison table generated by the comparison table generating unit 30. The comparison table arranges each design proposal in the column direction, and the rows list the design conditions used to extract each design proposal, the cost estimates, and detailed information saved as templates for each construction proposal in the system.

[0046] 9, the detailed content items include a column (sample text entry column 410) in which sample text (template text) that needs to be added or corrected by user B is entered. Note that, although in this embodiment, the items in the comparison table are configured so that they cannot be edited by user B, in the future, the comparison table screen 400 may be configured so that each item can be edited.

[0047] By selecting the download button 420, the user B can download the comparison table displayed on the comparison table screen 400 to the terminal C that the user B is using in the form of tabular data. User B can quickly create a comparison table to provide to User B's business partners, etc., by appropriately editing the downloaded comparison table.

[0048] (5) Comparison table list screen (Figure 10) FIG. 10 is a comparison table list screen 500 showing a list of the comparison tables that have been generated as shown in FIG. On the comparison table list screen 500 shown in FIG. 10, after selecting the design history button 112 in the menu field 110 on the left side of the screen, the tabbed comparison table list selection button 132 located at the top center of the screen is selected. This displays a list of the selected design proposals for each comparison table name entered in FIG. 8, and also provides a pull-down menu for each comparison table that allows the user to change the name, download, delete, etc.

[0049] <6> Screen image (2) [Single extraction process] (Figures 11 to 15) Next, a transition image of the screen displayed on the terminal C of user B when user B accesses the support system according to the present invention and extracts design proposals by single extraction processing will be described.

[0050] (1) Condition input screen (Figures 11 to 14) 11 to 14 show a condition input screen 100 displayed on the terminal C of user B by the design proposal extraction unit 10 when user B logs in to the support system of the present invention and extracts a design proposal by single extraction processing. 11 shows a condition input screen 100 in which a menu field 110 is arranged on the left side of the screen, and in which user B has selected new design button 111 in menu field 110, and further in which a first selection button 122 ("custom mode"), which is displayed as a tab in the upper area of ​​the area extending from the center to the right side of the screen, and which proceeds to single extraction processing, has been selected, and in the remaining area, a first input field 131 is arranged in which user B can input various design conditions, and in which basic information such as the property name and area is entered. After the design conditions in this first input field 131 are entered, new input fields are displayed below as needed, prompting user B to enter design conditions.

[0051] 12, a second input field 132 for inputting a temporary construction method is provided. In the custom mode (single extraction processing), it is possible to input a selection item for the construction method, which is omitted in the standard mode (multiple extraction processing).

[0052] In Figure 13, there are arranged a third input field 133 for inputting load conditions, etc., and a fourth input field 134 for inputting pile specifications. In the standard mode (multiple extraction processing) shown in Figure 4, the third input field 133 is a field for inputting the substructure type, and the fourth input field 134 is a field for inputting load conditions, etc., so the input order of the design conditions, which proceeds in an interactive format, differs between the standard mode (multiple extraction processing) and the custom mode (single extraction processing).

[0053] Figure 14 shows a fifth input field 135 for inputting the span length as bridge dimension 1, a sixth input field 136 for inputting the span length and effective width as bridge dimension 2, and an extraction execution button 140 for instructing the execution of the design proposal extraction process. When the user B selects the extraction execution button 140 arranged on the condition input screen 100 shown in FIG. 14, the design plan extraction unit 10 executes the design plan extraction process.

[0054] (2) Single extraction result screen (Figure 15) FIG. 15 shows a single extraction result screen 600 displayed by the result display unit 20, which displays the extraction results of the single extraction process. The single extraction result screen 600 shown in Fig. 15 is displayed as a pop-up so as to overlap the condition input screen 100 shown in Fig. 11 to Fig. 14, and displays detailed content of the design proposal of a single design proposal. After entering the name of an arbitrary design proposal in the design proposal name input field 610 located in the upper left of this single extraction result screen 600, the extracted design proposal can be saved on the system side by selecting the design proposal save button 620 located in the lower right of the screen.

[0055] (3) Design proposal selection screen (Figure 16) FIG. 16 shows a design plan selection screen 300 for selecting a design plan for which a comparison table is to be generated from the design plan extraction results by the comparison table generating unit 30. On the design proposal selection screen 300 shown in FIG. 16, after selecting the design history button 112 in the menu column 110 on the left side of the screen, the design proposal list button in tab format located at the top center of the screen is selected, and a list of the design proposals saved on the system side is displayed below that button.

[0056] When the user selects the design proposal add button 314 located on the right side of the screen from this design proposal selection screen 300, the design proposal extraction unit 10 displays the condition input screen 100 shown in FIG. 11 on the terminal C used by user B, in which the first input field 131 is arranged and the same property name and area ("Custom" and "Aichi Prefecture" in FIG. 16) are pre-reflected.

[0057] By this process, user B can input different design conditions and add other design plans that have been subjected to single extraction processing to the design plan selection screen 300 shown in FIG. The process for selecting saved design plans, generating a comparison table, and downloading it is described above. <5> There is no significant difference from (3) to (5) above, so we will omit the explanation.

[0058] <7> summary According to the design proposal review system of the present invention, at least one of the following effects can be obtained. (1) When users consider design proposals, they can choose to extract multiple design proposals simultaneously or narrow down the selection to one design proposal, enabling them to extract the optimal design proposal depending on the phase of the design proposal review process, the user's level of expertise, etc. (2) The user can check multiple design proposals presented on the presentation screen in the form of a comparison table, which improves the convenience of the user's design proposal selection process. (3) The comparison table generated by this system can be downloaded in tabular format as a template for documents that users need to prepare when presenting multiple design proposals to a client, thereby improving the convenience of document creation work for users. (4) It is possible to generate a comparison table that mixes design proposals extracted using multiple extraction processing and design proposals extracted using single extraction processing, thereby improving the convenience of users when creating comparison tables. (5) By changing the input order of the design conditions that the user is required to input interactively between the multiple extraction process and the single extraction process, it is possible to realize an input procedure for design conditions that allows for faster narrowing down of the design conditions in the single extraction process, which requires narrowing down to one design proposal. [Explanation of symbols]

[0059] A: Design proposal review support system (support system) B: User C: Device used 10: Design proposal extraction section 20:Result display area 30: Comparison table generator 40:Quantity summary table DB 50: Price book unit price DB 100: Condition input screen 110: Menu column 111: New design button 112: Design history button 121: First selection button 122: Second selection button 131: Design proposal list selection button 132: Comparison table list selection button 131~137: 1st input field to 7th input field 140: Extraction execution button 200: Multiple extraction results screen 210: Extraction result column 220:Design proposal details column 300: Design proposal selection screen 311: Highlighted item 312: Comparison table name input field 313: Comparison table generation execution button 314: Add design proposal button 400: Comparison table screen 410: Sample text entry field 420: Download button 500: Comparison table list screen 600: Single extraction result screen 610: Design proposal name input field 620: Save design proposal button

Claims

1. A system for supporting the review of design proposals for temporary structures in construction work by accessing the system from a user's terminal, a design proposal extraction unit that extracts one or more design proposals based on design conditions input by a user from the terminal; a result display unit that displays the extraction results by the design proposal extraction unit on a screen; a comparison table generating unit that generates a comparison table of a design plan selected by a user from the one or more design plans extracted by the design plan extracting unit; characterized by comprising at least A support system for reviewing design proposals for construction work.

2. The comparison table generation unit The design plan selection screen for generating the comparison table has a function of highlighting differences in design conditions and / or detailed information between all the design plans or between the compared design plans. The design proposal review support system according to claim 1 .

3. The comparison table generation unit The comparison table has a function of inserting sample text that requires addition or correction by the user into at least some of the items in the comparison table. The design proposal review support system according to claim 1 .

4. The design proposal extraction unit The system has a function that allows the user to select whether to proceed with a multiple extraction process that extracts multiple design proposals or a single extraction process that extracts one design proposal, The comparison table generation unit a function of generating a comparison table of design proposals selected by a user across the design proposals extracted by the multiple extraction process and / or the single extraction process; The design proposal review support system according to claim 1 .

5. The design proposal extraction unit In the multiple extraction process and / or the single extraction process, when the user is asked to input design conditions in an interactive format, the process has a function of changing the input order of subsequent design conditions according to the design conditions input by the user. The design proposal review support system according to claim 4.

6. The comparison table generation unit The comparison table has a function that allows a user to download the comparison table in tabular format. The design proposal review support system according to claim 1 .

Images