Method and apparatus for evaluating operation continuity of high-speed train during fire

Abstract

The present application provides a method and apparatus for evaluating the operation continuity of a high-speed train during a fire. The method comprises: applying, to a system functional block to be evaluated in a train operation simulation model, a simulated ignition source corresponding to a preset fire type; determining whether said system functional block can maintain a corresponding operation capability within a preset fire resistance index time period; if said system functional block cannot maintain the corresponding operation capability, determining whether a redundant configuration exists; if no redundant configuration exists, determining whether a train is equipped with a firefighting system; if the train is not equipped with a firefighting system, configuring the train to operate in a degraded mode, and determining whether the tractive force of the train can maintain normal traveling on a preset route during operation; if the tractive force cannot maintain normal operation of the train, determining that said system functional block does not have operation continuity during a fire. The present application can comprehensively and efficiently evaluate the capabilities of systems to maintain the intended functions when a fire occurs on a high-speed train, thereby achieving precise monitoring of the fire prevention capabilities of high-speed trains and enhancing the fire safety performance of high-speed trains.

Description

Method and device for evaluating fire operation maintaining capability of high-speed train

[0001] Cross-reference to Related Applications

[0002] The present application claims priority to the Chinese patent application No. 2024106480928, filed on May 23, 2024, and entitled "Method and device for evaluating fire operation maintaining capability of high-speed train", the content of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. TECHNICAL FIELD

[0003] The present application relates to the field of rail transit, in particular to a method and device for evaluating fire operation maintaining capability of high-speed train. BACKGROUND

[0004] With the rapid development of high-speed railway, a dense and mature high-speed rail network has been formed, providing strong support for economic development. High-speed trains, as an important modern transportation tool for passenger transport, have the characteristics of personnel concentration, space closure, long running line and time, and complex running environment (including tunnels and elevated lines). Once a fire occurs, it poses a great threat to personnel safety, and rescue forces are difficult to arrive in time. Therefore, it is necessary to develop a scientific and reasonable evacuation strategy. Ensuring that the vehicle has the ability to operate under fire and can run to the designated area is a prerequisite for evacuation.

[0005] Currently, due to the late start of domestic research on the fire operation capability of railway vehicles, the evaluation method for maintaining the operation capability of railway vehicles under fire conditions is not comprehensive and systematic, so it is necessary to develop a systematic evaluation program to ensure that the vehicle has a certain operation capability under fire conditions, improve the fire safety level of high-speed trains, and protect passenger safety.

[0006] SUMMARY

[0007] The embodiments of the present disclosure at least provide a method and device for evaluating fire operation maintaining capability of high-speed train, which can comprehensively and efficiently evaluate the ability of each system of high-speed vehicle to maintain its related functions under fire conditions, thereby realizing precise monitoring of the fire prevention capability of high-speed train and improving the fire safety performance of high-speed train.

[0008] The embodiments of the present disclosure provide a method for evaluating fire operation maintaining capability of high-speed train, comprising:

[0009] Obtaining a train operation simulation model, applying a simulation ignition source corresponding to a preset fire type to a system function block to be evaluated to generate a fire event;

[0010] inputting the temperature-time curve corresponding to the fire event into a preset simulation analysis model to determine whether the to-be-evaluated system function block maintains corresponding operation capability within a preset fire resistance index time;

[0011] If the to-be-evaluated system function block cannot maintain the corresponding operation capability, it is determined whether the to-be-evaluated system function block has a redundant configuration;

[0012] If the redundant configuration does not exist, it is determined whether the train is equipped with a fire extinguishing system;

[0013] If the fire extinguishing system is not equipped, it is determined whether the train traction force can maintain normal driving on the preset line during operation;

[0014] If the train traction force cannot maintain the normal operation of the train, it is determined that the to-be-evaluated system function block does not have fire operation maintaining capability.

[0015] In an optional embodiment, after it is determined whether the to-be-evaluated system function block maintains the corresponding operation capability within the preset fire resistance index time, if the to-be-evaluated system function block can maintain the corresponding operation capability, it is determined that the to-be-evaluated system function block has fire operation maintaining capability;

[0016] After it is determined whether the to-be-evaluated system function block has a redundant configuration, if the to-be-evaluated system function block has a redundant configuration, it is determined that the to-be-evaluated system function block has fire operation maintaining capability;

[0017] After it is determined whether the train is equipped with a fire extinguishing system, if the train is equipped with a fire extinguishing system, it is determined that the to-be-evaluated system function block has fire operation maintaining capability;

[0018] After it is determined whether the train traction force can maintain normal driving on the preset line during operation, if the train traction force can maintain the normal operation of the train, it is determined that the to-be-evaluated system function block has fire operation maintaining capability.

[0019] In an optional embodiment, it is determined whether the to-be-evaluated system function block maintains the corresponding operation capability, specifically including:

[0020] For the cable associated with the operation capability of the to-be-evaluated system function block, testing is performed according to the EN50200 standard, the EN50362 standard, or the IEC60331-3 standard to determine whether the fire resistance integrity requirement within a preset time range is met;

[0021] For the technical cabinet associated with the operation capability of the system function block to be evaluated, a test is performed according to the GB-T9978.4 standard to determine whether the fire-affected cabinet surface meets the fire integrity requirement and the thermal insulation requirement within a preset time range;

[0022] For the pneumatic and hydraulic equipment associated with the operation capability of the system function block to be evaluated, a test is performed according to the ISO15540 standard to determine whether the fire integrity requirement within a preset time range is met.

[0023] In an optional implementation, determining whether the system function block to be evaluated has a redundant configuration specifically includes:

[0024] In a test facility that meets the actual installation conditions, a test demonstration is performed on the redundant configuration according to the alternative burner standard specified in the 2.2 standard of ISO / TR9705-2:200 to determine whether the system function block to be evaluated has a redundant configuration.

[0025] In an optional implementation, determining whether the train traction force can be maintained for normal driving on the preset line during operation specifically includes:

[0026] In the train operation simulation model, the train is configured to operate in a degraded mode;

[0027] A simulated basic track line that meets the preset traction force requirement is constructed as the preset line;

[0028] The train operation simulation model is loaded in the simulated basic track line for simulation operation to determine whether the train traction force can be maintained for normal driving on the preset line during operation.

[0029] In an optional implementation, the preset fire types include luggage fire, seat fire, flammable liquid fire, and new energy battery fire.

[0030] The embodiments of the present disclosure further provide an evaluation device for a high-speed train fire operation maintaining capability, which comprises:

[0031] A fire event simulation module is configured to obtain a train operation simulation model, apply a simulation ignition source corresponding to a preset fire type to a system function block to be evaluated, and generate a fire event;

[0032] A maintaining operation capability determination module is configured to input a temperature-time curve corresponding to the fire event into a preset simulation analysis model, and determine whether the system function block to be evaluated maintains a corresponding operation capability within a preset fire index time.

[0033] a redundancy configuration determination module configured to determine whether the system function block to be evaluated has a redundancy configuration if the system function block to be evaluated cannot maintain the corresponding operation capability;

[0034] a fire-fighting system determination module configured to determine whether the train is equipped with a fire-fighting system if the redundancy configuration does not exist;

[0035] a degraded mode operation traction force determination module configured to determine whether the train traction force can be maintained at a normal driving on a preset line during the operation if the train enters a degraded mode operation if the fire-fighting system does not exist;

[0036] an evaluation conclusion output module configured to determine that the system function block to be evaluated does not have the fire operation maintaining capability if the train traction force cannot maintain the normal operation of the train.

[0037] The embodiments of the present disclosure further provide an electronic device, including a processor, a memory and a bus, the memory stores machine readable instructions executable by the processor, when the electronic device is running, the processor and the memory communicate through the bus, the machine readable instructions are executed by the processor to perform the above-mentioned high-speed train fire operation maintaining capability evaluation method, or the steps in any possible implementation manner of the above-mentioned high-speed train fire operation maintaining capability evaluation method.

[0038] The embodiments of the present disclosure further provide a computer readable storage medium, the computer readable storage medium stores a computer program, the computer program is executed by the processor to perform the above-mentioned high-speed train fire operation maintaining capability evaluation method, or the steps in any possible implementation manner of the above-mentioned high-speed train fire operation maintaining capability evaluation method.

[0039] The embodiments of the present disclosure further provide a computer program product, including a computer program / instruction, the computer program / instruction is executed by the processor to implement the above-mentioned high-speed train fire operation maintaining capability evaluation method, or the steps in any possible implementation manner of the above-mentioned high-speed train fire operation maintaining capability evaluation method.

[0040] The embodiment of the present disclosure provides an evaluation method and device for fire operation maintaining capability of a high-speed train, which comprises the following steps: obtaining a train operation simulation model, applying a simulation ignition source corresponding to a preset fire type to a system function block to be evaluated to generate a fire event; inputting a temperature-time curve corresponding to the fire event into a preset simulation analysis model to determine whether the system function block to be evaluated can maintain corresponding operation capability within a preset fireproof index time; if the system function block to be evaluated cannot maintain the corresponding operation capability, determining whether the system function block to be evaluated has a redundant configuration; if the redundant configuration does not exist, determining whether the train is equipped with a fire extinguishing system; if the fire extinguishing system is not equipped, setting the train to run in a degraded mode, and determining whether the train traction force can maintain normal driving on a preset line during the running; if the train traction force cannot maintain the normal operation of the train, it is determined that the system function block to be evaluated does not have the fire operation maintaining capability. The capability of each system of the high-speed train to maintain the related functions that should be implemented when a fire occurs can be comprehensively and efficiently evaluated, so that the precise monitoring of the fireproof capability of the high-speed train is realized, and the fireproof safety performance of the high-speed train is improved.

[0041] In order to make the above objectives, characteristics and advantages of the present application more apparent, clear and easy to understand, the following will describe a preferred embodiment in detail, and the accompanying drawings will be described as follows. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

[0042] In order to more clearly illustrate the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present application, the following will briefly introduce the drawings needed to be used in the embodiments. It should be understood that the following drawings only show some embodiments of the present application, and therefore should not be regarded as a limitation to the scope. For those skilled in the art, other related drawings can also be obtained without creative labor on the basis of these drawings.

[0043] Fig. 1 shows a flowchart of an evaluation method for fire operation maintaining capability of a high-speed train according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;

[0044] Fig. 2 shows a flowchart of a test method for determining whether a system function block to be evaluated can maintain corresponding operation capability according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;

[0045] Fig. 3 shows a schematic diagram of an evaluation device for fire operation maintaining capability of a high-speed train according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;

[0046] Fig. 4 shows a schematic diagram of an electronic device according to an embodiment of the present disclosure. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0047] To make the objects, technical solutions and advantages of the embodiments of the present disclosure clearer, the following will be combined with the accompanying drawings for the embodiments of the present disclosure to make a clear and complete description of the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present disclosure. Obviously, the described embodiments are only a part of the embodiments of the present disclosure, but not all the embodiments. The components of the embodiments of the present disclosure generally described and shown in the accompanying drawings can be arranged and designed in various different configurations. Therefore, the following detailed description of the embodiments of the present disclosure provided in the accompanying drawings is not intended to limit the scope of the claimed present disclosure, but only represents selected embodiments of the present disclosure. Based on the embodiments of the present disclosure, all other embodiments obtained by those skilled in the art without creative work are within the scope of protection of the present disclosure.

[0048] It should be noted that similar reference numerals and letters refer to similar items throughout the accompanying drawings, and therefore, once an item is defined in one drawing, it need not be further defined and explained in subsequent drawings.

[0049] The term "and / or" herein only describes an associated relationship, which means that there can be three relationships, for example, A and / or B can mean that A exists alone, A and B exist together, and B exists alone. In addition, the term "at least one" herein means any one of a plurality or any combination of at least two of a plurality, for example, including at least one of A, B, and C can mean including any one or more elements selected from the set consisting of A, B, and C.

[0050] It is found through research that high-speed EMUs, as an important modernized transport tool for transporting passengers, have the characteristics of personnel concentration, space closure, long running line and time, and complex running environment (including tunnels and viaducts). Once a fire occurs, it is a great threat to personnel safety, and rescue forces are difficult to arrive in time. Therefore, it is necessary to develop a scientific and reasonable evacuation strategy. Ensuring that the vehicle has running ability under fire and can run to the designated area is a prerequisite for evacuation. At present, since the research on the running ability of railway vehicles under fire started late in China, the evaluation method for maintaining the running ability of railway vehicles under fire is not comprehensive and systematic, so it is necessary to form a systematic evaluation scheme to ensure that the vehicle has a certain running ability under fire, improve the fire safety level of high-speed trains, and protect passenger safety.

[0051] Based on the above research, the present disclosure provides a method and device for evaluating the fire operation maintaining capability of a high-speed train. By obtaining a train operation simulation model, a simulation ignition source corresponding to a preset fire type is applied to a system function block to be evaluated to generate a fire event. The temperature-time curve corresponding to the fire event is input into a preset simulation analysis model to determine whether the system function block to be evaluated can maintain the corresponding operation capability within a preset fire resistance index time. If the system function block to be evaluated cannot maintain the corresponding operation capability, it is determined whether the system function block to be evaluated has a redundant configuration. If there is no redundant configuration, it is determined whether the train is equipped with a fire extinguishing system. If the train is not equipped with the fire extinguishing system, the train is set to run in a degraded mode, and it is determined whether the train traction force can maintain normal driving on a preset line during the running process. If the train traction force cannot maintain the normal operation of the train, it is determined that the system function block to be evaluated does not have the fire operation maintaining capability. The method can comprehensively and efficiently evaluate the capability of each system of a high-speed train to maintain the related functions that should be implemented when a fire occurs, thereby realizing precise monitoring of the fireproof capability of the high-speed train and improving the fireproof safety performance of the high-speed train.

[0052] To facilitate the understanding of the present embodiment, first, a method for evaluating the fire operation maintaining capability of a high-speed train is described in detail. The execution subject of the method for evaluating the fire operation maintaining capability of a high-speed train provided by the present embodiment is generally a computer device with certain computing capability, which may, for example, include a terminal device or a server or other processing device. The terminal device may, for example, be a user equipment (UE), a mobile device, a user terminal, a terminal, a cellular phone, a cordless phone, a personal digital assistant (PDA), a handheld device, a computing device, a vehicle-mounted device, a wearable device, etc. In some possible implementation manners, the method for evaluating the fire operation maintaining capability of a high-speed train may be realized by a processor calling computer readable instructions stored in a memory.

[0053] Referring to FIG. 1, a flowchart of a method for evaluating the fire operation maintaining capability of a high-speed train provided by the present embodiment is shown. The method includes steps S101-S106.

[0054] S101, a train operation simulation model is obtained, and a simulation ignition source corresponding to a preset fire type is applied to a system function block to be evaluated to generate a fire event.

[0055] In a specific implementation, first, a train operation simulation model simulating a train operation state is acquired, a preset fire type determined according to a fire operation retention capability requirement is applied to a system function block to be evaluated included in the train operation simulation model, and a corresponding simulation fire source is applied to simulate a fire event occurring in a high-speed train during operation.

[0056] Here, the system function block included in the train operation simulation model includes various functional components required for simulating train operation, which may, for example, include a power output function block, a braking function block, an automatic control function block, a state monitoring function block, etc., and may be configured according to actual needs, which is not specifically limited here.

[0057] Among them, the fire event can include a second or third class fire, and the preset fire type may, for example, include a luggage fire, a seat fire, a flammable liquid fire, and a new energy battery fire.

[0058] Specifically, the simulation ignition source corresponding to the preset fire type can be simulated and calculated by using a power model as an ignition model.

[0059] For example, the power model uses an ignition source with a nominal radiation flux of 20kWm-2 to 25kWm-2 applied to an area of 0.7m2, with an average output power of 75kW for 2min, and then immediately uses an ignition source with a nominal radiation flux of 40kWm-2 to 50kWm-2 applied to the same 0.7m2 area, with an average output power of 150kW for 8min.

[0060] It should be noted that in the process of evaluating the fire operation retention capability of the high-speed train, the train operation simulation model needs to be first set to a normal operation state, and the fire event caused by the simulation ignition source should be an independent event in the embodiments of the present application, and two or more independent fire events occurring simultaneously are not within the evaluation range of the embodiments of the present application.

[0061] Meanwhile, the evaluation requirements of the high-speed train fire operation retention capability in the embodiments of the present application can include that the on-board battery should be able to provide sufficient power for at least 15 minutes for all battery-required auxiliary equipment; any fire extinguishing system should not affect the unaffected system functions related to the operation capability, and should not cause other ignition events when activated.

[0062] S102, input the temperature-time curve corresponding to the fire event into a preset simulation analysis model to determine whether the to-be-evaluated system function block maintains the corresponding operation capability within the preset fireproof index time.

[0063] In a specific implementation, after a specific type of fire event is tried for the system function block to be evaluated, it is necessary to verify whether the system function has a certain carrying capacity for fire, and the verification can be verified by test verification or conformity assessment verification.

[0064] Referring to FIG. 2, a flowchart of a test method for determining whether a system function block to be evaluated maintains corresponding running capability is provided, and the method includes steps S1021-S1023, wherein:

[0065] S1021, for the cable associated with the running capability of the system function block to be evaluated, test according to EN50200 standard, EN50362 standard or IEC60331-3 standard to determine whether the fire integrity requirement within the preset time range is met.

[0066] S1022, for the technical cabinet associated with the running capability of the system function block to be evaluated, test according to GB-T9978.4 standard to determine whether the fire integrity requirement and the heat insulation requirement of the cabinet surface affected by the fire within the preset time range are met.

[0067] S1023, for the pneumatic and hydraulic equipment associated with the running capability of the system function block to be evaluated, test according to ISO15540 standard to determine whether the fire integrity requirement within the preset time range is met.

[0068] Further, for the evaluation method for determining whether the system function block to be evaluated maintains the corresponding running capability, the preset simulation analysis model can be used for simulation analysis according to the temperature-time corresponding curve of the specific type of fire event, and it is proved that the fire event does not cause the loss of system function within the time of the accident.

[0069] Here, the preset simulation analysis model can use existing professional fireproof simulation analysis software, which can be selected according to actual needs, and is not limited here.

[0070] As a possible implementation, after determining whether the system function block to be evaluated maintains the corresponding running capability within the preset fireproof index time, if the system function block to be evaluated can maintain the corresponding running capability, it is determined that the system function block to be evaluated has fire running retention capability.

[0071] S103, if the system function block to be evaluated cannot maintain the corresponding running capability, it is determined whether the system function block to be evaluated has redundant configuration.

[0072] In a specific implementation, if the system function block to be evaluated cannot maintain the corresponding operating capacity in a fire event, it is necessary to continue to determine whether the system function block to be evaluated has a redundant configuration. To determine whether the system function will be affected by a specific type of fire event, it is necessary to verify whether the system function has a redundant system configuration, which can be verified by a test verification or a compliance evaluation verification.

[0073] Here, when determining the compliance of the system configuration redundancy, the following two points should be considered: first, each way of maintaining the system function is independent; second, at least one method of maintaining the system function continues to function under the influence of a Class 2 fire.

[0074] Specifically, for the compliance test verification of the redundant configuration, the replacement burner standard specified in the 2.2 standard of ISO / TR9705-2:200 can be used in a test facility that meets the actual installation conditions to test and demonstrate the redundant configuration to determine whether the system function block to be evaluated has a redundant configuration.

[0075] Further, for the compliance evaluation verification of the redundant configuration, the temperature-time corresponding curve of a Class 2 fire can be selected to evaluate the system function that may affect the operating capacity, thereby proving that the system function will not be lost during a fire incident.

[0076] As a possible implementation, after determining whether the system function block to be evaluated has a redundant configuration, if the system function block to be evaluated has a redundant configuration, it is determined that the system function block to be evaluated has a fire operation maintaining capability.

[0077] S104, if the redundant configuration does not exist, it is determined whether the train is equipped with a fire extinguishing system.

[0078] In a specific implementation, if the system function block to be evaluated does not have a redundant configuration, it is necessary to continue to determine whether the current train is equipped with a fire extinguishing system.

[0079] Here, the fire extinguishing system should include a fire detection system and a fire extinguishing system, and the fire detection system can be verified by a compliance test or a compliance evaluation, and the fire extinguishing system can only be verified by a compliance test.

[0080] As a possible implementation, after determining whether the train is equipped with a fire extinguishing system, if the train is equipped with a fire extinguishing system, it is determined that the system function block to be evaluated has a fire operation maintaining capability.

[0081] S105, if the fire extinguishing system is not equipped, the train is set to run in a degraded mode, and it is determined whether the train traction can maintain normal driving on the preset line during operation.

[0082] In a specific implementation, if the train is not equipped with a fire-fighting system, the train is set to run in a degraded mode in the train operation simulation model, and during the degraded mode operation of the train, it is determined whether the train can run on a specific route under the influence of a fire event.

[0083] Here, when the running capability maintenance determination, the redundancy configuration determination, and the fire-fighting system determination do not meet the evaluation requirements during the evaluation process of the running capability, it is necessary to determine whether the train can run on a route for which traction calculation has been performed and which meets the operation compliance requirements in a degraded operation mode in which the relevant system functions are in a failure state caused by a fire event.

[0084] Among them, the degraded mode of the train is a mode in which the train is manually switched to a next level of train control mode and maintained in operation when the train cannot maintain normal operation in the current level of train control mode.

[0085] Specifically, in the train operation simulation model, the train is configured to run in a degraded mode; a simulated basic track route meeting the preset traction requirement is constructed as the preset route; and the train operation simulation model is loaded in the simulated basic track route for simulation to determine whether the train traction can maintain normal driving on the preset route during operation.

[0086] As a possible implementation, after determining whether the train traction can maintain normal driving on the preset route during operation, if the train traction can maintain normal operation of the train, it is determined that the system function block to be evaluated has fire operation maintenance capability.

[0087] S106, if the train traction cannot maintain normal operation of the train, it is determined that the system function block to be evaluated does not have fire operation maintenance capability.

[0088] In a specific implementation, when the running capability maintenance determination, the redundancy configuration determination, the fire-fighting system determination, and the degraded operation determination do not meet the evaluation requirements during the above-mentioned evaluation process of the running capability, it is determined that the system function block to be evaluated does not have fire operation maintenance capability, and the design of the fire operation maintenance capability needs to be re-performed.

[0089] The method for evaluating the fire operation maintaining capability of a high-speed train provided in the embodiments of the present disclosure comprises the following steps: obtaining a train operation simulation model, applying a simulation ignition source corresponding to a preset fire type to a system function block to be evaluated to generate a fire event; inputting a temperature-time curve corresponding to the fire event into a preset simulation analysis model to determine whether the system function block to be evaluated can maintain corresponding operation capability within a preset fireproof index time; if the system function block to be evaluated cannot maintain the corresponding operation capability, determining whether the system function block to be evaluated has a redundant configuration; if the redundant configuration does not exist, determining whether the train is equipped with a fire extinguishing system; if the train is not equipped with the fire extinguishing system, setting the train to run in a degraded mode, and determining whether the train traction force can be maintained for normal driving on a preset line during the running process; and if the train traction force cannot maintain the normal operation of the train, determining that the system function block to be evaluated does not have the fire operation maintaining capability. The method can comprehensively and efficiently evaluate the capability of each system of the high-speed train to maintain the related functions that should be implemented when a fire occurs, thereby realizing accurate monitoring of the fireproof capability of the high-speed train and improving the fireproof safety performance of the high-speed train.

[0090] Those skilled in the art can understand that, in the above method of the specific implementation, the writing order of each step does not mean a strict execution order and does not constitute any limitation on the implementation process, and the specific execution order of each step should be determined according to its function and possible internal logic.

[0091] Based on the same inventive concept, the embodiments of the present disclosure also provide an evaluation device for the fire operation maintaining capability of a high-speed train corresponding to the method for evaluating the fire operation maintaining capability of a high-speed train. Since the principle of solving problems by the device in the embodiments of the present disclosure is similar to the method for evaluating the fire operation maintaining capability of a high-speed train described above, the implementation of the device can be referred to the implementation of the method, and the repeated parts will not be described herein.

[0092] Please refer to FIG. 3, which is a schematic diagram of an evaluation device for the fire operation maintaining capability of a high-speed train provided in the embodiments of the present disclosure. As shown in FIG. 3, the evaluation device 300 for the fire operation maintaining capability of a high-speed train provided in the embodiments of the present disclosure comprises:

[0093] The fire event simulation module 310 is configured to obtain a train operation simulation model, apply a simulation ignition source corresponding to a preset fire type to a system function block to be evaluated to generate a fire event.

[0094] The operation capability maintaining determination module 320 is configured to input a temperature-time curve corresponding to the fire event into a preset simulation analysis model to determine whether the system function block to be evaluated can maintain corresponding operation capability within a preset fireproof index time.

[0095] The redundancy configuration determination module 330 is configured to determine whether the to-be-evaluated system function block has a redundancy configuration if the to-be-evaluated system function block cannot maintain the corresponding operation capability.

[0096] The fire-fighting system determination module 340 is configured to determine whether the train is equipped with a fire-fighting system if the redundancy configuration does not exist.

[0097] The degraded mode operation traction force determination module 350 is configured to set the train to enter a degraded mode operation and determine whether the traction force of the train can maintain normal driving on a preset line during operation if the train is not equipped with the fire-fighting system.

[0098] The evaluation conclusion output module 360 is configured to determine that the to-be-evaluated system function block does not have the fire disaster operation maintaining capability if the traction force of the train cannot maintain normal operation of the train.

[0099] The processing flow of each module in the device and the interaction flow between the modules can refer to the related description in the method embodiments, and will not be described in detail here.

[0100] The evaluation device for the fire disaster operation maintaining capability of the high-speed train provided in the embodiments of the present disclosure can obtain a train operation simulation model, apply a simulation ignition source corresponding to a preset fire type to a to-be-evaluated system function block to generate a fire disaster event, input a temperature-time curve corresponding to the fire disaster event to a preset simulation analysis model to determine whether the to-be-evaluated system function block maintains the corresponding operation capability within a preset fire resistance index time, determine whether the to-be-evaluated system function block has a redundancy configuration if the to-be-evaluated system function block cannot maintain the corresponding operation capability, determine whether the train is equipped with a fire-fighting system if the redundancy configuration does not exist, set the train to enter a degraded mode operation and determine whether the traction force of the train can maintain normal driving on a preset line during operation if the train is not equipped with the fire-fighting system, and determine that the to-be-evaluated system function block does not have the fire disaster operation maintaining capability if the traction force of the train cannot maintain normal operation of the train. The capability of each system of the high-speed train to maintain the related functions that should be implemented when a fire disaster occurs can be comprehensively and efficiently evaluated, so that the fireproof capability of the high-speed train can be accurately monitored, and the fireproof safety performance of the high-speed train can be improved.

[0101] Corresponding to the evaluation method for the fire disaster operation maintaining capability of the high-speed train in FIG. 1, the embodiments of the present disclosure further provide an electronic device 400, as shown in FIG. 4, which is a structural schematic diagram of the electronic device 400 provided in the embodiments of the present disclosure, and includes:

[0102] The processor 41, the memory 42, and the bus 43; the memory 42 is used for storing execution instructions, including the internal memory 421 and the external memory 422; the internal memory 421 here is also called the internal memory, used for temporarily storing operation data in the processor 41 and data exchanged with the external memory 422 such as a hard disk, the processor 41 exchanges data with the external memory 422 through the internal memory 421, when the electronic device 400 is running, the processor 41 and the memory 42 communicate through the bus 43, so that the processor 41 executes the steps of the high-speed train fire running keeping capability evaluation method in FIG. 1.

[0103] The embodiment of the present disclosure further provides a computer readable storage medium, and the computer readable storage medium stores a computer program, and the computer program is run by a processor to execute the steps of the high-speed train fire running keeping capability evaluation method described in the method embodiment.

[0104] The embodiment of the present disclosure further provides a computer program product, and the computer program product includes computer instructions, and the computer instructions are executed by a processor to execute the steps of the high-speed train fire running keeping capability evaluation method described in the method embodiment, and details can be referred to the method embodiment, and details are not described herein.

[0105] The computer program product can be specifically implemented by means of hardware, software or combination thereof. In an optional embodiment, the computer program product is specifically embodied as a computer storage medium, and in another optional embodiment, the computer program product is specifically embodied as a software product, such as a software development kit (Software Development Kit, SDK) and the like.

[0106] Those skilled in the art can clearly understand that, for the convenience and brevity of the description, the specific working process of the device described above can refer to the corresponding process in the foregoing method embodiment, and details are not described herein. In several embodiments provided by the present disclosure, it should be understood that the disclosed device and method can be implemented by other ways. The device embodiments described above are only schematic, for example, the division of the units is only a logical function division, and actual implementation can have another division manner, for example, a plurality of units or components can be combined or integrated into another system, or some features can be ignored or not executed. In addition, the coupling or direct coupling or communication connection between the units or components shown or discussed can be indirect coupling or communication connection through some communication interfaces, devices or units, and can be electrical, mechanical or other forms.

[0107] The units described as separate components may or may not be physically separate, and the components displayed as units may or may not be physical units, i.e., may be located in one place, or may be distributed on multiple network units. Part or all of the units can be selected according to actual needs to achieve the purpose of the embodiment scheme.

[0108] In addition, each functional unit in various embodiments of the present disclosure can be integrated into one processing unit, or each unit can exist physically, or two or more units can be integrated into one unit.

[0109] If the functions are realized in the form of software functional units and sold or used as independent products, they can be stored in a non-volatile computer readable storage medium executable by a processor. Based on this understanding, the technical solutions of the present disclosure essentially or the part of the prior art or the part of the technical solutions can be embodied in the form of a software product. The computer software product is stored in a storage medium, including a plurality of instructions for causing a computer device (which can be a personal computer, a server, or a network device, etc.) to execute all or part of the steps of the method described in various embodiments of the present disclosure. The aforementioned storage medium includes: U disk, mobile hard disk, read-only memory (Read-Only Memory, ROM), random access memory (Random Access Memory, RAM), magnetic disk or optical disk, and various program codes that can be stored in the medium.

[0110] Finally, it should be noted that: the above-described embodiments are only specific embodiments of the present disclosure, used to illustrate the technical solutions of the present disclosure, and not to limit them. The protection scope of the present disclosure is not limited thereto, although the present disclosure has been described in detail with reference to the foregoing embodiments, those skilled in the art should understand that any skilled person in the art can modify or easily think of changes to the technical solutions described in the foregoing embodiments within the technical range disclosed by the present disclosure, or make equivalent replacements to some technical features; and these modifications, changes or replacements do not make the corresponding technical solutions deviate from the spirit and scope of the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present disclosure, and should be covered within the protection scope of the present disclosure. Therefore, the protection scope of the present disclosure should be subject to the protection scope of the claims.

Claims

1. A method for evaluating the fire operation maintaining ability of a high-speed train, characterized in that, The method comprises the following steps: obtaining a train operation simulation model, applying a simulation ignition source corresponding to a preset fire type to a system function block to be evaluated to generate a fire event; inputting a temperature-time curve corresponding to the fire event into a preset simulation analysis model to determine whether the system function block to be evaluated can maintain corresponding operation capability within a preset fire resistance index time; if the system function block to be evaluated cannot maintain the corresponding operation capability, determining whether the system function block to be evaluated has a redundant configuration; if the redundant configuration does not exist, determining whether the train is equipped with a fire extinguishing system; if the train is not equipped with the fire extinguishing system, setting the train to run in a degraded mode, and determining whether the train traction force can maintain normal driving on a preset line during the running process; if the train traction force cannot maintain the normal operation of the train, it is determined that the system function block to be evaluated does not have fire operation maintaining capability.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein, The method further comprises the following steps: after determining whether the system function block to be evaluated can maintain the corresponding operation capability within the preset fire resistance index time, if the system function block to be evaluated can maintain the corresponding operation capability, it is determined that the system function block to be evaluated has fire operation maintaining capability; after determining whether the system function block to be evaluated has the redundant configuration, if the system function block to be evaluated has the redundant configuration, it is determined that the system function block to be evaluated has fire operation maintaining capability; after determining whether the train is equipped with the fire extinguishing system, if the train is equipped with the fire extinguishing system, it is determined that the system function block to be evaluated has fire operation maintaining capability; after determining whether the train traction force can maintain the normal operation of the train during the running process, if the train traction force can maintain the normal operation of the train, it is determined that the system function block to be evaluated has fire operation maintaining capability. Determining whether the system function block to be evaluated can maintain the corresponding operation capability comprises the following steps:

3. The method of claim 1, wherein, for the cables associated with the operation capability of the system function block to be evaluated, testing according to the EN50200 standard, the EN50362 standard or the IEC60331-3 standard to determine whether the fire resistance integrity requirement within the preset time range is met; for the technical cabinets associated with the operation capability of the system function block to be evaluated, testing according to the GB-T9978.4 standard to determine whether the fire resistance integrity requirement and the heat insulation requirement of the cabinet surface affected by the fire within the preset time range are met; for the pneumatic and hydraulic equipment associated with the operation capability of the system function block to be evaluated, testing according to the ISO15540 standard to determine whether the fire resistance integrity requirement within the preset time range is met. Determining whether the system function block to be evaluated has a redundant configuration comprises the following steps:

4. The method of claim 1, wherein, in a test facility meeting the actual installation conditions, using the alternative burner standard specified in the 2.2 standard of ISO / TR9705-2:200 to test and demonstrate the redundant configuration to determine whether the system function block to be evaluated has a redundant configuration. Determining whether the train traction force can maintain the normal driving on the preset line during the running process comprises the following steps:

5. The method of claim 1, wherein, ​ In the train operation simulation model, the train is configured to run in a degraded mode; A simulated basic track line meeting the preset traction force requirement is constructed as the preset line; The train operation simulation model is loaded in the simulated basic track line for simulation running to determine whether the train traction force can be maintained for normal driving on the preset line during operation.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein: The preset fire types include luggage fire, seat fire, flammable liquid fire, and new energy battery fire.

7. An apparatus for evaluating a high-speed train fire operation maintaining ability, characterized in that, Comprise: a fire event simulation module for obtaining a train operation simulation model, applying a simulation ignition source corresponding to a preset fire type to a to-be-evaluated system function block to generate a fire event; a maintenance operation capability determination module for inputting a temperature-time curve corresponding to the fire event into a preset simulation analysis model to determine whether the to-be-evaluated system function block maintains corresponding operation capability within a preset fire resistance index time; a redundancy configuration determination module for determining whether the to-be-evaluated system function block has a redundancy configuration if the to-be-evaluated system function block cannot maintain corresponding operation capability; a fire extinguishing system determination module for determining whether a train is equipped with a fire extinguishing system if the redundancy configuration does not exist; a degraded mode running traction force determination module for determining whether the train traction force can be maintained for normal driving on the preset line during operation if the train is not equipped with the fire extinguishing system; an evaluation conclusion output module for determining that the to-be-evaluated system function block does not have fire operation maintaining capability if the train traction force cannot maintain normal operation of the train.

8. An electronic device, comprising: Comprise: a processor, a memory, and a bus, the memory storing machine-readable instructions executable by the processor, the processor and the memory communicating through the bus when the electronic device is running, the machine-readable instructions being executed by the processor to perform the steps of the high-speed train fire operation maintaining capability evaluation method of any one of claims 1 to 6.

9. A computer-readable storage medium, characterized in that, The computer program stored on the computer readable storage medium is executed by the processor to perform the steps of the high-speed train fire operation maintaining capability evaluation method of any one of claims 1 to 7.

10. A computer program product comprising computer instructions, characterized in that, The computer instructions are executed by the processor to implement the steps of the high-speed train fire operation maintaining capability evaluation method of any one of claims 1 to 6.

Images