Process for producing 4-hydroxyacetophenone

Abstract

A process for producing 4-hydroxyacetophenone (4-HAP) comprises the steps of providing phenyl acetate and methanesulfonic acid (MSA) source; feeding the phenyl acetate and the MSA source into a reactor; and allowing the phenyl acetate and the MSA to react under conditions suitable for forming 4-HAP by Fries rearrangement to yield a 4-HAP containing phase.

Description

[0001] Munich, 17 July 2025Our Ref.:SM 6938-02WO SOE / TWS Applicant: Symrise AGSerial Number: Subsequent patent application based on PCT / EP2024 / 070515Symrise AG Mühlenfeldstraße 1, 37603 Holzminden, Germany Process for producing 4-hydroxyacetophenone The present invention lies in the field of cosmetics and, more specifically, concerns a process forthe production of 4-hydroxyacetophenone (4-HAP).4-hydroxyacetophenone (4-HAP) is a well-known large scale organic synthesis intermediate usedin many life sciences syntheses including one of the industrial processes for paracetamol. Aprocess for producing crude 4-HAP is known from EP 0 167 286 A1. In this process, phenol isacetylated to 4-HAP by contacting phenol with acetic acid or acetic anhydride. When acetic acidis the acetylating agent, per mole of phenol about 0.9 to 1.4 moles of acetic is used in the presenceof about 20 to 50 moles of hydrogen fluoride, at a temperature of reaction of about 40 to 90°C,for a reaction period of about 10 to 120 minutes. When acetic anhydride is the acetylating agent, per mole of phenol, about 0.9 to 2.0 moles of acetic anhydride is used, in the presence of about8 to 60 moles of hydrogen fluoride (HF), at a temperature of reaction of about 30 to 95°C for areaction period of at least about 10 minutes. The process is said to result in a phenol conversionof at least about 80% and a reaction selectivity to crude 4-HAP of at least about 70%.As a drawback of the known process, the applicant observed that 90-94 % of the large HF excess can be recycled by distillation. However, 1.2 to 2 equivalents of HF remain complexed in the crude product and cannot be recycled by means of distillation. Even at p < 3 mbar, the required temperature leads to decomposition / polymerization of the crude product. This prevents the fullrecovery of HF, and requires its neutralization by about 2 equivalents potassium hydroxide (KOH),which in turn, has a significant cost impact. Furthermore, recycling of the resulting mixture ofpotassium acetate (KOAc) and potassium fluoride (KF) is difficult and elaborate. Moreover, toachieve the quality and the olfactory specifications of cosmetic grade 4-HAP, crude 4-HAP has toundergo further purification. In addition, in an attempt to reduce risk, the EPA stipulates that HFis tried to be replaced by safer alternatives.On the other hand, 4-HAP can be produced batch wise from phenyl acetate and methanesulfonic acid. However, the known process has low productivity. The object to be solved by the present invention is the provision of a process for producing 4- HAP that overcomes at least some disadvantages of the known processes. In particular, it wasthe aim to circumvent the cost impact associated with the requirement of neutralization of HFusing KOH and to obtain a more economic process for the production of 4-HAP, also in largescale.This object is achieved by a process as set forth in appended claim 1, among others. Thedependent claims define preferred embodiments of the invention.According to the present invention, the process for the production of 4-HAP is based on Friesrearrangement of phenyl acetate in methanesulfonic acid (MSA). It comprises the steps of:a) providing a phenyl acetate source and a methanesulfonic acid (MSA) source;b) feeding the phenyl acetate source and the MSA source into a reactor; andc) allowing the phenyl acetate and the MSA (herein also referred to as “reaction mixture”) toreact under conditions suitable for forming 4-HAP by Fries rearrangement.The formation of 4-HAP by Fries rearrangement follows reaction scheme (I): A number of advantages are associated with the Fries rearrangement of phenyl acetate in MSA.In particular, the Fries rearrangement does not involve the use of HF, and does not require toremove / recycle a mix of KOAc / KF as compared to the known process.After feeding the phenyl acetate source and the MSA source into the reactor, water may be added.Moreover, in accordance with the invention, step c) is carried out in a flow reactor. Thereby,productivity of the reaction can be varied (increased or decreased) as needed without affectingselectivity. When large amounts of product is needed, it is still possible to keep equipment (e.g.reactor, heat exchanger, mixing chambers, etc.) small. This is a great advantage over knownbatch processes which are not flexible and require handling of large volumes. Carrying out thereaction in step c) continuously simultaneously requires the feed to enter the reactor continuouslyand the reaction mixture to leave the reactor continuously. Moreover, the downstream processingmay be carried out continuously as well, to keep the corresponding apparatuses small. Before feeding to the reactor, the phenyl acetate source and MSA source may be preheatedseparately, and the preheated streams combined in a mixer. At the end of the reaction time(residence time), the resulting reaction product may be cooled down and / or may be blended withwater. This leads to quenching of the reaction and potential side reactions.The conversion of phenyl acetate is fast. Further, the risk that side-products are formed increases with progressing time. Therefore, it is preferred that the residence time in step c) ranges from 3 sto 5 min, preferably 15 s to 3 min, more preferably 30 s to 200 s, in some cases 30 s to 90 s. Thecomparably short residence time allows to reach a high productivity, yet keep equipment small. Advantageously, the isomeric ratio of 4-HAP to 2-HAP can be controlled via the reactiontemperature and / or the MSA content fed into the reactor.According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, step c) is carried out at a temperatureranging from 60 to150°C, preferably 70 to 140°C, more preferably 80 to 130°C, yet morepreferably 90 to 120°, most preferably about 103°C ± 5°C.In a specific embodiment, step c) is carried out at a temperature of at least 100°C, and / or at atemperature of at most 150°C, preferably at most 140°C, more preferably at most 130°C, mostpreferably at most 125°C.As is well-known to the skilled person, the temperature and residence time are dependent on each other. Lower temperatures tend to have a higher residence time, while higher temperaturestend to have a smaller residence time, until conversion is complete. The above temperatureranges are based on the finding that an improved isomeric ratio of 4-HAP to 2-hydroxyacetophenone (2-HAP) of 7.9 can be obtained at around 103°C, such as at 100°C,reaction temperature. Lower temperatures appear to favor a higher isomeric ratio, but may reduce the conversion rate of phenyl acetate. Hence, the residence time is preferably appropriatelyadapted in light of the specific conversion rate and / or specific temperature used. For example, atemperature around 103°C may favor a residence time close to 200 s, such as from 160 to 200s, preferably 170 s to 190 s, in particular around 180 s (± 5 s). The specified ranges of temperatureand residence time are giving particularly favorable results with 10 eq. pre-dried MSA. As anotherexample, at 120°C full conversion may be reached at a residence time of around 45 s (± 5 s). Toavoid the complexity associated with recycling the phenol and the unreacted phenyl acetate, thetemperature and residence time is balanced to achieve high conversion, preferably fullconversion.Depending on the reaction conditions, different ratios between the desired product 4-HAP andthe undesired side products, 2-hydroxyacetophenone (2-HAP, 3) and phenol (PhOH) may be obtained. A high selectivity towards the desired 4-isomer can be achieved, when the MSA isapplied in great excess, such as 8 or more, 9 or more, 10 or more, 11 or more, 12 or more, etc.,equivalents MSA relative to the amount of phenyl acetate. On the other hand, lower amounts ofMSA are favored from a perspective of process economics, such as 2 or more, 3 or more, 4 ormore, 5 or more, 6 or more, 7 or more, or 8 or more, equivalents MSA relative to the amount of phenyl acetate. Accordingly, in the process of the invention, the molar ratio is generally not limited,and may in particular lie in any of the previous ranges, or in any of the following ranges, wherethe MSA source fed into the reactor includes the MSA in an amount ranging from 2 to 20, 4 to 18,6 to 14, or 8 to 12, equivalents MSA relative to the amount of phenyl acetate. In particularembodiments, the MSA source fed into the reactor includes the MSA in an amount of 8 to 12equivalents, relative to the amount of the phenyl acetate.Moreover, the water content of the MSA source has a bearing on the reaction outcome. In particular, water favors hydrolysis of the phenyl acetate to phenol, thereby leading to an undesired high phenol content in the reaction mixture. It is therefore preferred that the MSA source has a low water content. In a preferred embodiment, the MSA source is characterized by a water content of at most 3.0 wt.-%, preferably at most 2.5 wt.-%, more preferably at most 2.0 wt.-%, most preferably at most 1.5 wt.-%, as determined by Karl Fischer titration. The reaction product of step c) has preferably the following composition: In a preferred reaction product, the isomeric ratio of 4-HAP to 2-HAP is at least 4, preferably at least 5, more preferably at least 6, and / or the isomeric ratio of 4-HAP to 2-HAP is at most 100, preferably at most 50, more preferably at most 20, yet more preferably at most 10, mostpreferably, the isomeric ratio of 4-HAP to 2-HAP ranges between 6 and 10 such as around 8 (±1). Moreover, in a preferred reaction product, the 4-HAP is contained in an amount ranging from 70 to 95 wt.-%, preferably 75 to 90 wt.-%, more preferably 80 to 85 wt.-%. Furthermore, a preferred reaction product includes 2-HAP in an amount of less than 20 wt.-%,preferably less than 17 wt.-%, more preferably less than 15 wt.-%, most preferably less than 12.5w.-%. In addition, a preferred reaction product contains phenol in an amount of less than 10 wt.-%, preferably less than 8 wt.-%, more preferably less than 6 wt.-%, most preferably less than 4 wt.- %.Because the reaction product contains large amounts of MSA, and minor amounts of 2-HAP andpossibly phenol, it is preferred that the formed 4-HAP and / or MSA is / are respectively isolated / enriched / purified and recycled.The present invention further relates to downstream processing of the reaction product obtainedin step c). Though the downstream process is described in relation to the above described upstream process, the downstream process is to be understood to form a separate aspect of the invention. That is, a process for recovering, isolating and / or purifying 4-HAP from a mixture comprising 4-HAP and one or more of 2-HAP, MSA and phenyl acetate, wherein the mixture is preferably produced or producible in step c) of the (upstream) process of the invention, may be carried out as follows: According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, the formed 4-HAP and / or residual MSAis / are isolated from the reaction mixture as the reaction proceeds. Because the reaction iscontinuous, also the isolation is preferably (semi-) continuous. Preferably, the isolation involvesone or more of the following: (i) liquid-liquid separation (solvent extraction), wherein the 4-HAP isenriched in an organic phase and the MSA is enriched in an aqueous phase; (ii) removing waterand / or MSA by distillation , wherein the 4-HAP remains in the retentate, (iii) removing water and / or MSA from the 4-HAP by membrane separation such as nanofiltration or reverse osmose; (iv)direct crystallization of 4-HAP from the reaction mixture; and separating 4-HAP from 2-HAP byalkaline extraction, wherein the 4-HAP is enriched in an alkaline aqueous phase and the 2-HAP is enriched in an organic phase, optionally, wherein after phase separation the alkaline aqueous phase is acidified and the 4-HAP is back-extracted from the acidified aqueous phase into anorganic phase. Dilution with water, optionally after cooling, prior to separation may avoid thathighly concentrated and hot MSA enters the liquid-liquid separation unit, suppress side reactionsand facilitate recycling. The outlet of the reactor may be coupled to the liquid-liquid separationunit, optionally via heat exchanger(s) and / or mixer(s).Preferably, the organic phase includes an organic solvent selected from the group consisting ofmethyl isobutyl ketone (MIBK), methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE), heptane, toluene, p-menthane,2,4-dimethyl octane, p-cymene, cyclopentyl methyl ether (CPME), octanol, butyl acetate, ethylacetate, methyl isobutyl carbinol (MIBC) and combinations thereof, preferably MIBK.According to a further embodiment of the present invention, the liquid-liquid separation involvesfeeding the reaction mixture to a continuous extraction unit. A preferred continuous extraction unitis a continuous countercurrent flow extraction unit. Moreover, a preferred continuous extractionunit includes alternating mixer and settler units.Using a continuous countercurrent flow extraction unit, an (almost) complete separation of MSAand 4-HAP can be achieved, when the reaction product is diluted with water, when the extractionis carried out using MIBK as organic solvent, and when a backwash with water is included. Highdilution is preferred due to the dependency of the partition coefficient from the dilution factor. Optionally, the process further comprises the step of separating 4-HAP from 2-HAP by liquid-liquid separation, preferably in the form of alkaline extraction from an organic solvent, and / ordistillation. The alkaline extraction from an organic solvent results in an alkaline aqueous phaseenriched in 4-HAP and an organic phase enriched in 2-HAP. After phase separation the alkaline aqueous phase can be acidified and the 4-HAP back-extracted from the acidified aqueous phase into an organic phase. In an exemplary approach, the reaction mixture is diluted with water, made alkaline with NaOH, and then subjected to biphasic extraction using an organic phase such asMIBK or heptane. Subsequently, the aqueous phase is acidified and subjected to biphasicextraction using an organic phase such as MIBK or heptane. For reasons of economics, preferred processes further comprise the step of recycling at least aportion of the residual MSA and / or recycling at least a portion of the organic solvent. Recycling ofMSA can, for instance, be achieved by dilution with water, extraction of crudes and distillation off of water. Preferred processes may further include purification of the isolated 4-HAP by one or more of precipitation, crystallization, melt crystallization and distillation. The process has thus far primarily be described starting from phenyl acetate as starting material. However, the process may further comprise the step of producing the phenyl acetate to be fedinto the reactor by acetylation of phenol using acetic anhydride. It is also envisaged that the phenylacetate is produced directly in the reactor, whereas the Fries rearrangement occurs subsequentlyor simultaneously. In other words, the phenyl acetate source may comprise phenol and aceticanhydride, and the phenyl acetate is produced by acetylation of the phenol using the aceticanhydride in the reactor, or the phenyl acetate source may be phenyl acetate, which is producedby acetylation of phenol using acetic anhydride before feeding the phenyl acetate into the reactor.Phenyl acetate synthesis may be carried out by reacting phenol with acetic anhydride. To thisend, phenol may be charged to a reactor, sodium acetate (NaOAc) may be optionally added, andthe mixture may be heated, e.g., up to around 103 °C. Then Ac2O may be added dropwise. Aftercomplete addition, the reaction mixture may be stirred at increased temperature, e.g., at around103 °C. After reaction is complete, crude phenyl acetate may be optionally purified by removingacetic acid (AcOH) using distillation and extraction using water and ethyl acetate (EtOAc).The phenyl acetate and / or the 4-HAP may be individually selected from substantiallypetrochemical, and substantially non-petrochemical origin, including mass balance approach.Mixtures of petrochemical and non-petrochemical phenyl acetate, such as defined by a mass ratio of petrochemical to non-petrochemical phenyl acetate ranging from 5% to 95% to 95% to 5%,10% to 90% to 90% to 10%, 20% to 80% to 80% to 20%, 30% to 70% to 70% to 30%, etc. and / ormixtures of petrochemical and non-petrochemical 4-HAP, such as defined by a mass ratio ofpetrochemical to non-petrochemical 4-HAP ranging from 5% to 95% to 95% to 5%, 10% to 90%to 90% to 10%, 20% to 80% to 80% to 20%, 30% to 70% to 70% to 30%, etc. are specificallyenvisaged. Moreover, the phenyl acetate source may include both petrochemical and non-petrochemicalcarbon, as would be formed when only one of the phenol and the acetic anhydride used forforming the phenyl acetate is of petrochemical origin, while the other one is of non-petrochemicalorigin. For example, the phenol may be petrochemical and the acetic anhydride may be non- petrochemical, or vice versa. Any mass ratio of petrochemical and non-petrochemical phenol and / or any mass ratio of petrochemical and non-petrochemical acetic anhydride is envisaged. In a preferred embodiment, the 4-HAP and / or the phenyl acetate is / are substantially non-petrochemical. A compound is considered “substantially non-petrochemical” herein, if at least 75%, preferably at least 80 %, further preferably at least 85 %, particularly preferably at least 90 %, even further preferably at least 95 %, more preferably at least 97.5 % of its carbon is non- petrochemically-derived carbon, based on the total carbon content of the respective compound, as determined by radiocarbon dating. Particular preferred is that the 4-HAP and / or the phenyl acetate is / are non-petrochemical, i.e. all carbon of the respective compound is non- petrochemically-derived carbon, based on the total carbon content of the respective compound, as determined by radiocarbon dating. Methods for determining whether and which proportion of the carbon of a compound ispetrochemically-derived and / or non-petrochemically-derived are known to a skilled person. In theframework of the present invention radiocarbon dating, e.g. according to ASTM D6866-16, isused. The method is based on the observation that the ratio of 12C and 14C is indicative for the non-petrochemical carbon content. Non-petrochemical phenyl acetate can, for example, be produced from non-petrochemical phenol and non-petrochemical acetic anhydride, following the above-mentioned route. Sources of non- petrochemical phenol are cyclic terpenes and terpenoids. Non-petrochemical phenol can be produced from lignocellulose-derived alkylmethoxyphenols, or from aromatic precursors,obtained by fermentation via genetically modified oragnisms (GMOs) or by oxidation of biobasedCumene (Hock process). In other embodiments, the 4-HAP is substantially petrochemical. A compound is considered “substantially petrochemical” herein, if at least 75 %, preferably at least 80 %, further preferablyat least 85 %, particularly preferably at least 90 %, even further preferably at least 95 %, morepreferably at least 97.5 % of its carbon is petrochemically-derived carbon, based on the total carbon content of the respective compound. In this embodiment, it is particularly preferred that the 4-HAP and / or the phenyl acetate is / are petrochemical, i.e. all carbon of the respective compound is petrochemically-derived carbon, based on the total carbon content of the respective compound. Another aspect of the present invention pertains to a raw material comprising or consisting of 4- HAP produced by the process described herein. As mentioned above, the 4-HAP is substantially petrochemical or substantially non-petrochemical.According to another aspect, a personal care product or composition, or pharmaceutical productor composition comprises the raw material of the invention. Yet another aspect of the invention concerns 4-HAP, obtainable or obtained by a process as described herein, wherein the 4-HAP contains at least 25 %, preferably at least 50 %, further preferably at least 70 %, particularly preferably at least 80 %, even further preferably at least 90 %, more preferably at least 95 % non-petrochemically-derived carbon, based on the total carbon content of the 4-HAP.In view of the multi-step character of the process disclosed herein multiple intermediate stagesproviding compositional differences can be defined. For instance, following the basic process ofthe invention may yield the flow reactor effluent as an intermediate composition towards thepurified product. Quenching in accordance with a preferred embodiment results in a quenched flow reactor effluent with its compositional difference reflecting the treatment with water. From the quenched flow reactor effluent, an organic fraction may be extracted. Its compositional profile after extraction corresponds to that before, i.e. as present within the quenched flow reactor effluent. MIBK-based extraction in accordance with a further preferred embodiment provides anextraction phase as intermediate composition towards the final pure product. In accordance withthese considerations, additional aspects concern intermediate compositions of the process of theinvention and its preferred embodiments, as well as compositions substantially corresponding thereto and being defined as follows:Composition comprising: MSA in an amount ranging from 80% to 91%, preferably 84% to 90%,more preferably 87.7% ±2%; an organic fraction in an amount ranging from 9 to 20%, preferably10 to 16%, more preferably 12.3% ± 2%; wherein the organic fraction comprises 4-HAP, 2-HAPand phenol. Preferably, the composition is as obtained in an intermediate stage, in particular inthe form of a flow reactor effluent, of the process disclosed herein.Composition comprising: MSA in an amount ranging from preferably 62% to 68%, preferably 64%to 68%, more preferably 66.2% ± 1%; an organic fraction in an amount ranging from 6% to 15%,preferably 7% to 12%, more preferably 9.3% ± 2%; and, water in an amount ranging from 22 to26, preferably 23 to 24, more preferably 24.5% ± 0.2%; wherein the organic fraction comprises 4- HAP, 2-HAP and phenol. Preferably, the composition is as obtained in an intermediate stage, inparticular in the form of a quenched flow reactor effluent, of the process disclosed herein.Composition comprising: 4-HAP in an amount of 75% or more, preferably 80 % or more, morepreferably 84% or more, yet more preferably 90% or more, most preferably 94% or more; 2-HAPin an amount of 19% or less, preferably 15% or less, more preferably 10.6% or less, yet morepreferably 8% or less, most preferably 5% or less; and phenol in an amount of 6% or less,preferably 5% or less, more preferably 3.7% or less, yet more preferably 2% or less, mostpreferably 1% or less. Preferably, the composition is as obtained in an intermediate stage, inparticular in the form of an organic fraction of a flow reactor effluent or quenched flow reactoreffluent, of the process disclosed herein.Composition comprising: 4-HAP in an amount of 20% or more, preferably 25% or more, morepreferably 27% or more, more preferably 28.3% or more, yet more preferably 30% or more, mostpreferably 32% or more; MIBK in an amount ranging from 45% to 80%, preferably 49% to 66%,more preferably 53% to 62%, most preferably 57.6% ± 2.0%; and optionally one or more of thefollowing:MSA in an amount of 8% or less, preferably 6% or less, more preferably 4.5% or less, yet morepreferably 2.0% or less, most preferably 0.5% or less; 2-HAP in an amount of 8% or less,preferably 6% or less, more preferably 4.3% or less, yet more preferably 3.0% or less, mostpreferably 2.0% or less; phenol in an amount of 1.5% or less, preferably 1.2% or less, morepreferably 0.9% or less, yet more preferably 0.5% or less, most preferably 0.2% or less; water inan amount of 8% or less, preferably 6% or less, more preferably 4.3% or less, yet more preferably2.0% or less, most preferably 1.0% or less. Preferably, the composition is as obtained in anintermediate stage, in particular in the form of a phase resulting from MIBK-based extraction, ofthe process disclosed herein.The percentages given for the components of the various compositions described above arepreferably expressed as weight percentages relative to the weight of the respective composition.

[0002] ExperimentsA preferred embodiment of the present invention relates to a continuous manufacturing processfor 4-hydroxyacetophenone (4-HAP) through Fries rearrangement of phenyl acetate in thepresence of excess methane sulfonic acid (MSA). The trials until achieving the invention includedthe establishment of an upstream and a downstream processing protocol based on continuousextraction to separate the product from the MSA.The process resulted in full conversion of phenyl acetate while leading to high assay yields of 4-HAP, as compared to 2-HAP, and phenol. The results could be improved further, especially withrespect to lowering the phenol content, when pre-dried MSA was used. To demonstraterobustness, a prolonged run of almost 9 h was tested, which resulted in the formation of 2.6 kg 4-HAP by means of a 30 mL reactor.The collected effluents were subsequently fed to a continuous extraction column. MIBK wasidentified as preferred extraction solvent when used as the dispersed phase. With this setting itwas shown that 4-HAP (and 2-HAP) can be extracted almost quantitatively from the quenchedreaction mixture leading to an organic phase which contains at least 20 wt.-% of 4-HAP(preferably, max. 35 wt.-%). If either a high enough MIBK feed or sufficient column length wasused, only 20 mg 4-HAP per hour were lost to the raffinate. An aqueous back-wash was identifiedas a desirable step in the process to remove MSA completely from the extract as this acid wouldcause 4-HAP degradation in the subsequent distillation step. Specifically, the MIBK phasecontained up to 0.5 wt.-% of MSA depending on the applied conditions, which could be reducedby a factor of 10 by introducing this back-wash. The feasibility of the Fries rearrangement (scheme (I), depicted above) of phenyl acetate (1) to 4- HAP (2) in the presence of methane sulfonic acid (MSA) was demonstrated. Depending on the tested reaction conditions, different ratios between the desired product 2 and the undesired side products, 2-hydroxyacetophenone (2-HAP, 3) and phenol (PhOH, 4), were obtained. A high selectivity towards the desired 4-isomer 2 was achieved, when at least 8 equivalents of MSA were applied.Consequently, efficient recycling of the latter is preferred to make this process economicallyviable. Further experiments aimed at development of a telescoped process for the synthesis of 4-HAP from phenol; and development of an efficient downstream processing protocol, including theisolation of 4-HAP (by crystallization and distillation) and recycling of MSA.As described in more detail in the following, using a continuous flow synthesis of 4-HAP fromphenyl acetate, 10 molar equivalents of pre-dried MSA at around 103 °C and a residence time ofaround 180 s resulted in (near) full conversion and an assay yield of ca. 84% 4-HAP, whilereducing the amount of 2-HAP and PhOH to less than 11.0% and less than 4.0%, respectively. MSA could be recovered and recycled at least six times. Although the selectivity towards 4-HAPwas independent of the starting material (phenol or phenyl acetate), higher conversion (andyields) were achieved when the synthesis started directly from ester 1. Then, an aqueous workup procedure was developed, which allowed separation of the two isomerichydroxyacetophenones and provided 4-HAP in 63% isolated yield. Fractional distillation of 4-HAP resulted in an off-white product. However, in view of the high boiling point and limited thermalstability of the product, a deep vacuum (< 0.1 mbar) was required for this distillation. Meeting suchrequirement may be difficult on production scale. Hence, a different isolation / purificationprocedure was sought-after. Based on a melting point difference of 100 °C between the isomers2 and 3, a melt crystallization was looked into as a potential alternative. In a proof-of-principleexperiment that used artificial mixtures of 2- and 4-HAP, it was possible to increase the 4-HAPcontent from 90 wt.-% up to 97.5 wt.-%.1. Synthesis of phenyl acetatePhenyl acetate (PhOAc) synthesis was carried out by reacting phenol with acetic anhydride(Ac2O) in the presence of 10 mol% sodium acetate (NaOAc). To this end, phenol (50 g, 0.52 mol, 1.0 eq) was charged at 70 °C to the reactor. NaOAc (5.0 g, 60 mmol, 0.11 eq) was added and themixture heated up to 100 °C. Then Ac2O (68 g, 0.67 mol, 1.3 eq) was added dropwise over aperiod of 120 min. After complete addition, the reaction mixture was stirred for another 7 h at 100 °C. The conversion of Phenol was monitored by TLC. After reaction was complete, crude phenyl acetate was purified from the reaction mixture by removing acetic acid (AcOH) using distillation at 70°C and extraction using water and ethyl acetate (EtOAc). Specifically, AcOH (40 g) wasdistilled off at 70 °C and 15 mbar. Crude product was cooled to room temperature, diluted withwater (50 g) and extracted with EtOAc (100 g). After phase separation, the organic layer was washed with aqueous NaOH (50 g, 2 %) and water (50 g). The solvent (82 g EtOAc) was removed at 70 °C and 20 mbar to yield PhOAc (66.9 g, 98 % purity, 0.48 mol, 92.5 % yield).2.1 Flow reactor setupA 3D-printed reactor was integrated into a flow setup as schematically depicted in Fig.1. Pumpswere used to feed the chemicals. Phenyl acetate (PhOAc) synthesis was carried out by reactingphenol (PhOH) with acetic anhydride (Ac2O). PhOAc and MSA were preheated in heatexchangers. Then, the preheated streams were combined in a small mixer (not shown) and thejoined effluent was reacted in a reactor. The resulting reaction mixture was cooled down.Afterwards, water was blended with the effluent and the diluted stream was cooled down.2.2 Recovery setupDilution prior to extraction avoids that highly concentrated MSA enters the extraction column.Being a strong acid, MSA will be completely ionized in an aqueous solution. The heat of formationof the methanesulfonate ion in an aqueous solution is reported to be -163.79 ± 1.04 kcal / mol.Consequently, the solvation of MSA in water represents an exceptionally exothermic process(vide infra) and a significant temperature drifting during the extraction would arise. Hence,aqueous dilution and cooling prior to the continuous extraction ensure a safe and stable operation.Reaction calorimetry study of MSA (292,3 g, 3,03 mol) with water (55 g, 3,03 mol, 1,0 eq) at 22 °Crevealed: 1st water eq increased T by Δ86,37 K (18,94 kJ / mol). 2nd water eq increased T byΔ38,23 K (10,57 kJ / mol). Quenching with 2 eq Water is considered sufficient to ensure that heatdevelopment in the extraction column is significantly below Δ38,23 K.The diluted stream was guided to a liquid / liquid extraction column using MIBK as organic solvent in which the formed 4-HAP was enriched along with side product 2-HAP. Distillation was carriedout to separate 2-HAP from 4-HAP. The extraction solvents water and MIBK were fed by(peristaltic or HNP gear) pumps. The 4-HAP extract was collected at the top and the MSA raffinateat the bottom of the column. Recycle streams are shown. A residence time of 45 s is achieved in the installed 30 ml reactor when a total volumetric flow of0.67 mL / s or 40 mL / min is used. Four reactors (á 30 mL) were connected in series to realize aresidence time of around 180 s. Next, the total volumetric flow was converted into the total massflow. Finally, the individual mass flows of PA and MSA were calculated considering thecorresponding density of a pure compound and X its mass fraction, respectively. Taking intoaccount the purity and stoichiometric ratio of the chemicals, the calculation resulted for the firstexperiment in flow rates of 6.28 g / min for PA (94 % purity by HPLC) and 50.51 g / min for MSA(purity 99 %). The application of PA with higher purity (99 %) results in a flow rate of 6.01 g / minand 50.91 g / min for MSA, respectively. In contrast to the process flow diagram shown in Fig.1, the outlet of the reactor was decoupled from the extraction column to enable the separate examination of flow conditions without the influence of additional extraction parameters. Details of tested reaction conditions and the corresponding assay results of the flow experiments are summarized in Table 1. The obtained results are discussed in the following paragraphs.Table 1: Summarized results of flow experiments with varied reaction temperature, concentrationand quality of MSA.3. Results3.1 Varying the molar equivalents of MSAStarting material 1 was reacted in the presence of 12 molar equivalents MSA at 120 °C for 45 s. The effluent was diluted with equal molar amounts of H2O compared to MSA. Under these conditions full conversion of ester 1 was observed. The desired product 2 was formed with an assay yield of 82.4 % while the 2-isomer 3 was formed in 11.2 % resulting in an isomeric ratio of 7.4. Along with the rearrangement products 2 and 3, phenol (4) was formed as hydrolysis product in a yield of 10.9 % (Table 1, entry 1). The yield of 4-HAP was 82 %.Next, the influence of different amounts of MSA on the reaction outcome was tested (Table 1,entry 2-4). The reduction from 12 to 8 molar equivalents MSA resulted in minor changes of thereaction outcome. The yield for 4-HAP slightly decreased while the amount of phenol increased(Table 1, entry 2). A bigger change in the reaction numbers was observed, when the amount ofMSA was reduced further to 6 molar equivalents. Under this reaction condition a diminished yieldof 68.7 % for product 2 was obtained and only fractionally altered amounts of isomer 3 and phenol(4) (Table 1, entry 3). This result is explained by an undesired formation of tarry side-products athigher concentrations. In the presence of acid (and elevated temperatures), 4-HAP (2)tautomerizes to its corresponding enol, which opens the door for self-condensation reactions thatfinally lead to tar formation. The formation of such side products was not only observed in thecollected effluent of the experiment but is also unmasked by the incomplete mass balance. Basedon these findings it was concluded that a higher MSA content is favorable for the reaction outcomesince a higher dilution helps controlling the tar formation. 3.2 Varying the reaction temperature Different reaction temperatures were applied because the regioselectivity of the Friesrearrangement is assumed to be temperature dependent. At lower temperatures the desired 4-isomer 2, the kinetic product, is preferably formed, whereas elevated temperatures favor the in this case undesired thermodynamic 2-isomer 3. At 150°C 4-HAP was observed to decompose.Experiments performed at 120 °C exclusively resulted overall in a 4-HAP / 2-HAP ratio of 7.4 (Table1, entry 1-3). Consequently, the temperature was decreased to 100 °C in a next experiment topotentially increase the isomeric ratio. The performed experiment resulted in a high PA (1)conversion of 98.1 % and in assay yields of 70.8 % 4-HAP, 8.9 % 2-HAP, and 18.7 % phenol,respectively (Table 1, entry 4). Based on the assay results an improved isomeric ratio of 7.9 was obtained at a reduced reaction temperature. Therefore, a higher isomeric ratio can be assumed at even lower temperatures. At a temperature of 100 °C the conversion of phenyl acetate (1) was not quantitative anymore at a fixed residence time of 45 s and a relatively high phenol contentwas found. The found phenol content may be due to an inferior MSA quality, in particular MSAnot having the preferred dryness. Results of a DOE study (not shown) suggests that atemperature around 103°C favors a residence time of around 180 s to achieve full conversion andmaximum selectivity. In theory it would be possible to recycle the phenol and the unreacted phenylacetate, but this endeavor will significantly increase the complexity of the DSP in the final process.A temperature at 120 °C ensures full conversion of the starting material 1. Additionally, the phenolcontent was tried to be reduced while increasing the yield of 4-HAP by chemical means.3.3 Varying the MSA source Different MSA sources were tested. With a different MSA source (same purity 99%), we repeatedthe reaction conditions of the previous experiment (Table 1, entry 5 vs. 6). Surprisingly, thereaction outcome changed significantly when the new source of MSA was applied. The assayyields of 4-HAP and 2-HAP dropped to 65.9 % and 9.5 %, respectively, while the yield of phenolincreased to 21.5 %. Repeating the experiment with different bottles of the same supplier resultedin the same reaction outcome and remained unchanged in a prolonged run of 40 min as well(Table 1, entry 6-8). These findings suggest a higher water content in the newly sourced MSAbased on the fact that the supplier change alone led to a significant increase of the hydrolysisproduct phenol.Therefore, the water content of different MSA sources was determined by Karl-Fischer titration.Besides MSA sourced from Fluorochem and Sigma Aldrich, we also included CarlRoth as supplierfor MSA (purity 99.5%). The results of the Karl-Fischer titration are listed in Table 2. Table 2: Water content of different MSA sources determined by Karl-Fischer titration. The analysis disclosed a water content of 2.6 wt% in the MSA sourced from Fluorochem. Basedon this value 1.7 molar equivalents of water compared to phenyl acetate were fed during the flowexperiments. In contrast, a lower water content of 2.2 wt% was found for the MSA sourced fromSigma Aldrich. This comparison shows that the increased phenol content in the experiments usingFluorochem’s MSA can indeed be linked to a higher water content. The additionally ordered MSAfrom CarlRoth contained the lowest water content of 1.4 wt% and resulted in a reaction outcome(Table 1, entry 11) similar to the ones using Sigma Aldrich’s MSA. Consequently, these twosources were used for further experiments. 3.4 Varying the residence time Variation of the residence time was investigated. So far, the residence time was fixed in all experiments to 45 s. For a better understanding, the residence time was shortened to 30 s. In this case, the conversion of starting material 1 was still complete, and assay yields of 80.6 %, 11.9 %, and 10.7 % for 4-HAP, 2-HAP, and phenol were obtained, respectively (Table 3, entry 1). Compared to the benchmark reaction of 45 s (Table 3, entry 2) a decreased isomeric ratio of 6.8was obtained. When doubling the initially used 45 s residence time, assay yields of 81.7 % for 4-HAP, 11.1 % for 2-HAP, and 6.1 % for phenol were obtained at a full conversion of phenyl acetate leading to an isomeric ratio of 7.3 (Table 3, entry 3). Consequently, only a minor improvement of the selectivity was achieved at the cost of the productivity. Therefore, we decided to keep usinga residence of 45 s for the further investigation. Nevertheless, it was shown that the process isrobust against variations of the residence time. Table 3: Reaction outcome varying the residence time. 3.5 Anhydrides as drying agent As mentioned above, the water content crucially influences the reaction outcome as it will determine the amount of undesired phenol by hydrolysis. Since neither changing the reaction temperature nor the residence time significantly influenced the phenol content, the water content of MSA was decided to be reduced by chemical means. Thus, the application of anhydrides as drying agents for MSA and selected acetic anhydride (Ac2O) and methane sulfonic anhydride (Ms2O) were tested for this purpose. MSA was dried by mixing the acid with a defined amount of the chosen anhydride for 30 min at 90 °C. Then, phenyl acetate was added and the reaction mixture was analyzed after 30 min. Theresults for Ms2O are listed in Table 4 and for Ac2O in Table 5. Table 4: Reaction outcome using different amounts of Ms2O as drying agent. First, the benchmark was set using untreated MSA. Assay yields of 83.7 % for 4-HAP, 8.0 % for 2-HAP, and 5.7 % for phenol were obtained at 90 °C and a reaction time of 30 min (Table 4, entry 1). The benchmark could be slightly improved when a freshly opened bottle of MSA was used. In this case a similar yield of 83.8 % for 4-HAP was observed but the isomeric ratio was slightly increased from 10.5 to 10.9 (Table 4, entry 2). Then, dried MSA was used for the Fries rearrangement of starting material 1. The application of 0.66 equiv. Ms2O as drying agent resulted in an excellent isomeric ratio of 70.8 (Table 4, entry 3) and a low phenol content of 0.5 %. However, this result was achieved at the cost of an incomplete mass balance (76.3 %) and a reduced 4-HAP selectivity. Based on the significantly reduced amount of 2-HAP and the presence of a significantamount of tarry side products, we reasoned that consecutive reactions from 2-HAP are favoredunder these conditions. Therefore, we reduced the amount of anhydride in the next experiment ten-fold. In this case, an isomeric ratio of 11.8 was obtained along with a low phenol content of 3.2 % (Table 4, entry 4). Still, the mass balance is incomplete, and we reduced the amount of anhydride even further. When 0.01 equiv. Ms2O was used as drying agent a mass balance similar to the ones of the benchmark reactions is observed along with a 4-HAP yield of 85.2 %, but a phenol content similar to fresh MSA (Table 4, entry 5). Thus, we applied the conditions reported in literature that make use of 0.2 equiv. Ms2O compared to the starting material. Under these particular conditions, the isomeric ratio rose again to 16.3 and the phenol content decreased, but so did the mass balance. These batch experiments demonstrate that it is possible to decrease the water content in the MSA and therefore the phenol content. Along these lines, a compromisebetween a low phenol content and undesired tar formation was made.Table 5: Reaction outcome using different amounts of Ac2O as drying agent.Next, we evaluated if the same trends exist for another Ac2O. The application of varying amountsof anhydride (0.01-1.15 equiv.) results in a significantly decreased phenol content but also in some cases in an incomplete mass balance (Table 5, entry 1 and 2), similar to Ms2O. When 0.01 equiv. Ac2O are used (Table 5, entry 3), an almost complete mass balance of 98.3 % and a reduced phenol content of 3.9 % were observed. Additionally yield and selectivity for 4-HAP were also increased to 86.4 %. The application of the literature conditions adapted to Ac2O resulted again in an incomplete mass balance (Table 5, entry 4). Surprisingly, an acceptable mass balance of 94.3 %, a yield of 86.1 % for 4-HAP as well as a low phenol content of 0.8 % were obtained when 0.1 equiv. of Ac2O compared to phenyl acetate were applied (Table 5, entry 5). This result demonstrated a good balance between drying the MSA and taming the side reactions. Additionally, the comparison between the two anhydrides revealed acetic anhydride to be slightly superior in terms of the reactions outcome, while being significantly cheaper than Ms2O. It is worth mentioning that overall the application of Ac2O resulted in a lower phenol contents compared to Ms2O. This could potentially point to a desired trapping of phenol as phenyl acetate by Ac2O, which is not possible for Ms2O.Table 6: Reaction outcome of flow experiments using MSA pretreated with Ac2O.For these reasons, 0.1 equiv. of acetic anhydride compared to phenyl acetate was used for dryingMSA, but this time performing the Fries rearrangement under flow conditions. Using pretreated MSA under flow conditions significantly improved the yield of 4-HAP, reduced the phenol content compared to the bench mark (Table 6, entry 1 vs. entry 2.) and resulted in an acceptable massbalance. We repeated the flow experiments and increased the acetic anhydride amount to 0.2equiv. compared to the starting material. Similar to the batch procedure, an incomplete massbalance was observed and the overall reaction outcome slightly deteriorated (Table 6, entry 3). The application of 0.01 equiv. Ac2O was not effective to improve the reaction outcome either. Inthis case a similar phenol content compared to the benchmark was observed (compare Table 6,entry 1 and 4). Since 0.1 equiv. of Ac2O resulted in an improved selectivity and 0.2 equiv. in the lowest phenol content, we applied 0.15 equiv. of Ac2O compared to the starting material as compromise. These conditions did not only result in a complete mass balance, but also resulted in an excellent reaction outcome of 86.8 % 4-HAP, an increased isomeric ratio of 7.7, and a low phenol content of 2.1 % (Table 6, entry 5). Pre-drying of MSA suppressed phenol formation toless than 4.0 %. %. Additional drying was observed not to lead to a further reduction of phenolformation. Based on these results, we decided to proceed using a temperature of 120 °C on theHTF side, a residence time of 45 s, and MSA sourced from CarlRoth or Sigma Aldrich that was pretreated with 0.15 equiv. Ac2O. 3.6 Long-runsLong-term stability of the process in the flow reactor was demonstrated. The results of the trialsare listed in Table 7. In a first attempt we aimed for a production run of 2 h. In this case an almostquantitative conversion of PA of 99.5 % was achieved that led to assay yields of 80.8 % 4-HAP, 10.6 % 2-HAP, and 1.5 % phenol, respectively (Table 7, entry 1). Table 7: Reaction outcome of long-term runs. These results equal an isomeric ratio of 7.7 and 673 g of crude 4-HAP. Additionally to the HPLC analysis of the effluent, we recorded the PhOAc temperature and all flow rates. As the temperature recording illustrates, a stable outlet temperature of approx.100 °C can be found forPhOAc over the course of the reaction. However, the recording of the flow rates show an unstableMSA feed since peaks in the MSA flow rate are observed. This fluctuation can also be seen inthe mass balance, which is incomplete. Since such fluctuations have not been observed duringthe optimization phase, we repeated the experiment twice. Similar results in terms of conversion and yield were observed (Table 7, entry 2 and 3), but the fluctuations in the MSA feed remained.Since the fluctuations appeared randomly and only over a time frame of 2-5 s, we hypothesizeda potential cavitation was taking place in the pump head. If true, a slightly increased pressure on the MSA feeding vessel as well as a bigger feeding tube in direction of the pump head should circumvent the fluctuations. Thus, we exchanged the ⅛-inch tubing for a ¼-inch tubing and placed the MSA feed vessel at an elevated position. With these small adjustments it was possible for usto perform another run was performed over 8 h with stable reaction parameters. This can be seenby the consistency between set and measured feeds. Only in the case of the water feed 5 small fluctuations can be seen that are traced back to air bubbles. However, water is only used for diluting the effluent, the alternations in the water feed have no effect on the reaction outcome. In this long-run we were able to achieve complete conversion leading to yields of 83.7% 4-HAP (2.6 kg), 10.7 % 2-HAP, and 1.9 % phenol as well as an isomeric ratio of 7.8 and a good mass balance of 96.3%, respectively (Table 7, entry 4). Thus, the development of a stable flow system for the production of crude 4-HAP can be concluded.3.7 Batch reaction (comparative example)Phenol (20.1 g; 0.214 mol) was dissolved in 8 molar equivalents (163.9 g; 1.705 mol) of methane sulfonic acid. The solution was heated to 49°C and subsequently, acetic anhydride (26.2 g; 0.257 mol; 1.2 equiv.) was added over a period of 20 minutes. During the dosing, the heating was continued until the final temperature of 60°C was reached. The mixture was subsequently stirred at this temperature for another 130 minutes. After cooling to ambient temperature the reaction mixture was carefully diluted with water (170 g) and subsequently extracted three times with organic solvent (once with 135 g and twice with 75 g). The combined organic extracts werewashed with water (twice with 60 g) and the subsequently the solvent was removed in vacuo. The4-HAP was isolated from the obtained residue by means of fractional distillation at reducedpressure. Thereby, the pressure was slowly reduced to 0.1 mbar, and the bottom temperaturewas gradually increased to 180˚C. The melting point of 4-HAP (109˚C) required heating of thecondenser in order to avoid solidification of the distillate in the condenser.The reaction yield of 4-HAP was 75%. The distillation yield of 4-HAP (sum of amount in fractions)was 90%.4. CrystallizationThe collected effluent of the above mentioned flow process was stored for extraction experiments.It was observed that in most samples a solid crystalline-looking material, potentially crystallized4-HAP, formed overnight. Therefore, a sample of the solid material was collected, blotted with apaper to free the solid as good as possible from attached mother liquor, and finally analyzed byHPLC. The analysis revealed the material to consist of up of 99.9 wt% 4-HAP and only traces of2-HAP. This chance find opened the door for crystallization / precipitation procedures as analternative to the planned extraction in the DSP. Therefore, we investigated the isolation of 4-HAPby crystallization / precipitation further. Further in respect of crystallization, reference is made toapplicant’s international patent application WO 2023 / 170048 A1.4.1 Crystallization from the effluentThe amount of crystallized 4-HAP based on simple effluent storage was analyzed. Therefore, theamount of 4-HAP found in freshly collected effluent was compared to the amount of thesupernatant solution after solid material formed. Overall, 8 samples collected in three individualflow experiments were analyzed. The results are shown in Table 8. All samples showed asolidified amount of 4-HAP between 34 and 37 % (Table 8, entry 1-2.4). Only the samples from a100 °C-experiment (see Table 1, entry 4) differed. The effluent collected in this reaction revealeda solidified amount of approximately 21% for product 2 (Table 8, entry 3.2 and 3.3). The reasonfor the absence of solid product 2 in the first sample of the 100 °C-reaction (Table 8, entry 3.1)remains unclear, especially since equal amounts of 4-HAP were present in the fresh effluent(Table 8, entry 3.1-3.3). However, this particular sample indicates that the reaction still proceedsat room temperature, since the amount of 4-HAP increased and the remaining amounts of thestarting material disappeared (compare Table 1, entry 4). Moreover, the results of all experimentshighlight that the majority of 4-HAP still remains in solution as the solubility of 4-HAP in the given MSA:H2O mixture of approximately 1:1 is too high. To increase the amount of solidified 4-HAP, additional crystallization experiments were performed.Table 8: Amount of 4-HAP crystallized out from the effluent upon storing.First, the effect of small amounts of additional water was investigated. Thus, 1 g of water was added to the effluent and the supernatant solution was homogenized by shaking. The next day,the solution was analyzed and a small amount of 0.77 %-points of additional solid 4-HAP wasfound (Table 9, entry 1). Next, we investigated the effect of sonication and colder storagetemperatures on the amount of solid product 2. When the already solid containing effluent wassonicated for 1 minute and stored overnight at room temperature, we found that some of the solid4-HAP was dissolved again (Table 9, entry 2). However, when the experiment is repeated but thesample was stored at 4 °C a significant additional amount of solid 4-HAP of 8.78 %-points wasfound (Table 9, entry 3). More solid material was expected since the overall solubility is known todecrease with decreasing temperature. Pursuing a complete isolation of 4-HAP by crystallization,we increased the water content in the next sample in a way that a MSA:H2O ratio of 1:3 wasmade. Under these conditions and additional storing overnight at room temperature 10.81 %-points of extra solidified 4-HAP were found (Table 9, entry4). Next, we were interested, if thesolidification of 4-HAP was complete. Therefore, a sample that already contained solid product 2was analyzed the next day again. In this case an additional amount of 1.34 %-points solidified. Arecrystallization of the exact same sample led basically to the starting amount of 37.37 %. Thus,these experiments (entry, 5 and 6) show that the maximum amount of solidified product 2 at roomtemperature in a mixture of MSA:H2O is almost reached. As last experiment, we used the samplethat initially did not contain solid 4-HAP. When this sample was seeded with 16 mg of the isolatedmaterial, the next day small quantities of 4-HAP crystals were found indicating that a seedingprocedure can be used to initiate crystallization. However, roughly 50 % of 4-HAP remained insolution. A further increase of solidified product 2 would require the application of even largeramounts of water.Table 9: Additional 4-HAP crystals under various crystallization strategies.4.2 Melt crystallization 4.2.1 Melt crystallization of artificial reaction mixtures including phenolTo assess melt crystallization, we extended the artificial mixtures to also contain phenol; thehydrolysis product of the Fries rearrangement. As described in the previous chapter differentamounts of phenol were formed depending on the water content of the MSA. Therefore, wecorrected the artificial mixture for phenol in the first experiments. Two samples with ratios of 8:1:1and 7:1:2 regarding the amounts of 4-HAP, 2-HAP, and phenol were prepared, respectively(compare Table 1). These mixtures were placed in an oil bath and heated until a homogenousmelt was observed. The artificial mixture with a ratio of 7:1:2 was completely molten around 90 °Cwhereas a temperature of 110 °C was required to reach the same result with the 8:1:1 mixture.Then, the heating was turned off and the melts were kept stirring in the oil bath for slow cooling.In both cases one solid reaction mixture was observed below the melting temperature of the4-isomer but above the melting temperature of the 2-isomer. This simple setup did not allow aseparation of the isomers but demonstrates that a crystallization is potentially possible in thepresence of varying amounts of different side-products (2-HAP and phenol).4.2.2 Melt crystallization of a batch extractThe concept of a melt crystallization was tested with an actual reaction mixture. A batch extractionwas applied. First, the effluent was diluted further with water to achieve a MSA / H2O ratio of 1:2.Then, the aqueous phase was extracted thrice with MIBK. The HPLC analysis of both layersrevealed that the product 2 and the side-products 3 and 4 were completely extracted into theorganic phase. This experiment demonstrates the complete removal of organic material from theeffluent by means of extraction. Consequently, this experiment was also the basis for theinvestigation of the continuous extraction process (vide infra).Then, the organic layer was concentrated under reduced pressure. After solvent evaporation adark colored residue was obtained. The residue was transferred to the melt chamber of the melt crystallization setup, which consisted of a double-jacketed dropping funnel connected to a Liebigcondenser. Both parts were heated individually, and the overall setup was tilted. To feed a meltto the Liebig condenser, the melting chamber was heated to 110 °C; the temperature at which ahomogenous melt in the previous experiments was observed.Then, we attempted the actual melt crystallization by feeding the melt dropwise to the condenser.We concluded that the melt crystallization is difficult at this stage in the DSP. However, it may beuseful in the purification of 4-HAP at a later stage of the DSP. For instance, once the heavy sideproducts described above are removed by a short path distillation only the isomeric mixture needsto be processed further. Then, the large difference in the melting points of 2-HAP (4-6 °C) and 4-HAP (104 °C) might prove beneficial.4.3 Investigation of the continuous extractionMoreover, we focused on the development of a continuous extraction protocol to separate crude4-HAP (as well as 2-HAP, phenol, and other organic side products) from the to be recycled MSA.4.3.1 Solvent selectionAs potential extraction solvents, p-menthane, p-cymene, or 2,4-dimethyl octane would be thepreferred choices. Heptane, cyclohexane, and toluene have been tested in batch extractions.However, the solubility of 4-HAP in them is marginal and their application caused precipitation.Being part of the same solvent class, similar solvation properties can be expected for p-menthane,2,4-dimethyl octane, or p-cymene, excluding them as extraction solvents. An hypothesis that wasunderlined by testing p-cymene as solvent for pure 4-HAP. The attempt to dissolve 0.5 g 4-HAPin 5 g of p-cymene (2215-23-02-062) resulted in a 4-HAP content of only 0.2 wt% (HPLC) afterthe mixture was stirred for 24 h at ambient temperature.Further experiments testing extraction of 4-HAP from a system comprising phases of water andextraction solvent led to the following observations (“1 x” denote a single extraction step, “2 x”denote two extraction steps, etc.; results are indicated as ratio of 4-HAP in wt% found in the waterphase to 4-HAP in wt% found in the solvent phase): 1 x heptane 0 / 93 1 x cyclohexanone 28 / 66 2 x cyclohexanone 53 / 51 1 x n-butylacetate 57 / 31 1 x MIBK 91 / 14 3 x MIBK 94 / 8 1x cyclopentyl methyl ether (CPME) 70 / 302 x CPME 83 / 173 x CPME 96 / <0,1Extraction of 4-HAP from the MSA / Water phase was found to be most efficient with MIBK.Next, MIBK was compared to MTBE. On the basis of initial data, MIBK seemed to be the betterchoice. Not only because it can dissolve up to 25-33 wt% 4-HAP at 20-30 °C, but also because itoffers a partition coefficient for 4-HAP of 14, whereas the one for MTBE was determined to be 1.Accordingly, a more efficient extraction process on the basis of MIBK can be foreseen, and asuccessful application of MIBK as extraction solvent has already been demonstrated. 4.3.2 MIBK stability After MIBK was selected as extraction solvent, its stability in a highly acid environment on the basis of MSA was questioned. Being an α-CH acidic carbonyl compound the presence of acid may catalyze potential aldol reactions. To examine the stability, MIBK (as received) was stirred in the presence of 5 wt% MSA at ambient temperature. The accumulation of potential aldol products, and thus the stability of MIBK, was monitored over time by GC-MS. Already after 2 h non-neglectable signals for aldol products were observed by GC-MS. Their signals and thus their quantities kept growing over the monitored time frame of 72 h. Since the formation took place in the presence of smaller quantities of MSA (5 wt%), this reactivity couldpresent a problem for the extraction, where even larger amounts of MSA will be present. However,the effluent will not consist of pure MSA as it will be diluted with a significant amount water. Therefore, the influence of water on the formation of undesired aldol products was investigatednext. The previous experiment was repeated, this time using wet MIBK that was prepared bystirring a biphasic mixture of MIBK and water at ambient temperature for 10 min. After phase separation, the wet MIBK was subjected to the stability test. Based on a watersolubility of 19 g / L in MIBK, a maximal concentration of 2.3 wt% H2O in MIBK, and thus an excessof MSA towards water, is given. Like before, the reaction was monitored by GC-MS. No signal for aldol products could be detected by GC-MS after 2 h, whereas in the case of “dry”MIBK a significant amount was already present. After 72 h, a diminutive signal for aldol productswas detected. These results indicate that water indeed tames the formation of aldol products and increases the stability of MIBK in an acid environment significantly. Moreover, an almost 1:1 ratio between MSA and water will be used in the column (vide infra). Thus, the reactivity of MSA will be reduced further. Finally, while in wet MIBK aldol products were detected after several hours of reaction time, the residence time in the extract in the column will be in the range of minutes, hampering the decomposition of MIBK further. Overall, the experiments so far justify selection of MIBK as extraction solvent. 4.3.3 Design of the continuous extraction process After sufficient stability of MIBK in an acidic aqueous environment had been demonstrated, we continued our endeavors designing a continuous extraction process. In theory, two separateextraction steps will be used. The first is the extraction of the effluent with MIBK. The second anaqueous back-wash of the extract to remove residual amounts of MSA. In this process, the freshlyprepared effluent will be fed to the continuous extraction column. The exact feeding position willbe determined during the investigation. The extraction solvent MIBK will be fed almost at thebottom of the column to maximize the number of extraction stages. Water will be fed at the top ofthe column for the potentially required back-wash for the same reason. As a result, it is plannedto receive an aqueous MSA raffinate at the bottom of the column and the 4-HAP containingorganic extract at the top of the column. Ideally the organic side products, e.g., 2-HAP, phenol,are also fully extracted into the MIBK phase.4.3.4 Design of the continuous extraction columnBased on the results so far, we decided to build a continuous extraction column consisting of alternating mixer and settler units. The column has an internal diameter of 4 cm and a length ofapprox.100 cm. The MIBK inlet was 7 cm and the water inlet 94 cm from the bottom. The extractoverflow was located at 98 cm from the bottom. The effluent can be fed either at 25 cm, 50 cm,or 75 cm from the MIBK inlet. The impellers used have a 6-blade geometry of 1 cm in height and 1.8 cm in diameter. Due to the acidic environment the impellers were made of Hastelloy C. The settler units were filled with 40 Raschig rings (5 mm height, 5 mm outer diameter, 3 mm internal diameter) to break the movement of the liquid due to agitation.4.3.5 DoE studyEmploying a DoE study, the extraction process was then tried to be optimized. The feed rate forthe effluent (MSA:H2O 1:1, collected over various flow experiments) was 10 mL / min. Then, weselected the ratio between the volumetric feeds of effluent and water as well as between MIBKand water as parameters for the DoE study. Thus, all feeds were linked with each other. Anotherparameter in the study was the position of the liquid-liquid boundary layer between raffinate andextract. This variation should allow to determine the influence of varying the number of theoreticalextraction stages for both the 4-HAP extraction as well as the aqueous back-wash. Thisparameter was considered to be especially important since we wanted to combine both steps ina single extraction column. As response we selected the MSA content in the raffinate as well asthe amount of 4-HAP lost to the raffinate compared to the initial amount of 4-HAP fed with theeffluent. The tested extraction conditions and resulting responses of the DoE study are listed inTable 10.Table 10: Tested extraction conditions for the DoE study. To have comparable results, samples have been taken once the steady-state for each individualextraction condition was reached. We decided to check for the steady-state by tracking the MSAcontent of the raffinate over time by IR. For the DoE we focused on the raffinate since the MSAshould not only be recycled but should also contain as little organic material as possible. Samplesof the raffinate were taken every 5 minutes. The MSA content reached a plateau that indicatesthe steady-state after 30 minutes. Once the steady-state was reached samples of extract andraffinate were taken and analyzed (Table 10). With this data in hand, the DoE model was fed andanalyzed using the software package MODDE.The analysis of all data shows no correlation between the selected parameters according to themodel. However, the data include experiments, which have a theoretically impossible MSA extraction of over 100%. There are various reasons for these outliers. First, the IR calibration was done with solutions of pure MSA in water. Consequently, the presence of organic material in the raffinate, such as (side) products or traces of MIBK, might interfere with the analysis. Second,peristaltic pumps were used in the DoE experiments for the inlet- and outlet streams of theextraction column. Even though the calibration of the pumps was checked on a daily basis, it cannot be excluded that the volume fed per revolution changed for one or all pumps over the tested experiment. As a consequence, the calculations based on the set feed rates do not match anymore the actually used feeds. In case these outliers are excluded from the analysis, and at the cost of the reproducibility experiments, it appears that each parameter influences the extraction to some extent. Especially the ratio between the streams appears to have a significant influence on the outcome of the reaction. Even though the DoE study did not result in a straightforward optimization of the extraction process, the single experiments of the study reveal useful information that could be used for the further optimization (Table 10). First, it can be seen that even though the highest MSA content was approx. (only) 27 wt% in the raffinate, non-neglectable amounts of 4-HAP were lost to the raffinate. Since this MSA content should inprinciple result in a 4-HAP partition coefficient higher than 13 (compare 3.3.3.2.2), it indicates thatthe number of extraction steps is too small to ensure a complete extraction of 4-HAP.Consequently, the feed point of the effluent to the column should be significantly higher than theones tested in the DoE study. Second, the best result in terms of lowest 4-HAP loss was obtained,when the MIBK feed was bigger than the water feed for the back-wash. Third, the relatively highwater content resulted in a diluted MSA raffinate, which is unfavorable for the MSA recycling.4.3.6 Batch extractions using actual effluentAdditional experiments using small batch extractions have been performed. In these experimentsactual effluent from the continuous process, based on a 1:1 w / w dilution of the reaction mixturewith water, was applied and ergo led to a more representative simulation of the extraction column.To a defined amount of effluent was added just enough MIBK to form a second layer. After the mixture was vigorously shaken for 1 minute, both layers were analyzed. In this manner, theorganic phase was enriched as far as possible in 4-HAP. Therefore, this sample of the organiclayer can be considered to simulate the top of the extraction column. Repeating the experimentwith equal amounts of effluent and MIBK should on the other hand represent a column sectionsignificantly closer to the MIBK feeding point. When actual effluent was used, the experimentsrevealed a potential enrichment of 4-HAP in the extract to up to almost 26 wt% at the top of the column while at the higher MIBK volume a 4-HAP content of 4.4 wt% was obtained. Based on these findings, it should be possible to efficiently extract 4-HAP and other organic material from the effluent as long as sufficient extraction stages are used. Extending this experiment, otherMIBK volumes were tested as well to simulate the gradual enrichment of 4-HAP in MIBK over thelength of the column. In this way the extraction process was simulated and the partition coefficientof 4-HAP was more accurately determined using a representative matrix. A mean distributioncoefficient of 9.8 (K value) was found for 4-HAP. Compared to the coefficients using pure materialit is slightly reduced, but still high enough to potentially enable an effective extraction.Since actual effluent was used, the same procedure was applied to determine the distribution of2-HAP and phenol in parallel. For 2-HAP a mean K value of 35.2 and for phenol of 25.2 wasobtained. These coefficients indicate that once 4-HAP can be extracted efficiently, the sideproducts will be too, leading in an ideal case to a raffinate that contains only trace quantities oforganic material. 4.3.7 MIBK as continuous phase Unlike in the DoE study, we started a first extraction experiment with MIBK as continuous phase.After the column was filled with MIBK, the effluent as well as MIBK were fed with flow rates of 50mL / min, and no aqueous backwash was used. Once the effluent was fed to the column, a colorfulgradient slowly developed over time. After the system reached its steady-state the liquid-liquidboundary between extract and raffinate is clearly visible at the bottom of the column. Additionallythe color intensity of the extract gradually increases towards the top of the column. This is alreadya visual indicator that the highest content of organic material is to be found at the top of thecolumn. Such gradient was also visible when samples of raffinate and extract were taken overtime. The results of the first extraction experiment building on the previously generated data is summarized in Table 11.Table 11: Results of the extraction using 50 mL / min for effluent- and MIBK feed using no back-wash, MIBK continuous phase. The applied conditions allowed a high MSA content in the raffinate of 51.9 wt%, while it containedonly trace quantities of 4-HAP, and other organic material was not detectable by HPLC. Theextract on the other hand revealed a 4-HAP content of 6.9 wt% and quantities of 0.54 wt% MSA.The amount of MSA was determined by titrating the extract with 0.1 N TBAOH(ntetrabutylammonium hydroxide, solution in a isopropanol / MeOH mixture). Additionally, thewater content of the extract was determined by Karl-Fischer titration and shown to be 1.71 wt%.This extraction experiment demonstrates an almost complete extraction of the organic materialfrom the effluent if sufficient extraction stages and MIBK volumes are given. Without a backwasha high MSA content in the raffinate is achieved. However, smaller quantities of MSA are lost tothe extract and still need to be removed prior to the next steps of the DSP.4.3.8 MIBK as dispersed phaseWe tested if making MIBK the dispersed phase (again) would alter the extraction outcome.Therefore, we repeated the experiment, but started with a water-filled column. The results of theexperiment are summarized in Table 12. In general, similar values to the previous experiment areobtained for the extract. In case of the raffinate, the results were further improved. At a similarMSA content only diminutive quantities of 4-HAP could be detected. The amount is so little that itequals a productivity or loss of 4-HAP in the raffinate of only 20 mg per hour.Next, we tried to increase the 4-HAP content in the extract, while reducing the MSA amount in it.To achieve this, we kept the conditions of 500 rpm, MIBK as dispersed phase, and an effluentfeed rate of 50 mL / min.Table 12: Results of the extraction using 50 mL / min for effluent- and MIBK feed using no back-wash, MIBK dispersed phase. Since the next goal was to increase the 4-HAP content in the extract while reducing its MSA content, we tested first the limit of the extraction towards the 4-HAP content in the MIBK phase. Thus, we reduced the MIBK feed to 10 mL / min, still not using an aqueous back-wash. Alreadywhile monitoring the extraction process by IR, a high 4-HAP content revealed itself by crystalformation during analysis.The results of the extraction experiment are summarized in Table 13. A high 4-HAP content of27.4 wt% being close to the maximal solubility, and a total organic content of 33.5 wt% were foundin the MIBK extract.Table 13: Results of the extraction using 50 mL / min for effluent- and only 10 mL / min MIBK feedusing no back-wash, MIBK dispersed phase. Surprisingly, no MSA was detectable in the extract. The absence of MSA in the extract might beexplained by the high organic content in the MIBK phase. Due to its high polarity and tendency todissociate, MSA is completely forced into the aqueous phase. The analysis of the raffinaterevealed a breakthrough of organic material into the aqueous phase. Consequently, there wereeither not sufficient extraction steps available to extract the high content of organic materialcompletely and / or the organic phase was simply over-saturated. So far, effluent consisting more or less of a 1:1 ratio between MSA and water was used. As a nextstep we wanted to apply an aqueous back-wash of the extract using a water feed of 10 mL / min.To counter any dilution, the effluent was diluted with only 36.86 g / min water, instead of thepreviously used 47.47 g / min. Additionally, we increased the MIBK feed to 20 mL / min to handlethe 4-HAP losses seen in the previous experiment. The results of this extraction are listed in Table14.Table 14: Results of the extraction using 50 mL / min for effluent- and 20 mL / min MIBK feed, and10 mL / min H2O as back-wash, MIBK dispersed phase. The doubled volumetric feed of MIBK resulted in a 4-HAP content of 15.3 wt%. Due to the higher feed a reduced 4-HAP content was expected. With the additionally installed aqueous backwash,the MSA content was slightly reduced and determined to be 0.4 wt%. Since the used extractionsetup only has one mixer unit for backwashing the extract, more stages should allow a better MSA removal. However, with the extraction column available for the experiments this wouldreduce the number of extraction units available for the effluent extraction. Consequently, anincomplete extraction would result or a significantly higher MIBK feed would be required in thecurrent set-up. The MSA content in the raffinate dropped slightly to 49 wt% as a result of the usedback-wash. This raffinate contained only minor quantities of 0.02 wt% 4-HAP. Even though a more concentrated effluent was applied, the temperature in this experiment remained between 25-27 °C, indicating no further temperature increase caused by dilution inside the column.Since the backwash decreased the MSA content in the extract, but we could not use an additionalextraction stage, we slightly increased the back-wash feed to 15 mL / min. To remove the lasttraces of 4-HAP we increased the MIBK flow rate once more to 25 mL / min. The results are listedin Table 15. With a slightly increased backwash rate it was possible to significantly reduce theMSA content in the extract to 0.09 wt%. Based on the higher water feed, the MSA content in theraffinate was slightly decreased to 42 wt%, but due to the increased MIBK flow rate, only tracesof 4-HAP could be found in it.Table 15: Results of the extraction using 50 mL / min for effluent- and 25 mL / min MIBK feed, and15 mL / min H2O as back-wash, MIBK dispersed phase. In a further trial, we varied the feed rate of the effluent and decided to decrease it slightly to 45mL / min and increase it in another experiment to 71 mL / min. Based on the previous results, awater feed of 15 mL / min was used to ensure sufficient backwashing. To find a balance between a high 4-HAP content in the extract and as little 4-HAP in the raffinate as possible, a MIBK feedof 20 mL / min was used as compromise. The results of both experiments are compared in Table16. In case of a lower effluent feed rate of 45 mL / min, only 0.05 wt% MSA and 9.3 wt% 4-HAPwere found in the extract, whereas an increased feed rate of 71 mL / min resulted in MSA- and 4-HAP contents of 0.21 wt% and 14.9 wt%, respectively. The results of the extraction experiments allow the following conclusion: an efficient extraction of 4-HAP from the aqueous effluent with MIBK is possible and the extract can be enriched to at least up to 20 wt% with 4-HAP. The losses of 4-HAP to the raffinate can be minimized as long as sufficient MIBK feed or number of extraction stages are used. The same is true for backwashing the extract with water to recover residualamounts of MSA. Such aqueous backwash prevents 0.5 wt% MSA to be lost with the extract. Assoon as the extract is backwashed with water, the losses of MSA towards the extract can bereduced. The higher the water feed, the lower the residual amounts of MSA. However, this will result in a lower MSA concentration in the raffinate.Table 16: Results of the extraction using either 45 or 71 mL / min for effluent- and 20 mL / min MIBKfeed, and 15 mL / min H2O as back-wash, MIBK dispersed phase. 5. ConclusionsA continuous flow synthesis for the production of 4-HAP was developed. After several reactionparameters were analyzed, two preferred process regimens were identified. First, a residence time of 45 s, a reaction temperature of 120 °C on the HTF side of the reactor, and 12 molarequivalents of MSA were found to be preferred for the production of 4-HAP. These reactionconditions allowed full conversion of phenyl acetate leading to an assay yield of 82.5 % 4-HAP along with 11.9 % 2-HAP and 8.1 % phenol. Second, even more preferred is a process as disclosed herein that employs the following conditions: around 10 eq MSA pre-dried (e.g., with1.0 wt% Ac2O) at around 103 °C at a residence time of around 180 s. These conditions resultedin (almost) 100 % conversion, yielding 83.87 % 4-HAP, 10.64 % 2-HAP and 3.78 % PhOH. Thiscorresponds to a ratio of 4-HAP to 2-HAP of 7.89). Moreover, it was found that the water content of MSA has an effect on the reaction outcome. IfMSA was dried with around 0.10 (±0.02) or more, such as 0.1 or more, in some cases around0.15, equiv. Ac2O compared to PA prior to use, the reaction outcome was improved further. Inthis case assay yields of 4-HAP, 2-HAP, and phenol of 83.7 %, 10.7 %, and 1.9 % were obtained, respectively. These conditions were successfully applied in a long-run over > 8 h, resulting in the formation of 2.6 kg 4-HAP and a mass balance of 96.3 %. Running the process more than 5 d yielded more than 100 kg 4-HAP. As a result of these findings, it can be concluded that it is preferred to apply MSA with a low water content (< 2 wt%, preferably <1 wt%). Ideally, such values are achieved in the MSA recycling process, but if not, addition of acetic anhydride may be considered for in situ drying. After establishing a continuous flow synthesis for 4-HAP, the effluents were used to investigate a continuous extraction of the organic products out of the aqueous effluent using MIBK. In these trials, we were able to determine some key values and parameters for the extraction. Byoptimizing the amount of effluent, water and MIBK the extraction could be steered towards fullrecovery of the MSA in a highly concentrated (50 wt% MSA) aqueous phase loosing negligibleamounts of 4-HAP. Alternatively, an MIBK extract containing up to 28 wt% of 4-HAP with hardlyany residual MSA present could be achieved in case less MIBK was used albeit that the raffinate still contained significant amounts of product in this case. Due to limitations of the used extraction column it was not possible to achieve both full recovery of 4-HAP in a concentrated organic phase as well as full recovery of the MSA in a concentrated aqueous phase at the same time. However, the results of the experiments provide a solid basis to design a column that is suitable for thatpurpose; it should be noted that a low content of MSA in the organic phase prevents degradationof the product during distillation, and a backwash of the organic layer (e.g. in a second extraction column) is therefore preferred. Aging experiments on the diluted reaction mixture showed that 4-HAP can be directly obtained from the effluent in high purity by crystallization. Although only a modest yield of less than 50%could be obtained in this way, it does show that crystallization is in principle an option to separate4-HAP from 2-HAP at a later stage of the DSP if necessary. Full crystallization of 4-HAP from theeffluent may favor diluting the effluent with water. Thus, we can conclude that a continuous flowprocess followed by a continuous extraction is technically feasible to produce a crude 4-HAPstream in MIBK.6. Experimental methodsThe amount of 2-HAP and 4-HAP was determined by HPLC using an Inertsil ODS-3150 x 4.6 5µm column. IR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Alpha II Compact FT-IR spectrometer using 32 scans, absorbance mode, a range of 3000 to 600 cm-1 and a resolution of 4 cm-1.The water content was determined by Karl-Fischer titration as follows. A 10 wt.% solution of MSAin anhydrous pyridine was prepared. After complete addition of MSA, the reaction mixture was thoroughly shaken and the formed salts were removed by filtration using a syringe filter. The obtained pyridine solution was subjected to Karl-Fischer titration. The found water-content was corrected for the blank value of pyridine. The amount of MSA found in the MIBK extract was determined by titration. A sample (~5 mL) of the extract was added to 50 mL MIBK by means of a syringe and the exact sample amount was determined by weighing back the syringe. The solution was titrated with 0.1 N TBAOH solution inan isopropanol / MeOH mixture. The found amount was corrected for the blank value of MIBK.

Claims

Claims1. Process for producing 4-hydroxyacetophenone (4-HAP) comprising:a) providing a phenyl acetate source and a methanesulfonic acid (MSA) source;b) feeding the phenyl acetate source and the MSA source into a reactor; andc) allowing the phenyl acetate and the MSA to react under conditions suitable forforming 4-HAP by Fries rearrangement, wherein the reaction in step c) is carried out in a flow reactor.

2. Process of claim 1, wherein the residence time in step c) ranges from 3 s to 5 min,preferably 15 s to 3 min, more preferably 30 s to 90 s.

3. Process of any of the preceding claims, wherein step c) is carried out at a temperature ofat least 100°C, more preferably to at least 110°C, most preferably to at least 115°C, and / or wherein step c) is carried out at a temperature of at most 140°C, more preferably to at most130°C, most preferably to at most 125°C, in particular wherein step c) is carried out at a temperature ranging from 115° to 125°C.

4. Process of any of the preceding claims, wherein the MSA source fed into the reactorincludes the MSA in stoichiometric excess.

5. Process of any of the preceding claims, wherein the MSA source is characterized by awater content of at most 3.0 wt.-%, preferably at most 2.5 wt.-%, more preferably at most 2.0 wt.-%, most preferably at most 1.5 wt.-%, as determined by Karl Fischer titration.

6. Process of any of the preceding claims, further comprising quenching the reaction mixtureof step c) by water, optionally after cooling.

7. Process of any of the preceding claims, wherein the formed 4-HAP and / or residual MSAis / are isolated from the reaction mixture as the reaction proceeds, preferably, wherein the isolation involves one or more of the following:- liquid-liquid separation, wherein the 4-HAP is enriched in an organic phase and theMSA is enriched in an aqueous phase,- removing water and / or MSA by distillation, wherein the 4-HAP remains in theretentate, -removing water and / or MSA from the 4-HAP by membrane separation such asnanofiltration or reverse osmose,- direct crystallization of the formed 4-HAP from the reaction mixture; and- separating 4-HAP from 2-HAP by alkaline extraction, wherein the 4-HAP is enrichedin an alkaline aqueous phase and the 2-HAP is enriched in an organic phase,optionally, wherein after phase separation the alkaline aqueous phase is acidifiedand the 4-HAP is back-extracted from the acidified aqueous phase into an organic phase.

8. Process of claim 7, wherein the organic phase includes an organic solvent selected fromthe group consisting of MIBK, MTBE, heptane, toluene, p-menthane, 2,4-dimethyl octane,p-cymene, CPME, octanol, butyl acetate, ethyl acetate, methyl isobutyl carbinol (MIBC) and combinations thereof, preferably MIBK.

9. Process of claim 7 or 8, wherein the liquid-liquid separation involves feeding the reactionmixture to a continuous extraction unit, preferably a continuous countercurrent flow extraction unit.

10. Process of any of claims 7 to 9, further comprising recycling at least a portion of the residualMSA and / or recycling at least a portion of the organic solvent.

11. Process of any of claims 7 to 10, wherein the isolated 4-HAP is purified by one or more ofprecipitation, crystallization, melt crystallization, liquid-liquid separation and distillation.

12. Process of any of the preceding claims, wherein the phenyl acetate source comprisesphenol and acetic anhydride, and the phenyl acetate is produced by acetylation of the phenol using the acetic anhydride in the reactor of step (ii), orwherein the phenyl acetate source is phenyl acetate, which is produced by acetylation ofphenol using acetic anhydride before feeding the phenyl acetate into the reactor in step (ii).

13. Raw material comprising or consisting of 4-HAP produced by the process of any of claims1 to 12, wherein preferably the 4-HAP is substantially petrochemical or substantially non- petrochemical.

14. Personal care product or composition, or pharmaceutical product or compositioncomprising the raw material of claim 13.

15. 4-HAP obtainable by a process according to any of claims 1 to 12, wherein the 4-HAPcontains at least 25 %, preferably at least 50 %, further preferably at least 70 %, particularlypreferably at least 80 %, even further preferably at least 90 %, more preferably at least 95% non-petrochemically-derived carbon, based on the total carbon content of the 4-HAP.

16. Composition as obtained in an intermediate stage of a process as defined in any of claims1 to 12, the composition, preferably being a flow reactor effluent, comprising:MSA in an amount ranging from 80% to 91%, preferably 84% to 90%, morepreferably 87.7% ±2%; an organic fraction in an amount ranging from 9 to 20%, preferably 10 to 16%, more preferably 12.3% ± 2%; and, wherein the organic fraction comprises 4-HAP, 2-HAP und phenol; or the composition, preferably being a quenched flow reactor effluent, comprising:MSA in an amount ranging from preferably 62% to 68%, preferably 64% to 68%,more preferably 66.2% ± 1%; an organic fraction in an amount ranging from 6% to 15%, preferably 7% to 12%, more preferably 9.3% ± 2%; and, water in an amount ranging from 22 to 26, preferably 23 to 24, more preferably 24.5%± 0.2%; wherein the organic fraction comprises 4-HAP, 2-HAP und phenol; or the composition, preferably being an organic fraction of a flow reactor effluent orquenched flow reactor effluent, comprising:4-HAP in an amount of 75% or more, preferably 80 % or more, more preferably 84%or more, yet more preferably 90% or more, most preferably 94% or more;2-HAP in an amount of 19% or less, preferably 15% or less, more preferably 10.6%or less, yet more preferably 8% or less, most preferably 5% or less; andphenol in an amount of 6% or less, preferably 5% or less, more preferably 3.7% orless, yet more preferably 2% or less, most preferably 1% or less;or the composition, preferably being an extraction phase, comprising:4-HAP in an amount of 20% or more, preferably 25% or more, more preferably 27%or more, more preferably 28.3% or more, yet more preferably 30% or more, mostpreferably 32% or more;MIBK in an amount ranging from 45% to 80%, preferably 49% to 66%, morepreferably 53% to 62%, most preferably 57.6% ± 2.0%; andoptionally one or more of the following:MSA in an amount of 8% or less, preferably 6% or less, more preferably 4.5% orless, yet more preferably 2.0% or less, most preferably 0.5% or less;2-HAP in an amount of 8% or less, preferably 6% or less, more preferably 4.3% orless, yet more preferably 3.0% or less, most preferably 2.0% or less;phenol in an amount of 1.5% or less, preferably 1.2% or less, more preferably 0.9% or less, yet more preferably 0.5% or less, most preferably 0.2% or less;water in an amount of 8% or less, preferably 6% or less, more preferably 4.3% orless, yet more preferably 2.0% or less, most preferably 1.0% or less.

Images