Service performance integrated testing method and system for polar ship communication and navigation systems

Abstract

The present invention provides a service performance integrated testing method and system for polar ship communication and navigation systems. By installing the testing system on a sailing ship, the service performance of the ship's installed equipment can be tested in real time, thereby realizing the service performance test in an actual application scenario. The testing system can perform integrated testing on the communication system and the navigation system, and monitor the service performance of different types of communication modes and navigation modes in real time, thereby providing a basis for crew members to select communication systems and navigation systems with high service performance. Configuration files can be flexibly set to adapt to different devices and different application scenarios, and the service performance of different devices can be compared and graded. Periodic service capability test briefs are generated through test results and performance grading results, and visualized processing is performed, thereby providing a basis for crew members to switch communication links and conduct ship navigation positioning, thereby greatly optimizing the utilization efficiency of existing shipborne communication and navigation equipment by sailing ships.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the technical field of polar navigation ship communication test, and in particular to a polar ship communication and navigation system service performance integrated test method and system. Background Art

[0002] During the voyage of ocean transport, due to the harsh environment of high latitude and high magnetic field, the communication between ship and shore is unstable or interrupted, and the navigation positioning also has the problem of reduced accuracy, which leads to great safety hazards in navigation. Most ships are equipped with a variety of communication equipment and satellite navigation equipment to achieve the performance complementarity of various communication and navigation methods in polar regions.

[0003] However, most of the current testing methods are aimed at the factory indicators of the equipment, and there is a lack of testing methods for the service performance of the equipment in actual application scenarios. Under the influence of harsh environments, the service performance of the equipment varies greatly, and it is difficult for crew members to grasp the real-time service performance status of various communication and navigation equipment.

[0004] At the same time, there is still a lack of testing methods for the integration of communication and navigation systems. In terms of communication system service performance testing, there are currently integrated testing methods for 5G and satellite communications. However, in the ship-side field, the communication methods are complex, including 8 methods such as AIS, ASM, VDE, Beidou short message, medium frequency, high frequency, very high frequency, and satellite communication. Due to the special environment of high magnetism in the polar regions, ships sailing in the polar regions usually use a variety of communication methods to ensure ship-shore communication. At present, there is no integrated testing solution that can support the service performance of 8 types of communication methods. In terms of satellite navigation and positioning service performance testing. The current testing methods are mostly simulation tests and test field tests, and there is also a lack of testing methods for its service performance during actual applications.

[0005] Therefore, it is urgent to study the periodic testing methods of service performance that support various ship-shore communication modes and satellite navigation modes. Summary of the invention

[0006] In order to solve the problems of lack of service performance testing for equipment in actual application scenarios, lack of integrated testing solutions for multiple communication and navigation systems, and large changes in equipment service performance in harsh environments, which makes it difficult for crew members to grasp the real-time service performance status of the equipment, the present invention provides a service performance integrated testing method and system for polar ship communication and navigation systems, which can simultaneously realize periodic service performance testing of multiple ship-shore communication modes and satellite navigation modes in one system.

[0007] The specific plan is as follows:

[0008] A service performance integration test method for a polar ship communication and navigation system comprises the following steps:

[0009] Step S1: Identify, detect equipment and set configuration files: Identify the types of equipment to be tested of the communication system and navigation system installed on the ship, the types of equipment include the communication mode of the communication system and the satellite navigation mode of the navigation system; detect whether the hardware is operating normally to obtain hardware detection results, the detection results of whether the hardware is operating normally include normal operation and abnormal operation; and set configuration files according to actual needs, the configuration files include: test content, test cycle, recommended service threshold and minimum service threshold;

[0010] Step S2: testing the communication system and navigation system equipment to be tested installed on the ship according to the test cycle described in step S1 and recording the test data;

[0011] Step S3: service performance grading and generating test briefs: the test data described in step S2 is stored; the recommended service threshold and the minimum service threshold described in step S1 are compared and graded with the test data described in step S2 to obtain a service performance grading result; the hardware detection result described in step S1, the test data described in step S2 and the service performance grading result are used to generate a test brief indicating the service performance status of the communication system and the navigation system in the current period, and the test brief is sent back to the shore center; the service performance grading result includes: recommendation, compliance, and warning;

[0012] Step S4: Visualization of the test brief: Visualize the test brief described in step S3, set different sorting indicators to sort the specific communication methods or satellite navigation methods, and select different colors to display the service performance grading results described in step S3: "Recommended" is marked in green, "Meet the standard" is marked in yellow, and "Warning" is marked in red. According to the service performance grading results marked with "Warning", find the specific communication method or satellite navigation method, generate it as warning information for the current period and display it.

[0013] Preferably, the method for implementing step S1 is:

[0014] Step S11: Detecting the installed equipment type: The test system detects the equipment type of the communication system and navigation system installed on the ship, and identifies the communication mode and satellite navigation mode supported by the equipment to be tested;

[0015] Step S12: Determine whether they are consistent: Determine whether the detection result of step S11 is consistent with the list of equipment installed on the ship. If not, mark "warning". If consistent, execute step S13;

[0016] Step S13: Check whether the equipment is operating normally: determine whether the communication and navigation equipment is operating normally according to the input equipment self-check instruction. If it is not operating normally, mark "warning". If it is operating normally, execute step S14;

[0017] Step S14: Setting the configuration file in step S1, wherein the configuration file includes: test content, test cycle, recommended service threshold and minimum service threshold.

[0018] Preferably, the method for implementing step S2 is:

[0019] Step S21: Periodically testing communication system type equipment: carrying out periodic communication system equipment service performance testing according to the test cycle described in step S1, wherein the communication system equipment service performance testing is to send a service performance test message; collecting and recording the test data of the communication system;

[0020] Step S22: Periodically test navigation system type equipment: perform periodic navigation system equipment service performance testing according to the test cycle described in step S1, wherein the navigation system equipment service performance testing is to test the reception of satellite signals; collect and record the test data of the navigation system.

[0021] Preferably, the communication system periodic testing method for implementing step S21 is:

[0022] Step S211: Sending a test message: within a test cycle described in step S21, selecting a communication mode of a communication system described in step S1 that has not been tested, and sending a test message;

[0023] Step S212: Determine whether the communication mode is connected: Determine whether the current communication mode is connected through the test message result, if yes, go to step S214, if not, go to step S213;

[0024] Step S213: Recording the first test data of the disconnection of the ship-to-shore communication mode: the first test data includes the current ship position coordinates, the type of communication equipment, the current communication equipment interruption status and the test time;

[0025] Step S214: Record the second test data in the state of ship-shore communication connection: the second test data includes the current ship position coordinates, communication equipment type, frequency band, signal strength, signal quality, network delay, the distance to the corresponding main base station, the main base station identifier, and the distance between the base station and the terminal; if the device is a satellite communication device, the number of satellites connected in real time is additionally recorded;

[0026] Step S215: Determine whether all the ship-to-shore communication modes described in step S1 have been tested. If so, go to step S3; if not, go to step S211.

[0027] Preferably, the navigation system periodic test method for implementing step S22 is:

[0028] Step S221: testing the navigation system: within a test cycle described in step S21, selecting a navigation subsystem of the satellite navigation mode described in step S1 that has not been tested;

[0029] Step S222: Determine whether the navigation system is available: Determine whether the current satellite navigation system can receive satellite signals. If so, go to step S224; if not, go to step S223;

[0030] Step S223: recording the third test data in the state where the satellite signal cannot be received: the third test data includes the type of the current satellite navigation mode, the interruption condition and the test time;

[0031] Step S224: Record the fourth test data in the state of being able to receive satellite signals: the fourth test data includes current positioning information, satellite health signal status, position precision factor PDOP, total number of visible satellites, satellite elevation angle, and signal-to-noise ratio; if the device supports GNSS multi-constellation combined positioning, the satellite constellation information actually supported is combined and counted;

[0032] Step S225: Determine whether all satellite navigation modes described in step S1 have been tested. If so, go to step S3; if not, go to step S221.

[0033] Preferably, the method for implementing step S3 is:

[0034] Step S31: test data storage: storing the collected test data of the communication system in step S21 and the test data of the navigation system in step S22 in a test data storage unit;

[0035] Step S32: Test data analysis and evaluation and service performance grading: The test data described in step S2 is expanded and compared with the recommended service threshold and the minimum service threshold described in step S1. If the result indicator in the test data is greater than or equal to the recommended service threshold, it is marked as "recommended", if the result indicator is less than the highest service threshold but greater than or equal to the minimum service threshold, it is marked as "met", and if the result indicator is less than the minimum service threshold, it is marked as "warning".

[0036] Step S33: According to the test data described in step S2, the disconnected communication mode and the satellite navigation mode with no signal are marked as "warning";

[0037] Step S34: Generate a test brief: Generate a test brief for the current cycle based on the hardware detection results described in step S1, the test data results described in step S2, and the service performance grading results described in step S3; and send the test brief back to the shore center.

[0038] A service performance integrated test system for polar ship communication and navigation systems comprises a configuration module, a test module, a processing module and a visualization module.

[0039] The configuration module includes a system detection unit, a hardware detection unit, an equipment operation detection unit and a test configuration unit. The system detection unit detects and identifies the types of various communication systems and navigation systems installed on the ship; the hardware detection unit identifies the communication mode and satellite navigation positioning mode supported by the communication and navigation system to be tested; the equipment operation detection unit detects whether the equipment system to be tested can operate normally, and marks the system to be tested that cannot operate normally with a "warning" mark; the test configuration unit obtains the test task, which includes the test cycle and the recommended service threshold and minimum service threshold of each performance indicator.

[0040] The test module includes a communication test unit for implementing ship-to-shore communication tests on the communication system and a positioning test unit for implementing satellite navigation positioning tests on the navigation system. The two units receive test tasks of corresponding types sent by the configuration module, determine the target system to be tested corresponding to the test tasks, control the target system to be tested to execute the test tasks, and obtain the service business performance of the target system.

[0041] The processing module includes a test data storage unit, a test data analysis unit and a test report generation unit. The test data storage unit stores the test data obtained in the test module; the test data analysis unit compares the data obtained from the test module test with the recommended service threshold and the minimum service threshold in the test task, and marks "recommended" if the result index is better than the recommended service threshold, "up to standard" if the result index is worse than the highest service threshold but better than the minimum service threshold, and "warning" if the result index is worse than the minimum service threshold; the test report generation unit generates a test report based on the detection result of the hardware detection unit and the test result of the test data analysis unit.

[0042] The visualization module includes a visualization unit and an early warning unit. The visualization unit displays the test results of the system to be tested in the test brief in a graphical or tabular form, supports sorting specific communication methods or navigation methods according to different indicators, and visualizes the service performance grading results of various communication and navigation methods: "recommended" is marked in green; "meeting the standard" is marked in yellow; "early warning" is marked in red; the early warning unit generates early warning information for the specific communication method or navigation method marked with "early warning" and displays the early warning information.

[0043] The present invention provides a method and system for integrated testing of the service performance of polar ship communication and navigation systems. Specifically, (1) the test system is installed on a sailing ship, and the service performance of the ship's installed equipment can be tested in real time during navigation, thereby realizing service performance testing of the equipment in actual application scenarios; (2) by realizing integrated testing of the communication system and the navigation system, the service performance of different types of ship-to-shore communication modes and satellite navigation modes can be monitored in real time, providing a basis for crew members to select communication systems and satellite navigation systems with high service performance; (3) by setting configuration files according to actual needs, flexible configuration of test files is realized to adapt to different communication and navigation equipment and different actual application scenarios, and the service performance of different test equipment is compared and graded in a more refined manner, making the grading results more accurate; (4) by integrating the test results and the performance grading results, a periodic service capability test brief is generated, and visualization processing is performed to achieve a visualized display of the test results, providing a basis for crew members to switch communication links and navigate and position the ship, and greatly optimizing the utilization efficiency of existing shipborne communication and navigation equipment by sailing ships. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0044] Figure 1 The present invention is a flow chart of a service performance integration test method for a polar ship communication and navigation system.

[0045] Figure 2 A flowchart of a method for identifying, detecting a device and setting a configuration file in an embodiment.

[0046] Figure 3 The figure is a flow chart of a method for testing equipment by type in an embodiment.

[0047] Figure 4 The figure is a flow chart of a communication system periodic testing method in one embodiment.

[0048] Figure 5 The figure is a flow chart of a method for periodic testing of a navigation system in an embodiment.

[0049] Figure 6 A flow chart of a method for grading service performance and generating a test report in an embodiment. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0050] The present invention will be further described below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and embodiments.

[0051] like Figure 1 As shown, a flow chart of a service performance integration test method for polar ship communication and navigation systems,

[0052] Step S1: Identify, detect equipment and set configuration files: Identify the types of equipment to be tested of the communication system and navigation system installed on the ship, the types of equipment include the communication mode of the communication system and the satellite navigation mode of the navigation system; detect whether the hardware is operating normally to obtain hardware detection results, the detection results of whether the hardware is operating normally include normal operation and abnormal operation; and set configuration files according to actual needs, the configuration files include: test content, test cycle, recommended service threshold and minimum service threshold;

[0053] Step S2: testing the device to be tested according to the test cycle described in step S1 and recording the test data;

[0054] Step S3: service performance grading and generating test briefs: the test data described in step S2 is stored; the recommended service threshold and the minimum service threshold described in step S1 are compared and graded with the test data described in step S2 to obtain a service performance grading result; the hardware detection result described in step S1, the test data described in step S2 and the service performance grading result are used to generate a test brief indicating the service performance status of the communication system and the navigation system in the current period, and the test brief is sent back to the shore center; the service performance grading result includes: recommendation, compliance, and warning;

[0055] Step S4: Visualization of the test brief: Visualize the test brief described in step S3, set different sorting indicators to sort the specific communication methods or satellite navigation methods, and select different colors to display the service performance grading results described in step S3: "Recommended" is marked in green, "Meet the standard" is marked in yellow, and "Warning" is marked in red. According to the service performance grading results marked with "Warning", find the specific communication method or satellite navigation method, generate it as warning information for the current period and display it.

[0056] like Figure 2 As shown, the method for implementing the identification and detection of the device and setting the configuration file in step S1 is:

[0057] Step S11: Detecting the installed equipment type: The test system detects the equipment type of the communication system and navigation system installed on the ship, and identifies the communication mode and satellite navigation mode supported by the equipment to be tested;

[0058] Step S12: Determine whether they are consistent: Determine whether the detection result of step S11 is consistent with the list of equipment installed on the ship. If not, mark "warning". If consistent, execute step S13;

[0059] Step S13: Check whether the equipment is operating normally: determine whether the communication and navigation equipment is operating normally according to the input equipment self-check instruction. If it is not operating normally, mark "warning". If it is operating normally, execute step S14;

[0060] Step S14: Setting the configuration file in step S1, wherein the configuration file includes: test content, test cycle, recommended service threshold and minimum service threshold.

[0061] like Figure 3 As shown, the method for implementing the periodic testing of the device to be tested and recording the test data in step S2 is:

[0062] Step S21: Periodically testing communication system type equipment: carrying out periodic communication system equipment service performance testing according to the test cycle described in step S1, wherein the communication system equipment service performance testing is to send a service performance test message; collecting and recording the test data of the communication system;

[0063] Step S22: Periodically test navigation system type equipment: perform periodic navigation system equipment service performance testing according to the test cycle described in step S1, wherein the navigation system equipment service performance testing is to test the reception of satellite signals; collect and record the test data of the navigation system.

[0064] It should be noted that the above-mentioned "step S21" and "step S22" are used to distinguish the different types of devices to be tested, rather than describing a specific order or sequence. It should be understood that they can be interchanged or performed simultaneously in actual application scenarios.

[0065] like Figure 4 As shown, in some embodiments, the method for implementing the periodic test of the communication system in step S21 is:

[0066] Step S211: Sending a test message: within a test cycle described in step S21, selecting a communication mode of a communication system described in step S1 that has not been tested, and sending a test message;

[0067] Step S212: Determine whether the communication mode is connected: Determine whether the current communication mode is connected through the test message result, if yes, go to step S214, if not, go to step S213;

[0068] Step S213: Recording the first test data of the disconnection of the ship-to-shore communication mode: the first test data includes the current ship position coordinates, the type of communication equipment, the current communication equipment interruption status and the test time;

[0069] Step S214: Record the second test data in the state of ship-shore communication connection: the second test data includes the current ship position coordinates, communication equipment type, frequency band, signal strength, signal quality, network delay, the distance to the corresponding main base station, the main base station identifier, and the distance between the base station and the terminal; if the device is a satellite communication device, the number of satellites connected in real time is additionally recorded;

[0070] Step S215: Determine whether all the ship-to-shore communication modes described in step S1 have been tested. If so, go to step S3; if not, go to step S211.

[0071] like Figure 5 As shown, in some embodiments, the method for implementing the periodic test of the navigation system in step S22 is:

[0072] Step S221: testing the navigation system: within a test cycle described in step S21, selecting a navigation subsystem of the satellite navigation mode described in step S1 that has not been tested;

[0073] Step S222: Determine whether the navigation system is available: Determine whether the current satellite navigation system can receive satellite signals. If so, go to step S224; if not, go to step S223;

[0074] Step S223: recording the third test data in the state where the satellite signal cannot be received: the third test data includes the type of the current satellite navigation mode, the interruption condition and the test time;

[0075] Step S224: Record the fourth test data in the state of being able to receive satellite signals: the fourth test data includes current positioning information, satellite health signal status, position precision factor PDOP, total number of visible satellites, satellite elevation angle, and signal-to-noise ratio; if the device supports GNSS multi-constellation combined positioning, the satellite constellation information actually supported is combined and counted;

[0076] Step S225: Determine whether all satellite navigation modes described in step S1 have been tested. If so, go to step S3; if not, go to step S221.

[0077] Specifically, Figure 6 As shown, the method for implementing the service performance classification and generating the test brief in step S3 is:

[0078] Step S31: test data storage: storing the collected test data of the communication system in step S21 and the test data of the navigation system in step S22 in a test data storage unit;

[0079] Step S32: Test data analysis and evaluation and service performance grading: The test data described in step S2 is expanded and compared with the recommended service threshold and the minimum service threshold described in step S1. If the result indicator in the test data is greater than or equal to the recommended service threshold, it is marked as "recommended", if the result indicator is less than the highest service threshold but greater than or equal to the minimum service threshold, it is marked as "met", and if the result indicator is less than the minimum service threshold, it is marked as "warning".

[0080] Step S33: According to the test data described in step S2, the disconnected communication mode and the satellite navigation mode with no signal are marked as "warning";

[0081] Step S34: Generate a test brief: Generate a test brief for the current cycle based on the hardware detection results described in step S1, the test data results described in step S2, and the service performance grading results described in step S3; and send the test brief back to the shore center.

[0082] Embodiment 1:

[0083] The communication system is tested, taking high frequency (HF) communication, i.e. shortwave communication, as an example. The transmitting base station is Tianjin shortwave station, with coordinates: 39.00N, 117.70E.

[0084] The test contents of the configuration file include: current ship position coordinates, test time, communication equipment type, frequency band, received signal quality, received signal strength, and the distance to the corresponding main base station;

[0085] The threshold settings are for core indicators, including: received signal quality, received signal strength and rate. The recommended service thresholds are:

[0086] Received signal quality: signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) greater than 20dB, received signal strength greater than 15dBu, rate greater than 44Kbps;

[0087] The minimum service thresholds are:

[0088] Received signal quality: signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) greater than 10dB, received signal strength greater than 0dBu, and rate greater than 9.6Kbps.

[0089] After completing step S21, the test data obtained is:

[0090] Current ship position coordinates: 77.48N, 77.18E,

[0091] Test time: 2022-11-21,

[0092] Communication equipment type: HF,

[0093] Frequency band: 16MHz,

[0094] Received signal quality: 24.6dB,

[0095] Received signal strength: 21.2dBu,

[0096] Corresponding distance to the main base station: 4713km.

[0097] According to the comparison between the obtained test results and the thresholds set in the configuration file, both are better than the recommended thresholds, so they are marked as "recommended" in the performance grading results.

[0098] Embodiment 2:

[0099] Test the navigation system. The test data is mainly based on NMEA protocol messages, taking GPS navigation service performance test as an example.

[0100] The test contents of the configuration file include: current positioning information, test time, position precision factor, total number of visible satellites, minimum satellite elevation angle, and signal-to-noise ratio;

[0101] The threshold setting is based on core indicators, including: position precision factor, total number of visible satellites, minimum satellite elevation angle and signal-to-noise ratio.

[0102] The recommended service thresholds are: position precision factor less than 6, total number of visible satellites greater than 8, minimum satellite elevation angle greater than 15 degrees, and signal-to-noise ratio greater than 20dB;

[0103] The minimum service threshold is: the position precision factor is less than 10, the total number of visible satellites is greater than 4, the minimum satellite elevation angle is greater than 5 degrees, and the signal-to-noise ratio is greater than 10dB.

[0104] After completing step S22, the test data obtained is:

[0105] Current location information: 31.17N, 121.50E,

[0106] Test time: 2023-4-20 12:12:52,

[0107] Position precision factor: 2.20,

[0108] Total number of visible stars: 12,

[0109] Minimum satellite elevation angle: 24 degrees,

[0110] Signal-to-noise ratio: 21.

[0111] According to the comparison between the obtained test results and the thresholds set in the configuration file, both are better than the recommended thresholds, so they are marked as "recommended" in the performance grading results.

[0112] It should be noted that the above-described specific implementations can enable those skilled in the art to more fully understand the invention, but do not limit the invention in any way. Therefore, although this specification has described the invention in detail with reference to the drawings and embodiments, those skilled in the art should understand that the invention can still be modified or replaced by equivalents. In short, all technical solutions and improvements that do not deviate from the spirit and scope of the invention should be included in the protection scope of the patent for the invention.

Claims

1. A service performance integration test method for polar ship communication and navigation systems, characterized in that: Step S1: Identify and detect equipment and set configuration files: Identify the types of equipment of the communication system and navigation system installed on the ship, the types of equipment include the communication mode of the communication system and the satellite navigation mode of the navigation system; detect whether the hardware of the equipment of the communication system and the navigation system is operating normally to obtain hardware detection results, the hardware detection results include normal operation and abnormal operation; and set configuration files according to actual needs, the configuration files include: test content, test cycle, recommended service threshold and minimum service threshold; Step S2: testing the equipment of the communication system and the navigation system according to the test cycle described in step S1 and recording the test data; Step S3: service performance grading and generating test briefs: the test data described in step S2 are stored; the recommended service threshold and the minimum service threshold described in step S1 are compared with the test data described in step S2, and the test data are graded to obtain a service performance grading result; the hardware detection result described in step S1, the test data described in step S2 and the service performance grading result are used to generate a test brief indicating the service performance status of the communication system and the navigation system in the current period, and the test brief is sent back to the shore center; the service performance grading result includes: recommendation, compliance and warning; Step S4: Visualization of the test brief: Visualize the test brief described in step S3, set different sorting indicators to sort the specific communication methods or satellite navigation methods, and select different colors to display the service performance grading results described in step S3: green for recommendation, yellow for compliance, and red for warning. Find the specific communication method or satellite navigation method based on the service performance grading results with warning marks, generate it as warning information for the current period, and display it; The method for implementing step S2 is as follows: Step S21: Periodically testing the communication system equipment: performing a periodic service performance test of the communication system equipment according to the test cycle described in step S1, wherein the service performance test of the communication system equipment is to send a service performance test message; and collecting and recording the test data of the communication system equipment; Step S22: periodically testing the navigation system equipment: performing a periodic service performance test of the navigation system equipment according to the test period described in step S1, wherein the service performance test of the navigation system equipment is a test of receiving satellite signals; collecting and recording the test data of the navigation system equipment; The communication system equipment periodic testing method for implementing the above step S21 is: Step S211: Sending a test message: In one of the test cycles in step S21, a communication mode in step S1 that has not been tested is selected and a test message is sent; Step S212: Determine whether the communication mode is connected: Determine whether the current communication mode is connected through the test message result, if yes, go to step S214, if not, go to step S213; Step S213: recording the first test data of the communication mode being disconnected: the first test data includes the current ship position coordinates, the communication system equipment type, the current communication system equipment interruption status and the test time; Step S214: Record the second test data in the communication mode connected state: the second test data includes the current ship position coordinates, communication system equipment type, frequency band, signal strength, signal quality, network delay, the distance to the corresponding main base station, the main base station identifier and the distance between the main base station and the terminal; if the communication system equipment is a satellite communication equipment, the number of satellites linked in real time is additionally recorded; Step S215: Determine whether all the communication modes described in step S1 have been tested. If yes, go to step S3; if no, go to step S211; The method for periodically testing the navigation system equipment to implement the above step S22 is: Step S221: testing the navigation system device: within one of the test cycles in step S21, selecting a navigation system device of the satellite navigation mode in step S1 that has not been tested; Step S222: Determine whether the navigation system device is available: Determine whether the current navigation system device can receive satellite signals, if so, go to step S224, if not, go to step S223; Step S223: recording the third test data in the state where the satellite signal cannot be received: the third test data includes the type of the current satellite navigation mode, the interruption condition and the test time; Step S224: recording the fourth test data in the state of being able to receive satellite signals: the fourth test data includes current positioning information, satellite health signal status, position precision factor PDOP, total number of visible satellites, satellite elevation angle and signal-to-noise ratio; if the navigation system device supports GNSS multi-constellation combined positioning, the satellite constellation information actually supported is combined and counted; Step S225: Determine whether all satellite navigation modes described in step S1 have been tested. If so, go to step S3; if not, go to step S221.

2. The service performance integrated testing method of a polar ship communication and navigation system according to claim 1, characterized in that: The method for implementing step S1 is: Step S11: Detecting the type of installed equipment: the test system detects the type of equipment of the communication system and the navigation system, and identifies the communication mode and satellite navigation mode supported by the equipment of the communication system and the navigation system; Step S12: Determine whether they are consistent: Determine whether the detection result of step S11 is consistent with the list of equipment installed on the ship. If not, mark a warning. If consistent, execute step S13; Step S13: Check whether the equipment is operating normally: determine whether the equipment of the communication system and the navigation system is operating normally according to the input equipment self-check instruction. If it is not operating normally, mark a warning. If it is operating normally, execute step S14; Step S14: Setting the configuration file of step S1.

3. The service performance integrated testing method of a polar ship communication and navigation system according to claim 1, characterized in that: The method for implementing step S3 is: Step S31: test data storage: storing the collected test data of the communication system equipment in step S21 and the test data of the navigation system equipment in step S22 in a test data storage unit; Step S32: test data analysis and evaluation and service performance grading: the test data described in step S2 is expanded and compared with the recommended service threshold and the minimum service threshold described in step S1. If the result indicator in the test data is greater than or equal to the recommended service threshold, it is marked as recommended; if the result indicator is less than the recommended service threshold but greater than or equal to the minimum service threshold, it is marked as qualified; if the result indicator is less than the minimum service threshold, it is marked as warning; Step S33: Based on the test data described in step S2, annunciate the disconnected communication mode and the satellite navigation mode with no signal as a warning; Step S34: Generate a test brief: Generate a test brief for the current cycle according to the hardware detection result in step S1, the test data result in step S2, and the service performance grading result in step S3; And send the test briefing back to the shore center.

4. A service performance integrated test system for polar ship communication and navigation systems is used to execute the method described in any one of claims 1 to 3, characterized in that: include: Configuration module, test module, processing module and visualization module; The configuration module includes a system detection unit, a hardware detection unit, a device operation detection unit and a test configuration unit. The system detection unit detects and identifies the types of devices of the communication system and the navigation system installed on the ship side; The hardware detection unit identifies the communication mode supported by the communication system device and the satellite navigation mode supported by the navigation system device; The device operation detection unit detects whether the devices of the system to be tested can operate normally, and marks the devices of the system to be tested that cannot operate normally with a warning mark; The test configuration unit sets a configuration file according to actual needs, and the configuration file includes: test content, test cycle, recommended service threshold and minimum service threshold; The test module includes a communication test unit for implementing ship-to-shore communication test on the communication system equipment and a positioning test unit for implementing satellite navigation positioning test on the navigation system equipment. The two units receive the test tasks of the corresponding types sent by the configuration module, determine the target system to be tested corresponding to the test tasks, control the target system to be tested to execute the test tasks, and obtain the service performance of the target system; The processing module comprises a test data storage unit, a test data analysis unit and a test report generation unit; The test data storage unit stores the test data acquired in the test module; The test data analysis unit compares the data obtained from the test module test with the recommended service threshold and the minimum service threshold in the test task, and marks a recommendation if the result indicator is greater than or equal to the recommended service threshold, marks a passing mark if the result indicator is less than the recommended service threshold but greater than or equal to the minimum service threshold, and marks a warning if the result indicator is less than the minimum service threshold; The test report generating unit generates a test report according to the hardware detection result, the test data and the service performance grading result; The visualization module includes a visualization unit and an early warning unit; The visualization unit displays various test results of the equipment of the system to be tested in the test briefing in a graphical or tabular form, supports sorting specific communication methods or navigation methods according to different indicators, and visualizes the service performance grading results of various communication and navigation methods: green marking is recommended; Standards that meet the standards are marked in yellow; The warning mark is red; the warning unit generates warning information for the specific communication method or navigation method with the warning mark, and displays the warning information.

Images