High-frequency transformer production intelligent management system
Through the design of the intelligent production management system of high-frequency transformer, the energy efficiency and stability of production lines are analyzed, and the problems of low management efficiency and high production costs in the existing technology are solved, and the optimization of low consumption, high efficiency and stable production and production line management are achieved.
Patent Information
- Application Number
- CN202411088933.0
- Authority / Receiving Office
- CN · China
- Patent Type
- Applications(China)
- Current Assignee / Owner
- Filing Date
- 2024-08-09
- Publication Date
- 2024-12-27
- Estimated Expiration
- Not applicable · inactive patent
AI Technical Summary
The production line cannot be managed reasonably during the production process of existing high-frequency transformers, resulting in low management efficiency and high production costs, and the inability to reasonably divide and recommend according to the operation of the production line, affecting production quality and efficiency.
Design a high-frequency transformer production intelligent management system, including production management platform, production information unit, energy efficiency division unit, facility factor unit, dynamic monitoring unit and optimal production unit. By analyzing the energy efficiency and stability of the production line, the production line will be carried out. Dividing and recommending to achieve low-consumption, high-efficiency and stable production.
Through information feedback, the recommended supervision and analysis of production line selection is improved, and the pertinence and efficiency of production line management is reduced, and production costs are ensured, and production quality and efficiency are ensured.
Smart Images

Figure CN119204715A_ABST
Abstract
Description
Technical Field
[0001] The present invention relates to the technical field of production management, and in particular to an intelligent management system for high-frequency transformer production. Background Art
[0002] High-frequency transformers are power transformers with operating frequencies exceeding medium frequency (10kHz). They are mainly used as high-frequency switching power transformers in high-frequency switching power supplies, and are also used as high-frequency inverter power transformers in high-frequency inverter power supplies and high-frequency inverter welding machines. With the rapid development of electronic technology, high-frequency transformers, as key components in electronic circuits, have a growing market demand. Based on this, the high-frequency transformer production line project and the development of the industry are receiving increasing attention.
[0003] However, in the existing transformer production process, it is impossible to manage the transformer production line reasonably and in a targeted manner, thereby reducing the management efficiency of the transformer production line, and it is impossible to reasonably divide, manage and recommend according to the operation of the transformer production line, which is not conducive to the low-consumption, high-efficiency and stable production of the transformer, and at the same time increases the transformer production cost;
[0004] In view of the above technical defects, a solution is now proposed. Summary of the invention
[0005] The purpose of the present invention is to provide an intelligent management system for high-frequency transformer production to solve the above-mentioned technical defects. The present invention analyzes from the perspective of energy efficiency and stability of the transformer production line to achieve low-consumption, high-efficiency and stable production of the transformer, thereby helping to save production costs and improve production efficiency. The production line is recommended for supervision and analysis through information feedback. On the one hand, it helps to intuitively understand the division of the transformer production line, and at the same time facilitates the reasonable and targeted management of the transformer production line. On the other hand, it helps to reasonably recommend the transformer production line to ensure the transformer production quality and production efficiency.
[0006] The object of the present invention can be achieved by the following technical solutions: an intelligent management system for high-frequency transformer production, including a production management platform, a production information unit, an energy efficiency division unit, a facility factor unit, a dynamic monitoring unit, a preferential production unit, and a management response unit;
[0007] The production information unit is used to collect processing data of the transformer production line and historical basic information of the facilities, and send the processing data and historical basic information to the energy efficiency classification unit and the facility factor unit respectively;
[0008] After receiving the processing data, the energy efficiency division unit immediately performs processing supervision division evaluation analysis on the processing data, and compares and analyzes the obtained production evaluation coefficients to obtain high-efficiency production lines and low-efficiency production lines;
[0009] After receiving the historical basic information, the facility factor unit immediately performs a facility interference assessment operation on the historical basic information, and performs an in-depth analysis on the obtained damage assessment coefficient Sn to obtain stable facilities, risky facilities and facility risk coefficient SF;
[0010] The dynamic monitoring unit is used to collect potential interference data of the transformer production line, the potential interference data includes fault frequency and total number of faults, and to perform operation stability supervision division analysis on the potential interference data, and to compare and analyze the obtained production line stability risk coefficient R to obtain a stable production line and a risky production line;
[0011] The optimal production unit is used to perform optimal production line recommendation supervision analysis to obtain efficient and stable production lines, efficient and risky production lines, inefficient and stable production lines, and inefficient and risky production lines. At the same time, a progressive division analysis is performed on the efficient and stable production lines to obtain the best recommended production line.
[0012] Preferably, the processing supervision division evaluation and analysis process of the energy efficiency division unit is as follows:
[0013] S1: The production period of the transformer production line is collected and set as a time threshold, the time threshold is divided into i sub-periods, i is a natural number greater than zero, and the processing data of the transformer production line in each sub-period is obtained, the processing data includes the total energy consumption and the product quality coefficient, and then the ratio between the product quality coefficient and the total energy consumption is obtained, and the ratio between the product quality coefficient and the total energy consumption is set as the low-consumption and high-efficiency index;
[0014] S2: The product quality coefficient represents the proportion of qualified products in the total number of products produced by the transformer production line in the sub-time period. The low-consumption and high-efficiency index is compared and analyzed with the preset low-consumption and high-efficiency index threshold value stored in the internal input:
[0015] If the ratio between the low-consumption and high-efficiency index and the preset low-consumption and high-efficiency index threshold is less than 1, the corresponding sub-time period is determined to be an unqualified time period;
[0016] If the ratio between the low-consumption and high-efficiency index and the preset low-consumption and high-efficiency index threshold is greater than or equal to 1, the corresponding sub-time period is determined to be a qualified time period;
[0017] S3: Obtain the ratio between the number of unqualified time periods and the number of qualified time periods, set the ratio between the number of unqualified time periods and the number of qualified time periods as the production evaluation coefficient, and compare and analyze the production evaluation coefficient with the preset production evaluation coefficient threshold value stored in the internal input:
[0018] If the ratio between the production evaluation coefficient and the preset production evaluation coefficient threshold is less than 1, the corresponding transformer production line is determined to be a high-efficiency production line; if the ratio between the production evaluation coefficient and the preset production evaluation coefficient threshold is greater than or equal to 1, the corresponding transformer production line is determined to be an inefficient production line.
[0019] Preferably, the facility interference assessment operation process of the facility factor unit is as follows:
[0020] Obtain the historical basic information of each facility in the transformer production line within the time threshold, the historical basic information includes the use time, parts information and maintenance management coefficient, the use time indicates the time from the time when each facility in the transformer production line starts to be put into use to the current time, the parts information indicates the total number of times the parts of the facility are replaced, the maintenance management coefficient indicates the product of the average maintenance interval time and the value corresponding to the number of overheating operations, the number of overheating operations indicates the number of times the time corresponding to the operating temperature of the facility exceeding the preset operating temperature threshold is greater than the number corresponding to the preset time threshold, mark the facilities in the transformer production line as n, n is a natural number greater than zero, and label the use time, parts information and maintenance management coefficient as SCn, LJn and WGn respectively;
[0021] The damage assessment coefficient Sn of each facility is obtained according to the formula, and the damage assessment coefficient Sn is compared and analyzed with the preset damage assessment coefficient threshold value stored internally:
[0022] If the ratio between the damage assessment coefficient Sn and the preset damage assessment coefficient threshold is less than 1, the corresponding facility is determined to be a stable facility;
[0023] If the ratio between the damage assessment coefficient Sn and the preset damage assessment coefficient threshold is greater than or equal to 1, the corresponding facility is judged to be a risky facility, and the ratio between the number of risk facilities and the number of stable facilities is obtained, and the ratio between the number of risk facilities and the number of stable facilities is set as the facility risk coefficient SF.
[0024] Preferably, the operation stability supervision division analysis process of the dynamic monitoring unit is as follows:
[0025] Obtain the production assessment coefficient of the transformer production line within m historical time thresholds, where m is a natural number greater than zero, compare and analyze the production assessment coefficient with the internally entered preset production assessment coefficient threshold, and then obtain the number of time thresholds corresponding to the production assessment coefficient threshold that is less than the preset production assessment coefficient threshold, and set the ratio between the number of time thresholds corresponding to the preset production assessment coefficient threshold that is less than the preset production assessment coefficient threshold and m as the high-efficiency risk rate;
[0026] The potential interference coefficient of the transformer production line within the time threshold is obtained. The potential interference coefficient represents the product of the fault frequency and the total number of faults of the transformer production line after data normalization. The high-efficiency risk rate and the potential interference coefficient are labeled GF and QG respectively. The high-efficiency risk rate GF, the potential interference coefficient QG and the facility risk coefficient SF are substituted into the formula R=[(GF+QG)×(a1+a2)+SF×a3]×a4 to obtain the production line stability risk coefficient, wherein a1, a2 and a3 are the preset proportional factor coefficients of the high-efficiency risk rate GF, the potential interference coefficient QG and the facility risk coefficient SF respectively, and a1, a2 and a3 are all greater than zero. a4 is the preset correction factor coefficient, which is 2.191, and R is the production line stability risk coefficient.
[0027] Preferably, the production line stability risk coefficient R is compared and analyzed with a preset production line stability risk coefficient threshold value recorded and stored internally:
[0028] If the ratio between the production line stability risk coefficient R and the preset production line stability risk coefficient threshold is less than 1, the corresponding transformer production line is determined to be a stable production line;
[0029] If the ratio between the production line stability risk coefficient R and the preset production line stability risk coefficient threshold is greater than or equal to 1, the corresponding transformer production line is determined to be a risky production line.
[0030] Preferably, the production line optimization recommendation supervision analysis process of the optimization production unit is as follows:
[0031] Get the numbers corresponding to the efficient production lines within the time threshold, and then build a set A of efficient production lines; get the numbers corresponding to the inefficient production lines within the time threshold, and then build a set B of inefficient production lines; get the numbers corresponding to the stable production lines within the time threshold, and then build a set C of stable production lines; get the numbers corresponding to the risky production lines within the time threshold, and then build a set D of risky production lines;
[0032] The intersection of set A and set C is obtained, and the transformer production line corresponding to the intersection of set A and set C is marked as an efficient and stable production line. The intersection of set A and set D is obtained, and the transformer production line corresponding to the intersection of set A and set D is marked as an efficient and risky production line. The intersection of set B and set C is obtained, and the transformer production line corresponding to the intersection of set B and set C is marked as an inefficient and stable production line. The intersection of set B and set D is obtained, and the transformer production line corresponding to the intersection of set B and set D is marked as an inefficient and risky production line.
[0033] Preferably, the progressive division analysis process of the efficient and stable production line is as follows:
[0034] Obtain the production assessment coefficient and production line stability risk coefficient R corresponding to the efficient and stable production line, label the production assessment coefficient as SX, and substitute the production assessment coefficient SX and production line stability risk coefficient R into the formula TJ = (SX×R×v1) 2 The recommended production line evaluation coefficient is obtained, where v1 is the preset influencing factor coefficient, v1 is greater than zero, TJ is the recommended production line evaluation coefficient, and the minimum value of the recommended production line evaluation coefficient TJ is obtained. The efficient and stable production line corresponding to the minimum value of the recommended production line evaluation coefficient TJ is marked as the best recommended production line.
[0035] The beneficial effects of the present invention are as follows:
[0036] (1) The present invention analyzes the energy efficiency and stability of the transformer production line to achieve low-consumption, high-efficiency and stable production of the transformer, thereby helping to save production costs and improve production efficiency, that is, the processing data is evaluated and analyzed for processing supervision division, the transformer production line is analyzed from the perspective of product quality and energy consumption to ensure low-consumption and high-efficiency production of the transformer production line, and the operation stability supervision division analysis is performed from the perspective of stability, so that the transformer production line can be divided based on dynamic stability to understand the stability of the transformer production line, and combined with the analysis of the operating influencing factors of the facilities in the transformer production line, on the one hand, it helps to understand the risk of each facility, and on the other hand, it helps to understand the impact of the facilities on the operational stability of the transformer production line, thereby helping to improve the comprehensiveness of the analysis data;
[0037] (2) The present invention performs production line preferential recommendation and supervision analysis through information feedback. On the one hand, it helps to intuitively understand the division of transformer production lines and facilitates reasonable and targeted management of transformer production lines. On the other hand, it helps to reasonably recommend transformer production lines to ensure transformer production quality and production efficiency. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0038] The present invention will be further described below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings;
[0039] Figure 1 It is a flowchart of the system of the present invention;
[0040] Figure 2 This is a local analysis diagram of Example 1 of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0041] The following will be combined with the drawings in the embodiments of the present invention to clearly and completely describe the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention. Obviously, the described embodiments are only part of the embodiments of the present invention, not all of the embodiments. Based on the embodiments of the present invention, all other embodiments obtained by ordinary technicians in this field without creative work are within the scope of protection of the present invention.
[0042] Embodiment 1:
[0043] See also Figure 1 to Figure 2 As shown, the present invention is an intelligent management system for high-frequency transformer production, including a production management platform, a production information unit, an energy efficiency division unit, a facility factor unit, a dynamic monitoring unit, a preferred production unit and a management response unit. The production management platform is connected to the production information unit in a one-way communication manner, the production information unit is connected to the energy efficiency division unit and the facility factor unit in a one-way communication manner, the energy efficiency division unit is connected to the dynamic monitoring unit and the preferred production unit in a one-way communication manner, the facility factor unit is connected to the dynamic monitoring unit and the management response unit in a one-way communication manner, the dynamic monitoring unit is connected to the preferred production unit in a one-way communication manner, and the preferred production unit is connected to the management response unit in a one-way communication manner;
[0044] When the production management platform monitors the production of any transformer production line, it generates a supervision instruction and sends the supervision instruction to the production information unit. After receiving the supervision instruction, the production information unit immediately collects the processing data of the transformer production line and the historical basic information of the facilities, and sends the processing data and the historical basic information to the energy efficiency division unit and the facility factor unit respectively. After receiving the processing data, the energy efficiency division unit immediately performs a processing supervision division evaluation and analysis on the processing data, that is, analyzes the transformer production line from the perspective of product quality and energy consumption to ensure low-consumption and high-efficiency production of the transformer production line. The specific processing supervision division evaluation and analysis process is as follows:
[0045] The production time period of the transformer production line is collected and set as the time threshold, the time threshold is divided into i sub-time periods, i is a natural number greater than zero, and the processing data of the transformer production line in each sub-time period is obtained, the processing data includes the total energy consumption and the product quality coefficient, and then the ratio between the product quality coefficient and the total energy consumption is obtained, and the ratio between the product quality coefficient and the total energy consumption is set as the low-consumption and high-efficiency index. It should be noted that the analysis is conducted from the two points of energy consumption and production quality so as to reasonably divide the transformer production line so as to reasonably allocate the subsequent transformer production;
[0046] Compare and analyze the low-consumption and high-efficiency index with the preset low-consumption and high-efficiency index threshold value stored internally:
[0047] If the ratio between the low-consumption and high-efficiency index and the preset low-consumption and high-efficiency index threshold is less than 1, the corresponding sub-time period is determined to be an unqualified time period;
[0048] If the ratio between the low-consumption and high-efficiency index and the preset low-consumption and high-efficiency index threshold is greater than or equal to 1, the corresponding sub-time period is determined to be a qualified time period;
[0049] The ratio between the number of unqualified time periods and the number of qualified time periods is obtained, and the ratio between the number of unqualified time periods and the number of qualified time periods is set as the production evaluation coefficient, and the production evaluation coefficient is compared and analyzed with the preset production evaluation coefficient threshold value stored in the internal input:
[0050] If the ratio between the production evaluation coefficient and the preset production evaluation coefficient threshold is less than 1, the corresponding transformer production line is determined to be a high-efficiency production line;
[0051] If the ratio between the production evaluation coefficient and the preset production evaluation coefficient threshold is greater than or equal to 1, the corresponding transformer production line is determined to be an inefficient production line;
[0052] In the embodiment of the present invention, the product quality coefficient represents the proportion of the number of qualified products in the total number of products produced by the transformer production line in the sub-time period. It should be noted that the transformer production line is analyzed from the perspective of product qualification rate to ensure low-consumption and high-efficiency production of the transformer production line;
[0053] After receiving the historical basic information, the facility factor unit immediately performs a facility interference assessment operation on the historical basic information, so as to analyze it from the perspective of the impact of the facilities in the transformer production line. On the one hand, it helps to understand the risk situation of each facility, and on the other hand, it helps to understand the impact of the facilities on the operational stability of the transformer production line. The specific facility interference assessment operation process is as follows:
[0054] Obtain the historical basic information of each facility in the transformer production line within the time threshold, the historical basic information includes the use time, parts information and maintenance management coefficient, the use time indicates the time from the time when each facility in the transformer production line starts to be put into use to the current time, the parts information indicates the total number of times the parts of the facility are replaced, the maintenance management coefficient indicates the product of the average maintenance interval time and the value corresponding to the number of overheating operations, the number of overheating operations indicates the number of times the time corresponding to the operating temperature of the facility exceeding the preset operating temperature threshold is greater than the number corresponding to the preset time threshold, mark the facilities in the transformer production line as n, n is a natural number greater than zero, and label the use time, parts information and maintenance management coefficient as SCn, LJn and WGn respectively;
[0055] According to the formula The damage assessment coefficient of each facility is obtained, where f1, f2 and f3 are respectively the preset weight factor coefficients of the service life, parts information and maintenance management coefficient, f4 is the preset fault tolerance factor coefficient, f1, f2, f3 and f4 are all greater than zero, Sn is the damage assessment coefficient of each facility, and the damage assessment coefficient Sn is compared and analyzed with the preset damage assessment coefficient threshold value stored in the internal input:
[0056] If the ratio between the damage assessment coefficient Sn and the preset damage assessment coefficient threshold is less than 1, the corresponding facility is determined to be a stable facility;
[0057] If the ratio between the damage assessment coefficient Sn and the preset damage assessment coefficient threshold is greater than or equal to 1, the corresponding facility is determined to be a risk facility, and the ratio between the number of risk facilities and the number of stable facilities is obtained. The ratio between the number of risk facilities and the number of stable facilities is set as the facility risk coefficient SF, and the stable facilities and risk facilities are sent to the management response unit at the same time. After receiving the stable facilities and risk facilities, the management response unit immediately marks the numbers corresponding to the stable facilities and risk facilities respectively, so as to supervise the stable facilities and risk facilities respectively and conduct subsequent maintenance adjustments;
[0058] It should be noted that the larger the value of the facility risk factor SF, the greater the risk of abnormal operation of the transformer production line. Analyzing from the perspective of the facilities in the transformer production line can help understand the risk situation of each facility on the one hand, and on the other hand, help understand the impact of the facilities on the operational stability of the transformer production line.
[0059] Embodiment 2:
[0060] The dynamic monitoring unit is used to collect potential interference data of the transformer production line, including fault frequency and total number of faults, and to analyze the potential interference data in terms of operation stability supervision so as to understand the stability of the transformer production line from the perspective of dynamic stability. The specific operation stability supervision division analysis process is as follows:
[0061] The production evaluation coefficient of the transformer production line within the historical m time thresholds is obtained, where m is a natural number greater than zero, and the production evaluation coefficient is compared and analyzed with the internally entered preset production evaluation coefficient threshold, so as to obtain the number of time thresholds corresponding to the preset production evaluation coefficient threshold when the production evaluation coefficient is less than the preset production evaluation coefficient threshold, and the ratio between the number of time thresholds corresponding to the preset production evaluation coefficient threshold and m is set as the high-efficiency risk rate. It should be noted that the high-efficiency risk rate is an influencing parameter reflecting the stability of high-efficiency production of the transformer production line;
[0062] The potential interference coefficient of the transformer production line within the time threshold is obtained. The potential interference coefficient represents the product value obtained by multiplying the fault frequency and the total number of faults of the transformer production line after data normalization. It should be noted that the potential interference coefficient is an influencing parameter reflecting the efficient production stability of the transformer production line;
[0063] The high efficiency risk rate and potential interference coefficient are labeled as GF and QG respectively, and the high efficiency risk rate GF, the potential interference coefficient QG and the facility risk coefficient SF are substituted into the formula R = [(GF + QG) × (a1 + a2) + SF × a3] × a4 to obtain the production line stability risk coefficient, wherein a1, a2 and a3 are the preset proportional factor coefficients of the high efficiency risk rate GF, the potential interference coefficient QG and the facility risk coefficient SF respectively. The proportional factor coefficient is used to correct the deviation of various parameters in the formula calculation process, so as to make the calculation result more accurate. a1, a2 and a3 are all greater than zero, a4 is the preset correction factor coefficient, and the value is 2.191. R is the production line stability risk coefficient. The production line stability risk coefficient R is compared with the preset production line stability risk coefficient threshold value stored in the internal input:
[0064] If the ratio between the production line stability risk coefficient R and the preset production line stability risk coefficient threshold is less than 1, the corresponding transformer production line is determined to be a stable production line;
[0065] If the ratio between the production line stability risk coefficient R and the preset production line stability risk coefficient threshold is greater than or equal to 1, the corresponding transformer production line is determined to be a risky production line;
[0066] The optimal production unit is used to perform optimal production line recommendation supervision analysis, so as to reasonably produce transformers to achieve low-consumption, high-efficiency and stable production, which helps to save production costs and improve production efficiency. The specific production line optimal recommendation supervision analysis process is as follows:
[0067] Get the numbers corresponding to the efficient production lines within the time threshold, and then build a set A of efficient production lines; get the numbers corresponding to the inefficient production lines within the time threshold, and then build a set B of inefficient production lines; get the numbers corresponding to the stable production lines within the time threshold, and then build a set C of stable production lines; get the numbers corresponding to the risky production lines within the time threshold, and then build a set D of risky production lines;
[0068] The intersection of set A and set C is obtained, and the transformer production line corresponding to the intersection of set A and set C is marked as an efficient and stable production line. The intersection of set A and set D is obtained, and the transformer production line corresponding to the intersection of set A and set D is marked as an efficient and risky production line. The intersection of set B and set C is obtained, and the transformer production line corresponding to the intersection of set B and set C is marked as an inefficient and stable production line. The intersection of set B and set D is obtained, and the transformer production line corresponding to the intersection of set B and set D is marked as an inefficient and risky production line. The efficient and stable production line, the efficient and risky production line, the inefficient and stable production line, and the inefficient and risky production line are sent to the management response unit. After receiving the efficient and stable production line, the efficient and risky production line, the inefficient and stable production line, and the inefficient and risky production line, the management response unit immediately marks the corresponding preset warning text on the numbers of the efficient and stable production line, the efficient and risky production line, the inefficient and stable production line, and the inefficient and risky production line on the display panel, so as to intuitively understand the division of the transformer production line, and at the same time facilitate reasonable and targeted management of the transformer production line.
[0069] At the same time, the production evaluation coefficient and the production line stability risk coefficient R corresponding to the efficient and stable production line are obtained, the production evaluation coefficient is labeled as SX, and the production evaluation coefficient SX and the production line stability risk coefficient R are substituted into the formula TJ = (SX×R×v1) 2 Obtain the production line recommended evaluation coefficient, where v1 is the preset influencing factor coefficient, v1 is greater than zero, TJ is the production line recommended evaluation coefficient, obtain the minimum value of the production line recommended evaluation coefficient TJ, mark the efficient and stable production line corresponding to the minimum value of the production line recommended evaluation coefficient TJ as the best recommended production line, and send the best recommended production line to the management response unit. After receiving the best recommended production line, the management response unit immediately displays the number corresponding to the best recommended production line, so as to produce the transformer to achieve low-consumption, high-efficiency and stable production, thereby helping to save production costs and improve production efficiency;
[0070] In summary, the present invention analyzes from the perspective of energy efficiency and stability of the transformer production line to achieve low-consumption, high-efficiency and stable production of the transformer, which helps to save production costs and improve production efficiency, that is, to perform processing supervision division evaluation analysis on the processing data, that is, to analyze the transformer production line from the perspective of product quality and energy consumption to ensure low-consumption and high-efficiency production of the transformer production line, and to perform operation stability supervision division analysis from the perspective of stability, so as to divide the transformer production line based on dynamic stability to understand the stability of the transformer production line, and to analyze in combination with the operating influencing factors of the facilities in the transformer production line. On the one hand, it helps to understand the risk situation of each facility, and on the other hand, it helps to understand the impact of the facilities on the operational stability of the transformer production line, and then helps to improve the comprehensiveness of the analysis data, and to perform production line preferential recommendation supervision analysis through information feedback. On the one hand, it helps to intuitively understand the division of the transformer production line, and at the same time facilitates the reasonable and targeted management of the transformer production line, and on the other hand, it helps to reasonably recommend the transformer production line to ensure the production quality and production efficiency of the transformer.
[0071] The threshold is set to facilitate comparison. The threshold depends on the amount of sample data and the number of bases set by technicians in this field for each set of sample data.
[0072] The above formulas are obtained by collecting a large amount of data for software simulation and selecting a formula that is close to the actual value. The coefficients in the formula are set by technical personnel in this field according to actual conditions. The above is only a preferred specific implementation manner of the present invention, but the protection scope of the present invention is not limited to this. Any technical personnel familiar with the technical field within the technical scope disclosed by the present invention, according to the technical solution and the inventive concept of the present invention, make equivalent replacement or change, which should be covered within the protection scope of the present invention.
Claims
1. An intelligent management system for high-frequency transformer production, characterized in that: It includes production management platform, production information unit, energy efficiency classification unit, facility factor unit, dynamic monitoring unit, optimal production unit and management response unit; The production information unit is used to collect processing data of the transformer production line and historical basic information of the facilities, and send the processing data and historical basic information to the energy efficiency classification unit and the facility factor unit respectively; After receiving the processing data, the energy efficiency division unit immediately performs processing supervision division evaluation analysis on the processing data, and compares and analyzes the obtained production evaluation coefficients to obtain high-efficiency production lines and low-efficiency production lines; After receiving the historical basic information, the facility factor unit immediately performs a facility interference assessment operation on the historical basic information, and performs an in-depth analysis on the obtained damage assessment coefficient Sn to obtain stable facilities, risky facilities and facility risk coefficient SF; The dynamic monitoring unit is used to collect potential interference data of the transformer production line, the potential interference data includes fault frequency and total number of faults, and to perform operation stability supervision division analysis on the potential interference data, and to compare and analyze the obtained production line stability risk coefficient R to obtain a stable production line and a risky production line; The optimal production unit is used to perform optimal production line recommendation supervision analysis to obtain efficient and stable production lines, efficient and risky production lines, inefficient and stable production lines, and inefficient and risky production lines. At the same time, a progressive division analysis is performed on the efficient and stable production lines to obtain the best recommended production line.
2. The intelligent management system for high-frequency transformer production according to claim 1 is characterized in that: The processing supervision division evaluation and analysis process of the energy efficiency division unit is as follows: S1: The production period of the transformer production line is collected and set as a time threshold, the time threshold is divided into i sub-periods, i is a natural number greater than zero, and the processing data of the transformer production line in each sub-period is obtained, the processing data includes the total energy consumption and the product quality coefficient, and then the ratio between the product quality coefficient and the total energy consumption is obtained, and the ratio between the product quality coefficient and the total energy consumption is set as the low-consumption and high-efficiency index; S2: The product quality coefficient represents the proportion of qualified products in the total number of products produced by the transformer production line in the sub-time period. The low-consumption and high-efficiency index is compared and analyzed with the preset low-consumption and high-efficiency index threshold value stored in the internal input: If the ratio between the low-consumption and high-efficiency index and the preset low-consumption and high-efficiency index threshold is less than 1, the corresponding sub-time period is determined to be an unqualified time period; If the ratio between the low-consumption and high-efficiency index and the preset low-consumption and high-efficiency index threshold is greater than or equal to 1, the corresponding sub-time period is determined to be a qualified time period; S3: Obtain the ratio between the number of unqualified time periods and the number of qualified time periods, set the ratio between the number of unqualified time periods and the number of qualified time periods as the production evaluation coefficient, and compare and analyze the production evaluation coefficient with the preset production evaluation coefficient threshold value stored in the internal input: If the ratio between the production evaluation coefficient and the preset production evaluation coefficient threshold is less than 1, the corresponding transformer production line is determined to be a high-efficiency production line; if the ratio between the production evaluation coefficient and the preset production evaluation coefficient threshold is greater than or equal to 1, the corresponding transformer production line is determined to be an inefficient production line.
3. The intelligent management system for high-frequency transformer production according to claim 1 is characterized in that: The facility interference assessment operation process of the facility factor unit is as follows: Obtain the historical basic information of each facility in the transformer production line within the time threshold, the historical basic information includes the use time, parts information and maintenance management coefficient, the use time indicates the time from the time when each facility in the transformer production line starts to be put into use to the current time, the parts information indicates the total number of times the parts of the facility are replaced, the maintenance management coefficient indicates the product of the average maintenance interval time and the value corresponding to the number of overheating operations, the number of overheating operations indicates the number of times the time corresponding to the operating temperature of the facility exceeding the preset operating temperature threshold is greater than the number corresponding to the preset time threshold, mark the facilities in the transformer production line as n, n is a natural number greater than zero, and label the use time, parts information and maintenance management coefficient as SCn, LJn and WGn respectively; The damage assessment coefficient Sn of each facility is obtained according to the formula, and the damage assessment coefficient Sn is compared and analyzed with the preset damage assessment coefficient threshold value stored internally: If the ratio between the damage assessment coefficient Sn and the preset damage assessment coefficient threshold is less than 1, the corresponding facility is determined to be a stable facility; If the ratio between the damage assessment coefficient Sn and the preset damage assessment coefficient threshold is greater than or equal to 1, the corresponding facility is judged to be a risky facility, and the ratio between the number of risk facilities and the number of stable facilities is obtained, and the ratio between the number of risk facilities and the number of stable facilities is set as the facility risk coefficient SF.
4. The intelligent management system for high-frequency transformer production according to claim 1 is characterized in that: The analysis process of the dynamic monitoring unit's operation stability supervision division is as follows: Obtain the production assessment coefficient of the transformer production line within m historical time thresholds, where m is a natural number greater than zero, compare and analyze the production assessment coefficient with the internally entered preset production assessment coefficient threshold, and then obtain the number of time thresholds corresponding to the production assessment coefficient threshold that is less than the preset production assessment coefficient threshold, and set the ratio between the number of time thresholds corresponding to the preset production assessment coefficient threshold that is less than the preset production assessment coefficient threshold and m as the high-efficiency risk rate; The potential interference coefficient of the transformer production line within the time threshold is obtained. The potential interference coefficient represents the product of the fault frequency and the total number of faults of the transformer production line after data normalization. The high-efficiency risk rate and the potential interference coefficient are labeled GF and QG respectively. The high-efficiency risk rate GF, the potential interference coefficient QG and the facility risk coefficient SF are substituted into the formula R=[(GF+QG)×(a1+a2)+SF×a3]×a4 to obtain the production line stability risk coefficient, wherein a1, a2 and a3 are the preset proportional factor coefficients of the high-efficiency risk rate GF, the potential interference coefficient QG and the facility risk coefficient SF respectively, and a1, a2 and a3 are all greater than zero. a4 is the preset correction factor coefficient, which is 2.191, and R is the production line stability risk coefficient.
5. The high-frequency transformer production intelligent management system according to claim 4 is characterized in that: The production line stability risk coefficient R is compared and analyzed with the preset production line stability risk coefficient threshold value stored in the internal input: If the ratio between the production line stability risk coefficient R and the preset production line stability risk coefficient threshold is less than 1, the corresponding transformer production line is determined to be a stable production line; If the ratio between the production line stability risk coefficient R and the preset production line stability risk coefficient threshold is greater than or equal to 1, the corresponding transformer production line is determined to be a risky production line.
6. The high-frequency transformer production intelligent management system according to claim 1 is characterized in that: The production line selection recommendation supervision analysis process of the preferred production unit is as follows: Get the numbers corresponding to the efficient production lines within the time threshold, and then build a set A of efficient production lines; get the numbers corresponding to the inefficient production lines within the time threshold, and then build a set B of inefficient production lines; get the numbers corresponding to the stable production lines within the time threshold, and then build a set C of stable production lines; get the numbers corresponding to the risky production lines within the time threshold, and then build a set D of risky production lines; The intersection of set A and set C is obtained, and the transformer production line corresponding to the intersection of set A and set C is marked as an efficient and stable production line. The intersection of set A and set D is obtained, and the transformer production line corresponding to the intersection of set A and set D is marked as an efficient and risky production line. The intersection of set B and set C is obtained, and the transformer production line corresponding to the intersection of set B and set C is marked as an inefficient and stable production line. The intersection of set B and set D is obtained, and the transformer production line corresponding to the intersection of set B and set D is marked as an inefficient and risky production line.
7. The intelligent management system for high-frequency transformer production according to claim 6 is characterized in that: The progressive division analysis process of the efficient and stable production line is as follows: Obtain the production assessment coefficient and production line stability risk coefficient R corresponding to the efficient and stable production line, label the production assessment coefficient as SX, and substitute the production assessment coefficient SX and production line stability risk coefficient R into the formula TJ = (SX×R×v1) 2 The recommended production line evaluation coefficient is obtained, where v1 is the preset influencing factor coefficient, v1 is greater than zero, TJ is the recommended production line evaluation coefficient, and the minimum value of the recommended production line evaluation coefficient TJ is obtained. The efficient and stable production line corresponding to the minimum value of the recommended production line evaluation coefficient TJ is marked as the best recommended production line.
Citation Information
Cited By
Low-power-consumption data transmission optimization system and method for smart watch
CN119421225A