Indoor decoration evaluation method and device for medical department

Abstract

The invention provides an interior decoration evaluation method and device for a medical department. The method comprises the steps of obtaining a project effect picture and a constructed realistic picture of a to-be-evaluated medical department; respectively inputting the project effect picture and the constructed live-action picture into an evaluation model for evaluation to obtain a first evaluation result corresponding to the project effect picture and a second evaluation result corresponding to the constructed live-action picture; according to the first evaluation result and the second evaluation result, a final evaluation result corresponding to the to-be-evaluated medical department is obtained, and the final evaluation result at least comprises whether the decoration of the to-be-evaluated medical department meets the decoration standard or not. According to the method, the specific evaluation standard is formulated by means of the evaluation model, the intelligent evaluation method is adopted for the indoor decoration effect drawing or the as-built drawing of the medical department, an objective and accurate evaluation result is obtained, beneficial suggestions are provided for indoor decoration optimization and reconstruction of the medical department, and the service satisfaction degree of the medical department is improved.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present disclosure relates to the field of interior decoration, and more specifically, to an interior decoration evaluation method and device for medical departments. Background Art

[0002] The interior decoration of special departments of medical purification projects includes intensive care units (ICU), neonatal intensive care units (NICU), emergency intensive care units (EICU), anesthesia recovery rooms, operating rooms and other treatment rooms as well as supporting functional rooms. These decorations must comply with specific regulations and industry standards. For the interior decoration of medical departments, the existing evaluation method is based on set rules and manual evaluation. This evaluation method not only has the problem of low efficiency, but also has human subjective factors, which makes the evaluation results not objective and accurate enough. Summary of the invention

[0003] The present invention aims at solving the technical problems existing in the prior art and provides an interior decoration evaluation method and device for a medical department, thereby realizing a scientific evaluation method for interior decoration.

[0004] According to a first aspect of the present disclosure, there is provided a method for evaluating interior decoration of a medical department, comprising: S1, obtaining a project rendering and a constructed scene drawing of the medical department to be evaluated; S2, inputting the project rendering into an evaluation model for evaluation to obtain a first evaluation result corresponding to the project rendering, and inputting the constructed scene drawing into the evaluation model to obtain a second evaluation result corresponding to the constructed scene drawing, wherein the first evaluation result at least includes whether the decoration design of the medical department to be evaluated meets the design standards, and the second evaluation result at least includes whether the decoration construction of the medical department to be evaluated meets the construction process standards; and S3, obtaining a final evaluation result corresponding to the medical department to be evaluated based on the first evaluation result and the second evaluation result, wherein the final evaluation result at least includes whether the decoration of the medical department to be evaluated meets the decoration standards.

[0005] According to a second aspect of the present disclosure, there is provided an interior decoration evaluation device for a medical department, comprising: a data acquisition module, for acquiring a project rendering and a constructed real scene picture of a medical department to be evaluated; an evaluation module, for inputting the project rendering into an evaluation model for evaluation, and obtaining a first evaluation result corresponding to the project rendering, and inputting the constructed real scene picture into the evaluation model, and obtaining a second evaluation result corresponding to the constructed real scene picture, wherein the first evaluation result at least includes whether the decoration design of the medical department to be evaluated meets the design standards, and the second evaluation result at least includes whether the decoration construction of the medical department to be evaluated meets the construction process standards; and an evaluation result confirmation module, for obtaining a final evaluation result corresponding to the medical department to be evaluated based on the first evaluation result and the second evaluation result, wherein the final evaluation result at least includes whether the decoration of the medical department to be evaluated meets the decoration standards.

[0006] According to a third aspect of the present disclosure, there is provided an electronic device, comprising a memory and a processor, wherein the processor is configured to implement the steps of an interior decoration evaluation method for a medical department when executing a computer management program stored in the memory.

[0007] According to a fourth aspect of the present disclosure, a computer-readable storage medium is provided, on which a computer management program is stored, and when the computer management program is executed by a processor, the steps of the interior decoration evaluation method for a medical department are implemented.

[0008] The present disclosure provides a method and device for evaluating interior decoration of a medical department. The method evaluates project renderings and actual construction scenes during interior decoration based on an evaluation model, respectively, to obtain a first evaluation result and a second evaluation result, respectively, and jointly determines a final evaluation result corresponding to the medical department to be evaluated based on the first evaluation result and the second evaluation result, thereby achieving a scientific evaluation of the decoration of the medical department with more accurate evaluation results. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0009] The accompanying drawings are used to better understand the present solution and do not constitute a limitation of the present disclosure.

[0010] Figure 1 is a flow chart of an interior decoration evaluation method for a medical department according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;

[0011] Figure 2 A schematic diagram of a process for evaluating a project rendering according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;

[0012] Figure 3 A schematic diagram of a process for evaluating a constructed real scene image according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;

[0013] Figure 4is a schematic block diagram of an interior decoration evaluation device for a medical department according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;

[0014] Figure 5 is a schematic diagram of the hardware structure of an electronic device according to an embodiment of the present disclosure; and

[0015] Figure 6 Schematic diagram of the hardware structure of a computer-readable storage medium according to an embodiment of the present disclosure. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0016] In order to make the purpose, technical solutions and advantages of the embodiments of the present disclosure clearer, the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present disclosure will be clearly and completely described below in conjunction with the drawings in the embodiments of the present disclosure. Obviously, the described embodiments are part of the embodiments of the present disclosure, rather than all of the embodiments. Based on the embodiments in the present disclosure, all other embodiments obtained by ordinary technicians in this field without making creative work are within the scope of protection of the present disclosure. In addition, the technical features in the various embodiments or single embodiments provided by the present disclosure can be arbitrarily combined with each other to form a feasible technical solution. This combination is not subject to the constraints of the sequence of steps and / or the structural composition mode, but must be based on the ability of ordinary technicians in this field to achieve. When the combination of technical solutions is contradictory or cannot be achieved, it should be considered that such a combination of technical solutions does not exist and is not within the scope of protection required by the present disclosure.

[0017] Figure 1 The present invention provides a flow chart of an interior decoration evaluation method for a medical department. Figure 1 As shown, the method includes: steps S1 to S3.

[0018] In operation S1, the project renderings and the actual construction pictures of the medical department to be evaluated are obtained.

[0019] In operation S2, the project rendering is input into the evaluation model for evaluation to obtain a first evaluation result corresponding to the project rendering, and the constructed real scene is input into the evaluation model to obtain a second evaluation result corresponding to the constructed real scene. The first evaluation result at least includes whether the decoration design of the medical department to be evaluated meets the design standards, and the second evaluation result at least includes whether the decoration construction of the medical department to be evaluated meets the construction process standards.

[0020] In operation S3, a final evaluation result corresponding to the medical department to be evaluated is obtained according to the first evaluation result and the second evaluation result, wherein the final evaluation result at least includes whether the decoration of the medical department to be evaluated meets the decoration standard.

[0021] It is understandable that in the process of decorating a medical department, including the design stage and the decoration stage, the decoration drawings will be designed first, and then the decoration will be carried out according to the decoration drawings. The design drawings in the design stage are called project renderings, and the decoration real scene pictures after decoration are called constructed real scene pictures. When the decoration is completed, the project renderings of the medical department to be evaluated in the design stage and the constructed real scene pictures after the decoration construction are completed can be obtained respectively.

[0022] In the disclosed embodiment, the project renderings and the actual scenes that have been constructed are respectively input into the evaluation model. Based on the evaluation model, the project renderings are evaluated to see whether they meet the design standards, including whether the design principles of the project renderings are reasonable and whether the decorative effects meet the design standards. In addition, based on the evaluation model, it is evaluated whether the actual scenes that have been constructed meet the construction process standards.

[0023] When the project renderings meet the design standards, and the actual construction pictures also meet the construction process standards, the final evaluation result corresponding to the medical department to be evaluated is that it meets the decoration standards. If the project renderings do not meet the design standards, or the actual construction pictures do not meet the construction process standards, the final evaluation result corresponding to the medical department to be evaluated is that it does not meet the decoration standards.

[0024] Among them, the project renderings include multiple design drawings in the design stage, such as cover, catalog, design concept, color characteristics, CAD plan, renderings, etc. The actual construction pictures include various decoration materials and product pictures in the decoration construction process, such as tiles, stones, carpets, floor glue, automatic doors, hand washing basins, etc.

[0025] See also Figure 2 In step S2, the project effect diagram is input into the evaluation model for evaluation to obtain a first evaluation result corresponding to the project effect diagram, including steps S21 to S23.

[0026] In operation S21 , a plurality of design drawings are input into the evaluation model, and a plurality of features to be evaluated corresponding to each design drawing are obtained based on the evaluation model.

[0027] In operation S22, the multiple features to be evaluated of each design drawing are evaluated one by one, and the evaluation result corresponding to each design drawing is obtained according to the evaluation results of the multiple features to be evaluated.

[0028] In operation S23, a first evaluation result corresponding to the project rendering is obtained according to the evaluation result corresponding to each design drawing.

[0029] In the disclosed embodiment, the project rendering includes multiple design drawings in the design stage. The evaluation process of the project rendering can be to input each design drawing into the evaluation model, the evaluation model extracts multiple features of each design drawing, evaluates each feature, and determines the evaluation result of each design drawing according to the evaluation results of the multiple features. And, according to the evaluation result of each design drawing, the evaluation result of the project rendering is determined, recorded as the first evaluation result, and the first evaluation result indicates whether the project rendering meets the design standard.

[0030] According to an embodiment of the present disclosure, in step S21, multiple design drawings are input into an evaluation model, and multiple features to be evaluated corresponding to each design drawing are obtained based on the evaluation model, specifically including: each design drawing is input into the evaluation model, and the evaluation model identifies the product information of each product therein from each design drawing based on image recognition technology or big data comparison and other methods.

[0031] According to an embodiment of the present disclosure, in step S22, multiple features to be evaluated of each design drawing are evaluated one by one, and an evaluation result corresponding to each design drawing is obtained based on the evaluation results of the multiple features to be evaluated, specifically including: comparing the product information of each product with the preset product recommendation information, and determining the evaluation result of each product based on the comparison result of each product, the evaluation result of each product including whether the design of the product meets the design standards; and determining the evaluation result of each design drawing based on the evaluation result of each product.

[0032] It is understandable that each design drawing is input into the evaluation model, and the evaluation model identifies the product information of each product in the design drawing from each design drawing based on image recognition. Among them, the products mentioned in the present disclosure can be various medical devices and facilities in the medical physical environment. Medical devices can be, for example, medical displays, diagnostic equipment, etc.; facilities in the medical physical environment can be office products, sofas, desks, chairs, etc., hand wash basins, lighting fixtures, appliances, etc.

[0033] In the disclosed embodiment, the product information of each product is compared with the preset product recommendation information, and the evaluation result of each product is determined by comparing the deviation value between the product information of each product and the product recommendation information. The evaluation result of each product mainly includes whether the design of the product meets the design standards. According to the evaluation result of each product, the evaluation result of each design drawing is determined.

[0034] For example, the product information of each product includes at least a product name, a product color, and a product style.

[0035] According to an embodiment of the present disclosure, the product information of each product is compared with the preset product recommendation information, and the evaluation result of each product is determined based on the comparison result of each product, including: according to the product name, finding the corresponding product and product recommendation information from the preset library, the product recommendation information including product recommended color, product recommended style and product recommended size; comparing the extracted product color, product style and product size with the product recommended color, product recommended style and product recommended size; determining the design grade of each product based on the comparison result; and determining whether the design of each product meets the design standards based on the design grade of each product.

[0036] It is understandable that the product information of each product includes at least multiple product information items such as product name, product color and product style. According to the product name, the corresponding product and the corresponding product recommendation information are found from the preset library, and the preset library stores each product and product recommendation information, including product recommended color, product recommended style and product recommended size.

[0037] Compare each product information item of the product with the corresponding product recommendation information item, for example, compare the product color, product style and product size with the product recommended color, product recommended style and product recommended size respectively. According to the comparison result of each product information item, determine the design level of each product information item, and then calculate the design level of each product according to the design level of each product information item.

[0038] According to the design level of each product, determine whether the design of each product meets the design standards.

[0039] According to an embodiment of the present disclosure, the design level of each product is determined based on the comparison results, including: respectively calculating the deviation values ​​between the product color and the product recommended color, the product style and the product recommended style, and the product size and the product recommended size to obtain multiple deviation values; and determining the design level based on the multiple deviation values.

[0040] According to an embodiment of the present disclosure, whether the design of each product meets the design standards is determined based on the design level of each product, including: if the design level of the product is greater than or equal to the preset level, the evaluation result of the product is in compliance with the design standards; otherwise, the evaluation result of the product does not meet the design standards.

[0041] It is understandable that when determining the design grade of each product, the deviation value between the product color and the product recommended color is calculated, the deviation value between the product style and the product recommended style is calculated, and the deviation value between the product size and the product recommended size is calculated.

[0042] When calculating the deviation value between the product color and the recommended product color and calculating the deviation value between the product style and the recommended product style, the color of the designed product and the recommended product color, the style of the designed product and the recommended product style can be digitized respectively. After digitization, the deviation value between the product color and the recommended product color and the deviation value between the product style and the recommended product style are calculated.

[0043] According to the size of the deviation value, the corresponding level can be determined. Specifically, the correspondence between the deviation interval and the level can be set. For example, the design level can be set as high, ultimate and low, or it can be designed as more levels. Different levels can be assigned numerical values. The closer the deviation value between the designed product information and the recommended product information, the higher the design level of the product; conversely, the farther the deviation value between the designed product information and the recommended product information, the lower the design level of the product. According to the deviation interval into which the deviation value between the product color and the recommended product color falls, the design level of the product color can be determined. Similarly, according to the interval range into which the deviation value between the product style and the recommended product style falls, the design level of the product style can be determined. For product size, if the size itself is a numerical value, the deviation value between the designed product size and the recommended product size is directly calculated, and the design level of the product size is determined according to the deviation interval into which the size deviation value falls.

[0044] Of course, the above only describes the method for determining the design level of product color, product style and product size. Product information items are not limited to color, style and size. Based on the same method, the design level of each information item of each product is determined.

[0045] According to the grades of the multiple information items of each product, the design grade of the corresponding product is calculated by weighted summation.

[0046] If the design level of the product is greater than or equal to the preset level, the evaluation result of the product meets the design standards; otherwise, the evaluation result of the product does not meet the design standards.

[0047] Among them, the evaluation result of each design drawing is determined according to the evaluation result of each product, including: if the designs of all products in the design drawing meet the design standards, the evaluation result of the design drawing is that it meets the design standards; otherwise, the design drawing does not meet the design standards, and the product information that does not meet the design standards is recorded.

[0048] It is understandable that the above steps obtain the evaluation results of each product in the design drawing. When all products in the design drawing meet the design standards, the design drawing meets the design standards. As long as one or more products do not meet the design standards, the corresponding design drawing does not meet the design standards. When the design drawing does not meet the design standards, the product information that does not meet the design standards is recorded so that the products that do not meet the design standards can be improved later.

[0049] The evaluation results of the project renderings are determined based on the evaluation results of each design drawing. If all the design drawings in the project renderings meet the design standards, it is determined that the design of the project renderings meets the design standards; otherwise, the design of the project renderings does not meet the design standards. If the design of the project renderings does not meet the design standards, the design drawings that do not meet the design standards and the product information in the design drawings that do not meet the design standards are recorded, and the evaluation of the project renderings is completed.

[0050] For evaluation of the actual construction pictures, see Figure 3 In S2, the constructed real scene picture is input into the evaluation model to obtain a second evaluation result corresponding to the constructed real scene picture, including: steps S21'~S24'.

[0051] In operation S21 ′, the constructed real scene picture is input into the evaluation model, and multiple construction parameters in the constructed real scene picture and product information of each product after construction are extracted based on image recognition.

[0052] In operation S22', each construction parameter is compared with a corresponding preset parameter threshold, and the product information of each product after construction is compared with the corresponding product recommendation information of each product.

[0053] In operation S23', the construction level of each construction parameter and the construction level of each product are obtained according to the comparison result.

[0054] In operation S24', according to the construction level of each construction parameter and the construction level of each product, the evaluation result of each construction parameter and the evaluation result of each product are determined, and the evaluation result of each construction parameter includes whether each construction parameter meets the construction process standard, and the evaluation result of each product includes whether the decoration of each product meets the construction process standard. If each construction parameter and the decoration of each product meet the construction process standard, the constructed real scene image meets the construction process standard. Otherwise, the constructed real scene image does not meet the construction process standard.

[0055] It is understandable that when evaluating the actual scene pictures of the construction, the actual scene pictures of the construction can be input into the evaluation model. The evaluation model identifies multiple construction parameters and product information of each product after construction from the actual scene pictures based on image recognition technology.

[0056] Then, each construction parameter is compared with the preset parameter threshold to obtain the comparison result of each construction parameter. And the product information of each product after construction is compared with the corresponding product recommendation information of each product to obtain the comparison result of each product information. According to the comparison result of each construction parameter, the construction level of each construction parameter is obtained, and according to the comparison result of each product, the construction level of each product is determined.

[0057] According to the construction level of each construction parameter and the construction level of each product, the evaluation result of each construction parameter and the evaluation result of each product are determined. Specifically, when the construction level of the construction parameter is greater than or equal to the set level, the construction parameter meets the construction process standard, otherwise, the construction parameter does not meet the construction process standard. Similarly, when the construction level of the product is greater than the set level, the decoration of the product meets the construction process standard, otherwise, the decoration of the product does not meet the construction process standard.

[0058] Then, if every construction parameter and every product decoration meet the construction process standards, the actual scene pictures after construction meet the construction process standards; otherwise, the actual scene pictures after construction do not meet the construction process standards.

[0059] Among them, multiple construction parameters include the verticality, neatness, equality of the construction and the product information of each product after construction. The construction level of each construction parameter and the construction level of each product are obtained according to the comparison results, including: respectively calculating the distance between the verticality, neatness and equality of the construction and the corresponding preset parameter thresholds, and determining the construction level of each construction parameter according to the distance; and calculating the deviation value between the product information of each product and the corresponding product recommendation information of each product, and determining the construction level of each product according to the deviation value.

[0060] In the disclosed embodiment, the evaluation result of each construction parameter and the evaluation result of each product are determined according to the construction grade of each construction parameter and the construction grade of each product, including: if the construction grade of the construction parameter is greater than or equal to the preset grade, the construction parameter meets the construction process standards, otherwise, the construction parameter does not meet the construction process standards; if the construction grade of the product is greater than or equal to the preset grade, the decoration of the product meets the construction process standards, otherwise, the decoration of the product does not meet the construction process standards.

[0061] It can be understood that multiple construction parameters include verticality, neatness, and equality of the construction, and the deviation values ​​between the verticality, neatness, and equality of the construction and the corresponding preset parameter thresholds are calculated respectively, and the construction grade of each construction parameter is determined according to the deviation interval in which the deviation value falls, wherein the correspondence between the deviation interval of each construction parameter from the preset parameter threshold and the construction grade is pre-set.

[0062] And calculate the deviation value between the product information of each product after construction and the product recommended information, and determine the construction level of each product according to the deviation range in which the deviation value falls. Among them, the specific determination of the construction level of each product after construction can refer to the design level of each product in the design stage.

[0063] For example, the specific evaluation process for tiles after construction is: compare the size, thickness, and texture of the tiles after actual construction with the size, thickness, and texture of the tiles in the preset library to obtain the construction grade of the tiles. Based on the construction grade of the tiles, it can be determined whether the construction of the tiles meets the construction requirements.

[0064] For example, the specific evaluation process for a carpet after construction is as follows: compare the actual carpet pile height, gram weight, and adhesive backing with the carpet pile height, gram weight, and adhesive backing in the preset library in the model to obtain the quality grade corresponding to the carpet. Based on the carpet's quality grade, project classification, overall design style, and technique, it can be determined whether the carpet's construction meets the construction requirements.

[0065] For example, the specific evaluation process for the floor glue after construction is: compare the size, pattern and color of the floor glue after actual construction with the size, pattern and color of the floor glue in the preset library in the model to obtain the construction grade corresponding to the floor glue. According to the construction grade of the floor glue, it can be judged whether the construction of the floor glue meets the construction requirements.

[0066] When the construction level of the construction parameter is greater than or equal to the set level, the construction parameter meets the construction process standard. Otherwise, the construction parameter does not meet the construction process standard.

[0067] When all the construction parameters extracted from the constructed real scene picture meet the construction process standards and the decoration of each product after construction also meets the construction parameters, the evaluation result of the constructed real scene picture meets the decoration standards, otherwise, the evaluation result of the constructed real scene picture does not meet the decoration standards. The evaluation result of the constructed real scene picture is called the second evaluation result.

[0068] Among them, in step S3, the final evaluation result corresponding to the medical department to be evaluated is obtained based on the first evaluation result and the second evaluation result, including: if the first evaluation result is in compliance with the design standards and the second evaluation result is in compliance with the construction process standards, the final evaluation result corresponding to the medical department to be evaluated is determined to be in compliance with the decoration standards; otherwise, the final evaluation result corresponding to the medical department to be evaluated is not in compliance with the decoration standards.

[0069] It is understandable that the above S2 obtains the first evaluation result of the project rendering and the second evaluation result of the constructed real scene based on the evaluation model, and determines the final evaluation result of the decoration of the hospital department to be evaluated according to the two evaluation results.

[0070] Specifically, the decoration of the hospital department to be evaluated meets the decoration standards only when the design of the project renderings meets the design standards and the construction corresponding to the actual scene drawings also meets the construction process standards.

[0071] Among them, if the final evaluation result corresponding to the medical department to be evaluated is that it does not meet the decoration standards, corresponding improvements shall be made based on the product information that does not meet the design standards in the project renderings, and / or the construction parameters that do not meet the construction process standards in the actual construction scenes and / or the product information that does not meet the construction process standards.

[0072] It is understandable that if the decoration of the hospital department to be evaluated does not meet the decoration standards, then find out where it does not meet the decoration standards, for example, whether the project renderings do not meet the design standards, or whether the actual scenes that have been constructed do not meet the construction process standards, or whether the project renderings do not meet the design standards, and the actual scenes that have been constructed do not meet the construction process standards. If the project renderings do not meet the design standards, then find out the design drawings that do not meet the design standards and which product does not meet the design standards, and improve the design of the product. Similarly, if the actual scenes that have been constructed do not meet the construction process standards, then find out the construction parameters that do not meet the construction process standards or find out the products that do not meet the construction process standards, and improve the construction parameters and products that do not meet the construction process standards.

[0073] The evaluation method further includes: matching the project renderings of the medical department to be evaluated with the reference project renderings in the history library, wherein the history library stores the correspondence between the reference project renderings and the cost quotations. If there is a reference project rendering that matches the project renderings of the medical department to be evaluated in the history library, the cost quotation corresponding to the reference project renderings is used as the cost quotation of the project renderings of the medical department to be evaluated.

[0074] It is understandable that after designing the project renderings, you can understand the cost quotation of the designed renderings. You can match the project renderings with the reference project renderings in the history library, find the reference project renderings that match the designed project renderings in the history library, and use the cost quotation of the reference project renderings as the cost quotation of the designed project renderings.

[0075] See also Figure 4 , is a structural diagram of an indoor decoration evaluation device for a medical department provided by an embodiment of the present disclosure. The device includes: a data acquisition module 401, an evaluation module 402 and an evaluation result confirmation module 403.

[0076] The data acquisition module 401 is used to obtain the project renderings and the actual construction pictures of the medical department to be evaluated.

[0077] Evaluation module 402 is used to input the project renderings into the evaluation model for evaluation to obtain a first evaluation result corresponding to the project renderings, and to input the actual scene pictures that have been constructed into the evaluation model to obtain a second evaluation result corresponding to the actual scene pictures that have been constructed, wherein the first evaluation result at least includes whether the decoration design of the medical department to be evaluated meets the design standards, and the second evaluation result at least includes whether the decoration construction of the medical department to be evaluated meets the construction process standards.

[0078] The evaluation result confirmation module 403 is used to obtain a final evaluation result corresponding to the medical department to be evaluated based on the first evaluation result and the second evaluation result, wherein the final evaluation result at least includes whether the decoration of the medical department to be evaluated meets the decoration standards.

[0079] It can be understood that the interior decoration evaluation device for medical departments provided by the present disclosure corresponds to the interior decoration evaluation method for medical departments provided by the aforementioned embodiments. The relevant technical features of the interior decoration evaluation device for medical departments can refer to the relevant technical features of the interior decoration evaluation method for medical departments, which will not be repeated here.

[0080] See also Figure 5 , Figure 5 Schematic diagram of an electronic device provided by an embodiment of the present disclosure. Figure 5 As shown, an embodiment of the present disclosure provides an electronic device 500, including a memory 510, a processor 520, and a computer program 511 stored in the memory 510 and executable on the processor 520. When the processor 520 executes the computer program 511, the steps of the interior decoration evaluation method for a medical department are implemented.

[0081] See also Figure 6 , Figure 6 Schematic diagram of an embodiment of a computer-readable storage medium provided by the present disclosure. Figure 6 As shown, this embodiment provides a computer-readable storage medium 600 on which a computer program 611 is stored. When the computer program 611 is executed by a processor, the steps of the interior decoration evaluation method for a medical department are implemented.

[0082] The interior decoration evaluation method and device for medical departments provided in the embodiments of the present disclosure respectively evaluate the project renderings and the actual scenes of the interior decoration process based on the evaluation model, and obtain the first evaluation result and the second evaluation result respectively, and jointly determine the final evaluation result corresponding to the medical department to be evaluated based on the first evaluation result and the second evaluation result with different weights.

[0083] The evaluation of the renderings of the department to be constructed and the actual construction scene is quantified. According to the evaluation results, it can be clearly known whether the construction of the department to be constructed meets the requirements, which is convenient for project management, improves evaluation efficiency and improves service quality.

[0084] It should be noted that in the above embodiments, the description of each embodiment has its own emphasis, and for parts that are not described in detail in a certain embodiment, reference can be made to the relevant descriptions of other embodiments.

[0085] Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the embodiments of the present disclosure may be provided as methods, devices, systems or computer program products. Therefore, the present disclosure may take the form of a complete hardware embodiment, a complete software embodiment, or an embodiment combining software and hardware. Moreover, the present disclosure may take the form of a computer program product implemented on one or more computer-usable storage media (including but not limited to databases, disk storage, CD-ROM, optical storage, etc.) containing computer-usable program codes.

[0086] The present disclosure is described with reference to the flowcharts and / or block diagrams of the methods, devices (systems), and computer program products according to the embodiments of the present disclosure. It should be understood that each process and / or box in the flowchart and / or block diagram, as well as the combination of the processes and / or boxes in the flowchart and / or block diagram, can be implemented by computer program instructions. These computer program instructions can be provided to a processor of a general-purpose computer, a special-purpose computer, an embedded computer, or other programmable data processing device to generate a machine, so that the instructions executed by the processor of the computer or other programmable data processing device generate instructions for implementing the processes in the flowchart and / or block diagram. Figure 1 A process or multiple processes and / or boxes Figure 1 A device that provides the functions specified in a block or multiple blocks.

[0087] These computer program instructions may also be stored in a computer-readable memory capable of directing a computer or other programmable data processing device to operate in a specific manner, so that the instructions stored in the computer-readable memory produce an article of manufacture comprising an instruction device, which implements the process Figure 1 A process or multiple processes and / or boxes Figure 1 A function specified in one or more boxes.

[0088] These computer program instructions can also be loaded onto a computer or other programmable data processing device so that a series of operating steps are executed on the computer or other programmable device to produce a computer-implemented process, thereby providing instructions for implementing the process. Figure 1 A process or multiple processes and / or boxes Figure 1 The steps for the functions specified in one or more boxes.

[0089] Although the preferred embodiments of the present disclosure have been described, those skilled in the art may make additional changes and modifications to these embodiments once they have learned the basic creative concepts. Therefore, the appended claims are intended to be interpreted as including the preferred embodiments and all changes and modifications that fall within the scope of the present disclosure.

[0090] Obviously, those skilled in the art can make various changes and modifications to the present disclosure without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure. Thus, if these modifications and variations of the present disclosure fall within the scope of the claims of the present disclosure and their equivalents, the present disclosure is also intended to include these modifications and variations.

Claims

1. A method for evaluating interior decoration of medical departments, characterized in that: include: S1, obtain the project renderings and construction scenes of the medical department to be evaluated; S2, inputting the project rendering into the evaluation model for evaluation to obtain a first evaluation result corresponding to the project rendering, and inputting the constructed real scene picture into the evaluation model to obtain a second evaluation result corresponding to the constructed real scene picture, wherein the first evaluation result at least includes whether the decoration design of the medical department to be evaluated meets the design standards, and the second evaluation result at least includes whether the decoration construction of the medical department to be evaluated meets the construction process standards; and S3. Obtaining a final evaluation result corresponding to the medical department to be evaluated based on the first evaluation result and the second evaluation result; wherein the final evaluation result at least includes whether the decoration of the medical department to be evaluated meets the decoration standards.

2. The interior decoration evaluation method according to claim 1, characterized in that: The project renderings include a plurality of design drawings; in S2, the project renderings are input into an evaluation model for evaluation to obtain a first evaluation result corresponding to the project renderings, including: Inputting a plurality of design drawings into the evaluation model, and obtaining a plurality of features to be evaluated corresponding to each design drawing based on the evaluation model; Evaluate the multiple features to be evaluated of each design drawing one by one, and obtain an evaluation result corresponding to each design drawing according to the evaluation results of the multiple features to be evaluated; and According to the evaluation results corresponding to each design drawing, a first evaluation result corresponding to the project rendering is obtained.

3. The interior decoration evaluation method according to claim 2, characterized in that: The step of inputting a plurality of design drawings into the evaluation model and obtaining a plurality of features to be evaluated corresponding to each design drawing based on the evaluation model includes: Each design drawing is input into the evaluation model, and the evaluation model identifies the product information of each product in each design drawing based on image recognition; wherein the product information of each product includes at least the product name, product color and product style.

4. The interior decoration evaluation method according to claim 3, characterized in that: The step of evaluating the multiple features to be evaluated of each design drawing one by one and obtaining the evaluation result corresponding to each design drawing according to the evaluation results of the multiple features to be evaluated includes: Compare the product information of each product with the preset product recommendation information, and determine the evaluation result of each product according to the comparison result of each product, wherein the evaluation result of each product includes whether the design of the product meets the design standard; and Based on the evaluation results of each product, determine the evaluation results of each design drawing.

5. The interior decoration evaluation method according to claim 4, characterized in that: The step of comparing the product information of each product with the existing product recommendation information and determining the evaluation result of each product according to the comparison result of each product includes: According to the product name, find the corresponding product and product recommendation information from the preset library, wherein the product recommendation information includes a product recommended color, a product recommended style, and a product recommended size; compare the product color, product style and product size to the product recommended color, product recommended style and product recommended size; Determine the design level of each product based on the comparison results; and According to the design level of each product, determine whether the design of each product meets the design standards.

6. The interior decoration evaluation method according to claim 5, characterized in that: Determining the design grade of each product according to the comparison result, and determining whether the design of each product meets the design standard according to the design grade of each product, includes: Calculate the deviation values ​​between the product color and the recommended product color, the product style and the recommended product style, and the product size and the recommended product size respectively to obtain multiple deviation values; Determine the design level of the product based on multiple deviation values; When the design level of the product is greater than or equal to the preset level, the evaluation result of the product meets the design standards; otherwise, the evaluation result of the product does not meet the design standards.

7. The interior decoration evaluation method according to claim 3, characterized in that: Determining the evaluation result of each design drawing based on the evaluation result of each product includes: If the designs of all products in the design drawings meet the design standards, the evaluation result of the design drawings is that they meet the design standards; otherwise, the design drawings do not meet the design standards, and the product information that does not meet the design standards is recorded.

8. The interior decoration evaluation method according to claim 1, characterized in that: In S2, the constructed real scene image is input into the evaluation model to obtain a second evaluation result corresponding to the constructed real scene image, including: Inputting the constructed real scene image into the evaluation model, and extracting multiple construction parameters and product information of each product after construction in the constructed real scene image based on image recognition; Comparing each construction parameter with a corresponding preset parameter threshold, and comparing the product information of each product after construction with the corresponding product recommendation information of each product; Obtaining the construction grade of each construction parameter and the construction grade of each product according to the comparison results; and According to the construction level of each construction parameter and the construction level of each product, determine the evaluation result of each construction parameter and the evaluation result of each product, wherein the evaluation result of each construction parameter includes whether each construction parameter meets the construction process standard, and the evaluation result of each product includes whether the decoration of each product meets the construction process standard; If all construction parameters and the decoration of all products meet the construction process standards, the second evaluation result corresponding to the actual scene of the construction is that it meets the construction process standards; otherwise, the second evaluation result corresponding to the actual scene of the construction is that it does not meet the construction process standards.

9. The interior decoration evaluation method according to claim 8, characterized in that: The plurality of construction parameters include verticality, neatness, equality of the construction and product information of each product after construction; the construction level of each construction parameter and the construction level of each product obtained according to the comparison result include: Calculating the distances between the verticality, neatness and equality of the construction and the corresponding preset parameter thresholds respectively, and determining the construction level of each construction parameter according to the distances; and Calculate the deviation between the product information of each product and the corresponding product recommendation information of each product, and determine the construction level of each product according to the deviation; Determining the evaluation result of each construction parameter and the evaluation result of each product according to the construction level of each construction parameter and the construction level of each product includes: If the construction level of the construction parameter is greater than or equal to the preset level, the construction parameter meets the construction process standard; otherwise, the construction parameter does not meet the construction process standard; If the construction grade of the product is greater than or equal to the preset grade, the decoration of the product meets the construction process standards; otherwise, the decoration of the product does not meet the construction process standards.

10. The interior decoration evaluation method according to claim 1, characterized in that: In S3, a final evaluation result corresponding to the medical department to be evaluated is obtained according to the first evaluation result and the second evaluation result, including: If the first evaluation result is in compliance with the design standards and the second evaluation result is in compliance with the construction process standards, the final evaluation result corresponding to the medical department to be evaluated is determined to be in compliance with the decoration standards; otherwise, the final evaluation result corresponding to the medical department to be evaluated is not in compliance with the decoration standards.

11. The interior decoration evaluation method according to claim 10, characterized in that: If the final evaluation result corresponding to the medical department to be evaluated is that it does not meet the decoration standards, the interior decoration of the hospital department to be evaluated shall be improved based on the product information that does not meet the design standards in the project renderings, the construction parameters that do not meet the construction process standards, or the product information that does not meet the construction process standards in the actual scene drawings.

12. The interior decoration evaluation method according to claim 1, characterized in that: The method further includes: Matching the project renderings of the medical department to be evaluated with the reference project renderings in the history library; wherein the history library stores the corresponding relationship between the reference project renderings and the cost quotations; When there is a reference project rendering that matches the project rendering of the medical department to be evaluated in the historical database, the cost quotation corresponding to the reference project rendering is used as the cost quotation of the project rendering of the medical department to be evaluated.

13. An indoor decoration evaluation device for a medical department, characterized in that: include: The data acquisition module is used to obtain the project renderings and the actual construction pictures of the medical departments to be evaluated; An evaluation module is used to input the project rendering into the evaluation model for evaluation to obtain a first evaluation result corresponding to the project rendering, and input the constructed real scene picture into the evaluation model to obtain a second evaluation result corresponding to the constructed real scene picture, wherein the first evaluation result at least includes whether the decoration design of the medical department to be evaluated meets the design standards, and the second evaluation result at least includes whether the decoration construction of the medical department to be evaluated meets the construction process standards; as well as The evaluation result confirmation module is used to obtain a final evaluation result corresponding to the medical department to be evaluated based on the first evaluation result and the second evaluation result, and the final evaluation result at least includes whether the decoration of the medical department to be evaluated meets the decoration standards.

Images