Method, system and device for determining test pose of wireless communication equipment, equipment, medium and product

Abstract

The invention relates to a test pose determination method, system and device of wireless communication equipment, computer equipment, a computer readable storage medium and a computer program product. The method comprises the following steps: acquiring performance test reference information of a plurality of reference direction angles of to-be-tested equipment in a target angle range; if an optimal direction angle of which the performance test reference information meets a theoretical optimal performance condition exists in the reference direction angles, obtaining a target test angle according to the optimal direction angle; if the optimal direction angle does not exist, re-determining a target angle range in a reference angle range between every two adjacent reference direction angles according to the performance test reference information of each reference direction angle, and executing the step of obtaining the performance test reference information corresponding to a plurality of reference direction angles of the to-be-tested equipment in the target angle range; and obtaining a target test pose according to the target test position and the target test angle. By adopting the method, the target test pose of the wireless communication equipment can be efficiently and accurately obtained.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present application relates to the field of mobile communication technology, and in particular to a method, system, device, computer equipment, computer-readable storage medium and computer program product for determining a test posture of a wireless communication device. Background Art

[0002] With the development of communication technology, the technology of wireless communication equipment is also being innovated synchronously, and the requirements for its performance are constantly increasing. Over-the-air (OTA) testing is a key test method to ensure the stability and reliability of wireless communication equipment in actual use scenarios. Through over-the-air testing, the signal transmission state in the wireless environment can be simulated to evaluate the comprehensive performance of the equipment. Among them, in the over-the-air test, the test posture of the wireless communication device can directly affect the accuracy of the test. However, in the over-the-air test, it is usually difficult to efficiently and accurately obtain the optimal test posture of the wireless communication device, which affects the test efficiency. Summary of the invention

[0003] Based on this, it is necessary to provide a method, system, device, computer equipment, computer-readable storage medium and computer program product for determining a test posture of a wireless communication device in response to the above-mentioned technical problems.

[0004] In a first aspect, the present application provides a method for determining a test posture of a wireless communication device, comprising:

[0005] Acquire performance test reference information corresponding to multiple reference direction angles of the device to be tested within a target angle range; the device to be tested is located at a target test position of a test environment; the target test position is a position that meets basic conditions for performance testing of the device to be tested;

[0006] If there is an optimal direction angle among the multiple reference direction angles, in which the corresponding performance test reference information satisfies the theoretical optimal performance condition, then obtaining the target test angle of the device to be tested according to the optimal direction angle;

[0007] If the optimal direction angle does not exist among the multiple reference direction angles, then based on the performance test reference information corresponding to each of the reference direction angles, the target angle range is re-determined in the reference angle range between every two adjacent reference direction angles, and the step of obtaining the performance test reference information corresponding to the multiple reference direction angles of the device to be tested within the target angle range is performed;

[0008] The target test posture of the device to be tested in the test environment is obtained according to the target test position and the target test angle.

[0009] In one of the embodiments, obtaining performance test reference information corresponding to multiple reference direction angles of the device to be tested within a target angle range includes: dividing the target angle range into equal parts to obtain the multiple reference direction angles; and obtaining the performance test reference information corresponding to each reference direction angle of the device to be tested.

[0010] In one of the embodiments, obtaining the performance test reference information corresponding to the device to be tested at each reference direction angle includes: obtaining the test signal strength corresponding to the device to be tested at each reference direction angle; and obtaining the performance test reference information based on the test signal strength.

[0011] In one of the embodiments, the target angle range is redetermined in the reference angle range between every two adjacent reference direction angles based on the performance test reference information corresponding to each of the reference direction angles, including: obtaining a performance test reference value for the reference angle range between each of the reference direction angles based on the performance test reference information corresponding to each of the reference direction angles; and redetermining the target angle range in the reference angle range between each of the reference direction angles based on the relative sizes of the performance test reference values ​​for the reference angle range between each of the reference direction angles.

[0012] In one embodiment, the performance test reference information includes a test signal strength; obtaining a performance test reference value of a reference angle range between each reference direction angle based on the performance test reference information corresponding to each two adjacent reference direction angles includes: obtaining the performance test reference value of the reference angle range between two adjacent reference direction angles based on an average value of the test signal strengths corresponding to two adjacent reference direction angles; and / or redetermining the target angle range in the reference angle range between each two adjacent reference direction angles based on the relative size of the performance test reference value of the reference angle range between each reference direction angles includes: obtaining the redetermined target angle range based on the reference angle range having the largest performance test reference value.

[0013] In one embodiment, if the optimal direction angle does not exist among the multiple reference direction angles, then the target angle range is re-determined in the reference angle range between every two adjacent reference direction angles based on the performance test reference information corresponding to each reference direction angle, after executing the step of obtaining the performance test reference information corresponding to multiple reference direction angles of the device to be tested within the target angle range, it includes: if the re-determined target angle range reaches the minimum angle range, and the optimal direction angle does not exist among the multiple reference direction angles, then the target test angle of the device to be tested is obtained based on the performance test reference information corresponding to each reference direction angle obtained each time.

[0014] In one of the embodiments, the target test angle of the device to be tested is obtained based on the performance test reference information corresponding to each reference direction angle obtained each time, including: obtaining the best direction angle among the reference direction angles that enables the device to be tested to achieve the best performance test effect based on the performance test reference information corresponding to each reference direction angle obtained each time; and obtaining the target test angle of the device to be tested based on the best direction angle.

[0015] In a second aspect, the present application also provides a testing system for a wireless communication device, comprising:

[0016] Turntable, controller; wherein,

[0017] The turntable is used to rotate the wireless communication device under the control of the controller to change the direction angle of the wireless communication device; the wireless communication device is located at a target test position in the test environment; the target test position is a position that meets the basic conditions for the performance test of the device to be tested;

[0018] The controller is used to obtain a target test posture for testing the wireless communication device according to any one of the methods for determining a test posture of a wireless communication device.

[0019] In a third aspect, the present application also provides a test posture determination device for a wireless communication device, comprising:

[0020] An information acquisition module is used to obtain performance test reference information corresponding to multiple reference direction angles of the device to be tested within a target angle range; the device to be tested is located at a target test position of a test environment; the target test position is a position that meets basic conditions for performance testing of the device to be tested;

[0021] An angle acquisition module, configured to obtain a target test angle of the device to be tested according to an optimal direction angle if there is an optimal direction angle corresponding to the performance test reference information satisfying a theoretical optimal performance condition among the multiple reference direction angles;

[0022] A range adjustment module, configured to, if the optimal direction angle does not exist among the multiple reference direction angles, redetermine the target angle range in the reference angle range between every two adjacent reference direction angles according to the performance test reference information corresponding to each of the reference direction angles, and execute the step of obtaining the performance test reference information corresponding to the multiple reference direction angles of the device to be tested within the target angle range;

[0023] A posture acquisition module is used to obtain a target test posture of the device to be tested in the test environment according to the target test position and the target test angle.

[0024] In a fourth aspect, the present application further provides a computer device, comprising a memory and a processor, wherein the memory stores a computer program, and when the processor executes the computer program, the following steps are implemented:

[0025] Acquire performance test reference information corresponding to multiple reference direction angles of the device to be tested within a target angle range; the device to be tested is located at a target test position of a test environment; the target test position is a position that meets basic conditions for performance testing of the device to be tested;

[0026] If there is an optimal direction angle among the multiple reference direction angles, in which the corresponding performance test reference information satisfies the theoretical optimal performance condition, then obtaining the target test angle of the device to be tested according to the optimal direction angle;

[0027] If the optimal direction angle does not exist among the multiple reference direction angles, then based on the performance test reference information corresponding to each of the reference direction angles, the target angle range is re-determined in the reference angle range between every two adjacent reference direction angles, and the step of obtaining the performance test reference information corresponding to the multiple reference direction angles of the device to be tested within the target angle range is performed;

[0028] The target test posture of the device to be tested in the test environment is obtained according to the target test position and the target test angle.

[0029] In a fifth aspect, the present application further provides a computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, wherein when the computer program is executed by a processor, the following steps are implemented:

[0030] Acquire performance test reference information corresponding to multiple reference direction angles of the device to be tested within a target angle range; the device to be tested is located at a target test position of a test environment; the target test position is a position that meets basic conditions for performance testing of the device to be tested;

[0031] If there is an optimal direction angle among the multiple reference direction angles, in which the corresponding performance test reference information satisfies the theoretical optimal performance condition, then obtaining the target test angle of the device to be tested according to the optimal direction angle;

[0032] If the optimal direction angle does not exist among the multiple reference direction angles, then based on the performance test reference information corresponding to each of the reference direction angles, the target angle range is re-determined in the reference angle range between every two adjacent reference direction angles, and the step of obtaining the performance test reference information corresponding to the multiple reference direction angles of the device to be tested within the target angle range is performed;

[0033] The target test posture of the device to be tested in the test environment is obtained according to the target test position and the target test angle.

[0034] In a sixth aspect, the present application further provides a computer program product, including a computer program, which implements the following steps when executed by a processor:

[0035] Acquire performance test reference information corresponding to multiple reference direction angles of the device to be tested within a target angle range; the device to be tested is located at a target test position of a test environment; the target test position is a position that meets basic conditions for performance testing of the device to be tested;

[0036] If there is an optimal direction angle among the multiple reference direction angles, in which the corresponding performance test reference information satisfies the theoretical optimal performance condition, then obtaining the target test angle of the device to be tested according to the optimal direction angle;

[0037] If the optimal direction angle does not exist among the multiple reference direction angles, then based on the performance test reference information corresponding to each of the reference direction angles, the target angle range is re-determined in the reference angle range between every two adjacent reference direction angles, and the step of obtaining the performance test reference information corresponding to the multiple reference direction angles of the device to be tested within the target angle range is performed;

[0038] The target test posture of the device to be tested in the test environment is obtained according to the target test position and the target test angle.

[0039] The test posture determination method, system, device, computer equipment, computer-readable storage medium and computer program product of the above-mentioned wireless communication device first obtains performance test reference information corresponding to multiple reference direction angles within a target angle range of the device to be tested, wherein the device to be tested is located at a target test position in a test environment, and the target test position is a position that satisfies the basic conditions for the performance test of the device to be tested. Then, if there is an optimal direction angle among the multiple reference direction angles whose corresponding performance test reference information satisfies the theoretical optimal performance conditions, the target test angle of the device to be tested is obtained according to the optimal direction angle. If there is no optimal direction angle among the multiple reference direction angles, the target angle range is re-determined in the reference angle range between every two adjacent reference direction angles according to the performance test reference information corresponding to each reference direction angle, and then the step of obtaining the performance test reference information corresponding to multiple reference direction angles of the device to be tested within the target angle range is executed. Finally, according to the target test position and the target test angle, the target test posture of the device to be tested in the test environment is obtained. This solution utilizes the continuity of the antenna pattern of the wireless communication device to first obtain the performance test reference information corresponding to multiple reference direction angles of the wireless communication device at the target test position. When there is an optimal direction angle corresponding to the theoretical optimal performance condition, the target test angle of the wireless communication device at the target test position can be directly obtained, and then the target test posture of the device can be obtained efficiently and accurately. When there is no optimal direction angle in the reference direction angle, the target angle range can be re-determined according to the performance test reference information corresponding to each reference direction angle, so that the search range of the target test angle can be quickly narrowed, so that the target test angle can be determined by re-obtaining the performance test reference information corresponding to each reference direction angle in the new target angle range without searching and testing the remaining angle ranges, and then the target test posture of the device to be tested can be obtained efficiently and accurately. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0040] In order to more clearly illustrate the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present application or related technologies, the drawings required for use in the embodiments of the present application or related technical descriptions will be briefly introduced below. Obviously, the drawings described below are only some embodiments of the present application. For ordinary technicians in this field, other related drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without paying creative work.

[0041] FIG1 is a diagram of an application environment of a method for determining a test posture of a wireless communication device in one embodiment;

[0042] FIG2 is a schematic flow chart of a method for determining a test posture of a wireless communication device in one embodiment;

[0043] FIG3 is a schematic flow chart of a method for determining a test posture of a wireless communication device in another embodiment;

[0044] FIG4 is a data uplink antenna pattern of a wireless communication device in one embodiment;

[0045] FIG5 is a data downlink antenna pattern of a wireless communication device in one embodiment;

[0046] FIG6 is a structural block diagram of a device for determining a test posture of a wireless communication device in one embodiment;

[0047] FIG7 is a schematic diagram of the structure of a testing system for a wireless communication device in one embodiment;

[0048] FIG. 8 is a diagram showing the internal structure of a computer device in one embodiment. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0049] In order to make the purpose, technical solution and advantages of the present application more clearly understood, the present application is further described in detail below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and embodiments. It should be understood that the specific embodiments described herein are only used to explain the present application and are not used to limit the present application.

[0050] The test posture determination method of the wireless communication device provided in the embodiment of the present application can be applied to the scenario of over-the-air (OTA) testing of the wireless communication device. For example, as shown in FIG1, a turntable and a controller can be provided in the air transmission test scenario, wherein the turntable can be connected to the controller and rotate the wireless communication device under the control of the controller to change the direction angle of its orientation. The controller can be a server, optionally, it can be an independent physical server, or a server cluster or distributed system composed of multiple physical servers, or a cloud server providing cloud computing services.

[0051] In an exemplary embodiment, as shown in FIG2 , a method for determining a test posture of a wireless communication device is provided, which is described by taking the method applied to the controller in FIG1 as an example, and includes the following steps:

[0052] Step S201: obtaining performance test reference information corresponding to a plurality of reference direction angles of a device to be tested within a target angle range.

[0053] Among them, the device to be tested may include but is not limited to various personal computers, laptops, smart phones, tablet computers, Internet of Things devices and portable wearable devices, etc., which may be provided with one or more antennas. The device to be tested may be set at a target test position in a test environment, and the target test position may be a position in the test environment that can meet the basic conditions for the performance test of the device to be tested. Exemplarily, the basic conditions for the performance test of the device to be tested may be that the signal strength at at least one directional angle of the device to be tested at the position reaches a preset test strength basic value. Optionally, the test strength basic value may be a preset numerical value.

[0054] Exemplarily, the test environment may be an over-the-air (OTA) darkroom, which may also be referred to as an anechoic chamber or a microwave darkroom, and is a facility specifically used for testing wireless communication equipment. The target test position may be a position in the OTA darkroom that can meet the basic conditions for the performance test of the device to be tested. Exemplarily, taking the over-the-air test scenario shown in FIG1 as an example, assuming that the target test position in the OTA darkroom is (x, y, z), the turntable may be set in the OTA darkroom to fix the device to be tested at the target test position (x, y, z). The controller may control the turntable to rotate the device to be tested to change the direction angle of its orientation.

[0055] When this step is performed for the first time, the target angle range may be the entire plane at the target test position. The controller may control the turntable to rotate the device to be tested so that it faces multiple reference direction angles, and obtain the performance test reference information corresponding to the device to be tested when facing each reference direction angle. The performance test reference information may be used to indicate the overall performance of the device to be tested in sending or receiving data.

[0056] Step S202: If there is an optimal direction angle among the multiple reference direction angles whose corresponding performance test reference information satisfies the theoretical optimal performance condition, a target test angle of the device to be tested is obtained according to the optimal direction angle.

[0057] Among them, according to the obtained performance test reference information of the device to be tested in multiple reference direction angles, it can be judged whether each reference direction angle meets the preset theoretical optimal performance condition. Exemplarily, the performance test reference information can include the test signal strength of the device to be tested, and the theoretical optimal performance condition can be the theoretical maximum value of the test signal strength of the device to be tested in the test environment. When the test signal strength corresponding to the reference direction angle reaches the theoretical maximum value, it can be considered that the performance test reference information corresponding to the reference direction angle meets the theoretical optimal performance condition.

[0058] If there is performance test reference information of a reference direction angle that satisfies the theoretical optimal performance condition, the reference direction angle can be determined as the optimal direction angle of the device to be tested at the target test position. Then, the optimal direction angle can be used as the target test angle of the device to be tested at the target test position. Then, the process can turn to step S204.

[0059] Step S203: If there is no optimal direction angle among the multiple reference direction angles, redetermine the target angle range in the reference angle range between every two adjacent reference direction angles based on the performance test reference information corresponding to each reference direction angle, and execute the step of obtaining the performance test reference information corresponding to the multiple reference direction angles of the device to be tested within the target angle range.

[0060] Among them, when the performance test reference information of the device to be tested in multiple reference direction angles obtained does not meet the theoretical optimal performance conditions, it can be determined that there is no optimal direction angle among these reference direction angles. In this case, the target angle range can be re-determined in the reference angle range between every two adjacent reference direction angles based on the performance test reference information corresponding to each reference direction angle. Exemplarily, in this step, the overall performance of every two adjacent reference direction angles can be determined based on the performance test reference information corresponding to each reference direction angle, and then the two adjacent reference direction angles with the best overall performance are selected therefrom, and the reference angle range between the two is used as the re-determined target angle range. Then step S201 can be executed again to obtain the performance test reference information corresponding to the device to be tested at multiple new reference direction angles within the newly determined target angle range.

[0061] Among them, when there is an optimal direction angle among the multiple reference direction angles within the re-determined target angle range, the target test direction angle of the device to be tested can be obtained according to the optimal direction angle. When there is no optimal direction angle among the multiple reference direction angles within the re-determined target angle range, steps S203 and S201 can be repeated until the optimal direction angle is obtained. Optionally, in some embodiments, a minimum angle range that needs to be met can be set for the target angle range. When the re-determined target angle range has reached the minimum angle range, the repetition can be stopped, and according to the performance test reference information corresponding to the multiple reference direction angles obtained each time, the reference direction angle that can enable the device to be tested to achieve the best performance is selected as the target test angle.

[0062] Step S204, obtaining the target test posture of the device to be tested in the test environment according to the target test position and the target test angle.

[0063] Among them, according to the target test position and target test angle of the device to be tested, the target test posture of the device to be tested in the test environment can be obtained. For example, taking the aforementioned test scenario in the OTA darkroom as an example, assuming that the target test position is (x, y, z) and the target test angle is θ, the target test posture of the device to be tested in the test environment (i.e., the OTA darkroom) can be expressed as (x, y, z, θ).

[0064] The method for determining the test posture of the wireless communication device described above utilizes the continuity of the antenna pattern of the wireless communication device, and first obtains the performance test reference information corresponding to multiple reference direction angles of the wireless communication device at the target test position. When there is an optimal direction angle corresponding to the theoretical optimal performance condition, the target test angle of the wireless communication device at the target test position can be directly obtained, and then the target test posture of the device can be obtained efficiently and accurately. When there is no optimal direction angle in the reference direction angle, the target angle range can be re-determined according to the performance test reference information corresponding to each reference direction angle, so that the search range of the target test angle can be quickly narrowed, so that the target test angle can be determined by re-obtaining the performance test reference information corresponding to each reference direction angle in the new target angle range without searching and testing the remaining angle ranges, and then the target test posture of the device to be tested can be obtained efficiently and accurately.

[0065] In an exemplary embodiment, obtaining performance test reference information corresponding to multiple reference direction angles of the device to be tested within a target angle range may include: dividing the target angle range equally to obtain multiple reference direction angles; and obtaining performance test reference information corresponding to each reference direction angle of the device to be tested.

[0066] Specifically, when obtaining the performance test reference information corresponding to multiple reference direction angles of the device to be tested within the target angle range, the target angle range may be equally divided according to a preset number of divisions to obtain multiple reference direction angles. For example, assuming that the number of divisions is N, the target angle range may be equally divided into N equal parts to obtain N reference direction angles θ1, θ2, θ3, ..., θ N , and then the performance test reference information corresponding to the device to be tested at each reference direction angle can be obtained respectively.

[0067] In this embodiment, by equally dividing the target angle range to obtain multiple reference direction angles, the reference direction angles can be uniformly selected, thereby achieving search uniformity, which is beneficial for determining the target test angle of the terminal to be tested with as few iterations as possible, thereby improving overall efficiency.

[0068] In an exemplary embodiment, obtaining performance test reference information corresponding to the device under test at each reference direction angle may include: obtaining the test signal strength corresponding to the device under test at each reference direction angle; and obtaining the performance test reference information according to the test signal strength.

[0069] Specifically, when obtaining the performance test reference information corresponding to each reference direction angle of the device under test, the test signal strength corresponding to each reference direction angle of the device under test can be measured respectively, and then the performance test reference information corresponding to the device under test at the corresponding reference direction angle is obtained according to the test signal strength. Optionally, the test signal strength of the device under test may include a first test signal strength for sending data and a second test signal strength for receiving data.

[0070] Exemplarily, in some embodiments, the test signal strength of the device to be tested at the reference direction angle can be directly used as its corresponding performance test reference information, that is, the performance test reference information corresponding to the reference direction angle can include the first test signal strength and the second test signal strength of the device to be tested at the direction angle. Exemplarily, in some embodiments, the first test signal strength and the second test signal strength of the device to be tested can be combined to calculate the comprehensive test signal strength of the device to be tested at the reference direction angle, and use it as the performance test reference information corresponding to the reference direction angle. Exemplarily, in other embodiments, the performance of the device to be tested can also be graded according to the test signal strength of the device to be tested at the reference direction angle, and the test signal strength and the corresponding grading result can be used as the performance test reference information corresponding to the reference direction angle.

[0071] In this embodiment, by obtaining the test signal strength corresponding to each reference direction angle of the device to be tested, and obtaining the performance test reference information corresponding to each reference direction angle based on the test signal strength, the performance test reference information corresponding to each reference direction angle can be obtained through quantifiable performance indicators, which is conducive to obtaining more accurate and objective results.

[0072] In an exemplary embodiment, based on the performance test reference information corresponding to each reference direction angle, redetermining the target angle range in the reference angle range between every two adjacent reference direction angles may include: obtaining a performance test reference value for the reference angle range between each reference direction angle based on the performance test reference information corresponding to each two adjacent reference direction angles; and redetermining the target angle range in the reference angle range between each two adjacent reference direction angles based on the relative sizes of the performance test reference values ​​for the reference angle range between each reference direction angles.

[0073] Specifically, the multiple reference direction angles in the target angle range may divide the target angle range into multiple reference angle ranges, each reference angle range corresponding to an angle range between two adjacent reference direction angles.

[0074] Wherein, when the target angle range needs to be re-set, the performance test reference value of the reference angle range between the two adjacent reference direction angles can be determined first according to the performance test reference information corresponding to each two adjacent reference direction angles. Exemplarily, the size of the performance test reference value of the reference angle range can depend on the performance level of the terminal to be tested corresponding to its two adjacent reference direction angles. The higher the performance test reference value, the higher the performance of the terminal to be tested at the corresponding two adjacent reference direction angles.

[0075] Then, the performance test reference values ​​of each reference angle range can be compared with each other, and a new target angle range can be determined therefrom. For example, the reference angle ranges can be sorted from large to small according to the performance test reference values, and the first reference angle range can be used as the target angle range, or the first few reference angle ranges can be used as the target angle range.

[0076] In this embodiment, by calculating the performance test reference value of the reference angle range between every two adjacent reference direction angles based on the performance test reference information, the overall performance of the device to be tested within the reference angle range can be quantified, and then based on the relative sizes of the performance test reference values ​​of each reference angle range, the reference angle range that can improve the performance of the device to be tested can be efficiently selected as the target angle range, which is beneficial to improving the overall target test angle search efficiency.

[0077] In an exemplary embodiment, the performance test reference information includes a test signal strength; obtaining a performance test reference value of a reference angle range between each reference direction angle based on the performance test reference information corresponding to each two adjacent reference direction angles may include: obtaining a performance test reference value of a reference angle range between two adjacent reference direction angles based on an average value of the test signal strengths corresponding to two adjacent reference direction angles; and / or, redetermining a target angle range in a reference angle range between each two adjacent reference direction angles based on a relative size of the performance test reference value of the reference angle range between each reference direction angles, may include: obtaining a redetermined target angle range based on a reference angle range having a maximum performance test reference value.

[0078] Specifically, the performance test reference information corresponding to the reference direction angle may include the test signal strength of the device to be tested at the reference direction angle. When determining the performance test reference value of the reference angle range between two adjacent reference direction angles, the performance test reference value of the corresponding reference angle range can be obtained by calculating the average value of the test signal strengths corresponding to the two reference direction angles. Exemplarily, assuming that the test signal strengths corresponding to the reference direction angles θ1 and θ2 are P(1) and P(2), respectively, the performance test reference value corresponding to the reference angle range i1 between θ1 and θ2 can be expressed as: [P(1)+P(2)] / 2.

[0079] Among them, after obtaining the performance test reference value corresponding to each reference angle range, the reference angle range with the largest performance test reference value can be selected therefrom and used as the re-determined target angle range. Exemplarily, the reference angle ranges can be sorted in order from large to small according to the performance test reference values, and the reference angle range ranked first can be used as the target angle range. Among them, it can be understood that when the performance test reference values ​​of multiple reference angle ranges are all maximum values ​​at the same time, these reference angle ranges can be used as new target angle ranges respectively.

[0080] In this embodiment, by calculating the performance test reference value of the reference angle range between two adjacent reference direction angles based on the average value of the test signal strength, it is possible to obtain a performance test reference value that can objectively reflect the overall performance of the device to be tested within the reference angle range, thereby facilitating the improvement of the accuracy of the subsequent reselection of the target angle range, and then improving the accuracy of the target test angle finally obtained. By obtaining the re-determined target angle range based on the reference angle range with the maximum performance test reference value, the search range of the target test angle can be minimized, which is conducive to improving the search efficiency.

[0081] In an exemplary embodiment, if there is no optimal direction angle among multiple reference direction angles, then the target angle range is re-determined in the reference angle range between every two adjacent reference direction angles based on the performance test reference information corresponding to each reference direction angle, and after executing the step of obtaining the performance test reference information corresponding to multiple reference direction angles of the device to be tested within the target angle range, it can include: if the re-determined target angle range reaches the minimum angle range, and there is no optimal direction angle among the multiple reference direction angles, then the target test angle of the device to be tested is obtained based on the performance test reference information corresponding to each reference direction angle obtained each time.

[0082] Specifically, after the target angle range is re-determined and the performance test reference information corresponding to multiple reference direction angles in the new target angle range is obtained, it can be determined whether the optimal direction angle is included therein based on the performance test reference information corresponding to these reference direction angles. When the optimal direction angle does not exist among the multiple reference direction angles in the re-determined target angle range, steps S203 and S201 can be repeated until the optimal direction angle is obtained or the newly determined target angle range reaches a preset minimum angle range. Optionally, the minimum angle range can be determined based on the minimum angle of rotation of the turntable, for example, its value can be greater than or equal to the minimum angle of rotation of the turntable.

[0083] Among them, when the re-determined target angle range reaches the minimum angle range and there is no optimal direction angle among the multiple reference direction angles, the performance test reference information corresponding to the reference direction angles corresponding to different target angle ranges obtained previously can be comprehensively analyzed to obtain the target test angle of the device to be tested at the target test position.

[0084] Among them, in an exemplary embodiment, obtaining the target test angle of the device to be tested based on the performance test reference information corresponding to each reference direction angle obtained each time may include: obtaining the best direction angle among the reference direction angles that enables the device to be tested to achieve the best performance test effect based on the performance test reference information corresponding to each reference direction angle obtained each time; and obtaining the target test angle of the device to be tested based on the best direction angle.

[0085] Specifically, when the re-determined target angle range reaches the minimum angle range, and there is no optimal direction angle among the multiple reference direction angles, the performance test effect corresponding to each device to be tested at each reference direction angle can be determined based on the performance test reference information corresponding to each reference direction angle obtained each time, and the reference direction angle among these reference direction angles that can enable the device to be tested to achieve the best performance test effect is used as the optimal direction angle. Then, the target test angle of the device to be tested at the target test position can be obtained based on the optimal direction angle, for example, the optimal direction angle can be directly used as the target test angle.

[0086] For example, taking the performance test reference information corresponding to the reference direction angle including the test signal strength value of the device to be tested at the reference direction angle as an example, the reference direction angle with the largest corresponding test signal strength value can be taken as the optimal direction angle, and the optimal direction angle can be taken as the target test angle of the device to be tested at the target test position.

[0087] In this embodiment, by setting the minimum angle range, when the re-determined target angle range has reached the minimum angle range and the optimal direction angle has not appeared in the previous iterations, the target test angle of the device to be tested is determined based on the performance test reference information of each reference direction angle that has been obtained, which can effectively speed up the convergence speed of finding the target test angle and improve the efficiency of obtaining the target test angle.

[0088] In order to further illustrate the test posture determination method of the wireless communication device of the present application, the following is a detailed description of the method through an embodiment:

[0089] Exemplarily, the test posture determination method of the wireless communication device in this embodiment can be applied to the application environment shown in Figure 1. As shown in Figure 3, the method may include the following steps:

[0090] Step S301: According to the basic conditions for performance testing, the terminal to be tested is set at a target test position, wherein the target test position may be a position in the test environment that can meet the basic conditions for performance testing of the device to be tested.

[0091] Step S302: divide the target angle range of the target test position into equal parts to obtain a plurality of reference direction angles, and obtain performance test reference information corresponding to the device to be tested at each reference direction angle.

[0092] For example, in this step, the target angle range may be divided into N equal parts according to a preset number of divisions N, to obtain N reference direction angles θ1, θ2, θ3, ..., θ N Then, the terminal performance of the device to be tested at each reference direction angle can be checked respectively to obtain performance values ​​P(1), P(2), P(3), ..., P(N). Then, the performance test reference information corresponding to each reference direction angle can be obtained according to the performance value corresponding to each reference direction angle.

[0093] Step S303: If there is an optimal direction angle among the multiple reference direction angles whose corresponding performance test reference information satisfies the theoretical optimal performance condition, a target test angle of the device to be tested is obtained according to the optimal direction angle.

[0094] For example, for reference direction angles θ1, θ2, θ3, ..., θ N , if there is a reference direction angle θ i When the corresponding performance value P(i) reaches the theoretical maximum performance, the reference direction angle θ can be considered i The corresponding performance test reference information meets the theoretical optimal performance conditions, and then θ can be determined i is the optimal direction angle. In this case, the optimal direction angle θ can be i As the target test angle of the device under test.

[0095] Step S304: If there is no optimal direction angle among the multiple reference direction angles, redetermine the target angle range in the reference angle range between every two adjacent reference direction angles based on the performance test reference information corresponding to each reference direction angle, and execute the step of obtaining the performance test reference information corresponding to the multiple reference direction angles of the device to be tested within the target angle range.

[0096] For example, for reference direction angles θ1, θ2, θ3, ..., θ N , when there is no optimal direction angle, the performance test reference value of the reference angle range between the reference direction angles can be obtained according to the performance test reference information corresponding to each reference direction angle. For example, for the reference angle range between the reference direction angles θ1 and θ2, the performance test reference value can be expressed as [P(1)+P(2)] / 2, for the reference angle range between the reference direction angles θ2 and θ3, the performance test reference value can be expressed as [P(2)+P(3)] / 2, ..., for the reference direction angles θ N The reference angle range between θ1 and θ2, the performance test reference value of which can be expressed as [P(N)+P(1)] / 2. Then, the reference angle range with the largest performance test reference value can be selected as the new target angle range, and the operation of step S301 is performed again.

[0097] Among them, when there are multiple performance test reference values ​​corresponding to the reference angle range, such as multiple [P(i1)+P(i 1+1 )] / 2, [P(i2)+P(i 2+1 )] / 2,…, [P(i M )+P(i M+1 )] / 2 is the highest, then the corresponding reference angle ranges i1, i2, i3, ..., i M As new target angle ranges, the operation of step S301 is performed for each new target angle range. j Perform N equal divisions to obtain new N reference direction angles θ'1, θ'2, θ'3, ..., θ' N-1 , and then obtain the corresponding performance values ​​P'(1), P'(2), P'(3), ..., P'(N-1).

[0098] Then, the iteration can be repeated until the optimal direction angle is obtained, or the target angle range obtained by segmentation reaches the minimum angle range.

[0099] Step S305: If the re-determined target angle range reaches the minimum angle range and there is no optimal direction angle among the multiple reference direction angles, the target test angle of the device to be tested is obtained according to the performance test reference information corresponding to each reference direction angle obtained each time.

[0100] Exemplarily, when the optimal direction angle is not obtained in each iteration and the newly determined target angle range has reached the minimum angle range, the performance test reference information corresponding to the reference direction angle obtained in previous iterations, such as performance values ​​P(1), ..., P(N), P'(1), ..., P'(N-1), ..., etc., can be selected from the maximum value and the corresponding reference direction angle can be used as the target test angle.

[0101] Step S306, obtaining the target test posture of the device to be tested in the test environment according to the target test position and the target test angle.

[0102] Exemplarily, the method in this embodiment is described below by taking the uplink and downlink target test posture of a wireless communication device as an example.

[0103] Among them, the wireless communication device can be a dual-card terminal, and its data uplink antenna pattern is shown in Figure 4, and its data downlink antenna pattern is shown in Figure 5. Among them, the corresponding target test posture can be determined for the data uplink transmission and data downlink transmission of the wireless communication device. Exemplarily, in this embodiment, the basic condition for the performance test of the wireless communication device can be pre-set to test that the signal strength meets the medium-high signal strength (RSRP=-70dBm), and the number of divisions of the target angle range is set to N=4, and the minimum angle range of the target angle range is set to 15°.

[0104] The process of determining the target test posture for uplink data transmission may include:

[0105] Step 1: Fix the wireless communication device at the target test position (x, y, z) in the OTA dark box so that the received RSRP on the wireless communication device is -70dBm.

[0106] Step 2: Take the entire plane of the target test position (x, y, z) as the target angle range, divide it into 4 equal parts on average, and obtain 4 reference direction angles θ1 (corresponding to 0°), θ2 (corresponding to 90°), θ3 (corresponding to 180°), and θ4 (corresponding to 270°). Check the terminal performance of these reference direction angles and obtain the corresponding performance test reference information P(1), P(2), P(3), and P(4).

[0107] Step 3: Combined with Figure 4, it can be obtained that the performance value P(3) corresponding to the reference direction angle θ3 is the theoretical maximum performance, that is, the reference direction angle θ3 is the optimal direction angle that meets the theoretical optimal performance conditions. The reference direction angle θ3 can be used as the target test angle of the device to be tested and the search is stopped. Then, combined with the target test angle and the target test position, the target test posture of the wireless communication device for data uplink and downlink transmission testing can be obtained.

[0108] Here, assuming that the time for testing the performance of the device to be tested each time is T, the above process takes 4T.

[0109] The process of determining the target test posture for downlink data transmission may include:

[0110] Step 1: Fix the wireless communication device at the target test position (x, y, z) in the OTA dark box so that the received RSRP on the wireless communication device is -70dBm.

[0111] Step 2: Take the entire plane of the target test position (x, y, z) as the target angle range, divide it into 4 equal parts on average, and obtain 4 reference direction angles θ1 (corresponding to 0°), θ2 (corresponding to 90°), θ3 (corresponding to 180°), and θ4 (corresponding to 270°). Check the terminal performance of these reference direction angles and obtain the corresponding performance test reference information P(1), P(2), P(3), and P(4).

[0112] Step 3: Since there is no optimal direction angle among the four reference direction angles, the maximum value [P(3)+P(4)] / 2 can be selected from [P(1)+P(2)] / 2, [P(2)+P(3)] / 2, [P(3)+P(4)] / 2, [P(4)+P(1)] / 2, and the reference angle range i3 between the reference direction angles θ3 and θ4 can be determined as the new target angle range.

[0113] Step 4: Divide the target angle range i3 into four equal parts and combine it with the minimum angle range to obtain three new reference direction angles θ'1 (corresponding to 210°), θ'2 (corresponding to 225°), and θ'3 (corresponding to 255°). Check the terminal performance of these reference direction angles and obtain the corresponding performance test reference information P'(1), P'(2), and P'(3).

[0114] Step 5: Since the angle range obtained by dividing the reference angle range between the reference direction angles θ3 and θ'1, the reference angle range between θ'1 and θ'2, the reference angle range between θ'2 and θ'3, and the reference angle range between θ'3 and θ4 again will be smaller than the minimum angle range, the iteration can be stopped, and the maximum value is selected from the performance values ​​P(1), P(2), P(3), P(4), P'(1), P'(2), and P'(3) corresponding to the reference direction angles obtained previously, and the corresponding reference direction angle is used as the target test angle. Among them, P'(3) is the maximum value, that is, the reference direction angle θ'3 (corresponding to 255°) is the target test angle. Then, combined with the target test angle and the target test position, the target test posture of the wireless communication device for data downlink transmission test can be obtained.

[0115] Here, assuming that the time for testing the performance of the device to be tested each time is T, the above process takes 7T.

[0116] In contrast, in the traditional test posture determination method, after determining the target test position, it is necessary to test the performance of the terminal facing each different direction angle on the plane according to the minimum angle range. Taking the minimum angle range as 15° and the time for each performance test of the device to be tested as T as an example, the time taken to determine the uplink and downlink target test direction angles in the traditional method is 24T respectively.

[0117] In this embodiment, a method for automatically finding the optimal test posture of a wireless communication device in an OTA dark box based on a bidirectional two-insertion method is proposed. The method uses the continuous characteristics of the antenna performance pattern to first fix the target test position, and then quickly locate the target test angle of the wireless communication device by rotation. Compared with the traditional method based on the O(N) search time complexity, that is, the search method based on one turn of the turntable, the method in this embodiment uses the universal continuity of antenna design, corresponding to the continuity of the antenna pattern, to search for the target test angle, and its corresponding time complexity is O(logN), which can greatly shorten the time used to find the target test posture and improve the accuracy.

[0118] It should be understood that, although the various steps in the flowcharts involved in the above-mentioned embodiments are displayed in sequence according to the indication of the arrows, these steps are not necessarily executed in sequence according to the order indicated by the arrows. Unless there is a clear explanation in this article, the execution of these steps does not have a strict order restriction, and these steps can be executed in other orders. Moreover, at least a part of the steps in the flowcharts involved in the above-mentioned embodiments can include multiple steps or multiple stages, and these steps or stages are not necessarily executed at the same time, but can be executed at different times, and the execution order of these steps or stages is not necessarily to be carried out in sequence, but can be executed in turn or alternately with other steps or at least a part of the steps or stages in other steps.

[0119] Based on the same inventive concept, the embodiment of the present application also provides a test posture determination device for a wireless communication device for implementing the test posture determination method for the wireless communication device involved above. The implementation scheme for solving the problem provided by the device is similar to the implementation scheme recorded in the above method, so the specific limitations in the embodiments of the test posture determination device for one or more wireless communication devices provided below can refer to the limitations of the test posture determination method for the wireless communication device above, and will not be repeated here.

[0120] In an exemplary embodiment, as shown in FIG6 , a test posture determination apparatus 600 for a wireless communication device is provided, comprising:

[0121] The information acquisition module 601 is used to obtain performance test reference information corresponding to multiple reference direction angles of the device to be tested within a target angle range; the device to be tested is located at a target test position of a test environment; the target test position is a position that meets the basic conditions for the performance test of the device to be tested;

[0122] Angle acquisition module 602, used for obtaining the target test angle of the device to be tested according to the optimal direction angle if there is an optimal direction angle corresponding to the performance test reference information that meets the theoretical optimal performance condition among the multiple reference direction angles;

[0123] The range adjustment module 603 is used to redetermine the target angle range in the reference angle range between every two adjacent reference direction angles according to the performance test reference information corresponding to each reference direction angle if the optimal direction angle does not exist in the multiple reference direction angles, and execute the step of obtaining the performance test reference information corresponding to the multiple reference direction angles of the device to be tested within the target angle range;

[0124] The posture acquisition module 604 is used to obtain the target test posture of the device to be tested in the test environment according to the target test position and the target test angle.

[0125] In an exemplary embodiment, the information acquisition module 601 is further used to: divide the target angle range into equal parts to obtain the multiple reference direction angles; and obtain the performance test reference information corresponding to the device to be tested at each reference direction angle.

[0126] In an exemplary embodiment, the information acquisition module 601 is further used to: obtain the test signal strength corresponding to each reference direction angle of the device to be tested; and obtain the performance test reference information according to the test signal strength.

[0127] In an exemplary embodiment, the range adjustment module 603 is also used to: obtain a performance test reference value of the reference angle range between each reference direction angle based on the performance test reference information corresponding to each two adjacent reference direction angles; and redefine the target angle range in the reference angle range between each two adjacent reference direction angles based on the relative size of the performance test reference value of the reference angle range between each reference direction angle.

[0128] In an exemplary embodiment, the performance test reference information includes a test signal strength; the range adjustment module 603 is further used to: obtain the performance test reference value of the reference angle range between two adjacent reference direction angles based on an average value of the test signal strengths corresponding to two adjacent reference direction angles; and / or, the range adjustment module 603 is further used to: obtain the re-determined target angle range based on the reference angle range having the largest performance test reference value.

[0129] In an exemplary embodiment, the device also includes: a second angle acquisition module, which is used to obtain the target test angle of the device to be tested based on the performance test reference information corresponding to each of the reference direction angles acquired each time, if the re-determined target angle range reaches the minimum angle range and the optimal direction angle does not exist among the multiple reference direction angles.

[0130] In an exemplary embodiment, the second angle acquisition module is also used to: obtain the best direction angle among the reference direction angles that enables the device to be tested to achieve the best performance test effect based on the performance test reference information corresponding to each reference direction angle obtained each time; and obtain the target test angle of the device to be tested based on the best direction angle.

[0131] Each module in the test posture determination device of the wireless communication device can be implemented in whole or in part by software, hardware and a combination thereof. Each module can be embedded in or independent of a processor in a computer device in the form of hardware, or can be stored in a memory in a computer device in the form of software, so that the processor can call and execute operations corresponding to each module.

[0132] Based on the same inventive concept, the embodiment of the present application also provides a test posture determination system for a wireless communication device for implementing the test posture determination method for the wireless communication device involved above. The implementation scheme for solving the problem provided by the system is similar to the implementation scheme recorded in the above method, so the specific limitations in the embodiment of the test posture determination system for one or more wireless communication devices provided below can refer to the limitations of the test posture determination method for the wireless communication device above, and will not be repeated here.

[0133] In an exemplary embodiment, as shown in FIG7 , a test system for a wireless communication device is provided, including: a turntable and a controller.

[0134] The turntable is used to rotate the wireless communication device under the control of the controller to change the direction angle of the wireless communication device; the wireless communication device is located at a target test position in the test environment; the target test position is a position that meets the basic conditions for the performance test of the device to be tested;

[0135] The controller is used to implement the steps in the above method embodiments.

[0136] In an exemplary embodiment, a computer device is provided, which may be a server, and its internal structure diagram may be shown in FIG8. The computer device includes a processor, a memory, an input / output interface (Input / Output, referred to as I / O) and a communication interface. The processor, the memory and the input / output interface are connected via a system bus, and the communication interface is connected to the system bus via the input / output interface. The processor of the computer device is used to provide computing and control capabilities. The memory of the computer device includes a non-volatile storage medium and an internal memory. The non-volatile storage medium stores an operating system, a computer program and a database. The internal memory provides an environment for the operation of the operating system and the computer program in the non-volatile storage medium. The database of the computer device is used to store data such as performance test reference information. The input / output interface of the computer device is used to exchange information between the processor and an external device. The communication interface of the computer device is used to communicate with an external terminal through a network connection. When the computer program is executed by the processor, a test posture determination method for a wireless communication device is implemented.

[0137] Those skilled in the art will understand that the structure shown in FIG. 8 is merely a block diagram of a partial structure related to the solution of the present application, and does not constitute a limitation on the computer device to which the solution of the present application is applied. The specific computer device may include more or fewer components than shown in the figure, or combine certain components, or have a different arrangement of components.

[0138] In one embodiment, a computer device is further provided, including a memory and a processor, wherein a computer program is stored in the memory, and the processor implements the steps in the above method embodiments when executing the computer program.

[0139] In one embodiment, a computer-readable storage medium is provided, on which a computer program is stored. When the computer program is executed by a processor, the steps in the above-mentioned method embodiments are implemented.

[0140] In one embodiment, a computer program product is provided, including a computer program, which implements the steps in the above method embodiments when executed by a processor.

[0141] It should be noted that the user information (including but not limited to user device information, user personal information, etc.) and data (including but not limited to data used for analysis, stored data, displayed data, etc.) involved in this application are all information and data authorized by the user or fully authorized by all parties, and the collection, use and processing of relevant data must comply with relevant regulations.

[0142] A person of ordinary skill in the art can understand that all or part of the processes in the above-mentioned embodiment method can be completed by instructing the relevant hardware through a computer program, and the computer program can be stored in a non-volatile computer-readable storage medium. When the computer program is executed, it can include the processes of the embodiments of the above-mentioned methods. Among them, any reference to the memory, database or other medium used in the embodiments provided in the present application can include at least one of non-volatile memory and volatile memory. Non-volatile memory can include read-only memory (ROM), magnetic tape, floppy disk, flash memory, optical memory, high-density embedded non-volatile memory, resistive random access memory (ReRAM), magnetic random access memory (MRAM), ferroelectric random access memory (FRAM), phase change memory (PCM), graphene memory, etc. Volatile memory can include random access memory (RAM) or external cache memory, etc. As an illustration and not limitation, RAM can be in various forms, such as static random access memory (SRAM) or dynamic random access memory (DRAM). The database involved in each embodiment provided in this application may include at least one of a relational database and a non-relational database. Non-relational databases may include distributed databases based on blockchains, etc., but are not limited to this. The processor involved in each embodiment provided in this application may be a general-purpose processor, a central processing unit, a graphics processor, a digital signal processor, a programmable logic device, a data processing logic device based on quantum computing, an artificial intelligence (AI) processor, etc., but are not limited to this.

[0143] The technical features of the above embodiments may be combined arbitrarily. To make the description concise, not all possible combinations of the technical features in the above embodiments are described. However, as long as there is no contradiction in the combination of these technical features, they should be considered to be within the scope of this application.

[0144] The above-described embodiments only express several implementation methods of the present application, and the descriptions thereof are relatively specific and detailed, but they cannot be construed as limiting the scope of the present application. It should be noted that, for a person of ordinary skill in the art, several modifications and improvements can be made without departing from the concept of the present application, and these all belong to the protection scope of the present application. Therefore, the protection scope of the present application shall be subject to the attached claims.

Claims

1. A method for determining a test posture of a wireless communication device, characterized in that: The method comprises: Acquire performance test reference information corresponding to multiple reference direction angles of the device to be tested within a target angle range; the device to be tested is located at a target test position of a test environment; the target test position is a position that meets basic conditions for performance testing of the device to be tested; If there is an optimal direction angle among the multiple reference direction angles, in which the corresponding performance test reference information satisfies the theoretical optimal performance condition, then obtaining the target test angle of the device to be tested according to the optimal direction angle; If the optimal direction angle does not exist among the multiple reference direction angles, then based on the performance test reference information corresponding to each of the reference direction angles, the target angle range is re-determined in the reference angle range between every two adjacent reference direction angles, and the step of obtaining the performance test reference information corresponding to the multiple reference direction angles of the device to be tested within the target angle range is performed; The target test posture of the device to be tested in the test environment is obtained according to the target test position and the target test angle.

2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that The obtaining of performance test reference information corresponding to a plurality of reference direction angles of the device to be tested within a target angle range includes: Divide the target angle range into equal parts to obtain the multiple reference direction angles; The performance test reference information corresponding to each reference direction angle of the device to be tested is obtained.

3. The method according to claim 2, characterized in that The obtaining the performance test reference information corresponding to each reference direction angle of the device to be tested includes: Obtaining the test signal strength corresponding to each reference direction angle of the device to be tested; The performance test reference information is obtained according to the test signal strength.

4. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that: The step of re-determining the target angle range in a reference angle range between every two adjacent reference direction angles according to the performance test reference information corresponding to each reference direction angle comprises: Obtaining a performance test reference value of a reference angle range between the reference direction angles according to the performance test reference information corresponding to every two adjacent reference direction angles; The target angle range is re-determined in the reference angle range between every two adjacent reference direction angles according to the relative sizes of the performance test reference values ​​of the reference angle range between the reference direction angles.

5. The method according to claim 4, characterized in that The performance test reference information includes a test signal strength; and obtaining a performance test reference value of a reference angle range between the reference direction angles according to the performance test reference information corresponding to every two adjacent reference direction angles includes: Obtaining the performance test reference value of the reference angle range between two adjacent reference direction angles according to the average value of the test signal strengths corresponding to two adjacent reference direction angles; and / or, The step of re-determining the target angle range in the reference angle range between every two adjacent reference direction angles according to the relative size of the performance test reference value of the reference angle range between the reference direction angles comprises: The target angle range is re-determined based on the reference angle range having the largest performance test reference value.

6. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 5, characterized in that: If the optimal direction angle does not exist in the multiple reference direction angles, then according to the performance test reference information corresponding to each of the reference direction angles, the target angle range is re-determined in the reference angle range between every two adjacent reference direction angles, and after executing the step of obtaining the performance test reference information corresponding to the multiple reference direction angles of the device to be tested within the target angle range, the method includes: If the re-determined target angle range reaches the minimum angle range and the optimal direction angle does not exist in the multiple reference direction angles, the target test angle of the device to be tested is obtained based on the performance test reference information corresponding to each reference direction angle obtained each time.

7. The method according to claim 6, characterized in that The step of obtaining the target test angle of the device to be tested according to the performance test reference information corresponding to each reference direction angle obtained each time includes: According to the performance test reference information corresponding to each of the reference direction angles obtained each time, obtaining the best direction angle among the reference direction angles for achieving the best performance test effect for the device to be tested; The target test angle of the device to be tested is obtained according to the optimal direction angle.

8. A testing system for wireless communication equipment, characterized in that: The system comprises: a turntable and a controller; wherein, The turntable is used to rotate the wireless communication device under the control of the controller to change the direction angle of the wireless communication device; the wireless communication device is located at a target test position in the test environment; the target test position is a position that meets the basic conditions for the performance test of the device to be tested; The controller is used to obtain a target test posture for testing the wireless communication device according to the method according to any one of claims 1 to 7.

9. A device for determining a test posture of a wireless communication device, characterized in that: The device comprises: An information acquisition module is used to obtain performance test reference information corresponding to multiple reference direction angles of the device to be tested within a target angle range; the device to be tested is located at a target test position of a test environment; the target test position is a position that meets basic conditions for performance testing of the device to be tested; An angle acquisition module, configured to obtain a target test angle of the device to be tested according to an optimal direction angle if there is an optimal direction angle corresponding to the performance test reference information satisfying a theoretical optimal performance condition among the multiple reference direction angles; A range adjustment module, configured to, if the optimal direction angle does not exist among the multiple reference direction angles, redetermine the target angle range in the reference angle range between every two adjacent reference direction angles according to the performance test reference information corresponding to each reference direction angle, and execute the step of obtaining the performance test reference information corresponding to the multiple reference direction angles of the device to be tested within the target angle range; A posture acquisition module is used to obtain a target test posture of the device to be tested in the test environment according to the target test position and the target test angle.

10. A computer device comprising a memory and a processor, wherein the memory stores a computer program, characterized in that: When the processor executes the computer program, the steps of the method according to any one of claims 1 to 7 are implemented.

11. A computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, characterized in that: When the computer program is executed by a processor, the steps of the method according to any one of claims 1 to 7 are implemented.

12. A computer program product, comprising a computer program, characterized in that When the computer program is executed by a processor, the steps of the method according to any one of claims 1 to 7 are implemented.

Images