Quantitative evaluation method for feldspar corrosion hole increase in reservoir

By combining XRD whole rock quantitative analysis and human-computer interactive image recognition technology, a calculation method for feldspar dissolution pore increase is established, and the problem of inaccurate quantitative evaluation of feldspar dissolution pore increase in the existing technology is solved, and accurate and reliable quantitative evaluation is achieved.

CN119578125AActive Publication Date: 2025-03-07CHINA UNIV OF PETROLEUM (EAST CHINA)
View PDF 2 Cites 0 Cited by

Patent Information

Application Number
CN202510131820.2
Authority / Receiving Office
CN · China
Patent Type
Applications(China)
Current Assignee / Owner
Filing Date
2025-02-06
Publication Date
2025-03-07
Estimated Expiration
2045-02-06

AI Technical Summary

Technical Problem

The prior art is difficult to accurately evaluate the amount of feldspar dissolution pore increase, and the results are inaccurate.

Method used

The feldspar mass fraction was determined by conducting XRD whole rock quantitative analysis experiments, and the visual field ratio and dissolution face rate were determined before and after feldspar dissolution using human-computer interactive image recognition technology, the transformation relationships R1 and R2 were established, and the feldspar dissolution pore increase amounts Q1 and Q2 were calculated, and mutual verification was performed.

Benefits of technology

Accurate evaluation of feldspar dissolution pore increase amount is achieved, and effective inspection methods are provided to ensure the accuracy and credibility of the calculation results.

✦ Generated by Eureka AI based on patent content.

Smart Images

  • Figure CN119578125A_ABST
    Figure CN119578125A_ABST
Patent Text Reader

Abstract

The invention relates to a quantitative evaluation method for feldspar corrosion hole increasing in a reservoir, and belongs to the technical field of oil-gas exploration and development. The mass fraction of various feldspar in rock is measured by carrying out an XRD total rock diffraction experiment, and the vision field proportion and the surface porosity of the feldspar before and after corrosion are extracted by utilizing a man-machine interaction image recognition technology. The method comprises the following steps of: respectively comparing feldspar corrosion porosity data Q1 and Q2 calculated in different modes at the same sample point according to the feldspar corrosion porosity obtained by the surface porosity extracted by image recognition and the porosity calculated based on a feldspar corrosion mechanism, and finally, mutually verifying Q1 and Q2 to determine the feldspar corrosion porosity and detect the correctness of the corrosion mechanism.
Need to check novelty before this filing date? Find Prior Art

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The invention relates to a quantitative evaluation method for feldspar dissolution and pore increase in a reservoir, belonging to the technical field of oil and gas exploration and development. Background Art

[0002] Feldspar is the most abundant mineral species in the upper crust and the most important mineral component in the reservoirs of oil and gas basins. For deep and ultra-deep oil and gas reservoirs, the primary pores of the reservoirs are almost all destroyed by destructive diagenesis such as compaction, so secondary pores become the main storage space of the reservoirs. Feldspar dissolution is a common geological phenomenon, accompanied by the generation of dissolution pores, which can effectively improve the physical properties of the reservoir, and therefore has an important reservoir-forming effect.

[0003] At present, the research on secondary porosity increase caused by feldspar dissolution mainly includes: using weathering indexes such as CIA to indirectly judge the degree of feldspar dissolution. This method uses the ratio of the content of different ions to characterize the intensity of feldspar dissolution based on the difficulty of ion migration during feldspar weathering and dissolution. The disadvantage is that the characteristic ion content measured today is difficult to exclude the part of the ion content change caused by diagenesis other than feldspar dissolution, such as potassium replacement of feldspar, etc., which will lead to inaccurate characterization results. Another method is to fit the relationship between feldspar dissolution pores and pore throat radius, and the relationship between feldspar content and rock porosity and permeability to evaluate the reservoir effect of feldspar dissolution. However, this method can only qualitatively describe that the less the remaining feldspar content, the stronger the dissolution degree and the better the physical properties, and cannot quantitatively characterize the porosity increase caused by feldspar dissolution. Some scholars also directly use the feldspar dissolution reaction equation to calculate the amount of dissolution porosity. The amount of dissolution porosity calculated by this method is a theoretical amount of porosity, which cannot directly obtain the amount of feldspar dissolution porosity under actual geological conditions. In addition, there is a lack of effective verification mechanism, and the calculation results cannot be verified.

[0004] For example, the Chinese patent application document with application publication number CN108363117A discloses a method for quantitatively predicting the amount of porosity increase caused by feldspar dissolution. Although this method can also quantitatively evaluate the amount of feldspar dissolution, the result obtained is only the percentage of feldspar dissolution. It can only be judged that feldspar dissolution does produce a porosity increase effect on the reservoir, but the specific amount of increased porosity cannot be directly obtained. Summary of the invention

[0005] In view of the shortcomings of the prior art, the present invention provides a quantitative evaluation method for feldspar dissolution and porosity increase in reservoirs, so as to solve the problems of lack of research on quantitative evaluation of feldspar dissolution and porosity increase and inaccurate results.

[0006] The technical solution of the present invention is as follows: A quantitative evaluation method for feldspar dissolution and porosity increase in a reservoir comprises the following steps: 1) Randomly select samples and conduct mineral XRD whole-rock quantitative analysis experiments to determine the mass fraction of feldspar and calculate the amount of substance; 2) Use human-computer interactive image recognition technology to determine the viewport ratio of residual feldspar in the casting thin section, that is, the viewport ratio after removing the dissolved pores, establish the conversion relationship R1 between the viewport ratio and the amount of feldspar material calculated by XRD measurement, and calculate the amount of residual feldspar material; 3) Use human-computer interactive image recognition technology to determine the proportion of each type of feldspar before dissolution, that is, the proportion of the original feldspar, and use the relationship R1 to obtain the amount of the original feldspar in the rock; 4) Calculate the amount of dissolved feldspar using the amount of original and residual feldspar in the rock, and calculate the feldspar dissolution pore increase amount Q1 based on the feldspar dissolution mechanism; 5) Use human-computer interactive image recognition technology to extract the surface ratio of casting thin sections, including various surface ratios, and establish the relationship between the surface ratio and the measured porosity R2; 6) Based on the conversion relationship R2, combined with the feldspar dissolution surface ratio extracted by human-computer interactive image recognition technology, the feldspar dissolution pore increase amount Q2 is calculated; 7) Finally, Q1 and Q2 are mutually verified to determine the porosity increase of feldspar due to dissolution and to test the feasibility of quantitatively evaluating the amount of porosity increase due to dissolution mechanism.

[0007] The present invention determines the mass fraction of various feldspars in the rock by conducting an XRD whole-rock diffraction experiment, and uses a human-computer interactive image recognition technology to extract the viewport ratio and the dissolution surface ratio of feldspar before and after dissolution. First, a conversion relationship R1 between the viewport ratio after feldspar dissolution and the amount of feldspar material measured and calculated by the XRD experiment is established to determine the amount of residual feldspar in the rock. According to the relationship R1, the amount of various original feldspars in the rock is obtained in combination with the viewport ratio before feldspar dissolution. After the amount of dissolved feldspar is calculated in combination with the amount of residual feldspar material, the dissolution porosity Q1 is obtained based on the feldspar dissolution mechanism. Secondly, a conversion relationship R2 between the rock surface ratio and the measured porosity data is established, and then the feldspar dissolution surface ratio and the conversion relationship R2 extracted by the image recognition method are used to calculate the feldspar dissolution porosity Q2. Finally, Q1 and Q2 are mutually verified to determine the feldspar dissolution porosity and verify the feasibility of quantitatively evaluating the dissolution porosity by the dissolution mechanism and the correctness of the results.

[0008] Preferably, in step 1), a mineral XRD whole-rock quantitative analysis experiment is carried out to obtain the mass fraction ω of each type of feldspar in the rock. 钾长石 ,ω 钠长石 ,ω 钙长石 , calculate the amount of each type of feldspar material n according to the material amount calculation formula 钾长石 、n 钠长石 、n 钙长石 .

[0009] (1) (2) (3) Where ω is the mass fraction of different types of feldspar, m 样品 and M represent the sample mass and the molar mass of different types of feldspar respectively, and n is the amount of substance of different types of feldspar.

[0010] Preferably, in step 2), the sheet processing identification step is as follows: 2-1) Preliminary processing of thin slice images: TWS (Trainable Weka Segmentation), a machine learning-based image segmentation tool, is used to pre-process the thin slices. Oversized images are compressed to increase processing speed. The image size is compressed to 3M-20M. TWS will segment the image into pixel blocks. 2-2) Dataset establishment: Use the tool's built-in box selector to label the image samples in step 2-1) with classification labels. These sample images need to be labeled through human-computer interaction. During the labeling process, you can use the tool's built-in image labeling tool selection box to select different areas in the image as training sets for machine learning. This process can be added multiple times to extract the features of the image area, including color features, contour features, area and other shape features; 2-3) The features extracted in step 2-2) are used to repeatedly train the SVM classifier model. The goal of feature extraction is to capture important information in the image to distinguish different pixel categories. During the training process, the classifier learns based on the labeled image samples and classifies according to the features, thereby achieving accurate image segmentation and identifying thin slice images. When TWS initially completes the image segmentation, human-computer interaction is required to evaluate and optimize the model. The evaluation includes calculating the accuracy and performance indicators of the segmentation results, including pixel-level accuracy, recall rate, and F1 score. Optimization includes manually adjusting feature selection and classifier parameters to improve the quality of the segmentation results, further expanding the training set and repeating steps 2-2) and 2-3) to train again until the recognition results are completely consistent with the original image features. 2-4) Export the data for statistical analysis and synthesize the area of ​​the regions marked in the classification map, and then conduct quantitative analysis of the face ratio and feldspar field proportion; The Excel software was used to draw the intersection diagram of the residual feldspar viewport ratio after dissolution and the amount of feldspar material, and the conversion relationship between the residual feldspar viewport ratio after dissolution and the amount of feldspar material R1 was fitted: Y1=a1×X1+b1. When the amount of residual feldspar material needs to be obtained, the residual feldspar viewport ratio is substituted into the formula Y1=a1×X1+b1 to replace X1, and the residual feldspar ratio in the viewport can be converted into the amount of residual feldspar material.

[0011] Where Y1 is the amount of feldspar material, X1 is the field percentage of residual feldspar, a1 is the coefficient, and b1 is a constant.

[0012] Preferably, in step 4), the feldspar dissolution pore increase amount Q1 is calculated based on the feldspar dissolution mechanism, that is, the volume difference before and after dissolution is calculated using the amount of material dissolved by feldspar, and the dissolution pore increase amount is determined according to the ratio of the volume difference before and after to the total volume of the sample; (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) (twenty one) Therefore, the quantitative characterization of feldspar dissolution and pore increase can be carried out. 钾长石溶蚀 +φ 钙长石溶蚀 +φ 钠长石溶蚀 ; Among them, ρ represents the density of different types of rocks, V represents the volume difference caused by the dissolution of different types of feldspar (potassium feldspar, calcium feldspar, sodium feldspar), and V 总 is the total volume of rock, and φ represents the amount of pore increase caused by dissolution of different types of feldspar (potassium feldspar, calcium feldspar, and sodium feldspar).

[0013] Preferably, in step 5), Excel software is used to draw a cross plot of the measured porosity and the surface ratio extracted by the image recognition technology, and a relationship R2 between the surface ratio and the measured porosity is established: Y2=a2×X2+b2; Where Y2 is the porosity, X2 is the surface ratio, a2 is the coefficient, and b2 is the constant.

[0014] Preferably, in step 7), finally, SPSS software is used to perform a difference analysis on Q1 and Q2. First, the difference between Q1 and Q2 is tested for normal distribution using SPSS software. If the difference between Q1 and Q2 conforms to the normal distribution, a t-test of two paired sample data is performed on Q1 and Q2 using SPSS software. When the significant P value>0.05, it indicates that there is no significant difference in the calculation results of the two methods. If P<0.05, it proves that there is a significant difference in the calculation results of the two methods. When the difference between Q1 and Q2 does not conform to the normal distribution, the Wilcoxon test of two paired sample data is used to test whether there is a difference between the two. Similarly, when the significant P value>0.05, it indicates that there is no significant difference in the calculation results of the two methods. If P<0.05, it proves that there is a significant difference in the calculation results of the two methods.

[0015] The beneficial effects of the present invention are: The present invention is a method for calculating the amount of feldspar dissolution pore increase by utilizing the dissolution mechanism of feldspar, which solves the problem that the amount of feldspar dissolution pore increase cannot be directly and quantitatively evaluated, and provides an effective testing method (confidence level 95%) to verify whether the calculation result is accurate. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0016] Figure 1 It is a flow chart of the quantitative evaluation method of feldspar dissolution and pore increase of the present invention; Figure 2 is a diagram of the steps of extracting the feldspar visual field proportion and face rate by image recognition technology in an embodiment of the present invention; Figure 3 This is a result diagram of the surface ratio of feldspar dissolution pores extracted by the image recognition technology in an embodiment of the present invention. The left figure is the original figure, and the right figure is the effect diagram of feldspar dissolution pore recognition; Figure 4 This is a result diagram of the visual field ratio after feldspar dissolution identified by the image recognition technology in an embodiment of the present invention. The left picture is the original picture, and the right picture is the residual feldspar identification effect picture; Figure 5 is a graph showing the relationship between the proportion of the viewing area after the feldspar is dissolved and the amount of the feldspar material converted in the embodiment of the present invention; Figure 6 is a graph showing the conversion relationship between the surface porosity and the measured porosity in the embodiment of the present invention; Figure 7 is a comparison chart of the porosity increase due to dissolution calculated based on the feldspar dissolution mechanism and the porosity increase due to dissolution calculated using the image recognition technology in the embodiment of the present invention; Figure 8 1 is a normal test result diagram of the difference between Q1 and Q2 in an embodiment of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0017] The present invention will be further described below by way of embodiments in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, but is not limited thereto.

[0018] Embodiment 1: Feldspar dissolution pores have important reservoir-forming effects on deep and ultra-deep tight reservoirs. The present invention proposes a quantitative evaluation method for feldspar dissolution and pore increase in view of feldspar dissolution. This method determines the mass fraction of various feldspars in the rock by conducting XRD whole-rock diffraction experiments, and uses human-computer interactive image recognition technology to extract the field of view percentage and dissolution surface ratio before and after feldspar dissolution. First, a conversion relationship R1 between the field of view percentage after feldspar dissolution and the amount of feldspar material calculated by XRD data is established, and the amount of residual feldspar in the rock is determined. According to the relationship R1, the original amount of each feldspar in the rock is obtained in combination with the field of view percentage before feldspar dissolution. The amount of dissolved feldspar is obtained by subtracting the amount of original feldspar and the amount of residual feldspar, and then the dissolution pore increase amount Q1 is obtained based on the feldspar dissolution mechanism. Secondly, the conversion relationship R2 between the surface porosity of rock thin sections and the measured porosity data is established. Then, the feldspar dissolution surface porosity and conversion relationship R2 extracted by the image recognition method are used to calculate the feldspar dissolution porosity Q2. Finally, Q1 and Q2 are mutually verified to determine the feldspar dissolution porosity and to verify the feasibility of quantitatively evaluating the dissolution porosity by the dissolution mechanism. The implementation process of this method is as follows: Figure 1 As shown, the implementation process of the invention is explained by taking a specific work area as an example, and the specific implementation process is as follows.

[0019] 1) Randomly select samples, wash them with oil, then dry them at a temperature below 60°C, cool and crush them until the total particle size is less than 40μm, and carry out mineral XRD whole-rock quantitative analysis experiments to obtain the mass fraction of various feldspars in the rock. 钾长石 ,ω 钠长石 ,ω 钙长石 , calculate the amount of each type of feldspar material n according to the material amount calculation formula 钾长石 、n 钠长石 、n 钙长石 .

[0020] (1) (2) (3) Where ω is the mass fraction of different types of feldspar, m 样品 and M represent the sample mass and the molar mass of different types of feldspar respectively, and n is the amount of substance of different types of feldspar.

[0021] 2) Use human-computer interactive image recognition technology to determine the viewport ratio of residual feldspar in the casting thin section, that is, the viewport ratio after removing the dissolved pores, such as Figure 4As shown, Figure 4 The left picture in the middle is the original picture, and the right picture is the residual feldspar identification effect picture, with a field of view ratio of 9.82%. The conversion relationship R1 between the field of view ratio and the amount of feldspar material calculated by XRD determination is established, and the amount of residual feldspar material is calculated. The thin section of the rock is photographed under a microscope, and the thin section is imported into the image recognition software, and the segmentation tool Trainable Weka Segmentation is used to process the image. The thin section processing and identification steps are as follows: 2-1) Preliminary processing of thin slice images: TWS (Trainable Weka Segmentation), a machine learning-based image segmentation tool, is used to pre-process the thin slices. Oversized images are compressed to increase processing speed. The image size is compressed to 3M-20M. TWS will divide the image into pixel blocks.

[0022] 2-2) Dataset establishment: Use the tool's built-in box selector to label the image samples in step 2-1) with classification labels. These sample images need to be labeled through human-computer interaction. During the labeling process, you can use the tool's built-in image labeling tool selection box to select different areas in the image as training sets for machine learning. This process can be added multiple times to extract the features of the image area, including color features, contour features, area and other shape features.

[0023] 2-3) The features extracted in step 2-2) are used to repeatedly train the SVM classifier model. The goal of feature extraction is to capture important information in the image to distinguish different pixel categories. During the training process, the classifier learns based on the labeled image samples and classifies according to the features, thereby achieving accurate image segmentation and then identifying thin slice images. When TWS initially completes the image segmentation, human-computer interaction is required to evaluate and optimize the model. The evaluation includes calculating the accuracy and performance indicators of the segmentation results, including pixel-level accuracy, recall rate, and F1 score. Optimization includes manually adjusting feature selection and adjusting classifier parameters to improve the quality of the segmentation results, further expanding the training set, repeating steps 2-2), 2-3) and training again until the recognition results are completely consistent with the original image features. Through repeated adjustments, the software can accurately identify the features of the target to be extracted and automatically extract the features.

[0024] 2-4) Set the threshold to calculate the area of ​​the extracted target, export the data to analyze the area of ​​the area marked in the classification map, and then conduct quantitative analysis of the face rate and feldspar field ratio; Figure 2 shown.

[0025] The Excel software was used to draw the intersection diagram of the residual feldspar viewport ratio after dissolution and the amount of feldspar material, and the conversion relationship between the residual feldspar viewport ratio after dissolution and the amount of feldspar material was fitted R1: Y1=a1×X1+b1; when the amount of residual feldspar material needs to be obtained, the residual feldspar viewport ratio is substituted into the formula Y1=a1×X1+b1 to replace X1, and the residual feldspar ratio in the viewport can be converted into the amount of residual feldspar material. Figure 5 shown.

[0026] Where Y1 is the amount of residual feldspar material, X1 is the viewport percentage of residual feldspar, a1 is the coefficient, and b1 is a constant.

[0027] 3) Use human-computer interactive image recognition technology to determine the viewport proportion of various feldspars before dissolution, that is, the original feldspar viewport proportion. According to the relationship R1: Y1=a1×X1+b1, the original feldspar viewport proportion is substituted into the formula Y1=a1×X1+b1 to replace X1 to obtain the amount of original feldspar in the rock. The original feldspar viewport proportion is the sum of the residual feldspar and the feldspar dissolution pore viewport proportions.

[0028] 4) The amount of the original feldspar in the rock is subtracted from the amount of the residual feldspar to calculate the amount of the dissolved feldspar. The feldspar dissolution pore increase amount Q1 is calculated based on the feldspar dissolution mechanism. That is, the volume difference before and after dissolution is calculated using the amount of feldspar dissolved material. The dissolution pore increase amount is determined based on the ratio of the volume difference before and after to the total volume of the sample; (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) (twenty one) Therefore, the quantitative characterization of feldspar dissolution and pore increase can be carried out. 钾长石溶蚀 +φ 钙长石溶蚀 +φ 钠长石溶蚀 ; Among them, ρ represents the density of different types of rocks, V represents the volume difference caused by the dissolution of different types of feldspar (potassium feldspar, calcium feldspar, sodium feldspar), and V 总 is the total volume of rock, and φ represents the amount of pore increase caused by dissolution of different types of feldspar (potassium feldspar, calcium feldspar, and sodium feldspar).

[0029] 5) Use human-computer interactive image recognition technology to extract the surface ratio of the casting thin section, including the total surface ratio of various pores and the surface ratio of feldspar dissolution. The total surface ratio includes the dissolution surface ratio, but both cannot be extracted at once and need to be extracted separately. Figure 3 As shown, Figure 3 The left picture in the middle is the original picture, and the right picture is the feldspar dissolution pore identification effect picture, with a surface ratio of 4.42%. It is matched with the measured porosity of the corresponding sample point, and the intersection diagram of the measured porosity and the surface ratio extracted by image recognition technology is drawn using Excel software to establish the relationship between the surface ratio and the measured porosity R2: Y2=a2×X2+b2; Figure 6 shown.

[0030] Where Y2 is the porosity, X2 is the surface ratio, a2 is the coefficient, and b2 is the constant.

[0031] 6) According to the transformation relationship R2: Y2=a2×X2+b2, the feldspar dissolution surface porosity extracted by image recognition technology is substituted into the formula to replace X2, and the porosity Y2 is calculated to be the feldspar dissolution pore increase amount Q2.

[0032] 7) Compare the feldspar dissolution porosity data Q1 and Q2 calculated by different methods at the same sample point, such as Figure 7As shown. The porosity increase of feldspar obtained by the face ratio extracted by image recognition is objective, so it is used to verify the porosity increase calculated based on the feldspar dissolution mechanism. Q1 is subtracted from Q2, and the difference analysis of Q1 and Q2 is performed using SPSS software. First, the normal distribution test of the difference between Q1 and Q2 is performed using SPSS software. If the difference between Q1 and Q2 conforms to the normal distribution, the two paired sample data t test is performed on Q1 and Q2 using SPSS software. When the significant P value>0.05, it indicates that there is no significant difference in the calculation results of the two methods. If P<0.05, it proves that there is a significant difference in the calculation results of the two methods; when the difference between Q1 and Q2 does not conform to the normal distribution, the two paired sample data Wilcoxon test method is used to test whether there is a difference between the two; similarly, when the significant P value>0.05, it indicates that there is no significant difference in the calculation results of the two methods. If P<0.05, it proves that there is a significant difference in the calculation results of the two methods. This is used to determine the amount of pore increase caused by feldspar dissolution and to test the feasibility of quantitatively evaluating the amount of pore increase caused by dissolution mechanism.

[0033] like Figure 8 As shown, in this embodiment, the data points are all near the diagonal line, indicating that the difference between the two is in accordance with the normal distribution according to the SPSS software analysis, so the difference between the two is analyzed using the t-test distribution of the two paired sample data. The analysis results show that P>0.05, indicating that there is no significant difference between Q1 and Q2, as shown in Table 1.

[0034] Table 1 Results of t-test of paired samples Q1 and Q2 This proves the feasibility of the method of the present invention, and can provide assistance for the quantitative evaluation of the amount of pore increase caused by feldspar dissolution in reservoirs.

Claims

1. A quantitative evaluation method for feldspar dissolution and porosity increase in reservoirs, characterized in that: The steps include: 1) Randomly select samples and conduct mineral XRD whole-rock quantitative analysis experiments to determine the mass fraction of feldspar and calculate the amount of substance; 2) Use human-computer interactive image recognition technology to determine the viewport ratio of residual feldspar in the casting thin section, that is, the viewport ratio after removing the dissolved pores, establish the conversion relationship R1 between the viewport ratio and the amount of feldspar material calculated by XRD measurement, and calculate the amount of residual feldspar material; 3) Use human-computer interactive image recognition technology to determine the proportion of each type of feldspar before dissolution, that is, the proportion of the original feldspar, and use the relationship R1 to obtain the amount of the original feldspar in the rock; 4) Calculate the amount of dissolved feldspar using the amount of original and residual feldspar in the rock, and calculate the feldspar dissolution pore increase amount Q1 based on the feldspar dissolution mechanism; 5) Use human-computer interactive image recognition technology to extract the surface ratio of casting thin sections, including various surface ratios, and establish the relationship between the surface ratio and the measured porosity R2; 6) Based on the conversion relationship R2, combined with the feldspar dissolution surface ratio extracted by human-computer interactive image recognition technology, the feldspar dissolution pore increase amount Q2 is calculated; 7) Finally, Q1 and Q2 are mutually verified to determine the porosity increase of feldspar due to dissolution and to test the feasibility of quantitatively evaluating the amount of porosity increase due to dissolution mechanism.

2. The quantitative evaluation method for feldspar dissolution and pore increase in reservoir according to claim 1, characterized in that: In step 1), a mineral XRD whole-rock quantitative analysis experiment is carried out to obtain the mass fraction of various feldspars in the rock ω 钾长石 ,ω 钠长石 ,ω 钙长石 , calculate the amount of each type of feldspar material n according to the material amount calculation formula 钾长石 、n 钠长石 、n 钙长石 ; (1) (2) (3) Where ω is the mass fraction of different types of feldspar, m 样品 and M represent the sample mass and the molar mass of different types of feldspar respectively, and n is the amount of substance of different types of feldspar.

3. The quantitative evaluation method for feldspar dissolution and pore increase in reservoir according to claim 1, characterized in that: In step 2), the sheet processing and identification steps are as follows: 2-1) Preliminary processing of thin slice images: TWS, an image segmentation tool based on machine learning, is used to pre-process the thin slices and compress the images to a size of 3M-20M; 2-2) Dataset establishment: Use the tool's built-in box selector to label the image samples in step 2-1) with classification labels. The labeling process uses the tool's built-in image labeling tool selection box to select different areas in the image as training sets for machine learning. This process is added multiple times to extract the features of the image area, including color features, contour features, and shape features. 2-3) The features extracted in step 2-2) are used to repeatedly train the SVM classifier model. During the training process, the classifier learns based on the labeled image samples and classifies according to the features, thereby achieving image segmentation and then identifying the thin slice image; when TWS initially completes the image segmentation, human-computer interaction is required to evaluate and optimize the model itself; the evaluation includes calculating the accuracy and performance indicators of the segmentation results, including pixel-level accuracy, recall rate, and F1 score; optimization includes manually adjusting feature selection and classifier parameters, further expanding the training set and repeating steps 2-2), 2-3) and training again until the recognition result is completely consistent with the original image features; 2-4) Export the data for statistical analysis and synthesize the area of ​​the regions marked in the classification map, and then conduct quantitative analysis of the face ratio and feldspar field proportion; The Excel software was used to draw the intersection diagram of the residual feldspar viewport ratio after dissolution and the amount of feldspar material, and the conversion relationship between the residual feldspar viewport ratio after dissolution and the amount of feldspar material was fitted R1: Y1=a1×X1+b1; Where Y1 is the amount of feldspar material, X1 is the field percentage of residual feldspar, a1 is the coefficient, and b1 is a constant.

4. The quantitative evaluation method for feldspar dissolution and pore increase in reservoir according to claim 1, characterized in that: In step 4), the feldspar dissolution pore increase amount Q1 is calculated based on the feldspar dissolution mechanism; (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) (21) The quantitative characterization of feldspar dissolution and pore expansion is obtained as Q1=φ 钾长石溶蚀 +φ 钙长石溶蚀 +φ 钠长石溶蚀 ; Among them, ρ represents the density of different types of rocks, V represents the volume difference caused by the dissolution of different types of feldspar, and V 总 is the total volume of rock, and φ represents the amount of pore increase caused by dissolution of different types of feldspar.

5. The quantitative evaluation method for feldspar dissolution and pore increase in reservoir according to claim 1, characterized in that: In step 5), the intersection diagram of the measured porosity and the surface ratio extracted by the image recognition technology is drawn using Excel software to establish the relationship between the surface ratio and the measured porosity R2: Y2=a2×X2+b2; Where Y2 is the porosity, X2 is the surface ratio, a2 is the coefficient, and b2 is the constant.

6. The quantitative evaluation method for feldspar dissolution and pore increase in reservoir according to claim 1, characterized in that: In step 7), finally, SPSS software was used to perform a difference analysis on Q1 and Q2. First, the difference between Q1 and Q2 was tested for normal distribution using SPSS software. If the difference between Q1 and Q2 conformed to the normal distribution, a paired sample data t test was performed on Q1 and Q2 using SPSS software. When the significant P value > 0.05, it indicated that there was no significant difference in the results calculated by the two methods. If P < 0.05, it proved that there was a significant difference in the results calculated by the two methods. When the difference between Q1 and Q2 did not conform to the normal distribution, the Wilcoxon test of paired sample data was used to test whether there was a difference between the two. Similarly, when the significant P value > 0.05, it indicated that there was no significant difference in the results calculated by the two methods. If P < 0.05, it proved that there was a significant difference in the results calculated by the two methods.

Citation Information

Patent Citations

  • Corrosion hole surface porosity method, system and equipment and storage medium

    CN117115229A

  • Quantitative calculation method for pore evolution of tight sandstone reservoir under polarizing microscope

    CN119269361A