Aviation intelligence management competency assessment method

Abstract

The invention discloses a method for evaluating the competency of aviation intelligence management. Comprising the steps of establishing an aviation intelligence management competency model, establishing an aviation intelligence management competency evaluation system, creating a competency subject, adding an aviation intelligence management knowledge base and a competency evaluation probe function in an aviation intelligence management production system, and adding an aviation intelligence management competency evaluation link. And continuously monitoring the aeronautical intelligence management competency, and periodically adjusting an aeronautical intelligence management competency evaluation formula and a threshold value. According to the method, rapid quantitative evaluation and monitoring can be carried out on the aviation intelligence management competency, and the aviation data security level can be improved.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The invention relates to the technical field of data processing, and in particular to a method for evaluating aviation intelligence management competency. Background Art

[0002] Aeronautical information management is an important part of the air navigation services stipulated by ICAO. It is an important service that provides support for the safe and efficient operation of aircraft by collecting, processing, publishing and distributing information and data related to aviation operations. Its core content includes data management of airports, navigation facilities, flight procedures, routes, airspace, etc., as well as the issuance of navigation notices, compilation of aviation information and production of aeronautical charts, providing basic data guarantee for aviation operations. With the continuous development of modern navigation technology, the level of aviation information management and data quality are becoming more and more important. The safety and efficiency of control, command and crew flight depend on the data quality of aviation information. It can be seen that a high-quality aviation information management system is inseparable from the scientific and efficient monitoring and evaluation of the competence of aviation intelligence practitioners.

[0003] For a long time, there has been a lack of effective mechanisms and methods to effectively evaluate and monitor the competence of aviation information management. In most cases, it can only be remedied after an unsafe incident caused by defects in aviation intelligence data quality occurs. There is a lack of a mechanism to evaluate the competence of aviation information management practitioners in advance, especially a lack of a quantitative scoring method for aviation information management competence.

[0004] Citation document 1: Chinese invention patent, "Pilot competency profiling method and system based on aviation QAR big data", authorization announcement number: CN113298431B. This invention discloses a method for evaluating the competency of flight personnel, which analyzes flight competency through flight process record data (QAR). This method analyzes competency by obtaining data after the flight, which is a post-evaluation method, and only collects result data for evaluation, and the evaluation elements are relatively simple. This method evaluates competency from multiple subjective and objective factors and aspects such as knowledge, skills, attitudes, and results, and the evaluation links cover the pre-, mid-, and post-event stages.

[0005] Citation document 2: Chinese invention patent application, "A method for evaluating the competence of air traffic controllers", publication number: CN118536846A. This invention discloses a method for evaluating the competence of air traffic control personnel. All observation data of this method are obtained from the control simulation system, and no actual production system data is collected. In addition, only one competence indicator of personnel mental fatigue can be evaluated. However, this method samples data from the actual production system, and can make subjective and objective comprehensive scores on personnel's knowledge, skills, attitudes and product quality, with more comprehensive evaluation factors. Summary of the invention

[0006] In order to solve the long-standing problem of lack of effective methods for aviation information management competency assessment and inability to quickly conduct quantitative assessment before, during and after the event, the present invention provides an aviation information management competency assessment method. This method establishes an aviation information management competency model, establishes an aviation information management competency evaluation system, and improves the existing production system, so that the aviation information management competency quantitative assessment and monitoring can be continuously performed, thereby improving the aviation information management level and aviation data quality and safety.

[0007] In order to achieve the above object, the technical solution of the present invention comprises the following steps: S1: Establish an aviation information management competency model, which consists of multiple competency subjects.

[0008] The competency subject includes one or more competency items, which refer to the personal abilities and product quality requirements that should be possessed when carrying out aviation information management activities in accordance with the requirements of the Civil Aviation Aviation Information Work Regulations.

[0009] Personal competence includes three elements: knowledge, skills and attitude. Product quality requirements refer to the aviation data quality standards defined in the RTCA-Do201 specification.

[0010] Each competency item contains a threshold value, which is used to determine whether an individual's competency in performing AIM activities meets the minimum requirements of that competency item.

[0011] S2: Establish an aviation information management competency evaluation system, including external conditions, observable behaviors and evaluation formulas. Among them, external conditions refer to the environment, tools and external information available when people carry out aviation information management activities. Observable behaviors refer to the knowledge, skills, attitudes and product quality displayed by people when carrying out aviation information management activities under external conditions. Evaluation formulas refer to a set of mathematical formulas that quantitatively evaluate external conditions and observable behaviors.

[0012] Furthermore, the evaluation formula is: ,in: S is the aviation information management competency score.

[0013] is the weight factor, satisfying ,and .

[0014] is the score for each item, and ,in: P1 = external condition score. The scoring rules are as follows: 20 points for a working environment without a computer, 60 points for a stand-alone working environment without a network, and 100 points for a working environment with a local area network.

[0015] P2=attitude score. This is a subjective score. The scoring rules are: depressed mood and low work enthusiasm get 0 to 10 points; normal mood and work enthusiasm get 11 to 60 points; positive mood and high work enthusiasm get 61 to 100 points.

[0016] P3=knowledge score. The scoring formula is: P3=g×T, where g represents the difficulty of the test paper 0≤g≤1, and T represents the test paper score 0≤T≤100.

[0017] P4=skill score, the scoring formula is: ,in It is a sub-skill score, where: N1 = aviation information management awareness score, N2 = work coordination ability score, N3 = automation system operation ability score, N4 = work optimization ability score, N5 = emergency response ability score, N6 = troubleshooting ability score; is the weight factor of the sub-skill score, satisfying ,and .

[0018] P5=product quality score, the scoring formula is: ,in: is the data quality score, A1 is the data accuracy score, A2 is the data resolution score, A3 is the data format score, and A4 is the timeliness score. is the data quality weight factor, satisfying ,and ; is the metadata quality score; B1 is the data integrity score, B2 is the data relevance score, and B3 is the data traceability score. is the metadata quality weight factor, satisfying ,and , α and β are allocation factors, satisfying 0<α<1, 0<β<1, and α+β=1.

[0019] S3: Based on the aviation intelligence data processing flow, five competency subjects are created: aviation intelligence original data collection and reporting, navigation notice processing, static aviation data management, aeronautical chart production, and aviation intelligence product production and release.

[0020] Furthermore, the competency items included in each competency subject are: The competency subjects for collecting and reporting original aviation intelligence data include five competency items: receiving original data, reviewing the compliance of original data, selecting the type of aviation data release, collecting original aviation data, and reporting original aviation data.

[0021] The main competency items for handling navigation notices include: issuing and forwarding regional series navigation notices, issuing and forwarding domestic series navigation notices, issuing international series navigation notices, receiving and processing navigation notices, receiving and issuing snow notices, receiving and issuing volcano notices, and receiving and issuing official reports.

[0022] The main competencies of static aviation data management include six capabilities: airport data management, flight procedure data management, waypoint and navigation facility data management, route data management, airspace data management, and flight route data management.

[0023] The main competencies of aeronautical chart production include: airport plan drawing, terminal area map drawing, route map drawing, and digital chart production.

[0024] The main competencies for the production and release of aviation intelligence products include: production and release of printed products, production and release of electronic products, and production and release of digital products.

[0025] S4: For each competency subject, transform the aviation information management production system and add aviation information management knowledge base and competency assessment probe functions.

[0026] Furthermore, the aviation information management knowledge base includes technical information on aviation information management standard documents of China and the International Civil Aviation Organization, and has question bank management and test answering functions. According to the work requirements of original data collection, navigation notice issuance, aviation data management, flight procedure design, chart drawing and aviation intelligence product release, the test papers are automatically compiled and scored according to stages and difficulty levels, and the knowledge gaps of the examinees are analyzed based on the answer results.

[0027] The competency assessment probes are designed according to the capability requirements of each competency subject, including six types: overall process awareness of aviation intelligence management, work collaboration capability, automated system operation capability, work optimization capability, emergency response capability and troubleshooting capability.

[0028] Each type of competency assessment probe records observable behaviors in the registration of original aviation information, review of original information notices, information query, aviation data entry, navigation notice processing, flight procedure coding, chart production and results submission.

[0029] The competency assessment probe will be automatically triggered when personnel operate the aviation information management system production system, recording personnel operation procedures, data modification records, content verification records, internal and external collaborative work records, data quality, product error rate and task completion time, and automatically collating and statistics data.

[0030] S5: Add an AIM competency evaluation link to the AIM production process to evaluate personnel's AIM competency and score them based on subjective impressions and objective sampling results through the AIM competency evaluation system; among which: Subjective impression refers to the enthusiasm and mental state displayed by people in the production of aviation information management, and is subjectively scored by the superiors of aviation information management practitioners.

[0031] Objective sampling results refer to the external conditions when people perform AIM production activities and the operating processes and product quality recorded by the competency assessment probe.

[0032] S6: Continuously monitor the competence of aviation information management, issue alerts to personnel whose competence scores are below the competence threshold, and calculate the alert rate of aviation information management competence of all personnel.

[0033] S7: Adjust the weight factors of the AIM competency evaluation formula and the thresholds of each competency item every six months to keep the AIM competency alert rate between 1% and 5%.

[0034] The present invention has the following advantages: The present invention establishes an aviation information management competency model and evaluation system, sets competency evaluation probes in the aviation information management production system, and comprehensively measures the knowledge, skills, attitudes and product quality of aviation information management personnel, so as to quickly and efficiently evaluate the aviation information management competency. Compared with the traditional method that mainly relies on subjective evaluation of aviation information management competency, the present invention has the advantages of deep coupling with the aviation information management production system, taking into account comprehensiveness and objectivity, and the evaluation mechanism can be dynamically adjusted and optimized. The present invention can significantly improve the efficiency, quality and competency of aviation information management. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0035] Figure 1 This is a diagram of the main steps of conducting aeronautical information management competency assessment according to an embodiment of the present invention.

[0036] Figure 2 The present invention is a flowchart of performing aeronautical information management competency assessment according to an embodiment of the present invention.

[0037] Figure 3 This is a schematic diagram of the aeronautical information management competency model. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0038] In order to make the purpose, technical solution and advantages of the present invention more clearly understood, the present invention is further described in detail below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and specific embodiments. It should be understood that the specific embodiments described herein are only used to explain the present invention and are not used to limit the present invention.

[0039] Aeronautical information management aims to provide accurate and timely aeronautical information services and basic aviation data for the air transport industry. With the continuous advancement of digitalization in the aviation industry, the stable and efficient operation of various important aviation automation systems increasingly depends on the quality of aviation data and the level of aeronautical information services. Stable and timely aeronautical information management is inseparable from the effective assessment and monitoring of the competence level of all aeronautical information management practitioners. However, there is currently a lack of methods for accurately and effectively assessing and monitoring the competence of aeronautical information management practitioners.

[0040] Based on this, the present invention proposes a method for evaluating the competence of aviation information management. Through this method, it is possible to comprehensively, accurately and objectively evaluate whether the competence of practitioners in each link of the aviation information management production process meets the requirements, thereby promoting the level of aviation information management, improving the quality of aviation data, and ensuring the safe, efficient and stable operation of air transportation.

[0041] An embodiment of the present invention is an assessment process of aviation information management competency using the method.

[0042] like Figure 1 As shown, one embodiment of the present invention includes the following steps: S1: Establish an aviation information management competency model; S2: Establish an aviation information management competency evaluation system; S3: Create competency subject; S4: For each competency subject, transform the aviation information management production system and add aviation information management knowledge base and competency assessment probe functions; S5: Add the AIM competency assessment process to the AIM production process; S6: Conduct continuous AIM competency monitoring; S7: Adjust the evaluation formula weight factors and the thresholds of each capability item to control the alert rate of aviation information management competency.

[0043] The detailed processing process of this embodiment is as follows Figure 2 As shown: S1: Establish an AIM competency model, such as Figure 3As shown in the figure, the competency model includes five aviation information management competency subjects, each of which includes several competency items, and each competency item includes three parts: threshold, personal competency, and product quality. Among them, personal competency includes three elements: knowledge, skills, and attitude. Product quality requirements are divided into seven types of data requirements: data accuracy, data resolution, data format, timeliness, completeness, relevance, and traceability according to the aviation data quality standards defined in the RTCA-Do201 specification.

[0044] S2: Establish an aviation information management competency evaluation system, including external conditions, observable behaviors and evaluation formulas. The evaluation formula is: ,in: S is the aviation information management competency score.

[0045] is the weight factor, satisfying ,and .

[0046] is the score for each item, and .

[0047] in: P1 = external condition score. The scoring rules are as follows: 20 points for a working environment without a computer, 60 points for a stand-alone working environment without a network, and 100 points for a working environment with a local area network.

[0048] P2=attitude score. This is a subjective score. The scoring rules are: depressed mood and low work enthusiasm get 0 to 10 points; normal mood and work enthusiasm get 11 to 60 points; positive mood and high work enthusiasm get 61 to 100 points.

[0049] P3=knowledge score. The scoring formula is: P3=g×T, where g represents the difficulty of the test paper 0≤g≤1, and T represents the test paper score 0≤T≤100.

[0050] P4=skill score, the scoring formula is: ,in It is a sub-skill score, where: N1 = aviation information management awareness score, N2 = work coordination ability score, N3 = automation system operation ability score, N4 = work optimization ability score, N5 = emergency response ability score, N6 = troubleshooting ability score; is the weight factor of the sub-skill score, satisfying ,and .

[0051] P5=product quality score, the scoring formula is: ,in: is the data quality score, A1 is the data accuracy score, A2 is the data resolution score, A3 is the data format score, and A4 is the timeliness score. is the data quality weight factor, satisfying ,and ; is the metadata quality score; B1 is the data integrity score, B2 is the data relevance score, and B3 is the data traceability score. is the metadata quality weight factor, satisfying ,and , α and β are allocation factors, satisfying 0<α<1, 0<β<1, and α+β=1.

[0052] S3: Create five competency subjects for aviation information management, such as Figure 3 As shown: The competency subjects for collecting and reporting original aviation intelligence data include five competency items: receiving original data, reviewing the compliance of original data, selecting the type of aviation data release, collecting original aviation data, and reporting original aviation data.

[0053] The main competency items for handling navigation notices include: issuing and forwarding regional series navigation notices, issuing and forwarding domestic series navigation notices, issuing international series navigation notices, receiving and processing navigation notices, receiving and issuing snow notices, receiving and issuing volcano notices, and receiving and issuing official reports.

[0054] The main competencies of static aviation data management include six capabilities: airport data management, flight procedure data management, waypoint and navigation facility data management, route data management, airspace data management, and flight route data management.

[0055] The main competencies of aeronautical chart production include: airport plan drawing, terminal area map drawing, route map drawing, and digital chart production.

[0056] The main competencies for the production and release of aviation intelligence products include: production and release of printed products, production and release of electronic products, and production and release of digital products.

[0057] The initial threshold for each capability item is set to 80 points.

[0058] S4: Transform the aviation information management production system and add aviation information management knowledge base and competency assessment probe functions for each competency item of each competency subject.

[0059] This embodiment transforms a certain aviation information management automation production system, adds aviation information management knowledge base management function, converts the normative documents and technical data of China and ICAO on aviation information management into the examination question bank, and enters the knowledge points required for original data collection, navigation notice sending, aviation data management, flight procedure design, chart drawing and aviation information product release into the question bank, and sets four levels of difficulty for each knowledge point, namely, primary intelligence officer, intermediate intelligence officer, senior intelligence officer and intelligence instructor. The knowledge base can automatically compile and score the examination papers and analyze the knowledge deficiencies of the examinees.

[0060] This embodiment adds competency assessment probes to aviation intelligence automation production systems such as raw data acquisition system, navigation notice management system, aviation data management system, flight procedure coding system, chart production system, and product production and release system.

[0061] The competency assessment probes are designed according to the capability requirements of each competency subject, including six types: overall process awareness of aviation intelligence management, work collaboration capability, automated system operation capability, work optimization capability, emergency response capability and troubleshooting capability.

[0062] The competency assessment probe is automatically triggered when personnel operate the above system, recording personnel operation procedures, data modification records, content verification records, internal and external collaborative work records, data quality, product error rate and task completion time, and automatically collating and statistics data.

[0063] For example, the work collaboration capability probe added to the navigation notice management system in this embodiment will record the detailed processing flow of the navigation notice processing personnel after receiving the original data notification form, including whether to verify the validity of the original data, whether to retrieve the currently valid navigation notice, whether to verify whether there is any conflict between the original data and the currently valid navigation notice, whether to verify the consistency of the original data and the static data, and whether to verify the questionable content with the notification form issuer through internal email. The evaluation probe will also record the data quality and sending time of the issued navigation notice item by item.

[0064] S5: Add an AIM competency evaluation link to the AIM production process to evaluate personnel’s AIM competency and score them through the AIM competency evaluation system based on subjective impressions and objective sampling results.

[0065] In this embodiment, the subjective impression score is obtained by the head of the NOTAM department giving a subjective score to the work enthusiasm and mental state of all NOTAM processing personnel.

[0066] The objective sampling results of this embodiment include the working environment of the NOTAM processing position and the NOTAM processing process and NOTAM data quality recorded by the competency assessment probe for scoring.

[0067] This example takes a certain NOTAM processing personnel Am of a certain aviation information management unit as the object for competency assessment, where: This embodiment is a networked office environment, and the external condition score is: P1=100.

[0068] Am has a normal work attitude, attitude score: P2=60 points.

[0069] The score of Am aviation intelligence theory test is T=95 points, the test difficulty is g=0.8, and the knowledge score is: P3=0.8×95=76 points.

[0070] In the skill part of Am's NOTAM receiving and processing capability, the score of aviation information management awareness is N1=75, the score of work coordination capability is N2=93, the score of automation system operation capability is N3=84, the score of work optimization capability is N4=70, the score of emergency response capability is N5=95, and the score of troubleshooting capability is N6=98. The weight factors Q1 to Q6 of this embodiment are 0.1, 0.2, 0.1, 0.1, 0.3, and 0.2, respectively. Therefore, the skill score P4=0.1×75+0.2×93+0.1×84+0.1×70+0.3×95+0.2×98=89.6 points.

[0071] In the evaluation of the quality of the Am NOTAM data recorded by the probe, data accuracy A1=86 points, data resolution A2=83 points, data format A3=100 points, timeliness A4=99 points, data integrity B1=70 points, data relevance B2=90 points, and data traceability B3=80 points. The data quality weight factors C1 to C4 of this embodiment are 0.4, 0.2, 0.1, and 0.3 respectively; the metadata quality weight factors B1 to B3 are 0.4, 0.5, and 0.1 respectively; and the allocation factors α and β are 0.6 and 0.4 respectively. Therefore, the product quality score P5 of Am=0.6×(86^0.4×83^0.2×100^0.1×99^0.3)+0.4×(0.4×70+0.5×90+0.1×80)=54.3+32.4=86.7 points.

[0072] The weight factors W1 to W5 of the evaluation formula in this embodiment are 0.1, 0.1, 0.1, 0.3, and 0.4 respectively. Therefore, the competency score of Am in the NOTAM reception and processing capability item is: S=100^0.1×60^0.1×76^0.1×89.6^0.3×86.7^0.4=84.49 points.

[0073] S6: Continuously monitor the competence of aviation information management, issue alerts to personnel whose competence scores are below the competence threshold, and calculate the alert rate of aviation information management competence of all personnel.

[0074] In this embodiment, the score of the navigation notice receiving and processing capability item of the competency evaluation object Am is 84.49, which is higher than the preset threshold of 80 for this capability item, and no alarm is required. Return to step S5 to score all the capability items of Am and other personnel in turn, and monitor the scoring results and alarm conditions.

[0075] S7: Adjust the weight factors of the AIM competency evaluation formula and the thresholds of each competency item every six months to keep the AIM competency alert rate between 1% and 5%.

[0076] This enables efficient assessment of aviation intelligence management competence, with the assessment scope covering the entire process from raw data processing to aviation intelligence product release, and comprehensively monitoring the knowledge, skills, attitudes of aviation intelligence management personnel and the quality of aviation intelligence products, which can effectively improve the level of aviation intelligence management competence and the quality of aviation intelligence products.

[0077] The above is only an embodiment of the present invention and does not limit the present invention in any form. Any simple modification, equivalent changes and modifications made to the above embodiment based on the technical essence of the present invention still fall within the protection scope of the technical solution of the present invention.

Claims

1. A method for assessing aviation information management competency, characterized in that: The following steps are involved: S1: Establish an aviation information management competency model, which consists of multiple competency subjects; the competency subjects include one or more competency items; the competency items refer to the personal competencies and product quality requirements that should be possessed when performing aviation information management activities in accordance with the requirements of the Civil Aviation Aviation Information Work Regulations; the personal competencies include three elements: knowledge, skills and attitudes, and the product quality requirements refer to the aviation data quality standards defined in the RTCA-Do201 specification; each competency item contains a threshold value, which is used to determine whether the competency of an individual engaged in aviation information management activities meets the minimum requirements of the competency item; S2: Establish an aviation information management competency evaluation system, which includes three parts: external conditions, observable behaviors and evaluation formulas; the external conditions refer to the environment, tools and external information available when people carry out aviation information management activities; the observable behaviors refer to the knowledge, skills, attitudes and product quality displayed by people when carrying out aviation information management activities under the external conditions; the evaluation formulas refer to a set of mathematical formulas for quantitative evaluation of external conditions and observable behaviors; S3: According to the aviation intelligence data processing process, five competency subjects are created: aviation intelligence original data collection and reporting, navigation notice processing, static aviation data management, aviation chart production, and aviation intelligence product production and release; S4: For each competency subject, transform the aviation information management production system and add aviation information management knowledge base and competency assessment probe functions; S5: Add an AIM competency evaluation link to the AIM production process to evaluate personnel's AIM competency and score them based on subjective impressions and objective sampling results through the AIM competency evaluation system; among which: The subjective impression refers to the enthusiasm and mental state of a person in the production of aviation information management, which is subjectively rated by the superior of the aviation information management practitioner; The objective sampling results refer to the external conditions when people perform AIM production activities and the operating process and product quality recorded by the competency assessment probe; S6: Continuously monitor the competence of aviation information management, issue alerts to personnel whose competence scores are lower than the competence item threshold, and calculate the alert rate of aviation information management competence of all personnel; the alert rate = the number of personnel alerted / the number of all personnel; S7: Adjust the weight factors of the AIM competency evaluation formula and the thresholds of each competency item every six months to keep the AIM competency alert rate between 1% and 5%.

2. The method for evaluating aviation information management competency according to claim 1, characterized in that: In step S2: The evaluation formula is: ,in: S is the aviation information management competency score; is the weight factor, satisfying ,and ; is the score for each item, and ,in: P1 = external condition score, the scoring rules are: 20 points for a work environment without a computer, 60 points for a stand-alone work environment without a network, and 100 points for a work environment with a local area network; P2 = Attitude score, which is a subjective score. The scoring rules are as follows: depressed mood and low work enthusiasm are scored from 0 to 10 points; normal mood and high work enthusiasm are scored from 11 to 60 points; full mood and high work enthusiasm are scored from 61 to 100 points; P3 = knowledge score, the scoring formula is: P3 = g × T, where g represents the difficulty of the test paper 0≤g≤1, and T represents the test paper score 0≤T≤100; P4=skill score, the scoring formula is: ,in It is a sub-skill score, where: N1 = aviation information management awareness score, N2 = work coordination ability score, N3 = automation system operation ability score, N4 = work optimization ability score, N5 = emergency response ability score, N6 = troubleshooting ability score; is the weight factor of the sub-skill score, satisfying ,and ; P5=product quality score, the scoring formula is: ,in: is the data quality score, A1 is the data accuracy score, A2 is the data resolution score, A3 is the data format score, and A4 is the timeliness score. is the data quality weight factor, satisfying ,and ; is the metadata quality score; B1 is the data integrity score, B2 is the data relevance score, and B3 is the data traceability score. is the metadata quality weight factor, satisfying ,and , α and β are allocation factors, satisfying 0<α<1, 0<β<1, and α+β=1.

3. The method for evaluating aviation information management competency according to claim 1, characterized in that: In step S3, the competency items included in each competency subject are: The competency of collecting and reporting original aviation intelligence data includes five competency items: receiving original data, reviewing the compliance of original data, selecting the type of aviation data release, collecting original aviation data, and reporting original aviation data. The main competency subjects of NOTAM processing include: issuing and forwarding regional NOTAM series, issuing and forwarding domestic NOTAM series, issuing international NOTAM series, receiving and processing NOTAM, receiving and issuing snow notices, receiving and issuing volcano notices, and receiving and issuing official bulletins. The main competencies of static aviation data management include: airport data management, flight procedure data management, waypoint and navigation facility data management, route data management, airspace data management, and flight route data management. The main competencies of aeronautical chart production include: airport plan drawing, terminal area map drawing, route map drawing, and digital aeronautical chart production; The main competencies for the production and release of aviation intelligence products include: production and release of printed products, production and release of electronic products, and production and release of digital products.

4. The method for evaluating aviation information management competency according to claim 1, wherein: In step S4: The aviation information management knowledge base includes the technical information of aviation information management specifications of China and ICAO, and has the functions of question bank management and examination answering. According to the work requirements of original data collection, navigation notice issuance, aviation data management, flight procedure design, chart drawing and aviation information product release, the test paper is automatically compiled and graded according to stages and difficulty, and the knowledge gaps of the examinees are analyzed according to the answering results; The competency assessment probes are designed according to the competency requirements of each competency subject, including six types: overall process awareness of aviation information management, work collaboration ability, automation system operation ability, work optimization ability, emergency response ability and troubleshooting ability; Each type of competency assessment probe records observable behaviors in the registration of original aviation data, review of original data notices, information query, aviation data entry, navigation notice processing, flight procedure coding, chart production and results submission links; The competency assessment probe will be automatically triggered when personnel operate the aviation information management system production system, recording personnel operation procedures, data modification records, content verification records, internal and external collaborative work records, data quality, product error rate and task completion time, and automatically collating and statistics data.

Images