Differentiated electricity utilization inspection plan making method

Abstract

The invention discloses a differentiated electricity utilization inspection plan making method, which comprises the steps of collecting data and processing the data, defining indexes for different electricity utilization characteristics according to the processed data, and performing analysis work of a user; setting a unified standard and a threshold value; making a priority order and an inspection plan; and real-time feedback and continuous improvement are realized. According to the method, a differentiated electricity utilization inspection plan making method is provided, so that the problems of lack of unified standards and specifications and randomness and subjectivity of inspection plans in traditional electricity utilization inspection plan making are solved. According to the method, unified standards and specifications are established based on multi-dimensional data analysis, and comprehensive and scientific inspection of all users is ensured, so that the management efficiency of an electric power company is improved, potential risks are reduced, and the user satisfaction is improved.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the technical field of power management, and in particular to a method for formulating a differentiated power consumption inspection plan. Background Art

[0002] In power management, power inspection is an important part, which aims to timely discover and solve potential problems by monitoring and analyzing the power usage of users. Traditional methods of screening users for power inspection often rely on personal experience. Different inspectors may formulate different inspection plans based on their own understanding and experience. At the same time, the lack of data support and standardization and systematization of plan formulation makes it difficult to quickly identify users who need to be inspected, reducing the efficiency and effectiveness of the inspection.

[0003] As the demand for electricity in modern society continues to increase, the safety and stability of the power system has become increasingly important. While providing services, power companies need to effectively monitor and manage users' electricity usage behavior to ensure power supply quality and reliability while reducing operating costs and risks.

[0004] In order to meet these challenges, power companies need to change their traditional inspection methods and adopt scientific and data-driven methods to formulate electricity inspection plans. In recent years, with the development of smart meters and Internet of Things technologies, users' electricity consumption data can be monitored and summarized in real time, providing rich basic data for electricity inspection. Although some electricity inspection methods based on data analysis have been proposed, the current related technologies still have the following shortcomings: the selection of data indicators lacks systematicity, and fails to fully consider multiple factors such as voltage and current data, abnormal data of substations and line losses, power outage data, customer service work order request data, electricity consumption data, load rate data, demand data, and user profile data; when formulating inspection plans, there is a lack of unified standards and specifications, resulting in insufficient pertinence and effectiveness of inspections.

[0005] Therefore, a new method is urgently needed to formulate a scientific and reasonable differentiated electricity inspection plan through comprehensive analysis of multi-dimensional data. This can not only improve the comprehensiveness and accuracy of the inspection, but also effectively reduce the risks in the power management process, improve user satisfaction, and lay the foundation for the long-term development of power companies. Summary of the invention

[0006] In view of the above existing problems, the present invention is proposed.

[0007] Therefore, the present invention provides a differentiated electricity inspection plan formulation method, which solves the problems of lack of unified standards and specifications in traditional electricity inspection plan formulation and the randomness and subjectivity of inspection plans by proposing a differentiated electricity inspection plan formulation method. The method is based on multi-dimensional data analysis, establishes unified standards and specifications, ensures comprehensive and scientific inspections of all users, thereby improving the management efficiency of power companies, reducing potential risks, and improving user satisfaction.

[0008] In order to solve the above technical problems, the present invention provides the following technical solutions, a method for formulating a differentiated electricity inspection plan, comprising:

[0009] Collect and process data, define indicators based on the processed data for different electricity usage characteristics, and conduct user analysis; unify standards and threshold settings; formulate priority sorting and inspection plans; provide real-time feedback and continuous improvement.

[0010] As a preferred scheme of the differentiated electricity consumption inspection plan formulation method described in the present invention, the data collection and data processing includes collecting user electricity consumption data from the marketing management system, metering automation system, electric energy platform, and line loss abnormality analysis system in a scheduled or real-time manner. The collected data include voltage and current data, substation and line loss abnormality data, power outage data, customer service work order request data, electricity consumption data, load rate data, demand data, and user profile data. At the same time, missing or abnormal values ​​are cleaned up, and the voltage and electricity consumption data are formatted.

[0011] As a preferred solution of the differentiated electricity inspection plan formulation method described in the present invention, the defined indicators include: formulating voltage and current indicators, analyzing the sub-item voltage and current of the dedicated transformer user, and the current of a phase in the three phases is not 0, but the voltage of the item is less than 50V at the same time point, and it occurs 10 times or more;

[0012] If one phase of the three-phase current of the dedicated transformer user is less than 0.01 and greater than or equal to 0 for 10 or more times within a day, it is judged as a loss of current abnormality in the current household;

[0013] Formulate abnormal indicators for substations and line losses. If the line meter reading rate is greater than 98% and the line loss rate is greater than the lower limit of the threshold and less than the assessment index, or the power supply and sales are less than 70kW·h at the same time, it is normal, otherwise it is abnormal; among them, the lower limit of the threshold for abnormal indicators of substations and line losses is -2%, the assessment index is 4% or 6%, and 70kW·h is light load;

[0014] If the meter reading rate of the substation is greater than 98% and the line loss rate is greater than the lower limit of the threshold and less than the assessment index, or the power supply and sales are less than the transformer capacity X0.3kW·h at the same time, it is normal, otherwise it is abnormal; the assessment index is 7% or 10%;

[0015] The formulation of power outage analysis indicators includes monitoring and analyzing the collected power outage data, and including users with frequent power outages due to overloads and short circuits in the scope of power inspections to carry out power inspections.

[0016] As a preferred solution of the differentiated electricity inspection plan formulation method described in the present invention, the defined indicators include formulating customer service work order demand analysis indicators. If a user has made 3 or more complaints due to power supply quality problems in the past year, and has made complaints again in the past three months and has a tendency to complain across levels, or if a user has made 3 or more complaints due to electricity demand problems in the past year, and has made complaints again in the past three months and has a tendency to complain across levels, the user is determined to be abnormal.

[0017] Formulate power consumption analysis indicators. If the power consumption of a dedicated transformer user today decreases by more than 500 kWh compared with yesterday and the decrease exceeds 75%, or the power consumption of a dedicated transformer user today increases by more than 500 kWh compared with yesterday and the increase exceeds 200%; or if the billing power consumption of a user who implements the residential tiered electricity price exceeds 2,000 kWh or more for three consecutive months, the user will be judged to be abnormal;

[0018] If the daily power consumption is greater than the sum of the rated capacities of the operating transformers*24 hours, the user is judged to be abnormal.

[0019] As a preferred solution of the method for formulating a differentiated electricity inspection plan described in the present invention, the defined indicators include formulating load rate analysis indicators. If the average load of the transformer load information of the dedicated transformer user in one day is greater than 80%, the load is evaluated as heavy load or overload, and the transformer exceeds the threshold value more than 1 times, then one load non-compliance is recorded. If the number of non-compliance times in the last month is ≥10 times, it is identified as abnormal transformer load;

[0020] Formulate demand abnormality indicators. If the monthly maximum active demand of the dedicated transformer user in the metering system is multiplied by the transformer ratio in the marketing system, that is, the comprehensive multiple, the calculated capacity is greater than 130% of the current transformer capacity of the customer, it is considered abnormal.

[0021] Formulate customer risk and default analysis indicators, analyze customer electricity usage based on residential customer electricity consumption data, holidays and weather data, and identify users who default.

[0022] As a preferred solution of the method for formulating a differentiated electricity inspection plan according to the present invention, the unified standard and threshold setting includes defining each indicator as P in the analysis results of each indicator. i = {P1,P2,P3,...,P n}, and P i ∈{0,1}. When there is a problem, the value of P is set to 1, and when there is no problem, the value of P is set to 0;

[0023] Configure the weights for the importance of each indicator, and define the weight as W i ={W1,W2,W3,...,W n}, and 0≤W i ≤1;

[0024] Calculate each risk value according to the weight value of each indicator. i =P i *W i Determine the risk value of a single indicator;

[0025] The final risk value is obtained by accumulation. The higher the risk value, the higher the inspection priority.

[0026] As a preferred solution of the differentiated electricity inspection plan formulation method of the present invention, the formulation of priority sorting and inspection plan includes, according to the final risk value of each user, performing priority sorting to obtain the following results: R sorted = {R u1 ,R u2 ,R u3 ,R u4 ,R u5 ...} where R u1 ≥R u2 ≥R u3 ≥R u4 ≥R ui ≥R un .

[0027] As a preferred solution of the differentiated electricity inspection plan formulation method described in the present invention, the implementation feedback and continuous improvement include, after formulating the inspection plan, organizing technical personnel to conduct on-site inspections of priority users, and dynamically adjusting the indicator settings based on the inspection results and user feedback, and repeating the above through the implementation of feedback mechanism and data analysis, to continuously improve the formulation and implementation process of the electricity inspection plan.

[0028] A computer device includes a memory and a processor, wherein the memory stores a computer program, and is characterized in that when the processor executes the computer program, the steps of a method for formulating a differentiated electricity inspection plan are implemented.

[0029] A computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, characterized in that when the computer program is executed by a processor, the steps of a method for formulating a differentiated electricity inspection plan are implemented.

[0030] Beneficial effects of the present invention: 1. The present invention ensures a comprehensive understanding of the user's electricity usage behavior through the comprehensive collection and analysis of multi-dimensional data. Compared with the traditional method that relies solely on personal experience, this patent makes full use of multiple data such as voltage and current, line loss, power outage records, customer service complaints, etc., to analyze the user's electricity usage from multiple angles, thereby improving the scientificity and accuracy of the inspection.

[0031] 2. When formulating the inspection plan, the present invention sets clear indicators and standards, including voltage quality, line loss rate, power outage frequency, complaint records, etc. This standardized process makes the inspection results of different users comparable, reduces the deviation of subjective judgment, and improves the fairness and consistency of the inspection.

[0032] 3. By prioritizing users, this patent can effectively identify high-risk users and focus limited resources on those that need inspection the most. This measure not only improves inspection efficiency, but also reduces operating costs, allowing power companies to allocate resources more reasonably.

[0033] 4. The present invention emphasizes a dynamic feedback mechanism, which can collect inspection results and user feedback in a timely manner, and quickly identify and solve problems. Compared with the delayed response of traditional methods, this mechanism ensures that power companies can quickly respond to user power problems and improve user satisfaction.

[0034] 5. By analyzing user complaints and feedback data, this patent helps power companies identify weak links in services and improve service quality in a timely manner, thereby improving user experience and reducing complaint rates.

[0035] 6. This patent can effectively identify potential power system risks by comprehensively analyzing multiple indicators such as voltage and current, line loss and power outages. This forward-looking management method helps prevent equipment failures, power outages and other problems, and ensures the stability and safety of power supply. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0036] In order to more clearly illustrate the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present invention, the accompanying drawings required for use in the description of the embodiments will be briefly introduced below. Obviously, the accompanying drawings described below are only some embodiments of the present invention. For ordinary technicians in this field, other accompanying drawings can be obtained based on these accompanying drawings without paying creative work.

[0037] Figure 1 A flowchart of a method for formulating a differentiated electricity consumption inspection plan is provided for one embodiment of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0038] In order to make the above-mentioned purposes, features and advantages of the present invention more obvious and easy to understand, the specific implementation methods of the present invention are described in detail below in conjunction with the drawings of the specification. Obviously, the described embodiments are part of the embodiments of the present invention, but not all of the embodiments. Based on the embodiments of the present invention, all other embodiments obtained by ordinary persons in the art without creative work should fall within the scope of protection of the present invention.

[0039] In the following description, many specific details are set forth to facilitate a full understanding of the present invention, but the present invention may also be implemented in other ways different from those described herein, and those skilled in the art may make similar generalizations without violating the connotation of the present invention. Therefore, the present invention is not limited to the specific embodiments disclosed below.

[0040] Secondly, the term "one embodiment" or "embodiment" as used herein refers to a specific feature, structure, or characteristic that may be included in at least one implementation of the present invention. The term "in one embodiment" that appears in different places in this specification does not necessarily refer to the same embodiment, nor does it refer to a separate or selective embodiment that is mutually exclusive with other embodiments.

[0041] The present invention is described in detail with reference to schematic diagrams. When describing the embodiments of the present invention, for the sake of convenience, the cross-sectional diagrams showing the device structure will not be partially enlarged according to the general scale, and the schematic diagrams are only examples, which should not limit the scope of protection of the present invention. In addition, in actual production, the three-dimensional dimensions of length, width and depth should be included.

[0042] At the same time, in the description of the present invention, it should be noted that the directions or positional relationships indicated by the terms "upper, lower, inner and outer" are based on the directions or positional relationships shown in the drawings, and are only for the convenience of describing the present invention and simplifying the description, rather than indicating or implying that the device or element referred to must have a specific direction, be constructed and operated in a specific direction, and therefore cannot be understood as limiting the present invention. In addition, the terms "first, second or third" are only used for descriptive purposes and cannot be understood as indicating or implying relative importance.

[0043] In the present invention, unless otherwise clearly specified and limited, the terms "install, connect, connect" should be understood in a broad sense, for example: it can be a fixed connection, a detachable connection or an integral connection; it can also be a mechanical connection, an electrical connection or a direct connection, or it can be indirectly connected through an intermediate medium, or it can be the internal communication of two components. For ordinary technicians in this field, the specific meanings of the above terms in the present invention can be understood according to specific circumstances.

[0044] Example 1, reference Figure 1 , which is the first embodiment of the present invention, and provides a method for formulating a differentiated electricity inspection plan, comprising:

[0045] S1: Collect and process data, define indicators based on different electricity consumption characteristics, and conduct user analysis.

[0046] S2: Unified standards and threshold setting.

[0047] S3: Develop a prioritization and review plan.

[0048] S4: Real-time feedback and continuous improvement.

[0049] The data collection and data processing include collecting user electricity consumption data from the marketing management system, metering automation system, electric energy platform, and line loss abnormality analysis system in a scheduled or real-time manner. The collected data include voltage and current data, substation and line loss abnormality data, power outage data, customer service work order request data, electricity consumption data, load rate data, demand data, and user profile data. At the same time, missing or abnormal values ​​are cleaned up, and the voltage and electricity consumption data are formatted.

[0050] The defined indicators include formulating voltage and current indicators, analyzing the sub-item voltage and current of the dedicated transformer user, and the current of one phase among the three phases is not 0, but the voltage of this item is less than 50V at the same time point, which occurs 10 times or more;

[0051] If one phase of the three-phase current of the dedicated transformer user is less than 0.01 and greater than or equal to 0 for 10 or more times within a day, it is judged as a loss of current abnormality in the current household;

[0052] Formulate abnormal indicators for substations and line losses. If the line meter reading rate is greater than 98% and the line loss rate is greater than the lower limit of the threshold and less than the assessment index, or the power supply and sales are less than 70kW·h at the same time, it is normal, otherwise it is abnormal; among them, the lower limit of the threshold for abnormal indicators of substations and line losses is -2%, the assessment index is 4% or 6%, and 70kW·h is light load;

[0053] If the meter reading rate of the substation is greater than 98% and the line loss rate is greater than the lower limit of the threshold and less than the assessment index, or the power supply and sales are less than the transformer capacity X0.3kW·h at the same time, it is normal, otherwise it is abnormal; the assessment index is 7% or 10%;

[0054] The formulation of power outage analysis indicators includes monitoring and analyzing the collected power outage data, and including users with frequent power outages due to overloads and short circuits in the scope of power inspections to carry out power inspections.

[0055] The defined indicators include formulating customer service work order demand analysis indicators. If a user has made three or more complaints due to power supply quality issues in the past year, and has made complaints again in the past three months and has a tendency to complain to a higher level, or if a user has made three or more complaints due to power demand issues in the past year, and has made complaints again in the past three months and has a tendency to complain to a higher level, the user is judged to be abnormal;

[0056] Formulate power consumption analysis indicators. If the power consumption of a dedicated transformer user today decreases by more than 500 kWh compared with yesterday and the decrease exceeds 75%, or the power consumption of a dedicated transformer user today increases by more than 500 kWh compared with yesterday and the increase exceeds 200%; or if the billing power consumption of a user who implements the residential tiered electricity price exceeds 2,000 kWh or more for three consecutive months, the user is considered abnormal;

[0057] If the daily power consumption is greater than the sum of the rated capacities of the operating transformers*24 hours, the user is judged to be abnormal.

[0058] The defined indicators include: formulating load rate analysis indicators. If the average load of the transformer load information of the dedicated transformer user in one day is greater than 80%, the load evaluation is heavy load or overload, and the transformer exceeds the threshold value more than 1 times, then one load non-compliance is recorded. If the number of non-compliance in the last month is ≥10 times, it is identified as abnormal transformer load;

[0059] Formulate demand abnormality indicators. If the monthly maximum active demand of the dedicated transformer user in the metering system is multiplied by the transformer ratio in the marketing system, that is, the comprehensive multiple, the calculated capacity is greater than 130% of the current transformer capacity of the customer, it is considered abnormal.

[0060] Formulate customer risk and default analysis indicators, analyze customer electricity usage based on residential customer electricity consumption data, holidays and weather data, and identify users who default.

[0061] The unified standard and threshold setting include defining each indicator as P in the analysis results of each indicator. i = {P1,P2,P3,...,P n}, and P i ∈{0,1}. When there is a problem, the value of P is set to 1, and when there is no problem, the value of P is set to 0;

[0062] Configure the weights for the importance of each indicator, and define the weight as W i ={W1,W2,W3,...,W n}, and 0≤W i ≤1;

[0063] Calculate each risk value according to the weight value of each indicator. i =P i *W iDetermine the risk value of a single indicator;

[0064] The final risk value is obtained by accumulation. The higher the risk value, the higher the inspection priority.

[0065] The formulation of the priority sorting and inspection plan includes, according to the final risk value of each user, performing priority sorting to obtain the following results: R sorted = {R u1 ,R u2 ,R u3 ,R u4 ,R u5 ...} where R u1 ≥R u2 ≥R u3 ≥R u4 ≥R ui ≥R un .

[0066] The implementation feedback and continuous improvement include, after formulating the inspection plan, organizing technical personnel to conduct on-site inspections of priority users, and dynamically adjusting the indicator settings according to the inspection results and user feedback, and repeating the above through the implementation of feedback mechanism and data analysis to continuously improve the formulation and implementation process of the electricity inspection plan.

[0067] Embodiment 2, the second embodiment of the present invention, is different from the previous embodiment in that:

[0068] If the functions are implemented in the form of software functional units and sold or used as independent products, they can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium. Based on this understanding, the technical solution of the present invention, or the part that contributes to the prior art or the part of the technical solution, can be embodied in the form of a software product. The computer software product is stored in a storage medium, including several instructions for a computer device (which can be a personal computer, a server, or a network device, etc.) to perform all or part of the steps of the methods described in each embodiment of the present invention. The aforementioned storage medium includes: U disk, mobile hard disk, read-only memory (ROM, Read-Only Memory), random access memory (RAM, Random Access Memory), disk or optical disk, etc., which can store program codes.

[0069] The present application is described with reference to the flowcharts and / or block diagrams of the methods, devices (systems), and computer program products according to the embodiments of the present application. It should be understood that each process and / or box in the flowchart and / or block diagram, as well as the combination of the processes and / or boxes in the flowchart and / or block diagram, can be implemented by computer program instructions. These computer program instructions can be provided to a processor of a general-purpose computer, a special-purpose computer, an embedded processor, or other programmable data processing device to generate a machine, so that the instructions executed by the processor of the computer or other programmable data processing device generate instructions for implementing the processes in the flowchart and / or block diagram. Figure 1 A process or multiple processes and / or boxes Figure 1 A device that provides the functions specified in a block or multiple blocks.

[0070] These computer program instructions may also be stored in a computer-readable memory capable of directing a computer or other programmable data processing device to operate in a specific manner, so that the instructions stored in the computer-readable memory produce an article of manufacture comprising an instruction device, which implements the process Figure 1 A process or multiple processes and / or boxes Figure 1 A function specified in one or more boxes.

[0071] These computer program instructions can also be loaded onto a computer or other programmable data processing device so that a series of operating steps are executed on the computer or other programmable device to produce a computer-implemented process, thereby providing instructions for implementing the process. Figure 1 A process or multiple processes and / or boxes Figure 1 A step that specifies a function in one or more boxes.

[0072] Although the preferred embodiments of the present application have been described, those skilled in the art may make other changes and modifications to these embodiments once they have learned the basic creative concept. Therefore, the appended claims are intended to be interpreted as including the preferred embodiments and all changes and modifications falling within the scope of the present application.

[0073] Obviously, those skilled in the art can make various changes and modifications to the present application without departing from the spirit and scope of the present application. Thus, if these modifications and variations of the present application fall within the scope of the claims of the present application and their equivalents, the present application is also intended to include these modifications and variations.

Claims

1. A method for formulating a differentiated electricity inspection plan, characterized in that: include, Collect and process data, define indicators based on different electricity consumption characteristics, and conduct user analysis; Unified standards and threshold setting; Develop a prioritization and review plan; Real-time feedback and continuous improvement.

2. A method for formulating a differentiated electricity inspection plan according to claim 1, characterized in that: The data collection and data processing include collecting user electricity consumption data from the marketing management system, metering automation system, electric energy platform, and line loss abnormality analysis system in a scheduled or real-time manner. The collected data include voltage and current data, substation and line loss abnormality data, power outage data, customer service work order request data, electricity consumption data, load rate data, demand data, and user profile data. At the same time, missing or abnormal values ​​are cleaned up, and the voltage and electricity consumption data are formatted.

3. A method for formulating a differentiated electricity inspection plan as claimed in claim 2, characterized in that: The defined indicators include formulating voltage and current indicators, analyzing the sub-item voltage and current of the dedicated transformer user, and the current of one phase among the three phases is not 0, but the voltage of this item is less than 50V at the same time point, which occurs 10 times or more; If one phase of the three-phase current of the dedicated transformer user is less than 0.01 and greater than or equal to 0 for 10 or more times within a day, it is judged as a loss of current abnormality in the current household; Formulate abnormal indicators for substations and line losses. If the line meter reading rate is greater than 98% and the line loss rate is greater than the lower limit of the threshold and less than the assessment index, or the power supply and sales are less than 70kW·h at the same time, it is normal, otherwise it is abnormal; among them, the lower limit of the threshold for abnormal indicators of substations and line losses is -2%, the assessment index is 4% or 6%, and 70kW·h is light load; If the meter reading rate of the substation is greater than 98% and the line loss rate is greater than the lower limit of the threshold and less than the assessment index, or the power supply and sales are less than the transformer capacity X0.3kW·h at the same time, it is normal, otherwise it is abnormal; the assessment index is 7% or 10%; The formulation of power outage analysis indicators includes monitoring and analyzing the collected power outage data, and including users with frequent power outages due to overloads and short circuits in the scope of power inspections to carry out power inspections.

4. A method for formulating a differentiated electricity inspection plan as claimed in claim 3, characterized in that: The defined indicators include formulating customer service work order demand analysis indicators. If a user has made three or more complaints due to power supply quality issues in the past year, and has made complaints again in the past three months and has a tendency to complain to a higher level, or if a user has made three or more complaints due to power demand issues in the past year, and has made complaints again in the past three months and has a tendency to complain to a higher level, the user is judged to be abnormal; Formulate power consumption analysis indicators. If the power consumption of dedicated transformer users today decreases by more than 500 kWh compared with yesterday and the decrease exceeds 75%, or the power consumption of dedicated transformer users today increases by more than 500 kWh compared with yesterday and the increase exceeds 200%; Or for users who implement the residential tiered electricity price, if the billed electricity consumption exceeds 2,000 kWh or more for three consecutive months, the user will be considered abnormal; If the daily power consumption is greater than the sum of the rated capacities of the operating transformers*24 hours, the user is judged to be abnormal.

5. A method for formulating a differentiated electricity inspection plan as claimed in claim 4, characterized in that: The defined indicators include: formulating load rate analysis indicators. If the average load of the transformer load information of the dedicated transformer user in one day is greater than 80%, the load evaluation is heavy load or overload, and the transformer exceeds the threshold value more than 1 times, then one load non-compliance is recorded. If the number of non-compliance in the last month is ≥10 times, it is identified as abnormal transformer load; Formulate demand abnormality indicators. If the monthly maximum active demand of the dedicated transformer user in the metering system is multiplied by the transformer ratio in the marketing system, that is, the comprehensive multiple, the calculated capacity is greater than 130% of the current transformer capacity of the customer, it is considered abnormal. Formulate customer risk and default analysis indicators, analyze customer electricity usage based on residential customer electricity consumption data, holidays and weather data, and identify users who default.

6. A method for formulating a differentiated electricity inspection plan as claimed in claim 5, characterized in that: The unified standard and threshold setting include defining the abnormal value of each indicator as P in the analysis results of each indicator. i , P i = {P1,P2,P3,...,P n }, and P i ∈{0,1}, i represents the type of anomaly; When there is a problem, the value of P is set to 1, and when there is no problem, the value of P is set to 0; Configure the weights for the importance of each indicator, and define the weight of each indicator in all indicators as W i , W i ={W1,W2,W3,...,W n }, and 0≤W i ≤1, i represents the type of abnormality; Define R i is the risk value of each indicator, and the risk value of each indicator is calculated according to the weight value of each indicator. i =P i *W i Determine the risk value of a single indicator; Define R 总 To accumulate the final risk value, the higher the risk value, the higher the inspection priority.

7. A method for formulating a differentiated electricity inspection plan according to claim 6, characterized in that: The formulation of the priority sorting and inspection plan includes, according to the final risk value of each user, performing priority sorting to obtain the following results: R sorted = {R u1 ,R u2 ,R u3 ,R u4 ,R u5 ...} where R u1 ≥R u2 ≥R u3 ≥R u4 ≥R ui ≥R un .

8. A method for formulating a differentiated electricity inspection plan as claimed in claim 7, characterized in that: The implementation feedback and continuous improvement include, after formulating the inspection plan, organizing technical personnel to conduct on-site inspections of priority users, and dynamically adjusting the indicator settings according to the inspection results and user feedback, and repeating the above through the implementation of feedback mechanism and data analysis to continuously improve the formulation and implementation process of the electricity inspection plan.

9. A computer device comprising a memory and a processor, wherein the memory stores a computer program, wherein: When the processor executes the computer program, the steps of the method according to any one of claims 1 to 8 are implemented.

10. A computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, characterized in that: When the computer program is executed by a processor, the steps of the method according to any one of claims 1 to 8 are implemented.

Images