Steel bar modeling method for fabricated prefabricated wall

Abstract

The invention relates to a steel bar modeling method for an assembly type prefabricated wall body, which comprises the following steps: S1, generating a prefabricated wall body contour: if the wall body belongs to a situation containing a wall hole, executing the step S2; if the wall body belongs to the situation of the wall body without the hole, no wall body sub-component is generated, and the edge component is directly and manually arranged; s2, wall body hole arrangement; s3, default sub-component steel bar area geometric data calculation; s4, default sub-component steel bar area drawing is generated; s5, performing addition, deletion, checking and modification on the sub-component data to obtain the sub-component data after addition, deletion, checking and modification; and S6, sub-components needed by the wall body are drawn. According to the method, the division work of the reinforcing steel bar area is preposed, and the complex reinforcing steel bar layout problem is simplified into a series of reusable and combinable standardized modules through a high abstraction method. By means of the strategy, the reinforcing steel bar design process is more organized and clearer, management is easy, and the flexibility and adaptability of reinforcing steel bar configuration between different wall body types are greatly improved.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The invention relates to the technical field of construction engineering, and in particular to a steel bar modeling method for assembled prefabricated walls. Background Art

[0002] When dealing with wall reinforcement layout, the common problem of traditional design software is the lack of systematic and in-depth wall division. They often ignore the targeted regional division of different parts of the wall (such as infill walls, connecting beams, edge components, etc.), but take a one-size-fits-all approach to directly arrange reinforcement, or only provide limited and rigid local regional division options. This approach not only limits the sophistication and rationality of reinforcement layout, but also makes the design process lack sufficient flexibility and difficult to adapt to the complex and changing actual engineering conditions. In addition, due to the imperfect regional division, subsequent design adjustments and maintenance work have become extremely difficult, adding unnecessary cost burdens. First, the abstraction level of traditional wall reinforcement configuration is insufficient, and there is a lack of effective identification and reuse mechanism for similar reinforcement areas. This defect directly leads to a large amount of repetitive work in the reinforcement layout process, even in the face of repetitive or similar design elements, which is not only time-consuming and labor-intensive, but also greatly increases the cost and difficulty of later maintenance. Specifically, due to the inability to efficiently use existing reinforcement layout templates or modules, designers and engineers have to repeat tedious calculations and layouts, making it difficult to achieve optimal allocation and efficient utilization of resources. Secondly, the flexibility of traditional wall reinforcement configuration is limited, and its design framework is often limited to a few standard wall types. Its adaptability is particularly insufficient for the increasing number of special-shaped wall structures. The complex geometric form and unique stress characteristics of special-shaped walls require that the reinforcement configuration must have a high degree of flexibility and customization. However, the traditional method has obvious shortcomings in this regard, and it is difficult to provide sufficient degrees of freedom to meet the design requirements in complex application scenarios. This not only limits the innovation and diversity of the design, but may also have an adverse impact on the overall performance and safety of the wall. Finally, the traditional wall reinforcement configuration technology lacks a set of sustainable and optimizable reinforcement layout rules. This means that when faced with potential new reinforcement layout area requirements, the system often cannot respond quickly and adapt effectively. This lack of scalability limits the potential and application prospects of the technology in future development. An ideal reinforcement layout rule system should be able to continue to evolve with the changing design requirements, and provide designers with more flexible, efficient and intelligent reinforcement configuration solutions through continuous learning and optimization. However, the current technical status quo is obviously unable to meet this requirement, and it is urgently needed to be improved through technological innovation and breakthroughs.

[0003] The information disclosed in this background technology section is only intended to deepen the understanding of the overall background technology of the present invention, and should not be regarded as acknowledging or suggesting in any form that the information constitutes the prior art already known to those skilled in the art. Summary of the invention

[0004] The purpose of the present invention is to provide a steel bar modeling method for assembled prefabricated walls to solve the technical problems existing in the prior art.

[0005] In order to achieve the above object, the present invention adopts the following technical solutions: The present invention provides a steel bar modeling method for an assembled prefabricated wall, which comprises the following steps: S1. Generate prefabricated wall outline: If the wall contains a hole, execute step S2; If the wall body is a wall body without openings, no wall body sub-components will be generated, and the edge components will be manually arranged; S2, wall opening arrangement; S3, default sub-component reinforcement area geometry data calculation; S4. Generate default sub-component reinforcement area drawing; S5, add, delete, query and modify sub-component data, and obtain the sub-component data after addition, deletion, query and modification; S6. Draw the sub-components required for the wall.

[0006] Preferably, in step S1, when the wall body is a wall body without openings, the system defaults to a single structure without sub-components, and directly uses a preset algorithm to automatically derive the precise geometric information of the edge components, allowing manual arrangement of hidden wall columns; when a beam structure passes through the top of the wall body, the system can automatically identify and capture the exact position of the beam and its detailed geometric parameters, and then automatically calculate the two-dimensional coordinate points required for the top incision and the specific geometric dimensions of the incision based on the acquired data, thereby achieving precise incision processing on the top of the wall. At the same time, the system can also calculate the local coordinate points and geometric shape of the hidden columns at the bottom of the incision, ensuring accurate arrangement of edge components at the bottom of the incision.

[0007] Preferably, in step S2, after the prefabricated wall outline is generated, the optimization process of the wall details is implemented through modeling technology, including: by accurately inputting the opening coordinate points (X, Y), clearly specifying the specific positions of door openings, window openings and required incisions; combined with the comprehensive input of the opening geometric information, including but not limited to key parameters of size, shape, and direction, the system can automatically complete the precise arrangement of these openings and incisions on the wall.

[0008] Preferably, in step S3, based on known conditions in the wall design stage, including but not limited to the overall size of the wall, the precise position and size of the top cutout, and the specific geometry and coordinate information of the wall opening, as basic data for calculating the regional layout of sub-components, the system can automatically perform calculations and analyses to derive the initial layout area of ​​key sub-components and their basic data parameters.

[0009] Preferably, in step S4, for each identified opening, the system automatically configures edge components on both sides of the opening, automatically generates a connecting beam structure at the top of the opening, and automatically fills the bottom of the opening with wall materials to close the bottom space.

[0010] Preferably, in step S6, sub-components required for the wall are drawn, including: connecting beam drawing, filling wall drawing, edge component drawing and other component drawing.

[0011] By adopting the above technical solution, the present invention has the following beneficial effects: The present invention puts the division of the reinforcement area in front, and through a highly abstract method, simplifies the complex reinforcement layout problem into a series of reusable and combinable standardized modules. This strategy not only makes the reinforcement design process more organized and easy to manage, but also greatly enhances the flexibility and adaptability of reinforcement configuration between different wall types. By following this set of rules, designers can quickly locate and apply appropriate reinforcement layout templates, thereby greatly shortening the design cycle, reducing duplication of work, and ensuring the rationality and economy of reinforcement configuration. In addition, the standardized reinforcement area layout also facilitates subsequent maintenance and upgrade work, reducing the additional costs caused by design changes or repair needs. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0012] In order to more clearly illustrate the specific implementation methods of the present invention or the technical solutions in the prior art, the drawings required for use in the specific implementation methods or the description of the prior art will be briefly introduced below. Obviously, the drawings described below are some implementation methods of the present invention. For ordinary technicians in this field, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without paying creative work.

[0013] Figure 1 A workflow diagram of a reinforcement modeling method for an assembled prefabricated wall provided in an embodiment of the present invention; Figure 2 The wall provided in the embodiment of the present invention is a first form of generating a graph of a wall without openings; Figure 3 The wall provided in the embodiment of the present invention is a second form of generating a graph of a wall without openings; Figure 4The third form of generating diagram of a wall body provided in the embodiment of the present invention is a wall body without openings; Figure 5 The wall provided in the embodiment of the present invention belongs to the first form of generating diagram of a wall with an opening; Figure 6 The wall provided in the embodiment of the present invention belongs to the second type of wall with openings; Figure 7 A generated diagram of a special-shaped knife handle wall provided by an embodiment of the present invention; Figure 8 A schematic diagram of calculating basic geometric information of edge components based on basic geometric information of a wall when there is no opening provided by an embodiment of the present invention; Fig. 9 When it is an opening provided by the embodiment of the present invention, the basic geometric information of the edge component is calculated according to the basic geometric information of the wall; Fig.10 A design process for scenario 1 after the improvement of the sub-component reinforcement area arrangement process provided by an embodiment of the present invention; Fig.11 The design process of scenario 2 after the improvement of the sub-component reinforcement area arrangement process provided by the embodiment of the present invention; Fig.12 The design process of scenario 3 after the improvement of the sub-component reinforcement area arrangement process provided by the embodiment of the present invention; Fig.13 A design drawing after the sub-component reinforcement area arrangement process is improved provided in an embodiment of the present invention; Fig.14 A schematic diagram of structural wall concrete contour modeling provided by an embodiment of the present invention; Fig.15 A schematic diagram of the precise arrangement of openings and cutouts in a wall provided by an embodiment of the present invention; Fig.16 A schematic diagram of completing the splitting of a prefabricated wall with one click provided by an embodiment of the present invention; Fig.17 A schematic diagram of arranging wall sub-component areas provided in an embodiment of the present invention; Fig.18 A schematic diagram of an embodiment of the present invention after deleting edge components and filling walls; Fig.19 A schematic diagram of querying the geometric properties of a sub-component generated by default provided by an embodiment of the present invention; Fig. 20 An interface diagram of querying attribute parameters of a default generated sub-component provided by an embodiment of the present invention; Fig.21 A schematic diagram of the effect of manually arranging edge components provided by an embodiment of the present invention; Fig. 22 A schematic diagram of manually adding a filling wall provided by an embodiment of the present invention; Fig.23 A schematic diagram of manually arranging gaps provided by an embodiment of the present invention; Fig.24 A schematic diagram of an interface before adjustment of an edge component provided by an embodiment of the present invention; Fig.25 Schematic diagram of the interface after the edge component is adjusted according to an embodiment of the present invention Fig.26 A schematic diagram of the arrangement of required sub-components provided in an embodiment of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0014] The technical solution of the present invention will be described clearly and completely below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. Obviously, the described embodiments are only part of the embodiments of the present invention, not all of the embodiments. Based on the embodiments of the present invention, all other embodiments obtained by ordinary technicians in this field without creative work are within the scope of protection of the present invention.

[0015] The following is combined with Figures 1 to 22 The specific embodiments of the present invention are described in detail. It should be understood that the specific embodiments described herein are only used to illustrate and explain the present invention, and are not used to limit the present invention. Example

[0016] This embodiment provides a steel bar modeling method for an assembled prefabricated wall, which includes the following steps: S1. Generate the outline of the prefabricated wall: If the wall contains a wall hole, execute step S2; if the wall does not have a hole, do not generate the wall subcomponents, and directly arrange the edge components manually. S2. Wall hole arrangement; S3. Calculate the default subcomponent reinforcement area geometry data; S4. Generate the default subcomponent reinforcement area drawing; S5. Add, delete, check and modify the subcomponent data, and obtain the subcomponent data after addition, deletion, check and modification; S6. Draw the subcomponents required for the wall. It can be seen that this embodiment provides a systematic wall division rule. This rule can comprehensively cover all key parts of the wall, and scientifically and reasonably divide different reinforcement arrangement areas according to the force characteristics and functional requirements of different parts. Through this refined area division, designers can use reinforcement resources more flexibly to achieve accurate abstraction and efficient modeling of local reinforcement of the wall. At the same time, this systematic division rule will also provide strong scalability support for reinforcement modeling, so that the model can easily cope with various design changes and optimization requirements, bringing unprecedented convenience and benefits to the design, construction and maintenance of prefabricated walls. In the detailed design stage of prefabricated wall reinforcement, this application innovatively puts the layout of the reinforcement area in advance. Through in-depth analysis and induction, it extracts several typical rules that are most representative of the layout of the wall reinforcement area. These rules cover a comprehensive range from the most basic wall without door and window openings to walls with top cuts, door and window openings, and even complex special-shaped knife handles. This pre-layout strategy aims to lay a solid foundation for the subsequent design process and improve the overall design efficiency and accuracy.

[0017] Combination Figures 2 to 3 As shown in the figure, when dealing with a wall without a hole, the system assumes that the wall is a single structure without sub-components. At this time, the system can use the preset algorithm to automatically derive the precise geometric information of the edge components based on business needs, allowing designers to conveniently manually arrange the wall hidden columns to ensure the stability of the structure. If there is a beam structure passing through the top of the wall, the system can intelligently identify and capture the exact position of the beam and its detailed geometric parameters, and then automatically calculate the two-dimensional coordinate points required for the top incision and the specific geometric dimensions of the incision based on these precise data, so as to achieve accurate incision processing on the top of the wall. At the same time, the system can further calculate the local coordinate points and geometric form of the hidden column at the bottom of the incision to ensure the accurate arrangement of edge components at the bottom of the incision to enhance the load-bearing and stability of the overall structure.

[0018] In addition, combined Figure 4As shown in the figure, the system also demonstrates powerful processing capabilities for complex wall structures with infill walls. It can automatically identify the specific location and geometric features of the infill wall, and based on this, accurately calculate the optimal layout and geometric dimensions of the connecting beam and edge components. On this basis, the system can automatically set the connecting beam at the appropriate position on the top of the wall, and accurately arrange the hidden columns on both sides of the infill wall to fully optimize the overall force performance and structural safety of the wall. Through this series of intelligent and automated processing processes, we have successfully achieved efficient pre-planning of the wall reinforcement area layout, providing strong support for subsequent detailed design and construction.

[0019] During the wall design process, if the wall is planned to contain one or more openings, this technical solution provides an efficient and flexible processing mechanism. Specifically, the system can directly capture and parse the location data of these openings, and then use advanced algorithms to accurately derive the detailed geometric information of the sub-components required around the openings. Under the default configuration, the system will automatically generate edge components on both sides of the opening to enhance structural stability, build connecting beams on the top to connect the walls on both sides, and fill the bottom with filler walls to ensure the integrity and functionality of the opening area. In addition, in order to meet the personalized needs of different business scenarios, the system also allows users to easily adjust the position or delete the generated sub-components according to actual needs, realizing a high degree of customizability of the design.

[0020] Combination Figures 5 and 6 As shown, in particular, when the door opening is in a special position, that is, its edge is close to one side of the wall, the system can intelligently identify this special situation and make corresponding adjustments. In this situation, the system will still generate a connecting beam at the top of the wall to maintain the continuity of the structure, but on the other side where the door opening is not close to the edge of the wall, a hidden column will be generated to strengthen the support capacity of this area, thereby ensuring the stability and safety of the entire wall structure under complex stress conditions. This design not only reflects the precise grasp of the details of this technical solution, but also demonstrates its flexibility and adaptability in responding to diverse design needs.

[0021] After completing the automatic generation of default sub-components of the wall (including edge components, connecting beams and infill walls, etc.), the system further provides a powerful sub-component adjustment function to fully respond to various business needs. Specifically, users can freely modify the width of the hidden column according to actual design needs to optimize the overall bearing capacity and aesthetics of the wall. If there is a infill wall between the hidden column and the door and window openings, and the layout or size of the infill wall has a specific impact on the overall structure, the system allows users to accurately move the position of the hidden column to ensure coordination and balance between the components.

[0022] In addition, for special needs such as the need to cut holes inside the infill wall to accommodate pipes and equipment, the system supports flexible arrangement of holes inside the infill wall and automatically adjusts the outline of the infill wall to adapt to these changes, maintaining the integrity and functionality of the wall structure. This function not only improves the flexibility of design, but also greatly simplifies the processing flow of wall construction in complex scenarios.

[0023] Combination Figure 7 As shown, it is worth mentioning that this system also has a strong ability to handle special situations. When encountering complex or special business application requirements, users can freely arrange connecting beams, filling walls, hidden columns and other sub-components at any position of the wall to achieve personalized design and customized solutions. This high degree of flexibility and customizability makes this system widely applicable to the in-depth design of various building wall structures, meeting the needs of various design scenarios from simple to complex.

[0024] Taking a common wall with no opening or one opening as an example, the process of calculating its geometric information is listed as follows: Figures 8 to 9 shown.

[0025] In the process of sub-component area layout, we adopted a systematic and efficient methodology. First, we made full use of the known conditions in the wall design stage, including but not limited to the overall size of the wall, the precise position and size of the top cutout, and the specific geometry and coordinate information of the wall hole, as the basic data for calculating the sub-component area layout. Based on this detailed input information, the system can automatically perform complex calculations and analyses to accurately derive the initial layout area and basic data parameters of key sub-components such as coupling beams, edge components, and infill walls.

[0026] Subsequently, the system will automatically generate a preliminary layout plan for these sub-components in the wall according to the preset default rules, ensuring that each sub-component can be initially placed in a reasonable position and size. However, this is only the starting point of the layout process. In order to meet diverse business needs and personalized design goals, the system further provides a flexible sub-component adjustment function. Users can add, delete, check, modify and other operations on the key information such as the coordinate position and geometric dimensions of the sub-components that have been generated by default according to actual design needs, so as to achieve refined adjustment and optimization of the sub-component layout.

[0027] Through this series of intelligent processing combined with manual intervention, we can ultimately ensure that the sub-component areas required for the wall are accurately and reasonably arranged. This process not only improves design efficiency and accuracy, but also gives designers greater freedom and flexibility to cope with various complex and changing design challenges.

[0028] The design process after the improvement of the sub-component reinforcement area layout process is as follows Figures 10 to 13 shown.

[0029] In summary, 1) This application aims to propose a set of innovative modeling rules specifically for the design of the wall reinforcement area of ​​precast concrete shear wall structures, aiming to transform the wall reinforcement data that may have been scattered and disordered into a highly structured form. The implementation of this rule not only greatly improves the readability and manageability of the data, but more importantly, it provides a more convenient and efficient way to achieve rapid expansion and update of wall reinforcement configurations in the future continuous iteration and optimization process of precast concrete shear wall structures. By following this modeling rule, designers can easily meet the challenges of technological development and ensure that wall reinforcement design always keeps pace with the latest developments in precast concrete shear wall structures.

[0030] 2) In order to further improve design efficiency and reduce maintenance costs, this application also proposes an innovative steel bar abstraction strategy. Specifically, we deeply explore and integrate those steel bars that follow the same or similar arrangement rules, and refine them into reusable local steel bar modules through advanced abstract technology. This measure not only significantly enhances the reusability of local steel bars, allowing the same or similar design scenarios to directly call these prefabricated modules, thereby greatly reducing the repeated development of steel bars for prefabricated concrete shear wall structural components; at the same time, it also simplifies the complexity of subsequent maintenance work, because for these standardized steel bar modules, we can establish a more unified and efficient maintenance mechanism, thereby effectively reducing the overall development and maintenance workload. Example

[0031] The following describes the specific operation process of generating the wall layout sub-component area in a common situation: 1) Combination Fig.14 As shown, according to the wall information in the two-dimensional drawing in the construction drawing, the concrete contour modeling of the structural wall is completed; 2) Combination Fig.15 As shown in the figure, in the deepening stage of wall design, the accurate arrangement of openings and cuts in the wall is a crucial link. Specifically, after the basic outline of the wall is established through preliminary design, we introduced highly refined modeling technology to further optimize the details of the wall. In this process, users can clearly specify the specific locations of door openings, window openings and other required cuts by accurately inputting the opening coordinate points (X, Y). At the same time, combined with the comprehensive input of the opening geometry information, including but not limited to key parameters such as size, shape, and direction, the system can automatically complete the precise arrangement of these openings and cuts on the wall. This method not only greatly improves the accuracy and meticulousness of wall modeling, but also ensures the rationality and practicality of the layout of openings and cuts, laying a solid foundation for the smooth progress of the subsequent construction stage.

[0032] 3) One-click completion of prefabricated wall splitting and combination Fig.16 As shown; 4) Combination Fig.17 As shown in the figure, in the wall structure design, we implemented a highly specialized automated process to accurately arrange the wall sub-component area. This process can intelligently identify complex structural features such as openings and cuts on the wall, and automatically perform the sub-component arrangement task according to preset specialized default rules. Specifically, for each identified opening, the system will automatically configure edge components on both sides. These edge components are carefully calculated and optimized to enhance the structural rigidity and stability of the opening area. At the same time, at the top of the opening, the system will accurately generate a connecting beam structure to ensure an effective connection between the walls on both sides and maintain the continuity and coordination of the overall structure. At the bottom of the opening, it will be automatically filled with professional filling wall materials to close the bottom space, prevent structural defects, and improve the overall performance of the wall.

[0033] 5) Delete the default generated sub-components according to business needs. Fig.18 As shown below, this is the effect after deleting the edge components and filling the wall.

[0034] 6) You can also query the geometric properties of the default generated subcomponents, combined with Fig.19 , 20 shown.

[0035] 7) In order to fully meet the diverse business needs and personalized design goals, the technology of this application provides a highly flexible sub-component configuration function. Users can accurately set the basic geometric dimensions of sub-components according to the specific requirements of the project, including but not limited to key parameters such as length, width, height and cross-sectional shape, to ensure that the sub-components are perfectly matched with the overall structure. On this basis, users also have the ability to freely arrange sub-components at any position of the wall. Whether it is an edge component, a filling wall or other types of sub-components, they can be flexibly arranged according to design needs to achieve customized and refined design of the wall structure.

[0036] The following figure shows the manual layout effect of this patented technology in actual application, combined with Fig.21 , 22 shown.

[0037] 8) At the same time, according to business needs, wall cutouts can be arranged at the top of the wall, combined with Fig.23 shown.

[0038] 9) During the detailed processing of wall structure design, if the geometric dimensions of the arranged sub-components fail to fully meet the design requirements or subsequent change requirements, this patented technology provides a professional size adjustment function. This function allows users to make precise geometric size adjustments for arranged sub-components, such as edge components, infill walls, etc. Through an intuitive operating interface and an efficient calculation engine, users can easily modify key size parameters such as the length, width, and height of sub-components to ensure that the sub-components fit perfectly with the overall wall structure. This adjustment process not only reflects the outstanding performance of this technology in terms of design flexibility, but also further enhances the accuracy and reliability of the design solution, providing a strong guarantee for the optimized design and safe construction of building structures. Fig.24 and Fig.25 shown.

[0039] 10) Combination Fig.26 As shown, after the above addition, deletion, checking and modification, the wall required for the business is finally obtained, and the required sub-components are arranged on the wall.

[0040] Finally, it should be noted that the above embodiments are only used to illustrate the technical solutions of the present invention, rather than to limit it. Although the present invention has been described in detail with reference to the aforementioned embodiments, those skilled in the art should understand that they can still modify the technical solutions described in the aforementioned embodiments, or replace some or all of the technical features therein with equivalents. However, these modifications or replacements do not cause the essence of the corresponding technical solutions to deviate from the scope of the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present invention.

Claims

1. A steel bar modeling method for prefabricated walls, characterized in that: The steps include: S1. Generate prefabricated wall outline: If the wall contains a hole, execute step S2; If the wall body is a wall body without openings, no wall body sub-components will be generated, and the edge components will be manually arranged; S2, wall opening arrangement; S3, default sub-component reinforcement area geometry data calculation; S4. Generate default sub-component reinforcement area drawing; S5, add, delete, query and modify sub-component data, and obtain the sub-component data after addition, deletion, query and modification; S6. Draw the sub-components required for the wall.

2. The steel bar modeling method for prefabricated walls according to claim 1, characterized in that: In step S1, when the wall body is a wall body without openings, the system defaults to a single structure without sub-components, and directly uses a preset algorithm to automatically derive the precise geometric information of the edge components, allowing manual arrangement of hidden wall columns; when a beam structure passes through the top of the wall body, the system can automatically identify and capture the exact position of the beam and its detailed geometric parameters, and then automatically calculate the two-dimensional coordinate points required for the top incision and the specific geometric dimensions of the incision based on the acquired data, thereby achieving precise incision processing on the top of the wall. At the same time, the system can also calculate the local coordinate points and geometric shape of the hidden columns at the bottom of the incision, ensuring accurate arrangement of edge components at the bottom of the incision.

3. The steel bar modeling method for prefabricated walls according to claim 1, characterized in that: In step S2, after the prefabricated wall outline is generated, the optimization process of the wall details is implemented through modeling technology, including: by accurately inputting the opening coordinate points (X, Y), clearly specifying the specific locations of door openings, window openings and required incisions; combined with the comprehensive input of the opening geometric information, including but not limited to key parameters of size, shape, and direction, the system can automatically complete the precise arrangement of these openings and incisions on the wall.

4. The steel bar modeling method for prefabricated walls according to claim 1, characterized in that: In step S3, based on the known conditions in the wall design stage, including but not limited to the overall size of the wall, the precise position and size of the top cutout, and the specific geometry and coordinate information of the wall opening, as the basic data for calculating the regional layout of the sub-components, the system can automatically calculate and analyze to derive the initial layout area of ​​the key sub-components and their basic data parameters.

5. The steel bar modeling method for prefabricated walls according to claim 1, characterized in that: In step S4, for each identified opening, the system automatically configures edge components on both sides of the opening, automatically generates a connecting beam structure at the top of the opening, and automatically fills the bottom of the opening with wall materials to close the bottom space.

6. The steel bar modeling method for prefabricated walls according to claim 1, characterized in that: In step S6, the sub-components required for the wall are drawn, including: connecting beam drawing, filling wall drawing, edge component drawing and other component drawing.

Images