Comparison evaluation method and system for environmental monitoring parameters based on completion process data

Abstract

The invention relates to the technical field of environment evaluation, and discloses an environment monitoring parameter comparison evaluation method and system based on completion process data. According to the method, the process of correcting the data generated in the construction process from construction to completion in combination with the park environment problem and combining the data generated in the park daily super operation process to provide the recommendation scheme is provided, and the recommendation scheme provided by the invention can ensure that the independently working park supervisor does not work when facing the environment problem; according to the method, sufficient data support can be obtained, clear rectification suggestions can be given to related enterprises on site, the park is helped to quickly recover the environment, the working efficiency of a park supervisor is improved, in addition, the environment state of the adjacent plots can be simply predicted based on the obtained environment function, and the prediction efficiency is improved. Therefore, the situation that the pollution problem of the adjacent land parcels is neglected due to the pollution of the current land parcels is avoided.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present application relates to the technical field of environmental assessment, and in particular to a method and system for comparative assessment of environmental monitoring parameters based on completion process data. Background Art

[0002] Environmental assessment can guide the development of industrial parks and has been highly integrated with the development of an industrial park. Some environmental assessment companies will establish a park environmental information platform after the assessment to display the assessment results. Usually, this type of environmental information platform is a verification system for park environmental problems, which is used for subsequent environmental problem supervision in the park and also facilitates the assessment company to cooperate with the park in the future.

[0003] However, the current use of the environmental information platform by industrial park regulators is extremely simple. They usually use it as a simple online environmental problem record book. The verification system usually records a large amount of relevant data on daily environmental problems in the park, which has certain value in the supervision and guidance of environmental issues.

[0004] In view of this, the present invention proposes an environmental monitoring parameter comparison and evaluation method and system based on completion process data, which can fully combine the relevant data of daily environmental problems stored in the monitoring and verification system, provide ordinary supervisors with intelligent guidance in facing environmental problems, and indicate potential risks to reduce the occurrence of environmental problems. Summary of the invention

[0005] In order to fully combine the relevant data of daily environmental problems stored in the monitoring and verification system, provide intelligent guidance to ordinary regulators in facing environmental problems, and indicate potential risks to reduce the occurrence of environmental problems, the present application provides an environmental monitoring parameter comparison and evaluation method and system based on completion process data.

[0006] In the first aspect, the present application provides an environmental monitoring parameter comparison and evaluation method and system based on completion process data, which adopts the following technical solutions:

[0007] A method and system for comparing and evaluating environmental monitoring parameters based on completion process data, comprising the following steps:

[0008] Divide the industrial park into blocks based on geographic information maps to obtain multiple secondary plots, and build a basic solution library;

[0009] Environmental monitoring equipment is installed on each secondary plot. The monitoring equipment is used to obtain monitoring data of the secondary plot, including exhaust gas emission data, wastewater discharge data and noise data;

[0010] Obtain the monitoring data of the rectification plan in the basic plan library from the beginning to the completion process and calculate the environmental function based on the monitoring data, and match each recorded rectification plan with the environmental function;

[0011] Conduct an inspection on the secondary plots and upload the inspection results. Classify the environmental problems existing in the current plot according to the problem description in the inspection results. Provide several rectification plans from the basic plan library based on the results of the problem classification. Then, obtain a recommended plan from the rectification plans based on the calculated environmental function.

[0012] Acquire the monitoring data of the adjacent secondary plots during the implementation of the recommended plan for the current plot and calculate the environmental function, compare the environmental function of the current plot with the environmental function of the adjacent secondary plots to generate a prediction result, which includes the existence of potential environmental hazards and the absence of potential safety hazards.

[0013] Through the above technical scheme, a process is given for combining the data generated from the construction to the completion of the park environmental problem correction construction with the data generated during the daily operation of the park to give a recommendation plan. The recommendation plan provided by the present invention can ensure that independent park supervisors can obtain sufficient data support when facing environmental problems and give clear rectification suggestions to related enterprises on the spot, help the park to quickly restore the environment, and improve the work efficiency of park supervisors. In addition, it can also make a simple prediction of the environmental status of adjacent plots based on the obtained environmental function, thereby avoiding the situation where pollution problems in adjacent plots are ignored due to pollution in the current plot.

[0014] Optionally, a corresponding warning value is set based on the daily data of the current plot, and the average value of the exhaust gas emission data, wastewater discharge data and noise data in the monitoring data is obtained once every hour. The total number of times N that the average value of the daily exhaust gas emission data, wastewater discharge data and noise data exceeds the corresponding warning value from the beginning to the completion of the rectification plan is recorded, then the environmental function The calculation method is as follows:

[0015]

[0016] in, is the duration before the first phase change occurs, is the duration before the last phase change occurs, is the interval between the first phase change and the last phase change. is the preset first weight coefficient, is the preset second weight coefficient, is the base value set based on the current question type. It is the curve of total number N changing with date t.

[0017] Optionally, the determination conditions for the phased change include:

[0018] If the difference between the total number of monitoring times N of the current secondary plot on a date and the total number of monitoring times on the previous date exceeds the preset safety value, the previous date is recorded as the first critical day and the current date is recorded as the second critical day;

[0019] If there are at least three dates in the subsequent adjacent dates of the second critical day whose difference between the total number of monitoring times N and the total number of monitoring times of the previous date does not exceed the preset safety value, it is judged that a phased change occurs on the second critical day.

[0020] Optionally, the process of acquiring the first weight coefficient and the second weight coefficient includes:

[0021] Get the first time a phased change occurs The curve of the first stage change process The area enclosed by the Y axis, the first weight coefficient is the reciprocal of the area;

[0022] The second weight coefficient It is the reciprocal of the number of times N a step-by-step change occurs.

[0023] Optionally, the process of matching each recorded rectification plan with an environment function includes:

[0024] Get multiple environment functions corresponding to a recorded rectification plan and calculate the matching coefficient;

[0025] The matching coefficient P is calculated as follows:

[0026]

[0027] in, is the total number of environmental functions corresponding to a recorded rectification plan, is the integral difference of the environmental functions of any two non-repeating environmental functions during the first stage-by-stage change. It is the integral difference of the environmental functions during the last stage-by-stage change of any two non-repeating environmental functions. is not greater than A non-zero positive integer;

[0028] Match the value of P to the interval Compare and if the value of P falls into the matching interval , then the current rectification plan is judged to match the environmental function, and the environmental function with the largest sum of the integral difference of the environmental function during the first stage-by-stage change and the integral difference of the environmental function during the last stage-by-stage change is selected as the matching object of the current rectification plan;

[0029] If the value of P is in the matching interval Otherwise, it is judged that the current rectification plan does not match the environmental function.

[0030] Through the above technical scheme, a process of matching and judging the recorded rectification scheme with the corresponding problem classification by calculating the matching coefficient is provided. The matching coefficient of the present invention takes into account that when dealing with some environmental problems, although the problem types are the same, the same problems of different scales and locations may have different processing efficiencies. The matching coefficient can distinguish these environmental problems and identify the situation where the processing efficiency of the rectification scheme corresponding to the problem type is always consistent, so that more reasonable recommendation results can be given in the subsequent recommendation process.

[0031] Optionally, the process of obtaining a recommended solution from a plurality of rectification solutions according to the calculated environmental function includes:

[0032] Obtain the estimated duration of rectification, and bring the estimated duration of rectification into the environment function of the rectification plan corresponding to the current problem classification for calculation;

[0033] Select several objects with the smallest environmental function values ​​as recommended objects.

[0034] Optionally, the process of comparing the current plot environment function with the adjacent secondary plot environment function to generate a prediction result includes:

[0035] The monitoring data actually generated by the adjacent secondary plots during the entire construction process after the completion of the rectification plan is brought into the environmental function for calculation to obtain the calculation results. The rectification plan is the rectification plan actually used, not necessarily the recommended plan;

[0036] If there are at least two adjacent secondary plots whose calculation results are not less than 0, then obtain the calculated values ​​of the environmental function of the adjacent secondary plots during each stage-by-stage change of the current plot and the calculated values ​​of the environmental function of the current plot during each stage-by-stage change;

[0037] The calculated values ​​of the environmental functions of the adjacent secondary plots during each stage-by-stage change of the current plot and the number of stages of the stage-by-stage change are used as coordinates. The stage-by-stage changes are numbered according to the time of change. The change curves of the calculated values ​​of the environmental functions of each adjacent secondary plot versus the number of stages are obtained, and the prediction results are obtained by comparing the change curves corresponding to different secondary plots.

[0038] Through the above technical scheme, a calculation process of the environmental function and a process of generating prediction results through the environmental function are provided. The environmental function is obtained based on the total number of times that the average values ​​of daily exhaust gas emission data, wastewater emission data and noise data exceed the corresponding warning values ​​from the beginning to the completion of the project. The difference from conventional exhaust gas emission data, wastewater emission data and noise data is that when counting the adjacent affected secondary plots, the collected data will not be distorted due to the emissions of the adjacent plots themselves, thereby improving the subsequent prediction accuracy. That is, through the environmental function, both the environmental status can be evaluated and the subsequent prediction accuracy can be guaranteed.

[0039] Optionally, the process of obtaining the prediction result by comparing the change curves corresponding to different secondary plots includes:

[0040] Perform discrete Fourier transform on the change curves corresponding to any two secondary plots, and calculate the frequency domain distance between them. If all frequency domain distances do not exceed the preset safety threshold, the prediction result is that there is no potential safety hazard, otherwise the prediction result is that there is a potential environmental hazard.

[0041] The problem classification also includes a problem determination process, wherein the problem determination process gives a problem level determination based on the uploaded problem description, and the problem levels include general problems, major problems and potential problems;

[0042] In the second aspect, the present application provides an environmental monitoring parameter comparison and evaluation system based on completion process data, which adopts the following technical solutions:

[0043] A method and system for comparing and evaluating environmental monitoring parameters based on completion process data, comprising:

[0044] The park management module divides the industrial park into blocks based on the geographic information map to obtain multiple secondary plots, and builds a basic solution library;

[0045] A monitoring module, wherein the monitoring module is provided with environmental monitoring equipment in each secondary plot, and the monitoring equipment is used to obtain monitoring data of the secondary plot, and the monitoring data includes exhaust gas emission data, wastewater emission data and noise data;

[0046] A scheme recommendation module, wherein the scheme recommendation module obtains monitoring data of the rectification scheme in the basic scheme library from the beginning to the completion and calculates the environmental function based on the monitoring data, matches each rectification scheme recorded in the basic scheme library with the environmental function, inspects the secondary plots and then uploads the inspection results, classifies the environmental problems existing in the current plot according to the problem description in the inspection results, and provides several rectification schemes from the basic scheme library according to the results of the problem classification, and then obtains a recommended scheme from the several rectification schemes according to the calculated environmental function;

[0047] A risk prediction module, which obtains monitoring data of adjacent secondary plots during the implementation of the recommended plan for the current plot and calculates the environmental function, compares the environmental function of the current plot with the environmental function of the adjacent secondary plots to generate a prediction result, and the prediction result includes the existence of potential environmental hazards and the absence of potential safety hazards.

[0048] In summary, the present application includes at least one of the following beneficial technical effects:

[0049] The present invention provides a process for providing a recommendation plan by combining the data generated from the construction to the completion of the rectification construction of the park's environmental problems with the data generated during the daily operation of the park. The recommendation plan provided by the present invention can ensure that independent park supervisors can obtain sufficient data support when facing environmental problems and give clear rectification suggestions to related enterprises on the spot, thereby helping the park to quickly restore the environment and improving the work efficiency of park supervisors. In addition, it can also make a simple prediction of the environmental status of adjacent plots based on the acquired environmental function, thereby avoiding the situation where pollution problems in adjacent plots are ignored due to pollution in the current plot.

[0050] The matching coefficient of the present invention takes into account that when dealing with some environmental problems, although the problem types are the same, the same problems of different scales and locations may have different processing efficiencies. The matching coefficient can distinguish these environmental problems and identify situations where the processing efficiency of the rectification plans corresponding to the problem types is always consistent, thereby providing more reasonable recommendation results in the subsequent recommendation process.

[0051] The present invention provides a calculation process of an environmental function and a process of generating prediction results through the environmental function. The environmental function is obtained based on the total number of times that the average values ​​of daily exhaust gas emission data, wastewater emission data and noise data exceed the corresponding warning values ​​from the beginning to the completion of the project. The difference from conventional exhaust gas emission data, wastewater emission data and noise data is that when counting adjacent affected secondary plots, the collected data will not be distorted due to the emissions of the adjacent plots themselves, thereby improving the subsequent prediction accuracy. That is, through the environmental function, both the environmental status can be evaluated and the subsequent prediction accuracy can be guaranteed. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0052] Figure 1 It is a flow chart of the steps of the evaluation method of the present invention.

[0053] Figure 2 It is a schematic diagram of the module composition of the evaluation system of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0054] Embodiments of the present application are described in detail below, examples of which are shown in the accompanying drawings.

[0055] In the description of this specification, the description with reference to the terms "certain embodiments", "one embodiment", "some embodiments", "illustrative embodiments", "examples", "specific examples", or "some examples" means that the specific features, structures, materials, or characteristics described in conjunction with the embodiments or examples are included in at least one embodiment or example of the present application. In this specification, the schematic representation of the above terms does not necessarily refer to the same embodiment or example. Moreover, the specific features, structures, materials, or characteristics described may be combined in any one or more embodiments or examples in a suitable manner.

[0056] The present application discloses a method and system for comparing and evaluating environmental monitoring parameters based on completion process data. Figure 1 , including the following steps:

[0057] S100, based on the geographic information map, the industrial park is divided into blocks to obtain multiple secondary plots, and a basic solution library is constructed. The block division is carried out according to the building and the settled enterprise. That is to say, the same building with different enterprises is regarded as a secondary plot, and multiple buildings with the same enterprise are regarded as a secondary plot. The solution library is a collection of solutions for different environmental problems established based on historical data;

[0058] S200, installing environmental monitoring equipment on each secondary plot, the monitoring equipment is used to obtain monitoring data of the secondary plot, the monitoring data includes exhaust gas emission data, wastewater discharge data and noise data;

[0059] S300, obtaining monitoring data of the rectification plan in the basic plan library from the beginning to the completion process and calculating the environmental function based on the monitoring data, and matching each rectification plan recorded in the basic plan library with the environmental function;

[0060] S400, inspect the secondary plots and upload the inspection results, classify the environmental problems existing in the current plot according to the problem descriptions in the inspection results, provide several rectification plans from the basic plan library according to the problem classification results, and then obtain a recommended plan from the several rectification plans according to the calculated environmental function;

[0061] S500, obtaining monitoring data of adjacent secondary plots during the implementation of the recommended plan for the current plot and calculating the environmental function, comparing the environmental function of the current plot with the environmental function of the adjacent secondary plots to generate a prediction result, the prediction result includes the existence of potential environmental hazards and the absence of potential safety hazards.

[0062] In this embodiment, a process is provided for combining the data generated from the construction to the completion of the rectification construction of the park's environmental problems with the data generated during the daily operation of the park to provide a recommendation plan. The recommendation plan provided by the present invention can ensure that independent park supervisors can obtain sufficient data support when facing environmental problems and give clear rectification suggestions to related enterprises on the spot, thereby helping the park to quickly restore the environment and improving the work efficiency of park supervisors. In addition, it can also make a simple prediction of the environmental status of adjacent plots based on the acquired environmental function, thereby avoiding the situation where pollution problems in adjacent plots are ignored due to pollution in the current plot.

[0063] Among them, the corresponding warning value is set based on the daily data of the current plot, and the average value of the exhaust gas emission data, wastewater discharge data and noise data in the monitoring data is obtained once every hour. The total number of times N that the average value of the daily exhaust gas emission data, wastewater discharge data and noise data exceeds the corresponding warning value from the beginning to the completion of the rectification plan is recorded. Then the environmental function The calculation method is as follows:

[0064]

[0065] in, is the duration before the first phase change occurs, is the duration before the last phase change occurs, is the interval between the first phase change and the last phase change. is the preset first weight coefficient, is the preset second weight coefficient, is the base value set based on the current question type. It is the curve of total number N changing with date t.

[0066] The conditions for determining whether a phased change occurs include:

[0067] If the difference between the total number of monitoring times N of the current secondary plot on a date and the total number of monitoring times on the previous date exceeds the preset safety value, the previous date is recorded as the first critical day and the current date is recorded as the second critical day;

[0068] If there are at least three dates in the subsequent adjacent dates of the second critical day whose difference between the total number of monitoring times N and the total number of monitoring times of the previous date does not exceed the preset safety value, it is judged that a phased change occurs on the second critical day.

[0069] The process of obtaining the first weight coefficient and the second weight coefficient includes:

[0070] Get the first time a phased change occurs The curve of the first stage change process The area enclosed by the Y axis, the first weight coefficient is the reciprocal of the area;

[0071] The second weight coefficient It is the reciprocal of the number of times N a step-by-step change occurs.

[0072] The process of matching each recorded rectification plan with the environmental function includes:

[0073] S310, obtaining multiple environmental functions corresponding to a recorded rectification plan, and calculating a matching coefficient;

[0074] S320, the matching coefficient P is calculated as follows:

[0075]

[0076] in, is the total number of environmental functions corresponding to a recorded rectification plan, is the integral difference of the environmental functions of any two non-repeating environmental functions during the first stage-by-stage change. It is the integral difference of the environmental functions during the last stage-by-stage change of any two non-repeating environmental functions. is not greater than A non-zero positive integer;

[0077] Match the value of P to the interval Compare and if the value of P falls into the matching interval , then the current rectification plan is judged to match the environmental function, and the environmental function with the largest sum of the integral difference of the environmental function during the first stage-by-stage change and the integral difference of the environmental function during the last stage-by-stage change is selected as the matching object of the current rectification plan;

[0078] If the value of P is in the matching interval In addition, the current rectification plan is judged to be mismatched with the environment function. When it is judged to be mismatched, if the current rectification plan is used as a recommended plan, the current plan will be marked as a reminder.

[0079] In this embodiment, a process of matching and judging the recorded rectification plan with the corresponding problem classification by calculating the matching coefficient is given. The matching coefficient of the present invention takes into account that when some environmental problems are being handled, although the problem types are the same, the same problems of different scales and locations may have different processing efficiencies. The matching coefficient can distinguish these environmental problems and identify the situation where the processing efficiency of the rectification plan corresponding to the problem type is always consistent, so that a more reasonable recommendation result can be given in the subsequent recommendation process.

[0080] The process of obtaining a recommended solution from a number of rectification solutions based on the calculated environmental function includes:

[0081] Obtain the estimated duration of rectification, and bring the estimated duration of rectification into the environment function of the rectification plan corresponding to the current problem classification for calculation;

[0082] Select several objects with the smallest environmental function values ​​as recommended objects.

[0083] The process of comparing the current plot environment function with the adjacent secondary plot environment function to generate a prediction result includes:

[0084] The monitoring data actually generated by the adjacent secondary plots during the entire construction process after the completion of the rectification plan is brought into the environmental function for calculation to obtain the calculation results. The rectification plan is the rectification plan actually used, not necessarily the recommended plan;

[0085] If there are at least two adjacent secondary plots whose calculation results are not less than 0, then obtain the calculated values ​​of the environmental function of the adjacent secondary plots during each stage-by-stage change of the current plot and the calculated values ​​of the environmental function of the current plot during each stage-by-stage change;

[0086] The calculated values ​​of the environmental functions of the adjacent secondary plots during each stage-by-stage change of the current plot and the number of stages of the stage-by-stage change are used as coordinates. The stage-by-stage changes are numbered according to the time of change. The change curves of the calculated values ​​of the environmental functions of each adjacent secondary plot versus the number of stages are obtained, and the prediction results are obtained by comparing the change curves corresponding to different secondary plots.

[0087] In this embodiment, a calculation process of the environmental function and a process of generating prediction results through the environmental function are provided. The environmental function is obtained based on the total number of times that the average values ​​of daily exhaust gas emission data, wastewater emission data and noise data exceed the corresponding warning values ​​from the beginning to the completion of the project. The difference from conventional exhaust gas emission data, wastewater emission data and noise data is that when counting the adjacent affected secondary plots, the collected data will not be distorted due to the emissions of the adjacent plots themselves, thereby improving the subsequent prediction accuracy. That is, through the environmental function, both the environmental status can be evaluated and the subsequent prediction accuracy can be guaranteed.

[0088] The process of obtaining prediction results by comparing the change curves corresponding to different secondary plots includes:

[0089] Perform discrete Fourier transform on the change curves corresponding to any two secondary plots, and calculate the frequency domain distance between them. If all frequency domain distances do not exceed the preset safety threshold, the prediction result is that there is no potential safety hazard, otherwise the prediction result is that there is a potential environmental hazard.

[0090] Problem classification also includes a problem determination process, which gives a problem level determination based on the uploaded problem description. The problem levels include general problems, major problems, and potential problems.

[0091] refer to Figure 2 , this application provides an environmental monitoring parameter comparison and evaluation system based on completion process data, which adopts the following technical solutions:

[0092] A method and system for comparing and evaluating environmental monitoring parameters based on completion process data, comprising:

[0093] The park management module divides the industrial park into blocks based on geographic information maps to obtain multiple secondary plots and build a basic solution library;

[0094] Monitoring module: The monitoring module sets up environmental monitoring equipment on each secondary plot. The monitoring equipment is used to obtain monitoring data of the secondary plot, including exhaust gas emission data, wastewater discharge data and noise data;

[0095] The scheme recommendation module obtains the monitoring data of the rectification scheme in the basic scheme library from the beginning to the completion and calculates the environmental function based on the monitoring data, matches each rectification scheme recorded in the basic scheme library with the environmental function, inspects the secondary plots and then uploads the inspection results, classifies the environmental problems existing in the current plot according to the problem description in the inspection results, and provides several rectification schemes from the basic scheme library according to the results of problem classification, and then obtains the recommended scheme from several rectification schemes according to the calculated environmental function;

[0096] Risk prediction module, the risk prediction module obtains the monitoring data of the adjacent secondary plots during the implementation of the recommended plan for the current plot and calculates the environmental function, compares the environmental function of the current plot with the environmental function of the adjacent secondary plots to generate a prediction result, and the prediction result includes the existence of potential environmental hazards and the absence of potential safety hazards.

[0097] An embodiment of the present application also discloses a method and system for comparing and evaluating environmental monitoring parameters based on completion process data, including a processor in which a program of any one of the above-mentioned methods and systems for comparing and evaluating environmental monitoring parameters based on completion process data is running.

[0098] The embodiment of the present application also discloses a storage medium storing a program of any one of the above-mentioned environmental monitoring parameter comparison and evaluation methods and systems based on completion process data.

[0099] Although the embodiments of the present application have been shown and described above, it can be understood that the above embodiments are exemplary and cannot be understood as limitations on the present application. Ordinary technicians in this field can change, modify, replace and modify the above embodiments within the scope of the present application.

Claims

1. A comparative evaluation method for environmental monitoring parameters based on completion process data, characterized in that: The steps include: Divide the industrial park into blocks based on geographic information maps to obtain multiple secondary plots, and build a basic solution library; Environmental monitoring equipment is installed on each secondary plot. The monitoring equipment is used to obtain monitoring data of the secondary plot, including exhaust gas emission data, wastewater discharge data and noise data; Obtain the monitoring data of the rectification plan in the basic plan library from the beginning to the completion process and calculate the environmental function based on the monitoring data, and match each recorded rectification plan with the environmental function; Conduct an inspection on the secondary plots and upload the inspection results. Classify the environmental problems existing in the current plot according to the problem description in the inspection results. Provide several rectification plans from the basic plan library based on the results of the problem classification. Then, obtain a recommended plan from the rectification plans based on the calculated environmental function. Acquire the monitoring data of the adjacent secondary plots during the implementation of the recommended plan for the current plot and calculate the environmental function, compare the environmental function of the current plot with the environmental function of the adjacent secondary plots to generate a prediction result, which includes the existence of potential environmental hazards and the absence of potential safety hazards.

2. The environmental monitoring parameter comparison and evaluation method based on completion process data according to claim 1 is characterized in that: The corresponding warning value is set based on the daily data of the current plot. The average value of the exhaust gas emission data, wastewater discharge data and noise data in the monitoring data is obtained once every hour. The total number of times N when the average value of the daily exhaust gas emission data, wastewater discharge data and noise data exceeds the corresponding warning value from the beginning to the completion of the rectification plan is recorded. Then the environmental function The calculation method is as follows: in, is the duration before the first phase change occurs, is the duration before the last phase change occurs, is the interval between the first phase change and the last phase change. is the preset first weight coefficient, is the preset second weight coefficient, is the base value set based on the current question type. It is the curve of total number N changing with date t.

3. The environmental monitoring parameter comparison and evaluation method based on completion process data according to claim 2 is characterized in that: The conditions for determining whether a phased change has occurred include: If the difference between the total number of monitoring times N of the current secondary plot on a date and the total number of monitoring times on the previous date exceeds the preset safety value, the previous date is recorded as the first critical day and the current date is recorded as the second critical day; If there are at least three dates in the subsequent adjacent dates of the second critical day whose difference between the total number of monitoring times N and the total number of monitoring times of the previous date does not exceed the preset safety value, it is judged that a phased change occurs on the second critical day.

4. The environmental monitoring parameter comparison and evaluation method based on completion process data according to claim 2 is characterized in that: The process of obtaining the first weight coefficient and the second weight coefficient includes: Get the first time a phased change occurs The curve of the first stage change process The area enclosed by the Y axis, the first weight coefficient is the reciprocal of the area; The second weight coefficient It is the reciprocal of the number of times N a step-by-step change occurs.

5. The environmental monitoring parameter comparison and evaluation method based on completion process data according to claim 2 is characterized in that: The process of matching each recorded remediation plan to an environmental function involves: Get multiple environment functions corresponding to a recorded rectification plan and calculate the matching coefficient; The matching coefficient P is calculated as follows: in, is the total number of environmental functions corresponding to a recorded rectification plan, is the integral difference of the environmental functions of any two non-repeating environmental functions during the first stage-by-stage change. It is the integral difference of the environmental functions during the last stage-by-stage change of any two non-repeating environmental functions. is not greater than A non-zero positive integer; Match the value of P to the interval Compare and if the value of P falls into the matching interval , then the current rectification plan is judged to match the environmental function, and the environmental function with the largest sum of the integral difference of the environmental function during the first stage-by-stage change and the integral difference of the environmental function during the last stage-by-stage change is selected as the matching object of the current rectification plan; If the value of P is in the matching interval Otherwise, it is judged that the current rectification plan does not match the environmental function.

6. The environmental monitoring parameter comparison and evaluation method based on completion process data according to claim 1 is characterized in that: The process of obtaining a recommended solution from a number of rectification solutions based on the calculated environmental function includes: Obtain the estimated duration of rectification, and bring the estimated duration of rectification into the environment function of the rectification plan corresponding to the current problem classification for calculation; Select several objects with the smallest environmental function values ​​as recommended objects.

7. The method for comparing and evaluating environmental monitoring parameters based on completion process data according to claim 2 is characterized in that: The process of comparing the current plot environment function with the adjacent secondary plot environment function to generate a prediction result includes: The monitoring data actually generated by the adjacent secondary plots during the entire construction process after the completion of the rectification plan is brought into the environmental function for calculation to obtain the calculation results; If there are at least two adjacent secondary plots whose calculation results are not less than 0, then obtain the calculated values ​​of the environmental function of the adjacent secondary plots during each stage-by-stage change of the current plot and the calculated values ​​of the environmental function of the current plot during each stage-by-stage change; Taking the calculated values ​​of the environmental functions of the adjacent secondary plots in each stage-by-stage change process of the current plot and the number of stages of the stage-by-stage change as coordinates, obtain the change curves of the calculated values ​​of the environmental functions of each adjacent secondary plot as the number of stages, and compare the change curves corresponding to different secondary plots to obtain the prediction results.

8. The method for comparing and evaluating environmental monitoring parameters based on completion process data according to claim 7 is characterized in that: The process of obtaining prediction results by comparing the change curves corresponding to different secondary plots includes: Perform discrete Fourier transform on the change curves corresponding to any two secondary plots, and calculate the frequency domain distance between them. If all frequency domain distances do not exceed the preset safety threshold, the prediction result is that there is no potential safety hazard, otherwise the prediction result is that there is a potential environmental hazard.

9. The method for comparing and evaluating environmental monitoring parameters based on completion process data according to claim 1 is characterized in that: The problem classification also includes a problem determination process, which makes a problem level determination based on the uploaded problem description, and the problem level includes general problems, major problems and potential problems.

10. An environmental monitoring parameter comparison and evaluation system based on completion process data, characterized in that: The method for comparing and evaluating environmental monitoring parameters based on completion process data as described in any one of claims 1 to 9 comprises: A park management module, which divides the industrial park into blocks based on a geographic information map to obtain multiple secondary plots, and builds a basic solution library; A monitoring module, wherein the monitoring module is provided with environmental monitoring equipment in each secondary plot, and the monitoring equipment is used to obtain monitoring data of the secondary plot, and the monitoring data includes exhaust gas emission data, wastewater emission data and noise data; A scheme recommendation module, wherein the scheme recommendation module obtains monitoring data of the rectification scheme in the basic scheme library from the beginning to the completion and calculates the environmental function based on the monitoring data, matches each recorded rectification scheme with the environmental function, inspects the secondary plots and then uploads the inspection results, classifies the environmental problems existing in the current plot according to the problem description in the inspection results, and provides several rectification schemes from the basic scheme library according to the results of the problem classification, and then obtains a recommended scheme from the several rectification schemes according to the calculated environmental function; A risk prediction module, which obtains monitoring data of adjacent secondary plots during the implementation of the recommended plan for the current plot and calculates the environmental function, compares the environmental function of the current plot with the environmental function of the adjacent secondary plots to generate a prediction result, and the prediction result includes the existence of potential environmental hazards and the absence of potential safety hazards.

Images