Regional traffic infrastructure operation evaluation method and system, electronic equipment and storage medium

Abstract

The invention discloses a regional traffic infrastructure operation evaluation method and system, electronic equipment and a storage medium. The evaluation method comprises the following steps: S1, establishing a full-life-cycle regional traffic infrastructure operation evaluation framework integrating different facility types; s2, according to the regional traffic infrastructure total-factor intelligent operation and maintenance platform data, constructing a tunnel overall technical condition evaluation index; s3, according to the regional traffic infrastructure total-factor intelligent operation and maintenance platform data, urban roads and road overall technical condition evaluation indexes are constructed; and S4, according to the tunnel overall technical condition evaluation index and the urban road and highway overall technical condition evaluation index, calculating to obtain a regional traffic infrastructure operation evaluation index. According to the regional traffic infrastructure operation evaluation method and system, the electronic equipment and the storage medium provided by the invention, the regional urban traffic infrastructure operation evaluation quality and capability containing different facility types can be quantified.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention belongs to the technical field of maintenance and operation of urban traffic infrastructure, and relates to a method for evaluating infrastructure operation, and particularly relates to a method, a system, an electronic device and a storage medium for evaluating the operation of regional traffic infrastructure. Background Art

[0002] Regional traffic infrastructure has the characteristics of fast operating speed, large service traffic volume and passing capacity, and has become the main artery of urban traffic. Sudden traffic accidents will cause a decline in passing capacity and affect the traffic operation environment and safety of the regional road network. In 2022, the Ministry of Transport proposed to enhance the resilience of the transportation network to provide strong emergency support for accelerating the construction of a transportation power. Therefore, how to improve the operation service quality and level of regional traffic infrastructure has become an urgent problem to be solved, and has become the focus of attention in the academic and industrial circles.

[0003] The full-life cycle regional traffic infrastructure operation evaluation method analyzes the connotations of regional facilities and refined operation capabilities, and based on the full-life cycle evaluation, quantifies the service quality and level of the operation of regional traffic infrastructure within a certain period from two dimensions of facility technical conditions and operation and maintenance management behaviors. At present, there is a lack of methods for evaluating the operation of regional traffic infrastructure including different types. The existing evaluation practices and related research results of urban traffic infrastructure focus on the evaluation of a single facility type, such as tunnels, urban roads, highways, etc. The evaluation methods mainly focus on the technical condition evaluation of facilities, and the selection of indicators focuses on the performance of facilities. For example, pavement diseases of urban roads, diseases of tunnel structures, etc. The calculation methods mostly adopt the analytic hierarchy process, key performance indicators, balanced scorecards, etc. The above evaluation indicators and methods are relatively single, only focusing on equipment performance, while the evolution and development of facility performance are closely related to daily operation and maintenance management behaviors. In addition, with the development of the full-life cycle intelligent operation and maintenance of urban traffic infrastructure, more and more data resources can be obtained, and single manual data collection is not suitable for the real-time requirements of facility evaluation.

[0004] In view of this, there is an urgent need to design a new method for evaluating the operation of traffic infrastructure to overcome at least some of the above defects existing in the existing evaluation methods. Summary of the Invention

[0005] The present invention provides a method, a system, an electronic device and a storage medium for evaluating the operation of regional traffic infrastructure, which can quantify the evaluation quality and ability of the operation of regional urban traffic infrastructure containing different facility types.

[0006] To solve the above technical problems, according to one aspect of the present invention, the following technical solution is adopted:

[0007] A method for evaluating the operation of regional transportation infrastructure, the evaluation method comprising:

[0008] Step S1, establish an evaluation framework for the operation of regional transportation infrastructure throughout the life cycle that integrates different facility types;

[0009] Step S2, construct an evaluation index for the overall technical condition of the tunnel according to the data of the regional transportation infrastructure all-element intelligent operation and maintenance platform;

[0010] Step S3, construct an evaluation index for the overall technical condition of urban roads and highways according to the data of the regional transportation infrastructure all-element intelligent operation and maintenance platform;

[0011] Step S4, calculate and obtain an evaluation index for the operation of regional transportation infrastructure according to the evaluation index for the overall technical condition of the tunnel, and the evaluation indexes for the overall technical conditions of urban roads and highways.

[0012] As an implementation manner of the present invention, step S1 includes: adopting evaluation by facility type and hierarchical comprehensive evaluation; first evaluating a single facility, then forming an evaluation of a certain type of facility according to the facility type, and finally forming an evaluation system for the current operation status of regional facilities;

[0013] Step S2 includes: constructing an evaluation index for the overall technical condition of the tunnel by means of hierarchical evaluation of the civil structure, mechanical and electrical system, ancillary facilities, and operation services.

[0014] As an implementation manner of the present invention, step S3 includes: adopting a combination of hierarchical evaluation and single-item control, and using the section between every two adjacent intersections in the same driving direction of the road as the evaluation unit; first evaluating a one-way road grid, secondly evaluating the section between two adjacent intersections, then conducting an evaluation of the facility technical condition, combining with the evaluation of management behaviors, and finally forming an evaluation of the overall technical conditions of urban road facilities and highway facilities.

[0015] As an implementation manner of the present invention, step S4 includes:

[0016] Adopt the operation evaluation index RI and the overall condition evaluation indexes CI of each type of facility, and calculate according to the following formula:

[0017] RI = CI H ×W H +CI C ×W C +CI T ×W T ;

[0018] Wherein, WH is the weight of the overall highway condition index in the regional facility operation evaluation index; WC is the weight of the overall urban road condition index in the regional facility operation evaluation index; WT is the weight of the overall tunnel / underground road condition index in the regional facility operation evaluation index.

[0019] According to another aspect of the present invention, the following technical solution is adopted: A regional traffic infrastructure operation evaluation system, the evaluation system includes:

[0020] An operation evaluation framework construction module for establishing an operation evaluation framework for regional traffic infrastructure integrating different facility types throughout the life cycle;

[0021] A tunnel evaluation index construction module for constructing an overall technical condition evaluation index of the tunnel according to the data of the regional traffic infrastructure all-element intelligent operation and maintenance platform;

[0022] A road evaluation index construction module for constructing an overall technical condition evaluation index of urban roads and highways according to the data of the regional traffic infrastructure all-element intelligent operation and maintenance platform;

[0023] An operation evaluation index calculation module for calculating the operation evaluation index of the regional traffic infrastructure according to the overall technical condition evaluation index of the tunnel, and the overall technical condition evaluation indexes of urban roads and highways.

[0024] As an implementation manner of the present invention, the operation evaluation framework construction module adopts classification by facility type and hierarchical comprehensive evaluation; first, a single facility is evaluated, then an evaluation of a certain type of facility is formed according to the facility type, and finally an evaluation system of the current situation of regional facility operation is formed;

[0025] The tunnel evaluation index construction module constructs the overall technical condition evaluation index of the tunnel by means of hierarchical evaluation of the civil engineering structure, the electromechanical system, the ancillary facilities, and the operation service.

[0026] As an implementation manner of the present invention, the road evaluation index construction module adopts a combination of hierarchical evaluation and single-item control, and uses the section between every two adjacent intersections in the same driving direction of the road as the evaluation unit; first, a one-way road grid is evaluated, secondly, the section between two adjacent intersections is evaluated, then the technical condition of the facility is evaluated, combined with the management behavior evaluation, and finally the overall technical condition evaluation of urban road facilities and highway facilities is formed.

[0027] As an implementation manner of the present invention, the operation evaluation index calculation module uses the operation evaluation index RI and the overall condition evaluation indexes CI of various types of facilities, and calculates according to the following formula:

[0028] RI = CI H ×W H +CIC ×W C +CI T ×W T ;

[0029] Wherein, WH is the weight of the overall highway condition index in the regional facility operation evaluation index; WC is the weight of the overall urban road condition index in the regional facility operation evaluation index; WT is the weight of the overall tunnel / underground road condition index in the regional facility operation evaluation index.

[0030] According to another aspect of the present invention, the following technical solution is adopted: An electronic device includes a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored on the memory and executable on the processor. When the processor executes the computer program, the steps of the above method are implemented.

[0031] According to another aspect of the present invention, the following technical solution is adopted: A storage medium stores computer program instructions thereon, and when the computer program instructions are executed by a processor, the steps of the above method are implemented.

[0032] The beneficial effect of the present invention is that: The regional traffic infrastructure operation evaluation method, system, electronic device, and storage medium proposed by the present invention can quantify the operation evaluation quality and ability of regional urban traffic infrastructure containing different facility types. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0033] Figure 1 It is a flowchart of the regional traffic infrastructure operation evaluation method in an embodiment of the present invention.

[0034] Figure 2 It is a flowchart of the overall technical condition evaluation steps of urban roads and highways in an embodiment of the present invention.

[0035] Figure 3 It is a flowchart of the overall technical condition evaluation steps of tunnels in an embodiment of the present invention.

[0036] Figure 4 It is a schematic diagram of the greening technology evaluation index system in an embodiment of the present invention.

[0037] Figure 5 It is a schematic diagram of the drainage facility evaluation index system in an embodiment of the present invention.

[0038] Figure 6 It is a schematic diagram of the maintenance operation supervision index system in an embodiment of the present invention.

[0039] Figure 7 It is a schematic diagram of the safety and quality supervision index system in an embodiment of the present invention.

[0040] Figure 8It is a schematic diagram of the reward and punishment evaluation management index system in an embodiment of the present invention.

[0041] Figure 9 It is a flowchart of the evaluation process in an embodiment of the present invention.

[0042] Figure 10 It is a schematic diagram of the composition of an electronic device in an embodiment of the present invention. Detailed implementation manners

[0043] The preferred embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings.

[0044] To further understand the present invention, the preferred implementation manners of the present invention will be described below in conjunction with embodiments. However, it should be understood that these descriptions are only for further explaining the features and advantages of the present invention, rather than limiting the claims of the present invention.

[0045] The description of this part only focuses on several typical embodiments, and the present invention is not limited to the scope described in the embodiments. The mutual replacement of the same or similar prior art means and some technical features in the embodiments is also within the scope of the description and protection of the present invention.

[0046] The expressions of the steps in each embodiment in the specification are only for convenience of description, and the implementation manner of the present application is not limited by the order of step implementation.

[0047] "Connection" in the specification includes both direct connection and indirect connection.

[0048] The present invention discloses a method for evaluating the operation of regional traffic infrastructure, Figure 1 It is a flowchart of the method for evaluating the operation of regional traffic infrastructure in an embodiment of the present invention; please refer to Figure 1 , and the evaluation method includes:

[0049]

Step S1

[0050] In an embodiment of the present invention, the step S1 includes: adopting evaluation by facility type and hierarchical comprehensive evaluation; first evaluating a single facility, then forming an evaluation of a certain type of facility according to the facility type, and finally forming an evaluation system for the current situation of regional facility operation;

[0051]

Step S2

[0052] In an embodiment of the present invention, the step S2 includes: constructing an evaluation index for the overall technical condition of the tunnel by means of hierarchical evaluation of the civil structure, electromechanical system, auxiliary facilities, and operation services.

[0053]

Step S3

[0054] In an embodiment of the present invention, the step S3 includes: adopting a combination of hierarchical evaluation and single-item control, and taking the section between every two adjacent intersections in the same driving direction of the road as the evaluation unit (abbreviated as one-way road grid); first, evaluate the one-way road grid, secondly, evaluate the section between two adjacent intersections, then conduct the evaluation of the technical condition of the facilities, and combine with the evaluation of management behaviors, and finally form the overall technical condition evaluation of urban road facilities and highway facilities.

[0055]

Step S4

[0056] In an embodiment of the present invention, the step S4 includes:

[0057] Adopt the operation evaluation index RI and the overall condition evaluation indexes CI of various types of facilities, and calculate according to the following formula:

[0058] RI = CI H ×W H +CI C ×W C +CI T ×W T

[0059] In the formula, WH is the weight of the overall condition index of highways in the regional facility operation evaluation index, which can be taken as 0.3; WC is the weight of the overall condition index of urban roads in the regional facility operation evaluation index, which can be taken as 0.5; WT is the weight of the overall condition index of tunnels / underground roads in the regional facility operation evaluation index, which can be taken as 0.2.

[0060] The present invention also discloses a regional traffic infrastructure operation evaluation system, which includes: an operation evaluation framework construction module 1, a tunnel evaluation index construction module 2, a road evaluation index construction module 3, and an operation evaluation index calculation module 4.

[0061] The operation evaluation framework construction module 1 is used to establish an overall life cycle regional traffic infrastructure operation evaluation framework integrating different facility types;

[0062] The tunnel evaluation index construction module 2 is used to construct the overall technical condition evaluation index of the tunnel according to the data of the regional traffic infrastructure all-element intelligent operation and maintenance platform;

[0063] The road evaluation index construction module 3 is used to construct the overall technical condition evaluation indexes of urban roads and highways according to the data of the regional traffic infrastructure all-element intelligent operation and maintenance platform;

[0064] The operation evaluation index calculation module 4 is used to calculate the regional traffic infrastructure operation evaluation index according to the overall tunnel technical condition evaluation index, and the overall technical condition evaluation indexes of urban roads and highways.

[0065] In an embodiment of the present invention, the operation evaluation framework construction module adopts the type-of-facility and hierarchical comprehensive evaluation; first, a single facility is evaluated, then an evaluation of a certain type of facility is formed according to the facility type, and finally an evaluation system of the current situation of the regional facility operation is formed. The tunnel evaluation index construction module constructs the overall tunnel technical condition evaluation index according to the hierarchical evaluation method of the civil structure, mechanical and electrical system, auxiliary facilities, and operation service.

[0066] The road evaluation index construction module adopts the combination of hierarchical evaluation and single-item control, and uses the section between every two adjacent intersections in the same driving direction of the road as the evaluation unit (abbreviated as one-way road grid); first, the one-way road grid is evaluated, secondly, the section between two adjacent intersections is evaluated, then the technical condition of the facility is evaluated, combined with the management behavior evaluation, and finally the overall technical condition evaluation of urban road facilities and highway facilities is formed.

[0067] In an embodiment of the present invention, the operation evaluation index calculation module uses the operation evaluation index RI and the overall condition evaluation indexes CI of various types of facilities, and calculates according to the following formula:

[0068] RI = CI H ×W H +CI C ×W C +CI T ×W T

[0069] In the formula, WH is the weight of the overall highway condition index in the regional facility operation evaluation index, which can be taken as 0.3; WC is the weight of the overall urban road condition index in the regional facility operation evaluation index, which can be taken as 0.5; WT is the weight of the overall tunnel / underground road condition index in the regional facility operation evaluation index, which can be taken as 0.2.

[0070] For the overall technical condition evaluation indexes of the urban roads and highways, the technical condition evaluation and the combined management behavior evaluation include: using the sub-item index technical condition index MQI (Maintenance Quality Indicator) and the management behavior condition index MBI (Manage Behavior Indicator), and calculating according to the following formula:

[0071] CI = MQI × W WQI + MBI × W MBI

[0072] Wherein,

[0073] W MQI - The weight of the technical condition index in the overall technical condition index of the facility, taking 0.6;

[0074] W MBI - The weight of the greening technical condition index in the overall technical condition index of the facility, taking 0.4.

[0075] For the above-mentioned technical condition evaluation, the technical condition index MQI includes: the greening technical condition index GCI, the drainage technical condition index DCI, the sidewalk technical condition index FCI, the pavement technical condition index PQI, the accessory facility technical condition index TCL, and the bridge technical condition index BCI of sub-items. It is calculated according to the following formula.

[0076] MQI = GCI × W GCI + DCI × W DCI + FCI × W FCI + PQI × W PQI + TCL × W TCI + BCI × W BCI

[0077] Wherein,

[0078] W GCI — The weight of the greening technical condition index in the technical condition index, taking 0.2;

[0079] W DCI — The weight of the drainage technical condition index in the technical condition index, taking 0.15;

[0080] W FCI — The weight of the sidewalk technical condition index in the technical condition index, taking 0.15;

[0081] W PQI — The weight of the pavement technical condition index in the technical condition index, taking 0.25;

[0082] W TCL — The weight of the accessory facility technical condition index in the technical condition index, taking 0.1;

[0083] W BCI — The weight of the bridge technical condition index in the technical condition index, taking 0.15.

[0084] The described technical condition evaluation, the management behavior condition index MBI, includes: It is composed of the maintenance operation supervision condition index JSI, the safety and quality condition index SQI, and the reward and punishment evaluation index ISI. It is calculated according to the following formula.

[0085] MBI = JSI × W JSI + SQI × W SQI + ISI

[0086] W JSI — The weight of the maintenance operation supervision condition index in the management behavior condition index, 0.8;

[0087] W SQI — The weight of the safety and quality condition index in the management behavior condition index, 0.2.

[0088] The described technical condition index MQI, characterized in that the greening technical condition index GCI includes:

[0089] ① The plant current situation index GPCI

[0090] The plant current situation evaluation is composed of the evaluation scores of 6 indicators: the current situation evaluation of roadside trees, the current situation evaluation of hedgerows, the current situation evaluation of general green spaces, the current situation evaluation of intersection scenic spots and flower beds, the current situation evaluation of climbing plants, and the current situation evaluation of elevated flower boxes. The value range is 0 - 75. The calculation formula is as follows:

[0091] GPCI = TI + HI + VI + GI + CPI + FBI

[0092] In the formula,

[0093] TI — The evaluation score of the roadside tree current situation index, value range 0 - 10;

[0094] HI — The evaluation score of the hedge current situation index, value range 0 - 10;

[0095] VI — The evaluation score of the general green space current situation index, value range 0 - 35;

[0096] GI — The evaluation score of the intersection scenic spot and flower bed scenic spot current situation index, value range 0 - 10;

[0097] CPI — The evaluation score of the climbing plant current situation index, value range 0 - 5;

[0098] FBI — The evaluation score of the elevated flower box current situation index, value range 0 - 5.

[0099] ② The environmental health index GEQI

[0100] The environmental health evaluation is composed of 2 evaluation scores of environmental sanitation evaluation and green space protection evaluation. The value range is 0 - 15 points. The calculation formula is as follows:

[0101] GEQI = EHI + GPI

[0102] In the formula,

[0103] EHI - Environmental health status index score, value range 0 - 10;

[0104] GPI - Green space protection status index score, value range 0 - 5.

[0105] ③ Accessory facilities index GTCI

[0106] The evaluation of accessory facilities status includes the following 5 elements: garden buildings and structures, garden chairs and benches, roads and ground surfaces, water supply and drainage, and other accessory facilities index scores, with a value range of 0 - 10. The calculation formula is as follows:

[0107] GTCI = GAI + GSI + GFI + DI + OTI

[0108] In the formula,

[0109] GAI - Garden building and structure status index score, value range 0 - 2;

[0110] GSI - Garden chair and bench status index score, value range 0 - 2;

[0111] GFI - Road and ground surface status index score, value range 0 - 2;

[0112] DI - Water supply and drainage status index score, value range 0 - 2;

[0113] OTI - Other accessory facilities status index score, value range 0 - 2.

[0114] ④ Greening technology status index GCI

[0115] The calculation formula for the greening technology status index GCIi of the evaluation unit is as follows:

[0116] GCI I = GPCI + GEQI + GTCI

[0117] In the formula

[0118] GCIi - Unit greening technology status index, value range 0 - 100

[0119] The calculation formula for the greening technology status index GCI of a single facility is as follows:

[0120]

[0121] GCI - Greening technology current status index, value range 0 - 100.

[0122] The greening technology evaluation index system is as follows Figure 4 .

[0123] The described technical condition index MQI, and the drainage technical condition index DCI includes:

[0124] ① Rainwater drainage facility technical condition index RDCI

[0125] The technical condition evaluation of rainwater drainage facilities consists of the evaluation of the current status of rainwater inlets, the evaluation of the current status of rainwater manholes, the evaluation of the current status of rainwater pipelines, and the pipeline inspection status. The value range is 0 - 100. The calculation formula is as follows:

[0126] RDCI = ROI + RMI + SSI + RRI

[0127] In the formula

[0128] ROI - Rainwater inlet current status index, value range 0 - 20

[0129] RMI - Rainwater manhole current status index, value range 0 - 20

[0130] SSI - Rainwater pipeline current status index, value range 0 - 15

[0131] RPI - Pipeline inspection current status index, value range 0 - 45

[0132] ② Sewage drainage facility technical condition index SDCI

[0133] The technical condition evaluation of sewage drainage facilities consists of the evaluation of the current status of sewage wells, the evaluation of the current status of sewage pipelines, and the pipeline inspection status. The value range is 0 - 100. The calculation formula is as follows:

[0134] RDCI = SMI + SCI + SPI

[0135] In the formula

[0136] SMI - Sewage well current status index, value range 0 - 25

[0137] SCI - Sewage pipeline current status index, value range 0 - 30

[0138] SPI - Pipeline inspection current status index, value range 0 - 45

[0139] ③ Drainage technical condition index DCI

[0140] The drainage facility evaluation consists of the evaluation of rainwater drainage facilities and the evaluation of sewage drainage facilities. The calculation formula is as follows:

[0141] DCI = (RDCI + SDCI) ÷ 2

[0142] The drainage facility evaluation index system is as follows Figure 5 .

[0143] The technical condition index MQI and the auxiliary facility evaluation index TCL include the following calculation methods:

[0144]

[0145] In the formula

[0146] GD TCLI — The cumulative deduction points for the damage of the i-th type of facility, with a maximum score of 100, and taking values according to regulations;

[0147] W i — The weight of the damage of the i-th type of facility, taking values according to regulations;

[0148] According to the technical condition index MQI described in claim 7, characterized in that the urban road and highway pavement technical condition evaluation index PQI includes:

[0149] Using sub-item indicators, pavement damage condition, pavement riding quality, pavement rut depth, pavement bump index, and pavement skid resistance ability, and the corresponding evaluation indicators are pavement damage condition index (PCI), pavement riding quality index (RQI), pavement rut depth index (RDI), pavement bump (PBI), and pavement skid resistance performance index (SRI). The calculation method is evaluated according to the "Technical Specification for Urban Road Maintenance" (CJJ36 - 2016) and the "Standard for Highway Technical Condition Assessment" (JTG5210 - 2018).

[0150] The technical condition index MQI and the urban bridge technical condition evaluation index BCI include: Using sub-item indicators, from the technical condition evaluation of a single bridge to the technical condition evaluation of the entire facility bridge structure. The evaluation of the technical condition of urban bridges should include: deck system, superstructure, substructure, and overall bridge evaluation. The method of first evaluating components, then parts, and then comprehensively combining with single-item direct control indicators should be adopted. The technical condition of the bridge should be determined by the bridge condition index BCI. According to the bridge regular inspection records, the deck system, superstructure, and substructure should be evaluated respectively according to the rating method levels and deduction tables in the "Technical Standard for Urban Bridge Maintenance" (CJJ / 99 - 2017) by the stratified weighted method, and then the evaluation of the technical condition of the entire bridge should be obtained comprehensively.

[0151] The management behavior condition index MBI and the maintenance operation supervision condition index JSI include: composed of 5 indicators: operation progress management, operation plan management, mechanical operation execution, quality management behavior, and asset ledger management. The evaluation of the maintenance operation supervision condition is expressed by the maintenance operation supervision condition index (JSI), and other sub-indicators are respectively used: operation progress index GPI, operation plan index OPI, mechanical operation execution index MWPI, quality management index QCI, and asset ledger management index AIMI. The evaluation system of the maintenance operation supervision condition is shown inFigure 6 .

[0152] ① Operation progress management GPI

[0153] The calculation method is as follows:

[0154] GPI = Monthly maintenance plan execution + defect and disease dispatch execution + special external plan execution

[0155] Where:

[0156]

[0157]

[0158]

[0159] ② Operation plan management OPI

[0160] The full score for operation plan management is 20 points, which is composed of two indicators: plan information reporting and plan execution. Safety management staff of each grassroots unit will check the plan information reporting and plan execution every day. Assessment content: whether the reporting is qualified and whether the plan is completed.

[0161] The evaluation indicators for filling in plan information are basic information filling, subcontract work information, location description information, corresponding option filling, and work content information. If any of the above items is unqualified or incomplete, the work plan will be judged as unqualified. The number of unqualified items in each element will be checked daily and reported weekly.

[0162] The evaluation indicators for plan execution are safety briefing records, safety briefing photos, safety enclosure photos, and operation execution status. If any of the above items is not reported as qualified or not completed, the operation plan will be judged as unqualified. The number of unqualified items in each element will be checked daily and reported weekly.

[0163]

[0164] ③ MWPI for mechanical operations

[0165] The maximum score for mechanical operation execution is 20 points, which is composed of two parts: mechanical operation coverage rate and mechanical operation utilization rate. The calculation method is as follows:

[0166] MWPI = mechanical operation coverage + mechanical operation utilization

[0167] Where:

[0168]

[0169] The evaluation indicators for the utilization rate of mechanical operations are 4 items, namely the utilization rate of sweeper trucks, inspection vehicles, sprinkler trucks, and anti-collision vehicles. The calculation methods are as follows:

[0170]

[0171]

[0172]

[0173]

[0174] When the value ≥ 1, take 1; when the value < 1, take the calculated value.

[0175] Utilization rate of mechanical operations = Utilization rate of sweeper trucks × 4 + Utilization rate of inspection vehicles × 2 + Utilization rate of sprinkler trucks × 2 + Utilization rate of anti-collision vehicles × 2 ④ Quality management behavior QCI

[0176] It consists of road defect diseases. The evaluation indicators for road defect diseases are 7 items, namely road facilities, greening facilities, drainage facilities, accessory facilities, bridge components, environmental sanitation cleaning, and other diseases. The calculation methods are as follows:

[0177]

[0178] ⑤ Asset ledger management AIMI

[0179] It consists of two parts: the in-page ledger materials within a month and the asset data information. The calculation method is as follows:

[0180] AIMI = In-page ledger materials + Asset data information

[0181] In the formula:

[0182]

[0183]

[0184] ⑥ Maintenance operation supervision status index (JSI)

[0185] The calculation formula is as follows:

[0186] JSI = GPI + OPI + MWPI + QCI + AIMI

[0187] The management behavior status index MBI and the safety and quality status index SQI mentioned above include:

[0188] It consists of 7 indicators: safety behavior management, assessment quality management, emergency response management, emergency incident management, operator management, vehicle and equipment management, and crew base management. The evaluation of the safety and quality supervision status is represented by the Safety Quality Index (SQI). See Figure 7 the safety and quality supervision index system.

[0189] ① Safety Behavior Management BBSI

[0190] It is composed of safety basic management, on-site safety management, and crew base safety index scoring.

[0191] The evaluation indicators for safety basic management are 7 items: qualification certificates, personnel allocation, safety systems, meeting and education, plan handover, emergency management, and safety investment. The evaluation indicators for on-site safety management are 10 items: facility safety, safety enclosure, machinery safety, temporary electricity use, civilized construction, road roller vehicles, three violations of personnel, personal protection, and special operations. The evaluation indicators for crew base safety are 6 items: fire safety, electricity use safety, cooking, room housekeeping, crew base environment, and other management.

[0192]

[0193] ② Assessment Quality Management AMI

[0194] It is composed of owner assessment, subcontractor assessment, and inspection quality index scoring. The calculation method is as follows:

[0195] AMI = owner assessment + subcontractor assessment + inspection quality

[0196] In the formula:

[0197] The evaluation indicators for owner assessment are 3 items: assessment information, problem rectification, and assessment notice. The calculation adopts a deduction system, with a minimum of 0 points. The calculation method is as follows:

[0198] Owner assessment = 5 - number of unqualified assessment information × 1

[0199] The evaluation indicators for subcontractor assessment are 3 items: assessment information, assessment problems, and assessment scoring. The calculation adopts a deduction system, with a minimum of 0 points. The calculation method is as follows:

[0200] Subcontractor assessment = 5 - number of unqualified assessment information × 0.5

[0201] The evaluation indicators for inspection quality are 2 items: inspection quality and defect closed-loop. The calculation method is as follows:

[0202]

[0203] ③ Emergency Response Management ERMI

[0204] It consists of the scores for flood control and typhoon prevention, ice and snow weather, and other weather indicators. The calculation adopts a deduction system, and the calculation method is as follows:

[0205] ERMI = 10 - (deduction for flood control and typhoon prevention + deduction for ice and snow weather + deduction for other weather)

[0206] The detailed evaluation indicators for the three indicators of flood control and typhoon prevention, ice and snow weather, and other weather are all 3 items: early warning response, danger situation handling, and response information. Calculate the deduction scores for each item, and the calculation method is as follows:

[0207] Deduction for flood control and typhoon prevention / ice and snow weather / other weather = number of unqualified problems in early warning response × 1

[0208] + number of unqualified problems in danger situation handling × 0.5 + number of unqualified problems in response information × 0.5

[0209] ④ Incident Management IMI

[0210] It consists of the scores for facility damage, traffic accidents, and safety accidents. The calculation adopts a deduction system, with the lowest score being 0 points. The calculation method is as follows:

[0211] IMI = 10 - (deduction for facility damage + deduction for traffic accidents + deduction for safety accidents)

[0212] The detailed evaluation indicators for the three indicators of facility damage, traffic accidents, and safety accidents are all 5 items: initial report of the incident, basic information, follow-up report description, handling photos, and final report of the incident. Calculate the deduction scores for each item, and the calculation method is as follows:

[0213] Deduction for facility damage / traffic accidents / safety accidents = number of unqualified problems in the initial report of the incident × 1 + number of unqualified problems in basic information × 0.5

[0214] + number of unqualified problems in follow-up report description × 0.5 + number of unqualified problems in handling photos × 0.5 + number of unqualified problems in the final report of the incident × 0.5

[0215] ⑤ Worker Management WMI

[0216] It consists of the personnel information ledger. The evaluation indicators for the personnel information ledger are 7 items: basic information, certificate age, certificate information, insurance information, labor contract, education record, and safety disclosure. The calculation method is as follows:

[0217]

[0218] ⑥ Vehicle and Equipment Management VEMI

[0219] It consists of the vehicle and equipment ledger, on-vehicle equipment supervision, and vehicle usage indicators. The calculation method is as follows:

[0220] VEMI = Vehicle Equipment Ledger + On-vehicle Equipment Supervision + Special Vehicle Usage

[0221] Wherein:

[0222] The evaluation indicators of the vehicle equipment ledger are 4 items: basic information, equipment information, insurance information, and vehicle inspection information. The calculation methods are as follows:

[0223]

[0224] The evaluation indicators of on-vehicle equipment supervision are 2 items: 360-degree video and GPS system. The calculation methods are as follows:

[0225]

[0226] The evaluation indicator of special vehicle usage is 1 item: vehicle usage rate. The calculation method is as follows:

[0227]

[0228] ⑦ Maintenance Team Base Management (DBMI)

[0229] It consists of the maintenance team base ledger. The evaluation indicators of the maintenance team base ledger are 6 items: maintenance team base, construction rooms, emergency supplies, emergency teams, vehicle equipment, and maintenance team personnel. The calculation methods are as follows:

[0230]

[0231] ⑧ Safety and Quality Status Index (SQI)

[0232] The calculation formula is as follows:

[0233] SQI = BBSI + AMI + ERMI + IMI + WMI + VEMI + DBMI

[0234] For the Management Behavior Status Index MBI mentioned above, it is characterized in that the Reward and Punishment Evaluation Index ISI includes:

[0235] It consists of 6 indicators: supervision by superiors, social honors, other accidents, safety accidents, social evaluations, and owner assessments. The evaluation of rewards and punishments is represented by the Reward and Punishment Evaluation Index (ISI). See the Figure 8 Reward and Punishment Evaluation Management Index System

[0236] The filling in of the reward and punishment evaluation management is the responsibility of the safety and quality post staff of each unit. All indicators are filled in by collecting the data of the previous month every month. The criteria for adding and deducting points can be modified, and the latest standard is used for calculation during calculation. The index calculation methods are as follows:

[0237] ISI = Points deducted for supervision by superiors + Points added for social honors + Points deducted for other accidents + Points deducted for safety accidents + Points deducted for social evaluations

[0238] +Social evaluation bonus + Owner assessment deduction + Owner assessment bonus

[0239] Superior notice of criticism = -(Number of internal rectification orders × 1 + Number of external rectification orders × 2)

[0240] Social attention honor = +(Number of social attention items × 1 + Number of social honor items × 2)

[0241] Traffic and fire accidents = -(Number of traffic accidents × 1 + Number of fire accidents × 1)

[0242] Work safety accidents = -(Number of general accidents × 1 + Number of major and above accidents × 10)

[0243] Social impact evaluation = +(Number of social praise evaluations × 1 - Number of socially responsible complaints × 1)

[0244] The present invention also discloses an electronic device. Figure 10 It is a schematic diagram of the composition of the electronic device in an embodiment of the present invention; please refer to Figure 10 , at the hardware level, the electronic device includes a memory, a processor, and at least one network interface; the processor can be a microprocessor, and the memory can include an internal memory, such as a random access memory (RAM), and can also include a non-volatile memory, etc. Of course, the electronic device can also be provided with other hardware as needed.

[0245] The processor, network interface, and memory can be interconnected through an internal bus, and the internal bus can be an ISA (Industry Standard Architecture) bus, a PCI (Peripheral Component Interconnect Standard) bus, or an EISA (Extended Industry Standard Architecture) bus, etc.; the bus can include an address bus, a data bus, a control bus, etc. The memory is used to store programs (which can include an operating system program and application programs); the programs can include program codes, and the program codes can include computer operation instructions. The memory can include an internal memory and a non-volatile memory, and provide instructions and data to the processor.

[0246] In one embodiment, the processor can read the corresponding program from the non-volatile memory into the internal memory and then run; the processor can execute the programs stored in the memory and is specifically used to perform the following operations (as Figure 1 shown):

[0247] Step S1: Establish an operation evaluation framework for regional transportation infrastructure throughout the life cycle that integrates different facility types;

[0248] Step S2: Construct an evaluation index for the overall technical condition of the tunnel based on the data of the regional transportation infrastructure all-element intelligent operation and maintenance platform;

[0249] Step S3: Construct an evaluation index for the overall technical condition of urban roads and highways based on the data of the regional transportation infrastructure all-element intelligent operation and maintenance platform;

[0250] Step S4: Calculate the operation evaluation index of the regional transportation infrastructure based on the overall technical condition evaluation index of the tunnel, and the overall technical condition evaluation indexes of urban roads and highways.

[0251] The present invention further discloses a storage medium, on which computer program instructions are stored. When the computer program instructions are executed by a processor, the following steps of the method of the present invention are implemented (as Figure 1 shown):

[0252] Step S1: Establish an operation evaluation framework for regional transportation infrastructure throughout the life cycle, integrating different facility types;

[0253] Step S2: Construct an evaluation index for the overall technical condition of the tunnel based on the data of the regional transportation infrastructure all-element intelligent operation and maintenance platform;

[0254] Step S3: Construct an evaluation index for the overall technical condition of urban roads and highways based on the data of the regional transportation infrastructure all-element intelligent operation and maintenance platform;

[0255] Step S4: Calculate the operation evaluation index of the regional transportation infrastructure based on the overall technical condition evaluation index of the tunnel, and the overall technical condition evaluation indexes of urban roads and highways.

[0256] In summary, the operation evaluation method, system, electronic device and storage medium of the regional transportation infrastructure proposed by the present invention can quantify the operation evaluation quality and ability of the regional urban transportation infrastructure containing different facility types.

[0257] It should be noted that the present application can be implemented in software and / or a combination of software and hardware; for example, it can be implemented using an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC), a general-purpose computer or any other similar hardware device. In some embodiments, the software program of the present application can be executed by a processor to implement the above steps or functions. Similarly, the software program of the present application (including related data structures) can be stored in a computer-readable recording medium; for example, a RAM memory, a magnetic or optical drive or a floppy disk and similar devices. In addition, some steps or functions of the present application can be implemented using hardware; for example, a circuit that cooperates with a processor to execute each step or function.

[0258] The technical features of the above-described embodiments can be combined arbitrarily. For the sake of brevity of description, not all possible combinations of the technical features in the above embodiments are described. However, as long as there is no contradiction in the combination of these technical features, it should be considered as falling within the scope described in this specification.

[0259] The description and application of the present invention here are illustrative and are not intended to limit the scope of the present invention to the above embodiments. The effects or advantages involved in the embodiments may not be reflected in the embodiments due to various factors. The description of the effects or advantages is not used to limit the embodiments. The deformations and changes of the embodiments disclosed here are possible, and the substitutions and equivalent components of the embodiments are well-known to those of ordinary skill in the art. Those skilled in the art should clearly understand that the present invention can be implemented in other forms, structures, arrangements, proportions, and with other components, materials, and parts without departing from the spirit or essential characteristics of the present invention. Other deformations and changes can be made to the embodiments disclosed here without departing from the scope and spirit of the present invention.

Claims

1. A method for evaluating the operation of regional transportation infrastructure, characterized in that, the evaluation method includes: Step S1, establish an evaluation framework for the operation of regional transportation infrastructure throughout the life cycle, integrating different facility types; Step S2, construct an evaluation index for the overall technical condition of tunnels according to the data of the regional transportation infrastructure all-element intelligent operation and maintenance platform; Step S3, construct an evaluation index for the overall technical condition of urban roads and highways according to the data of the regional transportation infrastructure all-element intelligent operation and maintenance platform; Step S4, calculate and obtain an evaluation index for the operation of regional transportation infrastructure according to the evaluation index for the overall technical condition of tunnels, and the evaluation indexes for the overall technical condition of urban roads and highways.

2. The method for evaluating the operation of regional transportation infrastructure according to claim 1, characterized in that: Step S1 includes: adopting hierarchical comprehensive evaluation by facility type; first, evaluate single facilities, then form an evaluation of a certain type of facility according to the facility type, and finally form an evaluation system for the current operation status of regional facilities; Step S2 includes: constructing an evaluation index for the overall technical condition of tunnels by means of hierarchical evaluation of civil structure, mechanical and electrical systems, ancillary facilities, and operation services.

3. The method for evaluating the operation of regional transportation infrastructure according to claim 1, characterized in that: Step S3 includes: adopting a combination of hierarchical evaluation and single-item control, and taking the section between every two adjacent intersections in the same driving direction of the road as the evaluation unit; first, evaluate one-way road grids, secondly, evaluate the section between two adjacent intersections, then conduct an evaluation of the technical condition of facilities, combined with the evaluation of management behaviors, and finally form an evaluation of the overall technical condition of urban road facilities and highway facilities.

4. The method for evaluating the operation of regional transportation infrastructure according to claim 1, characterized in that: Step S4 includes: Adopt the operation evaluation index RI and the overall condition evaluation index CI of each type of facility, and calculate according to the following formula: RI = CI H × W H + CI C × W C + CI T × W T ; In the formula, WH is the weight of the overall condition index of highways in the evaluation index of the operation of regional facilities; WC is the weight of the overall condition index of urban roads in the evaluation index of the operation of regional facilities; WT is the weight of the overall condition index of tunnels / underground roads in the evaluation index of the operation of regional facilities.

5. A system for evaluating the operation of regional transportation infrastructure, characterized in that, the evaluation system includes: An operation evaluation framework construction module for establishing an evaluation framework for the operation of regional transportation infrastructure throughout the life cycle, integrating different facility types; A tunnel evaluation index construction module for constructing an evaluation index for the overall technical condition of tunnels according to the data of the regional transportation infrastructure all-element intelligent operation and maintenance platform; A road evaluation index construction module for constructing an evaluation index for the overall technical condition of urban roads and highways according to the data of the regional transportation infrastructure all-element intelligent operation and maintenance platform; An operation evaluation index calculation module for calculating and obtaining an evaluation index for the operation of regional transportation infrastructure according to the evaluation index for the overall technical condition of tunnels, and the evaluation indexes for the overall technical condition of urban roads and highways.

6. The system for evaluating the operation of regional transportation infrastructure according to claim 5, characterized in that: The operation evaluation framework construction module adopts facility type-based and hierarchical comprehensive evaluation; first, single facilities are evaluated, then evaluations of certain types of facilities are formed according to facility types, and finally, an evaluation system for the current operation status of regional facilities is formed. The tunnel evaluation index construction module constructs an overall technical condition evaluation index for the tunnel by means of hierarchical evaluation of the civil structure, mechanical and electrical system, auxiliary facilities, and operation service.

7. The regional traffic infrastructure operation evaluation system according to claim 5, characterized in that: The road evaluation index construction module adopts a combination of hierarchical evaluation and single-item control, and uses the section between every two adjacent intersections in the same driving direction of the road as the evaluation unit; first, the one-way road grid is evaluated, secondly, the section between two adjacent intersections is evaluated, then the technical condition of the facilities is evaluated, combined with the evaluation of management behaviors, and finally, the overall technical condition evaluation of urban road facilities and highway facilities is formed.

8. The regional traffic infrastructure operation evaluation system according to claim 5, characterized in that: The operation evaluation index calculation module uses the operation evaluation index RI and the overall condition evaluation index CI of each type of facility, and calculates according to the following formula: RI = CI H ×W H +CI C ×W C +CI T ×W T ; In the formula, WH is the weight of the overall condition index of highways in the regional facility operation evaluation index; WC is the weight of the overall condition index of urban roads in the regional facility operation evaluation index; WT is the weight of the overall condition index of tunnels / underground roads in the regional facility operation evaluation index.

9. An electronic device, comprising a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored on the memory and executable on the processor, characterized in that, when the processor executes the computer program, the steps of the method according to any one of claims 1 to 4 are implemented.

10. A storage medium, on which computer program instructions are stored, characterized in that, when the computer program instructions are executed by the processor, the steps of the method according to any one of claims 1 to 4 are implemented.

Images