A management method, apparatus, equipment, medium, and procedure for pipeline inspection.

Abstract

This invention discloses a management method, apparatus, equipment, medium, and program product for pipeline inspection. The method includes: receiving inspection data sent by an in-pipe detector; if the inspection data includes a first pipe miter angle, determining whether the first pipe miter angle meets an angle verification condition; if it does, identifying the target pipeline associated with the first pipe miter angle and obtaining the perimeter of the miter surface of the target pipeline; and determining the verification result of the first pipe miter angle based on the perimeter of the miter surface. Through this technical solution, the accuracy of the quantified inspection data can be effectively managed.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This invention relates to the field of pipeline inspection technology, and in particular to a pipeline inspection management method, apparatus, equipment, medium, and procedure product. Background Technology

[0002] Long-distance oil and gas pipelines are crucial basic energy infrastructures, and ensuring their efficient, stable, and safe operation is of great significance to energy security. Therefore, monitoring relevant data on the safe operation of long-distance oil and gas pipelines is essential.

[0003] In practice, technicians typically use technical means to detect pipeline defects or characteristics, generating quantifiable detection data to assess the risks to pipeline safety. Therefore, the accuracy of this quantified detection data is crucial for technicians to determine the risks to pipeline safety. However, current technologies lack effective verification and management schemes for the accuracy of this quantified detection data. Summary of the Invention

[0004] This invention provides a management method, apparatus, equipment, medium, and program product for pipeline inspection, in order to solve the problem of the lack of effective management of the accuracy of quantified inspection data in the prior art.

[0005] According to one aspect of the present invention, a pipeline inspection management method is provided, comprising:

[0006] Receive detection data sent by the internal detector in the pipeline;

[0007] If the analysis reveals that the detection data includes the first pipe mitered angle, then determine whether the first pipe mitered angle meets the angle verification conditions.

[0008] If satisfied, the target pipe associated with the first pipe's miter angle is determined, and the perimeter of the pipe miter surface of the target pipe is obtained.

[0009] The verification result of the first pipe miter angle is determined based on the perimeter of the pipe miter joint surface.

[0010] According to another aspect of the present invention, a pipeline inspection management device is provided, comprising:

[0011] The receiving module is used to receive detection data sent by the internal detector in the pipeline;

[0012] The judgment module is used to determine whether the first pipe mitered angle meets the angle verification condition if the analysis shows that the detection data includes the first pipe mitered angle.

[0013] The acquisition module is used to determine the target pipe associated with the first pipe mitered angle and obtain the perimeter of the pipe mitered surface of the target pipe when the first pipe mitered angle meets the angle verification condition.

[0014] The result determination module is used to determine the verification result of the first pipe miter angle based on the perimeter of the pipe miter joint surface.

[0015] According to another aspect of the present invention, an electronic device is provided, the electronic device comprising:

[0016] At least one processor; and a memory communicatively connected to the at least one processor; wherein the memory stores a computer program executable by the at least one processor, the computer program being executed by the at least one processor to enable the at least one processor to perform the pipeline inspection management method according to any embodiment of the present invention.

[0017] According to another aspect of the present invention, a computer-readable storage medium is provided, the computer-readable storage medium storing computer instructions for causing a processor to execute and implement the pipeline detection management method according to any embodiment of the present invention.

[0018] According to another aspect of the present invention, a computer program product is provided, the computer program product comprising a computer program that, when executed by a processor, implements the pipeline inspection management method according to any embodiment of the present invention.

[0019] The technical solution of this invention receives detection data sent by an internal detector in a pipeline. When the detection data includes a first pipe mitered angle, it determines whether the first pipe mitered angle meets the angle verification condition. If it does, it identifies the target pipeline associated with the first pipe mitered angle and obtains the perimeter of the pipe mitered surface of the target pipeline. Then, based on the perimeter of the pipe mitered surface, it determines the verification result of the first pipe mitered angle. This allows for obtaining the corresponding verification result for the detection data that needs to be verified, thereby verifying the accuracy of the detection data. This solves the problem in the prior art of not being able to effectively manage the accuracy of quantified detection data, and improves the effectiveness and accuracy of managing the accuracy of quantified detection data.

[0020] It should be understood that the description in this section is not intended to identify key or essential features of the embodiments of the present invention, nor is it intended to limit the scope of the invention. Other features of the invention will become readily apparent from the following description. Attached Figure Description

[0021] To more clearly illustrate the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention, the accompanying drawings used in the description of the embodiments will be briefly introduced below. Obviously, the accompanying drawings described below are only some embodiments of the present invention. For those skilled in the art, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without creative effort.

[0022] Figure 1 This is a flowchart of a pipeline inspection management method provided according to Embodiment 1 of the present invention;

[0023] Figure 2 This is a flowchart of a pipeline inspection management method provided according to Embodiment 2 of the present invention;

[0024] Figure 3 This is a schematic diagram of the oblique joint dimensions of the pipe oblique joint involved in Embodiment 2 of the present invention;

[0025] Figure 4 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of a pipeline inspection management device provided according to Embodiment 3 of the present invention;

[0026] Figure 5 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of an electronic device that implements the pipeline inspection management method of this invention. Detailed Implementation

[0027] To enable those skilled in the art to better understand the present invention, the technical solutions of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the accompanying drawings of the embodiments of the present invention. Obviously, the described embodiments are only some embodiments of the present invention, and not all embodiments. Based on the embodiments of the present invention, all other embodiments obtained by those skilled in the art without creative effort should fall within the scope of protection of the present invention.

[0028] It should be noted that the terms "first," "second," etc., in the specification, claims, and accompanying drawings of this invention are used to distinguish similar objects and are not necessarily used to describe a specific order or sequence. It should be understood that such data can be interchanged where appropriate so that the embodiments of the invention described herein can be implemented in orders other than those illustrated or described herein. Furthermore, the terms "comprising" and "having," and any variations thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion; for example, a process, method, system, product, or apparatus that comprises a series of steps or units is not necessarily limited to those steps or units explicitly listed, but may include other steps or units not explicitly listed or inherent to such processes, methods, products, or apparatus.

[0029] Example 1

[0030] Figure 1 This is a flowchart of a pipeline inspection management method provided in Embodiment 1 of the present invention. This embodiment is applicable to the management of inspection data for long-distance pipelines. The method can be executed by a pipeline inspection management device, which can be implemented in hardware and / or software. This pipeline inspection management device can be configured in an electronic device, which can communicate wirelessly / wiredly with the detector used for inspecting the long-distance pipeline. Figure 1 As shown, the method includes:

[0031] S110, Receive detection data sent by the internal detector in the pipeline.

[0032] The internal detector, installed inside the long-distance pipeline, can inspect the entire pipeline and collect and store relevant inspection data. This data can be used to assess pipeline integrity and safety, including but not limited to information such as the location, size, shape, depth, length, and angle of pipeline defects. Understandably, the accuracy of the inspection data directly affects the assessment of pipeline integrity and safety; therefore, effective management of the accuracy of the detector's data is necessary.

[0033] For example, this embodiment can receive detection data sent by the detector inside the pipeline through wired communication, wireless communication or any other method not mentioned in this embodiment, and this embodiment is not specifically limited here.

[0034] S120. If the analysis shows that the detection data includes the first pipe mitered angle, then determine whether the first pipe mitered angle meets the angle verification condition.

[0035] To accommodate the bends, branches, or turns in long-distance pipelines, it is necessary to cut and weld the pipelines to form mitered joints. The angle between the axes of the two pipes at the mitered joint is called the mitered joint angle. The first mitered joint angle can be detected and collected by an internal detector installed inside the pipeline at the mitered joint. Angle verification conditions can be used to determine whether the first mitered joint angle collected by the internal detector meets the construction design standards.

[0036] For example, when the detection data includes the first pipe mitered angle collected by the internal detector, it can be determined whether the first pipe mitered angle collected by the internal detector meets the construction design standard requirements by using preset angle verification conditions. The preset angle verification conditions can be set according to actual needs. For example, it can be determined whether the first pipe mitered angle meets the angle verification conditions by judging whether it is consistent with the standard angle of the construction design.

[0037] Optionally, determining whether the first pipe mitered angle meets the angle verification condition includes: if the first pipe mitered angle exceeds a preset angle range, then determining that the first pipe mitered angle meets the verification condition.

[0038] The preset angle range can be the maximum allowable range of pipe mitered angles set according to relevant engineering specifications and safety standards. If the pipe mitered angle exceeds this range, it is considered that the pipe mitered angle at the mitered joint does not meet the construction design standard requirements, affecting the evaluation of the pipeline's safety and integrity. Further verification and management are required to determine whether the accuracy of the pipe mitered angle collected by the internal detector is accurate.

[0039] For example, in actual testing, if the construction design standard for the pipe mitered angle requires that it not exceed 3°, but the internal detector reports a pipe mitered angle of 10°, which is significantly beyond the range required by the construction design standard for the pipe mitered angle, then it can be determined that the pipe mitered angle of this mitered angle meets the angle verification conditions.

[0040] S130. If satisfied, determine the target pipe associated with the first pipe's miter angle and obtain the perimeter of the pipe miter surface of the target pipe.

[0041] The target pipeline associated with the first pipe mitered angle can be the pipeline in the long-distance pipeline at the location of the mitered joint corresponding to the first pipe mitered angle. The perimeter of the pipe mitered joint surface can be the perimeter of the mitered joint cross-section at the pipe mitered joint. For example, the mitered joint cross-section of the pipe mitered joint can generally be an ellipse, then the perimeter of the pipe mitered joint surface is the perimeter of the ellipse in the mitered joint cross-section.

[0042] For example, when the internal detector detects the detection data of the pipeline, it can store the pipeline position corresponding to the detection data. When the first pipe miter angle meets the angle verification condition, the target pipeline at the location of the miter angle corresponding to the first pipe miter angle can be determined through the internal detector, and thus the perimeter of the miter surface of the target pipeline can be obtained. For example, the perimeter of the miter surface of the target pipeline can be obtained directly by measuring with a tape measure. This embodiment does not limit how the perimeter of the miter surface of the target pipeline is obtained.

[0043] S140. Determine the verification result of the first pipe miter angle based on the perimeter of the pipe miter joint surface.

[0044] Among them, the verification result of the first pipe mitered angle characterizes whether the detection quantification of the first pipe mitered angle is accurate.

[0045] For example, based on the correlation between the perimeter of the pipe joint surface and the pipe joint angle at actual pipe joints, the actual pipe joint angle corresponding to the first pipe joint angle can be determined according to the perimeter of the pipe joint surface corresponding to the first pipe joint angle. Then, the accuracy of the first pipe joint angle collected by the internal detector can be verified based on the actual pipe joint angle to obtain whether the detection quantification of the first pipe joint angle is accurate, which serves as the verification result of the first pipe joint angle.

[0046] The technical solution of this invention receives detection data sent by an internal detector in a pipeline. When the detection data includes a first pipe mitered angle, it determines whether the first pipe mitered angle meets the angle verification condition. If it does, it identifies the target pipeline associated with the first pipe mitered angle and obtains the perimeter of the pipe mitered surface of the target pipeline. Then, based on the perimeter of the pipe mitered surface, it determines the verification result of the first pipe mitered angle. This allows for obtaining the corresponding verification result for the detection data that needs to be verified, thereby verifying the accuracy of the detection data. This solves the problem in the prior art of not being able to effectively manage the accuracy of quantified detection data, and improves the effectiveness and accuracy of managing the accuracy of quantified detection data.

[0047] Based on the above embodiments, the method further includes: in response to a received pipeline inspection and analysis request, determining the inspection and analysis result of the pipeline based on the inspection data.

[0048] A pipeline inspection and analysis request can be a user-issued instruction to analyze pipeline inspection data. The pipeline inspection and analysis results can be an overall assessment of the pipeline's integrity and safety.

[0049] For example, after receiving and verifying the detection data sent by the detector inside the pipeline, the detection data can be analyzed based on the user's instruction to analyze the pipeline detection data to obtain an overall assessment result of the pipeline's integrity and safety.

[0050] Example 2

[0051] Figure 2 This is another flowchart of a pipeline inspection management method provided in Embodiment 2 of the present invention. This embodiment is based on and optimized from the technical solutions in the above embodiments. Figure 2 As shown, the method includes:

[0052] S210, Receive detection data sent by the internal detector in the pipeline.

[0053] S220. If the analysis shows that the detection data includes the first pipe mitered angle, then determine whether the first pipe mitered angle meets the angle verification condition.

[0054] S230. If satisfied, then determine the target pipe associated with the first pipe's mitered angle.

[0055] S240. Based on the perimeter of the pipe's mitered joint surface and the predetermined mitered joint angle formula, determine the second pipe mitered joint angle, and determine the pipe verification error range based on the second pipe mitered joint angle.

[0056] The relationship between the miter joint angle and the ellipse perimeter of the miter joint section can be defined as a function of the miter joint angle and the ellipse perimeter of the miter joint section. The second miter joint angle can be the actual miter joint angle determined based on the perimeter of the miter joint section, used to verify the first miter joint angle acquired by the internal detector. The pipe verification error range can be an angle range determined based on the second miter joint angle, used to verify the accuracy of the first miter joint angle acquired by the internal detector.

[0057] For example, the perimeter of the pipe's miter joint, obtained from actual measurement, can be input into a predetermined miter joint angle formula to obtain the second pipe miter joint angle. Based on the second pipe miter joint angle and a preset angle range, a corresponding angle interval is determined as the pipe verification error interval. The preset angle range can be set according to the actual accuracy requirements for the pipe miter joint angle collected by the internal detector or relevant standard requirements.

[0058] Understandably, in practical applications, long-distance oil and gas pipelines are generally buried underground. After collecting various detection data of the long-distance oil and gas pipeline based on the internal detector, it is necessary to verify the accuracy of each detection data of the long-distance oil and gas pipeline.

[0059] Current methods for verifying the accuracy of pipe joint angles involve determining the target pipe's location, excavating the pipe, and directly measuring the pipe joint angle using an angle gauge to verify the accuracy of the angle collected by an internal detector. However, after the pipe is excavated, the orientation of the pipe joint bend is difficult to determine accurately, making it hard to pinpoint the location of the maximum angle. This necessitates repeated measurements at multiple locations to confirm the maximum angle, leading to difficulties in orientation determination, cumbersome operation, and low measurement efficiency.

[0060] Furthermore, when measuring the mitered angle of a pipe using an angle gauge, the excess height of the mitered ring weld at the pipe mitered joint raises the angle gauge, reducing the measurement angle. This leads to inaccurate measurements of the actual mitered angle, resulting in low accuracy in verifying the precision of the mitered angle measurement.

[0061] However, this embodiment can obtain the pipe angle at the pipe joint by pre-setting the miter angle relationship, which only requires measuring the perimeter of the pipe miter surface at the pipe joint. This not only avoids the problems of difficulty in determining the orientation, complicated operation, low measurement efficiency and low accuracy verification caused by directly measuring the angle with an angle ruler, but also can be directly used for measuring and calculating the angle of ground-mounted miter pipes, with a wide range of applications.

[0062] S250. If the first pipe mitered angle falls within the pipe verification error range, then the first pipe mitered angle detection is accurately quantified and used as the verification result.

[0063] For example, if the first pipe mitered angle collected by the internal detector falls within the corresponding angle range determined based on the second pipe mitered angle and a preset angle range, it indicates that the accuracy of the first pipe mitered angle collected by the internal detector is accurate and can be used to assess the integrity and safety of the pipeline. In this case, the accurate detection of the first pipe mitered angle can be used as a verification result.

[0064] S260. If the first pipe mitered angle falls outside the pipe verification error range, then the inaccurate quantification of the first pipe mitered angle detection is taken as the verification result.

[0065] For example, if the first pipe mitered angle collected by the internal detector falls outside the corresponding angle range determined based on the second pipe mitered angle and a preset angle range, it indicates that the accuracy of the first pipe mitered angle collected by the internal detector is inaccurate and cannot be used to assess the integrity and safety of the pipeline. In this case, the inaccuracy of the first pipe mitered angle detection can be used as a verification result.

[0066] It is understandable that when the quantification of the first pipe miter angle detection is inaccurate, the inaccurate quantification of the first pipe miter angle will seriously affect the accuracy of the assessment of pipe integrity and safety. This embodiment can use an accurate pipe miter angle to update and replace the inaccurately quantified first pipe miter angle, thereby ensuring the accuracy of the assessment of pipe integrity and safety.

[0067] Optionally, if the verification result indicates that the quantization of the miter angle detection is inaccurate, the first pipe miter angle can be updated based on the second pipe miter angle to obtain updated detection data.

[0068] For example, updating the first pipe joint angle, which is inaccurate in the detection quantification, by using a second pipe joint angle determined based on the perimeter of the pipe joint surface and a predetermined joint angle relationship, can ensure the accuracy of the assessment of pipe integrity and safety.

[0069] The technical solution of this invention receives detection data sent by an internal detector in a pipeline. When the detection data includes a first pipe slant angle, it determines whether the first pipe slant angle meets the angle verification condition. If it does, it determines the target pipeline associated with the first pipe slant angle and obtains the perimeter of the pipe slant surface of the target pipeline. Then, based on the perimeter of the pipe slant surface and a predetermined slant angle relationship, it determines a second pipe slant angle and determines the pipeline verification error range based on the second pipe slant angle. This allows it to determine whether the first pipe slant angle is accurately detected and quantified, thereby achieving the verification measurement of the accuracy of the pipe slant angle. This avoids the problems of difficult orientation, complicated operation, low measurement efficiency, and low accuracy of accuracy verification measurement in existing technical solutions, thus improving the efficiency and accuracy of the verification measurement of the accuracy of the pipe slant angle.

[0070] Based on the above embodiments, the miter angle relationship is predetermined. For example, the miter angle relationship can be a relationship between the miter angle of the pipe and the circumference of the miter cross-section ellipse established in advance through calculation.

[0071] Optionally, the step of determining the miter angle relationship includes: obtaining the pipe diameter, the expression for the major and minor axes of the ellipse displayed by the pipe miter surface, a pre-set dimensionless parameter expression, and an approximate expression for the perimeter, wherein the dimensionless parameter expression is set based on the perimeter of the pipe miter surface and the pipe diameter; and determining the miter angle relationship between the pipe miter angle and the perimeter of the pipe miter surface based on the expression for the major and minor axes of the ellipse, the dimensionless parameter expression, and the approximate expression for the perimeter.

[0072] Among them, such as Figure 3 The diagram shows the dimensions of the miter joint at the pipe joint. The miter joint surface is an ellipse. Let the circumference of the ellipse be C, the pipe diameter be D, and the miter angle be θ. Then, the expression for the semi-major axis of the ellipse is: The expression for the minor semi-axis of the ellipse is: Based on this, the steps to obtain the formula for the miter joint angle are as follows:

[0073] 1. Based on Ramanujan's approximate perimeter formula and the semi-major and semi-minor axes of the ellipse, the perimeter of the ellipse in the oblique cross-section is obtained:

[0074]

[0075] 2. Establish a functional relationship between the pipe mitered angle and the ellipse perimeter in the pipe mitered cross section based on the defined dimensionless parameters:

[0076] It can make but Simultaneously, the dimensionless parameter expression is defined as follows: Then we can obtain the function:

[0077] Furthermore, we can obtain:

[0078] Furthermore, based on the above We can obtain:

[0079]

[0080] in,

[0081] 3. Verify the accuracy of the functional relationship between the pipe mitered angle and the ellipse perimeter in the pipe mitered cross section, established based on defined dimensionless parameters:

[0082] When the pipe has no mitered joint, the actual mitered joint angle is 0°. In this case, the circumference of the ellipse C = πD and the dimensionless parameter K = 2 are used. Then, based on the defined dimensionless parameter, the function relationship between the pipe mitered joint angle and the circumference of the ellipse in the pipe mitered joint cross section can be established to obtain the value of θ. If θ = 0°, it matches the actual pipe mitered joint angle, and the accuracy is verified.

[0083] Alternatively, when the pipe miter angle is 60°, the major and minor semi-axes of the ellipse in the pipe miter surface are respectively: The circumferences of the ellipse are obtained as C≈4.844D and K≈3.084. Then, based on the defined dimensionless parameters, the function relationship between the pipe mitered angle and the circumference of the ellipse in the pipe mitered cross section can be established to obtain θ. If the error between θ and 60° is small and matches the actual pipe mitered angle, then the accuracy verification is passed.

[0084] 4. After passing the accuracy verification, the final confirmed formula for the miter joint angle is:

[0085]

[0086] Where C is the perimeter of the pipe's miter joint and D is the pipe's diameter.

[0087] Example 3

[0088] Figure 4 This is a schematic diagram of a pipeline inspection management device provided in Embodiment 3 of the present invention. Figure 4 As shown, the device includes:

[0089] The receiving module 410 is used to receive detection data sent by the detector inside the pipeline;

[0090] The judgment module 420 is used to determine whether the first pipe slant angle meets the angle verification condition if the analysis shows that the detection data includes the first pipe slant angle.

[0091] The acquisition module 430 is used to determine the target pipe associated with the first pipe mitered angle and obtain the perimeter of the pipe mitered surface of the target pipe when the first pipe mitered angle meets the angle verification condition.

[0092] The result determination module 440 is used to determine the verification result of the first pipe miter angle based on the perimeter of the pipe miter joint surface.

[0093] The technical solution of this invention receives detection data sent by an internal detector in a pipeline. When the detection data includes a first pipe mitered angle, it determines whether the first pipe mitered angle meets the angle verification condition. If it does, it identifies the target pipeline associated with the first pipe mitered angle and obtains the perimeter of the pipe mitered surface of the target pipeline. Then, based on the perimeter of the pipe mitered surface, it determines the verification result of the first pipe mitered angle. This allows for obtaining the corresponding verification result for the detection data that needs to be verified, thereby verifying the accuracy of the detection data. This solves the problem in the prior art of not being able to effectively manage the accuracy of quantified detection data, and improves the effectiveness and accuracy of managing the accuracy of quantified detection data.

[0094] Based on the above embodiments, optionally, the judgment module 420 can be used to determine that the first pipe mitered angle meets the verification conditions if the first pipe mitered angle exceeds a preset angle range.

[0095] Optionally, the result determination module 440 can be specifically used to determine the second pipe miter angle based on the perimeter of the pipe miter joint surface and a predetermined miter angle relationship, and to determine the pipe verification error range based on the second pipe miter angle; when the first pipe miter angle falls within the pipe verification error range, the first pipe miter angle detection is accurately quantified as the verification result; when the first pipe miter angle falls outside the pipe verification error range, the first pipe miter angle detection is inaccurate as the verification result.

[0096] Optionally, the device may also include: a relation determination module;

[0097] The relation determination module can be used to obtain the pipe diameter, the semi-major and semi-minor axis expressions of the ellipse displayed by the pipe oblique joint, the pre-set dimensionless parameter expressions, and the approximate perimeter expression, wherein the dimensionless parameter expressions are set according to the perimeter of the pipe oblique joint and the pipe diameter.

[0098] Based on the expressions for the major and minor semi-axes of the ellipse, the dimensionless parameter expression, and the approximate expression for the perimeter, the relationship between the pipe mitered angle and the mitered angle of the pipe mitered surface perimeter is determined.

[0099] Optionally, the device may also include: an update module;

[0100] Specifically, the update module can be used to update the first pipe mitered angle based on the second pipe mitered angle when the verification result indicates that the quantization of the mitered angle detection is inaccurate, and to obtain the updated detection data.

[0101] Optionally, the device may also include: an analysis module;

[0102] Specifically, the analysis module can be used to respond to a received pipeline inspection and analysis request and determine the inspection and analysis results of the pipeline based on the inspection data.

[0103] The pipeline inspection management device provided in this embodiment of the invention can execute the pipeline inspection management method provided in any embodiment of the invention, and has the corresponding functional modules and beneficial effects of the method.

[0104] Example 4

[0105] Figure 5 A schematic diagram of an electronic device 50 that can be used to implement embodiments of the present invention is shown. The electronic device is intended to represent various forms of digital computers, such as laptop computers, desktop computers, workstations, personal digital assistants, servers, blade servers, mainframe computers, and other suitable computers. The electronic device can also represent various forms of mobile devices, such as personal digital processors, cellular phones, smartphones, wearable devices (e.g., helmets, glasses, watches, etc.), and other similar computing devices. The components shown herein, their connections and relationships, and their functions are merely illustrative and are not intended to limit the implementation of the invention described and / or claimed herein.

[0106] like Figure 5As shown, the electronic device 50 includes at least one processor 51 and a memory, such as a read-only memory (ROM) 52 and a random access memory (RAM) 53, communicatively connected to the at least one processor 51. The memory stores computer programs executable by the at least one processor. The processor 51 can perform various appropriate actions and processes based on the computer program stored in the ROM 52 or loaded into the RAM 53 from storage unit 58. The RAM 53 can also store various programs and data required for the operation of the electronic device 50. The processor 51, ROM 52, and RAM 53 are interconnected via a bus 54. An input / output (I / O) interface 55 is also connected to the bus 54.

[0107] Multiple components in electronic device 50 are connected to I / O interface 55, including: input unit 56, such as keyboard, mouse, etc.; output unit 57, such as various types of monitors, speakers, etc.; storage unit 58, such as disk, optical disk, etc.; and communication unit 59, such as network card, modem, wireless transceiver, etc. Communication unit 59 allows electronic device 50 to exchange information / data with other devices through computer networks such as the Internet and / or various telecommunications networks.

[0108] Processor 51 can be a variety of general-purpose and / or special-purpose processing components with processing and computing capabilities. Some examples of processor 51 include, but are not limited to, a central processing unit (CPU), a graphics processing unit (GPU), various special-purpose artificial intelligence (AI) computing chips, various processors running machine learning model algorithms, a digital signal processor (DSP), and any suitable processor, controller, microcontroller, etc. Processor 51 performs the various methods and processes described above, such as pipeline monitoring management methods.

[0109] In some embodiments, the pipeline monitoring management method may be implemented as a computer program tangibly contained in a computer-readable storage medium, such as storage unit 58. In some embodiments, part or all of the computer program may be loaded and / or installed on electronic device 50 via ROM 52 and / or communication unit 59. When the computer program is loaded into RAM 53 and executed by processor 51, one or more steps of the pipeline monitoring management method described above may be performed. Alternatively, in other embodiments, processor 51 may be configured to perform the pipeline monitoring management method by any other suitable means (e.g., by means of firmware).

[0110] Various embodiments of the systems and techniques described above herein can be implemented in digital electronic circuit systems, integrated circuit systems, field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs), application-specific standard products (ASSPs), systems-on-a-chip (SoCs), payload-programmable logic devices (CPLDs), computer hardware, firmware, software, and / or combinations thereof. These various embodiments may include implementations in one or more computer programs that can be executed and / or interpreted on a programmable system including at least one programmable processor, which may be a dedicated or general-purpose programmable processor, capable of receiving data and instructions from a storage system, at least one input device, and at least one output device, and transmitting data and instructions to the storage system, the at least one input device, and the at least one output device.

[0111] Computer programs used to implement the methods of the present invention may be written in any combination of one or more programming languages. These computer programs may be provided to a processor of a general-purpose computer, a special-purpose computer, or other programmable data processing device, such that when executed by the processor, the computer programs cause the functions / operations specified in the flowcharts and / or block diagrams to be performed. The computer programs may be executed entirely on a machine, partially on a machine, or as a standalone software package, partially on a machine and partially on a remote machine, or entirely on a remote machine or server.

[0112] In the context of this invention, a computer-readable storage medium can be a tangible medium that may contain or store a computer program for use by or in conjunction with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device. A computer-readable storage medium may include, but is not limited to, electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor systems, apparatus, or devices, or any suitable combination thereof. Alternatively, a computer-readable storage medium may be a machine-readable signal medium. More specific examples of machine-readable storage media include electrical connections based on one or more wires, portable computer disks, hard disks, random access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or flash memory), optical fibers, portable compact disk read-only memory (CD-ROM), optical storage devices, magnetic storage devices, or any suitable combination thereof.

[0113] To provide interaction with a user, the systems and techniques described herein can be implemented on an electronic device having: a display device (e.g., a CRT (cathode ray tube) or LCD (liquid crystal display) monitor) for displaying information to the user; and a keyboard and pointing device (e.g., a mouse or trackball) through which the user provides input to the electronic device. Other types of devices can also be used to provide interaction with the user; for example, feedback provided to the user can be any form of sensory feedback (e.g., visual feedback, auditory feedback, or tactile feedback); and input from the user can be received in any form (including sound input, voice input, or tactile input).

[0114] The systems and technologies described herein can be implemented in computing systems that include backend components (e.g., as data servers), or computing systems that include middleware components (e.g., application servers), or computing systems that include frontend components (e.g., user computers with graphical user interfaces or web browsers through which users can interact with implementations of the systems and technologies described herein), or any combination of such backend, middleware, or frontend components. The components of the system can be interconnected via digital data communication of any form or medium (e.g., communication networks). Examples of communication networks include local area networks (LANs), wide area networks (WANs), blockchain networks, and the Internet.

[0115] A computing system can include clients and servers. Clients and servers are generally located far apart and typically interact through communication networks. The client-server relationship is created by computer programs running on the respective computers and having a client-server relationship with each other. The server can be a cloud server, also known as a cloud computing server or cloud host, which is a hosting product within the cloud computing service system to address the shortcomings of traditional physical hosts and VPS services, such as high management difficulty and weak business scalability.

[0116] It should be understood that the various forms of processes shown above can be used, with steps reordered, added, or deleted. For example, the steps described in this invention can be executed in parallel, sequentially, or in different orders, as long as the desired result of the technical solution of this invention can be achieved, and this is not limited herein.

[0117] The specific embodiments described above do not constitute a limitation on the scope of protection of this invention. Those skilled in the art should understand that various modifications, combinations, sub-combinations, and substitutions can be made according to design requirements and other factors. Any modifications, equivalent substitutions, and improvements made within the spirit and principles of this invention should be included within the scope of protection of this invention.

Claims

1. A management method for pipeline inspection, characterized in that, include: Receive detection data sent by the internal detector in the pipeline; If the analysis reveals that the detection data includes the first pipe mitered angle, then determine whether the first pipe mitered angle meets the angle verification conditions. If satisfied, the target pipe associated with the first pipe's miter angle is determined, and the perimeter of the pipe miter surface of the target pipe is obtained. The verification result of determining the first pipe miter angle based on the perimeter of the pipe miter joint surface includes: Based on the perimeter of the pipe's mitered joint surface and the predetermined mitered joint angle formula, the second pipe mitered joint angle is determined, and the pipe verification error range is determined based on the second pipe mitered joint angle. If the first pipe mitered angle falls within the pipe verification error range, then the first pipe mitered angle detection is accurately quantified and used as the verification result. If the first pipe mitered angle falls outside the pipe verification error range, then the inaccurate quantification of the first pipe mitered angle detection is taken as the verification result. The formula for the miter angle is: Where C is the perimeter of the pipe's miter joint, and D is the pipe diameter. This refers to the angle of the pipe's mitered connection.

2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, Determining whether the first pipe's miter angle meets the angle verification condition includes: If the first pipe mitered angle exceeds the preset angle range, then the first pipe mitered angle is determined to meet the verification conditions.

3. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, Also includes: If the verification result indicates that the quantization of the miter angle detection is inaccurate, the first pipe miter angle is updated based on the second pipe miter angle, and the updated detection data is obtained.

4. The method according to any one of claims 1-3, characterized in that, Also includes: In response to a received pipeline inspection and analysis request, the inspection and analysis results of the pipeline are determined based on the inspection data.

5. A pipeline inspection and management device, characterized in that, include: The receiving module is used to receive detection data sent by the internal detector in the pipeline; The judgment module is used to determine whether the first pipe mitered angle meets the angle verification condition if the analysis shows that the detection data includes the first pipe mitered angle. The acquisition module is used to determine the target pipe associated with the first pipe mitered angle and obtain the perimeter of the pipe mitered surface of the target pipe when the first pipe mitered angle meets the angle verification condition. The result determination module is used to determine the verification result of the first pipe miter angle based on the perimeter of the pipe miter joint surface; Specifically, the result determination module is used to determine the second pipe slant angle based on the perimeter of the pipe slant joint surface and a pre-determined slant angle relationship, and to determine the pipe verification error range based on the second pipe slant angle. If the first pipe mitered angle falls within the pipe verification error range, then the first pipe mitered angle detection is accurately quantified and used as the verification result. If the first pipe mitered angle falls outside the pipe verification error range, then the inaccurate quantification of the first pipe mitered angle detection is taken as the verification result. The formula for the miter angle is: Where C is the perimeter of the pipe's miter joint, and D is the pipe diameter. This refers to the angle of the pipe's mitered connection.

6. An electronic device, characterized in that, The electronic device includes: At least one processor; and A memory communicatively connected to the at least one processor; wherein, The memory stores a computer program that can be executed by the at least one processor to enable the at least one processor to perform the pipeline inspection management method according to any one of claims 1-4.

7. A computer-readable storage medium, characterized in that, The computer-readable storage medium stores computer instructions that, when executed by a processor, implement the pipeline inspection management method according to any one of claims 1-4.

8. A computer program product, characterized in that, The computer program product includes a computer program that, when executed by a processor, implements the pipeline inspection management method according to any one of claims 1-4.

Images