Project quality acceptance method and device, computer equipment and storage medium

Abstract

The invention relates to the technical field of quality evaluation, in particular to a project quality acceptance method and device, computer equipment and a storage medium. The method comprises the steps of obtaining project quality parameters of at least one detection project corresponding to a foundation project; performing quality scoring on the foundation project according to the project quality parameter of each detection project to obtain a comprehensive quality score; and constructing an acceptance quality report of the capital construction project according to the comprehensive quality score. According to the method, the actual engineering condition of the foundation engineering is effectively reflected by obtaining the quality comprehensive score, so that a manager can intuitively know the engineering quality of the foundation engineering through the quality comprehensive score and the acceptance quality report.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This application relates to the technical field of quality assessment, and particularly to a method, device, computer device, and storage medium for engineering quality acceptance. Background Art

[0002] With the acceleration of the urbanization process, the number of infrastructure engineering projects has been increasing, and the technical complexity and project scale involved have also been continuously expanding.

[0003] However, in the process of project acceptance, traditional quality assessment methods often rely on manual inspection and static reports, suffering from problems such as long assessment cycles, strong subjectivity, and lack of real-time data. This not only affects the ability to detect engineering defects in a timely manner but also causes difficulties in subsequent maintenance management. Summary of the Invention

[0004] Based on this, in view of the above technical problems, it is necessary to provide a method, device, computer device, and storage medium for engineering quality acceptance that can monitor in real time and dynamically evaluate the quality of engineering acceptance.

[0005] In a first aspect, this application provides a method for engineering quality acceptance. The method includes:

[0006] Obtain the engineering quality parameters of at least one detection item corresponding to the basic project;

[0007] Perform a quality score on the basic project according to the engineering quality parameters of each detection item to obtain a comprehensive quality score;

[0008] Construct an acceptance quality report for the infrastructure project according to the comprehensive quality score.

[0009] In one embodiment, the performing a quality score on the basic project according to the engineering quality parameters of each detection item to obtain a comprehensive quality score includes:

[0010] Determine the weighting factor coefficients for each detection item;

[0011] Determine the basic scores corresponding to each detection item according to the engineering quality parameters of each detection item;

[0012] Perform a weighted operation on the basic scores corresponding to each detection item according to the weighting factor coefficients to obtain a comprehensive quality score.

[0013] In one embodiment, the determining the basic scores corresponding to each detection item according to the engineering quality parameters of each detection item includes:

[0014] For each inspection item, analyze and evaluate the engineering quality parameters of the inspection item to obtain evaluation indicators;

[0015] Determine the basic score corresponding to the inspection item according to the index difference between the evaluation indicator and the standard indicator of the inspection item.

[0016] In one embodiment, the determining the weighting factor coefficients for each of the inspection items includes:

[0017] Determine the weighting factor coefficients for each of the inspection items according to the engineering type and acceptance criteria corresponding to the basic project.

[0018] In one embodiment, the inspection items include construction structure items, construction material quality inspection items, and construction environmental protection items;

[0019] Correspondingly, the obtaining of the engineering quality parameters of at least one inspection item corresponding to the basic project includes:

[0020] Obtain the engineering quality parameters corresponding to the construction structure items through a structure measurement device deployed on at least one structure monitoring point within the scope of the basic project construction;

[0021] Obtain the engineering quality parameters corresponding to the construction material quality inspection items by randomly sampling the construction materials;

[0022] Obtain the engineering quality parameters corresponding to the construction environmental protection items through an environmental protection measurement device deployed on at least one environmental protection monitoring point within the scope of the basic project construction.

[0023] In one embodiment, the obtaining of the engineering quality parameters corresponding to the construction structure items through a structure measurement device deployed on at least one structure monitoring point within the scope of the basic project construction includes:

[0024] Obtain the structural strain value in the engineering quality parameters through the structural strain measurement device on the structure monitoring point;

[0025] Obtain the structural displacement value in the engineering quality parameters through the structural displacement measurement device on the structure monitoring point;

[0026] Obtain the structural load value in the engineering quality parameters through the structural load measurement device on the structure monitoring point.

[0027] In a second aspect, the present application also provides an engineering quality acceptance device. The device includes:

[0028] An acquisition module, configured to acquire engineering quality parameters of at least one inspection item corresponding to a basic project;

[0029] A scoring module, configured to perform quality scoring on the foundation project according to the engineering quality parameters of each of the detection items, so as to obtain a comprehensive quality score;

[0030] A construction module, configured to construct an acceptance quality report for the infrastructure project according to the comprehensive quality score.

[0031] In a third aspect, the present application further provides a computer device. The computer device includes a memory and a processor. The memory stores a computer program, and when the processor executes the computer program, the following steps are implemented:

[0032] Obtain the engineering quality parameters of at least one detection item corresponding to the foundation project;

[0033] Perform quality scoring on the foundation project according to the engineering quality parameters of each of the detection items, so as to obtain a comprehensive quality score;

[0034] Construct an acceptance quality report for the infrastructure project according to the comprehensive quality score.

[0035] In a fourth aspect, the present application further provides a computer-readable storage medium. The computer-readable storage medium stores a computer program thereon, and when the computer program is executed by a processor, the following steps are implemented:

[0036] Obtain the engineering quality parameters of at least one detection item corresponding to the foundation project;

[0037] Perform quality scoring on the foundation project according to the engineering quality parameters of each of the detection items, so as to obtain a comprehensive quality score;

[0038] Construct an acceptance quality report for the infrastructure project according to the comprehensive quality score.

[0039] In a fifth aspect, the present application further provides a computer program product. The computer program product includes a computer program, and when the computer program is executed by a processor, the following steps are implemented:

[0040] Obtain the engineering quality parameters of at least one detection item corresponding to the foundation project;

[0041] Perform quality scoring on the foundation project according to the engineering quality parameters of each of the detection items, so as to obtain a comprehensive quality score;

[0042] Construct an acceptance quality report for the infrastructure project according to the comprehensive quality score.

[0043] The above engineering quality acceptance method, device, computer equipment and storage medium obtain the engineering quality parameters of at least one inspection item corresponding to the basic project; realize quality scoring of the basic project according to the engineering quality parameters of each inspection item to obtain a comprehensive quality score; furthermore, construct an acceptance quality report for the infrastructure project according to the comprehensive quality score. According to the above content, it can be seen that this application improves the real-time performance and accuracy of engineering quality control by obtaining the engineering quality parameters of at least one inspection item. Compared with the traditional evaluation method, this application no longer relies on regular static inspections, effectively ensuring that managers can quickly identify potential problems and take necessary corrective measures. Moreover, this application effectively reflects the actual engineering situation of the basic project by obtaining the comprehensive quality score, enabling managers to intuitively understand the engineering quality of the basic project through the comprehensive quality score and the acceptance quality report. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0044] Figure 1 FIG. is an application environment diagram of an engineering quality acceptance method provided by an embodiment of the present application;

[0045] Figure 2 FIG. is a schematic flowchart of a first engineering quality acceptance method provided by an embodiment of the present application;

[0046] Figure 3 FIG. is a schematic flowchart of a second engineering quality acceptance method provided by an embodiment of the present application;

[0047] Figure 4 FIG. is a schematic flowchart of a third engineering quality acceptance method provided by an embodiment of the present application;

[0048] Figure 5 FIG. is a schematic flowchart of a fourth engineering quality acceptance method provided by an embodiment of the present application;

[0049] Figure 6 FIG. is a structural block diagram of an engineering quality acceptance device provided by an embodiment of the present application;

[0050] Figure 7 FIG. is an internal structure diagram of a computer device in an embodiment. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS

[0051] In order to make the objectives, technical solutions and advantages of the present application clearer, the present application will be further described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings and embodiments. It should be understood that the specific embodiments described herein are only used to explain the present application and are not used to limit the present application.

[0052] The engineering quality acceptance method provided by the embodiments of the present application can be applied to, for example Figure 1In the application environment shown. Among them, the terminal 102 communicates with the server 104 through the network. The data storage system can store the data that the server 104 needs to process. The data storage system can be integrated on the server 104, or can be placed on the cloud or other network servers. By obtaining the engineering quality parameters of at least one inspection item corresponding to the basic project; realizing the quality scoring of the basic project according to the engineering quality parameters of each inspection item to obtain a comprehensive quality score; furthermore, according to the comprehensive quality score, constructing an acceptance quality report for the infrastructure project. Among them, the terminal 102 can be, but is not limited to, various personal computers, laptop computers, smart phones, tablet computers, Internet of Things devices, and portable wearable devices. The Internet of Things devices can be smart speakers, smart TVs, smart air conditioners, smart in-vehicle devices, etc. The portable wearable devices can be smart watches, smart bracelets, head-mounted devices, etc. The server 104 can be implemented by an independent server or a server cluster composed of multiple servers.

[0053] In one embodiment, as Figure 2 shown, a method for accepting the quality of a project is provided. Taking the terminal 102 in Figure 1 as an example for illustration, the method includes the following steps:

[0054] S201, obtain the engineering quality parameters of at least one inspection item corresponding to the basic project.

[0055] Among them, the inspection items can be set or adjusted according to the actual situation of the basic project and the requirements for accepting the project quality. The type of the inspection items is not limited here.

[0056] It should be noted that after determining at least one inspection item, multiple measuring devices can be set for each inspection item respectively; so as to realize obtaining the engineering quality parameters of at least one inspection item corresponding to the basic project through multiple measuring devices.

[0057] In one embodiment of the present application, the inspection items can include but are not limited to: construction structure stability items, construction material quality inspection items, and construction environmental protection items.

[0058] S202, perform quality scoring on the basic project according to the engineering quality parameters of each inspection item to obtain a comprehensive quality score.

[0059] It should be noted that when it is necessary to obtain the comprehensive quality score, the basic scores corresponding to each inspection item can be determined in advance according to the engineering quality parameters of each inspection item; furthermore, the comprehensive quality score is determined according to the basic scores corresponding to each inspection item.

[0060] Furthermore, to ensure that the comprehensive quality score can effectively reflect the actual situation of the foundation project, the weighted factor coefficient can be set for each detection item in combination with the actual situation of each foundation project. Then, the quality score of the foundation project can be obtained according to the weighted factor coefficient and the engineering quality parameters of each detection item.

[0061] Specifically, when it is necessary to obtain the quality score of the foundation project according to the engineering quality parameters of each detection item, the following steps may be included: determining the weighted factor coefficient for each detection item; determining the basic score corresponding to each detection item according to the engineering quality parameters of each detection item; and performing a weighted operation on the basic scores corresponding to each detection item according to the weighted factor coefficient to obtain the comprehensive quality score.

[0062] S203. Construct an acceptance quality report for the infrastructure project according to the comprehensive quality score.

[0063] It should be noted that when it is necessary to construct an acceptance quality report for the infrastructure project, the acceptance quality of the foundation project can be evaluated according to the comprehensive quality score, and the rectification measures for the foundation project can be obtained. Then, an acceptance quality report for the infrastructure project can be constructed according to the comprehensive quality score, the acceptance quality of the foundation project, and the rectification measures.

[0064] In an embodiment of the present application, when it is necessary to determine the acceptance quality of the foundation project, the mapping relationship between the comprehensive quality score and the acceptance quality can be predefined. Different acceptance qualities corresponding to different comprehensive quality scores are recorded in the mapping relationship. Specifically, if the comprehensive quality score is greater than or equal to 80 points, it is evaluated that the acceptance quality of the infrastructure project in this evaluation period is qualified; if the comprehensive quality score is greater than or equal to 60 points but less than 80 points, it is evaluated that the acceptance quality of the infrastructure project in this evaluation period is good, but partial rectification is required; if the comprehensive quality score is less than 60 points, it is evaluated that the acceptance quality of the infrastructure project in this evaluation period is unqualified and on-site rectification is required. The rectification items include the construction structure stability items of the overall infrastructure project, the construction material quality inspection items of the overall infrastructure project, and the construction environmental protection items of the overall infrastructure project.

[0065] The above engineering quality acceptance method obtains the engineering quality parameters of at least one inspection item corresponding to the basic project; realizes the quality scoring of the basic project according to the engineering quality parameters of each inspection item to obtain a comprehensive quality score; furthermore, constructs an acceptance quality report for the infrastructure project according to the comprehensive quality score. According to the above content, it can be known that this application improves the real-time performance and accuracy of engineering quality control by obtaining the engineering quality parameters of at least one inspection item. Compared with the traditional evaluation method, this application no longer relies on regular static inspections, effectively ensuring that managers can quickly identify potential problems and take necessary corrective measures. Moreover, this application effectively reflects the actual engineering situation of the basic project by obtaining the comprehensive quality score, enabling managers to intuitively know the engineering quality of the basic project through the comprehensive quality score and the acceptance quality report.

[0066] In one embodiment, as Figure 3 shown, the inspection items include construction structure items, construction material quality inspection items, and construction environmental protection items. Therefore, when it is necessary to obtain the engineering quality parameters of at least one inspection item corresponding to the basic project, the following specific contents may be included:

[0067] S301, obtain the engineering quality parameters corresponding to the construction structure items through the structure measurement devices deployed on at least one structure monitoring point within the scope of the basic project construction.

[0068] It should be noted that for different inspection items, different structure measurement devices can be used to achieve the accuracy of obtaining engineering quality parameters. Specifically: obtain the structural strain value in the engineering quality parameters through the structural strain measurement device on the structure monitoring point; obtain the structural displacement value in the engineering quality parameters through the structural displacement measurement device on the structure monitoring point; obtain the structural load value in the engineering quality parameters through the structural load measurement device on the structure monitoring point.

[0069] S302, obtain the engineering quality parameters corresponding to the construction material quality inspection items by randomly sampling the construction materials.

[0070] In one embodiment of this application, several evaluation cycles are set during the engineering construction period. During the evaluation cycle, a certain number of construction materials are randomly selected for quality inspection to obtain the qualified quantity of the batch of inspected construction materials; the ratio of the qualified quantity to the total quantity of construction materials is used as the engineering quality parameter corresponding to the construction material quality inspection item.

[0071] S303, obtain the engineering quality parameters corresponding to the construction environmental protection items through the environmental protection measurement devices deployed on at least one environmental protection monitoring point within the scope of the basic project construction.

[0072] In an embodiment of the present application, when it is necessary to obtain the engineering quality parameters corresponding to the construction environmental protection project, several environmental protection monitoring points can be selected within the scope of the infrastructure project construction. At each structural monitoring point, the following are installed and set: a noise monitoring device for obtaining the noise level of the environmental protection monitoring point; an air quality detection device for obtaining the air quality level of the environmental protection monitoring point; and the detection results of the noise monitoring device and the air quality detection device are used as the engineering quality parameters corresponding to the construction environmental protection project.

[0073] The above engineering quality acceptance method realizes obtaining the engineering quality parameters corresponding to the construction structure project through the structure measuring device set at the structural monitoring point; obtains the engineering quality parameters corresponding to the construction material quality inspection project through random spot checks of the construction materials; obtains the engineering quality parameters corresponding to the construction environmental protection project through the set environmental protection measuring device; thereby ensuring the accuracy of obtaining the engineering quality parameters of at least one detection item corresponding to the basic project.

[0074] In an embodiment, as Figure 4 shown, when it is necessary to perform a quality score on the basic project according to the engineering quality parameters of each detection item to obtain a comprehensive quality score, it specifically may include the following content:

[0075] S401, determine the weighted factor coefficients for each detection item.

[0076] It should be noted that when it is necessary to determine the weighted factor coefficients for each detection item, it can be combined with the engineering type and acceptance criteria corresponding to the basic project. Specifically, according to the engineering type and acceptance criteria corresponding to the basic project, determine the weighted factor coefficients for each detection item.

[0077] In an embodiment of the present application, different weighted factor coefficients corresponding to different engineering types and different acceptance criteria can be preset in advance. Furthermore, after determining the engineering type and acceptance criteria corresponding to the basic project, according to the mapping relationship between the engineering type and acceptance criteria and the weighted factor coefficients respectively, determine the weighted factor coefficients corresponding to the engineering type and acceptance criteria of the basic project.

[0078] S402, according to the engineering quality parameters of each detection item, determine the basic scores corresponding to each detection item.

[0079] It should be noted that when it is necessary to determine the basic scores corresponding to each detection item, it specifically may include the following content: for each detection item, analyze and evaluate the engineering quality parameters of the detection item to obtain evaluation indicators; determine the basic scores corresponding to the detection item according to the index difference between the evaluation indicators and the standard indicators of the detection item.

[0080] In an embodiment of the present application, for the engineering quality parameters corresponding to the construction structure project, when determining the basic score corresponding to the construction structure project, the following contents may be included:

[0081] (1) Perform a first scoring analysis on the structural strain value in the engineering quality parameters according to the following calculation formula;

[0082]

[0083] where D max represents the maximum displacement data of the structural monitoring point within the measurement time; D min represents the minimum displacement data of the structural monitoring point within the measurement time; D threshold represents the set maximum deviation displacement threshold; when S displacement > 1, it indicates that the displacement deviation of the structural monitoring point has exceeded the maximum deviation displacement threshold, and the structure is unstable. Therefore, the first score S1 = 0; when S displacement ≤1, it indicates that the displacement deviation of the structural monitoring point has not exceeded the maximum deviation displacement threshold, and the structural monitoring point has not shown structural instability. Therefore, the first score S1 = 1.

[0084] (2) Perform a second scoring analysis on the structural displacement value in the engineering quality parameters according to the following calculation formula;

[0085]

[0086] where E actual represents the actual strain value measured at the structural monitoring point; E threshold represents the set strain value threshold; when S strain > 1, it indicates that the strain value of the structural monitoring point exceeds the preset standard, and the structural stability decreases. Therefore, the second score S2 = 0; when S strain ≤1, it indicates that the strain value of the structural monitoring point meets the preset standard, and the structural stability is good. Therefore, the second score S2 = 1.

[0087] (3) Perform a third scoring analysis on the structural load value in the engineering quality parameters according to the following calculation formula;

[0088]

[0089] where L actual represents the actual load value measured at the structural monitoring point, L threshold represents the set load value threshold, when S load > 1, it indicates that the actual load of the structural monitoring point exceeds the maximum load that the structure is designed to bear, and there is a safety hazard. Therefore, the third score S3 = 0; when S loadWhen ≤ 1, it indicates that the actual load of the structural monitoring point conforms to the maximum load that the structure is designed to bear, and there is no potential safety hazard. Therefore, the third score S3 = 1.

[0090] (4) After determining the first score, the second score, and the third score, the basic score corresponding to the construction structure project can be determined according to the following formula and the first score, the second score, and the third score;

[0091]

[0092] Among them, i is the sequential number of each structural monitoring point, N is the total number of structural monitoring points, S i is the basic score of each structural monitoring point, K si is the evaluation ratio of each structural monitoring point, S ki = S1 + S2 + S3; when S ki = 3, K si = 1; when S ki = 2, K si = 0.6; when S ki = 1, K si = 0.3; when S ki = 0, K si = 0.

[0093] In an embodiment of the present application, for the engineering quality parameters corresponding to the construction material quality inspection project, when determining the basic score corresponding to the construction material quality inspection project, the following contents may be included:

[0094] The basic score corresponding to the construction material quality inspection project is determined according to the following calculation formula:

[0095]

[0096] Among them, C q is the qualified quantity of the construction materials submitted for inspection, C t represents the total quantity of the construction materials submitted for inspection.

[0097] In an embodiment of the present application, for the engineering quality parameters corresponding to the construction environmental protection project, when determining the basic score corresponding to the construction environmental protection project, the following contents may be included:

[0098] (1) Through the following formula, a fourth score analysis is performed on the measured noise level,

[0099]

[0100] Among them, L measured represents the actually measured noise level at this environmental monitoring point, L threshold represents the set noise level threshold, when Cnoise When ≤ 1, it indicates that the noise level at this environmental monitoring point meets the noise level requirements, and the fourth score C1 for noise environmental protection = (1 - C noise ) × 100; when C noise > 1, it indicates that the noise level at this environmental monitoring point does not meet the noise level requirements, there is a phenomenon of excessive noise, and the fourth score C1 for noise environmental protection = 0.

[0101] (2) Through the following formula, conduct a fifth score analysis on the measured air quality level,

[0102]

[0103] where AQI measured represents the actually measured air quality level at this environmental monitoring point, and AQI threshold represents the set air quality level threshold. When C air ≤ 1, it indicates that the air quality level at this environmental monitoring point meets the air quality level requirements, and the fifth score C2 for air quality environmental protection = (1 - C air ) × 100; when C air > 1, it indicates that the air quality level at this environmental monitoring point does not meet the air quality level requirements, and the fifth score C2 for air quality environmental protection = 0.

[0104] (3) After determining the fourth score and the fifth score, according to the following formula, the fourth score and the fifth score, determine the basic score corresponding to the construction material quality inspection item;

[0105]

[0106] where w1 represents the weighted factor coefficient of the noise level of the infrastructure project, w2 represents the weighted factor coefficient of the air quality level of the infrastructure project, and w1 + w2 = 1.

[0107] S403, perform a weighted operation on the basic scores corresponding to each detection item according to the weighted factor coefficient to obtain the comprehensive quality score.

[0108] In an embodiment of the present application, when it is necessary to perform a weighted operation on the basic scores corresponding to each detection item according to the weighted factor coefficient, the following content may be included:

[0109] α represents the weighted factor coefficient of the structural stability item, β represents the weighted factor coefficient of the construction material quality inspection item, γ is the weighted factor coefficient of the construction environmental protection item, and the values of α, β, and γ are dynamically adjusted by evaluating the type and acceptance requirements of the infrastructure project to dynamically adjust the proportion weights of each evaluation item; the relationship between α, β, and γ is as follows: α + β + γ = 1.

[0110] Furthermore, the weighted factor coefficients of the structure stability items, the weighted factor coefficients of the construction material quality inspection items, and the weighted factor coefficients of the construction environmental protection items are respectively used to perform weighted operations on the basic scores corresponding to each inspection item to obtain the comprehensive quality score.

[0111] The above engineering quality acceptance method realizes the accurate acquisition of the comprehensive quality score by determining the weighted factor coefficients for each inspection item and the corresponding basic scores for each inspection item; by obtaining the comprehensive quality score, it effectively reflects the actual engineering situation of the foundation project, enabling the manager to intuitively know the engineering quality of the foundation project through the comprehensive quality score and the acceptance quality report.

[0112] In one embodiment, as Figure 5 shown, when constructing the acceptance quality report of the infrastructure project, it may specifically include the following contents:

[0113] S501, Obtain the engineering quality parameters corresponding to the construction structure item through the structure measurement device deployed on at least one structure monitoring point within the scope of the foundation project construction.

[0114] S502, Obtain the engineering quality parameters corresponding to the construction material quality inspection item by randomly inspecting the construction materials.

[0115] S503, Obtain the engineering quality parameters corresponding to the construction environmental protection item through the environmental protection measurement device deployed on at least one environmental protection monitoring point within the scope of the foundation project construction.

[0116] S504, Determine the weighted factor coefficients for each inspection item according to the engineering type and acceptance criteria corresponding to the foundation project.

[0117] S505, For each inspection item, analyze and evaluate the engineering quality parameters of the inspection item to obtain the evaluation index.

[0118] S506, Determine the basic score corresponding to the inspection item according to the index difference between the evaluation index and the standard index of the inspection item.

[0119] S507, Perform weighted operations on the basic scores corresponding to each inspection item according to the weighted factor coefficients to obtain the comprehensive quality score.

[0120] S508, Construct the acceptance quality report of the infrastructure project according to the comprehensive quality score.

[0121] The above engineering quality acceptance method involves obtaining the engineering quality parameters of at least one inspection item corresponding to the foundation project; achieving quality scoring of the foundation project based on the engineering quality parameters of each inspection item to obtain a comprehensive quality score; and then constructing an acceptance quality report for the infrastructure project according to the comprehensive quality score. According to the above content, it can be seen that this application improves the real-time performance and accuracy of engineering quality control by obtaining the engineering quality parameters of at least one inspection item. Compared with traditional evaluation methods, this application no longer relies on regular static inspections, effectively ensuring that managers can quickly identify potential problems and take necessary corrective measures. Moreover, this application effectively reflects the actual engineering situation of the foundation project by obtaining the comprehensive quality score, enabling managers to intuitively understand the engineering quality of the foundation project through the comprehensive quality score and the acceptance quality report.

[0122] It should be understood that although the steps in the flowcharts involved in the above embodiments are sequentially shown according to the arrows, these steps are not necessarily executed in the order indicated by the arrows. Unless otherwise clearly stated in this article, the execution of these steps has no strict order limit, and these steps can be executed in other orders. Moreover, at least a part of the steps in the flowcharts involved in the above embodiments may include multiple steps or multiple stages. These steps or stages are not necessarily executed at the same time, but can be executed at different times. The execution order of these steps or stages is not necessarily sequential, but can be executed alternately or in turn with at least a part of other steps or steps or stages in other steps.

[0123] Based on the same inventive concept, the embodiments of this application also provide an engineering quality acceptance device for implementing the above-mentioned engineering quality acceptance method. The solution provided by this device to solve the problem is similar to the solution described in the above method. Therefore, the specific limitations in one or more embodiments of the engineering quality acceptance device provided below can refer to the limitations on the engineering quality acceptance method in the above text, and will not be repeated here.

[0124] In one embodiment, as Figure 6 shown, an engineering quality acceptance device is provided, including: an acquisition module 10, a scoring module 20, and a construction module 30, where:

[0125] The acquisition module 10 is configured to acquire the engineering quality parameters of at least one inspection item corresponding to the foundation project.

[0126] The scoring module 20 is configured to perform quality scoring on the foundation project according to the engineering quality parameters of each inspection item to obtain a comprehensive quality score.

[0127] Building module 30, configured to generate an acceptance quality report for infrastructure projects based on a comprehensive quality score.

[0128] In one embodiment, determine the weighted factor coefficients for each inspection item.

[0129] Based on the engineering quality parameters of each inspection item, determine the basic score corresponding to each inspection item.

[0130] Perform a weighted operation on the basic scores corresponding to each inspection item according to the weighted factor coefficients to obtain a comprehensive quality score.

[0131] In one embodiment, for each inspection item, analyze and evaluate the engineering quality parameters of the inspection item to obtain evaluation indicators.

[0132] Based on the index difference between the evaluation indicators and the standard indicators of the inspection item, determine the basic score corresponding to the inspection item.

[0133] In one embodiment, determine the weighted factor coefficients for each inspection item according to the engineering type and acceptance criteria corresponding to the basic project.

[0134] In one embodiment, obtain the engineering quality parameters corresponding to the construction structure project through a structure measurement device deployed at at least one structure monitoring point within the scope of the basic project construction.

[0135] Obtain the engineering quality parameters corresponding to the construction material quality inspection project by randomly sampling the construction materials.

[0136] Obtain the engineering quality parameters corresponding to the construction environmental protection project through an environmental protection measurement device deployed at at least one environmental protection monitoring point within the scope of the basic project construction.

[0137] In one embodiment, obtain the structural strain value in the engineering quality parameters through a structural strain measurement device at the structure monitoring point.

[0138] Obtain the structural displacement value in the engineering quality parameters through a structural displacement measurement device at the structure monitoring point.

[0139] Obtain the structural load value in the engineering quality parameters through a structural load measurement device at the structure monitoring point.

[0140] The above-mentioned engineering quality acceptance device obtains the engineering quality parameters of at least one inspection item corresponding to the basic project; realizes the quality scoring of the basic project according to the engineering quality parameters of each inspection item to obtain a comprehensive quality score; furthermore, constructs an acceptance quality report for the infrastructure project according to the comprehensive quality score. According to the above content, it can be seen that this application improves the real-time performance and accuracy of engineering quality control by obtaining the engineering quality parameters of at least one inspection item. Compared with the traditional evaluation method, this application no longer relies on regular static inspections, effectively ensuring that managers can quickly identify potential problems and take necessary corrective measures. Moreover, this application effectively reflects the actual engineering situation of the basic project by obtaining the comprehensive quality score, enabling managers to intuitively know the engineering quality of the basic project through the comprehensive quality score and the acceptance quality report.

[0141] Each module in the above-mentioned engineering quality acceptance device can be implemented in whole or in part by software, hardware, and their combination. Each of the above modules can be embedded in the processor of the computer device in hardware form or independent of it, or stored in the memory of the computer device in software form to facilitate the processor to call and execute the operations corresponding to each of the above modules.

[0142] In one embodiment, a computer device is provided. This computer device can be a terminal, and its internal structure diagram can be as Figure 7 shown. This computer device includes a processor, a memory, an input / output interface, a communication interface, a display unit, and an input device. Among them, the processor, the memory, and the input / output interface are connected through the system bus, and the communication interface, the display unit, and the input device are connected to the system bus through the input / output interface. Among them, the processor of this computer device is used to provide computing and control capabilities. The memory of this computer device includes a non-volatile storage medium and an internal memory. The non-volatile storage medium stores an operating system and a computer program. The internal memory provides an environment for the operation of the operating system and the computer program in the non-volatile storage medium. The input / output interface of this computer device is used for the processor to exchange information with external devices. The communication interface of this computer device is used to communicate with external terminals in a wired or wireless manner, and the wireless manner can be achieved through WIFI, a mobile cellular network, NFC (Near Field Communication), or other technologies. When the computer program is executed by the processor, it realizes an engineering quality acceptance method. The display unit of this computer device is used to form a visually visible picture, which can be a display screen, a projection device, or a virtual reality imaging device. The display screen can be a liquid crystal display screen or an electronic ink display screen. The input device of this computer device can be a touch layer covering the display screen, or a button, a trackball, or a touchpad provided on the shell of the computer device, or an external keyboard, a touchpad, or a mouse, etc.

[0143] Those skilled in the art can understand that Figure 7 The structure shown in Figure 7 is only a block diagram of some structures related to the solution of this application, and does not constitute a limitation on the computer device to which the solution of this application is applied. The specific computer device may include more or fewer components than those shown in the figure, or combine some components, or have different component arrangements.

[0144] In one embodiment, a computer device is provided, including a memory and a processor. A computer program is stored in the memory. When the processor executes the computer program, the following steps are implemented:

[0145] Obtain the engineering quality parameters of the foundation project corresponding to at least one inspection item;

[0146] Perform a quality score on the foundation project according to the engineering quality parameters of each inspection item to obtain a comprehensive quality score;

[0147] Construct an acceptance quality report for the infrastructure project according to the comprehensive quality score.

[0148] In one embodiment, when the processor executes the computer program, the following steps are further implemented:

[0149] Determine the weighted factor coefficient for each inspection item;

[0150] Determine the basic score corresponding to each inspection item according to the engineering quality parameters of each inspection item;

[0151] Perform a weighted operation on the basic scores corresponding to each inspection item according to the weighted factor coefficient to obtain a comprehensive quality score.

[0152] In one embodiment, when the processor executes the computer program, the following steps are further implemented:

[0153] For each inspection item, analyze and evaluate the engineering quality parameters of the inspection item to obtain an evaluation index;

[0154] Determine the basic score corresponding to the inspection item according to the index difference between the evaluation index and the standard index of the inspection item.

[0155] In one embodiment, when the processor executes the computer program, the following steps are further implemented:

[0156] Determine the weighted factor coefficient for each inspection item according to the engineering type and acceptance standard corresponding to the foundation project.

[0157] In one embodiment, when the processor executes the computer program, the following steps are further implemented:

[0158] Obtain the engineering quality parameters corresponding to the construction structure project through the structure measurement device deployed at at least one structure monitoring point within the scope of the basic engineering construction;

[0159] Obtain the engineering quality parameters corresponding to the construction material quality inspection project by randomly sampling the construction materials;

[0160] Obtain the engineering quality parameters corresponding to the construction environmental protection project through the environmental protection measurement device deployed at at least one environmental protection monitoring point within the scope of the basic engineering construction.

[0161] In one embodiment, when the processor executes the computer program, the following steps are further implemented:

[0162] Obtain the structural strain value in the engineering quality parameters through the structural strain measurement device at the structure monitoring point;

[0163] Obtain the structural displacement value in the engineering quality parameters through the structural displacement measurement device at the structure monitoring point;

[0164] Obtain the structural load value in the engineering quality parameters through the structural load measurement device at the structure monitoring point.

[0165] In one embodiment, a computer-readable storage medium is provided, on which a computer program is stored. When the computer program is executed by the processor, the following steps are implemented:

[0166] Obtain the engineering quality parameters corresponding to at least one detection item of the basic project;

[0167] Perform a quality score on the basic project according to the engineering quality parameters of each detection item to obtain a comprehensive quality score;

[0168] Construct an acceptance quality report for the infrastructure project according to the comprehensive quality score.

[0169] In one embodiment, when the computer program is executed by the processor, the following steps are further implemented:

[0170] Determine the weighted factor coefficients for each detection item;

[0171] Determine the basic score corresponding to each detection item according to the engineering quality parameters of each detection item;

[0172] Perform a weighted operation on the basic scores corresponding to each detection item according to the weighted factor coefficients to obtain a comprehensive quality score.

[0173] In one embodiment, when the computer program is executed by the processor, the following steps are further implemented:

[0174] For each detection item, analyze and evaluate the engineering quality parameters of the detection item to obtain evaluation indicators;

[0175] Determine the basic score corresponding to the inspection item according to the index difference between the evaluation index and the standard index of the inspection item.

[0176] In one embodiment, when the computer program is executed by a processor, the following steps are further implemented:

[0177] Determine the weighted factor coefficient for each inspection item according to the project type and acceptance criteria corresponding to the basic project.

[0178] In one embodiment, when the computer program is executed by a processor, the following steps are further implemented:

[0179] Obtain the engineering quality parameters corresponding to the construction structure project through the structure measurement device deployed on at least one structure monitoring point within the scope of the basic project construction;

[0180] Obtain the engineering quality parameters corresponding to the construction material quality inspection item by randomly sampling the construction materials;

[0181] Obtain the engineering quality parameters corresponding to the construction environmental protection project through the environmental protection measurement device deployed on at least one environmental protection monitoring point within the scope of the basic project construction.

[0182] In one embodiment, when the computer program is executed by a processor, the following steps are further implemented:

[0183] Obtain the structural strain value in the engineering quality parameters through the structural strain measurement device on the structure monitoring point;

[0184] Obtain the structural displacement value in the engineering quality parameters through the structural displacement measurement device on the structure monitoring point;

[0185] Obtain the structural load value in the engineering quality parameters through the structural load measurement device on the structure monitoring point.

[0186] In one embodiment, a computer program product is provided, including a computer program, which when executed by a processor, implements the following steps:

[0187] Obtain the engineering quality parameters corresponding to at least one inspection item of the basic project;

[0188] Perform a quality score on the basic project according to the engineering quality parameters of each inspection item to obtain a comprehensive quality score;

[0189] Construct an acceptance quality report for the infrastructure project according to the comprehensive quality score.

[0190] In one embodiment, when the computer program is executed by a processor, the following steps are further implemented:

[0191] Determine the weighted factor coefficient for each inspection item;

[0192] Determine the basic score corresponding to each inspection item according to the engineering quality parameters of each inspection item;

[0193] Perform a weighted operation on the basic scores corresponding to each inspection item according to the weighted factor coefficients to obtain the comprehensive quality score.

[0194] In one embodiment, when the computer program is executed by the processor, the following steps are further implemented:

[0195] For each inspection item, analyze and evaluate the engineering quality parameters of the inspection item to obtain evaluation indicators;

[0196] Determine the basic score corresponding to the inspection item according to the index difference between the evaluation indicator and the standard indicator of the inspection item.

[0197] In one embodiment, when the computer program is executed by the processor, the following steps are further implemented:

[0198] Determine the weighted factor coefficients for each inspection item according to the engineering type and acceptance criteria corresponding to the basic project.

[0199] In one embodiment, when the computer program is executed by the processor, the following steps are further implemented:

[0200] Obtain the engineering quality parameters corresponding to the construction structure project through the structure measurement devices deployed on at least one structure monitoring point within the scope of the basic project construction;

[0201] Obtain the engineering quality parameters corresponding to the construction material quality inspection item by randomly sampling the construction materials;

[0202] Obtain the engineering quality parameters corresponding to the construction environmental protection project through the environmental protection measurement devices deployed on at least one environmental protection monitoring point within the scope of the basic project construction.

[0203] In one embodiment, when the computer program is executed by the processor, the following steps are further implemented:

[0204] Obtain the structural strain value in the engineering quality parameters through the structural strain measurement device on the structure monitoring point;

[0205] Obtain the structural displacement value in the engineering quality parameters through the structural displacement measurement device on the structure monitoring point;

[0206] Obtain the structural load value in the engineering quality parameters through the structural load measurement device on the structure monitoring point.

[0207] It should be noted that the user information (including but not limited to user device information, user personal information, etc.) and data (including but not limited to data for analysis, stored data, displayed data, etc.) involved in this application are all information and data that have been authorized by the user or fully authorized by all parties, and the collection, use, and processing of relevant data need to comply with the relevant laws, regulations, and standards of relevant countries and regions.

[0208] Those of ordinary skill in the art can understand that all or part of the processes in the methods of the above embodiments can be completed by instructing relevant hardware through a computer program. The computer program can be stored in a non-volatile computer-readable storage medium. When the computer program is executed, it can include the processes of the embodiments of the above methods. Among them, any reference to a memory, database, or other medium used in the embodiments provided in this application can include at least one of non-volatile and volatile memories. Non-volatile memory can include read-only memory (ROM), magnetic tape, floppy disk, flash memory, optical memory, high-density embedded non-volatile memory, resistive random access memory (ReRAM), magnetoresistive random access memory (MRAM), ferroelectric random access memory (FRAM), phase change memory (PCM), graphene memory, etc. Volatile memory can include random access memory (RAM) or external cache memory, etc. By way of illustration and not limitation, RAM can be in various forms, such as static random access memory (SRAM) or dynamic random access memory (DRAM), etc. The databases involved in the embodiments provided in this application can include at least one of relational databases and non-relational databases. Non-relational databases can include distributed databases based on blockchain, etc., and are not limited thereto. The processors involved in the embodiments provided in this application can be general-purpose processors, central processors, graphics processors, digital signal processors, programmable logic devices, data processing logics based on quantum computing, etc., and are not limited thereto.

[0209] The technical features of the above embodiments can be combined arbitrarily. For the sake of brevity of description, not all possible combinations of the technical features in the above embodiments are described. However, as long as there is no contradiction in the combination of these technical features, it should be considered as the scope recorded in this specification.

[0210] The above embodiments merely represent several implementation manners of the present application. The description thereof is relatively specific and detailed, but it should not be construed as a limitation on the patent scope of the present application. It should be noted that for those of ordinary skill in the art, without departing from the concept of the present application, several modifications and improvements can still be made, and these all fall within the protection scope of the present application. Therefore, the protection scope of the present application shall be subject to the appended claims.

Claims

1. An engineering quality acceptance method, characterized in that, The method includes: Obtaining engineering quality parameters of at least one inspection item corresponding to the basic project; Performing a quality score on the basic project according to the engineering quality parameters of each inspection item to obtain a comprehensive quality score; Constructing an acceptance quality report for the infrastructure project according to the comprehensive quality score.

2. The method according to claim 1, wherein The performing a quality score on the basic project according to the engineering quality parameters of each inspection item to obtain a comprehensive quality score includes: Determining a weighted factor coefficient for each inspection item; Determining a basic score corresponding to each inspection item according to the engineering quality parameters of each inspection item; Performing a weighted operation on the basic scores corresponding to each inspection item according to the weighted factor coefficient to obtain a comprehensive quality score.

3. The method according to claim 2, characterized in that, The determining a basic score corresponding to each inspection item according to the engineering quality parameters of each inspection item includes: For each inspection item, analyzing and evaluating the engineering quality parameters of the inspection item to obtain evaluation indicators; Determining the basic score corresponding to the inspection item according to the index difference between the evaluation indicator and the standard indicator of the inspection item.

4. The method according to claim 2, wherein The determining a weighted factor coefficient for each inspection item includes: Determining a weighted factor coefficient for each inspection item according to the engineering type and acceptance standard corresponding to the basic project.

5. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that The inspection items include construction structure items, construction material quality inspection items, and construction environmental protection items; Correspondingly, the obtaining engineering quality parameters of at least one inspection item corresponding to the basic project includes: Obtaining the engineering quality parameters corresponding to the construction structure items through a structure measuring device deployed on at least one structure monitoring point within the scope of the basic project construction; Obtaining the engineering quality parameters corresponding to the construction material quality inspection items through random spot checks of construction materials; Obtaining the engineering quality parameters corresponding to the construction environmental protection items through an environmental protection measuring device deployed on at least one environmental protection monitoring point within the scope of the basic project construction.

6. The method according to claim 5, wherein The obtaining the engineering quality parameters corresponding to the construction structure items through a structure measuring device deployed on at least one structure monitoring point within the scope of the basic project construction includes: Obtaining the structural strain value in the engineering quality parameters through the structural strain measuring device on the structure monitoring point; Obtaining the structural displacement value in the engineering quality parameters through the structural displacement measuring device on the structure monitoring point; Obtaining the structural load value in the engineering quality parameters through the structural load measuring device on the structure monitoring point.

7. An engineering quality acceptance device, characterized in that, The device includes: An obtaining module, configured to obtain engineering quality parameters of at least one inspection item corresponding to the basic project; A scoring module, configured to perform a quality score on the basic project according to the engineering quality parameters of each inspection item to obtain a comprehensive quality score; A constructing module, configured to construct an acceptance quality report for the infrastructure project according to the comprehensive quality score.

8. A computer device, comprising a memory and a processor, the memory storing a computer program, characterized in that, When the processor executes the computer program, the steps of the method according to any one of claims 1 to 6 are implemented.

9. A computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, characterized in that, When the computer program is executed by the processor, the steps of the method according to any one of claims 1 to 6 are implemented.

10. A computer program product, comprising a computer program, characterized in that, When the computer program is executed by a processor, it implements the steps of the method according to any one of claims 1 to 6.

Images