Low-cost commercial equipment system scheme optimization method based on energy transfer

Abstract

The invention discloses a low-cost commercial equipment system scheme optimization method based on energy transfer. The method comprises the following steps: step 1, modeling and designing an equipment system based on a DoDAF system structure method; 2, after available equipment units are screened out under the structural framework of the constructed equipment system, the efficiency-cost ratio of the system is calculated through an equipment system efficiency calculation method, and the equipment system with the highest efficiency-cost ratio is selected as an optimal scheme. Therefore, the problem that there is no calculation method from the single-loading efficiency to the system efficiency in the prior art is solved. According to the method, the efficiency improvement caused by the cooperative relationship between the devices is fully considered, the joint probability distribution of the cooperative effect generated on the battlefield between the different devices is innovatively selected as the gain coefficient, mathematical modeling of the endophytic emergence of the device system under the actual combat condition is achieved, and the accuracy and scientificity of system efficiency estimation are greatly improved.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the technical field of weapon equipment construction and development, and in particular to a method for optimizing a low-cost commercial equipment system solution based on energy transfer. Background Art

[0002] A military equipment system refers to a higher-level armed equipment system that is integrated into a specific structure by combining various weapon systems that are interconnected in function and complementary in performance. Its purpose is to maximize overall combat effectiveness and adapt to the characteristics and laws of integrated joint operations.

[0003] The characteristics and functions of the military equipment system are as follows:

[0004] Integrity and confrontation: The military equipment system establishes mutual connections and interactions through information, emphasizes coordinated operations between various equipment, and forms overall combat capabilities to cope with complex battlefield environments and changing combat needs.

[0005] Systematic and synergistic: The military equipment system emphasizes system design and system integration, coordinates the development of various types of weapons and equipment, ensures that each equipment complements each other in function and coordinates with each other in performance, and forms a strong combat capability.

[0006] Adaptability and flexibility: The military equipment system can adapt to different combat environments and mission requirements, and achieve "1+1>2" combat effectiveness through optimized combination and structural adjustment.

[0007] However, the construction cycle of military equipment system is long, the formation of capacity is slow, and the flexibility is insufficient, which leaves some problems. In the construction and optimization of equipment system, there is more qualitative analysis and less quantitative analysis, and it is highly dependent on the experience of demonstrators. In view of this, a low-cost commercial equipment system solution optimization method based on energy transfer is proposed. Summary of the Invention

[0008] In response to the above technical problems, the present invention provides a method for optimizing low-cost commercial equipment system solutions based on energy transfer. By constructing a calculation method from single-equipment effectiveness to system effectiveness, the system effectiveness can be effectively estimated, and then the cost-effectiveness ratio can be calculated. In addition, the efficiency improvement brought about by the synergistic relationship between equipment is fully considered, and the joint probability distribution of the synergistic effect between different equipment on the battlefield is innovatively selected as the gain coefficient, thereby improving the accuracy and scientificity of the system effectiveness estimation.

[0009] To achieve the above object, the technical solution of the present invention is as follows:

[0010] A method for optimizing a low-cost commercial equipment system solution based on energy transfer includes the following steps:

[0011] Step 1. Model and design the equipment system based on the DoDAF architecture approach;

[0012] Step 2. After screening out the available equipment units within the structural framework of the constructed equipment system, use the equipment system effectiveness calculation method to calculate the system cost-effectiveness ratio, and select the equipment system with the highest cost-effectiveness ratio as the preferred option.

[0013] The step 1 includes the following sub-steps:

[0014] Step 11. Customize and tailor the equipment system design requirements, using operational views to describe mission scenarios, clarify equipment organizational structures, and decompose operational activities.

[0015] Step 12. Begin with an analysis of the key operational issues of the mission, propose mission-oriented equipment system capability indicator requirements, and then correlate operational activities with equipment system capability indicators. Construct a quality house model, conduct capability mapping analysis, and identify key capability indicators for optimization.

[0016] Step 13. Based on the equipment system capability requirements, clarify the required equipment types, conduct sufficient market research, and, on the premise of meeting capability requirements, focus on sorting out civilian shelf products, select product models with advanced performance, stable supply, and high cost-effectiveness, build an equipment alternative library, and based on this, form a rich library of low-cost commercial equipment system alternative solutions.

[0017] The specific steps of the equipment system effectiveness calculation method in step 2 are as follows:

[0018] Step 21. After screening out the available equipment units under the constructed equipment system architecture framework, calculate the combat effectiveness of each equipment or equipment system by ADC method. There are m equipment in the entire equipment system. For any equipment F in the equipment system, i The combat effectiveness is recorded as E op (i), the cost is recorded as Cost(i), each equipment F i The contribution rate to the system is

[0019] Step 22. There are n pieces of equipment in the equipment system that have a collaborative relationship with it, recorded as F ij , the effectiveness of these n equipment is recorded as E op (i,j), which is the equipment F i The performance improvement gain coefficient is the equipment F i With F ij The joint probability distribution of

[0020] Step 23. In the equipment system, equip F iUnder the joint action of n equipment that establishes a synergistic relationship with it, its effectiveness value is increased. The effectiveness value after the increase is calculated as: The overall effectiveness of the equipment system is Among them E op (i),E op (i, j) is calculated by the performance parameters of the equipment according to the ADC method, w i ,p ij It is obtained based on expert experience, battlefield situation judgment, and empirical coefficients and probability distribution models formed based on actual combat data;

[0021] Step 24. The cost of the entire equipment system is recorded as, The cost-effectiveness ratio is:

[0022] Furthermore, the mission scenario in step 11 is based on scenario conception, determines the combat mission, combat environment, system composition and opponent object, clarifies the interaction relationship between the equipment system and other systems and the external environment, and establishes a generated high-level combat concept map model.

[0023] Furthermore, the equipment organizational structure in step 11 should construct an equipment system hierarchy according to combat mission requirements, clarify the relationship between command, control and coordination between different equipment nodes, and generate an organizational relationship diagram model.

[0024] Furthermore, the specific content of decomposing the combat activities in step 11 is to conduct a detailed analysis of the high-level combat concept diagram model, construct combat activities and the resource exchange process between activities, clarify the responsibilities and functions of different equipment nodes, give a normative description of combat activities and activity relationships, generate a combat activity model, and based on the combat activity model, use a sequence diagram to describe the key timing and behavior sequence between equipment nodes, as well as the response to external events, generate an event tracking description model, and describe the dynamic behavior of each equipment node in the combat activity to generate a combat status conversion model.

[0025] Beneficial effects of the present invention:

[0026] The present invention constructs a calculation method from the perspective of energy, which converts the effectiveness of individual equipment into system effectiveness. When the effectiveness of all individual equipment constituting the system is known, the system effectiveness can be effectively estimated based on the clear equipment coordination relationship, and then the cost-effectiveness ratio can be calculated. This solves the problem that due to the lack of a calculation method from individual equipment effectiveness to system effectiveness, the effectiveness evaluation of the equipment system requires system confrontation or system simulation, which is very costly in terms of manpower, material resources and time.

[0027] The present invention fully considers the performance improvement brought about by the synergistic relationship between equipment, and innovatively selects the joint probability distribution of the synergistic effect between different equipment on the battlefield as the gain coefficient, realizing the mathematical modeling of the endogenous emergence of the equipment system under actual combat conditions, greatly improving the accuracy and scientific nature of the system performance estimation. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0028] Figure 1 This is a flow chart of the preferred embodiment of the energy transfer-based equipment system of the present invention;

[0029] Figure 2 This is the advanced combat concept diagram model OV-1 established by the present invention for clearing mountainous areas;

[0030] Figure 3 This is the equipment organization diagram model OV-4 established for clearing mountainous areas in the present invention;

[0031] Figure 4 This is the combat activity model OV-5b established by the present invention for clearing mountain and forest land;

[0032] Figure 5 The event tracking description model OV-6c established by the present invention for clearing mountain forests;

[0033] Figure 6 This is the combat status conversion model OV-6b established by the present invention for clearing mountainous areas;

[0034] Figure 7 This is a quality house model established by clearing forest land in the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0035] The technical solution of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the accompanying drawings. Obviously, the embodiments described are only some embodiments of the present invention, not all embodiments. All other embodiments obtained by ordinary technicians in this field based on the embodiments of the present invention without making any creative efforts shall fall within the scope of protection of the present invention.

[0036] Example 1

[0037] A method for optimizing low-cost commercial equipment system solutions based on energy transfer. The technical solution is as follows:

[0038] Step 1: Design the equipment system by modeling based on the DoDAF architecture approach.

[0039] Step 1 includes the following sub-steps:

[0040] Step 11. Customized tailoring can be performed based on the equipment system design requirements, mainly using combat views to describe mission scenarios, clarify equipment organizational structures, and decompose combat activities.

[0041] The specific contents of step 11 are as follows:

[0042] 1. Mission scenario conception: Based on the mission scenario conception, determine the combat mission, combat environment, system composition, and opponent, clarify the interaction between the equipment system and other systems and the external environment, and generate a high-level combat concept diagram model;

[0043] 2. Equipment organizational structure: Based on combat mission requirements, build an equipment system hierarchy, clarify the command, control, and coordination relationships between different equipment nodes, and generate an organizational relationship diagram model;

[0044] 3. Operational process description: Detailed analysis of high-level operational concept diagrams, constructing operational activities and the resource exchange process between activities, clarifying the responsibilities and functions of different equipment nodes, providing a standardized description of operational activities and their relationships, and generating an operational activity model;

[0045] 4. Event tracking description: Based on the combat activity model, a sequence diagram is used to describe the key timing and behavior sequence between equipment nodes, as well as the response to external events, to generate an event tracking description model;

[0046] 5. Combat status transformation description, describing the dynamic behavior of each equipment node in combat activities and generating a combat status transformation model.

[0047] Step 12. Start with the analysis of key operational issues of the combat mission, propose mission-oriented equipment system capability indicator requirements, and associate combat activities with equipment system capability indicators. Construct a quality house model, conduct capability mapping analysis, and identify key capability indicators for optimization.

[0048] The specific contents of step 12 are as follows:

[0049] 1. Design of equipment system capability indicators based on key combat issues

[0050] Starting with an analysis of the key operational issues of the mission, we propose mission-oriented equipment system capability indicators. Key operational issues are usually expressed in terms of the impact of the equipment system on the expected effectiveness of the mission.

[0051] 2. QFD-based capability index optimization

[0052] Associate combat activities with equipment system capability indicators to construct a quality house. The left wall of the quality house lists combat activities and their importance, the ceiling lists the required equipment capabilities, and the house is filled with the activity and capability relationship matrix. The floor lists capability indicators and their importance, and the roof fills in the matrix relationship between capabilities.

[0053] Based on the relationship matrix in the quality house, capability mapping analysis is carried out to determine the contribution of each equipment system capability to meeting combat activities, identify key capability indicators, analyze the relationship between capabilities, and conduct optimization design.

[0054] Step 13. Based on the equipment system capability requirements, clarify the required equipment types, conduct sufficient market research, and, on the premise of meeting capability requirements, focus on sorting out civilian shelf products, select product models with advanced performance, stable supply, and high cost-effectiveness, build a library of available equipment alternatives, and based on this, form a rich library of low-cost commercial equipment system alternative solutions.

[0055] Step 2. Based on the energy transfer-based equipment system solution optimization, after screening out the available civilian shelf equipment units under the constructed equipment system architecture framework, the combat effectiveness of each equipment or equipment system is calculated by ADC method, which is recorded as E op Considering that the coordination ability between different equipment will have a huge impact on the overall combat effectiveness of the entire equipment system during the task completion process, when selecting equipment from available equipment units to form an equipment system, the focus is on considering the efficiency improvement brought about by the coordination relationship between equipment and the reduction in average cost brought about by it. That is, when the overall cost-effectiveness ratio of the system is maximized, the solution is optimal. The flow chart is shown in the attached figure. Figure 1 .

[0056] The calculation method of equipment system effectiveness based on energy transfer is as follows: after screening out available equipment units under the constructed equipment system architecture framework, the combat effectiveness of each equipment or equipment system is calculated by ADC method. Assuming that there are m equipment in the entire equipment system, for any equipment F in the equipment system i The combat effectiveness is recorded as E op (i), the cost is recorded as Cost(i), each equipment F i The contribution rate to the system is

[0057]

[0058] There are n pieces of equipment that have a synergistic relationship with it in the equipment system, recorded as F ij , the effectiveness of these n equipment is recorded as E op (i,j), which is the equipment F i The performance improvement gain coefficient is the equipment F i With F ij The joint probability distribution of

[0059] In the equipment system, equipment F i Under the joint action of n equipment that establishes a synergistic relationship with it, its effectiveness value is increased. The effectiveness value after the increase is calculated as: The overall effectiveness of the equipment system is Among them E op (i),E op (i, j) is calculated by the performance parameters of the equipment according to the ADC method, w i ,p ij It is obtained based on expert experience, battlefield situation judgment, and empirical coefficients and probability distribution models formed based on actual combat data;

[0060] The cost of the entire equipment system is recorded as, The cost-effectiveness ratio is:

[0061] Example 2

[0062] Taking the task of clearing mountain forests as an example, this article explains how to design the equipment system.

[0063] Based on the equipment system design requirements, customized tailoring is carried out, mainly using the operational view to describe mission scenarios, clarify the equipment organizational structure, and decompose combat activities. The specific contents are as follows:

[0064] 1. Mission scenario conception

[0065] Based on the mission scenario concept, determine the combat mission, combat environment, system composition and opponent, clarify the interaction between the equipment system and other systems and the external environment, and generate the high-level combat concept diagram model OV-1.

[0066] With the mountain and forest clearing mission as the background, a high-level combat concept diagram model is established, such as Figure 2 After receiving the mission instructions, the combat command center dispatches reconnaissance and surveillance drones to search and monitor the fleeing enemy. Upon discovery, the drones transmit the target information to the combat command center, which then calculates and formulates a mission plan. The center then issues a strike order to the artillery unit, which then conducts the strike and conducts a kill evaluation upon completion.

[0067] 2. Equipment organizational structure

[0068] Clarify the equipment organizational structure. Build an equipment system hierarchy based on combat mission requirements, clarify the command, control, and coordination relationships between different equipment nodes, and generate the organizational relationship diagram model OV-4.

[0069] The equipment system for clearing mountain forests adopts a low-cost commercialized equipment system design optimization method based on energy transfer. It can be directly selected from the large-scale, low-priced, and reliable civilian market shelf products or selected after adaptive improvement, thereby improving the flexibility, adaptability, advancement, and cost-effectiveness of equipment system construction. It mainly includes command and control equipment, situational awareness equipment, network information equipment, and strike equipment, such as Figure 3The command and control equipment primarily consists of a vehicle-mounted combat command and control system, offering flexible operation and efficient command and control. Situational awareness equipment comprises surveillance and reconnaissance drones. Networking equipment utilizes base stations and multiple terminals to provide a secure and stable network environment for all elements of the equipment system. Strike equipment comprises individual integrated combat systems, all-terrain vehicles, and 60mm mortars, offering flexibility and the ability to carry out efficient and precise strikes on targets.

[0070] 3. Description of the combat process

[0071] The high-level combat concept diagram is analyzed in detail, combat activities and the resource exchange process between activities are constructed, the responsibilities and functions of different equipment nodes are clarified, a normative description of combat activities and activity relationships is given, and the combat activity model OV-5b is generated.

[0072] The combat activity model of the mountain and forest clearing mission, such as Figure 4 As shown in the figure, the entire combat activity is decomposed into five modules: target detection, target information solution, command and control, target strike, and damage effect assessment, and the relationship between each combat activity is described.

[0073] 4. Event Tracking Description

[0074] Based on the combat activity model OV-5b, a sequence diagram is used to describe the key timing and behavior sequence between equipment nodes, as well as the response to external events, to generate the event tracking description model OV-6c.

[0075] The combat event tracking description model is constructed based on the constraints of combat activity rules. By tracking the interaction of events between combat units, it generates a sequence of each combat unit responding to external triggers according to causal relationships over time. The information state temporal logic between the main components of the equipment system for mountain and forest clearing missions, such as Figure 5 shown.

[0076] 5. Description of combat status conversion

[0077] Describe the dynamic behavior of each equipment node in combat activities and generate the combat status transformation model OV-6b.

[0078] The state transformation model of the mountain forest clearing task, such as Figure 6 As shown in the figure, the system modeling is mainly based on the state transformation of direct combat units such as drones and strike equipment during combat operations. Starting from combat preparation, it has undergone 8 combat state transformations. Each state transformation is described in the form of a legend. Through the state transformation model, the entire process of combat operations can be tracked intuitively.

[0079] Starting with the analysis of key operational issues in combat missions, we propose mission-oriented equipment system capability indicator requirements, associate combat activities with equipment system capability indicators, construct a quality house model, conduct capability mapping analysis, and identify key capability indicators for optimization, as shown in the figure below:

[0080] 1. Design of equipment system capability indicators based on key combat issues

[0081] Starting with an analysis of the key operational issues of the mission, we propose mission-oriented equipment system capability indicators. Key operational issues are usually expressed in terms of the impact of the equipment system on the expected effectiveness of the mission.

[0082] Take the equipment system for clearing mountain forests as an example:

[0083] (1) Whether the battlefield maneuver mission can be completed. Within the specified time, reach the designated combat area via off-road roads, rural roads, etc.

[0084] (2) Whether the battlefield surveillance mission can be completed. Achieve uninterrupted aerial surveillance of the designated combat area within the specified time.

[0085] (3) Whether the target inspection and close-in reconnaissance missions can be effectively completed. Within the specified time, the location, type, weapons, and other conditions of the target in the designated combat area and building can be perceived and identified.

[0086] (4) Whether the command and control mission can be effectively completed. Within the specified time, the threat level of the target can be judged and the strike decision-making task can be achieved by 20%.

[0087] (5) Whether the precision strike mission can be effectively completed. Achieving precise strikes on targets such as personnel, equipment, and supplies within the specified time.

[0088] (6) Whether the cost of ordering and operating the equipment system is affordable.

[0089] The preliminary evaluation index system for this equipment system is: rapid mobility capability, battlefield surveillance capability, regional reconnaissance capability, command and control capability, precision strike capability, and equipment system affordability.

[0090] 2. Associate combat activities with equipment system capability indicators and construct a quality house model, as shown in the attached Figure 7Combat activities were further optimized into networking and link establishment, reconnaissance and surveillance, command and control, and precision strikes, with precision strikes including damage effect assessment. Required combat capabilities were initially abstracted into rapid mobility, battlefield surveillance, regional reconnaissance, command and control, precision strike, and network connectivity. Using the Quality Factor (QFD) method based on the House of Quality, combat activities were assigned to the "left wall" of the House of Quality, and combat capabilities were assigned to the "ceiling." Experts weighted the relationships between these two components, with the results assigned to the "room." The coupling relationships between the various combat capabilities were analyzed, filling the "roof." To achieve the corresponding combat capabilities, combat measures were implemented in the "floor" of the House of Quality, and the support provided by each combat measure to the force was assessed. Finally, a comprehensive assessment of the entire House of Quality revealed that, within the defined combat area of the mission scenario, rapid mobility provided less support than other capability requirements. Ultimately, battlefield surveillance, regional reconnaissance, command and control, precision strike, and network connectivity were selected to form the equipment system capability indicators.

[0091] The basic principles, main features, and advantages of the present invention are shown and described above. Those skilled in the art should understand that the present invention is not limited to the above embodiments. The above embodiments and descriptions are merely illustrative of the principles of the present invention. Various changes and modifications may be made to the present invention without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. Such changes and modifications are intended to fall within the scope of the present invention. The scope of protection claimed in the present invention is defined by the appended claims and their equivalents.

Claims

1. A method for optimizing a low-cost commercial equipment system solution based on energy transfer, comprising the following steps: Step 1. Model and design the equipment system based on the DoDAF architecture approach; Step 2. After screening out the available equipment units within the structural framework of the constructed equipment system, use the equipment system effectiveness calculation method to calculate the system cost-effectiveness ratio, and select the equipment system with the highest cost-effectiveness ratio as the preferred option.

2. The method for optimizing a low-cost commercial equipment system solution based on energy transfer according to claim 1, characterized in that The step 1 includes the following sub-steps: Step 11. Customize and tailor the equipment system design requirements, using operational views to describe mission scenarios, clarify equipment organizational structures, and decompose operational activities. Step 12. Begin with an analysis of the key operational issues of the mission, propose mission-oriented equipment system capability indicator requirements, and then correlate operational activities with equipment system capability indicators. Construct a quality house model, conduct capability mapping analysis, and identify key capability indicators for optimization. Step 13. Based on the equipment system capability requirements, clarify the required equipment types, conduct sufficient market research, and, on the premise of meeting capability requirements, focus on sorting out civilian shelf products, select product models with advanced performance, stable supply, and high cost-effectiveness, build an equipment alternative library, and based on this, form a rich library of low-cost commercial equipment system alternative solutions.

3. The method for optimizing a low-cost commercial equipment system solution based on energy transfer according to claim 1, characterized in that The specific steps of the equipment system effectiveness calculation method in step 2 are as follows: Step 21. After screening out the available equipment units under the constructed equipment system architecture framework, calculate the combat effectiveness of each equipment or equipment system by ADC method. There are m equipment in the entire equipment system. For any equipment F in the equipment system, i The combat effectiveness is recorded as E op (i), the cost is recorded as Cost(i), each equipment F i The contribution rate to the system is w i (i=1,.2...,m), Step 22. There are n pieces of equipment in the equipment system that have a collaborative relationship with it, recorded as F ij , the effectiveness of these n equipment is recorded as E op (i,j), which is the equipment F i The performance improvement gain coefficient is the equipment F i With F ij The joint probability distribution of ij (i=1,.2...,m,j=1,.2...,n), Step 23. In the equipment system, equip F i Under the joint action of n equipment that establishes a synergistic relationship with it, its effectiveness value is increased. The effectiveness value after the increase is calculated as: The overall effectiveness of the equipment system is Among them E op (i),E op (i, j) is calculated by the performance parameters of the equipment according to the ADC method, w i ,p ij It is obtained based on expert experience, battlefield situation judgment, and empirical coefficients and probability distribution models formed based on actual combat data; Step 24. The cost of the entire equipment system is recorded as, The cost-effectiveness ratio is:

4. The method for optimizing a low-cost commercial equipment system solution based on energy transfer according to claim 2, characterized in that The mission scenario in step 11 is based on scenario conception, determines the combat mission, combat environment, system composition and opponent object, clarifies the interaction relationship between the equipment system and other systems and the external environment, and establishes a generated high-level combat concept map model.

5. The method for optimizing a low-cost commercial equipment system solution based on energy transfer according to claim 4, characterized in that The equipment organizational structure in step 11 should be based on combat mission requirements, build an equipment system hierarchy, clarify the command, control and coordination relationships between different equipment nodes, and generate an organizational relationship diagram model.

6. The method for optimizing a low-cost commercial equipment system solution based on energy transfer according to claim 5, characterized in that The specific content of decomposing combat activities in step 11 is to conduct detailed analysis of the high-level combat concept diagram model, construct combat activities and the resource exchange process between activities, clarify the responsibilities and functions of different equipment nodes, give a normative description of combat activities and activity relationships, generate a combat activity model, and based on the combat activity model, use sequence diagrams to describe the key timing and behavior sequence between equipment nodes, as well as the response to external events, generate an event tracking description model, and describe the dynamic behavior of each equipment node in the combat activity to generate a combat status conversion model.

Images