Cross-department scientific research and production task cooperative closed-loop management and control mechanism

Abstract

The invention relates to the technical field of production task collaborative management and control, and discloses a cross-department scientific research production task collaborative closed-loop management and control mechanism. Comprising the following steps: task project establishment and demand disassembly: a leading department is combined with related departments to clarify the overall target, technical indexes and delivery requirements of a task, the task is disassembled into executable sub-tasks through a work decomposition structure, and each sub-task responsibility department and a collaborative interface are delimited; and resource overall planning and scheme evaluation: the resource management department overall plans cross-department resource allocation, and each responsible department compiles a subtask execution scheme. According to the method, tasks are disassembled to minimum execution units through a WBS method, responsibility division and collaboration interfaces of all departments and all posts are defined, the problems of cross-department prevarication and fuzzy responsibilities are avoided, related departments participate in demand disassembly in advance, it is ensured that task targets are matched with multi-dimensional demands such as business, technology and production, follow-up collaboration conflicts are reduced from the source, and the success rate is improved. And the task propulsion efficiency is improved.

Description

TECHNICAL FIELD

[0001] The present application relates to the technical field of production task coordination and control, in particular to a cross-department scientific research and production task coordination and closed-loop control mechanism. BACKGROUND

[0002] Scientific research and production tasks are systematic work that combines scientific research and product manufacturing, covering new technology research and development, sample trial production, batch production, and quality testing, etc. The goal is to transform scientific research results into practical products or technologies, which are widely used in military, high-end manufacturing, and new materials, etc. It needs to balance technological breakthroughs and production efficiency, and is the core carrier for promoting industrial upgrading and technological innovation. In order to ensure that the task is promoted within the specified time, cost, and quality standards, coordinate the innovation of scientific research and the stability of production, avoid technical risks and resource waste, and ensure the efficiency and reliability of the transformation of research results, the scientific research and production task needs to be controlled.

[0003] Currently, the control of cross-department scientific research and production tasks in the shipbuilding industry lacks systematic decomposition methods. The overall goal of the task and the specific execution unit are disconnected, and the cross-department coordination interface and delivery standards such as design, manufacturing, inspection, and ship owner requirements are not clearly designed, resulting in blurred departmental boundaries and mutual blame when problems such as substandard ship material performance, poor manufacturing process connection, and inconsistent quality testing standards occur. Moreover, the demand decomposition is often dominated by the research and development design department, and the manufacturing, quality, resource guarantee, and ship owner demand departments are not involved enough, which can cause the task goal to be disconnected from the actual ship sailing requirements, workshop production equipment conditions, marine environment adaptation requirements, and industry quality standards. Subsequent adjustments to the formula, optimization of the process, and supplement of resources are required, which seriously affects the efficiency of the ship scientific research and production task and even delays the ship delivery cycle.

[0004] Therefore, there is an urgent need for a cross-department scientific research and production task coordination and closed-loop control mechanism to solve the above problems. SUMMARY

[0005] The purpose of the present application is to provide a cross-department scientific research and production task coordination and closed-loop control mechanism to solve the above problems existing in the prior art.

[0006] To achieve the above purpose, the technical solution adopted by the present application is as follows: A cross-department scientific research and production task coordination and closed-loop control mechanism, comprising the following steps: S1, task establishment and demand decomposition: the leading department jointly with the related departments to clearly define the overall goal of the task, technical indicators and delivery requirements, and to decompose the task into executable sub-tasks through work decomposition structure, and to define the responsibility departments and coordination interfaces of each sub-task; S2, Resource allocation and scheme review: The resource management department allocates cross-departmental resources, each responsible department formulates sub-task execution schemes, and the leading department organizes review and supervision; In the resource allocation link, the resource management department calculates the resource supply-demand balance degree through the following formula to assist in formulating a cross-departmental resource scheduling scheme: ; Among them is the resource supply-demand balance degree, is the available amount of the th resource, is the task demand amount of the th resource, is the priority weight of the th resource, is the total number of resource types; S3, Task start and process coordination: Hold a cross-departmental start meeting to clarify the execution rules, synchronize progress and feedback problems through a real-time collaboration platform, and coordinate cross-departmental interface matters by a collaboration officer; S4, Key node control and risk early warning: Sort out key milestone nodes and organize review, establish risk control account, report and evaluate risks in real time and develop response plans; S5, Delivery acceptance and problem rectification: Each responsible department submits the delivery, which is jointly accepted by cross-departmental departments, and the unqualified items are rectified and rechecked until they meet the requirements; S6, Task review and experience sedimentation: After the completion of the task, organize cross-departmental review, summarize experience and deficiencies, and sort out optimization direction, and sediment mature process standards; S7, Performance evaluation and continuous optimization: Based on task execution data, carry out cross-departmental performance evaluation, link the results with assessment and incentive, and optimize the collaboration mechanism based on the review conclusion.

[0007] Further, in the S1, the work breakdown structure adopts the WBS method to decompose the task into quantifiable and assessable smallest execution units, and clearly defines the delivery standards, time nodes and responsible persons of each sub-task, ensuring that the task execution is traceable.

[0008] Further, in the S1, the relevant departments include business departments, technical departments, production departments and quality control departments, and each department participates in demand decomposition to ensure that the task target matches business demand, technical capability, production conditions and quality requirements.

[0009] Further, in the S2, the resource allocation includes human resources, equipment, materials, funds and site resources. The resource management department formulates a cross-departmental resource scheduling scheme through resource supply-demand balance analysis, and clearly defines the resource allocation priority and use period.

[0010] Further, in the S2, the review is specifically: invite cross-department experts in business, technology, production, quality and safety fields to participate, the review focuses on the feasibility of the scheme technology, the rationality of the coordination and connection, the sufficiency of the risk prediction and the matching degree of the resources, and the review opinions need to form written records and track rectification implementation.

[0011] Further, in the S3, the execution rules include task schedule, communication meeting system, problem reporting process and emergency response plan; the real-time collaboration platform supports task progress visualization, file sharing, online communication and problem closed-loop tracking function, ensuring efficient synchronization of cross-department information.

[0012] Further, in the S4, the key milestone nodes include scheme confirmation node, sample trial production node, batch production start node, delivery initial inspection node, etc., and each node review needs to form a review report to clearly pass the conclusion or rectification requirements, and the unqualified node review cannot enter the next stage.

[0013] Further, in the S5, the cross-department joint acceptance is led by the quality control department, and jointly implemented by the leading department, demand department and technology department, the acceptance standards include technical index compliance, delivery completeness, document standardization and consistency with the execution scheme; the rectification notice of unqualified delivery needs to clearly specify the rectification subject, rectification measures, completion deadline and re-inspection standard, and the re-inspection still unqualified needs to re-develop the execution scheme.

[0014] Further, in the S6, the experience precipitation includes cross-department collaboration best practices, process optimization suggestions, common problem solutions and standardized templates, and the precipitation results are included in the enterprise knowledge base and forced to be applied.

[0015] Further, in the S7, the performance evaluation indicators include collaborative response timeliness, task completion quality, delivery acceptance pass rate, problem rectification efficiency and resource utilization efficiency; the examination incentive includes positive incentive and constraint mechanism to ensure that the collaborative responsibility is in place.

[0016] The cross-department scientific research and production task collaborative closed-loop management mechanism provided by the application has the following remarkable beneficial effects compared with the prior art: 1. The task is decomposed into the smallest execution unit by WBS method, the responsibility division and collaborative interface of each department and each post are clear, the cross-department shirking and responsibility ambiguity problem is avoided, the related departments participate in demand decomposition in advance, the task target is matched with multi-dimensional demand such as business, technology and production, the subsequent collaborative conflict is reduced from the source, and the task promotion efficiency is improved.

[0017] 2、Resource management department coordinates cross-departmental resources such as manpower, equipment, and funds, formulates scheduling plan and priority through supply and demand balance analysis, avoids resource idling or repeated occupation, and dynamically adjusts resource allocation according to task progress to ensure sufficient supply of core node resources and maximize resource utilization value.

[0018] 3、Real-time collaboration platform realizes progress visualization and real-time problem feedback, and collaborative specialists coordinate and connect to block points, break through cross-departmental information barriers, combine key milestone node review with risk account mechanism, predict potential risks such as technology, resources, and progress in advance, reduce task delay probability through hierarchical response plan, and ensure task advancement according to nodes.

[0019] 4、Cross-departmental joint acceptance specifies multi-dimensional standards such as technical indicators and document specifications, and implements closed-loop rectification and re-inspection for unqualified delivery to avoid quality problems flowing into the next link. The acceptance standard is consistent with the implementation plan and demand target to ensure that the final delivery fully meets the scientific research and production requirements and reduces the rework loss caused by substandard quality.

[0020] 5、The collaborative best practices and standardized templates sorted out after task review are included in the enterprise knowledge base to realize experience reuse through mandatory promotion and application, avoid repeated pitfalls in similar tasks, and continuously improve the standardization and normalization level of cross-departmental collaboration.

[0021] 6、Performance evaluation covers core indicators such as collaborative response, task quality, and rectification efficiency, and combines positive incentives with restraint mechanisms to fully mobilize the collaborative enthusiasm of various departments and core participants. At the same time, the evaluation results are linked with the assessment to force the implementation of collaborative responsibilities.

[0022] 7、Based on the review conclusion and performance evaluation results, continuously optimize the collaborative process, flexibly adjust the control details for different types of scientific research and production tasks, make the mechanism have strong adaptability, and continuously iterate and upgrade with the expansion of business and adjustment of department structure, and long-term maintain the efficiency and adaptability of cross-departmental collaboration. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS Figure 1 The method flowchart of the present application. DETAILED DESCRIPTION The technical solutions in the embodiments of the present application will be described clearly and completely below with reference to the drawings in the embodiments of the present application. Obviously, the described embodiments are only part of the embodiments of the present application, not all. Based on the embodiments in the present application, all other embodiments obtained by those skilled in the art without creative labor are within the scope of protection of the present application.

[0023] Reference Figure 1 The present embodiment provides a cross-departmental scientific research and production task collaborative closed-loop control mechanism, comprising the following steps: S1, task establishment and requirement decomposition: the leading department jointly with relevant departments to clarify the overall goal, technical indicators and delivery requirements of the task, and to decompose the task into executable sub-tasks through work breakdown structure, and to define the responsibility departments and collaborative interfaces of each sub-task; S2, resource planning and scheme review: the resource management department allocates cross-departmental resources, each responsible department prepares sub-task execution scheme, the leading department organizes review and supervision; In the resource planning link, the resource management department calculates the resource supply and demand balance degree through the following formula to assist in formulating cross-departmental resource scheduling scheme: ; Among them is the resource supply and demand balance degree, is the available amount of the th resource, is the task demand amount of the th resource, is the priority weight of the th resource, is the total number of resource types; S3, task start and process coordination: hold a cross-departmental start meeting to clarify the execution rules, synchronize progress and feedback problems through real-time collaboration platform, and coordinate cross-departmental interface matters by the collaboration officer; S4, key node control and risk early warning: sort out key milestone nodes and organize review, establish risk control account, report and evaluate risks in real time and develop response plans; S5, delivery acceptance and problem rectification: each responsible department submits the delivery, which is accepted by cross-departmental joint acceptance, and the unqualified items are rectified and rechecked until they meet the requirements; S6, task review and experience sedimentation: after the completion of the task, organize cross-departmental review, summarize experience and shortcomings and sort out optimization direction, and sediment mature process standard; S7, performance evaluation and continuous optimization: based on task execution data, carry out cross-departmental performance evaluation, link the results with evaluation and incentive, and optimize the coordination mechanism based on the review conclusion.

[0024] Among them, in S1, the work breakdown structure adopts WBS method to decompose the task to the smallest executable unit, and clearly defines the delivery standard, time node and responsible person of each sub-task, ensuring that the task execution is traceable. Through WBS method to decompose the task to the smallest execution unit, the responsibility division and coordination interface of each department and post are clarified, avoiding cross-departmental shirking and ambiguous responsibilities. Relevant departments participate in requirement decomposition in advance to ensure that task goals match multi-dimensional requirements such as business, technology and production, reducing subsequent coordination conflicts from the source and improving task promotion efficiency.

[0025] In S1, the relevant departments include the business department, the technical department, the production department, and the quality control department. Each department participates in demand disassembly to ensure that the task target matches the business demand, technical capability, production condition, and quality requirement. The real-time collaboration platform realizes progress visualization and real-time feedback of problems. The collaborative officer coordinates and connects the bottlenecks, breaks the cross-department information barrier, combines the key milestone node review with the risk account mechanism, predicts potential risks such as technology, resources, and progress in advance, reduces the probability of task delay through hierarchical response plan, and ensures the task to advance according to the node.

[0026] In S2, resource demand includes manpower, equipment, materials, funds, and site resources. The resource management department formulates a cross-department resource scheduling plan through supply and demand balance analysis, and determines the resource allocation priority and use period. The resource management department coordinates cross-department resources such as manpower, equipment, and funds, formulates a scheduling plan and priority through supply and demand balance analysis, avoids resource idling or repeated occupation, and dynamically adjusts resource allocation according to task progress to ensure sufficient resource supply at core nodes and maximize resource utilization value.

[0027] In S2, the review specifically includes inviting cross-department experts in business, technology, production, quality, and safety fields to participate. The review focuses on the feasibility of the scheme, the rationality of collaboration and connection, the sufficiency of risk prediction, and the matching degree of resources. The review opinions need to be recorded in writing and tracked for rectification. Cross-department joint acceptance determines multi-dimensional standards such as technical indicators and document specifications. Unqualified delivery objects are subject to closed-loop rectification and re-inspection to avoid quality problems flowing into the next link. The acceptance standards and execution plan are consistent with the demand target to ensure that the final delivery object fully meets the scientific research and production requirements and reduces the rework loss caused by substandard quality.

[0028] In S3, the execution rules include task schedule, communication meeting system, problem reporting process, and emergency response plan. The real-time collaboration platform supports task progress visualization, file sharing, online communication, and problem closed-loop tracking functions to ensure efficient synchronization of cross-department information. The collaborative best practices and standardized templates sorted out after task review are included in the enterprise knowledge base to realize experience reuse through mandatory promotion and application, avoid repeated pitfalls in similar tasks, and continuously improve the standardization and normalization level of cross-department collaboration.

[0029] In S4, the key milestone nodes include scheme confirmation node, sample trial production node, batch production start node, and delivery object preliminary inspection node. Each node review needs to form a review report to determine the pass conclusion or rectification requirement. The node review does not pass and cannot proceed to the next stage.

[0030] In S5, the cross-department joint acceptance is led by the quality control department, and the joint leading department, demand department, and technology department jointly implement it. The acceptance standards include technical indicators, delivery completeness, document specification, and consistency with the implementation plan. The rectification notice for unqualified delivery must specify the rectification subject, measures, deadline, and re-inspection standards. If the re-inspection is still unqualified, a new implementation plan must be developed. Based on the review conclusion and performance evaluation results, the collaborative process is continuously optimized, and the control details are flexibly adjusted for different types of scientific research and production tasks to make the mechanism highly adaptable. As the business expands and the department structure adjusts, the mechanism is continuously iterated and upgraded, maintaining the efficiency and adaptability of cross-department collaboration in the long term.

[0031] In S6, the experience accumulation content includes cross-department collaboration best practices, process optimization suggestions, common problem solutions, and standardized templates. The accumulated results are incorporated into the enterprise knowledge base and are mandatory for application.

[0032] In S7, the performance evaluation indicators include collaborative response timeliness, task completion quality, delivery acceptance pass rate, problem rectification efficiency, and resource utilization efficiency. The assessment and incentive mechanism includes positive incentives and constraints to ensure that collaborative responsibilities are implemented. Performance evaluation covers core indicators such as collaborative response, task quality, and rectification efficiency. The combination of positive incentives and constraints fully mobilizes the collaborative enthusiasm of various departments and core participants. At the same time, the evaluation results are linked to the assessment, forcing the implementation of collaborative responsibilities.

[0033] I. Implementing subjects and preliminary preparation This task is led by the ship research and development design department, which is responsible for leading the development of lightweight deck steel and technical standards for ship research and development. The ship manufacturing department is responsible for sample production and batch production, the quality inspection department is responsible for full-process quality inspection and ship industry standard compliance verification, the resource guarantee department coordinates the allocation of cross-department resources such as ship material research experts, numerical control cutting equipment, and special steel, and the ship owner demand department provides the core demand and final acceptance basis for the ship company's requirements for deck steel, such as resistance to marine corrosion, compressive strength ≥590MPa, and lightweight (density ≤7.8g / cm³). To ensure collaborative efficiency, a "ship research and production collaboration platform" is built, integrating task progress tracking, ship structure drawing sharing, manufacturing risk real-time reporting, and welding process parameter online approval functions. A collaboration specialist is appointed, who is a senior engineer with 12 years of experience in ship material research and cross-department collaboration from the ship research and development design department. The specialist coordinates cross-departmental interfaces and information synchronization for ship design, manufacturing, and inspection, ensuring seamless connection between research and production.

[0034] II. Detailed implementation process of each step S1: Task establishment and demand decomposition (completed in the first week) The ship research and development design department first organized a demand consensus meeting with 5 core departments. The ship owner demand department combined with the ocean-going cargo ship navigation scene, and clearly defined the core requirements of the lightweight deck steel, such as anti-marine atmospheric corrosion, high compressive strength, lightweight, excellent welding performance, etc. At the same time, it mentioned the strict requirements of the shipping company on material batch stability and service life (≥15 years); the quality inspection department proposed to meet the GB / T712-2019 “Structural Steel for Ships and Marine Engineering” detection standard; the shipbuilding department feedback that the existing numerical control cutting equipment and submerged arc welding equipment can adapt to the processing of 6-20mm thick deck steel, and each department fully communicates to ensure that the task target matches the self ability. Then the total task is divided into 6 first-level sub-tasks and 22 second-level sub-tasks by using WBS work decomposition structure. For example, the “formula research and development” first-level sub-task is divided into “alloy element selection”, “component proportioning test” and “mechanical property test”. Among them, “alloy element selection” is responsible by Li worker of the ship research and development design department, and he needs to submit the list of 3 candidate alloys (nickel, chromium, molybdenum) and purity test report before the 2nd week; “component proportioning test” is led by Wang worker of the department, and he needs to complete 15 groups of formula test data before the 4th week, each group needs to be attached with compressive strength and corrosion resistance test results. The “sample trial production” first-level sub-task is divided into “raw material smelting”, “rolling forming” and “welding process verification”, etc. “Raw material smelting” is responsible by Zhang worker of the shipbuilding department, and he needs to complete the mixed raw material smelting with component uniformity of more than 99% before the 5th week; “rolling forming” is led by Liu worker, and he needs to complete the rolling of the first batch of 20 samples before the 6th week, with thickness error controlled within ±0.1mm. After task decomposition, the coordination interface is clear: the ship research and development design department submits the “process guide book” containing rolling temperature, welding current, etc. to the shipbuilding department; the shipbuilding department synchronizes the production process record to the quality inspection department; the interface persons of each department update the progress to the coordination platform before 17:30 every day to ensure real-time synchronization of information.

[0035] S2: Resource coordination and scheme review (completed in the 2nd-3rd week) Each responsibility department submits a resource demand list in combination with sub-tasks, and the resource guarantee department forms a "resource supply and demand table" by summarizing. In terms of manpower, the ship R&D design department needs 3 materials science doctors to support formula research and development, and the ship manufacturing department needs 6 numerical control operators and 4 welding technicians, all of whom need to participate throughout the process; in terms of equipment, the ship manufacturing department needs 1 electric arc furnace, 1 numerical control rolling mill and 2 submerged arc welding machines from the 5th to the 9th week, and the quality inspection department needs 1 universal material testing machine and 1 salt spray corrosion test box during the same period; in terms of materials, the ship manufacturing department needs 150 kg of low-phosphorus steel billets and 30 kg of alloy additives (nickel, chromium, molybdenum), which should be in place by the 4th week; in terms of funds, the ship R&D design department applies for 350,000 yuan of test fees, and the ship manufacturing department applies for 400,000 yuan of raw material procurement fees, which will be allocated in the 1st week. The resource guarantee department calculates the core resource matching situation using the resource supply and demand balance degree formula: the supply and demand of numerical control rolling mill (core equipment, priority weight P = 1.3) are both 1; the supply and demand of universal material testing machine (conventional equipment, P = 1.0) are also both 1, and the balance degree B = 100%, which means the supply and demand are completely matched. However, the supply of materials science doctors (core manpower, P = 1.2) is 2, while the demand is 3, and the balance degree B = 66.7% (< 70%), which means the supply and demand are not completely matched. Therefore, the resource guarantee department hires a senior researcher through cooperation with the ship material research institute, who will report to work by the 3rd week. In the scheme review stage, the ship R&D design department and the ship manufacturing department submit "lightweight deck steel formula research and development scheme" and "sample trial production process scheme" respectively, the leading department organizes a review meeting, and invites 2 experts in the field of ship materials and 5 department heads to participate. The experts suggest adding a small amount of niobium element to improve the grain refinement effect, the ship manufacturing department confirms that the electric arc furnace can adapt to the new formula smelting, and the quality inspection department requires adding a "batch-to-batch corrosion resistance deviation detection" link. The review forms 5 written opinions, and the two departments complete the scheme optimization and pass the re-review by the 3rd weekend.

[0036] S3: Task initiation and process coordination (started in the 4th week and throughout the whole process) At the beginning of the 4th week, the ship R&D department held a cross-departmental kickoff meeting to clarify the execution rules: a weekly meeting was held at 14:00 every Friday, and each department reported progress and raised questions; emergency issues were responded to within 40 minutes through the "Coordination Officer Direct Group", and the coordination officer tracked the progress of the solution. At the same time, emergency plans were developed: if special steel materials were delayed, 3 backup suppliers would be activated; if the sample compressive strength did not meet the standard, the ship R&D department would provide a composition adjustment plan within 36 hours; if welding defects occurred, a joint task force would be established to develop optimization measures within 24 hours. During the process, the coordination platform played a key role: the ship R&D department uploaded the formula test log and composition test report, the ship manufacturing department synchronized the equipment operating parameters and production progress, and the quality inspection department input the mechanical property and corrosion resistance test data. In the 7th week, the ship manufacturing department found that the chromium purity in the alloy additive fluctuated beyond the required range, and immediately uploaded the test report to the ship R&D department through the platform. The coordination officer organized an online interface within 15 minutes, and the ship R&D department proposed a solution of "adjusting the melting temperature to 1600°C and extending the holding time". The problem was closed on the same day, and the trial production schedule was not affected. The average problem resolution time across departments during the task period was reduced by 70% compared to previous periods.

[0037] S4: Key node control and risk early warning (executed at weeks 6, 9, 13, and 18) Four key milestone nodes were identified and must pass the review to proceed to the next stage. At the 6th week "formula confirmation node", the ship R&D department, ship owner demand department, and quality inspection department reviewed and confirmed that the formula sample compressive strength reached 610MPa and the salt spray corrosion resistance time was greater than 500 hours, successfully passing the review; at the 9th week "sample trial production node", the ship manufacturing department and quality inspection department led the review of the first batch of samples, and the thickness and welding joint strength of the samples met the standards; at the 13th week "small batch production start node", all departments jointly checked the production process and resource supply; at the 18th week "delivery initial inspection node", the ship owner demand department and quality inspection department conducted full-index testing on 5 batches of samples. In terms of risk control, a "Risk Control Log" was established, and each department reported potential risks within 10 hours. At the 11th week, the ship manufacturing department reported "rapid electrode wear of the electric arc furnace" (secondary risk), and the leading department organized the equipment maintenance department and ship R&D department to develop a "replace electrodes, adjust power supply parameters, and test melting" plan, which was completed within 18 hours and did not affect the node schedule. During the task period, 6 low-risk and 2 secondary-risk issues were tracked, and no high-risk events occurred.

[0038] S5: Delivery acceptance and problem rectification (completed at weeks 19-20) Quality Inspection Department led the acceptance team, combined with Ship Research and Development Design Department and Ship Owner Demand Department, developed the acceptance list according to technical indicators, national standards of ship industry and implementation plan, covering four dimensions of compressive strength, corrosion resistance, welding performance and document integrity. The acceptance found that the salt spray corrosion resistance time of 2 samples in the 3rd batch was 480 hours (not up to standard), and the "Rectification Notice" was issued, which clearly stated that Ship Manufacturing Department was the responsible subject and the rectification measures were "adjust the proportion of chromium element to 3% and extend the passivation treatment time to 2 hours". The re-inspection samples were submitted within 5 days, and the re-inspection standard was consistent with the original standard. After optimizing the process by Ship Manufacturing Department and Ship Research and Development Design Department, the re-inspection showed that the salt spray corrosion resistance time of all samples was ≥510 hours and the compressive strength was ≥600 MPa, and the acceptance was passed. Quality Inspection Department issued the "Product Acceptance Report" and confirmed that all 5 batches of samples were qualified and could be delivered to Ship Owner Demand Department.

[0039] S6: Task review and experience sedimentation (completed in the 21st week) Ship Research and Development Design Department organized a cross-department review meeting, and each department provided core feedback: Ship Research and Development Design Department pointed out that "the early stage did not carefully connect the smelting process parameters with Ship Manufacturing Department, resulting in substandard corrosion resistance of some samples"; Resource Guarantee Department believed that "the external researcher collaboration mode is efficient and can be incorporated into the long-term talent cooperation mechanism"; Quality Inspection Department suggested "adding real-time component detection links in the production process". Based on the review results, three types of achievements were sorted out and incorporated into the enterprise knowledge base: the best practices for collaboration were "process parameter cross-department double-sign system" (key parameters confirmed by research and manufacturing departments) and "production process real-time detection mechanism"; the standardized templates included "Ship Lightweight Material WBS Disassembly Template" and "Ship Manufacturing Resource Demand Declaration Template"; and the common problem solutions were "Electric Arc Furnace Emergency Handling Process" and "Deck Steel Corrosion Resistance Adjustment Scheme", providing references for future similar tasks.

[0040] S7: Performance evaluation and continuous optimization (completed in the 22nd week) Human Resources Department, together with Ship Research and Development Design Department, evaluated the collaboration response timeliness and task completion quality from 5 indicators: Ship Research and Development Design Department's collaboration response rate was 98.5% and the formula compliance rate was 100%, winning the "Collaboration Excellent Team" award; Ship Manufacturing Department's rectification efficiency was excellent, and the team was awarded 20,000 yuan; Quality Inspection Department's detection data was zero error, and the person in charge won the "Special Contribution Award". Based on the review conclusions, the mechanism was optimized: "process parameter review" and "raw material detection standard confirmation" sub-steps were added in S1 disassembly; and "core equipment spare parts library" and "special material emergency procurement channel" construction requirements were supplemented in S2 to ensure that the mechanism adapts to the needs of future high-end ship material research and production tasks.

[0041] Implementation effect The task is completed 5 days in advance, 5 batches of samples have a 100% pass rate, and the ship owner signs a deck steel supply contract for 3 ocean-going cargo ships after verification; the cross-department resource idle rate is reduced from 20% to 5%, and the problem solving efficiency is improved by 70%; the standardized template deposited is applied to the "ship low-temperature-resistant plate steel" task, so that the S1 disassembly time is shortened from 1 week to 3 days, and the task promotion efficiency is significantly improved, laying a foundation for the enterprise's ship material independent research and development and large-scale production.

[0042] Finally, it should be noted that: the above only for the preferred embodiments of the present application, and not for the purpose of limiting the present application, although the foregoing embodiments of the present application are described in detail, for those skilled in the art, it still can be modified, or part of the technical features of the equivalent replacement, within the spirit and principles of the present application, any modification, equivalent replacement, improvement, etc., should be included within the scope of the present application.

Claims

1. A cross-departmental collaborative closed-loop management and control mechanism for scientific research and production tasks, characterized in that, Includes the following steps: S1. Task Initiation and Requirements Decomposition: The lead department, in conjunction with relevant departments, clarifies the overall task objectives, technical indicators, and delivery requirements. The task is then broken down into executable sub-tasks through a work breakdown structure, and the responsible departments and collaboration interfaces for each sub-task are defined. S2. Resource Coordination and Plan Review: The resource management department coordinates the allocation of cross-departmental resources, each responsible department prepares sub-task execution plans, and the lead department organizes reviews and supervises optimization. In the resource coordination phase, the resource management department uses the following formula to calculate the resource supply and demand balance, which helps in formulating cross-departmental resource allocation plans: ； in For the balance of resource supply and demand, For the first The available supply of this type of resource. For the first The task requirements for this type of resource For the first Priority weights of class resources Total number of resource types; S3. Task Initiation and Process Collaboration: Hold cross-departmental initiation meetings to clarify execution rules, synchronize progress and feedback on issues through a real-time collaboration platform, and have collaboration specialists coordinate cross-departmental matters. S4. Key Node Control and Risk Warning: Identify key milestone nodes and organize reviews, establish a risk control ledger, report and assess risks in real time, and develop contingency plans. S5. Acceptance of Deliverables and Rectification of Issues: Each responsible department shall submit deliverables, which shall be jointly accepted by multiple departments. Any non-conforming items shall be rectified and re-inspected until they meet the requirements. S6. Task review and experience accumulation: After the task is completed, organize a cross-departmental review to summarize the shortcomings and sort out the optimization direction, and accumulate mature process standards. S7. Performance Evaluation and Continuous Optimization: Conduct cross-departmental performance evaluations based on task execution data, link the results with performance incentives, and optimize the collaboration mechanism based on the debriefing conclusions.

2. The cross-departmental collaborative closed-loop management and control mechanism for scientific research and production tasks according to claim 1, characterized in that: In S1, the work breakdown structure adopts the WBS method to break down tasks into the smallest quantifiable and assessable execution units, and clearly defines the deliverables, time nodes, and responsible personnel for each sub-task to ensure that task execution is traceable.

3. The cross-departmental collaborative closed-loop management and control mechanism for scientific research and production tasks according to claim 1, characterized in that: In S1, the relevant departments include business departments, technical departments, production departments, and quality control departments. All departments jointly participate in the breakdown of requirements to ensure that the task objectives match business needs, technical capabilities, production conditions, and quality requirements.

4. The cross-departmental collaborative closed-loop management and control mechanism for scientific research and production tasks according to claim 1, characterized in that: In S2, the resource allocation includes human resources, equipment, materials, funds, and site resources. The resource management department formulates a cross-departmental resource scheduling plan through resource supply and demand balance analysis, and clarifies the priority and usage period of resource allocation.

5. The cross-departmental collaborative closed-loop management and control mechanism for scientific research and production tasks according to claim 1, characterized in that: In S2, the review specifically involves inviting cross-departmental experts from the fields of business, technology, production, quality, and safety to participate. The review focuses on the technical feasibility of the solution, the rationality of collaboration and coordination, the adequacy of risk prediction, and the degree of resource matching. The review opinions must be recorded in writing and tracked for rectification and implementation.

6. The cross-departmental collaborative closed-loop management and control mechanism for scientific research and production tasks according to claim 1, characterized in that: In S3, the execution rules include a task schedule, a communication meeting system, a problem reporting process, and an emergency response plan; the real-time collaboration platform supports tasks progress visualization, file sharing, online communication, and problem closed-loop tracking functions to ensure efficient cross-departmental information synchronization.

7. The cross-departmental collaborative closed-loop management and control mechanism for scientific research and production tasks according to claim 1, characterized in that: In S4, the key milestone nodes include the scheme confirmation node, the prototype trial production node, the mass production start node, and the initial acceptance node of the deliverables. Each node review must generate a review report, which clearly states the conclusion of approval or the rectification requirements. If a node review is not approved, the next stage cannot be entered.

8. The cross-departmental collaborative closed-loop management and control mechanism for scientific research and production tasks according to claim 1, characterized in that: In S5, the cross-departmental joint acceptance is led by the quality control department and jointly implemented by the lead department, the requesting department, and the technical department. The acceptance criteria include the compliance of technical indicators, the completeness of deliverables, the standardization of documents, and consistency with the implementation plan. The rectification notice for non-conforming deliverables must clearly specify the responsible party for rectification, rectification measures, completion deadline, and re-inspection standards. If the re-inspection is still unqualified, a new implementation plan must be formulated.

9. The cross-departmental collaborative closed-loop management and control mechanism for scientific research and production tasks according to claim 1, characterized in that: In S6, the experience accumulation includes best practices for cross-departmental collaboration, process optimization suggestions, solutions to common problems, and standardized templates. The accumulated results are incorporated into the enterprise knowledge base and are mandated for promotion and application.

10. The cross-departmental collaborative closed-loop management and control mechanism for scientific research and production tasks according to claim 1, characterized in that: In S7, the performance evaluation indicators include the timeliness of collaborative response, the quality of task completion, the pass rate of deliverable acceptance, the efficiency of problem rectification, and the efficiency of resource utilization; the assessment incentives include positive incentive and constraint mechanisms to ensure that collaborative responsibilities are implemented effectively.

Images