Asset management supporting system, asset management supporting method and program

Abstract

To evaluate a facility after construction by an evaluation method equivalent to that when an improvement plan is planned, accumulate an evaluation result, and use the information in each processing of planning.SOLUTION: An asset management supporting system 1E includes an indexing processing part 84A for indexing an improvement plan for a facility, a storage device 6E for storing information on the device, information on an improvement plan on the facility including the result of the indexing executed by the indexing processing part 84A, and construction evaluation information obtained by evaluating the content of construction based on the improvement plan using the same evaluation item as an indexing axis of the indexing, in association with each other, and a construction evaluation information acquisition operation part 211 for executing arithmetic operation using the construction evaluation information on a plurality of facilities stored in the storage device 6E, wherein the indexing processing part 84A extracts an item to be prioritized as the indexing axis on the basis of the result of the arithmetic operation by the construction evaluation information acquisition operation part 211, sets an indexing parameter including the item, and executes the indexing.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 165

Description

[Technical Field]

[0001] The present invention relates to an asset management support system, an asset management support method, and a program. [Background technology]

[0002] A facility management system for centrally managing various facilities owned by local governments and companies is known (see, for example, Patent Document 1). The system disclosed in Patent Document 1 stores the facility name, the year of inauguration, and an evaluation value for at least one value evaluation item for each managed facility. The system calculates a total score of the value evaluation score based on the evaluation value and the deterioration evaluation score of each facility for a specific year, sorts the facilities in order of total score or deterioration evaluation score, and generates a list indicating the priority of repair work. This system automatically displays a list indicating the priority of repair work for managed facilities by simply entering known information, such as the year of inauguration and the value evaluation value, which does not require actual measurement. Therefore, even if the number of managed facilities is enormous, the management staff can relatively easily obtain basic information for determining whether repair work is necessary and whether to continue or abandon a specific facility (paragraph 0018 of Patent Document 1).

[0003] Also known is a facility reorganization support system that can support facility reorganization planning by taking into consideration the functions possessed by each facility and the layout and configuration of each facility (see, for example, Patent Document 2). The system disclosed in Patent Document 2 is configured to generate facility reorganization plan support information based on evaluation information of multiple facilities, and to output, based on the generated facility reorganization plan support information, any of the following: information indicating the locations of multiple facilities included in a specified area; information indicating the composition ratio of facilities by function or by use; information indicating the scale or size of multiple facilities; information indicating the usage status of multiple facilities; and information indicating the costs of multiple facilities. This allows facility managers to consider facility reorganization by taking into consideration the functions common to each facility and the layout and configuration of each facility (paragraph 0061 of Patent Document 2). [Prior art documents] [Patent documents]

[0004] [Patent Document 1] Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2008-217655 [Patent Document 2] Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2015-127858 Summary of the Invention [Problem to be solved by the invention]

[0005] In recent years, school facilities have been experiencing a wave of deterioration, and are reaching the time for simultaneous renewal. School facilities are not only places where children learn and live, but also important facilities that serve as places for lifelong learning, culture, sports, and other activities for local residents, and as evacuation sites in the event of a disaster. Therefore, measures to address the deterioration of school facilities are an important issue that cannot be postponed.

[0006] In light of this situation, local governments are considering plans to extend the lifespan of school facilities and rebuild them. Local governments need to understand the actual situation of each school facility, take into account future usage forecasts, and consider plans to extend the lifespan and rebuild them while reducing the total costs associated with mid- to long-term maintenance and renewal and leveling budgets. In other words, local governments need to specifically consider plans to extend the lifespan and rebuild them for many school facilities within their limited budgets, while improving safety and functionality. However, with the systems disclosed in Patent Document 1 and Patent Document 2, which calculate building value and deterioration status and provide reorganization plans based on these assessments, it is difficult to understand the actual situation of each school facility, take into account future usage forecasts, and establish mid- to long-term facility management plans, including plans to extend the lifespan and rebuild them, in line with each local government's budget. It is also difficult to continuously consider individual, specific facility management and operation plans while improving safety and functionality, taking into account the actual conditions of the surrounding areas of the school facilities.

[0007] In order to solve at least one of the above-mentioned problems, the present invention aims to provide an asset management support system, an asset management support method, and a program that can evaluate facilities after construction using the same evaluation method as when formulating improvement plans, accumulate the evaluation results, and use the information in each planning process. [Means for solving the problem]

[0008] In order to achieve the above-mentioned object, a first aspect of the asset management support system of the present invention comprises an indexing processing unit that indexes improvement proposals for facilities, a memory unit that links and stores information about the facility and information about the improvement proposals for the facility including the results of indexing performed by the indexing processing unit, as well as construction evaluation information that evaluates the content of construction based on the improvement proposals using the same evaluation items as the indexing axes of the indexing, and a construction evaluation information calculation unit that performs calculation processing using the construction evaluation information about multiple facilities stored in the memory unit, and is characterized in that the indexing processing unit extracts items that should be prioritized as indexing axes based on the results of the calculation processing by the construction evaluation information calculation unit, sets indexing parameters including the items, and performs indexing.

[0009] Another aspect of the asset management support system of the present invention is that the construction evaluation information calculation unit performs calculation processing based on the construction evaluation information for multiple facilities stored in the memory unit, so that items that have received evaluations equal to or higher than the results of the actual construction and the indexing in the improvement plan, items that have been used most recently in the processing of the indexing processing unit, and items that have high satisfaction with the construction are preferentially extracted.

[0010] Furthermore, a second aspect of the asset management support system of the present invention is characterized by having an indexing processing unit that indexes improvement proposals for facilities; a memory unit that links and stores information about the facility, information about improvements to other facilities, information about the improvement proposals for the facility including the results of indexing performed by the indexing processing unit, and information about the improvement proposals for other facilities, together with construction evaluation information that evaluates the content of construction based on the improvement proposals using the same evaluation items as the indexing axes for indexing; and an improvement example extraction unit that extracts improvement examples that can be used as references for formulating new improvement proposals based on the construction evaluation information about multiple facilities and information about improvements to other facilities stored in the memory unit.

[0011] Another aspect of the asset management support system of the present invention is that it further comprises a construction evaluation information calculation unit that performs calculation processing using construction evaluation information for multiple facilities stored in the memory unit and extracts items that should be prioritized as indexing axes based on the results of the calculation processing, and an indexing processing unit that sets indexing parameters including the items based on the calculation results by the construction evaluation information calculation unit and performs indexing, and the improvement example extraction unit extracts improvement examples for items specified by the user.

[0012] Another aspect of the asset management support system of the present invention is characterized in that it further has a problem extraction unit that extracts issues of the facility, and the improvement example extraction unit extracts improvement examples for the issues extracted by the problem extraction unit.

[0013] Furthermore, a first aspect of the asset management support method according to the present invention is an asset management support method executed in an asset management support system having a memory unit that stores information relating to facilities, the method comprising: a first indexing step of indexing improvement proposals for facilities; a construction evaluation information acquisition step of acquiring construction evaluation information that evaluates the content of construction based on the improvement proposals using the same evaluation items as the indexing axes of the indexing executed by the processing of the first indexing step; a construction evaluation information calculation step of executing calculation processing using the construction evaluation information acquired by the processing of the construction evaluation information acquisition step; and an item extraction step of extracting items that should be prioritized as indexing axes for the indexing based on the calculation results of the processing of the construction evaluation information calculation step. The method is characterized by including a second indexing step of setting indexing parameters including the items extracted by the processing of the item extraction step and performing indexing for the new improvement plan.

[0014] Furthermore, a first aspect of the program according to the present invention causes an asset management support system having a memory unit that stores information about facilities to execute processing characterized by including a first indexing step of indexing improvement proposals for facilities, a construction evaluation information acquisition step of acquiring construction evaluation information that evaluates the content of construction based on the improvement proposals using the same evaluation items as the indexing axes of the indexing executed by the processing of the first indexing step, a construction evaluation information calculation step of performing calculation processing using the construction evaluation information acquired by the processing of the construction evaluation information acquisition step, an item extraction step of extracting items that should be prioritized as indexing axes for indexing based on the calculation results of the processing of the construction evaluation information calculation step, and a second indexing step of setting indexing parameters including the items extracted by the processing of the item extraction step and performing indexing for the new improvement proposals.

[0015] Furthermore, a second aspect of the asset management support method of the present invention is an asset management support method executed in an asset management support system having a memory unit that stores information related to facilities, and is characterized by including an indexing step that indexes improvement proposals for facilities, a construction evaluation information acquisition step that acquires construction evaluation information that evaluates the content of construction based on the improvement proposals using the same evaluation items as the indexing axes of the indexing executed by processing in the indexing step, and an improvement example extraction step that extracts improvement examples that can be used as references for formulating new improvement proposals based on the construction evaluation information acquired by processing in the construction evaluation information acquisition step and information related to improvements to other facilities stored in the memory unit.

[0016] Furthermore, a second aspect of the program according to the present invention is a program for executing a process in an asset management support system having a storage unit that stores information about facilities, the process including: an indexing step for indexing improvement proposals for facilities; a construction evaluation information acquisition step for acquiring construction evaluation information that evaluates the content of construction based on the improvement proposals using the same evaluation items as the indexing axes of the indexing executed by the processing in the indexing step; and an improvement example extraction step for extracting improvement examples that can be used as references for formulating new improvement proposals based on the construction evaluation information acquired by the processing in the construction evaluation information acquisition step and information about improvements to other facilities stored in the storage unit. [Effects of the Invention]

[0017] According to the present invention, an asset management support system, an asset management support method, and a program can be provided that can improve the quality of asset management support by evaluating facilities after construction using the same evaluation method as when formulating improvement plans, accumulating the evaluation results, and using the information in each planning process. [Brief explanation of the drawings]

[0018] [Figure 1]1 is a diagram showing an overview of an asset management support system 1 which is an embodiment of an asset management support system, an asset management support method, and a program according to the present invention. [Figure 2] 2 is a flowchart showing a facility management process executed by the asset management support device 4 shown in FIG. 1. [Figure 3] This paper provides an overview of the longevity plan for school facilities using the asset management support system of this system. [Figure 4] FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of a basic information sheet. [Figure 5] FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of a building information list. [Figure 6] This is a bar graph showing the state of maintenance of school facilities by age and future maintenance and renewal costs. [Figure 7] 10 is a flowchart showing a process for simply distinguishing between renovation and life extension. [Figure 8] FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of a building information list to which information regarding the soundness of the structural frame has been added. [Figure 9] FIG. 1 is a diagram showing an example of inspection items based on the Building Standards Act. [Figure 10] FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of a deterioration status survey form. [Figure 11] FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of construction history and schedule information. [Figure 12] FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating an example of evaluation criteria. [Figure 13] It provides specific criteria for visually evaluating roofs and rooftops. [Figure 14] It shows specific criteria for visually evaluating exterior walls. [Figure 15] It provides specific evaluation criteria for interior finishes, electrical equipment, and mechanical equipment based on the number of years that have passed since construction began. [Figure 16] FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of a photograph of a deteriorated portion and detailed information. [Figure 17] FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating an example of information indicating a deteriorated portion. [Figure 18] FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of a matrix relating to the specifications and performance of each part of a facility. [Figure 19] FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of a maintenance management sheet. [Figure 20] FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of a maintenance management sheet. [Figure 21] FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of a conversion table for converting the evaluation index of each part into an evaluation score. [Figure 22] FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of a cost allocation table for allocating costs to each part. [Figure 23] FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating an example of calculating the health degree. [Figure 24] FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of a building information list to which information regarding deterioration status assessment has been added. [Figure 25] FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of a cost calculation condition entry sheet for calculating future maintenance and renewal costs (longevity type). [Figure 26] 26 is a bar graph showing future maintenance and renewal costs calculated based on various information entered in the cost calculation condition entry table shown in FIG. 25. [Figure 27] This is a diagram showing an image of the shift from a focus on renovation to a focus on extending the service life of buildings. [Figure 28] FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of facility development levels determined based on the setting of a financial constraint line. [Figure 29] This is a diagram showing an example of a development plan for individual facilities for the past five years. [Figure 30] This is a bar graph showing the costs of the individual facility development plans for the last five years calculated based on the project costs entered in the individual facility development plan form for the last five years shown in Figure 29. [Figure 31] This is a diagram showing an example of an implementation plan for maintenance work over the next five years. [Figure 32] 32 is a bar graph showing an example of budget allocation for the next five years set based on the maintenance content shown in FIG. 31. [Figure 33] This is a diagram showing an example of a detailed implementation plan for the next five years. [Figure 34] This is a bar graph showing the costs of life extension plans over the next 40 years. [Figure 35]FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of consideration of new policies and improvement measures for solving a problem. [Figure 36] FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating an example of a simulation. [Figure 37] This is a diagram for explaining the relationship between the management classifications in the building information list, school facility ledger, and fixed asset ledger. [Figure 38] FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating an example of a matching table between a school facilities ledger and a fixed asset ledger. [Figure 39] FIG. 10 is a diagram for explaining the relationship between a facility layout diagram of a building and a building information list. [Figure 40] This shows a portion of the building information list, with vertical columns consisting of "Basic building information," "Structural integrity," "Deterioration status other than the structure," and "Specifications and performance," and horizontal rows consisting of multiple buildings. [Figure 41] This figure shows the state in which only the ``Building Basic Information'' item shown in Figure 40 is fixedly displayed and slid sideways, allowing the relationship between ``Building Basic Information'' and ``History'' to be understood. [Figure 42] This figure shows the state when only the "Basic Building Information" item shown in Figure 40 is fixed and slid sideways, allowing the relationship between the "Basic Building Information" and the "Annual Plan (Target Years / Repair and Renovation Cycle)" to be understood. [Figure 43] FIG. 43 is a diagram showing a state in which alternative plans for the "annual plan (target number of years / repair and renovation cycle)" of the building information list shown in FIG. 42 are displayed. [Figure 44] FIG. 44 is a diagram showing an example of a screen displayed when considering an optimal solution for future development by facility and building in the building information list shown in FIGS. 40 to 43. [Figure 45] FIG. 10 is a diagram showing another example of items to be displayed in the building basic information and history section. [Figure 46] FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating an example of a functional configuration of an asset management support system 1A for outputting a building information list. [Figure 47]This is a diagram to explain long-life renovations that go beyond simply understanding and restoring the deterioration state. [Figure 48] FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating an example of the functional configuration of an asset management support system 1B. [Figure 49] FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of information in a utilization consideration sheet. [Figure 50] FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of information in a utilization consideration sheet. [Figure 51] 1A and 1B are diagrams showing examples of floor plans of each floor of a facility and information showing usage details. [Figure 52] 1A and 1B are diagrams showing examples of floor plans of each floor of a facility and information showing usage details. [Figure 53] FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating an example of a composite graph showing the transition of the number of students. [Figure 54] FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of a list of type classification results for elementary schools in a specified municipality. [Figure 55] FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of a list of type classification results for elementary schools in a specified municipality. [Figure 56] FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of a format that can list the basic axes for classifying elementary schools in a given municipality into types and the numerical values ​​that indicate the characteristics of each type. [Figure 57] FIG. 10 is a diagram for explaining type classification based on different type classification axes. [Figure 58] FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of a format that can list numerical values ​​indicating characteristics for each type. [Figure 59] FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of a format including items into which a user who has referred to the data can enter new numerical values ​​or information. [Figure 60] FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of a format that can list detailed information regarding changes in the number of students and classes in a high school. [Figure 61] FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of a format corresponding to detailed information about a type B school building. [Figure 62] FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of a format corresponding to detailed information about a type B building structure. [Figure 63] FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of a format corresponding to detailed information about the campus area of ​​Type B. [Figure 64] FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of a format corresponding to detailed information about the possession status of Type B classrooms. [Figure 65] FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of a format in which review target values ​​can be entered. [Figure 66] FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of a format in which an area reduction target value can be entered. [Figure 67] FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of a format in which a revised target value for school building area can be entered. [Figure 68] FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of a format in which a review target value for a building area can be entered. [Figure 69] FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of a format in which a revised target value for school grounds area can be entered. [Figure 70] FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of a format in which revised target values ​​for the number of rooms and the area per room can be entered. [Figure 71] This is a diagram showing an example of a plan to rebuild part of a high school. [Figure 72] 1 is a bar graph showing actual and forecast costs to date. [Figure 73] FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of a format in which information about pools is classified by type based on area information and displayed as items. [Figure 74] 1 is a bar graph showing actual and forecast costs to date. [Figure 75] This graph makes it possible to distinguish between the costs of repairs and renewals to address aging and the costs of improving the functionality and environment of school facilities. [Figure 76] FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of a format that allows a list of the numbers of elementary schools of types A to E. [Figure 77] This is a line graph showing the past trends and future forecasts of the number of students in Type A elementary schools. [Figure 78]FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of a format consisting of items of detailed information related to the number of students in a Type A elementary school. [Figure 79] This is a line graph showing the past trends and future forecasts of the number of students in Type B elementary schools. [Figure 80] FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of a format consisting of items of detailed information related to the number of students in a Type B elementary school. [Figure 81] This is a line graph showing the past trends and future forecasts of the number of students in Type C elementary schools. [Figure 82] FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of a format consisting of items of detailed information related to the number of students in a Type C elementary school. [Figure 83] This graph shows past changes in the number of students and classes on a map of the corresponding municipality. [Figure 84] FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of detailed information including the ownership status of buildings at a specific elementary school and the construction history of each building. [Figure 85] This graph shows predicted changes in the number of students and classes on a map of the corresponding municipality. [Figure 86] This is a diagram showing an example of a format for creating a review plan for the corresponding rooms of an elementary school based on a sensitive appropriate plan for the rooms of the type to which it belongs. [Figure 87] FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of a format for listing information about a specific elementary school and its surrounding local facilities. [Figure 88] FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of a format for listing information about a specific elementary school and its surrounding local facilities. [Figure 89] This is a diagram showing an example of a proposed improvement for classroom layout after renovation of an elementary school. [Figure 90] This is a diagram showing an example of an improvement plan for the layout of an elementary school building after renovation. [Figure 91] 10 is a flowchart illustrating a process using type classification. [Figure 92] 10 is a flowchart illustrating a process using type classification. [Figure 93] 10 is a flowchart illustrating a type classification process 1. [Figure 94] FIG. 10 is a diagram for explaining type classification based on a base axis of type classification that includes conditions indicating changes in facility usage over time. [Figure 95] FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of a format corresponding to detailed information about the possession status of Type B' classrooms. [Figure 96] This is a diagram showing an example of a plan to rebuild part of a high school. [Figure 97] This is a graph showing the change in the number of high school students in a certain municipality. [Figure 98] This is a diagram showing an example of a format for checking the building configuration and room configuration by school type and department. [Figure 99] FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of a format that shows classifications based on the size of high schools and information such as the school building area and indoor gymnasium area based on those classifications. [Figure 100] FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of a format showing changes in student math classes when classified based on the size of high schools. [Figure 101] FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of a format for checking regional changes in high schools in a given municipality. [Figure 102] This is a diagram for explaining the case of creating a matrix and performing type classification using the size of high schools and changes in the number of student classes as the classification axes. [Figure 103] This is a diagram for explaining the case of creating a matrix and performing type classification using the size of high schools and changes in the number of student classes as the classification axes. [Figure 104] FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of a format indicating the results of type classification and the characteristics of each type. [Figure 105] FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of a format showing detailed information about each school classified by type. [Figure 106] FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of a format showing detailed information about each school classified by type. [Figure 107]FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of a format showing the correspondence between the population growth rate of cities, towns, and villages within a municipality and the type classification results of high schools. [Figure 108] FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of a format for comparing the number of students and the total floor area of ​​a school building. [Figure 109] FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of a format for comparing the number of students and the total floor area of ​​a school building. [Figure 110] FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of a format for comparing the number of students and the total floor area of ​​a school building. [Figure 111] 10 is a flowchart illustrating a type classification process 2. [Figure 112] 10 is a diagram for explaining information showing changes in the composition of students by department at the peak, present, and future times. [Figure 113] This diagram explains the changes in the number of students and classes from the peak to the present, as well as the total floor area of ​​buildings owned by the municipality, such as school buildings and gymnasiums, extracted from the perspective of the entire municipality. [Figure 114] This diagram explains information extracted from the perspective of each region of a local government, including the changes in the number of students and classes from peak times to the present, as well as the total floor area of ​​owned buildings such as school buildings and gymnasiums. [Figure 115] FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating an example of the functional configuration of an asset management support system 1C. [Figure 116] FIG. 10 is a diagram for explaining a specific example of an alarm generation process. [Figure 117] FIG. 10 is a diagram for explaining an example of an indexing result that is generated. [Figure 118] FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating an example of generated display image data. [Figure 119] 10A and 10B are diagrams for explaining a case where arbitrary information is added to generated display image data. [Figure 120] FIG. 10 is a diagram for explaining an example of a considered improvement plan. [Figure 121] FIG. 10 is a diagram for explaining an example of an indexing result for a considered improvement plan. [Figure 122] FIG. 10 is a diagram for explaining an example of a two-phase improvement plan that was considered. [Figure 123] FIG. 10 is a diagram for explaining an example of indexing results for the two-phase improvement plan that was considered. [Figure 124] FIG. 10 is a diagram showing a format for displaying a list of data that assists in understanding the current situation. [Figure 125] FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating an example of generated display image data. [Figure 126] FIG. 10 is a diagram showing a format for displaying a list of data that assists in analyzing the current situation. [Figure 127] FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating an example of generated display image data. [Figure 128] FIG. 10 is a diagram showing a format for displaying a list of data that assists in studying improvements. [Figure 129] FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating an example of generated display image data. [Figure 130] FIG. 10 is a diagram showing a format for displaying a list of data that assists in the consideration of the basic concept of a facility layout plan. [Figure 131] FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating an example of generated display image data. [Figure 132] This is a diagram showing a format for displaying a list of data that will assist in considering the basic concept of the floor plan of each floor of a facility. [Figure 133] FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating an example of generated display image data. [Figure 134] This is a diagram showing a format for displaying a list of data that will assist in considering the basic concept for the first and second phases of the facility's floor plan. [Figure 135] FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating an example of generated display image data. [Figure 136] FIG. 10 is a diagram showing a format for displaying a list of data that assists in analyzing and verifying the improvement effect. [Figure 137]FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating an example of generated display image data. [Figure 138] 10 is a flowchart illustrating an asset management support information generation process. [Figure 139] 10 is a flowchart illustrating an asset management support information generation process. [Figure 140] 10 is a flowchart illustrating an alarm generation process. [Figure 141] 10 is a flowchart for explaining indexing processing 1. [Figure 142] FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating an example of the functional configuration of an asset management support system 1D. [Figure 143] FIG. 2 is a functional block diagram showing a detailed functional configuration of a wide-area improvement plan formulation support processing unit 111. [Figure 144] FIG. 1 is a diagram for explaining facilities that take merger integration into consideration. [Figure 145] FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating an item input screen. [Figure 146] FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating an item input screen. [Figure 147] FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating an item input screen. [Figure 148] FIG. 10 is a diagram for explaining a facility list screen within a reorganization range. [Figure 149] FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating an item input screen. [Figure 150] FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating an item input screen. [Figure 151] FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating an item input screen. [Figure 152] FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating an additional information input box. [Figure 153] FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating an additional information input box. [Fig. 154] FIG. 10 is a diagram for explaining a screen displaying a list of reorganization plans. [Figure 155] FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating a detailed display screen. [Figure 156] FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating a detailed display screen. [Figure 157] FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating a detailed display screen. [Figure 158] FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating a detailed display screen. [Figure 159] FIG. 10 is a diagram for explaining a reorganization plan list display screen. [Figure 160] FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating a display screen for detailed information. [Figure 161] FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating a display screen for detailed information. [Figure 162] 10 is a flowchart for explaining a process for supporting the formulation of a wide-area improvement plan for a resource; [Figure 163] 10 is a flowchart for explaining a process for supporting the formulation of a wide-area improvement plan for a resource; [Fig. 164] 10 is a flowchart for explaining a process for supporting the formulation of a wide-area improvement plan for a resource; [Figure 165] FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating an example of a functional configuration of an asset management support system 1E. [Figure 166] FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating an evaluation input screen. [Figure 167] FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating a setting screen. [Figure 168] FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating a setting screen. [Figure 169] FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating a setting screen. [Figure 170] FIG. 10 is a diagram for explaining an indexing setting information input screen. [Figure 171] FIG. 10 is a diagram for explaining a display screen showing the current indexing results. [Figure 172] FIG. 10 is a diagram for explaining a list of improvement examples. [Fig. 173] FIG. 10 is a diagram for explaining a list of improvement examples. [Fig. 174] 10 is a flowchart for explaining post-implementation evaluation acquisition processing. [Figure 175] 10 is a flowchart for explaining indexing processing 2. [Figure 176] 10 is a flowchart for explaining an evaluation category and evaluation item setting process. [Figure 177] 10 is a flowchart illustrating an improvement example extraction process. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0019] Hereinafter, an embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings. Note that the asset management support systems 1, 1A, 1B, and 1C, which are embodiments of the asset management support system, asset management support method, and program of the present invention, will be described as examples, but the present invention is not limited to the asset management support system 1.

[0020] <Outline of Asset Management Support System 1> FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating an overview of an asset management support system 1, which is an embodiment of the asset management support system, asset management support method, and program of the present invention. This asset management support system 1 is a system that supports the management and operation of multiple facilities owned by, for example, a national government, a local government, or a company in a specified area. By using the asset management support system 1, it is possible to grasp the actual situation of multiple facilities owned by a national government, a local government, or a company in a specified area, reduce the total cost of maintenance and management over the medium to long term, level out budgets, and ensure the specifications and performance required for each part of the facility. This makes it possible to consider not only rebuilding due to aging but also planning for extending the facility's lifespan. Hereinafter, the present invention will be described using an example of the asset management support system 1 that supports the management and operation of school facilities.

[0021] 1, an asset management support system 1 is connected to a client terminal 3 via a network 2. The asset management support system 1 includes an asset management support device 4, a communication device 5, a storage device 6, and an input / output device 7.

[0022] Network 2 is a transmission path for establishing communication between computers. Network 2 is generally implemented using communication cables, and TCP / IP (Transmission Control Protocol / Internet Protocol) is used as the communication protocol. Note that the transmission path of Network 2 is not limited to cables, and can be composed of wired or wireless general-purpose or dedicated lines, multiple wired or wireless networks, such as LANs (Local Area Networks), WANs (Wide Area Networks), or IP (Internet Protocol) communication networks such as the Internet, public telephone networks, and mobile phone networks, as long as the communication protocols between them are the same or compatible.

[0023] The client terminal 3 is a terminal that can be used by an asset manager or a person in charge of investigating the deterioration status of a building (hereinafter referred to as an operator). The client terminal 3 can be operated by an operator to issue various processing requests (such as a request to display desired information, a request to register information, or a request to search for information) or input various data to the communication device 5 of the asset management support system 1. A web browser is pre-installed on the client terminal 3, and the client terminal 3 is configured to display data output from the communication device 5 on a display device such as a monitor. While the client terminal 3 is illustrated as a smartphone in the example of FIG. 1, it may also be a portable device such as a laptop computer, desktop computer, dedicated mobile terminal, mobile phone, or PDA (Personal Digital Assistant). That is, the client terminal 3 may be any device that can access the services provided by the asset management support device 4 via the network 2, issue various execution instructions, and display the information. Although only one client terminal 3 is shown in FIG. 1, it is natural that multiple client terminals exist for each operator.

[0024] The asset management support device 4 stores various information input by the user of the asset management support device 4 through the input / output device 7, or supplied via a recording medium, or various information supplied from the client terminal 3, in the storage device 6 (described later). In response to the user's input via the input / output device 7 or instructions from the client terminal 3, the asset management support device 4 acquires information from the storage device 6 (described later) and executes various processes. Specifically, for example, the asset management support device 4 acquires information (deterioration status) indicating the actual state of the school facilities to be managed from the storage device 6, determines a maintenance policy feasible within the upper limit of the total budget per year to be invested in the school facilities to be managed based on medium- to long-term financial forecasts (hereinafter simply referred to as the "financial constraint line"), and executes facility management processing to calculate future maintenance and renewal costs based on the determined maintenance policy and the current maintenance level. For this reason, the asset management support device 4 is pre-installed with programs for functioning as a web server and an application server. As shown in FIG. 1, the asset management support device 4 has a screen information generation unit 11, an information storage processing unit 12, a deterioration status evaluation unit 13, a financial constraint line setting unit 14, a maintenance standard value setting unit 15, a maintenance policy determination unit 16, a business content setting unit 17, a part-specific identification unit 18, a part-specific cost calculation unit 19, a maintenance standard value update unit 20, an accounting linkage unit 21, and a simulation unit 22.

[0025] The screen information generation unit 11 generates data (for example, HTML data or image data) for displaying a screen in response to a request from the client terminal 3 or operation input by a user of the asset management support device 4 input from the input / output device 7, and transmits the data to the client terminal 3 via the communication device 5 or supplies it to the input / output device 7 for output.

[0026] The information storage processing unit 12 stores various information related to the school facilities, deterioration information on the school facility's framework and major inspection areas other than the framework, etc. in the storage device 6. The information storage processing unit 12 can store various information related to the school facilities, deterioration information on the school facility's framework and major inspection areas other than the framework, etc. in the storage device 6, for example, in response to a request from the client terminal 3 or an operation input (information registration processing request) by a user of the asset management support device 4 input from the input / output device 7. The various information related to the school facilities and deterioration information on the school facility's framework and major inspection areas other than the framework stored in the storage device 6 will be described later using specific examples. The information storage processing unit 12 also stores information generated by the processing of each unit of the asset management support device 4 in the storage device 6.

[0027] The deterioration status assessment unit 13 can calculate the health level, which is a value obtained by indexing the assessment result of the deterioration status of the school facility, based on the deterioration information of the main inspection parts other than the structure of the school facility stored in the deterioration information storage unit 32 of the storage device 6 and information indicating the evaluation index for indexing the assessment of the deterioration status. The deterioration status assessment unit 13 can index the assessment of the deterioration status of the school facility and calculate the health level, for example, in response to a request from the client terminal 3 or an operation input (a request for assessing the deterioration status) by a user of the asset management support device 4 input from the input / output device 7. The health level calculated by the deterioration status assessment unit 13 is stored in the deterioration information storage unit 32 of the storage device 6 by the information storage processing unit 12. Details of the deterioration information of the main inspection parts other than the structure of the school facility and the health level generated by the deterioration status assessment unit 13 will be described later using specific examples.

[0028] The financial constraint line setting unit 14 sets a numerical value that will be the financial constraint line. For example, the financial constraint line setting unit 14 can set a numerical value as the upper limit of the total budget amount to be allocated to the school facilities to be managed per year in response to a request from the client terminal 3 or an operational input (a request for setting a financial constraint line) by a user of the asset management support device 4 input from the input / output device 7. Note that in the above explanation, the numerical value set as this financial constraint line is the upper limit of the total budget amount to be allocated to the school facilities to be managed per year, but it is not necessarily limited to the upper limit of the total budget amount per year, and any numerical value can of course be set. For example, the financial constraint line setting unit 14 may be configured to set the upper limit of the budget for each school facility as the financial constraint line.

[0029] The maintenance standard value setting unit 15 can set information on the current maintenance level of the school facility, including its specifications, performance, and total cost, based on the specification, performance, and cost information for each part of the school facility stored in the storage device 6 (described later), as well as information obtained through periodic deterioration surveys and deterioration assessment information for each school facility. This allows the current facility maintenance level of the school facility to be determined in conjunction with the deterioration information stored in the deterioration information storage unit 32 of the storage device 6, i.e., the actual deterioration survey, and can serve as a concrete criterion for future repairs. The maintenance standard value setting unit 15 can also set facility maintenance levels for each part of each school facility (e.g., roof, exterior wall, interior finish, electrical equipment, mechanical equipment) within a range that does not exceed the financial constraint line set by the financial constraint line setting unit 14. This makes it possible to determine the facility maintenance level that can be maintained within the budget set as the financial constraint line. The details of the maintenance standard values ​​and facility maintenance levels set by the maintenance standard value setting unit 15 will be described later using specific examples.

[0030] The maintenance policy determination unit 16 performs aggregation and analysis based on basic building information contained in a building information list (described later) stored in the storage device 6, and calculates the maintenance status by year of construction and future maintenance and renewal costs if the facility is renovated. The maintenance policy determination unit 16 also calculates future maintenance and renewal costs if the facility's lifespan is extended based on cost calculation conditions supplied from the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 and basic information about each school facility stored in the storage device 6. The maintenance policy determination unit 16 also determines a maintenance policy of either restoring the functionality of the school facility or improving its functionality based on the maintenance standard values ​​for the specifications, performance, and cost of the school facility set by the maintenance standard value setting unit 15, the soundness calculated by the deterioration status evaluation unit 13, and the numerical value that constitutes the financial constraint line set by the financial constraint line setting unit 14. Details of the maintenance policy determined by the maintenance policy determination unit 16 will be described later using a specific example.

[0031] The project content setting unit 17 specifies the repair contents for each part of the school facility in accordance with the maintenance policy decided by the maintenance policy decision unit 16, and calculates the repair costs for the facility for each predetermined period. Details of the repair costs calculated by the project content setting unit 17 will be described later using specific examples.

[0032] The part identification unit 18 can identify the repair contents for each part of the school facility based on the performance data described in the construction details sheet created when rebuilding or repairing the school facility. If the part identification unit 18 cannot identify the part based on the information contained in the performance data alone, it can appropriately complement the information by referring to the storage device 6 described later so as to reach the part-by-part level.

[0033] The part-by-part cost calculation unit 19 can calculate the part-by-part costs and the component ratios of the costs based on the repair contents for each part of each school facility identified by the part-by-part identification unit 18.

[0034] The maintenance standard value update unit 20 can update the maintenance standard values ​​for the specifications, performance, and cost of each school facility set by the maintenance standard value setting unit 15 based on the repair details of each school facility identified by the part identification unit 18 and the costs for each part calculated by the part cost calculation unit 19.

[0035] The accounting linkage unit 21 can link the cost of improving the functionality of school facilities to capital expenditures in accounting, and can link the cost of restoring the functionality of school facilities to repair costs in accounting.

[0036] The simulation unit 22 executes a simulation of compartmentalized ownership, joint ownership, consolidation, etc. of facilities based on one or a combination of information on future population changes within a predetermined area, information on the usage status of each facility, and information on the functions of each facility, from the conservation policy determined by the conservation policy determination unit 16. Details of the simulation executed by the simulation unit 22 will be described later using specific examples.

[0037] The asset management support device 4 is a general-purpose computer system and includes a central processing unit (CPU), read-only memory (ROM), random access memory (RAM), and storage devices such as solid-state drives (SSDs) and hard disk drives (HDDs), all connected to a bus (not shown). The SSD or HDD is a nonvolatile storage device that stores an operating system (OS) and a facility management program for implementing facility management processing. The CPU also references and updates data in the storage device 6 and controls the communication device 5 to send and receive data to and receive data from client terminals 3 via the network 2. The CPU also controls facility management processing by executing the facility management program stored in the SSD or HDD. The CPU also controls operation input, data input, and data output via the input / output device 7. In the asset management support device 4, the CPU loads the OS and facility management program stored in the SSD or HDD into RAM and executes them. This enables the asset management support device 4 to perform various information processing, such as facility management processing.

[0038] The asset management support device 4 does not have to be a single device, and may be processed by multiple distributed computers. Also, the asset management support device 4 may have the functions of the client terminal 3.

[0039] The communication device 5 is connected to the asset management support device 4, receives instructions from the CPU of the asset management support device 4, and transmits and receives data to and from the client terminal 3 via the network 2. The communication device 5 also transmits requests from the client terminal 3 to the asset management support device 4. Note that the communication device 5 is configured with a LAN board and the like as hardware, and a device driver for communicating with the OS and the like as software, but the communication device 5 is not limited to these configurations.

[0040] The storage device 6 is a device that stores basic building information and deterioration information for the school facilities that are the object of management. The storage device 6 can also store information on the current maintenance level of the school facilities set by the asset management support device 4, such as maintenance standard values, maintenance history information, evaluation information, and information on maintenance policies. As shown in FIG. 1, the storage device 6 is connected to the asset management support device 4 and includes a facility information storage unit 31, a deterioration information storage unit 32, an evaluation information storage unit 33, and a maintenance policy information storage unit 34.

[0041] The storage device 6 may be configured with hardware such as an HDD or SSD, and software such as an RDBMS (Relational Database Management System), but is not limited to these configurations. The database contained in the storage device 6 is not limited to a relational database, but may be a hierarchical database or a network database. The storage device 6 is preferably a non-volatile storage device such as a hard disk drive or flash memory. The storage device 6 does not need to be a single device, but may be distributed across multiple devices. That is, the facility information storage unit 31, the deterioration information storage unit 32, the evaluation information storage unit 33, and the maintenance policy information storage unit 34 may be distributed and managed across multiple storage devices. The storage device 6 may be built into the asset management support device 4.

[0042] The information stored in the facility information storage unit 31 of the storage device 6 includes a school facility ledger, which is a facility ledger for the school, basic building information, and specification, performance, and cost information for each part of the school facility. The facility information storage unit 31 further stores information related to the facility among the data generated by the processing of each part of the asset management support device 4.

[0043] The basic building information includes various basic building-related information extracted from information recorded in a school facility ledger or the like, or input via the network 2 from the client terminal 3 or via the input / output device 7 by a user of the asset management support device 4. Specifically, the basic building information includes, for example, the name of a school facility, information indicating the size of the school facility, information indicating the location (area) of the school facility, information indicating the department responsible for the school facility, information indicating the name used in accounting for the school facility, information indicating the classification of the school facility (major classification, medium classification, minor classification, etc.), information indicating the year of construction of the school facility, information indicating the site area of ​​the school facility, information indicating the building area of ​​the school facility, information indicating the total floor area of ​​the school facility (total total floor area, total floor area by building, etc.), information indicating the structure of the school facility (reinforced concrete, lightweight steel frame, wood, etc.), information indicating the number of floors of the school facility (e.g., two stories above ground, one basement), a floor plan of the entire school facility, and floor plans of each floor of the building. Note that the basic building information may also include information other than those described above. Specific examples of the school facility register and basic building information will be described later with reference to FIG.

[0044] The specification, performance, and cost information includes information on the specifications, performance, and costs of the five components (roof, exterior walls, interior finishes, electrical equipment, and mechanical equipment) that are itemized for building a school facility. For example, the roof and roof components of a certain school facility include information indicating sheet waterproofing; the exterior walls of the school facility include information indicating painted finishes, tiled flooring, and aluminum sashes; the interior finishes of the school facility include information indicating mortar paint; the electrical equipment components of the school facility include information indicating electric lights and electrical outlets; and the mechanical equipment components of the school facility include information indicating water supply piping, hot water supply piping, drainage piping, and gas piping. This specification, performance, and cost information is recorded so that lower-level components are included within higher-level components in accordance with the hierarchical structure of the building. Note that the data structure that records lower-level components in accordance with the hierarchical structure of the building and the technology for allocating costs at the higher-level components to each lower-level component are disclosed, for example, in Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2009-116840, and therefore will not be described in detail here.

[0045] The specification, performance, and cost information also includes various information such as estimates or performance data for past construction or renovation projects that can be used for cost calculation processing by the maintenance policy determination unit 16, the business content setting unit 17, the cost calculation unit by component 19, the accounting linkage unit 21, or the simulation unit 22. This information is recorded, for example, linked to various information included in the basic building information.

[0046] The information stored in the deterioration information storage unit 32 includes facility deterioration information and maintenance history information for the five parts that are categorized for constructing school facilities. The information stored in the deterioration information storage unit 32 also includes information on the classification of the corresponding school facilities as either "renovation" or "extension of life" in calculating future maintenance and renewal costs, as well as information on the soundness of the structural frame, which is information used to determine the classification.

[0047] The facility deterioration information includes information on the deterioration status of the specification and performance configurations of the five parts (roof, exterior walls, interior finishes, electrical equipment, and mechanical equipment) that are itemized for building a school facility. The facility deterioration information is evaluated using four levels: generally good (A), partially deteriorated (B), extensively deteriorated (C), and urgent action required (D). For example, the information includes information indicating a rating of B for the roof and roof of a certain school facility, information indicating a rating of C for the exterior walls of the school facility, information indicating a rating of C for the interior finishes of the school facility, information indicating a rating of B for the electrical equipment of the school facility, and information indicating a rating of B for the mechanical equipment of the school facility. The facility deterioration information also includes information indicating the soundness of the school facility calculated by the deterioration status evaluation unit 13. Note that the facility deterioration information may include information other than the above, and the evaluation levels are not limited to four levels.

[0048] The maintenance history information includes information on repairs and renovations that have been carried out on the five parts (roof, exterior walls, interior finishes, electrical equipment, and mechanical equipment) that are divided into categories for building school facilities. For example, it includes information that the roof and roof of a certain school facility were waterproofed in a certain year, and information that the deterioration status changed from rating C to rating B as a result of that renovation. Note that the maintenance history information may also include information other than the above.

[0049] The information stored in the evaluation information storage unit 33 includes information indicating evaluation indices for evaluating the deterioration state of five parts of a school facility on a four-point scale and quantifying the results on a scale of 100 points. The information indicating the evaluation indices includes a conversion table for converting the evaluation indices of each part into evaluation points, such as information indicating that evaluation A is 100 points, information indicating that evaluation B is 75 points, information indicating that evaluation C is 40 points, and information indicating that evaluation D is 10 points. The information indicating the evaluation indices also includes a cost allocation table for allocating costs to each part. Note that the information indicating the evaluation indices may include information other than those described above, and the numerical values ​​are not limited to these.

[0050] The information stored in the maintenance policy information storage unit 34 includes information on maintenance plans for extending the lifespan of school facilities. For example, information indicating facility reconstruction, facility function recovery, and facility function improvement is included, as well as detailed information on the maintenance level for each part. Note that the information indicating the maintenance plan may also include information other than the above, such as future maintenance and renewal costs calculated by the maintenance policy determination unit 16.

[0051] The input / output device 7 is composed of, for example, input devices such as a keyboard, mouse, buttons, and microphone, devices such as a reader / writer to which various storage media can be attached, input / output devices such as a touch panel, or output devices such as a display, printer, and speaker, and receives operational inputs from the user of the asset management support device 4, supplies them to the asset management support device 4, and outputs the information supplied from the asset management support device 4 using methods such as display, printing, or audio.

[0052] <Calculation method for future maintenance and renewal costs> 2 is a flowchart showing a facility management process executed by the asset management support device 4 shown in FIG. 1. In the following process, various instructions and requests from the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 are transmitted to the asset management support device 4 by an operator operating the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7. Steps S1 to S10 described below are intended for the first time when facility management processing is performed, and step S11 and subsequent steps are intended for processing performed between the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 and the asset management support device 4 when repair work or the like is performed. Therefore, steps S1 to S10 and step S11 and subsequent steps may be performed by different operators and client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7.

[0053] START: When an instruction is received from the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7, the asset management support device 4 starts the facility management process. Here, for example, it is assumed that the operator is about to input information about a certain school facility (basic information or deterioration survey information about the school facility) using the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7.

[0054] Step S1: The information storage processing unit 12 of the asset management support device 4 acquires basic information about each school facility from the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 via the network 2, including information entered on a basic information sheet (described later using FIG. 4), information corresponding to the school facility ledger (including basic building information) (described later using FIG. 5), and various other information about the school facility, including blueprints, as well as specification, performance, and cost information for each part of each school facility. The information storage processing unit 12 then stores the acquired information in the facility information storage unit 31 of the storage device 6. Furthermore, upon receiving a display request from the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7, the screen information generation unit 11 of the asset management support device 4 generates screen information showing the basic information about each school facility from the basic information about each school facility stored in step S1 and transmits the screen information to the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7, thereby displaying a screen showing various basic information about each school facility on the display of the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7. This allows the operator of the client terminal 3 or the user of the asset management support device 4 to easily grasp and manage the basic information about each school facility. If the basic information on the school facilities has already been stored in the facility information storage unit 31 of the storage device 6 or has been acquired from an external source, the process proceeds to step S2.

[0055] Step S2: The information storage processing unit 12 acquires deterioration survey information for each school facility from the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 via the network 2 and stores it as facility deterioration information in the deterioration information storage unit 32 of the storage device 6. The facility deterioration information includes information indicating whether the corresponding school facility is estimated to be renovated or extended in lifespan, and, if the school facility is to be extended in lifespan, a four-level rating (A, B, C, D) obtained as a result of the deterioration survey of each part of the facility. Furthermore, upon receiving a display request from the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7, the screen information generation unit 11 generates screen information showing the deterioration status of each school facility from the deterioration survey information for each school facility stored in step S2 and transmits it to the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7, thereby displaying a screen showing various deterioration statuses for each school facility on the display of the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7. This allows the operator of the client terminal 3 or the user of the asset management support device 4 to easily understand and manage the deterioration status of each school facility.

[0056] Step S3: The maintenance standard value setting unit 15 sets information about the current maintenance level of each part of each school facility, including the specifications, performance, and cost, as a maintenance standard value based on the basic information of each school facility stored in step S1 and the facility deterioration information stored in step S2. That is, the specification, performance, and cost information for each part of each school facility included in the basic information of each school facility stored in step S1 includes information indicating the maintenance level of each part, but does not include information about the deterioration status. Furthermore, the facility deterioration information stored in step S2 is information indicating the deterioration of each part, but does not include information about the specifications, performance, and cost of each part. By correlating these information through processing by the maintenance standard value setting unit 15, information about the current maintenance level can be generated that allows the status of each part of each school facility to be recognized from the perspectives of both the specifications, performance, and cost of each part and the deterioration status of each part, and can be set as a maintenance standard value.

[0057] Step S4: Based on the deterioration survey information stored in the deterioration information storage unit 32 in step S2, the deterioration status evaluation unit 13 calculates the healthiness of each school facility by indexing the evaluation results of the deterioration state of each part, i.e., the four-level evaluation of (A), (B), (C), and (D), and stores the calculated healthiness in association with the facility deterioration information in the deterioration information storage unit 32 of the storage device 6.

[0058] Step S5: The maintenance policy determination unit 16 acquires cost calculation conditions from the client terminal 3 via the network 2 or from the input / output device 7. The cost calculation conditions include, for example, information such as past facility-related expenses, renovation renewal cycles, and renovation unit costs. Note that the cost calculation conditions may be set based on conditions other than those described above.

[0059] Step S6: The maintenance policy determination unit 16 calculates future maintenance and renewal costs based on the cost calculation conditions acquired in step S5 and the basic information of each school facility stored in step S1. If a display request is received from the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7, the maintenance policy determination unit 16 generates screen information showing the future maintenance and renewal costs for each school facility from the future maintenance and renewal costs calculated in step S6 and transmits the information to the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7, thereby displaying a screen showing the future maintenance and renewal costs for each school facility on the display of the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7. This allows the operator of the client terminal 3 or the user of the asset management support device 4 to easily grasp the future maintenance and renewal costs for each school facility.

[0060] Step S7: The financial constraint line setting unit 14 obtains information about the financial constraint line from the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 via the network 2, and sets this as the upper limit of the total cost of all school facilities. If information about the financial constraint line has been obtained in advance, it is read from the storage device 6.

[0061] Step S8: The maintenance standard value setting unit 15 acquires information about the facility maintenance level for each part of each school facility from the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 via the network 2, and sets the information as the facility maintenance level for each part of each school facility. If information about the facility maintenance level for each part has been acquired and set in advance, it is read from the storage device 6.

[0062] Step S9: The maintenance policy determination unit 16 selects a facility improvement level that can be selected for each school facility within the range of the financial constraint line set in step S7.

[0063] Step S10: The project content setting unit 17 identifies the repair contents for each school facility by part in accordance with the facility maintenance level selected in step S9, and calculates the repair costs of the most recent maintenance plan for each school facility. If a display request is received from the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7, screen information showing the calculated repair costs of the most recent maintenance plan for each school facility is generated and sent to the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7. By performing steps S1 to S10, a screen showing the repair costs of the most recent maintenance plan for each school facility can be displayed on the display of the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7, allowing the operator of the client terminal 3 or the user of the asset management support device 4 to easily understand the repair costs of the most recent maintenance plan for each school facility. Next, the processing when a periodic deterioration survey is performed will be described with reference to steps S11 and onward.

[0064] Step S11: The part identification unit 18 determines whether or not the actual data to be included in the construction details sheet created during reconstruction or repair work on school facilities has been input from the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 via the network 2, and repeats the determination process until the actual data is input.

[0065] Step S12: If it is determined that actual data has been input in step S11, the part identification unit 18 identifies the repair details for each part of each school facility. The part-by-part cost calculation unit 19 calculates the cost for each part of each school facility and the component ratio of the cost for each part based on the repair details for each part of each school facility identified by the part-by-part identification unit 18. If a display request is received from the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7, screen information showing the cost for each part of each school facility and the component ratio of the cost for each part is generated from the cost for each part of each school facility and the component ratio of the cost for each part calculated in step S12 and sent to the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7, thereby displaying a screen showing the cost for each part of each school facility and the component ratio of the cost for each part on the display of the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7. This allows the operator of the client terminal 3 or the user of the asset management support device 4 to easily understand the cost for each part of each school facility and the component ratio of the cost for each part.

[0066] Step S13: The maintenance standard value update unit 20 updates the maintenance standard value, which is the current maintenance level of the specifications, performance, and cost of each school facility set in step S3, based on the repair details of each school facility identified in step S12 and the cost for each part of each school facility. After that, the process returns to step S2, and the above-mentioned process is repeated.

[0067] <Examples of plans to extend the lifespan of school facilities> FIG. 3 illustrates an outline of a school facility life extension plan supported by the asset management support system 1 of the present invention.

[0068] To extend the lifespan of school facilities, local government operators create a series of steps: goal setting, actual situation assessment, policy setting, and the formulation and implementation of a longevity plan. Goal setting involves understanding the background, purpose, planning period, and target facilities of the school facility longevity plan, allowing for the establishment of the desired vision for the school facility. Current situation assessment involves investigating the actual state of school facilities, such as their operation and utilization status, as well as their aging status, allowing for an understanding of the current state of the school facility. Policy setting involves determining basic policies for renovations and other measures based on the size and layout of school facilities, allowing for the establishment of the level of maintenance and management, as well as the items and methods for renovations and other measures, based on these basic policies. The formulation and implementation of a longevity plan involves determining the prioritization and implementation plan for renovations and other measures, and examining the cost forecast and effects of longevity. This allows for the development and utilization of an information infrastructure, the establishment of a promotion system, and follow-up measures, which will serve as the ongoing operational guidelines for the longevity plan. Local government operators implement longevity plans according to this series of steps.

[0069] (How to grasp the overall picture of school facilities) As a first step, an operator of the client terminal 3 or a user of the asset management support device 4 conducts Survey 1, which organizes information about the target building. For Survey 1, for example, a basic information sheet such as that shown in FIG. 4 is used. The basic information sheet includes land information, such as the property name, i.e., facility name, site area, ownership type, property management department, and land price; building information, such as the building name, building floor area, number of floors, structure, and year of completion; facility information, such as the facility name, occupied area, facility information, and management and operation information for the facility and surrounding facilities; and a space for notes. The basic information sheet may also include other information. The operator of the client terminal 3 or the user of the asset management support device 4 can input the information obtained by Survey 1 in the format of the basic information sheet shown in FIG. 4 and transmit the information to the asset management support device 4 via the network 2. The information storage processing unit 12 of the asset management support device 4 stores information acquired from the client terminal 3 via the network 2 or from the input / output device 7 in the facility information storage unit 31 of the storage device 6. When the screen information generation unit 11 receives a request from the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7, it reads out the necessary information from the basic information of each school facility, including the information entered in the basic information sheet described using Figure 4 and the school facility register described later using Figure 5, which is stored in the facility information storage unit 31 of the storage device 6, creates data for displaying the building information list described later using Figure 5, and displays it on the display of the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7.

[0070] FIG. 5 is a diagram showing an example of a school facility ledger stored in the facility information storage unit 31 of the storage device 6, and a building information list generated by the screen information generation unit 11 based on basic building information. As shown in FIG. 5, corresponding items in the school facility ledger and the building information list are linked to each other. The building information list includes basic building information, such as a serial number, school survey number, facility name, building name, building number, fixed asset ledger number, use classification including school type and building use, structure, number of floors, total floor area (m 2The building information table also includes fields for the building's basic building information, construction year (including both the Gregorian and Japanese calendar years), and age. Each building information item in the building information list is linked to each item in the school facility ledger. When information is added or updated in either the client terminal 3 or the asset management support device 4, the addition or update is reflected in the other. The school type and building use, which are the use classifications in the building information list, are set in detail because they are linked to the graph series of maintenance status by construction year and the unit price setting for future maintenance and renewal costs, which will be described later. For example, school type is classified into kindergarten, elementary school, junior high school, compulsory education school, high school, secondary education school, special needs school, and school lunch center, while building use is classified into kindergarten building, school building, gymnasium, dormitory, martial arts hall, other, and school lunch center.

[0071] The maintenance policy determination unit 16 of the asset management support device 4 calculates the maintenance status by year of construction and future maintenance and renewal costs as a result of aggregation and analysis based on the basic building information included in the building information list shown in Fig. 5. This allows the operator of the client terminal 3 or the user of the asset management support device 4 to grasp the overall situation of each school facility.

[0072] Figure 6 shows bar graphs showing the maintenance status and future maintenance and renewal costs of school facilities by age. The bar graph for maintenance status by age (Figure 6A) displays the total floor area of ​​each school facility by age. The proportion of patterns within each bar visualizes the proportion of each school facility's use, making it easy to understand the actual age of each building. The bar graph for future maintenance and renewal costs (Figure 6B) displays the total annual renovation costs for rebuilding a building less than 50 years old. By entering facility-related expenses from the past few years, users can compare the average with the average future maintenance and renewal costs. Figure 6C shows a table for calculating the cost conditions for future maintenance and renewal costs (traditional). Based on the renovation cycle, renovation unit cost, and past facility-related expenses entered in these tables, the future maintenance and renewal costs (traditional) shown in Figure 6B are calculated. The bar graphs shown in Figures 6A and 6B are calculated using a conventional method and do not take into account the financial constraint line or the maintenance level by area, but it is also possible to calculate using the conventional method in the asset management support device 4 and display it on the display of the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7.

[0073] (Method for assessing the deterioration status of school facilities) In the second step, the operator of the client terminal 3 or the user of the asset management support device 4 grasps the state of deterioration of the school facilities by dividing the survey into Survey 2, which grasps the soundness of the structural frame, and Survey 3, which grasps the state of deterioration of the main inspection parts other than the frame. First, Survey 2, which grasps the soundness of the structural frame, will be explained.

[0074] Fig. 7 is a flowchart showing an example of a judgment process for simply distinguishing between renovating the structural framework of a school facility and extending its lifespan without renovation. In the planning stage, it is judged whether the earthquake resistance standards of the school facility are the new earthquake resistance standards or not (S100), and if the school facility is judged to be the new earthquake resistance standards, it is calculated as having a "long lifespan" (S101). Also, if the school facility is based on the old earthquake resistance standards and has not been seismically reinforced or judged to be earthquake-resistant in a seismic diagnosis (S102: NO), it is judged as requiring "seismic reinforcement" (S103). Also, if the school facility is based on the old earthquake resistance standards and has been seismically reinforced or judged to be earthquake-resistant in a seismic diagnosis (S102: YES), and furthermore, it is reinforced concrete with a concrete compressive strength of 13.5 N / mm 2 If the building is steel or wooden, or if it is more than 40 years old and corrosion or deterioration has progressed significantly (S104: YES), it will be judged as "investigation required" (S105) and estimated as "reconstruction" (S106). Also, if the school facility is built to the old earthquake resistance standards, has undergone earthquake resistance reinforcement or is judged to be earthquake resistant in an earthquake resistance diagnosis (S102: YES), and is reinforced concrete with a concrete compressive strength of 13.5 N / mm 2 If the building is of steel or wooden construction and is generally 40 years or older and is not judged to have significant corrosion or deterioration (S104: NO), it will be calculated as having a "long life" (S101).

[0075] Next, at the construction implementation stage, inspectors conduct a detailed investigation of the structure of school facilities that have been estimated as needing a "longer life" or "renovation." First, school facilities are divided into three categories: reinforced concrete, steel-reinforced concrete, steel-framed, and wooden. Inspectors investigate each structure by conducting on-site visual inspections and material tests, and evaluate the soundness of the structural frame in accordance with the evaluation criteria for each category (S107). In addition to the structural inspection, they make a comprehensive judgment from the perspectives of economy and educational function (S108), and ultimately decide whether to implement "longer life" or "renovation" (S109, S110).

[0076] The operator of the client terminal 3 or the user of the asset management support device 4 can follow the processing flow shown in Figure 7 to determine whether the structural frame to be investigated should be classified as "renovation" or "life extension" in calculating future maintenance and renewal costs. Then, the operator inputs this classification and information used to determine the classification as information about the structural frame's health in a predetermined format, and transmits the information to the asset management support device 4 via the network 2. These determinations can be made by displaying questions for each determination on the display screen of the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 and having the operator answer yes or no. Alternatively, the operator can make the determinations themselves using this flowchart, and only the final estimated results can be transmitted from the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 to the asset management support device 4. The information storage processing unit 12 of the asset management support device 4 stores the information about the structural frame's health acquired from the client terminal 3 via the network 2 or from the input / output device 7 in the deterioration information storage unit 32 of the storage device 6. Furthermore, when a display request is received from the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7, the screen information generation unit 11 reads out the necessary information stored in each unit of the storage device 6 and, based on this information, generates data for adding information about the soundness of the structural frame to the building information list shown in FIG. 5 and displaying it. The screen information generation unit 11 can then transmit the data to the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 via the network 2 for display. Specifically, a selection screen for each determination shown in FIG. 7 is displayed on the display of the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7, and the operator's selection is transmitted to the asset management support device 4, thereby enabling a lifespan extension determination. The information storage processing unit 12 of the asset management support device 4 can record information about the soundness of the structural frame, which is the classification used in the trial calculation for the lifespan extension determination of the corresponding school facility in the building information list, in the storage device 6. The screen information generation unit 11 of the asset management support device 4 can then generate a building information list to which the information about the soundness of the structural frame recorded in the storage device 6 has been added, and transmit the generated data to the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 via the network 2 for display.

[0077] Fig. 8 is a diagram showing an example of a building information list to which information on the soundness of the structural frame has been added. As shown in Fig. 8, in addition to basic building information, the building information list includes, for example, seismic safety including standards, diagnosis, and reinforcement, the year of investigation, compressive strength (N / mm 2 ), and items for assessing longevity, including classification based on trial calculations, are provided, and each item contains information regarding the soundness of the structural frame.

[0078] The operator of the client terminal 3 or the user of the asset management support device 4 can input information about the soundness of the structural frame obtained by Survey 2 in a predetermined format, and send that information to the asset management support device 4 via the network 2. The asset management support device 4 can create the building information list shown in Figure 8 based on the information about the soundness of the structural frame obtained and stored from the client terminal 3 via the network 2 or from the input / output device 7. Next, we will explain Survey 3, which ascertains the deterioration status of major inspection parts other than the frame.

[0079] FIG. 9 shows an example of inspection items based on the Building Standards Act. As shown in FIG. 9, the Building Standards Act prescribes standards for inspection cycles, inspection areas, and inspection items. For example, in the case of an inspection cycle of less than three years, inspection items are prescribed for each part of a building (site and structure) (site and ground, exterior of the building, roof and roof, interior of the building, evacuation facilities, etc.). In addition, in the case of an inspection cycle of less than one year, inspection items are prescribed for each part of elevators, fire prevention equipment, and building equipment (excluding elevators) (ventilation equipment, smoke exhaust equipment, emergency lighting equipment, water supply equipment, and drainage equipment). In the figure, the inspection areas and inspection items enclosed in bold frames indicate items linked to the deterioration status survey form, which will be described later using FIG. 10.

[0080] The operator of the client terminal 3 or the user of the asset management support device 4 investigates the deterioration status of the five parts (roof / top, exterior wall, interior finish, electrical equipment, and mechanical equipment) that are itemized for building school facilities based on the Building Standards Act shown in Figure 9, and enters the evaluation details in a deterioration status investigation form.

[0081] FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of a deterioration status survey form. As shown in FIG. 10, the deterioration status survey form includes, for example, sections for specifications, construction history (year, construction details), deterioration status, special notes, and evaluation for the roof, rooftop, and exterior wall sections. For the interior finish, electrical equipment, and mechanical equipment sections, sections for repair and inspection items, repair and inspection years, special notes, and evaluation are provided. Furthermore, a section for soundness is provided to comprehensively evaluate the deterioration status of the facility. If, for example, the construction history and schedule information shown in FIG. 11 is linked to each item of other information and stored in advance in the deterioration information storage unit 32, the screen information generation unit 11 can extract information corresponding to the construction history year and construction details from the information included in the construction history and schedule information stored in the deterioration information storage unit 32, and enter the information in the construction history section of the deterioration status survey form shown in FIG. 10.

[0082] The operator of the client terminal 3 or the user of the asset management support device 4 can visually inspect the roof, rooftop, and exterior walls, and can evaluate the interior finish, electrical equipment, and mechanical equipment on a four-point scale of A, B, C, or D based on the number of years since the last complete renovation of the area.

[0083] Figure 12 shows an example of the evaluation criteria. Figure 10A shows the evaluation criteria for visually evaluating roofs, rooftops, and exterior walls. Figure 10B shows the evaluation criteria for evaluating interior finishes, electrical equipment, and mechanical equipment based on the age of the building. As shown in Figure 10A, the evaluation criteria for roofs, rooftops, and exterior walls are as follows: Grade A indicates generally good condition, Grade B indicates partial deterioration, Grade C indicates widespread deterioration, and Grade D indicates the need for immediate action. As shown in Figure 10B, the evaluation criteria for interior finishes, electrical equipment, and mechanical equipment are as follows: Grade A indicates less than 20 years old, Grade B indicates 20 to 40 years old, Grade C indicates 40 years or more old, and Grade D indicates significant deterioration regardless of the age of the building.

[0084] 13 to 15 are diagrams for explaining the details of the evaluation criteria for the roof, exterior wall, interior finish, electrical equipment, and mechanical equipment shown in FIG.

[0085] Figure 13 shows the specific criteria for visually inspecting roofs and rooftops. As shown in Figure 13, when the specifications are asphalt protective waterproofing, those that are only slightly dirty or have been renovated within the last 10 years are rated A, those with partial cracks, deterioration, poor drainage, or damaged joint sealant are rated B, those with widespread cracks, deterioration, poor drainage, sediment accumulation, weeds, or damaged joint sealant and traces of water leakage on the top floor ceiling are rated C, and those with widespread damage, wide cracks, poor drainage, and multiple leaks on the top floor ceiling are rated D. If the specifications are for exposed asphalt waterproofing, those that are only slightly dirty or have been renovated within the last 10 years will be rated A, those with partial swelling, deterioration (wear) or poor drainage will be rated B, those with widespread cracks, deterioration (wear), poor drainage, sediment accumulation or weeds and traces of water leakage on the top floor ceiling will be rated C, and those with widespread breaks, damage, exposed subfloor and wide cracks and multiple leaks on the top floor ceiling will be rated D. If the specifications are sheet waterproofing, those that are only slightly dirty or have been renovated within the last 10 years will be rated A, those that have partial swelling, wrinkles, deterioration (wear) or poor drainage will be rated B, those that have widespread swelling, wrinkles, holes, deterioration (wear), poor drainage, sediment accumulation, weeds, and signs of water leakage on the top floor ceiling will be rated C, and those that have widespread breaks, peeling, exposed subfloor, and multiple leaks on the top floor ceiling will be rated D. If the specifications are for paint waterproofing, those that are only slightly dirty or have been renovated within the last 10 years will be rated A, those with partial swelling, wrinkles, deterioration (spongy) or poor drainage will be rated B, those with widespread swelling, wrinkles, holes, deterioration (wear), poor drainage, sediment accumulation, weeds and traces of water leakage on the top floor ceiling will be rated C, and those with widespread breaks, peeling, exposed base and multiple leaks on the top floor ceiling will be rated D.If the specifications are metal plates, those that are only slightly dirty or have been renovated within the last 10 years will be rated A, those with partial paint peeling, rust, deterioration, cracks in the sealant, or rust on the metal fittings will be rated B, those with widespread paint peeling, rust, deterioration, cracks in the sealant, rust on the mounting hardware, partial corrosion / damage, and signs of water leakage on the top floor ceiling will be rated C, and those with widespread rust, peeling, corrosion, and damage to the mounting hardware, and multiple leaks on the top floor ceiling will be rated D.

[0086] Figure 14 shows the specific evaluation criteria for visually inspecting exterior walls. As shown in Figure 14, when the specifications are a painted finish, those that are only slightly dirty or have been renovated within the last 10 years are rated A, those with partial cracks, deterioration, peeling, or rust are rated B, those with widespread cracks, tortoiseshell cracks, deterioration, peeling, peeling, rust, and small leaks are rated C, and those with widespread peeling, spalling, and wide cracks, as well as puddles on the interior floor and multiple leaks are rated D. If the specifications are tiled or stone-clad, those that are only slightly dirty or have been renovated within the last 10 years will be rated A, those with partial cracks, deterioration, lifting, bulging, rust, or cracks in the sealant will be rated B, those with widespread cracks, deterioration, lifting, bulging, rust, or cracks in the sealant and small leaks will be rated C, and those with widespread peeling, cracking, or wide cracks, puddles on the interior floor, or multiple leaks will be rated D. For metal panels, those that are only slightly dirty or have been renovated within the last 10 years will be rated A, those with partial rust, deterioration, or cracks in the sealant will be rated B, those with widespread rust, deterioration, cracks in the sealant, or rust on the mounting hardware and small leaks will be rated C, and those with widespread rust, corrosion, wobbling, or corrosion of the mounting hardware, puddles on the interior floor, or multiple leaks will be rated D. For cementitious panels, those that are only slightly dirty or have been renovated within the last 10 years will be rated A, those with partial cracks, deterioration, missing parts, or cracks in the sealant will be rated B, those with widespread cracks, deterioration, cracks in the sealant, or rust on the mounting hardware and small leaks will be rated C, and those with defects, wobbling, corrosion of the mounting hardware, or missing sealant, puddles on the interior floor, or multiple leaks will be rated D. If the specification is a window (sash), it will be rated A if it is only slightly dirty or has been renovated within the last 10 years, B if there is partial deformation, deterioration, or hardened sealant, C if there is deformation, deterioration, rust, hardened sealant, or cracks overall, and D if there is corrosion, damage, poor opening and closing, or water leakage overall.

[0087] Figure 15 shows the specific evaluation criteria for interior finishes, electrical equipment, and mechanical equipment based on the number of years since construction began. Interior finishes, electrical equipment, and mechanical equipment are generally evaluated on a four-point scale based on the number of years since construction began, based on the history of repairs, renovations, and inspections. Furthermore, if any of the issues shown in Figure 15 are found through visual inspection, these issues are also taken into account for a comprehensive evaluation. As shown in Figure 15, if deterioration issues such as peeling floor finishes, cracks in the floor, or falling or peeling ceiling materials are found over a wide area or in various places in the corresponding interior finish areas, the evaluation will be lowered by one level. If deterioration issues are found in the corresponding electrical equipment areas that are more than the number of years since construction began, the building will be rated C. If deterioration issues are found in the corresponding mechanical equipment areas that are more than the number of years since construction began, the building will be rated C or D.

[0088] An operator of the client terminal 3 or a user of the asset management support device 4 can evaluate the deterioration status of five areas, namely, the roof / top, exterior walls, interior finishes, electrical equipment, and mechanical equipment, on a four-level scale of A, B, C, and D based on the evaluation criteria shown in FIGS. 13 to 15, and fill out the deterioration status survey form shown in FIG. 10. The evaluation criteria shown in FIGS. 13 to 15 may be transmitted from the asset management support device 4 and displayed on the display of the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 so that the operator can refer to them when making an on-site evaluation. The deterioration status survey form shown in FIG. 10 may also be completed by the operator on paper and then entered later on the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7, or information indicating the input items may be transmitted from the asset management support device 4 and displayed on the display of the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 so that the operator can enter the information as needed.

[0089] In addition, the operator of the client terminal 3 or the user of the asset management support device 4 supplies photographs and detailed information of the deteriorated areas, as shown in Figure 16, and information showing the deteriorated areas, as shown in Figure 17, to the asset management support device 4 via the network 2.

[0090] In addition, the operator of the client terminal 3 or the user of the asset management support device 4, when filling out the deterioration status survey form shown in Figure 10, or at any other time, selects the corresponding specifications and performance of each part of the facility from the matrix regarding the specifications and performance of each part of the facility shown in Figure 18, and supplies this to the asset management support device 4 via the network 2 along with cost information regarding those specifications and performance.

[0091] In this way, the contents of the deterioration status survey form entered into the client terminal 3 or input / output device 7, i.e., the four-level evaluation results of the deterioration status of the five parts (A, B, C, D), photographs and detailed information of the deteriorated parts, information indicating the deteriorated parts, and information regarding the specifications, performance, and cost of each part of the facility, are supplied to the asset management support device 4 via the input / output device 7 or the network 2.

[0092] Next, the information storage processing unit 12 of the asset management support device 4 stores the four-level evaluation results (A, B, C, D) of the deterioration status of the five parts, photos and detailed information of the deteriorated parts, and information indicating the deteriorated parts, all of which have been transmitted from the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7, in the deterioration information storage unit 32 of the storage device 6. Furthermore, the information storage processing unit 12 of the asset management support device 4 stores the specification, performance, and cost information of each part of the facility, all of which have been transmitted from the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7, in the facility information storage unit 31 of the storage device 6. This information is linked to the facility name, the results of filling out the deterioration information survey form, the detailed information on deterioration described with reference to FIGS. 16 and 17, the information on the corresponding specifications and performance of each part, and the cost information, and is stored in the deterioration information storage unit 32.

[0093] 19 and 20 can be created for each facility from the information stored in the deterioration information storage unit 32 and facility information storage unit 31 of the storage device 6. The maintenance management sheet can contain the property name, i.e., the facility name, segment code, deterioration information, construction history and schedule, inspection results, equipment-related findings, safety inspection results, and maintenance management status.

[0094] The deterioration status evaluation unit 13 then reads out the four-level evaluation results (A, B, C, D) of the deterioration status of the five parts stored in the deterioration information storage unit 32 of the storage device 6, as well as a conversion table for converting the evaluation index of each part into evaluation points and a cost allocation table for allocating costs to each part, which are stored in the evaluation information storage unit 33, and converts the evaluation results, which have been evaluated on a four-level scale for the five parts of the roof / top, exterior walls, interior finishes, electrical equipment, and mechanical equipment, into a numerical value out of 100 points, and calculates the healthiness of the school facilities as an index of the deterioration status based on the predetermined cost allocation for each part.

[0095] Fig. 21 is a diagram showing an example of a conversion table for converting the evaluation indexes of each part stored in the evaluation information storage unit 33 of the storage device 6 into evaluation points. As shown in Fig. 21, evaluation A is converted to 100 points, evaluation B is converted to 75 points, evaluation C is converted to 40 points, and evaluation D is converted to 10 points. Note that the conversion table shown in Fig. 21 is merely an example, and the relationship between the evaluation and the evaluation points may be changed as appropriate.

[0096] FIG. 22 shows an example of a cost allocation table for allocating costs to each component stored in the evaluation information storage unit 33 of the storage device 6. The cost allocation for each component is set in advance with reference to the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology's "Long-Life Improvement Project" school building renovation ratio calculation table. As shown in FIG. 22, the roof and rooftop components are allocated 5.1, the exterior walls are allocated 17.2, the interior finish components are allocated 22.4, the electrical equipment components are allocated 8.0, and the mechanical equipment components are allocated 7.3. Note that the cost allocation shown in FIG. 22 was set with reference to the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology's "Long-Life Improvement Project" school building renovation ratio calculation table, but this is merely an example. Different allocations may be set depending on the type of building, or the allocation may be changed to any desired allocation.

[0097] The deterioration status evaluation unit 13 of the asset management support device 4 calculates the healthiness index of the deterioration status of each school facility based on the evaluation details of each part entered in the deterioration status survey form shown in Figure 10, the evaluation point conversion table shown in Figure 21, and the cost allocation table shown in Figure 22.

[0098] FIG. 23 is a diagram schematically illustrating an example of how the soundness level is calculated. For example, in the deterioration status survey form shown in FIG. 10, the roof and rooftop sections are given a rating of C, the exterior wall sections are given a rating of D, the interior finish sections are given a rating of B, the electrical equipment sections are given a rating of A, and the mechanical equipment sections are given a rating of C. The deterioration status evaluation unit 13 converts these evaluation details into 40 points for the roof and rooftop sections, 10 points for the exterior wall sections, 75 points for the interior finish sections, 100 points for the electrical equipment sections, and 40 points for the mechanical equipment sections based on the conversion table shown in FIG. 21. Next, the deterioration status evaluation unit 13 multiplies the evaluation score of each section by the cost allocation based on the cost allocation table shown in FIG. 22, and divides the sum by the total cost allocation value to calculate the soundness level quantified on a scale of 100 points. Information indicating the soundness level calculated by the deterioration status evaluation unit 13 is stored in the deterioration information storage unit 32 of the storage device 6 by processing by the information storage processing unit 12.

[0099] The screen information generation unit 11 of the asset management support device 4 can read out the necessary information from the deterioration status assessment and health level of the main inspection areas other than the structure stored in the deterioration information storage unit 32 of the storage device 6 based on a request supplied from the client terminal 3 via the network 2 or from the input / output device 7, and create data for displaying a building information list table with the deterioration status assessment and health level information added to the building information list table shown in Figure 8.

[0100] Fig. 24 is a diagram showing an example of a building information list to which information related to deterioration assessment has been added. As shown in Fig. 24, in addition to basic building information and the soundness of the structural frame, the building information list includes items such as the roof, exterior walls, interior finishes, electrical equipment, mechanical equipment, and soundness, and each item includes information related to the deterioration assessment.

[0101] An operator of the client terminal 3 or a user of the asset management support device 4 can input the evaluation of the deterioration status and soundness of the main inspection parts other than the structural frame obtained by the survey 3 in a predetermined format, and transmit this information to the asset management support device 4 via the network 2. The asset management support device 4 can calculate the soundness based on the evaluation of the deterioration status of the main inspection parts other than the structural frame obtained from the client terminal 3 via the network 2 or from the input / output device 7, and create the building information list shown in FIG. 24. In addition, the maintenance standard value setting unit 15 sets information regarding the current maintenance level, including the specifications, performance, and cost of each part of each school facility, as a maintenance standard value based on the evaluation results of the deterioration status obtained as described above.

[0102] This allows the operator of the client terminal 3 or the user of the asset management support device 4 to easily identify school facilities that may not be suitable for long-life renovation or that are in advanced deterioration, based on the deterioration status assessment included in the building information list shown in Figure 24. For example, if the soundness score is less than 40 points, it is determined that it is desirable to prioritize measures such as long-life renovation. Furthermore, regardless of the soundness score, parts rated C or D are determined to require repair or renovation. The soundness score is also taken into consideration when prioritizing buildings for renovation.

[0103] (Method of determining future maintenance and renewal costs) In the third step, the asset management support device 4 calculates future maintenance and renewal costs (long life type) using the information supplied from the client terminal 3 or input / output device 7 in the first and second steps and stored in the memory device 6.

[0104] FIG. 25 is a diagram showing an example of a cost calculation condition entry sheet for calculating future maintenance and renewal costs (life-extension type). As shown in FIG. 25, the operator of the client terminal 3 or the user of the asset management support device 4 inputs the renewal cycle for renovations, the renovation cycle for life-extension renovations, the renovation cycle for major renovations, the timing of component repairs, unit prices, facility-related costs, etc. For example, for a building that can be extended in life, the following criteria are set: life-extension renovations at 40 years after construction, major renovations at 20 years after construction, major renovations at 60 years after construction, renovations at 80 years after construction, investigation required every 50 years, life-extension renovations within the next 10 years, repairs to components rated D within the next 5 years, and repairs to components rated C within the next 10 years. For a building that undergoes life-extension renovations within the next 10 years, the cost of repairs to components rated A is deducted from the life-extension renovation costs.

[0105] An operator of the client terminal 3 or a user of the asset management support device 4 can input the renewal cycle for renovations, the renovation cycle for long-life renovations, the renovation cycle for large-scale remodeling, the timing of component repairs, unit prices, facility-related costs, etc. into the cost calculation condition entry form shown in FIG. 25 and transmit the information to the asset management support device 4 via the network 2. The maintenance policy determination unit 16 of the asset management support device 4 acquires the cost calculation conditions from the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7. Based on the cost calculation conditions acquired from the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 via the network 2 and the evaluation of the information deterioration status stored in the deterioration information storage unit 32 of the storage device 6, the maintenance policy determination unit 16 of the asset management support device 4 can calculate future maintenance and renewal costs (life extension type) that aim to extend the life and reflect the deterioration status of major inspection components other than the building structure. The future maintenance and renewal costs (life extension type) calculated by the maintenance policy determination unit 16 are stored in the maintenance policy information storage unit 34 by processing of the information storage processing unit 12.

[0106] Figure 26 is a bar graph generated by the screen information generation unit 11 based on future maintenance and renewal costs calculated based on various information entered in the cost calculation condition entry sheet shown in Figure 25. The bar graph of future maintenance and renewal costs shown in Figure 26 aims to extend the lifespan up to 80 years and allows you to see the total repair costs for each year reflecting the state of deterioration, and by entering facility-related expenses for the past few years, you can compare the average value with the average future maintenance and renewal costs. In addition, the dotted line shows the reduction effect achieved by shifting maintenance methods from conventional to long-life methods.

[0107] Figure 27 shows an image of the shift from a focus on renovation to a focus on extending lifespan. Figure 20A shows an image of a focus on renovation, and Figure 20B shows an image of a focus on extending lifespan. In Figures 20A and 20B, the horizontal axis shows the level of maintenance in the year the building was completed and also shows a chronological order, while the vertical axis shows the costs related to repairs and renovations.

[0108] As shown in Figure 20A, in the case of the traditional renovation-centered model, after a building is completed, its functionality and performance gradually deteriorate over time, and post-construction conservative repairs are carried out at set intervals, temporarily improving functionality and performance. However, functionality and performance gradually deteriorate again over time, and when it is determined that the functionality of the entire facility is significantly impaired, renovation is carried out. In other words, with the traditional renovation-centered model, as little attention is paid to the deterioration of functionality and performance, it becomes difficult to use, and renovation is carried out every 40 to 50 years.

[0109] As shown in Figure 20B, in the case of long-life construction, after a building is completed, its functionality and performance gradually deteriorate over time. Preventive maintenance renovations (large-scale remodeling) are carried out at regular intervals to restore its functionality and performance to the level of its original condition at the time of completion. However, if the functionality and performance gradually deteriorate again over time and it is determined that the overall function of the facility is significantly impaired, long-life construction renovations at approximately 60% of the cost of reconstruction can be carried out to raise the functionality and performance above the level of its original condition at the time of completion. Then, if the functionality and performance gradually deteriorate again over time and it is determined that the overall function of the facility is significantly impaired, large-scale remodeling is carried out to restore its functionality and performance to the level of its original condition at the time of long-life construction renovations. In other words, long-life construction maintains buildings in good condition by restoring the deterioration of functionality and performance at regular intervals, and renovations are carried out every 70 to 80 years, the useful life of the building's structure.

[0110] (Method of formulating the latest development plan) In the fourth step, the asset management support device 4 uses the building information list created in the first and second steps to consider the maintenance priority of each facility, and from the calculated future maintenance and renewal costs (longevity type), formulates an immediate maintenance plan according to the budget situation.

[0111] The operator of the client terminal 3 or the user of the asset management support device 4 can input a numerical value to be used as the financial constraint line based on the priorities for the development of individual facilities considered by each board of education, the budget situation, etc., and transmit this information indicating the financial constraint line to the asset management support device 4 via the network 2. The financial constraint line setting unit 14 of the asset management support device 4 sets the financial constraint line for the school facilities to be managed from the information indicating the financial constraint line obtained from the client terminal 3 via the network 2 or from the input / output device 7. The development standard value setting unit 15 can determine the development level of facilities for long lifespan based on this financial constraint line.

[0112] FIG. 28 is a diagram showing an example of facility improvement levels determined based on the setting of a financial constraint line. As shown in FIG. 28, school facilities are divided into the following parts: framework, roof, exterior walls, interior finishes, electrical equipment, and mechanical equipment. The maintenance policy determination unit 16 determines a maintenance policy for restoring and improving the functionality of school facilities. Based on the numerical value of the financial constraint line, assuming that the overall cost allocation is 100, the maintenance policy determination unit 16 sets the cost allocation for roof renovation, exterior wall renovation, and equipment replacement for functional restoration in 20 years to, for example, 25; the cost allocation for roof renovation, exterior wall renovation, and equipment replacement for functional restoration in 40 years, as well as for functional improvement measures such as diverse learning, accommodation for different forms of learning, energy conservation, disaster prevention, barrier-free access, and extending the lifespan of the framework, to, for example, 50 to 60; and the cost allocation for roof renovation, exterior wall renovation, and equipment replacement for functional restoration in 60 years to, for example, 25. The accounting linking unit 21 links the cost of the functional improvement category of the repair contents carried out for each part with capital expenditures, and links the cost of the functional recovery category with repair costs.

[0113] The maintenance standard value setting unit 15 acquires information about the facility maintenance level for each part of each school facility from the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 via the network 2, or reads information about the facility maintenance level for each part of each school facility that was previously transmitted from the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 and stored in the maintenance policy information storage unit 34 of the storage device 6. Based on the basic information and facility deterioration information for each school facility, the maintenance standard value is set to information about the current maintenance level of each part of each school facility, including the specifications, performance, and cost. Multiple facility maintenance levels can be set based on performance considerations for extending the facility's lifespan. For example, facility maintenance levels for long-life renovations or energy-saving long-life renovations can be set. In the facility maintenance level diagram in Figure 28, the maintenance level marked with a circle indicates the current maintenance level, and the position of the circle within the maintenance level box indicates the deterioration ranks A to E. The maintenance policy determination unit 16 of the asset management support device 4 can select one of two facility maintenance levels—lifespan extension renovation or energy-saving lifespan extension renovation—based on the current maintenance level for each part of the school facility, which is set as the maintenance standard, as well as the financial constraint line and cost-effectiveness. The project content setting unit 17 can then identify the repair content for each part of the school facility that would be required if the selected facility maintenance level were met, calculate the repair costs for the most recent equipment plan for each school facility based on the difference between the current maintenance level for each part of the school facility and the selected facility maintenance level, and formulate a maintenance plan. The information storage processing unit 12 stores information about the formulated maintenance plan in the maintenance policy information storage unit 34 of the storage device 6.

[0114] For facility maintenance levels, several renovation menus (specifications) are prepared for each part, and the construction method characteristics, cost-effectiveness, etc. of each renovation menu are set. For example, for exterior wall (insulation), renovation menus including external insulation (insulation thickness 70 mm), internal insulation (insulation thickness 25 mm), and wood construction are prepared, and the construction method characteristics, cost-effectiveness, etc. of each renovation menu are set in detail based on the actual data described in the construction breakdown created during facility reconstruction or repair work. The part-specific identification unit 18 identifies the repair content for each part of each school facility based on these renovation menus. The part-specific cost calculation unit 19 calculates the part-specific cost and the part-specific cost component ratio of each school facility based on the repair content for each part of each school facility identified by the part-specific identification unit 18. Then, the maintenance standard value update unit 20 updates the maintenance standard value, which is the current maintenance level of the specifications, performance, and cost of each school facility, based on the repair content for each school facility identified by the part-specific identification unit 18 and the part-specific cost of each school facility calculated by the part-specific cost calculation unit 19.

[0115] Figure 29 shows an example of an individual facility maintenance plan for the past five years. In Figure 29, the vertical axis is divided into project names: facility maintenance costs, other facility maintenance costs, maintenance and repair costs, and utility and contract fees. Facility maintenance costs are further broken down into new construction and expansion projects, renovation projects, earthquake-proofing projects, lifespan extension projects, large-scale renovations (aging), disaster prevention-related projects, toilet maintenance, air conditioning equipment, measures for disabled children, special needs school maintenance, and part repairs. The horizontal axis shows school names and project costs by fiscal year. This presentation makes it easy to see at a glance which project names include which school facilities and project costs.

[0116] The operator of the client terminal 3 or the user of the asset management support device 4 can input the school name and project cost into the maintenance plan table shown in FIG. 29 while referring to the various data obtained by the above-mentioned processing, and transmit that information to the asset management support device 4 via the network 2. The asset management support device 4 stores the maintenance plan table information obtained from the client terminal 3 via the network 2 or from the input / output device 7 in the maintenance policy information storage unit 34 of the storage device 6. The asset management support device 4 can also calculate the cost of equipment plans for individual facilities for the most recent five years based on the information stored in the storage device 6.

[0117] In response to a request from the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 provided via the network 2, the screen information generating unit 11 of the asset management support device 4 can read the information obtained by the above-described processing from the storage device 6, process it into the desired information, and transmit it to the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 via the network 2 for display. Figure 30 is a bar graph generated by the screen information generating unit 11 showing the costs of the individual facility development plans for the past five years, calculated based on the project costs entered in the individual facility development plan form for the past five years shown in Figure 29. The bar graph of the costs of the individual facility development plans for the past five years shown in Figure 30 not only allows users to see the total cost of the development plans for each year, but also visualizes the proportion of the costs for each individual facility development plan by the proportion of the patterns in each bar graph, making it easy to understand the development plans for each year.

[0118] It is desirable that the maintenance plan be decided by an agency-wide system that includes the finance department, maintenance department, etc. The operator of the client terminal 3 or the user of the asset management support device 4 can refer to various information stored in the storage device 6 as needed, and can create an implementation plan for the maintenance content based on the bar graph showing the costs of the maintenance plan for the past five years, as shown in Figure 30, to ensure that the implementation plan is feasible based on the financial constraint line.

[0119] Figure 31 shows an example of an implementation plan for maintenance content over the next five years. As maintenance standards, long-life renovations will be carried out at schools with good structural integrity, for example, at three schools per year. Of the component renovations, D-rated renovations will be carried out at two schools per year, and exterior wall renovations at four schools per year, so that D-rated components can be eliminated within five years. Of the component renovations, responses to measures will be determined based on past performance, for example, elevators will be carried out at one school per year, toilets at two schools per year, and sewers at one to two schools per year. Of the component renovations, responses to the costly renewal cycle of equipment, etc. will be determined based on past performance, for example, cubicles will be carried out at one school per year, and boilers at one school per year. Grounds will be repaired at one school per year. Repair costs and other expenses will be determined based on past performance, for example, repair costs will be 500 yen / m 2 The operator of the client terminal 3 or the user of the asset management support device 4 transmits information on the implementation plan for maintenance content for the next five years shown in FIG. 31 to the asset management support device 4 via the network 2. The information storage processing unit 12 of the asset management support device 4 stores the information on the implementation plan for maintenance content for the next five years, acquired from the client terminal 3 via the network 2 or from the input / output device 7, in the maintenance policy information storage unit 34 of the storage device 6.

[0120] FIG. 32 is a bar graph showing an example of a budget allocation for the next five years, generated by the screen information generator 11 based on the maintenance details shown in FIG. 31 and stored in the maintenance policy information storage unit 34. The screen information generator 11 can transmit the bar graph of the budget allocation for the next five years shown in FIG. 32 to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 or provide it to the input / output device 7 for display. The bar graph of the budget allocation for the next five years shown in FIG. 32 allows the total cost of the maintenance plan for each fiscal year to be seen, and the proportion of the cost of each maintenance detail is visualized by the proportion of the pattern within each bar graph, making it easy to understand the budget allocation for each maintenance detail for each fiscal year. The bar graph of the budget allocation for the next five years shown in FIG. 32 is calculated based on the average investment expenses of 1.7 billion yen per year for the past five years, and on the maintenance plans for individual facilities for the most recent five years shown in FIG. 29 and the maintenance details shown in FIG. 31. Similarly, the screen information generation unit 11 generates a detailed implementation plan for the maintenance content for the next five years, as shown in Figure 33, based on the maintenance content shown in Figure 31 stored in the maintenance policy information storage unit 34, and the cost information and facility information, etc. stored in each storage unit, and can transmit it to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 or supply it to the input / output device 7 for display.

[0121] In this way, by using the asset management support system 1, it is possible to easily formulate an implementation plan for the next five years by leveling out investment expenses over the past five years, prioritizing repairs and other work using the maintenance content shown in FIG. 31, and formulating an implementation plan based on budget allocation for the next five years as shown in FIG. 32. In addition, the screen information generation unit 11 of the asset management support device 4 can also create a table showing details of the implementation plan based on budget allocation for the next five years, as shown in FIG. 33, based on the maintenance content stored in the maintenance policy information storage unit 34. In this way, by using the asset management support system 1, it is possible to easily consider the outlook for costs and effects of life extension.

[0122] Figure 34 is a bar graph showing the costs of a 40-year lifespan extension plan. The bar graph of the costs of the 40-year lifespan extension plan shown in Figure 34 is calculated based on the results of future maintenance and renewal costs calculated by the maintenance policy determination unit 16. The screen information generation unit 11 of the asset management support device 4 reads the calculation results of future maintenance and renewal costs stored in the storage device 6 in response to operational input from the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 provided via the network 2, processes them into the desired information, and transmits them to the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 via the network 2 to display the bar graph shown in Figure 34. For example, if the 40-year lifespan extension plan averages out the total maintenance and renewal costs of 123.6 billion yen due to lifespan extension and keeps investment expenses at 1.7 billion yen per year over the next five years (FY2016-FY2020), then investment expenses will be 3.3 billion yen per year for the next 35 years from FY2021 onwards. It also shows that the next 20 years will be centered on lifespan extension renovations, and the remaining 20 years will be centered on reconstruction.

[0123] As shown in Figure 34, future maintenance and renewal costs for school facilities are expected to increase by approximately double the investment costs of the past five years, even with the implementation of lifespan extension measures. The contradiction of facility maintenance and renewal costs increasing while the number of students decreases presents major challenges for the government. Therefore, since there are limits to what can be achieved by simply extending the lifespan of individual school facilities (preservation plans), a multifaceted review of the layout, size, operation, and utilization of school facilities is necessary to bridge the gap between financial constraints and costs, and a comprehensive approach to optimization must be clarified.

[0124] Figure 35 shows an example of a new policy and improvement measures for resolving the issue. As shown in Figure 27A, new policies for resolving the issue include responding to local conditions, reducing maintenance and renewal costs, and reviewing maintenance standards by utilizing public-private partnerships and private funds, as well as improving the school facility environment through multi-purpose use. Then, as shown in Figure 27B, specific improvement measures are considered in line with the new policy for resolving the issue. Specifically, specific improvement measures are considered by the simulation unit 22 by simulating the divisional ownership, joint ownership, or consolidation of school facilities based on information on future population changes within a specified area, information on the usage status of each facility, or information on the functions of each facility, or a combination of these pieces of information.

[0125] For example, schools could be used as regional hubs, consolidating functions such as libraries and community centers into school facilities, allowing them to function as schools during the day and as multipurpose regional hubs outside of school hours, or by considering combining with private businesses through PPP (public-private partnerships), private funds and know-how could be utilized to secure new financial resources and allow the facilities to be used as private facilities outside of school hours.Furthermore, by considering the sharing of swimming pools, and utilizing private pools when it is time to renew them, or by sharing them among several schools, financial resources can be secured and maintenance costs can be reduced.

[0126] Figure 36 shows an example of a simulation based on specific policies and formulation. As shown in Figure 36, once specific policies and measures such as reviewing standards, combining with other public systems, consolidating and sharing pools, and utilizing private funds are decided, a regional reorganization study is conducted. The simulation unit 22 of the asset management support device 4 receives information on the results of the reorganization study from the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 via the network 2. Based on this information and various information stored in the storage device 6, the simulation unit 22 recalculates the costs of the lifespan extension plan for the next 40 years. This determines the need to reduce maintenance and renewal costs or secure financial resources by taking measures beyond lifespan extension. To close the gap between the financial constraint line and costs, the layout, size, operation, and utilization of school facilities are reviewed from various perspectives, and the specific process for clarifying the policy for a comprehensive approach to optimization is described below using Figures 47 to 92.

[0127] <Effects> As explained above, the asset management support device 4 of the asset management support system 1 accumulates and stores basic information about facilities, accumulates and stores deterioration information about facilities, evaluates and indexes the deterioration state of the facilities based on the stored deterioration information, sets information about the current maintenance level including the specifications, performance, and cost of the facilities as a maintenance standard value based on the stored basic information about the facilities and the deterioration information about the facilities, sets a financial constraint line which is the upper limit of the costs invested in the facilities, and determines whether to rebuild the facilities, restore the functions of the facilities, or improve the functions of the facilities based on the maintenance standard value, the indexed deterioration state of the facilities, and the financial constraint line. The system determines one of the above maintenance policies, identifies the facility repair details by component based on the policy, calculates the facility repair costs for each specified period, identifies the facility repair details by component based on actual data included in the construction breakdown sheet created during facility reconstruction or repair work, calculates the costs by component and the component cost ratios based on the identified facility repair details by component, and updates the maintenance standard values ​​based on the identified facility repair details by component and the calculated facility costs by component, thereby enabling the actual facility situation to be understood and its deterioration to be reflected. This makes it easy to calculate future maintenance and renewal costs. Furthermore, by setting facility maintenance levels linked to the financial constraint line, future maintenance and renewal costs do not diverge, allowing the facility's longevity to be optimally managed within the financial constraint line. Furthermore, by linking the costs required for functional improvement to capital expenditures and the costs required for functional restoration to repair costs and separating them into accounting categories, it is possible to evaluate both the capital and management (maintenance) aspects of the facility based on actual data. Furthermore, as a way to consider further improvements to owned facilities, it is possible to review maintenance plans by conducting simulations from various perspectives, such as facility sharing and consolidation. Note that the asset management support method executed by the asset management support device 4 and the program installed in the asset management support device 4 also contain the same components as the asset management support device 4 described above, so it is possible to grasp the actual state of the facility and calculate future maintenance and renewal costs by reflecting the deterioration status.

[0128] (Variation: Linkage with fixed asset ledger) The above-described embodiment describes the relationship between the building information list, including basic building information, and the school facilities ledger. However, to further link with accounting, the system may be configured to link with the fixed asset ledger. Fixed asset ledger data is input via the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7, supplied to the asset management support device 4, and then linked to the building basic information and school facilities ledger items by the information storage processing unit 12 and stored in the facility information storage unit 31 of the storage device 6. Figure 37 illustrates the relationship between the building information list, the school facilities ledger, and the management classifications in the fixed asset ledger. The fixed asset ledger is a ledger maintained as a supplementary ledger for preparing financial statements under the local government accounting system. It records and manages the history of fixed assets, from acquisition to disposal, for each asset. When classifying target buildings based on the school facilities ledger, configuring the system to allow cross-referencing with the fixed asset ledger enables efficient future data updates. In addition, if the numbers do not match due to different methods of calculating area between the school facilities ledger and the fixed asset ledger, it is preferable to clarify rules such as unifying the area to either the school facilities ledger or the fixed asset ledger.

[0129] FIG. 38 is a diagram illustrating an example of a reconciliation table between the school facilities ledger and the fixed asset ledger. In the fixed asset ledger, increases are recorded when actual extensions or renovations are made. Therefore, the registration unit in the fixed asset ledger and the unit entered in the building information list may not have a one-to-one relationship (i.e., they may not match). This is because the fixed asset ledger allows for comparison with the actual property and records the unit of replacement or renewal. Therefore, as shown in FIG. 38, it is preferable to associate and store all identifiers in the fixed asset ledger (fixed asset ledger numbers) corresponding to building numbers, which are management categories in the school facilities ledger. Furthermore, since increases in the fixed asset ledger are recorded in this way and the repair costs for those increases can be calculated and understood from the performance data described above, the accounting interlocking unit 21 of the asset management support device 4 can record costs related to improving the functionality of the facility as capital expenditures and costs related to restoring the functionality of the facility as repair costs.

[0130] (Variation: Use of facility layout diagram) Furthermore, the basic building information and school facility register preferably use a facility layout diagram to organize management classifications. Data on the facility layout diagram of a building is input via the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 and provided to the asset management support device 4. The data is then linked to the respective items in the basic building information and school facility register by the information storage processing unit 12 and stored in the facility information storage unit 31 of the storage device 6. Figure 39 illustrates the relationship between the facility layout diagram of a building and the building information list. The school facility list preferably organizes buildings that are expected to undergo integrated reconstruction or renovation as a single building. This enables efficient future management, such as inspections, diagnosis, maintenance planning, and construction history management. In the example shown in Figure 39, for example, the building names are organized as follows: a single general classroom building is called School Building 1, a building consisting of a general classroom building and a special-general classroom building is called School Building 2, and the main building is called the gymnasium. It is more preferable to change and manage the information recorded in the building information list using the organized building names.

[0131] (Variation: Building Information List) Figures 40 to 43 are diagrams showing other examples of the building information list shown in Figure 24, which allow the status of each building to be grasped at once. Note that the building information lists shown in Figures 40 to 43 are displayed on the screen, but they may also be output as data in a file format or printed out.

[0132] The building information list shown in Figure 40 shows a portion of the display, displaying vertical columns consisting of "Building Basic Information," "Structural Integrity," "Deterioration Status Other Than the Structure," and "Specifications and Performance," and horizontal rows consisting of multiple buildings. The building information list shown in Figure 41 shows the state in which only the "Building Basic Information" item shown in Figure 40 is fixed and slid horizontally, allowing the relationship between the "Building Basic Information" and the "History" to be grasped. Furthermore, the building information list shown in Figure 42, like Figure 41, shows the state in which only the "Building Basic Information" item shown in Figure 40 is fixed and slid horizontally, allowing the relationship between the "Building Basic Information" and the "Annual Plan (Target Life Span / Repair and Renovation Cycle)" to be grasped. Figure 43 shows the state in which an alternative plan for the "Annual Plan (Target Life Span / Repair and Renovation Cycle)" of the building information list shown in Figure 42 is displayed. Each item and the building information list are described in detail below.

[0133] The column of "basic building information" is an area where basic information about the building stored in the facility information storage unit 31 is read out and displayed. The column of "basic building information" includes, for example, "school type", "facility name", "display order", "building name", "building number", "structure", "number of floors", "total floor area (m 2)," "Year of Construction," and "Year Built." Information shown in the "School Type" field is, for example, elementary school, junior high school, high school, etc. Information shown in the "Facility Name" field is, for example, the name of an individual school, such as Danjo Elementary School, Kohyoen Elementary School, Hinoguchi Elementary School, Hiraki Elementary School, etc. Information shown in the "Display Order" field is, for example, a numerical value assigned for the convenience of displaying the buildings that make up the building. Information shown in the "Building Name" field is, for example, the name of each building in the building. Information shown in the "Building Number" field is a numerical value assigned to each building. Information shown in the "Structure" field is the structure of the building, for example, reinforced concrete, steel reinforced concrete, steel frame, etc. Information shown in the "Number of Floors" field is a numerical value indicating the number of floors in the building. "Total Floor Area (m 2 ) is a numerical value indicating the total floor area of ​​the building. "Construction year" information is a numerical value indicating the year in which each building was constructed. The construction year includes a four-digit number indicating the Gregorian calendar year (for example, 1955) and an alphabet and number indicating the Japanese calendar year (for example, S30 for 1955). "Age of building" is a numerical value indicating the number of years that have passed since construction.

[0134] The "Structural Frame Integrity" column is an area where information about the structural frame integrity stored in the deterioration information storage unit 32 is read and displayed. The "Structural Frame Integrity" column further includes, for example, the items "Seismic Safety" and "Life Extension Assessment." The "Seismic Safety" item further includes the items "Standards," "Diagnosis," and "Reinforcement." The "Standards" item displays either "Old" or "New." "Old" indicates the seismic standards under the Building Standards Act up to May 31, 1981 (old seismic standards), while "New" indicates the seismic standards under the Building Standards Act from June 1, 1981 (new seismic standards). The seismic standards applicable to each building are determined by the year of construction of each building. The "Diagnosis" item displays "Completed" if a seismic diagnosis has already been conducted, and is blank if one has not been conducted. Note that "-" is displayed if a seismic diagnosis is not required. Regarding whether or not to carry out a seismic diagnosis, if the standard item is "old," it is judged that it is necessary, and if it is "new," it is judged that it is not necessary. In the "reinforcement" item, "Completed" is displayed if reinforcement work has been carried out, and it is blank if it has not been carried out. If reinforcement work is not necessary, "-" is displayed. Whether or not to carry out reinforcement work is decided based on the results of the seismic diagnosis. The "Life Extension Judgment" column also displays "Inspection Year," "Compressive Strength (N / mm 2 ) and "Estimated classification." "Survey year" indicates the year in which the assessment of longevity was carried out (for example, if the survey was conducted in 2000, it will be H12). "Compressive strength (N / mm 2 )" indicates the numerical value that indicates the compressive strength of concrete measured during the survey for determining the longevity of concrete. "Estimated classification" indicates the compressive strength (N / mm 2 If the numerical value of "Concrete Neutralization Level" is 13.5 or less, the word "Investigation Required" is displayed. Although not shown in Figure 40, the "Life Extension Assessment" item may be further subdivided to display more detailed items. For example, additional columns may be provided to show the concrete neutralization depth (mm), rebar cover thickness (mm), rebar corrosion level, and remarks (visual inspection status, etc.), and the corresponding numerical values ​​or information may be displayed.

[0135] The "Deterioration Status of Items Other Than the Building Structure" column is an area where the evaluation information and evaluation indices stored in the evaluation information storage unit 33 are read and displayed. The "Deterioration Status of Items Other Than the Building Structure" column further includes, for example, "Roof / Rooftop," "Exterior Wall," "Interior Finish," "Electrical Equipment," "Water Supply and Drainage Sanitary Equipment," "Heating and Cooling Equipment," and "Soundness (maximum of 100 points)." Each item in "Roof / Rooftop," "Exterior Wall," "Interior Finish," "Electrical Equipment," "Water Supply and Drainage Sanitary Equipment," and "Heating and Cooling Equipment" is indicated with an alphabet (four levels: A to D) corresponding to the deterioration status. "A" indicates generally good condition, "B" indicates partial deterioration, "C" indicates widespread deterioration, and "D" indicates the need for immediate action. A "-" is displayed if the item is not subject to evaluation. The "health level (maximum score of 100)" shows a numerical value calculated based on the deterioration assessment of each part entered in the deterioration status survey form shown in Figure 10, using the evaluation point conversion table shown in Figure 21 and the cost allocation table shown in Figure 22.

[0136] The "Specifications and Performance" column is an area that reads and displays the building specifications, performance, and cost information stored in the facility information storage unit 31. The "Specifications and Performance" column further includes, for example, "Rooftop Specifications," "Exterior Wall Specifications," "Exterior Openings," "In-House Power Generation Equipment," "Solar Panels," "Storage Battery," and "Air Conditioning Method." If there is information indicating specifications or performance that corresponds to each of these columns, the specification name and information regarding performance are displayed within each item.

[0137] The "History" column is an area where maintenance history information stored in the deterioration information storage unit 32 is read out and displayed. The "History" column is further divided into columns for every 10 years, for example. In the example shown in FIG. 41, the 10-year column is further divided into columns for every year, and the cells are colored based on the type of work carried out in each year. The types of work include, for example, "new construction / extension," "renovation," "earthquake-resistant reinforcement," "full-scale renovation," "renovation of parts and portions," and "renovation to extend service life (improvement of functionality)," and each of these can be displayed using a different color.

[0138] The "Annual Plan (Target Years of Condition / Repair and Renovation Cycle)" column can be displayed based on information entered by the operator of the client terminal 3 or the user of the asset management support device 4 via the cost calculation condition table for future maintenance and renewal costs (lifespan extension type) shown in FIG. 25. In the example shown in FIG. 42, cells are color-coded according to whether the age of the existing building is less than 40 years old, 40 to 59 years old, or 60 to 79 years old. The "Annual Plan (Target Years of Condition / Repair and Renovation Cycle)" column is calculated and determined based on the values ​​entered by the operator of the client terminal 3 or the user of the asset management support device 4 for each item shown in the table shown in FIG. 25. In other words, if the operator of the client terminal 3 or the user of the asset management support device 4 enters and sets the base year for calculating future maintenance and renewal costs, the renewal cycle in the case of renovation, the number of years for lifespan extension, the construction period, etc., the cells in the annual plan column are color-coded according to the input values. Therefore, it is easy to understand the situation, such as when renovations will be carried out for each building (each wing) and how long the lifespan can be extended.

[0139] Figure 43 shows the state in which an alternative plan for the "Annual Plan (Target Life Span / Repair and Renovation Cycle)" in the building information list shown in Figure 42 is displayed. The building information list shown in Figure 43 is a list displayed when the renovation timing is reviewed based on the lifespan indicated for each building and each building in the "Annual Plan (Target Life Span / Repair and Renovation Cycle)" shown in Figure 42 and the renovation cycle period is changed. For example, in the figure shown in Figure 42, the renovation is performed on older buildings in order to extend their lifespan, but it can be seen that there is only about 20 years between the renovation and the need for reconstruction. Therefore, as shown in Figure 43, by changing the renovation to start with the buildings that are suitable for extending their lifespan, the period until reconstruction becomes 30 years. Note that a method for changing from the display in Figure 42 to the display in Figure 43 can be, for example, by adding an item for setting the renovation order to the cost calculation condition entry table shown in Figure 25 so that the person in charge can select it, or by configuring the renovation year to be changed by directly operating the screen in Figure 42. Furthermore, the information shown in FIG. 43 may be switched on the screen with the corresponding part in FIG. 42, or may be connected horizontally so that they can be visually compared at the same time.

[0140] Figure 44 shows an example of a screen displayed when considering optimal solutions for future maintenance by facility and building in a building information table. The upper part of Figure 44 shows the "Current Status" and "Improvement Proposals" in the building information table. The row labeled "Current Status" indicates that partial renovations at the current time would extend the building's lifespan to 60 years. The row labeled "Improvement Proposals" indicates that medium-scale renovations would be performed now, followed by large-scale renovations at a specified time in the future, would extend the building's lifespan to 80 years. These displays may be displayed simultaneously, or the screen may be configured to allow users to change from "Current Status" to "Improvement Proposals" by manipulating the displayed cell. To configure the screen to allow users to change from "Current Status" to "Improvement Proposals," for example, selecting a cell labeled "Partial Renovation" in the "Current Status" could display a separate screen interface that allows users to change the setting to large-scale or medium-scale renovations, or clicking the cell could change the renovation setting to partial, medium, or large-scale renovations.

[0141] Also, as shown in the lower part of Figure 44, two schools in the building information list can be combined into one row to form an integrated elementary and junior high school when renovated. Alternatively, one of the two schools can be left unrenovated, and instead consolidated and combined into the other school, and large-scale renovations can be carried out to improve its functionality. Note that these displays and operations can be configured so that the person in charge can make these changes directly on the display screen of the client terminal 3 or input / output device 7.

[0142] (Other examples of information to display in the history and annual plan sections) Figure 45 shows another example of items displayed in the building basic information and history sections. The table shown in Figure 45(1) displays only the building basic information and history section of the building information list shown in Figures 40 to 44, with the history cells darkened only during the period when Building A was in use. The table shown in Figure 45(2) replaces the column for building basic information with a column displaying information (category and quantity) for desired equipment, and displays the equipment's history information for each row. The table shown in Figure 45(3) displays more detailed equipment information (category and name / specifications and quantity) than the equipment display in Figure 45(2). Furthermore, the table shown in Figure 45(4) replaces the column for building basic information with a column for accounting categories (expenses and cumulative totals) to display the cost history for each building. The expenditures in this accounting category can be further divided into capital expenditures and repair costs, and the cumulative asset value can also be displayed. In other words, this display format allows for detailed display of costs (numerical values) according to the classification recorded in accounting. While each table shown in FIG. 45 displays only the past history portion, if a simulation or the like is performed, the annual plan portion may also be displayed. Furthermore, the screens shown in (1) to (4) may be switched to table (2), table (3), or table (4) by clicking a display switching button (not shown) on the screen showing table (1). Alternatively, a screen (not shown) on which detailed conditions for displaying this list on the screen can be set allows for specifying one of the display methods (1) to (4). In this way, the building information list can be switched to display not only basic building information but also information on facilities and accounting information, allowing these various perspectives to be expressed in a single hierarchical structure.

[0143] (Functional configuration of asset management support device 4A) With reference to Fig. 46, an asset management support system 1A for outputting the building information list shown in Figs. 40 to 45 will be described. The asset management support system 1A basically has the same functional configuration as the asset management support system 1 described using Fig. 1, except that an asset management support device 4A is provided instead of the asset management support device 4. In the asset management support device 4A shown in Fig. 46, the same functions as those in the asset management support device 4 shown in Fig. 1 are designated by the same reference numerals, and a description of the functions will be omitted.

[0144] The asset management support device 4A basically has the same functional configuration as the asset management support device 4 described using Figure 1, except that it has a screen information generation unit 11A, a first extraction unit 11B, and a second extraction unit 11C instead of the screen information generation unit 11.

[0145] The screen information generating unit 11A can generate screen information for displaying the building information list shown in FIGS. 40 to 45. Specifically, in response to an output request from a person operating the client terminal 3 or an output request input by a user of the asset management support device 4 via the input / output device 7, the screen information generating unit 11A extracts desired information from the information stored in the facility information storage unit 31, the deterioration information storage unit 32, the evaluation information storage unit 33, and the maintenance policy information storage unit 34 of the storage device 6, using the first extraction unit 11B and the second extraction unit 11C (described later), or calculates desired information based on the extracted information, to generate screen information. The screen information generated by the screen information generating unit 11A is transmitted to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 or supplied to the input / output device 7, where it can display the building information list on the display of the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7, or it can be supplied to the input / output device 7 and displayed or output on a predetermined output device.

[0146] In response to an output request from a person in charge of operating the client terminal 3 or an output request input by a user of the asset management support device 4 via the input / output device 7, the first extraction unit 11B extracts information indicating the specifications, cost, performance or deterioration status according to the classification of equipment from the history column in the building list for each year or from the column indicating future annual plans, and supplies this information to the screen information generation unit 11A.

[0147] The second extraction unit 11C, in response to an output request from a person in charge of operating the client terminal 3 or an output request input by a user of the asset management support device 4 via the input / output device 7, extracts information indicating the specifications, cost, performance or deterioration status according to the accounting classification for each year in the history column in the building list or for each year in the column indicating future annual plans, and supplies this information to the screen information generation unit 11A.

[0148] As described above with reference to Figures 40 to 46, the asset management support device 4A has a screen information generation unit 11A that generates a building information list based on information stored in the facility information storage unit 31 of the asset management support system 1. The building list generated by this screen information generation unit 11A includes a row for each building or each building wing, a column indicating past history, and a column indicating future annual plans. This allows a list of building information to be displayed for each building or each building wing from the past to the future, based on the present, thereby enabling visualization of information about buildings. Note that the building lists shown in Figures 40 to 46 include a column indicating past history and a column indicating future annual plans, but it may also include either a column indicating past history or a column indicating future annual plans.

[0149] In addition, in the columns showing the past history of the asset management support system 1 described in Figures 40 to 46, the types of construction work performed in the past for each building or wing (for example, new construction / extension, renovation, reconstruction, earthquake-resistant reinforcement, large-scale full renovation, local or partial renovation, and life-extension renovation, as shown in Figures 42 and 43) can be displayed in different colors or with different color intensities so that they can be visually distinguished, making it possible to grasp at a glance what types of construction work have been performed in the past based on this building information list.Also, in the columns showing the past history of the asset management support system 1 described in Figures 40 to 46, the specific periods of use (building life) for each building or wing can be displayed in different colors or with different color intensities so that periods of use and non-use periods are clearly indicated, making it possible to grasp at a glance the past years of use based on this building information list.

[0150] In addition, in the columns showing future annual plans of the asset management support system 1 described in Figures 40 to 46, the range of specified years of use for each building or building is similarly displayed so that it can be visually distinguished, so that it is possible to visually grasp what types of construction work are planned to be carried out in the future plans, and also visually grasp the specific period of years of use (building lifespan) for each building or building, in the same way as the display of past history described above.

[0151] In addition, the asset management support system 1 described in Figures 40 to 46 has a first extraction unit 11B that extracts information indicating the specifications, cost, performance, or deterioration status according to the equipment classification from the building equipment information, and this first extraction unit 11B can output information indicating the specifications, cost, performance, or deterioration status according to the equipment classification for each year in the history column in the building list or for each year in the column indicating the future annual plan in response to an output request from a user operating the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7, so that detailed information regarding the building equipment, such as deterioration information, can be visually grasped over the past or future.

[0152] 40 to 46, the asset management support system 1 has a second extraction unit 11C that extracts costs according to accounting classification from building cost information. When extracting costs according to accounting classification, this second extraction unit 11C determines whether the costs are classified as capitalized, fixed asset stock, or depreciation. Based on this determination, the extracted costs are output as numerical values ​​for each fiscal year in the history column of the building list or for each fiscal year in the column showing the future annual plan. This allows for a visual understanding of costs according to accounting classification, both past and future. Furthermore, when displayed by building or building wing, costs according to accounting classification can be understood in more detail.

[0153] (Comprehensive renovations aimed at extending service life and other efforts to optimize facilities) As explained using Figure 34, in a long-life renovation plan that focuses on identifying and restoring the deterioration state, if a discrepancy occurs between the financial constraint line and the cost, a multifaceted review of the layout, size, operation, and utilization of school facilities is required to close the discrepancy, and a comprehensive approach to optimization must be clarified. Therefore, referring to Figure 47, we will explain long-life renovation that goes beyond identifying and restoring the deterioration state.

[0154] Figure 47 shows the renovation items in the center, and the considerations necessary to determine the renovation items are listed to the left. The first step is to identify the deterioration and restore the original state—that is, restore functionality. Second, considering future changes in student numbers, it is necessary to redesign school facilities, accommodate expansions and reductions, and ensure flexibility to accommodate changes in student numbers and class sizes. Furthermore, considering the future state of schools, including new learning environments, it is necessary to address the need for new functions, such as media centers, small classrooms, and multipurpose halls. Furthermore, to improve the facility's maintenance level and functionality, it is necessary to make the facility energy-efficient, barrier-free, fully air-conditioned, and install comfortable restrooms. Furthermore, it is necessary to consider collaboration with surrounding facilities, such as sharing special classrooms and swimming pools, and utilizing school facilities as community hubs. Here, we define long-life renovation in the broad sense as considering and efficiently implementing all of these elements.

[0155] In order to implement long-life renovations in the broad sense explained using Figure 47 and support comprehensive efforts toward optimization, for example, by classifying, organizing, and analyzing facilities such as schools managed by a certain administrative agency according to their characteristics, it becomes possible to obtain various information necessary for considering changes in the number of students, responses to new learning environments, improvements to facility functionality, and coordination with surrounding facilities. Furthermore, by classifying, organizing, and analyzing this information, it becomes possible to derive values ​​that can serve as a reference for reviewing reconstruction plans by considering not only long-life renovations in the broad sense, but also changes in the number of students, responses to new learning environments, improvements to facility functionality, and coordination with surrounding facilities.

[0156] (Functional configuration of asset management support device 4B) Figure 48 explains the functional configuration of the asset management support device 4B and storage device 6B of the asset management support system 1B that can provide support for implementing life-extending renovations in the broad sense explained using Figure 47 and derive values ​​that serve as a reference for review at the time of rebuilding. In Figure 48, the same functions as those of the asset management support device 4 and storage device 6 shown in Figure 1 or the asset management support device 4A and storage device 6A shown in Figure 46 are designated by the same reference numerals, and detailed explanations of those functions will be omitted.

[0157] That is, the asset management support device 4B has the same functional configuration as the asset management support device 4A shown in Fig. 46, except that it is provided with a screen information generation unit 11E instead of the screen information generation unit 11A, a simulation unit 22B instead of the simulation unit 22, and further includes a third extraction unit 11D, a classification information acquisition unit 51, a type classification processing unit 52, and a calculation unit 53. Moreover, the storage device 6B has the same functional configuration as the storage device 6 shown in Figs. 1 and 46, except that it is further provided with a format storage unit 71 and a utilization study related information storage unit 72.

[0158] In addition to the functions of the screen information generator 11 and the screen information generator 11A, the screen information generator 11E further has a function of generating data for displaying a screen in response to a request from the client terminal 3 transmitted via the network 2 or an operation input by a user of the asset management support apparatus 4B input from the input / output device 7, using a format stored in the format storage unit 71 (described later). Specifically, the screen information generator 11E reads from the format storage unit 71 a format corresponding to the request from the client terminal 3 or an operation input by a user of the asset management support apparatus 4 input from the input / output device 7, and controls the third extraction unit 11D to extract data necessary to generate information corresponding to the read format from each component of the storage device 6B. The screen information generator 11E also commands the calculation unit 53 to calculate data necessary to generate information corresponding to the read format. The screen information generator 11E also causes the simulation unit 22B to execute a simulation necessary to generate information corresponding to the read format. Then, the screen information generation unit 11E uses the supplied data to insert numerical values ​​into a format, thereby generating data corresponding to a request to display data based on various formats input from the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7, and sends the data via the network 2 to the client terminal 3 for display, or supplies the data to the input / output device 7 for display or other output.

[0159] The third extraction unit 11D uses a format stored in a format storage unit 71 (described later) to extract, from any of the facility information storage unit 31, the deterioration information storage unit 32, the evaluation information storage unit 33, the maintenance policy information storage unit 34, and the utilization study related information storage unit 72 of the storage device 6B, information required for generating data for displaying a screen in response to a request from the client terminal 3 or an operation input by a user of the asset management support device 4B input from the input / output device 7, using the screen information generation unit 11E. The third extraction unit 11D supplies the extracted information to any of the screen information generation unit 11E, the simulation unit 22B, the type classification processing unit 52, and the calculation unit 53.

[0160] In addition to the functions of the simulation unit 22, the simulation unit 22B can simulate the costs required for repairing, rebuilding, etc. of a facility based on information on the results of studies on repairing, rebuilding, etc. of a facility that is supplied from the client terminal 3 via the network 2 or input from the input / output device 7, and various information stored in the storage device 6. The simulation unit 22B supplies the simulation results to the screen information generation unit 11E and the utilization study related information storage unit 72, and also supplies them to the calculation unit 53 as necessary.

[0161] The classification information acquisition unit 51 acquires information necessary for type classification, such as the designation of facility groups to be classified, classification information that serves as the basis for type classification for classifying the facility groups, and the content and thresholds of the classification, from the client terminal 3 via the network 2 or receives operational input from the input / output device 7, and supplies the information to the type classification processing unit 52. Examples of information that can be used for type classification include location and region, school size, number of classes, history and prediction of changes in school size and number of classes, school type, whether the school is an independent school or a branch school, and main courses. School size can be classified using the range of student numbers or the number of classes. For high schools, for example, classifications are possible as to school type (high school or special needs school), whether full-time or part-time, and whether the main subject is general education, agriculture, industry, fisheries, commerce, comprehensive education, or other subjects. Furthermore, special needs schools can use classifications such as whether the type of disability they cater to is perceptual disability, hearing impairment, intellectual disability, physical disability, weak health, other disability, or multiple of these. Furthermore, the number of classification information that forms the basis of type classification is not specified.

[0162] The type classification processing unit 52 classifies a predetermined group of facilities in response to a request from the client terminal 3 or an operation input from the input / output device 7 based on the classification information supplied from the classification information acquisition unit 51, and supplies the classification results to the information storage processing unit 12, where they are stored in the utilization study related information storage unit 72, and also to the screen information generation unit 11E and the calculation unit 53. For example, if the classification information acquisition unit 51 supplies three types of type classification axes, (1) region, (2) class size, and (3) predicted change in number of classes, along with the content and thresholds of each classification, in order to classify elementary schools in a predetermined municipality, the type classification processing unit 52 first classifies the elementary schools by the specified region, then classifies the elementary schools within that classification by a specified range of class size, and further classifies the elementary schools within that classification by a specified range of the predicted value of change in number of classes. Then, these classifications are divided, for example, into Type A, Type B, etc., and the classification results are supplied to the information storage processing unit 12, where they are stored in the utilization consideration related information storage unit 72, and also supplied to the screen information generation unit 11E and the calculation unit 53.

[0163] Based on instructions from the screen information generation unit 11E, the calculation unit 53 generates data for the screen information generation unit 11E to display a screen in response to a request from the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7, and performs predetermined calculation processing based on various information stored in the storage device 6B and, if necessary, the type classification results supplied from the type classification processing unit 52 and the simulation results supplied from the simulation unit 22B, in order to send the data to the client terminal 3 for display or supply the data to the input / output device 7 for output, and supplies the calculation results to the screen information generation unit 11E.

[0164] For example, based on instructions from screen information generation unit 11E, calculation unit 53 refers to basic school information stored in facility information storage unit 31 of storage device 6, and calculates, for example, the difference between the number of students at peak time (or when school opens) and the current number of students, the difference between the current number of students and the expected number of students in the future, the total floor area per current student, the playground area per current student, the total floor area per student in the future, the playground area per student in the future, the total floor area per student at peak time (or when school opens), and the playground area per student at peak time (or when school opens), and supplies these to screen information generation unit 11E. Furthermore, for example, the calculation unit 53 refers to the information stored in the facility information storage unit 31 of the storage device 6 based on instructions from the screen information generation unit 11E and the type classification results supplied from the type classification processing unit 52, and calculates the maximum, minimum and average values ​​of, for example, the current number of students, the number of classes, the predicted change in the number of classes (student) from the present to the future (number for the number of classes, % for the number of students), the predicted change in the number of classes (student) from the peak time (or when the school opens) to the present, the total floor area, the total floor area per person, the number of heads, the playground area, the playground area per person, etc. in schools classified into each type, and supplies these to the screen information generation unit 11E.

[0165] The format storage unit 71 generates data for displaying a screen in response to a request from the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 using the screen information generation unit 11E, and stores various formats for displaying the data.

[0166] The utilization study related information storage unit 72 stores, for example, information on utilization study sheets such as those shown in FIGS. 49 and 50, as well as various information generated by the simulation unit 22B, the type classification processing unit 52, and the calculation unit 53. The utilization study sheet in FIG. 49 includes information such as the facility name, map information showing the layout of the facility and similar facilities, facility drawings, urban planning information, use restrictions, buildable area, and notes. The utilization study sheet in FIG. 50 includes information such as the facility name, the soundness of the building's framework and components, basic facility information, and the floor layout of each floor. The information included in these utilization study sheets is appropriately linked to each item stored in each memory unit of the storage device 6B, such as the building information list, school facility ledger, fixed asset ledger, deterioration survey information, facility, function, and cost information, and information generated by each unit of the asset management support device 4B. Needless to say, these utilization study sheets may also include other information.

[0167] As described above, the facility information storage unit 31 of the storage device 6B stores information such as basic facility information, a school facility ledger, and a fixed asset ledger, and further stores floor plans and usage information for each floor of each facility at the time of construction (or, for example, if the facility is a school, at the time when the number of students was at its peak) as shown in Fig. 51, as well as current floor plans and usage information for each floor of each facility as shown in Fig. 52. The facility information storage unit 31 of the storage device 6B also stores address information for each facility and map information showing its location.

[0168] The maintenance policy information storage unit 34 of the storage device 6B also stores information indicating the number of facility users in each facility and each municipality (for example, if the facility is an elementary or junior high school, information indicating the trend in the number of students and the trend in the number of classes in each elementary or junior high school). In response to a request from the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7, the screen information generation unit 11E generates data for a composite graph showing the trend in the number of students, such as that shown in FIG. 53, based on the information indicating the trend in the number of students in the entire municipality stored in the maintenance policy information storage unit 34, and transmits the data to the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 via the network 2 for display. The composite graph showing the trend in the number of students shown in FIG. 53 is composed of line graphs indicating the total number of students, the total number of elementary school students, and the total number of junior high school students, and bar graphs indicating the average number of classes per elementary school and the average number of classes per junior high school. At this time, the calculation unit 53 calculates the average number of classes per elementary school and the average number of classes per junior high school based on information indicating the changes in the number of classes at each elementary and junior high school stored in the conservation policy information storage unit 34, and supplies this to the screen information generation unit 11E. The operator of the client terminal 3 or the user of the asset management support device 4B can refer to the composite graph in Fig. 53 to check the changes in the number of students across a given municipality, analyze the changes, and, if necessary, predict future changes in the number of students.

[0169] In this way, the asset management support device 4B of the asset management support system 1B includes an information storage processing unit 12 that links each item of the basic information of the facility, the school facility ledger, and the fixed asset ledger, and accumulates and stores them in the storage device 6B, a classification information acquisition unit 51 that acquires multiple classification information that forms the basis of type classification, a type classification processing unit 52 that refers to the basic information of the facility, the school facility ledger, and the fixed asset ledger stored in the storage device 6B, and classifies the facility into types according to the classification information acquired by the classification information acquisition unit 51, a format storage unit 71 that stores a format having multiple items, and a tag The system includes a calculation unit 53 that extracts corresponding information from the basic facility information, school facility ledger, and fixed asset ledger stored in the memory device 6B based on the type classification result by the type classification processing unit 52 and the format items stored in the format memory unit 71, and performs calculation processing; and a screen information generation unit 11E that generates display data based on the format stored in the memory device 6B using the type classification result by the type classification processing unit 52, the basic facility information, school facility ledger, and fixed asset ledger stored in the memory device 6B, and the calculation processing result by the calculation processing unit.

[0170] As a result, the asset management support device 4B can use the linked information to classify the facility into types and generate data in various formats using the type classification results. The operator of the client terminal 3 or the user of the asset management support device 4B can refer to the data organized in the desired format in the asset management support device 4B. Therefore, the asset management support device 4B of the asset management support system 1B can support planning for long-life renovations that go beyond understanding the deterioration status of facilities and restoring them.

[0171] Next, the type classification process executed by the type classification processing unit 52 and the screen information generated by the screen information generating unit 11E will be described with reference to FIGS.

[0172] For example, when an operator of the client terminal 3 or a user of the asset management support device 4B commands the classification of elementary schools in a specified municipality into types, and three types of information, namely (1) region, (2) class size, and (3) predicted changes in the number of classes, are input as the basis for the type classification, along with the content and thresholds of each classification, the classification information acquisition unit 51 acquires this information and supplies it to the type classification processing unit 52.

[0173] The type classification processing unit 52 first classifies elementary schools by specified region, then classifies the elementary schools within that classification by specified range of class size, and further classifies the elementary schools within that classification by specified range of predicted numerical values ​​of changes in the number of classes. The type classification processing unit 52 then divides the classification results into, for example, Type A, Type B, etc., and supplies the names of elementary schools classified into each type as classification results to the information storage processing unit 12, where they are stored in the utilization study related information storage unit 72, and also supplied to the screen information generation unit 11E and the calculation unit 53.

[0174] When the operator of the client terminal 3 or the user of the asset management support device 4B commands the display of a list of type classification results for elementary schools in a given municipality, the screen information generation unit 11E reads a format corresponding to the list of type classification results from the format storage unit 71 and controls the third extraction unit 11D to extract data necessary to generate information corresponding to the read format from each unit of the storage device 6B. The screen information generation unit 11E also commands the calculation unit 53 to calculate the data necessary to generate information corresponding to the read format. For example, if each unit of the storage device 6B does not contain information on "(the area of ​​a certain part) per child (at a certain time)," the screen information generation unit 11E controls the calculation unit 53 to obtain the numerical values ​​of the number of children and (the area of ​​a certain part) stored in each unit of the storage device 6B and calculate these numerical values.

[0175] 54 and 55 show an example of a list of type classification results for elementary schools in a specified municipality, generated by the screen information generation unit 11E. In FIGS. 54 and 55, because the number of items in the corresponding format is large, it is not possible to display all items on one screen, and a display screen is shown in which a portion of the list is scrolled to display. The list of type classification results for elementary schools in a specified municipality, exemplified in FIGS. 54 and 55, lists the names of elementary schools belonging to each type and, for each elementary school, information corresponding to each item in the format corresponding to the list of type classification results. Here, classification is provided up to Type D, but information about elementary schools classified into other types is listed at the bottom of the list.

[0176] Next, FIG. 56 shows an example of a format generated by the screen information generation unit 11E that lists the basic axes of the type classification of elementary schools in a given municipality and numerical values ​​indicating the characteristics of each type. In the format illustrated in FIG. 56, the basic axes of the type classification are listed along with the classification details: (1) whether the region is northern or southern; (2) whether the class size is large, appropriate, or small (this example shows a case where there is no elementary school corresponding to small); and (3) whether the predicted change in the number of classes is a decrease or no change, a decreasing trend of six or more classes, no change, or an increase in the future. The number of schools included in each type is also listed. This format also provides columns for maximum, minimum, and, if necessary, average values ​​for each item as numerical values ​​indicating the characteristics of each type. The screen information generation unit 11E controls the calculation unit 53 to calculate and obtain maximum, minimum, and average values ​​from the information stored in each unit of the storage device 6B, and can enter them in the corresponding sections of the format.

[0177] The classification information acquisition unit 51 acquires information necessary for type classification from the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 via the network 2 and supplies it to the type classification processing unit 52. The type classification processing unit 52 classifies the facilities into types based on the supplied information, for example, Type A, Type B, etc., and supplies the classification results to the information storage processing unit 12, which stores the results in the utilization study related information storage unit 72 and also supplies the results to the screen information generation unit 11E and the calculation unit 53. The screen information generation unit 11E reads a format corresponding to a request from the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 from the format storage unit 71 and controls the third extraction unit 11D to extract data necessary to generate information corresponding to the read format from each component of the storage device 6B. The screen information generation unit 11E also instructs the calculation unit 53 to calculate the data necessary to generate information corresponding to the read format. The screen information generation unit 11E then generates data such as those described with reference to Figures 54 to 56, transmits the data to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 for display, or supplies the data to the input / output device 7 for output.

[0178] Next, using Figures 57 to 64, we will use an example to explain type classification based on different type classification axes and support the process of establishing ``review criteria for reconstruction'' that serve as a model case for reconstruction based on the type classification.

[0179] First, type classification based on different type classification axes will be described with reference to Fig. 57. For example, when an operator of the client terminal 3 or a user of the asset management support device 4B commands the type classification of high schools in a predetermined municipality, and the type classification axes are input as follows: (1) whether the school type is a high school or a special needs school; if the school type is a high school, (2) whether the school is an independent school or a branch school; (3) whether the main curriculum is full-time or part-time; (4) which is the main department; and (5) school size; and if the school type is a special needs school, (2) whether the school is a main school, a branch school, or a branch classroom; and (3) which type of disability the school has, together with the content and threshold of each classification, the classification information acquisition unit 51 acquires this information and supplies it to the type classification processing unit 52.

[0180] The type classification processing unit 52 first classifies the school type as either a high school or a special needs school. Within the high school type classification, the type classification processing unit 52 further classifies the high school as either an independent school or a branch school, and within that classification, further classifies the main curriculum as either full-time or part-time, further classifies the main department within that classification, and further classifies the high school within that classification into a specified range of school size. Additionally, within the special needs school type classification, the type classification processing unit 52 further classifies the main school, branch school, or branch classroom, and further classifies within that classification by the type of disability that the special needs school primarily caters to. The type classification processing unit 52 then divides the classification results into, for example, Type A, Type B,..., Type M, and supplies the names of the high schools classified into each type as classification results to the information storage processing unit 12, where they are stored in the utilization study related information storage unit 72, and also to the screen information generation unit 11E and the calculation unit 53.

[0181] Next, Fig. 58 shows an example of a format generated by the screen information generating unit 11E that lists numerical values ​​indicating the characteristics of each type of high school, classified as Type A through Type j according to the basic axis (1) of the type classification. The format shown in Fig. 58 includes the classification details specified in accordance with the basic axis of the type classification described with reference to Fig. 57, namely, (2) whether the school is an independent school or a branch school, (3) whether the main curriculum is full-time or part-time, (4) whether the main subject is general education, agriculture, fisheries, industrial, commercial, or comprehensive, and (5) whether the school size is large, standard, or small, and also lists the number of schools included in each type. This format also includes columns for maximum and minimum values, and, if necessary, average values, for numerical values ​​indicating the characteristics of each type, such as the number of classes, the rate of reduction in the number of classes, the number of students, the rate of reduction in the number of students, and the area of ​​the school building, roof, and grounds. The screen information generating unit 11E controls the calculation unit 53 to calculate and obtain maximum, minimum, and average values ​​from the information stored in each unit of the storage device 6B, and can enter these values ​​in the corresponding parts of the format. The screen information generating unit 11E can transmit the data generated in this way to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 to be displayed, or can supply it to the input / output device 7 to be output.

[0182] When a user, referencing the data of FIG. 58 displayed on the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7, issues a command to display detailed information of a predetermined type, the screen information generation unit 11E reads a format corresponding to the detailed information of the predetermined type from the format storage unit 71 and controls the third extraction unit 11D to extract data necessary to generate information corresponding to the read format from each component of the storage device 6B. The screen information generation unit 11E also commands the calculation unit 53 to calculate the data necessary to generate information corresponding to the read format and acquires the calculation results. The screen information generation unit 11E inserts numerical values ​​corresponding to each item of the format read from the format storage unit 71 to generate data, which the screen information generation unit 11E then transmits to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 for display or to the input / output device 7 for output. These formats may include fields into which a user, referencing the data displayed on the client terminal 3, can enter new numerical values ​​or information.

[0183] A format corresponding to detailed information of a predetermined type, which includes items into which a user who has referenced the data can enter new numerical values ​​or information, will be described with reference to Fig. 59. Fig. 59 shows data in a state in which the user of the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 has entered new numerical values ​​or information into the displayed data, which is generated by the screen information generating unit 11E and transmitted to the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 via the network 2 when a user who has referenced the data of Fig. 58 displayed on the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 issues a command to display detailed information about the ownership of each building of a high school classified as Type B, for example.

[0184] The format corresponding to detailed information about the buildings owned by a specific type includes fields for the number of school buildings (main, secondary, and other), the number of laboratory buildings, the number of main, secondary, and other buildings, the number of greenhouses, the average, minimum, and maximum number of parking spaces, as well as the number of schools with 25-meter pools and the number of schools with 50-meter pools. The screen information generation unit 11E controls the third extraction unit 11D to extract data necessary to generate information corresponding to the read format from each component of the storage device 6B and instructs the calculation unit 53 to calculate the data necessary to generate the corresponding information. This format also includes a blank "review criteria for reconstruction" field, which allows the user of the client terminal 3 or input / output device 7, who references this information, to enter new values ​​for the "review criteria for reconstruction" for each of these fields. The data generated by the screen information generation unit 11E is transmitted to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 and displayed, or provided to the input / output device 7 for output.

[0185] When the user of the client terminal 3 or input / output device 7 newly enters a numerical value that will be the "review standard when rebuilding" and sends it to the asset management support device 4B via the network 2, the information storage processing unit 12 links the numerical value that will be the "review standard when rebuilding" entered by the user of the client terminal 3 or input / output device 7 to each item and stores it in the utilization consideration related information storage unit 72.

[0186] It is also possible to specify multiple types and prepare formats corresponding to the detailed information of those multiple types.

[0187] Referring to FIG. 60, an example of a format selected by the screen information generating unit 11E from the format storage unit 71 when a user, referencing the data of FIG. 58 displayed on the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7, commands the display of detailed information regarding, for example, changes in the number of students and the number of classes at high schools classified as Type B and Type I. The format shown in FIG. 60 includes fields for the average, minimum, and maximum values ​​of the number of students and the number of classes as of 2016 for full-time schools (Type B) and part-time schools (Type I), as well as fields for the rate of decline in the number of students and the number of classes from the time of school opening to the present. The screen information generating unit 11E controls the third extracting unit 11D to extract data necessary to generate information corresponding to the read format from each component of the storage device 6B and commands the calculating unit 53 to calculate the data necessary to generate the corresponding information. Note that if the information necessary to calculate the information corresponding to each field is insufficient, the entered value may be set to "unknown," as shown in FIG. 60. The data generated by the screen information generating unit 11E is transmitted to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 and displayed, or is supplied to the input / output device 7 and output.

[0188] Next, with reference to Figures 61 to 64, we will explain the formats that correspond to detailed information on school buildings, roof structures, school grounds area, and classroom ownership status in Type B, and the establishment of ``review criteria for reconstruction'' using these formats.

[0189] FIG. 61 shows an example of a format corresponding to detailed information about Type B school buildings. When a user of the client terminal 3 or input / output device 7 commands the display of detailed information about Type B school buildings, the screen information generation unit 11E reads the corresponding format from the format storage unit 71. The screen information generation unit 11E controls the third extraction unit 11D to extract data necessary to generate information corresponding to the read format from each component of the storage device 6B and commands the calculation unit 53 to calculate the data necessary to generate the corresponding information. This format provides fields for the average, minimum, and maximum school building area and the average, minimum, and maximum school building area per student in fiscal year 2016. The format contains the respective values ​​for the main school buildings, sub-school buildings, and other school buildings owned by the 33 schools classified as Type B. It also includes a field where users can enter new values ​​and information as "review criteria for rebuilding." Note that in FIG. 61, "-" is displayed where information necessary to calculate the corresponding information is missing. The data generated by the screen information generating unit 11E is transmitted to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 and displayed, or is supplied to the input / output device 7 and output.

[0190] When the user of the client terminal 3 or input / output device 7 newly enters a numerical value that will be the "review standard when rebuilding" and sends it to the asset management support device 4B via the network 2, the information storage processing unit 12 links the numerical value that will be the "review standard when rebuilding" entered by the user of the client terminal 3 or input / output device 7 to each item and stores it in the utilization consideration related information storage unit 72.

[0191] FIG. 62 shows an example of a format corresponding to detailed information about Type B buildings. When a user of the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 commands the display of detailed information about Type B buildings, the screen information generation unit 11E reads the corresponding format from the format storage unit 71. The screen information generation unit 11E controls the third extraction unit 11D to extract data necessary to generate information corresponding to the read format from each component of the storage device 6B and commands the calculation unit 53 to calculate the data necessary to generate the corresponding information. This format provides fields for the average, minimum, and maximum building area values, and lists the numerical values ​​for the main, secondary, and other buildings owned by the 33 schools classified as Type B. It also includes fields in which users can enter new numerical values ​​and information as "review criteria for rebuilding." The data generated by the screen information generation unit 11E is transmitted to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 and displayed, or provided to the input / output device 7 for output.

[0192] When the user of the client terminal 3 or input / output device 7 newly enters a numerical value that will be the "review standard when rebuilding" and sends it to the asset management support device 4B via the network 2, the information storage processing unit 12 links the numerical value that will be the "review standard when rebuilding" entered by the user of the client terminal 3 or input / output device 7 to each item and stores it in the utilization consideration related information storage unit 72.

[0193] FIG. 63 shows an example of a format corresponding to detailed information about Type B school grounds. When a user of client terminal 3 or input / output device 7 commands the display of detailed information about Type B school grounds, screen information generation unit 11E reads the corresponding format from format storage unit 71. Screen information generation unit 11E controls third extraction unit 11D to extract data necessary to generate information corresponding to the read format from each component of storage device 6B and commands calculation unit 53 to calculate the data necessary to generate the corresponding information. This format provides fields for the average, minimum, and maximum area for building grounds, athletic field grounds, laboratory and practical training grounds, and total school grounds area, as well as the average, minimum, and maximum area per full-time student for fiscal year 2016. The data for each of the 33 schools classified as Type B is listed, and a field is also included where users can enter new values ​​and information as "review criteria for rebuilding." Note that in FIG. 63, "-" is displayed where information necessary to calculate the corresponding information is missing. The data generated by the screen information generating unit 11E is transmitted to the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 via the network 2 and displayed.

[0194] When the user of the client terminal 3 or input / output device 7 newly enters a numerical value that will be the "review standard when rebuilding" and sends it to the asset management support device 4B via the network 2, the information storage processing unit 12 links the numerical value that will be the "review standard when rebuilding" entered by the user of the client terminal 3 or input / output device 7 to each item and stores it in the utilization consideration related information storage unit 72.

[0195] FIG. 64 shows an example of a format corresponding to detailed information about the ownership status of Type B classrooms. When a user of the client terminal 3 or input / output device 7 commands the display of detailed information about the ownership status of Type B classrooms, the screen information generation unit 11E reads the corresponding format from the format storage unit 71. The screen information generation unit 11E controls the third extraction unit 11D to extract data necessary to generate information corresponding to the read format from each component of the storage device 6B and commands the calculation unit 53 to calculate the data necessary to generate the corresponding information. This format provides fields for the average, minimum, and maximum number of classrooms owned by each facility and the average, minimum, and maximum area per room. The corresponding values ​​for classrooms owned by the 33 schools classified as Type B are listed. The format also includes fields where users can enter new values ​​and information as "review criteria for rebuilding" for the number of rooms and area per room. Note that in FIG. 64, "-" is displayed where information necessary to calculate the corresponding information is missing. The data generated by the screen information generating unit 11E is transmitted to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 or is supplied to the input / output device 7 and displayed.

[0196] When a user of the client terminal 3 or input / output device 7 newly enters numerical values ​​that will serve as the "review criteria when rebuilding" for each of the number of rooms and the area per room and sends them to the asset management support device 4B via the network 2, the information storage processing unit 12 links the numerical values ​​that will serve as the "review criteria when rebuilding" entered by the user of the client terminal 3 or input / output device 7 to each item and stores them in the utilization consideration related information storage unit 72.

[0197] As explained using Figures 61 to 64, the asset management support device 4B extracts information corresponding to a predetermined format from the information stored in association with each unit of the storage device 6B, and performs calculations as necessary to generate data for display in a list, thereby enabling the user of the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 to easily establish a numerical value that will serve as the "review standard for rebuilding." Furthermore, the value established by the user of the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 as the numerical value that will serve as the "review standard for rebuilding" is associated with each item of information stored in the storage device 6B and stored in the utilization study related information storage unit 72.

[0198] Furthermore, the screen information generation unit 11E is further capable of generating data corresponding to different formats using values ​​established by the user of the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 and stored in the utilization consideration related information storage unit 72.

[0199] Next, with reference to FIGS. 65 to 70, examples of information generated based on a predetermined format using values ​​established by a user of the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 and stored in the utilization study related information storage unit 72 will be described. Each format in FIGS. 65 to 69 focuses on a specific high school (denoted as XXX in FIGS. 65 to 70) included in Type B, and allows for comparison of the current state and future projections of that high school with the average, minimum, and maximum values ​​of Type B school buildings, roof structures, school grounds area, and classroom ownership status, as well as information set as "review criteria for rebuilding." Furthermore, these formats allow the user of the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 to enter review target values ​​for the specific high school of interest based on the values ​​set as "review criteria for rebuilding" for the corresponding type.

[0200] FIG. 65 shows a format that can be entered by a user of the client terminal 3 or input / output device 7. The format compares the current value of a specific high school XXX with detailed information about the building ownership in Type B described with reference to FIG. 59 and the "reconstruction review criteria" established by the user of the client terminal 3 or input / output device 7 and stored in the utilization study related information storage unit 72, and then determines the target review value for the specific high school XXX. The screen information generation unit 11E controls the third extraction unit 11D to extract data necessary to generate information corresponding to the read format from each unit of the storage device 6B and instructs the calculation unit 53 to calculate the data necessary to generate the corresponding information. The data generated by the screen information generation unit 11E is transmitted to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 and displayed, or is supplied to the input / output device 7 and output.

[0201] When a user of the client terminal 3 or input / output device 7 compares the detailed information regarding the ownership of a building in Type B described using Figure 59 and the ``review criteria at the time of reconstruction'' established by the user of the client terminal 3 or input / output device 7 and stored in the utilization study related information storage unit 72 with the current value of a specified high school XXX, inputs the target review value for the specified high school XXX, and sends it to the asset management support device 4B via the network 2, the information storage processing unit 12 links the numerical value that is the ``review criteria at the time of reconstruction'' for the specified high school XXX entered by the user of the client terminal 3 or input / output device 7 to each item and stores it in the utilization study related information storage unit 72.

[0202] FIG. 66 shows a format that can be entered by a user of the client terminal 3 or input / output device 7. The format compares detailed information on changes in the number of students and classes at high schools classified as Type B and Type I described with reference to FIG. 60 with the current values ​​for a given high school XXX, and then calculates the area reduction target for the non-classroom portions of the school building of the given high school XXX based on the required area per student value set by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. The screen information generation unit 11E controls the third extraction unit 11D to extract data necessary to generate information corresponding to the read format from each component of the storage device 6B, and instructs the calculation unit 53 to calculate the data necessary to generate the corresponding information. The data generated by the screen information generation unit 11E is transmitted to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 and displayed, or is supplied to the input / output device 7 and output.

[0203] When a user of the client terminal 3 or input / output device 7 compares detailed information regarding changes in the number of students and classes at high schools classified as Type B and Type I described using Figure 66 with the current values ​​of a specified high school XXX, inputs a target value for reducing the area of ​​the school building other than the classrooms at the specified high school XXX based on the value of the required area per student set by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, and sends it to the asset management support device 4B via the network 2, the information storage processing unit 12 links the target value for reducing the area of ​​the school building other than the classrooms at the specified high school XXX input by the user of the client terminal 3 or input / output device 7 to each item and stores it in the utilization consideration related information storage unit 72.

[0204] FIG. 67 shows a format that can be entered by a user of the client terminal 3 or input / output device 7 to enter detailed information about the Type B school building described in FIG. 61, namely, the average, minimum, and maximum values ​​of the school building area, the average, minimum, and maximum values ​​of the school building area per student in 2016, the "review criteria for rebuilding" for the school building area per student, and the target value for reviewing the school building area for a specified high school XXX, by comparing the current value with the current value for the specified high school XXX. The screen information generation unit 11E controls the third extraction unit 11D to extract data necessary to generate information corresponding to the read format from each component of the storage device 6B and instructs the calculation unit 53 to calculate the data necessary to generate the corresponding information. The data generated by the screen information generation unit 11E is transmitted to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 and displayed, or is supplied to the input / output device 7 and output.

[0205] When a user of the client terminal 3 or input / output device 7 compares detailed information about the Type B school building area described using Figure 67, i.e., the average, minimum, and maximum values ​​of the school building area, the average, minimum, and maximum values ​​of the school building area per student in 2016, the "review criteria at the time of reconstruction" for the school building area per student, and the current value of a specified high school XXX, inputs a target value for review of the school building area for the specified high school XXX, and transmits it to the asset management support device 4B via the network 2, the information storage processing unit 12 links the target value for review of the school building area for the specified high school XXX input by the user of the client terminal 3 or input / output device 7 to each item and stores it in the utilization consideration related information storage unit 72.

[0206] FIG. 68 shows a format in which a user of the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 can enter detailed information about the Type B roof described with reference to FIG. 62, i.e., the average, minimum, and maximum roof area values, the roof area "review criteria for rebuilding" and the current value of a specified high school XXX, and then compare these values ​​to determine the target roof area review value for the specified high school XXX. The screen information generation unit 11E controls the third extraction unit 11D to extract data necessary to generate information corresponding to the read format from each component of the storage device 6B and instructs the calculation unit 53 to calculate the data necessary to generate the corresponding information. The data generated by the screen information generation unit 11E is transmitted to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 and displayed, or is supplied to the input / output device 7 and output.

[0207] When a user of the client terminal 3 or input / output device 7 compares detailed information about the Type B roof area described using Figure 68, i.e., the average, minimum, and maximum values ​​of the roof area, the current roof area value of a specified high school XXX, and the "review criteria for roof area at the time of reconstruction," inputs a target review value for the school building area of ​​the specified high school XXX, and transmits it to the asset management support device 4B via the network 2, the information storage processing unit 12 links the target review value for the roof area of ​​the specified high school XXX input by the user of the client terminal 3 or input / output device 7 to each item and stores it in the utilization study related information storage unit 72.

[0208] FIG. 69 shows a format that can be entered by a user of the client terminal 3 or input / output device 7. The format compares detailed information about the Type B school grounds area described in FIG. 63, i.e., the average, minimum, and maximum school grounds area, the average, minimum, and maximum school grounds area per full-time student in 2016, the school grounds area "review criteria for reconstruction" and the current value of a specific high school XXX, and then determines the target school grounds area for the specific high school XXX. The screen information generation unit 11E controls the third extraction unit 11D to extract data necessary to generate information corresponding to the read format from each component of the storage device 6B and instructs the calculation unit 53 to calculate the data necessary to generate the corresponding information. The data generated by the screen information generation unit 11E is transmitted to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 and displayed, or is supplied to the input / output device 7 for output.

[0209] When a user of the client terminal 3 or input / output device 7 compares detailed information about the Type B school grounds area described using Figure 69, i.e., the average, minimum, and maximum values ​​of the school grounds area, the average, minimum, and maximum values ​​of the school grounds area per full-time student in 2016, the current school grounds area of ​​the specified high school XXX, and the "review criteria for school grounds area at the time of reconstruction," inputs a target value for review of the school grounds area for the specified high school XXX, and transmits it to the asset management support device 4B via the network 2, the information storage processing unit 12 links the target value for review of the school grounds area for the specified high school XXX input by the user of the client terminal 3 or input / output device 7 to each item and stores it in the utilization consideration related information storage unit 72.

[0210] FIG. 70 shows a format that can be entered by a user of the client terminal 3 or input / output device 7. The format includes detailed information about the Type B classroom status described in FIG. 64, i.e., the average, minimum, and maximum number of classrooms at each high school, the average, minimum, and maximum floor area per room, review criteria for the number of rooms and floor area per room, and a comparison with the current values ​​for a specific high school. The screen information generation unit 11E controls the third extraction unit 11D to extract data necessary to generate information corresponding to the read format from each component of the storage device 6B and instructs the calculation unit 53 to calculate the data necessary to generate the corresponding information. The data generated by the screen information generation unit 11E is transmitted to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 for display or supplied to the input / output device 7 for output.

[0211] When a user of the client terminal 3 or input / output device 7 compares detailed information about the ownership status of Type B classrooms described using Figure 70, i.e., the average, minimum, and maximum numbers of classrooms owned by each high school, the average, minimum, and maximum values ​​of the area per room, the review criteria for the number of rooms and the area per room, and the current values ​​for a specified high school XXX, inputs the target review values ​​for the number of rooms and the area per room for the specified high school XXX, and sends this to the asset management support device 4B via the network 2, the information storage processing unit 12 links the target review values ​​for the number of rooms and the area per room for the specified high school XXX input by the user of the client terminal 3 or input / output device 7 to each item and stores them in the utilization consideration related information storage unit 72.

[0212] As explained using Figures 65 to 70, the asset management support device 4B inserts values ​​established by the user of the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 and stored in the utilization study related information storage unit 72 into the format stored in the format storage unit 71, and transmits the format to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 for display or supplies it to the input / output device 7 for output. This allows the user of the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 to easily establish various target values ​​for the renovation of a specified high school XXX by comparing the review criteria for the type classified in the type classification with the current values. For example, as shown in Figure 71, when rebuilding part of a high school, it becomes possible to make a plan that ensures the necessary number of classrooms while appropriately reducing surplus classrooms.

[0213] Furthermore, when part of a high school is to be rebuilt, the information on the deterioration status of the building skeleton, etc., linked to the relevant high school and stored in the facility information storage unit 31 can be referenced to determine which building to rebuild. Specifically, when a command is issued on the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 to display the name of the high school for which a rebuilding plan is being made and information on the deterioration status of the building skeleton, etc., of the high school, the screen information generation unit 11A controls the first extraction unit 11B and the second extraction unit 11C to extract desired information from the information stored in the facility information storage unit 31, the deterioration information storage unit 32, the evaluation information storage unit 33, and the maintenance policy information storage unit 34 of the storage device 6, or calculates the desired information based on the extracted information, to generate screen information, which can be displayed on the input / output device 7 or transmitted to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 and displayed. When rebuilding a building, prioritizing rebuilding the most deteriorated parts makes it easier to reduce long-term maintenance costs. Therefore, the user of the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 can easily consider which building to rebuild in order to reduce the costs required for managing and operating the facility by referring to the displayed information and, if necessary, issuing a command to execute a cost calculation simulation using the simulation unit 22B.

[0214] Figure 72 is a bar graph showing the actual costs to date for rebuilding and renovating a high school managed by a specific local government, and the cost forecast calculated based on a future plan established based on the revised target values ​​obtained as explained using Figures 57 to 71. By appropriately reducing surplus classrooms when rebuilding part of a high school, it is possible to reduce the future costs for rebuilding and renovating the high school, for example, as shown in Figure 72, compared to a base plan in which surplus classrooms are not reduced.

[0215] However, if there is still a discrepancy between the financial constraint line and the planned costs, it will be necessary to consider cooperation with surrounding facilities, such as sharing special classrooms and swimming pools, or utilizing school facilities as a regional hub. Specifically, it will be necessary to consider whether facilities such as swimming pools can be shared with neighboring facilities. Figure 73 shows a format for displaying information about swimming pools, categorized by type according to district information.

[0216] For example, if the user of the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 commands the classification of high schools in a specified municipality by type and specifies the district name as the base of the type classification, the classification information acquisition unit 51 acquires information indicating that the district name is the base of the type classification from the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 and supplies it to the type classification processing unit 52. The type classification processing unit 52 classifies the high schools in the specified municipality by type using the district name, and supplies the names of the high schools classified into each type as the classification results to the information storage processing unit 12, where they are stored in the utilization study related information storage unit 72, and also supplied to the screen information generation unit 11E and the calculation unit 53.

[0217] As shown in Fig. 73, the screen information generation unit 11E reads from the format storage unit 71 a format including items such as the name of the school in each district, the representative department, the number of classes, the school size, the length of the pool, the number of lanes, the year the pool was installed, and the age of the pool, as well as an item in which the user of the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 can enter whether or not the pool at each high school is scheduled to be renovated. Then, the screen information generation unit 11E controls the third extraction unit 11D to extract data necessary to generate information corresponding to the read format from each part of the storage device 6B, and instructs the calculation unit 53 to calculate the data necessary to generate the corresponding information. The data generated by the screen information generation unit 11E is transmitted to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 or supplied to the input / output device 7 and displayed.

[0218] The user of the client terminal 3 or input / output device 7 refers to the displayed data and determines which groups of high schools can share a pool based on the district, number of classes, and size of each school, and determines which high school pools would be best to renovate and which would be best to remove based on the number of classes, school size, and the year the pools were installed and built, and enters whether or not each high school plans to renovate its pool in the corresponding column.

[0219] When a user of the client terminal 3 or input / output device 7 newly inputs whether or not the swimming pool at each high school is scheduled to be renovated, the information storage processing unit 12 receives the information entered by the user of the client terminal 3 or input / output device 7 about whether or not the swimming pool at each high school is scheduled to be renovated from the client terminal 3 or input / output device 7, and stores this information in the utilization consideration related information storage unit 72, linking it to each item.

[0220] The simulation unit 22B uses the feasibility of renovating the pool stored in the utilization study related information storage unit 72 to perform a simulation of the costs involved in renovating and repairing the pool if it is shared by multiple high schools, and stores the results in the utilization study related information storage unit 72, linking them to each item.

[0221] Figure 74 is a bar graph showing the actual costs to date for rebuilding and renovating high schools managed by local governments, and the cost forecast calculated when, as explained using Figures 51 to 71, a plan is added to appropriately reduce excess classrooms when rebuilding part of a high school, as well as a plan to share school facilities such as swimming pools among multiple high schools, as mentioned above. By adding a plan to share school facilities such as swimming pools among multiple high schools, for example, as shown in Figure 74, it is possible to further reduce the costs for future rebuilding and renovating high schools compared to the base plan in which excess classrooms are not reduced, as explained using Figure 72.

[0222] Furthermore, the accounting linkage unit 21 can link the costs of improving the functionality of school facilities to capital expenditures in accounting, and can link the costs of restoring the functionality of school facilities to repair costs in accounting. Therefore, instead of the bar graph showing the costs described above, the screen information generation unit 11E can generate a graph, as shown in Figure 75, that can distinguish between the costs of restoring the functionality of school facilities, i.e., repairs and updates as measures against aging, and the costs of improving the functionality and environment of school facilities.

[0223] Next, referring to Figures 76 to 90, we will explain an example of creating a model case by establishing review criteria for reconstruction based on type classification, using an elementary school managed by a local government as an example, with the aim of responding flexibly even when the number of students increases or decreases.

[0224] For example, if the operator of the client terminal 3 or the user of the input / output device 7 commands the classification of elementary schools in a specified municipality and inputs two items as the basis for the type classification, namely (1) the size of the number of classes in fiscal year 2017 and (2) the predicted trend in the number of students from fiscal year 2017 to fiscal year 2022, along with the content and thresholds of each classification, the classification information acquisition unit 51 acquires this information via the communication device 5 and supplies it to the type classification processing unit 52.

[0225] The type classification processing unit 52 first classifies the class sizes into large, standard, and small. Within each classification, the type classification processing unit 52 further classifies the schools based on whether the number of students is likely to continue increasing or will remain stable or decrease. The type classification processing unit 52 then divides the classification results into, for example, Type A, Type B, ..., Type E, and supplies the names of elementary schools classified into each type as classification results to the information storage processing unit 12, where they are stored in the utilization study related information storage unit 72, and also to the screen information generation unit 11E and the calculation unit 53.

[0226] FIG. 76 shows an example of a format generated by the screen information generating unit 11E that lists two basic type classification axes and the number of elementary schools classified into types A to E based on these basic type classification axes. In this example, there is one elementary school classified as type A, which has large class sizes and a tendency for the number of students to continue increasing. There are six elementary schools classified as type B, which has large class sizes and a tendency for the number of students to remain stable or decrease. There are seven elementary schools classified as type C, which has standard class sizes and a tendency for the number of students to continue increasing. There are four elementary schools classified as type D, which has standard class sizes and a tendency for the number of students to remain stable or decrease. Finally, there are two elementary schools classified as type E, which has small class sizes and a tendency for the number of students to continue increasing.

[0227] Next, Figure 77 shows a line graph showing the past trends and future forecasts of the number of students in elementary schools classified as Type A, which have large class sizes and where the number of students is likely to continue to increase.

[0228] The screen information generation unit 11E reads from the format storage unit 71 a format for creating a line graph showing past trends in the number of students and a predicted future trend, and controls the third extraction unit 11D to extract information showing trends in the number of students at elementary schools classified as Type A, which is stored in the maintenance policy information storage unit 34 of the storage device 6B. The screen information generation unit 11E draws a line graph based on the numerical values ​​showing trends in the number of students at elementary schools classified as Type A, extracted from the maintenance policy information storage unit 34, for the format read from the format storage unit 71, and transmits the line graph to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 or provides it to the input / output device 7 for display. The user of the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 can easily recognize that, in elementary schools classified as Type A, the number of students was minimized in the year indicated by the line α in FIG. 77, increased sharply from the year indicated by the line β to the year indicated by the line γ in FIG. 77, and then decreased.

[0229] Next, Figure 78 shows an example of a format consisting of detailed information items related to the number of students at an elementary school classified as Type A, which has large class sizes and is likely to continue to increase in number of students.

[0230] Screen information generation unit 11E reads from format storage unit 71 a format consisting of items such as detailed information related to the number of students, i.e., school name, total floor area, total floor area excluding gymnasium, construction year, number of years since construction, values ​​for the peak, minimum, current, and future predicted number of students, values ​​for the peak, minimum, current, and future predicted number of classes, a value representing the change in the number of classes, values ​​representing the area of ​​the school building and grounds and the area per student, and the number of classrooms that can be used for other purposes, surplus, etc., and controls third extraction unit 11D to extract detailed information related to the number of students at elementary schools classified as Type A corresponding to each item of the format stored in each unit of storage device 6B. Screen information generation unit 11E also instructs calculation unit 53 to calculate data necessary to generate information corresponding to the read format and obtains the calculation results. The screen information generation unit 11E inserts the numerical values ​​extracted from each unit of the storage device 6B or calculated by the calculation unit 53 into the format read from the format storage unit 71 to generate the data shown in Fig. 78, and sends it to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 or supplies it to the input / output device 7 for display. The user of the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 can easily recognize that in an elementary school classified as Type A, despite its aging, the number of students is likely to increase rapidly in the near future, resulting in a shortage of classrooms and a very small area per student.

[0231] Next, Figure 79 shows a line graph showing the past trends and future forecasts of the number of students in elementary schools classified as Type B, where class sizes are large and the number of students is flat or decreasing.

[0232] The screen information generation unit 11E reads out from the format storage unit 71 a format for creating a line graph showing past trends in the number of students and a predicted future trend, and controls the third extraction unit 11D to extract information showing trends in the number of students at elementary schools classified as Type B, which is stored in the maintenance policy information storage unit 34 of the storage device 6B. The screen information generation unit 11E draws a line graph in the format read out from the format storage unit 71 based on the numerical values ​​showing trends in the number of students at elementary schools classified as Type B, which are extracted from the maintenance policy information storage unit 34, and sends the line graph to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 or supplies it to the input / output device 7 for display. A user of the client terminal 3 or input / output device 7 can easily recognize that in elementary schools classified as Type B, the number of students is minimized in the year indicated by line α in Figure 79, the number of students increases or remains flat from the year indicated by line α to the year indicated by line β in Figure 79, the number of students decreases or remains flat from the year indicated by line β to the year indicated by line γ in Figure 79, and then the number of students decreases.

[0233] Next, Figure 80 shows an example of a format consisting of detailed information items related to the number of students in an elementary school classified as Type B, where the class size is standard and the number of students is stable or decreasing.

[0234] Screen information generation unit 11E reads from format storage unit 71 a format consisting of items such as detailed information related to the number of students, i.e., school name, total floor area, total floor area excluding gymnasium, construction year, number of years since construction, values ​​for the peak, minimum, current, and future predicted number of students, values ​​for the peak, minimum, current, and future predicted number of classes, a value representing the change in the number of classes, values ​​representing the area of ​​the school building and grounds and the area per student, and the number of classrooms that can be used for other purposes, surplus, etc., and controls third extraction unit 11D to extract detailed information related to the number of students at elementary schools classified as Type B corresponding to each item of the format stored in each unit of storage device 6B. Screen information generation unit 11E also instructs calculation unit 53 to calculate data necessary to generate information corresponding to the read format and obtains the calculation results. The screen information generation unit 11E inserts the numerical values ​​extracted from each unit of the storage device 6B or calculated by the calculation unit 53 into the format read from the format storage unit 71 to generate the data shown in Fig. 80, and sends it to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 or supplies it to the input / output device 7 for display. The user of the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 can easily recognize that elementary schools classified as Type B have aging buildings, some elementary schools have playgrounds that are too small for the number of students, and there is a high possibility that surplus classrooms will occur in the future.

[0235] Next, Figure 81 shows a line graph showing past and future trends in the number of students in elementary schools classified as Type C, where class sizes are standard and the number of students is likely to continue to increase.

[0236] The screen information generation unit 11E reads out from the format storage unit 71 a format for creating a line graph showing past trends in the number of students and a predicted future trend, and controls the third extraction unit 11D to extract information showing trends in the number of students at elementary schools classified as Type C that is stored in the maintenance policy information storage unit 34 of the storage device 6B. The screen information generation unit 11E draws a line graph in the format read out from the format storage unit 71 based on the numerical values ​​showing trends in the number of students at elementary schools classified as Type C that are extracted from the maintenance policy information storage unit 34, and transmits the line graph via the network 2 to the client terminal 3 or supplies it to the input / output device 7 for display. A user of the client terminal 3 or input / output device 7 can easily recognize that in elementary schools classified as Type C, the number of students reaches its maximum in the year indicated by line α in Figure 81, decreases to its minimum in the year indicated by line β, and remains flat from the year indicated by line β to the present indicated by line γ, except for Elementary School I, which shows an increasing trend, but then increases from the present indicated by line γ to the year indicated by line δ, and then decreases.

[0237] Next, Figure 82 shows an example of a format consisting of detailed information items related to the number of students in an elementary school classified as Type C, where the class size is large and the number of students is stable or decreasing.

[0238] Screen information generation unit 11E reads from format storage unit 71 a format consisting of items such as detailed information related to the number of students, i.e., school name, total floor area, total floor area excluding gymnasium, construction year, number of years since construction, values ​​for the peak, minimum, current, and future predicted number of students, values ​​for the peak, minimum, current, and future predicted number of classes, a value representing the change in the number of classes, values ​​representing the area of ​​the school building and grounds and the area per student, and the number of classrooms that can be used for other purposes, surplus, etc., and controls third extraction unit 11D to extract detailed information related to the number of students at elementary schools classified as Type C corresponding to each item of the format, which is stored in each unit of storage device 6B. Screen information generation unit 11E also instructs calculation unit 53 to calculate data necessary to generate information corresponding to the read format and obtains the calculation results. The screen information generation unit 11E inserts the numerical values ​​extracted from each part of the storage device 6B or calculated by the calculation unit 53 into the format read from the format storage unit 71 to generate the data shown in Fig. 82, and sends it to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 or supplies it to the input / output device 7 for display. The user of the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 can easily recognize that among the elementary schools classified as Type C, there are schools that are becoming increasingly dilapidated and are predicted to run out of room for classrooms in the future, but there are also elementary schools that do not have room in the school grounds for expansion.

[0239] Next, Figure 83 shows the changes in the number of students and the number of classes in each elementary school from the time when the number of students was at its lowest to the present, on a map of the corresponding municipality.

[0240] When a user of the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 issues a command to display, on a map of the corresponding municipality, the changes in the number of students and the number of classes from the time when the number of students was smallest to the present at each elementary school, for which the type classification described with reference to FIG. 76 was performed, the screen information generation unit 11E reads from the format storage unit 71 a format for generating data based on the command from the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7. The screen information generation unit 11E then controls the third extraction unit 11D to extract the information on the utilization consideration sheet described with reference to FIG. 49 stored in the utilization consideration related information storage unit 72, information on the number of classes at each elementary school stored in the facility information storage unit 31, map information showing the address information and location of each facility, and information showing the change in the number of students at each elementary school stored in the maintenance policy information storage unit 34. Furthermore, the screen information generation unit 11E commands the calculation unit 53 to calculate the increase or decrease in the number of classes at each elementary school based on the information on the number of classes at each elementary school stored in the facility information storage unit 31, and acquires the calculation result. Then, the screen information generating unit 11E generates map information that is color-coded based on the increase or decrease in the number of children, as shown in FIG. 83, based on the acquired information.

[0241] When a user of the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 issues a command to display detailed information about the building status of a specific elementary school on the map described with reference to FIG. 83, including the building status and the construction history of each building, the screen information generation unit 11E reads from the format storage unit 71 a format consisting of items corresponding to the building status and the detailed information, including the construction history of each building. The screen information generation unit 11E then controls the third extraction unit 11D to extract data necessary to generate information corresponding to the read format from each component of the storage device 6B, thereby generating detailed information about the building status of a specific elementary school and the construction history of each building, as shown in FIG. 84. The generated information is transmitted to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 or provided to the input / output device 7 for display. By viewing the data displayed in the format of FIG. 84, the user of the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 can see that, for example, not much time has passed since the expansion of the southeast school building and the installation of air conditioning equipment in each school building. Users of the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 can refer to the building status and construction history of each elementary school and easily understand which areas require urgent expansion or renovation and which areas require less urgent construction. When rebuilding a building, prioritizing rebuilding the most deteriorated parts makes it easier to reduce long-term maintenance costs. Therefore, users of the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 can easily consider which building should be rebuilt to reduce the costs required for facility management and operation by referring to the displayed information and, if necessary, instructing the simulation unit 22B to execute a cost calculation simulation.

[0242] Next, Figure 85 shows the predicted changes in the number of students and classes in each elementary school from the present to a certain point in the future, shown on a map of the corresponding municipality.

[0243] When a user of the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 issues a command to display, on a map of the corresponding municipality, predicted changes in the number of students and the number of classes from the present to a future point in time at each elementary school for which the type classification described with reference to FIG. 76 has been performed, the screen information generation unit 11E reads from the format storage unit 71 a format for generating data based on the command from the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7. The screen information generation unit 11E then controls the third extraction unit 11D to extract information on the utilization consideration sheet described with reference to FIG. 49 stored in the utilization consideration related information storage unit 72, information on the number of classes at each elementary school stored in the facility information storage unit 31, map information showing the address information and location of each facility, and information showing the change in the number of students at each elementary school stored in the maintenance policy information storage unit 34. Furthermore, the screen information generation unit 11E commands the calculation unit 53 to calculate the increase or decrease in the number of classes at each elementary school based on the information on the number of classes at each elementary school stored in the facility information storage unit 31, and acquires the calculation result. Then, the screen information generating unit 11E generates map information that is color-coded based on the increase or decrease in the number of children, as shown in FIG. 85, based on the acquired information.

[0244] By comparing the data described in the map information using Fig. 83 with the data described in the map information using Fig. 85, the user of the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 can easily understand that, for example, areas where the number of students is predicted to change in the future are often completely different from the changes in each area in the past. Therefore, it can be easily understood that the future lifespan plan for elementary schools managed by this local government cannot be achieved by continuing with the measures taken so far to deal with increases in the number of students, but that it is necessary to follow the predictions of future changes in the number of classes and to actively incorporate measures such as cooperation and sharing with neighboring facilities.

[0245] Even when implementing measures such as cooperation with neighboring facilities, merging, consolidating, or sharing facilities, it is easier to reduce long-term maintenance costs by prioritizing the elimination of the most deteriorated parts and merging or consolidating them with other facilities. Therefore, when an input is made to the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 to command the display of the name of an elementary school that is considering implementing measures such as cooperation with neighboring facilities, merging, consolidating, or sharing facilities, and information on the deterioration status of the elementary school's building structure, the screen information generation unit 11A controls the first extraction unit 11B and the second extraction unit 11C to display the building information list shown in Figures 40 to 45. The screen information generation unit 11A extracts desired information from the information stored in the facility information storage unit 31, the deterioration information storage unit 32, the evaluation information storage unit 33, and the maintenance policy information storage unit 34 of the storage device 6, or calculates the desired information based on the extracted information, generates screen information, and transmits it to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 or provides it to the input / output device 7 for display. The user of the client terminal 3 or input / output device 7 can refer to the displayed information and, if necessary, command the execution of a cost calculation simulation using the simulation unit 22B, thereby easily considering which building should be rebuilt in order to reduce the costs required for managing and operating the facility.

[0246] Furthermore, by extracting deteriorated facilities, i.e., facilities that require high repair costs, from among the facilities under management, the system may consider prioritizing measures such as cooperation with neighboring facilities in the area including the deteriorated facilities, merging, consolidating, or sharing the facilities. For example, the screen information generating unit 11A controls the first extracting unit 11B and the second extracting unit 11C to read information about the facility, such as its purpose of use and usage status, from the information stored in the facility information storage unit 31, the deterioration information storage unit 32, the evaluation information storage unit 33, and the maintenance policy information storage unit 34 of the storage device 6, extract nearby facilities with similar or identical purposes, read various information about the extracted facilities, calculate desired information based on the information, generate screen information, and transmit the information to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 or provide it to the input / output device 7 for display. The user of the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 can refer to the displayed information and, if necessary, command the execution of a cost calculation simulation using the simulation unit 22B, thereby easily considering which facilities should be given priority in terms of measures such as collaboration with neighboring facilities, mergers, consolidations, or sharing, in order to reduce the costs required for managing and operating the facilities.

[0247] Referring to Figure 86, a review plan suitable for an elementary school will be described, which is prepared by comparing the numerical value of the appropriate plan based on the type classification of the elementary school with the current value of the elementary school.

[0248] As explained using FIG. 76, elementary schools managed by this local government are classified by type, and as in the case described above, appropriate plans for rebuilding for each type are established based on the type classification results. The user of the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 commands the asset management support device 4B to generate various information, as explained using FIGS. 79 to 84. The user of the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 uses the data generated, transmitted, and displayed by the asset management support device 4B as a reference to conduct various studies regarding lifespan extension renovations.

[0249] When a user of the client terminal 3 or input / output device 7 compares the detailed proposals for rooms of a specific elementary school, which have been classified using the type classification described above with reference to FIG. 76, i.e., the proposals for administrative rooms, classrooms, special classrooms, and other rooms, with the numerical values ​​indicating the current status of the rooms owned by the corresponding elementary school, and commands the display of a format for creating a revision proposal for the rooms of the corresponding elementary school, the screen information generation unit 11E reads from the format storage unit 71 a format for generating data based on the command from the client terminal 3 or input / output device 7. The screen information generation unit 11E then controls the third extraction unit 11D to extract from each component of the storage device 6B the data necessary to generate information corresponding to the read format, and commands the calculation unit 53 to calculate the data necessary to generate the corresponding information. This format also includes blank "revision proposal" fields for the user of the client terminal 3 or input / output device 7 to enter new numerical values ​​to create a revision proposal for the rooms of the corresponding elementary school. The data generated by the screen information generating unit 11E is transmitted to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 or is supplied to the input / output device 7 and displayed.

[0250] The data in Figure 86, in which the user of the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 has newly entered the numerical values ​​for each item of the "review proposal," is transmitted to the asset management support device 4B via the network 2. The information storage processing unit 12 of the asset management support device 4B associates the numerical values ​​for each item of the "review proposal" entered by the user of the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 with each item and stores them in the utilization study related information storage unit 72.

[0251] Next, referring to Figures 87 and 88, we will explain an example of a case where collaboration with facilities around a school is considered, such as sharing special classrooms and swimming pools, or using school facilities as a local hub.

[0252] FIG. 87 shows a format for listing the details of facilities owned by a specific elementary school and its neighboring community facilities, sports facilities, etc., as well as information on their maintenance and operation. FIG. 88 shows a format for showing the weekday and holiday utilization status of facilities owned by a specific elementary school and its neighboring community facilities, sports facilities, etc. When a user of the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 commands the display of these formats, the screen information generation unit 11E reads from the format storage unit 71 a format for generating data based on the command from the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7. The screen information generation unit 11E then controls the third extraction unit 11D to extract data necessary to generate information corresponding to the read format, i.e., information such as the information on the utilization consideration sheet described with reference to FIGS. 49 and 50 stored in the utilization consideration related information storage unit 72, from each component of the storage device 6B, and commands the calculation unit 53 to calculate the data necessary to generate the corresponding information. The data generated by the screen information generation unit 11E is transmitted to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 or provided to the input / output device 7 and displayed. The user of the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 can refer to this information and consider facilities that can be shared with the corresponding elementary school.

[0253] The simulation unit 22B uses the results of the study on sharing between the elementary school and other facilities to perform a cost simulation of sharing, and stores the results in the utilization study related information storage unit 72, linking them to each item. When a command is issued to display information such as costs obtained as a result of the simulation, the screen information generation unit 11E reads a format for generating a bar graph showing the costs, etc., from the format storage unit 71. The screen information generation unit 11E then controls the third extraction unit 11D to extract data necessary for generating information desired by the user of the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 from each unit of the storage device 6B, commands the calculation unit 53 to calculate the data necessary to generate the corresponding information, generates the corresponding information, and supplies it to the input / output device 7 for display or transmits it to the client terminal 3 via the network 2.

[0254] Next, we will explain an example of the layout of classrooms and school buildings after renovation at an elementary school, which involves planning a long-life renovation that goes beyond simply understanding and restoring the deterioration state. As described above, the facility information storage unit 31 stores floor plans and usage information for each floor of each facility at the time of construction (or, for example, if the facility is a school, at the time when the number of students was at its peak), as shown in Figure 51, and current floor plans and usage information for each floor of each facility, as shown in Figure 52. A user of the client terminal 3 or input / output device 7 can instruct the asset management support device 4 to transmit the floor plans shown in Figures 51 and 52 stored in the facility information storage unit 31, display these floor plans, and consider the layout of classrooms and school buildings after renovation.

[0255] For example, in this elementary school, as a result of the various studies mentioned above, it is predicted that the number of classes will decrease in the future, and in light of the future state of the school, it will be necessary to accommodate new functions such as small classrooms, multipurpose rooms, classrooms for special needs classes, etc. Furthermore, even during the actual renovation work, there must be no disruption to the operation of the elementary school.

[0256] Therefore, examples of improvement plans for classroom layout and school building layout after renovation of an elementary school, which are formulated by a user of the client terminal 3 or input / output device 7 with the support of the processing executed by the asset management support device 4B described above, are shown in Figures 89 and 90. The floor plans of each floor in Figure 89 show the final school building and its classroom layout, and correspond to the south building and administration building in the school building layout diagram in Figure 90. As shown in the floor plans in Figures 51 and 52, the current school building layout consists of the south building west of the school building, the south building, and the administration building.

[0257] First, in the first phase of renovations, a temporary building will be constructed, and the functions of the administration building will be transferred to the temporary building so that the operation of the elementary school will not be disrupted even during the actual renovation work. After that, the administration building will be renovated to extend its lifespan. At this time, the science room, home economics room, and art room, which require water supply and drainage facilities, will be equipped in the administration building.

[0258] Next, in Phase II of the renovation, a temporary building will be added to accommodate more classrooms, followed by the demolition of the south building and reconstruction work. After that, the west side of the south building will be demolished and the land will be made available for other purposes, such as a playground.

[0259] After the longevity renovation of the administration building and the reconstruction of the south building are completed, classrooms for each grade will be arranged together as shown in Figure 89, and the learning environment at this elementary school will be improved by arranging classrooms for small classes, a lunch room that can be used as a multipurpose room, a playroom, classrooms for special needs classes, etc.

[0260] Next, with reference to the flowcharts of FIGS. 91 and 92, a process using type classification executed by the asset management support apparatus 4B will be described.

[0261] In step S31, the classification information acquisition unit 51 receives a designation of a facility group to be classified from the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 via the network 2, and supplies it to the type classification processing unit 52.

[0262] In step S32, the classification information acquisition unit 51 acquires classification information that forms the basis of type classification for classifying the facility group into types, as well as information necessary for performing type classification, such as the content of the classification and thresholds, from the client terminal 3 or from the input / output device 7 via the network 2, and supplies it to the type classification processing unit 52.

[0263] In step S33, the type classification processing unit 52 executes the type classification process, which will be described later with reference to FIG. 93 or FIG.

[0264] In step S34, the screen information generation unit 11E receives a specification of the format that the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 commands to display based on information supplied from the client terminal 3 via the network 2 or input by the input / output device 7, and reads it from the format memory unit 71.

[0265] In step S35, screen information generation unit 11E controls third extraction unit 11D to extract information necessary for generating information corresponding to the read format from each unit of storage device 6B. Third extraction unit 11D extracts information necessary for generating information corresponding to the format from each unit of storage device 6B under the control of screen information generation unit 11E, and supplies the information to screen information generation unit 11E.

[0266] In step S36, screen information generation unit 11E instructs calculation unit 53 to perform calculations necessary to generate information corresponding to the format. Calculation unit 53 executes calculations necessary to generate information corresponding to the format under the control of screen information generation unit 11E, and supplies the calculation results to screen information generation unit 11E.

[0267] In step S37, the screen information generating unit 11E uses the data supplied from the third extracting unit 11D and the calculating unit 53 to generate information corresponding to the format.

[0268] In step S38, the screen information generating unit 11E transmits the information corresponding to the format generated in step S37 to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 or supplies it to the input / output device 7 to be displayed.

[0269] In step S39, the information storage processing unit 12 determines whether or not it has received information corresponding to the blank spaces in the transmitted format, based on information transmitted from the client terminal 3 via the network 2 or supplied from the input / output device 7. If it is determined in step S39 that it has not received information corresponding to the blank spaces in the transmitted format, the process ends.

[0270] If it is determined in step S39 that information corresponding to the blank spaces in the transmitted format has been received, in step S40 the information storage processing unit 12 links the information transmitted from the client terminal 3 via the network 2 or supplied from the input / output device 7 and entered by the user of the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 with the corresponding information in each part of the storage device 6B, stores it in the utilization consideration related information storage unit 72, and the processing is then terminated.

[0271] Through this processing, the asset management support device 4B can generate information corresponding to a specified format using information linked and stored in each part of the storage device 6B based on instructions from the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7.

[0272] Next, with reference to the flowchart in FIG. 93, a type classification process 1, which is a first example of the process executed in step S33 in FIG. 91, will be described.

[0273] In step S61, the type classification processing unit 52 sets n, which indicates the order of the base axis of the type classification to be processed, to n=1.

[0274] In step S62, the type classification processing unit 52 classifies a predetermined group of facilities in response to a request from the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 into types within each current classification based on classification information that is the basis of the nth type classification. That is, if n=1, the type classification processing unit 52 classifies all groups of facilities using the basis of the first type classification, and if n≠1, it classifies each group that has already been classified using the basis of the nth type classification.

[0275] In step S63, the type classification processing unit 52 determines whether classification according to all classification axes has been completed.

[0276] If it is determined in step S63 that classification according to all classification axes has not been completed, in step S64, the type classification processing unit 52 sets n, which indicates the order of the type classification axes to be processed, to n=n+1, and the process returns to step S62, where the subsequent processes are repeated.

[0277] If it is determined in step S63 that classification based on all classification axes has been completed, in step S65, the type classification processing unit 52 assigns a classification name to the classification result, supplies the classification result to the information storage processing unit 12, stores it in the utilization consideration related information storage unit 72, and also supplies it to the screen information generation unit 11E and the calculation unit 53, and the processing proceeds to step S34 in Figure 91.

[0278] By such processing, detailed type classification based on a plurality of classification axes can be performed, for example, as described with reference to FIGS. 54, 55, 57, or 76.

[0279] With reference to Figures 76 to 90, an example of creating a model case by establishing review criteria at the time of reconstruction, in which the base axis of type classification includes a forecast of future facility usage, that is, using an elementary school managed by a local government as an example, by including a forecast of student numbers from FY2017 to FY2022 as the base axis of type classification, it is possible to flexibly respond even if the number of students increases or decreases. However, the base axis of type classification can also include other conditions that indicate changes in facility usage over time, such as from a specified time in the past to the present, or from a peak in the number of students, etc. to the present, such as conditions that indicate changes in the number of students or the number of classes, etc.

[0280] Furthermore, by changing or adding to the basic axis of the type classification, it is possible to re-formulate an improvement plan that has already been formulated.Furthermore, when formulating an improvement plan, not only can various review target values ​​be determined by referring to the review criteria for each type classification obtained through type classification, but various review target values ​​can also be determined by taking into account the issues to be considered and functions that will be required for the facility in the future.

[0281] Using Figures 94 to 96, we will explain how to formulate an improvement plan when the conditions indicating changes in facility usage over time are included in the basic axis of type classification, and various review target values ​​are determined taking into account the functions etc. that will be required for the facility in the future.

[0282] Here, when classifying high schools in the same municipality as in the case explained using Figures 57 to 71, we will use the example of a new case in which the criteria for the type classification include a condition indicating changes in facility usage over time as a key axis for type classification, and explain the part classified as a high school based on the key axis (1) of the type classification, whether the school type is a high school or a special needs school. Furthermore, the relevant municipality believes that in the future, a media center that combines the functions of a library, audiovisual room, computer room, etc., or that can be used interchangeably as a single unit, will be essential for high school education, and that if there is a large surplus of land area, it is desirable to efficiently allocate various facilities so that future sale of the surplus land can be considered.

[0283] First, we will explain the type classification when a condition indicating the change in facility usage over time is newly included in the base axis of type classification, and the results.

[0284] For example, when an operator of the client terminal 3 or a user of the asset management support device 4B commands the type classification of high schools in the same municipality as in the case explained using Figures 57 to 71, and the basic axes of the type classification explained using Figure 57 are (1) whether the school type is a high school or a special needs school, and if the school type is a high school, (2) whether it is an independent school or a branch school, (3) whether the main course is full-time or part-time, (4) which is the main department, and (5) school size, and (6) the rate of increase / decrease in the number of students from the peak to the present, and (7) the number of increases / decreases in the number of classes from the peak to the present, for a total of seven types, are input along with the content and thresholds of each classification, the classification information acquisition unit 51 acquires this information via the communication device 5 and supplies it to the type classification processing unit 52.

[0285] The type classification processing unit 52 executes processing using type classification according to the processing described using the flowchart of FIG. 93. That is, the type classification processing unit 52 first classifies the school type as either a high school or a special needs school, in the same manner as described using FIG. 57. Once a school type is classified as a high school, the type classification processing unit 52 then classifies the school into an independent school or a branch school, and within that classification, classifies the main curriculum into a full-time or part-time school, and further classifies the high school into a main department, and further classifies the high school into a specified range of school size within that classification. Furthermore, the type classification processing unit 52 further classifies each classification into a specified range of the rate of increase or decrease in the number of students from the peak to the present, and further classifies each classification into a specified range of the increase or decrease in the number of classes from the peak to the present.

[0286] The type classification processing unit 52 classifies the classification results into 14 types, for example, Type A, Type A', Type B, Type B',...Type J, and supplies the names of the high schools classified into each type as classification results to the information storage processing unit 12, where they are stored in the utilization consideration related information storage unit 72 and also supplied to the screen information generation unit 11E and the calculation unit 53.

[0287] FIG. 94 shows an example of a format generated by the screen information generating unit 11E, listing 14 types of high schools (Type A to Type J) based on the basic axis (1) of type classification. The format shown in FIG. 94 lists the classification details specified as the basic axis of type classification, namely, (2) whether the school is an independent school or a branch school, (3) whether the main curriculum is full-time or part-time, (4) whether the main department is general, agricultural, fisheries, industrial, commercial, or comprehensive, (5) whether the school size is large, standard, or small, (6) the rate of increase or decrease in the number of students from the peak to the present, and (7) the number of classes from the peak to the present. The format also lists the number of schools included in each type. This format also lists numerical values ​​indicating the characteristics of each type, such as the average number of students and the average number of classes. The screen information generation unit 11E controls the calculation unit 53 to calculate the average values ​​of the number of students and the number of classes from the information stored in each part of the memory device 6B, obtains the calculation results, and writes them in the corresponding parts of the format.

[0288] Furthermore, the screen information generating unit 11E can also control the calculating unit 53 to calculate the maximum or minimum values ​​of the number of students and the number of classes, the maximum or minimum values ​​of the area of ​​the school building, the roof, and the school grounds, and also average values ​​as necessary, from the information stored in each unit of the storage device 6B, and can enter these in a format similar to that described with reference to Fig. 58. The screen information generating unit 11E can transmit the data generated in this way via the network 2 to the client terminal 3 for display, or supply it to the input / output device 7 for display.

[0289] When a user, referencing the data shown in FIG. 94 displayed on the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7, issues a command to display detailed information of a predetermined type, the screen information generation unit 11E reads a format corresponding to the detailed information of the predetermined type from the format storage unit 71 and controls the third extraction unit 11D to extract data necessary to generate information corresponding to the read format from each component of the storage device 6B. The screen information generation unit 11E also commands the calculation unit 53 to calculate the data necessary to generate information corresponding to the read format and acquires the calculation results. The screen information generation unit 11E inserts numerical values ​​corresponding to each item of the format read from the format storage unit 71 to generate data, which can then be transmitted to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 or supplied to the input / output device 7 for display. These formats may include fields into which a user, referencing the data displayed on the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7, can enter new numerical values ​​or information.

[0290] That is, the screen information generating unit 11E can generate information for supporting the process of establishing "review standards for rebuilding" that will serve as a model case for rebuilding, using a format similar to that described with reference to Figures 59 to 64, based on the new 14 types of classification results, for example, Type A, Type A', Type B, Type B',..., Type J, classified by the type classification processing unit 52. The screen information generating unit 11E can transmit the data generated in this way to the client terminal 3 via the network 2, or supply it to the input / output device 7 and display it.

[0291] Next, we will explain the process of supporting the establishment of "review criteria for rebuilding" that will serve as a model case for rebuilding when a certain high school XXX, which was classified as Type B out of the 10 types as explained using Figures 57 to 71, is classified as Type B' in the 14-type classification explained using Figure 94, to which a new condition indicating changes in facility usage over time has been added as a base axis, where (6) the rate of increase / decrease in the number of students from the peak to the present has decreased significantly, and (7) the number of classes has increased / decreased significantly from the peak to the present.

[0292] When the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 displays list data for the cases classified as Type A, Type A', Type B, Type B',..., Type J, as described with reference to FIG. 94, a user who references the data can instruct the display of detailed information for a specific type, for example. For example, when a command to display detailed information corresponding to Type B' is issued, the screen information generation unit 11E reads from the format storage unit 71 a format similar to that described with reference to FIGS. 59 to 64, and controls the third extraction unit 11D to extract data related to high schools classified as Type B' from each component of the storage device 6B, which is necessary to generate information corresponding to the read format. The screen information generation unit 11E also instructs the calculation unit 53 to calculate data necessary to generate information corresponding to the read format, and acquires the calculation results. The screen information generation unit 11E inserts numerical values ​​corresponding to each item of the format read from the format storage unit 71, and generates data. The generated data can be transmitted to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 or supplied to the input / output device 7 for display. As in the above-mentioned cases, these formats include items in which the user can enter new numerical values ​​or information after referring to the data displayed on the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7.

[0293] The user of the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 can establish "review criteria at the time of reconstruction" that will serve as a model case for the reconstruction of a high school corresponding to Type B', in the same manner as described using Figures 59 to 64.

[0294] In addition, at this time, the user of the client terminal 3 or input / output device 7 can determine various review criteria by referring to values ​​such as the average, minimum, and maximum values ​​for Type B' obtained by type classification, such as the number of school buildings, number of students, number of classes, and area of ​​school buildings and grounds, and can also determine various review criteria in consideration of future issues and functions that will be required for the facility in question.

[0295] For example, a user of the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 can refer to detailed information data about the classroom availability of high schools classified as Type B', as shown in Figure 95, in the same way as in the case explained using Figure 64. By checking the information shown in Figure 95, a user of the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 can see that for Type B', the key axis of type classification (6), the rate of increase / decrease in the number of students from the peak to the present, has decreased significantly, and the key axis of type classification (7), the number of classes from the peak to the present, has also decreased significantly, so there is a strong tendency for classrooms to be in surplus, and that each school has many rooms allocated as preparation rooms for each subject.

[0296] Furthermore, if the relevant local government believes that a media center that combines the functions of a library, audiovisual room, computer room, etc., or that can be used interchangeably as a single unit, will be essential for high school education in the future, the user of the client terminal 3 or input / output device 7 can refer to the detailed information data on the classroom ownership status in Figure 95 and, when establishing review standards for the number and area of ​​classrooms in high schools classified as Type B', can establish review standards for the number and area of ​​each classroom that functions as a media center, such as a library or audiovisual room, so that it is sufficient to function as a media center.

[0297] When the user of the client terminal 3 or input / output device 7 newly enters a numerical value that will serve as the "review standard when rebuilding" for each item and sends it to the asset management support device 4B via the network 2, the information storage processing unit 12 links the numerical value that will serve as the "review standard when rebuilding" entered by the user of the client terminal 3 or input / output device 7 to each item and stores it in the utilization consideration related information storage unit 72.

[0298] Even if the basis of the type classification is changed in this way, the asset management support device 4B extracts information corresponding to a predetermined format from the information linked to and stored in each unit of the storage device 6B, as described with reference to Figures 59 to 64, and performs calculations as necessary to generate data for list display. This allows the user of the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 to easily establish numerical values ​​that will serve as the "review criteria for rebuilding" for each type (here, Type B'). Furthermore, at this time, the user of the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 can determine various review criteria not only by referring to the average, minimum, maximum, and other values ​​of each type obtained by type classification, but also by taking into account future issues and functions required for the facility. Furthermore, the values ​​established by the user of the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 as the "review criteria for rebuilding" are linked to each item of information stored in the storage device 6B and stored in the utilization study related information storage unit 72.

[0299] Next, a process for supporting the establishment of review targets at the time of reconstruction of a specific high school XXX classified as Type B' will be described.

[0300] The user of the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 can establish review targets for rebuilding a specific high school XXX, for example, included in Type B' described using FIG. 95, in the same manner as described using FIGS. 65 to 70. That is, even if the basis of the type classification is changed, the asset management support device 4B can insert values ​​established by the user of the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 and stored in the utilization study related information storage unit 72 into the format described using FIGS. 65 to 70 stored in the format storage unit 71, and transmit the values ​​to the client terminal 3 or provide them to the input / output device 7 via the network 2 for display. This allows the user of the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 to easily establish various target values ​​for rebuilding the high school XXX by comparing the review criteria for Type B', one of the 14 types classified in the newly set type classification, with the current values ​​of the high school XXX.

[0301] When the user of the client terminal 3 or input / output device 7 newly enters numerical values ​​that will be the target values ​​for review when rebuilding High School XXX in each item and sends them to the asset management support device 4B via the network 2, the information storage processing unit 12 links the numerical values ​​that will be the target values ​​for review when rebuilding High School XXX entered by the user of the client terminal 3 or input / output device 7 to each item and stores them in the utilization consideration related information storage unit 72.

[0302] Furthermore, in the relevant local governments, if there is a large surplus in the land area, it is required to consolidate the surplus area by efficiently arranging various facilities, thereby expanding the area of ​​the athletic fields, etc., and to make it possible to consider selling the surplus land in the future. For example, by referring to data equivalent to that explained using Figure 63, a user of the client terminal 3 or the input / output device 7 can easily recognize that if the current athletic field land area of ​​High School XXX is large compared to the target value for review based on the standards, it is necessary to consider selling the surplus land by efficiently arranging various facilities.

[0303] In this way, an improvement plan that has already been formulated can be easily re-formulated by changing or adding the basis of the type classification, including conditions that indicate changes over time in facility usage, such as from a specific time in the past to the present, or from a peak in the number of students to the present, etc. Furthermore, in formulating an improvement plan, various review target values ​​can be determined not only with reference to the review criteria for each type classification obtained by type classification, but also in consideration of future issues and functions that will be required of the facility.

[0304] As a result, when rebuilding part of High School XXX, for example, as shown in FIG. 96, the asset management support device 4B can help the user of the client terminal 3 or input / output device 7 to easily formulate a new improvement plan that will enable the facility to reduce its excess school building area, construct a main school building 2 equipped with a media center, a function that will be required in the future, and, based on the issues under consideration, consolidate the playgrounds by moving the tennis courts to their positions after demolishing the sub-school buildings, thereby preparing for the future sale of the excess land, etc.

[0305] In this way, by adding or changing the base axis of the type classification, high schools in the same municipality as in the case described using Figure 57 were classified into types, resulting in 14 types, compared to the 10 types described using Figure 57. Furthermore, since a condition indicating changes in facility usage over time has been newly added to the base axis of the type classification, it is possible to perform type classification that takes into account changes in facility usage at present compared to, for example, when the facility opened or during peak facility usage. Therefore, by including a condition indicating changes in facility usage over time in the base axis of the type classification, the asset management support device 4B can support the formulation of improvement plans that focus on surplus or shortage areas of the facility that have arisen due to changes in facility usage over time.

[0306] Next, with reference to FIGS. 97 to 111, a method for determining the base axis of type classification and different examples of type classification processing will be described.

[0307] Figure 97 is a graph showing the change in the number of high school students in a certain municipality.

[0308] It can be seen that the total number of high school students in this municipality has decreased by approximately 45% over the past 50 years. In particular, the rate of decline in the agricultural department has been more than 80% over the past 50 years. Also, unlike 50 years ago, fisheries and general education high schools have been established, and the number of schools has increased by two.

[0309] In order to maintain and operate high schools managed by local governments, it is necessary to grasp not only the current situation but also various factors that are causing changes from multiple angles.To do this, it is necessary to confirm, for example, changes in the classification of school types, the classification of the size of these high ...

Claims

1. an indexing processing unit that indexes improvement proposals for the facility; a storage unit that stores information about the facility, information about the improvement plan for the facility including the result of the indexing executed by the indexing processing unit, and construction evaluation information that evaluates the content of the construction based on the improvement plan using the same evaluation items as the indexing axis of the indexing, in association with each other; a construction evaluation information calculation unit that executes calculation processing using the construction evaluation information related to the plurality of facilities stored in the storage unit; having The indexing processing unit extracts items to be prioritized as the indexing axis based on the result of the calculation process by the construction evaluation information calculation unit, sets indexing parameters including the items, and executes the indexing. An asset management support system comprising:

2. The asset management support system according to claim 1, The construction evaluation information calculation unit executes the calculation process so as to preferentially extract the items that have been evaluated as equivalent to or higher than the results of the indexing in the improvement plan, the items that have been frequently used recently in the processing of the indexing processing unit, and the items that have a high satisfaction level with the construction, based on the construction evaluation information about the multiple facilities stored in the storage unit. An asset management support system comprising:

3. an indexing processing unit that indexes improvement proposals for the facility; a storage unit that links and stores information about the facility, information about improvements to other facilities, information about the improvement plan for the facility including the results of the indexing executed by the indexing processing unit, and information about the improvement plan for the other facilities, together with construction evaluation information that evaluates the content of the construction based on the improvement plan using the same evaluation items as the indexing axis of the indexing; an improvement example extraction unit that extracts improvement examples serving as references for formulating a new improvement plan based on the construction evaluation information on the plurality of facilities and information on improvements of the other facilities, which are stored in the storage unit; An asset management support system comprising:

4. The asset management support system according to claim 3, A construction evaluation information calculation unit that executes a calculation process using the construction evaluation information related to the plurality of facilities stored in the storage unit, and extracts items that should be prioritized as the indexing axis based on the results of the calculation process; the indexing processing unit that sets indexing parameters including the items based on the calculation results by the construction evaluation information calculation unit and executes the indexing; Further comprising: The improvement example extraction unit extracts the improvement examples for the items designated by a user. An asset management support system comprising:

5. The asset management support system according to claim 3, Further comprising a problem extraction unit for extracting problems of the facility, The improvement example extraction unit extracts the improvement examples for the issues extracted by the issue extraction unit. An asset management support system comprising:

6. An asset management support method executed in an asset management support system having a storage unit that stores information about a facility, comprising: A first indexing step of indexing improvement proposals for the facility; A construction evaluation information acquisition step of acquiring construction evaluation information that evaluates the content of the construction based on the improvement plan using the same evaluation items as the indexing axis of the indexing executed by the processing of the first indexing step; A construction evaluation information calculation step of performing calculation processing using the construction evaluation information acquired by the processing of the construction evaluation information acquisition step; An item extraction step of extracting items to be prioritized as the indexing axis of the indexing based on the calculation result by the processing of the construction evaluation information calculation step; a second indexing step of setting indexing parameters including the items extracted by the processing of the item extraction step and executing the indexing for a new improvement plan; 13. An asset management support method comprising:

7. An asset management support system having a storage unit for storing information about a facility, A first indexing step of indexing improvement proposals for the facility; A construction evaluation information acquisition step of acquiring construction evaluation information that evaluates the content of the construction based on the improvement plan using the same evaluation items as the indexing axis of the indexing executed by the processing of the first indexing step; A construction evaluation information calculation step of performing calculation processing using the construction evaluation information acquired by the processing of the construction evaluation information acquisition step; An item extraction step of extracting items to be prioritized as the indexing axis of the indexing based on the calculation result by the processing of the construction evaluation information calculation step; a second indexing step of setting indexing parameters including the items extracted by the processing of the item extraction step and executing the indexing for a new improvement plan; A program for executing a process comprising:

8. An asset management support method executed in an asset management support system having a storage unit that stores information about a facility, comprising: An indexing step of indexing the improvement plan for the facility; A construction evaluation information acquisition step of acquiring construction evaluation information that evaluates the content of the construction based on the improvement plan using the same evaluation items as the indexing axis of the indexing executed by the processing of the indexing step; an improvement example extraction step of extracting improvement examples serving as references for formulating a new improvement plan based on the construction evaluation information acquired by the processing of the construction evaluation information acquisition step and information on improvements of other facilities stored in the storage unit; 13. An asset management support method comprising:

9. An asset management support system having a storage unit for storing information about a facility, An indexing step of indexing the improvement plan for the facility; A construction evaluation information acquisition step of acquiring construction evaluation information that evaluates the content of the construction based on the improvement plan using the same evaluation items as the indexing axis of the indexing executed by the processing of the indexing step; an improvement example extraction step of extracting improvement examples serving as references for formulating a new improvement plan based on the construction evaluation information acquired by the processing of the construction evaluation information acquisition step and information on improvements of other facilities stored in the storage unit; A program for executing a process comprising:

Images